Guhyasamajatantra-Ocr PDF

Full text of "82422626 Wayman Alex Tr Yoga
Of The Guhyasamajatantra OCR"

See other formats
BwMbitt
T rMlilkia
S*ri#»
Yoga of the
Guh>^sainajatantni
lm UM.iM lO«U Of HlMh *UtVI3
ALEX WAYVtAX
YOGA OF
THE GUH Y AS AM A J AT ANTRA
The Arcane Lore of Forty Verses

A Buddhist Tantra Commentary
ALEX WAYMAN
MOTiLAh BA N A R S11) A SS
] Jrllii :: Varanasi :: Patna

© MOTILAL BANARSIDASS
Indological Publishers and Booksellers
AW Offict : BVNOALOW ROAD, JAWAHAR NACAR, DELHI-7

Branthtt : I. CHOWX, vara nasi-■ (u.P.)
2. ABHOR RAJPATH, PATNA-4 (BIHAR)
First Edition : Delhi, 1977
Printed in India
RY IBAKTUJU. JAIN AT OtRI JAIHENDRA PRES*, A-45, PHASE- |, INDUSTRIAL

AREA, KARAINA, NEW DRLHI-28 AND PUBLISHED BV IUNDARLAL JAIN FOR
MOTILAL BANAREIDAsa, BUNQALOW ROAD, JAWAHAR KAOAR, DELHI-7
To
Professor Murray B. Emencau,

Who set the standard
difficult to sustain
PREFACE
The work here presented i<> the public is an organization of

materials Iroin the Guhyasumajatantra cycle, stressing the aspect
of yoga, with sufficient introductory treatments to enable the
reader to place this remarkable literature within the general
frame of Indian thought and religious practice, which has
already made world-wide contributions to the theory of yoga.
The set of forty verses was memorized for centuries by follo¬

wers of the ‘Arva’ Guhyasamaja tradition, which claims that
these verses explain the entire ( Guhyasamdja) Tantra. I made
up a title, the ‘ Guhya$amaja-nidana-kdrika\ for those verses
( karika ) which go with each syllabic of the initial sentence
(nidana) of the Guhyasamajafantra. The verses stem from the
Explanatory l antra Wijmmiild, and were extant in the origi¬
nal Sanskrit by reason of being cited in the Pradipoddyotana
manuscript.
As the synthetic commentary on the verses became increas¬
ingly technical, considerable introductory materia) was indi¬
cated; and this grew to three introductions before I was satisfied
with the standard of clarification. Thus the reader has a bridge
to the verses, which in turn have been sullicicntly annotated to
bring out their individual character.
Having long ago become aware of the hazards of speculating

on the intricate subject of the Tantra, I have tried at every
point to bring forward the authentic and reliable passages,
whether in Sanskrit or Tibetan. But I do not deny my own
contribution of selecting, translating, and organizing this mate¬
rial; and especially the decision to group the forty verses accord¬
ing to the steps of yoga.
.Since most of the material in this book has not hitherto

appeared in Western sources, certainly as far as English is con¬
cerned, I have preferred to give the original passages. However,
I have omitted the Tibetan for Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan fjtgrel on

the forty verses, because the interlinear form of this annotation
renders it difficult to cite separately; and there arc some other
omissions of Tibetan. The reader will soon notice my over¬
whelming use of Tsoii-kha-pa’s works. His writing is like the
VUI
PREFACE
personal message of a guru, for it is always to explain, not to

conceal. The Tibetan chronicle called The Blue Annals lias a
most eloquent tribute to Tson-kha-pa for his authoritative works
on the Guhyasamaja system.
The concluded research is the outcome of a long-time aspi¬

ration. My original delving into the major theories is found in
my first major published article, “Notes on the Sanskrit term
Jfiana” (1955). Already I knew about the forty verses and
that they are quoted in the Pradipoddyotana because they are
mentioned in an important context in Abkhas grub rje's Funda¬
mentals of the Buddhist Taniras\ the late Professor F.D. Lessing
and myself collaborated on a translation of tnis Tibetan book
during the 1950’s even though it was not published until 1968.
I realized that to do anything scholarly with the forty verses
I would have to obtain the original Sanskrit, which was pre¬
sumably in the Pradipoddyotana manuscript of the Bihar Research
Society, During my faculty research in India from February
1963 to January 1964, sponsored by the American Institute of
Indian Studies, it became part of a wonderful memory of 1963
Divali days in Patna that the Bihar Research Society in con¬
junction with the K.P, Jayaswal Institute graciously arranged
forme to secure an enlargement of the Pradipoddyotana manuscript,
for which I am most grateful. On December 24, 1963, the
author was granted an interview with the Dalai Lama at
Dharamsala (Punjab, India) during which His Holiness ex¬
pressed delight to learn that the forty ‘revelation’ verses
explaining the initial sentence of the Guhyasamaja were extant
in that unique manuscript. He mentioned a Tibetan tradition
that there had been an Indian commentary on these forty verses
not translated into the Tibetan language, and asked to be in¬
formed if such a Sanskrit commentary were to turn up. It is a
special pleasure of this research that the present modest incursion
into the vast Guhyasamdja lore leads to the publication in India
of this commentary on the nidana verses, which thus becomes
an ‘Indian commentary’ in a sense. If an old Sanskrit conunen-
tary ever turns up, the contents should overlap, but tire fact
that the data has been silted through a Western consciousness
will have brought many changes of outer form.
Upon returning to my position of those days in Madison,

Wisconsin, with the help of the Tibetan version. I edited the
PREFACE
IX
forty verses in Sanskrit, which along with the. Tibetan and

English translations, heads the ‘Documents’. As time went on,
I collected materials for a synthetic commentary, on which
account I must pay tribute to the remarkably convenient
Japanese photographic edition of the Peking Kanjur-Tanjur
and of Tsoh-kha-pa’s collected works, all of which has
contributed so much to this endeavor. The early integrat¬
ing labor was pursued in part-time research in the Fall of
l%a supported by Ford Area funds of Tbe University
ot Wisconsin; and I tried out some of the subject matter in my
seminars on lantric Buddhism at Madison in Spring 1966 and
at Columbia (as a visitor) in Fall 1966. In Summer 1966,
I put together a manuscript that had considerable information
oil the subject. The Department of Indian Studies in Madison
kindly afforded me secretarial assistance for typing up these
technical materials. During the next academic year I derided
to include oven more new data while publishing such a book.
During the Summer 1967 in a special teaching and research
arrangement by mv department in Madison, I selected from
the photographic edition of the Tibetan canon a great amount
of works or portions of works dealing with these and kindred
topics. Mv assistant, Mr. Rio Kanda, duplicated all those
pages on the excellent machine of the University-Industry
Research Program in Madison by the cooperation of the ladies
in that office. This provided me maximum ease of consulting
texts as desired. In my new position at Columbia University
starting in Fall 1967 I found some leisure from time to time for
perusing more of the relevant texts, and for making more use
of the I'uid'ifmUlyolana manuscript, which however, is only of
interest to me for completing this book. The sabbatical year
(1966-70) allowed me by Columbia University afforded me
some leisure for further improvements and corrections. I am
confident that the delays have considerably strengthened the
contribution to knowledge of this tantric system, and that any
future investigator of this or associated Buddhist tantric litera¬
ture will find in this a rich reference work.
Ail important observation of comparing the basic text of

the GulivHuimajntiintia with its commentaries, and in particular,
with the kind of ideas found in the forty verses and their annota¬
tion, is that the coinnientarial literature brings forth an array
PREFACE
of data that is not at all apparent in the basic 1 antra. Ibis

observation leads to the surprising conclusion that one cannot
evaluate the Guhvasamdjatantra in its edited Sanskrit lot in simply
bv reading it, which is the premise ol the modern-day condem¬
nation of the Tantra. Adding to the dillirulty is the hiss in
original Sanskrit of most ol the eommentaria) works; which,
fortunately, are almost all available in fine Tibetan translations.
But few specialists are pre pared to exploit these I ibetau woiks.
For example, the onlv published paper that I know ot as employ¬
ing Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan hard t*» anv extent is fliuseppe
Tucci’s “Some glosses upon the Guhyauirndja." I ucci also
explored the Guhyasamdja man dal a in his Indn-'I ihetica and in his
work translated into Kuglish under the title 7 he ! henry and
Practice of the Mandafa. Without any rcllrction on those pre¬
vious efforts, it still follows tli.it the subject of the Guhyauimaja
has an importance deserving its own book. I I relieve it lair
to say that the very effort of integrating materials from the
vast sources has brought this system into a locus not hitherto
possible with those -other than Professor Tucci who only
brushed against it in the dark and then piaiscd or blamed.
It is a pleasure to reeall the* helpful conversations with

f>r. Rasik Yihari [oshi about some* of the Sanskrit verses
included in this book.
An explanation is due the readers who e*xpe*e ted this work

to appear some years ago, since* it was submitted to a publisher
in South India late in MtfiO. Through no fault of that publisher
but only ol troubles in his city, it was hnalK nr< essarv to lesubmit
it to the present publisher. I am indeed grateful to Shree
N. P. Jain ol Motilal Banarsidass to have undertaken this work
and given it a speech* processing. However, those who appre¬
ciate tin* appendixes should thank the publishing de-lav. Also,
in the meantime Samuel W**ise i. Inc . of New York, published
another work e»l mine on the* Buddhist lautras, with tnatc'iials
mostly different from the cemtent «»1 the present work , just as
this one is se> different liom \tkhas o 1u b ijr's Fundamentals of the
Huddhist 1 antras. This should point attention to the* almost
inexhaustible* character of the Buddhist Tanlias.
New York City .

July HI77
Alex Wavnian
CONTENTS
PREFACE vii
PART ONE : DOCUMENTS 1
I. The Guhyasamaja-nidana-karika (Sanskrit-
Tibrtan-English) 1
II. Chapters VI and XII of the Guhyasamaja-
tantra, translated into English 23
III. Edited Pradlpoddyotana commentary on

Chapter XII, 60-64, and English translation 35
PART TWO : INTRODUCTIONS 51
I. Introduction to Buddhist Tantrism 51
A. Tantra (generalities) 51
B. Definitions and varieties of Tantras 58
C. Some fundamentals of the Tantras 62
D. Winds and mantras 69
E. The world of light 77
II. Introduction to the Guhvasamajatantra 84
A. Texts, commentators, and history 84
B. Title of the work and nidana 105
C. Seven ornaments and subdivisions 113
D. Importance of the forty verses 119
E. The mandala of the Guhyasamaja 122
III. Introduction to the Yoga of the Guhyasamaja
system 137
A. The chapters of the Guhyasamaja-
tantra and yoga 137
B. The two stages, initiations, and the
Clear Light 142
G. The four steps of yoga and three
samadhis in the Stage of Generation 156
1). The six members of yoga and five
kramas in the Stage of Completion 163
E. Grouping the Nidana Karikas 173

XU
CONTENTS
PART THREE : COMMENTARY ON THE NIDANA
KARIKAS
181
I.
The
Stage of Generation
181
A.
Evam maya srutam ‘Thus by me it was
heard’
181
B.
Ekasmin samaye ‘Upon an occasion’
199
C.
Bhagavan sarva ‘The Lord—All’
223
D.
Tathagata ‘Who has come the same way’
244
II.
The
Stage of Completion
259
E.
Kayavakcitta ‘Body, Speech, and Mind’
259
F.
Hrdaya-vajrayosid ‘Diamond Ladies
of the Heart’
284
G.
Bhage-su vijahara ‘Was dwelling in the
Bhagas’
310
APPENDIX I:
The Lankavatarasutra and the Guhva-

samajatantra
332
>>
II:
The Arcane-Body Controversy
340
III:
The Praxis according to Aryadeva
349
fy
IV:
Grading of the Four-Stage Yoga
361
BIBLIOGRAPHY
363
INDEX
373
ERRATA AND ADDITIONS
389
TABLES
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
The World of Light—Brahmanical and Buddhist

Correspondences of Aksobhya-mandatu
The Clear Lights
Intra-uterine correspondences
Partite realities : five skandhas
• » ■.four elements
>1 n : six sense organs
>1 >> : live sense objects
The Great Time
78
132
153
216
231
235
242
254
324
Part One
DOCUMENTS
The purpose of placing the documents first is to expose the

Guhyasamajatantra on its literal level. This was always the initial
step in the traditional understanding of Buddhism, pursuant
to the ‘three instructions’ (iikfa-traya ), ‘insight consisting of
hearing’, ‘i nsight consisting of contemplation‘insight consisting
of cultivation (or putting into practice)’. That is to say.
Buddhism always acknowledged a kind of ‘insight’ ( prajfld )
for the elementary step of exposure to the text when it was
accompanied by devotion even if necessitating personal dis¬
comfort. The subsequent introductions, annotation of the
forty verses, and appendices, all represent the ‘pondering’
level for this study.
While the documents provide the most elementary level of

‘insight’, the form in which they are exhibited here has some
advantage over their service to the reader of edited Sanskrit
texts. In particular, a number of corrections have been made
to the Sanskrit text of Chapters Six and Twelve, Guhyasamdja -
tantra, prior to their translation. Again, a portion of the Pradt -
poddyotana commentary on Chapter Twelve is presented from
an unedited work, and the same holds for the forty verses them¬
selves, here edited in Sanskrit. Also, the translations of the
two chapters and the extract of comment on Chapter Twelve
have been slightly expanded by the use of commentarial and
subcommentarial materials, mainly available in Tibetan. Of
course, the theory of ‘insight consisting of hearing’ takes for
granted that the text itself is correct. Thus considerable care
has been taken with the Documents to meet this condition
laid down for ‘insight’.
I. The Guhyasamaja-nidana - karika (Sanskrit - Tibetan-

English). This section of the ‘documents’ exhibits samples
of the languages employed: Sanskrit and Tibetan for research
purposes , and English for translation and communication
purposes.
YOOA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA

The nidana is the formula at the outset of the Gtthyasa-
mdjotantra : Evam maya srutam ckasmin samayc bhagavan
sarvatathagatakayavakcittahrdaya-vajrayosidbhagcsu vijahara.
The word nidana is being employed in the sense of ‘primary

cause’, that is to say, the cause of the entire Guhyasatmljatantra.
The forty syllables of that formula serve mnemonic purpose
as initials of forty verses (karikd) : (1) E, (2) vam, (3) ina,
(4) ya, (5) Sru, (6) tarn, (7) e, (8) ka, (9) smin, (10) sa,
(11) ma, (12) ye, (13) bha, (14) ga, (15) van, (16) sa, (17)
rva, (18) ta, (19) tha, (20) ga, (21) ta, (22) ka, (23) ya,
(24) vak, (25) cit, (26) ta, (27) h r , (28) da, (29) ya, (30)
va, (31) jra, (32) yo, (33) sid, (34) bha, (35) ge, (36) su,
(37) vi, (38) ja, (39) ha, (40) ra.
The original Sanskrit of the forty verses is here edited from

the Pradipoddyotana manuscript, the Tibetan translation from
the Derge Tanjur edition of the Pradipoddyotana and from the
version of the Tantra Vajramald in the Peking Tibetan Tripitaka
edition. There are relatively few textual problems. The
Sanskrit manuscript gives the syllables ci and tta for nidana
verses 25 and 26, but I followed the Tibetan phonetic transcrip¬
tion, since cit and ta correspond more closely to the initial words
of the Sanskrit verses. Nidana verse 20 has a defective pad a
in the manuscript, gacchaty indriyas tat tat . But the scribe had
erased a syllable, leading to my solution : gacchann asty indriyas
tat tat. The correction gacchann asty is justified by the Tibetan
equivalence hgro bar hgyur ba.
The Tibetan text here presented follows the Vajramald except

for some obvious corruptions remedied with the Pradipoddyotana
version. The translation snail ba gsal ba is the old one
for nidana verse 4’s alokabhusa; the standard translation is
snah ba mched pa.
DOCUMENTS
q i q* rc>fir mi st5tt farmTftWITtfem I
r^jff fafafaw qRd re vmb ti [i]
tfl| £r^*r*q^*rq^| |
5jY^S*T c ^* r ^* rc l| |
“E” is the Noble woman (sati) Prajfia, the moments

of aversion, and so on. This root is designated as the
experience in the three worlds.
*1 w?wtfcT TTnrforcr^fcimni
II [2]
4| I
Sîr^^*q**q*§*\*^! I
^•q*0|âi'q-j=«*qv^| |
That Spread-of-Light vij'tana called ‘means* (upaja),

attended with begetting of desire, and so on, appears like
an emerging bamboo.
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
i ngifoar wi i
wferar II [3)
Y^-fr-q^qc-q^l ]
In the reverse order, the great Science (=Wisdom) is

itself the root of nescience. And the (‘Spread-of-Light’)
arises from nescience ( avidya ) while from that (‘Spread-of-
Light’) arises Light.
m I mfa f^5TR*TR> cRTvftVPTmHf^cm I
cn q gmwicri m * mfa u [4]
S*^C'^C*q-ârq*^r |
^*^c*G^*£n^srqv(- 5p3j
At first, that vijilana (i.e. Light) passes to what is called

*Spread-of-Light’. That passes to the great Void, and the
latter passes to the Clear Light.
documents
STf*frnfa* Hr^ldkil^d: || [5]
^J| |
^wrs^psisrâriwci^l |
The vijudna heard here has the characteristics of the three

lights. This is entirely the root of the prakrtis (natures) of the
sentient-being realm.
cT I I
5 l ^5 cT ^ fW5TH II [6]
O " •» "k ^
51 5T*‘^VVV'F'^! 1
| f
N-.
n; 4 “* ' <L-
The wind seizing, takes hold of that entity-light in each

case, and vijtiana joined with wind continually operates in the
world of living beings.
6
YOGA OF THE OUHYASAMAJATANTRA
&«T: JTfTrRT: *T*U II [7]
<W ^•^•§C - pW«^“5 5 ^l |
v'
*'Wr*c-q§dj^q|y3l I
Tim wind, the great element, is the mount of the three

vijUdnas. By means of it, the prakrtis always proceed accord¬
ingly.
*> i v: TOtergTrq?^ &srt gupr ^ i
3TOW § Eisth srroft II [8]
"I! *r^-«rp*isr§‘9^c-| |
SY^*F°fl 5 , ‘*r§r t *‘ a » 3 *l I
What be the solid realm and of water : likewise that of

fire and wind —using these, vijndna takes birth in the womb of
triple gestation.
DOCUMENTS
*lfcsTW HWtTT fntR #* ^SWHq II [9]
mi ^•^gc-^2f^wi'»i t
aqc*a‘a^*rg*r*Ms^^| |
"l^-âiy^^ygV^sM I
|5!-^5}-f^-arqpf| |
And when this is present, the five skandhas arise with
the characteristic of construction:—possessing ‘form* is ‘name’—
the (three) samskaras, as is also perception (vijfiana), the
fifth.
*t i eerfn sTratwur $rmg®3H»ta ^ i
wresif qitaign firaRTs^*: 11 [10]
*?! msr^-Sf«V«j3| - £r^c-| j
g-q-oTq-q--jtr-RC^| |
■Cb
Just (the knowledges) Equality, Discriminative, Proce-

durc-of-duty: as well as (the knowledges) Mirror-like and
Dharmadhatu. In this (knowledge-pentad) is the vijmna-
pentad.
YOOA OF THE CUHYASAMAJAT ANTRA
IT I IMUPUFT «*mrr am I
MHilfafJI aa: II [II]
*i i
frq^c^-q^'qê'l |
The seme base of mind, that of eyes, so of ears, nose, tongue,

then of torso—thus is the origination of the sense bases.
* i ^ i **15% TT?m: srujncniraHTfaai: i

fT?vrm 3 TT??*titt wnamTFMsfaar: it L12]
«-^srq«q-o)^*atil-q-gc5J\ I
The beings in the three worlds taking recourse to prdndyama
(breathing in and out) who recite the‘king of mantras’ with
ignorance, miss the ‘mental reading*.
DOCUMENTS
H I TT^TTTmTfifVT: l
fn?a: cleft ***&£&*: II [13]
ejj |
YW^^c-sr^jcôwi j
^•aj^-g‘q^qc-q'^1 j
W <j 1
In this gestation are the Prakrtis , desire, aversion, and so

on; as a result of those, auspicious and inauspicious karma i
therefrom the origination of (re)birth.
*T I nf^T: H'H'jfd ^cj: |
q ^l^ TlfiTHg tofafa TW ST rftfg eT: II [ 14]
°1 |
«£3i’q^-gz-gq-^-g-^j I
A skandha occurs as a destiny ( gati) t also as (one of)

the five Buddhas, and exhorted as (one of) the abhisanibodhi
of five kinds.
10
yooa of the guhyasamajatantra
iT RynrRWTH qr u [ 15 ]
*1! ,
a lâj-ÎsN-q-q^^l j
<*
^*rg**fc*r0*rgc-<§q*^| |
Wind, fire, water, earth, are the quaternion Locanii and

so on, which is to be known by one with the nature of the three
gnoses as conferring the enlightenment of the Buddhas.
1 wfa*mMf > mregg gfer: 1
^^ l U T eHT l a* fafd*wf f ^ R h« |: II [ 16 ]
*l| |
«9|*ar^N*q!yq^**s*^| |
«’^c*^’^=r|*r0ar$fsr*f [ 1
Every Tathagata body is sealed by four seals. By means

of the eye, etc. identifications, in that (body) arc the Bodhi-
sattvas Kfitigarbha, etc.
DOCUMENTS
11
# i irafor ^ g i
flFJ ^TT?r^<? II [17]
q| <irq*r^<yq‘«lC*uiyq^! |
g t q'i^-ijpi , 5r^qN‘^^««| |
^qrq-^-U^SIJJ-Sfq^l I
As for the mighty Fury Kings who run delighted, one

should depict them in their natural abodes of the quarters
and intermediate directions and in the limbs such as the
arms.
<T I I
* # tffcr * eTT: afrr STt^ 5Tfd^f51efT: II [18]
Of the different gods and goddesses generated by him and

his family, neither the gods nor goddesses exist, but are
displayed for the sake of sentient beings.
12
YOQA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATAN1KA
q I qtfq^TTS’qsFsPTT 1
5TRTâfH^5IH lr{ II [19]
-q^-ys’^ *aj *3| ^rr] • qx, • q |
Afterwards the y Off in who sees the non-duality sliould he

dwelling upon sense objects ‘inferior*, ‘intermediate’, and
'superior* by seeing the triple gnosis.
*T I iT^HffrUPsidfriricl fq fe q q qffl I
qnnn^’ii tTÊRrf^f^Frt'qTg n 1201
cj| ^qc*cr^C'^**‘Z , ys’'V'ui I
^ 5 rq*‘'Vn*-q*VS c, Sl I
t
While each and every sense organ is going by itself toward its
own sense object, whatever be the sense organ and its range,
each of them is ‘light only’ [abhasanuitra).
DOCUMENTS
13
cT I cTTTfafrflqMllftir fowi STTÎ OT^nif: I
<T*mT^«W *TOrf sftiJRW M [21]
5! I
|p-q-5Sr^ # wri|Sr^f |
<iX , ’% , vs-5**^rqvqf I
While the sddhaka is reaching the sense object by way of

this and that sense organ, he should make offering completely
satisfying the Tathagatas.
i Hgffrcz cnfaffT i
q^T^>TT ^TOFfH fffC'Tffjrq'atffff: It [22]
N - N.*
|3)5rq^-^srsj^r|^*q-»j9i|
*ys>c*d(-^cyj^*q*jAiajj
SJ 'w
The protector (i.e. the Buddha) well taught the three

Bodies as being different. Moreover, their unity occurs through
the yoga of niifmnna-krama.

!
14
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
1 * I HffcT: 5 T>tF* fTTOvTSH!!** I
fr qsr> fteq^RN: SHiwfagt: n [23]
EA[| 1
Whatever body characteristic of the Buddhas has been

stated to be ‘conventional truth’ ( samvrti-satya ), the niffianna-
yoga would be it through purification in the Clear light.
I VflirqTOV faww *FRt aOTTO: ST^: \

IWHr^%TT^rrT 5T3T^T<T5^ II [24]
q'fjf
? W'r * |
ij
The speech-path’s topic, namely the Lord—the body made

of knowledge—is seen like a rainbow, as well as apart from
the benefit of all sentient beings.
DOCUMENTS
15
faff I f%rT I
g^Tfa!pm^l!Wjr«f« smtu^ I [25]
S<;| ,
Thought (citta), thought derivative ( caitasika ), and nescience

{avidya) are also called respectively Insight (prajfid). Means
(updya), Culmination ( upalabdhtka ) : as well as Void (Siinya),
Further Void (atihlnya), and Great Void (mahaSunya).
a i aasirof si+4fa afrmyreS»3fa<j i
safara qfcqsy u [26]
51 6j| ,
v^’fjV^ygi i
V V
Then, knowing the differences of the prakrtis and the

Lights, one should engage in the caryd , (namely) abandoning
the body of works ( karmakaya ), he would obtain the diamond
body ( vajradcha ).
16
H ?T*n»T?T: I
fcmfa ^ wrri irtnq^H w [27]
51 !
g^-rfv^^fpii I
The worldling praxis of aim having been formed in the

heart, he thcTathagata, creating a conventional body, practises
desires exactly as he cares.
f 1 snfocf wi \
giwmfq n [28]
Like the best wish-granting jewel, hatha grants everything

desired, and seizing (by force) enacts even the success of the
Buddhas.
DOCUMENTS
17
’J I ggfesjsfa olffr?: I
srenufetfroVta JTsnfjra: a [29]
S-$-§q-S*SVS!*-3i
*J :-K-3 s.W33 3 1^--;-^-|54I
' 'W O'
I
I
Whatever the powerful one of yoga wishes, just that he

would do without hindrance; and by means of the yoga of
‘after’-stabilitv, is continually stabilized.
* ' *
z 1 3^<isrcmTift»Tisi 5TH^Jifa*rc*rfw3 1
f?t'aTfa'a*iffra sra g^ htt a [30]
3| if : | , uy£fNWr|p - «l*l| f
(S‘3sraw$r§'* , £ ! »i*£i| I
SpsrpjV^C'Srsisrqi I
* V
Knowing the portions of the three knowledges, through

union of thunderbolt and lotus,—-the defiled and the undefiled
intelligence would dwell therein with bliss forever.
YOOA OF THE GU11YASAMAJ AT ANTRA
fsfcmfa 11 13 1]
i\ §i'^Tgv!c*5-^*%it |
The universal self of entities sports l>y means of the illusory

samddhi. It perforins the deeds of a Buddha while stationed
at the traditional post.
tit I ql<T5?i*<lfatft*15^ I
^ Tifcft #«f (Ttitafns^ a: ?gtpj n (32]
ajf I
Yoga.auyoga, and mall.,yoga occur l>y themselves; also
vajnn, dakmi, as well as any union (yoga) of both, by them-
DOCUMENTS
19
fa* i fafas^fa i
N « C t
* q^mfa*T**m n [33]
F'V |
S^T^^'SFÎ I
VG*!*^rtf*^rrx| |
Having done even the prohibited, he renounces both the

proper and the improper act. The one knowing the intrinsic
nature is not adhered to (by sin), any more than is a lotus leaf
by water.
faw^T STFT^* II [34]
* >
3?i ^-y^^yz'-jvsf'ycisn |
Equipped with the eight gunas to be practised, an omni¬

scient being arises, and by himself wandersall over the worldly
realm by means of the knowledge body.
20 YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMaJATANTRA
T*r% fotf II (35]
"j| *»|e , 5f a |C , y^-er»!| 1

qyxrsysf<^ , sc , a l t'y0«i| I
VfVT^ 3 ! T Kai] 1
His home is the sky wherever he the Lord does roam.

By the samadki of great ecstasy he forever rejoices in that very
place.
flFcft STTHSafoSTm^ II [36]
A conventional illustration is made in the world regarding

just these distinctions ofliglus as the twilight, the night, and the
day—so as to see three gnoses ( jil&na),
DOCUMENTS
21
fa i q f<»f gq d i: i
q^^fa^fa?T ifR^q^ g^ lT: II [37]
ij N q54*q^T?J , ^^*5^*q^'| ]
Worldlings imagine the multiform conventions, which

divided into three paths, originate the three knowledges.
êq^Teft% forTmgfasjfoTdT: II [38]
•> 1 1 *} »
^ M*y 5,“'I /
(Namely) birth, and by loss of abode—formation of the

intermediate state. To the extent there is discursive thought
in the world, so is there phenomenal projection of mind and
(its vehicular) winds.
22
YOGA OF THE OL'HYASAMAJATANTRA
j£T I qq^nSSTetf^TT: I
U [39]
g^|W^c-ga]'*‘^*fsn*^f I
Both the acts of laughter and accompanied dance with

the nine sentiments of dramatic art, as well as mudra, mantra,
and mental formation, are enacted by Vajrasattva (the tantric
hierophant).
T I 7 cW*i *T ^Tfed^ ^ I
snn**Tfags ii [40]
fi-wsrsica^Y^T 53 ^! j
o *
There is no jewel in this world so great as the Sradliis'h ana, if
purified by the Clear Light like a gem cleansed by fire.
DOCUMENTS
23
II. Chapters VI and XII of the Guhyasamdjatantra> translated

into Knglish.
These two chapters are selected for translation because

they are the most important in terms of commcntarial literature
for stating explicitly the steps of yoga underlying the entire
Guhyasamdjatantra.
The portions of the two chapters which especially apply

to steps of yoga arc repeated with explanations in Part Two
(III. Introduction to the Yoga of the Guhyasamaja system).
Here we may say by way of introduction that the two stages.
Stage of Generation and Stage of Completion, are represented
by verse blocks in both chapters, while other blocks may go
with both stages. In Chapter Six, verses 3-5 belong to the
Stage of Completion, verses 6-14 represent the prdndyama of the
Stage of Generation, and 15-18 show the advancement to the
prdndyama of the Stage of Completion. In the case of Chapter
Twelve the Pradipoddyolana y inaugurating its commentary on verse
50 in that chapter says : “Having taught the mundane siddhi
by way of the deeds of the yogin belonging to the ‘Stage of
Generation’, now in order to teach the means of accomplishing
the siddhi of mahamudrd of those situated in the ‘Stage of Com¬
pletion’, there are the words 'vqjrasamaya' and so on (of verse
50). Presumably these ‘Stage of Completion’ verses continue
through 59. Then verses 60-63 show the steps of achieving
those siddhis of the ‘Stage of Generation’; while the verse 64
(on which Candrakirti has the long commentary which is edited
in the next section is understood to allude to the steps of
achieving the siddhis of the ‘Stage of Completion’. The subse¬
quent verses can be understood to indicate both stages, by use
of the four expressions of sadhana (elucidated in Part Two)
which can be construed as the ‘shared’ ( sad ha rana ) terminology
of the two stages.
The translations are made from die Bhattacharyya edition

of the Tantra with the verse numbering in Dr. S. Bagchi’s
edition, and with some minimum expansion based on Candra-
kirti’s Pradipoddyotana commentary in the Tibetan edition with
Tsoh-klia-pa’s tippani (Mchan hgrd) thereon. Since the Sans¬
krit is readily available in Bagchi’s edition and in the reprint
of Bhattacharyya’s edition, there is no reason to reproduce the
entire Sanskrit text for the two chapters.
24
However, it has been necessary to correct the Sanskrit in

certain places with the help of the Tibetan translation in the
Kanjur and the Pradipoddyotana. And in Chapter XII, the
lines of verses 39-41 have been grouped differently from the
edited text. After this manuscript was being printed,
I received from Professor Yukci Matsunaga his work, “The
Gultyasamdjatantra : A New Critical Edition.” Upon comparing
his readings for Chapters VI and XII, I find confirmation for
most of my corrections, in some cases from the readings he
accepts, and in the remainder from the variants given in the
footnotes. Following are the corrections which arc observed
in the translation :
CHAPTER SIX
Verse
6
9
17
25
26
i Verse
I 5
■ 12
\ 15
16
f -
25
K
f
40
41
45
48
50
51
53
Incorrect reading
guddham
manah santosanapriyam
vaca kaya-
ni$padayanti samyogam
bodhicitte ca bhavana
vidhisaipy ogam
j&anadam
mantra
para karmakrt
darSanenaiva
lak$itam
CHAPTER 1
Incorrect reading
pradegesu
siddhatma
maftjuSri
cintyadharma
vajra
trisahasraip mahaguro
brahma narottamah
cakragrasadha n am
cakrakayagrayogatah
parakarmakrt
•arvasiddhinam
sat warn
vajrasattvatvam apnuyat
siddhyarthaip
siddhyante
s&rvasiddhlnaip
Correct reading
guhyam
manahsamtosanam priyam
vacakaya-
nispadayet trisamyogam
bodhir vina ca bhavanam
bodhisamyogam
jnanapadam
sarva
padakarmakrt
darsane naiva
lahghitam
,’VELVE
Correct reading
prader'e ca
suddhatma
manju
vajradharma
tri vajra
trisahasram ckasuro
guhyadharottamah
jAanagrasadhanam
b uddh a kayagray oga t a h
padakarmakrt
sarvabuddhatiam
sarvam
trivajratvam avapnuyat
siddhyagre
siddhyagre
sarvabuddhanam
DOCUMENTS
25
58
karyaih
kayaili
drdhagra
rddhyagra
59
vajrapanl
vajrapado
64
sarvamantrartha
mantratattvartha
66
mantrena
samcna
68
abdam
ardham
72
dharmo vai vakpathah
dharmatavakpathah
CHAPTER SIX
Then the Tathagata Aksobhya-vajra entered the samadhi

called ‘Secret Diamond of the Body, Speech, and Mind of all
the Tathagatas’ and pronounced this mantra which empowers
the mind :
Om sarvatathdgatacittavajrasvabhdvalmako ’hamj
“Om. I am the self-existence of the cittavajra of all the

Tathagatas.”
Then the Lord, the Tathagata Vairocana-vajra, entered the

samadhi called ‘Dustless Diamond Abode* and pronounced this
mantra which empowers the body :
Om sarvatathdgatakdyavajrasvabhdvdtmako *ham}
“Om, I am the self existence of the kayavajra of all the

Tathagatas.”
Then the Lord, the Tathagata Amitayur-vajra, entered the

samadhi called ‘Xoudual Diamond which is the Sameness of all
Tathagatas* and pronounced this mantra which empowers
speech:
Om sarvatathdgataidgvajrasvabhdvdtmako *hamf
“Om, I am the self-existence of the vagvajra of all the

Tathagatas.*’
(1) One may perfect by these preeminences the triple

diamond which has the Tathagata-secrets and the (absolute)
abode which contemplates the (conventional) abode and is
symbolized by the characteristic of mantras.
Then the Lord, the Tathagata Ratnaketu-vajra, entered the

samadhi called ‘Diamond which is the Lamp of Knowledge*
and pronounced this mantra which impassions:
Om sarvatathdgaldmirdgmavajrasvabhdvdtmako ’ ham}
“Orp. I am the self-existence of the anuraganavajra of

all the Tathagatas.”
Then the Lord, tnc Tathagata Amoghasiddhi-vajra,
26
entered the samadhi called ‘Unwasted Diamond’ and pronoun¬

ced this mantra of worship:
Om sarvatathagatap ujavajrasvabhdvdtmako *ham l
“Om, I am the self-existence of the pujavajra of all the

Tathagatas.”
(2) One should continually and methodically worship

the Buddhas with the five strands of desire ( = sense objects).
By the five kinds of worship he would speedily achieve
Buddhahood.
So spoke the Lord Vajradhara, master of the Body, Speech,

and Mind diamonds of all the Tathagatas.
Then the Lord Vajradhara, master of the Body, Speech,

and Mind diamonds of all the Tathagatas, pronounced this
secret mantra of all the Tathagatas:
Otft sarvatathagatakayavakciltavajrasvabhavatmako ’ham /
“Om. I am the self-existence of the Body, Speech, and

Mind diamonds of all the Tathagatas.”
(3) The one who has body as the mantra visualized

should accomplish, exhorted by speech in the mind, the ‘surpas¬
sing one’, ‘successful one’, ‘one satisfying the mind,’ ‘beloved
one’.
(4) He should accomplish the selflessness of citta being

visualized, (then) the contemplation of speech (vtied) and body,
(then) the triple conjunction, (finally) the abode equal to
space.
(5) The self-existence of body-, speech-, and mind-visuali-

zation is not reached by the praxis of mantra-bodv, nor is
revelation in the absence of contemplation.
(6) Having pondered in brief this characteristic of body,

speech, and mind, he should contemplate the samadhi ‘Con¬
junction to revelation’ as constructed by mantra.
(7) Then the glorious Vajradhara, accompanied by all

the Tathagatas, and most omniscient one among all the Buddhas,
proclaimed the supreme contemplation.
(8) One should imagine a moon disk in the midst of the

sky. Having contemplated an image of the Buddha, he should
begin the ‘subtle yoga* (sukftna-yoga).
(9) One should imagine a (minute) mustard seed at the

tip of the nose and the moving and non-moving (worlds) in
the mustard seed. He should contemplate the joyful realm of
DOCUMENTS
27
knowledge as the (highest) secret that is imagined by knowledge.
(10) Me should contemplate a solar disk in the midst

of the sky, and having contemplated an image of the Buddha,
superimpose it on that abode.
11 tun!
(11) One should contemplate a bright disk in the middle

of the sky. (Then,) he should contemplate a lotus and a dia¬
mond in contact in the manner of an eye.
(12) Me should contemplate a ratna disk in the middle

of the sky and should perseveringly contemplate upon it the
‘original yoga’ (the syllables Om, Ah, Hum).
(13) [—omitted in Tibetan translation of the midatantra
and in the explanatory tantra Sandhivydkaram —]
(14) He should contemplate a light disk in the middle

of the sky. He should project (thereon) a Buddha mark which
is mild and in differentiation the retinue.
(15) He should imagine with perseverance at the tip

of bis nose a five-pronged (thunderbolt) appearing like a blue
lotus petal and in the advanced degree the size of a tiny barley
grain.
(16) With enlightenment his sole aim, he should contem¬

plate vividly at the tip of his nose an eight petallcd lotus
with filaments and the size of a chick-pea.
(17) In the extraordinary case, he would construct therein

(i.e. in the ‘chick-pea’) the contemplation of wheel and
so on. Then, he would accomplish the ecstatic basis of
enlightenment—the store of all (mundane) siddhis and the (eight
supramundane guttas.
(18) He would project there in condensed manner what

has been placed in the Buddha’s enlightenment. He would
draw forth the Dharma Word marked with body, speech, and
mind.
(19) Then the glorious Yajiadhara, the revealer of all

the meaning of reality, expressed the sublime secret that issues
from all the best praxis (carytt).
(20) The wise man, provided with forms, sounds, and

tastes, should contemplate for six months; and should also
contemplate by offering the great offering to the secret reality.
(21) The one desiring siddhis as fruit should perform by

using excrement and urine as (imaginary) food. Hewould
28
YOGA OF THE GUH Y ASAM Aj ATANTRA
accomplish the supreme reality and immaculate mind of enlight¬

enment.
(22) He should imagine the great flesh as flesh for food.
He would accomplish the mysterious body, speech, and mind
that are in all siddhis.
(23) He should eat as food, the sublime flesh of elephant,

horse, and dog, and not partake of other food.
(24) The wise Bodhisattva becomes dear to the Buddhas.

Indeed, by this praxis one would quickly attain Buddhahood.
(25) He would become in the world Lord of the Realm

of Desire ( kama-dhdtu ), the doer of deeds of the rank; the radiant,
powerful leader, his handsome features gratifying the sight.
(26) He would assent to the world on sight, without being

exhorted. This is what for all the Buddhas is the secret, the
supreme enlightenment. This secret mantra is the reality
transcending (the ordinary) body, speech, and mind.
Ended is chapter six, entitled ‘Empowerment of Body,

Speech, and Mind* in the Mahnguhyatantra ‘Guhyasamaja*
of the secret and the greater secret belonging to the Body,
Speech, and Mind of the Tathagatas.
CHAPTER TWELVE
Then the teacher Vajradhara, who has accomplished the

supreme J ft ana, proclaimed the diamond of speech which is the
reality of the three diamond pledges.
(1) One should imagine this dance (ndtaka) among the

natures pure by intrinsic nature, which are equal to the sky and
have the intrinsic nature devoid of discursive thought.
(2) One may accomplish the sum of all siddhis both in a

spot of a great forest and in a secluded mountain adorned with
flowers and fruits.
Mdm
(3) The contemplation of the maftjuvajra in the diamonds

of (one’s own) body, speech, and mind, is comparable to the
maAjuvajra which radiates in the body, speech, and mind
(of the three realms).
(4) The pure self, adorned with all adornments, shines

with a light of blazing diamond for a spread of a hundred
yojanas.
DOCUMENTS
29
(5) The gods Brahma, Rudra, and so on, never see it.
(Thus) the samadhi called ‘Causing the disappearance of the
highest samaya of the maftjuvajra.’
(6) Having caused what proceeds from the triple hook

(i.c. the three lights) by means of the five s am ay as of excrement
( = sense object) and urine ( »*• sense organ) which arise from the
inseparable triple vajra (i.e. the mind), he should contemplate
it as cast into his mouth (=the Clear Light).
(7) He should contemplate therein the citta as inseparable

from all the Buddhas. It would have from that moment a light
like that of the manjuvajra.
(8-9) Having contemplated by way of one’s own mantra

(Om), and having imagined the wheel with the light of a fire¬
brand as the abode of all the Buddhas, one would be like a
Buddha. As many as be the atoms of the 36 Sumerus corres¬
ponding to that (wheel), they are all like Vajradhara. (Thus)
the samadhi called ‘Pledge of the Wheel’.

(Hum), and (having contemplated) the Mahavajra in the
middle of the mandala as the abode of all the vajras, one'
would be equal to the Cittavajra. As many as be the atoms of
the 36 Sumerus, that many will be the ladies (yofit ) who are
its abode of merits (guna). Having made the obeisance of
Rudra, he would be the Mahavajra of the three realms. (Thus)
the samadhi called ‘Diamond equality’.

(Ah) the great eight-pctalled lotus, one would be the store
of all dharmas equal to Vajradharma. As many as be the
atoms of the 36 Sumerus, the pure self causes them to take
shape in the supreme mandala of Buddha offerings. (Thus)
the samadhi called ‘Lotus equality’.
(14-17) He stays serving the triple-aeon pledge of the

five knowledge-bearers. He meditatively worships the three
secrets of all the Buddhas of the ten directions. He should
contemplate his own mantra (Ha) as the sword with a light
equal to the five rays. Holding it in his hand, wide-eêd, he
would be a vidyadhara of the triple vajra. Worshipping with
the great (mystic powers)of the three realms, having bowed to
Brahma, Indra and the Daityas, he, the solitary hero in the
chiliocosm, would be the highest Guhyadhara. What one
30
YOGA OF THE G IT IV A S A M AJ AT A NT K A
wishes with his mind of the vajrins r>f Hotly, Speech, and Mind —
it confers such a siddhi created from die citt.iv.ijra. I hus tlie
samadhi called ‘Best of all swords’.
(18-19) Having meditated on the pellet of Oni, the size

of a pea kernel, one should contemplate- in its center the image
ofone’sdeitv, imagining it in the ‘mouth' die luahmaraudhia).
Immediately he would have the same light as the hodhisattva,
the same light as the Jambu rivet , appearing like the tisen stm.
(20-21) Having meditated on the pellet of Ah. the size

of a pea kernel, one should contemplate in its center the image
of one’s deity, imagining it in the ‘mouth’. Immediately he
■ would have the same light as the revelation-knowledge, the same
light as the Jambu river, appearing like the risen sun.
(22-23) Having meditated cm die pellet of Hum, the size

of a pea kernel, one should contemplate in its center the
image of one’s deity, imagining it in the ‘month’. Immediately
he would have the same light as the diamond body, the same
light as the Jambu river, appearing like the risen sun.
(24-25) One should contemplate Vairocana stationed in

the center of a clear sky. Having imagined a wheel in his hand,
one would be a cakra-Vidyadhara. Having imagined the ‘Great
Wheel’ family as the best praxis of Buddha body, one would
enact with the knowledge diamond the best evocation ( sddhana )
of knowledge.
(26-27) One should contemplate a knowledge Aksobhya

stationed in the center of a diamond in the sky. Having imagined
a thunderbolt in his hand, one would be a vajra-Vidyadhara.
Having imagined the ‘Great Diamond’ family as the best
praxis of Diamond body, one would enact with the knowledge
diamond the best evocation of diamond.
(28-29) One should contemplate a Katnavajra stationed

in the center of a jewel in the sky expanse. Having imagined
a ratna in his hand, one would be a ratna-Yidyadhara. Hav¬
ing imagined the ‘Great Jewel’ family as the best praxis of
Jewel body, one would enact with the knowledge diamond the
best evocation of jewel.
(30-31) One should contemplate an Amitahha stationed

in the center of the dharma in the sky. Having imagined a
lotus in his hand, one would be a padma-Yidyadhara. 1 laving
imagined the Great Lotus’ family as the best praxis of Dharma-
DOCUMENTS
31
kfiya. one would enact with the knowledge diamond the best
evocation of lotus,
(32-33) One should contemplate an Amoghiigra stationed

in the center of the samaya in the sky. Having imagined a
sword in his hand, one would he a khadga-Vidvadhara. Having
imagined the ‘Great Samaya’ family as the host praxis of kiiyasa-
maya, one would enact with the knowledge diamond the best
evocation of samaya.
(34) The trident ( of Mahabala ), the knowledge-hook

(of Takkirajaand the other (symbols of the Krodha-raja-s),
to be evoked by diversification of the vajra, are evoked with
meditation of that (Aksobhya) by means of the evocations of
body, speech, and mind.
I bus spoke the Lord who is the vajra of siddhi-(revelation)

belonging to the Great Pledge (mahasamaya — the Diamond
Vehicle).
(35) As a special (or distinguished) case, the performer

should com inuallv evoke the diamond attraction (of four linea¬
ges of goddesses) at a crossroads, a solitary tree, an ekalinga,
or in a calm place.
(36-37) Having contemplated the ‘incantation person’ of

triple voga (—born from the 3 syllables, Oni, Ah, Hurp)
as the vajrin of triple yoga (- having the stack of three sattvas),
the hook for the oidinary body, speech, and mind, on the
part of the ‘Ruddhas* (the jewel-like persons) who have jhuna-
buddhis (i.c. seek the non-dual knowledge); and having attract¬
ed, with the vajra arisen from the symbols (- goddesses)
of the ten directions, the supreme Huddha attraction that abides
in the best windy mandala, he w ould partake of that. (Thus)
the attraction by the diamond of‘symbols in the sky’ (khadhatu-
$amaya = the goddesses).
(38) Having meditated on Yairocana, the ‘Great Wheel*

with the hook ‘store of Buddhas’, he should engage in the
supreme attraction of the ‘pledges’ (samaya = the goddesses)
by means of the thunderbolt (vajra), lotus ( padma ), and so on.
(Thus) the attraction of the samaya (the yaksinis, etc.) of the
three realms (‘below the earth’, ‘upon the earth’, ‘above the
earth’).
(*39) He should contemplate a Buddha image endowed

with the best of all aspects. And he should contemplate in
32
YOGA £>F THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
its hand the hook and so on (the differentiation of the hook)

of body, speech, and mind. Indeed, with this yoga he would
be a performer of the rites of the ‘place’ (the rank of Vajra-
sattva).
(*40) He should contemplate the ‘diamond of body’

(one’s own transfigured body) as endowed with the best of all
aspects. Having meditated with the praxis (recitation of
mantras) of diamond tongue, he would be equal to the Vag-
vajra (i.e. Amitabha). When he offers the offering (i.e. one’s
own body) which is the best offering of the ‘pledge’ of the three
secrets, he would be consummated.
(*41) This is the quintessence, the sum of secrets of all

the Buddhas. Thus spoke the Lord, the great secret pledge.
(42) He should perfect the supreme triple vajra by the

best pledge of ‘great flesh’ (the human corpse). He would
become the Vidyadhara Lord by the best pledge of excrement
and urine.
(43-44) He would obtain the five supernormal powers

by the pledge-flesh of elephant. He would become the master
of disappearance by the pledge-flesh of horse; the achiever of all
siddhis by the pledge-flesh of dog, the supreme attraction of
vajra by the best pledge of cow flesh.
(45) When he is unable to obtain any (such) (dead)
flesh, having meditated upon any one (of them), he should
mentally construct (the flesh). By this diamond praxis he
would become empowered by all the Buddhas.
(46-47) He should contemplate the Vajrin of Body,

Speech, and Mind ( — the samayasattva) endowed with the
best of all aspects; then in its heart (on a moon-disk) the J ft fin a
pledge (* the jftanasattva); and on (the latter’s) crown, the
holder of the best vajra (-the samadhisattva). This grati¬
fication of all the Buddhas is the supreme method of pledge.
Enacting it by the best pledge (yields) the finest creation of
every siddhi. (Thus) the samadhi called ‘Partaking of all the
vajras of samaya and jftuna’.
(48-49) Having meditated on the Vajrin (i.e. Aksobhya)

of Hutp when there is the best pledge-diamond of the tongue,
and having enjoyed by the praxis of the five ambrosias, one
may obtain the triple vajra. This (same) pledge of Ah (for
Amitabha) and Ont (for Vairocana)^ is the supreme diamond
DOCUMENTS *
33
method. Indeed, by this praxis one would become equal to

Vajrasattva. (Tims) the samadhi called ‘Ambrosia-garland
of Vaj rasa in ay a.*
(50) When he has the superior siddhi whose symbol

(samaya) is the triple vajra (of Body, Speech, and Mind-the
three lights), he would become the vajrin (possessor of the
vajra) of three bodies (the Dharmakaya, Sambhogakaya, and
Nirmanakfiya). He would become the sea of wish-granting
jewels belonging to all the Buddhas of the ten directions.
(51) 1 lie Diamond-soul shines on the worldly realm on

all levels. When there is the superior siddhi of cakrasamaya
(associated with Vairocana), it (the Diamond soul) becomes
equal to the body of a Buddha.
(52) He would sport successful on all levels, numbering the

Ganges sands. When there are all the superior samayas
(dakinis and dakas), he would become the Vidyadhara Lord.
(53) He shines alone in the chiliocosm during all disap¬
pearances (of speech activity and bodily members), he steals
(the mystic powers) from all the Buddhas, enjoys the daughters
of the best gods (such as Indra)—when he has the superior
siddhi of all the samayas by reason of the potency of the kaya-
vajra (= the Mahamudra).
(54) He secs with the diamond eye (the pure, refined

divine eve), like a single myrobalan fruit in his hand, the Bud¬
dhas iii the number of the Ganges sands, who arc stationed
in the triple vajra abode.
(55) He hears through the influence of supernormal faculty

as though all around gathered to his car as many sounds as are
revealed in fields numbering the Ganges sands.
(56) He knows, in the form of a drama, the thought-

announced character (the 160 prakrtis) of body, speech, and
mind of all the sentient beings in fields numbering the Ganges
sands.
(57) He remembers, as though of three-days duration,

the incidents of former lives occurring as he dwelt in samsara
through aeons numbering the Ganges sands.
(58) He emanates through the vajrin of magical power

(tddhi ) with bodies numbering the Ganges sands and adorned
with clouds of Buddhas, for aeons numbering the Ganges sands.
Thus spoke the Lord who has the supernormal faculty of
34
YOCA OF THE CUHYASAMAJATAMKA
■C
s am ay namely : the diamond eye, the diamond he. tiring, the

diamond consciousness, the diamond abode, and the diamond
magical power.
(59) When one has the success of goal that is the Buddha’s
supernormal faculty, then he becomes equal to the
Buddha's body. He, the diamond of body and speech (and
mind), would roam the worldly realm on all levels, surround¬
ed by retinues as numerous as the Ganges sands.
(60-61 A) There are four (steps): 1. occupation with
the pledge of service, 2. arising of near-evocation, 3. evoca¬
tion goal and the symbol, and 4. great evocation. Having
understood them as a division of vajra, then one should accom¬
plish the rites.
(61B-62-63) I. He should contemplate the samadlii-praxis

of service as the supreme revelation. 2. The deliberation
on the bases of the vajras when there is foremost success is the
ntiar-evocation. 3. The contemplation of the lords of the
mantras is said to be the exhortation when there is evocation.
4. At the time of great evocation, when he imagines the form
of his own mantra-vajrin as the lord on the crown of his head,
he is successful because of the jnana-vajrin.
(64) One should create, everywhere and always, just

with the knowledge nectar of service. For this brings to success
the aim of mantra and of tattva, of all mantras.
(65) Success is always attained in spots of a great forest,

places entirely clear of (other) persons, and abodes of moun¬
tain caves.
Thus spoke the Lord with the diamond of Alahasadhana.
(66) Thus, the one of firm devotions ( vrata ) should per¬

form the service by means of four vajras (the four in Chap.
XVIII beginning with the ‘revelation of voidness’). Contem¬
plating through equality (of oneself) with the three vajra bodies
> • (of Vajradhara), he reaches success.
(67) The wise man, having contemplated with the know-

Icdgc diamond of reciting Oin, that is, by union with the four
temporal junctures ( = the four goddesses) in five places (=ihe
distinguished kind of the five sense objects), engages in the
vow ( = bliss).
(68) The siddhi is easily attained when one relies on the

£. vajrasamaya (the Clear Light in sense objects) for seven days
DOCUMENTS
35
(l>y one of superior organs}, half a month {medium organ), a
month or a half more (inferior organ).
( 60 ) I have explained extensively by stressing the difference

of days (for accomplishing siddhi in the Stage of Generation);
(notv) the siddhi that takes a half-month (the Mahainudra)
is stated by sources (the Tathagatas) of the high secret (the
(Hear Light).
Herein is the domain of the Upasadhana-vow :
(70-71) May the glorious holder of Buddha Body contem¬

plated as the inseparable triple vajra, create for me today
the place of blessing by way of the Diamond-holder of Body
(Vairocana). May the Buddhas of the ten directions contem¬
plated as the inseparable three vajras, create for me today the
place of blessing characterized as body.
Herein is the domain of the Sadhana-vow :
(72-73) May the glorious speech-path of true-naturc,

contemplated as the inseparable triple vajra, create for me
today tI k* place of blessing by way of the Diamond-holder of
Speech (Amitabha . May the Buddhas of the ten directions,
contemplated as the inseparable three vajras, create for me
today the place of blessing arising from the path of speech.
Herein is the domain of the Mahasadhana-vow :
(74-75) May the glorious holder of the Cittavajra, con¬

templated as the inseparable triple vajra, create for me today
the place of blessing by way <>f the Diamond-holder of Mind
(Aksobhva . May the Buddhas of the ten directions contem¬
plated as the inseparable tin re vajras, create for me today the
place of blessing, arising from mind.
76 There is no doubt that if there is a Buddha (—yogin

of Vairocana , a Yajradharma yogin of Amitabha), or
a Vajrasattva ' - yogin ot Aksobhva . then if the deluded self
(mohdtmnn would go beyond, it would become rent asunder.
Lnded is chapter twelve, entitled ‘Instruction on the best

evoeation of the pledge’ in the Mahaguhya-iauira ‘Guhya-
sainaja’ of the secret and the greater secret belonging to the
Body, Speech, and Mind of all the I athagatas.
III. Ldited Pradipoddyoiana commentary on Chapter

XII, 60-64, and bnglish translation.
This portion of Caiuhnkirti's commentary is devoted to

defining the four steps of uitlhana constituting the ‘Stage of
36
YOGA OF THE GVHYASAMAJATA NTRA
Generation’ and then to explaining in detail the six members

of yoga (fadaitga-yoga) constituting the ‘Stage’ of Completion’.
The part of the commentary on the six members of yoga is
almost the same as is found in a work attributed to Xagarjuna,
the fadangayoga-nama (PTT, Vol. 85). Therefore, this comment
by Candraklrti may well have been a traditional commentary
on the six members. At the end of the work ascribed to Nagar-
juna (meaning of course the tantric author), there is presented
the lineage of the fadangayoga of the Cuhyasamdja : “Buddha
Vajradhara; Arya-Nagarjuna; Nagabodhi; Candraklrti; Arya-
deva; Sakyaraksita; Ratnamitra; Dharmabhadra; Gunamati;
ManjuiSrijilana; Amoghasrl; Viramati; VijayakTrii; Varaprajna-
dharmabhadra; Srlbhadra; Dharmapfda; Sakvadhvaja; Vagls-
varakirti; Ratnakirti; Mahasthavara ; Srivanaratna; those
arc the chief ones. Also, from ftrlvunaratna to (the Tibetan)
Gnam-gan-rin-po-chc; the chief one is Dharmabuddhi.”
However, the Karmuntavibhdga cited within the comment is
by Kluhi bio (*Niigabuddhi) who might be the same person
as the Nagabodhi in the above lineage list.
Here I omit the verse numbers assigned in Bagchi’s edition

to the block of verses which Candrakirti cites from the
Cuhyasamdja , Chap. XVIII. Candraklrti does not include the
verse line (Bagchi, XVIII, 144A) : guhyatantre. \u sane fit tividhdk
parikirtitdh ; and the verse grouping thereafter diverges from the
edited Sanskrit text. Otherwise, Candrakirti’s citation of the
verses agrees for the most part with the edited text. But his
line guhyatrayam vitarkai ca viedras tatprabhogatah appears to be
an improvement over the line guhyam tarkodayam tarkam viedram
tat prayogatali (Bagchi, XVIII, 144B). NiiropTs Sckoddeia(ika
(p. 30), when quoting the block of verses from Chap. XYIII,
gives the line guhyatrayodayas tarko viedras tatprayogatd , which at
least verifies the reading guhyatraya .
The translation is somewhat expanded by extracts within

parentheses of Me fan fjgret comments by Tson-kha-pa, PTT,
Vol. 158, pp. 87-5 to 92-1.
Edited Commentary on Chapter XII, 60-84.

Idanim utpattikramasadhanangam punah spastayami aha/
•evetyadi/sevyatc alambyata iti seva/tathatam eva samayah/
DOCUMENTS
37
tatah bhubhagadinam satnyojanarp nispadanah / scva-

samayasamyogam / prathamam angam / $unyatalambanam
suryadyalambanam upasadhanam / tad eva mantravinya-
saparyantam sambhavatity upasadhanasambhavo dvitlyam /
sadhanartham ca samayam iti/sadhanopasthapanayas tah
adhvcsanam sadhanarthah samaye sameti gacchatiti samayah
samadhi-sattvah jnanasattvas ca sadhanarthah ca samayas
ca trfiyam f avaîstasya mandalarajagri karmarajagrl paryan*
tasva mabatah pararthasya sadhanam mahasadhanam tac
caturthakam /
I'vam angacatustayam vijuaya vajrabhedcna kulabhedena

tatas tadantaram karmani vaksyamanani purvanycva/sadhayed
ity uddcsah/sevasamadhityadina uddistany arigani nirdiSate/
bodhicitlalambanam/scva saiva samadhiyate cctasi sthapyata
iii samadhih / samyojanam samyogah / kim tat bhubhagadiip
maiulalacakram paryantam yadhimuktya nispadayah / scva-
samadhiS ca samvogas ca sevasamadhisamyogam / tat krtva
om sunyatcti mamrarthapravicaran [otpaditam] sambodhim
tathatalaksanam bhavavcd iti/
suryacandrapadmadikramenaiva paryuparivyavasthapya tadu-

pari u yak sarain vinyasya sarvopagrahancna £asanka-
mandalam tadtipari punas nyaksaram tadparavrttva cihnam
cihnaparavritya mah.umidrarupanispadam upasadhanam ya
samlpc sadbya nispadya ta ity uktva / siddhir maha-
mudriisiddhih ta^ya agratmadibhutah pranavadayo mantrah/
vasmin tad upasadhanam ity a gram / vinyastasamantamantra
[ksaram] mah.unudruiiipns tasinin vajram / vairocanadisum-
bhaparyantah tesum ayatanani rupaskandhadayah /
tcsam trtiyavyavasthatikramcna nirniya karyakarana-
parijnanam vicarant-sadhya tenadhisthanayaradhyate ycna
tat sadhane codanaiu proktam itiparyayakalhanam kim tu budd-
hakayadhara ityadi/gathadvayah ; mantradhipativibhavanam
iti mantra omkaiadayah / samadhisattvah adhipatayah jnana-
sattvah mamradhipatinam kulabhedena yathasambhavaip
dhyanam mantradhipativibhavanam iti/
mahasadhanctyadi yad uddistam mahasadhanam tat
sampadanakalesu jtianavajrinah ' svadhidaivatayogavan mantri
vajrapadmasatnskarapurvikam , samapattim krtva svaman*
travajradrgadayah . tatsambhuta vajrinas tesam viivam maha-
mudrarupam dhyiiiva mukute ’dhipatim dhyatveli/paAcata-
38 yooa or the gltiyasamAjatantra
thagatanam mahaniudrarupasya jaiinmkutc mahavajradharam

adhipatim pariSisfc tatkulinanatn muku(c vaimranadih / dhya*
tva siddhyatc siddhim apnoii vaiharuiam
evam caturyogakramena vajrasattva*amaradhajiam pran-

padycdanim sadangakramcna mahavajradharanispaltitii aha/
Samdjottare \
sdmdnyottamabhcdena seed tu dtii idhd bhaiet

vajracatufkena samanyam uttamam fadbhir ahgatahff
scva jtianainrtcnaiva kariavyctyadi sevyatc rmumiksuhhir
abhyasvata iti scva kim tat parivisuddhadrvatamui till sa
jrianamrtenaiva sadahgayogcnuiva kartavya nispadya sarvatah,'
sarvatmana / sada sarvakalam/ sarvcryapathcsu cvakaro Yadh-
aranc cso hi jnanantrtakhyah sadahgayogah sarvamanira-
nam sarvatathagatanam , manttah ; sarpadayah tattvam drva-
tatattvam [*tcsam arthah phalam] tatsadhanan mantiam
tattvarthasadhakah hi yasmad arthc yasmad warn sadaiiga-
yogah / tasmat tenaiva scva karycti tani pratyahaiadini sadah-
gani nirdistani Samajottare :
sevam fadahgayogena krtta sadhanam uttamam

sddhayed anyathd naiva jdyate siddhir uttamdj
pratyaharas tat fid dhydnam prdndydmai ca dhdrand'
anusmrtiyoga(h) samddhii ca fadanga ucyatc
ity uddeSapadanain nii dt-sam aha /
daidnam indriydudm tu svavrttistham tu sarvatah 1
pratydhdra iti proktah kdtndhara in prati prat:'
pancakdmds samdsena pahcabuddhaprayogatahf
kalpanam dhydnam ucyeta tad dhydnam pattcadhd bhaiet'
’ vitarkai ca vicaras ca pritiS caiia sukham tatha

ciltayaikdgratd caiia paiicaitc dhydnasamgrahd h
guhyatrayam vitarkai ca vicaras tatprabhogatah
trtiyam pritisankaiatn caturtham sukhasamgraham /
svanttani paiicamam j hey am jiidnajneyodayakfayam I
sarvtbuddhamayam fdntam sarvakdmaprafifthitam }
paiicajt.dnamayani fvdsain paiicabhutasiabhdvakam I
niiedna pdmandsagre pindarupena kafpayct '
pahcai arnarn mahdratnam prdndyhnam iti snutam f
siamantmm hrdaye dhydtrd prdnam bindu$atarn nyaset!
niruddhc svendriye ratne dhdrayed dhdranatjt start am j
nirodhavajragaU citte nimittodgraha (h) jdyate I
paiuadhd tarn nimittam tu bodhivajrena bhdfitam /
DOCUMENTS
39
prathamam maricikdkdram dh ftmrdkdram dvitiyakam j

trtiyam khadyotakdkdram caturtham dipavajjvalam f
paiicamant tu sadalokam nirabhra°aganopamam f
sthiram mi vajramdrgena spharayct tarn khadhdtufu f
vibhdvya yad anusmrtya taddkdram tu samspharet f
anusmrtir iti jneyam .pratibhasas tatra idyate }
prajiiopdyasamdpattyd <arvabhdvdn samara tab f
uunhrtya pindayogcna bimbani madhye vibhdvayet (
rtiti jiidnani'pattih samadhii iti samjiiitam /
iti pratinirdesam aha / dasanam itvadi / indriyani indriy-
anhiiS ca indriyani tesam dasanam indrivanarn visaya-
visayinam svavrttih / vatha svagrahyagrahakasvariipcna
pravrttih / svavrttis tatra sthitam svavrttistham / sarvatah
hinamadhyottamabhcdena kamaharam prati pratiti /
kamyante abhilasyanta iti kama rupadayas tesam
indriyair yadaharanam grahanam prati prati punah
punah tadgrahyahfira itvudyangasya pratinirdesam /
pratyaharaviôdhanaya dvitiyam ahgam aha f pancctvadif—
pahca kama rupadayah ! indriyani visavabhutah samasena /
indriyair ekibhavena pancabnddhah caksuradayah tam tesam
samyojanam yojanam ' pancabuddhaprayogatah / tasmad
rupadayah ye pancabuddha(h) ityrvainvidham vat pari£ud-
dhakalpanaip tad dhyanatn'tad vitarkrtvadibhrdcna paAca-
vidharri bhavati vitarketyadi tadblu-dakathanam /Tguhyatra-
vetvadi / indriyaviâyendriyajuanani guhyatrayarp jf paAcen-
dt iyani / indriyajnanani / tad\ isava£ ca pancatathagatatma-
kcti yat parikalpanam sa vitarkah { tasminn eva vicaranam
sthitivicarah / cvatn vicaravat sa tattvapravcSabhimukhyena
yat saumanasvalaksanarp tat prititi samkaSam tattve ’bhinivciena
kayaprasrubdhyadilaksanam ' yat pr.iptam sukham tat sukha-
satngraham / cvatn abhyasvatah prakarsaparyantagamanat/
jnanasva raksuradi satpravrttir vijftanasyajfievc rupadidhaima-
dhatuparyante udavojnanajncyodayah / tasva ksayah/cittasva-
grahyagrihakasunyatvaparijnanalaksana cittaikagratn sva-
cittam ityuktah tadcvamvidham svacittam yogena sarva-
buddhainayarp bantam iti grahvadivikalpa&imanat/gantam/
bhasamatram tat sarvasunyaiaikanisfham jayate/paAcapra-
bhcdani dvitiyam aiigani
paucetyadi ! adarSadipancajnanasvabhavam adhahsvasam/
tam cva prtliivyadyatmakani svavajravivaran nLscarya padma-
40
YOGA OF THE GL'HYASAMAJATANTRA
nasagrc pindarupena bodhicittabindurupcna dhyayat / tam

evordhvapravrttaSvasam paftcavarnarn pancatathagatatmakam
tam eva maharatnam pranojjivitam avameti dirgha(m) \istar-
yateyenetisa pranayama iti smrtah jnata (vya)h/tam eva prave-
fadisvabhavenaharnKamjapamanatvai/svamantram hrdaycsva-
hrtpundarike dhyatva p ran am bindugatam samahitam aksaiam
nyaset iti trtiyam ahgarn /
niruddhetyadi svarupadaya indriye caksuradayah asinin

dvendriyc nirodhe viline tato visayendrivadharabhuie ratnc
cittaratne ca pranayamena saha nirodhe ’starngate yad
dharayet tad dharanarn/kirn tat/bhutakotih/nirodhavajragate
citte nimittodgraha(h) jayata iti/nirodhavajram prabhasvaram
tadbhute tajjate citte nimittanam udgraho/nimittapratibhasah
jayate utpadyate / paftcadhatunimittam tu bodhivajrena
bha$itam iti prthivya ’mbhasi layanan maricikakaram
pratibhasate/prathamam nimittam / warn ambhasas tejasi
jayanad dhumrakaram dvitiyam / tejasc vayau layanat
khadyotakakaram trtiyam/suksmadhator abhasatrayagamanad
dipavadalokapuhjasvabhava (m) caturtham / prakrtyabhasa-
iayanan nirabhragaganavat satatalokaprabbasavararnatrani
bhavati pahcamam / etani pahcanimittani nirvana (m)
prapayanti/, yathoktam Karmdntavibhdgt :
pran mahi salilam gaccbtj jalam gacchati pdvakam /

pdvako vdyum anvil i vdyur vijudnam dviset /
vijndnam dhdramnvitvam prabhasvaram apy oviiedjitil
sthiram ityadina / vajramargena Manghaniyam pahcaniniittanu-
purvena prabhasvarapravesena khadhatusu lokadhatusu sphi-
rayed vyapayed dharmakayarupena/etad dharanangam i«i catur¬
tham /
evam atmanarp prabhasvaragatam vibhavya saksiitkrtva

yat purvam anusmrtya maricikadyakarena bhutakotim prapi-
tam / tadakarena tenaiva kramena samspharet/utpadayet/ctad
anantaroktaip anusmrtir iti jfteyam jfiatavvam / pratibhhsa
saxpvit tatra paflcamam ahgarn anusmrtir jayate [*nanvatra]/
tarvabhav&b prajhopayasamapattya samvrtiparamarlhasa-
tyayogena sthavarajaiigamam sthitipindarupena maha-
mudrarupcna ekikftya tasya sthavarajangamasya niadhyc
yuganaddhatmakamahavajradharabimbarp vibhavayet/janiyat/
ftnena kramena rîti ksancna jfianani$pattih / jhanadehanis-
pattib / samadhir iti ?a$tham ahgarn kathyate /
DOCl'MENTS
41
Sri-Mth djdle' pi mam ova devatanispattibhedam udddyotayann aha

yogas tu trividho jiieyo ’dhifthdnah parikabas caj
nispannair cittabimbasya yogo buddhais tu varmtahj
adhisthdnaindtr [d] hamkaro yogo ’dhiffhdna ucvatef
bodhicittaviiuddhis tu mantrabijodayo mahunf
krannin ni^pannabimbas tu mudrdganesii kalpitahf
tatkalpitdi kathitayogah kalpita ucyateI
sar.dkdra; aropdah spharet samhdrakarakahl
rtiti jhdnanifpanno yogo niypanna ucyata itil
Vairocandbhisantbodhitantrc “pi dvividhadcvatayogarn nirdiSatc/

devatarupam api guhyakadhipatc dvividham pariSuddham
asuddham ca iti / tatpari’suddham adhigatarupain sarvanimitta-
pagatam apari[suddha]m sarvanimittam rupavarnasam-
sihanas ca/taira dvividhcna dcvatarupena dvividhakaryanis-
pattir bhavati.sanimittena sanimitta siddhir upajayatc/animit-
lennnimitia siddhir ista jinavaraih sada animitte sthitva vai
sanitnittam prasadhyaie'iasmat sarvaprakarena vinimittani
sovyata iti/samdhya bhasa//
7 ranslation
The Stage of Gt aeration :
Now iddnim m> as to c Unify tho four) evocation monibcr(s)

of the Stage of Gem-ration, ho says ‘Service’ and so on.
Because one serves and envisages, it is service Jtid), namely,
just toward reality, as the 'pledge* (samara). Pursuant to
that, the undertaking and generation of the diamond) spot
of earth, etc. generation of the palace from BHRUM, up to
the Clear Light of conviction is the ‘occupation with the pledge
of service’ seid>ama\asatnyoga , the first member.
Having in that way) voidness as meditative object, the

meditative object of >un. and so on, is Near Evocation ( upasd -
dhana). Precisely the bringing to conclusion the depositing
(in the body of mantras (Out, etc.) is the arising of Near Evo¬
cation ( upasddhana-santbhava ), the second (member).
Concerning ’the aim of the sadhana, and the symbol’

(sddhandrthani ca samayain ), the aim ol the sadhana means to solicit
for establishing the evocation (of one’s own three doors as the
Buddha’s Body, Speech, and Mind). ’Symbol’ (samara)
means "to get together’, i.e. the symbol (one’s own Symbolic
Being), along with the Samadhisattva and the Jhanasattva, to
42
YOGA OF TIIF. GUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
wit, both the aim of the sddhana and the symbol are the third
(member).
The accomplishment of the great aim of others, (accom¬

plishment) which is the ‘best victorious mandala’ and the
‘best victorious rite* belonging to the remaining conclusion, is
the Great Evocation {mahd sddhana). That is the fourth
(member).
Having thus understood the four members as a division of

vajra, i.e. as a division of ‘family’ (kufa) (the five families),
then, i.e. next, one should accomplish the rites to be stated
subsequently precisely as the first.
(The first member :) Starting with the lines ‘Sevasamadhi

he expands upon the (four) members which were touched
upon. The bodhicitta (in the void) as meditative object is
service (sevd). Precisely that concentrates, i.e. halts in the
mind, hence ( samddhi\ Praxis ( samyoga ) means right appli¬
cation. That (imaginative) generation, by means of convic¬
tion ( adhimukti ), from the (diamond) spot of earth, etc. up
to the mandaia-circle y which is both the servic e-samadhi and
the praxis, is the sevasamddhisamyoga. Having done that (much),
he should contemplate the supreme revelation, possessing the
character of thusness, which has arisen from pondering the
meaning of the mantra, ‘OmSunyata.
(The second member:) (Then,) in the sequence of sun,

moon, lotus, etc., one stacks successively higher, places the
three syllables (a, c, ha) upon that; then consolidates all that,
and again imagines the moon-disk, and upon that the three
syllables (Otn, Ah, Hum). Then from the transformation of
that, there arise the hand symbol(s) (of the six families).
From the transformation of the hand symbol(s), there are
completed the form(s) of Mahamudia (of the six families).
What accomplishes and completes nearby, that is said to be
(definition of' Near Evocation (u/nisadhana). The siddhi
is the siddhi of mahdmudrd (body from the five abhisatnbodhis ).
Its foremost’ is the initial ones, the mantras Om, etc. When
that is present, the Near Evocation is foremost. Having placed
all the mantra-syllables, there are the form(s) of the Muha-
mudra. Therein is the vajra, to wit, the (32) deities from
Vairocana down to Sumbha(raja). Their bases (d\ntana)
arc the skandhas of form, etc.
DOCUMENTS
43
(The third member :) Of those (members), one becomes

certain by the stage of the third series (the Atiyoga) and
accomplishes through pondering with thorough knowledge of
cause (the placement of deities in the body) and fruit (of con¬
templating after that placement). Whereby (by inviting the
deity host of the triple vajra and drawing them into oneself)
one has pleased (the deities) for the sake of blessing (one’s
own three doors), thereby that ‘is said to be the exhortation
when there is evocation.’ That is related by way of synonym
(of evocation and exhortation). But why (the exhortation) ?
The two verses (Nos. 70-71) beginning ‘ buddhakayadhara\
The ‘contemplation of the lords of the mantras’ refers to the
syllables Om, etc. (i.e. when Vajradhara and Aksobhya are
the mandala-Yu\cvs, Hum; and the remaining four samddhi -
salivas by Om, Sva, Ah, Ha). The Samadhisattvas are the
lords; the Jnanasattvas belong to the lords of the mantras.
The meditation on the various families according to their arising
is the ‘contemplation of the lords of the mantras.’
(The fourth member :) Regarding ‘the great evocation

(Mahasadhana).what is pointed out as the great evocation
belongs to the jnanavajrin-s at the time of generating it. The
mantrins possessing the yoga of presiding deity, having aroused
samapatli preceded by instigation of the vajra an dpadma (of their
own family), are their own mantras Vajradrg, etc. (32 in no.),
i.e. the vajrin-s arisen therefrom (i.e. as in a womb from the
syllables Om, etc.). To have imagined their totality as the
form of Mahamudra (of the Victorious Mandala), is stated as
‘having imagined the lord on the crown of his head’, that is,
having imagined the lord Mahavajradhara on the crown and
twisted hair of the Mahamudra form of the five Tathagatas,
and (having imagined) Vairocana and the other Buddhas on
the remaining crowns of their family deities (Locana, etc.),
one is successful, i.e. attains siddhi.
yathdrutam /
The Stage of Completion :
Having thus explained the delighting of Vajrasattva (for

the purpose of mundane siddhis) by the stages of four yogas
(but with no treatment of‘Victory of the Rite, which belongs
to Mahasadhana), now ( iddnim ) he alludes to the completion
44
YOGA OF THE GtHYASAMAJATAN1RA
of Mahavajradhara by the stages of six members in the L'ttara-

tantra (Chap. XVIII) of the Guhyasamdja :
By the distinction of‘shared’ and ‘superior',

one posits two kinds of service: the ‘shared’
one by the four lajras. the ‘superior* one by
members six in number.
(Of. XII, 64 :
One should create, everywhere and always, just with

the knowledge nectar of service. For this brings to
success the aim of mantra anti ot tattva, of all
mantras. )
As to the words, 'One should create just w ith the know¬

ledge nectar of service’, and so on, “One serves, having been
studying with desire for liberation (the highest siddhi)”, is
■
(the definition of) ‘service’ (*« «). And why (the desired
liberation) ? The (yuganaddha) body of deity completely
pure (of the two obscurations). That is to be created, i.c.
completed, just with the knowledge nectar of service, i.r. just
with the six-membered yoga. ‘Everywhere’ means in the
nature of alt. ‘Always’ means (those six) at all times and in
■
all good postures. The expression ‘just’ (« <*) is in the sense
of restriction (to the particular instance). ‘For this’ (e;o hi)
refers to the knowledge nectar, i.c. the six-membered yoga.
‘Of all mantras’ means ‘of all Tathagatas*. ‘Mantras’ arc
SARPA (‘serpent’) and so on (diamond muttering of both
neydrtha and nitartha mantias). ‘Reality* ( tattia ) means the
god reality (of ultimate yuganaddha). Their aim (at(ha) is
the fruit ( phala ). By accomplishing that (fruit, by means of
the six members) one accomplishes the reality aim for the
mantra. ‘For’, means whcicfoir in the sense of aim. For
the reason the six-membered yoga is that way, for that reason
the service is to create just with that (yoga).
Those six members, praiyaharu, etc. are set forth in the

Vltara-tantra of the Guhyasamdja:
When one does the service with the six-membered yoga,

he wins the supreme success. In no other way does the
supreme siddhi arise.
Praiyahara, dhviina, pranayama, dharana, anusmrli, and

samadhi, are the six members.
He expands upon those brief indications as follow s (Chap.
DOCUMENTS
45
XVIII, verses 141, AT. in Bagchi’s numbering):
The dwelling upon interiorization of the ten sense bases

on all levels severally directed toward the taking of desires,
is called Withdrawal (pratyahara). The five desires
are in condensation through the application to the five
Buddhas. Meditation (dhyana) is said to be imagmation.*1
And that Meditation is fivefold: Primary Conception
(vitarka)is the secret triad, from the enjoyment of which
comes Secondary Conception (vicara). The vicinity of — ^
joy is the third, and the sum of pleasure is the fourth.
One’s own consciousness with removal of the upsurge of

knowledge and knowables, is known as the fifth, with a
peace composed of all Buddhas and abiding in all desires.
Drawing forth the breath made of five knowledges and
which is the self-existence of the five elements, one should
imagine it in the formofa tiny ball on the tip of the lotus
nose.
The great jewel of five colors is said to be pranayama.

Having meditated on one’s own mantra in the heart, one
should place the prana in its bindu form.
When one’s sense organ and the jewel have ceased (to
operate) one should retain. (That is) called Retention
{dhdrana). When consciousness goes toward the diamond
of cessation, the apprehension of signs arises.
Those signs have been explained by the diamond of

enlightenment as fivefold. The first has the aspect of a
mirage, the second the aspect of smoke. The third has
the aspect of fire-flies, the fourth shines like a lamp, and
the fifth is a steady light like a cloudless sky.
One should radiate that firm thing by the vajra path into
the regions of the sky. Contemplating which, by Recol¬
lection ( anusmrti ) one should radiate those aspects. One
should know about Recollection that there is the
shining appearance, and that it (Recollection) is
engendered therein.
Having drawn together by the equipoise of insight and

means all states in condensation by the yoga of the small
ball, one should contemplate the image in their middle.
Instantly there is the consummation of knowledge called
‘Samadhi’.
46
YOGA OF THE Gl’HYASAMAJ.ATANTRA
Explaining in detail, he state* ilu* vcr<e ‘of the ten* and

so on. ‘Sense bases’ are the (personal) sense bases 'of eye,
etc.) and the objects (forms, c«c.) of the sense bases. The
‘intcriorization* (svavrtti) is of those ten sense bases which are
the sense objects and the senses grasping them, to wit : accord¬
ing to the engagement with the intrinsic featuie of the individual
apprehended object and apprehending organ, there isinteriori-
zation. The abiding in that, is the dwelling upon interiorizalion.
‘On all levels’ means according to the distinctions of inferior,
middling, and best (for each sense object , that is, ‘severally
directed toward the taking of desires*. ’Desites* according
to the passage, “They desire and ate attached to”, are form,
and soon (the five sense objects). ‘Seveiallv directed', i.c.
again and again, toward that taking, i.c. apperception, ot those
(sense objects) by the sense organs, their apperception is the
‘taking’. That is the detailed explanation of the initial member
(which is the arcane body of purification‘afterwards obtained*).
With the aim of purifying the Withdrawal, he states the
second member with the verse ‘the five' and so on. 'The five
desires’ are the sense bases of form, etc., i.c. the live) sense
objects. ‘In condensation’ means by unification of the sense
objects) with the sense organs. The ‘live Buddhas* arc the
eye and other sense organs. The right conjunction of them
(to their respective Buddha, Aksobhya, etc.■ is the conjunction
‘through the application to the five Buddhas’. As a result,
form and so on, arc (also) those five Buddhas. In that fashion
(of conjunction), whatever is the imagination purified (of
ordinary appearance) is the ‘Meditation’. That becomes
fivefold by the division into ‘Primary Conception’ and mi on.
The verse ‘Primary Conception’ and so on. has the setting
forth of its division. As to the verse ‘the secret tiiad' and <o
on, the sense organ, the sense object, and the knowledge based
on the sense, are <he secret triad. The rough imagination
that the five sense organs, the five) knowledges based on the
senses, and their sense objects have the nature of the five 1'atha-
gatas, is Primaty Conception. ’I he deliberating (in detail)
just on that, is Secondary Conception in location 'those two
arc also arcane body of purification ‘afietwards obtained ).
When one is so deliberating (with those two), what has the
characteristic of contentment through facing the entrance into
DOCUMENTS
47
reality. b the vicinity called Joy {fnlti). What lias attained

tlu* pleasure possessing the characteristic of body-cathartic
and so on the mind-cathartic), through adherence to reality,
that is the sum of pleasure {sttkha-samgraha). The one who
thus has applied himself repeatedly so as to go to the pinnacle
of excellence has the removal of upsurge of knowledge and
know.tides, when* the upsurge of knowledge is the six cvolvc-
ments as eye, and so on, of perception (vijridna ), and where
the upsurge in the knowahlcs is in (the six) from form up to
the dhaimadhdtu (which is the object of the sixth ‘sense’); and
where its removal is called ‘one’s own consciousness’ ( siacitta )
as the voidness in consciousness ofbolh apperceived and apper¬
ception,and as the one-poiutedness of mind with the characteri¬
stic of complete knowledge/ One’s own consciousness’ of such
fashion by reason of yoga is ‘with a peace composed of all
Buddhas'. The ‘Peace* is through pacifying the discursive
thought of the apperceived and so on. It is engendered (by
successive dissolution of the three voids) as light-only and
the ultimate that is one with universal void (the fourth void,
the Symbolic Clear Light . That is the fivefold division of
the second member.
Regarding the verse ‘five’ and so on, the downward breath

has the intrinsic nature of the live knowledges, beginning with
mirror-like, and is the individualizing laetor of earth (and the
other elements). Drawing it forth from the nostril of one’s
vajra. one should imagine it in the form of a tiny ball, i.c. in
the form of the bodhicitta-bindu. on the tip of the lotus-nose
(of the sacral place . Precisely that is the breath proceeding
upward with five colors, the nature of the five 1 athagatas.
Precisely that is the ‘gnat jewel' the ‘drop of light’ at the
nose of the face, and which b truted ‘Prana* is what
envigorates: ‘ayama’ b that b\ which it is spread lar:—thus
the explanation of pifinayama to be know n, because one should
recite dui ing day and night by way nt the own-nature <>1 making
that (praiiayama enter and n<* on. ‘Having meditated on
one’s own mantra drop in the heat i’, i.c. at (the nose of)
the loins 8-prialhd of one's heat t, ‘one should place' {nyaset)
‘the Prdna in its bmdu form’ the letter A, etc.) deposited, invio¬
lable (ak*ata). That is the third member.
Concerning the verse ‘has ceased’ and so on, the sense
48
YOGA OF THE CUIIYASAMAJATAN1 RA
bases arc one’s form, and so on (the five sense objects'*, as well
as the eye, and so on (the five sense organs . When the pairs
of sense bases have ceased, i.e. are not in evidence (as in death s
sequence), then when the jewel which is the basis of sense objects
and sense organs, and the jewel of consciousness (the manoii-
jHana , the sixth sense) have ceased along with ftrdnayama, i.e.
have set (astamgata). what one would retain, that is Retention.
Why that ? The True Limit (the gnosis of the ( Hear Light). The
verse states) ‘‘When consciousness goes toward the diamond
of cessation, the apprehension of signs arises.” The ‘diamond
of cessation’is the Clear Light (prabtuhrara). When conscious¬
ness has gone to it. it is born in it. The apprehension of
signs i.e. the manifestation of signs arises, i.e. occurs as prior
signs). Regarding the passage, the signs of the live realms
have been explained by the diamond of enlightenment the
details are as follows) : Through dissolution into water by
earth (in the performer’s body), the aspect of a mirage mani¬
fests—the first sign. Through the dissolution into fire on the
part of water, the aspect of smoke the second. Through
the dissolution into wind of fire, the aspect of tirc-Hirs—the
third. Through the going into the three lights on the part of the
subtle element (i.e. wind), the self-existence of the set of
lights like a lamp—the fourth. Through the (sequential)
dissolution of the (three) prakrti-\\i*\\\ (s), there is only the
Clear Light, a lasting light like a cloudless skv—the fifth.
Those five signs bring (consciousness) to Nirvana, as is
said in the Karmantaiibhtiga : “First, earth goes into water.
Water goes into fire. Fire passes into wind. Wind enters
perception (tijildna). Perception accompanied by Retention
in turn enters the Clear Light”. Then the verse ‘that linn thing’
fpurified in the Clear Light) anti so on (is as follows 1 : *Hy
the vajra path’, (expansion of buddhi to the whole sentient world •
i.e. by entering the Clear Light preceded bv the indispensable
(‘non-cvadible’, ahnghanna) five signs, one should radiate, i.e.
pervade with the form of the Dharmakaya, in the regions of
the sky, i.e. the worldly realms. That, explaining Retention,
is the fourth member.
‘Contemplating’, i.e. realizing in immediacy, that oneself

has in that way gone into the Clear Light, ‘by Recollection’
that previously one has reached the True Limit by means of
DOCUMENTS
49
the aspects of mirage atul so on, one should radiate, i.c. engender,
in a sequence which is precisely by those aspects (in reverse
order'. Immediately after that was told, one should know,
i.e. it should be known, about ‘Recollection’ that there is the
shining appearance ( f'ratibhdsa ), which is right understanding
(the gnosis of the Clear Light) and that therein is engendered
the fifth member. Recollection, not anywhere else.
Having unified ‘by the equipoise of insight and means’, i.e,

by the union of absolute and conventional truths, all states
(bhaia ), whether stationary (the receptacle worlds, bhajana~
loka ) or moving (the sentient life, sattvaloka ), in the form of
a tiny ball in location, i.c. in the form of Mahamudra (the
divine body), (then) one should contemplate, i.e. should know,
the image of Mahavajradhara with the nature of yuganaddha
in the middle of that, the stationary and the moving. In this
sequence, instantly, i.c. in a moment, there is the consumma¬
tion of knowledge, i.c. the consummation of the knowledge-
body (the yuganaddha body), called ‘Samadhi’, i.e.explained
to be the sixth member.
Besides, in the Sri-Mayajdfa, he clearly states the varieties

in the generation of deity :
Yoga should be known as of three kinds: with blessing

and with imagination (on the Stage of Generation), and
the yoga (on the Stage of Completion) of the citta image
which is extolled by the perfected Buddhas.
The ego of Blessing-only is said to be the yoga with

blessing. When there is the pure bodhicitta , and the
great source of mantra-seeds; and in sequence the per¬
fected image, imagined in the set of mudras—and when
that (image is imagined with the thought, “That is
imagined”, it is called the yoga with imagination.
Endowed with the best of all aspects, and having conso¬
lidated (the deities one should radiate (them). Instantly,
there is the consummation of knowledge, called the
completed yoga.
Also, in the I airocambhisatnbodhi he sets forth the devata-

yoga as of two kinds:
O master of the secret folk, there are two kinds of divine

form—pure and impure. I he pure kind is understood
form, free from all signs. The impure kind has all signs.
with color-and-shape forms. Now, two purposes go with

those two kinds of divine form. The kind with signs
generates siddhi with signs; the kind without signs, the
siddhi without signs. Besides, the holy Jinashave main¬
tained that when one is always stationed in the signless
kind, he can also bring to success (the siddhi) with signs.
Therefore, by all means one should take recourse to the
non-signed.
Samdhya bhasa/.
Part Two
INTRODUCTIONS
I INTRODUCTION TO BUDDHIST TANTRISM
A. Tantra (generalities)
What is an introduction to the ideas and practices of the

Buddhist Tantras ? Let me allude to the leading literature on
the subject. It is well known that S. B. Dasgupta wrote a
book entitled An Introduction to Tantric Buddhism (University
of Calcutta, 1930). This has certainly been a helpful book
for persons interested in the Buddhist Tantras. The Japanese
scholars appreciated it especially since the kinds of Tantras
, which had been continued in Japan were of a quite different
character from the works consulted by S. B. Dasgupta, and
those scholars were also interested in the philosophical tenets
which Dasgupta found in the tantric manuscripts which he
consulted. It must also be admitted that Dasgupta was himself
attracted to certain features of tlie manuscripts which he con¬
sulted, such as verses about the cakras (mystic centers) in the
body, and the special way in which the male and female are
regarded, suggestive of being compared with the Sakta move¬
ments that have been strong in Bengal. All the material which
he brought forward is indeed authoritative data from those
texts. Naturally he did not thoroughly represent the works
he consult*d; and besides they are replete with ritual details
that arc often tedious. Bcnoytosh Bhattaeharyya made giant
strides in opening up this subject by his various text editions;
and of course lie was well prepared to explain elements of the
system, which he did in various publications with sympathy.
I have frequently recommended to my students to consult G.

