See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/326083259

Moths Diversity of Kodagu District in Central Western Ghats of Karnataka,

India

Article  in  Indian Journal of Ecology · September 2016

CITATIONS READS

0 238

4 authors, including:

Shashi Bhushan Mishra G. M. Devagiri

Karnataka Forest Department University of Agricultural & Horticultural
15 PUBLICATIONS   0 CITATIONS    27 PUBLICATIONS   106 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Anil Kumar Khaple

western ghats nature foundation
12 PUBLICATIONS   37 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Honey Bee View project

Human-Elephant Conflicts View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Shashi Bhushan Mishra on 30 June 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Manuscript Number: 2362
Indian Journal of Ecology (2016) 43 (Special Issue-2): 713-718 NAAS Rating: 4.47

Moths Diversity of Kodagu District in Central Western Ghats

of Karnataka, India

Shashi Bhushan Mishra , R.N. Kencharaddi, G.M. Devagiri and Anil Kumar Khaple
College of Forestry, Ponnampet-571 216, India
E-mail: shashimishra92@gmail.com

Abstract: Moth diversity was assessed in Kodagu district, which lies in the central Western Ghats region of peninsular India. A
total of 117 species belonging to 102 genera, 28 sub-families, 17 families and 9 super families were recorded in the present
study. The family Erebidae dominated with 32.48% of the total species recorded, followed by Crambidae (20.51%) and
Geometridae (19.66%). Together these 3 families accounted for about 70% of the total moth diversity of the district. The next
predominance of species was observed in Saturniidae and Sphingidae with 6 species in each family and Uraniidae with 4
species. These three families accounted for about 14.5% of the total moth species diversity. These results showed that 6 out of
17 families have accounted for the majority (80%) of moths diversity. Furthemore, results indicated the presence of higher
species richness and diversity of moths in this region. This study is first of its kind in the peninsular region of India which has
recorded and checklisted more than hundred species of moths which would form as the basis for developing strategies for
conservation and management of insect diversity particularly, of moths diversity in Central Western Ghats.

Key Words: Central Western Ghats, Erebidae, Kodagu district, Lepidoptera, Moths diversity

Western Ghats region of India is the repository of relatively minor disturbances and hence moths and
diverse flora and fauna. The majority of the 34 global butterflies have been considered as indicators of
biodiversity hotspots identified worldwide occur within environmental quality. Kodagu district covering an area of
tropical regions and Western Ghats in South India is one 4102 km2 is a part of the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot
among them (Meyers et al., 2000). Historically, most tropical and is known as highly wooded district of India with 80% of
forests have experienced varying levels of human activity the geographical area under tree cover. In addition to forest
and today these forests are being increasingly affected by areas the district also harbours about 1241 sacred groves
expanding human populations, exploitation, fragmentation, with a total area of 2550 ha. The western side of the district is
and climate change. How these rapidly changing factors surrounded by three large protected areas such as
impact species composition, structure, and function of Brahmagiri, Talacavery and Pushpagiri Wildlife Sanctuaries
tropical tree communities is not well known and remain a and Nagarhole National Park on the South-Eastern side.
critical gap in developing conservation plans for tropical Many studies have documented the floral diversity in the
biodiversity. As a result of disturbances at the landscape district however, there is scanty information available on the
level, many species particularly, the insects become extinct. insect diversity and in particular, the diversity of moths.
The disappearance of many species remains undocumented Moths, order Lepidoptera, are one of the mega diverse
even before establishing their economic importance. groups of insects and recent reports have recorded 127000
Therefore, there is an urgent need to study the insect fauna of species of moths from around the world (Alfred et al., 1998),
this region. Our knowledge on the insect fauna of India is of which over 12000 species have been reported from India
largely based on earlier studies of Hampson (1892-1896). (Chandra and Nema, 2007). The present investigation was
Although a series of revisionary studies have been undertaken to record the diversity of moths in the district,
subsequently carried out from different geographical regions, hitherto a less attempted task with a scanty information.
no exhaustive survey has so far been carried out from this
region which is known for rich faunal diversity. MATERIAL AND METHODS
Among insects, the moths belonging to Lepidoptera This study was conducted in forest-coffee landscape
are economically very important as the primary herbivores in mosaics of Kodagu district which lies in the Central Western
the forest ecosystem. They are diverse in their habits and are Ghats region (70o 25' – 76o 14' E and 12o 15' – 12o 45' N). The
adapted to variety of conditions. Being highly sensitive to district shares common border with Kerala in the south and is
change in the environment, they are more vulnerable to surrounded by three other districts of Karnataka viz., Dakshina
714 Shashi Bhushan Mishra , R.N. Kencharaddi, G.M. Devagiri and Anil Kumar Khaple

