Determination of Optimum Percentage Addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminum Alloy
Determination of Optimum Percentage Addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminum Alloy
Determination of Optimum Percentage Addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminum Alloy
net/publication/284458144
CITATIONS READS
0 15
4 authors, including:
Vineesh Vishnu
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,CHENGANNUR
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Vineesh Vishnu on 06 July 2018.
Abstract: The use of aluminum and magnesium alloys in the automobile industry is continuously increasing. The
driving force is reduced green house gas emissions resulting from light weighting of the vehicles and efficient
scrap recycling. The aluminium alloy castings are generally used in automotive, aerospace, defense and general
engineering industries. Among the commercial aluminium castings, Al - 6Si – 3Cu (319) is widely used mainly
because of its excellent cast ability, high strength to weight ratio, good mechanical properties, lower coefficient of
thermal expansion, low recycling cost and corrosion resistance. The present study was performed on 319 Al alloy
to investigate the effect of magnesium addition as well as other melt treatment parameters such as Sr modification
and grain refinement on the heat treatment behavior of the alloy. T6 treatment was carried out on the alloy taking
an optimum temperature of 500°C-10 hours, for solution treatment followed by 60°C water quenching and 170°C-
8 hours for artificial ageing. The results show that increasing the Mg content in Al 319 up to 0.45% considerably
enhances the alloy response to heat treatment in the T6 temperatures. Addition of Mg in amounts of the order of
0.45% results in the precipitation of Al5Mg8Si6Cu2 phase particles. Modification with Sr tends to cause severe
segregation of Cu-containing intermetallics in areas away from the growing Si regions. Various tests like tensile,
fatigue, wear and hardness are done on the various castings and the results are compared.
Keywords: Aluminium 319 alloy, Sr modification, water quenching, tensile test, grain refinement.
I. Introduction
Al-Si alloys are materials that have been developed over the years to meet the increasing demands of the
automotive industry for smaller, lighter-weight, high-performance components. An important alloy in this respect
is the 319 alloy, wherein silicon and copper are the main alloying elements, and magnesium is often added in
automotive versions of the alloy for strengthening purposes. The excellent castability and mechanical properties of
319 aluminum alloy makes it a popular foundry alloy for use in automotives applications. Its low specific gravity
is essential to reduce energy consumption and its excellent corrosion resistance and low costs of recycling are also
important considerations from an environmental point of view. The presence of magnesium improves strain,
hardenability and enhances the material strength by solid solution. Chemical composition and Heat treatment exert
an important influence on the mechanical properties. The most applied heat treatment for this alloy is a solution
treatment followed by an age-hardening that is required for the precipitation of the Al2Cu hardening constituent.
Solution heat treatment is particularly suitable for alloys with high magnesium content in order to promote the
formation of the important strengthening precipitate, Mg2Si, a hardening peak caused by a cooperative
precipitation of Al2Cu and Mg2Si phases in this kind of alloys. It has been found that precipitation in the Al-Cu-
Mg-Si alloys depends on magnesium con-tents as well as on the Cu: Mg ratio in solid solution. The mechanical
properties of 319 alloy are generally influenced by the micro structural characteristics and casting defects.
The factors determining the microstructure are the compositions, the solidification condition and heat
treatment. The microstructure of 319 is controlled by its chemical composition and also by the addition of
modifiers and grain refiners. The grain refiners (Al-Ti-B) reduce the grain size whereas the modifier like
strontium alters the shape of eutectic Si from acicular brittle form to fibrous form. Sr is used because its effect
does not fade on holding and gives better modification even during remelting.
The liquid aluminum is prone to hydrogen adsorption and oxidation. Gas porosity and oxide inclusion are
inevitably found in Al castings. In addition, if the castings is not properly fed, shrinkage porosity results which is
quite deleterious to mechanical and fatigue properties. The fatigue behavior of the alloy depends on number of
factors such as mechanical loading and micro structural factors particularly presence of porosity introduced by the
combined effect of dissolved gas and shrinkage. Factors controlling porosity formation are the hydrogen content,
solidification rates and alloy treatments such as strontium modification, grain refinement and melt cleanliness.