Tucci’s Tibdan Painted Scrolls for its Vajrayana chapter; but this
is an expensive work of restricted distribution. Then the late
Professor F. D. Lessing of Berkeley and myself collaborated
in the translation from 1 ibetan of the work now published
(1968) as Mkhas grub ije's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras.
In conversations 1 have freely admitted that this is not an intro¬
duction for Westerners as it was for Tibetans, even though it
52

presents the fundamentals of the four Tantra literature divisions
with a considerable and convenient fund of information not
hitherto available in any Western language. To answer the
question posed above, an introduction should dunv what the
Tantra is all about, the underlying suppositions, the leading
instructions, to the extent of recreating the Tantra as a viable
entity to be liked or disliked. The trouble with so much of the
present writing on the Tantra is that the reader is, or should be,
left with a feeling of distanev or bewilderment; he is neither
genuinely for or against it, because he does not understand it.
It is on this point that one can praise S. B. Dasgupta’s work:
he was not simply reproducing citations from texts; he tried
to explain as he went along. But lie could only explain when
his own background allowed him, namely when these Buddhist
Tantras overlapped the Hinduism with which he had a natural
knowledge through his birthright and training.
Now, what is the relation of the Buddhist Tantra to

Hinduism? This is hardly a onc-dircctional influence. In
fact, the Buddhist Tantra goes hack in many of its leading ideas
to the Brahmanism of the older Upanisads, and some of its
ritual (e.g. the homa, or burnt offering can be traced tn old
Vedic rites. In short, the Buddhist Tantra incorporated a
large amount of the mystical ideas and practices that have been
current in India from most ancient times, and preserved them
just as did the Hindu Tantra in its own way, while both systems
had mutual influence and their own deviations. The Buddhist
Tantra is deeply indebted to certain later Upanisads such as the
Yoga Upanisads, which were probably composed in the main
form about 1st century n. c. to the beginning of the Gupta period,
and which are a primitive kind of Hinduism. But these my¬
stical practices were so thoroughly integrated with Buddhist
dogma, that it is a most difficult matter to separate out the
various sources of the Buddhist Tantra.
Then, with regard to the chronology, it is not my original

idea to put the revealed Buddhist Tantras in the period of hh
and 5th centuries, a. d. (B. Bhattacharyya maintained such an
early date for the Cuhyasamdjatar.lra). This certainly requires
justification, and in the section ‘Introduction to the Guhvasa-
majatantra* I shall present sonic arguments in its case. for the
others I shall simply assert that there is no where else in Indian
INTRODUCTION TO BUDDHIST TANTRISM
53
chronology to put the bulk of them: exactly in the same period
which was the creative period of Hinduism and which cast the
mold for the forms of Indian religion in the subsequent centuries.
There are some notable exceptions just as there arc for Hin¬
duism; and in the case of the Buddhist Tantra certainly the
expanded halacakraiantta was composed much later. The
Tantrie revelations were kept in esoteric cults—for there must
have been a tension between the orthodox Buddhist sects and
these far-out tantrie groups. This strict secrecy was continued
up to around the 8th century when commentaries by named
persons appear. Those commentaries continue through the
12th century, more and more coloring the public forms of
Buddhism in its last Indian phase. However, we must look to
other reasons for the disappearance of Buddhism; after all, the
Hindus themselves are fond of Tantra and this has not caused
Hinduism to disappear !
These tantrie cults were introduced into China from India

during the T’ang Dynasty but did not take root until the 8th
century which saw the activity of the Indian masters Vajra-
bodhi and Amoghavajra {cf. Chou Yi-liang, Tantrism in
China). The kind of Buddhist Tantras which prevailed
in China gave rise to the two forms of Buddhist mysticism in
Japan—the form handed down by the Tendai school (in which
the Tantra is one of the topics of study) and that handed down
by the Shingon School in which the Tantra is the main thing).
Buddhist Tantrism called the Diamond Vehicle, was brought to
completion in Japan by Kobo Daishi, founder of the Shingon.
Japanese Tantrism is especially based on the works called the
Mahaiairocanastitra , also known as the Vairocanabhisambodhi
(which yields the ‘Cat bha-mandala’) and the Tatirasamgraha
(referred to in Japan as “Tit) of the Thunderbolt” which yields
the *Vajramandala ? . Forms of Tantra were also introduced
and once apparently flourished in what is now called Java,
where as Paul Mus has shown, the five levels of Borobudur
symbolise the five Buddhas. But more than anywhere else the
Buddhist Tantras came to flower in Tibet, starting with their
implantation in the 8th century by the teachers Padrnasambhava
and Samaraksiia. After the cessation of composition in Sanskri
of the commentaries, they continued in the Tibetan language
in an enormous literature.
54
YOOA OF THE GUHVASAMAJAT ANTRA

There are serious problems in studying the Tantric litera-
Because of the syncretic and deliberately mystifying
nature of such texts as the Guhyasamajalant>a s their sentences,
L although relatively simple in language complexity, continually

need the guru’s oral expansion and authoritative commentary.
The problem is not with the individual words, which indeed
mean what they ought; but rather in the fact that so many
words, besides meaning what they ought, are employed in a

range, of acceptable usages and then intend other senses in
arbitrary analogical systems. Again, these texts are essentially
' practical, are concerned with doing things such as rites. And
recipe books, even on the mundane level, arc notorious for
—>- requiring a teacher to tell the missing steps. Then, in the case
, of the Tantras. the gurus have taken vows not to reveal the
Tantras to the uninitiated (‘immature’) persons, and so the
: difficulty is compounded, even for those persons who are initia-
-—ted. The style of writing is conducive to corruptions in the

texts, certainly a fault in manuscripts of the Guhyasamdjatantra .
It is understandable that the numerous difficulties of the

literature might result in some unwarranted judgments. In
fact, eminent authorities of the Tantras during their India
period had disagreements with each other, and later investi¬
gators, such as the Tibetan gurus, decided that certain earlier
authorities had misunderstood this or that important point.
Therefore, it is right for us to be charitable in the event of
seeming misinterpretations; but still they should be pointed
out. In illustration, some questionable terms have been applied
to the Buddhist Tantras. (I) There is no expression ‘Dhyani
Buddhas’ in the texts; one finds instead the words Tathagata,
Buddha or Jina, as in the compound paucatathagata (‘five
Tathagatas’), (2) There is no terminology ‘right and left
hand paths’ in the Buddhist Tantras, and tio classification of
the Tantras on that basis, insofar as classification by the tan-
trics themselves is concerned. The standard classification is into
four classes, Kriya-tantra, Carya-tantra, Yoga-tantra, and
Anuttarayoga-tantra. Of course, some Westerners may feel
that certain Buddhist Tantras such as the Guhyasamdjatantra
teach practices which fit the category ol ‘left hand path’ and
there are statements in those Tantras which lend credence to
such a theory. We should observe that the Hindu Tantras
themselves use such terminology but in difVcrcnt ways, as shown
INTRODUCTION TO RUDDHIST TANTRISM
55
in Chintaharan Ghakravatti’s work, The Tantra: Studies on their

Religion and Literature. (3) The lexis do not use the word sakti
in ihr sense of the female consort power of a deity (of course,
the word / akti can l»e and is used in the other meaning of a
certain weapon). In the article, “Female Energy and Symbo¬
lism in the Buddhist Tantras” I gave the following list of generic
words used for the goddesses or females in the class of Anuttara-
yogalantra firajmt (‘insight'), yogini (‘female yogin’), vidya
(‘occult science’ or ‘know how’), devi (‘goddess’ or ‘queen’),
nuitr (‘mother’), nuihf.d (‘mother’ or‘letters’), ddkini (‘fairy’),
duii (‘female messenger’), Sari (‘heroine’), and mudra (‘seal’
or ‘gesture’). Of course, that use of the word Sakti for the
female consort of the Buddhist Tantras implies that this is
what the tantrics mean by their consort. Later on. various
scholars (S. 11. Dasgupta especially) protested against the use
of the word on the grounds that in these Buddhist Tantras,
the ‘ prajtia ’ (one of the most frequent of the words) is passive,
not active like the .Saiviiic <akti. That is one reason for my
writing that article “Female Energv. because when one goes
into the texts he will find for the usage of the word prajiid that
in the ordinary person who docs not control his mind this
is indeed a passive function, while the aim of the Buddhist
praxis is to arouse the fiery potentiality of this function. How
is it aroused ? The Mahdvairocanasutra has a celebrated verse
about this matter, and which is correlated with mantra steps
in the Shingoit sect. Fortunately it is in Sanskrit, as cited in
Kamalavila’s (First■ Ilfuivandkrama (G. Tucci’s Minor Buddhist
Texts, Part II, p. 1 h(> : vairocanabhisambodhau coktam/tad
etat sarvajnajtiannm katunamfdum bodhicittahctukam upuya-
paiyavasfmarn in / “And it is said in the Vairocanabhisambodhi :
‘/Master of secret folk . The omniscient knowledge has
Compassion for a root, lias the Mind of Enlightenment fora
motive, and has ihe Means for a finality’.” In that passage
‘omniscient knowledge* is equivalent to the Buddha’s Perfection
of Insight ( firajhdfait ami td ). Compassion provides this Insight
with a root in th>’ phenomenal world. The Mind of Enlighten¬
ment provides this Insight with a motive, the vow as cause.
The Means provides (his Insight with a finality, its fulfilment.
At the first two levels, the Insight is still passive; it is with the
Means that it appeal> in full flowering, its true active form.
56
YOGA OF THE Gl'HYASAMAJATANTRA
■s
<
When Insight (prajfid ) is combined with the Means ( updya),

it is no longer passive. Therefore, while it is not strictly correct
to call Prajna a Sakti, the persons who applied this expression—
and Benoytosh Bhattacharyya and Giuseppe Tucci had read
widely in both Hindu and Buddhist Tantras—were closer to the
truth than those who insist on the ‘passive 5 interpretation.
This general problem of explaining the Tantras is so crucial

that it is germane to dwell upon it some more. Fortunately,
there is a master who expressed himself on this very point, the
V~"8th century teacher Lilavajra, the teacher of Buddhasrijnana
, who heads one of the two lineages of Guhyasamaja interpre¬
tation. Lilavajra has written a commentary on the $ri-guhya-
garbha-mahdtantrardja (the fikd-ndma) (PTT, Vol. 82, pp. 248
and 249). He soon begins a section ‘Method of Explaining
the Tantra 5 , which he says has three aims, in the sense of aims
for the superior, intermediate, and inferior among candidates
t jUid sense organs. In the course of explaining for the aim of

the superior candidate or sense organ, he includes that which
is related to the form of meaning, which “has certainty about the
reality of the guhyagarbha” {gsah baht sniri po de kho na hid nes
paho) t regarding the chief words in the title of the Tantra on
which he is commenting. Then he states that there are three
kinds of guhya and three kinds of garbha. The three of guhya
(‘secret’)) are (I) of the self existent {rati bzhin=*svabhava), (2)
pregnant (sbas pa^garbhin), and (3) profound ( gab pa*=gam-
bhira). In explanation of the first kind, that of the self existent,
he cites the text:
Aho ! The dharma which is the utmost secret is the in¬

trinsic secret (behind) diverse manifestation, highly
secret through self existence; than which there is nothing
more secret !
In summary of his commentary on this verse, it turns out

that the utmost secret is the non-dual, self-originated Wisdom
(ji?5na), an effortless fount of good qualities while its own aspect
is incognizable. It is an element located in the stream of
consciousness (the samtdna or samtati ), an incessant fountain
of entities self appearing, but this clement is obscured by dis¬
cursive thought; it is both cause and effect as both conscious¬
ness and the imagined objective domain; there is nothing
more central, and it appears through introspection {svasamve-
57
dana ) but by reason of obscurations, men have sought it else- \

where. (This is certainly the ‘embryo of the Tathagata* 1
theory from one stream of non-tantric Buddhism). The second j
kind of secret is the ‘pregnant’, so called because it is like the i
woman impregnated by another and with the embryo growing i
in privacy. This secret is deliberately given or withheld by ,
the guru, and concerns the secret practice of the Tantra. Lila-
vajra says, “If one practices by praxis according to the word
(of the Tantra) but lacks the mantra- precepts, this is a grievous
fault” (shags kyi man hag mod pa dah/sgra bzhin spyod pa
mams kyis spyad na/în tu ties pa che bas/ ). The third kind,~T
the profound, is the perfect meaning of the Tantra ( rgyud kyi ■
don phun sum (sltogs pa), and (his is conferred by oneself through j
the two pramanas. He must mean Direct Perception (pratyak$a\_ 1
and Inference ( anumana ). In summary of the three kinds of 1
secret, the first of the self-existent is nature’s secret, the second of 1
‘pregnant’ is conferred by another, the third of profound is—1
conferred by oneself. When wc think over Lilavajra’s precepts, it
strikes us that it is easy to be irrelevant about the Buddhist
Tantra by treating as doctrine what in fact is a practice: as far,--'''
as human secrecy is concerned, in Tantrism there is only ‘pre- ^.
gnant’ practice and profound doctrine. And that it is easy to go ,
wrong by interpreting the literal words of the Tantra as the
practice, while lacking the precepts of the guru which clarify
what the practice should be. I have been told that this point is
also stressed in the Shingon sect of Japan, and so this is a mat¬
ter independent of whether the passage in question has ‘sexual’
symbolism. Lately some persons have found only a sexo-yogic
topic to set forth as characteristic of the Anuttarayoga-tantra,
but Lilavajra informs us that the most important issue and aim
of the Tantras is that element hidden in the stream of conscious¬
ness, obscured by discursive thought (which plagues us all).
That man becomes interested in finding the element hidden

in the stream of consciousness is probably the reason for the
non-tantric teaching that Buddhahood is attainable only
through a human body, which is a teaching continued in the
Tantras (Shags rim , f. 460a-2):
/clri med hod las/ skye ba hdi la satis rgyas hid kyi hbras
bu rab tu sler ba rgyud kyi rgyal poho/lha la sogs pa
hgro ba hiahi skye ba la ni ma yin no/zhes dan/It says
58
yoga of the guhyasamajatantra
in the Vimalaprabhd : ‘The phrase “grants the Buddha-

hood fruit in this life” means—the King of Tantras grants
the Buddhahnod fruit in this Birth, which is a human
birth; not in the birth which is one of the five (other)
destinies (â//), god and the like,’
B, Defini lions and varieties of 7 an has
The way of the Tantras is especially called the \ ajrayatia

(‘Diamond Vehicle’) or the Mantray.ina (‘Mantra Vehicle i.
Tsot'i-kha-pa in his Snags tiiti cites the Vimalaprabhd : “ 1 he
diamond ( vajra ) is the great ‘insplittable’ and "unbreakable ;

and the Great Vehicle (mahdydna ) which is precisely so, is the
Vajrayana : it combines the Mantra-way and the Prajfia-
paratnita-way, which arc (respectively the ‘effect’ (or ‘fruit )
and the ‘cause’ ’’ ( / rclo rje ni mi phvetl pa daii mi chod pa
chen po yin la de Aid theg pa chen po yin pa ni rdo rje iheg
pa stc/ shags kyi tshul dan pha rol Hi pliyiu pahi ishtil libras
bu dan rgyuhi bdag hid geig tu luIres par gyur pa ho '. Hence
in Tsoh-kha-pa’s reform, non-tantric Buddhism (pdrarmtd-
ydna) must be mastered in preparation for the Tamtas.
Concerning the expression ‘Mantrayana’, the standard

explanation is that in the Guhyasamdjatantta, Chap. Will,
p. 156 (two theoretical corrections with asterisks): 1 he theore¬
tical corrections were made bv Professor R,»sik Vihari |odu and
myself putting our beads together on this when he w as teaching
at Columbia University. Pall 1969. Compare S. Bagi hi Gtthasa-
mdjatantra, XVIII, 70A, and Vukei Matsunaga, “The Guhuisa-
mijatantra : A New Critical Kdition," XVIII, JOB.
pratityotpad\atc \ad yad indnjair vif avoir rnanah /

tanmano * man - i ttk In d ta m * tiakdram trdnandrthatah If
lokd<dravini:muktam yad uklam sannyasambaram
palanam sarvaiajtais tu manhacayeti kalhyate jl
Whatsoever mind arises in dependence on sense organs
and sense objects, that mind is explained as the 'man',
the ‘ tra * in the meaning of (its) salvation.
Whatever pledge and vow said to be free from worldly

conduct has protection by all the vajras, that i- explained
as the mantra practice.
Nagarjuni’s AUdJaia-patala-vistara-iydkhyd (PTT. Vol. 60.

p. 9-4, 5) explains the ‘sense organs’ and ‘sense objects' as
59
union of up ay a and prajfta; and explains the words ‘free from

worldly conduct’ as ‘leaving off discursive thought about the
ordinary body, and taking on the contemplation of the divine
body’ (tha mal pahi lus rnam par nog pa dan bral ba lhahi
skur bsgom pa blahs nas). He docs not comment on the words
‘all the vajras ’. In this literature, the multiplicity of vajras
refers to the five Tathagalas or Buddhas.
Besides, various Tantras may define the word ‘Vajrayana*

in a way that characterizes the special subject matter of that
Tantra, So wc arc led to understand Guhyasamajatantra,
Chapter XVIII, p. 154:
moho dvesas talhd rdgah sada vajrc ratihsthitd /

upayas tena buddhdndm vajraydnam iti smrtamll
Delusion, hatred, and lust arc always the repose lying
in the vajra.
Whereby the means of the Buddhas is called Vajrayana

(‘Diamond Vehicle’).
That verse presumably refers back to Chapter VIII, verse 2:

rdgadvefamohavajra i>ajraydnapradc$aka(
dkdiadhdtukalpdgra ghosa piijdm jindlayaf /
May Thou, the diamond of lust, hatred, and delusion,

who reveals the Vajrayana;
Thou, the best like the sky, the womb of the Tathagatas—
proclaim the worship ( puja):
Candraklrti’s Pradipoddyotana, and Mchan hgrel (PTT.

Vol. 158, p. 62-1,2) first explain the passage according to the
ncydrtha comment with the usual meanings of the words (*=»the
literal translation), and then go on to the nitartha comment
as follows : ‘lust’ is means ( upaya ), the ‘spread of light’ and its
40 prakrtis; ‘hatred’ is insight {prajiid}, the ‘light’ and its 33
prakrtis; ‘delusion’ is nescience {avidyd), the ‘culmination of j
light’ and its 7 prakrtis ; ‘worship’ is the yuganaddha with non¬
dual knowledge. That terminology of the nitartha comment j
will be explained in later sections.
As has been mentioned, the usual classification of the

Buddhist tantra works is into four classes cailed K.riva-tantra,
Carya-tantra, Yoga-tantra, and Anuttaravoga-tantra. This
is the classification of the main corpus of Tantras translated,
into Tibetan and included in the collection called the Xanjur.
The orthodox way of explaining this classification is either in
€0
terms of the candidates or in terms of the deities. Mkhas grub

rjt's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras (p. 219) presents the
candidate differentiation:
Now, there are two methods laid down in the four Tantra
divisions, namely, outer action{* bdhya-kriya), such as bathing,
cleaning, etc.; and inner yoga (* adhyatma-yoga ). The
Kriya Tantra was expressed for subduing the candidates
(oinrya) who delight in outer action, while the Cary a Tantra
was expressed for subduing the candidates who delight
in practicing outer action and inner yoga in equal measure.
The Yoga Tantra was expressed lor subduing the candi¬
dates who delight in theôâ of inner samddhi with minimal
outer ritual, while the Anuttara Yoga Tantra is the in¬
comparable Tantra for subduing the candidates who
delight in inner-yoga.
Mkhas grub rjc alludes to the deity differentiation as the ‘four

Passion Families’ (pp. 168-169), detailed in the notes thereto
on the basis of the Shags rim :
The mutual attraction of Insight (prajhd) and the Means
(updya) finds :
some deities laughing — Kriya Tantra;
some deities gazing — Carya Tantra;
some deities embracing — Yoga Tantra;
^ some deities in coition — Anuttara Tantra.
Tsoh-kha-pa emphasizes that this is not a description of the

candidates of these Tantra divisions;...
Besides, it can be speculated that the fourfold grouping of

Tantras (there were earlier groupings of six or more) is made
with an eye to the four Siddhantas. In later Indian Buddhism,
it was standard to divide up Buddhist metaphysics into four
viewpoints, called Siddhanta, that of the Vaibhasikas, Sautra-
ntikas, Yogacarins, and the Madhyamikas. That could be
the implication of Pandit Smrti’s commentary called Vajraii-
44rana~ndma-dhdrani-vrtti (Tohoku no. 2684) to the effect that
four Tantras constitute four kinds of washing by four kinds
^ of persons, namely, Sravakas, Pratyckabuddhas, Yogacarins,
ând Madhyamikas, in the given order. In M.thavana termi¬
nology, the Sravakas and Pratyckabuddhas constitute the Hina*
yina saints, while Yogacarins and Madhyamikas are followers
of the two main philosophical Mahayana schools constituting
61
the last two Siddhantas. Also the first two Siddhantas, those
of the Vaibhasika and the Sautrantika, are classified as Hina-
yana, with the Sautrantika considered preparatory for the rise
of Mahayana viewpoints. The relation set up bv Pandit Smrti
(al so called Smrtijhanaklrti) has an artificial tone, at best is an
ovcrgencralization, and at the same time is suggestive.
In the Anuttarayoga-tantra, there is also a principal division -

into Father Tantras, such as the Guhyasamdjatantra ; and
Mother Tantras, such as the $ri-Cakrasami'ara, a division which^_
Mkhas-grub-rje explains following Tson-kh-pa. In brief, a
Father Tantra emphasizes the ‘Means’ side of the ‘means-
insight’ union, and so deals especially with the topics so promi¬
nent in the present work of evoking the three lights followed by
the Clear Light, and of introducing the Illusory Body into the
Clear Light. A Mother Tantra puts emphasis on the ‘Insight’
side of the ‘means-insight’ union, and so treats the indissoluble
bliss and void; in fact, insofar as material dealing with this
topic is included in the present work, it was derived from the
Mother Tantra literature. Besides, the Guhyasamdja-tantra irj
considered the chief Tantra of the Father class, as is the .$rt- 1
Cakrasamvara of the Mother class, for the reason that the litera- '
ture and cult for the two Tantras is the most extensive anddeve-
loped among the Tantras found in the Kanjur and Tanjur.
The Guhyasamajatantra (Chap. XVIII, 153, 6-7) also has

its own definition and classification of tantra: “‘Tantra’ is
explained as ‘continuous series’ ( prabandha ). That continuous ;
series is threefold through the division— adhdra, prakrti , and !
asanihdryn.” The succeeding verse explains that prakrti is the
hetu, asamharya is the phala, and adhdra is the updya. According
to Mkhas-grub-rje, the Tantra of Cause (hetu) is the chief of
candidates for the high goal of the Tantra. The Tantra of
Means (updya) is the Tantra of Path. The Tantra of Fruit
(phala) is the rank of Vajradhara. Those explanations clarify
the definition of ‘Tantra* as ‘continuous series’. Apparently
what is meant is that the Tantra shows the continuous progress
of a superior candidate ("I antra of Cause) along the Tantric
Path (Tantra of Means) to the high goal of Vajradhara (Tantra
of Fruit). Nagarjuna’s .1 c tddasa-patala-vistara-vydkhyd (PTT,
Vol. 60, p. 6-1) sets forth on the same basis three kinds of
Vajradhara, causal Vajradhara, fruitional Vajradhara, and
62
YOGA OF THE GUI!Y AS A M A J AT AN TR A
Vajradhara of the means. The causal Vajradh.ua is Maha-

vajradhara, the ddinatha. The fniitional Vajradhara is Akso-
bhya and the other Tathagatas. The Vajr.ulharu of the means
is of three kinds, guarding of the place, guarding of oneself, and
guarding of yoga. Guarding of the place is the frightening
away of the demons through emanation of the ten Krodha
deities. Guarding of oneself is the contemplation ol only
Paramartha-satya (supreme truth), by recollecting such mantras
as “Om Sunyata..”. Guarding of yoga is of two kinds; the
collection of merit (arousing compassion and contemplating
the four Brahma-vihara-s) and the collection ol knowledge
(contemplation of the four doors to liberation).
C. Somefundamnitals of thi 7 antra r
Here wc shall consider four fundamentals: analogical

thinking, the subtle body, the three worlds, and initiation by
the hierophant.
The first fundamental is analogical thinking : "As with¬

out, so within” (yathd bahyarn tathii 'dhyatmam iti). The Sanskrit
is from Abhayakaragupta’s .Xitpannayogdrali (ed. by B. Bliatta-
charyya, p. 4), where it applies to the man dal a of the ‘Stage of
Generation’ ( utpatti-krama ). See Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals ..,
Index under i mandala y : the self existent mandala is in the mind,
and the reflected image mandala is drawn outside in conformity.
The outer rite must conform to the inner rite, and lice msa.
One must clear defiled thoughts from a space within the mind
-4 and erect the meditative image in this space. In the external
mandala-rltc, first one drives away the evil spii its from the selec¬
ted area; in this consecrated space one w ill draw the mandala . In
Mkhas-grub-rjc’s work, probably the most intricate set of
analogies is found in the clnptcr on the Yoga tantra. In the
present work, the most remarkable analogies aie those in the
treatment of the 'hundred lineages’ under the commentary of
the Bhagavan Sarva’ and ‘Tathagata’ verses in Part Three,
But the analogies are ubiquitous in the Taniras. The most
important analogy of all is that of alliliation: the candidate
should affiliate his body, speech, anil mind with the Body,
Speech, and Mind of the Buddha, called the three mysteries.
According to Mkhas grub rje, it is this affiliation which estab-
INTRODUCTION TO HUDDHIST TANTRISM
63
lishes the* superiority oi' the Diamond Vehicle (the Tantras)

over noil-tannic Buddhism. One affiliates his body by gesture
(mudnV », his speech by incantation (mantra) and his mind by
deep concentration (samddhi). Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals...
states, ‘In the Kriya and Carya (Tantras) one intensely con-
tempi.lies the body as Great Seal (tnahdmudrd) , speech as In¬
cantation \.mantra) y and mind as Reality ( tatlia ).” This is
the ‘Quick Bath’ because all avenues of the being are operating
for a common goal : the body, speech, and mind arc not working
at cross purposes.
In stu b a case, we might say of hotly, speech, and mind,
what .\rya-Sura wrote in his Jdtaka-mdld in description of King
£ibi (but in his case meaning the three types, kdma, artha , and
dlt arm a ).
' tasmims trivarganuguna gundughdh samharsayogdd iva

samnii’i\tdhj
uimastarufni vibabhur na cdsu virodhasamkôbhavipannaio -

bhdhU
In him all forms having multitudes of virtues consistent

with the three types appeared with common residence
as though from merger of rivalries, and they had no loss
of brilliance due to opposition and commotion.
In Hinduism it is believed that those three types when in har¬

mony yield the fourth one, liberation (mokfa).
To understand any system of Buddhist Tantra one must

lind out the basic correspondence system or systems and carry
through accordingly, fourfold correspondences are especially
prevalent in the Yoga-tantra. Among Anuttarayoga-iantras,
the (•uh\a\amajatantra legularly employs fivefold corresponden¬
ces bas;<l on the live Buddhas, the five knowledges, the five
personality aggtegates. .md so on. The h'dlacakra-laulra uses
sixfold correspondent rs, wherein the tit incuts are increased to
six by addition of ‘knowledge element’ to the five of earth, water,
lire, wind, and spate. Sevenfold correspondences can be
noticed in comment.u ies of the £ri-Cakrasamvara~tantra. An
example espe-t i.illy priiinem to the present work is the Guhya-
samaja set of lour sups u\ sad ham: or spiritual culture. Once
the praxis is established in four steps, then some other principal
entities are put in coi i espondence; thus the four goddesses are
identified with the four su ps This very principle is employed
64
in the present work for grouping the forty verses which expand
the niddna of the Guhyasamajatantra.
Is there a particular philosophical position of Buddhism

that fits this kind of analogical thinking? Mkhas-grub-rje
reports the thesis of the school founded by his teacher Tson-
kha-pa that the Prasangika Madhyamika underlies all four
classes of Tantra. This appears to stem from the acceptance
fr of all four pramdnas by the non-tantric Candrakfrti in his Fra -
sannapadd commentary on the Miila-madhyamaka-karika. There
(in the commentary on the first chapter) Candrakirti says,
in agreement with the Hindu Naiyayikas, that the four sources
("of knowledge f pramana) provide a foundation for the knowledge
\ of worldly objects. Therefore, this Buddhist school accepts
Lupamdna (analogy) as an independent source of knowledge.
However, the epistemology of this school may differ from that
of the Naiyayikas. Thus Candrakirti (text, p. 75) goes on to
modify his acceptance of the pramdnas by insisting on their
relativity,or mutual dependence: “There being the cognitions
(pramana ), there are the cognizable objects [pramtyartha) : and
there being the cognizable objects, there are the cognitions.
But, indeed, there is no intrinsic-nature kind of establishment
for either the cognition or the cognizable object” (satsu pram a-
nesu prameyarthah/ satsu prameyesv arthesu pramanani/na
tu khalu svabhaviki pramanaprameyayoh siddhir iti. .). In
p Contrast, Asanga (as I pointed out in “The Rules of Debate
According to Asanga”) accepts only three pramdnas , direct per¬
ception, inference, and testimony of authoritative persons. This
appears to be consistent with Asaiiga’s Yogacara idealism,
wherein the subjective consciousness has the upper hand over
the objective domain. Because idealist philosophy does not
admit an equal status of subject-object, it docs not agree with
the precept “As without, so within” , and so does not admit
f analogy as an independent source of knowledge. The Buddhist
\ logicians, as well known, accept only two pramdnas> direct percep¬
tion and inference.
A fundamental metaphysical postulate is that of the subtle

cody, which of course is a basic idea of the Hindu systems
as well. Tson-kha-pa explains in his commentary on the
Paficakrama (PTT, Vol. 159, p. 41-5) that there arc two kinds
. of 'mind-only bodies’ ( sans tsam gyi lus, cittamdlra-deha) , namely
65
the body of‘states’ (gnas skabs, avast ha) and the‘innate body*
(guug ma fulfil lus % nija-deha). The first of these is the ‘body of
maturation' (ripdkakdya) formed during the ten states (avasthd),
which are the lunar months of intrauterine life, and which is
born, matures, and dies. The second of these is the body
formed of winds and mind only, the ‘mind only’ including no
five outer-sense based perception (vijiidna) and the ‘winds’
including only the basic five winds (prana, etc.) and not the
secondary five (ndga, etc.). According to Mkhas grub rjt's
Fundamentals. ., the ‘uncommon means body’ (asddharana-upd- j
yadeha ), a kind of subtle body, is the basis for the tantricmachi- \
nations; this body seems to be a development of the innate bodyJ
( nija-deha). The Tan Iras believe that by praxis involving
mystic winds and mental muttering, this innate body gradually
becomes defined as separate though within the coarse body.
A more advanced stage is when this body can appear separately"

as an illusory body and be made to enter an ultimate state
called the Clear Light, thus returning to a condition from which
it had fallen, and which is anterior to the male-female divisions
As this innate body is strengthened, first it brings out exceed¬
ing acuity of one or more senses. The supernormal sharpness
of smell is a topic in the celebrated Lotus Sutra ( Saddharma -
Putidarika ) chapter XVIII on advantages of a religious preacher.
Xon-tantric Buddhism speaks of six supernormal faculties
(abhijvd), while taturic Buddhism adds more, for example, the
eight siddhis.
The remarkable occult physiology of the tantric books is

really based on their theories of this subtle body. This body
is said to have 72.000 ‘veins’ (widi), of which three arc the
chief ones located itt the position of the backbone. These
three, the chief conduits of the ‘winds', are differently named
in the Hindu and Buddhist Tantras:
right
middle
left
Hindu
Pi < tga la
Su Minina
Ida
Buddhist
TCwnna
A\ adhuti
L.ilana
Br<idrv.
the Buddhbi T
■’ aipri nnpo e on
those three
channels four catn 7* MiggiMii.g he\\ fi>ni-fold analogies may

■
be superimposed on tin tlire* -fold mio ,. However. iber,- -»» -
66
VOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJ ATANTK A
two systems, earlier and later. One primary group of four

caJcras, important for what is called the ‘Stage ol Completion
(sampanna-krama) and having affinities with L’panisudic
teachings, corresponds to four of the Hindu system as follows:
head neck heart navel
Hindu Ajfia Vbuddha Anahata Manipuia
Buddhist Mahasukha Sambhoga Dhaitna N inn ana
Here I may cite my article ‘‘Female Energy and Symbolism

in the Buddhist Tantras” for observations stemming from
Tson-kha-pa’s commentary on the Guhvasamaja Explanatory
Tantra Caturdevipariprcchd :
The primacy in this system of four cobras for physiologi¬

cal manipulation in ascetic practices may well go back
to the old Upanisadic theories of the four states of con¬
sciousness. The Brahmopaniâd, one of the Samnyasa
Upanisads, later than the early Upauisads but preceding
the Tantric literature as we now have it, leaches that the
Purusa has those four states when dwelling in the four
places, namely, waking state in the navel, slee p ( i.e.
dream) in the neck, dreamless sleep in the heart, and the
fourth, Turiya, in the head. In agreement, Tsoh-kha-pa
writes : ‘When one has gone to sleep, there is both
dream and absence of dream. At the time of deep sleep
without dream the white and red elements of the bodhi-
citta, which is the basis of mind, stay in the heart, so
mind is held in the heart. At the time of dreaming,
those two elements stay in the neek, so mind is held in
the neck. At the time when one is not sleeping, they
stay at the navel, so mind is held there. When the male
and female unite, those two stay in the head.
The later system of four cakras is correlated with the theory

of four elements deified as goddesses, and is important for the
practice during the ‘Stage of Generation’ ( utpatti-krama).
Following the indications of the .Manimdld commentary on
Nagarjuna’s Padcakrama (PTT, Vol. 62, p. 178-2) and the
Sarvarahasya-mma-tanlrardja , verses 37-39 (PTT, Vol. 5), the
fire-disk at the throat (or neck) is shaped like a bow; the water-
INTRODUCTION TO Bl’DDIIIST TANTRISM
67
disk at tlit' heart is circular in shape; the wind-disk at the navel

is triangular; and the earth-disk in the sacral place is square.
These are also the shapes of the four altars for rites of burnt
olfcring (homa) aimed at certain mundane siddhis (see niddna
verse If)), and they are also the shapes of the four continents
of Puranie mythology (compare the printed geometrical forms
in the edition of the (luhyasamdja , Chap. XV). The elements
supply the names for these cakras (frequently mnhendra for
earth, and vdrurta for water). According to the Snags rim
(Peking hloekprint, 44la-5).
Ik ha sbyot la* I fair hid gah dan rlnh dan nil

Id hah chni dah ni h'ltiti chuj f hkhor lor sems
kyi knn sfyod />aj l steh dah hos dah btah hog hgrof
zhes gsuhs pas me steh dah rluh bsegs dah sa thad kar
dah chu hog hi hgroho /
It says in the Samputa : ‘Fire, wind, earth ( mahnidra) t

and water, are each the executors of consciousness in
a (given) cakra , and move (respectively) upwards, at
acute angles, forward, anti downwards.’ This means
that the fire (vibration' moves upwards; the wind, at
acute angles to the wave (tiryak ); the earth, straight
forward; and the water, downwards.
The earth disk is equivalent to the Hindu Muladhdra-cakra,

said to lie below the root of the sex organs and above the anus.
The series is increased in the Hindu Tantras with Sahasrara
at the crown of the head, where Buddhism places the Buddha’s
usnifa (sometimes said to be outside the body); and with Sva-
dhis(hana at the root of the penis, called in some Buddhist
Tantras the ‘tip of the gem* (*many-agra).
Then we must take for granted that there are three worlds
full of gods and demons. In the (luhyasamiijatantra, Chap.
IV, p. 17, there is the line atha vajradharah his hi Irilokas tu (ridha•
tukah , on which Pradipoddyotana (Mchan hgrel edition, P IT.,
Vol. 158, p. 38.5) explains triloka as being sa hog ( pdtala ), sa
steh ( bhttmi ), and ml ho ris ( svarga ); and explains tridhiituka as
being the ‘realm of desire’ ( kdmadhdlu ), etc. The correspondences
can be tabulated as follows:
68
Old Vedie
words
Hindu period
Tibetan
Possibly the
Buddhist three
Dyaus
Svarga
sa bla = mtho
ris (‘superior
world’)
‘formless
realm (arupa
dhatu)
Antariksa
Bhumi
sa steh (‘above
the earth’)
‘realm of form
(rupa dhatu)
Prthiv!
Patala
sa hog ('earth
and below’)
‘realm of desire’
(kamadhalu)
The Vedic mantras of the three worlds are also employed
in the Buddhist Tantras, as in this passage of Tsoh-kha-pa’s

Shagsrim (f. 31 lb.4) :
jbhur rti rluh gi dkyit hkhoi la sogs pa fikhor dan bcas

pahi sa bog gojbhuvah tii sa steh gi hjig rten nojsvah
zhes pa ni mtho ris te srid rise mlhar thug pa hoi.
Bhur is the underworld accompanied by the circles of

the wind disk ( vayu-mandala ) and so forth. Bhurah is
the ‘perishable receptacle’ (loka) of 'above the earth’.
Svah is the ultimate pinnacle of existence, the superior
world.
The females or goddesses in terms of the three worlds are

especially treated in the Sri-Cakrasamara-tantra and its com¬
mentaries. How does one come in contact with any of those
gods or goddesses ? Mircea Eliade {Toga : Immortality and
Freedom , p. 208) cites the proverb ‘a non-god docs not honor
a god* ( nadevo deram arcayet). That means that one must
awaken the senses of that particular realm and learn the rules.
The child cannot make his way in the human world without
human senses and without learning the human rules. Thus
first one generates oneself into deity (‘selfgcneration’ in Mkhas-
grub rje’s work).
The last of these fundamentals is the topic of initiation

(abhiftka ) meant to confer power, explained as maturing the
stream of consciousness. The power, including the permission
to continue that tantric lineage, is conferred bv the hierophant
(vajracarya). The Pradipoddvotana on Chapter XY11 {Mchan
bgrdj p. 157-4' contains this passage :
I tatha cdha / mahdma/uhdnaratnatdjasutu jj bhagavdn

vajiapdnih I uddtydnapatrate nifatttiahfsarvdmS ea iajia-
ydnaiikfitan dmanUayamdsaU finuta nikhilaiajtawna -
69
sikfitdh tathdgatam parinirvrtaiji na pasyatifiastdram api

tu vajrdcdryo vajragmuh j so’yatfi Sdsta bhavatitij
And it is also said in the Mahdmahdydnaratnardjasutra:
The Lord Vajrapani was seated on the mountain of
Oddiyana, and addressed all the trainees of the Vajra-
yana : “All you trainees in the Vaj ray ana, listen! When
one does not see the Teacher, the Tathagata entered into
Pnrinirvana, then the hierophant, the diamond guru,
will serve as his teacher.”
Various passages stress that one should look upon the hiero¬
phant as upon the Buddha, to disregard his faults and notice
only his virtues, in that way, he is able to play the role of master
for the disciple.
Initiations are conferred in mandalas and are accompanied

by vows (samara] and pledges (samaya). The ‘Stage of
Generation’ has the five vidyd initiations as described in Mkhas-
grub rje’s work. They arc called the ‘vidyd’ because they
are adversaries for the five forms of ‘ avidyd ’ (nescience), also
because they are in reality conferred by the goddess consorts
of the five Buddhas. Mkhas grub rjc points out that although
the ‘preceptor* and the ‘hierophant’ lift up the flask (all five
rites are accompanied with ‘sprinkling’), in fact the goddesses
Locana and soon hold the flask and conduct the initiation. In
the transition to the Stage of Completion, there is the hiero¬
phant’s initiation. Then there are three initiations proper to
the Stage of Completion, the Secret Initiation, the Insight
Knowledge Initiation, and the ‘Fourth’. The initiating goddess
is sometimes called the Seal’ mudra). The notes to Mkhas
grub rje cite the verse: ‘‘The seal pledge is explained as solidi¬
fying the ‘body made of mind* (manomayakdya ); because it
solidifies all the body, it is called a ‘seal’ (mudra).” The fact
that in each instance the goddess is imagined as the initiator,
or is the female element behind the scenes, indicates the initia¬
tions as the step-wise progress in the solidification of the innate
body of the tantras which non-tantric Buddhism calls the ‘body
made of mind’, meaning the progress of that body to the pregc-
netic androgyne state and then to the Clear Light.
D. 11 'iuds and mantras
A fundamental of the Buddhist Tantras that deserves
70
YOGA OF THE GIT!YASAMAJATANT RA
special treatment is the practice ol mantras and machinations

with winds, Such practices are very ancient in India, certainly
of Vedic character. The doctrine ol lile winds is lirst worked
out in the old Upanisads. The basic live winds are mentioned
in Chdndogya Up. y III. 13 and V. 19, in the order pidna, vydna,
apart a. samdrut , udJria . The winds are the 'breaths rest thing
from ‘water’, as in the well-known 'Throe-fold development’
discussion of the Chdndogya; this is made dear in Brhaddranyaka
Up. y 1.5.3. The functions ascribed to these winds continued
to be speculated upon, and so came into the Buddhist Tantras
in the theory of breath manipulation through yoga practice.
Also a theory of five subsidiary winds developed, clarified later
in Tht Toga Upanisads; in the Buddhist Tantras these latter live
arc accorded the function of relating external sensory objects
to the five sense organs, while the former five are attributed
various internal functions. When ten breaths (prana) are
mentioned in Brhaddranyaka Up ., III. 9.4, Vedantic coinmentaiial
tradition takes them to be the ten sensory and motor organs
(jiidnakarmmdriydni ), thus explaining away the palpable refe¬
rence to winds: but we can infer the real meaning to be that
those winds vivify the sensory and motor organs. In the latter
Brhaddranyaka Up. passage, modern translators have rendered
the verb rodayanti with causative force (‘make someone lament’),
thus requiring an unexpressed object. A good Sanskrit grammar,
such as the one by William Ds\ iglu Whitney. readily shows that
the causative in fix-mvi-does not necessarily confer causative
force upon a Sanskrit verb. So mv translation of the Sanskrit
passage:
katamt rudra ili. dastmt ptiruif brandh atmaikddaiah;

tt yadds mat farirdn martxdd i itktdrnanti, atha rodayanti,
tadyad rodayanti, tasmdd rudra iti.
‘What are the Kudras ?’ ‘These ten breaths in the person
with the dtman as the eleventh. When they depart from
this mortal frame, they cry out ; and because they cry
out, they are called Rudras.’
In the Satapathabrdhmana's celebrated account of the birth

of Rudra (Eggeling’s translation, SBE, Vol. XL1, pp. 157-
161) we read : ‘because he cried ( rud ) therefore he is Rudra.’
The teaching that the winds make a sound as they depart is
continued into the Buddhist Tantras, as in Tsou-kha-pa’s
71
commentary Bzhis zhns on the Cuhyasamdja Explanatory Tantra

Caturdtripariprccha Collected Works. Lhasa, Vol. Ca, 13b-5,6):
‘‘The roaliiv mantra tone which each wind has, is not revealed
to the ‘child' bnla : its form, that is, its self-existence (srabhava)
or identity (dtmaka), is revealed to the yogin” (/rluh dchi rah
gdatis snags kvi tie hid tin byis pa la mi gsal ba rnal hbyor pa la
gsal balii g/.ugs le/rau bzhin nam bdag hid can/).
In the (iuhyasamajatantra tradition, the Vajramdfa Ex¬

planatory Tantra, chapter 48 (FIT, Vol. 3, p. 221) holds that
the phenomenal world is due to the two winds prana and apdna
identified with two mantra syllables A and HAM (aham , or
egotism . which form the 'knot of the heart’ :
’. ! nni uog t>j tin j du b(adI

I dr l>zhi t: th.tr scl HAM du bijodj
dr g 'tis "ci" " rut hkhot ba stt'l
A is explained as the prana wind.
Likewise, apdna is said to bo HAM
When those two unite, there is samsdra (the cycle of

phenomenal existence'.
In the full svstem of human life, there are, as was said,

five principal and five Mih'idiaty winds, genetically 'ton/' or
'prana'. The five principal winds have the respective natures
of the five Buddhas and are associated with the five mantra-
syllablcs and hot\x-cal.rn\ as follows:
Orn Yairoi.ma —\\ana —all over the
bodv, or head
Ah —Amiiabha —udana —throat
Hum —Aksobhsa —prana —heart
Sva —Ratnas.nnbhasa -apana —sacral region
I la —Atnoghasiddhi -samana —navel
The four winds, leaving out tydna . are held in basic time or
ordinary life to breathe in and out cyclically through one or
other nostril or both, lienee these four are prdndyama. This
word does not ordinarilv signify in the Buddhist Tantra, ‘res¬
traint of breath* but rather prd>a. in-breathing, and drama.
out-breathing: or prdra. i he passage of winds through the orifices,
and d)dma , the out-going mental component that ‘rides on the
wind 1 . The Pancakrama. in its first kratna , called Yajrajdpa ,
cites the Vajramdld in tegatd to the oidinarv outward passage
of the winds:
72
19. Dakfindd vinirgato lafmir hutabhuhniandalam ca totj

Raktavarnam idam vyaktam padmanatho tra devatajl
The ray leaving via the right nostril is the fire man-
dala. This distinguished one of red color (i.c. the
udana wind) is the deity Padma-Lord (i.e. Antitabha).
20. Vdmad vinirgato raimir vayumandalasamjiiitah /
HantakyamasamkaSalt karmandtho ‘tra devatdf /
The ray leaving via the left nostril is called ‘wind

nriandala’. With a vellowish-green appearance (i.e.
samana wind) it is the deity Karma-Lord (i.c. Amo-
ghasiddhi).
21. Dvabhyam vinirgato raimih pitavarno niahddjiutihj

Mahcndramandalam caitad uitnandtho 't>a devatajl
The ray leaving via both nostrils is the great radiance
of yellow color—the earth mandala (i.c. apana wind)
and this is the deity Ratna-Lord (i.c. Ratnasambhava).
22. Ad ho niandaptaedras hi sitakumlauiusamnibhahj

Mandala m id run a m caitad vajf audit ho ’tra devatdJI
Moving slowly downwards (but also leaving via both
nostrils) is the water mandala white like the Jasmine
(i.c, the prana wind), and this is the deity Vajra-
Lord (i.e. Aksobhya).
23. Sarvadehdnugo vd\uk sarvaccftdpraiartakahj

Vairocanasiabhdvo 'sou mrtakd)dd vinikaiet , /
The wind that proceeds throughout the body and

evolves all activity (i.c. the vvana wind) has the
nature ofVairocana and departs (only) from the dead
body (with blue color).
Recitation of the wind in the Stage of Generation (nidana

verse 12) means reciting according to the natural cycle of the
winds. This recitation of winds is indicated, accotding to the
Pradipoddyotana commentary, as the meaning of the verves ‘>-14
(omitting 13) in Chapter Six (‘Documents'). Verse 9 deals
with meditation on the tip of the nose of the face; at this stage
one must take the passage of the winds on faith. Then verse
10 mentions an image of the Buddha, which is Vairocana. But
as the Vairocana wind, vyana, does not enter into the inbreathing
and outbreaking, the diamond recitation intended by thcvcr.sc
is in fact Amitabha’s fiery udana-wind. The text of Chapter
Six interposes a ‘Hum* before verse II, hinting at the recitation
73
of Aksobhva’s watery prana-wind. Verse 12 mentions a ratna-

disk which enables the knower of the system to assign here the
recitation of Ratnasambhava’s earthy apana-wind. Then
verse 14 involves recitation of Amoghasiddhi’s wind and black
samana-wind which is yellow green when passing out through
the left nostril.
Then in Chapter Six, verses 15-18 state the advanced level

of that recitation, as practiced in the Stage of Completion
(nidana verse 24). In the latter stage, the yogin moves those
winds from their usual location in basic time to extraordinary
combinations in fruitional time, as I summarized from Tson*
kha-pa’s Rdor bzlas in “Female Energy...”, p. 88: Om, the
prana wind of the heart cakra, the udana wind of the neck
cakra, and the bindu in the position of the ufnifa, is the thun¬
derbolt of body at the Mahasukha-cakra of the forehead. Ah,
the initial prana of the heart cakra, the apana wind of the
sacral center, along with the udana of the neck center, is the
thunderbolt of speech at the neck cakra. Hum, the apana
wind of the sacral center, the udana wind of the neck center,
and the pervasive prana (i.e. vyana) normally in the forehead,
is the thunderbolt of mind at the nave of the heart lotus. And
the winds mixed that way dissolve the knots ( mdud ) of those
centers. Accordingly, in fruitional time, the mantras have
been reduced from five to three. This is meant to achieve
three photism experiences called Might’, ‘spread of light’, and
‘culmination of light’. The further reduction from three to
one corresponds to the experience of the Clear Light which is
free from the three.
Also, the Stage of Completion increases to three the noses

meant by ‘tip of nose’, a teaching found in the Vajramdld ,
summarized in Tson-kha-pa, “Dkah gnad”, Lhasa collected
works, Vol. Ca, 8a-2 :
The three ‘tips of nose’ (nasagra) are 1. the ‘tip of nose*

of the sacral place; 2. ‘tip of nose’ of the face’ ; 3. ‘tip of
nose’ of the heart (sna rise gsum ni/gsan bahi sna rise,
gdon gi sna use, shin gi sna rtse). Idem : The three ‘drops*
(bindu) are 1. ‘drop’ of substance, 2. ‘drop’ of light, 3.
‘drop’ of mantra (thig le gsum ni/rdza$ kyi thig le, hod
kyi thig le, shags kyi thig le), Ibid., f. 8a-6: The lustful
person contemplates the ‘substance drop’ on the ‘tip-of-
74
YOGA OF TIIK GUHYASAMAjATANTRA
nose’ at the sacral place; the hating person, the‘mantra

drop’ on the ‘tip-of-nose’ of the heart; the deluded person,
the ‘drop of light’ on the ‘tip of nose' of the face (jhdod
chags can gjris gsak bahi sna rtsn ideas kyi thig le dan
I ( zhr sdafi can gyis sit in gi sna it set snags kyi thig h dan ft
gti mug can g)is gdougt sna 1 1 sir hod kyi thig le bsgoni
par bfad ciii f )
Sec in this connection the explanation of prdnaydma among
the six members of yoga in the /*radipuddyotana commentary
(‘Documents’), where the contemplation of the three ‘noses
seems not to go with three different persons but with the succe¬
ssive contemplation of a single person.
The relation between prana and mantra is brought out in

the discussion about the ‘reality’ ( tattia ) of the mantra. Thus
Paiicakrama , 1st krama, verse 66; Sri I.akmit, Vol . 63. p. 21-5
and 22-1 :
manhatattram idatn vyaktam vdgvajiasya prasddhanam 1

jndnatrayaprabhedena cittanuitrc nhojayct ff
This clear reality of mantra as the accomplishment of
the speech diamond, is applied to ‘Mind Only 1 by the
variety of three gnoses.
Sri Laksmi explains that mantra has two aspects, by distinction

of cause and effect. “The cause is prana. the effect is mantra:
and their reality is the ‘reality of mantra' " (Mr la rgvu ni srog
rluh dan ! hbras bu ni snags ste'de dag gi de hid ni shags kvi
dc hid dc/ . The ‘three gnoses’ mean the three lights.
But then, do mantras have meaning ? See the discussion

in The Calcutta Review , 137-1 (Oct. 1955), a portion of the serial
translation by J. V. Bhattacharyva of the Xydyatnaiijari . here
(pp. 7-13 discussing the validity of mantras. TIu* opponents
hold that the mantras do not convcv meaning p. f! ; “A
mantra renders its assistance to a Ycdic rite only bv its recita¬
tion.” Among their illustrations is the mantra. "Hear, oh
slabs of stone !*’ ( irnota grdvdnah ). They say pp. fl-9 : “This
meaning is absurd since unconscious slabs of stone arc never
employed to listen to something.” The author of the .YrJva-
mattjari , when replying to their arguments, says of ibis parti¬
cular example (p. 12) : “Smota gravunah is...a miraculous
act by the influence of which slabs of stone can even hear.”
His chief answer is that the opponents have not taken .. .pains
75
to find out the meaning. In conclusion he states (p. 13) :

“Mantras, revealing their senses, render assistance to a sacrificial
rite. But they do not help a rite by their mere recitation like the
muttering of a mantra....’* The viewpoint of the Nyaya-
maitjari is quite consistent with that of the Buddhist Tantras,
where the mantras do indeed have meaning. For example,
one need only consult the Tanjur commentaries on the Vajra-
ridurana-ndma-dharani. to learn that each one of the mantra
expressions is given its explanation in terms of functions of the
various deities involved. The Buddhist Tantra also insists that
mere muttering of the mantra is useless, since one must simuU
taneously make a mudra and concentrate the mind accordingly.
And it also agrees when the Buddhist Tantra speaks of success
in the incantation as the state when the mantra seems to pro¬
nounce itself, thus assuming the role of a deity’s body {mantra-
murti . An interesting example of this is in the last chapter of
the Sri Paramadya tantra fPTT, Vol. 5, p, 171-5), understood
with the help of Anandagarbha’s commentary (PTT, Vol. 73,
p. 127-5). TheTantra states: “How is the Bhagavat the master
of the deed' of ‘diamond pride’ ? Because the best mudra belonjfs
to the great lord {maheivara') who has the best of great siddhis
and she greatly praises the diamond lord, the one who says
'I am the master of diamond pride' is the Bhagavat, the supreme
primordial person." (/ de la ido rje bsnems bvahi bdag po
bcorn Idan hdas ci liar yin zhe na // kun mchog duos grub chcn
po vi t ' dban phyug chcn po phvag rgyahi mchog // rdo rje
dban phyug cher bstotl pas // rdo rje bsnems pahi bdag po bdag
ces by a ba ni bcom Idan lidas mchog dan pohi skyes bubo /).
The idea here, as gleaned from Anandagarbha’s comments, is
that ‘diamond pride' is the name of a goddess and she is the best
mudra. Since she praises the Bhagavat, he is her master (pati).
This alludes to the state when tin- mudra coalesces with the mantra
to reveal it 11 sense as the .Xyayamavjari would say ; and since
its sense is 'diamond pride’ (tajragarra) the mind united with that
mudra can be proud. She praises without any prompting :t he
incantation sounds bv itself. She has her own deeds or functions.
However, some Western scholars have quite mi«ed the

point of how mantras acquire meaning. Take the celebrated
mantra of the Buddhist Bodhisattva Lord Avalokitc vara, Otjt
mani padm• fn’rr. Scholars have ascribed this and that meaning
76
to it; for example, “Om, the jewel in the lotus, hum.” The
implication of such an explanation is that the mantra has a
meaning independent of the recitation, which is denied both by
the Hindu Kydyamaiijari and the Buddhist Tantras. When
one goes into this cult of Avalokitc*-'vara, he finds out readily
that this is called the six-syllabled formula. The six syllables
are recited in the six times of day and night, along with fasting
and correlated with gestures (marfra), and the imagined six
destinies of gods, men. etc. as associated with six colors. 1 he
meaning is the six Buddhas corresponding respectively to
the syllables. By continual application to the cult with proper
recitation of the six syllables in a correlation of body, speech, and
mind, the yogin expects to identify himself with the Lord Ava-
lokitcgvara who looks with compassion at the beings in the six
destinies. Gradually the meaning is evoked by the recitation.
While such a translation as “Om, the jewel in the lotus, hum”
does not convey any intelligence of the cull; nevertheless, if one
insists on a translation anyway in such form, it is proper to
translate the ‘mani padnic’ portion as “jewel in the lotus” be¬
cause one would understand mani as the Middle Indie form
equal to Sanskrit mani(l ti. the nominative. In terms of mantra
construction, because the initial and final syllables aic Om and
Hum, thcmiddle portion ‘mani padme’ is equivalent to thesyllable
Ah, for these are the three heart syllables of the Buddhas corres¬
ponding to Body, Speech, and Mind, respectively Vairocana,
Amitabha, and Aksobhya. Accordingly, the middle portion
stands for the Buddha Amitabha in the heaven Sukhavati.
The gods arc literally txpresud into manifestation; that is,

they arc called into phenomenal forms by mantra. In the
Anuttarayoga-tantra cult, the syllables E-VA(M) serve for
this expression. ‘Evam’ (Thus) is the first word in the Buddhist
scriptures, which normally begin “Thus by me it was heard”
(aarp mayd srutam). Mchan hgrel , PIT, Vol. 158, p. 13-3,
states : “The syllable E is like a mother. Therefore, the ‘in¬
sight’ ( prajiid ) syllabic (E) is symbolized as the sixteen vowels
(svara). Va is like a father. The‘seminal drop’ (bindu, ihig U,
qi) of Vam makes manifest the vowels. Hence the ‘means’
(updya ) syllabic (Vam) is symbolized as the thirty-three conso¬
nants (i yaujana). Through their union arises, like sons, the
77
host of words. Thus E is the womb (dlaya y kun gzhi) and Vam
the progenitor, of pravacana (the Buddhist scripture).” The
bindu is also called in this literature the bodhicitta (mind of
enlightenment).
E. The world of light
In the article “Notes on the Sanskrit termjnana” I first tried

to correlate the Guhyasamaja tradition of four lights (three
light stages leading to or emerging from the Clear Light) with
other systems of thought. Already it was apparent to me that
the theory involved a reinterpretation of the old Buddhist for¬
mula of Dependent Origination (pratitya-samutpada). With
the researches of the present work behind me it is easier to detect
the Upanisadic precursors of this theory (it would be hazardous
to try to trace it back to the Ijig-veda ).
Perhaps the most discussed Upanisadic passage is the

Chandogya Vpanifad from VI.2 to VI.6. This teaches a develop¬
ment order of 1. heat, becoming speech; 2. water, becoming
breath; 3. food, becoming mind. By their respective colors
of red, white, and black, they were later (Hindu period) identi¬
fied with the three gunas (employed extensively in the Buddhist
Tantras), to wit: rajas (activity, passion), sattva (buoyancy,
clarity), tamos (immobility, darkness), although the guna
applicability to the Chandogya text has been questioned. The
Brhaddranyaka Upanisad 1.5 portrays Prajapati’s production of
the world as food for himself; and this suggestion of‘food’ as the
first produced is consistent with 1.5.3; “Mind, speech, breath,
these he made for himself” (mono vacant prdnam, tdny dtmane
kuruta). since we learn from the Chandogya that ‘food’becomes
‘mind’. The Brhadaranyaka order is consistent with a tantric
i liter pi eta tion of Buddhist Dependent Origination, with my
understanding of the 1 arahopanifad, and with the Guhyasamaja-X^
nidana doctrine of three lights or three gnoses (jridnatraja).
1 he Vardhopaniâd b translated by T. R. Srinivasa Avyangar

and edited bv G. Srinivasa Muni in The Toga Upanifads . In
ih< | atdha we read: "For says the Sruti. ‘These are the five
essential features. \ iz.. Asti (there ishBhati (there shines forth'!,
Preyas (whatever pleases , Rupa (form i and Xanian (name).
The first three are of the form of the Brahman. The two there-
78 *
after are the characteristics of the phenomenal world.’ ” If we

rearrange the order of the Chandogya terms and employ these other
sources, a tabular comparison can be made as shown in Table I.
i. THE WORLD OF LIGHT : BRAHMANICAL & BUDDHIST
Brahmanism
Old terminology of
Later terminology of
Chandogya Up.
Varaha Up.
1. Black Food
“It is” (asti)
(krsna-anna)
2. Red Heat
“It shines forth”
(rohita-tejas)
(bhati)
3. White Water
Whatever pleases
(gukla-iipas)
(prevas)
4. Fire, Sun, Moon,
4, 5. Name and Form
Lightning
Buddhi
sm
Old terminology of
Later tantric terminology

Dependent Origination
1. Nescience
Culmination-of-Light
(avidya)
y (alokopalabdhi)
2. Motivations
Spread-of-light
(samskara)
(alokabhasa)
3. Perceptions
Light (aloka)
(viji\:ina)
4. Namc-and-Form
Phenomenal World
(nama-rupa)
Moreover, the relation of the tantric three lights to the first

three members of Dependent Origination is plainly stated by
Mchan hgrel on Pradipoddyotana (Chapter III) in PTT, Vol.
158, p.38-1. The Pradipoddyotana quotes the Samdhivyakarana's
remark, ‘said to be the doctrine of Dependent Origination’
(riot tin hbrel hbyun chos su grags), to which Mchan hgrd adds,
‘arising from the wind and mind only of the Clear Light’ •; hod
gsal gyi rlun sms tsam las skyes pahi).
Maryla Falk wrote a book entitled Pfiima Pupa and Dharma-

Rapa. It is undeniable that she hit upon the basic division by appre¬
ciating the signifiqance of the research by the Geigers (p. 71, n.):
79
One of the principal results of the long and detailed inquiry
made by Mrs. M. Geiger and Prof. W. Geiger into the
use of the term dhamma in the Pali Canon (Pali Dhamma ,
vornehmlich in dtr kanonischai Litcratur y Abh. de Bayer.
Ak. d. Wiss., Philos.-philol. u. hist. KL, XXXI, 1. Munich
1921) is the conclusion that ‘the concept dhamma takes
in Buddhism the place of the brahman of older Vedanta*
(p. 77). We have shown above that in Upanishadic
thought, ever since its Vedic beginnings, the equivalence
of both terms reflects the sameness of the entity they
designate.
In short, the equivalence of Pali dhamma and the old Indian

term brahman leads to the equivalence Dharma-rupa *= Brahma-
rupa. This Dharma-rupa is therefore the pre-gcnctic world,
anterior to the phenomenal world denoted by Nama-rupa.
The Satapatha-brahmana (Eggeling’s translation as quoted by
Surendranath Dasgupta, A History of Indian Philosophy , I, p. 20)
has the celebrated passage:
Then the Brahman itself went up to the sphere beyond.

Having gone up to the sphere beyond, it considered,
‘How can I descend again into these worlds ?* It then
descended again by means of these two, Form and Name.
Whatever has a name, that is name; and that again which
has no name and which one knows by its form, ‘this is (of
a certain) form,’ that is form: as far as there are Form
and Name so far, indeed, extends this (universe). These
indeed are the two great forces of Brahman; and, verily,
he who knows these two great forces of Brahman becomes
himself a great force.
The equivalent statement involving the equation Dharma =

Brahman, and taking into account the Paiicakrama list of eighty
prakrtis in three sets (seven, forty, and thirty-three), each set
constituting momentary dark spots obscuring three light realms,
also called the triple vijuana, can be expressed by Vijnana (the
(La'ikdvatdra's ‘body of the Tathagata’) descending into the
womb bv means of namc-and-form, the fourth member of
Dependent Origination. So also, when Gautama was medi¬
tating under the tree of Enlightenment, and according to the
tradition found out the formula of Dependent Origination by
working backwards from Old Age and Death, in each case
80
yoga op the ouhyasmajxtantra
thinking, ‘What is the indispensable condition for this to arise?’,

he proceeded this way : That No. 11 ‘birth’ is the indispensable
condition for No. 12 ‘old age and death, and the whole mass
of suffering’; and for No. 11 ‘birth*—No. 10’gestation’ ( bhaia );
for the latter, No. 9 ‘indulgence’ (upadana) ; for the latter, No. 8
‘craving’ ( trfnd ); for the latter, No. 7 ’feelings* ( vedana) (and
‘ideas’, samjhd); for the latter. No. 6, ‘sensory contact* (sparia) ;
for the latter, No. 5 ‘six sense bases’ (fa dayntana ; for the latter.
No. 4, ‘namc-and-form’ (ndma-at\d-rupa). Anti then, as wc can
see from the foregoing, in order for Gautama to answer the
question ‘What is the indispensable condition for nanie-and-
form to arise ?’ he had to go to the sphere beyond, himself the
Brahman, hence obtaining the Dhaima-kava. In this pre-
genetic sphere, Gautama decided that 4. ‘name-and-form’
has 3. ‘perception’ (vijiiana) as its indispensable condition;
the latter, No. 2 ‘motivations’ (samskara) ; and the latter, No. 1
‘nescience’ (avidya). And—the Guhyasamdja tradition suggests—
this is his way ofstating in psychological terms, the ‘white w ater*,
‘red heat’, and ‘black food’ of the Chdndogya Up. vision, the atomic
triad of the superior realm.
Since the correlation of the supramundanc light stages of

the Guhyasamdja commentarial tradition is associated with the
first members of Dependent Origination, and with the develop¬
mental order of the Brhaddranyaka Upant f ad (rather than with
the Chandogya order), it follows that if we are to acknowledge
a feasibility that the formula of Dependent Origination is based
on the Upanisads, we have to further admit that the Brhaddran-
yaka Up. is the one with wliich the Buddhist formula has the
most affinity.
Even if we accept that these three light stages may be

traceable to such ancient sources as the old Upanisads, it must
still be acknowledged that the thcoiy ol 80 prakriis superimposed
on the three lights is a development after the rise of the Buddhist
Tantras. The Patlcakrama commentary Manimdtd cited under
nidana verse 6 explicitly mentions that the ihirty-tlu ce female
natures arc generated by the wind in the left channel, the foitv
male natures by the wind in the light c hannel, and the se\» n
neuter natures bv the wind in the middle. The method of
allotting mental states to three gioups 'cents to be a develop¬
ment of the assignment of qualities to the three gun as as wc find

81
in the Bhagavadgitd, Chapter 14, but of course in the present form

a number of centuries after this Hindu classic. In contrast,
as John Woodrofi'e, Introduction to Tantra Shastra , pp. 49, ff.,
points out, there arc six vrtti associated with the Svadhisthana-
cakra, ten vrtti with the Manipura, twelve vrtti with the Ana-
hata, twelve vrtti with the Viûddha, sixteen kald with the
Sahasrara, four dnanda with the Miiladhara, with no sets men¬
tioned for the Ajfia-cakra. Thus, this kind of Hindu tantra
assigns vrttis to cakras rather than to the three nadi ; and very
few of the vrttis can be identified with the prakrtis.
As I perused the various commentaries on the Paiicakrama

available in the Tibetan Tanjur, I tried to find some explanation
for the numbers ‘thirty-three’ etc., and any suggestions of
internal grouping within the three sets of natures, but to little
avail. However, the Paiicakrama commentary called Marti-
maid attempts to rationalize the eighty prakrtis in terms of the
Buddhist Abhidharma set of fifty-one caitasikadharmas (‘derivative
mentals’), so in PTT, Vol. 62, pp. 186-187. I studied these
pages with the help of the collaborated article by Dr. P. Cordier
and L. de La Vallee Poussin, “Lcs soixante-quinze ct les cent
dharmas.” For example, when this commentary analyses the
set of thirty-three prakrtis (see the list under nidana verse 1)
it includes nos. 1-3, three degrees of aversion, under kaukrtya
(‘regret’); 4-5 (thinking) future and past, under vitarka and
viedra (‘searching state of mind* and ‘deciding state of mind’)—
— kaukrtya , vitarka , and viedra being among the list of antyata-
bhumikas (‘indeterminate caitasikas’’). It includes 11-13,
thrcc«degrees offcar, under the three virtuous roots ( kufalamdla )—
non-clinging (alobha), non-hating (advc<a), and non-delusion
( amoha), which are in the list of kulalamahdbhumikas (mental
elements present in every good conception); and so on. The
attempt is obviously forced, but is significant for showing this
author’s belief that the dharmas are identical with the prakrtis.
This is a common theory that the conscious mind docs not create
a thought, but that the thought (here a dharma or a prakrti)
flows into the mind. Where docs the thought come from ?
The Guhyasamaja system holds that the thought comes from
one other of three light realms. In terms of ‘channels’ ( nadi ),
the archetypal world is called ‘left’, ‘right’, and ‘middle’. A
consistent theorv was earlier stated in the Bhagavadgila (Chap.
82
YOGA OF THE GLHYASAMAJATANTRA
X, 4-5): **. . thedifferent slates of being proceed from me alone.”
Moreover, there is a curious resemblance between the

thirtv-thrcc female prakrtis anti the five sthdyi-bhavas as discussed
by Edward C. Dimock, Jr., Tht Place oj the Hidden Moon , and
earlier in his article “Doctrine and Practice Among the Yahnavas
of Bengal.” There are informative annotations concerning
them in Saraswati Goswiimi Thakur, Shri Iirahma~Samhitd.
pp. 10-3, 159-62, which represents the five as devotion of dille-
rent individuals. The only source in the English language to
my notice which presents these five in the form of stages of a
single person tounion with the LordKrsna. is V. Jagannatham,
Divine Love and Amorous Sentiment , a modern pamphlet picket! up
at Javavclu’s in Madras. When I studied these passages and
added the advice of Mr. Kirpal Singh Narang about the five
stages of the Sikhs (stated in his very words below on the occa¬
sion of his Madison, Wisconsin visit on .April 18, 1966. it occur¬
red to me that the thirty-three prakrtis of female consciousness
to be presented under nidana verse no. I arc roughly in five
groups the fleeting moments of consciousness in the five stages
of the devotee’s ‘female’ soul becoming a Gopi (row-girl)
in union with the Lord. I give here in outline m\ merely ten¬
tative solution, observing that should it prove applicable, this
would indeed provide a most important link between the I*aiua -
krama tradition and the early Yaisnava Sahajiva cull.
Sthayi-bhdca (or Rasa)
Sikh Stages
Female Prakrtis
1 .
Santa, pacification of
Yairagya
1-3. degrees of
longing for the exter¬
(‘aversion’)
aversion
nal world
2.
Dasya, service to the
Doing what is
4-9. thinking of
Lord
pleasing to
future and
the Lortl
past, sorrow
and calmness
3.
Sakhya, being a friend
Fear and Love
10-22. vikalpa ,
to the Lord
fear, down to
feelings
4.
Vatsalya, the
Knowing the
23-30, intuition,
Lord as a child
Lord’s Will
down to
affection
5.
Madhurva or <riig.'«ra,
Union
31-33. worry.
the Lord Krsna as a
collecting, and
lover
jealousy
83
In a comparable wav, I noticed that the forty prakrtis
listed under nidana verse no. 2 seem to be the very characteristics
attributed to the Lord Krsna in his various exploits, ranging
from the Child Krsna to the Divine Lover, and that the list
seems easily to fall into five groups. Perhaps the forty prakrtis
of maleconsciousness derive from a Vaivrtava prototype.
The only way that occurs to me to reconcile the division

of the eighty prakrtis into three groups, with what seems to me to
be an obvious division of the male and female ones into five
groups, is to associate them with the right and left in five cakras
starting with no. 1 at the base of the spine, no. 2 at the navel,
and moving upward to union in the djfid-cakra or mahdsukha~
cakra. Admittedly, I have found no textual passage to support
this theory.
II. INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAj AT ANTRA
A. Texts , commentators , and history
The Guhyasamaja literature falls into two distinct groups—

the revealed texts in the Tibetan Kanjur and the exegetical
literature in the Tibetan Tanjur. In A Complete Catalogue
of the Tibetan Buddhist Canons (Tohoku catalog), the Kanjur
works have numbers 442-447 (and disputed works 448-453),
the Tanjur works 1784-1917 (cf. Alex Waynian, “Analysis of
the Tantric Section of the Kanjur Correlated to Tanjur Exege¬
sis,” p. 121).
The chief revealed works in the Tibetan language with

catalog titles are :
No. 442. Guhyasamaja mulatantra : Sanatathagatakdya -

vdkcittarahasya-guhyasamdja-ndma-mahdkalpardja.
Chaps. 1-17 of the Sanskrit text.
No. 443. Guhyasamaja uttaratantra : Chap. 18 of the

Sanskrit text.
No. 444. Guhyasamaja-vyakhyatantra : Sandhivyd-

karana-ndma-tantra.
No. 445. Guhyasamaja-vyakhyatantra : SrhajranuiIdbhi-

dhdnamahdyogatantra-sariatantrahrdayarahasyavi-
bhatiga-ndma.
No. 446. Guhyasamaja-vyakhyatantra ; Caturdetipari -

prechd.
No. 447, Guhyasamaja-vyakhyatantra : Vajrajndna -
samuccaya-nama-tantra (However, from the Tibe¬

tan translation one would expect * Jiuinavajta-).
Tson-kha-pa writes in his commentary on the Pailcaktama called
Gsal bahi sgron me (Vol. 158, p. 175-5) : “Five Explanatory
Tantras ( vyakhydtantra ) have been specifically mentioned by the
‘noble father and sons’ (i.c. the tantric Xagarjuna as ‘father’
and the tantrics Aryadcva and Candrakirti as ‘sons’), that is,
Caturdevipariprccha , Sandhi vydkarana, and Yajramdld are stated to
be Explanatory Tantras in the Pancakrama ; 1 ajrajndnasan<ucea)a
is also said to be an Explanatory Tantra in the Carydnuldpaka-
pradipa ; and while the first two syllables of the niddna (i.c.
IV TRODUCTON TO THE GUHYASAKAJATANTRA
85
E-VAM) are being explained in the Pradipoddyotana , the

Devemirapariprcchd is specifically mentioned as the source;....
the Explanatory Tantra Devendrapariprcchd was not translated
(into Tibetan).” That passage in Tibetan : / hdus pahi bfad
rgyud du hphags pa vab sras kyis dhos su gsuns pa na lna ste /
rim lna las lha mo bzhis zhus dan / dgons pa luh ston pa dan /
rdo rje hphreti ba b ad rgyud du gsuns la / spyod bsdus las ye
ses rdo rje kun las btus kvan b£ad rgyud du gsuns £in / sgron
gsal las glen gzhihi yi ge dan po gnis hchad pa na lhahi dban
pos zhus pahi kliuns dhos su smos §in... /lhahi dban pos zhus pa
bsad rgyud du gsuns te hdi ma hgyur ro / . The reason the
Tibetan tradition accepted the Devendrapariprcchd as an Expla¬
natory Tantra is that immediately after the quotation from that
work by title (reproduced in the materials for nidana verses
Evarn maya..), Candrakirti continued with a verse citation
(reproduced in section B, next) which he introduced by the
remark (Pradipoddyotana MS): / mayetyadi vajrapadanam apy
artho vyakhyatantrad avataryatc / “One can understand from
the Explanatory Tantra the meaning of the diamond words
t mayd > etc.” Tsoh-kha-pa in his Mchan hgrel (p. 14-1) on the
Pradipoddyotana mentions, “Skal-ldan-grags-pa examined the
Vajramala carefully and could not find this therein.” The thrust
of the decision lies in the fact that the Vajramala presents the
forty nidana verses in its chapter 59. Its brief chapter 58 is
devoted to a treatment of the two syllables E-vam. It is precisely
the Vajramala which should have had, but lacked the cited
verses. Candrakirti preceded his citation of the forty verses
by citation of verses about the nidana sentence but used other
sources, first the named Dtvrndrapariprccha , and then an unnamed
work he calls an ‘Explanatory Tantra’. The Tibetans (Tsoh-
kha-pa, in any case) decided that Candrakirti had treated the
Devcndrapariprccha with the authority ordinarily accorded an ‘
Explanatory Tantra. and identified that work accordingly.
But that Tantra had not itself been translated; the Pradipoddyo¬
tana passage apparently is the full extant portion of Sanskrit of
this work (the Subhduta-sarngraha , Part II, pp. 32-3, quotes the
Derendrapariprcchd-tantra by lines contained within the Pradi¬
poddyotana citation).
The Vajrajnana also lias a difficulty of literary history. It

is a curious feature of Candrakirti’s Pradipoddyotana that his
86
YOOA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTKA
classifying terminology used throughout this comincntaiy on

the Guhyasamdjatantra , namely the ‘Seven Ornaments’ (uipta-
lamkara), is ascribed several times near the outset of his work to
an Explanatory Tantra which he does not name, but which is
none other than the Vajrajudnasamuccaya\ and so ison*kha-pa
in turn cannot specify the Pradipoddyotana for containing the
name of this Explanatory- Tantra. 1'his silence regarding the
title of the work from which he drew the material he populaiizcd
may mean that Candrakirti had a hand in composing the
Vajrajndnasamuccaya, the latter portion of it, or the expanded
version (Toh. 450), to justify his commentaiial position, as
has been suggested by Yukei Matsunaga in his article, “A Doubt
to Authority of the Guhyasamaja-Akhyana-tantias.”
Another mystery of Explanatory Tantras occurs in Cauthakii ti's

Pradipoddyotana at the very end of chapter Four:
/ yathoktam bhagavatd lydkhyaiantre j

sarvdngabhavandtitam kalpanakalpavarjitam j
matrabindusamdlitam elan man dal am uttamam jj
As was said by the Bhagavat in the Explanatory Tantra:
Transcending the contemplation of all portions (i.e. color

and shape), free from both imagination and lack of imagi¬
nation, transcending the upper sign and its bindu , that
is the supreme mandala.
Tson-kha-pa in his Mehan hgrel (p. 41) mentions that an almost
identical verse is found in the Candraguhyatilaka (another
quotation from this work in the Pradipoddyotana is reproduced in
the initiation remarks in the section ‘The two stages, initiations,
and the clear light’; and Aryadeva appeals to this Tantra for
the expression ‘100 lineages’). The only difference is where in
the verse the compound matrabindu is translated in Candrakirti’s
work as gug skyed thig le, the Candraguhyatilaka Tibetan version
has the words hdren dan tshig (‘guide and letter’). Since the
expression matrabindu is difficult to interpret, it is possible that it
is the original for those Tibetan words, with hdren — bindu, and
tshig — matrd. Tson-kha-pa left the matter open; he appears
not to accept the evidence of one similar verse as final pi oof
that Candrakirti had this Tantra iti mind. Howevci, it so
happens that this same verse is cited by Indrabhuti in his Jmina-
siddhi (GOS ed., p. 83), and attributed to a chapter thiitecn.
On the preceding page he has cited the Advayatamatdvijaya, and
INTRODUCTION TO THE QUHYASAMAjATANTRA
87
his immediately succeeding quotation from a chapter nine, at

well as that citation of chapter thirteen are presumably from
that Tantra.
According to George Roerich, The Blue Annals , Part Two,

p. 417, Bu-ston considered the Advayasamatavijaya to be an
Explanatory Tantra of the Guhyasamdjatantra ; he translated a
version of that work in 22 chapters that was incomplete in the
middle. Possibly this is the reason that Tson-kha-pa apparently
ignores this work. Several centuries after his time, the Chinese
version of this Tantra was used to fill out the missing portion of
Bu-ston’s translation, accounting for the present version in the
Tibetan Kanjur. But if Bu-ston was serious about this Advaya¬
samatavijaya as an Explanatory Tantra, I can find no confirma¬
tion of this in his own Pradipoddyotana commentary in Collected
Works (Part 9), where he freely cites the Sandhivyakarana (in
an older translation preceding the one now officially in the
Kanjur), the Vajramdld , the Vajrahrdayalamkdra , Yoga-tantras
(on which he was the great authority), Aryadcva’s various
works, and other works, but not, as far as I could notice, the
Advayasamatavijaya.
Again, in his Pradtpoddyotana on chapter XIV, Candra-

kirti quotes from an unnamed Vyakhya-tantra an interesting
prose passage with Vajrapani as interlocutor (included in this
work under ‘Van*). Finally, having mystified sufficiently
the ‘Explanatory Taniras,’ Candrakirti in his commentary on
Chapter XVII cites the ‘Mula-tantra*, which Tson-kha-pa
identifies as the Mula-tantra of the Yoga-tantra, namely the
Tattvasamgraha (cf. the passage in the treatment of initiation).
According to The Blue Annals, Book VII (‘The Preaching of the
Taniras’), there was a distinction of‘Ouicr’ Yoga-tantra and
‘Inner’Yoga-tantra, with the ‘inner’ variety becoming separately
called ‘Anuttaravoga-tantra’. One can therefore understand
Candraklrti's citation as indicating his adherence to this termi¬
nology, since the Tattvasamgraha is the mula-tantra of the‘outer’
Yoga-tantra. Indeed, there is much in common between the
Yoga-tantra (such works as the Tattvasamgraha , the Mdydjdla,
Sarvarahasya-tantra , and Sri Pararnddya) and the ‘Father’ class
of Anuttaravoga-tantra. Both classes of Tantra use the termi¬
nology of ‘three samadhis’, clarified in our Introduction III.
C., although there are differences in definitions.
88
Candraklrti’s citation of both the Sandhivyakarana and the

Vajramdld as ‘Arya-vyakhyana* shows that he took for granted
the knowledge in his readers of those two works. By impli¬
cation, when he cites a verse from the Sarvarahasya-tantra with¬
out any indication of source, those same readers are expected
to know the work. Then, when he cites by name some other
Tantras, such as the Mdydjdlatantra, the I 'ajro>ni>atantra, the
Vairoeanabhisambodhi , and the Vajrahrdaydlamkdra, we may infer
that he gives the names because he cannot expect the followers
of the Guhyasamaja to know those other Tantras by heart.
But if this is indeed the case, it would also have to apply to his
quotations from the named works Daendrapariprcehd and the
Candraguhyatilaka. So there are certainly many difficulties
about the literary history of these works. Tsoh-kha-pa (1*1 I,
Vol. 158, p. 175-6) rejects the view advanced by some that
the Vajrahrdayalanikara and the Mdydjdla are Explanatory Tantras,
since some consistency with the Guhyasamaja does not qualify
those works as ‘Explanatory’. However, Tsoh-kha-pa, as
Bu-ston before him, often cites the Vajrahrdaydlamkdra-tantra in
commentarial material on the Guhyasamdjatantra. Ilisjustificaiion
is suggested in his Pahcakrarna commentary, PIT Vol. 158,
p. 186-5, where he refers to the Vajrahrdaydlamkdra as a‘consistent
means ( updya ) tantra’ {phyogs mthun gyi thabs gyi rgyud ), that is to
say consistent with one side of Guhyasamaja teaching.
According to Tsoh-kha-pa (PTT, Vol. 158, p. 177-1),

while the Explanatory Tantra Vajramdld discusses some other
matters, it principally teaches the‘arcane body’, ‘arcane speech’,
and ‘arcane mind’, and the illusory body (mdyd-deha ). He
further explains {ibid., p. 177-1, 2)) that the Caturdaipariprcchd
principally teaches extensively the essentials of prdndydma\ and
that the Sandhivyakarana is consistent with the sequence of chap¬
ters of the mula-tantra and is an Explanatory Tantra for the first
twelve chapters of the Guhyasamaja and not for the remaining
ones. He also mentions (ibid., p. 176-1) that a larger and a
smaller version of the Vajrajiidnasamuccaya are stated in the com¬
mentary on the Vajramdld ; these are numbered respectively -150
and 447 in the Tohoku catalog based on the Derge edition of
the Kanjur-Tanjur (but the Peking edition of the Kanjur omits
the larger version).
The principle of the ‘explanatory tantras’ seems to be a
INTRODUCTION TO THE CUHYASAMAJATANTRA
89
consistency of terminology. Such works should employ the

same names of deities and treat some major subjects of the basic
tantra of the Guhyasamaja. The one which most qualifies as
such is of course the Sandhivydkarana because it does expand on
the Guhyasamaja chapter by chapter for the first twelve chapters,
and then itself comes to an end. Of course, other Tantras of the
Anuttarayoga-tantra class have much material in common, but
their departure in terminology makes it difficult to equate their
subject matter. Tsori-kha-pa, who commented on the chief
Father Tantra, the Guhyasamaja , and the chief Mother Tantra,
the $ri-Cakrasamiara, frequently has remarks which correlate
these two extensive sets of tantric literature. I made a modest
attempt at this too in my “Female Energy. . .. ” article, showing
the equivalence of the Father Tantra vocabulary ‘Mother,*
‘Sister,’ ‘Daughter’ with the Mother Tantra vocabulary ‘To¬
gether-born female,’ ‘field-born female,* and ‘incantation-born
female’.
As we pass from those revealed tantric works to the exege-

tical literature, we should note that the former are written in
strict anonymity and attributed to divine authorship, while in
the case of the latter, the writers are pleased to attach their
names to commcntarial literature and elaborate rituals which
have taken centuries to develop. Before it is possible even
tentatively to ascribe dates to the revealed literature, we must
do the same for the commcntarial works, and here we note that
some scholarly confusion already has set in. It simply is not
possible yet to pinpoint with accuracy the dale of Xagarjuna as
645 A.D., the date given by B. Bhattacharyya in the introduction
(p. xxx) to his edition of the Guhyasamaja. A helpful attempt
is Rulnila Saukrtyayana's gcneological tree of the eighty-
four Siddhas and list of the Siddhas in journal Asiatique, Oct.
Dec., 1934, pp. 218-225. Professor Giuseppe Tucci has given
his lists and tentative dates of Siddhas in Tibetan Painted Scrolls ,
I, pp. 227-232. The Japanese scholar Ilakuyu Hadano, in
Tohoku Daigaku Bungaku-bu Kenkyu-nemfw , No. 9 (1958), pp.
58-18, thoroughly discusses the traditions of King Indrabhuti.
Although the attempt involves trepidation, some chrono¬

logical layers can be worked out through textual analysis and
other considerations.
1. First come the revealed texts Guhyasamajatantra, the
90
three Explanatory Tantras named in the Paiicakrama, and the

(uncertain) Vajrajndnasamuccaya. In a negative way, no works
are extant composed with their names by the first persons in the
Guhyasamaja lineage list (Tibetan tradition), namely Indra-
bhuti the Great, Nagayogini, and King ViSukalpa (per Tsoh-
kha-pa, Vol. 158, p. 178-1, 2): i-ndra-bhu-ti chen po dan.
kluhi rnal hbyor ma dan sa bdag bi-su-ka-lpas gzhun mdzad pa
ni hdi na mi snan la/). There is a legendary account in The
Blue Annals (I, pp. 359-60) :
The adepts of the (Guhya)samaja agree that the Guhya¬

samajatantra had been preached by the Munindra himself,
following a request of Indrabhiiti, the great king of
Oddiyana, at the time when the Buddha had manifested
himself in Oddiyana and initiated (the king). There¬
upon the king and his retinue practised the Tamra by
means of the prapanca-carya (spros spyod) and became
initiates (Vidyadhara—one who has attained spiritual
realization or siddhi, grub pa), and the country of Oddi¬
yana became deserted. After that a yogini, who had
descended from the realm of the Nagas, heard it (i.e. the
Tantra) from (king) Indrabhuti and taught it to king
ViSukalpa of the Southern country. The niaha-brah-
mana Saraha heard it from him and taught it to acarya
Nagarjuna. The latter had many disciples, but the chief
ones were the four: Sakyamitra, Aryadeva, Nagabodhi,
and Candraklrti.
Tson-kha-pa (op. cit p. 178-2), right after the mention of those

first persons whose Guhyasamaja works do not exist iat least
under their names), goes on to mention, what in this context
should be the first work by an historical personnage, the Cuhja -
siddhi, whose authorship he assigns to §ri-Maliasukhanatha
(dpal mgon po bdt ba chen po). This name is undoubtedly drawn
from the verse cited from a manuscript of this work by S. B.
Dasgupta, An Introduction to Tanlric Buddhism, p. 156, note:
Irl-mahasukha-nathasya pada-padmopajivina / racitah padma-
vajrerta sarvasattvanukampaya // . The author is well known
by the name Padmavajra (who also has the name Dcvacandra,
per Tucci, Vol. I, p. 232). He might be different from the
disciple of Buddhaguhya (2nd half, eighth century 1 ' whocom-
mented on the Yoga-tantra. Tsoh-kha-pa states that the
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
91
Gulyasiddhi establishes the meaning of the Samaja. It princi¬

pally establishes the nidana of the Guhyasamaja; and it teaches
about the stages of the path : first, the Stage of Generation of
placing syllables; second, on the basis of‘Victory of the Rite’,
one’s own intrinsic nature symbolizing reality; third, for the
sake of relying on that, the contemplation with recourse to the
Jhana-mudra; fourth, the contemplation of mahamudra and
abhisnmbodhi togetherwith the fourfold praxis. The Blue
Annals* I, p. 363, mentions besides this Guhyasiddhi, the work by
King Indrabhuti, the Jndnasiddhi, as also based on the Guhya-
samaja. Hence this must be a different Indrabhuti from the
one who has no works on the Guhyasamaja, Tsoh-kha-pa
also mentions that there exist no works by Saraha on the Guhya-
samdjatantra. About his time begin two lineages of Guhya¬
samaja conunentarial tradition—the Arva school ( hphags lugs)
and the Jnanapada school (ye fes zhabs lugs).
(a) The Arya school is headed by the tantric Nagarjuna,

whose most important works in the tantric field are his own
compositions, the Pindikrta-sddhana (especially for the Stage
of Generation't and t\\c Paiicakrama (for thcStageofCompletion),
which became authoritative for the sequence of yoga. Besides,
h»s commentary Aftddaia-patala-iistara-vydkhyd on the 18th
chapter (the Uttara-tantra) remained the most important of
any commentary on that chapter, probably because Candra-
klrti’s Pradipoddyotana does not cover this pari. His commentary
Tantratikd on the inula Guhyasamdjatantra was overshadowed
by the Pradipoddyotana. His Pindikrta-sddhana and Paiicakrama
were based on the Guhyasamdjatantra, first 12 chapters, especially
chapter Six and Twelve (‘Documents’) and the Explanatory
Tantras Sandhivydkarana and Vajramala (although he also refers
to the Caturdcvipariprccha). He stressed the three lights and the
Clear Light, the theory of eighty prakrtis or vikalpas going with
three vijudnas , interpreted with Yogacara-type vocabulary pro¬
bably adopted from the Lankdvatdra-siilra. Nagarjuna’s Tantra-
likd is an attempt to explain the Guhyasamdjatantra on the basis
of the utpatti-krama and sampanna-krama, as well as his five stages,
to which he refers repeatedly, the latter under the title Prakarana
(rab tu byed pa) rather than Paiicakrama. So in PTT, Vol.
59, he mentions all five krama by name at p. 200-5 and again
all five beginning with ‘from the Prakarana ’ (rab tu byed pa las
92
kyah) at p. 239-4; and has numerous quotations from Prakarana

at pp. 214-4, 218-5, 226-5, 236-2, 243-5, 289-1, 300-3, etc.
Also, BhavyakTrti’s ‘ Prakdiikd ’ commentary on Pradipoddyolana ,
PTT Vol. 60, quotes the Paiicakrama twice on p. 257-4, 5
as * Prakarana suggesting that he was consulting Nagarjuna’s
Tantrafika while writing his commentary on Candraktrii’s work.
But the commentators on the Paiicakrama itself do not call it
* Prakarana ’. An extensive commentarial literature arose
on the basis of the Paiicakrama. I have mainly employed Sri
Laksmi’s commentary, because it adheres closely to the text
commented upon without wild speculations, has a beautiful
flow of language, and uses the nidaua verses which are the
basis of the present work. Another commentary which has
supplied some important passages is the Manimdld which the
colophon and accordingly the catalogs ascribe to Nagabodhi.
But this is hardly possible, because Nagabodhi is among the
earliest in the lineage. The Manimdld is the most developed
of the Indian commentaries I examined. It employs the
‘six alternatives’ (patkolt) terminology, which was popularized
by Candrakirti. It is full of opinionated speculations, such as
(PTT, Vol. 62, p. 160-2) equating Nagarjuna's five stages,
vajrajdfia, etc., with the five paths ( marga ), prayoga, etc. of the
Prajflaparamita exegesis. The fact that the respective descrip¬
tions in the two different literatures has ? e virtually nothing in
common docs not bother the author of the Manimdld , who
makes up five reasons which need not be cited. A clue of
identification is a certain frankness of language which the author
has in common with Bhavyakirti, the author of the Prakdlika
commentary on Candrakirti’s Pradipoddyolana (see below).
Thus in the Manimdld (op. cit. p. 155-3, 4, 5 and next page)
the author takes up the problem of what is meant by the ‘woman’,
‘man’, and ‘androgyne’ of this literature. He mentions and
rejects various opinions before giving his own. His remark
about the usual theory of the ‘woman’ is precisely the remark
given by Bhavyakirti in the Prakdiikd (PTT, Vol. 61, p. 3-2),
with alternate translation into Tibetan, where he rejects the
view that a ‘woman’ is described by breasts and hair :
If the feminine gender ( stri-liiiga ) has breasts and hair,

then mala (‘garlands’) and *svapnasani (‘beds’) would
not have feminine gender, because they do not have
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA 93
breasts and hair. And even when the (female) zones

that do have hair are shaved, they have feminine gender.
And it reduces to the absurdity that an actor impersonating
a woman by means of attached breasts and wig, would
have feminine gender” (/ gal term mat dan skra can mo
rings yin na f dchi tshe fihreti ba dati rial khri la sogs fia dag
mo tings stt mi hgyur tefde mams nu ma dan skrar mi Idan fiahi
fihyir to fl hbreg fiahi skra dan Idan fiahi sa fihyogs dag kyari mo
rings su hgyur ro 1 sbyar bahi nu ma dan skrahi cha lugs hdgin
fiahi gat mkhan skyes fia yah mo rings hid du that bar hgyur roj )
There are other commentators on the Guhyasamaja system who

are equally scornful of the vulgar interpretation of tantric
symbols, of which our own generation has no monopoly. But
it would take the same person to make the identical remark,
given above, in two books.
In the Arya school, the tantric Candrakirti wrote the most

eminent commentary on the inula Guhyasamdjalantra , called the
Pradipoddyolami. I ts main contribution is to classify commentarial
statements on the Guhyasamdjatantra by a rigorous application
of subdivisions of ^Seven Ornaments’, a terminology stemming
from the Vajrajiidnasamuccaya , but which is merely referred to by
Candrakirti as the 'Explanatory Tantra’ (see the Section C,
infra, for a summary exposition of the full twenty-eight subdivi¬
sions) and to avoid Yogacara terminology. The first commen¬
tary on his work may have been the primitive one by Laksmin-
kara, sister of Indrabhuti, called the ' , Visamafiada-paiijikd'‘. The
main commentary on the Pradifioddyotana . the ‘ Prakdsikd ’ of
Bhavyakirti (according to the Tohoku catalog; PTT catalog
incorrectly gives author’s name as Aryadeva), seems intent on
rebuking Candrakirti by restoring the Yogacara vocabulary
pursuant to the indications of Nagarjuna’s works.
In this tradition the greatest work on important phases of

tantric praxis is Aryadeva’s Carydmeldfiaka-pradifia. Aryadeva
is a tantric writer, no more to be identified with the celebrated
Madbyamika author of the same name than are the tantrics
Nagarjuna and Candrakirti. This tantric author Aryadeva
also wrote a number of brief summary works of which now the
most well-known is the Cittavisuddhifirakararia by reason of
Prabhubhai 11. Patel’s edition. Of all the later writers of this
94
‘Arya’ tradition of the Guhyasamaja cycle. Aivadeva gives the

greatest literary impression of having actually 'done it'.
(b) The Jnanapada school is named after Buddhasrijnana,

whose teacher Lilavajra composed (in the Gulixasamaja class)
only the .V iddnogurupade>a and does not appear to have made a
distinction between the ‘Stage of Generation' and the‘Stage
of Completion’ (PTT, Vol. 158, p. 178-3; slob dpon *gcg pahi
rdo rjes rgyud kyi glen gzhihi bsad pa tsam ntdzad kyau/
rim giiis kyi lam gyi srol zur pa mi snah ho ' ). Buddha-
SrijAana (see his legend in Roerich, The Blue Annah, I, pp. 367,
ff.) wrote works exemplifying both Stages: the Stage of Gene ra¬
tion in the Samantabhadra-nuwo-sddhana (Tohoku No. 1855)
and the Stage of Completion in the revealed Mukhagama '1 oh.
No. 1853) and Muktitilaka (Toh. No. 1859) based on that
revelation (PTT, Vol. 158, p. 178-3). Buddhasrijftana studied
the Prajftaparamita under the celebrated specialist Haribhacha,
and this part of his training is quite evident in his tantric works.
He adopted an interpretive position in which at each point the
explanations of the Guhyasamaja arc tied in with Mahayana
Buddhism, particularly of the Prajnaparamita type. That
kept obviously Brahmanical doctrines from flowing into the
syncretic tantric literature of his school. Perhaps partly due to
his Buddhist piety, Buddhasrijhana had gicai fortune of disciples.
One of his direct disciples, Buddhaguhya, became a celebrated
commentator on the Carya-and Yoga-Tantra classes of tantric
literature. Another one, Dipahkarabhadra is credited with a
work of highest importance on ritual in the Stage of Generation,
the Guhyasamajamandalaiidhi (Toh. 1865), often referred to as
the “Four-hundred-and-fifty verses,” which has a fikd on it by
Ratnakara£anti (Toh. No. 1871). This Dipahkarabhadra as
well as Rahulabhadra and some other direct disciples arc credit¬
ed in legend with advanced success in the yoga of the Guhya¬
samaja, it being hinted that they did better than Buddhasri-
jftana himself, who tried without success to generate the ‘diamond
body’ (vajrakdya). Another disciple, named Vitapuda, wrote
lengthy commentaries on the main works of (he master. This
school, at least as far as its literary products are concerned,
does not bother with the topics of three lights and the Clear
Light so prevalent in the works of the ‘Arya’ school. If the
Jftanapada school comes across a term in the Guhyasamiijatantra
INTRODUCTION TO THE CUHYASAMAjATANTRA
95
like 4 prakrtiprabhasvara' , it would be prone to explain it just as

in non-tantric Buddhism, to wit ‘intrinsically clear’ (said of
the pure consciousness); w bile a writer of the Arya school would
be likely to say it means (in what is called the ‘pregnant sense’)
‘the Clear Light along with the (BO) prakftis (of the three lights’).
However, it may well he the case that theJhanapada school does
not deny that ‘pregnant sense’ but reserves it for the oial tradi¬
tion, rigorously kept apart from the written works. The
emphasis on the guru’s precepts is show n hv the very title of that
work of Buddhas njhana's, the Atukhdgama ‘the tradition
from the mouth’. Yitapada’s commentary on the master’s
Muktitilaka carries on this same stress by a number
ofeonsistent remarks (PIT, Vol. 65, p. 134-5): “from themouth
of one’s own guru” (rah gi bla mahi kha nas....); ibid, p.
135-2; “ ‘arisen in the lineage chain’ means recourse to the
errorless path of the illustrious gurus” (brgyud rims las byun
zhes pa ni bla ma dam pahi ma nor bahi lam du brten paho).
Various commentaries on the m ula-tantra belong to the Jhanapada
school; probably the freedom from Candrakirti’s classifying
terms in the later commentaries is the best indication of inclusion
in that school. The Jhanapada school took greater care with
literary polish than the Arya school. It has been preeminent
in works on the Guhyasamaja ritual, especially on the praxis
of prdnaydma ; and the writer Smrtijhanakirti of this school
wrote a commentary on the Caturdevipariprccha, which is
mainly devoted to prdnaydma . The towering tantric com¬
mentator of the last period of Indian Buddhism, Abhayaka-
ragupta, is said to have belonged to the Jhanapada
lineage.
The author Ratn.ikarasanti freely used both lineages in

his own works, and his attitude is about what is found in Tibetan
tantrism, where the followers of the Guhyasamaja cycle were
glad enough to understand the Tantra and practice it in proper
fashion, no matter which of the two lineages would contribute
the most. In fact, both schools have an extensive literature on
this Tantra, as extant in Tibetan translation. In the present
work, products of the ‘Arya’ school are chiefly utilized for the
simple reason that it is this school which is built around the
position found in the forty niduna verses that are the main instig¬
ation of the current research. On the other hand, some important
96
YOGA OF THE GL’HYASAMAJATANTRA
passages have been selected from texts ofthe Juanap.ida school.
The above summary prepares us to make some chrono¬

logical observations. Tucci (I, p. 232) argues that we should
accept the Tibetan tradition which makes Padmasambhnva
(middle eighth century) the disciple of a King Indrabhuti
who therefore would fall in the period end of seventh to first
half of eighth century. But Hadano (op. cit. places Indrabhuti
in the ninth century ami Buddhajftanapada in the eighth
century. Of course, to reconcile the positions we should posit
two Indrabhuli's. The first Indrabhuti would be the one
associated with Oddiyana, who has no works on the liuhya-
samaja, but could well be the author of the great commentary
on the Samputa-tilaka in the Mother Tantra tradition, just as
Saraha, his junior, wrote commentaries on other Tantras, such
as the Buddhakapula-Tantra , but no distinguishable work on the
Guhvasamuja. Saraha is placed by Sankrtyavana as a contem¬
porary of King Dharmapala (769-809). The lama Taranatha,
in his tales of the Siddhas, calls the second Indrabhuti Tndra-
bhuti the junior’. He could be the Indrabhuti of Orissa
(Odivisa) whom Sahkrtyayana considered to be the only
Indrabhuti. His master is Anahgavajra, and the latter’s teacher
Padmavajra. This would be the Padmavajra who wrote the
Guhyasiddhi. His spiritual grandson Indrabhuti would be the
one who wrote the Jtlanasiddhi. Padmavajra would fall in
the second half of the eighth century, just as do both the tantric
Nagarjuna ofthe Arya school and Buddha£rljnana of thejhana-
pada school. In the ninth century comes Candrakini, author of
Pradipoddyotana , as well as the second Indrabhuti who has a
sister Laksmihkara ; and also, probably, Aryadeva. This
is easily the first half of the ninth, as maintained by (Miss)
Malati J. Shcndgc, cd. Advayasiddhi (Baroda, 1964), p. 11, in
agreement with Sncllgrovc and Sahkrtyayana. The Kashmi¬
rian Sri Laksmi is probably not the same person as Laksmih¬
kara. Tilopa belongs to the tenth century because he is the
guru of Naropa whodied in 1027, and the latter isacontcmporarv
of Ratnakara£anti. Guhyasamaja commentaries continued to
be written through the twelfth century, as is deducible from
translations into Tibetan. Thus, the Tanjtir Guhyasamaja
cycle of cominentarial literature is composed between the
eighth and twelfth centuries.
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMA.JATANTRA
97
Once wc place the commentarial literature, the way is

open to approach the more tenuous clues for solving the problem
of the revealed Tantras of the Kanjur. The tradition reported
from Tarnnfitha that the Tantras were transmitted in utmost
secrecy for 300 years before being rendered somewhat more
public by the Siddhas (cf. B. Bhattacharyya, Intro, xxxv),
would lead us to a fifth century A.D. time which is not unreason¬
able, even though we should be unhappy to have so little data
to go on. The early fifth century is the creative period of
Asahga (circa 375-430 A.D.), but I have rejected the never-
substantiated attribution of the Guhyasamdjatantra to his author¬
ship in my Analysis of the Sravakabhumi Manuscript , p. 39,
on the basis of my studies in his known works (which include
the Sanskrit prose commentary on the Sutrdlamkdra , but not the
basic verses) and repeat my rejection here as a consequence of
the intervening investigation of the Guhyasamaja literature.
Not for the reason that the Guhyasamdjatantra is unworthy of
Asahga, rather that it is impossible of Asahga, and further—to
mention an extrinsic reason—tantric commentators do not quote
from Asauga’s or his brother Vasubandhu’s works to justify
basic tantric ideas! Rather they quote the Lahkdvatdra-sutra
for their Yogacara-type vocabulary, and this sdtra was first
translated into Chinese in 443 A.D. and in the fifth century had
become so popular among Indian Buddhists that it was the chief
text of Bodhidharma when he came to China in either 520 A.D.
or 527 A.D. (the alternate dates of the Sino-Japanese tradition).
Wc can strengthen this tentative attribution to the fifth

century by considering some further materials of the Vajramdla
which, besides being the source of our nidana verses, contains
many other passages of supreme importance for understanding
the Guhyasamaja cult. In my “Studies in Yama and Mara,”
pp. 70-73, I show from a work ofTsoh-kha-pa that the Vajramdla
converts the Visnu Avatar doctrine, at least the first five
Avatars, into a kind of esoteric embryology, namely that in the
first five lunar months of uterine existence, the body has succes¬
sively the forms of fish, tortoise, boar, lion, and dwarf. Now this
doctrineisset forth in Vajramdla's Chapter XXXII, which also
contains Yogacara vocabulary tied in with the terminology of
the Lankdvatdra-siitra. As an example of this terminology in
the Vajramdla , I may cite PTT, Vol. 3, p. 214-5, line 6 : “the
98
YOOA OF THE OUHYASAMAj ATANTRA
secret state of the eight-fi/riana set” (/ mam ics brgvad kyi

tthogs dben pa / ). In that article, p. 71. note. I mention,
4 *Miss Kamala Ray, ‘The Ten Incarnations of Visnu in
Bengal’, IHQ. Vol. XV (1941), pp. 370-85, explains that while
the Avatara theory is very ancient, the standard list is more
modern, and (p. 373) ‘Epigraphic evidences testify to the exis¬
tence of this theory from the 5th century A.D. onwards (in
Bengal).*” This suggests that at the time the standard list
often incarnations became publicized, an esoteric tradition was
developing concerning these incarnations as represented, at
least the first five, by intra-uterine states.
Furthermore, in the previous introductory section, ‘The

world of light*, I put forward the striking hypothesis that both
the set of thirty-three female prakrtis and forty male prakrtis
listed under nidana verses nos. 1 and 2 can be interpreted as
breaking down into five groups in each set, the first set especially
going with the five stages of the Vaisnava path to union with
the Lord Krsna (presuming there was once a faith in such a
‘path’). If the sets of prakrtis have their origin in a syncretism
with Vaisnavism, then the fact that later on the commentators
on the Pancakrama (from which the lists of prakrtis are drawn)
have no inkling, as far as the texts are concerned, of how to
subdivide the sets of prakrtis , indicates that some time must have
elapsed between the adoption of this vocabulary in an esoteric
oral way and the more public commentarial tradition. We
must grant that any conclusion about this matter must be of a
highly speculative nature, since the early syncretisms of
Buddhism and Vaisnavism arc obscure, and since the erotic type
of Kf?na worship is usually placed at a considerably later date
than what we are now considering (fifth century, A.D.).
What I do maintain is that the Vajramald has the earmarks

of having been composed centuries before the tantric Nagar-
juna quoted it in his PaUcakrama, and I tentatively place it in
the fifth century. The Sandhiiyakarana should tentatively be
placed at about the same time, since it shows the same definite
atyle of authoritative revealed literature. The other explana¬
tory tantras can be roughly placed there also, subject to later
investigations.
The above considerations leave open a date for the Guhya -