Kannda, Hassan, and Mysore. The eastern border of Kodagu = ni X 100/ N. Where (ni) is individuals of particular species
district extends over the Mysore plateau. It has a steep West to and (N) is total number of species.
East climatic gradients especially, for temperature and rainfall RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
from the edge of the Ghats (Elouard, 2000). The study area, The present study recorded 117 species belonging
with an altitudinal range of 300-1300 m above MSL, receives to 102 genera, 28 sub-families, 17 families and 9 super
average annual rainfall ranging from 1500 to 3500 mm with families (Table 1). The family Erebidae dominated with
maximum rainfall during monsoon season (June to 32.48% of the total species recorded, followed by the family
September). The mean maximum temperature (32oC) is Crambidae (20.51%) and Geometridae (19.66%). Together
observed during April and May, while December and January these 3 families accounted for about 70% of the total moth
have the mean minimum temperature (15oC). diversity of the district. The next predominance of species
The study was conducted in three taluks of Kodagu was observed in Saturniidae and Sphingidae with 6 species
district namely Virajpet, Madikeri and Somwarpet in 2014- in each family and Uraniidae with four species. These three
2015. The light traps and light sheets were set in 9 locations families accounted for about 14.5% of the total diversity (Fig.
for collection of moth specimens. The traps were set at 7 p.m. 1). These results showed that about 5-6 out of 17 families
in the evening and observation /collection were made until accounted for the majority (80%) of moths diversity in the
2AM, continuously for three days. In each place the traps district. Overall higher species richness and diversity was
were set at an interval of one month. Besides light trap and recorded from this region.
light sheet, the moths hovering around other light sources The diversity of moth fauna as recorded by the earlier
(street light, houses etc.) were also collected. Diurnal moths studies from different part of India showed a wide variation.
were also collected from the flowering plants by using insect Ghosh (2003) recorded an increase in the number of species
nets. Some larval stages were also collected from their host from the family Larentiinae with an increase in the latitude.
plants and they were reared in the laboratory until their adult Similar trends were also observed with an increase in altitude
stage. The collected moths were brought to the laboratory at in the tropics by Holloway (1993, 1997). The present
Forestry College Ponnampet, for preservation and further investigation showed highest percentage of the species from
identification. All the specimens were identified using keys of the families of Erebidae, Crambidae and Geometridae (70 %).
Fauna of British India (Hampson, 1892-1896; Bell and Scott, Similary, Kailash and Sambath (2013) have also reported the
1937) and their current nomenclature is based on Moth of dominance of the families such as Geometridae (48%),
Borneo (Holloway, 1983-2011). The hierarchy of different Erebidae (26%), Drepanidae (8%) and Crambidae (7%) from
families is based on the modern classification of insect above Tawang district in Arunachal Pradesh .The family Geometridae
family level by Varshney (2003) and Van Nieukerken et al. being a largest family in the order Lepidoptera has recorded its
(2011). Species contribution to diversity of each family was dominance in Tawang district (Kailash and Sambath, 2013)
determined by calculating the dominance index similar dominance of Geometridae (260 of 460 species) was

Fig.1. Map of the study area showing the location of Kodagu district of Western Ghats in Karnataka
 Moths Diversity of Kodagu District 715