In the present study, 319 alloy plate, finger and cylindrical castings were made in permanent mould by
adding different additives like Sr (0.02%), tib (0.6%), Mg (0.2,0.4,0.6,0.45)% All the castings were subjected to
T6 heat treatment conditions. The heat treatment cycle for aluminum alloys involves solutionizing the material by
holding it at a temperature slightly below the eutectic temperature. This helps to dissolve the various intermetallic
phases that are formed, homogenize the matrix and spherodises the eutectic silicon particles it is done at an
optimum temperature of 500°C for 10 hours. The material is then quenched, typically in water at 70˚C, to form a
www.iosrjournals.org 90 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
supersaturated solid solution. Ageing follows at 170˚C for 8 hours for uniform distribution of small precipitates.
The effect of the various additives on the microstructure and the mechanical properties like hardness,
tensile, fatigue and wear were studied. Tensile and fatigue samples specimens were machined according to ASTM
standards. The specimens were subjected to tensile and fatigue test at room temperature. Microstructure of the as
cast and heat treated samples were analyzed using an optical microscope to study the silicon morphology. To
understand the mode of fracture and contribution of microstructural and porosity towards fatigue property,
fractographic examinations on the fractured surface were carried out using scanning electron microscope.
2.1.2. Modification
In order to change the shape of eutectic silicon from acicular to fine and fibro us form, various additives
are used. These are preheated to 150°C and plunged into the melt and held for 10 minutes for complete dissolution
and homogenization of the melt.
Fig.1. Moulds
2.1.4 pouring
After degassing, the melt is subjected to modification treatment and the slag on the top of the melt was
removed. It is then poured into the preheated moulds. The pouring temperature is kept at 720-730°c. The casting
is removed after solidification.
2.2. Metallography
2.2.1. Preparation Of Specimen
The specimens for metallographic studies are machined out from the various castings with 10 mm
diameter and 15 mm height. The metallographic specimens are shown in fig.3.
www.iosrjournals.org 92 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
B C
Fig.4.A) The Ultimate Tensile Strength B) Yield Strength And C) Elongation Plots Of Alloys
In T6-treated cast aluminium alloys, there exists a region during the early stage of solution treatment in
which the elongation to fracture of alloy reaches minimum values. This is due to a timing mismatch between an
increase in strength and the changes in the characteristics of the Si particles. The improvement of strength after the
controlled precipitation of small matrix-strengthening precipitates during artificial aging is consistent. The reason
for the increase in strength is primarily due to the precipitation of metastable β-Mg2Si precipitates from the
supersaturated solid solution, which obstructs the movement of dislocations. Yield strength of the alloy with
addition of 0.45 Mg at T6 shows better results. After conducting the tensile test, the fractured sample is measured
for its gage length for finding out the elongation .The percentage elongation shows that the magnesium addition
decreases the percentage elongation .It‘s due to the formation of the brittle Q phase in the aluminum matrix.
2.5 Characterization
2.5.1 Microstructure
2.5.1.1 1319 base alloy (unmodified)
www.iosrjournals.org 93 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
Fig.5 shows the microstructure of unmodified 319 alloy which consists mainly of a- aluminium network
and alternate layers of eutectic aluminium and acicular eutectic silicon n in the eutectic region between the
dendritic arms. The morphology of modified eutectic sil icon is typically coarse and flanky. These needles are
known to act as stress raisers in the micro structure making the material to fracture in a less ductile mode. In
unmodified 319 alloys, a large number of eutectic grains nucleate at or near the primary aluminium dendrite tips,
and eutectic aluminum forms epitaxial on the primary dendrites, also we can see the phases of -A l2Cu, -Al5FeSi
intermetallics [1]. By heat treatment it is seen that there is a change in the morphology of eutectic silicon. The
needle like silicon structure is transformed to a more rounded off structure thus lowering the brittle nature.