MMdjatentra itself. This problem cannot be separated from the
INTRODUCTION TO THE 0 UHYASAMAJATANTRA
99
dating of all the main revealed Buddhist Tantras preserved in

Tibetan translation in the Kanjur, because there is certainly
a great deal of common material to be found in all these Tantras;
as well as from the dating of the &aivitic and Vaisnava dgarnas.
I see no reason for denying it a century’s priority to the
Vajramd/d; and so, on a purely tentative basis, ascribe the
Guhyasamdjatantra to the fourth century, A.D. But a decision on
this matter requires solution of other problems of Indian
literary history.
I am well aware that the kind of reasoning employed above

might be challenged by the scholars who insist on a later date
for the Guhyasamdjatantra , in fact placed just prior to the
historical commentaries on it. Therefore, I take the liberty
of quoting extensively from my article in the Golden Jubilee
Volume of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, ‘‘Early
Literary History of the Buddhist Tantras, especially the Guhya-
samaja-tantra”:
“What is significant about the two commentarial traditions
is precisely that there arc two, with many differences within
each of these traditions. Just as the Sautrantika and Vaibha-
sika of non-tantric Buddhism could not have arisen fully-grown,
in the form in which we know them, in the century immediately
following the passing of the Buddha, so also the ‘Arya School*
and the ‘Jnanapada School’ could not have arisen in the century
immediately following the composition of the Guhyasam&ja , let
alone the very same century \ Indeed, any one who even
partially surveys the Guhyasamdja literature as extant in Tibetan
and notes the remarkable variance in explanation of a given
passage of the basic Tantra, would experience at leait a mild
shock at the flimsy reasons given for a late dating of the Guhya¬
samdja. One example will be given to show what is meant, and
this case is particularly chosen for a context where one would
expect minimal variation between the commentaries because
the expression to be explained is merely the ‘three kinds’ of each
sense object as mentioned without explanation in the basic
tantra of Guhyasamdja, Chap. 7:
Arya school :
Nagarjuna’s '/ antrafikd on Guhyasamdja (Dergc ed.,

Sa, f. 105b-7); (form, the object of sight)‘has the nature of
outer, inner, and both’ (phyi dannan dad gni gahi rati bzhin).
100
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJAT ANTRA
Candrakirti’s Pradipoddyotana oil Guhyasamdja (Dcrgo

cd., Ha, f. 49a-5): (form, the object of sight) ‘should be
perceived and comprehended as inferior, intermediate,
and superior’ ( dman pa dan bar ma dan mchog gsum du
mam par Ses Siri rtogs pa) ; in Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan-hgrel
on the Pradipoddyotana (PTT, Vol. 158, p. 55-3), we learn
that the superior kind is the Buddha going with that
sense object, e.g. Vairocana as form; (p. 56-1, form is
also of three kinds, pleasurable, repulsive or displeasing,
and neutral).
Jnanapdda School :
Prasantajnana’s Upadesd-niscaya on Guhyasamdja (PTT,

Vol. 63, p. 64-5); the three kinds are superior (lust),
intermediate (delusion), and inferior (hatred).
Celu-pa’s Ratnavrksa-ndma-rahasya-samdja-vrtli (PTT,
Vol. 63, p. 183-5): inferior, intermediate, and superior,
j Jinadatta’s Panjikd-ndma on Guhyasamdja (P IT, Vol.63,
p. 259-1) : “Because one discerns it as having the nature

of superior, and so on, there are three kinds ; having the
nature of outer, inner, and both, means “non-apprehen¬
sion” (anupalabdhi) , so one should understand it by the
nature of three gates to liberation, of voidness, etc.’
(mchog la sogs pahi ran bzhin du brtags pahi phyir rnam
gsum mo / phyi dan nan dan gfii gahi bdag nid mi dmigs
pa ste / stoh pa hid la sogs pahi rnam par thar pahi sgo
gsum gyi ho bos rtogs par byaho /).
Ratnakaras anti’s Kusumanjali-guhyasamdja-nibandha-

ndma (Vol. 64, p. 127-1): the three kinds mean the
respective offerings by the three kinds of yogins, the one
of lust, of delusion, and of hatred.
Smrtijftanakirti’s Sriguhyasamdja-tantrardja-vrtti (PIT,

Vol. 66, p. 132-3): ‘The “three kinds” means that one
knows (the object) as the three gates to liberation, the
signless, etc.’
Anandagarbha’s $ri-guhyasamdja-mahdtantrardja - tikd

(PTT, Vol. 84, p. 127-4, 5): ‘The three kinds are outer,
inner, and secret. That was explained by Arya-
Jftanapada to mean fifteen in an external set,fifteen in a pe r¬
sonal set, and fifteen in a secret set. Having cited his words.
101
I should here explain clearly his meaning/ (mam pa

gsum ni phyi dan nan dan gsan bafio / / de hphags pa ye
$cs zhabs kyis phyihi bye brag bco lfia dan / na& gi
bye brag bco Ina dan / gsah bahi bye brag bco lfiar biad
pahi don hdir sgrar drahs nas gsal bar biad par bya ste /).
He goes on to take the outer as three, which multiplied
by the five sense objects yields the number fifteen, and
does the same for the inner or personal, and for the secret
which involves the prajildupaya union. In each case, the
three arc the Buddha, the Bodhisattva, and the Devi,
associated with that object by the triad of perception,
sense organ and sense object, i.e. for form, the three are
the Buddha Vairocana, the Bodhisattva K$itigarbha,
and the Devi Rupavajra.
“There arc three main sources for the various comments cited
above. One is the Explanatory Tantra Sarndhivyokarana , which
is a verse paraphrase, with slight enlargement, of the first twelve
chapters of the Guhyasamajatantra. In its treatment of Chap.
7, it states (PTT, Vol, 3, p. 240-3):
/ nan daii de bzhin phyi rot dan f ghi ga rjes su mi dmigs pal
I gzugs la sogs gsum de yin te / lha rnams la ni dbul bar byafj
The three kinds of form and other sense objects are the
non-apprehension of inner, outer, and both; one should
offer those to the gods.
“The next source is the Explanatory Tantra Vajramdld , which

states in what 1 call the ‘ nidana-kdrikd *, no. 19 :
sthdtavyam vifaysfv asmdd yoginadrayadarSind /
hinamadhyapranitefu jiianatrayanidarsandt //
Afterwards the yogin who sees the non-duality should be

dwelling upon sense objects ‘inferior*, ‘intermediate*,
and ‘superior’ by seeing the triple gnosis.
“The third source is the uttara-tanlra (18th chap, of the Sanskrit

text, p. 158) :
rupafabdadayah kdmah sukhaduhkhobhaydlmakdh J

janayanti hrdaye nityarji rdgadvefatamodayam //
The ‘desires’ (i.e. the 5 strands of desire, paticakamagvQa)

‘form’, ‘sound’, etc.—pleasurable, painful, and neutral^-
continually generate in the heart, (respectively), thesource
of ‘lust’, ‘hatred’, and ‘delusion’.
“With all that information at hand, it is easy to see that
102
tome commentators relied especially on the Vajramdla , some

especially on the Samdhivyakarana, some especially on the utlara-
tantrai and then some commentators tried to harmonize two
different terminologies of ‘three kinds” l>y taking it as ‘three
times three', i.e. three each of each three. The Samdhivyakarana
expression ‘non-apprehension* suggested to some commentators
the non-tantric doctrines of ‘Perfection of Insight* (prajiia-
piramitd) with its stress on voidness (iunyatd ), so they saw an
Opportunity to make contact with non-tantric Buddhism by the
well-known set of Buddhism, the three gates to liberation (trini
vimokfa-mtikhdni), that is, the voidness (Srinyald-), the undirected
(apranihita -), and the sigtdess ( animitta -) gates. When one
takes into account that these commentaries vary much more in
most other places, where the Guhya\amdja passages arc not
restricted by such concrete objects as the sense objects, it is
difficult to avoid the conclusion that some centuries of oral
tradition have intervened between the basic (iuhyasamdjatantra
and the eighth century when the ‘historical* writers began to
appear on the scene. Of course, if the basic Tantra had been
concocted by the first commentator, or had been composed
just prior to his writing activity, there should not have been
any question of what the ‘three kinds’ were. Instead the com¬
mentators might have differed only in their metaphorical inter¬
pretation of the standard ‘three kinds’.”
Another conclusion one may draw from the evidence of

the above extract is that it is hazardous to try to understand the
Guhyasamdjatantra just from reading it. Who, reading the phrase
‘three kinds of form*, would know what the three kinds are,
unless someone told him ?
Now turning our consideration to ihe forty nidana verses,

since they arc a part of the Vajramdla, and no evidence has turned
up to suggest their later addition, wc may, pursuant to the above
reasoning, place these verses also in the fifth century, A.I).
Alarpkakalasa s commentary on the lajramdla , which is extant
in the Tanjur, does not comment all the way up to the chapter
which contains the forty verses. The verses arc cited in the
Pradipoddyotana without further explanation except for the
classifying term ‘pregnant sense' (garbhy-artha). The only
Indian commentary on the Pradipoddyotana translated into Tibetan
that generously treats these verses with comments is Bhavya-
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
103
kirti’s Prakdhkd. This is a highly opinionated commentary,

but I found it worthwhile citing in several places.
Later, in Tibet, Candrakirti’s work was highly prized.
A commentarial tradition arose which did not neglect the 40
verses. The Tibetan Bu-ston’s commentary on the Pradipod¬
dyotana (Vol. Ta of his collected works, published by Lokesh
Chandra in Part Nine) must have been eagerly greeted by
Tibetan monks when it first appeared, probably as the first
native commentary on that work by an eminent authority on
theTantras. He continues the Madhyamika tone of commen¬
tary in the same manner as the Pradipoddyotana itself, that is, in
a negative way by avoidance of the typical Yogacara vocabulary
found in many other commentaries, especially in the Pancakrama
tradition. Bu-ston has various disagreements with Bhavya-
kirti’s commentaries (the main one and the smaller one) and
with Kumara’s commentary on the Pradipoddyotana , as also with
unnamed teachers (“Some persons say...”). Bu-ston com¬
ments topically, not sentence by sentence in the order of occur¬
rence in Candrakirti’s work. This mode of commentary is
not original, for some of the Indian commentaries arc of this
type. In line with this sort of commentary, he docs not com¬
ment on the 40 verses in their order, but topically. So after some
remarks for the first four verses, going with E-vam ma-ya, he
begins to jump around, although in the end accounting for
almost all the verses. The Tibetan commentary on the Guhya-
samaja by Kun-dgah-don-hgrub (the “Man hag rim giiis
gter mdzod”', recently reprinted in India, contains the 40
verses almost at the beginning, and in section KA, f. 37a-b
(pp. 73-74), also treats the 40 verses topically and with extreme
brevity. These topical groupings are of no help to me in the
present work, because I shall treat the verses in their order, to
fully bring out the author’s intentions as an individual composi¬
tion. The commentarial tradition on Candrakirti’s work
culminated in Tsoh-kha-pa’s Mchan hgrcl (annotation in smaller
writing in between the words or phrases) in the early fifteenth
century. The Pradipoddyotana had been first translated by the
Indian pandit $raddhakaravanna and the great Tibetan trans¬
lator Rin-chcn-bsau-po (958-1035); Tsors-kha-pa used this
translation as well as ‘the two new translations’ (j Mchan kgrel y
p. 91-4). Tsoh-kha-pa’s annotation has evidence that he had
104
YOGA OF THE GUH Y AS A M.A J AT A N T R A
read Bu-ston’s work and continued many of his ideas, but Tson-
kba-pa’s treatment is far advanced. He knew that in order
for a commentary to be useful, it had to follow the order of the
original work. So does his annotation Mchan hgrel on the
Pradipoddyolana, and his Mthaf; gcod an the individual chapters.
His Don gsal ba on the Gvhyasamdja follows the order of the three
mandalas ; and his Dbar: gt don follows the order of the matufala-
ritc. Thereby his works were of great convenience for me to
consult, and it must have been the same for the Tibetans. There
can be little doubt that the Guhyasamdjatantra reached an ad¬
vanced and mature interpretation in Tibet at the hands of the
great teachers Bu-ston, Tson-kha-pa, and others.*
•After the present work was completed, I became indebted to Srtkong

Rimpoche, Assistant Tutor to H. H. the Dalai Lama, for allowing me to
secure a copy of a text just reprinted in North India for restricted circulation.
This is by Ses-rab-sen-ge, a disciple of Tson-kha-pa—a commentary on
Oandraktrti's Pradipoddyotana in its Tibetan version. This native work is a
remarkable piece of popularization of a Tantric topic, which I believe was
composed after the death of Tsoh-kha-pa, his teacher. The author
appears to have taken as basis Tsori-kha-pa’s Mchan fattl annotation on the
Pradipoddyotana, incorporating the annotation into the text commented upon
in a lucid paraphrase which, however, omits thorny points and then adds
citations from other works, Tantric anti non-Tantric. The author cons¬
tantly rationalizes with remarks like “don ni" (“the meaning is as follows”).
In illustration, in the course of Chap. One commentary’, his explanation
of the forty verses is approximately a paraphrase of Tson-kha-pa's Mchcn
bgftl on those verses, but omits mention of Tson-kha-pa’s difficult comment
on Stu. In Sec. Ka, f. 45, b to 46a-6, he has various w ays of grouping the
Ver *c* (which Tson-kha-pa did not present in his commentary , but gives
no solution for the order of the verses from i to 40. In Sec. Nga, f. 41a, he
points out that ptaljdhata and dhjana (the first tw o of the six-mcmbeird yoga)
■ are included in “arcane body” (T. his dhen) —which is Tsoii-kha-pa’s posi¬
tion. It is this position that is the chief clue for solving the order of the
forty verses, that is,if one tries to accommodate this position within the forty
wnfJ * especially with the Ka-Ta ’Body) verses. It is good that this fascinat¬
ing work is receiving its due appreciation from the Grlugpa Lamas who
specialize in Tantra, Besides, the Tibetans have recently reprinted works
by Mkhas-grub-rjc and by the First Panchcn Lama on aspects of the
Cnkja^rraj,: cult. I have made an important observation about the latter
two works in my Appendix 2. In any case, my policy of relying on the Master
Tson-kha-pa, rather than on the derivative literature of his followers, should
be appreciated by the present-day Gclugpa monks, who can scarcely deny
that Tson-kha-pa was as much a Lama guru) as any that can be met today.
B. The title of the work and its opening sentence (nidSna)
The full title as found at the ends of chapters in the edited

text is: Sarvatathdgatakdyavdkcittarahasydtirahasyaguhyasamdjamahd-
guhyatantraraja. The following translation of the title will
be justified: Great-secret King of Tantras—the ‘Secret Union’
ofthe secret and the greater secret belonging to the Body, Speech
and Mind of all the Tathagatas.
Vitapada’s commentary Mukhdgama-vrtti (PTT, Vol. 65,

p. 66-4) explains some of the construction ofthe title: “‘Tantra
of samaja by all the Buddhas’ means Vajradhara because it is
the union ( samaja ) by all the Buddhas in the manner q{ para-
mar tha and samvrti . To show that, there is ‘Thus’ (evatp).
‘‘Great secret’ ( mahdguhya ) means the illusory (mdyopama).
‘‘Secret’ ( rahasya) means the Stage of Generation, ‘Greater
secret’ ( atirahasya ) means the thusness of all modes. The great
■ dgama which incomparably shows those matters, is the Samaja* ’
(/ sans rgyas kun gyis hdus pahi rgyud ces pa ni / sans rgyaa
thams cad don dam pa dan kun rdzob kyi tshul du hdus pahi
phyir rdo rje hchah baho / de ston par byed pa la yah de skad
ces byaho / gsan chen Scs pa ni sgyu ma lta buho / gsan la £e>
pa bskyed pahi rim paho / ches gsaii ba i es pa ni dnos po thams
cad kyi de biin hid do / de roams ston par byed pahi goh na
med pahi lun chen po ni hdus paho / ). This commentary
makes it clear that the compound rahasyatirahasya is a dvandoa y
to be understood by such pairs as samvrti-satya and paramdrtha -
■ satya; Stage of Generation and Stage of Completion. By
bringing in the expression ‘Thus’ («;am),Vitapada also indicates
the relation between the title and the first sentence of the Tantra
which begins with evam.
The most important part of the title is the expression

guhyasamdja , because this is the standard abbreviated form of
the title, which in turn is abbreviated to samaja. Some light
is shed on the abbreviated title by its chapter one, verse 3:
Bhdfasva bhagavan tattvam vajrasarasamuccayam f
sarvatathdgatam guhyam samdjam guhyasambhavam //
Lord, pray explain the samaja, the reality, sum of diamond

essences, the all-tathagata secret, and what arises from
the secret !
The Pradipoddyotana comments with various of its classifying

signals, ‘invariant sense’ ( akfardrthah ), and so on: / bhd$asva
106
YOOA OF THE OlHYASAMAfATANTRA

samajam iti sambandhah / samajam iti dvayor ckibhavah
sam ajam / aksararthah // vajrapadinasaniayogam s.unajam(
samastangarn // p r aj n o p a y a s a m a v og a m samajam ‘ garbhi //
sarpvrtiparamarthasatyayor milanah samajam / gtihyasambha-
vam iti saiva viSesanah / guhyam ptahhasvaram lasmai /
sambhutam advayajnanatmak.ini mahavajradharam ili yava df
kolikah // sarvatathagatam guhyam iti sai vatath.igatan.im *pa-
ramparyena gopaniyam guliyam / vajrasaras tath.igatah lesam
ckibhavalaksanam samuccayaiu tattvam yathabhutam 7 1 rans "
lation (Mchan hgrel, p. 24): ‘Pray explain the samdja' is the
application. Concerning 'samdja', the unification of a pair is
samdja with invariant sense. The union of diamond and lotus is
samdja with shared sense. Insight, the means, and their union
is samdja with pregnant sense. The merger of the two truths,
conventional and absolute, is samdja; what arises from the secret
is precisely that as the extraordinary case, to wit, the secret is
the Clear Light, and what arises therefrom goes up to Maha-
vajradhara who is the non-dual knowledge; ( samaja) with
ultimate sense. The all-tathagata secret is the secret, to be
preserved of all the tathagatas, handed down in succession (of
master and disciple). The diamond essences are the Tathagatas;
their sum has the characteristic of unification. The reality
is as it really is.
The words ‘Body, Speech, anti Mind’ run through a

gamut of usages, of which the most comprehensive list is ten in
number (see Ratnakarasanti’s exposition in G, below). The
invariant sense is that the Diamond of Body is Vairocana, the
Diamond of Speech is Amitabha, and the Diamond of Mind is
Aksobhya. To these three Tath.igata families are added
Amoghasiddhi and Ratnasamhhava to make a total of live
Tathagatas, the usual meaning of ‘all the Tathagatas’.
In the second paragraph after verse 3 of chapter one, there

occurs the expression sarcalalhdgaldndm kdyavdkcittaûhyam, on
which the Pradipoddyolana comments (Mthan hgtfl. p. 24):
/ sarvatathagatan.im kayavakcitiaguhyam samayasam-
varadikulatrayaparin.imuh / aksararthah sarvatathaga-
tanam kayavakcitiaguhyam vyanjuna [ tray am ] / samas-
tangah // sarvatathagat.inam kayavakcitiaguhyam jhana-
trayaprakrtyabhasavayuvahanam / garbhi // sarvatatha-
gatanam kayavakcitiaguhyam jhanamavadehah kolikah/
INTRODUCTION TO THE C UHYASAMaJ AT ANTRA
107
‘The secret of the body, speech and mind of all the TathS-
gatas’ means the extending to the three families of pledges,
vows,and so on; invariant sense.‘The secret of the body...’
means the three syllables (for generating the deities);
shared sense. ‘The secret of the body...’, means the wind-
vehicle for the appearance of the (eighty) prakrtis upon
the three lights; pregnant sense. ‘The secret of the body...’,
means the body made of knowledge; ultimate sense.
The foregoing should demonstrate the multiple levels of

interpretation that can be, and were extended to the words of
the title.
The length of the opening sentence ( niddna ) is established

by theory that it demonstrates the ‘five perfections’, that is to
say, of the teaching, the retinue, the time, the teacher, and the
place. Naturally we give much weight to the tradition of the
Explanatory Tantra Vajramald, as found in AlamkakalaSa’s
Sri-vajramdld-mahayogatantra-tikd-gambhirdrihadipikd (PTT, Vol.
61, p. 164-1):
/ bsdus don bya ba ni phun sum tshogspa liia dan ldan

pa stc ; de la hdi skatl ces bya ba la sogs pas bstan pahi
bya ba phun sum tshogs paho // bdag gi thos pa it s bya
ba la sogs pas ni hkhor phun sum tshogs pa mdor bstan
paho dus geig na ces bya ba la sogs pas ni dus phun sum
tshogs paho / bcom Ulan hdas ces bya ba la sogs
pas ni ston pa po phun tshogs paho / / de b2in gsegs pa
thams cad kyi sku dan gsuri daii thugs kyi sftin po rdo
rje btsun mohi bha-ga rnams bcugs ste / 2es bya ba la
sogs pas ni gnas phun sum tshogs pa gsuiis so /
The ‘concise meaning’ is possession of five perfections.

Among them, by way of evam, there is the perfection of
what is to be taught. By way of maya Srutam , there is the
perfection of the retinue, in brief. By way ofekasmin
samaye , there is the perfection of time. By way of bhagavdn t
there is perfection of the teacher. By way of sarvatathd-
gatakayavdkcittahrdayavajrayofidbhagefu vijahara, there is
perfection of the place.
On the other hand both Y'ajrahasa’s Tantrardja-Sriguhyasamdja•

fika and Lilavajra’s Gufiyasamajatantra-niddna-gurupadeiabhatya
(PTT, Vol. 66, p. 75-5 and p. 97-2) explain the application of
five perfections (phun sum tshogs) in this manner : 1. the teacher
108
(ston pa) indicated by bhagaian; 2. compiler {sdud pa po ), by

evam maya irutam chasm in samayc ; 3. place (gnas) , by sanatathd-
gala, .vijahara; 4. retinue ( hkhor ) by anabhildpydnabhildpyaih
(text, chap. I, p. 1, line 3) down to samdiyatc stna (i«xt, p. 2,
line 12); 5. tantra , i.e. the discourse (rgyud), by a am. Tin i< fore,
the intention of these two authors (obviously c losely affiliated)
is to extend the nidana down through the naming of all auditors
to the discourse. The same allotment of the text to perfection
of the retinue is apparently given by the writer Kumara in his
Pradipadipa-tippani-hrdayddaria (PIT, Vol. 60, p. 220*1). How¬
ever, as the nidana verses are found in the I 'ajramdld, I accept
Alamkakalaa’s explanation especially since the forty syllables
going with the karikas amount to the length as slated by Alamka-
kalasa. The nidana thus established is as follows :
Evam maya srutain ekastnin samayc bhagavan
sarvatathagata-kayavakciuahrdaya-vajrayosidbhagesu
vijahara.
Thus by me it was heard—-on an occasion—the Uhagavat

(‘the Lord’) was dwelling in the bhagas of the diamond
ladies of the heart belonging to the Body, Speech, and
Mind of all the Tathagatas.
Smrtijhanaklrti’s $ri-guhyasamdja-tantrardja-vrtti (PIT. Vol.

66, p. 125-5) makes a distinction of ‘shared* and ‘unshared*
sense to apply to defining the nidana itself. He says, “Among
those words, evam comprises all aspects of sound ; hence it is
the form of the ‘unshared* nidana, which symbolizes the adaman¬
tine state of the ‘mind of enlightenment’ ( bodbicitta )’’ ( / de la
hdi skad ces pa ni sgrahi rnam pa mthah dag bsdus pa stc /
des thun mon ma yin pahi glen gjihi no bo by an chub kyi
sems rdo rje Aid mtshon paho / ). l'ui theimorc, “The words
maya irutam, etc. express the foim of the ‘shared* nidana ** ( bdag
gis thos pa Ses pa la sogs pas ni thun mon gi glen giihi ho bo
gsuns tc /). His subsequent comments show that by ‘shared
nidana ’ he means the* part which succinctly expresses the five
perfections. According to bis commentary, 'by me’ (maya)
is the perfection of the auditor (in other texts, the perfection
of the retinue); ‘was heard* (irutam), the perfection of the leach¬
ing; ‘on an occasion’ (ekastnin samayc), the perfection of the time;
‘the Bhagavat* ( bhagaian ), the perfection of the teacher ; and
the remaining words down to ‘was dwelling in the bhagas'
introduction to the guhyasamAjatantra
109
(...bhagefu vijahara ), the perfection of the place. His explana¬

tion leaves the nidana the same length as my acceptance. How¬
ever, no other commentary that I examined mentions such a
divison of the words as made by Pandit Smrti.
The meaning of the nidana as a coherent sentence can be

considered on several levels. There is the simple paraphrase,
with a few words added, as in Tsoh-kha-pa’s Mchan hgrel on the
Pradipoddyotana (brackettcd expressions from Mchan hgrel, pp. 11
and 12):
Thus by me it was heard (directly, not from an interme¬

diary; but not yet comprehended)—on an occasion
(not with another element of consciousness; not at an¬
other time; and in a single instant)—theBhagavat (hav¬
ing the six allotments, lordliness, etc.) was dwelling
(with the dress of a cakravartin ) in the bhagas (destruc¬
tion of defilement) of the diamond ladies (the prajhd
view of voidness attended with great ecstasy, mahasukha)
of the heart (Mah.'tvajradhara) belonging to the Body,
Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas.
That paraphrase is consistent with I ndrabhuti’s explanation in

his Jhanasiddhi (GOS, p. 81): / evam maya Srutam ekasmin
samayc bhagavan sarvatathagatakayavakcittahrdayavajrayo-
sidbhagesu vijahara ckasminn eva kale / bhagavan aisvaryadi-
gunayuktatvat / hrdayain jnanam tad eva vajrayosit abhedya-
prajnasvabhavaivat, tad eva bhagam sarvakleiabhafijanat,
tesu sarvatathagatakayavakcittahrdayavajrayosidbhagesu
vijahara / “Thus by me it was heard—upon an occasion—the

Lord was dwelling in the bhagas of the diamond ladies of the
heart belonging to the Body, Speech, and Mind of all the Tatha-
gatas“ :—‘on precisely that occasion, the Lord, because endowed
with the (six) merits of lordliness and so on; was dwelling in
those bhagas of the diamond ladies of the heart belonging to the
Body, Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas, where the
diamond ladies arc precisely the heart-knowledge, bccau se of
the self-existence of non-dual insight, and where the bhaga is
precisely the same, because ol destroying all defilement.
The Explanatory Tantra of the Guhyasamdja called Sartidhi-
vydkarana re-tells the nidana in this revealing manner (PTT,
Vol. 3, p. 231-4), labelled 'koliha' (ultimate sense) for the por¬
tion cited in Pradipoddyotana (Mchan hgrel, p. 17-5 to p. 18-1):
110 YOGA OF THE OUHYASAMAJATANTRA
/ punar aparam arya-vyakhyanam aha /

evam maya Srutarrt tattvam ekasmin samaye sphutc /
bhagavan guhyavajreias trivajrasamayottama(h) //
sarvatathiigate jftanc acintyagunasampadi /
sadasadubhayatitc asthanasthitisamjfiini //
akaiaikasvabhave’smin sarvajnajftanabhavini /
jagaddhrdi viSuddhiikhyc vijahara mahamunih //
(end of quotation).
/ raa rig pa dan hdu byed dan /
/ mam par $es daii miii dan gzugs /
/ skye mched drug dan reg pa dan /
/ tshor ba dan ni sred pa dan //

j flier len srid pa skye ba dan /
/ rga Si ics bya rig ma yin //
I ha rgyal che bahi ha rgyal dan /
/ naho sham ha rgyal mhon ha rgyal /
/ gzan yah ha rgyal las ha rgyal /
I cun zad ha rgyal log par bcas //
Furthermore, the ‘Arya-Vyakhyana’ states :
Thus, the Reality, was heard by me on a certain time

extraordinary.
TheBhagavat, diamond lord of mysteries, with the supreme

pledge of the triple vajra ,
Was dwelling as the Mahamuni in the pure heart of

the world, in this unique self-existence of sky having the
modes of omniscient knowledge, in the all-Tathagata
gnosis having the inconceivable perfection of merits;
beyond existence, non-existence, and both, called ‘place
of no location’.
The wisdom ( vidyd ) (there) is the knowable of nescience

( aoidya ), motivations ( samskdra ), perceptions (vijiidna ),
name-and-form ( ndma-rupa) > six sense bases (faddyatana),
contact (sparia), feelings (vedana), craving (/r/nJ), indul¬
gence ( updddna ), gestation ( bhava) y birth (jali), old age
and death (jara-marana ); and (that‘place of no location’)
has pride ( mdna ), haughty pride ( atimdna ), ‘I am’-pride
(ajmimdna ), assuming pride (abhimdna), pride over pride
(mdndtimana ), begrudging pride ( unamdna ), along with
the perverse kind (mithydmana).
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAJATANTRA
111
The Satndhtvydkarana represents the place where the Bhagavat

was dwelling to be the ‘Nirvana without fixed abode* (apratiffki-
ianirvana); his consort, the vidyd, to be the instantaneous vision
of all twelve members of Dependent Origination (pratUya*
samutpdda) headed by nescience (avidya ); and his pride, the
standard seven kinds mentioned by Abhidharma-kofa (V.
10). Apparently what is meant is that ordinary persons can
have one pride or several in combination, but it is superhuman
to have all seven. The pride thereby becomes the ‘divine pride*
(devatd-garva).
Another rc-tclling of the niddna is quoted by Candraklrti

from an (unnamed) Explanatory Tantra (understood in Tibetan
tradition to be the Devendrapariprccha )—it was immediately
preceded by the Devendrapariprccha passage on E-varp—and
is here edited from the Pradipoddyotana manuscript and transit*
ted with some Mchan hgrel (p. 14-1,2) expansion :
maya Srutam iti proktarp cakravartisvarupina /

bijarupena yat srstam devatacakram uttamam //
paramanandakalo’sau ckam samaya ucyate /
astaisvarycna bhagavan mahasukhapade sthitah //
sarvatathagatah proktiih paftcaskandha jinair iha /
tadatmakayavakeitto hrdvajro’sau mahasukhah //
yositsusamskrta mudra bhagam padmam susamskrtam/
vijahara sthitas tatra bindurupena vajradhrk //
The words ‘by me was heard’ arc pronounced by the
true form (the bodhicitta in father-mother union) of the
Wheel-turner (cakravartin). What is emitted by that
seed-form is the chief divinity-circle (»*the Vijaya-
mandala generated in the mother-lotus).
That time of supreme bliss is said to be ‘on an occasion*.

The Lord abides in the place (the bhaga) of great ecstasy
with the eightfold lordliness.
‘AH the Tathagatas’ are pronounced by the Conquerors

to be the five personality aggregates in this world. That
‘diamond of the heart’ with great ecstasy has the ‘body,
speech, and mind’ of the (practitioner’s) self.
The ‘lady’ is the well-finished Mudra (i.e. the karma-

or jiidna-mudra as a result of having been generated into
a goddess and having had the gods placed in her). The
bhaga is the well-finished lotus. The Vajra-holdcr was
112
dwelling’ therein (i.e. in the bhaga), abiding in the form

of the bindu.
A pregnant implication of the ‘winds’ is brought in by the

formulation in the £ri-Vajrahrddydlamkiiratantra (PTT, VoL
3, p. 255-5) : “Thus by me it was heard—on an occasion—
the Bhagavat was dwelling in five-part manner within the
circle of the ten ladies of the heart belonging to the Body, Speech,
and Mind of all the Tathagatas.” (/ luli skad bdag gis thos
pa dus geig na / bcom klan lulas dc be in gsegs pa thamscad
kyi sku dan gsuhs dan thugs kyi shin po bud med bcuhi dkyil
na cha Basina bahi tshul du bsugs so / ). ‘In live-part manner’
presumably means as five Tathagatas; and ‘circle of ten ladies’,
the five principal and five ancillary winds. The pregnant
sense of the nidana in terms of ‘winds’ is further borne out by
Guhyasamaja> Chap. I, p. 3: / atha khalu aksobhyas tathagatah
sarvatathagata-kayavakcittahrdaya-vajinyosidbhagesu caturas-
ram virajaskarn mahasamayamandalani adhisthapayam asa /
j svacchamca tatsvabhavamca nanarupant samantatah /
I buddhameghasamakirnam sphulihgagahanajvalam /
f svacchadimanâlair yuktam sarvataihagatam puram {(
The translation is aided by Mchan hgrel (p. 20-4, 21-1, 2, and
81-4) :
Then, you know, (the officiant =) Aksobhya Tathagata

(= vijnana-skandha and lord of the three lights or the
three jiianas) blessed the four-cornered dustless mandala
of‘Great Pledge’ in the bhaga-s ( = the Clear Light
resorted to by illustrious persons) of the diamond ladies
{ — the Clear Light) of the heart belonging to the Body,
Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas—‘on all levels
with diverse forms, both clear and the self-existence, of
clarity, pervaded by a Buddha-cloud that thickly blazes
with (five) tongues ot flame ( ^ the five ancillary winds),
(each) full of all the (five) Tathagatas associated with the
mandatas of clarity ( — Light), etc. (=Spread-of-Light
and Culmination-of-Light).’
Here the rays of the five ancillary winds are each multiplied by
five, to be compared with the twenty-five twisted threads called
jiidna-sutra in the nmnd(tla-ritc described in Mkhas grub rje’s
Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras. Each Buddha is associated
with a certain color and symbolized by a thread of that color.
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
IIS
On the other hand, the literal form of the niddna is doubt¬

lessly challenging, since the word bhaga often has the meaning
ol ‘female organ’. Therefore, the Vajrajndnasamnccaya (PTT,
Vol. 3, p. 253-1) has this passage :
I he Bhagavat spoke: 'The Sravakas and so on, unliberated

from the discursive impressions of practising the law
free from passion { viragadharma), became astonished to
hear the diamond words ( vajrapdda ) of the Maha-
yoga-lantras—“was dwelling in the bhaga( s)of the ladies’*
—which exemplify the doctrine of lust ( rdgadharma ).
The explanation which does not conflict with their aspira¬
tions is said to be the explanation as the shared sense.
The last sentence (sinon par byed pa de rnams dan mi hgal
bahi sgo nas 1)6ail pa de ni spyihi don du b6ad pa gsuns paho)
can be clarified with Candraktrti’s classifying terms, as set
forth below. The Tantra is here alluding to the sense shared
with non-tantric Buddhism. Assuming an explanation of the
tiidfina is forthcoming concordant with ordinary Buddhism, we
assume such is the explanation in Tson-kha-pa’s paraphrase
presented above and Indrabhuti’s brief expansion. The
Samdhivydkarana's re-telling seems also to represent the ‘shared
sense’. The explanations in terms of winds and in terms of the
three lights and Clear Light should be considered as the un¬
shared sense, especially unshared with non-tantric Buddhism.
C. The seven ornaments and subdivisions
Also fundamental to Ills tantric system is that there are

levels of interpretation of the basic Tantra, a difference of ex¬
planation in accordance with the listeners, and a determined
categorization of the sentences of the Tantra. Herein lies the
great contribution of (Jamlrakirti’.s Vmdipoddyolana employment
of the classilicatory twenty-eight subdivisions of the ‘Seven
Ornaments’, a terminology stemming from the Vajrajhdna-
samuccaya-tantra. Some examples ol this classification have
already been presented in the foregoing sections, especially
‘pregnant sense’. At the end of the Pradxpoddyotana , Candra-
kirti suggests the reason for adopting this terminology by lecall-
ing the Buddha’s dilemma immediately after his enlightenment,
when he hesitated to teach his doctrine since it was too pro¬
found for people at large. Vet the Buddha did begin to teach
114
YOGA OF THE GUIIY ASAM AJ AT ANTRA
on the basis that persons were like lotuses—some were still in

the mud, others had a stem reaching up, and a few had blossoms
on the surface which needed sun warmth. So also, in the case
oftheTantra, one had to adapt the explanation to the particular
stage of the candidate. Accordingly, the master had to know
multiple explanations, so he could answer a disciple to his
temporary satisfaction.
For presenting below the gist of the classification, I employ

the Pradipoddyotana manuscript which is somewhat chaotic at the
beginning, Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan hgrel on that work, and &raddha>
karavannan’s *Vajrajhdnasamuceaya~tantrodbhava-saptdlarnkdra-
oimocana (restored title) (PTT, Vol. 60, pp. 138-139). Yiikei
Matsunaga has also studied this terminology in an article in
Japanese, “On the Saptalamkara” (March 1963).
The seven ornaments are : 1. Introduction (T. glen bslan

ba) y 2. Way (T. tshul ), 3. Alternatives (T. mthah), 4.Ex¬
planation (T. biadpa), 5. Grouping (the auditors) (T. bsdus
pa), 6. Persons (T. zag), 7. Purpose (T. dgos pa).
The first ornament, of Introduction, has five sections :

1. name, i.e. Mahayogatantra (the commentarial reference
to the Guhyasamdjatantra, which however lacks that appellation
in its formal title); 2. for whom, i.e. for the ocean of candi¬
dates (vineya); 3. composer, i.e. Vajrasattva, thesixth Buddha;
4. extent, i.e. seventeen chapters and twenty rites ( cho ga Hi hi),
continuation tantra ( uttara-tanlra) in one chapter, and expla¬
natory tantras of such-and-such extent; 5. requirement, i.e,
the‘Stage of Generation* {utpatti-krama) , the‘Stage of Comple¬
tion’ (sampanna-krama) , the ordinary and the superior, etc.
The second ornament, of Way, constitutes two interpre¬

tations of four parts, 1. lineage {samtdna, rgyud), 2. underlying
cause ( nidana , glen gh), 3. true word ( nirukti , ties pahi tshig ),
4. impulse ( hetu , rgyu ). As to the two interpretations, the
Pradipoddyotana passage {Mchan hgrel, Vol. 158, p. 4) states that
there are four parts to the Way of becoming a Buddha according
to the doctrine free from lust {viragadharma) and four parts
according to the doctrine of lust ( ragadharma ), as in the following
tabulation:
four parts
1. lineage
2. underlying cause
3. true word
4. impulse
as viragadharma
birth of the man (in a fortunate

place)
rearing in the circle of women
the teaching according to the

Vinaya
(zestful) practice of the Law
with desire for the fruit
(Enlightenment)
as ragadharma
generating the Buddhas of the five

families in the Stage of Generation
unification of those families in the

Stage of Completion
dharanis such as (the incantation)
* vajra ’
practices such as the ‘erotic’

(irngara)
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJAT
116
YOGA OF THE Gl'HYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
The Viragadharma is of course based on the biography of

Gautama Buddha. In his case, the ‘ samtdna ’ is the solar lineage
(, suryaoamia ) through his father King f>udtl!iodana and mother
Queen Maya. The ‘ niddna ’ is his early life in the palace, reared
by the nurses and then surrounded by the harem women, to¬
ward whom he had *virdga' (aversion) and from whom he left
for the religious life. The four parts seem to agree with the
order of superintendence of the four goddesses who in chapter
XVII implore the Lord to emerge from the Clear Light (see the
section ‘Diamond Ladies of the 1 Icart’); that is, they implored
in the order Mind, Body, Speech, Acts.
=- The third ornament, of Alternatives, amounts to six (fafkoti)

in three pairs, which are : ‘hinted meaning’ (neyditha,
drati. bahidon) and ‘evident meaning’ ( nitdrtha, tits pahi don);
‘twilight language’ (samdhyd bhdâ) and ‘non-twilight language*
(no samdhyd bhdfd ); ‘standard terminology’ (yathdruta), e.g.
t mandala\ and coined terminology (noyathdruta), e.g. *kotdkhya*
(pseudonym for one of the ten winds). There has been much
scholarly discussion in the past on the meaning of the term
saifidhya bhdfa (of which samdhi-bhata is a form), and in the
Renou memorial volume I defended my interpretation that it is
‘twilight language’.
The fourth ornament, of Explanation of the sense of a

given passage, is of four kinds (1) ‘invariant sense’ ( akfardrtha,
yig don), (2)‘shared sense’ (samastdiigdrtha, spyi don), (3)‘preg¬
nant sense’ (garbhy-artha y sbas don), (4) ‘ultimate sense* (koli-
kdrtha, mthar thug don), in further explanation and breakdown
as follows :
1. ‘invariant sense’, i.c. literal meaning.
2. ‘shared sense’, of two sorts :
(a) sense shared with non-tantric Buddhism,
(b) sense shared with the three lower Tuntras.
3. ‘pregnant sense’, of three sorts :
(a) pregnant sense clarifying the doctrine of lust
(ragadharma-praka< ana-garbhin),
(b) pregnant sense revealing ‘conventional truth’
(-Illusory Body) (samvrti-satya-sambo-
dhagarbhin),
(c) pregnant sense considering the three gnoses
(jrtanatraya-vicintana-garbhin).
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAjATANTRA
117
4. ‘ultimate sense', of two sorts :
(a) ultimate sense clarifying the Clear Light

(prabhasvara-praka&a-kolika),
(b) ultimate sense revealing the paired-unioa
(yuganaddha-prabodhana-kolika).
The fifth ornament, of Grouping (the auditors), is of two

kinds :—an assembly, to which ‘invariant sense' and ‘shared
sense' among the four Explanations arc taught; and disciples,
to whom ‘pregnant sense' and ‘ultimate sense' among those
four are taught.
The sixth ornament, of Persons, means the five kinds of

persons who receive initiation ( abhifeka ) and adhere to pledges
(samaya) and vows (samvara). They are called ‘jewel-like
person’ (ratna-pud gala) y the ‘blue-lotus’ ( utpala ), the‘white-lotus
( pundarika ), the ‘red-lotus’ ( padma ), and the ‘sandalwood*
(candana)y each of which is defined in the Pradipoddyotana. In
the notes to Mkhas grub rjt's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras t
pp. 218-9, Bhavyakirti’s commentary was cited : “The ‘sandal-
wood-like’ is in the family of fools; the ‘blue-lotus-like* has in¬
ferior faculty (indriya); the‘white-lotus-like’ has intermediate
faculty; the ‘red-lotus-like’ has keen faculty ; the ‘jewel-like*,
has the most excellent of faculties.” The notes also cited the
Thobyig gsal bahi me Ion (of Bio bzan hphrin las) showing the
difference of instruction in terms of the six alternatives: the
evident meaning, standard terminology, and twilight language
are expressed to the ‘jewel-like person’. The other three alter¬
natives are expressed to the other four types of persons. In
Sraddhakaravarman’s terminology of three kinds of Tantra,
the five persons are called ‘causal tantra' ( heiu-tantra ) because
they are like seeds. Upon receiving initiation, they enter the
‘tantra of means’ {upaya-tantra). First they attentively listen
to the Tantra with ‘listening insight’ (Srutamayi prajnd) then
study to attach meanings to the words with ‘thinking insight'
(cintamayiprajnd), whereupon with ‘cultivation insight’ (bhavana~
mayiprajila) they conceptualize in the ‘Stage of Generation' and
then do the praxis in the ‘Stage of Completion’. The discussion
about these persons in Tson-kha-pa’s Mthah gcod (on Chapter
One) (PTT, Vol. 156, p. 33-2, 3) makes it clear that it is pre¬
cisely in terms of these three levels of ‘insight’that the termi¬
nology of ‘faculty’ (inferior, etc.) is employed.
118

The seventh ornament, of purpose (k<irya)> is the third
kind ofTantra, called Truitional (antra* ( phala-tantra ), andis of
two kinds, ordinary and superior. The ordinary kind is the
attainment by the four kinds of persons, exclusive of the ‘jewel-
like person*, of the eight great siddhis at the limit of the Stage
of Generation, whereupon they go no further. The superior kind
is the attainment by the ‘jewel-like person’ of the rank of Vajra-
dhara, because that person having arrived at the limit of the
Stage of Generation, rejects the ordinary siddhis , and goes on
to the Stage of Completion for the high goal.
Ratnakarasanti illustrates the classificatory vocabulary of the

Pradipoddyotana in the Pindikrta-sddhanopnyika-vrtti-ratndiali ,
PTT, Vol. 62, p. 69-3, 4 :
/ sku rdo rje ni mam par snarl mdzad do / / gsuri rdo rjc ni hod
dpag tu med pa hi / / thugs rdo rje ni mi bskyod pa ste //yi gehi
don to j I sku rdo rje ni yi ge om mo / / gsun rdo rje ni yi ge ah
ho I l thugs rdo rje ni yi ge hum ste / j spy i hi don to / ! sku rdo
rje ni rus sbal gyi rtsa dan / gsuri rdo rje ni zla bahi rtsa dan /
thugs rdo rjc hdod pahi gdugs kyi rtsa ste f sbas paho / j sku rdo
rje ni chags pa dan / gsun rdo rje ni chags pa dan bral ba danf
thugs rdo rje chags pa bar ma ste / mthar thugs paho f f sku rdo
rje ni khrag dan / gsun rdo rje ni iu-kra dan / thugs rdo rje ni
dri chab ste f dgohs pas bfad paho ( f sku rdo rje ni snarl bahoj f
gsuri rdo rje ni snarl ba mched paho / / thugs rdo rje ni snarl ba
he bar thob pa ste / dgohs pa mayin paho // sku rdo rje khru
hi fu pahi dkyil hkhor dan j gsuri rdo rjc ni khru bcu drug pahi
dkyil hkhor dan f thugs rdo rje ni khru bcu ghis pahi dkyil hkhor
te j sgraji bUn paho / / sku rdo rjc ni tshahs paho f j gsuri rdo
rje ni dbah phyug chen po dan / thugs rdo rje ni khyab hjug ste f
sgra ji biin mayin paho / / sku rdo rje ni hi ba dan j gsuri rdo
rje ni dbah dan j thugs rdo rje ni tnrlon spyod dc j drah bahi don
to I I skuhi rdo rje ni skuhi dkyil hkhor dah / gsuris rdo rje ni
gsuri gi dkyil hkhor / dah thugi rdo rje ni thugs kyi dkyil hkhor
(e I hes pahi don to /
The Diamond of Body is Vairocana; the Diamond of

Speech is Amitabha; the Diamond of Mind is Aksobhya;
invariant sense . The Diamond of Body is the syllable Om;
the Diamond of Speech is the syllabic Ah; the Diamond
of Mind is the syllable Hunt; shared sense. The Diamond of
Body is the vein of the tortoise (A umiak a) (the right midi );
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUKYASAMAJATANTRA

119
the Diamond of Speech is the vein of the moon (laSdtika)

(the left nddl) ; the Diamond of Mind is the vein oflove**
umbrella (>madandtapatra) (the middle ); pregnant
sense. The Diamond of Body is desire; the Diamond of
Speech is aversion; the Diamond of Mind is indifference;
ultimate sense. The Diamond of Body is blood; the Dia¬
mond of Speech is semen; the Diamond of Mind it
scented water; twilight language. The Diamond of Body
is Light; the Diamond of Speech is Spread-of-Light; the
Diamond of Mind is Cuimination-of-Light; non-twilight
language. The Diamond of Body is the mandala of twenty-
hasta size; the Diamond of Speech is the mandala of six-
tccn-hasta size; the Diamond of Mind is the mandala of
twclve-Aar/a size; standard terminology. The Diamond of Body
is Brahma; the Diamond of Speech is Mahegvara; the
Diamond of Mind is Visnu; coined terminology. The
Diamond of Body is an appeasing rite ( Sdntika ); the
Diamond of Speech is a controlling rite ( vaiikara ); the
Diamond of Mind is a destroying rite (dbhiedrika); hinted
meaning. The Diamond of Body is the mandala of Body;
the Diamond of Speech is the mandala of Speech; the
Diamond of Mind is the mandala of Mind; evident meaning .
D. Importance of the forty verses
Perhaps no more eloquent testimony can be made on behalf

of the verses than what is presented in the Pradipoddyotana
itself immediately after its citation of the forty verses from the
Vajramdla. Insofar as I can make out the manuscript at this
point (Plate 2A, fo). 1, line), it appears to read :
/ vijaharapadam so'rthah irisamdjaparisphuieh f

f vydkhydlah ma/ijughofcna vajramaldm updrata iti /
There is a verse : “To the sentence rijahdra , this meaning

resting on the Vajramdla has been explained by Maflju-
ghosa so as to elucidate the Glorious Samaja.**
The Prakditkd-ndma-vyakhyd- (ikd (PTT, Vol. 60, p. 296-1) com¬

ments : “explained the meaning to the sentence vijahdra , i.e.
the meaning to the sentence of the niddna ” (biugs pahi tshig
don ni glen g£ihi tshig don bsad pa yin 2cs pa ni). The verse
represents the Bodhisattva Manjughosa as the pronouncer
of the forty karikas in the Vajramdla to elucidate the niddna and
120
therefore the whole Guhyasamajatantra. lson-kha-pa explains

it this way in his commentary on ilu* Pahcakrama called Gsal
bahi sgron me (PTT, Vol. 158, p. I 7(>-5 to p. 177-1) : “(But)
the main thing is that the Pradipoddyotana lias slated that all
the meaning of the (Guhyasatndja) Tantra is comprised by the
nidana of forty syllables E-vam ma-ya, etc., and that in tins
(Vajramald Explanatory Tantra) the meaning of each syllabic
is explained respectively by forty verses starting with the verse
* “E” signifies the Noble Woman (sail) Prajn;1\” ( / glso bo ni
E-varri ma-ya la sogs pahi yi ge biii bcuhi gleii g2is rgyud kyi
•don thams cad bsdus par sgron gsal las gsuus pa dc rgyud l.ulir /
E ni $es rab dam pa ste / / fes sogs tshigs bead l>2i bcuhi tshigs
bead res yi ge rehi don hchad pa luli yin no / ).
While I am indeed far from having mastered the various

Tanjur commentaries and sub-commcntatrics on the Guhya-
samajatanira, on its Pradipoddyotana , or on the Pahcakrama, 1
did scan a considerable number for the research embodied in
the present work; and the only quotations of the forty verses
1 could find were in the beautiful Tanjur commentary on the
Pahcakrama by Sri Laksmi,*called Pa iicak ra m a - / ikd-k ramdrtha-
PrakaSikd. She quotes at least verses nos. 7, 12, 18, and 40—
the nos. 7 and 18 as from the Vajramald , the other two without
name of source; and at other places uses language reminiscent
of still other verses among the forty. The reason, the quotations
are easy to recognize, is that the translator into Tibetan of her
text, recorded as Mantrakalasa, who is not the translator of
the Vajramald or of the Pradipoddyotana wherein the translation of
the forty verses into Tibetan differs trillingly and in only a few
cases, has employed the identical translation of those four verses
as among the forty verses cited in the Pradipoddyotana. Presu¬
mably Mantrakalasa (12th cent., A.D. ?) had memorized
the whole group of verses, as many Tibetan followers of the
Guhyasamajatantra still do today. And in consideration of the
kind of passages &ri Laksmi ordinarily quotes, namely famous,
well stated, and appropriate lines, 1 draw the conclusion that
when she quotes nidana verses 12 and 40 without naming the
original work, she expects the reader to know the forty verses
by heart, as she herself obviously docs. Candrakirti also knows
them well since he quotes the block of forty verses in Chapter
One of his great work. This docs not prove that all Indian
followers of the Guhyasamaja memorized the forty verses and then

received explanation of them from theûrus, but it does suggest
this to be the case for followers of the Guhyasamaja in the light of
the Vajramdla , and subsequently in the light of the Pradipoddyo -
tana , hence for followers of the * Arya ’ school or tradition.
If this memorization of the forty verses for centuries took

place as stated above, there must be a good reason to be ascer¬
tained from the content or implications of the verses themselves.
The section ‘Introduction to the Yoga of the Guhyasamdja-tantrd*
leads up to the solution that the nidana verses can be grouped
in conformity with the major steps of the Stage of Generation
and the Stage of Completion. One must therefore admit that,
given sufficient insight into each verse and into the groupings
of the verses, it would be theoretically possible to arrange under¬
neath these verses, or to present in introductions to groups of
the verses, every important statement of Guhyasamaja ‘pregnant*
practice. And since thcTantras arc a practice rather than a philo¬
sophy, the verses thereby elucidate the entire Guhyasamajatantra.
It might be objected, that if this is so, why are not these

verses more widely quoted, and a number of independent com¬
mentaries written ? The answer is that their very breadth of
coverage renders these verses less practical for the candidates
of the cult, who need specialized treatises or explanations for
the particular phase of the cult in which they are engaged. A
similar situation is found with the celebrated formula of Depen¬
dent Origination in non-tantric Buddhism. It is admitted
that this formula sums up Buddhist doctrine, and theoretically
everything of doctrinal importance can be arranged under one
or other of the twelve members of the formula. But in practice
the Buddhist monks wanted specialized treatises; and there are
a number of important works of Buddhist doctrine that barely
take account of Dependent Origination.
There is another reason. It turned out in the course of

gathering materials for the present commentary on the verses
that they touch upon a number of disputed points in terms of
the steps of yoga. It may well be the case that in classical times
the commentators did not wish to argue for their respective
positions while writing such a commentary. Candrakirti takes
the lead in this silence about the verses, since he refrains from
making any comments on them other than appending his signal
122
'pregnant sense’ and adding the verse cited at the opening of the
present section.
But since the present work is not meant to teach anyone how
to proceed through the intricacies of the Guhyasamaja cult,,
but rather to show what the Guhyasamajatantra is all about,
these forty verses with appropriate introductions serve
admirably to advance this understanding.
It may well be the case during the time when this cult
flourished in India, that the master would expect the disciples
to understand these verses'more and more as they progressed
in the praxis {caryd), and that the guru would provide oral ex¬
planation coordinated with the disciple’s level of attainment.
As soon as the Guhyasamaja literature was rendered out of its
original Indie language into Tibetan, the necessity to have
‘bird’s eye’ views of the literature made the nidana verses even
more important, and led to Tsoh-kha-pa’s invaluable annota¬
tion.
E. The mandala of the Guhyasamaja
The word mandala is uniformly defined as an inner content

(ma$da) bounded by an enclosing clement (-/a). For example,
the extract from the Samdhivydkarana in this sub-section
illustrates the meaning of the word by the inner content as
‘knowledge’ with an enclosing element as the non-tantric state¬
ment of the path. There is also a ritual sequence of two kinds
of mandala, the mandala of residence ( adhdra-mandala) and the
mandala of the residents {adheya-mandala ); the former is the palace
and the seats for the gods; the latter is the group of gods who
take their places in that palace. The palace is the inner sanc¬
tum of the mandala. In the case of the Guhyasamaja-mandala,
the full complement of deities seated in the palace totals thirty-
two. They are the cast of the Guhyasamaja drama.
The dramatis personae amount to the following characters;

and any other deities mentioned in the Guhyasamaja cycle arc
held to be aspects or aliases of these thirty-two primary ones:
5 Buddhas : Aksobhya, Vairocana, Amitabha, Ratna-

sambhava, Amoghasiddhi.
8 Bodhisattvas : Maitrcya, K$itigarbha, Vajrapuni,
Khagarbha, Lokc^vara, Sarvanivaranavi^kambhin,.
Mahjusri (or MaAjugho?a), Samantabhadra.
9 Yosits : Locana, Mamaki, Pandara, Tara; and

Riipavajra, Sabdavajra, Gandhavajra, Rasavajra,
Sparsavajra.
10 Krodhas : Yamantaka, Prajiiantaka, Padmantaka,

Yighnamaku, Acala, Takkiraja, Niladanda, Maha-
bala, L’smsacakravanin, Sumbharaja.
The following diagram of the Guhyasamiija mandala deities with

assigned numbers shows their places in the palace in the event
of the Aksobhya-mandala :
In the center : 1. Aksobhya and 10. Sparsavajra. In the
inner circle : 2. Vairocana (K.), 3. Ratnasambhava (S.),.
4. Amitabha (W.), 5. Aiuoghasiddhi (N.); 6. Locana (S.E.)

7. Mamaki (SAW), 8. Pandara (N.W.), 9. Tara (N.E.).
In the second circle : I 1. Rupavajra (S. E.), 12. Sabdavajra
(S.W.), 13. Gandhavajra (N.W.), 14. Rasavajra (N.E.).
124
YOGA OF THE CUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
In the third circle : 15-16. Maitreya and Ksitigarbha, on

the two sides of the East Gate on the Eastern (white) paffika;
17-18. Vajrapani and Khagarbha, on the two sides of the
South Gate on the Southern (yellow) paffika ; 19-20. Loke-
ivara and Manjughosa, on the two sides of the West Gate on the
Western (red) paffika ; 21-22. Sarvanivaranaviskambhin and
Samantabhadra, on the two sides of the North Gate on the
Northern (green) paffika .
In the four gates : 23. Yamantaka (E.), 24. Prajftantaka (S.),

25. Padmantaka (W.), 26. Vighnantaka (N.). In the inter¬
mediate directions : 27. Acala (S.E.), 28. Takkiraja (S.W.),
29. Niladanda (N.W.), 30. Mahabala (N\ E.).
In the zenith : shown between Maitreya and Ksitigarbha,
31. U?nl?acakravartin.
In the nadir : shown between Lokesvara and Manjughosa,
32. Sumbharaja.
When the Guhyasamuja-mandala is painted and Aksobhya

is the chief deity; then in accordance with Tucci’s indications
in his article, “Some Glosses upon the Guhyasamaja,” p. 343,
Vairocana, being in the cast and in front of the Aksobhya image,
has to be represented in the painting upside down; and accord¬
ingly with the other deities. Ratnasambhava (south) is to the
right of the image.
In the Guhyasamaja cult, there are several different deities

that are taken as the central deity. While the Aksobhya-
mandala is predominant, there is also the Guhyasamaja
Maftjuvajra (the first mandala in Abhayakaragupta’s
MifpannayogSvali), based on Mahjusri (Manjughosa). Also the
Buddhalrijftana school had rites in which Avalokiteivara was
the chief deity. Fortunately, the most important mandala ,
the Akfobhya-mandala, exists in Sanskrit in a precise form,
namely the second mandala in the Ni*pannayogavali.
In his introduction (pp. xvii-xix) to the edition of the

Gutyasam&jalantra , B. Bhattacharyva has well stated with brevity
from the first chapter the procedure by which the Lord (as
Mahavajradhara) first emanated the deities. In the termino¬
logy of the Pradipoddyotana, this is a ‘restricted circle of deities’
(prattbaddhadfvatacakra ), because only the five Buddhas, four
yo?itt, and four krodhas are specifically indicated in that emana¬
tion. According to Ratnakaras anti’s husumdnj alt-guhyasamaja-
125
nibandha-nama (PIT, Vol. 64, p. 96*1), this involves the three

secrets of the Buddha, the secret of Body, of Speech, and of Mind.
“In brief, the secret of body is the lord Vairocana, and so on;
th e secret of speech is Locana, and so on; the secret of mind is
Yamantaka, and so on” ( /de la mdor bsdu na / skuhi gsah ba
ni boom ldan hdas rnam par snan mdzad la sogs paho // gsun
gi gsan ba ni / spyan la sogs paho / / thugs kyi gsaii ba ni
gsinrjcgSed la sogs pa ste / ). In that emanating role Maha-
vajradhara is called* Bodhicittavajra’ (Diamond of the Enlighten¬
ment Mind’) because all the deities emanate from bodhicitta.
But, as was mentioned, in the present case, only thirteen of
the deities are emanated. Also G. Tucci, The Theory and Practice
of the Mandala , has included his translation of chapter one from
the beginning. Therefore, it is not necessary to repeat here the
whole process; but the essential details should be mentioned.
The Lord first shifted from the role of Vairocana and

adopted the role of Aksobhya Tathagata, in which form he
blessed the four-cornered dusticss mandala of ‘Great Pledge*
in the bhaga-s of the diamond ladies, according to the passage
translated with annotation in our preceding discussion of the
niddna sentence. Then the Lord Mahavajradhara in the center
of this mandala began the emanation. The Lord’s first samadhi
involved a mystical generation called ‘the body of the great
incantation person’ (mahavidydpurufam ilrti) (the passage is trans¬
lated with annotation under niddna verses on ‘Tathagata’).
When the Lord blessed this body, the Lord was seen by all the
Tathagatas to have three heads. This is the stage called Maha-
sadhana, and according to Tson-kha-pa, the phase of it called
‘Victorious mandala’ ( vijaya-mandala). The Lord thus appear¬
ed in the role of the hierophant to teach the procedure to the
disciples (in this case, the Tathagatas). Then, the Lord, in the
appropriate samadhi , uttered the heart-mantra ‘Vajradhrk*
of the Hatred Family and took on the black, red, and white
(headed) appearance of Aksobhya, thus situated in the center
of the mandala. In another samadhi the Lord, uttering the heart-
mantra ‘Jinajik’ of the Delusion Family, transformed himself
into Vairocana, also black, red, and while, seated in front
(east). He continued with ‘Ratnadhrk’of the Cintamani Family
and Ratnaketu ( = Ratnasambhava), seated in the south ;*Arolik*
of the Vajraraga Family and Aniitabha, seated behind (west);
226
and ‘Prajftadhrk of the Samaya Family and Amoghavajra,

( — Amoghasiddhi), seated in the north. The Lord, in another
samddhiy emanated five goddesses as consorts of the five male
deities. They are all called rati (‘love*) because they love their
particular lord (whose family purifies the respective defilement
of hatred, etc.). Thus he first transformed himself into the
goddess Dvesarati ( = MamakI) in the center with Aksobhya;
then Moharati ( = Buddha-Locana) in the east with Vairocana,
Irsyarati ( = MamakI again) in the south with Ratnasambhava,
Ragarati ( = Pandara) in the west with Amitabha and finally,
Vajrarati ( =Samayatara) in the north with Amoghasiddhi. Then
the Lord, through a series of four samadhis, transformed himself
successively into the Krodha deities, fierce directional guardians:
by the mantra ‘Yamantakrt*, the fierce Yamantaka at the east
gate; ‘Prajriantakrt*, Prajfiantaka at the south gate; “Padman-
takrt’, Padmantaka at the west gate; ‘Vighnantakrt*. Vighnan-
taka at the north gate. The basic mandala was now complete:
the Lord had finished his masterful show to the assembly.
While that projection or spill-out of the deities is the goal

to be achieved (step four), the human performer has to start
in a more humble manner. He is given a meditational sequence
in which he first ascends to the plane of the void (step one).
There he imagines germ syllables, which transform themselves
into hand symbols (step two), and finally into the bodies of
the deities (step three), thus the ‘body mandala*. He can then
proceed with his own spill-out as a mandala (the utsarga-mandala,
infra) (step four). For the human performer the full set of
thirty-two deities is stipulated in the case of the Aksobhya-
manâla, available in Sanskrit, as was mentioned, in the A ifpan-
nayogavali. This mandala is based on Nagarjuna’s Pindikrama
(or Pindikrtasddhana ). Following is my translation of Abhaya-
karagupta’s text :
The Akfobhyamandala
Concerning the mandala stated in the Pindikrama it (in¬

volves procedures) like the foregoing (Maftjuvajra-mandala)
up to (creation of) the palace. Now we shall mention the
particulars of the fierce deities. In the middle of the palace is
a fierce black Aksobhya ; his right and left face (resp.) white and
red; holding in his right hands the kula (= Krodhavajra), wheel.
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJAT ANTRA
127
and padma ; holding in his left hands the bell, the wishing-gera,
and sword ; and embracing a Sparta vajra like himself. In the
directions east, etc., of him arc Vairocana, etc., and in the inter¬
mediate directions south-east {agntya), etc. are Locana, etc.
Among them, Vairocana is white, mild; has white, black,

and red faces ; holds the wheel, vajra , white lotus, bell, gem, and
sword. The hand symbols ( cihna ) in four hands, as above-
mentioned (for Vairocana) and below stated for other Buddhas
arc in the respective order, in the upper, then the lower, right
hands, and in the lower, then the upper left hands. The colors
are assigned to the three faces by the order—basic, right, left
faces.
Ratnasambhava is yellow ; his faces (in order), yellow,

black, and white; holds the gem, the vajra, wheel, bell, yellow
lotus, sword.
Amitabha is red; his faces red, black, and white ; with his
left hand, holds at his heart a staff having a red lotus together
with a bell here following Tibetan ; with his right hand holds
a full-blown lotus; and with his other hands, a vajra , wheel, ratna ,
and sword.
Amoghasiddhi is green; has faces green, black, w'hitc; holds

the sword, the vikavajra, the wheel, the bell, green lotus, and
gem.
Those five Tathagatas and the other deities to be described

below, down to Samantabhadra are adorned with jafdjula (twis¬
ted matted head hair), jewel diadem, and various jewels.
Locana is like Vairocana, but has a white utpala in place of

the white padma.
MamakI is like Aksobhya, but has a reddish-blue utpala in

place of the padma.
Pandara is like Amitabha.
'l'ara is like Amoghasiddhi and holds the viivavajra, wheel,

yellowish-blue utpala, bell, (mani-)jewel, and sword.
In the second circle, in the S. E. corner is Rupavajra,

like Locana, but with her first two hands holding a red mirror.
In the Southwest is &abdavajra, yellow, with faces yellow, black,
white; her first two hands playing a blue vind; her remaining
hands holding the vajra, blue utpala, ratna , and sword. In the
Northwest is Gandhavajra, like Pandara; her first two hands
holding a yellow perfumed conch-shell. In the Northeast is
128
Rasavajra dark blue, her faces dark blue, black, white; her two
hands holding a red savory chest (jasa-bhdnda ); with the remain¬
ing hands, holding the vajra, wheel, ratna , sword.
In the third circle, on the Eastern pattikd (strip) are (the

Bodhisattvas) Maitrcya and Ksitigarbha. On the Southern
pattikd are Vajrapani and Khagarbha. On the Western pattikd
are Lokesvara and Maujughosa. On the Northern patfikd are
Sarvanivaranaviskambhin and Samantabhadra. These eight
are like the lords of their own families, but Maitreya’s basic
arm holds a Nagakesara flower along with its branch marked
with a wheel.
At the gates of East, etc., and in the intermediate directions

of Southeast, etc., also in the zenith and in the nadir are the
10 krodhas in sequence. Among them, Yamantaka is black
his faces black, white, and red; holds a vajra club, the wheel,
the vajra, at his heart a threatening gesture (tarjani) along with
a noose, the bell, and axe.
Prajftantaka is white; faces white, black and red; holds a

vajra , a white staff marked with a vajra, the sword, and at his
breast the tarjani along with noose, the bell and axe.
Padmantaka is red; faces red, black, white; holds a red

padma , a sword, club, bell, and axe.
Vighnantaka is blue; faces blue, white, red; holds the
oiioavajra, wheel, club, tarjani along with noose, bell, and axe.
Acala is blue; faces blue, white, red; holds the sword, vajra,
wheel, tarjani, and axe.
Takkiraja is blue; faces blue, white, red; with two hands he

adopts the vajra-humkdra (gesture); with the remaining hands
he holds the vajra, the sword, the noose, and the hook.
Nxladanda is black; faces black, white, and red; holds a blue

staff marked with a vajra , a sword, a wheel, against the chest
a tarjani along with noose, a padma , and an axe.
Mahabala is black; faces black, white, and red; holds a

black staff marked with a vajra, a sword, and wheel, at the heart
a tarjani along with noose, the padma and axe.
Usnisacakravartin is black; faces black, white, and red;

with his two basic arms grasps the uftiifa on his head; with his
remaining arms holds the vajra , the padma , the tarjani, and the
sword. His two hands execute the ufniâ-mudrd called by some
Samantavabha, called by some otherwise, made as follows :
INTROIK’CTION TO THE OUHYASAMAJATANTRA 129
the palms stretched out together facing upwards; the two thumbs
hold on the nails of the two ring fingers; the small fingers to a
point; likewise the nails of the two middle fingers together com¬
ing to a point; the two forefingers on the middle fingers, forming
a cone.
Su mb ha raja is blaek; his faces black, red, white; holds a

vajra, a wheel, a ratna, at his breast a tarjani along with a noose,
a padma, and sword.
These (32) deities beginning with Aksobhya are thrcc-faccd,

six-armed, all upon a visvapadma , and individually seated in
their respective otder, on a (1-5) (the five Buddhas, to wit:)
five-pronged vajra ; (goddesses, Locanii, etc.) (6) wheel, (7)
nine-faced emerald, (8) red lotus, and (9) viivavajra\ (goddesses,
Rupavajrfi, etc. down to SparSavajra:) (10) wheel, (11) vajra,
(12) padma { 13) viivavajra , and (14) Nagakcsara flower; (eight
Bodhisauvas, to wit :—) (15) wheel, (16) vajra, (17) ratna,
(18) padma, (19) vajra, (20) viivavajra , (21) vajra , and (22)
stall; (the ten krodhas, to wit:—) (23) vajra , (24) red lotus,
(25) visvavajra, (26) staff with sword, (27) vajra, (28) blue
staff marked with vajra, (29) black staff, (30) vajra, and (31-32)
sun and moon each situated on a vajra.
Furthermore, they are composed of jewels coloured like

their own deity (-progenitor). Among them, Vairocana, the
goddesses, and the Iiodhisattvas arc located on a moon. The
others are located on a sun. (Tathagatas) such as Aksobhya
are in vajraparyanka (leg position). The Krodhas have their
left leg extended, their right one retracted; on each face three
eyes, each red and round; are howling and blazing; have espe¬
cially frightening forms, and are called the fearful raktacakra
(‘protective circle*).
Here only the mandala lord is together with his prajnd

(goddess consort . The other male deities, down to Sumbha-
raja, are without prajfia. Yamuntaka and the others in the
rakfdcakra are together with a prajnd looking like themselves (or :
‘their own light’, svdbha) in order:—(1) Vajravetali, (2) Apara-
jita, (3) Bhrkutf, (4) Ekajap't, (5) ViSvavajri, (6) Visvaratni,
(7) Vi vapadma, (8) Yi vakarma, (9) Gaganavajrini, (10)
Dharanidhara.
In the heart of Aksobhya is a ‘Knowledge Being* (jnana-

saltva), two-armed, with a red prajnd . In its heart is a black
130
Hum. Oed in that of Vairocana; Sva in that of Ratnasambhava;

Ah in that of Amitabha; Ha in that of Amoghasiddhi : Lam
Mam Pam Tam (respectively) in those of Locanii and the other
goddesses. (The officiant utters : ) Jah Hum Vam Hoh. Kham
in that of Sparâvajra. Mai-thlim in those of the Bodhisattvas,
Maitreya, etc. Om Om Orn Hum Om Sam Hum in those of
the ten Krodhas. The heart mantras of the deities are stated
in the Vajrdvali (another work by Abhayakaragupta).
The kulda (family master) is the previously-mentioned

Vajrasattva of Aksobhya and Samantabhadra, but holds a
vajra , wheel, padma, bell, gem, sword, and embraces a Vajra-
dhatvisvari looking like himself.
Aksobhya belongs (as their essence) to the Tathagatas,

Mamaki, VajrapanI, MaAjughosa, Usnisa-, and Sumbharaja.
Vairocana belongs to Locana, Rupavajra, Maitreya,

Ksitigarbha, Yamantaka, Acala.
RatneSa (»Ratnasambhava) belongs to Sabdavajra,

Khagarbha, Prajnantaka, Takkiraja.
Amitabha belongs to Pandara, Gandhavajra, Loke^vara,

Padmantaka, Niladanâ.
Amoghasiddhi belongs to Tara, Rasavajra, SparSavajra,

Vifkambhin, Vighnantaka, Mahabala.
So ends the Aksobhya-mantjala stated in the Pindikrama .
* # *
The foregoing translation leaves some matters to be explained.

The six hand symbols of Vajrasattva are set forth by Ratna-
kara£anti in the Pindikrta-sddhanopayika-vrtti-ratndvali (PTT.
Vol. 62, p. 77-5) as the signs of the six families : “The vajra is
the emblem of Aksobhya, being the intrinsic nature of contemp¬
lating the ‘wheel of the doctrine* [dharmacakra) . The red lotus
(padma) is the emblem of Amitabha, being the intrinsic nature
of prajdd not adhered to by the mud of lust, etc. The bell (is
the emblem of Vajrasattva), being the intrinsic nature of prajdd
that is the purity of gestation ( bhava ). The ‘wish-granting
gem* ( cintamani ) is the emblem of Ratnasambhava, being
the knowledge which fulfills all hopes. The sword is the emblem
of Amoghasiddhi, being the prajdd (that severs) the corrupt
practice. ( / de la rdo rje ni mi bskyod pahi phyag mtshan te /
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAjA TANTRA
131
ye ses Inahi ran biin no / / hkhor lo mam par snan mdzad kyi
phyag mtshan tc / chos kyi hkhor lo bsgom pahi rail biin no //
pa-dma ni hod dpag tu med pahi phyag mtshan te / hdod
chags la sogs pahi hdam gyis mi gos pahi Scs rab kyi rah biin
no II dril bu ni srid pa mam par dag pa $es rab kyi ho bo hid
do / yid biin nor bu rin chrn hbyuii Idan gyi phyag mtshan
tc / bsam pa thams cad rdzogs par bycd pahi ye ies so // ral
gri ni don yod par grub pahi phyag mishan te / non mons pa
spyod pahi ses rabbo/). That attribution of emblems to the
individual Tathiigata families plus important elements from the
translation of the Aksobhya-mandala can be clarified with
corrcspondcntial significance in tabular form, as in Table II.
Concerning the remark ‘Vajrasattva of Aksobhya and
Samantabhadra’, Nagarjuna’s Pindikrta-sadhana , 52 B-53, states:
‘‘Then he should enterprise the Atiyoga : Following upon
Aksobhya he should develop a Vajrasattva, three-faced, radiant
with six hands, and shining with sapphire light” (.—atha
atiyogam samarabhet / aksobhyanupravesena trimukham sad
bhujojjvalani / indranilaprabham diptam vajrasattvam vibha-
vayet / ). Xagarjuna, in the subsequent verses, shows that this
involves placing the Guhyasamaja deities in spots of the body
mandala. Ratnakarasanti (op. cit p. 77-4, 5) comments :
“ ‘three-faced’ because the purity of the three liberations; and
‘six-handed’ because the purity of the six perfections” (rnam
par thar pa gsum rnam par dag pas 2al gsum pa / pha rol tu
phyin pa drug main par dag pas phyag drug pa). (The three
liberations are through voidness, wishlessness, and signlessness;
the six perfections are giving, morality, forbearance, striving,
meditation, and insight). It appears that Vajrasattva is the
yogin possibility of a person, as the essence of the Tathagatas,
Aksobhya, and as their enlightenment-pledge, Samantabhadra;
who has advanced, equivalent to the non-tantric progression of
the Bodhisauva during the first seven stages, to the last three
Bodhisattva stages, as indicated by his embracing Vajradhatvi-
Svari (‘Queen of the Diamond Realm’), who is drawn from the
yogin’s own heart, according to the verse cited under nidana
verse 33,
II. CORRESPONDENCES OF AK§OBHYA-MANDALA
co
ro
Talhagaia
Families |
(with colors)
Emblem
Prajiid
(i and seat)
Vajra
(sense object
goddess)
Bodhisattvas
Krodhas
Aksobhya
(black)
Thunderbolt
(vajra)
Mamaki
Sparâvajra
Vajrapani and
Maujughosa
U snlsacakravarlin
and Sumbharaja
Vairocana
(while)
Wheel (cakra)
Locana
(on wheel)
Rupavajra
holding inirroi
Maitreya and
Ksitigarbha
Yamantaka and
Acala
Ratnasambhava
(yellow)
Wish-granting
gem (cinta-
mani)
(Mamaki)
(on nine-faced
emerald)
Sabda vajra,
playing a vina
Khagarbha
Prajftantaka and
Takkiraja
Amitabha
(red)
Red Lotus
(padma)
Pandara
(on red lotus)
Gandhavajra,
holding a
conchshell
Lokesvara
Padmantaka and
Niladanda
Amoghasiddhi
(green)
Sword
(khadga)
Tara{ on crossed
thunderbolt,
viSva vajra)
Rasavajra,
holding savo¬
ry chest
Yiskambhin
Yighnantaka and
j Mahabala
Vajra<ama ^
Bell (ghanta)
Vajradhatvisvar!
Samantabhadra
YOGA OF THE GUIIYASAMAJATANTRA
INTRODUCTION TO THE QUHYASAMAjATANTRA
133
The utterances ‘Jah, Hum, Vam, Hohi* also require ex¬

planation. They represent the four mantra stages of attracting
toward the vogin, drawing in, and bringing about non-duality
with the ‘knowledge beings’. Cf. Sadhana-mdla , No. 110, pp.
230-231 ; Om vajrarikuM akarsaya Jah, Om vajrapaii praveiaya
Hum, Om vajrasphota bandhaya Vam, Om vajravese vaSikuru
Hoh. “Om, May the diamond hook attract, Jah !” “Oip,
May the diamond noose drawn in, Hum !’* “Om, May the
diamond chain tic, Vam !” “Om, May the diamond bell
subdue, Hoh !**
So far the data about the mandala has involved the deities
who arc the residents of the palace. Now I shall turn to the
theory of the Guhyasamaja mandala as the residence. An
interesting statement about the symbolism of the Guhyasamaja
mandala is presented in the Samdhivydkarana on Guhyas<m&ia t
Chapter IV, verses 9-18, of which verse 9 is as follows :
dvadafahastam prakurvita cittamandalam uttamam {

c a turn tram caturdrdram calu$konam prakalpayet //
One should construct the supreme mandala of conscious¬
ness, measuring twelve hastas. One should imagine it
with four sides, four corners, and four gates.
On that verse of the basic Guhyafamdja-tantra y the Pradipoddyotana

cites this commentary as from the*Arya-tyakhyand* t which in this
case means the Samdftirydkarana :
a that ah kathayi ydmi mandat am cittam uttamam f

vajrajiidnapratikdsam kayavdkcittamandalam //
navatmakam idam (rr<tham suniyuktam tathoditam /
dvividhagamam ahkitam supramdnam tad ucyate U
samvrti paramdrtham yad advayam iobhanam matam f
prajhd sutram idam tatyat tad updydnuvarttitam //
t>rajiiopdyaika f tllrrna dharmam sambhogam uttamam /
sutntam mandalam ca t tarn pratitya dradaiav.gatah ff
( satydryam caturauam syad brahmniihdrakonakah (
t drdrasamgrahavastidkhyam pratyekam turyasamjnakah //
I dharmatattvartham ankitam cakrddyantaramandalam /
/ abhtdyajridnacihnam tad vajrendranilamudrakam f(
I Paiicakaraprabhfddkhyam iulam samsdranaiakam /
/ prdktad adartar iipam tu cakrarn jvdldrcibhufitam //
/ samantasamatdjiianarfi ratnatn ydmyaikasamjditam f
134
YOGA OF THE GUH YAS AMAJ AT ANTRA
( pratyavekfanapadmakhyam padmardgdrcim pakimam If

f uttarottaracittam yaj jagadvikalpaddlanam /
/ krtyanuf ihdnakhadgam syad raSmijvdldsamaprabham //
/ dgneyydm netratn maitrim tu nilameghasamaprabham /
/ nairrtydm karundkhyd sydn mdmakikulavajTakah //
/ vdyavydm padmasatnjitd tu muditdsusthitanand j

f aiidnyutpalam dbhdti sopekfd nilasannibha //
/ ddnapurvam tathd dvare mudgaratn kdntisuprabham /
/ tathaiva priyavddyakhyam dandam vajrdrcisuprabham //
/ arthacarydm tu padmakfiyam pakime hayakanthare /
/ vajram samdnacarydrtham vajrakundalivajrinah //
/ /a*/ ittham kathitam samyak mudrdvinydsalakfanam /
/ yathasamsthanatah pujd bhavct trividhabhdvanaih /
/ mahatvapurvakam tv etam mudrd mandalam ucyate //

Translation (MrAaw pp. 40-41):
Now I shall relate the supreme mandala of consciousness,

the mandala of Body, Speech, and Mind, resembling
the (non-dual) Knowledge of Diamond.
This best one, made of nine (five personality aggregates

and four elements), thus expressed as wcll-constructed, is
that one said to be of goodly authority marked by lineage
of two kinds.
What as convention (samvrti = illusory body) andsupreme

(paramartha = Clear Light) is the non-dual loveliness,
that is this thread (for the mandala outline) as the insight
of which it is applied by the means.
By the single thread of insight and means, there is the

supreme Dharma (-body) (insight—Clear Light) and
Sambhoga (-body) (means—illusory body), threaded as
the mandala of mind by twelve members (“12-hastas
measurement) in dependence.
The Noble Truths are the four sides; the Sublime Abodes
(i.c. love, compassion, sympathetic joy, and impartia¬
lity), the corners; the articles of conversion (i.e. giving,
pleasing words, acts in accordance, and exemplary con¬
duct), the gates—in each case by fours.
The inner circle of wheel, and so on, symbolizes the mean¬

ing of dharma-rcality. The symbol of the indivisible
knowledge is the diamond-sapphire seal.
It has facets of five kinds ( «the five knowledges). The tip
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAjATANTRA

135
destroys (the habit-energy of) the phenomenal world.

In the cast is the form of mirror (-knowledge), its disk
adorned with blazing light.
The sameness knowledge all around is the jewel whose

one name is ‘southern’. West is the lotus of discrimina¬
tive (-knowledge) with the light of a ruby.
What is the best mind of the north destroys the discursive

thought of living beings. The procedure-of-duty sword
would have the same light as blazing rays.
In the south-east is the ‘eye’ ( — Locana) and love, with

light the same as a blue cloud. In the south-west is com¬
passion with the diamond of the Mamaki family.
In the north-west, there is the lotus, the unshaken face of

sympathetic joy. The lotus of the north-east shines in
blue fashion with impartiality.
As the eastern giving at the gate is a mallet lovely in appea¬

rance, so also pleasing words are a staff (in the south)
appearing with diamond light.
Acts in accordance arc the lotus in the western horse-neck*

and exemplary conduct is the (vi$va-)vajra of the vajrin
of diamond winding (—ambrosia).
The characteristic of placing seals is what has been thus

rightly explained. By contemplations of three kinds
(arcane body, speech, and mind) there would be the
worship according to the proper place. This mudrfi.
preceded by greatness is said to be the manâla.
Besides, there are varieties of mandala. The Guhyasamajatantra,

Chapter XVIII, verse 99, mentions three kinds : bkaga-
mandala , bodhicitta-mandala , and deha-mandala. Tsoii-kha-pa,
in his independent Don gsal ba commentary on the Guhyasamaja
devotes individual sections to the three mandalas , keeping the
terminology of‘body-mandala’ ( deha-mandala ), while substitut¬
ing other names for the two other mand 3 ^- In place of
'bhaga-mandala', he employs the term 'utsarga-mandala* (emission
m.’)from the Pradipoddyotana on Chapter VII (equivalent to its
terminology ‘housc-m.’ puram man dal am, Pradipoddyotana MS.,
chapter one). Tson-kha-pa, following the Pradipoddyotana on
chapter VII, replaces the ‘ bodhicitta-m .* with the expression
paramdrtha-mandala. He makes it clear that the thirty-two Guhya-
samfija deities are involved in all three of the above-mentioned
136
YOGA OF THE Gl'HYASAMAj AT ANTRA
mandalas, which arc* evoked in the order dchti-mandala , uharga-

mandala , and paramartha-mandala. The dcha-mandala is prrfccl-
ed in the phase of yoga called Atiyoga. and both the uharga-m.
and the paramartha-m. belong to the phase of yoga called Maha-
yoga, or Mahasadhana: and are respectively equivalent 10 the
two sub-phases of Mahasadhana called‘Victorious Mandala*
(vijaya-mandala and ‘Victory of the Rite’ karma-iijaya So
much for the terminological side.
What is meant, is that the ‘body-mandala’of Atiyoga over¬

flows into the bhaga, or mother-lotus, whereupon the latter be¬
comes the bhaga-mandala. This phase is called ‘letter placement’
(akfara-nyasa ) i n the discussion of the fourth yoga (cf. the section
‘Four steps of yoga....’); and this is the posit ion of the Pradi-
poddyotana (Documents)when in its treatment of the fourth mem¬
ber it refers to the instigation of the rajra and padma and then
to the mantras (32 in no.) Vajradrg, etc. This is also the phase
discussed in the section 'Title of the work and nidana’, where
the quotation from the Devendrapariprcchd refers to the place¬
ment of the gods in the goddess (the karma-mudra or jnSno-mudra ).
The difliculty is that this process has several explanations going
respectively with the ‘Stage of Generation’ and (he ‘Stage of
Completion’. The explanation that agrees with both Stages,
is that this phase is the demonstration of the mandala, the ob¬
jective showing of the deity circle, either in its restricted form
as in Guhyasamdjatantra , chapter one, or in the full 32-deity
group. Hence the Pradipoddyotana (‘Documents’) refers to
this fourth yoga as ‘accomplishment of the great aim of ot bets'.
The third mandala, the paramartha-m. s refers to the (ruhya-

samaja deities being drawn into paramiirtha, or the absolute realm.
Tsoh-kha-pa explains in his Mchan hgrel on Chapter VII that
this means that the five personality aggregates (, skandha , five
elements ( dbdtu ), five sense organs (indriya ), live sense objects
(vifaya) , and five knowledges (jiidna ), a total of 25. are succes¬
sively drawn into the Clear Light (where, according to the
Pradipoddyotana on Chapter eight, verse 7. they unite with the
‘25-ycar old girl'V
III. INTRODUCTION TO THE YOGA OF
THE GUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM
A. The chapters of the Guhyasanta jatantra and yoga
1 he Eighteen chapters are discussed here because, as

will be soon demonstrated, chapters 2 to 17 arc divided into
four groups with titles almost identical with those of the
four sddhana steps.
The word for ‘chapter’ employed by the Guhyasamaja-

tantra is pafala. The Pradipoddyotana , at the end of its commen¬
tary on chapter one, explains this word in two senses, going
with pata- (‘cloth’) and -la (‘grasping’):
/ pa to yathd damSamasakadyupadravam nivarayati / tathdyatft

tantrdrthah kleiakarma janmadyupadravam nivaranat pa (a iva
pata (la)h / tarn lati grhnatiti taddharako granthasamChafi
pat ala h f
Just as a cloth covering (pa(a) wards off the attack of

gnats, mosquitoes, etc., so also, by warding off the attack
of defilement, karma, and rebirth, ‘ pafala ’ as the meaning
of the Tantra, is like a cloth covering. Since it grasps
and holds that (meaning), 'patala ’ as the collection of
compositions, is its receptacle.
Also, at the end of its commentary on chapter thirteen, the

Pradipoddyotana equates a pa tala with ‘the collection of composi¬
tions which teach it’ (tatpratipddako granthasamuhah).
The following chapter titles as preserved in Sanskrit have

varying relevance to the chapter contents. For example,
of the two chapters translated in ‘Documents’, chapter six does
adhere to indications of its title, while chapter twelve is scarcely
described by its title.
1. “Blessing of the sainudhi-inandala of all the Tatba
gatas” (sarvataihagatasamadhimandaladhi$thana).
2. “The Mind of Enlightenment” (bodhicitta).
1S8
3. “Samadhi called ‘Diamond Array’ ” (vajravyuho-

nama samadhi).
4. “Secret mandala of Body, Speech, and Mind” (guhya-

kayavakei t tamandala).
5. “Best of all praxis” (samantacaryagra).
6. “Empowerment of the Body, Speech, and Mind”

(kayavakeittadhisthana).
7. “Praxis of mantras” (mantracaryfi).
8. “Pledge of consciousness” (cittasamaya).
9. “Pledge whose goal is the reality of the non-dual

supreme entity” (paramarthad% , ayatattvfirthasamaya).
10. 'Exhorting with the heart (mantras) of all the

Tathagatas ” (sarvatathagatahrdayasaiicodana).
11. “The highest vidyapurusa who has the mantra-

pledge and the reality-diamond of all the Tathugatas”(sarva-
tathagatamantrasamayatattvavajravidyupurusottama).
12. “Instruc.^n on the best evocation of the pledge

(samayasadhanagranirdeSa).
13. “Revelation contemplating the meaning of the rea¬

lity of the array of pledges” (samayavyuhatattvarthabha-
vanasambodhi).
14. “Samadhi called ‘King of sporting with attraction

(of deities) by mantras’ ” (mantrakarsanavijrmbhitariijo nama
samadhi).
15. “Source of the diamond whose essence is the pledge

of all sentient beings” (sarvasattvasamayasaravajrasambhutir
nama) (edited citta replaced by sattva).
16. “Revelation of the mandala-diamond of all siddhis”

(sarvasiddhimandalavajrabhisambodhir nama).
17. “Blessing of the pledge—and—vow-diamonds of all

the Tathagatas” (sarvatathagatasamayasambaravajradhis-
thana).
18. “Blessing of the diamond knowledge which explains

all the secrets (sarvaguhyanirdcsavajrajnanadhisthana).
The Pradipoddvotana commentary covers only the first 17

chapters, although it cites the 18th chapter (‘Documents’) ;
while the 18th chapter itself has some separate commentaries
preserved in the Tibetan Tanjur. The reason is that there is a
block of verses in the 18th chapter (verses 25-31 in S. Bagchi’s
numbering) which group the previous chapters 2-17 in four sets.
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM 139
Consequently, the Guhyasamaja tradition generally labelled

the 18th chapter a ‘Continuation Tantra’ ( uttara-tantra). The
fact that those sixteen intermediate chapters fall into four sets by
authority of those verses is hardly noticed in the present edition
of the text, because of corruptions which cannot be corrected
without consultation of the Tibetan translation. Indeed, there
are even two important lines missing from the current edition,
which I have restored along with the other corrections, with
the help ofXagarjuna’s commentary ( AftddaSa-patala-vistara-vya -
AA)J,PTT,Vol.60,p. 4). The two lines were still part of the Guhya-
samdja-tantra when Ratnakara£anti composed his Kusumanjali-
guhyasamdja-nibandha-ndma (PTT, Vol. 64), which explains how
to pair the verses for translation purposes. What is presently
numbered verse 30 is in fact the first line ^hemistich) of one
verse and the second line of another verse. I have made two
new verses numbered 30’ and 30” in the following text of correct¬
ed Sanskrit. It can be speculated that factors in the gradual
corruption of the lines are the original presence of 9-syllable
padas in some places, and the use of infrequent ordinal forms of
numbers. The translation will follow the order in which the
Sanskrit verse mentions the ordinal numbers, in the first-men¬
tioned set, the fifth, ninth, seventeenth, and thirteenth (chap¬
ters).
paiicatnam navamarn caiva daiasaptamam trayodaiam /

buddhanam bodhisattvanam desandsadhanam mahat //25//
caturtham fodasam caiva aftarnam dvddasam tathd /
aedryakarmasamdnyam siddhis ca vratasambaram //26//
}af (ham caiva dvitiyam ca das am caiva calurdaSam {

ha!ham anurdganam ca upasadhanasambaram //27//
saptamam ca trtiyam ca ekddasani dafapancamam f
siddhikfetranimitiam ca sevasadhanasambaram //28//
sarvatathdgatakarma nigrahanugrahatmanam /
ddntadaurdantasaumydndm sattvdndm avataranam //29//
utpattikramasambandham scvdvajravidhiS catuh /
* sdmdnyasiddhisambandham agrabhutam ca granthanam //30’//

*mandalavratasambandham deary asampattigr anthanam /
gurundm mantramdrgena Si.ydndm paripdeanam jj 30” //
suvratasydbh t ;iktasya svahfyasya mahatmanah f
buddhunani bodhisattvanam deiandparimocanam //31 //
140
25, 31 : The fifth, ninth, seventeenth, thirteenth (chap¬

ters) have the great perfection of the teaching of the
Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, to wit, liberating one’s great-
souled disciple who is goodly vowed and initiated, by means
of the teaching of the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas.
26, 30” : The fourth, sixteenth, eighth, and twelfth have

the common acts of the deary a, occult powers (siddhi),
and the Vratasambara, to wit, the compositions on the
acarya’s perfection, associated with mandala-ritcs, maturing
the disciples by way of the guru’s mantras.
27, 29 : The sixth, second, tenth, and fourteenth have

the fierce act {hatha), attraction (of deity), and vows of
the Upasadhana, to wit, all the Tathagaia acts with the
nature of taming and assisting, introducing the sentient
beings whether tamed, obdurate, or mild.
28, 30’: The seventh, third, eleventh, and fifteenth have

the cause of the field of occult powers, and the Scva-
sadhana-sambara, to wit, the four diamond rites of Seva,
associated with the Stage of Generation; both the composi¬
tions associated with common siddhis and (those) which
show the superior kind.
The tantric Nagarjuna in that commentary on the 18th

chapter {op. eit ., p. 4) briefly alludes to the contents of each
chapter as he groups them by fours with titles :
Mahasadhana chapters (5, 9, 13, 17):
Chap. 5 on the praxis {caryd)

Chap. 9 on the yogasamddhi
Chap. 17 on samaya and samvara (pledges and vows)
Chap. 13 on extensive treatment of rites [karma)

Vratasambara chapters (4, 8, 12, 16):
Chap. 4 on the citta-mandala

Chap. 16 on the kdya and vdg-mandalas
Chap. 8 on the guhya-abhifeka
Chap. 12 on the change into the . Mahdmudrd
Upasadhana chapters (2,6, 10, 14) :
Chap. 6 on the adhiffhana of body, speech, and mind

Chap. 2 on the bodhicitta
Chap. 10 on exhorting all the Tathiigatas by their heart-

mantras
Chap. 14 principally devoted to mantras
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM
141
Seva chapters (3, 7, 11, 15) :
Chap. 7 on special practices (caryd)
Chap. 3 on the gods
Chap, 11 on the series of mantras and the knowledge body

Chap. 15 on the illusory divine body
Kumnknra£nmi’s cornmeniary (op. cit. y PTT, Vol. 64,
p. 96 and p. 201) mentions that chapter 1 is the goal-tantra
(literally: ‘the tantra of what is to be approached’. S. upeya-
tantra, T. thabs lax byuf: bahi rgyud ), while the chapters 2-17
are the ‘tantra of the approach’ (S. updya-tantra. T. thabs kyi
rgyud) t and that the chapter 18 is the ‘continuation tantra*
(uttara-tantra). Furthermore, each group of four chapters
from 2-1 7 is also known by a numerical title. 'I'lic Seva chap¬
ters are ‘Trcta’; Upasadhana, ‘Dvapara’; Vratasambara,
‘Krta’; and Maliasadhana, possibly*‘Nandin’ (T. dgah ba
can). However, the words Seva, and so on, appear to be
employed as categories rather than as steps, in which meaning
virtually the same set of terms is employed below (sub-section
C), Caiidrakirti’s Pradipoddyotana differs from Ratniikara*
£inti, by treating the first chapter as a basis for the remaining
sixteen; and so. for example, includes the forty nidana verses in
the commentary on Chapter 1.
There is a problem of how practical is that grouping by

fours. There is some confirmation for the validity of the
grouping in terms of the Maliasadhana and Vratasambara
( Sad liana) sets when these terms arc equated with the
‘vajras’, namely, Mahuyoga and Ativoga. As was shown, the
‘body mandala’ is associated with Ativoga, and this is indicated
by the Vratasambara chapters, namely. Chapter 16 (on the
kaya-and vag-mandalas) and Chapter 1 2 (on the change into
the Mah.unudra). The samadhi ‘Victory of the Rite’, associat¬
ed with Maliasadhana, is the topic of Chapter 13 (on exten¬
sive treatment of rites), and the utsarga-and paramartha-
maudalas, while not explicitly stated for the Maliasadhana
chapters, presumably go with Chapter 5 (on the praxis, carya)
and possibly with Chapter 9 (outlie yogasamadhi), while the
param.u lha-inandala also goes with Chapter 13. Even clearer
is the consistency of the Upasadhana chapters (2, 6, 10, 14)
with the equivalent ‘vajra’ called Anuyoga (as shown later)
because this involves depositing mantras (parts of the bodhi-
142
■cittta) in spots of the bod)'. Also when Guhyasamdja, Chapter

18, associates ‘the four diamond rites of Seva’ with the Seva
chapters (3, 7, 11, 15) this is consistent with my later
grouping of the first six nidana syllables (for Evam maya

£rutam) with Yoga (=Seva) because, as I later show, the
four syllables E, VAM, MA, YA can indicate any four steps of
yoga, and ‘^rutam’ means hearing or learning them. However,
insofar as I have noticed cross-referencing in the Pradipoddy otana
and its Mchan hgrel, the associations appear to be independent
of such grouping. For example, the important verses on the
meditation on the tip of the nose are found in Chapters three
and six, which belong to two different groups. Perhaps because
there was a question of the viability of this grouping, Ratnaka-
radanti composed his commentary {op. cit. ) by first comment¬
ing on chapters 2-17 in the above grouping, and then comment¬
ing on each of the 17 chapters in their normal order.
Of those chapters, my researches indicate that the first
twelve are the most important. This is indicated in part by
the fact that the explanatory tantra Samdhivydkarana, which
expands the Guhyasamdjatantra in chapter order, only goes up
through chapter twelve. This set of chapters includes chapter 1,
which is the‘goal’or ‘basis’ chapter; chapter 2, with the all-
important topic of bodhicitta\ chapters six and twelve with the
steps of yoga; and chapter seven with the three kinds of praxis
(<caryd ). Also, the theory that the chapters 2-17 arc grouped
by fours in the scheme given above, acknowledges that the
later chapters expand on materials of the earlier chapters rather
than start completely new topics.
B. The two stages , initiations and the Clear Light
The Guhyasamdja, in common with other Tantras of the

Anuttarayogatantra class, whether Mother or Father Tantras,
is divided into two stages of application, the Stage of Generation
( utpatti-krama) and the Stage of Completion ( sampanna'krama )
(or utpanna-krama). This is said in the Guhyasamdjatantra,
Chapter XVIII (p. 157) : /kramadvayam upagritya vajrinam
tatra dc£ana / kramam autpattikam caiva kramam autpanna-
katp tatha / “Taking recourse to two stages, the adamantine
one have therein the instruction, namely, the Stage of Genera¬
tion and the Stage of Completion.” Also, the Paiicakrama
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM 143
(I, 2) states : /utpatti-kramasamsthanam nispannakrama-

k.mksinilm / upayas caisa sambuddhaih sopunam iva nirmitah/
“The Complete Buddhas have formulated like a ladder this
means for those well standing in the Stage of Generation and
desiring the Stage of Completion.** In terms of yogins, Candra-
kirti at the beginning of his commentary on Chap. XI, distin¬
guishes them as the kalitayogin (“imagining y.’*) and the
nitfannayogin (“completed
In his Snags rim chen mo (f. 340a-5), Tsoh-kha-pa illustrates

the necessity to have the Stage of Generation precede the
Stage of Completion, by citing Vajragarbha’s commentary
on the Hevajratantra :
/mi yi skye ba dag 2in la / / dmigs med sAin rjchi sa bon ni/
/btab pas gan phyir dc yi phyir / / ston Aid dpag bsam
Ijon lift hbyun / By reason of having cast the seed of
aimless compassion into the pure field of human birth,
there arises the ‘wishing tree’ of voidness.
Tson-kha-pa explains that the ‘field* is ‘purified’ by the
Stage of Generation j and that the ‘seed’ of aimless compassion
attended with great ecstasy ( mahdsukha ) is cast therein by the
Stage of Completion.
The Stage of Generation is conceptual, the Stage of

Completion concrete. The reason the Stage of Generation
must precede can be illustrated in terms of the theory of winds.
In this first stage the candidate comes to understand the nature
of the winds which arc not visible to the ordinary senses, and in
the course of the yoga proper to this stage recites in accordance
with the natural cycle of the winds. In the Stage of Comple¬
tion he proceeds to combine those winds in extraordinary ways.
Of course one must understand a thing (first stage) before one
can manipulate it (second stage). It follows that unless one
believes that there are these mystic winds the Upanisads speak
about and which are so prominent in the commentarial litera¬
ture of the Gufiyasamdjatanlra, he can see little point to having
these two successive stages of yoga; and, in fact, there is little
profit to his pursuing the system at any level of application.
Tson-kha-pa’s remark, cited above, is clarified tcxtually

with such an expression as ‘knowing the intrinsic nature*
{svabhdvajna) (see also, nidana verse 33), that is to say, knowing
the natural cycle of the world in terms of the mystic forces, as
144
YOOA OF THE GUHYASAMAj AT ANTRA
the achievement of the Stage of Generation, prior to the great

ecstasy’ (mahasvkha) of the Stage of Completion. Here there
arc two passages that show what is meant. 1 he first is in
Aryadcva’s CittaviSuddhiprakaraiia, verse 20, where ‘intrinsic
nature’ translates svabhdia :
bald rajyanti rupr'u vairdgyam yanti madly amah /

svabhdvajiid vimucyante rupayottemabuddhayah ; •
Children delight in forms; the middle-aged pass to aversion.