Table 1. The diversity of moths in Kodagu district in Central Western Ghats of Karnataka, India
Super family Family Sub-family No. of genera No. of species Species richness Species contribution
to diversity (%)
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae 13 16 32.48
Calpinae 1 1
Erebinae 8 9 38
Lymantriinae 8 8
Aganainae 2 3
Hadeninae 1 1
Noctuidae Noctuinae 1 1 1 0.85
Nolidae Eligminae 1 1 1 0.85
Bombycoidea Bombaicadae Bombicenea 1 1 1 0.85
Eupterotidae Panacelinae 1 1 1 0.85
Saturniidae Saturniinae 4 6 6 5.13
Sphingidae Macroglossinae 3 4 5.13
Smerinthinae 1 1 6
Sphinginae 1 1
Calliduloidea Callidulidae Callidulinae 1 1 1 0.85
Pyraloidea Crambidae Acentropinae 2 2 20.51
Spilomelinae 20 22 24
Pyralidae Galleriinae 2 2 2 1.71
Geometroidea Geometridae Desmobathrinae 2 2 19.66
Ennominea 4 4
Geometrinae 6 11
Larentiinae 2 2 23
Sterrhinae 4 4
Uraniidae Microniinae 4 4 4 3.42
Hyblaeoidea Hyblaeidae - 1 1 1 0.85
Lasiocampoidea Lasiocampidae Lasiocampinae 3 3 3 2.56
Cossoidea Metarbelidae - 1 1 1 0.85
Cossidae Zeuzerinae 1 1 1 0.85
Zygaenoidea Zygaenidae Chalcosiinae 2 2 2.56
Eupterotinae 1 1 3
Total 9 17 28 102 117 117 100

also recorded by Ghosh (2003) in Sikkim. In respect of the moths were recorded and would form as the basis for
moth species from other families, there was a variation in their developing strategies for conservation and management of
percentage occurrence at Kodagu district when compared insect diversity particularly, of moths diversity which are the
with the findings of Ghosh (2003) and Kailash and Sambath important indicators of the ecosystem function and health.
(2013). Mathew et al. (2004) from Shendurny Wildlife However, the present investigation was only a preliminary
Sanctuary in Kerala reported 129 species of moth from nine study and species collected were only indicative but not
families, with the dominance of Noctuidae (including exhaustive. Considering the area under tree cover in the
Erebidae) and Pyralidae the different families. These Kodagu district, the sampling period and sampling sites
differences could be attributed to the habitat condition, floristic seemed to be insufficient. Detailed exhaustive survey with
diversity, altitude latitude and associated factors prevailing in different higher sampling intensity and different methods of
the respective regions. collections may provide an ample data for preparation of
In the present studies, one hundred and seventeen check list of moths in Kodagu district.
716 Shashi Bhushan Mishra , R.N. Kencharaddi, G.M. Devagiri and Anil Kumar Khaple

Table 2. List of moths collected from Kodagu district

Super family Family Sub-family Species
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Arctornis sp
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Euproctis sp.
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Lymantria concolor
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Olene mendosa
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Orvasca postica
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Orgyia postica
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Orvasca subnotota
Noctuoidea Erebidae Lymantriinae Perina nuda
Noctuoidea Erebidae Aganainae Asota plaginota
Noctuoidea Erebidae Aganainae Asota caricae
Noctuoidea Erebidae Aganainae Digama marchalii figurate
Noctuoidea Erebidae Hadeninae Spodoptera litura
Noctuoidea Erebidae Calpinae Eudocima mate rna
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Creatonotos gangis
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Creatonotos transiens
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Eressa confinis
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Estigmene sp
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Estigmene vittata
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Euchromia polymena
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Amata Sp.
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Hemonia orbiferana
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Macrobrochis gigas
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Mangina argus
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Nepita conferta
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Nyctemera coleta
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Olepa ricini
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Utetheisa pulchelloides
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Cyana peregrine
Noctuoidea Erebidae Arctiinae Cyana sigma
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Bastilla fulvotaenia
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Bastilia joviana
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Bastilla crameri
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Chalciope mygdoni
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Erebus ephesperis
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Sympis rufibasis
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Thyas coronate
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Trigonodes hyppasia
Noctuoidea Erebidae Erebinae Spirama sp.
Noctuoidea Noctuidae Noctuinae Agrotis sp
Noctuoidea Nolidae Eligminae Eligma narcissus
Bombycoidea Bombaicadae Bombicenea Ocinara sp.
Bombycoidea Eupterotidae Panacelinae Ganisa spp
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Actias maenas
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Actias selene
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Actias atlus
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Antheraea mylitta
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Attacus taprobanis
Bombycoidea Saturniidae Saturniinae Loepa katinka
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Macroglossinae Daphnis nerii
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Macroglossinae Macroglossum belis
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Macroglossinae Theretra aldenlandis
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Macroglossinae Theretra nessus
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Smerinthinae Marumba dyras
Bombycoidea Sphingidae Sphinginae Acherontia lachesis
Hyblaeoidea Hyblaeidae - Hyblaea puera

