Research Proposal Canada

How to Write a Research Proposal Página 1 de 4
Featured Article, May 8, 2002
How to Write a Research Proposal
Paul T. P. Wong, Ph.D., C.Psych.

Research Director, Graduate Program in Counselling Psychology
Trinity Western University
Langley, BC, Canada
Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a

research proposal means, nor do they understand its importance. To put
it bluntly, one's research is only as a good as one's proposal. An ill-
conceived proposal dooms the project even if it somehow gets through
the Thesis Supervisory Committee. A high quality proposal, on the other
hand, not only promises success for the project, but also impresses your
Thesis Committee about your potential as a researcher.
A research proposal is intended to convince others that you have a

worthwhile research project and that you have the competence and the
work-plan to complete it. Generally, a research proposal should contain
all the key elements involved in the research process and include
sufficient information for the readers to evaluate the proposed study.
Regardless of your research area and the methodology you choose, all
research proposals must address the following questions: What you plan
to accomplish, why you want to do it and how you are going to do it.
The proposal should have sufficient information to convince your readers

that you have an important research idea, that you have a good grasp of
the relevant literature and the major issues, and that your methodology
is sound.
The quality of your research proposal depends not only on the quality of
your proposed project, but also on the quality of your proposal writing. A
good research project may run the risk of rejection simply because the
proposal is poorly written. Therefore, it pays if your writing is coherent,
clear and compelling.
This paper focuses on proposal writing rather than on the development of

research ideas.
Title:
It should be concise and descriptive. For example, the phrase, "An

investigation of . . ." could be omitted. Often titles are stated in terms of
a functional relationship, because such titles clearly indicate the
independent and dependent variables. However, if possible, think of an
informative but catchy title. An effective title not only pricks the reader's
interest, but also predisposes him/her favourably towards the proposal.
Abstract:
It is a brief summary of approximately 300 words. It should include the

research question, the rationale for the study, the hypothesis (if any),
the method and the main findings. Descriptions of the method may
include the design, procedures, the sample and any instruments that will
be used.
Introduction:
The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the necessary
http://www.meaning.ca/articles/print/writing_research_proposal_may02.htm 19/04/2006
background or context for your research problem. How to frame the

research problem is perhaps the biggest problem in proposal writing.
If the research problem is framed in the context of a general, rambling

literature review, then the research question may appear trivial and
uninteresting. However, if the same question is placed in the context of a
very focused and current research area, its significance will become
evident.
Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules on how to frame your
research question just as there is no prescription on how to write an
interesting and informative opening paragraph. A lot depends on your
creativity, your ability to think clearly and the depth of your
understanding of problem areas.
However, try to place your research question in the context of either a

current "hot" area, or an older area that remains viable. Secondly, you
need to provide a brief but appropriate historical backdrop. Thirdly,
provide the contemporary context in which your proposed research
question occupies the central stage. Finally, identify "key players" and
refer to the most relevant and representative publications. In short, try
to paint your research question in broad brushes and at the same time
bring out its significance.
The introduction typically begins with a general statement of the problem

area, with a focus on a specific research problem, to be followed by the
rational or justification for the proposed study. The introduction generally
covers the following elements:
1. State the research problem, which is often referred to as the

purpose of the study.
2. Provide the context and set the stage for your research question in
such a way as to show its necessity and importance.
3. Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate
why it is worth doing.
4. Briefly describe the major issues and sub-problems to be
addressed by your research.
5. Identify the key independent and dependent variables of your
experiment. Alternatively, specify the phenomenon you want to
study.
6. State your hypothesis or theory, if any. For exploratory or
phenomenological research, you may not have any hypotheses.
(Please do not confuse the hypothesis with the statistical null
hypothesis.)
7. Set the delimitation or boundaries of your proposed research in
order to provide a clear focus.
8. Provide definitions of key concepts. (This is optional.)
Literature Review:
Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introduction

section. However, most professors prefer a separate section, which
allows a more thorough review of the literature.
The literature review serves several important functions:
1. Ensures that you are not "reinventing the wheel".

2. Gives credits to those who have laid the groundwork for your
research.
3. Demonstrates your knowledge of the research problem.
4. Demonstrates your understanding of the theoretical and research
issues related to your research question.
5. Shows your ability to critically evaluate relevant literature

information.
6. Indicates your ability to integrate and synthesize the existing
literature.
7. Provides new theoretical insights or develops a new model as the
conceptual framework for your research.
8. Convinces your reader that your proposed research will make a
significant and substantial contribution to the literature (i.e.,
resolving an important theoretical issue or filling a major gap in the
literature).
Most students' literature reviews suffer from the following problems:
z Lacking organization and structure