Understanding the intrinsic nature of foim, those with
best intelligence arc liberated (from it).
THfc second passage is from Saraha’s Dohd-kofa, verse 23 in

Shahidullah’s numbering, translated here from the Prakrit
(given) and Tibetan text. While it does not have such a term
as ‘intrinsic nature’, it seems to have the same message,
jallai marai ubajjai [bajjhai]
tallai parama mahasuha sijjahf.
[Sarahe gahana guhira bhasa kalha

pasu-loa nibboha jima rahia.]
Having taken which (jallai), one dies,

is reborn, and is bound;
Taking that very thing (tallai) one achieves

the supreme ‘great ecstasy’.
But Saraha speaks these inexplicable and

profound words so this beastly
world will not understand.
Interpreting Saraha’s verse in the present context, in the Stage

of Generation one contemplates those natural forces behind
the cycles of birth, staying for a while, and dying, and the
repetition of those three again and again, and then in the Stage
of Completion, manipulates those same forces to achieve the
‘great ecstasy’.
Both stages have their own forms of ‘subtle yoga’ (suksma-

yoga) of prdtidydma. The former stage is held to extend certain
worldly magical powers ( siddhi ) to its successful candidates.
The latter stage is held to confer the supreme achievement of
Complete Enlightenment, which is the goal o( non-tantric
Buddhism as well. In the commcntarial period, treatises were
composed especially for one or other of the two stages. The
most famous of such treatises, Nagarjuna’s Paiicakrama, is devoted
to the Stage of Completion but is also helpful for the prior stage.
145
This is because the treatise is first to be read or heard with

conviction, anti this conceptual reading is an elementary form
of the Stage of Generation which is the conceptual prepara¬
tion for the second stage.
The commentators of the ‘Arya’ tradition of the Guhya-

sarnaja tried to combine this theory of stages with the well-
known Bodhisattva stages of non-tantric Mahayana Buddhism,
thereby clarifying the tantric version as the ‘quick path’. These
ten stages either fall into a 5-5 grouping or a 7-3 grouping.
Both groupings are adopted in tantric literature, but the latter
grouping was accepted for the correlation in this ease, as is
suggested by the Paticakrama, 2d krama, verse 79:
ddikarmikayogena cdftamim bhiimim apnuxdi f
dlokatrayadarSi ca da<abhumydm pratifthitah //
By yoga of a beginner, he attains the Eighth Stage, and

seeing the three Eights he is settled in the Tenth Stage.
Tson-kha-pa’s Padcakrama comm., Yol. 159, p. 4-4,5, cites the
view of Spyod bsdus (Arvadeva's Carydmeiapaka)that one attains
the Eighth Stage by the Stage of Generation. The implication
is that the last three stages of the Bodhisattva Path constitute
part of the Stage of Completion. Thereafter, the commen¬
tators differ along sectarian lines. Commentators of Yoga-
eara preference would combine this tantric theory with the
terminology ‘revolution of the basis’ (aSraya-pardvrtti) of the
set of perceptions, especially the ‘store consciousness’ (dlayavij-
ddna) often associated in that Yogacara literature with attain¬
ment of the Eighth Bodhisattva Stage. Madhyamika-type
commentators would avoid the term ‘store consciousness’ in this
connection. However, no attempt is made in these tantric
correlations to make a full-scale dovetailing with the theory of
ten Bodhisattva Stages, in the manner as these arc portrayed
in great detail especially in the- Daâbhuviikd-sutra.
The old theory of ten Stages implies an eleventh (the

Sam mtaprabha), the stage* of the complete Buddha. A further
difficulty arose when three extra Stages (bhiimi)y with varying
names, w<*re added to the traditional ten, with the previous
name Sumantaprabha moved to the thirteenth. I-or example,.
Alarnkakalava, PI f. Vol. Gl, p. 1H2-2, explains the name
‘VajrainuhV as the Stage called Samantaprabha, and cites the
verse (the original Sanskrit given under ‘Bhagcsu vijahara’).
146
YOOA OF thb ouhyasamajatantra
including: “The Stage resorted to by all the Buddhas is the

Thirteenth, and it is called the ‘lady’.” The two systems of
stages, the ten plus one, on the one hand, and thirteen on the
other, relate to two ways of assigning the initiations ( abhiseka )
and mystical visions of the Guhyasamdjatantra.
— According to the notes to Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals
of the Buddhist Tantras , initiations are the means of attaining
power over nature. There are two kinds, initiation simply in
an honorary way, namely to the Buddhas; and initiation for the
purpose of generating the power, namely to the Bodhisattvas.
There are further varieties, such as those stated in the Guhya-
samdja, Chap. XVIII, verses 111-112A:
abhifekam tridha bhedam asm in tantre prakalpitam /

kalafabhifekam prathamam dviiiyat/i guhyiibhifekatah //
prajftajndnam trtiyam tu caturtham tat punas tathd }
A distinction of three initiations is prepared in this'I’antra,

to wit : initiation of the Bask as the first; the second, as
the secret initiation; insight-knowledge, the third; and the
fourth, precisely the same (as the third).
The first initiation, that of the flask, is laid in the Stage of
Generation, and is usually divided into five initiations of the

flask, going with the five Tathagatas, and all accompanied by
sprinkling rites. An initiation of the hierophant (vajrdcarya)
is laid in the transition to the Stage of Completion. The last
three initiations, the ‘secret’, the ‘insight-knowledge’, and the
^fourth* arc laid in the Stage of Completion. All those initia¬
tions arc described at length in Mkhas s’rub rje’s Fundamentals
of the Buddhist Tantras; here some correlative materials are
presented in order to clarify the role of the initiations in the
Yoga of the Guhyasamdjatantra.
Candrakirti’s Guhyasamdjdbhisamaydlamkdra-vrtti (PTT,Yol. 62,

p. 26-5) mentions three kinds of ‘flask initiation’ : outer,
inner, and ‘pregnant’ (phyi dan nan dan sbas paho). The
outer kind uses a flask made of precious material for the five
initiations of the flask. The inner kind also uses a precious
flask for the five kinds of ambrosia, empowered by the Tatha¬
gatas. The ‘pregnant’ kind also has two varieties, ‘means*
(updya) and ‘insight’ ( prajiid ) flasks. The pregnant flask of
means has the water from the mouth of the guru; the pregnant
flask of insight has the water from the lotus of the prajfia lady.
147
The ‘pregnant’ kind of flask initiation appears to be the
‘unshared kind’ {atadhdrana) involved with the Hierophant’s
Initiation. In the latter initiation, the candidate is given the
vidyl (goddess) called the ‘seal pledge’ ( mudrd-samaya ) and made
to enter the union ‘bliss-void’ (sukha-s unya) by embracing that
vidyd.
Passing to the three initiations of the Stage of Completion,

we note two ways of relating those initiations to the system
as stages, as is set forth in Alamkakalava’s commentary on the
Vajramdld (P IT', Vol. 61, p. 180-2, 3) :
/ dehi phyir las dan po pahi rnal hbyor gvi ho bo slob

dpon dan gsah bahi dbah bskur ba dag ni sa brgyad pa
ic s bya ba rnam par b£ad go / / Ses rab ye ses kyi dgu
paho / bii pa dpchi rnam pas ni bcu paho /..../ yah
na slob dpon gyi dban ni sa brgyad paho / /gsah bahi
dbah gis ni rnam pa gah gis rdo rje bzlas pa la brten
nas dgu paho / / ses rab ye ses kyi dbah gis sems rnam
par dag pahi ho bo hid kyi bcu paho / rah byin gyis brlab
pa yah de hid do j ' hf.\ pa hid kyi muon par byah chub
pahi ho bo hid kyis bcu grig paho 1 'mos pa spyod pahi
sa dah bcas pa ni bcu ghis paho // zuh du hjug pahi
rim pas ni bcu gsum paho /
Hence, the initiation of the hierophant (vajrdcarya) who

is a ‘beginner yokin' and the Secret Initiation are laid in
the Eighth (Bodhisattva)Stage; the PrajiVt-jiiana initiation
is on the Xinth; the Fourth Initiation, by form of
example (i.c. taking the preceding initiation as example),
on the Tenth.... In another way, the Hierophant’s
Initiation is on the Eighth Stage; the Secret Initiation
for which one depends on Diamond Muttering (vajra-
jdpa) on the Xinth; the Prajna-jtiana Initiation whereby
there is cittaviiuddhi is on the Tenth, as is also the si’Jdhi-
ffhdna ; the Fourth through abhisambodhi is on the Eleventh;
the Twelfth has the Adhimukti-carya Stage; and with
the Yuganaddha-krama there is the Thirteenth.
The second type of correlation involves the five krama titles of

Xagarjuna’s Padcakrama (Vajrajapa, C’ittavisuddhi, Svadhi-
sfliana, Abhisambodhi, and Yuganaddha). The first type
stems from Aryadcva’s Carydmeldpaka , in a passage cited in
148 YOOA OF THE OUHY AS AM A J ATANTR A
the notes to Mkhas grub rje’s work, pp. 312-3: (Tibetan

omitted):
Moreover, Dbyaris-can-dgah-bahi-blo-gros, following

the Arya school of the Guhyasamaja y writes in his Dpal
gsan ba hdus pa hphags lugs dan mthun paid snags kyis lam
rnam giag legs biad skal bzah hjug nogs , folio 20b-1, f.:
“The one who has arrived at the limit of the subtle and
the coarse of the Steps of Production which conclude
the maturation of the stream of consciousness, is asso¬
ciated with attainment of the eighth stage. Both' the
arcane body and arcane speech of the Steps of Comple¬
tion are associated with the latter part of the eighth stage
as well as with the ninth stage. Both the arcane inind
and the illusory body are associated with the first part
of the tenth stage. Both the Clear Light and the coup¬
ling in the realm of learning are associated with the latter
part of the tenth stage. The coupling beyond learning
is posited on the eleventh stage, Samantaprabha. That
is the purport of the Caryamelapaka (Toh. 1803.) ”
Furthermore, there is a difference in where the initiations
of the Stage of Completion are conferred. The notes to Mkhas
grub rje’s work show that the Secret Initiation is attained in the
.relative bodhicitta-mandala Insight-Knowledge ( prajiia-jhdna)
one in the bhaga-mandala of the vidya, and the Fourth Initiation

in the absolute bodhicitta-mandala. Comparing this terminology
with the previous discussion of the mancjala, it is easy to observe
that the relative bodhicitta-mandala is the ‘body-mandala’ (deha-
matydala), and the other two, the utsarga-mandala and the para -
martha-mandala ; while all three are understood in the present
case with interpretations of the Stage of Completion.
Also, these initiations can be stated in terms of the consorts

(mudra). Following the exposition of the Kloh-rdol bla-ma
as set forth in my “Female Energy...” article, the ‘incanta¬
tion-born female’ is the yogint at the final limit of the Stage of
Generation; hence is involved in the Mahasadhana phase of
'invariant (letter) placement’ (in the samadhi 'Victorious
Mandala’), and presumably is the vidya of the Preceptor’s
Initiation. The ‘field-born female’ enables one to attain the
Symbolic Clear-Light with the arcane state of body, speech,
and mind; and so is the vidya of the ‘Secret Initiation’. The
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM
149
‘together-born female’ enables one to attain the Illusory Body
and the Goal Clear-Light (or the Clear Light of the Absolute
Entity); lienee is the vidy.i of the Prajtiajiiana Initiation; and
since the Fourth Initiation is said to be just the same as the third,
she is also the vidva or mudra intended here.
Regarding the ‘Secret Initiation’, the Pradipoddyotana in

its chapter eight devoted to this initiation cites the Tantra
catalogued as Candraguhyatilaka (“vathoktam bhagavata guhye
candratilake ”):
utcrjya ratnoji ala- •bodhicittam samiufkamurtim sakalam
jindndm /
abhifineya murdhudmalaratnavakair viiudd/iavajrodbhavojfidna-
toyaih //
Having drawn forth the bodhicitta jewel-blazing of the

Jinas. he sprinkles all the arid body by way of the head
with knowledge drops issuing from the pure vajra , (drops)
with the power of the immaculate jewel.
The context shows that the expression ‘by way of the head*
means that the candidate imagines that the substance flows
down from the crown of the head and first stimulates the ‘little
tongue* (the uvula). Fora clear statement of its further pro¬
gress through the body, see Sri Laksmi’s passage presented
under nid'ma verse ‘K.V (No. 22). For the reference to the
tongue, the Pradipoddyotana on chapter seventeen quotes the
Wfulatantra' (in fact, the Tattvasamgraha of the Yoga-tantra
class):
jihviim lalagatdm krtvd nasikdgram tu cintayet /

j uktmavajrasukhasparidd bhaiet cittam samahilam //
Having placed the tongue on the ‘roof of the mouth’,

he should contemplate the tip of the nose (of the face).
From blissful contact with the subtle vajra (the little
tongue), the mind becomes stabilized.
In the same place the Pradipoddyotana cites a clarifying passage

from the ‘ Prajiidsutra ’ (which Mcfian hgrel identifies only as
‘Mother Tantra*):
dhdrdmrtamayi nityam yd murdhni variate dhruvam /

pitvd hayayogindrena jardmrtyuvindiakah jj
yalhotpalandlena {tu ) toy am dkarf.aU tiarah /
evam upajiiya jived yogi mabdbala iti //
What consists of streaming ambrosia continually and
150
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTR A
steadily rains in the head. Having drunk (that) with

the ‘yogi organ of a horse’ (i.e. the stretched-out tongue
curled back to the uvula) one destroys old age and death,
(drinking) like a man sucks water through the stalk of
an utpala-lotus. So having subsisted, the yogi lives with
the name ‘Mighty One*.
Furthermore, according to that work of Candrakirti’s, the

vrtti (op. cit., p. 29-3), the place where the initiation is conferred
is the disciple’s tongue, of which there arc three: in the throat,
the heart, and the navel, the places where he enjoys the substance.
This refers to the downward passage of the whitc-and-red
bodhicitta drop.
In the case of the third initiation, this is the ‘knowledge

based on the insight’ (Candrakirti’s explanation, the vrtti ,
p. 30-3, 4) as a definition of prajfid-jiidna (‘insight-knowledge’).
According to Mkhas-grub-rje’s work, the Insight-Knowledge
Initiation is associated with the passage of winds in the ‘central
vein’arousing ecstasies in four cakras . Hence it is understand¬
able that definitions of mahdsukha are given in connection with
this Initiation. Thus, Tsoh-kha-pa’s Snags rim chen mo, in the
Prajfia-jflana Initiation section, quotes Vitapada’s Yogasapta-
nama-caturabhifekaprakarana : “The distinction of whether there
is or is not the great ecstasy ( mahdsukha ) is accordingly the last
of explanations. However, in the Prajfta-jftana the charac¬
teristic of mahdsukha takes shape.. . .‘Because it is without place
and without deception, it is explained as mahdsukha' ” (sbyor
ba bdun pa las kyan // bde ba chen po yin ma yin gyi khyad
par de biin du b$ad pahi mthar / ho na kyan $es rab ye $es la
bde chen mtshan Aid gzugs su gnas / fes dan // ini gnas kyan
ni mi sluhi phyir // bde ba chen po ies su b$ad / ces dbah gsum
pa la....). Also, Tsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on the “Six
Law$ofNaro-pa,”(PTT Vol. 161, p. 8-2,3) states: “The main
thing here is the requirement that the ecstasy of the Stage of
Completion belong to the ‘consubstantiality’ (sahaja) arising
from making the wind(s) enter, dwell, and dissolve in the
'central vein’ ” (/ hdihi yah gtso bo ni rlun dbu mar
fugs gnas thim gsum byas pa las byun bahi lhan skyes kyi rdzogs
rim pahi bde ba dgos so / ). In Candrakirti’s way of explain¬
ing (the vrtti , p. 30-3, 4) the initiation is conferred in the three
series of caves or in the padma. Since the bodhicitta proceeds
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAjA SYSTEM
151
downward in tlu* ‘central vein’ through four cakras , we may

understand Candrakirti’s remark as intending the upper three
cakras as ‘caves* and the lowest cakra as the ‘padma*, where the
bodhicitta should not ‘fall out’ or be released.
The Fourth Initiation, also called ‘Initiation of the Name’,

is said to be just like the Prajfta-jftaua one, meaning that the
bodhicitta passes through the reverse order of the same cakras ;
and, according to the note in Mkhasgrub rje’s work, p. 36, upon
reaching the forehead cakra, the small circle called umd-koSa y
passes out into the ten directions like a lightning flash.
Furthermore, the theory of the Clear Light preceded or

followed by three Lights, is related to the division into two
stages. Now I shall present material from several works of
Tson-kha-pa, leading up to a convenient tabic, after which
some classifications in Tanjitr works can be appreciated better.
Tsoh-kha-pa, in his commentary on the Caturdcvipariprcchd
labelled ‘Bcis his' (P IT, Vol. 159, p. 97-4) writes: “That is the
concise paramiirtfui-mandala as the ‘Clear Light of conviction*
in the phase of the Stage of Generation, anti is comparable to
the four voids of which the Clear Light belonging to the Stage
of Completion is the chief one” ( ! de ni bskyed rim gyi skabs su
lhag mos hod gsal du bsdus pahi don dam pahi dkyil hkhor dan/
rdzogs rim gyi hod gsal gtso bor byas pahi stoh pa b2» lta buho /).
Restricting ourselves to this ‘Clear Light of conviction’ concern¬
ed with imagining the‘basic time’—the cycle oflifc and death—
we find that there are two kinds. There is a Clear Light of
deep sleep which contrasts with dream, and a Clear Light of
death which contrasts with the intermediate state, as in this
passage of Tson-kha-pa’s Gsah ba hdus pahi cal $ts yig chut 1 thor
bu pa (Vol. 159, p. 136-2): “Since the Clear Light of deep
sleep, and dream are controlled by the power of wind, there is
the invariable accompaniment that the Clear Light of death,
and the intermediate state are controlled by the power of wind.
In the same wav, since the Clear Light of deep sleep, and dream
are controlled by craving, there is the invariable accompani¬
ment that the Clear Light of death, and the intermediate state
are controlled by craving” ( / ghid kyi hod gsal dan / rmi lam
rlun stobs kyis zin na , hchi bahi hod gsal dan / bar do rlun
stobs kyis zin pas khyab , de b2in du gnid kyi hod gsal dah /
rmi lam hdun pas zin na hchi bahi hod gsal dan / bar do hduu
152
YOOA OF THE OUHYASAMAJ ATANTR A
pahi zin pas khyab cii'i /). According to this passage, the
‘basic time’ is controlled by wind and craving; deep sleep
corresponds to death; dream corresponds to the intermediate
state.
Turning to the ‘time of the path’ in the Stage of Comple¬

tion, when the four voids are evoked concretely, there is also a
terminology of two kinds of Clear Light, as in T sori-kha-pa s
Gsal bahi sgron me (Vol. 158, p. 194-1) : “Moreover, at the
conclusion of the Clear Light of the (Supreme) Entity, he
accomplishes the Yuganaddha-deha (pair-united body); and
at the end of the Symbolic Clear Light, he accomplishes the
Illusory Body” ( { deyari don gyi hod gsal gyi mjug tu zuh hjug
gi sku dan / dpehi hod gsal gyi mjug tu sgyu mahi sku hgrub
P° /)•
However, both the ‘basic time’ and the ‘time of the path’
are involved in the varieties of intermediate states and of births,
as in that same work of Tsoh-kha-pa (his commentary on the
Partcakrama) , first the intermediate states ( bar do) (Vol. 159,
p. 53-4): (1) bar-do of gestation ( srid pa bardo), which agrees
with (2) the bar-do of dream (rmi lam gyi bardo) according to
the Mar-pa school—the two being the bar-do of the basic time
( giihi bar do ); (3) bardo of the path ( lam gyi bardo). Next the
births (Vol. 159, p. 53-5): (1) birth in a womb through inter-
mediate^tate of gestation; (2) birth through 'bar-do of dream’
at the time of waking up to reoccupy the gross personality
aggregates—the two being the ‘birth’ of the basic time (giihi
skye ba); (3) birth of apprehending the gross personality aggre¬
gates by the bar-do of the illusory body ( sgyu lus kyi bardo).
The above data can be clarified in tabular form, where

the Clear Lights of deep sleep and death of everyday life corres¬
pond respectively to the Symbolic Clear Light and the Clear
Light of the Absolute Entity.
Now for the Tanjur classifications, of which a good start is
Sakyamitra’s (ika on the Carydmelapakapradipa (FIT, Vol. 62,
p. 300-5) : “The varieties are Clear Light of (1) training
(iaikfa), (2) beyond training ( aiaikfa ), (3) true mind ( cittatd ),

and ( 4 ) entity ( artha ). Nos. 3 and 4 in his classification seem
to be the two mentioned by Sri Lak$mi (Vol. 63, p. 29-4):
* The Clear Light is of two kinds, Clear Light of consciousness
and Clear Light of intrinsic nature. Among those, the Clear
III. THE CLEAR LIGHTS
Haste Time (in
Stage of Generation)
Time of the Path (in Stage of Com -

plclion )
Clear Light
Deep Sleep
Death
Symbolic
Supreme Entity
(paramartha)
Intermediate State
Dream
Gestation
Illusory Body
( maya-deha)
Yuganaddha-dcha
(pair-united body)
Birth
Waking up
Birth (exit
from womb, or
by some other
means)
(apprehending
the gross
personality
aggregates-
vipaka-kaya)
(apprehending
the world, in the
Nirmana-kaya)
Ui
INTRODUCTION TO THE CUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM
154
YOGA OF THE OL'HYASAMAJATANTRA
Light of consciousness is the (Yogiicara’s) ‘representation*

(vijdapti) without aspect {mrukdra ); and the Clear Light of in¬
trinsic nature is universal void (rarra/tiwya) which is obtained
at the fourth stage” (/ hod gsal ba ni main pa giiis te , semskyi
hod gsal ba dan / rah biin gyis hod baho ' de la sems kvi hod
gsal ba ni mam pa med pahi main rig dan / rah biin gyis hod
gsal ba ni thams cad stoh pa ste rim pa bii pas thob par byaho/).
That i% to say, Sakyamitra’s kind called ‘true mind* would be
the Yogacarin’s ‘representation without (external) aspect* :
and the one of ‘entity’ (short for ‘supreme entity’) would be
the universal void.
Nos. 1 and 2 of Sakvamitra’s classification arc explained in

Candrakirti’s Guhyasamdjdbhisamaydlamkdra-vrtti (PIT, Vol. 62,
p. 35-3) in summary verses : “One should understand two
Clear Lights by ‘training’ ( Saikfa) and ‘beyond training’
(. aSaikfa ). The Clear Light of training is explained as (the
dhydnas of) ‘contraction’ (pindagrdha) anti ‘expansion’ {anubheda).
The one beyond training is non-discursive (a; ikalpa) , not
perceptively reached ( anupalabdha ), pure from the outset ( iidi-
tuddha )These two are respectively equivalent to the Sym¬
bolic Clear Light and to the Clear Light of the Absolute entity
in the time of the path. Therefore, Sakyamitra’s varieties
(1) and (2) are respectively equivalent to his varieties (3)
and (4). All of the above Tanjur classifications apply to-
“Time of the Path.” The Clear Light of Deep Sleep appears
mainly a matter of oral instruction.
Finally, there is the dillicult but important topic of three

anyds in relation to the two Stages. In his \fthah gcod, Tsoh-
kha-pa points out that Aryadeva’s Caryamddpaka took account
of the three caryds only for the Stage of Completion, but that the
Pradipoddyotana on Chapter X (in fact the initial sentence)
implies that both Stages have their version of the three can Jr.
The three according to the Pradipoddyotana manuscript on
Chapter VII arc prapaiica-caryd , ttifprapaiica-caryd , and atyantanif-
prapanca-caryii. Tson-kha-pa elaborately discusses these matters
in his Paricakrama commentary (FIT, Vol. 159, pp. 67 to 78^,
the section entitled “The ran J which is the means of issuing the
profit in the two States” ( rim grits la bogs hbyin pahi thabs spyod
pd ); and has a briefer, but also complicated discussion in his
Mtkah gcod on Chapter VII (ITT, Vol. 156, pp. 42 to 45).
INTRODUCTION TO THE OUHYASAMAJA SYSTEM 155
The discussion shows that in each ease this is a caryd (advanced

yoga technique) connected with the female element of the world.
The word prapaiica has here the special meaning, “involvement
with the five sense objects”. In ancient Buddhist texts, these
five ate called the paiicakamaguna (“the five strands of desire”),
and they promote development of the being, his taking a place
in phenomenon (a more usual Indian meaning of the Sanskrit
word prapaiica ). The addition of the word caryd serves for
classifying the yoga techniques of this Tantric tradition. Candra-
kirti’s commentary on Chapter VII associates the three in
the given order with three of the four ways of interpreting
Guhyasamdjatantra passages, namely with the “shared sense,”
and “pregnant sense,” and the “ultimate sense” (see my section
“Seven ornaments and subdivisions”). In illustration, when
one contemplates the deities in their proper dress, hence in their
corporeal form, this is a case of prapaiica ; however, properly
speaking, the addition of the word carya restricts this case to the
five sense objects deified as goddesses (as in nidana verse 21).
Again, in relation to the three Lights, the carya would be of the
ii non~prapaiica" type; and in relation to the Clear Light, the
caryd would be of the “extreme non -prapaiica'' type. Hereafter,
the term prapaiica will be left untranslated; '’carya is cither trans¬
lated as ‘praxis’ or left untranslated.
Now that we have alluded to both superficial and profound

aspects of the two stages, wc should prepare for the separate
discussion of the two stages by the verse cited in ‘Documents*
(Fradipoddyota/ia on XII, 60-64) :
By the distinction of ‘shared’ and ‘superior’,

one posits two kinds of service :
The ‘shared’ one by the four vajras, the ‘superior’

one by members six in number.
This verse shows that the word ‘Service’ (sad) can be employed
in generalized ways to indicate the entire praxis of the Guhya-
samaja. Previously in section A, on the chapters, we have
translated that there are four diamond rites ol Seva associated
with the Stage of Generation. Then the superior service is the
six members of yoga in the Stage of Completion. To anticipate,
the four diamond rites are named 1. yoga, 2. anuyoga,
3. atiyoga, and 4. mahiiyoga. The six members of yoga have
already been defined in ‘Documents’ : 1. pratyahara, 2. dhyana.
156
3. pranayama, 4. dharana, 5. anusmrti, and 6. samadhi. What

is meant by ‘shared' service is that the terms 1. seva 2. upa-
sadhana, 3. sadhana, and 4. mahasadhana, can be employed
in one sense of the words as equivalent to the four vajras as
named above, and can be employed in another sense as equiva¬
lent to the six members of yoga. In the latter case, seva
covers pratyahara, dhyana, pranayama, and dharana;
upasadhana equals anusmrti; and both sadhana and maha¬
sadhana are included in samadhi. Moreover, as has been
shown, sixteen chapters (2-17) of the Guhyasamajatantra are
labelled by these four generalized terms of service. It may be
the intention of such labelling to indicate the shared aspects of
the two stages insofar as these aspects can be assigned in four
groups by those four labels of the chapters.
However, the Guhyasamajatantra has itself briefly defined the

common elements indicated by the four vajras in its chapter
XVIII, verse 137 :
prathaman i SQnyatdbodhim dvitiyam bijasamhrtam /

trtiyam bimbanifpattii caturtharji nydsam akfaram //
The first is the revelation of voidness; the second is the

drawing together of germ syllables; the third is the per¬
fection of the image; the fourth is the invariant ( — letter)
placement.
In order to apply to both stages, those four have to be explained

with utmost generality. The first indicates the yoga of reaching
up through the void or light stages to the Clear Light. The
second is a descent of divine elements. The third is the consum¬
mation of the candidate. The fourth is the saintly re-involve¬
ment with the world.
C. The four steps of yoga and the three samadhis

in the Stage of Generation
The four steps of yoga in the Stage of Generation are frequently

referred to as the four steps of service (jciyi) or of evocation
{sAdhana ). They are presented this wav in the Guhyasamiija y
XVIII, p. 162:
yogatantresu sanefu iasyate yogind sada f

sevdvidhanam prathamarji dvitiyam upasddhanam (
sddhanam tu trtiyam vai mahdsiidhanam caturthakam /
The yogin always praises in all Yogatantra—the rite of
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUIfYASAMAjA SYSTEM
157
service as first, the near-evocation as second, evocation

as third, and great evocation as fourth.
These steps arc stated somewhat more fully in Ibid., XII, p. 58

(completely given in ‘Documents’) : “He should contemplate
the samudhi-praxis of service (jefvl) as the supreme revelation
(lift arm-bodhi)" (sevasamadhisamyogam bhavayct bodhim
uttamam). .the deliberation on the ‘base of vajra’ ( vajra -
dyatana ) when there is foremost success is the near-evocation

( upascidhatia ) ” (upasadhanasiddhyagre vajrayatanavicaranam).
“The contemplation of the lords of the mantras stated to be the
exhortation at the time of evocation ( sddhana )” (sadhanc
codanam proktam mantradhipatibhavanam). “At the time of
great evocation ( mah'lsadhana ), when he imagines the form of
his own mantra-vajrin as the lord on the crown of the head, he
is successful because of the jfidna-vajrin ” (mahasadhanakale$u
bimbam svamantravajrinah / mukuje ’dhipatim dhyatva siddh-
yatc jftanavajrinah).
Tsoii-kha-pa further clarifies the four steps by identifying them

with the four yogas of the Kr$nayamari-tantra (presumably Tohoku
No. 467) in this passage (Snags rim, f. 364b) :
, rdo rje sans dpah rdzogs pa ni (f mal hbyor yin par hdi Itar
hdod f j dt yi rgyu mthun lha yi sku f rjts kyi mal hbyor yin
par grags / / hkhor lo thams cad yotis rdzogs pa { Sin tu mal
hbyonin par hdod // sku dan gsuii dan thugs mams dan jf
lha yi mig sogs by in brlabdau / f ye Ses hkhor lo gzug pa daii //
mchod dah bstod pa chcn poni f jmal hbyor chcn po its byafio (
The perfection of Vajrasattva is thus held to be yoga.
His affiliated divine body (*devata-kaya) is known as
anuyoga. The perfecting of all the ‘circles’ (cakra) is held
to be atiyoga. The blessing ( adhisfhdna ) of body, speech,
and mind, and of the divine eye ( divya-cakfus ), etc.;
the drawing in of the Jnana-cakra ("knowledge beings,
jiianasatlva), the great offerings and praises—is called
mahdyoga.
Nagarjuna, in his Pindikrta-sadhana, is consistent with his employ¬

ment of this terminology of yogas, starting with verse 44 (in
La Vallcc Poussin’s numbering). We learn that in yoga there
is the rite involving the recitation ol the celebrated mantras,
Orp Sunyatajnanavajrasvabhavatnuiko ’ham, and Om dharma-
dhatusvabhavatmako ’ham. With verse 51, he mentions the
158
YOOA OF THE OL’HYASAMAJATANTRA
uxnuyoga and this culminates in the contemplation of the ‘primeval

lord* (Sdindtha). Then the atiyoga develops vajrasattva (the
‘diamond being’) as the progressed self of the yogin with his Ixxly
as a mandala (the deha-mandala mentioned earlier in our mandala
section). The mahayoga starts with verse 70 and involves the
blessing or empowerment of body, speech, and mind, using the
mantras of Guhyasamaja t chapter 6 (‘Documents’).
Passing to some individual explanations for the four steps,

especially as they apply to the Stage of Generation, wc note
that the Pradipoddyotana (‘Documents’) is helpful for clarifying
the 1st step. It is necessary to place consciousness in samidhi.
The practitioner then reviews the evocation “from the spot of
earth, etc. up to the mandala circle.” He then enters the realm
of the void through contemplating the mantra, “Om iunyata-
jflanavajrasvabhavatmako ’ham” (Om. I am the intrinsic
nature of the knowledge diamond of voidness). Hence in this
step the officiant evokes the void mandala-palace, also called
the 'perfection of Vajrasattva’.
Commenting on the ‘ vajra-dyatana ’ of the second step of

sadhana, namely upasadhana, Snags rim says (f. 3G3a-6 to 363b-1):
“Thugs-rje-£abs explains that vajra means the thirty-two deities
from Vairocana down to Sumbharaja; while its base (ay at ana)
refers to the spots wherein are deposited the syllables of those
(deities) in the aggregate of form all the way down to the soles
of the feet.” ( / rdo rje ni mam snan nas gnod mdzes kyi bar
so giiis so If dchi skyc mehed ni gzugs phuii nas rkah mthil gyi
bar yin te de dag gis yi ge hgod pahi gnas bstan par thug rje
fabs hchad do / ). This remark immediately shows the connec¬
tion between the ‘ oajra-dyatana ’ of the second sadhana step with
the second vajra, the ‘drawing together of germ syllables’
(btjasamhrta) (cf. preceding sub-section). This refers to the
body-mandala where thirty-two syllables representing the thirty-
two deities arc deposited in the appropriate spots of the bodv.
But without this comment, the relation between the two second
ones would not be clear. Also the comment clarifies the Snags
rim remarks (362b-6, ff. through 363a-1, 2, 3) that on the
Stage of Generation the second sadhana yields the ‘incantation
body ( mantra~deha ) while the same sadhana, interpreted on the
Stage of Completion, yields the ‘knowledge body’ (jndna-kdya).
This evocation of a sanctified body, which the Pwdipoddyo -
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAJUAjA SYSTEM
159
tana calls the ‘form of Mahamudra’, is alluded to in Nagarjuna’s

Pin(/ikrtasadhana (verses 51-52) :
.... anuyogam samacaret {

tatas tryakfarasambhu tain sitakundendusannibham /
ddindtham vieintya ....
.... He should engage upon the Anuyoga. Then, imagin¬

ing the primeval lord (ddindtha) arisen from the three
syllables like the white-jasmine moon....
As to the three syllables, these can be either d, o, and ha, or they

can be Om, Ah, and Hum. Thus Mchan hgrel, PTT, Vol. 158,
p. 14-3, states : “a, o, and ha are the three basic syllables...;
that means that from the thirty-two parts of the ‘seminal drop’
( bindu-bodhicitta) the three syllables become 32-fold and gene¬
rate the gods on the lotus.” This alludes to generation of the
thirty-two Guhyasamaja gods from germ syllables. Further¬
more, Tsoh-kha-pa’s Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim pa (PTT, Vol. 160,
p. 91-1), shows the process of imagining a single bindu (of
bodhicitta) as the syllable Bhrum and from its transformation
generating the 4-cornercd, 4-doored, etc. palace along with
thrones (Step No. 1); and continues :
Then the single-part bindu becomes 32 parts upon the

thrones, and from their transformation (there arise the
syllables) Om, Ah, Hum. Then the incantation of each
of the seed syllables Hum, etc. gives rise to 32 Jriana-
adhisthanas of the three vajras. Therefrom there arise
32 hand symbols of thunderbolt ( vajra), etc. (Step No. 2).
Therefrom one generates sequentially the bodies of the
deities (Step No. 3) :—the foregoing is the ‘way of genera¬
ting’.
In the case of the third step—generation of the bodies of the

deities (especially within the practitioner’s own body as a body-
mandala) is presumably what the h'r$nayamdritantra (op. cit.)
calls the perfecting of all the circles. The Mchan hgrel on
chapter XII (Vol. 158, p. 92-2, 3) adds information for the
third step that the perfection here comes from the five abhisam-
bodhis. In summary of Xagarjuna s text, Ratnakaraianti s
Ptudikrta-sadhanopdyikd irtti-ratnavali-nama (Vol. 62, p. 62) places
here the blessing ol the sense bases ( dyatana ), the personality
aggregates ( skandha ), the elements, the major and minor limbs,
by the various 32 deities; and (ibid., p. 77) states that by divi-
160

sions of the skandhas, there are Vairocana and the other Tatha-
gatas; and so on, down to Sumbharaja (in the feet). These
arc what the Guhyasamiija calls the 'lords of the mantras’. The
Pradipoddyotana (‘Documents’) alludes to verses XII, 70-71
to explain the blessing, but thereby disagrees with both the
Kr$nayamdrit antra and Nagfuj una’s Pindikrta-sddhana which place
this blessing or empowerment of Body, Speech, and Mind in
the fourth step.
The fourth step in the Pradipoddyotana treatment involves

imagining the lord on the crown of the olTiciant’s head, and the
five Tathagatas on the heads of all the deities in their particular
families. Mchan hgrcl (PTT, VoJ. 158, p. 92-2, 3) brings in
the terminology of the fourth vajra, the 'invariant ( = letter)
placement’, and states that this refers both to letter placement
of the samadhi-sattva {lift iie hdzin sems dpah ) and to letter place¬
ment in the body of the vidyd (rig mahi lus la yi ge hgod pa),
hence to letter placement of vajra and padma (rdo rje dan pa-
dmahi yi gc hgod pa ste), referring of course to the mention of
vajra and padma in the Pradipoddyotana comment (‘Documents’)
on this step. This would then be the ‘overflow mandala’
(utsarga-mandala) spoken of in our mandala section. As was
mentioned, other sources place here the empowerment of Body,
Speech, and Mind.
Furthermore, the Pradipoddyotana (‘Documents’) clarifies that

the Mahasadhana, which is the fourth step, is the accomplish¬
ment of the aim of others. This agrees with the Guhyasamaja -
tantra's explanation of Mahasadhana as a title for chapters
5, 9. 17, and 13, that these chapters have the teaching that
liberates one’s great sou led disciple. The Pradipoddyotana men¬
tions that the Mahasadhana includes the ‘best victorious
mandala’and the ‘best victorious rite*. In fact, these are the
second and third of a well-known set called the three samadhis.
The set of three samadhis constitute a terminology in common

between the Yoga-tantra and the Anuttara-voga-tantra classes
of tantric literature. Even though there arc some differences
in explanation of those three, there are strong indications that
the Stage of Generation of the Anuttaravoga-tantra is the por¬
tion of that kind of Tantra that has practices shared with the
Yoga-tantra. The three samadhis are called ‘preliminary praxis*
(prathamaprayoga), ‘triumphant mandala’ (vijaya-tnantjala),

161
and ‘victory of the rite’ (karma-vijaya). Stags rim, f, 364a-

1, 2, mentions as the implication of those remarks of the Pradl -
poddyotana that the first three steps of service are the preliminary
praxis’ and amount to steps that accomplish one’s own aim.
The employment of two samadhis to cover the 4th step of yoga
helps to resolve the several ways of explaining the 4th step as
not constituting rival methods of conducting the rite of that
stage, hut rather as suggesting the grouping into two phases.
The 'victorious mandala’ is the initiation phase of the Stage
of Generation, involving the five vidya initiations, as they are
called. The ‘victory of the rite’ includes those rather strange
rites filling up a number of verses in both Chapter 6 and Chapter
12 (‘Documents’) about the ritual eating of different kinds of
flesh, in fact the meditative eating of that flesh, credited with
leading to supernormal powers (on which I once wrote an article,
“Totemic beliefs in the Buddhist Tantras”). The apportion¬
ment of rites between the three samadhis can be seen rather
clearly by placing in concordance with the four steps the mandala
rites of the Guhyasamaja which can also be arranged in four
parts following the classification of Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals
of the Buddhist Tantras, which in turn is based on the Snags rim.
These two works enabled me to group the rites in Nagabodhi’s
Sri’guhyasamaja-mandalopdyikaiimSati-vidhi-ndma (PIT, Vol. 62,
pp. 12 to 18), where there are actually twenty-one rites despite
the Vim/fl/i’ of the title. Admittedly, this correlation demands
more justification than here given, and a study of the Mkhas
grub rje context will provide some of the missing links, for
example, that the ‘rite of the site’ also requires contemplation
of voidness (as we saw in the case of the first yoga step).
(A) Rites of the site:
1. Clearing the site (sa sbyoii ba)
2. Seizing the site (sa yons su gzun ba )
3. Elimination of the obstructing demons (bgegs fle bar

ii ba)
(B) Rites of preparatory acts :
4. Pitching the lines with chalk (thog le kor gyis thig

gdab pa)
5. Preparing the flask (bum pa lhag par gnas pa)
6. Beseeching the gods (gsol gdab pa)

7. Preparation of the disciple (slob ma lhag par gnas pa)
162
YOGA OF THE CL’HY ASAMAJATANTRA
(C) The main rite, beginning with construction of mandala:
8. The five colored threads (tshon sna lha)
9. Putting in the colors (tshon dgved pa)
10. Invitation of the gods (spvan drah ba)
(D) Initiations of the flask :
11. Drawing the disciple into the mandala (slob ma g2ug pa)
12. Diadem Initiation (cod pan gyi dbaii bskur)
13. Diamond Initiation (rdo rjc dban bskur)
14. Mirror Initiation (me Ion gi dbah bskur) ( = Water

Initiation)
15. Name Initiation (mih gi dbah bskur)
16. Emblem Initiation (phyag mtshan gyi dbah bskur)

(=BeIl Initiation).
. Offerings:
17. Offerings to the gods (lha la yon hbul ba)
18. Offerings to the guru (bla ma la yon hbul ba)
Permission and Unification :
19. Conferral of permission ( anujiid ) on the disciple (slob

ma la rjes su gnah ba sbyin pa)
20. Unification (of the Guhvasamaja deities that are in

various spots of the body) (he bar bsdu ba)
Concluding Acts:
21. Release of the magic nail (phur bu dbyuh ba), i.c.
dismissal of the deities, along with a burnt offering
(homa).
In summary, one can establish the first samadhi of ‘prelimi¬

nary praxis’ to cover the three parts. A. Rites of the site, B.
Rites of the preparatory acts, and C. The main rite, where
the three (as external ritual) arc analogous to the first three
steps of service (as internal ritual) which in both cases accomp¬
lish one’s own aim. Then the second samadhi ‘victorious
mandala’ covers the initiations of the flask for the benefit of the
disciple, but since in reality these initiations arc conferred by
the goddess, the female element enters at this point. The third
samadhi ‘victory of the rite’ covers the offerings, permission to
the disciple (to repeat the ritual himself) and re-unification of
the 32 deities into Bodhicitta, as well as concluding acts. This
helps to clarify the Mahayoga as the second and third samadhi.
Also, it is becoming apparent that there arc various ways of

Stating the four steps of service or yoga, and this may be the
INTRODUCTION to the guh y asamaja system
163
implication of the rem.uk in Shags rim , f. 364a-l, 2 that for

accomplishing the four steps there is a lesser, a middling, and a
great (chun hbriri then po gsum ga dgos pas).
Besides, there is Tsoh-kha-pa’s insistence on correlating tantric

materials with the three phases, birth, death, and the inter¬
mediate slate, which are referred to in nidana verse 38, and those
three with the three bodies of the Buddha. This is stressed
among other places in his independent work Don gsal b <7 on the
Guhyasamdjatantra (I* IT. Yol. 160, p. 128). In this way,
Dharmakaya goes with death, Sambhogakaya with intermediate
state, and Nirmanakaya with birth (cf. the tabic about the
three phases in the preceding section). There Tsori-kha-pa
argues at length about the ‘Adinatha’ (which according to
Xagarjuna is the germinal Yajradhara) to the conclusion that
the generation of the ‘adinatha' agrees with the intermediate
state. In the foregoing discussion of the four yogas, the genera¬
tion of the adinatha was placed in the second yoga called anu-
yoga. In my at tide, "The Five-fold Ritual Symbolism of
Passion," I showed Tsoh-kha-pa’s view that the contemplation
of voidness is equivalent to death; and since this contemplation
takes place in the first yoga, this step can be correlated with
death. That leaves the third step to go with birth, which is
reasonable since it is the culminating step for one’s own sake.
We therefore have the following line-up of the steps :
1. Yoga — s\mbolic death — Dharmakaya
2. Anuyoga — symbolic inter¬
mediate state — Sambhogakaya
3. Atiyoga — symbolic birth — Nirmanakaya
Of course, such concordances are not meant to suggest that the

Yogiu attains suc h bodies by following through with the several
steps. Tsoii-kha-pa makes it plain that ibis correlation is meant
to establish those steps as the- cause's in the ‘Stage of Generation’
for the subsequent attainment of those Buddha bodies in the
‘Stage of Completion’.
D. The six members of yoga and the jive kramas

in the Stage of Com/detwn
The six members are stated in the ('.uhyasamdjat antra for the
first time in chapter 18, which is generally regarded in conimcn-
tarial tradition as an L’li.ua-tanira ‘continuation tantra be-
164
cause it includes verses grouping the preceding chapters 2-17.

However, Candrakirti's Piadipoddyotana on Chapter 12 (see
‘Documents’) insists that verse 64 has the implication ol these
members, especially by the words se:djtuitidmrtain ; and accord¬
ingly wrote in comment upon that verse a fairly lengthy account
of the six members. This account, curiously, is almost identical
with the work Sadanga-yoga (extant in Tibetan), attributed
to Nagarjuna (in PTT Vol. 85). It may be that the comment
was a traditional one for that block of verses in chapter 18.
The same verse block that Candrakirti quoted, plus some more,
were later quoted by Naro-pa in his Seh>dd?sa(ikd , a commen¬
tary on part of the A alacakra-tantra. Naro-pa, devotes much of
his subsequent commentary to aspects of those members, follow¬
ing the Kalacakra tradition. This shows that it was feasible to
carry through the tantric praxis in terms of those six members;
and the occurrence in the Guhyasdmaja , chapter 18, indicates that
this formulation was once a viable procedure in this tantric cult.
Of course, the names of the six members of yoga are ancient.

They are almost the same names as the members of yoga in the
Kiaitri Upanifad. However, over the centuries different inter¬
pretations have been made of the chief terms; and they do not
always occur in the same order as in the Guhyasamiijatantra.
Also, the order of the members in this Tantra, while standard in
the Anuttarayoga-tantra, has occasioned some sharp disputes.
Of course, Nagarjuna’s commentary on the 18th chapter, where
the six members are defined, was examined carefully by the
commentators, but their silence regarding his commentary
when they engage in disputes on these matters is due to Nagar¬
juna’s way of commenting, which we might call ‘around’ and
not ‘to’ the point. However, it is interesting to observe how he
did proceed in his commentary, the A,\ (dda.fo-papilo-ristaia~
vydkhyd.
He found his first opportunity to go into the matter when

commenting on chapter XVIII, verse 24 :
trividham kdyavdkcittam guhxam itr abhidhiyale f

samdjtm milanam proktam sarvabuddhabhidhamikam //
The three types, body, speech, and mind, arc explained

as the ‘secret’.
‘Samaj.V is said to be union, the definition of all the

Buddhas.
165
Using remarks based on those three, body, etc., he first explains

the three samadhis, ‘preliminary praxis,’ etc.; then the Stage
of Generation and the Stage of Completion; then his five kramas
in order; the ‘cause’ ( hetu ), ‘action’ (karma), and‘fruit’ ( phala );
then the six members of yoga in order. Then he starts over
again, with somewhat different remarks based on those three,
body, etc., with which he first explains the three samadhis, then
the two stages, then the five kramas in order, then those three,
‘cause’, etc., and finally the six members in order. His next
opportunity presented itself when commenting on the definition
ol I antra (chapter XVIII, verse 33), in particular the expres¬
sion ‘ asamhdrya ’ (‘which cannot be led astray’). He says this
means the Tantra of the Fruit, free from fear, wherein the
achievement Vajradhara, and so on, is conferred by way of the
yogin ol subtle yoga in the Stage of Generation or the Stage of
Completion, or of (the five krama) ‘Diamond Muttering, etc., or
of the six members. By this comment he clarifies that his five
kramas and the six members are alternate ways of expressing the
tantric path (in fact, the Stage of Completion). Then in verse 35,
still devoted to definition of‘Tantra’, the expressions ‘paftcakaip
trikulain caiva....’ gave him the opportunity to talk about
five-fold sets,, three-fold ones, and so on. His five kramas are
such a five-fold set, so they arc mentioned, along with the three
samadhis again; and he cannot mention those without alluding
to the six members, so now (PTT. Yol. 60, p. 6-3) he gives a
brief definition of each of the six members. When he comes to
the block of verses on which Candrakirti commented (‘Docu¬
ments’) he has a rather lengthy treatment of the six members
(op. cit., p. 14-3, 4, 5 and p.13-1 ) in a manner consistent with
Candrakirti’s statement, although having some other materials,
and in particular agrees on the disputed point that the dhyana
member has the five parts ol non-tantric Buddhism and that
these do reach up to the Spread-of-Light, Culmination-of-
Light, and finally the Clear Light; while also placing the six
members in the Stage of Completion. As though that were
not enough, he continues (p. 15-1,2) with brief explanations of
the benefit resulting from each member, for example, that
dhyana yields the five supernormal powers (the teaching of non-
tantric Buddhism). There can be no doubt that Nagarjuna
gives the subject of the six members its proper due. He presents
166
considerable information, all taken together. But since he

introduced his five kramas into this commentary when they
were not mentioned in the original text of chapter IB, he could
have been helpful to show the relationship between his five
kramas and the six members, which he avoided committing
himself upon. And so subsequent centuries of commentators
had to dispute over what was meant. In the Guhyasamaja
cult, his Pailcakrama triumphed over the six-membered termi¬
nology, for which we are fortunate to have Candrakirti’s Sanskrit
commentary.
As we consider Candrakirti’s comments, it seems that the first
two members pratyahara. and dhydna, amount to a summary of
non-tantric Buddhist meditation. In standard meditation, first
there is withdrawal of the mind from the multiplicity ol external
objects, with focussing upon one properly chosen meditative
object, which is contemplated in the mind. This is close to the
pratyahara of Candrakirti’s explanation which, however, adds
some tantric remarks. Then the five parts to Dhyana are the
traditional parts assigned to the dhyanas in non-tantric Buddhism
which teaches that there arc four Dhyana levels or heavens
constituting what is called the realm of form (> upa-dhdtu) , below
which is the realm of desire ( kama-dhdtu) and beyond which is
the formless realm { at upa-dhdtu ). While it is true that the
further explanations given by Candrakirti for the five parts of
dhydna arc not how those same words arc explained in the Ablii-
dharma treatises, it is intriguing to notice his remark that the
fifth part “is engendered as light-only and the ultimate that is
one with universal void.” This claim that dhydna reaches up
to the Clear Light (of which ‘universal void’ is a synonym)
practically admits that the Clear Light is an experience at the
top of the realm of form, which is precisely where Mahayana
Buddhism places the Complete Buddha in a heaven called
Akanistha with a body called Samhhogakaya. But what sense is
there to commenting that way, when dhydna precedes the next
member, 3. prdndydma, in which there is no mention of cxj>enencc
of the Clear Light, but which is a necessary preliminary of the
next member 4. dharana which covers the mvstic experience
of entering the Clear Light ? It makes sense only if one takes
into account the kinds of Clear Light as in the previous section
that summarized the varieties in a table. That is to say, the
167
Clear Light reached by the dhyana member is not the Clear

Light of the ‘Supreme Entity’; but, on the other hand, what is
its Clear Light is not definite without further information about
this member of yoga, especially since there was a controversy
about the first two members.
Tsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on Pahcakrama, PTT, Vol. 158,

p. 196-4, says :
/ s^ron ma rob gsal las sor bsatn giiis sans dben dan I
stag rtsol rdor It Jos dan / hdzin pa hod gsal dan f
rjts dran dan lift he hdzin gun hjtig tu hdus par biad de /
According to the Pradipoddyotana y (among the six members)
pratydhdra and dhyana are incorporated in secret state
of mind {ciUa-vtveka ); prdndydma in diamond muttering <
(vajrajdpa) (i.e. secret state of speech, vag-viveka ); dhdrand
in Clear Light; annsmrti and samadhi in pair-united { yuga-
naddha ).
litis Tibetan tradition then proceeded to reject a portion of

Candrakirti’s [tosition, and by implication, Xagaijuna’s com¬
mentary on the 18th chapter. This is made clear in Tson-
kha-pa’s commentary Mthah geod (PIT. Vol. 156, pp. 50-52,
‘Deciding among the alternatives* for chapter 12). He says
(p. 51-2-4) : “According to the Pradipoddyotana, both pratydhdra
and dhyana are the arcane mind ( citta-vh'tka ) (sor bsam ghis
sems dben)...." Later he says (p. 52-4-4): “In our school,
if one treats the six members as six stages of the Stage of Comple¬
tion, then we heartily endorse Sgra-dbyahs-bcu-gcig-pa (for
his position) to treat both pratyahdra and dhyana as the arcane
Ixxly ( kdyaiiifka )” (ran gi lugs kyis rdzogs rim gyi rim pa drug
la yan lag drug sbyar na / sor bsam gfiis lus dben la sbyor ba
sgra dbyahs heu geig pa liar legs so / ). The mentioned author
(*Pkdda(asraia) is the author of the Mahdvajradharapathakramo-
padt'fdmrtaguhya 'Tnhoku catalog Xo. 1823). What Tsori-kha-
pa means by the words “if one treats” is that some authorities
treated the first two members as part of the preceding Stage
of Ccneration. Thus, there are three possibilities posited :
1. The first two members belong to the Stage of Completion

as ‘arcane mind’; 2. they belong there as ‘arcane body’;
3. they belong to the Stage of Generation.
A part of the dispute is exposed in Bu-ston’s commentary Bfad

sbym on the Pradipoddyotana (Collected Works, Ta, f. 172 b,
168
published in Part 9): “Here, the acarva Abhayakaragupta held

that pratydhdra and dhydna belonged to the Stage of Generation;
that prdnaydma is Diamond Muttering, dhdrand is the Illusory
Body and the Clear Light, and that anusmrti and samddhi arc
Yuganaddha. And the author Kumara claimed that fnatyd-
hdra and dhydrta arc the arcane mind, and that anusmrti is the
Illusory Body. Neither are correct” ( j lidir slob dpcm a-bhyas/
sor sdud bsam gtan bskyed rim dan / srog rtsol rdo rje b/las pa
dan / hdzin pa sgyu lus hod gsal dah / rjes dran tin hd/.in
zuft hjug bstan / ics pa dah ku-ma-ras / sor sdud bsam
gtan sems dben / rjes dran sgyu lus su byed pa mi hthad de /).
In the ease of Abhayakaragupta, Bu-ston gives the obvious
reason that the position is in conflict with the Uttara-tantra
(as cited in ‘Documents') which places all six members in the
superior category understood to be the Stage of Completion;
but the reason Abhayakaragupta was forced into his position is
that Nagarjuna's Pancakrama begins with Diamond Muttering
(— prdnaydma, member No. 3). However, Bu-ston apparently
believes that the refutation of Abhayakaragupta takes care of
Kumara's position as well—presumably on the grounds that
pratydhdra and dhydna cannot be arcane mind except in the con¬
ceptual meaning proper to the Stage of Generation; but, as we
saw, Candrakirti may well have this position even though he
places all six members in the Stage of Completion {‘Documents').
Bu-ston continues by saying, “Some teach the caryd with pratyd-
h&ra and the arcane body with dhydna ; that is most certainly
wrong” ( / kha cig sor sdud kyis spyod pa bstan / bsam gtan
gyis lus dben bstan / fes pa £in tu mi hthad de). By 'cand’
Bu-ston refers to the technical use of this term, of which there
are three kinds alluded to in Tsoii-kha-pa's annotation of nnidna
verse 26 (which sec).
Although Bu-ston denies ‘arcane body’ to dhydna , he goes on

to give his own position, “Hence, when one combines the six
membered yoga with the five kramas, pratyahara and dh\dna
are included in Illusory Body” ( / des na sbyor ba van lag drug
lam rim pa Inar sdud na sor sdud bsam gtan sgvu lus su lulus
tc/)• He also quotes approvingly that “one sees samifti-satya
with pratyahara ” (so sor sdud pas kun rdzob kyi bden pa nuhoii
baho). Although there may be a difference in usage of the term
arcane bod) - , it appears to me that Tsoh-kha-pa accepts Bu-
INTRODUCTION TO THE GUHYASAMAjA SYSTEM 169
ston’s position; and Tson-kha-pa’s annotation of nidana verses

22-23 (on Ka-ya) seems indebted to Bu-ston’s comment on
this ‘Ka’ (op. cit ., f. 55b). The solution was to call these two
members the ‘samvrti-mava’ stages.
My own solution of the nidana grouping took account of the

mention in verse 22 of the word nispanna-krama (Stage of
Completion) and in verse 23 of the word nispanna-yoga (Yoga
of Completion). Since these two verses go with the word ‘Ka-
ya’, it is clear that die author of the nidana verses of the Vajra-
mdla explanatory tantra understood the Stage of Completion
to begin with an emphasis on ‘body’. To deny that this is
‘arcane body’ but then to aflirm that it is Illusory Body—as
Bu-ston did—seems an unnecessary quibbling over words. The
nature of this ‘body’ will become clearer as we proceed.
Now, the Cuhyasamdjatantra has an earlier treatment of yoga

that seems to belong to the Stage of Completion, namely in its
chapter 6 (see ‘Documents’). Verses 3-6 constitute the impor¬
tant block, and we present them here again with the Sanskrit
corrected and translated with the help of the PradipoddyotanOy
Tsori-kha-pa’s Mchan hgrel , as well as with the Sarndhuydkarana.
(PTT, Vol. 3, p- 239-3-8) for verse 5:
mantranidhyaptikdyena vied manasi coditah (

sddhayet pravaiam siddhim manahsantofandm priydm j(3jl
ciUanidhyaptinairdtmyam idea kdyaiibhdvanam /
nifpddayet trisamyogam dkdiasamatdlayam // 4 //
kdyavdkcittanidhyaptch svabhdvo nopalabhyate /
manfraniurliprayogena bodhir vind ca bhdvandm jf 5 //
vied rye dam samdsena kdyavdkcittalakeanam /
bhdvaycd bodhisamyogam samddhim manlrakalpitam // 6 //
The one who has lx>dy as the mantra visualized should

accomplish, exhorted by speech in the mind, the ‘surpass¬
ing one’, ‘successful one', ‘one satisfying the mind,*
‘beloved one’.
He should accomplish the selflessness of citta being visua¬

lized, (then) the contemplation of speech ( vded) and body,
(then) the triple conjunction, (finally) the abode equal
to space.
The self-existence of body-, speech-, and mind-visualiza¬

tion is not reached by the praxis of mantra-body, nor is
revelation in the absence of contemplation.
170
YOGA OF THE GfllYASAMAjATANTRA
Having pondered in brief t His characteristic of Irodv,

speech, and mind, he should contemplate the samadhi
‘Conjunction to revelation’ as constitu ted by mantra.
Candrakirti’s comment on those verses implies a kind of six-
membered yoga aniotu’ them. 1. ‘who has body as the
mantra visualized’. 2. ‘exhorted by speech in the mind’.
3. ‘surpassing one*. 4. successful one’. 5. ‘one satisfying
the mind’. 6. ‘beloved one’. There are four states ( avasthd)
to be achieved in the stream of consciousness of a yogin (yogi-
sanitaria) : ‘surpassing one’ because it outlasts diamond mutter¬
ing { vajrajapad adhikatidt) ; ‘successful one’, i.e. the Svadhisthana
( = mahamudra ); ‘one satisfying the mind' because it is the puri¬
fication of the mahamudra ( mahdniudrd-viiuddhikaratidt ); ‘beloved
one’, which generates the Ixxly of Nlnhavajradhara. And these
four successive states are respectively, ‘the selflessness of citta
being visualized’; ‘the contemplation of speech and body’;
‘the triple conjunction’ as the divine body made of mind (rnano-
maya-dez atartipani ); and ‘the alrode equal to space’. Therefore,
‘exhorted by speech in the mind’ refers to the diamond mutter¬
ing which is outlasted by the citta visualized. This diamond
muttering is preceded by an achievement referred to as ‘body
as the mantra visualized*. The ‘Ixxly as the mantra visualized’
must be the achievement of the Stage of Generation kept over
for the Stage of Completion, because having already achieved
that much, the practitioner will naturally carry over that bodily
attainment to the next stage, that of Completion.
The ‘self-existence of lx>dy-, speech-, and mind-visualization’

means the self-existence of the three lights, respectively prajnii,
upaya, and upatabdhi, that is to say, ‘the selflessness of citta
being visualized’. That self-existence is not reached by the
praxis of mantra-body, i.c. by having ‘Ixxly as the mantra
visualized’, because, the foregoing memlxrs show that it is
necessary to be ‘exhorted by speech in the mind’. On the other
hand, without contemplation (‘Ixxly as the mantra visualized’)
neither is revelation reached. Having appreciated this point,
‘he should contemplate the samadhi “Conjunction to revelation”
as constructed by mantra.’
While there are definitely six stages in that formulation, there

is no expressed indication that the (iuhyasamdjatantia (first 17
chapters) has in mind here such a division—as the Uttara-
INTRODrCTION TO THE CL'HYASAMAjA SYSTEM
171
tantra imposes, of Stage of Generation and Stage of Completion.

It may have implied the two in the dvandva of the title, rahasyAti -
rahasya. But our foregoing materials make it quite clear that
the 'body as the mantra visualized* is indeed the accomplish¬
ment of the Stage of Generation. If one leaves out that body,
the remainder ol the members in that passage of chapter 6
pertain to what became called the Stage of Completion. In
such a case, the first member in this second series is the one called
‘exhorted by speech in the mind’, that is to say, diamond mutter¬
ing attended with pnindyama. Tsori-kha-pa’s commentary
‘Deciding the alternatives' for the chapter 6 (op. cil., Vol. 156,
pp. 25-5 to 26-1) cites in this connection the Vajramald explana¬
tory tantra (actually in chapter 68, the last chapter):
/ rdo rje bzlas par rab sbyor bas

I rluii gi mtshan fiid tes nas ni (
I mam rtog rluii mams mam par gcod j
I seats la dmigs pa thob par hgyur //
/ bdag la byin brlabs rim pas kyah f

j dilOS grub brgyad ni thob par hgyur
■ snail ba la sogs dbyc ba ies
! miion par byaii chub pa ni hthob /
/ zuii hjug rim pa la gnas pa f
j diios grub thams cad bsdus pa ni f
I tshe hdi hid la hgrub hgyur bar f

j t rial hbyor pa yis the tshorn med //
The one who by the praxis of diamond muttering under¬

stands the characteristic of the wind(s), destroys the
vikatpa-whuh and attains visualization of the citta. Then,
by the Svadhisthana-krama he wins the eight siddhis.
Knowing (already) the distinctions of light ( aloka),
etc. he gains the Abhisambodhi. Stationed on the Yuga-
naddha-krama, the yogin doubtless accomplishes in this
very life the sum of all siddhis.
Immediatelv after this passage, Tson-kha-pa points out that this

is the source of the five kratnas. It cannot be doubted that
Nagarjuna based his Pahcakrama work especially upon the sixth
chapter of the Guhyqsamaja and the explanatory tantra 1 ajramdld.
He has not altered the terminology in the names of the five
kramas : 1. Diamond Muttering (Vajrajapa), 2. Purification
of consciousness (Cittaviûddhi), 3. Personal Blessing (Sva-
172
YOGA OF THE CUJIYASAMAJATANTRA
dhisthana), 4. Revelation-Enlightenment (Abhisambodhi).

5. Pair-wise united (Yuganaddha). Near the beginning of bis
first krama, he has this summary statement consistent with that
sixth chapter and with the Vajrotnald position :
4B. mantranidbyaptim dgamya lajrajdpah susik.yate
5. vajrajdpasthito niantri cittanidhyaptim dpmndl

mdyopamasamadhistko bh&takotydm sarndiiStl
6. bhutakoteh samuttiffhann adtayajiidnam dpnmdt

yuganaddhasamadhistho na kirncic chiâtc punah
Having understood the mantra-visualization, he trains

himself with diamond muttering. Firm in diamond
muttering, the yogin achieves the citta-visualization.
Stationed in the illusorv samadhi, he enters the true limit.
Emerging from the true limit, he achieves the non-dual
knowledge. Stationed in the pair-wise united samadhi,
there is nothing more for him to learn.
That is to say, after one has gained the mantra-body (in the
Stage of Generation) he proceeds to the Stage of Completion
with that kind of body prepared by yoga (which therefore may
or may not be counted as the initial part of the Stage of Com¬
pletion). If the mantra-body in its developed status as an
“arcane body” is not counted in the numbering, then the first
member is the diamond muttering. The yogin outlasts this
with the state of visualizing the three Lights with their associated
eighty prakrtis. Stationed in the illusory samadhi, to wit,
with the Illusory Body, he enters the Clear Light in this stage
of Personal Blessing ( svddhifthdna ). In the stage of Abhivam-
bodhi, by the reverse order of the Lights, he achieves the non¬
dual knowledge. Finally, he attains the yuganaddha wherein
there is nothing further to learn ( aiaikfa-yuganaddha ).
Now returning to our considerations of the six-membered

yoga on which Candrakirti wrote lus comments, it seems that
the set of terms applies to the yoga praxis in a period prior
to this terminology of two main Stages. When it was decided
(per Nagarjuna’s system) to begin the Stage of Completion with
the diamond muttering along with prdndydma > the third member
of the other terminological system, it became a problem of how
to define the first two members 1. piatyahara and 2. dfndna
in a manner applicable to the Stage of Completion. Nagarjuna
evaded the issue in his commentary on the 18th chapter in which
173
the six-membered yoga was presented. The solution adopted

by Tson-kha-pa is that they represent the arcane body {kdya-
viivka ).
With the help of Candraklrti’s explanations (“Documents”),

and availing ourselves of the preceding data, the rest of the
correlation in terms of the Guhyasamaja cult can be set up as
follows :
six-membered yoga
3. Prariayama —
4. dharana —
5 .
6 .
1 .
2 .
3.
4.
5.
five stages
vajrajapa
cittavi£uddhi
svadhisthana
abhisambodhi
yuganaddha
anusmrti —
samadhi —
It should be emphasized that such a correlation may help us to

understand the stages of yoga in a terminological sense, and
enable us to cross over from one system to the other one; and
also that in practice authors settled on either set of terminology;
and that either could be used by authority of the Guhyasamdja-
tanira , which presents them in its Chapter VI and Chapter
XVIII.
Finally, I wonder if this remarkable description of yoga is

meant to duplicate the Buddha’s feat in the celebrated account
of the Parinirvdna-s&tra. Here the Budcjha passed beyond the
realm of desire up through the various divisions of the realm of
form and then the divisions of the formless realm until he reached
the cessation of ideas and feelings. He then reversed himself,
going through the downward stages in order until he arrived at
the lowest division of the realm of form. He then proceeded
upwards again until he arrived at the top of the realm of form
and then entered Parinirvana. Later, in Mahayana Buddhism,
for example in the / Mnkdvatdra-sutra , the place where he had
entered Parinirvana was considered the place where one is
initiated as a Complete Buddha.
E. Grouping the niddna kdrikas
The reason for including this topic under the general dis¬
cussion of yoga, is that repeated consideration of these forty
verses with great labor of collecting commcntarial materials for
them, finally convinced me that they represent a sequence of
yoga, and in that case the only yoga that can apply by authority
174
of the Guhyasamdjatantra toward any grouping is the four steps

in the Stage of Generation and either the six-membered yoga
or the five stages in the Stage of Completion.
But before we can take up this matter of grouping, it will be

necessary to establish where to place what is called the “hund¬
red lineages”. This involves some disputed points about the
“arcane body”. Some authorities held that the “arcane body”
was restricted to the Stage of Completion. In the course of
Tsoh-kha-pa’s lengthy discussion of this topic in his Paiicakrama
commentary, he states (PTT, Vol. 158, p. 201-4,7,8) : “Since
the Caiydmelapaka has stated the arcane body of one hundred
lineages to three lineages and then compressed into one lineage,
with the Stage of Generation as the basis of inclusion, they should
be included there, and so (in that case) it is not proper to in¬
clude them in the Stage of Completion (rigs brgya nas gsum gyi
bar gyi lus dben mams rigs geig gi lus dben du sdud par spyod
bsdus las gsuris pas / bsdu rgyu bskyed rim der de mams bsdus
pa rdzogs rim du mi run bahi phyir ro/). When w’e know that
Tsori-kha-pa held Aryadeva’s Caryamtlapakapradipa in highest
esteem and drew from that work the entire material on the
“hundred lineages” after comparing three versions of Arya-
deva’s text then extent in Tibet, we must conclude that Tson-
kha-pa gives his own position as far as the “hundred lineages”
is concerned. Since Tsoh-kha-pa refers to those “hundred
lineages” as “arcane body”, it is clear to me that his “arcane
body” annotations on nidana verses, starting with verse 14 in
my third group, is his way of placing those verses in the set
describing the Stage of Generation. Although the “hundred
lineages” stem ultimately from Aryadeva’s work (in the Peking
edition, PTT, Vol. 61, p. 295-5, line 7, to 297-5, line 8), 1 have
taken them from the edited form in Tsori-kha-pa’s Paiicakrama
commentary. Here, Tsoh-kha-pa (FIT, Vol. 158, p. 201-3-7)
mentions that when the “arcane body” is included in the Stage
of Generation, it is placed in the Atiyoga step, which is the third
of the four steps. RatnakaraSanti also implies that the “arcane
body is located in the third step by our information included
from his book that the blessing is of the sense bases, personality
aggregates, the elements and the major and minor limbs.
The arcane body , which thus begins with yoga praxis in the
third step, must continue through the fourth step for the simple
175
reason that it is present at the outset of the next stage, that of

Completion. We shall see that this observation agrees with
the three kinds of caryd of the Stage of Generation, which are
illustrated in the Tathagata verses ( niddna verses 18-21). It
thus becomes obvious that the niddna verses which invite commen¬
tary of portions of the “hundred lineages'’ belong to the Stage
ol Generation, and also obvious that the niddna verses beginning
with verse 22, which speaks for the first time about the yoga of
“completion”, belong to the Stage of Completion. All my
further collection of material confirmed this division and worked
out with continual consistency.
Upon scanning the various commentaries on the Pradipoddyo-

lana in the Tanjur, I find only one commentator who attempts
to group the niddna verses. One reason for the general silence
of the sub-commentators is that the commentarial flow is inter¬
rupted by stopping to comment in a completely different way,
as would be necessary with arguments in the case of the niddna
karikas, since Candrakirti had cited them only in a block without
individual remarks or grouping suggestions. Thus, even pre¬
suming that these commentators had their own thoughts about
grouping, ordinarily it would be only such an independent
commentary as the Dalai Lama referred to (cf. Preface) that
would try to explain the verses from all possible angles including
grouping. By the one commentator I mean the Kumara whose
Pradipoddyoiana commentary was noticed in a preceding section,
lie is probably the same Kumara who is listed as a translator
of Bhavyaklrti’s long commentary on the same Pradipoddyoiana,
so he may even have been a personal disciple of Bhavyakirti.
His commentary is rather brief; he calls it a tippani-hrdayddarSa
{‘Annotation which is the Mirror of the Heart’), and so he
concerns himself with what lie considers the most important
elements ol the work he is commenting on, rather than comment¬
ing on everything. It is worthwhile to present his solution,
even though I do not accept it. He apparently followed this
initial course of reasoning: At the end ol the citation of the
forty verses by the Pradipoddyoiana, there appears Candrakirti s
signal ‘gf irbhyartha' (T. sbas pa or sbas don). In a previous in¬
troduction, I have shown that Gandraklrti’s ‘ garbhyartha has
the three varieties of ‘pregnant sense clarifying the doctrine of
lust’, ‘pregnant sense revealing conventional truth ( — Illusory
176
Body), and ‘pregnant sense considering the three jilanas'. Also

Tson-kha-pa’s Mchati hgrel mentions these three varieties when
annotating that word '’sbas pa ’ at the end of the forty verses, so
it was quite reasonable for Kumara to expect that the three
varieties would be found presented among the forty verses.
However, it is one thing to exemplify tire three varieties some¬
where or other; and another thing for the forty verses to fall
into three groups, as Kumara forces them (PTT, Vol. 60,
p. 219-5). His first group amounts to verses 1 through 9 :
/ E ni Us rab dam pa aid ces bya ba nas / rnam Us hid ni lha

poho zes bya bahi bar gyis ni sems mam par dag pa hi rim pa
yin no // ye Us gsum rnam par hbyed pa ni geig tu sbas pahi
don no /.
From, ‘ “E” signifies the Noble Women Prajna/ down

to ‘perception ( vijhana ), the fifth’, is the stage ‘purification
of the mind’ (citta-vUuddhi). Analyzing the three gnoses
(jhanatraya) is one kind of ‘pregnant sense’.
The second group constitutes verses 10-18 :
/ mnam nid so sot rtog pa dart zes bya ba nas j de dan. der rigs
las hbynn ba ( lha dan lha mo tha dad pa dc ni yod min de med
kyah / hgro bahi don phyir ston pa yin zes bya bahi bar gyis
ni j lhahi sku mam par dag pa mhon tu hgro bahi rdo rje bzlas
pahi rim pa bstan to / / dehi nail nas phyag rgya bU ni rgyas
gdab cih ies bya bas ni sans rgyas spy an la sogs pa ham dgug
pa dan iugs pa la sogs pa ham / las kyi phyag rgya la sogs paho j
f de nid hdod chags kyi chos ston pahi sbas pahi don griis paho f
From ‘(the knowledges) Equality, Discriminative....’
down to ‘Of the different gods and goddesses generated
by him and his family, neither the gods nor the goddesses
exist, but arc displayed for the sake of sentient beings*
—shows the stage ‘Diamond Muttering* (vajrajapa) which
brings directly the pure body of a god. Among those
(verses) the phrase ‘sealed by four seals’ (verse 16) implies
cither Buddhalocana and the other goddesses; or attract¬
ing, drawing in, etc. (the four steps in bringing non¬
duality with the jiiana~ being); or the karma-mudrd , etc.
Exactly that is the other kind of ‘pregnant sense* which
teaches the doctrine of lust.
The third group includes verses 19-40 :
j hdi las ghis med mthoh bahi les bya ba nas j sbas paho zes

177
by a bahi bar gyi ni sgyu ma Ita buhi tin tie hdzin bstan pa
stf / dr kho na rat 1 by in gyis brlab pa hi rim bstan paho f f kun
rdzob kyi bden pa la dr ma than m,i 0,1 P ar by an chub pa hi rim
pa ni sbas pahi don gsum paho /
From ‘Afterwards, who secs the non-duality* down to

(the signal) ‘pregnant sense*—teaches the illusory samadhi
{mayopnma-samadhi), and only that teaches the Svadhisthana-
krama. Immediately after that ‘conventional truth’,
there is the Abhisambodhi-krama. So the third ‘preg¬
nant sense*.
The weakness of Kumara’s solution can be judged from these

viewpoints: (1) It was reasonable for him to impose stagesfrom
Nagarjuna’s Pahcakrama, but lie does not adhere to the order of
the kramas, interchanging the first and second—Cittavi£uddhi
and Yajrajapa. By applying these stages throughout, which
arc prevalent on the ‘Stage of Completion* he leaves no group
of niddna verses to depict the ‘Stage of Generation’, which be¬
lies Candrakirti’s verse to the effect that the forty verses explain
the Guhyasamajatantra, which on the strength of Kumara’s
divisions has no Stage of Generation at all. (2) It was reason¬
able for him to apply the terminology of three kinds of ‘preg¬
nant sense’ but it is contrary to the obvious data of the verses to
divide them into three consecutive groups on this basis. For
example, the ‘three knowledges { jiidnatraya ) kind of pregnant
sense in fact covers the verses 1-7, 25-26, 30, 32, and 36-38.
(3) His solution takes no account of the words of the niddna
sentence, because his second group (verses 10-18) goes down to
the first ta of tathdgata. He evinces no indication that he tried
to relate the subject matter of the verses to the words which
furnish the fortv svllablcs.
• •
Having by those considerations eliminated the one classical

attempt to group the verses, the way is clear to group them by
appeal to the evidence of the verses themselves. The forty
verses divide into sets on the basis of the Stage of Generation and
the Stage of Completion, as previously discussed. Verse 22
employs the expression nispanna-krama (‘Stage of Completion*).
Therefore, the last nineteen verses are devoted to the Stage of
Completion.
Then, within the two sets of verses some groups arc obvious
and others require further justification. The most difficult group
178
in the first set is formed of the verses for Ekasmin Samaye, to

which I assign the second vajra or step of service, anuyoga . The
decision to make three groups out of the second set yields a solu¬
tion compatible with the six-nu*mbercd yoga, the five kramas,
as well as with the four steps of service as shared with the Stage
of Completion. The full picture in each case is provided in
the respective groups. Now I present the final arrangement
with some minimal remarks :
I. The Stage of Generation.
A. Evam maya Srutam. Yoga (— Seva)
B. Ekasmin samaye. Anuyoga (—L'pasadhana)
C. Bhagavan Sarva. Atiyoga ( - Sadhana)
D. Tathagata. Mahayoga{ = Mahasadhana)
II. The Stage of Completion.
E. Kayavakcitta. Pratyahara and Dhyana
■
( =* kayaviveka)
Pranavama (= Vaj r aj apa );

Dharana {=Cittavisuddhi and
Svadhisthana) —Seva
F. Hfdaya-vajrayosid. Anusmrti (= Abhisambodhi)
—Upasadhana
G. Bhagesu vijahara. Samadhi( — Yuganaddha)
—Sadhana and
Mahasadhana
It might be objected that E-VAM applies to both Stage of

Generation and Stage of Completion, and therefore it is improper
to restrict it to the Stage of Generation, as in my solution. To
this argument, one may respond that it is usual in the beginning
of the path (e.g. the ten-staged Bodhisattva path, or the present
Tantric path of two Stages) for the guru to tell the disciple the
steps that lie ahead so that he may be realistic about the course
he is to follow with its expected fruits. Accordingly, it is quite
proper for E-VAM, which condenses the entire path, to appear
first and to head the Stage of Generation. This would be the
E-VAM of the path of attainment, among the three kinds of
E-VAM to be explained later.
Here also a fe\v remarks arc in order regarding the correlation

of the shared steps of service with parts of the Stage of Comple¬
tion. Seva in the Stage of Generation is the conceptual reach
up to the Clear Light. In the second stage, the yogin is held
179
to enter the Clear Light with a subtle body in the krama of

Svfulhislhana. Therefore, all the members and kramas up to
Sv ad hist liana arc the superior kind of Seva. Upasadhana in
the Stage of Generation evokes the 'primeval lord' (ddindtha)
with a mantra-body (a kind of mahamudra). In the Stage of
Completion, the Abhisambodhi-krama represents the emergence
from the Clear Light with the Sambhoga body, a knowledge-
body (also a kind of mahamudra). Therefore Upasadhana is the
superior step in this case. The remaining correlation is by
reason of the distinction in this literature of ‘coupling in the
realm of learning’ (iaikta-yuganaddha ) and 'coupling beyond
learning’ (aiaikfa-yuganaddha). While there is a beginning of
this Saikfa-yugatiaddha in the Abhisambodhi-krama, both kinds
of yugarwddha are proper to Yuganaddha-krama. Sadhana in
the Stage of Generation accomplishes the body-martdala and
one’s own aim; therefore, in the Stage of Completion, it fulfills
the $aik$a-\>uganaddha of being a Buddha ‘in this life’ as the lord
‘with eight gunas’ (niddna verse 34). Mahasadhana in the Stage
of Generation serves the aim of others; therefore, in the Stage
of Completion it is the aSaikfa-\uganaddha y equivalent to the
‘Nirvana of no-fixed alrode’, or the Complete Buddha (Sam-
buddha or Abhisambuddha).
Besides, the basis laid in the Stage of Generation for the later ac¬
complishment of the Stage of Completion can lie treated in terms of
Tsoh-kha-pa’s correlation with the three Bodies of the Buddha.
The set “Thus by me it was heard’* is associated with silence,
death, and the Dharmakaya. For as Nagarjuna pointed out
in his commentary on chapter IB, when the Bodhisattvas were
reduced to silence it was because they heard the teaching and
entered one-pointed concentration. Thus they became affiliat¬
ed with the Mind of the Buddha.
The set “Upon an Occasion’’ is correlated with magical

Speech, the intermediate stale, and the Sambhoga-kaya, by
evocation of the primeval lord.
Then, the set “The Bhagavat—All” affiliates the yogin with

the Buddha's Body, the Niriniina-kaya, or birth, as the fulfil¬
ment of the microcosm.
The fourth set, “Taihagata”, involves all the previous three,

by imagining the Acts of the Buddha in projection upon the
external world, the macrocosm.
180
Then, in the direct order of the three ‘doors’, the yogin ex¬
periences the Body, the Speech, and the Mind, arriving at the
supreme plane, the Clear Light. The Diamond Ladies of the
Heart draw the yogin from the Clear Light. In the pregnant
‘bhaga’ they train him in the great attainment of the three
mysteries of Body, Speech, and Mind, through which lie can
dwell, beyond training, to inspire the later candidates.
Also there are technical and scholarly aspects. The principal

authorities for that grouping and the consequent annotation of
the forty verses are : Guhyasamdjalantra , especially chapters 6,
12, and 18; its explanatory tantras Vajramdla and Satjidhtvyd -
karana ; Nagarjuna’s commentary on chapter 18, his Pindikrta-
sadhana, his Paficakrama and its commentary by Sri Laksmi;
Aryadeva’s Catydmeldpakapradipa; Candraklrti’s Pradipoddy ot ana,
especially on chapters 1, 6, and 12; and among native Tibetan
works, Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan hgrel on the Pradipoddyotana , his
Gsal baht sgron me on the Paficakrama , and his Shags rimehen mo.
Part Three
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDANA VERSES
I. STAGE OF GENERATION
A. Evatti mayd hut am (Thus by me it was heard).
Those initial words of the Tantra can be treated in several

different ways : (1) separate treatment of the expression ‘Evam*,
(2) separate treatment of the expression ‘Evam maya’, and (3)
treatment in terms of the six verses going with the words ‘Evam
maya $rutam\
(1) For separate treatment of Evam, there is the Pradi-

poddyotana (A I chan hgrel , p. 13) citation of the Devendrapariprccha,
This appears to be the only original passage extant from this
Tantra; the selection found in Subhdfita-samgraha is included within
this longer selection.
( uktatp bhagavatd / devendrapariprcchdydm / Sakras aha j

kirn art ham evam ity etat kasmad dddu prayujyate f
kim idam saugatam idkyam kim id havakabhdfitam j
etan me samiayam sanam apanetu bhavantakah //
Srutva vdkyam surapates saddharmagu nabhdf it am j

sadhukdram lalo dalva bhagavdn idam abravit //
ddav evam iti proktam yad artham sanadarhnd /
tat hnu tvam surapate yathacad artupunaJah //
dharmaskandhasahastdndm caturai itisamkhyayd /
sanahayam pitdmatd dvyakfaram kathitam tathd fj
ckdras tu bhaven mdtd vakdras tu pita smrtah f
bindus tatra bhaven yogah sa yogah paramadbhutah jf
ckdrah padmam ity uktam vakdre vajram eva ca f
bindus tatra bhaved bijam tab pr as ft lam jagat tray am jj
ckdras tu bhavet prajrid vakdrah suratddhipah f
binduS ednahatam tat tvam taj-jdtdny akfardni ca fj
yo vijanati tattvajrio dharmamudrdkfaradvayam /
sa bhavet sarvasattvdndm dharmacakrapravartakah jf
yo ’vidiivd pat hen nityam akfaradvitayatp janah f
sa bdhyo buddhadhardndm dhanivad bhogavarjitah jj
evam dvir akfaram maya sarvajno ’tra by avasthitah /
ddau saddharmaSdstrdndtfi tad evatp pratigiyate fj
lasmdt surddhipa Sakra yadi cel idhatarp padam f
saddharmo guru kartavyah smara mayd dvir akfaram jjitij
182

It was said by the Lord in the Devendrapariprccha : Indra asked :
Why the term ‘evam’ ? Why is it placed first ? Is this
an expression coming from the Lord, or is it a comment
by a disciple ? May the destroyer of phenomenal life
remove from me all this uncertainty !
Having heard this discourse of the master of the gods,

concerning a merit of the Illustrious Doctrine, the Lord
then conferred a ‘Sadhu’ (‘Excellent !’) and spoke as
follows :
For the purpose of seeing everything, the term ‘evam*

is stated first. Master of the gods, listen to that which,
in regular order according to its full extent, has the count
of 84,000 dharmaskandhas, namely, the two syllables,
father-mother, the universal receptacle, which express
the same.
E is the mother; VA the father, the bindu (m) there the

union, and that union a marvel. E is said to be the
lotus; diamond the meaning of VA; the bindu there
the seed, and this engenders the three degrees of living
beings. E is insight (prajha); VA the lord of pleasure;
the bindu is the inviolable reality, and from that arise
the letters (of the alphabet).
Whatever knower of the reality recognizes the two sylla¬

bles as the ‘seal of the doctrine’, he becomes the setter into
motion of the Wheel of the Law among all the sentient
beings. Whatever person not knowing (the reality)
would constantly recite the two syllables he, outside the
Buddha-dharmas, would be like a rich man missing the
enjoyment. The two-syllabled ‘Evam’ is illusion {mdya)\
since omniscience is located therein, that ‘Evam* is rehears¬
ed at the outset of treatises of the Illustrious Doctrine.
Therefore, Indra, master of the gods, if you would have
(your) rank be perpetual, let the Illustrious Doctrine be
your master {guru). Remember that the two syllables
are the mdyd 1
Vajrayana (‘the Diamond Vehicle’) is summarized by the

three meanings of E-vam—(1) the fruit to be attained, (2) the
path of attainment, and (3) the ‘signs’ guiding that path, for
which there is Tsoh-kha-pa’s summary from his Mthah gcod, as
183
presented in my “Female Energy and Symbolism in the Buddhist

Tantras,*’ p. 82 :
1. E is the secret place for teaching the doctrine ( dharma) y

such as the sky, the bhaga (‘female organ,’ metaphorical),
the dharmodaya (‘source of natures'), the lotus, and the lion’s
scat. VAM is whoever the Tantra sets forth as the Teacher,
be he Yajradhara, Hcruka, and so on, who dwells in the
bhaga, lion's seat, and so on. (These deities symbolize the
inseparable union of the void and compassion).
2. E. is ‘insight’ ( prajha ), ‘voidness’ {sunyata). VAM is

‘means' (updya), ‘great compassion’ ( mahakaruna ).
Together they constitute the bindu (T. thig le).
3. E is the mother’s bhaga place ( adhdra) ( yum gyi bha -

ga rUn). YAM is the father’s vajra (‘male organ,’ meta¬
phorical) placed ( adheya) therein ( de la brlcn pahi yab
kyi rdo rje). This again is of two kinds : (a) the external
E-vam as ‘signs,’ the union with the ‘seal’ ( mudra ); (b)
the internal E-vam as ‘signs,’ the guiding agent for the
path of piercing the vital centers of the cakras (the ‘wheels’
imagined along the spinal column). “Here, ‘signs’
means signs of the genitals in the sense of shape.” These
shapes associated with the cakras are the triangle and the
circle (in other texts, the four geometrical shapes associa¬
ted with the four elements).
These three meanings of E-vam are especially explained in cer¬

tain verses. The E-vam of the fruit to be obtained is in verses
30-36 (Vajrayosidbhagesu). The E-vam of the path of
attainment is in verses 1 and 2 of the first group of verses. The
E-vam of the signs guiding that path is in verses 37 and 38 of
the last group of verses.
(2) The separate treatment of Evam maya is to indicate

any four steps of yoga. The four syllables arc given symbolic
values in Nagarjuna's Scka-catuh-prakarana (PTT. Vol. 61,
p. 284-5), where the four are said to summarize the meaning
of all the Tantras. For example, he says, “E is the voidness-
Light; YAM the further void ness-Spread-of-Light; MA great
voidness-Culmination-of-Light; and YA universal voidness-
thc single taste (samaiasa)" 1 E ni snah ba ston pas ste/ /VAM
ni mched pa sin tu ston/ /NIA ni iier thob chen po ston/ /YA
ni ro mil am thams cad sum/ These values are immediately
184
yoga of the g u h y as am a j a t a n tk a
applicable to the first four niddna verses since these serially in¬
troduce the four voids or four lights, the fourth light being
called the ‘Clear Light’ ( prabhastara ) in the verses, but called
‘single taste’ by Nagarjuna at this point. Another set he gives
suggests the four steps of sddhana in the shared sense : l 'h
achieves the unachieved; YAM reveals the achievement; MA is
the going successively higher; YA is the becoming of a Complete
Buddha in this life”: E ni ma thob thob par lived YAM ni
thob pa bstan par byed ’ MA ni goh nas goh du ligro / / YA ni
tshe hdir rdsogssahs rgyas/. We can associate the four steps
of sddhana (generalised) with Xagarjuna’s four values:
Syllabi*
E 1. The void palace Achieving the unachieved
VAM 2. Residents in the palace Reveals the achievement
MA 3. Perfection of the circles Going successively higher
YA 4, Entrance of the know- Buddliahood in this life
ledge being
(3) When we treat the words Evam maya £rutam in accor¬

dance with the niddna verses, they refer to Yoga, the first of the
four parts of sadhana in the sense of the Stage of Generation.
As this part is discussed in my sub-section ‘The Yoga of the
Guhyasamaja’, the performer must first make his consciousness
soar to the realm of the void. According to Candrakirti’
comment (‘Documents’) this is done with the help of mantras,
of which the most popular one is: Om Sunyatajhunavajra-
svabhavatmako ’ham/ “Om. I am the intrinsic nature of the
knowledge diamond of voidness !” The occupation with
the four voids corresponds conceptually to the maintain ritual
Rites of the Site’. To prepare the candidate for the later
praxis in which the yogin learns to live in those void realms,
now he merely imagines in conformity. Since the subsequent
praxis involves the ascent into the void stages railed Light,
Spread-of-Light, and Gulmination-of-Light, followed by the
Clear Light, the candidate engages his iniml with those same
mystical states, principally along intellectual lines, but making a
break with his previous habits ot thought. He divides up the
elements of consciousness into three groups. There are 33
female ideas, obscuring the moonlight; -10 male ideas obscur¬
ing the sunlight; and 7 androgyne ideas obscuring the dark
185
light. He contemplates the flow of those 80 ideas in day

and night, making a total of 160. Verse E introduces the female,
YAM the male, and MA the androgyne. Then verse YA,
names the Clear Light, the fourth light, the negation of the
160 ideas. Those groupings of female, male, and androgyne
ideas may first give the impression that the discussion devolves
about our ordinary consciousness. On the contrary, they
establish a kind of archetypal world, because those ideas are
deemed not to belong to us: they enter our minds. Then
the verses §RU and TAM turn to the phenomenalization of
that anterior world, as indicated by the phrases “The vijfidna
heard here” and “the wind... operates in the world of living
beings”.
//E// ekdro 'pi sati prajiid :>iramddik$andtmikd /
etnn muiam vinirdiftam parijiidnam bhavalraye jjljj
“F.” is the Noble Woman (jfltf) Prajiia, the moments of
aversion, and so on. This root is designated as the
experience in the three worlds.
Alchan hgrel (hereafter 'Alchan' when on the verses in their regu¬

lar order): ‘Aversion, and so on'—‘the thirty-three ideas, from
aversion down to jealousy.' ‘Moments'—‘the wink of an eye,
etc.’ ‘Designated’—in the Tnntras. ‘The three worlds’—‘of
desire, etc.', i.e. realm of desire {kdnui-dhdtu), realm of form
{riipa~dhatu)s and lonnless realm {aiupa-dhatu ).
Paiicakramti, II, 8-13: The thirty-three natures ( prakrti) are

night-time signs (ni.ul-samjnd) and female ideas (stri-samjiid),
‘with full-blown form of the covering process’ ( samrrtisphu-
tarupena), as follows (Paiicaktama order and my own grouping):
1-3. (incipient) aversion, medium aversion, intense
aversion (li/dga. madh\atna-viraga, adhimatra-viraga).
4-9. (thinking of) future, (thinking of) past (anagata,

agata); sorrow, of three degrees (Soka, madhyama-£,
adhimatra-s); calmness (sautnyam).
10-22. mental wandering (state of being scatter-brained)

(vikalpa); fear, of three degrees (bhita, madhyabhita,
atibhita); craving, of three degrees(trsna, madhya-t, ati-t);
indulgence (upadana); inauspiciousness (nihsubham);
hunger and thirst (ksut-trsa); feelings, of three degrees
(vedana, saina-v, ali-v).
186
23-30. intuition (vettivit); memory (dluiranapadam);

discrimination (pratyaveksanam); shame of (lajja);
compassion (karunyam); affection in three degrees
(snehatas travam), to wit: (a) protection of the object,
(b) adoration of it, (c) over-possession of it (as of a son).
31-33. worry (cakitam); collecting (same ay a)* of uten¬
sils, etc.; jealousy (matsarya).
The annotations of this ntddna verse did not clarify the claim
that this root is the experience in the three worlds. It may be
intended that knowledge through experience is made possible
by the degrees of aversion, which seems to be the psychological
premise of the Apoha doctrine of Buddhist logic. In this doc¬
trine a thing is defined by exclusion of what it is not. A ‘cow’
is the not not-cow. What might well be the explanation is
that to have the concept cow in the mind requires that a dis¬
tinct idea of cow be formed, the very clarity and determination
of which invlovcs the removal (apoha) of all other non-cow
entities. In this way, experiential knowledge (parijhana)
occurs with the ‘aversion’ to everything inconsistent with and
contrary to that knowledge. Understanding begins with a
kind of retreat. One must neglect the rest in order to appre¬
ciate something; and that thing understood means that a
faculty of prajiia has arisen which understands the rest.
Pahcakrama , II, 29:

/ dJuasasas tu muhurtam sydn nimefo * kfinimefanamj .
I mdtra tu hastatdlani sydt kfanadindm tu lak>anarn

The characteristic of ‘moments’ etc. is the short time
of an inhalation, the wink of the twinkling eye, the brevity
in a clap of hands.
In the Vajrajjidnasamuccaya (PTT, Vol. 3, p. 252-5), conscious¬

ness (citta), which is like a bright moon in the water, has the
Prakrits, aversion, etc. “In convention (samerfi), it is symboli¬
zed by the directly manifested woman, the bhaga, the padma ,
and the host of goddesses.” (kun rd/.ob tu ni mnon sum kyi bu
med dan bha-ga dan pad-ma dan lha mohi tshogs kyi brdalio/).
//VAM// varjiSas tad bhavad dbhiiti argadiprasaidnvitamj

dlokdbhdsa-vijrldnam updya iti samjilitam //2//
That Spread-of-Light vijhdna called ‘means’ (updya).
187
attended with begetting of desire, and so on, appears

like an emerging bamboo.
Mchatr, *Desire and so on'—‘the forty conceptions from desire

down to dishonesty'.
Panaikiama, II, lf»-2l: The forty natures are daytime and

male ideas or signs (died-purufa-samjnd ), as follows (Fatica-
ktama older and my own grouping):
I- 7. desire (raga); attachment (raktam); joy, medium

joy, intense joy (tus|am, madhva-t, ati-t); thrill
(harsanam); bliss (pramodyam).
8-13, surprise (vismaya); laughter (hasitam); refresh¬

ment (hladana); embracing (alinganam); kissing
(cumbana); sucking (cusanam).
II- 26. firmness (dhairyam); striving (viryam); pride

(maim); getting things done (kartr); theft (hartr);
strength (bala); enthusiasm (utsaha); daring, medium
daring, super-daring (saliasam, madhyama-s, uttama-s);
aggression (raudra); coquetry (vilasa); animosity'
( vairatu).
27-34. auspiciousness ( *<ubha; text reads ‘labha’) clarity

ofspeech( vak sphufa); truth( satyam ): untruth (asatyam)
certaintv (niscasa); non-indulgence ( nil upadana ); giving
(datitva ) ; ex hoi tat ion (< <>danain .
35-40. heroism sut.ita ; lack ol shame (alajja); decep¬

tion dhurta : wickedness dusta ; oppression (hatha);
dishonesty kutilu).
The ‘Spread-of*Light' mruina or means (updya), is symlxdizcd

by the form of the male.
MA mahaiid\d siauun mulam aiidyavd viloinatah

acidyayd bhavee caitat tasmdd dhkasambhmah //3//
In the reverse order, the great Science (=\Visdom)

is itself the root of nescience. And the (‘Spread-of-
I.ight’) arises from nescience ( avidyd ) while from that
(‘Spread-of-I.ight*) arises Light.
Mchatr. ‘the great Science’—‘the Clear Light’ {ptabhdsvara,

hod gsal) (to lx* specifically mentioned in verse 4). ‘nescience*—
‘the mixture ot prajiid and updya % thus ot altu and caitta, and
generates the seven conceptions of prakrtis, indifference, etc.*
(which arc therefore androgynous ideas). Frakditka (by
Bhavyakirti) on MA. p. 292-5; “The great science ( mahd -
188
aufyd) is the Dharmadhatu-naturc, the Clear Light; and why ?