due to the high oxygen affinity of strontium, and are extremely difficult to be removed during degassing (using
pure argon and a rotary impeller). The morphology of the pores (round or irregular) is determined by the form of
oxide, i.e., fine, dispersed particles or thick films. The rounded pores are also observed surrounded by Al-Si
eutectic regions [4]
www.iosrjournals.org 95 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
2.7. Fractography
The fractured surface revealed that fatigue crack was initiated at the specimen surface at micro pores and
the crack has propagated. Once it reaches near other surface of the specimen, the specimen had failed
catastrophically because the cross section of the remaining area was no longer able to carry the applied load. As
understood from the literature, the most likely factor for initiation of micro cracks is the silicon particles. The
www.iosrjournals.org 96 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
average inter-particle spacing increases with the solution heat treatment time or temperature in all the locations of
the specimens. Therefore, in heat-treated specimens, the fracture follows a path of ‗‗isolated‘‘ Si and intermetallic
particles, however, the average inter-particle spacing is lower. Decohesion at low strain on the Al matrix/a-Al and
the Al matrix/Si particle interface takes also place. The nucleation of cracks through the coalescence of adjacent
micro cracks created during the fracture of Si and intermetallic particles takes place and slip bands appear
between adjacent cracks. The necking along the slip bands between the micro cracks is the main mechanism for
their coalescence, and the micro crack coalescence is the origin of the reduction of the load-bearing area. Micro
crack coalescence is observed only after slip bands have formed between them and not due to their expansion or
growth [8]. The fracture surface reveals the brittle or cleavage rupture of the silicon flakes. Initiation of crack is
found to take place mostly in the silicon phase rather than the aluminium-silicon interfaces. The fracture of a-
aluminium is ductile as evident from the dimple formation.
2.8. Conclusion
This study mainly focused on the optimum amount of Magnesium addition in 319 aluminum alloy, the
test was carried out with five different composition of magnesium in the base alloy say 0.2, 0.4, 0.45, and 0.6
percentages are taken and microstructure of the base alloy with magnesium addition shows there is an additional
phase called Q-phase is formed with the increase in percentage addition of magnesium and base alloy phase of
Al2Cu transforms with higher percentages. The tensile test shows that with the magnesium addition the ultimate
tensile strength and yield strength increases up to 0.45% of magnesium addition. T6 treatment over this
composition shows good results in both ultimate tensile strength and yield strength. In case of elongation the
Magnesium addition decreases the elongation due to the formation of brittle phases, the base alloy with
modifications shows the better results .Hardness increases with the modification and magnesium addition. The
fractrographic studies show ductile fracture for the alloy with additions due to the aluminum dendritic structure.
References
[1]. T Kashyap and T Chandrasekhar, Effects and mechanisms of grain refinement in aluminium alloys, Mater. Sci., Vol. 24, No. 4, August
2001, pp. 345– 353.
[2]. B. Sua rez-Pen, J. Asensio-Lozano, Influence of Sr modification and Ti grain refinement on the morphology of Fe-rich precipitates in
eutectic Al–Si die cast alloys, Scripta Materialia 54 (2006) 1543–1548.
[3]. T.R. Ramachandran, P.K. Sharma and K.Balasubramanian, Grain Refinement of Light Alloys, 68th WFC - World Foundry Congress ,7th
-10th February, 2008, pp. 189-193.
[4]. F.H. Samuel, P. Ouellet, A.M. Samuel, and H.W. Doty , Effect of Mg and Sr Additions on the Formation of Intermetallics in Al-6 Wt Pct
Si-3.5 Wt Pct Cu-(0.45) to (0.8)Wt Pct Fe 319-Type Alloys, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, , Volume 29, Issue 12,1998, pp
2871-2884
www.iosrjournals.org 97 | Page
Determination Of optimum percentage addition of Magnesium in 319 Aluminium alloy
[5]. K T Kashya, T Chandrashekar; ―Effects and mechanisms of grain refinement in aluminium alloys‖; Bull. Mater. Sci., Vol. 24, No. 4,
August 2001, pp. 345–353.
[6]. Mark Easton and David Stjohn, ―Grain refinement of aluminum alloys: Part I. The nucleant and solute paradigms—A Review of the
Literature‖ Metallurgical and Material transactions A,30 (6),1999,1613-1623.
[7]. W. Kasprzak, C. A. Kierkus, W. T. Kierkus and J. H. Sokolowski, M. Kasprzak, W. J. Evans; The Structure and Matrix Microhardness of
the 319 Aluminum Alloy After Isothermal Holding During the Solidification Process, American Foundry Society; 2001.
[8]. Crossley F A and Mondolfo L F 1951Trans. AIME 191 1143.
www.iosrjournals.org 98 | Page