z Lacking focus, unity and coherence
z Being repetitive and verbose
z Failing to cite influential papers
z Failing to keep up with recent developments
z Failing to critically evaluate cited papers
z Citing irrelevant or trivial references
z Depending too much on secondary sources
Your scholarship and research competence will be questioned if any of

the above applies to your proposal.
There are different ways to organize your literature review. Make use of
subheadings to bring order and coherence to your review. For example,
having established the importance of your research area and its current
state of development, you may devote several subsections on related
issues as: theoretical models, measuring instruments, cross-cultural and
gender differences, etc.
It is also helpful to keep in mind that you are telling a story to an

audience. Try to tell it in a stimulating and engaging manner. Do not
bore them, because it may lead to rejection of your worthy proposal.
(Remember: Professors and scientists are human beings too.)
Methods:
The Method section is very important because it tells your Research

Committee how you plan to tackle your research problem. It will provide
your work plan and describe the activities necessary for the completion
of your project.
The guiding principle for writing the Method section is that it should
contain sufficient information for the reader to determine whether
methodology is sound. Some even argue that a good proposal should
contain sufficient details for another qualified researcher to implement
the study.
You need to demonstrate your knowledge of alternative methods and

make the case that your approach is the most appropriate and most valid
way to address your research question.
Please note that your research question may be best answered by

qualitative research. However, since most mainstream psychologists are
still biased against qualitative research, especially the phenomenological
variety, you may need to justify your qualitative method.
Furthermore, since there are no well-established and widely accepted

canons in qualitative analysis, your method section needs to be more
elaborate than what is required for traditional quantitative research. More
importantly, the data collection process in qualitative research has a far

greater impact on the results as compared to quantitative research. That
is another reason for greater care in describing how you will collect and
analyze your data. (How to write the Method section for qualitative
research is a topic for another paper.)
For quantitative studies, the method section typically consists of the

following sections:
1. Design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment?

What kind of design do you choose?
2. Subjects or participants - Who will take part in your study ? What
kind of sampling procedure do you use?
3. Instruments - What kind of measuring instruments or
questionnaires do you use? Why do you choose them? Are they
valid and reliable?
4. Procedure - How do you plan to carry out your study? What
activities are involved? How long does it take?
Results:
Obviously you do not have results at the proposal stage. However, you
need to have some idea about what kind of data you will be collecting,
and what statistical procedures will be used in order to answer your
research question or test you hypothesis.
Discussion:
It is important to convince your reader of the potential impact of your

proposed research. You need to communicate a sense of enthusiasm and
confidence without exaggerating the merits of your proposal. That is why
you also need to mention the limitations and weaknesses of the proposed
research, which may be justified by time and financial constraints as well
as by the early developmental stage of your research area.
Common Mistakes in Proposal Writing
1. Failure to provide the proper context to frame the research

question.
2. Failure to delimit the boundary conditions for your research.
3. Failure to cite landmark studies.
4. Failure to accurately present the theoretical and empirical
contributions by other researchers.
5. Failure to stay focused on the research question.
6. Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument for the
proposed research.
7. Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail on major
issues.
8. Too much rambling -- going "all over the map" without a clear
sense of direction. (The best proposals move forward with ease and
grace like a seamless river.)
9. Too many citation lapses and incorrect references.
10. Too long or too short.
11. Failing to follow the APA style.
12. Slopping writing.

Research Proposal Canada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Proposal Canada

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Proposal Canada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to Write a Research Proposal Página 1 de 4

Featured Article, May 8, 2002

How to Write a Research Proposal

Paul T. P. Wong, Ph.D., C.Psych.

Most students and beginning researchers do not fully understand what a

A research proposal is intended to convince others that you have a

The proposal should have sufficient information to convince your readers

This paper focuses on proposal writing rather than on the development of

It should be concise and descriptive. For example, the phrase, "An

It is a brief summary of approximately 300 words. It should include the

The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the necessary

background or context for your research problem. How to frame the

If the research problem is framed in the context of a general, rambling

However, try to place your research question in the context of either a

The introduction typically begins with a general statement of the problem

1. State the research problem, which is often referred to as the

Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introduction

The literature review serves several important functions:

1. Ensures that you are not "reinventing the wheel".

5. Shows your ability to critically evaluate relevant literature

Most students' literature reviews suffer from the following problems:

z Lacking organization and structure

Your scholarship and research competence will be questioned if any of

It is also helpful to keep in mind that you are telling a story to an

The Method section is very important because it tells your Research

You need to demonstrate your knowledge of alternative methods and

Please note that your research question may be best answered by

Furthermore, since there are no well-established and widely accepted

importantly, the data collection process in qualitative research has a far

For quantitative studies, the method section typically consists of the

1. Design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment?

It is important to convince your reader of the potential impact of your

Common Mistakes in Proposal Writing

1. Failure to provide the proper context to frame the research

You might also like