As the verse says, it is the reverse of nescience ( avidyd )” (rigs
chen ni effes kyi dbyihs kvi ho ho ste hod gsal baho■ / gah
gi phyir it na / ma rig pa ni bzlog pa yin 2es smos te).
Pahcakrama, II 24-25: The seven prakrtts are as follows
(Paticakrama order and my own grouping) :
1-4, indifference (madhyaraga); forgetfulness (vismrti);

illusion (bhranti); specchlcssncss (tusniinbhava).
5-7. weariness (kheda); indolence (alasya); ambivalence

(dandhata).
Vajrajilana-samuccaya (PTT, Vol. 3, 252-4) : “Here, the Clear
Light is without location, without cessation or orgination, is
Supreme Truth (paramartha-satya) , and True End (bhutakoti) .
The dark light arisen therefrom is nescience (avidyd)”/ dc la
hod gsal ba gnas pa med pa / hgag pa med pa / skye ba med
pa / don dam pahi bden pa / yah day pahi mthah ste /d e las
byun bahi mun pahi snah ba ni ma rig paho /.
Gukyasamdjatantra (VII, verse 35) :
ftatra katham anutpaddnusmrtibhavand/

prakrtiprabhasvaram sarvam nirnimittam nirakfaramj
na doayam nddvayam Sant am khasadriam sunirmalam fj
Here, what is the contemplation, recollection of non-origi¬
nation ?
The Clear Light with the intrinsic nature is completely

signless, unlettered, neither dual nor non-dual, quiescent,
spotless like the sky.
PaUcakrama, II, 53:
fttayatrayaviSuddhir yd prabhasiaram ihocyatcj

sarvaitlnyapadam tac ca jndnatrayaviSuddhitah //
That purity of the triple void is here called Clear Light.

And that is the plane of universal void through purity
of the triple knowledge.
Pahcakrama, II, 57-62:
57. tat ha coktam mahdyanasUtre lalitavistare /

abhisambodhikdmo \'yam idkyasimhas tathdgatah fj
58. mahdiUnycna buddhatvam prdpsydmity abhimdnatah f

nirahjandnaditire nifpddydsphdnakam gat ah j(
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTS' NTDAN'A VERSES
189
59. tilabimbiva sampumah khavajrasthd jinds (add f

ekasvarena tarn prahur acchatena jinaurasam fj
60. aviiuddham idani dhydnam na caitad iftakavaham /

prahhdsiaram tu dlambyam dkdiatalavat param If
61. prabhdsiarapade prdpte sveccharupas tu jayase /

sarvaisvaryam tathd prdpya vajrakdye pramodase //
62. evam irutvd (it (am iabdam visrjydsphdnakam tatah /

ni(drdhasamayc tattvam dtambyaiva jinaurasah fj
So it was said in the Mahay unasutra Lalitavislara :
The Lion of the Sakvas, the Tathagata, thought, “I shall

attain Buddhahood through the great void;” and seated
on the Xairanjana river bank, went into the Asphanaka-
saniadhi (the breath-holding concentration). There¬
upon the Victorious Ones dwelling in the diamond of
the sky and fulfilled like the sesame fruit, spoke to the
Son of the Victorious Ones with a single sound by the
snap of fingers. ‘Impure is this meditation and non-
conducive to the desired goal, lake as meditative
object the Clear Light, beyond like the dome of the sky.
When you have attained the plane of the Clear Light,
you shall emerge with a gratifying form, in that way
acquiring universal sovereignty in a delightful diamond
body.’ Having thus heard that sound, he abandoned the
breath-holding concentration, and at midnight visua¬
lized reality—did the Son of the Victorious Ones.
Of course, the account as the tantric Nagarjuna states it, is not

actually found in the /. alitavistara in those words. It appears
to be one tantric interpretation of the purport of the Lalita -
vistaray the Mahayana biography of the Buddha. Tsoh-kha-
pa, when citing the same passage in his Paiicakrama commentary
(PTT, Vol. 159, p. 59) states (ibid., p. 59-2) that the passage
maintains that after coming to the limit of the Mahayana
path of the Paramita, one becomes a Buddha by the supreme
path (anutfara-mdrga) (which of course is the Anudara-tantra)
(ces pha rol tu phyin pahi thegchen pahi lam gyi mthar bla
med kyi lam gyis htshun rgya tshul gsuhs so/). Tsoh-kha-pa
goes on to point out that while the pari about dwelling in the
‘Motionless Samadhi’ ( dninjya-samadhi ) (apparently equivalent
to the 'breath-holding, com entration’) on the Xairaftjana
river bank is indeed in that scripture, the rest of the account
190
YOGA OF THE Gt’HYASAMA)ATANTRA

is not expressly stntcd in the I.alitavistara. Mkhas j>rub rje's
Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras devotes its first chapter to
the various theories of how Gautama become a Complete
Buddha; and in the Tantras the main theories diverge between
the Yoga-tantra and the Amiltarayoga-tantra specialists.
Sri Laksmi’s discussion in her Paneakramu commentary

(PTT, Vol. 63, p. 29) mentions that the ‘single sound’
( ekasuara ) refers to ‘Thus’ (mint) ‘on an occasion’ (dusrnin
samaye) by purport of single meaning (/tie la dbyahs geig ni
don geig la dgons nas dus geig tu hdi skad gsuhs so /). She
goes on to the two varieties of the Clear Light discussed pre¬
viously in my introduction on this topic, and claims that the
‘Clear Light of consciousness’ is meant in the present account:
“Here, according to what I heard from my venerable teacher,
wc maintain it is only citta-prabhasvara ” ( / hdir rjc btsun gyi
2al sha nas kyis/sems kyi hod gsal ba kho no b£ed pa yin te/).
Her statement implies the word * prabhasvara ’ qualifying the word
*€ 1110 * in the Abhisambodhana chapter of the Lalitavisiara ,
where the word is employed three times for each of the three
watches of the night (an old division of time) during
which Gautama attained Complete Enlightenment. According
to my introduction, the ‘Clear Light of consciousness’ is equi¬
valent to the Clear Light of deep or dreamless sleep.
//YA// yah vijhdnam ddau tad dlokdbhdsa-samjhitamj

tan mahadinyatdm ydti sd ca ydti prabhast aram 4//
At first, that vijhana (i.c. Light) passes to what is called

‘Spread-of-Light’. That passes to the Great Void and
the latter passes to the Clear Light.
Alchan: ‘Passes to’ in each case means ‘dissolves in’.
This is the direct order, anttloma , of the three Lights leading

into the fourth or Clear Light, the latter being mentioned in
the nidana verses for the first time along with the terminology
of voidness. For the. sequence, cf. Paiicakrama , II, 4: “Void,
further void, and great void, the third, as well as universal void,
the fourth—by distinction of fruit (the succeeding one) and cause
(the preceding one)” (/Sunyam ca atisunyam ca muha£unyam
trtlyakam/ caturthain sarvaSunyam ca phalahetuprabhedatah//).
Besides the direct and the reverse order, there is the recita¬
tion order, frequently indicated by the Sanskrit words raga,
dvesa, moha, as in Guhyasamdja (Chap. VIII, p. 32) :
191
nlgadvtfamoharara vajrayiinapradriikaj
dkaiadhdtukalpdgra ghofa piijdm jindlaynfj
“(), the best of lust, hatred, and delusion, explaining
the Yajrayana;
C), the best like the plane of the sky, the womb of the
Victorious Ones,
Pray announce the piijd !”
Pradipoddyotatm on the preceding: ‘best of lust, hatred, and

delusion’, because the Yajrayana purifies lust, hatred, and
delusion.* Atchan hgrd on Chap. VIII {PTT, Vol. 158, p.
62*2) : The three ‘poisons’ or basic defilements—lust, hatred,
and delusion are associated with the three lights. ‘Lust’
stands for the 40 prakrtis covering ‘Spread-of-Light’; ‘hatred*
for the 33 prakrtis covering ‘Light’; ‘delusion’ for the 7
prakrtis covering ‘CuImination-of-Light’. (The three terms
‘lust’, ‘hatred’ and ‘delusion* arc apparently to be understood
in generalized senses, to wit, Must’—all attraction towards,
desire, ‘hatred'-all repulsion, aversion; ‘delusion’-—all inter¬
mediate and indecisive stales, indifference).
The following passages give further information on the direct

order.
Pancakrama, II, verse 5:
piajiiopdyasamayogaH ni\pantiam upalabdhaknm /

upalabdhac ca nispunnjt saria\Ctnyam prabhfisuaram fj
Through union «*f frrajrid and updya , the Culmination
(of Light) is perfected; and through Culmination
perfected, there is universal void, the Clear Light.
&ri-Laksmi comments (Y<>1. 63, p. 23-3-4):
dan po ses rab kyi ye Ses skye Ira dan de nas gi\is pa
thabs kyi ye 5es dan po las I hag pa skye ba stc / dc
giiis ga sbyor ba las ne bar I hob pa ni yc ses gsum pa
rd/.ogs par hgyur ro / tic nas tie bar thob pa rdzogs nas
thams cad stoh pahi hod gsal l>a ni yc Ses bjfi pahi hog nas
bsad par hgyur bahi snags dan' phyag rgyahi rim pas
rnal hbyor pa la snan bar hgyur ro,
• First arises the Prujua knowledge; then, second, arises

over the first the Upaya knowledge; from the union the
third knowledge, which is Culmination (of Light), is
192
YOGA OF THE Gl'H YASAMAJ ATAN'TRA
completed. Then, through the completion of the Cul¬

mination, the Clear Light, the fourth knowledge, which
is universal void, manifests to the yogin by a sequence
of mantra and mudrd , as will be explained below (cf.
Paiicakrama , II, 48-50, cited later).
Nagarjuna’s Pindikrta-sddhana, 43-44A (some additions from

Ratnakara&inti’s commentary, PIT, Yol. 62, p. 75-5) refers
to the direct order with consideration of the body-mandala:
Urdhvddhahkrodhasamyuktam prakrtydbhdsam eva ca I
vijilanaskandham dyati vijiidnam ca prabhdsvaram jj
sanirvanam sarvaiunyam {ca) dharmakdyaS ca gadyatc j
Precisely the Light (triad) with its (160) prakrtis, asso¬
ciated with the upper (i.c. Usnisacakravartin at the
Brahmarandhra, the orifice at crown of head) and
the lower (i.e. Sumbharaja at sole of feet) Wrathful
(Kings; cf. nidana verse 17), passes to the aggregate
of perceptions (vijiiana-skandha) (Aksobhya and Mamaki);
and perception (passes) to the Clear Light, also called
‘universal void with nirvana'’ and ‘Dharmakaya’.
//&RU// Srutam yad iha vijiidnam dbhasatrayalakfanam

prakrtinam idam mulam sattvadhator a <cfata ft //5//
The vijiidna heard here has the characteristics of the

three lights. This is entirely the root of the prakrtis
(natures) of the sentient-being realm.
Mchan: “Heard here arc both the essential nature (no bo)
and the sequence (go rims) t meaning both the path and the
four states ( a vast ha). First ( the disciple) is taught how 10
dwell in the four, and then taught how to generate the path
consistent therewith.”
Tsoh-kha-pa’s Mchan note about four states undoubtedly

refers to the three lights and the Clear Light. The path
doubles the (80) prakrtis by contemplation in both day and
night, per Pahcakrama. II, 27: “Those subtle prakrtis
proceed in both day and night, thus to total 160, by cause of
wind-conveyance” (etah prakrtayah suksmah satam sastyuttaram
diva/ ratrau capi pravartantc vavuvahanahetuna//).
But how should we understand the word l i , ijndna i of nidana

verse 5? Vajrajndnasamuccaya (FIT, Vol. 3, 252-4): ‘,That
vtjhana arisen from the Clear Light is called ‘consciousness’
((ilia), ‘mind’ ( manas ), and ‘perception’ (vijhdna); and that is
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDAN'A VERSES
193
entirely the root (mula, rtsa ba) of dharmas . Therefrom defile¬

ment and purification give rise to two false conceptions, that of
‘oncsell and that ol the ‘other'.” (/gah hod gsal las bvun
ba main par ses pa de hid sems dan yicl dan rnam par ses pa
ges bya la de ni chos thams cad kyi rtsa ba stc / kun nas hon
mohs ba dan rnam par byah bahi bdag hid de las rtog pa
gnis su gyur te bdag dan gjan dag tuho/). Bu-ston ( Biad
sbyar on §RU, f. 50a) says, “From the wind arises fire, from
that water, from that earth; from that the personality aggre¬
gates, the elements, and the sense bases; (that is the meaning
of the passage, to wit) ‘from that, arise the three lights, and
from that arise the 160 prakrtis.’ From that arise the 98
defilements, the 62 false views, and so on. Because sentient
beings arise with a birthplace by dint of the so-amassed karma ,
the text savs ‘this is the inexhaustible root of the sentient-being
realm’.” (' rlun las me de las chu ' de las sa / de las phuh
po khams dan skvc mched hbyuii ' de las snan ba gsum hbyuii /
de las ran biin brgya drug cu hbyuii ho / de las non mohs pa
dgu bcu rtsa brgyad dan Ita ba drug cu rtsa gnis la sogs pa
hbyuii / des las bsags pahi dbaii gis skyc gnas giihi sems can
hbyuii has sems can gyi khams ma lus pahi rtsa ba hdi yin
no /). Besides, Tsoii-kha-pa, commentary on the rajrqjna-
nasamuecaya (FIT, Vol. 160, 154-3, 4), following the Madhya-
mika point of view, insists that the vijiidna meant by the three
lights is manovijnana. Also, in his commentary on the
Caturdevifmriprccha (Lhasa Coll. Works, Vol. Ca, f. 37b-6 to
38a-l): “The three vijnanas proceed from the 18-fold dhar -
madhdlu which is the Clear Light of Death. They (the three)
are bodhuilta —the Bodhisattva Sainantabhadra.” Ibid. f.
37b-3: “The dharmadhdtu is the source of the six outer sense
bases, tin* six personal sense bases, and the six perceptions
(vijmna ), 18 in all.” (The sixth perception is the manovijMna ,
the other five being based on the five outer senses). This use
of the lJodhisativa name ‘Samantabhadra’ presumably stems
from the Ouhyasamdja, Chap. IV. p. 17 {Alchan hgrel , p. 38):
Sdntadharmdgrasambh ft (am jiidnacarydviiodhakam j
iamnntabhadravdedgryam bhdfa mandalam utlamam jj
"Pray explain the supreme mandala having the best
speech of Samantabhadra, arising from the summit
of quiescent dharmas (*= paramartha-satya ) and purifying
194
YOOA OF THE QUHYASAMAJATANTRA
(the 80 prakrtis) by the praxis of the gnoses (= the three

lights).”
My “Notes on the Sanskrit term Jflana,” p. 260, quotes from

Tson-kha-pa’s commentary on the Vajrajadnasamticcaya (Lhasa
ed., Vol. Ca) to the effect that the vijiiana (‘perception’) arising
from the Clear Light of dying from the Intermediate State
(bar do) is the Culmination of Light; the manas (‘mind’) arising
from that, is the Sprcad-of-Light; the cifta (‘consciousness’)
arising from that, is Light. Observe that the order: 1. delu¬
sion (— vijftana), 2. lust (-manas), 3. hatred ( = citta) is
consistent with the order of appearance of the three ‘poisons’
in the Buddhist genesis legend, as discussed in my article
“Buddhist Genesis and the Tantric Tradition.”
But the tantric Nagarjuna, Sri Laksmi, Bhavyakirti, anti some

other Tanjur commentators, employ a Yogacara-type vocabu¬
lary, to wit: Slaya-vijUdna, kliffa-manas , and pravrtti-vijnana.
The following tabulation should make the difference clear:
Lights —Voids The Covering-80 Prakrtis
Madhyamika Yogacara Terminology
terminology terminology in
common
The Clear
Light-Uni
versal Void
Culmination-
of-Light =
Great Void
Perception
(vijftana)
Basic perception
(alaya-vijfiana)
Nescience
(avidya)
Spread-of-light
Mind
Defiled Mind
Mentals
— Further Void
(manas)
(kli$ta-manas)
(caitta)
Light — Void
Consciousness Evolving Pcrccp-
Conscious¬
(citta)
tion (pravrtti-
ness (citta)
vijhana)
Therefore, when Bhavyakirti in his ‘ PrakaSikd ’ (PTI\ Vol. 60,
195
p. 293-1) comments on nidana verse 5, he first states ‘ vijiiana *

to be the three as previously explained, meaning the three
Yogacara terms he has been employing for explaining the pre¬
ceding nidana verses; and states these vijiianas to have the cha¬
racteristic ( lakfana ), i.c. the prakrtis of (covering) the three
lights; and so those lights appear when those vijiianas cease.
Then Bhavyakirti quotes two texts without naming their sources.
The first is the celebrated verse of the Samdhinirmocana-sutra
(which was translated by Etienne Lamotte into French; and
the verse is in Louis de la Vallee Poussin, Vijiiaptimatratasiddhi ,
I, p. 173): “The dddnavijndna, profound and subtle, like a
violent current, proceeds with all its seeds ( bija ). Deeming it
improper for them to imagine it as a self, I have not taught
it to the immature auditors” (/ji skad du ' len pahi rnam
par scs pa zab cin phra / sa bon thams cad chu bohi rgyun
l>2in hbab / bdag tu rtog par gyur na mi run it s / ftan thos
byis pa mams la tias ma bstan / zes hbvun ba). The next one
he quotes, is a well-known line from the Madhydnta-vibhaga
(I, 8A; 20 in Gadjin M. Xagao's edition of the Bhdfya) : “And
the imagination of unreality ( abhutaparikalpa ) is the three
worlds with their cilia and caitta” {/ de biin du yan / yan dag
ma yin kun brtags ni ' sems dan sems byun khams gsum pa /
fes hbvun ho /). These quotations do not necessarily mean
that Bhavyakirti makes the usual identification of dddnavijndna
with dlayavijiidna , which he equates with the avidyd having
seven prakrtis; but it certainly means that he considers the
*vijnana* of nidana verse 5 to be this dddnavijndna as well as abhu¬
taparikalpa \ and so he may understand by ‘ dddnavijndna' all
three vijiianas rather than simply dlayavijiidna. Since his a/a-
yavijndna is equivalent to verse 3’s ‘avid)a', it is unacceptable to
Tson-kha-pa, who rejects the equation in P'lT, Vol, 159, p.
31-3. In fact, both Bu-ston and Tson-kha-pa in their annota¬
tion of the nidana verses agree in ignoring Bhavyakirti’s commen¬
tary. This subject is resumed under nidana verse 7.
/,TAM ’ lam rkaikam arthdbhdsam vdyus samgrhya dharayetf
vdyuyuktam ca vijiidnam SaSvaj jagali variate //6//
The wind seizing, takes hold of that entity-light in each

case, and vijiidna joined with vdyu (wind) continually
operates in the world of living beings.
196
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTTRA
Mchan: “ ‘Entity-light in each ease’ means thr five sense

objects as manifested. They arise by the ‘reverse order* of
the three lights (vijfiana-manas-ritta) and dissolve by the
‘direct order’ (citta-manas-vijnana). Vijiiana ( the three
lights or vijfiana, manas, citta) rides on the winds which seize
their respective sense objects.”
Paiicakrama, II, 32-34:
vayund sukfmarupena jnanam sammiiratatji gatam /
nihsrtycndriyamdrgebhyo vifayan avalamb ate jf
dbhdscna yadd yukto vdyur vdhanidnt gatah /
tadd tatprakrldh sarva astavyastdh pravartayet //
yatra yatra sthito vdyus tdm prakrtim udvahctf
ydvat samiranotpado nabhdso niiealo bhavet jj
When ‘knowledge’ (jnana — the three lights) becomes
associated with subtle-formed wind, then issuing
forth from the paths of sense organs it grasps (‘hangs
on to’) the sense objects.
At whatever time the wind, having become a vehicle

(for vijfiana), is yoked by the ‘light’, at that time all
those prakrtis are completely dissipated.
At whatever (vein, natfi) the wind stops, at that one it

sustains some prakfti (among the 80 prakrtis). As
long as (the wind) stirs up, the ‘light’ is not steady.
Verses 33-34 mention the alternate conditions of the three
gnostic lights (Light, Spread-of-Light, and Culmination-of-
Light), namely (II, 33) when those lights arc free from the
eighty prakrtis, and (II, 34) when they arc subjected to the
eighty prakrtis in which event their ‘light’ is not steady. The
Afanimdla commentary on the Paiicakrama (PTT, Vol. 62, p.
188-3, 4) explains the second verse:
/ re iig rluri gi rnam lna dan main pa bcu yin par snar
b$ad cih dehi gnas shin ga la sogs pahi gnas rnanis dan
las kyi bye brag kyaii bstan mod kyi hon kyan rangi hobo
dpyad na chos kyi dbyins kyi hkhor lo hod gsil ba las
rluh byuh ste / dehi phyir gYon dan gYas dan bar
mahi rtsa gsum ni lam yin no / de bas na gan dan gaii du
ste gYon nam gY’as sam dbus su rluh gnas pa ni rah biin
dedah de ste sems las byuh bahi chos dc Ita bu dan dc Ita
bu skyed par byed cih hbyun bar byed do / / de biin du
197
yari rtsa gVon pahi lam nas byun bahi rlun gi $es rab kyi
no bo rah biin mams skyed par byed do If gYas na gnas
pas ni thabs kyi no bo rnams so / / dbus na gnas pa ni ma
rig pahi ho bo rnams skyed par byed mod kyi hon kyah
dmigs pa la bltos dgos tc dc ltar rtsahi bye brag
dan rjes su mthun pahi yul hdzin pa las rah biin rnams
hbyuri ho /
Now the topic is the five kinds and the ten kinds of wind,
as previously set forth, which are located in the heart and
in the other places. While they are taught as the mul¬
titude of deeds ('perform all deeds*), if one ponders
their intrinsic nature, they are the wind which arises
from the Clear Light of the Dharmadhatu circle. There¬
fore their path is the three natfis, left, right, and middle.
Hence, 'at whatever one,’ left, or right, or middle, ‘the
wind stops’, it generates while arising there the com¬
parable prakrti or sort of caitasika-dharma. Accordingly,
the wind arising in the path of the left nddi generates the
(thirty-three) prakrtis which have prajha nature; the
one of the right, the (forty) prakrtis of upaya; and the one
in the middle generates the (seven) prakrtis of avidyd.
However, that needs dependence on a support of con¬
sciousness (dlambana)... .Thus, the prakrtis arise from
apprehending a sensory object consistent with the basic
multitude (of deeds).
The implication of the Manimdld commentary is that as long

as the winds arc correlated with external objects, the lights
of the three midis arc unsteady. Hence the yogin must close
the sensory doors to dissipate the prakrtis associated with those
n&dis.
Sarjidhivydkarana (PTT. Vol. 3, p. 236-2):
/ by an chub sems ni rluii gyur cit1 /
( nam mkhah la ni mam gnas pa j

I sems can kun srog gyur gah j
I lha yi bdag hid bcu mi A can //
/ rten hbrel bcu giiis ics grags pa j

j ho bo hid mam gsum du gyur j
( rluh ies bya bahi by ah chub sems j
I dbah po kun gyi gtso hdi yin //
198
The bodhicUta which being wind and dwelling in space*

then becomes the life wind of all sentient beings, is five
and called ten.
The bodhicitta called ‘Twelvefold Dependent Origination*

is the three natures; and called ‘wind*, governs all the
sense organs.
Pancakrama , I, 3 (and Stags rim y 408b-5 and 440a-4, etc.):

pr&nabhutai ca sattv&nam vayv-dkhyah sarvakarmakrt /
vijMnavahanai caiva panedtma daiadha punah //
Being the life force of sentient beings, what is called

‘wind’ performs all deeds; and as the vehicle of vijnana
is five, besides is tenfold.
In the case of‘wind* as the vehicle of vijnana it is the five secon¬

dary winds, to wit:—
1. naga reveals forms through eye
2. kurma reveals sounds through ear
3. krkila reveals odors through nose
4. devadatta reveals tastes through tongue
5. dhanahjaya reveals tangibles through torso
In the case of ‘wind’ identified with prana itself, it is tenfold*
i.e. the five basic winds as well as the five secondary winds.
Cooperating with vijnana the five basic winds perform all deeds
and the five secondary winds perceive all things. Notice the
respective approximation to the classical Samkhya karamendriyas
(‘performall deeds’) and buddhindriyas (‘perceive all things’).
Regarding the ‘all deeds’ performed by the five basic winds,

Stags rim (f. 439b-2) draws upon a citation in Caryameldpaka
about the function of those winds:
1. Prana has the nature of streaming through the sense

doors, coursing as the breathing and extending far
(Prdna and aydma ), and continually coursing.
2. The yogin will always understand apdna as (breaking)

wind, expelling urine, excrement, and semen, and con¬
veying downward.
3. Samana is so called because it is w'hat is always conco¬

mitant with tasting, eating, licking, drinking, and sucking.
4. One understands udana to have the action of draw¬

ing upwards, eating food and enjoying it, associating
with awareness.
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIOAnA VERSES
199
5. Vyana has the function of filling, holding, (enabling)
walking and returning, and of pervading all the joints.
Pancakrama , III, 19:
tad eva vayusamyuktatjx vijMnatritayam punah f

jayate yogina inurtir mayadthas tad ucyate ff
Besides, precisely that vijftana-triad joined to the winds
is engendered as a body by the yogin. That is called
‘Illusory Body’.
The conception of these winds is a topic in the Stage of Gene¬

ration. Later, in the Stage of Completion, the yogin learns
to control them to engender a body called ‘Illusory Body*.
B. Ekasmin samaye (Upon an Occasion)
This group of verses represents the meaning of the Stage of

Generation ( utpattikrama ) as ordinary generation, but with the
‘climactic times’ of birth, death, and intermediate state, which
a theory (see verse 38 and annotation) correlates to the Bodies
of the Buddha. The meaning of this group of verses is frequ¬
ently referred to in Tibetan literature such as Tson-kha-pa’s
writings as ‘the basic time’ (giihi dus) to contrast with‘time of
the path’ (lam gyi dus). In the path, the yogin seeks to evoke
the entire cycle, passing through the portals of death as an
experience of yoga and then returning to normal consciousness.
In preparation for the separation from the coarse body of a
subtle body called the Illusory Body that takes place in the
Stage of Completion, in the present phase the practitioner
develops a body which is called the Mantra body. This takes
place in the second sadhana called Anuyoga with depositing
of germ syllables in spots of the body. It corresponds in ex¬
ternal mandala ritual to the second part ‘Rites of preparatory
acts,’ such as pitching the lines with chalk and beseeching
the gods. A similar result is obtained in the present instance
if the practitioner, following through the suggestions of this set
of verses, goes through the imaginative procedure of analyzing
his make-up and then of identifying his personality aggregates
with the five winds and so on. In short, the verses can be
interpreted as doctrinal assertions, but above all they are direc¬
tions for praxis in the form of imaginative identifications.
200
YOGA OF THE GTHYASAMAJATANTRA

Concerning the present and the anterior conditions of ordi¬
nary generation’, Kluiii-blo’s (Nagahuddhi’s) Samaja-sadhana-
vyavasthali (PTT, Vol. 62, p. 7-5, fl.) mentions the standard
four birthplaces, to wit, birth from eggs, birth from a womb,
birth from warmth and moisture, and birth through trans¬
formation; and then gives standard examples, as birds, etc.
from eggs; cows, etc. from a womb; worms, etc. from warmth
and moisture; and the gods, hell beings, intermediate state
beings, and men of the first aeon, through transformation.
All those beings are called sattva (‘sentient being’). This
work also gives the tantric version of Buddhist genesis that was
introduced into Tibetan literature such as Tson-kha-pa’s
writings. Kluhi-blo mentions, p. 8-4, that after the men of the
first aeon tasted the amrta , and so on down to their partaking
of the primeval grain, whereupon their bodies became heavy—
the light disappeared, and a darkness ensued; and then the sun
and moon appeared in the world. At this time, through the
separation of prajhd and updya , the beings became distinguished
with the male and female organs. Gradually, mutual craving
was aroused, whereupon these beings, known as gandhanas,
experienced the three states (< avasthd ), and entered into the
wombs of‘mothers’. Then the women, without illness, began
to have menses; and a ‘father’ and ‘mother’ through desire
for each other, engaged in various sexual techniques. Seeing
this, for the sake of ‘indulgencc-in-desire’, a vijnana-pati , as
though riding on a horse ( the wind), left the intermediate
state and entered (the mother) through the Yairocana-portal
(i.e. the crown of the head) (and then merged with the
agglomeration in the womb). As to the reason these beings
fell from the Clear Light (p. 8-2): “Although they possessed
the gnosis body ( jnana-deha ), they did not know the Illusory
Samadhi, (yc scs kyi lus can yin van de rnams kyis sgyu
ma lta buhi tin ne hdzin mi scs siri....).
Of course, that account has profound implications for the

whole Guhyasamaja praxis. I'soh-kha-pa’s Don gsal ba commen¬
tary on the (•uhyajamajatantra combines Kluhi-hlo’s account
with the abhidharma teaching of ‘sentient-being worlds’
(sativa-loka) and ‘receptacle worlds’ ( bhdjana-loka) as well as
with the tantric idea of the 'primeval lord’ (< admatha ). The
whole idea oi transmuting the body into a palace containing
201
the thirtv-tvvo deities is to replace the impure receptacle worlds
with a pure world, and this is founded on the evocation of the
'primeval lord’ in the present (Anuvoga) phase. While most
of the nidana verses in this group do not obviously show them¬
selves as a phase of yoga, the last one, nidana verse 12, sets
forth the praxis of prdndyama , and prdndyama is generally
described as ‘subtle yoga’ (sdkfma-yoga). Prdndyama is
accompanied by mantra-praxis, hence in this phase the yogin
gains the ‘mantra-deha'.
The school of Buddhajrtanapada, especially in Buddha-

srtjftana’s Mukti-tilaka-narna , and its commentary' Vitapada’s
Muktitilaka-ndma-iydkhydna , discusses this situation using the
terms ‘the Profound (zab mo)’ and ‘the Bright* (gsal ba)\
Thus, in Vitapada’s commentary (PTT, Vol. 65, p. 136),
we read that the meaning of ‘the Profound’ and ‘the Bright*
has been obscured for time immemorial by dint of habit forces
( vdsand ), and because the ordinary persons do not understand
those two, they are plagued by the sufferings of the three realms.
“What is the ‘Profound’ ?” In this regard, (BuddhaSrijftana)
states {the obscuration), ‘discursive thought {yikalpa )... .*
That is to say, (the ‘Profound’) rightly and from the outset
surpasses all forms of speech and conception because it is free
from all forms of error (bhrdnti ). . . . What is the ‘Bright* ?
(He) states, ‘the Mahamudra....’ That is to say,... the
unborn body which is like an illusion and shines like a rain¬
bow. .. .The self-existence of the non-duality of the Profound
and the Bright has the nature of pervading all states (bhava)
and is not included in the dharmas of samsara ; it is called
Dharmadhatu.” Combining this terminology with the previous
account, the sentient beings did not know the ‘Profound*
because they lacked the Illusory Samadhi. Therefore they
gradually lost the ‘Bright’, the Illusory Body.
jjEjj efo vdyur mahadhatur vijndnatrayavdhanah /

tebhyah prakrtayah iaivan nirgacchanti yatha yatha (fill
This wind, the great element, is the mount of the three
vijndnas. By means of it, the prakrtis always proceed
accordingly.
Mchan : ‘This wind’ means die wind of action (cf. Pancakrama

verse cited under verse 6, wherein the wind is said to ‘perform
202
YOGA OF THE GI’HYASAMAJATAVTRA
ail deeds’), and therefore is called ‘great element’.... It is

written in the Yajrajmina-samuccaya, “The wind is the mount
of that vijnana . From the wind arises fire; from fire, water;
from water, earth. From those, the five personality aggregates
(skandka), the six sense bases ( sadaiatana), and the five sense
objects;... and the prakrlis are generated by reason of the
manifestation.” In that Tantra, the three lights arc explained
to arise from the Clear Light, and subsequently the wind,
etc. arises. The mount of tijnana as imagination ( parikalpa )
arises from the ordinary ‘lights’ of the reverse order, which are
the phase of rebirth by transmigration into the womb.
The explanatory tantra Yajramahl states further how that

wind is responsible for generation. This passage inaugurating
its chapter 32 is involved with Yoga car a vocabulary; it is here
translated with the help of Alamkakalasa’s commentary (PTT
Vol. 61, p. 251-4,5 to p. 252-1,2):
1. Now listen to a further explanation and rightly

understand concretely how the wind has the characteristic
of generation and seeks the temporal opportunity.
/ dc nas gzan yah biad kyis non /
/ rlun skye ba yi mtshan bid ni

I dus kyi glags ni brtsal ba ni (
I ji Uar duos su yah dag Ses
2. The mind defiled (klif(amanas) by habit-energy

(vdsana) sees its own (wind) nature as (though it were)
another form. Not knowing the real state of affairs (the
pr&na and apana winds), it is deluded by just wind alone.
I bag chags non mobs can gy i yid
I ran gi no bo gzugs gian mlhon .
/ don ni yod par mi ies fin 1

I rlun tfam geig pus rmons pa ho
3. Conjured up by dlayavijhana , the habit-energies roam

around within. Vijnana is controlled by habit-energy
through (dcath’s)scqucnce of admixture with habit energy.
/ kun gii rnam its bkug nas ni j
I bag chags nan du rnam par spyod ■

I bag chags kyis ni rnam Scs bzuii ,
/ bag chags dan hdres rim pa las If
4. Then, by the infusion of inner habit-energv, at the

time of (welling up) menses, it evolves in the mother’s
203
channel as a diamond bindu of the melted semen and blood.

/ naii gi bag cbags bsgos pay is /
/ de nas gla mtshan dus su ni /
/ mhal gji rtsa la hjug pa ni j

I rdo rje kbu khrag iu Ihig U jj
5. It develops according to the admixture; vijnana is

aroused by the dlava as though intoxicated by wine:
from the habit-energies of dlayavijhdna the stream of
vijnana arises.
/ hdrespa ru ni gyur pa dan j

I kun gei las ni mam its skye /
/ ji liar chan ros myos pa bhin /
/ kun gii mam Ses bag chags las 11

The verses 3-5 arc the portion quoted by Tsoh-kha-pa in his
commentary on the Vajrajiidnasamuccaya (PTT, Vol. 160, p.
154-4, 5) with the remark, “The ‘ alaya * and ‘ kliffamanas *
mentioned in this Tantra (the Vajramdld) arc the same terms
explained in other texts but have different meanings’* (/rgyud
hdir kun gii dan non yid ces gsuris pa ni giun g2an nas bsad
pa dan miii hdra yah don mi hdra stc). I have come to under¬
stand that by ‘other texts’ he means the commentaries by the
tantric Nagarjuna and Rhavyakirti, as well as Sri LaksmI
among others, that insist on assigning the terms dlayavijhdna ,
kliffamanas , and pratrtti-vijhdna to the three sets of prakrtis t adding
up to eighty, thereby equating dlayavijhdna with the‘nescience*
(azidya) of niddna verse 3. Tsoh-kha-pa*s rejection of this appli¬
cation of Yogacara terms is consistent with how we may
interpret those Vajramdld verses in its chapter 32. That is
because, in terms of Buddhist Dependent Origination, the
Vajramdld verses can be interpreted as setting dlayavijhdna equi¬
valent to 3. vijnana as a stream of consciousness which had
undergone death's trauma and now (having 1. avidyd and 2.
samskara , as ‘conditions’) with reviving habit-energy is attracted
to a new birthplace offering a field for evolving perceptions.
That phase of attraction to the womb is stated in terms of

â/irf/iarea-consciousncss in Tsoh-kha-pa’s Snags rim chcn mo
(f. 438a-4,5):
I de las ston chcn tier thob stc dri zahi sems so j

* *
I dc las thabs snah ba inched pa hdod pa he bar len pahi sems so /
/ de las ies tab snah ba ste skye ba gznh bahi sems so j.
204
VOGA OF THE CUHYASAMAJATANTRA
From that (Clear Light of Death) comes the great void,

CulMiination-of-Light, which is the âmMarya-conscious-
ness. From that, comes the means, Spread-of-Light,
which is the indulgencc-in-dcsire consciousness ( *trfno-
padana-citia). From that, comes the insight, Light, which
is the $eizing-of-birth consciousness ( *janma-giahana-
citta ),
The above passage has terminology associated with members

8-10 of Buddhist Dependent Origination: 8. craving (/r.tna),
9. indulgence ( upadana ), and 10. gestation ( bhava ). After

considering the foregoing two selections from the Vajrmdld
and the Shags rim , it becomes credible that the three lights
are the Guhyasamuja tradition of recasting the fust three members
of the 12-mcmbered Buddhist Dependent Origination ( pratitya -
samutpdda ); while the same three lights interpreted to start
with âm/Aarva-consciousness are explanatory of members 8, 9,
and 10 of that same Dependent Origination.
To be explicit:—
1. nescience (avidya)
2. motivations ( samskdra )
3. perception ( vijhana)
4. name-and-form { ndma-riipa )
5. six sense bases ( faddyatana ),
6. contact {sparia),
7. feeling ( vedand ); then,

8. craving (trfnd )
9. indulgence ( upadana)
10. gestation {bhava)
Bodhicitta stages
Culmination-of-Light
Spread-of-Light
Light
Rebirth consciousness
â/it/Aarra-consciousness
indulgence-in-desire
consciousness
scizing-of-birth
consciousness
11. birth (j&ti), and
12. old age and death (jata-marana ).
II KA ff kah khafidhdtur apai ca tejo vayus tathaiva ca /

up&d&ya tu vijndnam jayate tribhavalaye //8//
What be the solid realm and of water; likewise that of

fire and wind—using these, vijhdna takes birth in the womb
of triple gestation.
COMMENTARY ON THF. FORTY NIDANA VERSES
205
Alchan: “At the time of transmigration, the manovijnana uses

as base the four elements within the ‘semen-blood’ entity and
thus takes birth in the abode of triple gestation—superior,
middling, and inferior destiny.'’
The grammatical formation of the first Sanskrit line, with

ta. . . .tathaiia ca, pairs the four elements in a manner consistent
with astrology, wherein earth and water (the hard and soft
‘heavy’ elements) are mutually concordant, as arc fire and wind
(the hot and cold ‘light’ elements). Furthermore, the order
of elements in the verse is that in which the equivalent goddesses
Locana, Mamakl, Pandata, and Tara ask their questions in
the explanatory tantra Caturdevipariprcchd.
The four elements and their evolutes constitute the aggregate

of form ( rtlpa-skandha) among the five aggregates. Vijnana
uses this aggregate of form to become embodied in the aiaya
(‘abode’) which means the womb according to Mchan hgrel
on the present verse. Hence, the verse practically defines
the celebrated term alayavijtidna , which thus means *vijnana
in (or toward) the womb’ as the 3rd member of Dependent
Origination or a phase of that member. The location of
vijMna in the 1 womb is understood to be the place which becomes
the heart of the new being. Thus, in his Dkah gnad commentary
on the Guhyasamaja (Lhasa ed., Vol. Ca, 10a-l), Tson-kha-pa
starts by quoting passages about the supreme A, the indestruct¬
ible syllable in the middle of the heart; and says, “In short,
the very place where the vijnana along with its ‘together-bom*
(sahaja) wind enters amidst the ‘semen-blood’, is the heart.
Also at the time of death it passes away from the heart when
gathered in the expiring sequence” (/ mdor bsdu na dan por
main par scs pa lhan cig skyes pahi rlun dan lhan cig tu khu
khrag gi dbus su gah 2ugs pa de hid shin ga yin la / hchi bahi
tshc hah hbyuh ba rim gyis bsdus nas shin ga nas hchi hpho
ba yin no /).
At that ‘heart’ site, according to the citations and discussion

of Snags rim, f. 433a-2, If., first the three primary channels of
right, left and middle, are established. Then the five veins
of the heart are originated. These veins are deified by goddesses,
especially named in Mother Tantra tradition: Traivrtta
is form (rupa), Kaminf is sound (sabda), Gcha is odor
(gandha), Ganrlika is taste (rasa), and Maradarika is dharma.
206
Maradarika is in the middle and hence associated with the middle

channel of Avadhuti; however, the five are separately counted
to add up with the primary three to the total of eight, referred
to as the eight petals of the heart. The other four goddesses
are placed in the four directions and are said to be the self¬
existence of the four elements ( dhaiu-svabhava ). As the other
cakras are established these goddesses transfer their essence
accordingly; so it is theoretically possible to identify the four
goddesses of the directions with the four of the Guhyasamdja,
Locana and so on. The numbers of petals in the other cakras
are multiples of the original four directional veins of the heart.
In the full list, according to the Snags rim, f. 436b-4, quotation
from Abhayakaragupta’s Amnaya-mahjari, there are 4 petals
at the U$i)I$a-cakra (crown of head at place of Brahmarandhra),
32 at the forehead cakra (sometimes misunderstood to be at
the crown of the head because of the Tibetan word spyi bo),
16 at the throat, 8 as mentioned at the heart, 64 at the navel,
32 at the cakra of the sacral place, and 8 at the ‘tip of the gem’
(root of the penis). However, the intrauterine order of es¬
tablishing the element bases, according to the Snags rim discus¬
sion, shows reversal within the pairs of the niddna verse: 1st
month ‘water’ vortex in heart; 2nd, ‘earth’ vortex in sacral
region; 3rd, ‘wind’ vortex in navel; 4th, ‘fire’ vortex in throat
(or neck). In the 5th month, 'ak&Sa' is invested throughout the
body.
The Snags rim (f. 438a-6) cites the Alahdmudrdiilaka , appa¬

rently as Aryadeva’s quotation in his Caryameldpaka, with a
different order of the elements:
/ rnam its no bo la brten nasi

I dad por hbyun ba bii po la j
I rat i biin ties par bskrun pa yis f
j de tshe ran gi gnas nos lhim //
/ rnam its las ni rlud skye ste /
I di las me ni yad dag hbyud /
/ hdi las chu mams yah dag (ibyun /
/ de las sa ni yad dag hbyud fj

I bdi mams las kyati phud po hbyud j
I de las skye mched rnams kyad do j I
j de las Ses pahi rad biin can /
J drug cu Utag pahi brgya rim pas /
COMMENTARY ON TI1K FORTY N1DANA VERSES
207
ji liar skyes pa de Itar hdir j

f Ifiitn par hgyur ro rat) biin (as // ...
When initially the* form of vijhana takes recourse to the

lour elements through the propagation of prakrti(s),
at that time it passes away from its own abode.
From vijhdna the wind arises; from that the fire; from
the latter the waters arise, and from these the earth.
From these (lour), in turn the personality aggregates
( skandha) arise; from these the sense bases as well. From
the latter, the holder of the prakrtis of consciousness, in a
sequence ol 160, dissolves here in the same way as it was
born, from tire prakrtis.
! i SMI A i as mi mi ca pa he a sambhutdh skandhas satfiskrtilak •
fandh f
riipavin niima samskdra vijhdnam caiva paheamam I fill

And when this is present, tho five skandhas arise with the
characteristic of construction:—possessing ‘form* is
‘name’—the (three) samskaras, as is also perception
(vijhana), the filth.
Mchan : “As previously stated, when this—the four elements—

is present, the five skandhas arise. Arising with the charac¬
teristic of construction, the five are form (rilpa), feelings
( redand ), ideas (samjha), motivations ( samskdra ), and percep¬
tions (vijhdna ),”
In the verse the word santskara stands for the three middle
skandhas—ted and, samjha , and samskdra —and labelled ‘name’
(nama). The fact that in Buddhist Dependent Origination,
the 'ndma’ of ‘ ndma-rupa' stands for the three middle skandhas
of vedand , samjha, and samskdra , is an ancient teaching preserved
in Buddhaghosa’s Visuddhimagga in the chapter on Dependent
Origination, section devoted to ndma-rvpa. On the other hand,
when the term ‘ ndma-r upa' is employed for the live skandhas in
discussions apart from Dependent Origination, it is standard
for 'ndma' to include vijhana as well. Guhyasamdjatantra , Chap.
XVIII, verses 45-47, with emendation of verses 45, 46 :
vijhdnam dieyam akhydtam he!ukaryadiayair dvisdt /
ruparn muham iti khydtam jadabandhasvabhdoatah / /
vedand ghaftamdndkhyd ahamkatasvabhdiatah /
samjha sarjirdgam dtmanam vastutah Saktilaksanaiji jj
208
YOGA OF THE GL'IIYASAMAJATANTRA
samskaras tu sada irfya pratitya prerandtmanam j

svabhavam bodhicittam tu sarvatra bhavasambhavam //
Vijnana is called ‘hatred’ because it is hostile to both
cause and effect. Rupa is called ‘delusion’ because its
nature is insentient bondage. Vedana is called ‘stirring
pride* because its nature is egoism. Sarpjha is ‘lust*,
having the character of attachment to things. Samskara
is always ‘envy’, being the instigation in dependence.
(Their) intrinsic nature is bodhicitta , the source of
gestation everywhere.
Celu-pa’s Ratnavrkfa-nama-rahasya-samaja-vrtti (PTT, Vol. 63,

p. 174-4) explains the attribution to vijnana :
j ic sdah 2es pa ni rgyu libras gnis dbycr med par thugs

su chud pahi ye ses te / ghis kyi main pa la sdah bahi
phyir ro // ji skad du / rgyu libras ghis la sdah has na /
mam scs ic sdah 2cs su bstan f.cs so // de hid rigs te thog
mn med pa nas rgyun chad pa med pahi phyir ro /.
Called ‘hatred’ means it is the knowledge fully compre¬
hending in an inseparable manner both cause and effect,
because it hates the (separate) aspects of both. It is said,
“Because it is hostile to both cause and effect, vijnana is
called‘hatred’.” That is valid, because it (i.e. vijnana )
has been uninterrupted for immemorial time.
The idea seems to be that the notions of cause and effect require
discontinuity—the cause must end so the effect may begin.
But the ‘stream of consciousness’ ( citta-samtana ), here the
'vijnana', is continuous, not discontinuous. So it is said (meta¬
phorically) to hate cause and effect. Without this plausible
explanation by Celu-pa, I would have supposed that the reason
oijndna is called hostile toward cause and effect is that the latter
arc inferred, not perceived, otherwise stated, vijnana is the eternal
present.
There is considerable cominentarial material on the five

skandhas, and since this topic is so important to the Tantras,
more information is now given. There is ( 1 ) the order of treat¬
ing the skandhas, (2) the locations attributed to the skandhas,
(3) further explanation of the individual skandhas, and (4)
the skandhas in the Intermediate State.
(1) For the order of the skandhas, we may refer to Alamkaka-

la£a’s commentary on the I'ajramald, the Gambhirartha-dipika-
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NID.&NA VERSES
209
mma (Vol. 61, p. 204-4) : “The basic nature (do bo Hid) of

the five skandhas is as follows :—
Prana is vijfiana-skandha;
A pan a is vedana-skandha;
Samana is samjfia-skandha;
Udana is samskara-skandha;
Yvana is rupa-skandha.” (This passage will be conti¬

nued under the next nidana verse).
While the nidana verse calls vijnana the ‘fifth’, it is usual in ‘preg¬
nant embryology’ of the Tantras to assign vdjnana-skandha to
the first lunar month, since in Buddhist dogmatics vijftana is
said to fall into the womb. The above passage from Alamka-
kalasa’s commentary states the traditional order of skandha-
arising in the womb, namely during first through fifth lunar
months. The old Buddhist order of slating the skandhas , to wit :
rupa, vedana , samjna, samskara , vijnana —is said by Buddhaghosa
in Visuddhimagga (of course in terms of the Pali equivalents)
not to be the order of arising, rather to be the order of expla¬
nation difficulty, starting from the easiest to explain, namely
rupa. Hence, when it is a matter of giving definitions of the
skandhas , that explanation order is followed.
(2) The locations of the skandhas is hinted at in a passage of

the Guhyasamajatantra , Chap. XVI, verses 66-67A, which I
discussed at length in my article, “The fivefold Ritual Symbolism
of Passion,” Part I. This is the passage :
khavajramadhyagatam cintet maiijuvajram mahabalam /

pancabanaprayogena mukutagram tu samsmaret f
paiicasthanefu mantrajhah kruravajTena patayet /
The knower of man/ras should contemplate in the middle

of the diamond sky Mafijuvajra/ (=* MafijuSri) of great
power; he should recollect the crest pinnacle by the
praxis of five arrows (which) he makes fall, by the dia¬
mond of ferocity, into five spots.
As that article explains, the deposits five mantras in locations

of the skandhas as targets for five arrows shot by a red Mafljusri
in the sky (the Clear Light) to instill the essence of the five
Tathagatas, thus identifying the five skandhas with the five
Tathagatas. Those five mantras as germ syllables, with the
respective skandhas and Tathagatas, are set forth in Nagaijuna’s
Pindikrtasddhana , verses 56-60. :
210
Vairocaniyab {jam tv omkaraiji Suklavarnakam j

Rupaskandhasvabhavena nyasen murdhani mantravit jf
Ahkaram amitabhasya samjnaskandhasvabhavakam /
Raktavarriam mukhe dhyatva vagaiivaryam avapmiyat //
Akfobhyasya tu humkaram rajavartakasuprabham /
Vinyased dhrdaye mantri vijnanaskandharupatah //
Svdkdrarn ratnanalhasya vedanaskandharupalah /
Pitavarnam nyasen nabhau vcdana-Suddhihetukam jj

Padadvaye tu hakaram samskaraskandhabhavatah /
Harildbham nyasen mantri karmanathasya tattvatah jj

The knower of mantras will place at his head Vairocana’s
germ syllable Om of white color, because it is the intrinsic
nature of the personality aggregate of form.
Having contemplated in the throat Amitabha’s red Ah,
pertaining to the intrinsic nature of the aggregate of
ideas, he attains lordliness of speech.
The mantrin should deposit in his heart Aksobhya’s Hum,

shining like the deep blue gem, as the form of the aggre¬
gate of perceptions. He should place at the navel a
yellow Sva belonging to the Jewel Lord { Ratnasam-
bhava) and the cause of purifying feelings, because it is the
form of the aggregate of feelings.
The mantrin then deposits in both feet a Ha of green light,

as the reality of the Karma Lord ( = Amoghasiddhi),
because it is the nature of the personality aggregate of
motivations.
(3) For further explanations of the skandhas, in fact there

are many such in non-tantric Buddhist commentaries. Here
it suffices to present the explanations in the Explanatory Tantra
Vajramdla , Chapter 23 (PTT, Vol. 3, p. 214-1,2) :
/ phra rags la sogs dbye ba vis / / thogs bcas thogs med

misham hid dan / /hbyun ba chen po bîhi dnos / ! hdi
ni gzugs kyi phun por gsuns / / der ni mam snah ho bo
dan / /thums cad spros par byed pahi rgyu / / bde daii
sdug bsnal mchog tu i\ / /gran dan dro ba mehog gi
mchog / /gan gis sin tu rig pa ni / / dc ni tshor bahi phun
por bsad / / rin chen hbyun ldan nid kyi mtshan / / dc
biin gsegs pahi spros bdag nid / / glaii po boh bu Icc
sbyan dan / /rta dan ri dags dan ni phag / / pha duh ma
dan pha yi spun // mdzah bo snag gi gften tshan sogs// gan
211
gis yah dag scs pa ni / / hdu scs phun pohi mtshan hid
ni ' do biin gscgs pa hod dpag med / / dc ni spros pa kun
nas gsal / hgro ba khyab par yons su scs / / dge dan mi
dgohi las hbras bu ‘ 1 gian yah lun du ma bstan mih //
de yi hdu bycd du ni bsad // don yod spro bahi rah
biin can hkhor ba dnos dan dnos med sogs / / kun rtog
hbyuri bahi bdag hid can 1 ' mam Scs ies ni mam par scs //
mi bskvod spro bahi bdag hid can /
1. The characteristic of being obstructing and non-ob¬
structing by division into subtle and coarse, etc., and the
substance of the four great elements—this is said to be
the aggregate of form (rupa-skandha). Therein is the
nature of Yairocana and the basis of all manifestation.
2. Whereby one feels joy and suffering and the highest

calm; cold, heat, and the furthcrest supreme—that is
explained as the aggregate of feelings ( ledana-skandha).
It has the character of Ratnasambhava and the egoity
of Tathagata manifestation.
3. Whereby one recognizes a cow, an ass, a jackal, a

horse, a deer, a hog; lather, mother, brethren on the
father’s side; friends, relations on the mother’s side, etc.—
that characteristic of idea aggregate ( samjha-skatidha )
is the Tathagata Amitahha and that clarifies the mani¬
festation.
4. The thorough knowledge jHrvading the world, the

fruit of good and evil deeds, besides being named the
indeterminate (anukrtu , what is explained as their moti¬
vations ( samskdta-skandha) is Amoghasiddhi, the own¬
being ( svabhava ) of the manifestation.
5. The perception of presences and absences of samsara,

etc.; what has the nature of i»A<i//><J-arising, the (aggregate
of) perceptions ( lijnatui-skandha ) is Aksobhya, the soul of
the manifestation.
The above is self-explanatory except in a few particulars which

are explained in Alainkakalusa's commentary (FTT, Vo). 61,
p. 235-3). In the case ot the samskara-skandha he says, “Be¬
sides being named the indeterminate means that its intrinsic
nature is indeterminate, because it generates the realms of form,
formless, and so on’’ (gian yah lun ma bstan mih ies bya ba ni /
luh ma bstan pahi rah biin tc / gzugs dan gzugs med la sogs pa
212
yoga of the olhyasamajat antra
bskyed pahi phyir ro). In the ease of the vijhana-skandha , he

explains the ‘presences’ ( bhdia ) and ‘absences’ ( abhdva ) this
way : “A ‘presence’ has the nature of efficiency ( arthakriydkd -
ritva ); an ‘absence’ is the reverse of that” (dhos po ni don lived
nus pahi bdag iiid can no ! dnos mod ni de las bzlog paho).
This explanation is consistent with Tson-kha-pa's explanation
of Madhyamika philosophy in the vipayanii (discerning the real)
portion of his Lam rim chat mo , where he defends the position at
length that entities arise dependentlv, void oi intrinsic nature
but possessed of efficiency.
An intriguing feature of the above I ajramald passage is that

while it explains more about the skandhas it is not directly expla¬
natory of the Guhyasamajalantra; for example, it does not explain
the passage about the skandhas in chapter 18 (the L'ttara-
Tantra), e.g. that vijnana is called ‘hatred*. It does set forth the
standard correspondence of skandhas to Tathagatas, which is
a matter of conceptual praxis in the next group of verses
(‘Bhagavan-Sarva’). This and other passages of the \ ajra¬
mald suggest that its ‘explanatory’ nature eonsists in giving
more information consistent with the Guhyasamdja. In the
present case, once the skandhas are so identified, one can proceed
to correlate that chapter 18 passage with the current information
to associate the Tathagatas respectively with the defilements
[klda]) as follows : ‘hatred’—Aksobhya,‘delusion*—Yairocana;
‘stirring pride’—Ratnasambhava; ‘lust’—Amitabha; and
‘envy’—Amoghasiddhi.
(4) The skandhas in the Intermediate State are already a

teaching of non-tantric Buddhism in a scripture entitled Arya-
nanda-garbhavakranti-nirdda (in the collection called Ratnakuta) :
/de la bar ma dohi plum pohi dbyibs de van mam pa
gflis su gvur te/ kha dog sdug cin mdzes pa dan , klm
dog mi sdug cin mi mdzes paho / ' sems can dmyal ba
mams kyi bar ma dohi srid pahi kha dog mi sdug pa yin
tc / hdi lta stc dper na sdon duni tshig pa dan lulraho//dud
hgrohi rnams kyi bar ma dohi srid pahi kha dog ni hdi
lta ste / dper na dud pa dan hdraho / / vi dag kyi bar ma
dohi srid pahi kha dog kyan hdi lta stc / dper na chu
dan hdraho / / Ilia dan mi rnams kyi bar ma dohi srid
pahi kha dog ni lidi lta ste / dper na gser gyi kha dog
dan hdraho / / gzugs kyi bar ma do|ii srid pahi kha dog
213
ni tlkar por hdug go / / gzugs med pahi khatns kyi lha

mams ni bar ma dohi srid pahi kha dog med de / hdi
Itar tic ni gzugs med pahi phyir ro /
Now, that form of the Intermediate-State skandha is of
two kinds—of pleasant, lovely color; and of unpleasant,
ugly color. The color of the Intermediate State of sentient
beings who arc hell beings, is unpleasant, in this way;
for example, like the burnt stump of a tree. The color
of the Intermediate State of animals is this way : for
example, like smoke. The color of the Intermediate
Stale of hungry ghosts (preta) is this way : for example,
like water. The color of the Intermediate State of gods
and men is this way: for example, like the color of gold.
The color of the Intermediate State of the ‘realm of form’
{ rupa-dhatu ) is abiding white. The Intermediate State

of I he ‘formless realm’ ( arupa-dhatu ) gods, has no color,
for the reason that it is formless ( arupa) (i.e. since ‘form’
means shape, samsthana, and color, varna).
The above description goes with the five-destiny list, omitting

any reference to the asura destiny which in some lists brings
the total to six.
SA s am at a piatxaiekfana krt\<hiu> fhdnam eia ca j

adario dharmadhdtui ca as min vijmmapaiicakah 10//
Just (the knowledges) Kquality, Discriminative, Proce-

durc-of-duty; as well as (the knowledges) Mirror-like
and Dharmadhatu. In this (knowledge-pentad) is
the i i//l<5»fl-i>entad.
Mchan does not help here, but mentions the theory that the
Dharmadhatu kind is the basis of the other four knowledges.
The solution that is faithful to the expression 'vijiidna- pentad’
should be the five proper functions of the sense organ of mind
that correspond to the live knowledges as explained by Tson-
kha-pa, Paiicakrama commentary ;Yol. 138, p. 204-3) : (1) the
bright appearance of objects like the bright reflection on a
minor; (2) equality consisting in the unified experience of the
three kinds of feeling (i.e. pain, pleasure, and neutrality);
(3) remembering the various names of beings, such as one’s
father and mother ; (4) remembering the deeds and needs
of the world; (5) the transmutation {paravrtti ) through
elimination of impurity. Now, these arc obvious references
214

to the five skandhasy and consistent with the Tact that this
nidSna verse 10 groups apart the three middle knowledges
on the first line (hemistich), comparable to the three middle
skandhas being set apart in nidana verse 9. This suggests
that the term < ^'^j‘n^^/RI-pentad , means the five having vijnana
as salient member. This would permit the Madhyamika type
correspondence between the five skandhas and live knowledges.
Thus, Alamkakalasa’s commentary on the Yajramdld
(continued from citation under nidana verse 9) slates that when
the personality aggregates {skandha) are pure, their equivalent
winds correspond to the five knowledges as follows:
Wind
Skandha
Knowledge
Prana
vijnana
dhannadhatu
apana
vedana
equality
samana
samjna
discriminative
udana
samskara
proccdurc-of-duty
vyana
rupa
mirror-like
Of course the term ‘w/mma-pentad’ can also mean the five
vijndnas based on the five ‘door’ senses, that ride on the five
ancillary winds, as is shown elsewhere. In this case, the five
vijndnas also correspond to the five knowledges by way of the
five-Tathagata correspondence to sense objects, presented
under nidana verse 21.
For individual explanations of the five knowledges, among

many such there is a fine statement by Sri Laksmi {Pahcakrama
commentary, p. 29-1) :
/ hgyur ba med pa ni me loti ha buhi ye scs te / dri ma

med pahi me loti biin du tha dad med pahi phyir ro / snaii
ba med pa ni mfiam pa nid kyi ye ses ste / ran dan g2an
gyi dbye ba so sor mi snan phyir ro / / gftid med ic s pa ni
so sor rtog pahi yc scs tc / sgrib pa gtiis mam par dag
pahi phyir ro / / mchog ni bya ba nan tan grub pahi
ye Ses te / dmigs pa med pahi sbyor bas g2an gyi don
mdzad pahi phyir ro / / ii ba ni chos kyi dbyihs kyi ye
Ses tc / bdag med pa gnis miion sum du mdzad pahi
phyir ro /.
The mirror-like knowledge is unchanging, because there

is no difference (i.e. it is a faithful reflection) in a
clear mirror. The equality knowledge docs not appear,
because it has no appearance separately of a division
215
into oneself and another. The discriminative knowledge

docs not sleep, because it is the purity of the two hind¬
rances (of defilement and the knowable). The procedure-
o^-duty knowledge is best, because it performs the goals
of others by a praxis without aim. The Dharmadhiitu
knowledge is calm, because it produces in immediacy the
two kinds of non-self (of pudgala and of dharma).
I! MA // manadyatanam caiva locane fravane tatha /

ghrdnajihvd tatah kdyaf cely ayatanasambhavah //11 //
The sense base of mind, that of eye, so of cars, nose, tongue,

then of torso—thus is the origination of the sense bases.
Mchan : By the condition ( pratyaya ) of accomplishing ‘name*
and-form’ ( nama-rupa ) in the womb, the six sense bases arise—
thus the origination of the sense bases in the womb.
Mchan alludes to the correspondence of ten lunar months to

sequential development of five skandhas and then dyatanas in
the womb. The sense base of mind arises in the fifth lunar
month, then the five ‘door’ sense bases in the stated order of the
verse during the lunar months sixth through tenth. In the
traditional treatment, to the fifth lunar month are assigned
both the rupa-skandha and the manaayatana.
Chapter 32 of the Yajramdln identifies the first five lunar

months of the embryo with the first five Visnu Avatars along
with the sequential emergence of the five basic winds, and the
second five with the emergence of the five secondary winds
(Alarpkakalasa’s commentary adds the second five Avatars).
Tabic No. IV has some further data added from
Rgyal-Tshab-Rje’s Dpyid Ihig ~in bri< (Lhasa collected works,
Vol. Ka, f. 7b-8a) /.
In the explanatory tantra Caturdciatdpariprcchdy and accord¬

ingly in its commentary by Smrtijnanakirti, the Upadcia-pauftika
(PTT, Vol. 66, p. 160-1) the discussion about the embryonic
states of mcr-mer-po (S. arbuda), etc., is followed immediately
by mention of the nine orifices of the body :
don de gsuhs pa sgo dgu la ni kun tu hgro 2es pa ste /

spvi bo tshans pahi bu ga dan / mig dan / rna ba dan
sna dan / kha dan siiin ga dan / he ba dan / gsan ba
dan t chu min (sic. for chu mig) gi bu ga rnams dgubo //
de rnams la by ah chub kyi sems khyab par gyur to 2cs
pahi tha tshig go /
IV. INTRA-UTERINE CORRESPONDENCES
A vast ha in
womb
Skatidha and ayalana

perfected
Vi mu Avatar
Winds
Base of Wind
or Orifce
1 .
vijftana
Fish
prana
heart
2.
veda n a
Tortoise
apana
sacral region
3.
samskara
Boar
samana
navel
4.
samjna
Man-Lion
udana
neck
5.
rupa and mana-

ayaiana
Dwarf
vyana
12 great dhatu
6.
locana
Parasu-Rama
naga
eye
7.
sravana
The 2nd Rama
kunna
ear
8.
ghrana
Krsna
krkila
nose
9.
jihva
Buddha
dcvadatia
tongue
10.
kaya
Kalki
dhanahjaya
torso
'216 YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
commentary on the forty nidana verses
217
The meaning stated as ‘going every where in the nine

orifices’ is a reference to the bodhicitta's pervasion in those
nine orifices, to wit : 1. brahmarandhra at the top of
head, 2. eyes, 3. ears, 4. nose, 5. mouth, 6, heart,

7. navel, 8. the anus, 9. the urinary passageway.
If) til I y e vai traidhatukc sattvah prdndydma-sam&Srit&k /

mantrarajam japanty ajna dhyanadhyapana-varjit&h //12//
The beings in the three worlds taking recourse to prdnd-
ydma (breathing in and out) who recite the ‘king of man¬
tras’ with ignorance, miss the ‘mental reading’.
Alchan : ‘Three worlds* means earth and below (ju bog), above
the earth (sa sten ), and the superior world (ja bla). Pran&y&ma
means breathing in (prana) and breathing out ( ayama ). ‘Mental
reading’ is the nitdrtha kind of mantra reading (nes don gyi snags
klog pa). ‘King of mantras’ means Om, etc. (i.e. Om, Ah,
Hum). (Tson-kha-pa in his annotation also rejects a viewpoint
of Skal-ldan-grags-pa that the ‘pregnant doctrine of lust*
(hdod chags riios sbas) occurs in the phase of ‘diamond recitation’
in the form of enjoying the consort).
The epithet 'mantraiaja' for the three heart syllables is found

earlier in the Vajramala (P'lT, Yol. 3, p. 211). According
to the indications of Mchan hgrc't , p. 51, the Om is recited for
entrance of the breath. Ah for the time the breath is held
within, and Hunt for the outbreaking. The ‘mental reading’
of course is the lecitation within the mind.
Smrtijnanakirti's Caturdevatd-paripruchd-vydkhydna-upadeia-
pauftika (PTT, Yol. 66, p. I 60-2): “ ‘Earth and below’ means
Jambudvipa (earth) downwards and hell upwards; ‘superior
world’ means where the sun pervades; ‘above the earth’ means
the peak of Alt. Meru'* ( de la sa hog ni hdzam bu glih
man chad dntyal ba van chad do / / sa bla ni hi mas gar
khyab paho / / sa stcu ni ri rab kyi rise nioho /).
The mdana verse sets forth the praxis of prdndydma proper to

the stage of Generation. In this case, there are two important
verses of the Guhyasanuijatantra :
paiicavartiam mahdratnam sar> a past ha lamd traka tn /

nasikagre prayatnena bhdvayed yogatah iadd // III, 12 //
He should imagine a great five-colored jewel, no bigger

in area than a mustard grain, on the tip of the nose,
through continual yoga zealously.
218
YOGA OF THE Gl'HVASAMAfATANTRA
nasagrt sarfapam cintft sat'apt sac at dear am {

bhavayct jiianapadatn ram)am tahasyam judnakalpitam 'j\ 1,9 //
He should imagine a mustard grain at the tip of the nose,
and the moving (sentient heings) and non-moving (recep¬
tacle worlds ) in the mustard grain. Hr should contemplate
the joyful realm of jitdna as the (highest) secret that is
imagined by jiidna.
The foregoing two verses are c ited cnnse< utively by Nagarjuna

in his Pindikrtasadhana, verses 199-2^0. and in Ins Pahcakiama % 1,
10-11. The Pradipoddyotana and Mchan hgtcl P IT. Yol. 158, pp.
36 and 37; ibid. p. 50) inteipret them differently lot the Stage
of Generation and the Stage of Completion. In both cases,
the enterprise is called ‘subtle yoga' sukynayoga and involves
the reality of the wind and the reality of the manha; and the
five winds have the nature of the live knowledges and the five
Tathagatas. In the Stage of Generation the winds are the
breathing in and out, as in niddna verse 12 and the ‘tip of the
nose* is on the face. In the Stage of Completion, the winds
arc made to enter the central ‘vein’, along which theie are thiee
kinds of ‘tip of nose’, detailed in my introduction.
Concerning the recitation, Cuhyasamdja , Chap. XVIII,

p. 159, employs metaphorical language :
pufpam ity abhidhiyante naiayoîtkhadhatavah /

kdyavakeittabhedena nvdsatn knryut kitlakrarnaih f[
The nine ‘ladies’ (yo.nt) and‘realm of space’ akaSadhatu)

arc called ‘flower’. One should arrange it’ bv division
into bodv, speech, and mind in the order of the families
( kula ).
Tson-kha-pa (Mchan hgrtl, p. 20-2) explains that the nine vomits

arc the nine winds while the akasadhatu is the tenth wind,
vydna\ and that the verse refers to ‘diamond mutteiing’ of the
three syllables (Om, Ah, Hunt) nl the three families respectively
Vairocana’s Body, Amitahha’s Speech, and Aksobhva’s Mind)
to cause the (five) basic and (live) secondary winds to enter,
stay, and rise (for leaving) (hjug gnas Idah).
In its discussion of the ‘Stage of Generation’ kind of‘subtle

yoga’, the Pradipoddyotana on Chapter Six cites the Samdhina-
karana on Chapter Three (Mchan hgrtl, p. 51) :
pintfaradijapah proktah pahcavimiac chatadraya

caturbhir gunitam satnyak caturyogam Sat am tiara fj
219
navafatam tu yad drffam caturvimSalparikramaih /

pratyutpadat bhaitt atra dvyayutam data<0(fafam jj
It is said that the recitation of Pandara and the other
goddesses involves 225 (wind recitations). When well
multiplied by four (goddesses), the union with four is
900. Now that observed 900 by a series of 24 would
increase here (for day and night) to 21,600.
When this same passage from the Samdhivyakarana is quoted in

Snags rim, f. 442a-1, Tson-kha-pa gives the explanation of the
Amnaya-maiijari, that when one is reciting the Pandara wind,
which is the (fire) wind of the Lotus-lord (Amitabha), then
there arc 225 of fiery Pandara of fire, 225 of windy Tara of fire,
225 of earth Locana of fire, and 225 of watery MamakI of fire.
And one can understand the recitation of the other three the
same way. The *24’ comes from division of watches. ( / gos
dkar la sogs 2es pa ni pad ma mgon pohi rlun la mehi me gos
dkar mo dan mehi rlun sgrol ma dan mehi sa spvan ma dan
mehi chu Ma-ma-kihi rlun nis brgva ner lha re yod pahi dban
du byas la des g2an gsum yah ses par byaho ' hdi la thun phyed
pa her b£i 2cs man she las gsuns so / ). Since there are eight
watches by day and night, the number ‘24’ must result from
multiplication with the three mantras. That this comes out
commensurate with ‘24 hours’ seems to be an accident. Divid¬
ing on this basis, we find that each shortest recitation takes
4 seconds. When one is reciting the wind of the Lotus-lord,
he would recite first the fiery Pandara of fire for four seconds of
Om, four seconds of Ah, and four seconds of Hum. He
continues this fiery Pandara of lire recitation for 225 times (45
minutes) before going to the windy Para of fire, and so on to
the other goddesses for a total of three hours. Then the instruc¬
tion states to go through the process similarly in the case of the
other three elements. This remark is clarified by observing
that the Samdhivyakarana verses in question are quoted in the
Pahcakrama (krama No. 1; but the edited text by La ValltJe
Poussin numbering them 45-46 does not notice these as con¬
tinuation of quotation). The commentary by Sri Lak$mi
(PTT Vol. 63, p. 13) explains :
/ de la nin mo thun dan pola mgrin par gnas pahi padmahi

mehi dkyil hkhor las snahi bu ga gYas pa laskha dog dmar
pohi hod zer hbyun ba stc / dehi tshe dban gi las hgrub pa
220
YOOA OF THE OUH YASAMAjATANTRA
yin no/ thun gfiis pa laite bargnas pahi rlun gi dkyil hkhor
las / snabi bu ga gVon pa la kha dog snon pohi hod zer
hbyun ba ste / dchi tshc miion spyod kyi las hgrub pa
yin no / hi ma phyed las brtsams tc / thun gsum pa la
gsah bahi padmar gnas pahi sahi dkyil hkhor las gnis
ka la kha dog ser pohi hod zcr hbyun ba ste / dehi tshe
rgyas pahi las hgrub pa yin no / thun hi\ pa la snih gar
gnas pahi chuhi dkyil hkhor las / kha dog dkar pohi
hod zcr dal 2in dman par rgyu ba gnis ka las hbyun
ba stc / dchi tshc i\ bahi las hgrub pa yin no / mtshan mo
yah dc biin du ses par bvaho /
Here, during the first watch of day, a light of red color

issues through the right nostril from the fire circle of the
lotus based in the throat; at that time one can succeed
in the rite of domineering magic. During the second
watch, a ray colored green issues through the left nostril
from the wind-circle based by the navel; at that time one
can succeed in the rite of destructive magic. Starting
at noon, in the third watch, a ray colored yellow issues
through both nostrils from the earth-circle based in the
lotus of the sacral place; at that time one is successful in
the rite of prosperity. During the fourth watch, through
both nostrils issues a slow and slight ray, colored white,
from the water-circle based in the heart; at that time,
one is successful in the rite of appeasing (the deities).
The same order takes place during the night (watches).
Sri Laksmi continues with explanation that those descriptions
show the dominant ray, but that the other three are represented
fractionally. This agrees with the foregoing manner of recita¬
tion, which obviously involves a permutation of the goddesses
in the order of the four watches of the day, repeated in the four
watches of the night. The total of recitations for the eight
watches thus amounts to 21,600.
One may observe that these subdivisions are governed by the

eight-watch system of classical times. There is evidence that
in the B.C. period there was a system of six watches (three by
day and three by night). This divided neatly with the muhurta
(48 minutes) unit; and recitation based thereon would be multi¬
plied by five tattvas (or elements) in a paheikarana type of five¬
fold fractions similar to the above four-fold fractions.
221
Finally, Tsoh-kha-pa quotes nidana verse 12 in the course of

a comment that clarifies the relation of the generation cycle to
the system of praxis, namely, in his Paiicakrama commentary
(PTT. Vol. 158, p. 192-5 to 193-2):
/ hdi ni hchi bahi dus kyi rlun hjig tshul dris pahi lan yin
la / de yah ji Itar mes bsregs pa na sin gi dnos po med par
hgro ba biindu / hchi bahi tsheyah rlun rnams srog hdzin
gyi bar du rim gyis thim nas hchi fin / yah ii bahi hod
gsal las las kyi rlun sar te / de dan rnam ies gnis lhan cig
tu hjig rten gsum du gnas pahi skye ba len no j j las kyi
rlun de las kyah chags pa la sogs pahi kun rtog rnams
skye la / des las bzah nan gftis bsags nas yah hchi iin
yah skye ba hkhor lo bskor ba biin du hgyur ro / / shon
du bsad pahi rdo rje bzlas pa sogs rim pa lha ni gii dus
kyi skye hchihi rim pa dehi dbye bar hgyur ro ies gsuhs
so / / hgyur tshul ni / rlun hbyuh hjug rgyun Idan du
byed pa ni giihi rdo rje bzlas pa yin te / de hid las / gan
yah khams gsum sems can rnams / / srog dan rtsol ba la
brten pa / / gsan shags rgyal pa zlas biin du / / mi ses bsam
gtan klog pa spans / / ies so / / dc ltar hin mtshan kun tu
rlun gi bzlas pa byas pahi mthar hchi ba ni / rlun phyi
nan du rgyu ba log nas hbyuh ba rnams rim gyis thim
stc / snah niched thob gsum gyi hams hohar ba ni sems
dben gyi rim paho / / her thob kyi mthar hchi bahi hod
gsal hchar ba ni hoc! gsal gyi rim pa ste giiho ohos sku
ies kyah byaho / / hchi bahi hod gsal gyi mthar phun
po rhin pahi khrod na gnas pahi rlun sems tsam las lus
rnih pa las logs su bye nas bar dohi lus grub pa ni rgyu
lus kyi rim pa ste giihi lohs sku ies kyah byaho / /gii la dag
ma dag gi sgyu lus kyi rim pa so so ba gnis med kyah / hdi$
lam dus kyi sgyu mahi sku gnis ka mtshon nus pa ni hchad
par hgyur ro ' / gi.ihi bar do lohs sku mig tha mal pa sahi
mig gi yul du mi mthon pa de / skye srid du skye ba blahs
pa na mig dehi yul du hgyur ba ni giihi spru! skuho /
This (passage of the Vajramala) answers the question
about the dissolution of the wind at the time of death.
Thus, just as when burnt by fire, the substance of the tree
is annihilated, so also at the time of death the winds
sequentially dissolve up to prana (i.e. in the order, vyana,
udana, samana, apana, prana) and one dies. Then,
222
from the Clear Light of Death the ‘wind of action’ arises,

and the pair consisting of the latter together with vijiiana,
takes birth somewhere in the three worlds. From that
‘wind of action’ the (80) vikalpa -s of ‘desire’, etc. arise,
and therefrom one amasses good and evil, and the wheel
of death and rebirth is so-to-say turned. The five stages
(pancakrama) of the aforementioned ‘diamond muttering’,
etc. are said to differentiate the stages of birth and death
pertaining to ‘basic time’. The method of differentiating
is as follows : The continuous activity of the wind’s inhala¬
tion and exhalation is the‘basic’ (1) ‘diamond muttering’,
as said in the same work (the Vajramald), “The beings
in the three worlds taking recourse to pranayama (breath¬
ing in and out) who recite the ‘king of mantras’ with
ignorance, miss the ‘mental reading’.” In that way,
at the conclusion of the wind-recital during the whole
day and night, ‘death’ occurs by the passage outward
and inward of the wind being averted, followed by the
serial dissolution of the elements, and then (2) stage
of the secret state of mind (cittaviveka) y wherein the three
(gnoses)—Light, Spread-of-Light, and Culmination-of-
Light, arise. The arising of the Clear Light of Death at
conclusion of the CuImination-of-Light, is the (3) stage
of Clear Light, also called ‘basic Dharmakaya*. At the
conclusion of the Clear Light of Death, a body formed
of wind and mind-only emerges from the aged mass of
personality aggregates ( skandha ), and from the aging of
that body and consequent alteration the Intermediate-
State body is produced, which is (4) stage of Illusory Body,
also called ‘basic Sambhogakaya’. As far as the* ‘basic
(time)’ is concerned, there is no differentiation of the stage
of illusory body into pure and impure. However, as will
be explained, for the time of the path, it is necessary to
posit two sorts of illusory body. The basic Intermediate-
State Sambhogakaya is not seen in the sense field of the
fleshly eye, which is the ordinary eye. Upon taking
birth through the birth process, what occurs in the sense
field of that eye is (5) the basic (time) Nimiana-kaya.
In that passage, Tson-kha-pa shows how to relate the five kramas
of the Stage of Completion, that is, in the ‘time of the path’.
223
with the sequence of ordinary generation in the cycle of death

and rebirth, that is, in ‘basic time*. The correspondence thus
established can be listed as follows :
Basic Time
1. Inhalation and Exhalation
2. Dissolution of the elements
3. Clear Light of Death
4. Intermediate State body
5. Birth
Time of the Path

Diamond Muttering
Purification of Mind
Personal Blessing
Revelation-Enlightenment
Pair-united
C. Bhagavan sarva (The Lord—All)
Candrakirti’s Pradxpoddyotana on Chapter XVII ( Mchan hgrel,

p. 152-5) cites this verse without identification :
j sarvayogo hi bhagavan vajrasaitvas tathagatah j

j tasyopabhogam sarvam vai traidhatukam aSefatah //
For all yoga is the Bhagavat. The Diamond Being

(vqjrasattva) is the Tathagata. His whole enjoyment is
the three worlds without remainder.
Now the yogin advances to a more refined yoga, with minute

partition of the world into partite realities (the ‘hundred linea¬
ges’) identified with the five Buddhas or Tathagatas. This is
the Atiyoga, or stage of the bodv-mandala containing the bodies
of all ( sarca ) the thirty-two deities emanated from the Lord
(Bhagavat) as the bodhicittavajra. It corresponds in external
ritual to the main part of the mandala rite during which
one employs the five colored threads representing the five
Tathagatas.
The usual commentaria! explanations of the word ‘Bhagavat’,

in both non-tantric and tantric Buddhist texts, refer to the six
allotments (or good fortune, bhaga) and the defeat of the four
Maras (temptors or metaphorical death). For the six allot¬
ments, there is the verse cited in StkoddeSafika of Xadapada
(Naropa), p. 3 :
aiivaryasya samagrasya rxipasya yaSasah Sriyah J

jhanasyarthaprayatnasya fanndtfx bhaga iti smrtih //
It is taught that his ‘good fortune’ is of the six : lordliness,

excellent form, fame, prosperity, knowledge, and zeal
of the goal.
For the defeat of the four Maras, this tradition has special
224
YOGA OF THE GL'HYASAMA JATANTRA

features such as explaining the defeat of the skandha-mara
in terms of the body-mandala, as in Alainkakalasa s I ajramdia
commentary, p. 164-4 :
/ dc la bdud bzi bcom pa ham dhah phyug la sogs pahi

yon tan drug dan ldan pas na 1 bcom Ulan hdas so / dc
la ston pa nid bsgoms pas hchi bdag gi bdud bcom mo //
lha sum cu rtsa gnis kvi bdag Aid can gyi dkvil hkhor
gyi hkhor lohi rnam pa rah gi lus la vohs su scs pas plum
po bdud bcom mo de bîn gsegs pa lhahi rnam pas
Aon mons pa lha vons su scs pas non inofis pahi bdud
boom mo f bgegs skrad pahi dus na tlbah po la sogs pahi
phyogs bcuhi hjig rten skyoh ba la phur bus btab pas
rnam par bcom pahi phyir lhahi buhi bdud bcom mo
By reason of defeating the four Maras or of having the six
qualities of lordliness, and so on, hr is the Bhagavat. By
contemplation of voidness he defeated the Mrtyu-mara
(‘Death’ mara). By fully recognizing his own body as
the circular form of the mandala having the embodiment
of the thirty-two gods, he defeated the Skandha-mara
(‘Personality-aggregate’ mara). By fully understanding
the five defilements as the aspects of the five Tathagatas,
he defeated the Klesa-mara (‘Defilement’ mara). At
the time of frightening away the hindering demons, be¬
cause he defeated Indra and the other ten Lokapalas by
applying the magic nail, he defeated the Devaputra-
mara (‘Son-of-the-gods’ mara).
Concerning the ‘All’ (sarva), Pradipoddyotana on Chapter XIII,

first sentence, comments on the epithet muni : “He is called muni
because he lives in the mind of all the Tathagatas’* (sarvatathd-
gatamanovarttitvdd munim). Besides, all the deities are an expres¬
sion of the Buddha’s ‘mind of enlightenment’ ( bodhicitta ), a
term which also means the male-female bindu in the central
channel and the mysterious substance tasted in the ‘Secret
Initiation of the Stage of Completion. This ‘aU'-iiielusivc
character of the bodhicitta is portrayed in some verses of Tsoii-
kha-pa, in his “Rnal-hbyor dag-pahi rim pa” (PIT. Vol. 160.
p. 85) :
/ gat) tig gzugs dan tshor ba hdu Ses hdu byed dan j
j mam par its dan skye niched drug dan dbat) po drug /
/ sa chu me dan rluh dan nam mkhah thorns cad ni j

22S
I by a tt chub scms hdra rgya chcn de la phyag htshal lo fj

I gti mug ht's pa Mod chags rdo rje chos be as gah f
/ rig pa hi sbyor ha lasbyuh rtag tu rab hbrcl bar j
l mam pa sna tshngs dgah has myos pahi dhos gyur pa f

l byah chub saw hdra tgya chcn de la phyag htshal lo jf
I sdud dan dgah dan mam pa dc bzin mi hgyur dot) f
j rgyu dan hbras bn hi rah biin scms su rjes thogs chos f
j rmohs dan ic sdah Mod (hags sgrib pa rdo rje sle j

} byah chub scms hdra rgya chen de la phyag htshal lo (}
I ics pas Uia sum ru so ghis la phyag byaho /.
I bow to that expanse like bodhicitta —all that is rfipa,

vedana, samjtVi, saniskara, and vijfiana; the six (external)
sensory bases, and the six sense organs; earth, water,
fire, and wind and space.
I bow to that expanse like bodhicitta —any fault of delusion

along with the nature of diamond lust; which by continual
union arisen from association with the consort ( vidya)
becomes an clement intoxicated bv variegated ecstasv.
I bow to that expanse like bodhicitta —the reunification,

the ecstasy, the aspect, the unchanging Thusncss; the
intrinsic nature of cause and effect as a nature afterwards
obtained in the mind; the diamond obscuration of delu¬
sion, hatred, and lust.
With those verses one bows to the thirty-two gods.
In the first of those three verses, the five personality aggregates

(ru/>a, etc.) arc the five skandha-Tathagatas; the six (external)
sensorv bases arc the five goddesses called vajra and also sems
ma (for the sixth sense object, some goddess would do double
dutv); the six sense organs are six of the Bodhisattvas; the five
elements (earth, etc.) arc the four goddesses Locana, etc. (the
dhdiu-mudrh) anti the Akasadhalu. That list includes all the
deities which are subject to division into five aspects, namely :
(a) five skandha-Tathagata (ntdana verse 14). (b) four dhalu-
mudra (verse 15), six indriya-bodhisattva (verse 16), and (d)

five uifaya-vajrd (ntdana verse 20). Tson-kha-pa explains
(FIT, Vol. 158, p. 205-3) that the ten krodha or wrathful gods,
in the ten limbs, and the bodhisattvas Maitreya and Samanta-
bhadra, in the joints anti veins, are counted among the thirty-
two gods for the purpose of ‘arcane body’ (kaya-viveka ), but are
226
YOGA OF THE Gl/IIYASAMAJATANTRA
not each divided into five aspects because they were not so
indicated in the basic Tantra.
The hundred subdivisions are listed by Aryadeva in his

Caryameldpakapradipn (PIT , \ ol. 61, p. 205-'), line 7, to 207-5,
line 8). In my annotation 1 follow the sulxlivisions as present¬
ed in Tsoh-kha-pa’s Pahcakrama commentary Gsal bahi sgron me
(PTT, Vol. 158 pp. 201 and 205) and a few differences with
the lists in that Peking edition of Aryadeva'’s work may be due
to the fact that Tson-kha-pa employed all translations of this
work in Tibetan, as I pointed out in “Notes on the Sanskrit
Term Jhana ” p. 267, note 59. Aryadeva, op. at., p. 295-5,
merely cites the Candtaguhyatilaka (gin gsari thig le) as mention¬
ing the term ‘hundred lineages’. Tsoh-kha-pa’s exposition
always uses the order Yairocana, Ratnasambhava, Ainitabha,
Amoghasiddhi, and Aksobhya; and means this order in many
other places by saying ‘Yairocana etc.’ This shows the Guhya -
samaja traditional correspondences to the skandhas to agree with
the old Buddhist statement of the skandhas (cf. niddna verse 9,
above), and this gives rise to the table in Pucci (Tibetan Painted
Scrolls , I, p. 2^0), where the standard jurisdictional activity of
the Buddha families is given in the same order : moha(delusion),
abhimana (pride), raga (lust), irsya (envy), krodha (wrath).
While this work was being printed, the author temporarily in
Japan heard that a scholar wondered about the consistency
of the Guhyasamajatantra to have Aksobhya as the chief deity and
yet apparently in another place assigning this role to Yairocana.
But by reference to the Aksobhya-mandala translated above
it will be noticed that the placement of Aksobhya in the center
gives Vairocana the assignment to the East. In this Tantra
Aksobhya has the role of emanating, as though from above
dowrnwards, the whole mandala. The human candidate has
to work from downwards upward and he docs this by the corres¬
pondences which start from the East, so there is no inconsis¬
tency.
The subdivisions amounting to a hundred lineages as well

as other lists in the annotation of these verses, are somewhat
tedious, unless the reader can sense the interesting sidelights on
Indian civilization suggested by the way of sectioning the
worlds into these partite realities grouped under the five Tatha-
gatas as ‘building-blocks’ of the world, which is made up of them
COMMENT ARY ON THE FORTY NIDANA VERSES
227
in various permutations and combinations. To help the reader

to this point of view, four summarizing tables have been included
under the respective nidana verses (Nos. 14, 15, 16 under ‘Bhaga-
van sarva’ and No. 20 under ‘Tathagata’). By way of easing
the reading of this annotation set, I have omitted the Tibetan
passages for the ‘partite realities’ and ‘hundred lineages’, since
th is subsection is already swollen with technical details.
(jBHAj! bhaviny asmin prakrtayn ragaragddikdh punah /
tdbhya(h) iubhdSubham karma tato janma-samudbhavah //13//
In this gestation are the prakrtis desire, aversion, and so
on; as a result of those, auspicious and inauspicious karma ;
therefrom the origination of (rc)birth.
Mchan : ‘In this gestation’ means the three lights. Auspicious

karma leads to birth in a good destiny ( sugati ), inauspicious
karma to birth in a bad destiny ( durgati ). Again, after amassing
the two kinds of karma one experiences the Clear Light of Death,
then undergoes the Intermediate State ( antarabhava ), and is
reborn through a womb or by some other means of birth. In
further explanation, after the amassing of karma, when facing
death, earth dissolves in water, watci in fire, fire in wind, the
wind which stirs up the (80) vikalpa- s in Light, that in Spread-
of-Light, that in Cuhnination-of-Light, and that in the Clear
Light of Death. This sequence of dissolution is the direct order
(anuloma-krama) and describes the ‘secret state of mind’ (riV/a-
viveka , sans dbrn ).
Padeaf:rama , 2nd kranm, 44-47 ; Sri Laksmi {op. cit.), p. 27-3, ff.:
krtva subhdsubhain karma bhtanuinti gatipadrake jf
anantaryddikatn krtva narake\u viparyate //
iubharti danudiham krtva svargddtfu mahiyate f
anantajanma uVuistam prapya caivani punah punah //
purvakarnuu ipako 'yam iti focati mohatah /
prakrtydbhdsayogcna ycna kltiyanti jantavah //
jnatva tarn eva mmyantc jndnino bhavapadjarat j
prajnasvabhdva eva yam candraniatjdafakalpand Jf
Having done good and evil deeds they wander in the five
destinies; having committed the sins of immediate retri¬
bution, they roast in the hells; having done the good deeds
of giving and the like, they thrive in heaven and other
(good destinies):—Again and again this iiappcns during
their uncountable lives. This maturation of former
228
YOOA OF THE OUHYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
deeds distresses because ol delusion; the beings arc tor¬

mented by wav of the (eighty) praktti lights. The knowing
ones who know that, are liberated from the net of genera¬
tion. This intrinsic nature of ptajhd is (tepresented in
the ‘Stage of Generation' as) the imagination of the lunar
disk.
While the Alchan annotation and the above citation from the
Pahcakrama treat die entire cycle of kanm and fruit in generali¬
ties, the nidana verse 13 in fact emphasizes birth or rebirth.
This is consistent with the observation in the Introduction III,
E. ‘Grouping the nidana kankas', that the stage ol Aliyoga,
the body-mandala, corresponds to biith. This nidana verse
therefore corroborates the remark in 1 sori-kha-pa’s Dim gsal ba
on the Guhyasamdja (PTI’, Yol. Hit), p. 121-1, 2) that the Stage
of Generation corresponds to the development of the nu n of
the first aeon : first, a condition of ‘death' corresponding to the
generation of the palace in Yoga; second, a condition of ‘inter¬
mediate state 5 corresponding to the generation of the primeval
lord in Anuyoga; third, a condition of ‘birth’ conesponding to
the body-mandala as though in the generation cycle of the
womb during Atiyoga. According to Tsoii-kha-pa in that
place, this ‘birth* is illustrated by the descent from the Tusita
heaven of the Bodliisattva for his last life. Referring to the
correspondence of five stages at the close of the preceding gioup
of verses (‘Ekasmin samayc’), ‘birth 5 corresponds to the fifth
krama, ‘pair-united ( yuganaddha ), and so to the ‘pair-united
with training’ (Saikâ-yuganaddha ). 1'his yuganaddha phase of
course occurs in the Stage of Completion, not in the present
Stage of Generation.
II GA /I gadh sarnbhavati skandhah puhcabuddhdtmakah punah /

pa heakarabhisambodhir iti ndma pracndiUih // 14 //
A skandha occurs as a destiny (gati), also as (one of) the

five buddhas , and exhorted as (one of) the abhisainbodhi of
five kinds.
Afchan : ‘As a destiny (gati) 5 means belonging to the six fami¬

lies (rig* dntg gi). The contemplation of the sk.mdhas as equi¬
valent to the Buddhas is the ‘arcane body’ (kdyavivtka).
Tson-kha-pa’s remark about ‘destiny 5 means the standard

Buddhist doctrine that the five skandhas can appear in any one
of six destinies, those of gods and men; of asuras; and of animals.
229
hungry ghosts, hell beings. The correspondence of skandhas

to Buddhas is standard (cf. Guiscppe Tucci. Tibetan Painted
Scrolls. I, p. 238) : riipa (Vairocana), vedand (Ratnasambhava),
samjna (Amitabha), samskara (Amoghasiddlii), vijnana (Akso-
bhya). The contemplation of the correspondences takes place
in the Stage of Generation; the identification in fact is the
achievement of the Stage of Completion.
The five kinds of abhisambodhi mean here the five of the Stage
of Generation rather than the five of the Stage of Completion
(nidana verse 36). In the present case, fortunately we can use
the correspondences from Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals of
the Buddhist Tantras , Chapter One. There the moon corresponds
to Aksobhya, the second (the red moon) to Ratnasambhava,
the germ syllable to Amitabha, the hand symbol to
Amoghasiddhi, and the image to Vairocana. Since the five
Tathagatas have already been indicated in terms of the skandhas ,
the five abhisambodhts of ‘moon,’ and so forth, are in turn made
to correspond.
In their undivided correspondence to the Tathagatas, the five

skandhas arc said to have ‘partite reality’, in terms of their coires-
pondence to the five defilements given above under ‘Smin,’
with rupa-skandha called ‘delusion’ ( moha ). Tson-kha-pa,
“Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim pa” (Yol. 160, p. 91) : “Having
purified ‘delusion,’... (etc.), one is transferred to the rank of
Vairocana, etc.; thus the partite reality of the (iespective)
Tathagata (gs'egs pa dbyuh ba hi de hid).” Thus the defilement
(, kleSa ) brings the yogin to a particular Buddhahood, by his
purifying that very defilement going with that Buddha.
The authority for the ‘hundred lineages* subdivisions of

skandhas is Guhyasamdjatantra , XVII, p. 137 :
1 paheaskandhah samdsena paheabuddhah prakirtitah /
The five skandhas are proclaimed in short to be the five

Buddhas.
Tson-kha-pa’s Pahcakrama commentary (Vol. 158, p. 204) :
“Among them, when dividing up the rupa-skandha = Vairo-

cana,— (1) Shape , long and short, etc., whether inner, outer, or
both; (2) aspect of oneself, other or both; (3) color , blue, etc.,
whether inner or outer; (4) lustre of sun, moon, etc., whether
inner or outer; (5) form which lacks representation—have
in the given order, the Vairocana, the Ratnasambhava, the
230
Amitabha, the Amoghasiddhi, the Aksobhya—of Vairocana.
“When dividing up the veda tut-sk andha Ralnasambhava

(1) impartiality and indifference; (2) (feeling) arisen from
bodily phlegm and wind; (3) joy and suffering; (4) (feeling)
arisen from meeting (of perception, sense organ, and sense
object); (5) feeling arisen from bill*,—have in the given order,
the Vairocana, etc., of Ratnasambhava.
“When dividing up the samjM-skandha Amitabha—(I)

(ideas of) the non-moving and the unchanging; (2) (ideas of)
the four-footed stage; (3) (ideas of) the footless stage;
(4) (ideas of) the multiple-footed stage; (5) (ideas of) the
two-footed stage—have in the given order, the Vairocana, etc.,
of Amitabha.
“When dividing up the samsknra-skattdha Amoghasiddhi,—

(1) (motivations of) the body; (2) (motivations of) the three
realms; (3) (motivations of) speech; (4) (motivations of) libe¬
ration; (5) (motivations of) the mind—have in the given order,
the Vairocana, etc., of Amoghasiddhi.
"When dividing up the vijnana-skattdha Aksobhya,— (1-5)

the perceptions based on eye, etc. down to body—have in the
given order, the Vairocana, etc., of Aksobhya.”
This multiplication of each Tathagata by each Tathagata
yields the number 5 x 5 = 25, the number of twisted threads
outlining the palace in the mandala-rite. Also, Tson-kha-pa,
“Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim pa” (FIT, Yol. 160, p. 89-2) states :
“The five colors of the manyjlala are the purity of the live skandhas ”
(phuh po Ina mam par dag pa ni dkyil hkhor kha dog hut).
V. PARTITE REALITIES OF THE FIVE TATHAGATAS IN THE FIVE SKANDHAS
Skandha
(Tathagatas) *
Vairocana
Ratnasambhava
Amitabha
Amoghasiddhi
Aksobhya
rupa
shape
aspect
color
lustre
(unrepre¬
vcdana
impartiality
from phlegm
joy and
from sense
sented) form
from bile
samjfla
of the inanimate
and wind
of the four-
suffering
of the footless
contact
of the multiple
of the two-
samskara
of body
footed
of three realms
of speech
footed
of liberation
footed
of the mind
vijnana
eye
car
nose
tongue
body

232
YOGA OF THE GITIYASAMAJATANTRA
II FXV II vayus tejo jalam (bhutnir) locanadicatuftayam /

jhanatraydtmakajiieyam buddhabodhipradayakam // 15 //
Wind, fire, water, earth, arc the quaternion Locana

and so on, which is to be known by one* with the nature
of the three gnoses as conferring the enlightenment of
the Buddhas.
Mchan : ‘One with the nature of the three gnoses’ means one
who has experienced the three - Light, Spread-ol-Light, Cul-
mination-of-Light in meditative attainment after being engaged
in subtle contemplation of the ‘lower orifice’ ( hog sgohi phra mo
bsgoms pa). ‘Which is to be known’ means alter having realized
the inseparable ‘bliss-void’ {sukha-Sunya) one returns to expe¬
rience of external objects along with the ‘subsequent attainment’
of knowing them in the manner of the three gnoses = the three
lights. This involves contemplating the five progcnitor-Buddhas
in each of the four elements. I bis is the ‘arcane body’ ( kaya~
viveka) in terms of elements ( dhatu ).
The four goddesses arc assigned intermediate directions in

the mantfala. South-east (agri'ya), etc. are Locana, etc. Thus,
Locana, south-east; MainakI, south-west; Pandara, north¬
west; and Tara, north-cast. Since Locana, etc. means, in
correspondential terms, earth, etc., nidana verse 15 states the
goddesses in reverse order. The verse indicates that one must
be cautious in interpreting the phrase ‘Locana, etc.’ since a
series may be meant that does not really begin with the corres¬
pondence to Locana. This is also a problem in the respective
jurisdiction of the goddesses, as follows :
Tsoh-kha-pa, “Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim pa,” (Vol. 160,

p. 91) :‘‘The jurisdictional activity (sgos mdzad pa) .. . of the
four goddesses Locana, etc. is in order :
1. Appeasing ( fdntika ) the sentient beings tormented by

illness and demons.
2. Protecting and making prosper { pau,\(ika ) those troubled

by hindering elements.
3. Pacifying and guarding against the demons which oppress

sentient beings.
4. Dominating (vaSikarana) all sentient beings.
“Thus the partite reality of the (respective) Tathagata consort.”