Cont.......
 Moths Diversity of Kodagu District 717

Lasiocampoidea Lasiocampidae Lasiocampinae Gastropacha pardale

Lasiocampoidea Lasiocampidae Lasiocampinae Trabala vishnou
Lasiocampoidea Lasiocampidae Lasiocampinae Lebeda nobilis
Cossoidea Metarbelidae - Indarbela quadrinotata
Cossoidea Cossoidae Zeuzerinae Polyphagozerra coffeae
Zygaenoidea Zygaenidae Chalcosiinae Eterusia aedea
Zygaenoidea Zygaenidae Chalcosiinae Yclosia papilionaris
Zygaenoidea Zygaenidae Eupterotinae Eupterote spp
Colliduloidea Collidulidae Collidulinae Tetragonus calamitus
Geometroidea Geometridae Desmobathrinae Eumelea ludovicata
Geometroidea Geometridae Desmobathrinae Naxa sp.
Geometroidea Geometridae Ennominea Fascellina plagiata
Geometroidea Geometridae Ennominea Hypomecis sp.
Geometroidea Geometridae Ennominea Ourapteryx sp
Geometroidea Geometridae Ennominea Scardamia spp
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Agathia hilarata
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Agathia laetata
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Agathia magnifica
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Agathia sp. 1
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Agathia sp. 2
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Berta sp
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Betra chrysolineata
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Comostola laesaria
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Dysphania percota
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Maxates sp.
Geometroidea Geometridae Geometrinae Pelagodes sp
Geometroidea Geometridae Larentiinae Chloroclysta truncate
Geometroidea Geometridae Larentiinae Eustroma melancholicum
Geometroidea Geometridae Sterrhinae Chrysocraspeda sp
Geometroidea Geometridae Sterrhinae Problepsis sp
Geometroidea Geometridae Sterrhinae Scopula opicata
Geometroidea Geometridae Sterrhinae Traminda mundissima
Geometroidea Uraniidae Microniinae Acropteris sp.
Geometroidea Uraniidae Microniinae Micronia aculeata
Geometroidea Uraniidae Microniinae Pseudomicronia sp
Geometroidea Uraniidae Microniinae Acropteris sp.
Pyraloidea Crambidae Acentropinae Eoophyla sp
Pyraloidea Crambidae Acentropinae Parapoynx stagnalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Leucinodes orbonalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Maruca vitrata
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Agrotera basinotata
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Scirpophaga sp.
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Eurrhyparodes bracteolalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Agathodes ostentalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Batyodes flavibasalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Cirrhochrista brizoalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Conogethes punctiferalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Cydalima spp
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Diaphania indica
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Filodes fulvidorsalis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Glyphodes sp1
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Glyphodes sp2
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Glyphodes sp3
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Nausinoe geometralis
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Omiodes indicata
Cont.......
 718 Shashi Bhushan Mishra , R.N. Kencharaddi, G.M. Devagiri and Anil Kumar Khaple

Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Parotis marginata

Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Pygospila tyres
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Talanga sp.
Pyraloidea Crambidae Spilomelinae Terastia meticulosalis
Pyraloidea Pyralidae Galleriinae Achroia grisella
Pyraloidea Pyralidae Galleriinae Galleria mellonella

REFERENCES Syntominae, Aganainae (to Noctuidae). Southdene Sdn.

Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Alfred JRB, Das AK and Sanyal AK 1998. Faunal Diversity in India.
ENVIS Centre Zoological Survey of India. Kolkata: 311-318. Holloway JD 1989. The Moths of Borneo. Part 12: Noctuidae:
Noctuinae, Heliothinae, Hadeninae, Acronictinae,
Bell TRD and Scott FB 1937. The Fauna of British India including
Amphipyrinae, Agaristinae. Malayan Nature Journal 43:
Ceylon and Burma Moths 5. Taylor and Francis, London,
537pp. 57-226.

