Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    E Emin Highest Emax Method A Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.784 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.784 Method B Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.791 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.791

    Uploaded by

    kevinblache
    Method A and Method B were tested on two layers. For each method and layer, the document reports the highest, lowest, and mean elastic modulus measured as well as the relative density at the highest and lowest elastic modulus and the difference between these relative densities. Method B resulted in a larger difference in relative density between the highest and lowest measurements for layer 2 compared to Method A.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    E Emin Highest Emax Method A Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.784 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.784 Method B Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.791 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.791

    Uploaded by

    kevinblache
    20 views2 pages
    Method A and Method B were tested on two layers. For each method and layer, the document reports the highest, lowest, and mean elastic modulus measured as well as the relative density at the highest and lowest elastic modulus and the difference between these relative densities. Method B resulted in a larger difference in relative density between the highest and lowest measurements for layer 2 compared to Method A.

    Original Description:

    Lab 3 Q7

    Original Title

    Lab 3 Q7

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Method A and Method B were tested on two layers. For each method and layer, the document reports the highest, lowest, and mean elastic modulus measured as well as the relative density at the highest and lowest elastic modulus and the difference between these relative densities. Method B resulted in a larger difference in relative density between the highest and lowest measurements for layer 2 compared to Method A.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    20 views2 pages

    E Emin Highest Emax Method A Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.784 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.784 Method B Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.791 Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.791

    Uploaded by

    kevinblache
    Method A and Method B were tested on two layers. For each method and layer, the document reports the highest, lowest, and mean elastic modulus measured as well as the relative density at the highest and lowest elastic modulus and the difference between these relative densities. Method B resulted in a larger difference in relative density between the highest and lowest measurements for layer 2 compared to Method A.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    e emin Highest emax

    Method A Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.784


    Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.784
    Method B Layer 1 0.442 0.431 0.791
    Layer 2 0.723 0.431 0.791
    Lowest emax Relative Density (Highest) Relative Density (Lowest) Difference
    0.773 96.88% 96.78% 0.10%
    0.773 17.28% 14.62% 2.66%
    0.754 96.94% 96.59% 0.35%
    0.754 18.89% 9.60% 9.29%

    You might also like