According to the information presented under nidana verse 12,
it is clear that the correspondence docs not take No. 1 as going
233
with Locana, despite the ‘Locana, etc.’ Indeed, the jurisdic¬

tion order is Mamaki for No. I, ‘Appeasing’ (Sdntika ); Locana
for No. 2, 'Prosperous' (pauffika) ; Tara for No. 3, ‘Overpower¬
ing’ (abhicaraka) ; and Panama for No. 4, ‘Dominating’ (vail-
karana).
At the beginning of Caiulrakirti’s Pradipoddyotana on Chapter

XIV, he mentions that one performs the appeasing rite (white),
facing North; prosperity rite (yellow), facing East; over¬
powering rite (black), facing South; and dominating rite (red),
facing West. (Therefore, the jurisdictional order of the goddesses
is clockwise in terms of the direction being faced.) Candraklrti
goes on to cite an unnamed explanatory tantra:
yathoktam bhagavata vyakhyatantre / vajrapanir aha /

adhyatmika vela iti bhagavan kim ucyatc / bhagavan aha /
adhyatmika vela nama vajrapanc mahaguhyatiguhyam
atisiiksmam bodhicittadhisthitam jnanam moksaya
satlvanam mantranam siddhisadhane santi-paustika-
karma ca / tatha vasyabhicarake , agrahyo bhagavan /
santah cittadhatus tathagatah / yatha puspe bhaved
gandhah tatha sattvahfdisthita vihared ardhayamika
vela paripiitya yathakramam agnivayavvamahendra-
varune pratimandale rakta krsna tatha pita sita caiva
samasata iti /
The following was said by the Lord in the Explanatory

Tantra : Yajrapani said, ‘‘Lord, what is said to be the
‘inner interval’ ?” The Lord spoke, “Yajrapani, the
‘inner interval’ is among great secrets still more secret,
highly subtle— the gnosis empowered by the bodhicitta
for the liberation of sentient beings, and the rites of appeas¬
ing and prosperity, so also, of overpowering and dominat¬
ing, in the accomplishment of siddhis going with mantras .
The Lord is imperceptible, calm; the Tathagata is the
realm of consciousness. As in the flower is perfume, so
in the heart of sentient beings dwells the half-watch interval,
in short, red, black, so also yellow, white, in sequence
according to their order, in the several mandalas (cakras
of the body), to wit, fire, wind, earth, and water.
The meaning of ‘half-watch interval’ is clear by the data under

nidana verse 12, that one recites each goddess in periods of 45
minutes. Therefore, the ‘red, black’ is two such periods or the
234
YOGA OF THE Cl’IIY ASAMAJATANTR A
1-j. hours constituting a half-watch; so also ‘yellow, white*.
It is of interest to observe that the sequence of jurisdiction hv

the goddesses over the four rites is the same order in which their
respective elements are said to arise in lunar months in the
information under nidana verse 8; and of course, the very reverse
of this order is the recitation sequence oi the tour goddesses.
The ‘hundred lineages’ authority for the four goddesses is

Guhyasamajatantra, Chap. XVII, p. 137 :
prthioi locana kkvata abdhatur mamaki smrta /

pdndarakhyd bhavet tfjo vdyits turd prakirtitd //
Locana is earth; Mamaki, water; Pandara, fire; Tara,

wind.
Tsori-kha-pa’s Pancakrama commentary (Vol. 158, p. 204) ;
“Among them, when dividing up the earth element Locana,

by external and personal, (a) the personal are : (1) the essence
of head hair, bone, excrement, liver; (2) the essence of body
hair, nails, pus; (3) the essence of teeth, skin, flesh(?); (4)
the essence of tendons, flesh, ribs; (5) the essence of filth, intesti¬
nes, bile;...and, (b) the external are: (1) Mount Meru;
and (2-5) the South, West, North, and Last Continents. The
five personal and external groups have in the given order the
Vairocana, etc. of Locana. (Vairocana, etc. means Yairocana,
Ratnasambhava, Amitabha, Amoghasiddhi. and Aksobhva).
“When dividing up the water element Mamaki, (a) the

personal arc: (1) phlegm, along with tears; (2) menses and
blood; (3)(semen); (4) lymph; (5) urine; and (b) the external
are: (1) waterfalls; (2) rivers; (3) springs; (4) ponds; (5)
oceans. Both groups have, in the given order, the Vairocana,
etc. of Mamaki.
“When dividing up the fire element Pandara, (a) the per¬

sonal are : (1-5) the heat of (1) the head, (2) the {secret) navel,
(3) all the limbs, (4) the belly, (5) the hcait (the chest?);
and (b) the external are: (1-4) fire from (I) stones, (2)
burning crystal, (3) wood, and (4) forests; (5) lire placed in
continual series (as in Divali ?). Both groups have, in the
given order, the Vairocana, etc. of Pandara.
VI THE TWENTY PERSONAL-EXTERNAL PAIRS REPRESENTING PARTITE REALITIES

OF THE FIVE TATHAGATAS WITHIN THE FOUR ELEMENTS_
Element-Goddesses:
Earth (Locana)
Water (MainakI)
Fire (Pandara) |
Wind (Tara)
Vairocana
head hair, bone,

excrement, liver
phlegm and
tears
head heat
vyana
Mount Meru
waterfalls
fire from stones

upper winds
Ratnasamhhava
body hair, nails,

pus
menses and
blood
heal of (secret)
navel
apana
South Continent
rivers
fire from burning

crystal
south winds
Amitabha
teeth, skin, flesh
(semen)
heat of all the

limbs
udana
West Continent
springs
fire from wood
west winds
Amoghasiddhi
tendons, flesh, ribs

lymph
heat of the belly
samana
North Continent
ponds
forest fire
north winds
Aksobhya
filth,
intestines, bile
urine
heat of the heart

(the chest) ?
prana
East Continent
oceans
fire placed in
continual series
cast winds
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY N1DANA VERSES 235

236 YOGA OF THE OUHYASAMAJATANTRA
“When dividing up the wind element = Tara, (a) the

personal are : (1) vyana, (2) apana, (3) udana, (4) samana,
(5) prana; and (b) the external arc: (1) upper, (2) south,
(3) west (4) north, (5) east—winds. Both groups have, in the
given order, the Vairocana, etc. of Tara.
“Granted that if one counts separately the personal and

external subdivision among the four elements it adds up to
twice twenty. Nevertheless while thus dividing the earth
element, etc. into personal and external elements, (for purposes
of ‘one hundred lineages’) the total is taken as twenty.”
Besides the above materials, which draw out the implications

-of nidana verse 15 in terms of the praxis in the Stage of Genera¬
tion, that niaana verse requires further annotation to explain
how those goddesses confer the enlightenment of the Buddhas
as a conceptualization in the Stage of Generation and as an
actual accomplishment in the Stage of Completion. Meharis
annotation suggests that the particular phase of the Stage of
Generation in which such a conceptualization takes place is
taught by nidana verse 19 which deals with the ‘subsequent
attainment*. There are two matters to be discussed : (1) the
conferring of enlightenment, (2) Meharis remark about ‘subtle
contemplation of the lower orifice’.
(1) One explanation for the statement that those goddesses

confer the enlightenment of the Buddhas is that the explanatory
tantra Caturdevipariprcehd , in the commentary of Smrti (PTT,
Vol. 66, p. 155-2), shows that the four steps of sadhana arc
identified with the four goddesses: 1. seva —Locana; 2.
■
upasadhana — Mamaki; 3. sadhana « Pa ntfara, 4. mahasa-
dhana — Tara. However, the chief explanation would be in
the Guhyasamdjaiantra , Chap. XV, the chapter devoted to dreams
and other auspices. Verses 32-34 can be understood as the
auspice of the later role of the four goddesses to be treated in
verse group ‘Diamond Ladies of the Heart’; those three verses
are here translated in Pradlpoddyotana context (Mchan hgrcl,
p. 123) :
jh&nasaltvaprayogena madhye bimbam prabhdtayet /

catuksthdnefu mantrajho yofitarp sth&payet sadd Jj
sandlahkarasanip urndm san'alakfanalakfitam /
padmaifi prasaritarp krtvd idam nuwtrarp vibhdvayet {(
237
II Hum If
pancaraimiprabham dtptam bhavayet yogam vajrinah f

kdyaidkcittavajrtfu pdtayan bodhim apnuyQt //
By the praxis of the Knowledge Being, he should contem¬

plate the image (of Mahavajradhara’s Body appearing
instantly) in the center (of the lotus). The mantra-
knower should always place the ‘lady’ (i.c. Locana, etc.)
in the four spots (corners, i.e. intermediate directions)
who has the full range of ornaments and who bears all
the (ladylike) characteristics. Ha^jng made the lotus
(of his own heart, svahrtpadma, and of the doors, mukha-
kamala) wide-open, he should contemplate this mantra :
II Hum (I
He should contemplate the blazing light of five rays as the

yoga of the vajrin. Falling into the diamonds of his body,
speech, and mind, it attains enlightenment.
The actual experience so indicated belongs to the phase Stage

of Completion with the praxis called ‘without prapaftca*
( nifprapanca , '1'. spros bral), which involves the experience of
the three light stages whether in the forward or reverse direction.
(2) The ‘subtle contemplation of the lower orifice’ is dis¬

cussed at length in Tsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on the Panca-
krama called “(idan rdzogs kyi dinar khrid” (PTT, Vol. 159,
pp. 120 and 121). It is the ‘arcane body’ as a practice in the
Stage of Completion; therefore it docs not involve experience
of the three Lights, which is called ‘arcane mind’ (cittaviveka );
rather, it is a preparation for that experience ol the Lights. The
‘lower orifice’ refers to the lower orifice of the central vein (the
avadhuti ), which Tucci ( Tibetan Painted Scrolls, I, p. 241) identi¬
fies as the perineum. In Tsoh-kha-pa’s work (op. cit., p. 120-2)
the ‘lower orifice’ seems to be equivalent to the ‘middle of the
gem’ (nor buhi dbtis) or ‘tip of the gem (nor baht rtse). In the
male this is the root of the penis. The ‘subtle contemplation’
(ibid., p. 120-4) involves contemplating at that spot a small
solar disk and on it a ‘drop’ (thig le, S. bindu) of substance having
three features : its color is blue; its shape is round; its size is no
bigger than a tiny grain such as barley and seen as the form of
one’s presiding deity (adhidera) brilliantly shining with five
rays. In the basic Tantra, this contemplation is alluded to
in Chapter Six, verse 15 (‘Documents’). In Tsoh-kha-pa’s
1238
YOGA OF THE CCHYASAMAJATANTRA
Mthah gcod on Chapter Seventeen (PIT, Yol. 156, p. 58-3),

the same spot seems to he called ‘site of the vajra’ (rdo rjehi sa
g$i), which he explains as ‘the lotus of the woman which is the
basis of the vajra (i.c. penis) in the sacral place’ (gsah gnas kyi
rdo rjehi rten yum gyi padma). In the light of this terminology,
when the yogin imagines there a bindu as above described, it
can be described mystically as depositing the seetl in the ‘woman’.
Accordingly, one could expect some different terminology in
the case of an actual woman. Such seems to be the implication
of Tson-kha-pa’s citation from the Vajtamdla (its chapter 16)
in his commentary on the Vajrajiidnasamuccaya (P I T, Yol. 160,
p. 153-4, and p. J54-1). The verse citation as follows is not
transparent :
j biah sgo gsah bahi dbtts na gnas /

l min ni ma skyes rtsa chen no j
I de yah mam ies dan bral ba !

j ye ies lus ni bdag med pa
j der ni skye ba srog gi mchog /

j srog chags rnams kyi mchog tu brjod I
It is situated in the middle of the sacral place by the
excrement orifice. Its name is ‘Great Unborn Root*.
It is free from vijhana. The Knowledge-Body, selfless,
is the best of life born there, and is said to have the best
of animated beings.
Tson-kha-pa’s commentary (based on Alarnkakalasa’s) ex¬

plains the ‘Great Unborn Root’ as the womb of the mother,
the place where one takes birth. It is unconscious, insentient
matter, hence free from vijhana. The Knowledge-Body of the
Intermediate State, which is selfless because devoid of any ego
substance that craves rebirth, so also devoid of the coarse body
(the vipaka-kaya ) that undergoes states, is the best of life born
there, and rides on the prana- wind which is the best of animated
beings. (That discussion may point to the yoga-praxis of a
woman as distinct from that of a man).
II II sarvatathagatah kdyai caturtnudrayd mudritah /

cakfuradyatmana tatra kfitigarbhadijinaurasdh If 16 //
Every Tathagata body is sealed by four seals. By means

of the eye, etc. identifications, in that (body) are the
Bodhisattvas Ksitigarbha, etc.
Mohan : The four seals arc the samayamudra of Mind, the
239
<lharmamudra of Speech, the mahamudra of Body, and the

karmamudra of Action. The Bodhisattva Ksitigarbha is imagin¬
ed in the eye; Vajrapani in the ear; Khagarbha in the nose;
Lokcsvara (or : AvalokitcSvara) in the tongue; Sarvanivaraija-
viskambhin in the body surface; MafijuSri in the mind ( manas -
indriya ). This is kdyaviveka in terms of the (six) sense organs
(indriya).
Prakaiika on SA, p. 293-4 : “The four seals {mudrd) have

the characteristic of attracting from that (realm of light),
drawing in, tying, and subduing. Some (Tathagata body)
does the attracting, etc. of the knowledge being ( jnanasattva ).
Also, the four goddesses, Locana, etc. are the four seals” ( / de
las dgug pa dah/giug pa dan / bciri ba dan / dban du bsdu
bah' mtshan hid can phyag rgya bgi poho / / gan gis ye ics
sems dpah dgug pa la sogs bya baho / / yah na spyan la sogs pa
bii po ni phyag rgya b£i stc /...)• Pancakrama, II, 50 :
prajiiopdyasamdyogdt jay ate devatdkrtih j
caturmudrabhir amudrya devatagarvam udvahan //
Through the union of prajha and upaya the configuration

of deities is generated —scaling with by four seals, conveying
the pride of divinity.
The following directions arc assigned to the eight Bodhisattvas

in the Aksobhya-mandala, translated prcsiously :
Maitreva and Ksitigarbha — Eastern pattika
Vajrapani and Khagarbha — Southern pattika
Lokesvara and Manjughosa — Western pattika
Sarvanivaranaviskambhin and
Samantabhadra — Northern pattika
The rite of imagining the Bodhisattvas in the respective

places is depicted in the Guhyasmndjatantra , first half of
chapter 11, where the emphasis is on the Mahamudra, or body
of deity.
In regard to the ‘lour seals’ of the mdana verse, the dharma-

mudra, samayamudra, mahamudra, and karmamudra, axe
explained in these passages of Tsoh-kha-pa’s Don gsal ba (PTT,
Vol. 160, p. 141-4): “The syllables Hum, etc. arc the dharma-
mudra (seal of the law). The thunderbolt (vajra ), etc. are the
samayamudra (symbolic seal). Aksobhya, etc. constituting
the circle of deities, are the mahamudra (great seal).” (Hum
la sogs pa ni chos kyi phyag rgyaho / / rdo rje la sogs pa ni
240
mtshan mahi phyag rgyaho / mi bskvod pa sogs pahi lhahi

îkhor lo ni phyag rgya chen poho / .... (According to one
view :) “The wondrous action accomplishing the aim of all
* sentient beings by diverse appearances ol the gods—is the karma-
mudra (seal of action).” (lha mams kyi gzugs sna tshogs kyis
sems can thams cad kyi don byed cin sgrub pahi phrin las ni
las kyi phyag rgyaho/).
Tson-kha-pa, “Rnal hbvor dag pahi rim pa,” Vol. 160,

p. 91-2: “The jurisdictional activity. . . .of the eight, Maitreya,
etc., is, in the usual order, purifying the (1) veins; purifying
(2-7) the sense bases of (2) eyes, (3) ears, (4) nose, (5) tongue,
(6) mind, (7) body; and purifying (8) the joints—of all sentient
beings. Thus the partite reality of the Bodhisattvas.” (The
order is seen by the assigned directions, above, or else by the
mchan note).
The ‘hundred lineages’ subdivisions in terms of the Bodhi¬
sattvas is based on Guhyasamajatantra , XVII, p. 137 :
/ vajra-uyatanany eva bodhisattvagryamandalam iti j

Precisely the adamantine sense bases arc called ‘best
mantjala of bodhisattvas’.
Tson-kha-pa, Pahcakrama commentary (Vol. 138, p. 204-4) :
“Among them, when dividing up the eve Ksitigarbha,—

(1) grasping the three kinds of form (cf. verse 19) by means of
the eye; (2) the white part around the pupils of the eye; (3)
form seen through a corner of the eye ; (4) movement of the
eye; (5) an eye organ no bigger than a grape or corn—have
in the given order the Yairocana, etc. of Ksitigarbha.
“When dividing up the ear= Yajrapani,— (1) the intrinsic

nature of the ear; (2) grasping the three kinds of sound; (3)
the ear orifice; (4) the ear root; (5) an car organ like a twisted,
cut-off ravine—have, in the given older, the Vaiiocaua, etc.
of Vajrapuni.
“When dividing up the nose■ = Khagarbha,— (1) the own¬

being of nose; (2) inside of nose; (3) grasping the three kinds of
odor; (4) orifice ol the nose; (5) nose organ like a thin spoon
for antimony—have, in the given order, the Yairocana, etc.
of Khagarbha.
“When dividing up the Lokesvara of the tongue,— (1) the

own-being of the tongue; (2) its root; (3) its lip; (4) grasping
the three kinds of taste; (5) tongue sense organ shaped like a
241
half moon—have in the given order the Vairocana, etc. of

Lokesvara.
■
“When dividing up the body < Sarvanivaranaviskambhin,—
(1) the sense organ of body; (2) the skeleton of the body; (3)
the own-being of flesh; (4) the own-being of skin; (5) grasping
the (three kinds of) tangible—have, in the given order, the
Vairocana, etc. of Sarvanivaranaviskambhin.
“When dividing up the sense organ of mind — Mafljusri,

where is gathered the three, Light, Spread-of-Light, and Culmi-
nation-of-Light —the five knowledges: (1) mirror-like, (2)
equality, (3) discriminative, (4) procedure-of-duty, (5) dharma-
dhatu—have the Vairocana, etc. of Mafijusri.”
VII. THE PARTITE REALITY OF THE FIVE TATHAGATAS WITHIN THE SIX SENSE ORGANS
The Six Senses

(Bodhisattvas)
Vairocana
Ratnasambhava
Amitabha
Amoghasiddhi
Aksobhya
eye
grasping the
three kinds
of form
white part
around the
pupil of the eye
form seen
through a
corner of the eye
movement of
the eye
eye organ no
bigger than
a grape
car
own-being of
ear
grasping the
three kinds
of sound
ear orifice
car root
car organ like

a twisted cut¬
off ravine
nose
own-being of
nose
inside of nose
grasping the
three kinds of
odor
orifice of the
nose
nose organ
like thin
spoon for
antimony
tongue
own-being of
tongue
root of tongue
tip of longue
grasping the
three kinds
of taste
tongue organ
shaped like a
half moon
body
sense organ of
body
skeleton of
body
own-being of
flesh
own-being of
skin
grasping the
three kinds of
tangible
mind
mirror-like
knowledge
equality
knowledge
discriminative
knowledge
proccdurc-of-
-duty knowledge
dharmadhatu
knowledge

243
II Rl'A If an anti ye lu tu,\(a vai hodhauijnmahabaldh j

tan digi idik-siabhdi rw bhujiidjaiigffu lakfayet fj 17 //
As for the mighty Fury Kings who run delighted, one

should depict them in their natural alx»dcs of the quarters
and intermediate directions and in the limbs such as the
arms.
JMchan : 'Who run delighted’ means that they subdue the hostile
spirits. This contemplation is ktlvaviveka in terms of the rakjfa
cakra, the protective circle.
The Furs* Kings are ten in number, as named in the Vajra*

mala, chapter 23. Their directions are stated in the Akfobhya -
mandala, body positions given in Nagarjuna’s Pindikrta-sadhana
66-67, taking Prajhantaka Aparajita, Padmantaka « Hayagriva,
Yighnantaka = Amrtakundali.
Fury Kings
Directions
Position in Body
1.
Yamantaka
F.ast
Right arm (savya-

bhuja)
2.
Prajnantaka
South
Left arm (apasavya-

bhuja)
3,
Padmantaka
West
Mouth (mukha)
4.
Vighnantaka
North
Face (vaktra)
3.
Acala
Agni (S.E.)
Right side (daksina-

bhaga)
6.
Takkiraja
Nairrta (S.W.)
Left side (vama-
bhiiga)
7.
Niladanda
Yayu (N.W.)
Right knee (daksina-

janu)
8.
Mahabala
Tsana (N.E.)
Left knee (vamajanu)

9.
U snisacak r a va r t i n
Above
Crown of head
(inurdhan)
10.
Sumbha(raja)
Below
Both feet (padanta-

dvaya)
Tson-kha-pa, “Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim
pa,” Vol. 160, p. 91 :
“The jurisdictional activity... of the ten. Yamantaka, etc.,

is, in the usual order, destroying (1) the demons of senses, etc.
(2) the demons of jama, ma-mo, etc., (3) the demons of song and
genius loci, (4) the demons ol yak*a, ganapatt, etc., (5) the demons
of agni , (6) the demons of nairrta, (7) the demons of v&yu, (8)
the demons of if ana, (9) the demons of brahma and deva t
244
YOGA OP THE GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
(10) the demons of stationary and mobile poison (c.g. of herbs

and of snakes, resp.), ndga, and genius loci. Thus the partite
reality of the krodhas.”
D. Tathdgata {Thus-Gone)
The last stage of sadhana , the Mahayoga, includes the two

samadkis called ‘Triumphant mandala’ and ‘Victory of the Rite’.
In the Guhyasamajatantra (Chapter One), the ‘Triumphant
mandala’ is the thirteen-deity mandala (Tsoii-kha-pa, Don
gsal ba t p. 144-1), because it is the revelation of the Buddha to
the retinue of Tathagatas. Similarly in this phase the master
reveals the mandala to the disciple, who is then initiated in it.
In fact, the Tathagata verses fall into two of Tatha for the
Triumphant mandala’ and two of Gata for the *\ ictory of the
Rite*. There are two interpretations of Tatha (the same way);
(a) displaying (the same way) for the sake of sentient beings
{fdddna verse 18); (b) ‘afterwards ... should dwell’ (the same
way) (verse 19). There are also two interpretations of Gata
(gone) ; (a) gone (as a divinity) to sense objects (for super¬
normal faculties) (verse 20); (b) gone, rendered up to, the
Tathagatas (verse 21).
There are five Tathagata families (Guhyasamaja, Chapter I,
p. fi) ;
dotjamohau tathd rdgai c mtaman isamayas tatha /

kuld hy ete tu vai pahcakdmamokfaprasddakah //
Hatred and delusion; likewise lust, wish-granting gem,

and symbol-pledge are the families. And they arrange
the liberation in terms of the five ‘desires’ (sense objects).
Mclurn frgrel (p. 26-5) : “Hatred ( dvefa ) is Aksobhya’s Family;
delusion (moha)j Vairocana’s; lust (rJga), Amitabha’s; wish-
g**nhug gem (eintdmani), Ratnasambhava’s; and symbol-pledge
■
( tanaya), Amoghasiddhi’s. ‘Liberation in terms of five desires
(sense objects)’ means the ultimate akfara-mahdsukha (incessant
great ecstasy).” According to our earlier indications (‘The
two stages’), the verse can be understood to mean that the
Tathagatas arrange in the Stage of Generation for the later
liberation in the Stage of Completion.
Also this literature attributes to each Tathagata a superinten¬

dence or empowering ( adhif(hdna) t Vairocana of Body, Amitabha
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDA.NA VERSES
245
of Speech, Aksobhya of Mind, Ratnasambhava of Merits

and Amoghasiddhi (called the kannandtha) of Acts
{karma).
Following is a summary of the ‘hundred lineages’ in terms of

the partite realities allotted to each Tathagata on three tables
in the previous group of verse comments and here under verse
19 :
Vairocana : Shape, impartial feeling, idea of the inanimate,

motivation of body, eye perception—among skandha -
Talhagatas. Head hair, etc. and Meru; tears and water¬
falls; head heat and fire from stones, vyana and upper
winds—among dhatu-mudras. Grasping three kinds of
form; own-being of ear, of nose, of tongue, of body sense;
and mirror-like knowledge—among six indriya-Bodhisattvas.
Barely visible form, sound inside ear, diffuse odor,
sweet taste, and tangible of sitting on mat—among five
vi}(iyavajrSs.
Ratnasambhava : Aspect, feeling from phlegm and wind, idea

of the four-footed, motivation of three realms, ear-percep¬
tion—among skandha-Tathagatas. Body hair, etc. and
South Continent; metises and rivers; secret navel heat
and burning-crystal fire; apana and south winds—among
dhatu-mudras. White part around cyc-pupil, grasping
three kinds of sound, inside of nose, root of tongue, skele¬
ton of body, equality knowledge—among indriya-Bodhi *
salivas. Form clung to, song, specific odor, astringent
taste, tangible of embracing—among lisaya-vajr&s.
Amitabha : Color, joy and suffering, idea of the footless, moti¬
vation of speech, nose-perception—among skandha-Tathd-
galas. Teeth, etc. anti West Continent; semen and springs;
heat of all limbs and fire from wood udana and west
winds—among dhatu-mudras. Form seen through eye-
corner, ear orifice, grasping three kinds of odor, tip of
tongue, own-being of flesh, discriminative knowledge—
among indriya-Bodhisatlvas. Form of three kinds, pleasur¬
able, etc.; palatal, labial, anti voiced sound; odor of
three kinds; salty taste; tangible of kissing—among vifaya-
vajras.
Amoghasiddhi : Lustre, feeling from sense contact, idea of the

multiple-footed, motivation of liberation, tongue-
246
YOGA OF THE GUH YASAMAj ATANTRA
perception—among skandha-Tathagatas. 1 melons, etc. and

North Continent; lymph and ponds; belly heat and
forest fire; samana and north winds—among dhahi-mudras.
Movement of eye, ear root, orifice oi the nose, grasping
three kinds of taste, own-being of skin, and procedure-
of-dutv knowledge—among indriya-ltodhisaHras. Form
accomplishing duties, nature's music, savory odor, sour
taste, tangible of inhalation--among viâya-vajrds.
Aksobhva : Unrepresented form, feeling from bile, itlea of the

two-footed, motivation of the mind, and body-perception
—among skandha-Tathagalas. Intestines etc. and East
Continent; urine and oceans; heat ol heart and fire in
series; prana and east winds—among dhdtu-nwhds. Eye
organ size of grape, ear organ like ravine, nose organ like
spoon for antimony, tongue organ like half-moon, grasping
three kinds of tangible, and dharmadhaiu knowledge—
among indriya-Bodhisattvas. Sensual form, incantations,
foul odor, pungent and bitter taste, tangible of copula¬
tion—among visaya-vajras.
ff TA (I tattatkulasamudbhutd deva devyah prtha»iidhdh /

na tt santi na tah santi sattiartham pratidarUtah (j 18 //
Of the different gods and goddesses generated by him and

his family, neither the gods nor the goddesses exist, but
are displayed for the sake of sentient beings.
Mchan : They do not exist separately : all those gods and

goddesses are unified in the family of Yajradhara. This is
ktyaviieka in terms of Mahaguhya Yajradhara.
The families are detailed at the end ol the Akfobhya-manrfala,

previously translated, but I follow here Xagarjuna’s commen¬
tary on the basic Tantra (Derge, Sa, 30a-1, fl’.). The Tatha-
gata families include the following deities :
Tathagata
Family Mother
Sen se Object
Vairocana
Locana
Rupavajra
Ratnasambhava
Mamaki
oahdavajra
Amitabha
Pandara
* •
Gandhavajra
Amogh aside! hi
Tara
Rasavajra
Aksobhya
(Mamaki)
Sparsavajra
Bodhisnttva
Ksiticarbha
• O
and Maitrcya
Vajrapani
Khagarbha
Lokcsvara
Sar van i vara na-

viskambhin,
Manjusri, and
Samantabhadra
Krodha
Yamantaka
and Acala
Prajnantaka
and Takkiraja
Padmantaka
and Nlladanda
Vighnantaka
and Mahabala
Usnlsaoakra-
vartin and
Sumbharaja
K>
4 *-
248 YOGA OF THE GlHYASAMAJATAN I KA
Those deities are all involved in what Bhavyakirti calls in his

commentary on the Pradipoddyotana (FI I, \ ol j). 275-2)
the 'Tantric options' {hdam kha), citing in this connection
Guhyasamdja , XIII, verse 56 4 second hemistich here considerably
emended) :
kdyavdkcittavajrais tu siamantrarthagu/ifna id
athavaufnifasamayai r ajmuakraprayojamvn
There is application of the ‘command-circle* ( ajhdcakra)

either by means of the diamonds of body, speech, and
mind; by the purpose and the merit of one’s own mantras ;
or by the pledges ol the uaii.ui.
According to the Pradipoddyotana on Chapter XIII (Mchan

hgrel ), p. 100-2, 3), the ‘command’ is used against the demonic
dements. When by the diamonds ol body, speech, and mind—
the five Tathagatas are meant; and the 'command circle be¬
longs to the goddesses, Locana, etc., of the five families. When
by the purpose and the merit of one's own mantras, i.e. the yogin
families of Vairocana, etc.—the associated eight Hodhisattvas,
Maitreya, etc., arc meant; the “command circle* belongs to
their purpose (artha) the maiuimiuinl form generated from the
five abhisambodhis in the phase of piathama-prayuga and belongs
to their merit ( guna ), the fierce aspect of Yajrasatlva arising
from the transformation of the Bodhisattvas in the phase ol
Victorious mandala\ When by the pledges ol the ufnha- -the
ten krodhas starting from Usnlsacakravaitin are meant; and one
applies their ‘command circle’.
Besides, the generation phase of nidana verse 18 can be illus¬

trated both by the method of Chapter One and by the method
of the master revealing to the disciple. In the first case, there is
Guhyasamdjatantra, Chap. I, p. 3 :
I at ha bhagaian bodhicittavajras tathdgatah

sanatathdgatakdyaidkcittaiajrasamayodbhai a-; ajram ndma
samddhirn samapadyandtn mahdi idydpuru.âm urtirn
sanatathagata-sattiddhi}(hanam adhi^thdnam adhi,\fhdt/aidm asal
samanantarddhiffhitamdtre sa fra bhagaian bodhiiittavajras
tathdgatas tr imukhakdrena sanatathagataih samdrsyate sma f
Then the Bhagavat, the vajta of bodhidtta , the Tathagata
(‘come’ or ‘gone* 'the same wav'), immersing himself in
the samadhi named Diamond of the Body, Speech, and
Mind of all the lathagatas and Diamond ol symbolic
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NJUANA VERSES
249
generation, blessed the body of the great incantation

person to have the blessing of the salivas belonging to all
Tathugatas. No sooner was that blessed, than the Bhaga-
vat, the vajra of bodhicitta , the Tathagata, was seen by all
the Tathagatas to have three heads.
Mchan hgrd (p. 22-5)— ‘Diamond of Body, Speech, and Mind,’

means respectively the syllables Om, Ah, Hum. ‘Diamond of
symbolic generation’ means deific generation through the five
abhisatnbadhis , namely, generating from those three syllables the
pair ‘hand symbol’ [Anuyoga] and ‘finished body’ [Atiyoga],
‘Great incantation’ means the three syllables; and the body of a
peison of those syllables means a mantra- body. The method of
generating is through the fourôgoj' called (a) yoga, (b) anu¬
yoga, (c) atiyoga, (d) mahayoga, which goes up through the
generation of the three salivas. ‘Seen to have three heads’
means seen by all the candidates in the world.
In the second case, there is Guhyasamdjatantra , X, p. 40;

Mchan hgrd, Vol. 158, p. 73-4, 5 :
svamanfrapurufam dhyatva catuhsthanefu rupatah f

trimukhdkdrayogcna trivarnena vibhdvayd //
Having meditated upon oneself as the incantation-person,

one should contemplate in the manner of form (bodily
color, hand symbol, etc. of Vairocana, Ratnasambhava,
Amitabha, Amoghasiddhi) in four places (the cardinal
directions) by way of three-faced aspect (the three, lust,
etc.; the three lights; and so on) and by means of the
three syllables (Om. Ah, Hum).
The second passage makes it clear that the three heads can be
understood as the while light, red light, and dark light respecti¬
vely of Light, Spread-of- Light, and Culmination-of-
Light.
Concerning the ‘sattvas* of the first passage, which Mchan

hgrel expands as the ‘three sattvas’, there is this passage in Naga-
rjuna’s Pm<fikrtasadhana (Rainakarasanti’s commentary, PTT
Vol. 62, pp. 80 and 81);
Om sarvatathagatakayavakcitiavajrasvabhavaimako ’ham
91. adhisthayaivam atinanam sasimandalamadhyagam

sadbhis cihnaih samayuktam cintct samayasattvakara
92. hrnmadhyasamsthitam suksmam jnanasattvam vibhavayct

samadhisattvasamjiiain ca humkaram taddhrdi nyaset
250
YOGA OF TIIF. GlIIYASAMAJAT\NTR \
93. nispadvaivam mahayogam uisaitvattnakam atmavan

ancna vidhivogena mahasadhanam arabhet
“Orn. I am tlie nature of tlu* liodv, Speech. and Mind
diamonds ot all the Tathagatav
Having in that wav empowered himsell. he should mntem-
platc a Svmbolic Being sama\asatt;a endowed with six
signs {vajra, etc., as listed in the Ai>obh',a-maudala and lor a-
ted in the middle of a moon-disk. I le should < ontemplate
as stationed in the middle of its heart a tim Knowledge
Being, and shotdd place in the lattei \ heart here, meaning
first at the crown of head a Hum referred to as a Con¬
centration Being samadhisattva . I lie sell-possessed
one in that way completes the Mahasoga identical to three
sattvas. With such a praxis of rite he should enterprise
the Mahasadhana.
The contemplation erf the three sattvas is stated brietly in Guhya-

samdja, Chapter XII, verses 46-47 'Documents' . Xagarjuna
refers to this portion of Chapter XII in his Guhyasamaja-maha-
yoga-tantrotpattikrama~sadhana-sutrameldpaka-ndma I’ l l . Yol. 61,
p. 274-2) and continues with a citation from Culnasanutja

Chapter XI, which apparently justifies tin- verse 92 of his Pindikrta-
sadhana. The Guhyasamaja verse is No. H> in that chapter :
khavajramadhyagam cintet vajraniandalam uttamam
nispadya stamanh apurmani liumkaratn cittasamsthitam
He should imagine in the middle of the diamond sky
the supreme diamond mancjala, and complete his Mantra-
purusa as a Hum formed of citta.
In Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras , pp. 29ti-7

(footnote), there is the citation from 1’admavajra's f ahikatikd
on the £ri-pdkarnaia : ‘‘The Dharmakava ol the \ngins is the
Samadhi Being; the Sambhogakaya, tin* Knowledge Being;
the Nirmanakaya, the Symbolic Being, because one creates
(those Beings) in direct vision in this world by means ol those
Bodies that way.”
In his Dkah gnad, Tson-kha-pa (Lhasa ed., Yol. Ca. f. 10a-t»)

shows the dissolution sequence of those same three sattvas, and
uses the term ‘article ot purification’ < ibvah «5t) which means
the affiliation to the three lw>dies of the Buddha as in the fore¬
going identification by Padmavnjra : "In the time of contem¬
plating the Stage of Generation, the arising of the 'articles of
251
purification being consistent with the sequence of dissolution—

the Samavasattva dissolves in the Jftanasattva; the latter dissol¬
ves in the Samadhisattva, whereupon (the yogin) enters the
tiada C-lcar Light, his gaze fixed thereon” ( j hskyed rim sgom
paid dus su sbyaii g$ihi hbyuh ba thim pahi ritn padanmthun
par dam tshig seins dpah ye ses seins dpah la thim 1 de tin he
hdzin sems dpah la thim pa nas na-da hod gsal la Jugs pahi
bar yah gnas tier dmigs pa gtod citi... ), Alamkakalaia’s
commentary on the Vajramala (Derge Kanju r , (Ji, f. 166b-3)
says, “The expression t ndda means the aspect of the A-letter”
(na-da ni fes bya ba ni A yig gi rnam paho).
Thus, finally the yogin reaches the extreme non~prapahca
(i atyanta-nifprapatuu ) in the letter A, wherein neither the gods
nor the goddesses exist.
if THA j} sthatavyam vifayifu osmQd yoginadtayadarfind /

hinamadhyapranUe$u jhanatrayamdarianot jj 19 //
Afterwards the yogin who sees the non-duality should be

dwelling upon sense objects ‘inferior’, ‘intermediate’, and
‘superior’ by seeing the triple gnosis.
Atchan : ‘Sees the non-duality’ means:—sees directly the non¬

dual knowledge of bliss-void (sukha-Sunya) while expetiencing
the three light stages.
Each of the sense objects is of three kinds according to the

Guhya±amajatanlra. Chapter VII; see B. Bhattacharv}a’s edi¬
tion. pp. 27-8: rupain vijnaya trividhain pujayet piijanatmakah,
etc. The three kinds are now to be stated as‘inferior’,‘intermedi¬
ate’ and ‘superior’.
The Atchan hgrcl on Praaipnddyotatia, Chapter \ II (Yol. 158,

p. 56-1) mentions that rupa is of three kinds—pleasurable,
repulsive or displeasing, and neutral. 1 hus, they correspond
to the prakrtis of the three lights ( three jnanas), i.e. ‘desire
—‘lust’ for pleasurable form; ‘aversion’—‘hatred’ for repulsive
form, while ‘indifference’ is said to be ‘intermediate’. Fur¬
thermore, ibid., p. 55-3, the ‘superior’ kind of the sense object
is the one seen as its own Buddha Family, and one should
have ‘desire’ for that kind. For example, the superior ‘form’
(rupa) is \ r airocana and the deities generated by him.
The idea here is alluded to in the Guhyasamdja , Chapter

XVIII, p. 158 (Sanskrit riled in history introduction):
The ‘desires’ (i.e. the live strands of desire, paheakdma-
252
YOGA OF THE QUHYASAMAjATANTRA
guna) ‘form’, ‘sound’, etc.—pleasurable, painful, and

neutral—continually generate in the heart the source
(respectively) of ‘lust’, ‘hatred’, and ‘delusion’.
Since the vogin experiences the three light stages, this is the
second kind of carya , the ‘non -prapafica' kind.
The ‘hundred lineages’ subdivisions in terms of deified sense

objects are based on Guhyasamdja y Chapter VII, verse 14 (edited
text corrected by authority of both Tibetan and Chinese):
jrupaJabdadibhir mantri devatd bhdvayet sadaj
The mantrin should always contemplate as a divinity
by means of form, sound, etc.
Tsoii-kha-pa, Vol. 158, p. 205-1, ff.: “According to that

( Guhyasamdja) passage, the arcane basis ( nben gzi) of the kaya-
viveka in terms of sense domains, is the five sense domains
(themselves); and the contemplation of those five as the five
diamantine goddesses ( vajrd ) is the kayaviveka (itself).
“Among them, the rgyu ba wind, based on the eye, assists

in seeing the five kinds of form; and when dividing up the
visible form = Rupavajra—when it (the wind) is based on
the set of three conditions {pratyaya, rkyen), (1) the barely visible
form; (2) that clung to; (3) that of the three kinds, pleasurable,
repulsive, neutral; (4) that one accomplishing duties; (5)
sensual form, namely, vulgarly carefree, playful, and coquet*
tish—have in the given order the five families, Vairocana,
etc. of the goddess Rupavajra.
“The mam par rgyu ba wind, based on the ear, assists in

hearing sound; and when dividing the heard sound*
Sabdavajra—(1) the sounds inside the ear, and those of the
head and its hair, (2) the sounds of song and (tinkling) orna¬
ments; (3) palatal, labial, and voiced sounds; (4) musical
sounds of glades, rivers, claps of the palms, drums of earthen
ware, etc., (5) mild and fierce sounds of syllables such as Hum
—have, in the given order, the five, Vairocana, etc., of the
goddess Sabdavajra.
“The yan dag par rgyu ba wind, based on the nose, assists in
the selection of odors; and when dividing up the smelt odor*
Gandhavajra—(1) a general odor, (2) specific odors, (3) the
three kinds of odor, (4) savory odor, (5) foul odor—-have, in
the given order, the five, Vairocana, etc., of the goddess
G andhavajra.
253
“The rab tu rgyu ba wind, based on the tongue, assists in
enjoying tastes; and when dividing up the enjoyed taste —
Rasavajra—(1) sweet, (2) astringent. (3) salty, (4) sour, (5)
pungent and bitter, tastes—have, in the given order, the five,
Vairocana, etc. of the goddess Rasavajra.
“The nes par rgyu ba wind, based on the torso, assists in enjoy¬
ing tangibles; and when dividing up the enjoyed tangible —
Sparâvajra—(1) that of sitting on a single mat, (2) that of
embracing, (3) that of kissing, (4) that of inhalation, (5)
that of copulation—have, in the given order, the five. Vairo¬
cana, etc. of the goddess Sparsavajra.”
The five ancillary winds, mentioned above successively by

their alternate names in Tibetan, are further treated under
nxdana verse 20.
VIII. PARTITE REALITIES OF THE FIVE TATHAGATAS IN
THE FIVE
, SENSE OBJECTS
<
Sense Objects
(Goddesses)
Vairocana
, i
Ratnasambhava
Amitabha
Ainoghasiddhi
Akyobhya
U
o
>
-J
Form
! barely visible
j clung to
of three kinds,
that accom- '
sensual form
PI
pleasurable,
plishing duties
etc.
Sound
inside ear
of song
palatal, labial
musical sounds
mild and fierce
<
>
and voiced
incantations’
V.
>
Odor i
diffuse
specific
three kinds
savory
foul
Tasic i
i sweet
astringent
salty
sour
pungent and
>
-J
>
bitter
VL
Tangible
| of sitting on
of embracing
of kissing
of inhalation
of copulation
7>
>
a mat j
255
//("*. I// gacchann asty indriyas lal tat svayatfi svavifayatjx pratij
dbhdsamdtrakam tat tad yad yad hidriyagocaram //20//
While each and every sense organ is going by itself toward
its own sense object, whatever be the sense organ and its
range, each of them is ‘light only’ ( dbhdsamatra ).
Mchan : ‘Each of them is light only* means that both the sense
organ and its range (goeara) is merely the combination bliss-
void along with the knowledge of the three lights.
Cf. Guhyasamdjatantra , Chapter XI (2nd half), beginning

with text, p. 46, line 12; now text, p. 47, Mchan hgrel , p. 80-1-5:
flrivajrasamayadhyanena trivajraketusamo bhaved ity dha
bhagavdn ratnaketuvajrahj
By the meditation consolidating the three vajras (here:

odors—pleasurable, repulsive, and neutral) one would
be equal to Three-Diamond Glory (Trivajrakctu)’—
so says the Lord Ratnaketuvajra. (Threc-Diamond-
Glory is hence the Bodhisaitva Khagarbha generated
in the nose by a Ratna-Om; compare niddna verse 16
above). (This meditation leads to supernormal
faculty regarding odor).
Likewise, Sanskrit text, p. 47: “By the meditation consoli¬

dating the three vajras (here : the three tastes) one would be
equal to Three-Diamond-Immeasurable” (hence the Bodhi-
sattva Lokesvara generated in the tongue by a Dharma Om,
and leading to supernormal faculty regarding taste).
Following is a summary of the five meditations that lead to

supernormal faculty (abhijhd) by consolidating the three vajras
( Guhyasamaja, XI, p. 46. 12, fi\, with corrections in names
of the Oni’s) : •
Three Vajras of
Bodhisaitva
Om by which
Organ in
sense objects j.e.

pleasurable , repulsive,
and neutral)
or Buddha
is generated
the abhijhd
which it is
generated
Sound
Yajrapani
Jiiana-Om
car
odor
Khagarbha
Ratna-Om
nose
taste
Lokesvara
Dhanna-Oni
tongue
tangible
Sarvanivarana-
viskainbhin
Samaya-Oin
body
(surface)
form
Yairocanavajra Trikaya-Om
eye
256
YOGA OF THE Gl'HYAS WlAjATANTR A
Pradipoddyotana and Mchan hgrel (p. 81.4) : “Previously, by

the stage of generation (utpatti-krama) one places the seed-
syllables and (merely) points to the accomplishment of the
five abhijna- s, because the Stage of Completion (sampanna-
krama) demonstrates the actual accomplishment.”
Guhyasamiija , Chapter XI, p. 48, and Mchan hgrel (p. 81-4) :
pahcaiulam mahdvajram pahcajialavibhufitamj
paheasthanaprayogena pahcabhtjhasamo bhacetH
By the praxis of the five abodes (the objects, form, etc.),
the great thunderbolt ( mahdvajra) (which cannot be
warded off) with five prongs (the five sense organs pierc¬
ing their objects like spears) adorned with five flames
(the five ancillary winds proceeding through sense orifices
to objects and returning as vehicles of vijiiana), would
be tantamount to the five abhijhd- s
Ancillary wind
Alternate name
and color
Passing through
which orifice
Piercing which
sense object
Naga
rgyu ba, red
eye
form
Kurina
rnam par
rgyu ba, blue
ear
sound
Krkila
yan dag par

rgyu ba,
yellow
nose
odor
Devadatta
rab tu rgyu
ba, white
tongue
taste
Dhanafljava
ties par rgyu
torso
tangible
ba, green
(surface)
Note : In the foregoing table
the order of the
ancillary winds
is the traditional order and the same in which they arc supjxised
to arise in the intrauterine states, lunar months (>th through
10th. The five colors are given by Tsori-kha-pa, Vol. 159,
commentary on Pahcakrama , p. 7-5-5, and ascribed to a precept
of Rje-hgos.
According to Mchan hgrel on Pradipoddyotana , Chapter XV,

verse 12 j, there is a dream auspice of the mundane siddhi :
jsarv&iahkHrasampumam surakanydm manoramdmj
jddrakam ddrikdni paiyan sa siddhim adhigacchatij}
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY N1DANA VERSES
257
When he sees the delightful daughter of the gods replete

with all ornaments, the lad, (or) the maiden, He gains
the occult power (siddhi).
As to where one practises those meditations:—
Guhyasam/]jaiantra , Chapter XI, p 48 :
•paivatefu vivikte\n nadtprasravanefu ca'

fSmaidnddifv api kiirvam idam d/tydnasamuccayam //
The set of meditations is done on lonely mountains,

at Mowing streams, and in cemeteries, etc.
Ptadipoddyolana on the above :
In hinted meaning (neyartha), ‘lonely mountains’ are

mountain peaks graced with flowers and fruit;‘flowing
streams' arc glades with flowing streams; ‘cemeteries,
etc.’ means (for the ‘etc.’) isolated tree, empty house,
temple, and so on.
(Note that the three main categories go with three kinds of

magical practice—a. appeasing deities, b. promoting prosperity,
c. destructive magic).
In evident meaning (mtartha), the ‘lonely’ of ‘lonely

mountains’ means free from reliance by other men, and
‘mountains’ can refer to maternal teamen. ‘Flowing streams’
arc frequented by all men, and so are the dissolute teamen.
Worldly persons are like ‘cemeteries’, and so these are
outcatte women, washerwoman, and so on.
(Note that they are the goddess in three forms : the mytholo¬
gical ‘Mother’, ‘Whore’, ’Devouring Karth*).
HI All tattadindriyamdrgena vifayarn prdpya sadhakah j

tathfn’atebhyas saknlam prinandya nivedayet //21 //
While the sadhaka is reaching the sense object by way

of this and that sense organ, he should make offering
completely satisfying the Tathagatas.
Alchan ; The verse indicates the secret state ol body ( kdya -

viveka ) consisting in contemplating the five sensory objects as
the adamantine goddesses (najni). Tsoh-kha-pa, “Rnal
hbyor dag pahi rim pa,” Vol. I<>0, p. 91 :
“The jurisdictional activity... ol Rfipavajra, etc,, is, in the

usual order, purifying the longings for form, sound, odor, taste,
(tangible); and then bring offerings to the Jinas as the pleasure
of form, etc. Thus, the partite reality of the sems-ma (the
vajrd ).” Mchan hgrcl , pp. 55 and 5G-I, 2:—For example, when
258
reaching the sense object ‘forms' by way of the eye, he offers

the lady Rupavajra, who is the m/£<?-wind, completely satisfying
Vairocana. An analogous offering is made in the case of the
other sense organs and sense objects, i.e.
Sabdavajra
to
Ratnasambhava
Gandhavajra
to
Amitabha
Rasavajra
to
Amoghasiddhi
Sparsavajra
to
Aksobhva
The goddesses arc also referred to as offering tlowers in

Guhyasamaja, Chapter VIII, p. 33 :
padmam pancaiidham j halt'd utpalam ca vicakfanah

jatikam triiidham kthd deiatdndm niiedaytt //
karnikarasya kusumam mallikay ulhikdm tat ha
karavirasya kusumam dhydtvd pujdm prakalpayet
A wise person, knowing the padma and the utpala , of five
kinds; and having prepared the three kinds of jdti, should
offer them to the gods. Having imagined the Karnikara,
Mallika, Yuthika, and Karavira flowers, he should con*
template them as worship.
Celu-pa’s Samaja-vftti (p. 185-4) explains that the five lotuses,

utpala , etc. arc the five goddesses of the senses, Kiipavajra, etc.;
that the three kinds of /a// are Dharmavajra who pervades the
three birthplaces; and that Karnikara is I.ocana, Mallika is
Mamaki, Yuthika is Pandora, and Karavira is Tara. The
Pradipoddyotana on Chapter VIII (op. cit.), p. 64-1, explains
that the five lotuses have the five colors going with the five
Tathagatas, and that jdti is made into three colors. Among those
words for flowers, jdti is the Jasminum grandillower ; Karnikara,
flower of Pterospermum acerilbliuin (Hibiscus mutablis,
with red flowers); Mallika, the Jasminum Zambac; Yuthika,
a kind of Jasmine; and Karavira, the Oleander.
II. STAGE OF COMPLETION
E. hdyaidkcitta (Body, Speech, and Mind)
In the introductory discussion of the four Tantras, it was

pointed out that the Anuttaravoga-tantra is preeminently
inner samadhi. This description is justified by the Stage of
Completion, which begins with nidana verse 22. According
to Guhyasamajat antra , XVII, p. 142:
caityakartna na kunita na ca pustakmdcanam /
mandalam naiia kunita na trivajragravandanam f /
He should not engage in the rite of caitya , or in the recita¬

tion of books; he should not make a mandala , or praise
the best of the three diamonds.
On the preceding, Pradipoddyotana in Mchan hgrel edition says

(PTT, Yol. 1">8, p. UiO-3) : ‘This refers to the great yog in
{ Mchan : ‘belonging to the Stage of Completion'). Regarding
his secret body, speech, and mind he should not engage
in the rite of caitya (e.g. circumambulation), including (pre¬
paration of) the site and (removal of) gravel, etc., because
it is not right ( Mchan : ‘for a person on the Stage of Completion
who himself is all Tathagatas’) to have craving for caitya- wor¬
ship; he should not recite books, because it is not right for one
who has aroused the spontaneous diamond recitation to lend
his voice to a different (recitation); he should not make an
external mandala, because when the mandala is one’s own body,
it is not a case of the (stationary) vurth-mandala ; he should not
worship the best of diamonds, namely, the irdvakas , pratyeka-
buddhas (concretely or their images), or the (image of) Samyak-
sambuddha, because it violates himself being all Tathagatas
(in the steady state of comprehending bliss-void);....’*
In this phase there is also the practice called ‘ vidyd-vrata *

(defined in Appendix III).
The authoritative passage is in the (iuhyasamajatantra , Chapter

XVI : ( Mchan hgrel, p. 147-2, 3):
kayavdkcittavajrdnam kdyai’dkcittabhdvanam /
svaruptnaiva tatkdryam evam siddhir avdpyate // 89 jj
tatrcdaqi svakdyavdkcitlavidydvratam f
260
VOGA OF THE GL'IIYASAMAJ ATANTRA
ja (amukufadharam bimbam silavartianibkatn mahat f

karayet vidhivat sarvam mantrasamvarasamvrlam II 90 H
kandamulaphalaih sarvam bhojyam bhaksyam samiicaret / 94A//
The task is the contemplation of a body, speech, and mind
belonging to (i.c. issuing Irom) the Body-. Speech-, and
Mind-diamonds and precisely like one's own appearance.
Just so is the siddhi (of Maha-mudra) attained.
Herein is the 'vidyavrata' of one's own body, speech, and

mind. The Great One, while in color, his (divine)
form (of Vairocana) bearing a crown of matted locks,
practises everything in ritual manner, restrained by
the wfjw/r/t-vow.
By means of bulbs and fruits, he subsists on all lood and

drink.
In Tsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on the Paficakramo (PTT, Yol.

159, p. 74-3, 4, 5), there is a lengthy discussion of what is meant
by the phrase ‘precisely like one's own appearance’. This
is frequently alluded to in Buddhist Tantra sadhanas by the
term ‘ svabha ’ (‘like oneself’). The solution appears to be that
the consort is one of the goddesses Locana, etc. having the same
dress as oneself as the yogin of one or another Buddha. The
consort is described in that Chapter XVI, verse 91, as the
‘sixteen-yeared girl’. The meaning apparently is that the
yogin is accompanied by a goddess-consort who has issued from
his own body, speech, and mind which have been identified
with the Body, Speech, and Mind of the Tathagatas. Tson-
kha-pa explains the phase as ‘without prapahea ( nifprapanca ).
Turning to the separate treatment of ‘kaya’, ‘vak’, and

‘citta’, according to previous indications the ‘arcane body 1
as pratydhdra and dhyana among the six members of yoga, is
treated under the ‘Kaya’ verses (sec §rl Laksmi’s comment
under ‘YA’). In that same Paiicakrama commentary (the
“Gsal bahi sgron me”), PTT, Vol. 158, p. 205-4, Tson-kha-
pa continues his discussion of the ‘hundred lineages’ of ‘arcane
body’ to show how to condense them into ‘elements’. Among
them, the 20 lineages belonging to the Vairocana-kula, that is,
from the lineage of r Bpa-skandha up to the lineage of the ‘tangible
diamond goddess’, arc condensed into the element of earth.
Similarly the 20 parts of Ratnasambhuva lineage are condensed
into the element of water; the 20 of Amitabha lineage, into
261
fire; the 20 of Amoghasiddhi, into wind; and the 20 of Aksobhya

lineage into the element of lijhana. Tsoh-kha-pa mentions
that the classification into five groups is further reduced into
three ‘secret* families by the method of including Ratnasam-
bhava in the kdya-vajra family of Yairocana; Amoghasiddhi
in the vag-vajra family of Amitabha; and the ‘sixth Tathagata’
Yajradhara in the citta-vajra family of Aksobhya. The three
families considered as three vajras when taken as indivisible,
yield the sixth adhideva Yajradhara, which is the ultimate of
kayaviveka (‘arcane body’).
The ‘arcane speech’ as prdnaydma, third of the six members,

is included in ‘YAK.’. Xagarjuna starts his five stages here,
with ‘diamond muttering’ (vojrajapa ). The praxis which
begins with YAK is stated succinctly by Tson-kha-pa in his
commentary on the Yajrajminasamuccaya , Yol. 160, p. 159-3;
“The generality in that regard is that the means of generating
the three knowledges (jiithta) has the inner (subjective) condi¬
tion of contemplating prdndyama and the outer (objective)
condition of resort to a mudra (‘seal*, partner).” He explains
the first as tlu; three kinds of prdnaydma based on three differently
located bindus (see under VAR), and the second as the genera¬
tion of the four ‘joys’ (sec under VA, verse 30). Therefore, the
goddess companion previously mentioned in connection with
‘vidyavrata’ has the function of helping the yogin generate
the four ‘joys’.
The ‘arcane mind’ as dharana, the fourth member, is included

in CIT-TA. Nagarjuna’s system is more explicit, because
it allows a whole krama, the ‘purification of consciousness’
(cittavtiuddhi), for CIT—the three light stages; and another
whole krama, the ‘personal blessing’ ( svadhifthana ), for TA—
entrance of the illusory body into the Clear Light.
II AVI // kdyatrayam samuddiyfaqi prthagbhdvena tayind /

ckdknrom punar yali nifpannakramayogatah It 22 H
The Protector (i.e. the Buddha) well taught the three
Bodies as being different. Moreover, their unity occurs
through the yoga of nifpanna-krama.
Mchan : (When the three bodies are taught to be different,

they are:) (I) Dharmakaya associated in the Clear Light
(of Death) with a goddess; (2) Sambhogakaya generated
from the five abhisambodhi as the ‘primeval lord’ ( adinatha );
262
yoga of thk gI hvas \m.\jatantra

(3) the latter converted into the Nirmanakaya. I his is taught
in the Stage of Generation.
Siehan : In the basic time, the unity occurs through) accomp¬

lishing the primordial body ddideha Irom wind-and-mind-
onlv belonging to the Clear Light ol death. Accordingly, in
the time of the path, there is the secret ol sam: pi-may a— accomp¬
lishing the illusorv body Irom uind-and-mind-only belonging
to the Symbolic Clear Light dpehi hod gsaP.
Mehan : In the case of the first krama the Stage of Generation ,

there is only a mental orientation to conviction, but the path
is lacking because there is no yoga of the three bodies. In
the case of the second krama. by yoga unifying the three bodies
it is not a matter of figments of imagination. I hese remarks
apply respectively to the two foregoing passages ol Mi hart
annotation).
This niddna \crse (‘K..V) and the next one {'LV) continue
and conclude the ‘arcane body’ [kayariieka of the foregoing
Stage of Generation. According to the Pradipaddyntana on
XII, 60-G4, and its Mehan hgrcl (‘Documents’,, the kind of
‘arcane body’ is called ‘purification afterwards obtained’.
This, then, is the reflex in the Stage of Completion of the pre¬
ceding praxis. Hence the commentators are allowed the
latitude of using the verse l KA ! and ‘YA’ to compare the two
stages in the matter of the innate body, which is the basis of
the present praxis rather than the coarse body seen by the eye
of flesh. ‘KA* can be understood as ptatydhara (‘Withdrawal’),
the first member. To show the continuity of the Stage of
Generation into the Stage of Completion, Pancakrama , 2nd
krama, 48*30; Sri Laksnu, Yol. 63, p. 27-j, ft*., has the following:
cittam tram stay am paint si am era iaiibimbai at
atha candram samdlambya vajracihnam prakalpaut
upayas tlcakam hy etad vajradyutpattiyogindm
candrarajiadisamyogdc cittacaitasasamgama h
prajhopayasamayogdj jdyate deratakrtih
eaturmudrabhir dmudrya devatagarram udiahati
He should so regard his own mind as itself like a
moon-reflection; then, he should imagine the ca/ra-sign
taking its support on the moon.
I hr (five)-pronged updya belongs to the yogins of (the Stage

of) Generation ot the raj/a^ etc. From the Generation union
COMMENT ARY ON THE FORTY NIDANA VERSES

265
of the vajra, etc. and the moon there (results) the Comple¬
tion combination of citta (=* prajna) and caitasa ( =*updya).
Front the union of prajna and upqya there arises the
configuration of deity,—scaling with four seals, con¬
veying divine pride.
The meaning of i vajra > etc.’ is shown under niddna verse 18,
referring back to the six signs listed in the Akfobhya-min<jlala.
Hence the above verses show the continuation of the Maha-
sadhana phase of the Stage of Generation into thr outset of the
Stage of Completion.
It is this union of prajna. and upaya that unifies the three

Bodies, according to Guhvasamdjatantra, IX, p. 36; Pradipodd-
yotana and Mchan hgrel , PTT. Vol. 158, p. 68-1 :
dvayendriyaprayogena sarvams tan upabhuhjayet j
idam tat sarvavajrdnam trikaydbhedyabhavanam //
By the union of the two organs (that oCvajra and of padma ),

he would enjoy all those (goddesses). This contempla¬
tion of the inseparable three Bodies (Dharma-, Sam-
bhoga-, and Nirmana-kaya) belongs to all *vajras *
(sadhakas of Buddhahood).
Furthermore, the Pradipoddyotana explanation of pratydhdra (‘Docu¬

ments’) brings in the three kinds of each sense object, and so in
turn, according to earlier explanations, is consistent with Pan -
cakrama . 2nd krama, verse 37; Sri Laksmi, Vol. 63, p. 26*5 :
rdgai caiva virago,i ca dvayor antar iti trayam /
dvindriyasya samapattya vajrapadmasamdgamiit //
Desire (= the middle knowledge), aversion ( — the first

knowledge), and ‘between the two’ (the combination of
the prior two)—are the three, (as symbolized) by union
of the two organs and by combination of vajra and padma.
But what is the meaning of having a mudra or partner in this

case ? Tsoh-kha-pa writes in his commentary on the Catur-
devipariprccha (Lhasa cd., Vol. Ca, Bhis Sus, f. 25a-6) :
/ dgotis pa lun ston las j j hdu its can dan hdu Ses med {
j sems can du b (r)tags hdi gnas pa / de mams rlur'i las byun
ba stc I j rlun las slar yan hgag pa yin / Us gsufis so / gnis
pa ni I j rlun dan sems kyis mo hi ggugs dan phohi gzugs sprul
nas gnas pa hi thabs ies miiam par sbyor baht rnal hbyor pa
mams la ni phyag rgya de did bbe ba then pohi go hphafi mchog
hthob pahi gnas su hgyur te /
264
YOGA OF THE Gl HYASAMA J AT\NTIt A
It is expressed in the Samdhii)dkat ana in t.tci, C.hupici II,

p. 236-1): “Those with this abode who are imagined
as ideational and non-ideational sentient beings, arise
from wind and again pass away in the wind.” Second :
the vogins who by wind and mind -only) materialize
the form of female and the form ol male, and unite the
means ( updya ) and insight (fnajnii) with abode, have
as the abode that very mudid whit h achieves the best
station of great ecstasy {mahdsukha ).
Also, the resort to a partner points to a celebrated verse ol the

PancakraiM) 2nd krama, verse 3b: &ri l.aksmi, \ ol. b3, p. 2<>-3,4:
sarvdsdm era mdydndm strimdyaira dii.yatt'
jhdnatrayaprabhcdo 'yam sphu turn alt aim takyyate i i
Of all illusions {maya), the illusion ot woman is supreme;
just here the variety of three gnoses is diflet cntialrd
clearly.
According to Sri Laksmi, the verse concerns differentiation of

the three gnoses by sequence of‘partner’ {mud) a) [phyag ray a hi
rim pas) as contrasted with the differentiation by sequence ot
'incantation* (manha) (snags kyi tim pas). According to Sri
Laksmi, ‘just here’ ( atra'ua ) means, according to the precepts
(man nag )—in the time of the Secret Initiation (guhya-abhi\cka) t
when the disciple is conferred the prajiiii by the guru ics rab
kyi dban gi dus su bla mas ses rab sbyin pahi slob mu. . . . ).
First, the bodhidtta drips down from the brahmarandhra aperture
in crown of the head); and, with non-apperception of the
thirty-three prakrtis f there is an instant of the gnosis of Light,
pure like moon-rays. Next, that bodhidtta pervades the elements
( dhatu ) of all the limbs ; and with non-apperception of the
forty prakrlis , there arises the gnosis Spread-of-Light, like snn-
rays. Then, that bodhidtta , spreads to tin* ‘tip’, the center of
the vajra {tdo rjthi dbus mo rtsemor...) in the male, the toot
of the penis); and with non-apperception ot the seven fnakttd,
there arises the gnosis (udmination-of-Light. like twilight.
Hence the word ‘clearly’ [spfui f am) in the verse line, “Just here
the variety ol three gnoses is differentiated death.” 1‘his
graphic description by Jsii Laksmi clarities tin* Initiation in
the conventional bodhidtta-nuuujala. According to the discussion
under niddna verse 15 ol the ‘subtle contemplation of the lower
orifice , when the bodhidtta arrives at the ‘tip of the icjia' it is
265
in the ‘lotus ot the woman', which is the ‘woman’ always in

that spot of the yogin. However, according to Sri Laksmi,
it is precisely here that arises the androgyne Culmination-
of-Light, which is the ‘dark light’. When the bodhicitta is in
that spot, presumably that place is what is called the ‘place of
androgynes'.
And if the preceding is not sufficiently mysterious, note the

Gahyasamdjatantra , XVII, p. 141:
dvayendriyaprayogena svaiukrbdiparigrahaih /
piijayet rid hi vat sarvdn buddhabodhim avapnuydt jj
By the union of the two organs, and by conceiving their
htkra, etc. (‘etc.’ rakta , etc.), one should worship all
(the Buddhas) according to the rules, and may attain
the enlightenment of the Buddhas.
On the preceding, Pradipoddyntana , Mchan-hgrd ed., Vol. 158,

p. 159-4, explains: This is the srcrct worship of the Body,
Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas ( sarvatathdgata -
kayavaktit/apujdraha\ya) . I'he verse says, ‘by the union of the
two organs,’ ‘meaning, by the union of diamond (rajra) and lotus
(padma) (Mchan : through the realm of deific brightness of
‘Father-Mother,’ yah yum gyis lhar gsal bahi hah nas). The
verse says, ‘by conceiving their sitkra, etc.’, means that one
conceives his own semen and the partner's ( vidyas ) menstrual
blood {rakta) becoming transformed into the (intrauterine)
states mcr-mcr-po, etc. {Mchan: the five states of the womb,
which are the five progenitors — Tathagatas, and then giving
birth to a son. nephew, etc., which one protects, nourishes, and
so on, according to the rules. Thereby one worships and
obtains.)
Having been brought into existence, they (the Tathagatas)

arc made to lose their individual life. They arc said to have
been engendered by sexual union and finally killed. This is
the message of Chapter VII. context of verse 33, here translated
from corrected Sanskrit with the help of Pradipoddyotana and
Mchan hgrcl , p. 59.
tatra katham samaydnusmrtibhdiana ?
: s a may at kfarendui idhind lid hi vat phalakamkfinah f

/ mar aye t tathdgatam vyuham sutardrn stddhim dpnuyat jf
And what is the contemplation with recollection of the union?
In the manner of the rite of overflowing drop from the
266
union, after desiring the fruit according to the rules, one

should kill the Tathagata array and obtain the highest
siddhi.
According to the Pradipoddyotana, the diverse deities by the

sequence of re-unification arc drawn into the Paramartha-
mandala.
But that union of prajiid and updya is not the union of the
two sex organs. Indrabhuti writes in his Jnanasiddhi (GOS
ed., p. 57):
sukham dvindriyajam kecit tattvam dhur narddhamdh j

tac cdpi mahdsukham naivam pravadanti jinottamdh //
pratityotpadasambh 5tarn na tattvam jdyate kvacit /
Some vile men say that the pleasure born from the two
(sex) organs is reality (tattva). But the Buddhas deny
that it is Mahasukha. Nothing engendered in Dependent
Origination is reality.
Along the same lines, it is said in the Hevajrat antra (I, x, 40c-d;
41a-c):
jtasmdt saukhyam na tattvdkhyam mahdbhutarnyatah sukham /

/ sahajatyam yad utpannam sahajam tat prakirtitam f
( svabhavam sahajam proktam...
Whenever pleasure is of the Mahabhuta sort (i.c. derived

from the four elements), then the pleasure is not called
‘reality’. Whatever (pleasure) arises in ‘together-birth’,
that is called ‘together-born’. The self-existent kind is
said to be ‘together-born’.
The Shags rim chen mo , f. 288a-2., quotes the fifth mahjari of Abha-
yakaragupta’s Amnaya-mahjari : “Thus, the reality arising from
the ‘together-born’ (pleasure)is the bodhicitta that is the insepa¬
rability ot voidness (Sunyata) and compassion (kartirui)'* (/de
ltar lhan cig skyes pa las bvun bahi de kho na nid byah chub
kyi sems ston pa Aid dan shin rje dbycr mod paho ;').
That terminology which seems to imply an external con¬

sort of a woman, and vet which is denied to so intend, is partially
explained by Tson-kha-pa in his Pahcakrama commentary “Gsal
bahi sgron me” (PIT, Veil. 159, p. 77-4) :
/ phvag rgvahi khyad par ni spyod bsdus las■ de bas na

phyi rol gvi bud med spans nas snin khar gnas pa hi ye
scs kyi phvag rgya dan lha cig sftoms par hjug nas sin tu
mNair bar rdo rje hchan thob par L byaho snam du dmigs.
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY N11JANA VERSES
267
to / pu kho nar spyod pa bya bar gsuhs pahi yc ics

k% i pli\ag rgyaho
The superior mudni is the jaattamudra (‘knowledge consort’)

referred to in the Caryumrlapaka {-ptadipa ), when it says :
Therefore, he bears in mind, that spurning an external
woman and entering into union with the jiianamudra
located in the heart, lie will speedily attain (the rank of)
Yajradhara: so he is to practise in complete
solitude.
Mtharr. Concerning that (unifying) path, the phase in which

it occurs is now stated :
"V. iff J'dt so ham samvrtih proktam buildhanam kayalakfanam j

sa t’fo ni^pannayoga (//) syiit prabhasratai iiuddheh 23//
Whatever body characteristic of the Buddhas has been
stated to be ‘conventional truth' (samerti-safya), the
ni\pannayaga would be it through purification in the Clear
I -iglit.
A It han: ‘Whatever bodv characteristic’ means:—bodv orna-

4 •
mettled with the major characteristics and minor marks of

Yajradhara. ‘Stand to 1 m* conventional truth’ means: — stated
as the illusory bodv m<h3-deha) . That ‘ m^pannayoga' means: —
that yoga unifving the three bodies, of the Stage of Completion
(sampanna-hama - ni'pamui-hama .
There are two kinds of mm3 to lx* considered in this case.

T he following passage (laiities that nidana verse 23 refers to the
first kind of maya-
Paiicakrama. 3rd verses 2o-27 with emendations); Sri Laksmt,

Yol. 63, p. 38-3, 5 :
iyatn na hi samiakya m3yanirdeialak<ana /

may aim samvrteh safyam kayah sambhogasyapi ca //
saiva gandhanasattrah syad rajrakayah sa era hi f
lajrasattrah siayam tasmal srasya pujam prarartayet
For the characteristic describing maya is precisely a thing
to be differentiated : that very maya as the truth of con¬
vention, and as the Body ot Sambhoga.
That very maya could be a gandhan asattra , as well as

the ‘diamond ImkIv* {rajra-kaya .
Therefore, Yajrasattva prompts by himself his own

worship.
Sri I.aksmi pp. 38-5 to 39-1): Yajrasattva, being all the
268
Buddhas, worships himself when those Buddhas honor him. The

worship (puja) is to be conducted with pratyahara and dhyana t
and not with any other stages” (mchod pa ni van so sor sdud
pa dan / bsam gtan dag gis bya ba yin te / rim pa g2an gyis bya
ni ma yin no).
Tson-kha-pa discusses the differentiation of these two

kinds of l M6ya in his M/hah gcod on Chapter One (PIT, Vol.
156, p. 26-4, 5); and to get the point one should refer back to
the table in our section ‘The Two Stages,..,’. On the line
‘Intermediate State’ under ‘Time of the Path’ there is Illusory
Body and Yuganaddha-deha. The Illusory Body as the ‘truth
of convention’ (samvrti-satya) is that ‘gandharvasattva’; and
the Yuganaddha-deha as the Sambhogakaya is that ‘diamond
body’. In the first case, the state of ‘maya’ lacks the ‘precepts’
of skill in the means (thabs la mkhas pahi man wo?) and so in the
condition of gandharvasattva is headed for rebirth, i.e. rcoccupa-
tion of five personality aggregates in the ordinary way. In the
second case, the ‘maya’ is attended with the precepts of skill
in the means involving the winds and mind-only, and so the
diamond body can appear in the world as a Nirmanakaya.
An important point about the terminology is that the illusory
body can be called the diamond body when there is present
the precepts of skill in managing the situation.
Concerning the major characteristics and minor marks,

I abstract these, with the latter commenting on the former—
drawn originally from Sakyamitra’s Kosalalamkara —as present¬
ed in my article “Thirty-two Characteristics of the Great
Person,” in most cases omitting the presumed original Sanskrit
terms in the following:
Associated with the characteristics ( lakfana ) ‘each hair

of the head curled to the right* ( ekaikakeia pradakunavarta ) and
having a proof of authority on the head’ (ufrtifa Siraskata) are
the twelve secondary distinctions {anuvyafijana ): head umbrella-
shaped, curly tips on the head hair, hair of head thick, hair
of head black, hair of head fragrant, hair of head not disorder¬
ed, hair of head not shaggy, hair of head lovely, hair of head
soft, hair of head glossy, hair of head regular, hair of head appear¬
ing like bees.
Associated with the characteristic ‘treasure of hair’ (urna-

koia) are the eight secondary distinctions: forehead large,
269
forehead un wrinkled, cyc-brows black, rye-brows like Ixwvs,

eye-1 nows long, cyc-brows ol uniform hair, cyc-brows of equal
width ?). nose prominent.
Associated with the characteristics ‘eyes dark blue* and

‘eye-lashes bovine', are the live secondary distinctions : eyes
as though smiling, eves large, eyes clear, eyes long, eyes
pure.
Associated with the characteristic ‘jaws leonine* arc the

secondary distinctions : ears uniform, ear flaps thick and
long.
Associated with the seven characteristics ‘tongue long and

slender', ‘voice pure’, ‘teeth very white’, ‘teeth without gaps’,
‘teeth 1(1 iu number*, ‘teeth equal in size’, and ‘taste perfect*
are the six secondary distinctions : face sweet-smelling, lace
leonine, lips red like the Bimba fruit, cvc-tecth regular, eye¬
teeth sharp, disk of lace circular and broad.
Associated with the characteristic ‘shoulders gently cur¬

ved’ is the secondary distinction : throat like the neck of a
flask.
Associated with the eight characteristics ‘standing, not

bending himself, 'hands which hang low’, ‘skin delicate’, ‘skin
of golden hue.', 'upper part of body leonine’, ‘broad-shouldered,*
‘rounded like a B.mv.ui tree’, and ‘seven mounds on his body’,
are the eighteen secondary distinctions : veins not showing,
joints not showing, joints as strong as those of Xarayana, body
clean, body not crooked, body regular, body well-rounded, body
smooth, members and limbs well-proportioned, body well-
controlled, body soft, whose signs arc consummated, abdomen
well-rounded, abdomen without folds, belly slender, abdomen
as though polished, body devoid of freckles or dark spots, ever
beautiful.
Associated with the characteristic: ‘secret of privities drawn

into a recess' are the three secondary distinctions: navel deep,
navel well-rounded, recess of navel fillcd-up.
Associated with the characteristic ‘legs like those of an

antelope* is the secondary distinction, knee-caps well-rounded
and beautiful.
Associated with the characteristic ‘each hair of body turn¬

ing to the right side’ is the secondary distinction, each hair pore
emitting delightful perfume.
270
YOGA OF THE Cl IIV ASAMAJATANTRA

Associated with the characteristic ‘tinkers and toes long’
are the six secondary distinctions: nails elevated, nails copper-
coloured, nails smooth, fingers and toes well-rounded, fingers
and toes full, fingers and toes regular.
Associated with the six characteristics 'hands and feet

marked by a wheel rim’, ‘feet well-planted*, ‘hands and feet
soft and tender', ‘webs joining (the fingers and toes on his
hands and feet’, ‘heels broad', and ‘ankle joints inconspicuous*,
arc the seventeen secondary distinctions : lines in the hands
non-intcrinittcnt, lines in the hands alike, lines in the hands
deep, lines in the hands not crooked, lines in the hands glossy,
palms and soles red like copper; on his hands, the lion’s seal
(sitfihasana), fish (tnina), banner of victory ( dhvaja ), thunder¬
bolt (vajra), the hook (ankuSa), the flask (kataui ), the Xandva-
vartta, the §rivatsa, the conch six'll (Sankha), the lotus padma ),
and the Svastika.
It is obvious that the characteristics and secondary distinc¬

tions (minor marks) as presented by fcakyamitra are ordered
by starting from the top of the head and proceeding down to
the legs, and showing last of all the pores, hands ami leet. His
minor marks go with a static figure and appear to suit the Buddha
as a great yogin.
IjVAh' ’ vakpathasyaiva tifayah kayo jnanamnyah prabhuh

sarvasattvahitac cdpa drSyatc sakraedpaiat 24//
‘The speech-path's topic, (namely) the - Lord — the body

made of knowledge — is seen like a rainbow, as well as
apart from the benefit of all sentient beings.
Afchan : ‘The speech-path’s topic’ means :— the topics of

‘illusion’ (widy<Z), etc. conveyed to the disciple. . . .Those remarks
teach the ‘illusorv body’ (maya-dcha) to be the body of Vajra-
dhara, a rainbow body — the hotly ol'knowledge born from wind-
and-mind-only of the Clear light.
In regard to the words ‘as well as apart’ (ca-apa), which

were not translated into Tibetan, cl*. Guhynsamaja , Chapter
XVII, p. 134; Mchan hgrcl, p. l53-f>:
svabhdialuddhanairdtmyc dharvxadhatuniraUn c j
kaipanii vajrasanibhutd glyatc na ta giyatc If
The imagination arisen from the vajra («f Bodv, Speech,
and Mind) expresses in the case of the selflessness(-- Clear
Light) of the intrinsically pure (moving and stationary
271
life), and also does not express in the case of the full womb
of dharmadhatu (with the vajra of bodhicitta).
Pradipoddyotana and Mchan hgrel : — ‘expresses’ because it can
appear like a rainbow, then teach the dharma ; ‘does not express*
because discursive analysis docs not reach reality.
The above appears to explain the two alternatives of

verse 24, to wit: (1) ‘seen like a rainbow,’ and (2) ‘apart from
the benefit’. Furthermore, since the ‘illusory body’ when
purified in the Clear Light is the Sambhoga-kaya located in,
or made to correspond to, the ‘speech center’ of the throat,
verse 24 alludes to this by saying “the speech-path’s topic,
(namely) the Lord.”
The Guhyasamdjatantra , Chapter III, has two celebrated

mantras which point to the rainbow body of Vajradhara. The
first (III, p. 14) begins the chapter :
atha bhagavan kayavakeittavajras tathagatah sarvatatha-

gata-spharanameghavyuham nama samadhim sama-
padyedam vajravyuham nama samadhipatalam udaja-
hara /
// 0X1 SCM'A TAJXAXA I ’AJRASVsIBHAVATMAKO
"HAM H
Then the Bhagavat, ‘Diamond of Body, Speech, and

Mind’, the Tathagata, immersing himself in the samadhi
called ‘array of clouds with the vibration of all the Tatha-
gatas,’ proclaimed this samadhi-mass named ‘diamond
array*:
“Om. I am the intrinsic nature of the knowledge

diamond of voidness !”
The second (II, p. 15) runs as follows :
atha bhagavan kayavakeittavajras tathagatah dharma-

dhatusvabhavavajram nama samadhim samapadyedam
kayavakeittadhisthanamantram udajahara /
// OM DHAR.\IADMATL'SVABHAl'AT.\IAA'0 ’HAM //
Then, the Bhagavat, ‘Diamond of Body, Speech, and
Mind’, the Tathagata, immersing himself in the samadhi
named ‘intrinsic-nature diamond of the dharmadhatu
( = Clear Light)' proclaimed this mantra which blesses
the body, speech, and mind ;
“Om. I am the intrinsic nature of the Dharmadhatu !”
In the ‘evident meaning’ {nitartha) interpretation of th cPradipo-
272
YOGA OF TIIK G l*II Y AS A M A J A TANTRA
ddyotana , both mantras incorporate (In* live Tath.igatas and a

sixth Buddha; in die former ease, identified with the five winds
by name, and the sixth (Ahum) identified with \ ajrasattva,
who is the incessant bindit of tiro heart (.Mcfian h"tel p. 35-4);
in the latter ease, identified with the five winds by the colors,
constituting the rainbow of the verse. ‘\ AK , and the sixth,
(Aham) identified with Yajradhara, as the gnosis of the Supreme
Entity. In illustration let me translate the second mantra,
according to nitartha (/’/adipoddyof ana , Mchan ligrel edition
PTT, Vol. 158, p. 3<>-2 :
Then the. Bhagavai, 'Diamond <d Body, Speech and Mind

( = Yajradhara), tin* lathagata, immersing, himself in
the samudhi (gazing at the Clear Light) named 'intrinsic
nature diamond of the dhanuadhaln ( Clear Light)
proclaimed this mantra which blesses the body, speech,
and mind :
OM—(Yairocana as a bluc-ra\cd wiml serving as the

mount of the gnosis of the Clear Light of the [Absolute]
Object).
DHARMA—(Ratnasambhavu, as a ycllow-vayed wind .