Chandra K and Nema DK 2007. Fauna of Madhya Pradesh Holloway JD 1993-94. The Moths of Borneo. Part 11: Family:
(including Chhattisgarh) part-I, State Fauna Series 15: Geometridae: Subfamilies Ennominae. Malayan Nature
347. Published by Director, Zoological Survey of India, Journal 47: pp1-309.
Kolkata. Holloway JD 1996. The Moths of Borneo. Part 9: Family:
Elouard C 2000. Landscape and Society: Mountain Biodiversity, Geometridae: Subfamilies Oenochrominae,
Demographic and Environmental Changes. Oxford and Desmobathrinae, Geometrinae. Malayan Nature Journal
IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, pp 25-42. 49: 147-326.
Ghosh SK 2003. Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera: Geometridae, Holloway JD 1997.The Moths of Borneo. Part 10: Family;
State fauna series-9, fauna of Sikkim (Part-4). Zoological Geometridae: Subfamilies Sterrhinae, Larentiinae,
Survey of India, pp 217–342. Addenda to other subfamilies. Malayan Nature Journal 51:
Kailash Chandra and Sambath S 2013. Moth diversity of Tawang 1-242.
district, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatend Holloway JD 1999. The Moths of Borneo. Part 5: Family:
Texa 5: 3565-3570. Lymantriidae. Malayan Nature Journal 53: 1-188.
Hampson GF 1892. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Holloway JD 2011. The Moths of Borneo Part 2: Families:
Burma, Moths - Volume 1. Taylor and Francis, London, pp Phaudidae, Himantopteridae and Zygaenidae; revised
527. and annotated checklist. Malayan Nature Journal 63: 1-
Hampson GF 1893. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and 548.
Burma, Moths - Volume 2. Taylor and Francis, London, pp
Mathew G, Chandran R, Brijesh CM and Shamsudeen RSM 2004.
609.
Insect fauna of Shendurny Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala.
Hampson GF 1894. The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Zoos Print Journal 19: 1321-1327.
Burma, Moths - Volume 3. Taylor and Francis, London, pp
546. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB and
Kent J 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation
Hampson GF 1896. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
Burma, Moths - Volume 4. Taylor and Francis, London, pp
595. Van Nieukerken EJ, Kaila L, Kitching IJ, Kristensen NP, Lees D
C, Minet J, Mitter C, Mutanen M, Regier JC, Simonsen
Holloway JD 1983. The Moths of Borneo. Part 4: Family: TJ, Wahlberg N, Yen SH, Zahiri R, Adamski D, Baixeras
Notodontidae. Malayan Nature Journal 37: 1-107. J, Bartsch D, Bengtsson BA, Brown JW, Bucheli SR,
Holloway JD 1985. The Moths of Borneo. Part 14: Family: Davis DR, Prins JD, Prins WD, Epstein ME, Poole PG,
Noctuidae: Subfamilies Euteliinae, Stictopterinae, Gielis C, Hattenschwiler P, Hausmann A, Holloway J D,
Plusiinae, Pantheinae. Malayan Nature Journal 38: Kallies A, Karsholt O, Kawahara AY, Koster S, Kozlov MV,
157–317. Lafontaine JD, Lamas G, Landry JF, Lee S, Nuss M, Park
Holloway JD 1986. The Moths of Borneo (Part 1); Key to families; KT, Penz C, Rota J, Schintlmeister A, Schmidt B C,
Cossidae, Metarbelidae, Ratardidae, Dudgeoneidae, Sohn JC, Solis MA, Tarmann GM, Warren AD, Weller S,
Epipyropidae and Limacodidae. Malayan Nature Journal Yakovlev RV, Zolotuhin VV, Zwick A 2011. Order
40: 1–165. Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.Q. (Ed.).
Animal Biodiversity: An Outline of Higher-level
Holloway JD 1987. The Moths of Borneo. Part 3: Lasiocampidae: Classification and Survey of Taxonomic Richness.
Eupterotidae, Bombycidae, Brahmaeidae, Saturniidae, Zootaxa 3148: 212-221.
Sphingidae. Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. Varshney RK 2003. Modern classification of insecta above family
level. Bionotes 5(3&4) & 6(1,2&3): 61–62 & 85–87; 9–11;
Holloway JD 1988. The Moths of Borneo. Part 6: Arctiidae: Arctiinae, 43-44; 67–69

Received 23 June, 2016; Accepted 20 July, 2016

View publication stats