DHATL t —(A mitfibha, as a red-rayed wind).
SYABHAYA— (Anmghasiddhi, as a green-rayed wind).
ATMAKO—(Aksobltya, as a white-rayed wind).
AHAM—(Yajradhara, that gnosis itself of the Clear

Light of the [Absolute] Object).
Mchan hgrel on the preceding : "This mantra expresses both the

gnosis of the Clear Light of the Absolute Object and the five
rays of wind which arc its mount.'*
Since ‘YAK’ refers in the praxis to the "diamond mutter¬
ing’ a brief indication is given now about that. Mihan hgrcl,
p. 51-4-1, on Chapter Six ('Documents’), mentions that verses
15-18 concern the subtle yoga of the. Stage of Completion, of
which verse 15 is here repeated with Sanskrit :
nilotpaladalakdram pahcaJ ulam ; iicâtah i
yaiamdtram prayatnena ndsikagre ; iemtayet
He should imagine with perseverance at the tip of tiis
nose a five-pronged (thunderbolt) appearing like a blue
lotus petal and in the advanced degree the size of a tinv
barley grain.
The Pradipuddyotana and Mchan hgrcl clarify that the tip of the
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NtOANA VERSES
273
nose (among the three possible ones in the Stage of Comple¬

tion) here meant is the one in the sacral place, now identified
as the ‘tip oi the gem’, i.e. the root of the penis (the svadhi-
sthana-enkra of the Hindu tantras). And in the advanced
degree (I'ifcfatab), he. reduces the lotus to the size of a tiny
barley grain. According to verse Ifi, the yogin then imagines
the red cight-])ctalled lotus of that cakra, no bigger than a chick¬
pea, which is the lotus of the vogin’s ‘woman’, his own dharmo-
daya (‘source of dhannas’). Verse 17 mentions the still more
subtle contemplation of a wheel therein. Finally (verse 18),
the yogin can draw forth the ‘Dharma word marked with body,
speech, and mind,’ consistent with the nidana verse ‘VAK\
I he theory that the yogin's ‘woman’ is found at the base#of
the penis seems parallel with the womb in the woman found
at the end of the vaginal tube. The Buddhist Anuttarayoga-
tantra seems concerned with the symbolism of that base in the
male and that womb in the woman rather than with what res¬
pectively leads up to them.
llCFTil cittam caitasikdvidyd. prajiiopdyopatabdfttkan . /

iunydtiiunyamahdsunyam iti cdpi pragiyatc / f 25//
Thought (citta), thought derivative (eailasika), and

nescience (avidya) arc also called respectively. Insight
'jtrajnd). Means (updya), Culmination (upalabdhika) ;
as well as Void (Sunya), Further Void {aliiuaya) , and
Great Void ( mahdittnya ).
Pancakrama, 2nd krama. 7 :
alokaf iunyam prajnd ca cittam ca paratantrakam j

Light is Void, is Insight, is thought, is dependence
(paratantia).
Ibid., 2nd krama, 13 :
alokdbhduim it) uhtnm atiS unyam upayakam ,

parikalpitam tathd proktam proktam caitasikam tathd //
Spread-of-Light is Further Void, is Means, also called
‘imagination’ ( parikalpita ) and called thoughtdcuvatise .
Ibid., 2nd krama, 23 :
a lukasyapaIabdh ii ca upalabdham tathaiva ca >

parinifpannakam caiia avid) d caiva ndmatah //
The Culmination-of- Light, likewise ‘the culminated’ also

named ‘perfection’ ( patinifpannaka ) as well as nescience
{avidya).
274
Tsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on Pancakrama , Vol. 159, p. 31-2

Synonymous terms lor the Three Lights: ... those three
(i.e. firajrla, updya, and avidya ); the three citta, mantis,
vijndna ; the three, paiikalpita , paratantra , par in if patina;
the three, hatred, lust, delusion; and the three svabhdvas.
Among those, upaya is Spread-of-Light, prajnd is Light,
the combination of those two as hermaphrodite (or and¬
rogyne) is Culmination-of-Light. Among the two, ecs¬
tasy and void, ‘Light’ is the preponderance of void men¬
tality ( buddhi ); ‘Spread-of-Light’ the reverse thereof;
‘Culmination-of-Light’ those two (ecstasy and void)
in equal parts.
tfsoh-kha-pa’s commentary on the Pancakrama called “Gsal

bahi sgron me” (PTT, Vol. 199, p. 31-4) faces the prob¬
lem of why the three lights have as synonyms the terms pari -
kalpita , paratantra , and parinifpanna (which arc the well-known
three svabhdvas or three lakfanas of Yogacara terminology).
The following explanation may have been developed in Tibctau
traditions :
/ rim Ina las / snah ba ggan dban dan / inched pa kun
brtags dan / her thob la yoris grub tu gsuhs la / dc ltar
bsad pa ni gzuh hdzin ghis rgyahs died du snah bahi
snah ggi ni g£an dbah dan / de ltar snah ba la brten nas
gsun hdzin rjes tha dad par sgro btags pa kun brtags
dan / hgyur ba med pahi yohs grub union du byas pahi
dor / kun brtags daii g his snah ghis kas dben pa bitin du
stoh pa mams kyi thog mahi g£i snah ba dan / de la
brten nas mched pa hbyun ba dan / her thob kyi tsho
sha ma ghis ka log nas thobs ses gnis ka log nas thabs
5es ghis ka log nas thabs ges mham par hjug pahi ehos
mthun la brten nas yin nam sham stc dpyad par byaho /
The Pahcakrama says (respectively at II, 7; II, 15; and II,
23) that Light is paratantra (‘dependent’), Sprcad-of-
Light is parikalpita (‘imaginary’), and Culmination-
of-Light is parinifpannaka (‘perfect’). One should ponder
whether this is the explanation: The basic Light which
shines when severing the distance between the thing per¬
ceived and the perceiver is ‘dependent’. Having in that
way taken recourse to Light, the subsequent difference
between, and affirmation of thing perceived and perceiver,
275
is ‘imaginary’. The casting away of the two lights—

‘imaginary’ and the other light—has incessant ‘perfect’
immediacy. Therefore, according to the particular
secret state: — Light is the initial basis of the voids; on
that basis Sprcad-of-Light arises; and at the time of
Culmination-of-Light, having averted the former two—
i.c. having averted both 'means’ and ‘insight’, one takes
recourse to the common dharma of uniting ‘means’ and
‘insight’.
The three lights constitute the fourth of the five signs pre¬
sented in the Guhyasamaja , Chapter XVIII and included in
Candrakirti’s comments (‘Documents’, PART ONE). The
first sign, a mirage, manifests through dissolution of earth into
water. The second, smoke, through dissolution of water into
fire. The third, fire-flies, through dissolution of fire into wind.
The fourth, a changeable lamp, through dissolution of wind into
the three lights. Through sequential dissolution of the three
lights, there is the fifth sign, the Clear Light like a cloudless sky.
Vitapada, in his commentary Sukusuma-ndma-diikrama-tattra-
hhaiana-mukhagama-irtti (PTT, Yol. 65, p. 58-4, 5) explains the
signs in accordance with the preceding puinayama involving the
bindu:
Now, what happens at first when that yogin turns back

his discursive thought ( likalpa) ? He should know that
at first there is the sign which is a manifestation like a
mirage. One should understand that phase this way:
the rays from that bindu have a pattern both bright and not
bright, appearing like a mirage. This is an illusory
appearance allowed in one’s stream of consciousness that
should be warded off, because one is attached to it if he
has the pride of thinking that he knows the sign. The
same applies to the others. It is like smoke when brighter
than the mirage, while lacking colors such as green, white,
and so on. The ‘fireflies’ or lights in space, are brighter
than the smoke and of different type. The sign ‘shining
like a lamp’ is superior to the fireflies and of different
type. Those are seen in the manner of rays, with each
one brighter than the preceding one. Concerning the
phrase, “like the meaning of non-duality of the profound
and the bright,” the body is considered to be like smoke,
276
YOGA OF THF. GUHYASAMAJATANTRA
because it is not genuine. Moreover, what is the mani¬

festation ? “Bright like a cloudless sky” means a cloud¬
less sky that manifests with special brilliance.
The above shows the difference between the ‘Arya’ and the
*Budd haj ft a n a pa d a ’ schools of the Guhyasamaja. The ‘Arva*
tradition understands the mystic signs to be related to sequential
dissolution of the elements, and takes the fourth sign ‘shining
like a lamp, to stand for three light stages. The other tradition
explains the signs as resulting from contemplation of the bindu,
does not relate them to the elements, and docs not subdivide
the sign ‘shining like a lamp'.
A remarkable ability to describe the praxis is found in Arva-

deva’s Caryameldpaka-pradipa (quoted in Tsoh-kha-pa’s Snags
rim chen mo y f. 456b-4), where we read a most lucid statement
of the sequence:
/ spvod bsdus las / /de nas skye ba geig nas geig tu goms
pas bdag med pahi chos la bslabs pas main par dag pahi
sbyor ba khon du chud nas rah b £in gyi snah ba dan
geig tu hdre bar bva ste rim pa hdis don dam pahi bden
pa la dmigs par byaho / dchi rim pa hdi yin te phun po
la sogs pa ni khams phra ba la giug go / khams phra ba
ni yah sems la g2ug go / sems ni yah sems pa la giug go /
sems pa ni yah ma rig pa la g£ug ste de ltar spyad nas
gftid log par byed do / de la dus hdir ni sems dan sems pa
ma rig pa la rub tu iugs pahi skad cig la drah pa brjod
paho / phyis ni brjod pa yah med pahi ye ses kyi ho bo
hid ni hod gsal baho / yah grol ba na rlun gi rah b£in
rfted de gan gi tshe rmi lam g2an dag hbyuh ba na ji
arid du rnam par $cs pa mi gYo ba de srid du ghid log
nas hod gsal ba la blta ste / de ni so sor rah g is rig pa lus
dan hag dan bral bahi don dam pahi bden pa nan gi
mnon par byan chub pa ics byaho / ês gsuns te...
Then, by meditative repetition from one life to the next,

and by training in the self-less natures, he comes to fully
understand the right praxis: how to mix together with
the Light of intrinsic nature; how to visualize the Supreme
Truth (paramdrtha-satya) by this sequence. The sequence
of it, is as follows : The personality aggregates ( skandha )
and so on, should be merged into the subtle clement
(*suk<ma-dhalu) (i.c. wind); the subtle element, in turn.
277
merged into consciousness ( citta ); consciousness, in turn,

merged into mentals (caitta); mentals, in turn, merged
into nescience (avidyii) ; and so practising he creates deep
sleep (sufupti). Now, in this life, he expresses the truth
at the instant when citta and caitta are absorbed in avidyd.
At the next instant there is the Clear Light with the intrinsic
nature of the inexpressible gnosis. Even when it is
released, he has attained the intrinsic nature of wind;
and at whatever time other dreams occur, then as long
as his perception (vijhdna) is immobile ( acala ) i.e. one-
pointed, in samddhi, the deep sleep (sufufiti) (is also pre¬
sent) and he sees the Clear Light. That introspection
is called ‘inner revelation of the Supreme Truth that is
free from Body and Speech’.
The meaning of this remarkable passage is exposed in Tsoh-
kha-pa’s commentary on the ‘Six Laws of Naro-pa’ (PTT, Vol.
161, pp. 7-8 and p. 12). Here we learn a distinction between
the Clear Light of the waking state (jdgrat-prabhdsvara) and the
Clear Light of deep sleep ( sufupti-prabhdsvara ). The waking
state Clear Light is also distinguished as subjective (vifayin),
the Jnana-Dharmakaya, and the objective (nVqya), the un-
constructcd ( asamshrta ) Dharmakaya. The subjective type
I understand by former terminology as ‘Clear Light of True
Mind’ or Symbolic Clear Light of three gnoses or Jftana lights,
namely, Light, Spread of Light, and Culmination of Light,
referred to by An adeva as, respectively, citta, caitta, and avidyd).
The objective type is tin Clear Light of the Absolute Entity.
The Clear Light of deep sleep is similarly distinguished into the
subjective deep sleep which is heavy (fittingpo) or light (srab we),
‘lost’ (iiams) (to memory) or ‘comprehended’ ( rtogs pa), and
the objective ‘ground’ (gii) Clear Light of death. In the
waking state category is the ‘son Clear Light’ contemplated with
praxis of ‘bliss-void’ (sukha-i unya) (bde ston sbyoryin bsgoms pahi
buhi hodgsal) which is the Clear Light of the path. In the deep
sleep category is the ‘mother Clear Light’ which is the ‘ground’
Clear Light of death (gHhi hchi bahi hod gsal tti mahi hod gsal).
As I understand this yoga praxis, the intention is to make the
‘son’ Clear Light break through to subjective waking state,
and to make the ‘mother’ Clear Light break through to sub¬
jective deep sleep (sufupti) as a samadhi. Then the yogin should
278
yoga ok the guhva$ \maj atantra
be capable of mixing the ‘mother and ‘son’ Clear Lights {hod

gsal ma bit ghis bsrc ihuh pa). All the preceding appears to be
intended in Aryadeva's passage.
Further details of tlie process are sketched in C. (.. Chang s

Teachings of Tibetan Toga. pp. 94-104. A fuller treatment is
found in Tson-kha-pa's Mthah gcod on chapter seven FI I,
Yol. 156, p. 45)and in his Don gsal ba on the 6 vhyasamaja FI l
Vol. 160, pp. 146 and 147). This exposition by l’soh-kha-pa,
of the dharana-ahga is based on the Samdhtnakarana and Pmdi-
poddyotana on Chapter VII, the I ajiamalu and its commentary
by Alamkakalasa, and Aryadcva’s Caryamelahaka-pradipa , Fre-
viously, under nidana verse 4, a passage was tpioted horn
Nagarjuna’s Pindikrta~sadhana 43-44A , which in lact stems
from the Vajramdld. The theory is to draw the 5x5 2.) entities
into the Clear Light as the pararnartha-mandala . There are five

each of sk and has, dhat us, indtiyas. vi soyas, and j hands. 1 he first
group to dissolve is of course the one with earth element ( dhatu )
since this gives rise to the first sign, a mirage. With dissolution
of the earth element, the entire body is desiccated (i.e. thirsts for
water). Individual explanations are given for dissolution of
the form-skandha ( rupa-skaudha ), mirror-like knowledge, eye-
organ ( indriya ), form-object (vifaya).
The second group includes the element of water, the dissolu¬

tion of which, yielding the sign of smoke, involves the drying tip
in one’s body of spittle, perspiration, urine, menstrual blood,
semen, and so on. Besides, the skandha of feeling, equality
knowledge, ear organ, and sense object of sound, are dissolved.
The third group includes the element of fire, the dissolution

of which, yielding the sign of fire-flies, involves loss of ability
to cat, drink, and digest. Besides, the skandha of ideas, discrimi¬
native knowledge, sense of smell, and odors, are dissolved.
The fourth group includes the element of wind, the dissolu¬

tion of which, yielding the sign of a changeable lamp, involves
the transfer from their individual places of the ten winds, the
prdna, etc. Besides, the skandha of motivations, the procedure-
of-duty knowledge, organ of taste, and tastes, arc dissolved.
Also, as l$on-kha-pa points out, at the time of dissolution of

each group, the deities of the corresponding Tathagata family
are drawn into the Clear Light together with the other members
of the group. Thus, the ‘Fury Kings’ {nidana verse 1 7) and
279
other members of the family {nidana verse 18) are sequentially

so drawn into the Clear Light of Death. In the. case of the first
group, Vairocana’s family; second group, Ratnasambhava’s
family; third group, Amitabha’s family; fourth group, Amogha-
siddhi's family.
finally, there is the dissolution indicated by that passage of

the Pindikrta-sadfiana. i.c. of the upper and lower Fury Kings,
of the twice-eighty prakrtis, and of Aksobhya’s family; where¬
upon ‘perception’ (vijriana) passes “to the Clear Light, also
called ‘universal void with nirvana* and ‘Dharmakaya’.”
UTAjl tatakaryam prakurvita prakrtyabhasabhedavit f

karmakayam parityajya vajradehatvam apnuyal //26//
Then, knowing the differences of the prakrtis and the

Lights, one should engage in the carya , (namely), abandon¬
ing the body of works ( kannakaya ), he would obtain the
diamond body (vajradeha).
Mchan: Knowing the differences of the eighty prakrtis and the

three Lights (=*three gnoses), the time has come for one to
engage in the carya (‘praxis’) part of the Stages of Completion.
He takes recourse to contemplation of the profound means of
piercing the centers in the body. Then he takes recourse to
experiencing the generation of the voids by the dissolution
sequence of the winds. Thus he has certainty in the methods
of arousing the three Lights and the (eighty) vikatpa~ s. How¬
ever, the verse takes Ibr granted that one has achieved the
Lights of‘arcane mind’ {cittavivcka ), then alludes to the subse¬
quent (1) carya for the aim of accomplishing the Illusory Body
{maya-deha), as well as to the (2) carya for the aim of Jaikfa-
yuganaddha after attaining the characteristics of the Illusory Body;
but the verse does not allude to the (3) third carya for the pur¬
pose of aiaikya-yuganaddha after attaining the iaikya-yuganaddha .
(1) Thus the sadhaka engaged in the carya , abandoning the
‘maturation’ ( vipaka ) body propelled by former deeds {karma),
obtains the illusory body called ‘diamond body’. (2) Having
obtained that, he attains the iaikya-yuganaddha , wherein the
‘diamond body’ is uninterruptedly affiliated ( rigs hdra rgyun mi
hchad par rdo rje sku). This illusory body is a topic of the third
krama of the Paiicakrama caller! Svadhiyfhdna-krama.
The Pradipoddyotana on Chapter VI {Mchan hgrel, p. 53)

quotes the Vajrahrdayalamkara-tantra :
280
evam samddhiyuktena nirvikalpena mantrhmh j

kalavadhini parityajya prnpyatc ’nuttaram padam //
When one thus abandons the limitation of time by non-

discursiveness joined to the samadhi of a mantrin, he
attains the incomparable rank.
Here the expression ‘limitation of time’ (kalavadhi) seems to

refer to the ‘maturation body*.
About that ‘non-discursivcness’, there is the important

verse 3 in Chapter II of the Guhyasamajatantra:
abhave bhuvandbhdvo bhavana naira bhdvana /

iti bhavo na bhavah syad bhdrana nopalabhyate //
When there is an absence, there is no contemplation

(because there is nothing to contemplate). (But also,)
a contemplation is not a contemplation (of reality).
That being so, whether it be a presence (for contempla¬
tion) or an absence (for no contemplation), the contem¬
plation is not perceptively reached.
From the various interpretations in the Pradipoddyotana (Mchan

kgrel, pp. 31 and 32), we present here the ‘pregnant sense’:
When there is an absence (because of dissolution in the
central channel), there is no contemplation. The con¬
templation (of the impure illusory body = samirti-satya)
is not a contemplation (of the Clear Light). That being
so, whether it be a presence (the illusory body) or an
absence (disappearance in the central channel), the
contemplation (of the two truths, samrrti and paramdrtha)
is not perceptively reached (in cither case).
Tson-kha-pa quotes the above niddna verse 26 in his Paiica-

krama commentary. Vol. 159, p. 51-5, to emphasize that this
caryd is indispensable for becoming a Buddha in this present life.
If there is this aim, one must apply himself to the caryd of the
two dhydnas called ‘contraction’ (pinefagraha) and ‘expansion
(anubheda ), set forth in Paiicakrama, Abhisambodhi-k., IV,25-27:
praptopaddakah fi,\yo dvidha yoga athdbhyasct /
pindagrdhakromenaiva tathd caivdnubhcdatah //25//
iirasah pddato vdpi ydvad dhr day am dgatah /
bhutakofitft viied yogi pinjagraha id smrtah i[ 26 •
sthdvaram jangamam caiva purr am krtva prabhasraram /
pakdt kurydt tathdtmdnam anubhidakramo hy a) am ,, 27 11
The disciple who has secured the precepts then applies
COMMENTARY ON THE 1-ORTY NtDANA VERSES
281
himself unremittingly to yoga of two sorts : by the sequence
of ‘contraction’ as well as by ‘expansion’.
Drawing (the winds) from head down, and from feet up,
into the heart, the yogi enters bhiitakofi (the true limit):
this is called ‘contraction*.
Having first rendered the stationary and the moving life

into the Clear Light, he then renders that into himself:
this is the stage of ‘expansion*.
Again, Tson-kha-pa’s Pancakrama commentary, Vol. 159, p.

52-1 and p. 53-5, explains that those are comparable to the
(Mother Tantra terminology) [yogas of transfer (hpho ba = S.
samkranti) and entrance to the city ( gron hjug, S. puravatara)*.
Hence the praxis proceeds along two lines : the first involves
the manipulation of winds to separate the five basic winds from
the five secondary winds; the second involves a separation of
‘mind-based perception’ ( monovijiiana ) from the five outer-
sense based perceptions. Thus, the separation of the ‘intrinsic
body’ from the ‘body of maturation’ has the aspects of wind and
mind, aimed at separating the subtle from the coarse, to yield
the body formed of ‘wind and mind only*.
Pancakrama, Svadhisthana-krama, III, 19 :
tad eva vfiyusamyuktaifi vijmmatritayam pttnah /

j&yatc yogind inurtir mdyddehas tad ucyate fj
Precisely that vijfiana-triad joined to the winds then arises
as a body by a yogin. That is called ‘illusory body*.
Pahcakrama , 3rd krama, 23 :
darpanajnatibimbcna mdyadcham ca lakfayet /

varndn mdrdyudhaiaiva vydpitvam udakenduna //
One characterizes the Illusory Body by the image in a

mirror, the colors by a rainbow, the spread by the moon
in the waters (Cf. Sri Laksmi’s commentary, p. 35- 3:
the rainbow body means having the five colors).
The Vajrajnanasamuccaya contains twelve similes of illusion con¬

cerning that body:—(1) phantom (jgyM tna), (2) moon in the
waters (chu zla), (3) shade ( migyor) t (4) mirage (smig rgyu),
(5) dream (rmi lam), (6) echo (brag cha }, (7) cloud (dri zahi
grot i khyer), (8) hallucination (mig hphrul ), (9) rainbow (hjah
tshon ), (10) lightning ( glog ), (11) water bubble (chuhi chu bur),
(12) image in a mirror (me loti gi gzug s brnan). Tson-kha-pa’s
commentary on that Tantra, Vol. 160, p. 160-4, 5, is in this
282
yoga of the c in y a s a m a j at a n tr a
case apparently based on the Caryfimrlapakn-pradipa : 1. It is like

a phantom (illusory man) because, although it has a lull comple¬
ment of main and secondary limbs when generated as the body
of Vajradhara from wind and mind-only, it is nothing but wind
and mind-only. 2. It is like the moon in the waters wherever
it is spread. 3. It is like a shade, i.e. the shadow body of a
man, because it lacks flesh, bone, and so on. 4. It is like a
mirage, because it shifts by the instant. 5. It is like a dream
body because, as a body accomplished from wind and mind-
only, it is (similar to) a body in a dream which is imputed
distinctions that differ from what it properly is. 6. It is like
an echo, because, although it belongs to the same stream ol
consciousness as the ‘maturation body' (vipaka-kaya ). it appears
elsewhere. 7. It is like a cloud, because that body possesses
the mandala of residence (fidhfira) and of residents (fidhey a).
8. It is like a hallucination, because being single it appears
multiple. 9. It is like a rainbow, or India's bow', since that
body appears with five colors that are unimpeded and unmixed.
10. It is like the lightning bursting from the cloud, from its
location within the personality aggregates of the maturation
body. 11. It is like a water bubble in very clear water when
it suddenly emerges from the realm of the void. 12. It is like
the image of Vajradhara in a mirror, because of simultaneous
completion of all the major and minor limbs.
One of the problems of the commentarial tradition is to relate

the theory of the two dhyanas known from the Pahcakrama back
to the basic Guhyasamajatantra. Tson-kha-pn, Pahcakrama
commentary, Yol. 159, p. 57-1, IT., points out that regarding
the contemplation (or cultivation) of the two dhubias by way
of the illusory body (sgyu lus pas bsam gtan giiis sg»m pa la ), the
Mar-pa school does not explain it in terms of piling up the three
sattvas ol the three vajras. Tsoh-kha-pa goes oil to highly approve
the precept handed down from Hgos hgos lugs), that the carya
of both dhyhnas is indicated in Guhyasamajatantra , chapter eleven,
verses 40-44 (with emendations):
buddhamatufalamadhyastham have vairocanam mas ft I

Onikarani hi day t dhyatva mantiaeijhanam bhavayrt jf
nirodhavajragatam cittf yada tasya prajavate
sa bhavfc cintamanih irirnun sarvabuddha^tasadhakah
buddhamandalamadhyastham vajrakfobhyarn prabhuiayct
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY XIDAN'A VERSES
283
Ilumktham hrdaye dhrdtrii cittam bindugatam nyaset j

buddiuimandoI annulhy a v tham amitdbham prabhavavet fj
.1 hkdram hrdaye dhyatva vajrarn bindugatam nyaset [j
idam tat samaydgrdgi yam trivnjrdbhedyabhavanam /
a i rod ha saw a yaj u a tut in buddhasiddhim samavahet ((
Hr should place in (Ins own) body the Yairocana abiding

in I In* middle of the Huddha-mandala. Having medi¬
tated on the Oin in his heart, h<* should contemplate
the lijhdna in the mantra.
At tin- time lie engenders the stale of cessation 'Vajra in his

citta. In* becomes the ‘wishing gem*. ‘glorious one’, best
sddhaka of all tlu* Buddhas.
He should contemplate a diamond Aksobhya in the middle

of the Buddha-nuuulala. Having meditated on the Hum
in his heart, he should place the citta in the form of a bittdu.
He should contemplate Amitabha stationed in the middle
of the Buddha-mandala. Having meditated on the Ah
in his heart, he should place the cajra in the form of a
bindii.
This, the chief of best pledges, the contemplation of the

inseparable three raj tax (of one’s own body, speech, and
mind), the knowledge of the cessation-pledge, brings the
success of the Buddhas.
Tsoh-kha-pu also mentions that some persons claimed that the

above verses portray the dhyana of ‘contraction* while the subse¬
quent (athynsamaja verses (XI, T."*—1-7) portray the ‘expansion*.
Tsoh-kha-pa denies this theory and states that both dhyanas are
portrayed in the above verses, and that the following verses
45-47 simply expand on the same topic.
In preparation for this coryCi , according to the indication of

Mkha> grub t jes Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras, the candidate
is conferred the‘Prajna-jhana Initiation*. This is the initiation
concerned with the cabas or bhagas. These bhagas become the
centers of associating four voids (the four lights) with four ecsta¬
sies. Abhayakaragupiapada's Vpaetesamahjari’-nama. (PTT, Vol.
87, p. 82) associates the lights with ecstasies as follows : Light
(aloha) with ecstasy (ananda ); Spread-of-Light ( diokabhasa )
with high ecstasy (patantdnanda) ; Guhnination-of-Light ( aloko -
palabdhi) with extraordinary ecstasy (viratnananda) ; Clear Light
(prabhdsvara ) with consubstuntial ecstasy (sahajananda) . The
264
YOGA OF THE CCHYASAMAJATANTRA
same identification is made in the Mahamudrdtilaka-tantra ,

Chapter Five, according to quotation in Snags rtm, f. 408a-5.
Tsori-kha-pa’s Pancakrama commentary “Gsal bahi sgron me”
{PTT, Vol. 159, p. 2, 3, discusses this association of voids ( =
lights) with ecstasies ( ananda ), and ibid , p. 2-4, cites the Vajra-
m&ld for the direct order (rjes lugs btbyun) and reverse order
(lugs Idog rim pa) of the four ecstasies. In the direct order
Sttanda starts at the Mahasukha-cakra of the head, down to the
Sambhoga-cakra of the throat, where starts paramananda ; that
down to the Dharma-cakra of the heart, where starts viramd-
nanda\ that down to the Wirmana-cakra of the navel, where starts
sahaj&nanda (continuing down to the ‘tip of the thunderbolt
gem’, already identified as the root of the penis, according to
the Prajfia-jnana initiation as portrayed in Mkhas grub rje’s-
work). In the reverse order, there is ananda up to the Nirmana
cakra; paramananda up to the Dharma-cakra; viramdnanda up to
the Sambhoga-cakra; and sahajananda up to the Mahasukha-
cakra. Again, according to Mkhas grub rje’s initiation section,
this reverse order is prepared for by the Fourth Initiation.
F. Hrdayavajrayo$id (The Diamond Ladies
of the Heart)
In terms of six-membered yoga this is 5. anusmrti (‘recollec¬

tion*) and in the Pancakrama system, it is Abhisambodhi-krama,
the fourth. Besides, according to the Pradipoddyotana it is in¬
cluded in yuganaddha, and therefore is the initial ‘saiksa-yuga-
naddha* (‘the pair-united where there is learning’). It is
the ability to come forth from the Clear Light (equivalent to
going through the portals of death) as a yogin in command of
the situation.
When the Illusory Body has been purified in the Clear Light
and emerges to pass in reverse order through the three lights,
it is treated by the simile of a fish, in Pancakrama , 4th krama
(Abhisambodhi), verse 31:
yatha nadijaliU svacchan mina utpatilo drulam /

sarvafunydt tathd svacchan miiydjalam udiryate //
Like a fish quickly springing up from a clear stream,

so the net of illusion emerges from the clear universal void.
For this phase there is the Fourth Initiation (there is no further
one), which the Guhyasamdjatantra, Chapter XVIII, describes
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NI DANA VERSES
285
as just like the Prajha-jhhna initiation. This is because here

the vogin experiences the reverse order of the very same combi¬
nation of voids with ecstasies.
The activities ami symbolism arc centered about the heart.

Three nidana verses are devoted to this : HR, the place of aim
and creativity; DA. the yield or accomplishment; YA, theaftcr-
reali/ation. both the diamond {vajra) and the lady (_y ofit)
symbolism are associated with the heart in Indrabhuti’s Jiiana-
siddhi : hrdayam jiVmam lad eva vajrayosit (‘the Diamond Lady
is just that heart gnosis'). The diamond (or thundcholt) has
two aspeets accord ini; to Guhyasamaja, Chap. XVIII, 39 (with
considerable emendation suggested by Nagarjuna’s commentary,
PIT, Vol. 00, p. 7-5, which mentions the two syllables ‘Va’
and ‘Jra’), that is, a destructive aspect of VA and a holding or
positive aspect of JRA,
paticahetiS cn vrtiti vajram ity abhidhiyate j

jrakdro dfirgili k/tyalo vijmmam vajradhrumanah //
‘Vajra’ is defined as ‘Va*, namely the five prongs, and as

‘Jra’, explained as holding. ‘Vijnana* is the mind which
holds the vajra.
The lady also has two aspects, YO, the automatic union taking
place through ‘recollection’; and SID, the othcrworldlincss of
the act.
The first or destructive meaning of vajra is that found in

Alamkakalasa’s commentary on the frbl'ajramald (PTT, Vol.
01, p. 182-4), while expounding the ‘unshared sense’ of the
Tantra: “So as to explain the word * vajra *, it is said ‘The vajra
and also the vikalpas because it destroys the set of natures,
(prakrti ) amounting to one-hundred-sixty ( twice 80 vikalpas )”

(rdo rjehi sgra bsad pahi phyir / / rdo rje dc yah rnam rtog
mains ic s gsuns tc ran bfin gyi tshogs brgya drug cu po mams
Ijcom pa tiicl kyi phyir ro). Tson-kha-pa’s lidor bzlas (Lhasa
Collected Works, Cha, f. 24b-4, 5, 6)starts with the first meaning
and then passes to the second or positive meaning of vajra :
“When the ‘wind-mind* dissolves there untying the knot of the
heart it is the sublime place with cessation of the 160
( twice 80) vikalptK. Because it is not perturbed by discursive

thought ( vihalpa ), it is explained as field of the (Buddha)
Aksobhya (the imperturbable)’; therefore, one may also under¬
stand it as the narrow space laid in the heart of Aksobhya. That
286 yoga of the ci hyasamajatantra
essential place is also called Sukhavatl, since it is the supreme

place for generating great ecstasy' ( mahasukha ). The bodhi-
citta (there), through cessation of death, is (the Buddha) Ainita-
yusj and because the infinite light ol prajiid arises therrtroin,
it is also called ‘field of AmitabhaV' ( shin gahi rtsa mdud
grol bahi gnas dcr rluh sems thim pa ni main rtog brgya rtsa
dan brgya cu [sic. for drug cu] hgog pahi gnas dam pa yin pas /
mam rtog gis mi bskyod pas mi bskvod pahi £in du bsad tie mi
bskyod pa thug kar hgod pahi dog pahah dcs ses par bvaho /
gnad dc bde ba can gyi $iii duhan brjod do l»de ba chen po
skyc bahi gnas kyi mehog dan / byan chub kyi sems ni he hi ba
Jigog pas tshc dpag mod yin la / de las byuh bahi ses rab kyi
hod inthah yas pahi phvir r<> / hod dpag mod kyi £in duhan
gsuns so / ). The positive meaning of vtijra is involved in the

frequent discussions of the Jiiauapada school about tlie ‘invio¬
lable drop’ ( *akfa(a-bindu ; T. mi figs pahi (big It) of the heart,
for example, in Vitapada’s commentary on the Muktitiiaka
(PTT, Vol. 65, p. 135-2), where the form of tlie ‘inviolable
drop’ in the heart is said to be, for example, like a grain of
mustard seed; and to be the non-prapabca of any ahatma chos
thams cad kyi ma spros pa), Yitapada also mentions in the same
place a theory about the three kinds of bindu that they are identi¬
fied with the three kinds of masters {deary a), the ‘causal master’
( *hetu-dcdrya) > the ‘conditional master’ {* pra(yaya-dcdrya) t and
‘co-natal master’ {* sahaja-dedrya) ; and that the ‘inviolable drop’
is the‘co-natal master’. (Vitapada’s passage is given in full and
explained in A. Wayman, The Buddhist Tantras , pp. 49-50).
The ‘recollection’ (anusmrli) takes place through the goddess

{yofit) or ‘perfection of insight’ [prajiid-pdramitd). The Cuhya-
samdjatantra , Chapter VII, treats this ‘recollection’ with various
examples. Perhaps the most important illustration involves
verse 34 (translated i nPradipoddyntami and Mchan ligrd context):
tatra katham prajhdpdiamildsamaydnusmrtibhdvand /
prakrtiprabhdsvardh sane anulpannd nirdsravah /
na bodhir ndbhisamayo mi dhdtuh na ca sambhavah ft
And what is the contemplation with recollection of the
Perfection-of-Insight pledge ?
All those with (entrance into, pravda) the Clear Light

and its (accompanying) prakrtis (numbering 160 l»v day
and night), are unborn (because the body taken is illusory)
commentary on the forty nidAna verses
287
and without flux (because not mere appearance, nirdbhd -

satvdt) when there is no (i.e. no attention to) enlighten¬
ment, no understanding, no realm (i.e. receptacle, ddhdra),
and no emergence (of phenomenal abodes).
The Pradipoddyotana at this point cites the Vajro$ni}atantra (trans¬

lated here with help of Mchan hgrel, p. 60-2):
I mrtyund * (v avikalpena prajndpdramitd nayd /
I prajndpdramitd jatih prajndpdramitd smrtih fj

j prajiidpdramifa bodhih prajndpdramitd layd /
/ prajndpdramitd muktih sarvaiiiparipuraka //
The Perfection of Insight has the method ( — the means,

up ay a ) by reason of non-discursivc death ( — the Clear
Light of Death). The Perfection of Insight has the birth
(“the Illusory Body emerging from the Clear Light)
and the recollection (srnrti — anusmrti-anga; for becoming
a Buddha in the Intermediate State). The Perfection
of Insight has the enlightenment (— vuganaddha) and
the merger (with the Clear Light). The Perfection of
Insight has the liberation (from the two hindrances, of
defilement and the knowable). (For those reasons)
it fulfills all hopes.
jjHRjj hrdi krtvarthacaryam vai laukikim sa tathagatah /

nimiaya samvrtam kdyam kdmamS cared yaihayatham //27//
The worldling praxis of aim having been formed in the
heart, he the Tathagata, creating a conventional body,
practises desires exactly as he cares.
Mchan: The praxis of aim on behalf of worldly beings having

been posited in the heart of the sddhaka —the Tathagata, namely
Vairocana, etc., transforming himself in appearance, i.e. creat¬
ing a conventional body, practises in desire fields ( = the five
sense objects) exactly in Tathagata correspondence (i.e. Vairo¬
cana in forms, etc.). The verse shows the engagement in the
time of praxis.
Prakbiikd on Hr: ‘Creating a conventional body’ means emanat¬

ing the mandala-cakra with the nature of Tathagatas, goddesses,
Bodhisattvas, and krodhas.
Bu-ston (BSad sbyar , Vol. Ta, f. 57a-b) on Hr cites Aryadeva:

“The one dwelling in the circle of yo?its, with a single mudra ,
or with four mudras , should recollect the Svadhisthana. Even
after the yogin has dwelt on the level of highest bliss, he should
288
YOGA OF THE GIUIYASAMAJATANTRA
always enjoy pleasant forms, sounds, odors, tastes, and tangibles’*

(/ phyag rgya geig dan Ulan pahatn '/ van na phyag rgya bî
dan ldan / /btsun mohi hkhoi na h2ugs pas kyan / / bdag byin
brlab pa rjes dran bya 1 I gzugs dan sgra dan de b*in dri / /ro
dan reg bva sdug pa mams ' bde mchog go hphan gnas nas
kvari / / rnal hbvor pa vis nag tu myari ics so /).
Concerning those lour mudtas, i.c. the four goddesses, Locana,

etc., they arc referred to as ‘his enjoyments' in Guhyasamaja-
tantra , Chap. XVIII, p. 157 :
tasya bhogdf caUtr jhtydh svadhiythanadibhis lathii /

virdnam (kavaktrdndm ekaikam murdhni sccanam fj
His four enjoyments are to be known by means of the
Svadhisthana, etc. Accordingly there is the anointment
one-by-onc on the head(s) of the one-faced heroes.
In partial explanation of the passage just cited, Nagarjuna’s

AffddaSa-patala-i'istara-vydkhyd (PTT, Vol. 60. p. 10-2) states:
“ ‘His four enjoyments’ are the four goddesses, I.ocana etc.”
(Ions spyod bzi ni spyan la sogs pa bzi ste). Furthermore, we
read in Guhyasamdjatantra , Chap, XVIII, p. 166 (translation
aided by Nagarjuna’s vyakhyd, p. 16-4-6):
vidydrajniti vikhyald caturbhogd mahdrdhikd f

sarvakameti vijiieyd vajradhipatayas tathii //
When the four enjoyments (= four goddesses, Locana, etc.)

have the great magical powers (<= five Tathagatas), they are
called ‘Queen of Vidya* ( = Rupavajra, etc.). In the same
circumstances, the Diamond Lords ( = the Bodhisattvas)
are known as ‘All desire’ ( = Yamantaka, etc.).
The mandala which the PrakdSikd refers to has an alternate

form according to Tson-kha-pa’s Pancakrama commentary (PTT,
Vol. 159, p. 74-5 to 75-1) called a ‘gam-cakra' (tshogs kyi dkvil
bkhor). In its middle is the yogin skilled in the praxis. The
first series is the four yosits which he places in the sequence of
E, S, W, N, namely Bde mchog sgyu ma, L-ma-ho bde ba.
Sgron ma, and Sasi. Those arc consorts ( sahacari , ‘wives’)
(lhan cig spyod pahi bud med), presumably to be identified
with the four goddesses, Locana, etc. Other sets of four goddesses,
totalling sixteen, arc disposed in outer circles and called ‘female
attendants’ ( anucari ; T. rjes su spyod pahi bud med). The
names of those deities belong to Mother Tantra rather than
Guhyasamdja tradition.
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NI DANA VERSES
289
Furthermore, the phrase ‘creating a conventional body*

can be illustrated in the case ofSakvamuiii with tantric reinter¬
pretation (sec the theory of the ‘Wav’ ornament in the introduc¬
tory treatment of ‘The seven ornaments and subdivisions’).
The Pnulipoddy ot ana {Mchan hgrcl, p. 12-5 to 13-1) has this
passage:
' uktam evaitad bhagavata / asadharanaguhvamahayoga-

tantre / athaparam sarvajnaparivarasanipatti (m) prava-
ksyami■ ' tadvatha suddhodanamaharajomaujusri bhavati/
mahamayadevi lokesvaro bhavati / yasodhara sridcvl
rahulo vajrasattvah sa rad vatipu trail sarvanivaranavis-
kambhi bhavati / aryanandah sthaviras samantabhadro
bhavati / devadattas sthaviro devendras srisakvamunis
samvaksambuddho mahavairocauo bhavati / anena
nvayena sangitikara iti f parsad iti adikarmikasattva-
vataraniiya buddhanatako ’vain pradarsitah /
This was said by the Lord in the ‘unshared’ Guhyamahd-

yogatantra [possibly the Yoga-tantra catalogued as the
Yajrakkhara-mafidguhyayogatantra] : “Xow I shall also reveal
the perfection of the retinue of omniscience, as follows:
Manjusri became the great king &uddhodana. Lokcsvara
became the. queen Mahamava. Sridevi became Yaso¬
dhara; Yajrasattva, Rahula; Sarvanivaranaviskambhin,
Jâriputra; Samantabhadra became the ‘elder’ Aryananda.
Devendra (i.c. India) became the ‘elder’ Devadatta,
and Mahavairocana, the Perfected Buddha &n-Siikya-
muni”. According to that interpretation, what is called
the ‘compiler’ and what is called the ‘retinue’ is revealed
as this drama of the Buddha for introducing the beginner
sentient beings (into the Doctrine).
!;'/)A'! dadali priirthitam sarvam cinldmaiiir ivaparam /

hatha(f) cahrtya kurute buddhdndm api sawpadam //28//
Like the best wish-granting jewel, hatha grants everything

desired, and seizing (by force) enacts even the success of
tin* Buddhas.
Mchan : ‘Grants everything desired’ means : —grants all mundane

siddhis. ‘And even the success «>i the Buddhas’ means :—
even grants the supramundaiie siddhi , which is Buddhahood.
Mchan hgtcl, Yol. 158, p. I N-5 : 'the wish-granting jewel*
( cintamani ) grants youth, health, and happiness.
290
YOGA OF THE Gt’lIYASAMAJATANTRA
The term hatha (fic.rce yoga) occurs in the Guhyasamdja-

tantra , Chap. Will, verse !f>2:
darianam tu krtc 'px evam sadhakasya na jdyafe i

yadd na sidhyatc bodhir hathayo^cna sddhayrt If
When one has performed that wav and still the sadhaka s
vision does not occur, nor is bndhi achieved, then by hatha-
■
> it is achieved.
According to Xagarjnna’s A<(ada fa-pa tala-vistara-vyakhya PT1
Yol. 60, p. 15-4, 5 and p. 16-1.2\ this involves a fiercer practice
with success in fewer days. Explaining the ‘six months’ (tanrndsa)
of verse 161, he says (p. 16-1-5) “If it is not achieved in six
months, two months, one, or a half month, then one should try
to achieve it in seven days” (gan gi tshe zla ha drug dan /la
ba gnis dan geig dan zla ha phved kvis hgruh par mi hgyur ni <
dehi tshe iag Ixlun gyis bsgrub pa brtsam par hya ste ). The
comments show that if success is not reached through the usual
procedure of the three salivas (samaya-sattva, jhdna-sattva, and
samadhi-sattva) in ‘six months', then one applies the procedure
through the jhdna-sattva with evocation of the krndha deity Sum-
bharaja for success in ‘seven days’. The explanation of hatha-
yoga in Naropa’s SekoddcSatika , p. 45 involves drawing the prana
into the ‘middle vein’ (hathena pranam madhyamayam
vdhayitva).
The general procedure of obtaining siddhis is through the

‘burnt offering’, as in the Guhyasamdjatantra , XYI, p. 117 (Mchan
hgreU p. 139-2):
hntnam kurvila manlrajhdh sarvasiddhiphaldrthinah f

nnm iit ramdmsatai lady air dhutim pratipddayct •!
The knower of mantras desiring as fruit all (mundane and

supramundanc) siddhis , should perform a burnt offering
{homa). He should accomplish the evocation by (an inner
burnt offering, to wit:—) excrement, urine, flesh, oil,
and so forth.
Pradipoddyotana and Mchan hgrcl (Yol. 158, p. 141-5): (The

offerings of) ‘excrement and urine’ mean tin* live ambrosias
(amrla); (of) ‘llesh’ mean the five kinds, ibid., p. 142-1):
‘Great flesh’ means the five kinds of lamps. {Ibid., p. 142-1):
All siddhis means ol mundane ones, the minor ones ol fdntika,
etc., and the eight great ones of ri-In, etc., called mahdsaniaya
(' Guhyasamaja, X\ I, p. 117, line 17). The relerencc to ‘live
291
ambrosias* is based on a passage in the Mahamudratilaka , cited

in my essay, “Totcmic beliefs in the Buddhist Tantras,” p. 91:
“Ratnasambhava is blood, Amitabha is semen; Amoghasiddhi
is human flesh, Aksobhya is urine; Yairocana is excrement.
These arc the five best ambrosias.” For the five kinds of flesh,
Dharmakirti’s commentary on the Hevajra-tantra called Spyan
hbytd (PTT, Vol. 54, p. 135-3) contains the Sanskrit words in
Tibetan transcription : % \a means human flesh ( tiara ); Ga means
ox flesh (gaura); Ha means elephant flesh (hasti); final $va
means horse flesh (aira); initial Sva means dog flesh (Ivan).
The list ‘appeasing’ (lantika), etc. is the four previously

described (nidana verse 15) as the jurisdictional activity of the
four goddesses, Locana, etc.; and they yield inferior mundane
siddhis. The great mundane siddhis arc eight in number, refer¬
red to as etc,, where ri-lu ‘(‘little ball’) is a contraction of
ril-bu. The list of eight siddhis is somewhat explained in the

annotation to Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras.
Here we need only list them : 1. “To walk in the sky” (, kheedra ),
2. “To be swift of foot” ( janghdkari ), 3. “To be invisible”
(antardhana ), 4. “To shape into a little ball” ( pin<farupa , T.
ril-bu ), 5. “To remove, blindness” (T. mig sman) y 6. “To
have the elixir of youth” (rasana) t 7. “To be invincible in
battle” ( khadga), 8. “To have dominion over the entities of the
underworld” (patala).
The following passage ol the Guhyasamiljatantra , XVI, p. 124

(Pradipoddyotana and Alt him hgret, p. 14G-4, ff.) differentiates
between superior and inferior mundane siddhi :
kayaiakcittasamsiddhu buddhar upadharaprabha j

jamb iinadaprabhakara hinasiddhisamasritah ff
antardhanudisa ins iddhau bhai-et vajradharah prabhuh j
yakfarajadisamsiddhau bhnvet vidyadharah prabhuh ff
She ( = Vajradakini) who shines with a form like the
(respective) Buddha is the (superior) occult success of
body (grasping various forms), speech (grasping various
sounds), and mind (gaining as desired). They ( — mun¬
dane fairies, ddkitti) who glisten on the Jambu river are
the resorts of inferior siddhi. The lord Vajradhara would
be in the (superior )occult success of‘invisibility’( — united
with the Vajradakini, a ‘logethcr-bom female’). The
lord Vidyadhara would be in the (inferior) occult success
292
YOGA OF THE GIHYASAMAJATANTRA

of Yaksaraja. etc. ( = united with the mundane fairies,
the ‘field-born females’).
Besides the distinction of inferior and superior kinds among

the mundane siddhis, these siddhis themselves contrast with the
supramundane siddhi, as differentiated in the Cluhyasamdja-
tantra , XVI, p. 117 ( Mchan hgrcl, Yol. 15, p. 142-1):
antardhanam balam viryam vajrakarcamm uttamam /

siddhyate man <jialc sanam kayavajravaco yathd
Everything is brought to success in the mantfala . as irom
the word of the ‘diamond of body* (* Yairocana), namely:
‘disappearance’, ‘strength’, ‘striving’, and the ‘ultimate
diamond attraction’.
Mchan hgrcl : ‘Strength ( bala) y means mastery of vidyadhara ;

‘striving {virya)' means the power of the five abhijhd- s; ‘in the
mandala ’ means initiation, guarding of vows, and contempla¬
tion of the path in the matjdala ; ‘diamond attraction’ means
attraction of things difficult to attract. The last named can
be compared with the supramundane siddhi ol Guhyasamaja ,
XII, verse 37 (‘Documents’): ‘the supreme Buddha attraction’
(i buddhakarianam uttamam). The five abhijha-s of this tradition
were previously detailed under nidana verse 20.
Sec also Chaps. YI and XII (‘Documents’).
Finally, supramundane siddhi , here called ‘supreme’ can

be given interpretive levels through Candrakirti’s classifying
terminology. Thus, Guhyasamajatantra, XIII, p. G2 (Pradi-
poddyotana in Derge Tanjur, Rgyud, Yol. Ha, f. 104a-4, ff.;
Mchan hgrcl, PTT, Yol. 158, p. 94-4, ff.):
mohasamayasambhiita vidyaraiano vajrinah ,

napumsakapadc siddhan dadanti siddhim uttamam fj
A. Translation with ‘invariant sense’ (aksarartha):
The vidyarajas and diamond-possessors, arisen from

the Delusion-Symbol (moha-samaya) confer the supreme
siddhi upon the adepts ( siddha ) at the place of androgynes.
B. Translation with ‘hinted meaning’ (ncydrtha):
The ( krodhas ) Usntsacakravartin, etc. (cf. nidana verse

17) and (Bodhisattvas) Ksitigarbha, etc. (cf. nidana
verse 16) arisen Irom (the Buddha) Yairocaua (as pro¬
genitor ol the Moha family), confer Englightenment
upon the adepts at (their reciting) the three syllables Om,
All, Hum (in die Clear Light and in yuganaddha).
COMMENTARY OX THE FORTY NJDaNA VERSES
293
C. Translation with ‘evident meaning’ (nitdrtha):
Tlie ‘men’ and ‘women’ who have taken an ‘aggregate of

indulgence' ( upaddna-skandha) ( = a body), arisen from
nescience (aridya), confer the extraordinary siddhi of
mahdmudid upon the adepts realizing at the Clear Light
and at the C.uImination-of-Light (having attained the
Clear Light and yuganaddha),
in 'A f! yad yad icchatiyogtndras tat tat kuryad anavrtah /
asamdhitayogena nityam eva samahitah //29//
Whatever the powerful one of yoga wishes, just that he

would do without hindrance; and by means of the yoga
of ‘after’-stability, is continually stabilized.
Mehan : l'he powerful one of yoga—the practitioner of the

Sumpannakrama—whatever he may wish to practise of his own
‘strand of desire’ {kdmaguna) —just that he would enjoy unhinder¬
ed; and by the yoga of such sporting in a ‘strand of desire’ in
the time of after-attainment—the ‘aftcr’-stability, he is conti¬
nually stabilized in the sense of inseparable ecstasy-void.
Guhyasamdjatantra, XVIII, p. 156:
asamdhitayogena nityam era samahitah I

sarvacittesu yd caryd mantracarycti kathyate //
By the yoga of‘alter-stability' one is ever stabilized. That

practice in all thoughts is called ‘practice of mantras’.
Paiicakrama, 3rd krama, verse 36 (with emendations):
yad yad indriyarndrgaUam dyas tat tat svabhdratah /
asamdhitayogena sarram bttddhasamam rahet //
Whatever the sense basis and whatever its path ( — sense

object), precisely that approach in its own-being leads
to all Buddha-cqimlity by the yoga of ‘aftcr’-stability.
Sri Laksmi's Paiicakrama comm., Vol. 63, p. 50-5: “Among
them, the samdhita is die contemplation of as many as 38 samddhis
starting from ‘initial training' and going up to the division into
the hundred lineages. Accordingly, the asamdhita is the place
in the intervals by means of‘divine pride’ ( devata-garva ). The
two of them do not exist separately in the yuQanaddha-krama
because there is a single own-being of ‘profound concentration’
( samddhi ) and ‘str.ning of mind' (viku'pa)" ( / dc la mfiam par

biag pa ni dan po sbyor ha la sogs pa nas / rig brgyahi dbyc
bahi bar clu ji srid tin iiehdziti sum cu rtsa brgvad sgom paho/
de b£in du mflam par ma biag pa ni lhahi ha rgyal gyis bar
294 YOGA OF THE GI’IIYASAMAJATANTRA
mtshams rnams la gnas pa ste / grtis po hdi dag zuri hjug gi rim
pa la yod pa ma yin tc I tin nc hdzin d«ah / rnam par gYch
ba dag ran biin gcig vin pahi phvir ro ).
The Sri-Paramadya-tantra' s last chapter has some relevant

verses (FIT, Yol. 5, p. 172-4):
/ dbari po gait daii gait lam gyur j

j dt dan dt yi no bm by a
I mnam par giag nay trial hbyor gyis
f rati gi lhag pahi lha sbyor by a .'/
j dt hid rnal hbyor hdi y is ni
j thams cad hid ni bsgrub par bye
j saris rgyas kun drios thams cad ni
I rtag tu mthoh citi grub par hgyur //
Whatever the sense basis and whatever its path, he should

act in the own-being of the former and the latter. By
yoga after stability, he will unite with his own presiding
lord ( adhideia ). By this very yoga he will accomplish
everything. He will always sec and perfect all the Buddha
natures.
{fVA}j vajrapadmasamayogdj jhanatrayavibkagavit f

liptdliptamatis tatra sukhena vihattt sadd // 30//
Knowing the portions of the three knowledges, through

union of thunderbolt and lotus,—the defiled and the
undefiled intelligence would dwell therein with bliss
for ever.
A ichan: Knowing well the portions of three knowledges—the

three (Lights called) Light, Spread-of-Light, and Culmination-
of-Light arising through the (sequential) dissolution of the winds,
by the sddhaka' s taking recourse to union of cajra and padrna —
both the defiled and the undefiled intelligence would for ever
be stabilized therein with ecstasy combined with void. This
refers to what is done by the possessor of discriminative intelli¬
gence distinguishing between (a) the stream of consciousness
defiled by the trouble of defilement ( klcsa ) when uniting with a
partner (mudrd) and acting that way, and (b) the stream of
consciousness undefiled by the trouble of operating in the
defiled path (in like circumstances).
The Vajramald has a brief chapter, no. 14 (FIT, Yol. 3, pp.

209 and 210), entitled, “Chapter Relating the Marriage of the
Diamond and the Lotus” (rdo rjc padma yah dag par sbyor ba
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY KIDAXA VERSES
295
hs;ul palii l«*hu). This contains two verses cited here and
translated with the help of Alamkakalasa’s comments (PTT
Vol. hi. p. 210-1, a and 211-1). The. first verse at Vol. 3,
p. 209-5, Ininas in the nmi-tantric terminology of calming
(famatha l and discerning (vipaiyana) , the two which should
he combined in Buddhist mm-tamric yugariaddha:
' pad-ma dr yi gnas dr In !

i dr vi .\byor bah on me hog tu gsal j
i ii guns pad-ma -rs gsuris la /
dr la (hag ml hot) rdo rjcho 11
And his union in that place of the padma is most clear when
(the master) explains that the padma is calming and that
the vajra there is discerning.
The next verse at Vnl. 3, p. 210-1, introduces the tantric termi¬

nology of male organ (lingo) and female organ ( bhaga)\
j hl<t Idan mam rtog bral ba yi /
/ rdo rjr Hi) -ga f rs ni bSad (

mam ring bral bahi bio Idan gyis j
I bha-ga pad-ma tea ni brjod If
The lingo possessing intelligence (matt) and lacking dis¬

cursive thought vitarka) is called vajra. The bhaga lack¬
ing intelligence and possessing discursive thought is called
padma.
On the latter. Alamkakalasa comments (PTT, Vol. 61, p. 211-1):

“ ‘Possessing intelligence' means: has the perfection of distin¬
guished insight ( prajiia ): ‘lacking discursive thought’ means
free from all (eighty) vikalpas.'' (bio Idan ies bya ba la sogs
pas gsuns ic khvad par can gyi ses rab phun sum tshogs pa dan
Idan pa laho / mam rtog bral bahi zes bya ba ni rnam par
rtog pa thams cad dan bral baho). When we add to this his
comments on the former verse PTT, Vol. 61, p. 210-4, 5), it
becomes possible to explain the two verses this way: Samatha,
or onc-pointcdncss of mind, temporarily clears the mind of
defilements but does not destroy them, since they remain in the
periphery of consciousness. So it is like the lotus (padma) which
is not adhered to by the muddy water but is still surrounded by
the muddy water (here the 80 vikalpas). Yipasyana, or dis¬
criminative ana lysis, is free from the defilements but is with¬
out location. So it is like the vajra which is the intelligence
free from the 80 vikalpas, but not localized in a particular mind.
296
The lotus and the diamond intuit that they complement each
other: the lotus will prepare the pure spot such as the mandala
of residence, and the diamond will introduce the divine intelli¬
gence such as the mandala of the residents. Their nuptials
are celebrated; otherwise stated, the yogin (whether male or
female)brings about their inseparable union with bliss for ever.
jjJRAH jpnbhate sarvabhdvatmd mdyopamasamddhina /
karoti buddhakrtydnl sarnpradayapadasthitah //31 //
The universal self of entities sports by means of the illu¬

sory samadhi. It performs the deeds ol a Buddha while
stationed at the traditional post.
Mchan : The universal self of inner-and-outer entities sports by

means of itself staying in the Illusory Samadhi: — Former tea¬
chers opined this to be the application to generating the gnosis
(jh&na) of‘arcane mind* ( cittaviveka) in meditative attainment
( samdpatti) through reliance on a partner ( mudra ); but that is
not all it is ! One should understand it also to be the generating
of ‘arcane mind’ in meditative attainment through continuous
line by ‘arcane body’ ( lus dben gyis rgyud nas ) and concretely by
‘arcane speech’ (flag dben gvis dfws jw); and we have already
explained the method of contemplation at the time of emerging
from the meditative attainment. By this is to be understood
the pregnant exposition of the doctrine of lust, not only in the
phase of the two carya-s (i.e. the first two, the prapahca-carya
and the nifprapahca-carya , explained under nidana verse 26),
but also the reliance on a partner (mudra). In their phase the
multiple occurrence of the three jiianas is numerous in these phases
of the Clear Light of the Supreme Entity and is the way of in¬
corporating the universal void of the Symbolic Clear Light into
the third void, the Culmination (-of-Light); hence, if one counts
separately the Symbolic Clear Light, there are four voids. //
One secs like that, itself appearing in the Illusorv Body, as
stated in the Pancakrama (3rd, 20b): “Stationed in the Illusory
Samadhi one secs everything that way.** // It performs the deeds
of a Buddha, i.e. performing the aim of sentient beings by various
means, and so doing by means of this Illusory Body; while
stationed in the Clear Light which is the ‘traditional post’, i.e.
the Supreme Entity. PrakdSika on Jra (PTT, Vol. 60, p.
296-1) : ‘Deeds of a Buddha’ means that he performs teaching,
maturation, and liberation (of the sentient beings); ‘the tradi-
commentary on the forty nidAna verses
297
tional post’ is the siddhdnta (consummate end), the post because

it docs not shilt; ‘stationed’ means resting there, (sans rgyas
kyi bya ba ni bstan pa dan / / yohs su sniin pa dan /mam par
grol ba la sogs pa byed pa ni mdzad paho / f gtan la dbab pain
gii ni grub pahi n it hah stc j dr hid ini hpho bahi phyir gnas
paho i ! dc las gnas pa ni rial so baho).
Paticakrama , 1st krama, 2B :
mdyopamasamiidhistho bhutakofyam samaviitt j

Stationed in the Illusory Samadhi he enters the true limit.
Jbid.y 1st krama, 58 :
anena vajrajdpena sevam krtva yathavidhi j

sadhayet sarvakaryani mdyopamasamddhina ({
Having done the service by that diamond muttering

according to the rite, he would accomplish all deeds by
the Illusory Samadhi.
Ibid., 3rd krama, 20 :
tasmad eva jagat sarvam mdyopamam ihocyaU (

mayopamasamddhiffhah sarvam patyati iadriam //
Accordingly, all the world is here said to be illusory.
Stationed in the Illusory Samadhi one sees everything
that way.
Ibid., 3rd krama (Svadhisthana), 29-30 :
mantramudraprayogam ca marujaladivikalpanam j
balihomakriyam sarvam kuryan mdyopamam sada //
iantikam pauftikam capi tatha vaSyabhiedrakam /
dkarfanddi yat sarvam kuryad indrayudhopamam //
He should engage in the training of mantra and mudrd,

in the imagining of manfala, etc., in the rites of ball and
horna; and in each ease, ever ‘illusory-like*. He should
engage in appeasing (deities), increasing (prosperity),
dominating (the elementary spiritis), overcoming (ini¬
mical elements), and in whatever attracting (of dakini -%),
and in each case, ‘rainbow-like’.
Tsoii-kha-pa, Comm, on Paticakrama, p. 71-1, 2, in illustration of

‘non -prapatica praxis’ (nifprapaiica-caryd) cites Anahgavajra’s
Prajnopdyavinikcayasiddhi (V, last line of verse 45, and verses
46-47) :
cittam caropya bodhau visayasukharatah sidhyatihaiva janmani }j

andspadah kalpanaya vimuktdh svabhdvatak sudd hat amah
samast&h /
298
YOGA OF THF. Gi l IYASAM AJ ATAXTRA
anatmasamjmiii$a\ahprat, it yd svapnenarajalapratibhdsatulyiih 46//

yaddi abuddhd niraia°raham attain sadbhir vipulaiayais tu /
taddbhibhutdh sahajavagatyd nn badhanajatamalibharanti //*17//
Having elevated the niirul to enlightenment, he. enjoying
ecstasy in sense object*, is successful in the present life.
The sense objec ts, called ‘non-self', by nature like dreams,
rainbows, and reflected images, are all intrinsically imma¬
culate, free from discursive thought and without abode.
When illustrious persons of wide aspiration fully under¬
stand them with a non-apprehending mind, then those
(sense objects) are overcome by together-born compre¬
hension and no longer trap (those persons) in their net.
// VO 1 ,} yogaS caivdtiyogaS at mahdvogah svayam bhavt'l i
vajri ca (bikini cairn furor yoga.< in yah svayam , 32//
Yoga, atiyoga, and mahayoga occur by themselves; also
vajrin, dakini, as well as any union (r««rt) of both, by
themselves.
Mchan ‘Yoga’ implies both yoga and anuyoga, and they plus
atiyoga and mahayoga —the pratfnnna-prayoga of four yogas —occur
by themselves for mdyddehin. Also vajrin , who is chief of the
vijaya-mandala, plus the dak ini , plus any yoga (of both) occur
themselves for mdyddehin. The two lines refer to the two samadhis
of mdyddehin (possessor of Illusory Body).
Prakasika on Yo (Vol. 60, p. 295-2 : Those arc the lour yotjcir

of the ‘Stage of Generation’, whereby one accomplishes the
samadhis of ‘Initial Praxis’, etc. In the ptesent case, yoga is
‘means’ (upaya), anuyoga is ‘insight’ ( prajhd ), atiyoga is entrance
into their union; mahayoga is the attainment of great bliss ( main!-
sukha) from their union, (bskyed pahi lim pa hi rnal hbyor
bfi ste / gan gis daii pohi sbyor ba /.vs bya ba la sogs pahi tin
he hdzin hgrub par hgvuv ro / hdir rnal hbyor ni tbabs so//
rjes su rnal hbyor ni ses t ab bo / / sin tu rnal hbyor ni de dag gi
sftoms par sugs pabo / /rnal hbvor chen po ni shouts par sugs
pa las bde ba chen po thob paho).
Besides, wc may interpret that the terms ‘yoga’, ‘atiyoga’,

and ‘mahayoga’ of nidana verse 32, refer to the yoga mastery
of the three lights, as is suggested by the synonyms of the lights
in verse 25, sunya, atisfinva, and mahasfmya. Thus the yogin
with such mastery can evoke automatically the dakini of sunya
(«prajfta), the vajrin of atisunya (supaya), or their
299
androgynous union. Notice also the series of terms in the lull

title oi the Guhyasamajalantra : rahasya, atirahasva, mahaguhya,
in which mahaguhya is understood to inchtdc both rahasya
and atirahasva.
The Guhyasamdjatantra, Chap. XVIII, verse 32, defines yoga

as follows :
prajnopdyasamdpattit yoga ity abhidhiyate i

Yo tn (It) slab tuna j) tab praj nd updyo bhaialak<anam //
‘Yoga' is defined as the equipoise of insight and means.
Whatever is devoid of intrinsic nature, is ‘insight’.
‘Means' is the characteristic of modes.
Nagarjuna's commentary, p. .‘>-2, 3, 4, 5, illustrates insight,

means, and their equipoise, first for each of his five stages {the
pancakrama); then for the terms cause, action, and fruit; next,
for each of the six members of the fatfanga-yoga. In the ease of
the six members, the explanations go as follows :
1. Insight is the sense organs and means is the sense

objects. The yoga of their equipoise and enjoyment, is
pratyahara .
2. Insight is the sense organs and means is the Tatha-

gatas. The yoga as their equipoise, is dhyana.
3. Insight is paramdrtha-bodhicitta and means is samvrti-

bodfiicitta. The yoga as their equipoise, involving the
emanation and reunification of them in upper and lower
sequence, is prana-ayama.
4. When insight and means ate as previous, the yoga of

their equipoise, holding the bindu the size of a mustard
grain in (or at) the three ‘tips of nose’, is dharand.
5. When insight and means are the Tathagatas embraced

by tlu: goddesses, the yoga of emanating into the sky, as
their equipoise, is anusmrti.
6. When insight and means arc the Dharmakaya and the

Sambhogakaya, the yoga of joining them with the Nir-
manakaya as their equipoise, is samadhi.
Now, although the nidana verse speaks ol those yoga states as

occurring by themselves for the possessor ot the Illusory Body,
the Guhyasamdjatantra, Chap. XVII, pp. 145-6, employs mytho¬
logical language representing the four goddesses as imploring
the lord in the Clear Light to come forth and make love to them.
The order of the goddesses is that in which they superintend
300
YOGA OF THE GL'IJYASAMAJATANTRA
the four rites (of appeasing, etc.). The translation is some¬

what expanded by the Pradipoddyotana and Mchan hgret (p. 162):
at ha te sane bodhisattvdh tuftiim lyavasthitd abhuian /
atha bhagavantah sanatathagatdh smvatathdgatakdya-
vdkcittavajray osidbhagefu vijahdra f
Then all those Bodhisattvas (their doubts dispelled) l>c-

came completely silent. Thereupon the Bhagavat who is all
(five) Tathagata (families) took abode in the bhaga-s (the
Buddhadharmodaya = the Clear Light) of the (four)
diamond ladies belonging to (Yajradhara, who is) the
vajra of the Body, Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas.
Then MamakI, the wife of the ‘mind of all the Tathagatas'
(-Aksobhya), implored Mahavajradhara in these passionate
terms :
*7 vam vajraeitta bhuvaneivata sattvadhato trayahi mdm

ratimanojila maharthakdmaih / kdmdhi mdm janaka
sattvamahagrabandhoyadicchase jivitam manjunathah //'
‘May you of adamantine mind, lord of the world, realm

of sentient beings, save me with love of great purpose,
O thou the gratificr of passion! O father, may the
great supreme kin of sentient beings love me, if you, the
mild lord, wish that I live.'
Then Buddhalocana, the wife of the ‘body of all the Tathagatas’

■
(• Vairocana), implored Mahavajradhara endearingly :
‘Tvam vajrakdya bahusattvapriydiikacakra

buddhdrthabodhiparamdrthahitanudars i f
rdgena ragasamayam mama kdmayasva
yadlcchase jivitam maiijunatha //'
‘May you, the diamond body, the revolving wheel ( afika -

cakra) that delights many beings, the revealcr of the
benefit of the Buddha aim and the supreme-enlightenment
aim, love me with passion at the time for passion, if you,
the mild lord, wish that I live.’
Then the ‘diamond eye of body, speech, and mind’ (- Pandara),

■
the wife of Lokesvara ( » Amitabha), suffused with passion
toward Mahavajradhara, pleaded with him :
'Tvarjt vajravdea sakalasya hitanukampi

lok&rthakiryakarane soda sampravrttah f
kdmdhi mdm suratacarya samantabhadra
yadicchase jivitarp mahjundtha jf
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDA.NA VERSES

301
‘You, O diamond speech, have compassion for everyone’s

benefit, are always engaged in doing the needful for the
world’s aim. Love me, O entirely good one (Samanta-
bhadra) with the praxis of ecstasy, if you, the mild lord,
wish that I live.’
Then the wife ( — Arya-Tara) of the Samayavajra

(«Amoghasiddhi) of the Body, Speech, and Mind of all the
Tathagatas, exhorted Maltavajradhara to make love to
her:
‘Tvatn vajrakdma samayagra mahdhxtdrtha

sambuddhava/xisalilakah samatdriukampi f
kamiihi mam gunanidhim bahuratnabhutam
yadicchasc jivitam mahjundtha //’
‘O Diamond love, the pinnacle of the Samaya (family),

whose aim is the great benefit; you have the mark of
the Complete Buddha's family and arc compassionate
with equality. Love me who is the treasure of virtues
made of many jewels, if you, the mild lord, wish that I
live.’
Thereupon, the Bhagavat, Yajiapant Tathagata, immersing

himself in the samadhi called ‘diamond glory partaking of all
desires’, remained silent, while making love to the wives of
all the Tathagatas bv means of the samoyacakra (atha bhagavan
vajrapanis tathagatah sarvakamo-pabhogavajrasriyaxp nama
samadhim samapannas tam sarvatathagatadayitam samayacak-
rena kamayan tusnlmabhut / ).
The Pradipoddyotana (PTT, \*ol. 158, p. 163-4, 5) explains that

the four goddesses, respectively representing the four Brahma-
viharas, which arc friendliness (mailri), compassion ( karuna ),
sympathetic joy ( anumodand ), impartiality ( upekfa ), succeeded
in their love petitions because the Bhagavat, by virtue of the
continuity of his previous vow (shon gyi smon lam gyi rgyun
gi sugs kyis)cmerged from the voidness-yoâ ( — the Clear Light)
and entering the above-named samadhi, engaged in love with
those goddesses by means of the samaya-cakra, w f hich is the
8x8— 64 kama-kald , or love techniques.
The lich symbolism of the Guhyasamdja account emphasizes

the exhorting by the female element, the winds, elements,
Nature herself, for the Lord to emerge from the absolute plane
as the compassionate teacher to show the path to others. For
302
YOGA OF THE GritYASAMA jatantra
this he must embrace Nature, the wife <»l others. And yet this
takes place by itself.
// SID // nifiddham apt krtt-ii vai krtyakrlya-vivarjitnh /

na lipyaU svabhdvajnah padtmpatram ivambhasa // 33 //
Having done even the prohibited, he renounces both
the proper and the improper act. 1 he one knowing the
intrinsic nature is not adhered to (by sin), any more
than is a lotus leal by water.
Mchatt : If one practises in the ‘strands oi desire' (kdmagtwa =

the five sensory objects) of the vidyti (ri«* ma ', is this in conflict
with the saying, “Desires are like poisonous leaves" ? ( I he
verse) disputes this. ‘Prohibited’ :—this is the label which
the other vehicle applies to desire for the ‘strands of desire’.
‘Having done even the prohibited’ with the skilful means
{updyakauialya ) of this (our) vehicle, ‘he renounces’ the dis¬
cursive thinking ( vikalpa ) of‘both the proper and the improper
act.’ He ‘is not adhered to’ in his stream of consciousness by
the trouble of committed desires, etc., which lead to an evil
destiny ( durgaii ), because he is ‘one knowing the intrinsic
nature’ of the dharmas. According to the texts of ‘Hphags pa
yab sras’ (i.e. the tantrics Xagarjuna and Aryadeva) there is
also such a viewpoint in the lower vehicle (Hiiiayanu), hence
in both (vehicles) it reduces to the greatest absurdity that there
is (unethical) permissiveness to take recourse to the ‘strands
of desire’ (form, sound, etc.) of the vidyd. But. while the com¬
prehension of reality is the main thing, it is necessary to fulfill
the frequently-mentioned characteristic of both firmness in
'yoga of the deity’ (daatd-yoga) and non-regression (avaivartika)
of the Bodhisattva (on the 8th to 10th stages, or Stage of Com¬
pletion). Because, while the lack of fault refutes the ‘jM*r-
missiveness’, there is a diflcrence in the respective candidates
of the two (vehicles).
The scriptural citation “Desires are like poisonous leaves”

is presumably taken by lsoii-kha-pa from Bu-ston's liSad sbyar
on $id (Ta, f. 57b-4) : “Mdo las / hdod pa mums ui dug gi
lo ma lta buho ics hdod yon la sogs spyod bkug paho / tc na /”.
So far I only find a reference to the poisonous flowers, as in the
passage like the flower on the poison tree” (vi,\avrkfe \afha
pufpani ), in Dharma-Samuccava , 2° Panic (Chap. IX), p. 280.
Also, in the UdayanavatsarajaparipnchA ol the Ratnakuta collec-
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTS’ NIDANA VERSES
303
tion (Dergc, Kanjur, Dkon brtscgs, Ca, f. 215a-4) there is the

half-verse. ha la ha lain dug hdra hahi / hdod chags kvis ni de
yah hkhrugs , “He is agitated by passion which is like the
halakala poison.” But this poison is produced from the roots of
the plant of that name, and is also the poison churned from the
ocean according to the Parana legend.
Prakdiikd on Sid (Vol. f»0. p. 295-2): ‘Prohibited’ means action

in violation of the world. For example, to harm those who do
injury to the Three Jewels (Buddha, Doctrine, and Congrega¬
tion); to steal the goods of the miser; to deprive the lustful
person of a family; to cut the pride of the proud; to speak harshly
to the envious. When one docs such acts as those in violation
of the world, and under control of‘skill in the means’, he is not
defiled, for by doing it under control of great compassion
(mahdkarund), there is no obscuration (aiaratia). (dgag pa ni
hjig rten dan hahi las so ' dper na dkon mchog gsum la gnod
pa can rnams la rnam par htshe ha dan 1 scr sna can la rdzas
hphrogs pa dan / hdod chags can hu sniad hphrog pa dan / ha
rgyal can la ha rgyal gcod pa dan ' phrag dog can la rtsub mo
smra ba dan ! de la sogs pahi hjig rten dan hgal bahi las rnams
thabs la mkhas pahi dbah gis byas tc gos par mi hgyur tc / shin
rjc chen pohi dbah gis byas par gyur na sgrib par mi hgvur ro/).
In accord with the second half of the nidana verse, Aryadeva

writes in his Cittavisuddhiprakarana , verse I 15 :
pankajdtam yathd padmam pa ilk ado fair na lipyate }

vikalpaidsanadotais tatha yogi na lipyate jj
Just as a lotus sprung from mud is not adhered to by
the faults of mud, so is the yogi not adhered to by the
faults of discursive thought and habit energy.
The phrase ‘knowing the intrinsic nature*, or a similar

expression, especially occurs in the eommentarial interpreta¬
tions of Guhyasamaja passages. Let us begin with the lady
(jofit) as portrayed in the last three verses (emended) of Guhya-
samajatantra , Chap. IV:
fodaiabdikam samptapya yofitam kanlistiprabham /
gandhapu>pam alamkrtva tasya rnadhye tu kamayet //
adhtf tbdpya ca (dm prdjhah mamakim gunamtkhaldm / •
srjed buddltapadam saumyam akasadhaU alamkrtam //

vinmutraiukraraktadin decatandm nivedayet j
evamtufyanti sambuddhdh bodhisattva mabdyaiah Jj
304
YOGA OF THE GUHYAÂMAJATANTRA
Having obtained a lady, I6-ycarcd, lovely in appearance,

having prepared a fragrant {lower, one should love (her)
in its center. The wise man, empowering that MamakI
girdled with merits, goes out to the calm Buddha plane
adorned with the realm of space. He should offer to
the gods excrement, urine, semen, and blood. In that
way, the Complete Buddhas and the renowned Bodhi-
sattvas are pleased.
The Pradipoddyofana quotes the Snntdhivyak arana expansion of
those verses {.\Ichan bgrcl, p. H-2, 3, 1) :
kfanddiktitabhedena samjiiti sytit yadasabdikd ]

anutptidofitti Stinti{r) yoyitti ili niScitti //
Santadharmtinapettikhyd l tint imp)abhmlitd ;
pratityavasantigandham puypam jntintwiktisanam //
nihsvabhtivakulc jneyam sarvajndjntinamadhyamam /
kamayed idrSim prtijfio yo'itam dhaimadhtituktim / ,'
nn cadhyatmam na bdhydntam nobhaye 'nyatra samsthita j
asthtinasthitiyogah syad ato mtimaki matti .7
tat svabhdvaikayngam tv adhiy (hdnam tad ucyale j
akaSaikatvasamvasah saumyam buddhapadam bhavet
atah samharandn lit sydd vifaytih parikalpittih
miitram jntinendriyam samstham Sukram visuddhidhannatti f(
raktarn sarvajnattijntinam ye dkarma h parikalpittih ;
ta eva devatah khytitti niksvabhtivo nivedanam
evam tu.yanti tc buddhti jinaurasti viSeyatah /
laukiki kalpana yeftim teftim eva yathoditam //
The peace abiding in the unborn, whose name would be

16-yeared by differentiation of time starting with a mo¬
ment, is determined as the Madv’ (yoyit). Possessing a
calm nature, she is said to be lovely in appearance.
The flower has the perfume of habit-energy in dependence
and is full-blown with gnosis.
The knowablc in the lamily devoid of intrinsic nature

is centered in omniscient knowledge. (.There) the
wise man should love such a ladv belonging to the
Dharmadhatu.
She who dwells neither within nor without, nor in both

or elsewhere, would be the yoga whose station is without
location. Accordingly is Marnnki understood.
The singleness of intrinsic nature is what is referred to
305
as the empowerment. The cohabitation of oneness with

space is the calm Buddha plane.
Thus, the excrement is the amassings as the imagined

sense objects. The urine is the formation with sense
organs (jiiancndiiya). The semen is the true nature of
purity. (Menstrua!) blood is the knowledge of all
knowables. Those imagined natures (personality aggre¬
gates, and so on) arc the deities. The offering is the
lack of intrinsic nature.
In that way, those Buddhas and their spiritual sons are

especially pleased. Whoever have mundane imagina¬
tion, for them it lias been told as (above).
The expression ‘who knows the intrinsic nature’ occurs in

the interesting comment by Pradipoddyotana on Gahyasamaja-
tantra > Chap. V, verses 7-8:
motrbhaginiputrimS ca kamayed yas tu sadhakah /

sa siddhim uipuldm gacchct mahayanagradhamiatum jf
tnii(atom buddhasya vibhoh kdmayan na ca lipyate /
sidhyate tasya buddhatvam nirvikalpasya dluma tab If
The performer who loves the ‘mother’, ‘sister’, and
‘daughter—achieves the extensive siddhi at the true nature
of the Mahayana summit. Loving the Mother of the
Buddha, who is the pervading lord, one is not adhered
to (by sin). Buddhahood is accomplished for that wise
man, devoid of discursive thought.
The Pradipoddyotana (Mchan hgrcl, pp. 43-44) comments :
buddhasya matatn prajiia pa rami tarn svahrdisthitarn

niscarva taya sahasamapattim kuryat / hrdayastha
tnahadevl yogi no yogavahinl / jananl sarvabuddhanam
vajradhatvisvari smrteti vacanat ' kamayann iti matr-
bhaginiduhitrvaddhitaisinibhih 1 samayajnabhih / jnana-
mudraya ca parainanandasukham anubhavah/ na ca
lipyata iti ragadiklesair naiva sprsyate / na kevalam
ragadidosair na lipyate / api tu sarvasampatlim apadyata
iiy aha f sidhyata itvadi / tasya sadhakasya dhlh susiksita
mudra / yasya tasya dlumatah / nirvikalpasya svabha-
vajnasya / buddhatvam mahavajradharatvam sidhyate
svayam eva nispadyale / ncyarthah // punar arya-vya-
khyanam ucyatc / prajnaparamitam prajnam dharmaka-
yatkamairkani ; kamayc(n) ni (h)svabhavakhyam
306
tathatadvayayogatah sanibhogatulyatam jatam tarn

cva bhaginim matam ! kamaycn mautramurtya
tu svadhidaivatayogavan // sadhako bhavayct tarn tu
putrim nirmanarupinim / kamayann idrsah yogi bhagi-
nimatrputnkarn [ sa siddhirn vipulam gacchcn maha-
yanagradharma (ta )m//nitarthah,/
Having drawn forth the (lady) Prajnaparamita (from

the Clear Light) dwelling in his own heart who is the
mother of the Buddha, he should engage in union with
her, because it is said (in the Sarvarahasyatantra, verse
46):
The great goddess dwelling in the heart, causing the

yoga of the yogin, the mother of all the Buddhas, is called
“Queen of the Diamond Realm’.
^Loving’ means by those aware of the pledge, well-wishing,

for such as mother, sister, daughter. Experiencing the ecstasy
of supreme bliss with the * know ledge seal’, one is ‘not adhered
to (by sin)’, i.e. is not contacted by the defilements of lust and
so on. Not only is one not adhered to by the faults (bad
destiny) of lust and so on, but also one attains all perfection,
for which reason (the verse) says ‘ (Buddhahood) is accompli¬
shed’ and so on. The wisdom (dhi = prajnd) of that performer
is the well-trained mudra . For that wise man, wlio is ‘devoid
of discursive thought’, i.e. knows the intrinsic nature, Buddha-
hood, i.e, the state of Mahavajradhara, is accomplished just
by itself, i.e. completed. Hinted meaning . Also, it is said in
the *Arya-vydkhydtia' (the Samdhivyakarana)-.
He should love by the non-dual yoga of thusness the

PrajAa-woman, who is the Perfection of Insight called
‘devoid of intrinsic nature’, the ‘Mother’ (the Clear
Light) identical to the Dharmakava. He, equipped
with the of his own presiding divinity (of the Stage
of Completion) should love just that one referred to as
‘sister’, engendred equal to the Sambhogukaya (which
has emerged as the yuganaddha-dcha from the wind and
mind-only ol the Clear Light). But, by (his) incantation
body (which has rc|>catcdly contemplated the Clear
k*8ht), the performer should contemplate that ‘daughter’
with the form of the Nirmana(kaya) (of the various
Tathagatas).
307
The yogin of this kind, loving the ‘mother,’ ‘sister,* ‘dau¬

ghter/ attains the extensive siddhi> i.c. the supreme
dharma-naturc of Mahayana.
Evident meaning.
It should be mentioned that the Mchan hgrel identified both the

Sarvarahasyatantra (the verses of which I have numbered) and
the Samdhiryakarana citations. Besides, the translation has
been influenced by the expression ‘ idrfa ’ applied to the yogin.
In order that he be ‘of this kind’ there should be a relevant
statement in each of the three eases, i.c. for the ‘mother’ “by
the nou-dual yoga of thusness”; for the ‘sister’ “equipped with
the_)'o/j<i of his own presiding divinity”; and for the ‘daughter*
“by (his) incantation body”. This consideration justifies
taking the Sanskrit expression mantramurtyd (‘by his incantation
body’) with the suggestion of/?/. . . tu , to apply to the ‘daughter*
of the next verse. Otherwise, the yogin would be of two ‘such
kinds’ for the ‘sister’ and of no ‘such kind’ for the ‘daughter*.
This also suggests the solution that the consort of the yogin in
the Mahasadhana phase of the Stage of Generation is the
‘daughter’; while his consorts during the Stage of Completion
arc the ‘sister’ and the ‘mother*. (Much information about
this daughter,etc. symbolism is in my article “Female Energy...”
reprinted with collections in 7 he Buddhist Tantras).
But also, the Ouhyasamdjatantra , Chap. V, after those verses

7-8, portrayed the astonishment of the Bodhisattvas. So the
Lord pronounced verse 9 :
iyam sa aharmata ittdaha buddhanam sdrajhunindm /

saradharmarthasambhuta Cfti bodhicaripadam //
This is the pure true nature of the Buddhas who know

the essential (the Nirvana of no fixed abode). That,
having arisen from the nature of the essential (supreme
truth) and the entity (conventional truth), is the plane
of enlightenment-coursing (Mahavajradhara).
Thereupon, according to Chapter V, the Bodhisattvas fainted.
The Ptadipoddyotana {.Mchan hgrei , p. 44-4, 5 to p. 45-1 ) quotes
again the Samdhivyukarana on this chapter:
punar aryavyakhyanam ueyate j
aspan{d)akatn idatft gtthyam santaikam sukham uttamam /

j andhy ay a kathitaty cedatp samyaksambodhiprupaka h. //...
akaidnantatayogad rupadinam anantatd f
308
YOGA OF THE GlTIVASAMA)ATANTRA
te vai tathagatdh proktd bodhisattvas tathaiva ca If...

tat tu samgraham ivedam mandalam yat svakdyatah /
kalpayantiha satkdydh bodhisattvd hi murchitdh H
na jananii tadityautc sukhcnoumadacoditdh j
bodhisattian mahasattvdn uktan te m urchitan
Further, the ‘Arya-Yyakhyana’ is tiled (for the ‘evident
meaning’): Motionless is this secret (place), peaceful,
unique, the supreme ecstasy. And this attaincr of
perfect enlightenment is stated iu the manner of twilight.
By the yoga (the two dhyanas) of space ( sfmya) and
infinity (= mahasunyn), there is infinity of form, etc.
(the skandhas, the elements, the sense bases). Those
arc indeed the Tat hagai as as well as the Bodhisattvas.
Now, that is this coinprisah which is the mandala as the
(yogin’s) body. The Bodhisattvas imagine it in this
world as their transitory bodies, so they swoon. Since
they do not know that (truth, the intrinsic nature), when
exhorted by ecstasy’s frenzy, the Bodhisattva Great Beings
are said to ‘swoon’.
Some other explanations of the seemingly immoral

injunctions are made without resort to such interpretations, as
above, of knowing the intrinsic nature. For example, the
Guhyosamdjatantra. Chap. XVI, p. 120, has a verse which
stipulates conduct precisely the reverse of the Buddhist layman’s
vows:
praninas ca tvayd ghdtyd vaktavyam ca ttitsa vacah /

adattam ca tvaya gidhynm sevanam yofitdm api jf
You should kill living beings, speak lying words, take
things not given, and resort to the ladies.
The Pradipoddyotana (.\Ichan hgrcl edition) does not comment

on this verse, presumably because the subject already was treat¬
ed in Chapter IX’s commentary. So, Ciuhyasamdja, IX, p. 35:
He should kill all sentient beings with this secret thunderbolt :

(anena guhyavajrena sarvasattvam vighatayei); Pradipoddyo-
tana y PTT, Yol. 158, p. GG-5 : “He should destroy all sentient
beings by rendering them into the Void (ifijtw)” (sems can
thams cad bsad cin stoti par byas pas rnatu par g£ig p al '
byaho). Tatitra p. 36: “He should contemplate the stealing
of all materials with the triple thunderbolt’ (haranam sarva-
dravyanam trivajrena vibhavayet); PIT, Yol. 158, p. 67-2:
309
“ ‘stealing’ means he summons the substance of all the Tatha-

gatas” (phrogs pa ni de biin gsegs pa thams cad kyi rdzas dgug
Pa ho) Tantra , p. 36 : “There he should contemplate the
conjunction of all of them to the aspect of a lady” (yosidakara-
samyogam sarvesam tatrabhavayet); PTT, \'ol. 158, p. 67*4, 5:
“ ‘there*, in that manrfala, he should contemplate the conjunc¬
tion with i.c. the transformation (of all other male deities)
into, the appearance of goddesses” (dkyil hkhor der... bud
nied kyi rnam pa lta bur vohs su gyur paho). Tantra t p. 36 :
“He should contemplate all forms as the diamond expressions
which are lying words” (tnrsavadam vajrapadam sarvabimban
vibhavayet); PTT, Vol. 158, p. 68-2: “He should contemplate
all forms of sentient beings as lying words, since all dharmas are
like illusions” (thams cad gzugs tc sems can thams cad...rdo
rjohi tshig gi rdzun smra has ies bva ba ni i chos thams cad
sgyu ma lta bu yin pas). Of course, it is not such a terrible
doctrine after all, if killing of living beings means only seeing
them as void; telling lies, the working with dharmas that arc seen
as illusions; stealing, the drawing into oneself of the divine sub¬
stance of the Tathagatas; and uniting freely with the ladies, the
imaginative transformation of mandala deities into goddesses.
The Gnhyasamaja in one place suggests that this ‘renouncing

the proper and the improper act’ of the nidana verse is from the
absolute standpoint while in conventional terms we must still
make these value judgments. Thus, Chapter IX, p. 38:
mahddbhutefu dharnuû dkdsasadriesu ca /
nirvikalpe$u iuddhefu samvrtis tu pragiyate //
While the dharmas are marvellous and like the sky, are free
from imagination and pure—a convention is expressed.
Another solution is to take ‘sin as merit’, according to

Pancakrama, V, 34-35 :
yathd saukhyam tathd duhkham yathd dusfas tathd sulah /

yathavicis tathd svargas tathd punyam tu pdpakam //
evatfi jiidtva cared yogi nirviiankas tu sarvakrt /
pracchannavratam asadya sidhyante sarvasampadah If
Having known suffering to be as happiness, the son as the
despised person, heaven as the Avici hell, sin as merit, the
yogin should do all deeds without fear. By his recourse
to the private asceticism, all perfections are fulfilled.
310
YOGA OF THE Gt'HYASAMAJATANTRA
G. Bhage-ftt vijahara (lias dwelling in (he bhagas)
In the six-mcm bercd voga, this is the Inst member, Samadhij

and in the Pahcakrama system, it is the last krama, \ uganaddha,
in fact continuing the kaikâ-yuganaddha and ending with aiaiksa -
yuganaddha. BHA portrays the yogin as a Buddha in one or
another of the five Buddha families: while GL portrays his
‘home’, where he is, being the female element ol the world.
The syllable SL’ is understood as the locative indication govern¬
ed by the verb Vijahara. Therefore, the author of these verses
starts his final aSaikfa topic with SL'. The \ ajrasattva yogin
continues by dwelling anywhere SL \ 1-jA-HA-RA) to instruct
the advanced Bodhisattvas.
What is the meaning of the word 'bhaga' * I he 1 ajramdld

Explanatory Tantra, Chap. 41 PTT. Vol. 3. p. 219-3) states :
/ chos dbyihs bha-ga ;es ni brjad /
/ bha-ga nn cheti ,'ji nut tog

! S a, ‘ phyir dban phyug sags yon (an
l Idan pa dc phyir bha-ga btjad //
/ bha-ga chos mam v su yah bind f

j dbyihs ni byati chub sems su gsiths f
j khams gsum pa yi hgro bo yi /
/ rgyu ni bha-ga its byar bind
The Dharinadhatu is called 'bhaga'.
The bhaga is a jewelled basket ( karanda).
Because it possesses the merits of ‘lordliness* and so on,

it is called 'bhaga'. The bhaga is also explained as the
dhamias. The dhdtu is said to be the bodhicitta. The
cause of movement of the three realms is explained as
* bhaga*.
The explanation by the Sandhivyakarana Explanatory Tantra

is cited by the Piadipoddyolana (Mchan hgrel. p. 21-2) :
yathoktam bhagavatd sandhydiydkarana-tantre f
sarvabuddhofita yd vd bhumih sydt sd trayodaSi■
sd ca yofit samdkhydtd saddharmo bhaga ucyate
As it was said by the Lord in the Sandhivydkaranatantra :
I he Stage resorted to by all the Buddhas is the Thirteenth,

and it is called the ‘lady*. The Dharma of illustrious
persons is said to be the bhaga.
(Sfchan hgrel explains that the 1 entli Stage has the three lights.
The Illusory Body is the Eleventh Stage. The Clear Light is
COMMENTARY ON THt FORTY XIDANA VERSUS
311
the Twelfth Stage. The Thirteenth Stage is the *Adhimukti-
eat Y.'i-hhiimi (tuns sprod hi sa) (hence Anusmiti in the six-
memhrred yoga or Abhisambodhi of the Pamakratno ]. Accord¬
ingly a fourteenth Stage is allotted io Vugnnaddha.)
(iandrakirti's Prat/ifmldyotana on Chapter Seven, verse 21,

devoted to ‘remembrance of the Buddha* (buddhanusmrti ),
comments on the words ‘dvayendriyasamapattya lniddhabim-
bam vibha vayet' (‘‘With union of the two organs one should
contemplate an image of the Buddha”), as follows : / bhagah
pur.mi.'n ihasatyam / tasmiu jlyata iti litigant / kim tat samvrti-
satv.un pratistliapva prabhasvare pravesya buddhabimbam
mahavajradharatn vibha vayet parainarthasatyad vyuttha-
payed iiy arthah ‘‘The bhaga is supreme truth. About the

finga, it is said, ‘It lies therein'. And what is it ? Conventional
truth. ‘Blueing it', i.e. introducing it into the Clear Light,
one should contemplate an image of the Buddha, i.c. Maha-
vajradh.ua. One should make it emerge from Supreme truth.
Thai is the meaning." Afckan hgrtl p. 58-1, 2) comments on
the Uiiga in the sense of Conventional truth that it is the Illusory
Bodv sgyu mahi t/.M . which ibid . p. 21-1-7 is golden . Earlier,
in Pradip'ddyotnna's comments on Chapter One (Afcban bgrel , p.
21-3, 4 . the same topic was set lorth as follows: atha prabha-
svarapravesad anantaram bhagavan mahavajradharah sarva-
tathagatakay.iv.ikcittadbipatih sai vakulatmakatn atmunam
paramarthasutyad vyut thuya bhavanit vanaikatasasvabhavena
sarvatathagalamahasamayamandalam.idhye pratisthapavam asa /
‘‘Immediately after the entrance of the Illusory Body)
in to the Clear Light, the Lord Mahavajradhara, master of the
Bodv. Speech, and Mind of all the Tathagatas, arousing himself,
who is all the families, from Absolute Truth ( paramarthasatya ),
by the intrinsic nature of ‘single essence' (inseparability) of the
phenomenal world the Illusory Body as samvrti-sotya ) and
Nirvana the Clear Light gnosis as paramartha-satya ) established
himself in the center of the ‘Great Pledge matufala of all the
Tathagatas." This is the four-cornered dustless mandala.
Those passages clarify the usage of the word 'bhaga' as

Supreme Truth, the Clear Light, in the sense of what is entered.
Hence, mystically, the word for ‘female organ’ is employed for
this arcanum, which therefore can represent any cahra of the
body with the stipulation that the yogin enters (with a subtle
312
YOGA OF THE Gl*HYASAMAJATANTRA

body) that cakra and realizes the Clear Light. The comment
on ‘ bhaga ’ as ‘destruction of defilement* (cf. the introductory
section on the niddna) refers to the purifying function of the
Clear Light, which is credited with converting the impure
Illusory Body into the pure gnostic body as the Samhhogakaya.
The explanation of Yuganaddha consistent with the above

remarks is treated as follows in the Pahcakrama , 5th krama
(Yuganaddha), verse 18 (Sri Laksmi, Yol. 63, p. 51-1, 2) :
ragaragaviniiviuktah paramanandamur liman
asamsaram sthitim kuijad \uganaddhai ibhauikah n
Possessing the (Illusory) Body in supreme ecstasy (- the
Clear Light), which is free from ‘desire* and ‘aversion’
(- the prakrtis associated with Spread-of-Light and Light),
he should remain as long as does samsdra , contemplating
yuganaddha.
Sri Laksmi further explains that this verse portrays the state
called ‘Nirvana without fixed abode’ ( aprati$thita-nirvdna ). This
is referred to in Pahcakrama , 5th krama, verses 2, 25 :
samsdro nirvrtii ceti kalpauadvayavarjanat j
ekibhdvo bhaved yatra yuganaddham tad ucyatc jj
<tad evddvayajhdnam apratifthitanirvrtih ,
buddhatvam vajrasattvatvam sarvatiuaryam tathaiva ca j;
Having eliminated the two imaginations 'samsdra' and
‘nirvana ’—then wherein unification occurs, is called
‘ yuganaddha ’ (the pair united). Just that is the non-dual
knowledge, the Nirvana without fixed abode, Buddha-
hood, the state of Yajrasattva, as well as universal
sovereignty.
But the human mind prefers that a dwelling be localized

somewhere. The Guhyasamdjatanha , Chap. XVII, p. 139,
has the passage :
I atha tc sane mahabodhisattvah tan sarvatathagatan

evam aliuh / sarvatathagatakayavnkeittasiddhini bhaga-
vautah kutra sthitam kva va sambhtituni sarvatathaga-
ta(i prahuh / trikayaguhyam sarvatathagatakayavak-
cittain vajracaryasya kayavakcittavajre sthitam maha-
bodhisattva ahull / kayavakcittaguhyavajram kutra sthi¬
tam / sarvatathagatah prahuh j aka sc sthitam maha¬
bodhisattvah prahuh j akasam kutra sthitam , sarvata¬
thagatah prahuh / na kvacit / atha tc mahabodhisattva

313
ascarvaprapta adbhutapraptah tusnim sthita abhuvan /

Tlicii all those great Bodhisattvas spoke as follows to all
the Tathagatas : “Lords, where dwell the occult powers
(siddhi) ol the Body, Speech, and Mind of all the Tatha-
gatas ? Where have they arisen ?” All the Tathagatas
replied : “The secret of three bodies—the Body, Speech,
and Mind ol all the Tathagatas dwells in the diamond of
Body, Speech, and Mind of the diamond hierophant.”
1 he great Bodhisattvas asked : “Where dwells the secret
diamond of his Body, Speech, and Mind ?” All the
Tathagatas replied: “It dwells in the sky.” The great
Bodhisattvas asked: “Where dwells the sky?” All the
Tathagatas replied: “Nowhere.” Then those great
Bodhisattvas in wonderment and amazement became

silent.
Another interpretation of the word ‘bhaga’ is found inCclu-

pa s Ratnavtk*a~ndma~rah asya-samdja-vrtti (PTT,, Yol. 63, p. 174-1)
“It is said : ‘Because it makes known everything, the mind(citta)
is called "bhaga of the lady”. From that is born the Teacher.’ ”
( / ji skad du tliams tad ses par lived pahi phyir / thugs ni
bud med bha-galio ics so tie las bviin ba tii ston paho / ).
However, the citta to which C'elu-pa refers is actually the bodhi-
citta. There is a celebrated verse about this, which was pro¬
nounced by Yairocana in the Guhyasarndja, Chap. Two :
sanabhd: a: igat am skandhadhdti dyata nagrdhyag rdhakararjitam f

dharmanaiidtmyasamatayd Si ant (am ddyanutpannam iunyata-
bhdi am //
“My citta is free from all inodcs-of-bcing; avoids the per¬

sonality aggregates, i calms, and sense bases, as well as
subject and object; is primordially unborn, the intrinsic
nature of voidness through the sameness of dharmanai -
rdt my a
There are also some other explanations ol yuganaddha. Thus,

Pahcakrama, 5th kutm.t, verse 12, associates yuganaddha with the
‘central vein’ of the body :
pitidagrdhdnubhcdabhydifi pravesas tathatdlaye /

utthdnam ca tato yatra samatdd i uganaddhakam //
By means of contraction [pind^gfdha) and expansion
(anubheda) —the entrance, so in the abiding, and then
314
YOGA OF THE Gl’llYASAMAjATANTRA
wherein the rising—through equality (of the two), there

is yuganaddha' .
The Subh&sita-samgraha (Part II, p. 42) quotes the Samvara-

tantra about yuganaddha :
exa svdbhavikah kayak iunyatdkarunddvayah /

napumsaka iti khydto yuganaddha iti kvacit //
This Svabhavika Body, the non-duality ol voidness and

compassion, called the Androgyne, is sometimes said to
be yuganaddha.
Finally, Paficakrama , 5th krama, verse 20 (Sri Laksmi. p. 52-2,3)

defines yuganaddha in terms ol samndhi:
vajropamasamddhis tu nifpannakrama eva ca !

mayopamasamadhii copy advayam tac ca kathyatc //
For the Diamond-like Samndhi is precisely the nifpanna¬

krama ; and the Illusory Samndhi is the non-dual (know¬
ledge ).
At this point, Sri Laksmi quotes a verse without naming the

source : 11 With insight (prajiid) one does not stay in samsdra;
with compassion (karuntl) one does not stay in (the quiescent)
nirvdna: —For a long time with not the means ( upaya) and for
the same long time with the means” ( / ses rab kyis ni srid mi
gnas / / sftin rjes mva nan hdas mi gnas ! / thabs med pa vis
yun riri dan / / thabs kyis kyah ni yun rih hid ! ). Here ‘insight*
is not the ‘means’ and ‘compassion’ is.
HBHAII bhavaty affagunaii caryair upetah sarvavit svayam /

vicarej jhanadchcna lokadhator ase>atah / ; 3 4/ /
Equipped with the eight gunas to be practised, an omni¬

scient being arises, and by himself wanders all over the
worldly realm by means of the knowledge body.
Mehan : ‘Eight gunas’ are subtle form, etc. (siJkfmarSpddi );
‘himself 1 —the yogin.
Pradtpoddyotana on Guhyasamdja , Chap. XV, verse 51 ; Mchn

hgrel edition, p. 124-4 : “Because he has the eight guna-aiivarya
he has glory (frf mat)” ( / yon tan gyi dban phyug brgyad dan
Idan pas na / de ni dpal Idan palm / ). On this remark, Mehan
bgrtl comments in part that it is the .fa ikfa - yuganaddha . Pra -
kdiikd on Bha (Vol. 60, p. 295-2): ‘Equipped with the gunas *
means he has the lordliness of eight gunas of the subtle, etc. or
has the lordliness of body, etc.; ‘an omniscient l>eing arises*
means that he knows the mental make-up of all sentient l>cings
315
ol past, present, and future, and knows their death, transmigra¬

tion. and rebirth; also, for the sake of sentient beings he ‘by
himselt wanders bv means of the jhdna-drha', that is to say, he
wanders ‘all over the lokadhdtu by the illusory aspect as well as
through all the Buddha fields {yon tan 2cs bva ba la sogs pa
smos te pin a ba la sogs pa yon tan brgvad kyi dbah phyug
gam skuhi dbah phyug la sogs pa dc dan Idan paho ! ! sems can
tbarns cad rig hgyur ês pa ni hdas pa la sogs palii dus gsum
gyi nan na guas palii sems can thams cad kyi sems kyi spyod
pa daft hchi bplio ba dan skve ba la sogs pa scs par hgvur re /
tie b;in du yah sems can gyi don bya ba phyir bdag hid ye scs
Ins k\ i spyod ■ ecs pa ni sgyu ma ha buhi rnam pas hjig rten gyi
khains ma lus pa ste / satis rgyas kvi zih rnams yotis su spyod
do ' ).
I*radifmddyutona on (iuhyasanuija. Chap. XYII, p. 135 and verse

3‘); .\hhan h">tl edition, p. 151-3: —
(a) I’radifmddyulnxia comment on the words trivajrah paxamt-

fraxaft : “ The three zajras are the diamond Bodv, Speech, and
Mind; and he is 'supreme' (paramo) among them.” “Further¬
more. the eight are : I lordliness aikarya) of bodv,
(2) lordliness of speech, (3, Imtlliuess ol mind, (-1) of magical
prowess rddhi . 5. omnipresent lordliness (j/m'rt'jti/arhvtrvti)
(6) of wish iccha . 7 ol creating kartr} % (8) lordliness of the
gimos ouna
;b) Mchan hgrcl : 1 he eight ate :)
(1) abilitv to simultaneously display innumerable cor¬

poreal manifestations.
2) abilitv to simultaneously teach the dhatma to the

different classes ol sentient beings in their own.
language.
(3) unsullied omniscience.
4) display of innumerable magical feats.
(5) omnipresence in all realms (I’/.wira), times (kdla) t

and states (aiasthn).
(G) abilitv to fulfil wishes as soon as wished.
! 7) creation of various forms, stationary or moving,

exactly as desired.
(8) having the gunat ol the ten powers, etc.
B\ ‘ten powers, etc.’ the reference is made to the ten posvers

( daia-bala ) and other attributes of the lalhagata, such as the
316
four confidences. According to the Maharyutpatti, Nos. 120-129,

the ten powers are : 1. power to know the possible and the
impossible ( sthdnasthana ), 2. power to know the maturation of
karma , 3. power to know the various convictions ( adhimukti ),
4. power to know the various elements ( dhatu)> 5. power to dis¬
tinguish between a superior and inferior sensory power (indriya),
6. power to know the paths going everywhere (sariatra-gdmini-
pratipad ), 7. power to know all accompaniment of meditation
(i dhydna ), liberation (vimokfa), profound concentration (. sanutdhi ),
meditative attainment (samapatti), defilement ( samkltSa) and
purification ( vyavadana ), 8. power to recollect former lives
( purvanivisa), 9. power to know transmigration and rebirth
(ryuty-utpatti), 10. power to know the destruction of the fluxes
(dsraoa-kfaya).
Also, theô^w who ‘wanders by himself’ in verse ‘BHA’—

despite the mysterious maidens (kanyd) mentioned tinder ‘GE’
and in Guhyasamdja , Chap. XV—is in that chapter classified by
different families, according to Pradipoddyotana (Mchan hgrel ,
p. 120-4, 5 and 122-2). So, in the Sanskrit text, p. 94, the
phrase, ‘He would shine like a Buddha’ ( bhaved buddhasama-
prabhah ) refers to the yogin belonging to Yairocana. ‘The
king who holds all dharmas 5 ( sarvadharmadharo rdja) is the yogin
of Amitabha. ‘By the praxis of Vajrasattva’ (vajrasatliapra-
joga(afi) means Aksobhya’s yogin. ‘Shining like Vajrasattva*
(; vajrasattvasamaprabhah ) refers to Ratnasambhava’s yogin. And
‘the one accomplishing the desire and the liberation* ( kdmamokfa -
prasadhakah) is the yogin of Amoghasiddhi’s family. Besides,
text, p. 95, the ‘one of diamond nature’ ( vajradharmdtman ) is
the superior yogin belonging to Amitabha.
Gokpasamdjatantra, XV, 11, places this attainment on the Tenth

Stage : “He would be Vajradharmatman, dwelling on the
Tenth Stage, the king who holds the Yaksamaya, the
ParameSvara who is supreme.” (sa bhaved vajradharmatma
daiabhumiprati?thitah / vaksamayadharo raja sarvagrah
paramesvarafi).
IjGEjj geharp tasydmbarai caiva yatra sa carati prabhuh j

tatraioa ramate nityam mahdsukhasamadhina //35/ /
His home is the sky wherever he the Lord docs roam. By

the samadhi of great ecstasy he forever rejoices in that
very place.
317
Mchan : t samddhi of great ecstasy’ means the consuhstantial bliss

(sahajdnanda ). I hat very place* is the sky and is explained as
fut nwtd t (ha-sa t vn.
Sarahu’s Ihdid-kofa (verses 03, 96 in Shahidnllah’s num¬

bering) as 1 translate from the Prakrit (given here) and the
Tibetan texts reproduced in M. Shahidullah, Les Chants Mysti¬
ques dt • A dnha et dc Saraha , was suggested for inclusion here by the
citation in Tsoh-kha-pa’s (Gsal baht sgrott me commentary nn
the Pafuaktama (IM F, Vol. 159, p. 70-5 to p. 71-1):
93. i nane saala bi jo nan gahai,

kunduru-khanai mahasuha sahai ?
jima tisia tisittanc dhabat
mara sose nabhajjalu kahi pabal.
'>6. kamala-kulisa bebi tnajjha thiu jo so suraa-bilasa,

ko talii ramai na tihuane kassa na puria asa ?
At the moment of ‘resin’ ( kunduru is twilight language

for indefinable ‘union’), does he gain the great ecstasy
(mahdwkha) who docs not know completely the true
nature (mi/w, *rtipana, taken equivalent to svarupa) ?
As one with avid thirst races for the water of a mirage
and dies of thirst—how can he obtain the water of the
skv ? That sport by pleasure located between the lotus
and the diamond, if anyone could not take pleasure
there, in the three worlds, whose hope could he fulfil ?
1‘rakdfikd on (le (Vol. 60, p. 295-3.1) : ‘The sky’ means the
realm of space ( dkdia-dhdtu or klta-dhdtu ); ‘the Lord who roams
wherever' is &ri Yajrasativa, the Lord of the five who are
Aksobhya, etc.;. . . ‘By the mahdsukhauimddhi he forever rejoices
in that very place’ lias as external meaning that by producing
in immediacy the reality of the Clear Light he rejoices by re¬
joicing in emanating and reunification; ... as to ‘wherever
the Lord does roam’, he roams in whatever lotus of tnudrd
by tin* form of upper and lower bodhicitta of Sri Vajradhara,
because the Tantra says, ‘Whatever the sky within the bhaga,
it is ornamented with five skies’;... this abiding in his own
form of introspection is the inner meaning.
Those remarks of the CrakdSikd introduce a number of diffi¬

culties, but also suggest the research to be brought up now.
The uidauu verse has the phrase ‘his home is the sky’. Guhya -
samdja, XII, verse 2 (‘Documents’) speaks of a spot of a great
318
YOGA OF TIIF- Gt IIYASAMAJATANTR A
forest and in a secluded mountain. The Piadipoddyotana on

this verse first explains the verse according to its literal form in
terms of a beautiful place for meditation, labelling this explana¬
tion the‘hinted meaning’ {nrydttha). I hen, to show the ‘evident
meaning' ( nitartho ), it cites some verses from the Atya-l ydkh-
y&na\ in fact from the Santdhivydkarana (P I 1’, Vol. 3, p. 242),

translated with some remarks from Mchan ftgrel, j>. 83-2, 3 :
akdiakalpana\ogaih skandha mahiitavi matah .
asthanasthitiyogena pradeit mahaiiiilaye
sarnbhogakaipairku' ’smin vivid he siddhipu^pite
nirmdnaphalasamiobhe samyaksamb»dhipari ate .
abhdvavijane ramye sadhyam tad vajrasamjnakatn
By procedures of considering their sky ( the Clear
Light), the personality aggregates are claimed to be 'he
‘great forest’.
By the yoga of the place of no location ( apiati\(hitaninana ),

there are those ‘flowers’ of the various (supramundanc)
siddhis on the wishing tree of Sambhoga (the illusory
body) in a ‘spot’ which is a great place.
When there is the decoration of Nirmana ‘fruit’ on the

joyous ‘mountain’ (Dharmakaya) of right completed
enlightenment that is ‘secluded’ by lack of states, what is
to be accomplished has the name ‘vajra* (i.e. Vajradhara).
Ratnakarasanti’s Piri{Iikrt(i-sddham>piiyika-vrUi-> at naval i-ndma

PTT, Vol. 62, pp. 69-5 to 70-1) concerns itself with the same
verse of Chap. XII, and adds further levels of interpretation
following Candrakirti’s classifying terms. Here, his ‘Yatharuta’
interpretation is most helpful :
♦
The ‘great forest’ is the sky of‘she who is love's umbrella’.
The ‘spot’ is the sky of Devadatta. ‘Adorned with
flowers, fruit, and so on’ is the sky of the Moon Lady.
The ‘mountain’ is the sky of the Tortoise Lady. ‘Seclu¬
ded’ is the sky of ‘Dhanavijaya (Nor rgyal ma). Because
it is said : “Whatever tin: sky within the bhaga, it is
ornamented with five skies, beautified with eight petals
and a nave with filaments. I he ambrosia with the form
of iukra, thrre located, ever drips.”
The description of eight petals indicates either the heart-cYiAra,

or the cakra which in the male is .at the root of the penis; the
latter seetns meant here. Previously wc took note that the
319
latter cakra constitutes the yogin’s ‘woman’. On the other hand,

the remark in the Prakiiftkd on Gc, “by the form of upper and
lower bodhicitta ” suggests both cakras.
The Prakdftkd on Gc also says, “whatever lotus of mudrS,"
which refers to the families of goddesses respectively going with
the five yogins mentioned under ‘BHA’, who, according to the
Prakdsika, abide in their own form of introspection. According
to Klon-rdol-bla-ma, as cited in my “Female Energy
p. 94, the butcher maiden belongs to Aksobhya’s family; the
washerman maiden to Vairocatia's; the necklacc-siringcr maiden
to Ratnasambhava’s; the dancer maiden to Amitabha’s; the
artisan maiden to Amoghasiddhi’s.
Also, there are ‘ages’ ascribed to various ones of those

maidens. According to the Guhyasamajatantra, Chapter Four,
verse 19 (Mchan hgrel, p. 40), and Chapter Sixteen verse 91
{Mchan hgrel, p. 147), the maiden belonging to Aksobhya’s
family is aged 12; the one of Vairocana’s 16. The article
“Female Energy.. . ” show's that this is consistent with the
sizes ascribed to mandalas of Body, Speech and Mind in the
Guhyasamajatantra. Its Chapter Four mentions (Aksobhya’s)
mandala of Mind to have twelve hastas; its Chapter Sixteen
mentions Yairorana’s mandala of Body to have sixteen hastas ,
and Amitabha s mandala <>1 Speech to have twenty hastas.
On this principle, the maiden ol Amitabha’s family is aged
20. In that article, p. I Of), I cited a passage from Saraha
setting forth five ages, the cight-yeared kumari, the twelve-
year-old Salika, the sixtrrn-yrared one called Siddha, the
twentv-vear-old *Balika, and the twciuv-five-vearcd *Bhadra-
kapalini. By implication, Ratuasambhava’s and Amogha-
siddhi’s maidens, in whatever order, have the ages of 8 and 25.
The Guhyasamajatantra (Chap. 8, verse 7) mentions the age 25,
but no age 8. Since this Tautra regularly has a four-fold
correspondence in terms of the four goddesses, and hence to
four Tathagatas, the basic three plus Amoghasiddhi (the
l karmanatha'), it follows that Amoghasiddhi’s maiden is aged
25, but so far 1 find no passage to confirm this. In that article,
p. 108, I included a quotation from the Maharnudratilaka :
“If one does not obtain a twelve-ycared, or sixteen-yeared
female, adorned with good features, long eyes, attractive figure
and youth, then a twenty-ycarcd one is proper. Other ‘seals’
320
YOGA OF THE G t' H YASAMAJ AT ANTRA
(mudra) above twenty put the occult power far off. One
should offer his sister, daughter, or wife to the ‘master’ (guru).**
This passage is one evidence that the ‘ages’ refer to the length
of time it takes the vogin to reach the sidahi. Other interpre¬
tations of the ‘ages’ presented in that article were, for the sixteen-
yeared maiden, the sixteen voidnesses as well as sixteen vowels,
the sixteen transits of winds and the sixteen digits of the moon.
The twclve-yeared maiden can he interpreted as the twelve
vowels by leaving out the ‘two neuters’ (r, }, ], and () from the
16-vowel group, or as twelve transits by leaving out the last
four transits.
Besides, according to Guhyasamdjalantra , Chap.XV, verse 51, the

maidens can belong to eithert he realm of desire ( kamndhatu )
or the realm of form (rupadhdtu). According to the Pradipoddyo-
tana on this, the ones in the realm of desire can be the daugh¬
ters of the six passion families (the Tusita gods, etc., a standa¬
rd category of non-tantric Buddhism), the ones called l surabhogd y
are the daughters of the Cakravartins; and the ‘ kulavratd ’ means
they can belong to the families of gods, asuras, and soon. The
ones in the realm of form have superior capacity (for siddhi).
II SU II efv evabhasabhedetu sandhyd-ratri-dinesu ca /

vyavahdrah krto lake jmnatrayanidarSandt // 36 //
A conventional illustration is made in the world regarding

just these distinctions of lights as the twilight, the night,
and the day—so as to see the three gnoses ( jhdna ).
Both Mchan and the Prakdiikd have little to add here.
These illustrations are made to the disciple by a revered

guru by way of Initiation (abhiyka) . The .Mani-mdld commen¬
tary on the Pahcakrama states (PTT, Vol. 62, p.208-4) : “The
exalted dedrya , by removal of the eve-veil ( timira ), reveals to
the disciple the outer abhisanibodhis'* (slob dpon mchog ni rab
rib spans pas slob ma la ni phvi rol byaii chub bstati). There¬
fore, in his Abhisambodhi-krama of the Pahcakrama , Xagarjuna
precedes the actual delineation of the abhisanibodhis with verses
showing the disciple’s exhortation to the guru to reveal those
abhisanibodhis.
tatsamaradhamim krtva variant mdsatfi athdpi vd /

tasrnai tuffdya guravc pujam kurydt tu Saktitah // 3 //
tatas iusfo mahdyogi paheakdmopabhogatah /
dlokasyodayam kurydt samdpattividhdnatah // 5 //
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NtDANA VERSES

321
kalaiddau susamsthapya bodhicittam prayatnatah j

ardhardtre cdbhisihcet suiifyani krpayd guru It // 6 //
abhiyckam tu samprdpva pratyufasamaye puna ft f
sampujyaradhayct stotrair gurum Sifyah krtdnjalih If 7 //
dra,\fukdmo 'bhisambodhim sarvaS unyasvabhdvikdm (
stutva krtdnjalih Si.syo gurum samcodayet punch // 12 //
prayaccha me mahdndtha abhisambodhidarianam f
k aim aja n m avinirmuktam dbhdsatrayavarjitam ff 13 //
evam drddhito yogi sadbhutagunakbtanaih f
Sifye kd tuny am utpadya kramarn evam athdrabhet jj 16 //
Having propitiated (the hierophant) for a month or even
lor a year, he should make offering as he is able to that
pleased guru .... Then the mahayogi, delighted through
enjoyment of the five pleasures, should arouse light by a
rite of equipoise ( samdpatti ). By engaging the ‘mind of
enlightenment’ he well disposes the flask and so on; and
at midnight the guru kindly initiates the good disciple.
Having received initiation, the disciple at the time of dawn
respectfully bows to the guru and pleases him with wor¬
shipful verses of praise .... When that disciple, desirous
of seeing the abhisambodhi which is the intrinsic nature
of universal void, had praised, then respectfully bowing
to the guru, he should exhort him further : *Oh, great
lord, pray offer me the glimpse of abhisambodhi , liberated
horn karma and rebirth, and Ircc of the three lights !’
. .. .The yogi , thus gratified by the recital of holy quali¬
ties, feeling compassion toward the disciple, then begins
the steps this way :
Paiicakrama, 2nd krama, verse 30 :
samvitlimdtrakam jhdnam dkasauad alakfanam j

hint in tasya prabhedo 'sti sorndhyardlridivatmanah //
'Hie gnosis (jhdna ) which is purely introspective is chara¬

cterless like the sky. But it has a division going with the
twilight, the night, the day.
Pahcakrnma, 4th krama, 1 7 :
dloko rdtribhdgah sphufaravikiranah syad aivdlokdbhdsah

srundhyalokopalabdhah pmkrtibhir asakrd yujj'ate svabhir etat (
‘Light’ is the (moon-rise) part of night. The day with
its spreading rays of the bright sun is ‘Sprcad-of- Light’.
322
YOOA OF THE G U H Y A SAM AJ AT ANT RA
Twilight is ‘Culmination-of-Light’. They work again

and again by their own piakrtis.
Therefore, the Clear Light, or universal void, is free of

day, night, and twilight. These conventional illustrations also
involve the distinction of inner and outer Abhisarnbodhis, as
are explained by Aryadeva in his Carya-melapaka-pradipa (PTT,
Vol. 61, p. 308-2), where we should observe that he employs
the word ‘nescience’ (avid)a) as in nidana verse 3 :
/ de la mrion par byan chub pahi rim pa ni rnam pa

gftis te / hdi lla ste phyi dan nan giho / / de la dan por
phyilii bstan par bya ste / tho raris kyi thun mtshams su
ma rig pahi snari ba hdas na ji srid ni ma gsal bar raa
gyur pa ste / hdi la ni hod gsal ba dri ma med pahi rnam
pa gsal ifiri lus dan hag dan yid dan bral ba thams cad
ston pahi mtshan hid can no / / hi ma sar ba ni snah
ba mehed paho / / hi ma nub pahi thun mtshams su ma
rig paho / / zla ba sar bahi tshe ni snah baho / / de Itar
stoh pa hid rnam pa h±\ phyi ro) ties par bstan pa bsad nas /
da ni nan gi mnon par byan chub pa so so rah gis rig pahi
mtshan nid can rim pa hdis bstan par bya ste / dan por
smig rgyu lta bu la hod zer lnahi tshogs dan ldan par
mthoh no / / ghis pa snah ba ste / zla bahi hod zer lta
buho / / gsum pa ni snah ba mehed pa ste / hi mahi hod
zer lta buho / / bii pa ni snah ba thob pa ste / mun pa
lta buho (j dc nas mun pa dan bral bahi skad cig la hod
gsal ba ste sin tu gsal brtag tu snah bahi mtshan hid can
don dam pahi bden pahi rah gi mtshan hid ye scs kyi.
mig gis mthoh ho /
Here, there are two kinds of Abhisambodhi sequences,

namely, outer and inner. Of those, I shall first explain
the outer kind. In the morning twilight, when the nes¬
cience light has passed away but still the sun is not bright—
this characterizes the Clear Light, clear, of immaculate
aspect, the universal void free from body, speech, and
mind. The rising of the sun is Spread-of-Light. The
twilight of sunset is nescience. The time of moonrisc is
Light. Having in that way related the external illustra¬
tions of the four kinds of voidness, I shall teach the inner
Abhisarnbodhis by this sequence characterized by intro¬
spection : One sees first a mirage appearance with a
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NJDANA VERSES
323
mass of five light rays. Second is Light, like moon-rays.

Third is Spread-of-Light, like sun-rays. Fourth is
Culmination-of-Light like darkness. Then, in an instant
free from darkness, there is Clear Light, characterized
by a very bright lasting light, the individual characteristic
of Paramartha-satya, which one sees with the Eye of
Knowledge.
In that passage, Aryadcva presents four outer abhi'atpbodhis

(revelations), namely, natural phenomena revealing the voids
or lights; and five inner abhiscjjibodhis (also, revelations), namely,
psychological states that are actually the voids or lights.
The ‘revealed’ source for the Abhisambodhi illustrations is

Guhyasamdjatantra, Chap. XV p. 95 :
astamitc tu vajrdrke sadhanam tu samatabkct j

arwiodgamavetayam sidhynte bhavanotlamaih //
When the diamond sun is setting, he should begin the

sddhana. At the initial appearance of dawn he will
succeed with the supreme contemplation.
The Pradipoddyotana , Mchan hgrel edition, on this (PIT, Vol.

158, p. 121-2), explains that the ‘diamond sun’ ( vajrarka ) is
characterized by the attainment of the ‘means’ gnosis ( updya
kind of jiidna ), hence Spread-of-Light. When this sets, there
is the form of ‘insight’ [prajnd ). hence Light. Then before
the Clear Light can emerge, that Light must pass into Cul¬
mination-of-Light, which is the initial appearance of dawn, or
nescience (aiidyd). Then, on the basis of the three gnoses,
namely, voidness, further void ness, and great voidness (Light,
Spread-of-Light, and Culmination-of-Light), riding on the
winds, thc_)'c_gtw soars to the Clear Light and perfects the moha -
mudra. (‘great seal’).
The success in the practice is indicated in the Guhyasamdja -

tantra , Chap. XVIII, p. 1G2 :
uajrapadmasamdyogdj jvdlya santapya yogitid /

udyate sphatikdkaram jiianasuryam iidparnm 11
Through union of vajra and padme by the yogin, blazing,
burning,-
The incomparable sun of knowledge rises with crystalline

appearance.
That description clearly points to the mystical experiences of

Gautarna Buddha under the Tree of Enlightenment during the
324
night inaugurated by defeat oi the Mara host at dusk, and

finally Full Enlightenment at the flush of dawn—in the
joy-faced night ( nandimukhayam rajanyam), or night becoming
rosy-colored, quoted from the Alahavastu in my “Notes on the
Sanskrit Term Juana” p. 265. The follow-up to that early
study is that the color of the sky represented the three lights
by three natural features, the blackness of night (Culmination-
of-Light), the red glow of the sun wishing to rise (Spread-of-
Light), the setting full moon (Light), a sort of “three-m-one”,
the revelation of the Clear Light—in Aryadcva’s language :
“free from body, speech, and mind”.
// VI If vicitravyava/u'nd v ca laukikaih parikalpitd/i }

pathatrayavibhdgaia jiidnatrayasamtulbhavah jj 37 I!
Worldlings imagine the multiform conventions, which
divided into three paths, originate the; three knowledges.
Mchati : ‘The multiform conventions' are : male, female,
neuter; right, left, middle; harsh, mild, medium; etc. ‘Three
paths’ means those leading to the Clear Light.
The ‘three paths’ are probably the Body, Speech, and

Mind referred to in the Prakasika on Yi.
I collected a number of these ‘multiform conventions’ in

the article “Female Energy...,” from which its Table 2
headed “The Great Time” is here reproduced :
IX. THE GREAT TIME
Om
1 Ah
i Hum
Prajfia, the form
Cpaya, the form
Androgyne
of woman
of man
8-petalled lotus
5-pronged thundcr-
boli
Moonlight
Sunlight
Fire
Night
Day
Juncture of day and

night
Left
Right
Middle
Waking
Dream
Dreamless sleep
Void
Further Void
Cheat Void
Light
Spread -of-Light
Culmination-of-light
Body
Speech
Mind
Vairocana
Amitabha
Aksobhva
Birth
Intel mediate Slate
Death
Nirmanakaya
Sanibhogakava
Dharmakava
Tamos
Rajas
Sattta
Head
Neck
Heart
Inspiration
Retention
Expiration
COMMENTARY on THE FORTY MDANA VER5ES
325
Indrabhiiti presents another list of synonyms and corres¬

pondences in his commentary on the fri-sampufa-tilaka called
Jikd-smiti-samdatiandloka (PTT, Vol. 55, p. 77-2):
, shin stobs dan snan ba <lah las <lah sems dan stoh pa dan
zla ba dan ics tab dah mtshan mo dan giandban dan orp
dan ah ho de bzin du rdul dan snan ba mehed pa
dan nag dan sems las byuh ba dan / sin m stoh pa dan /
hi ma dan / thalts dan hin mo dan , kun brtags dan I a
dah hri ho de bjfiti du mun pa dan snan ba thob pa
dan \ id dan ma rig pa dah stoh pa chen po dah
sgra gcan dah yah dag par sbyor ba dah mtshams dah
yohs su grub pa dah hum dah phat ho /
Sattva (-guna). Light, Body, citta, Void, Moon, Insight

fttajfid), Night, parat.mtra, Om and Ah. Likewise, rajas
(-guna), Spread-of-Light, Speech, caitta, Further Void,
Sun, Means updya), Day, parikalpita, A and Hri. Like¬
wise, tamas(-guna), (*u!mination-of-Light, Mind, avidya.
Great Void, K.ihu, samyoga (marriage), twilight, pari*
nispanna. Hunt and Pliat,
A little further in the same work, Indrabhuti says (p. 77-5):

Here, ‘inferior* (hina) means that by Om = entrance (of
the wind), he generates the fairies located in patdla.
Likewise, ‘medium’ (madby a ) means that by Ah = staying
(of ditto), he generates those located over bhumi. And,
‘best’ ( praaita ) means that by Hum—rising (of ditto),
he generates those ranging in the sky ( khecari }. Likewise,
in respective order, there are innumerable sets, including
three mandalas, three paths, three eyes, three bodies
(kdya ), three liberations l imokui), three worlds (loka) y
three gestations bham), three realities ( tattva ), three
times, three samdhya dawn, noon, and dusk), three firma¬

ments (? gaanna . three creature worlds ( jagat ), the triple
fortificaton (triputa >, three germ syllables (bija), triangle
(trikotja)y three places (possibly - three scats, pi{ha) t
three gunai, three letters (akyara). three lights ( aloka ).
three characters ( stabhdia ), three realms (dhatu) t three
faces ( mukha ), three hearths, three kinds of form (rupa).
,,JA> janma ca sthitibhaitgena antarabhavasamsthitih /
ydvantyah kalpanu I ok? cittaiaj n-i ijrmbhitah /;38//
(Namely) birth, and by loss of abode—formation of the
326 YOGA OF THE GL'HYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
intermediate state. To the extent there is discursive

thought in the world, so is there phenomenal projection
of mind and (its vehicular) winds.
Mchan: The verse refers to birth, death, and the state between
those two (the antanlbftava). Just as in the case of the two pre¬
ceding verses, this one presents synonyms «»l the three gnoses.
So also earlier (nidana verse 25) citta . caitta. avidyt'r. and soon.
The synonyms are collected in the 2nd krama : stm* dmt°s hi
rim pa) of the Paiicakrama. In the case of the intermediate state,
this generates the Illusory Body maya-dcha . ’Hie ultimate root
is the extremely subtle wind and the mind mounted upon it.
Discursive thinking ( kaipana ) phenomenalizes that wind and its
mounted consciousness. Ptakaiika on Ja (P PI, Vol. 60, p.
295-4, 5) : ‘To the extent then; is discursive thought in the world’
means the discursive thought going with the twelve-membercd
Dependent Origination (ji shed hjig rten gyis brtags pa ' 2cs
pa ni rten chi hbrcl bar hbyui't ba van lag bcu gnis la sogs pain
mam par rtog paho).
In my article “Buddhist Ciencsis and the Tantric Tradition”,

there are various passages from the works of Tsoh-kha-pa to
show that he laid great stress upon the concordance with the
three things, birth, death and the intermediate state. Accord¬
ing to Tsoh-kha-pa, contemplation of the Dharmakaya purifies
death; of the Sambhogakaya, the intermediate state; of the
Nirmanakaya, birth. Such contemplation takes place both
in the Stage of Generation and in the Stage of Completion.
11 HA} I hasyalasyakriyai caiva navanatya rasdnv i td h !

mudramantravikalpai ca vajrasa tfvavicffl i lam f j3 \[V
Both the acts of laughter and accompanied dance with
the nine sentiments of dramatic art. as well as mudra,
mantra, and mental formation, are enacted by Vajrasattva
(the tantric hierophant).
Mchan : ‘Laughter’ and the mutual gaze at the time of the

caryd (i.e. steps in divine courtship). ‘Accompanied dance’:
a dance (lasya) accompanied with singing and instrumental
music. ‘The nine sentiments of dramatic art’ : this refers to
accomplishing the Illusory Body from the wind-and-mind-only
belonging to the sadhaka's innate body (nija^dcha). ‘Mudra’
of body; ‘mantra* of speech; ‘mental formation* of binding
{pchih ba). ‘Enacted by Vajrasattva* : this furnishes the reason
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY Nil)ANA VERSES
327
lor the earlier statement that the one who knows the intrinsic
nature is not adhered to hv sin.
I'raktldkd on Ha (\ ol. bt), p. 20.>-5) : ‘Mental formation’

means the various mentals, such as one-pointedness; ‘enacted
by Yajrasattva* means that all those (acts) are enacted through
the Illusory Samadhi (mdyopama-samddhi) (mam par rtog pa
ui sems las hvuh ha rtse geig pa la sogs paho■ rdo rje sems
dpahi main liphrul ics pa ni de dag thams cad sgvu ma lta bulu
till he lid/.in las mam par liphrul pa stc).
Mudra. mantra, and mental formation {in samadhi) are

coordinated lespectively \sith the three mysteries of the Buddha
his Body, Speech, and Mind. The first two are especially, credit¬
ed with attracting the deities {the mental formation is also
required lor ‘binding’ them), as in the Guhyasamdjatantra y
Chap. \1Y. p. 87 (Mchan h"rel, p. 115-3):
mudrabhedena saucy am mantrabhedena sarvathii j

dkat yamftadam proktam na cen ndSam aidpmiyat fj
vajtauitfi'o maharaja rc.daniyo muhitr muhuh }}
sa era sarvamanh andm raja f>ai ama'/itvatah //
Bv division of tnaha- inudr'i into mantra-deha and jhana-

deha > of all the gods . and by division of (diamond-)
incantation into two kinds in every case— the way of
attracting is explained. If it were not so, that (way of
attracting) would be unsuccessful. Yajrasattva (the
latter, the sixth, as the basis of the former five) is the Great
King to l)c exhorted kept in mind) again and again.
For.) just he is the ever-supremr king of all incantations.
Yajrasattva’s activities are summarized in l*ahckrama t 3rd

krama, verse 31: fsii Laksmi, Yol <*3, p. 30-2, 3:
$rh*a}dd\upabh>zam ca zitaiad)ddiseianam '
k at dsn ca prarrttim ea kuryad wtakarandravat //
He should practise the experience of the ‘erotic’, etc. (the

nine sentiments), the recourse to (the three adamantine)
songs and instrumental music (the four beginning with
\ina i, and so on, as well as engagement in the (sixtv-
four) kald or !dmakatd in each case • in the manner
of the ‘moon in the water’ (i.e. while in the Itlusorv-likc
Samadhi {mayopama-satpddhi).
In Indian dramatic theory, Idsya is the sweet, graceful, and

feminine dance. The nine sentiments are : erotic (srh°dfa) y
328
heroic (vira), furious (raudra) t humorous (hasya), wondcilul

(adbhuta), compassionate (karunya) , disgusting ( bibhatsa ), fright¬
ful (bhayanaka); plus the ninth, tranquil (ia/tta) with indifference
to worldly objects and pleasures. Two passages should clarify
their tantric interpretation. The first is from Sri Rahugupta-
pada’s PrakaJa-nama-Jrihevajrasddhana (PIT, Vol, 56, p. 132-1):
Among those (nine sentiments), the ‘single taste’ ( ekarasa )
together with (the goddess) Xairatmya is the
‘erotic’; the staying at the burning ground is the ‘heroic’;
the furried brow and bared fangs is the ‘disgusting’; the
blazing light is the ‘furious’; the enhancement êxagge-
ration) of face is the ‘humorous’; the garland of dripping
heads is the ‘frightful’; the consciousness ol assisting
sentient beings is the ‘compassionate’; the illusory form is
the ‘wonderful’; the defilement of lust, etc. is the ‘tranquil’.
The second is from Sri LaksmI, Vol. 63, p. 39-2 :
(They arc) union with the partner ( mudrd ) (‘erotic’),

staying in the burning ground, etc. (‘heroic’)., enjoying
the ambrosia (‘furious’), rite of revived corpse ( vct&la -
vidhi) (‘disgusting’), holding of various emblems (‘humo¬
rous’), drastic rites yabhicara) (‘frightful’), empathy with
the great suffering of all sentient beings (‘compassionate’),
accomplishing enlightenment by the live great pledges,
( samaya) in conflict with the world (i.e. the five that op¬
pose the five layman vows) (‘tranquil’), and the character¬
istic of having the Clear Light in immediacy (‘wonderful’).
The goddess Nairatmya of the formei passage belongs
to the Mother Tantra tradition; outside of this fact, tin passag.
is appropriate and helps explain Sri Laksmi’s text, since she
leaves out the titles ‘erotic’, etc.
The three adamantine songs are very likely the group of three
songs discussed in the Snags rim chin mo (f. 212b2, tl'.): “The
three songs arc the ‘song of reality’ ( tattvagita ), ‘song of true
nature (dharmotdgita), and ‘song of mudra’ {mudrdgita)" (glu
gsum ni de kho na Aid kyi glu dan chos Aid kyi glu dan phyag
rgyahi glufio). By ‘songs’ are meant verses that art sung,
namely, ‘song of reality’ means a verse for ‘reality of intrinsic
nature (*svabhava-tattva, JT. ran b2in gyi do kho na Aid),
one for reality ol mystic attainment’ (*vibhuti-tattvu, hkhor
ba^ti de kho na Aid), and one for ‘reality of purity’ (visuddhi-
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDANA %'ERsES
329
tnttva, mam par dag pahi de kho na ft id). Then, a verse each
for ‘song of true nature’—referring to the pure dharmadhdtu,
and ‘song of mudra —referring to the pride (garva) of body, make
five verses in all, as presented and explained in Snags rim chrn mo.
I'he four kinds of musical instruments are personified as

goddesses in the main;lalas of the Mother Tantras Sampufatantra
and Ht'vajralantra (Raghu Vara and Lokcsh Chandra A New
Tibeto-Mongol Pantheon, Part 12), to wit: Vamsa, Vina, Mu*
ktinda, Mu raja. Jalandharipada's Hcvajrasadhanasya-fippani-
{itddhi-vajrapradipa (P1T, Yol. 36, p. 121-3) assigns colors to
these goddesses as follows: the yellow goddess Vina, the red
goddess Vamsa (bamboo Hute), the smokv-colorcd goddess
Muraja (barrel drum), the white goddess Mukunda (round
drum) (/pi wan ma ser mo // glin bu ma dmar mo / / rdza rna
ma du bahi mdog can ma / / rna zlum ma dkar mo /).
For the sixty-four kald , it should be observed that the list of

Kamas utt a begins with gita-vadya, so gitavadyadi ir the above
Paiicaktama verse III, 31, can refer to the katas in the ordinary
meaning of the sixtv-four worldly arts. However, Sri Laksmi’s
Commentary also permits tlie interpretation ol kali as kdmakald.
On p. 39-3, she states this paiticular list as l>cginning with
‘embrac ing" ( dlihganam, hkhjud pa) and 'kissing* ( eumbana , ho
byed ), expressions which occur among the forty ‘male natures
(cf. under nidana verse 2), but here obviously relate to kdma -
idsha terminology of eatuh<a<(i. Klon idol Bla ma, Vol. I,
Section Ma, presents two versions of arriving at the number
sixty-four (catuhy’tfi): the kiss (ho byed pa), the embrace
(hkhyud pa), the bite (so hdebs po), the fore-play {yah dag par
bskyed pa), erotic cries (sid kyi sgra sgrogs pa), the male posture
in coitus {skyes pahi bja ba ), the woman's) getting on top
(steh na hdug pa), (the eighth one not printed somehow, perhaps
the ‘oral intercourse’ of A dmasiUra); each one divided into eight
varieties, vielding sixtv-four. The alternate list amounts to
eight varieties of the embrace, eight of the kiss, eight of the male
posture in coitus, eight of the bite, eight of the scratch, eight of
the foreplay, eight of erotic cries, (and again, the eight of an
omitted eighth one, perhaps the "oral intercourse’), making sixty-
four in all. Neither solution actually names the respective
eightfold subdivisions, so this kdma-kald terminology remains
lexical as far as these tantric texts are concerned, but creates
330
mythologically salacious reading out of the four respective

movements of the goddesses as elements (upwards, at acute
Angles, forward, and downward).
flRAfl ratnam any am na castiha svadhifthanad rte mahat /
' prabhdsvararifuddham ced vahnifuddho manir yathd , -10 /
There is no jewel in this world so great as the Svadhi sthana,

if purified by the Clear Light like a gem cleansed by fire.
Mchan : Svadhi sthana = Illusory Body. ‘No jewel in this
world so great’ because it can confer in this very life the goal of
Buddhahood. ‘No jewel’ : no secret state. ‘Purified by the
Clear Light’ : bv entering the Clear Light. PrakaJikd on Ra
(Vol. 60, p. 296-1): ‘By fire', etc. means : if the Svadhisthana-
body is purified by the Clear Light attained by the fourth stage,
then, like gold cleansed by fire, it becomes immaculate and
devoid of phenomenalization. Therefore, it is only known
through contemplation of the fourth stage (mes 2cs bya ba la
sogs pa smos te / rim pa b2i pas thob pahi hod gsal bas gal tc /
bdag byin gyis rlob pahi sku dag par hgyur ra / dehi tshc mes
ibyans pahi gser b2in du rnam par dag pa dri ma med cin spros
pa med par hgyur ro / / dehi phyir rim pa bgi pa yah sgom par
byed par rig pa kho naho).
Following are some passages about the Svadhisthana’.

Paflcakran.a , 3rd krama, 12 :
svddhiffhdnakramam labdkvd sarvabuddhemayah prabhuh f

janmanihaiva buudhatvam nihsamdeham prapadyate jj
He the lord, composed of all the Buddhas, having arrived
at the stage of Svadhisthana, without doubt attains
Buddhahood in this very life.
PaHcakrama , 3rd krama, 25 :
sarvOk&r&varopeto asecanakavigrahah j
dariayel tam suiiyyaya svddhitfhdnam tad un'ate //
Endowed with the best of all aspects is the bodv which

onr never tires of seeing. (He) tcveals that to the good
disciple. That is called ‘Svadhisthana*.
Finally, $ri LaksmI, Vol. 63, p. 10-5 to 11-1, has this to say :
/ yah dag pahi mthah don dam pahi bden pa de vis rnam
par sbyan ba ni sgyu ma lta buhi tin he hdzin mi snah
bar byaho / / de la dper na phvihi mnon par byaii chub
pahi rim pa ham / nan gi mnon par bvan chub pahi riin
pa ham / ril por hdzin pahi tin he hdzin nam / rjes su
COMMENTARY ON THE FORTY NIDAXA VERSES
331
giig pahi tin rie hdzin gvis sgyu mahi sku hod gsal baht
bskal pahi me vis mi snan bar byas na rnam par dag par
l.igyur ro / / ji skad du / bdag la bvin rlabs ma gtogs
pahi / / rin chcn gian ni yod pa min / /gal te hod gsal dag
hgyur na * me yis dag pahi nor bu biin / /ics bva ba
hbyun bahi plivir ro /.
The purification by that Paramartha-satya which is the

true end ( bhutakofi ), would make disappear the Illusory
Sumadhi. New, for example, the Illusory Body becomes
purified when made to disappear by the ‘fire of the aeon’
of the Clear Light through the sequence of outer abhisam-
bodhis, the sequence of inner abhisambodhis, the samadhi
of‘contraction’ {pindngraha), or the samadhiof ‘expansion*
{anubhtda );—because the text states : “Theie is no jewel
in this world so great as the Svadhisthana, if purified by
the Clear Light like a gem cleansed by fire.”
APPENDIX I
THE LANKAN A I AKA-SL l'RA AM) I HE

G U H VAS A.\ I A) ATAN1RA
Here we shall treat some remarkable transitional yoga

experiences that even promise to clarify the Buddhist “non-sell
theory.
The learned author RatnakaiuCmti makes a fascinating tie-

up between the Lankdiatdta and the (iuhyasamdja in his Prajtid-
paramitopadeia (PTT, Yol. 114. p. 2P>-3, 4. 5 to p. 250-1 . In
illustration of his preceding exposition «>1 yoga in four stages,
he cites the Lankdvatdra (Sagathakam, verses 256-238), but the
verses in Tibetan relied some minor variants (indicated here
by underlining) of the Sanskrit text as presently edited by
Bunyiu Nanjio :
cit tamo tram samara hy a bah am atthatn tut kalpayet ,

tathatdlambanc sthitid cittamdtrarn atikranut
cittamdtram atikramya nirdbhdsam atikranut
nirabhdsaUhito yogi mahdymam sa paiyati
anabhogagatih Santa pranidhdnair viiodhita
jiianam andtmakam frr,*/ ham mahdydnena paiyati //
The following translation incorporates some of Ratnakarasanti's

commetits :
256. When he relies on ‘mind-onlv’ he does not imagine

the external entity [2nd stage of yoga]. Being stationed
in the meditative support of thusness, he goes beyond
‘inind-onlv’ [3rd stage ot yoga].
257. Going beyond ‘mind-only,’ he goes beyond the

non-appearance [ol the stgn-M»urci*s x nimitta) of the
external entity] Stationed in the non-appearance [of the
sign-sources of both dharmas and dharmata ] [4th stage
of yoga] the yogin sees by the Mahayana.
258. His elfortU ss going ( andbhngagati ) [the effortless

revelation of the supranmnduue stages] is peaceful [be¬
came these stages are undetiled and non-discursivo |
and purified by his vows | that are not not aimed at the
lower enlightenments, i.c.ol sravaka and pratyekabuddlia].
APPENDIX I
333
By mfiins of the Mahavana, he sees the knowledge that

is selfless [because utterly nonmanifest] and best [because
free from defilements and habit-energy].
The author claims that the same is stated by the Guhyasam&ja

in one verse (in Chap. XV, p. 109 in Bhattacharyva's edition):
svaeittam cittanidhyaptau sarvadharm&h pratiffhitdh /
khavajrasthd hy ami dharma na dharmd na ca dharmatd //
When one cxamircs the mind [with insight], [one con¬
cludes] that all dharmas arc located in one’s own mind.
[2nd stage of yoga]. These dharmas are located in the
diamond of sky [3rd stage of yoga]. There is no dharma
and no dharmatd [4th stage of yoga].
Ratnakarasanti’s discussion of the four stages can be sum¬

marized as follows:
1st stage of yoga: The meditative object on the pheno¬

menal limit of the entity. This is a kind of waking state.
2nd stage of yoga : All dharmas are ‘mind-only’; still the

phenomenal limit. This is a kind of dream state, because if all
dharmas are ‘mind-only’ they are all in the mind and not out¬
side, a feature of the dream state.
3rd stage of yoga : Goes beyond ‘mind-only’; the thusness

end of the entity, or the non-appearance of phenomenal
dharmas. This is a kind of dreamless sleep.
4th stage of yoga : Having gone beyond the sign-sources of

natures (dharma) , now goes beyond those of underlying nature
(dharmatd) . This ushers in the Mahayana, i.e. the first bhumi
called Pramudita.
In further explanation, the four stages are referred to else¬

where as the four parts of ntrvfdha-bhagiyo constituting in the
Prajfiaparamita scriptures and Abhisamaydlamkdra digest, the
Stage of Action in Faith (adhimukti-caryd-bhumi) of the Bodhi-
sattva. Obermillcr, who so far has the best description,* points
out that the four are given in the Mafidyana-Sutrdlamkdra,
within XIV, 23-26 and the Sanskrit commentary thereon. In
summary :
•E, Obermillcr, “The Doctrine of Piajiii-paramitii as exposed in the

Abhisamajri’tarfikara of Maitreya," A (la Onrnfci/nt, V’ol. XI, 1932. At p. 37,
he cites Haribhadra's Atoka commentary', including the term tattcdrlha-
ekadeiapraviffa.
334
yoga of the glhyasamajatantra
1. The state of warmth — light ( aloka )
2. The state of summits — spread ot light ( aloka -
vivrddht)
3. The state of forbearance — [directed only to the mean¬
ing of reality ( tattvarthu -

ekadesapravista) \
4. The state of supreme — samiidhi without interval
mundane natures {lauki - (anantaiya-sarnadhi)
k&gradharma-avasthd )
The expression ‘samadhi without interval’ means that this state,

while still mundane, leads directly to the supramundanc state,
namely the first Bodhisattva Stage ol the Maliayana.
Now, it is striking that non-tantric Mahayana Buddhism

allots to these states the terminology ‘light’ etc. that reminds us
of the tantric vocabulary so important to the Guhyasamaja
tradition about the three lights that lead up to the Clear Light.
In our earlier section on the two stages (Stage ol Generation
and Stage of Completion) the Pahcakrama was cited with trans¬
lation, “By yoga of a beginner, he attains the Eighth Stage, and
seeing the three lights he is settled in the Tenth Stage.” This
shows that the tantric theory of the mysterious lights leading up
to Buddhahood should not be confused with this Prajftupara-
mita theory of lights leading up to the Bodhisattva career.
However, there may have been an intention to establish a para¬
llel of mystical experiences; and such parallels arc consistent
with my tentative dating of the Guhyasamajatanha and Explana¬
tory Tantras in the 4th and 5th centuries, A.D. Besides, my
discussion earlier in this book shows that the ‘lights’ also occur
in mundane conditions.
Now, returning to that verse of the Guhyasamaja , Chap. XV,
the basic tantra already shows the context as ‘dream examina¬
tion.’ Besides, wc may consult the Pradipoddyotana commentary
and its annotation (the Mihan-hgrcl) for further information
about the verse in question. In the Pradipoddyotana (PTE, Yol.
158, p. 132-2, 3, 4), the parts of the verse can be understood
as answering questions.
Question 1: Where arc the dharmas ? The verse, alluding

to the dream state, replies : ‘all dharmas’ are located within
one’s mind.
Question 2*. Where is that mind ? The verse, alluding to
APPENDIX I
335
<lreamtcss sleep, replies: It is in the diamond of sky, to wit,

the Clear Light. [Recall in this connection Table III of this
book, “The Clear Lights,” indicating the Clear Light of dream¬
less sleep. ]
Questions 3 and 4: Suppose it be asked if there is a presence

separate from the mind. The verse replies : There is no dhnrma ,
to wit : there is no self-nature of the entities. Suppose it
be asked if there is sometimes ( kadd cit) an undcrlyinig nature
(dhatmUa). The verse replies : There is no underlying nature.
Here the Pradipnddyotana cites two verses without identifying

the source (which the Mchan-hgrel traces to a citation in Spyod
bsduSy i.e. the Caryameliipakapradipa , and states to he consistent
with the [ 'ajramdla) :
tathaiva dhoti ay at a vend riyadan jnanadvaye tntra susaifihate
tasmin f
iunye mahad-viSati yah prasuptah siapnain prapaiyet khalu
vatam samSraydt //
mptf prabuddhe catui ca namatedam samkalpayet siapna-
phalabhildfi /
svnpnopamas te snundhnrtm mriamrfdS cdpi tayor abhavah jf
In like manner, one is in deep sleep when he enters great
in that void Culmination of Light) wherein the pair of
gnoses Light and Spre.ul-ol-Light) arc gathered, in the
elements lour, i.e. earth, etc.), the sense bases (four
objects), the sense organs four, eye, etc.), and so on
(the personality aggregates, i.e. the first lour). Should one
lake recourse to the winds, surely he will see a dream.
The one wishing the fruit of dream (i.e. good fruit from a
good dream), should examine this m»n-difTerence, not
even in sleeping and waking. All dharmas arc like a
dream. Moreover, falsehood and truth are not present
in the two sleeping and waking).
Apparently, the first verse is intended to amplify the answers

to the first two questions, referring to the states of dream and
dreamlr.ss sleep. The second verse should therefore be construed
to amplify the answers to the third and fourth questions,
explaining the denial of a dhanna or dhannata. The logical
distinction of truth and falsehood is not present. And yet there
is no denial of the l'ruit of dream.
If one compares this Pradipoddyotana explanation of the
336
YOGA OF TIIF. OUllYASAMAJATANTRA
Guhyasamdja verse with what Ratnakarasanti said about it,

there does not appear any essential disagreement, even though
the discussion proceeds somewhat differently. Indeed, there
is no disagreement as yet with those verses cited from the Lanka-
vatdra-su/ta, where in the fourth stage the yog in sees the Maha-
yana; because in the second of the two verses edited and trans¬
lated above, one realizes that "all dharmas arc like a dream,”
which is a frequent teaching of the Mahayana.
Now, it is a striking feature of those stages of yoga, as Ratna¬

karasanti understands the Lankdvatdra verses, with the further
corresponding statements drawn out above, that certain state¬
ments seem to conflict with others. That is to sav, in the 2nd
stage, it is said that all dharmas are mind-only. If that is what
they are, then why in the 3rd stage docs one go beyond mind-
only to reach reality ? And if one has reached reality,
why should he go to a further stale said to deny both the
dharma and the dharmatd ? It seems to be the case that the
individual statements constitute the mottos for a given level
of yoga experience and for the yogitts with that experience.
But if this be granted, it denies that the same precept is given
to all yogins.
Now, it appears that this is the identical procedure of state¬

ment found in the old Buddhist classic, the Dhammapada (XX,
5, 6, 7), “All constructions are impermanent” {sabbe sankhdrd
anicca ), “All constructions are sulTering” {sabbe sankhdrd,
dukkha ), “All dhammas are non-self” {sabbe dhammd anal Id).
In illustration, the first statement, “All constructions are imper¬
manent,” is convincing on the intellectual level, and so is
addressed to laymen, monks, and anyone else who will listen.
But, having said this, the Buddha said something else about the
constructed things, “All constructions are sulTering,” and this
statement is not convincing on the intellectual level; it turns
out to he the precept to the anas, or iraiakas, the disciples of the
Buddha who are told to look upon suffering as suffering and
upon happiness as suffering because it entails suffering or will
lead to suffering. Furthermore, the Buddha said, "All dhammas
(S. dharmah) are non-self,” bringing into the discussion the
celebrated teaching of Buddhism, the non-self (an-dtman) theory
that has always been characteristic of Buddhism. This state¬
ment is not convincing on the intellectual level, because dharmas
APPENDIX I
337
such as love and hate arc understood l»v the intellect to require
a sell that loves and hates. Therefore, the statement cannot
be made intelligently to everyone, but also it is not just the way
the disciples should look upon constructed things, because
in Huddhism the dhartnas are not only in the constructed cate¬
gory but also there is the unconstructed kind, tor example,
Nirvana. Nirvana is the goal of the path, for which it is neces¬
sary to follow the procedures of Meditation as a vogin. There¬
fore, it may be concluded along the same lines that the state¬
ment, “All dhamma r are non-self,’' is the precept for the yogins.
Then the question naturally arises, if the statement, “All

dhammas are non-sell," is a yoga precept, can it be placed among
the stages of yoga that have been set forth above on the basis
of the l.attkai ataui verses and (iuhyasamaja verse ? This precept
is immediately identifiable with the 2nd yoga stage,
which is the stage that takes the ’sell’ out of “all dharmas."
In explanation, the statement, “All dharmas arc mind-only”
refers to the dream state. In this state, the object (the world
of dhanws' is paramount and the self is in abeyance; hence,
“All dhanna r arc non-self” cl. the quotation of Anatigavajra
under the Nidaua verse |K \ . \« < oidinglv, one may also
conclude that the Phammafmda precept. “All constructions are

suffering," applies to the Ut stage ol yoga, the meditative
object on the phenomenal limit of the entity, involving the
phenomenal sell that sulleis. In agreement the Buddha said
( Dhammapada . X\l. 7*12 . * The disciples of Gautama arc
always well awake ftahujjhanti)." Certainly yoga begins in
the waking state.
The above help 1 us tegarding the 3rd stage of yoga. This

is said to go bevond mind-onb the dream state) and to refer
to dreamless sleep, with the non-appearance of phenomenal
dharmas. It follows that this is the stage when the subject is
paramount and the object is in alievanee, and so one sees no
dream. This conclusion forces the word dharmata (underlying
nature) to apply to the subject.
Having concluded that much, it is also possible to appreciate

the meaning of the -4th stage, when there is no dhaima but also
no dharmata. In shoii, “there is no dharrna" denies a dream;
and “there is no dharmata' denies a dreamless sleep- - thus deny¬
ing both subject and object. This turns out, according to the
338
YOGA OF THE GIH1YASAMAJ ATANTRA
foregoing treatments, to lx* a climactic transitional state—in

one ease, leading immediately to the onset of the Mahayana;
and in another case, to complete Buddhahood.
Since this comparison of the l.a iik avatar a verses with the single
Guhyasamaja verse has been sufficiently exposed on its own
terminological side, it should be of interest to sec to what extent
this dovetails with Guhyasamaja yoga stages previously presented
in this work. My subsection “The six mcmlx-rs of yoga and
the five kramas in the Stage of Completion” presented the
commentarial exegesis of certain verses in the Guhyasamdja ,
Chap. VI, including verse 4 :
He should accomplish the selflessness of citta being visua¬
lized ( dUanidhyaptinairatmyam ), (then) the contemplation
of speech {vaca ) and body, (then) the triple conjunction,
(finally) the abode equal to space.
If one wishes to match these up with the stages already discussed

in this appendix, it follows immediately that the “selflessness of
citta being visualized” is the 2nd stage of yoga : “all dharmas are
located within one’s mind” and this is the non-self of dharmas.
Tnercforc, the preceding contemplation (‘body as the mantra
visualized’) corresponds to the 1st stage of yoga. It follows,
that this treatment does not allow the more generalized inter¬
pretation of yoga stages, as previously, to lead up to either the
beginning of the bodhisattva path (Mahayana) or to Complete
Buddhahood. Indeed, the context shows that the interpre¬
tation is fully within the Mahayana scope, just as the four
nirvedha-bhagiya were within the pre-Mahayana scope. In the
present case, the “body as the mantra visualized” is the accom¬
plishment of the Stage of Generation (— the first seven Bodhi¬
sattva stages), and “selflessness of cilia being visualized” is the
beginning of the Stage of Completion («the last three Bodhi¬
sattva stages). Then, the comparison continues along the same
lines, that the “contemplation of speech and body” is the Maha-
y&na version of the 3rd stage of yoga, the Svadhisthana, or
initial Mahamudra, as the thusness end, or the non-appearance
of phenomenal dharmas. Finally the “triple conjunction,”
or “divine body made of mind,” is equivalent to the transitional
4th stage of yoga, which goes beyond the sign-sources of dharmas
and dhamatit presumably to be “purified by the Clear Light
like a gem cleansed by fire” (Nidana verse RA).
APPENDIX I
339
Finally, the “abode equal to space” which generates the body

of Mahavajradhara has no equivalent in the four stages of
yoga. Nevertheless, it is analogous to the further statement
in the Lankavatara verses : “His effortless going is peaceful and
purified bv his vows,” except that now it applies to the Buddha
stage rather than to the Bodhisattva stages.
The foregoing rather neatly demonstrates a tie-up between

the Lankavatdrasutra and the Guhyasamajatantra ; and in the
latter case, the consistency between the stages of yoga in its
Chapter VI and the stages in that verse of Chapter XV. Be¬
sides, the material in this appendix will serve as an introduc¬
tion to both the second and third appendixes.
AI’I’KNDIX II
THE ARCANE-BODY CONTROVERSY
My use of the word “arc.me” and solution of t h r forty versrs

into two groups going with tin* Stage ot Generation and Stage
of Completion can he finally justified by consideration ol what
I term the “Arcane-Body Controvcisv
It is true that I have already presented some material about

this matter in my Introduction to the Yoga of the ( >uh\ asamaja-
tantra. But this is an exciting topic about a 1 ibetan contro¬
versy that reaches back to important Indian theories ot the fruits
of )yj£rt; as such it deserves a special treatment. \ arious forms
of Indian philosophy take account ol a Miblle bod\ * fikyna-
iarira). However, it is only in such Tantric currents ,»v the one
presented in the foregoing work that a whole upward < areer is
worked out for this subtle bodv. This kind ol body is of»oiirsc
denied immediately by the materialistic person. Here 1 am
not arguing for the existence of such a mysterious hotly, but
simply reporting the facts of the (•it/ntiuim/ijfi system, which
speaks of an “arcane body” which on the Stage of Completion
is called the “illusory body” or “impure illusory body,” that
can emerge from the ordinary body.
In fact, the theory is by no means original with the Guhva-

snmtijntantrn because ancient Buddhism already referred to it
with the terminology of “mental body" or “body made of mind”
{manimaya-ktiva), to which 1 have previously alluded. Here I
should add that the Ijiiikm-itarnsutra mentions three kinds of
mental body, which combine well with the theory in the Arya
school ol the tantric Nagarjmia and Aryadcva that tin* Stage
ol Completion begins with the Eighth Bodiiisutlva Stage. The
first mental body, with stabili/.aiiou in the Pi east ire of s< mult!hi
{samiieHutuUitisam<lfuitti-uuntt>maY<i ), which according to tli.it
scripture is developed in the course of tin* first seven Bodhi^
sattva stages, therefore, belongs to the Stage of Generation.
I he second kind, wlmh completely comprehends the intrinsic

nature nl tin* tlhatnun dhtimuiSitihhoiditihtuihtimuintimtiYti^ and whu li
is sail! to proceed to all the Buddha realms necessarily would
be placed in the Stage ol Completion as the “arcane bodv” ol
that Stage. According to tin* Guhyasamaja tradition, that
AI’I'KNDIX H
HI
“arcane hotly" is succeeded by, or next subjected to, the “arcane

speech" and then the “arcane mind." It is only at the phase
ol “arcane mind ’ that this mental or spiritual body “comple¬
tely comprehends the intrinsic nature of tin* dhaimas which
means in I'aihakramn terminology that it completely under¬
stands the eighty prakrtis associated with the three Light stages,
as experienced on the Tenth Bodhisattva Stage. The thitd
kind of mental hotly, which performs the instigations natural
to its class ( nikayasahajasamskarakriya-manomaya ), i.c. natural
to the class of Buddhas, is the yuganaddha-dtha of this Tantric
tradition.
At first glance, a certain verse of the Guhyasamajatantra

does not seem related to the above, hut I shall demonstrate the
relevance of Chapter XV, verse 22, of that Tantra, as follows,
which is almost the same as the last verse of Chapter XII
(“Documents"):
buddho dliar mad hart) rdpi vajrauittvo 'pi va radt f

a tiki a turd yadi mahatma (ad ant am tasya jivitam //
If someone would go Irryoiul whether as a Buddha, a

holder ol Dharma, or as a Vajrasattva; and il he is delud¬
ed, he would lose his life.
Candrakli li’s Viadipnddyotana Mchan cd., p. 122-2,3) repeats

.substantially its comment on the Chapter XII verse, to wit,
that the expression "Buddha" means "yogin of Vairocana,"
and so on. In this case. Cclu-pa's Uatnavrkui commentary on
Chapter XV FI 1. Vol. 63, p. 211-5. is more helpful. It
explains that "Buddha" is the Diamond of Body ; “holder ol
Dharma" is the Diamond of Speech; and “Vajrasattva” is the
Diamond of Mint! (sans rgyas ni sku rdo rjeho / chos hdzin pa
ui gsuh rdo rjeho / rdo rje sems dpali ni thugs rdo rjeho /).
This comment immediately associates this verse with the ex¬
pressions Body, Speech, and Mind that have such an important
role throughout the Guhyasamajatantra as well as in certain
nidana verses. In consideration that this Chapter XV has
previously in its verse 11 referred to the Tenth Stage (of the
Hodhisattva), one may recall in this connection the rather
remarkable statements about the last three Bodhisattva Stages
(Lighth through Tenth) in the manual of the Tathagatagai bha
theory, the Uatnagotravibhuga (ed. of Johnston, pp. 3.21-4.6):
I laira yalo ’sjaniyaiu bodhisattvabhumau vartanianuh
342
YOGA Ol- TIIE GUI! Y AS AM A J AT ANTRA
sarvadharma-vasitaprapto bhavati lasmat sa bodhimanda-

varagatah sarvadhannasamatabliisatnlniddha ity ucyatc /
yato navamyani bodhisaitvabhfnnau vartamano ’ruiltara-
dharmabhanakalvasampannah sarvasattvasayasuvidhijna
indriyaparamap.ira m i t a pra p t ali sarvasaltvaklesavasananu-
samdhisamudghatauakusalo bhavati i.isinat so ’bhisam-
buddhabodhih supravartitadhannacakra ity ucyatc /
yato dasamyam bhuinav anuttaratathagatadharmayauva-
rajyabhisckapraptyanantarain anabhogabuddhakaryapra-
tiprasrabdho bhavati lasmat sa supravartitadharmac.akro
’nantasisyaganasuvinita ity ucyatc /
Among those, for the reason that his attainment of power

over all dharmns takes place on the Eighth Bodhisattva
Stage, it is said (in the Dlunaniiiartndjastlha ), ‘He,
having proceeded to the best terrace of Enlightenment
(= the Tree of Enlightenment), was enlightened on the
equality of all dharmas'. lor the reason that his endow¬
ment of preaching the incomparable Dharma, his know¬
ing of the good rules for the hopes of all sentient beings,
his attainment of the highest perfection of faculties, and
his virtue of annihilating the continuance of defilement
habit-energy in all sentient beings, take place on the
Ninth Bodhisattva Stage, it is said, 'He, with enlighten¬
ment fully awakened, has well set into motion the Wheel
of the Dharma.’ lor the reason that immediately after
receiving, on the Tenth Stage, the Crown-Prince consec¬
ration for the incomparable Tathagala-Dharina he is
roused ( apratiprairabdhn) to the effortless Buddha duties—
it is said, ‘He who well set into motion the Wheel of the
Dharma has well trained the innumerable host ol disciples.”
That is to say, in this particular tradition, it is the Body of the
Buddha sitting under the liodhi Tree that occurs on the Eighth
Stage, his Speech as the Wheel of Doctrine that is on the Ninth,
his Mind roused to Buddha duties that is on the Truth. In
Tantrism, this Body, Speech, and Mind arc called the “three
mysteries of the Buddha,”
This plausible explanation of the sequence Buddha’,

‘Dharma holder’, and ‘Vajrasattva’ ol the (,'uhyasamdja verse,
still leaves unexplained the mysteiious remark that the one who
would go beyond in such status would lose his life if he be dr-
APPENDIX II
343
luded. However, this is a reasonable remark in the light of the

[jjiikavatara's second kind of “mental body,** prevalent oil the
Eighth through Truth Bodhisattva Stages, liccause the lânka-
valara's claim that this body visits all the Buddha realms is a
way of saying that it has emerged by yoga praxis from the
ordinary body. If the vogiu does not have, skill in guiding his
movements in these Buddha realms--whatever we may think
them to be—he could lose his life, because the separation of the
•‘mental body” would be tantamount to death’s separation.
This points to the importance of the first kind of “mental body,”
that immersed in samadhi, Ix’cause presumably this is a necessary
preparation for the dangerous trips of the subsequent second
kind. If this sort of teaching has been derived from the life
of the Buddha, one can promptly think of Gautama’s celebrated
austerities by the Xairanjana River when his body eventually
became so wasted that viewers could not decide whether he
was dead or alive. This extreme mortification immediately
preceded Gautama’s passage to the Bodlii Tree where, accord¬
ing to the tradition of the above Tathagatagarbha literature, he
represented a Bodhisattva ol the Eighth Stage.
Indeed, the premise ol such a “mental body” or illusory

body as tin* “arcane body” of the Stage ol Completion makes
it clear why the great commentators on this Tantra, c.g. the
Indian tantrics Xagarjuna and Aryadeva, and Tsoh-kha-pa
in Tibet, again and again emphasized that the Stage ol Gene¬
ration must precede the Stage ol Completion. Any lantric
who would try to practise the Stage ol Completion without first
having the Stage ol (Generation, would Ik: relying on instruc¬
tion and precepts which demand that tlie* body be an ‘‘arcane
body” in the sense of that ad winced Stage, while in fact the
person enterprising that Stage would only be starting with his
ordinary human body that is not even a sanctified body in the
worldly sense of withdrawal from certain foods, the opposite
sex, and society generally let alone “arcane” in any way.
All the above is necessary to appreciate Tsoti-kha-pa’s
insistence on an “arcane body” in both the Stage ol Generation
and Stage of Completion. His solution, as I have come to
understand it, is easy to stale: the “arcane body” of the Stage
of Generation is the “hundred lineages” in the Aliyoga phase;
and the “arcane body” ol the Stage ol Completion is the first
344
two members of the six-memhered yoga, namely pratydhdra and

dhydna. But while he expressly identified the second kind of
“arcane body" in that manner, ! never found him stating the
first kind in such a simple manner : lie always wrapped the
matter in complicated discussions, because ot the controversy.
In accordance with Tson-kha-pa's annotation of the Forty

Verses and my grouping of those verses, 1 placed the minute
correspondences called the “hundied lineages" (T. rigs brgya)
in the first group of verses concerning the Stage of Generation,
in fact beginning with the set which. 1 associated with the
division of vajra called Atiyoga. Then, more recently to my
surprise, I could find no mention of these “hundred lineages”
in a work by Tson-kha-pa’s faithful disciple Mkhas-grub-rjc
devoted to the topic of the Stage of Generation, namely the
latter’s work Rgjud thams cad kyi rgyal po dpal gsah ba hdus pahi
bskyed rim dnos grub rgya mtsho zesb ya ba . (“The 'Ocean of
Siddhis’ about the Stage of Generation in the King of all Tantras,
the Sri-Guhyasamdja ”), wherein I find important points of
Tson-kha-pa’s position amplified and defended by Mkhas-
grub-rje. His silence oil the matter was confirmed when I
perused a work by Blo-bzaii-chos-kyi-rgyal-mtshan, the First
Panchcn Lama, namely his Gsail hdus gdams hag rim lha gsal
sgrott gyi shin pofti gnad kun bsdus pa (“Concise statement of the
essential points, clarifying the Pahcaktama precepts of the
Guhyasamaja”). This work expressly states that the “hundred
lineages” belong to the Stage of Completion, with the remark,
‘‘The contemplation in which there is the arising as the body
of a deity involved with the illustrious ‘hundred lineages’ and
so forth, is the arcane body ol the Stage of Completion” (dam
pa rigs brgya la sogs pahi lha skur sar bar bsgom pa ni rdzogs
pa rim pahi lus dben yin te). Accordingly, the author treats
these “hundred lineages” in his work devoted to the Stage of
Completion.
Of course, I again referred to Tsou-kha-pa's elaborate
discussions of the “arcane body” problem to see if, after all I
ought have misunderstood lus position. 1 could hnd no reason
to change my conclusion. Besides, Tsoii-kha-pa, in his
sadhana of the Guhyasatndja entitled final hbyor dag pahi um pa
(“the pure stages of yoga”) (PIT, Vol. IfiO, p. 8‘>-4) states:
“After generating in that way the thirty-two gods, he should
APPENDIX II
345
respec lively contemplate them in sequence as the nature of the

live personality aggregates, the lour elements, the eignt consist¬
ing of eye, etc., the live sense objects starting with form, and
the set often beginning with right arm; this is Atiyoga” (de/
ltar Ilia sum cu so gins po bskyed pain hog tu re re nas rim pa
b/in pluui po Ilia dan / khams bzi dan mig la sogs pa brgyad
dan : g/ugs la sogs pa hia dan f lag pa gYas pa la sogs pa
beulii ht) bm* bsam par bya ste / sin tu rual hbyor ro /). Our
earlier discussions show that Atiyoga is the thud of the four
yogas in tin- Stage of (Jeneraiion, called Yoga, Anuyoga, Ati-
yog.i. and Malta yoga. Tson-kha-pa *s lemark fm liter confirms
mv division ol the verses in which I assign Atiyoga to the third
group ol verses (Bhagavau Sarva), because it is precisely iu
these verses that Tsoh-kha-pa begins his “arcane br>dy”
comments, stalling with the verse about the live personality
aggregates. Besides, Tson-kha-pa, when explaining the four-
treu fundamental (alls of the Yajrayana in his Diws grub kyi
site ma and grouping those tails (PIT. Yol. H>0, p. 70-1,2)
classilies as a fall ip the Stage ol (Generation the fall No. 8,
“to abuse the live shutuihas, lor their nature belongs to the five
Buddhas.” Pursuant to the given reason "their nature belongs
to the live Buddhas" , one could extend this remark about
the personal!I\ aggiegates Lntuiha to the sense bases and so
on, with which deity is ideutihcd in the Atiyoga stage. Doubt¬
less, Tsoh-kha-pa lollous a ti.uhtioii whi< h places the “bundled
lineages” in the Stage ol (jeueiatioii; and I need not speculate
on the particular reasons lor later luminaries of his school to have
understood the matter diflrirutly. Still, it is possible to set
forth the chief controversial aspect in the following manner.
Tsoh-klia-pa has his most < omplieatcd discussion of the

“arcane body'* rontioversy iu his I’aiicakrama commentary,
starting Vol. I‘>8, p. 201 and loutiuuing for a number of pages
in the photographic edition (each page with live folio sides).
It so happens that Tsoh-klia-pa repeats much of the same
discussion about the "arcane body" iu a later work, bis Mlhah
gcod ("Deciding the alternatives") oil the individual chapters
of the Guhya\amojafanh a. namely, in his mthoh gcctl of Chapter
VI (BIT, Yol. 1 ”>(i, pp. 30 and 10). I have presented this
Chapter iu “Documents” and also treated the relevant verses
(nos. 3-t») in my section “The six members of yoga and the
346
YOGA OF THE ClUIYASAMAJATAN TRA
five kramas in the Stage of Completion.” Since 1 son-kha-pa s

discussion here shows that the argument devolves about the
expression in verse 3, “the one who has body as the mantra
visualized” ( mantranidhyaptikdyena ), it is well to present C-andra*
kirti’s comment on that verse 3, as 1 edit from the Pradipoddyotana
manuscript and accordingly translate in Mchnn h^rtl context :
/ mantranidhyapti ityadi ' mantra alikalijah / sarpadi-
svabhavas tesatn stripumnapumsakatvena tryaksaradhar
[abhutja inantrah tryaksarani / tesain pravesasthiti-
vyutthanasvabhavena parijnanam mantranidhyaptih /
tatra purvakam kayena vajrajapasya sadhanabhutena
nirmanasarirena vaca vajrajapenopalaksitah / manasi
hrdi hrdisthito vajrasattvah coditah/yathabhutaparijnanena
visayikitah / bhavayed iti /' yogisantanasya vakyama-
nakam catasro ’vastha nispadayet / kits ta itv aha / pravara
ityadi /pravaramulkr stain cittavivekalaksanam vajrajapad
adhikatvat siddhim iti / svadhisthanalaksanain mahamudra
manah samtosayatlti manahsatntosanain mahamudra-
viSuddhikaratvat / priyam isâm bhavasama-ckalaksa-
nam mahavajradharamurtim nispadayet 1
As to the verse “The one who has body as the mantra
visualized...”, ‘mantras’ arise from the (sixteen)
vowels and the (thirty-three or thirty-four) consonants
and arc constituted by such expressions as SARPA.
Among them, when mantras have as basis three syllables
by way of female (Ah), male (Om), and androgyne
(Hum), they arc the three syllables. The thorough
knowledge of those (three) by way of inhalation (Om),
holding of breath (Ah), and exhalation (Hum) is the
‘mantra visualized'. Here, the one who previously has
the (arcane) body, that is, the body of hypostasis (by
the five Tathagatas and so on) which arose through
a sadhatut of diamond muttering, should accomplish,
i.e. intensely contemplate, exhorted by speech, i.e. by
Diamond Muttering, in the mind, i.e. in (one’s own)
heart, that is, (exhorted) meaning ‘distinguished* while
the Vajrasattva dwelling in llu* heart (within the central
‘vein’ of the dhatmacakra) is made the object (of cons¬
ciousness) by that thorough knowledge (of the three
phases of the wind) as they really are, that is (should
Al’l't.NIMX II
347
accomplish) four states to he explained of the yogin’s

stream of consciousness. What arc those ? (The text)
says: the ’surpassing one’, and so on, namely (l) the
‘surpassing one', i.e. outstanding one, with the character
of‘Arcane Mind', because it outlasts Diamond Muttering;
(2) ‘successful one’, with the character of Personal
Blessing, namely tin* Mahamudra; (3) ‘one satisfying
the mind*, that is. “It brings satisfaction to the mind,”
because, it purifies the Mahamudra; (4) ’beloved one’,
i.c. wished for. that is, he accomplishes the body of
Mahnvajradhata with the single character of the pheno¬
menal world and the realm of quiescence.
With that passage before us, it is easier to sec how those who
took Candrakirti's commentary as the most authoritative one
on the Cluhyasaniajalatilra , would be troubled to determine by this
passage which of tin- two Stages to assign the “arcane body”.
Candrakirti's subsequent commentary on Chapter VI shows
that the contemplation of tin- winds by means of the three
syllables can he understood either in the form appropriate to
the Stage of Generation or to that appropriate to the Stage of
Completion. Some persons could maintain that this verse of
the Gukyasamojatantra refers to the five stages which Xagarjuna
systematized in his Pafrcaktama, beginning with Diamond
Muttering; lor, as well known, the Pahcakrama deals only with
the Stage of Completion. On the other hand, some persons
could point to the word * fnaiakam in Candrakirti's commentary
to suggest that the “body as the mantra visualized” is a prior
accomplishment, already at hand when the yogin is exhorted
by Diamond Muttering of the Stage of Completion variety.
Besides, Candrakirti did not help matters when, in his commen¬
tary on Chapter XII, fiU-fil (see “Documents”), he explained
the Stage of Completion, not with this terminology from Chapter
VI, verse 3, but rather with the terminology of six-membered
yoga from Chapter XVIII. In the case of the six members,
Diamond Muttering would have to lx-assigned to pranayama,
the thiid memlxjr, leaving the first two members, pralyttham
and ilhyana, to he argued about. Xo wonder there were dis¬
agreements over this “arcane body” !
As I understand TWi-khu-pa's solution, it allows for both

interpretations of the expression “body as the mantra
348
YOGA Ol THE G1 II YA'-AMA) A'l AN 11i A
visualized'’. This amounts to .m admi , "'iou that the two stages

called Stage ol (iciinatmii and Stage ol (.oiimli tuni aie dis¬
tinctions imposed upon die had* I antra. Il we de< id< upon
the Stage ot (iencratinii, we eati consult (.aiidiaKti ti s t om-
mctitarv on Chapter \M, I. to see at oiue that in the ease
of the four steps, he* mentions that the three syllables ol Oin,
etc. arc deposited in the bod\ in the second step. l pas.idhana
ms Ann yoga, This agrees with our plating in the second group
of verses the material on muttering l>\ means ol the three
syllables, allotting lour sounds to each nulatin vet sc 12, ^ h).
* '
This is held to genet ate the primeval lord ad i nut ha). How¬
ever, in Tsoh-kha-pa's position, this body ol the second step is
still not the “arcane bodv'\ for tin: latter attainment the
yogin must pass to the third step, the Atiyoga. in which there
is the hypostasis of divinitx into the body by such means as
the correspondences established in the “hundred lineages".
This body becomes called in the fourth step the “mantra-
purusa”, seen with three heads, etc. Then, if the same line
of Chapter VI, verse 3, is understood to reler to the Stage of
Completion, the “body as the mantra visualized" i*. the “arcane
body” of tile Stage of Completion. nauicK fnatyaiiam and
dhyana, to which the two nidiina verses (KA-NA are devoted.
In such a case, the remaining lour mcinbeis, (ndtuh'dirm . etc.,
ol the six-membered yoga, have, to be equated with the live
steps of the Pahcakrama.
Because the above is its* If so involved and technical, I have

decided to lorcgo any more ol 1 son-klia-pa's portrayal ol vary¬
ing positions alxiut this “aicane hodv *. In summary, the
“arcane body” ol the Stage ol (irueratiou becomes that wav
because imagined to be invested with denies. But according
to the theory of steps, the \ogin should Inst pass through a
kind of symbolic death through attainment of the void: then
imagine himself in an inteimediate state by three-syllabled
breathing; now lie can pass to a symbolic birth wherein his
body is inhabited by deities; and finally return to the world
with transfigured consciousness. The yogin is now readv to
embark upon the dangerous Stage ol Completion, with the
drawing forth of an advanced “arcane body," the: Illusory
BtKlv. This Illusory Body the “.mane body” of the Stage of
Completion—is the reenactment ol the piimeval androgyne.
APPENDIX III
THK PRAXIS ACCORDING TO ARYADEVA
There are many ways of setting forth the indications of

practice that were touched upon in the foregoing introductions
and annotation of the uidana verses. Perhaps the clearest
statement of the practice in the Stage, of Completion is that
found in Aryadeva’s Catyamclapahipradipa , a work which has
already contributed considerably (for example, the ‘hundred
lineages' stem from here). Aryadeva's passage happens to be
extant in Sanskrit in Bendall's edition of the Subhafita-samgraha ,
Part II, pp. 33-35; but Bendali did not trace the Aryadeva
work.
The Sanskrit passage is touud in the Tibetan translation in

bits and snatches, anti one section could not be traced at all.
Unless the Suhhayita compiler had a completely different recen¬
sion of the Aryadeva text, he must have skipped around to
piece together a running account; and my study of the context
shows that he is faithful to Aryadeva’s intention. The exact
Tibetan equivalent begins in PTT, Yol. 61, p. 312-3, line 7,
but the lirst words of the Aryadeva citation may be a para¬
phrase of p. 311-2. In the following reproduction of IicndalPs
edited Sanskrit, I shall insert the places of the Tibetan transla¬
tion; and follow the text with my English translation and
comments.
pustakc .•TfjWreiJ-padair bhavanopadesah spasfaksare-

noktah / (Possibly paraphrase of p. 311-2 :) udyanc
vijane sravakadi-uktam sa-rahite (p. 312-3, line 7:)
pai amai thasaiyalambanapfn vakam svadhiffhana krarnrna
vajrasatlvai iipam aimanam nispadya (p. 312-5, line 4:)
prntUamarupadi-trividhavisayam asvadya tad anu
sodhanadividliina sarvaharam abhisamskrti-siddham
adhyatma-kundam anusmrtyatmaki tini samadhisatt-
vasya inukhe trisikhagnim juhomitv ahamkaram
utpadyabhyavaharati ’ tatah sukhena parinamati rasa-
yanam ca bliavati } evani kayavajram samtarpya (portion
not traced in 'rii>etan :) vain kamcit svabhaprajharupena
sarvalamkrtagalra trivali-taraiigabhahgabhirama atyan-
350
YOGA OF THE GUHYASAMA JATANTRA
takrsamadhyaroniarajjv (ii<. for nijy)-aiitai itavi(>ula-

gambbiranabbidesa iAghniia-ghanA-nitAniba-slnbdhAsrnga-
ra-lalita-kanialagau-sasnma-vadana saumyadrstya
mahasukhamirAganataya (]>. 315-5, lino 8:) nkc

vyavasthita ' lain "maliasidrlhim nispadavanri ti drclba-
hamkaram ut|)ad> alinganacumbanatusana- (p. 31 1-4,
■
line 3 :) km agrabana-pulakatadana-dasanaiiakhadana-
mardana- (p. 313-1, lino 1 :) sitkara-kokila-bhtnganada-
nadlsarncodanudikarn kilva (p. 314-4, line 1:) vacl-
kurparadikai ana-pi amiKlanataya prarali tamuktabara-
valaya-kaiaka-keyfiranfipiira-fp. 313-1, line 2:) vajra-

padmasaingbarsanat prajnopnya-sainapattya skandbadi-
svabbavat sai vatathagatanarn tnurdbanam arabhya
dvasaptati-nadisahasrani nirjharadharakareii-alik.didra /
vibhuva raga-viraga-inadhyaraga-kramena tatab prajna-
paramitadi-svarupan pratvatniavedyan karoti t
evam sri-Mahasukbasamadbim abbyasya praptotkarso

yogi tatraiva ganamandalc uigrabanugrabcna sativan
paripacayet / (p. 314-1, line 8 :) evam punab punar
bhutakotim pravisya punab punar by ultbaya pauca tatba-
gatarupan pauca kamagunan asvaday.ui yatba na mlayate
manab / (p.314-2, line 5:) lato nirvikalpo mahayogl sviit-
manah sarvabbavasvabhava-pratipadanaya loke garhitam
visodbya praccbannc pradeSc stbitva ’bbvavaharati /
tatha ca mudrabandho na man<jalam na caityam na
ca pustakavacanam na kavaklesam na patakastbapasana-
pratimam pranamati na &ravaka-Pratyckabuddham na
tithinaksatrainuhurtakalapeksanarn karoti ' sarvam etad
adhyatmcnaiva sampadayaii / / (p, 314-5, line 8 :)
vane bhikfdtn bhiamen nityam sadhako d\ dhaniScayah j
dada(n)ti bhayasamtrasta bhojanam daivyamanditam / /
aiikramet Irirajnltma naJam vajrakfaram bhavct j
surint narini (sir, for naîm ) mahayakfim asurim rnanufhn a pi f f
prapya vidydvratam k an a in trivajrajminascvitam ifi
(p. 313-4, line l:) evam latikikadbyanam apanlya
nianorajyam apahaya sadaprarudit.imana yoginibbib saba

ramatnano yatba raja Indrabhutis tadvat kalevaram p.iri-
vartya vajrakayo bliutva ’niabpuiena sabantardbayasta-
gunaisvaryagunanvito Imddbuksctrad buddbakseu am
gacchati / yatboktain Mulasutre /
APfF.NDIX III
351
sanadevopabhnoais fit \nyanumo (sic f<>r-nianair) yathdsukham /

svadhidaivatayogma svam atnuinam (sic, for paratmanau)
prapiijayrt j /
(Tibetan ends at p. 313-4, lint- 4).
Translation
In a book of Aryadeva the precepts of the contemplation

are stated in lucid words:
In a solitary glade, free as well from the words of Sravakas,

(thej’ogiii contemplates this way:—) Having first taken Supreme
Truth as the meditative object, by the Stage of Personal Blessing
(Svadhisthana-krama) he abides with himself as the body of
Vajrasattva. First he experiences the three kinds of form and
of the other sensory objects. After that, for the rites of puri¬
fication and so on, upon all food—he recalls the inner hearth,
whose shape is real, and arouses the pride, “I make a burnt
offering in the three-tongued llamc which is the configuration
of the self on the face of the Samadhi Being,” and partakes ot
food. Then it blissfully changes and becomes elixir ( rasdyana ).
Thus (the performer having satiated the diamond of body
(with elixir), (takes) some (consoit, mudrii ), by way of form,
a prajna like himself (or: his own light, srabha). She has a
body with all ornaments, gratifying through the restless break¬
ing of the three folds (at her navel), the place of her wide and
deep navel hidden by the streak of hair across her narrow waist;
her massive hips with firm buttocks: her gait amorous, playful,
and sweet; her fare with smiles; pleasant to sec, and stationed
in (the yogin's) proximity through the attraction of great ecstasy
(:mafiasukha ).
Then he confirms his pride, thinking, *‘I shall accomplish

the siddhi of Mah.i (mudra)." Having done the embracing,
kissing, sucking, bolding of breast, l>eating with bristling hair;
the bite, the scratch, the bruise; erotic cries, cooing, humming
of bees, calling through a tubular stalk (««<//), and so on —
because she is thrilled by his (yogi) postures of Juci f kurpara.
and so on, she shakes her string of pearls, armlet, bracelet of
lower and of upper arm, and anklet. Then, through the
friction of the diamond and the lotus, by union of prajnd and
upaya , starting at the head since the intrinsic nature of skandhas
352
YOGA OF the Gl’HYASAMAfATANTRA
belongs to all Tathagatas, the 72.000 uadis become a fluid

(dravibhuya) of vowels and consonants in the manner of a tor¬
rent, in the sequence of ‘desire,’ ‘aversion,’ and ‘indifference*.
Thus he introspects the true forms of Prajnaparamita and so
on. In this way the yogin, practising the glorious Mahasukha-
santadhi, reaches eminence, and matures the sentient brings
by hindering and assisting in the (32-deity) group-wnn/fl/d.
In that way, again and again he enters the true limit
( bhutakofi ); and having emerged again and again he experiences

the five ‘strands of desire’ as the five Tathagata forms, so the
(sublime) mind docs not fade.
Then, the great yogin, discursive thought lacking in himself,

so as to teach the intrinsic nature of all entities, cleansing what is
forbidden in the world, stays in a private place and enjoys, to
wit :— he makes no rnudrds, mandalas , or caityas, nor recites
texts, nor mortifies the body, nor bows to images of cloth, wood,
or stone, nor (takes refuge) in Sravakas or Pratyckabuddhas,
nor depends on time in terms of lunar days, astcrisms, or muhurtas.
All that fulfils solely the inner nature. ( Guhyauimaja ,
XVI, p. 126:) The sddhaka with firm resolve, always
seeks alms in the glade. Trembling with fear they give
food divinely prepared. Should the triple-diamond
one go l>eyond, there would be loss and (then) the
diamond syllable. Obtaining either a goddess, a tutga-
lady, great yakfi, demi-goddess. or human woman, he
should engage in vidyavrata, relying on the knowledge of
the three diamonds.
In that way dispelling the worldly meditations, and aban¬

doning the realm of fancy, with ever-ecstatic mind he rejoices
in the midst of the vogirris, like King ludrabhuti, who transmuted
his physical body ( kalrvara ) and became a diamond body,
whereupon he disappeared from the midst of his querns; and
endowed with the merits of the eight guna-nihatya, wandered
from Buddha field to Buddha field. As said in the Mfdasuha
(i.e. Guhyauimdja , VII, 2, with variant readings) :
By recourses that enjoy all desires ( deities) according to

pleasure; and by the praxis of one’s presiding lord one
(respectively) worships others and oneself.
So ends the Subhd}ita-$<imgraha citation of Aryadcvas ‘lucid

words. Fortunately, Aryadcva includes two passages from
APPENDIX III
353
the Guhyasamdja , one near the beginning of Chapter Seven

and the other near the end of Chapter Sixteen, which enable
me to bring in some of the commentarial tradition. Besides,
Sakvamitra’s Catydmeluf>akafnadipa-(ikd in Columbia University’s
Xarthang edition was consulted in the relevant section near
the end, but proved of little value.
In order to explain Aryadcva’s account in the terminology

already drawn from the Guhyasamdjatantra and associated
commentarial literature, it is necessary to observe that he says,
“Having first taken Supreme Truth as the meditative object...”
and says in the next sentence in further explanation, “First he
experiences the three kinds of form....” One can refer to the
three kinds of each sense object (as in Guhyasamdja , Chap. VII)
by desire, aversion, and indifference, as does Aryadcva.
i oga Stages 1 and 2

Body as the Mantra Visualized
Selflessness oj the Mind Visualized
The account begins with the yogin located in a solitary
glade. In this connection Aryadeva cites Guhyasamdja, XVI,
p. 126, “The sadhaka with firm resolve, always seeks alms in
the glade. Trembling with fear they give food divinely pre¬
pared....”* The Pradipoddyotana (Mchan hgrel , p. 148-1)
mentions the unshared food but does not clarify who does the
giving or why they arc frightened. It converts the yogin’s
glade, to the ‘great forest’ {vane mahafaiyam). Celu-pa’s com¬
mentary, Ratnavrksa-ndma-rahasya-samdja-vrtli (PTT, Vol, 63,
p. 227-2), is more helpful, because it explains, “food not shared
with men and having the hundred flavors” (mi dan thun moh
ma yin pahi 2al zas ro brgya dan ldan pa); and “those tree
divinities frightened by the fiery nimbus ( tejas ) of his evocation
power, give (it)” (sin la gnas pahi lha dc dag sgrub dbah dehi
gzi brjid kyis skrag nas stcr bar hgyur ro). This explanation
immediately associates those Guhyasamdja verses with the episode
•The verse is correctly given in Bhaitacbaryya’s edition to begin with

vane , the second line to begin with dadanti\ while Bagchi’s edition incorrectly
assigns the vane line to verse 98B, and starts verse 99 with dndanti. The
Pradipoddyotana manuscript supports Bbattacharyya here with the word*
lane-ityddi.
354
of the Buddha’s enlightenment under ihe Tree, which is called

‘terrace of enlightenment’ (bodhimon<iu) and has four ‘divinities
of enlightenment’ (bodhidevata) (rf. my Buddhist Tantras y
p. 186). It is obviously a development from the early Buddhist
legend of the girl Sujata, who brought food in a golden bowl
to the meditating Gautama who, after six years of fruitless
austerity, decided on a middle course (cf. Edward J. Thomas,
The Life of Buddha, pp. 70-71). As to who are those tree divi¬
nities, Tsori-kha-pa (commentary on Paiicakrama , PTT, Vol.
159, p. 77-3) states the ‘companion for accomplishing the food’
(kha zas sgrub pahi grogs) to be the Yaksi, the Kitnkara (ser¬
vant), etc. (gnod sbyin mo mnag g/ug ma sogs) as the best.
This explanation is consistent with tin: standard explanation of
the female figure on the Sanchl gate as a Yaksi or Yaksini.
Also, earlier in Guhyasamaja, Chap. XYI and its commentary,
there are several mentions of the Yaksi lady; for example,
Mchan hgrel , p. 146-2, identifies these yaksj-s as Yajradakini-s.
Aryadeva’s account starts with the yog in tantamount to

the Body of the Buddha silting under the Bodhi tree. Hence
the solitary glade is the yogin’s own body as the mandala. It
is the “arcane body” of the Stage of Completion, discussed
under the Nidana verses KA-YA, and is equivalent to the
Eighth Stage of the Bodhisattva. Now, our earlier discussions
have gone into the matter of how this “arcane body” is actually
the accomplishment of the previous Stage of Generation and is
brought forward into the Stage of Completion. This is now
combined with a new stage of yoga; and as the first appendix
showed, the new stage has been referred to as “the selflessness
of eitta being visualized,” a yoga state of dream.
The two stages are suggested by the two celebrated gestures

of the seated Buddha—right hand in the earth-touching gesture
(‘body as the mantra visualized’), and left hand level at the
heart in the equipoise ( samapatti ) gesture (‘selflessness of the
mind visualized’).
Toga Stage 3
The Svddhiffhana , or initial Mahamudra
Aryadeva has taken the first two yoga stages for granted
and goes immediately to the 3rd stage, saying, “Having first
APPENDIX III
355
taken Supreme Truth as the meditative object, by the Stage

of Personal Blessing (svadliifflitbui-krama) he abides with himself
as the body of Vajrasattva.” Under Nidana verse CIT,
Aryadeva’s same work was already cited in a remarkable
passage on how to visualize the Supreme Truth, in a process
that leads to the yoga condition of deep sleep and the revelation
of the Clear Light. In the present passage, observe that Arya¬
deva’s expression titmakrti (configuration of the self) is consistent
with the conclusion in Appendix No. 1 that in the 3rd stage
of yoga, referring to dreamless sleep, the subject is paramount
and the object is in abeyance—the subject now being indicated
as “configuration of the self”. Despite this condition of pure
subjectivity devoid of dream object, the description emphasizes
the extreme bliss, since the yog in dwells in the circle of the
goddesses. One may refer to Nidana verse HR (no. 27) for
more information; cf. there, Bu-slon’s citation of Aryadcva.
The present passage continues with the union of the male and
female energies, and Aryadcva summarizes, “Thus he intro¬
spects the true forms of Prajriaparamita and so on.” Tson-
kha-pa’s commentary on Paiicakrama (PIT, Vol. 159, p. 75-5)
treats this part of the account as illustrative of nifprapatica-
carya. Concerning the ‘inner hearth,’ Tson-kha-pa {ibid.,
p. 75-3) states that the yogin “eats while contemplating a
burnt offering offered to the face of the Samadhi-sattva” (tin
nc hdzin seins dpahi 2al clu sreg rdzas dbul pahi bsam pas
bsah stc). Presumably, what the yogin now eats is the food
“divinely prepared” which die tree divinities offered earlier.
Furthermore, it is iu this same connection that Aryadcva

cites the M ttlasulra,* On the verse as identified, the
•There is no doubt lh.it Aryadeva means die GnhyasatnAjatantra (first

seventeen chapters) by his citation Irom the *.1/ ulasutra ''. The verse has
some variant readings nl Chapter Seven, verse 2, as well as some corruptions;
but also the edited Sanskrit of the Taritru lias a corrupt reading in this verse.
The Hcndall verse has the reading ’svain atm.'inani’ where the published
Tanlra has ‘par.thgais ca’. Tin" PutdxfmJdyotawt manuscript (5B-3-4) ex¬
pands: ‘svatmanaiii pai ams ca’. The Pnulipo'lilyotamx suggests that the original
reading is ‘svani p.warns ca’. However, by my correcting principle of adopt¬
ing a reading as close as possible to the edited Sanskrit when it is corrupt,
I decided to correct the reading ‘paraiigais ca’ to 'paratmanau*. The stan¬

dard form of the verse should therefore read:
sariaktitnoptibhot>ais tu stiyantdnair vathccchatah j

ji ikM iduiivlaiugena pmdlmanou prapujaytt //
356
YOGA OF THE GI’IJYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
Pradipoddyotana explains how onr worships oneself by the praxis

of one’s presiding lord, namely by the arduous ascetic practices
called the twelve qualities of a purified man (d/mtaguna).
However, as the next Guhyasanuija verse (VII. 3) clarifies, it
is by the worship and satisfaction of others, i.e. by ollerings of
the five deified sense objects (kdmaguna) , that one speedily
attains Buddhahood. Aryadcva thus points to this worship
of others as the way in which King Indrabhuti transmuted
his physical body. This is also the message of Chapter VI,
2 (‘Documents’).
About the vowels and the consonants in the midis totalling
72,000, the Sriags rim chrn mo shows the way of conceiving them
in the body. The placement of these vowels and consonants
of course is done in the phase called the Stage of Generation,
with the achievement of ‘mantra body’ ( mantramurti ). The
fruition of this letter placement occurs in the Stage of Comple¬
tion; and this constitutes another reason for requiring the two
Stages in the given order. At f. 380b-6, Tson-kha-pa repeats
the citation of some Tanjur authority, and mentions that the
Sarpvaroday at antra and other Tantras are consistent regarding
the placement of the sixteen vowels :
The Lord said : The wise person should contemplate

this way : A at the root of the thumb, A at the calf of the
leg, I at the thigh joint, I at the private part (i.e. genitals),
U at the root of the navel, 0 at the stomach, R at the
middle of the breast, R at the hand, L at the neck, L
at the lip, E at the cheek, A1 at the eye, O at the root
of the ear, AU at the head, AM and AH in the body at
the crown of the head. Such is the disposition on the
‘white side’ (left), so also on the ‘black* (right) in reverse.
This Vajrasattva is in women and also in men at all times.
Notice that the name \ ajrasattva is employed for a sexless
(ot else, androgyne) body that is the same for men and women,
and is explained as a /miw/ra-body. Hence, when Aryadcva
The Bendall version substitutes Jnsj for kdma, which in this case amounts to
the same meaning, because ‘all desires’ means ‘all sense objects' and these
are identified with deities (</mi). Again the substitution of \ athdsukham
^ JWtheuhalah hardly departs from the intention. However, the Bendall
reading stiyamdno ought to be corrected to seiyamdnair. The verse with these
modifications accounts for the translation adopted previously.
APPENDIX III
357
said, “he abides with himself as the body of Vajrasattva,’’ the

remark can apply to either a yogin or yoginl. So also it is
possible to bring in the explanation presented in Appendix
II that on the Bodhisattva’s Ninth Stage he sets into motion
the wheel of the dharma; that is to say, in the fruitional Stage
of Completion the yogin sets into motion the wheel of mantras.
To continue with Tson-kha-pa’s exposition oflcttcr placement:—
The explanation of ‘white side’ as left and ‘black side’ as right
(side of body), in the case A at the left thumb or right thumb,
stems from the commentary on the Samvarodava-tantra according
to Snags rim , f. 38la-4. The Snags rim , f. 38lb-6, mentions
that the consonants arc grouped under the elements, with
certain consonants repeated according to the following break¬
down :
dkaia :
ka,
ha, ha, na
, na,
ma,
ha, ksa —
ivind :
gha
> jha,
dha,
dha
(2),
bha, ya(2), $a —
fire :
ga,
ja, da(2),
da,
ba, r
a(2), sa -
9
urn ter :
kha
, cha,
tha,
tha.
pha,
va(2) -
earth :
ca,
ta, ta
> pa,
la (2), sa
48
Those syllables arc held in this tantric tradition to give rise to

the thirty-two characteristics and eighty minor marks of the
Buddha’s body (cf. Nidana verse 23, YA). The Snags rim ,
f. 380a-6, cites in this connection Dipankarabhadra’s
Sriguhyasamdjaniandalaiidhi (known in Tibetan tradition as
the Four Hundred and Fifty Verses, Bit brgya l ha bcu pa) for a
half-i/oA'tf translated by indications in the commentary by
Ratnakarasanti, the Sriguhyasamajamandalaiidhi-tlkd :
. dbyaiis yig mtshan dan yah dag Idan /

ka sags dpc byad hod ~rr can
The (16) vowels arc the source of the (32) characteristics

(lakfana ). The (34) consonants radiate the (80) minor
marks {anuiyahjana).
Shags rim. f. 380b-2, identifies the vowels as white in color, the
consonants as red. The white vowels arc mystically called
‘moon’; the red consonants, ‘second moon’ or ‘sun’. Ibid, f.
380b-1, by dividing the vowels into two, ore makes a ‘right*
group (for the male upaya) of sixteen, and a ‘left’ group (for
the female prajha ), to yield the total of 32 for the characteristics.
358
YOGA OF THK Gt'HYASAMAjATANTRA
Likewise, the consonants, classified as above with series adding

up to 40, arc divided into two for upcha and prajha to yield the
total of 80 for the minor marks.
The above data on the vowels requires some lurther clari¬

fication. The statement that the vowels on the ‘black (right)
side are in reverse means, according to that above-cited com¬
mentary on the Samvarodaya-tantra. that for that side one con¬
templates the vowel placement in the reverse order, i.e. starting
from the AM and AH at the crown of the head. The vowel
depositing constitutes the sixteen parts of the bodhuitta bum
chub kyi sans kyi cha bat drug). At this point the Shags tim cites
the Hevajra-tantra, Part I, Chap, viii Snellgrove ed.) : suk-
rakaro bhaved bhagavan tatsukham kamini snirtam ">0A) :
“The Loid is the aspect of Juki a: Kamini U the ecstasy ol that
(bodhuitta)." Thus, the Lord, or Yajrasaitva, who is in both
men and women, is the Sukra “semen' white aspect, while the
Goddess Kamini, presumably also in both men and women,
is the ecstasy ( sttkha ' red aspect of the sixteen parts of bodhicitia ,
vielding a total of 32 for the characteristics.
Yoga Stage 4
The divine body made of mind
The next problem is to determine who is ‘the triple-diamond

one*. The verse just preceding those cited by Aryadova must
be considered (Guhyasamaja, XVI, 97 :):
svamudram id ’thava cinted dhyanatryakfaraiajrindm ;

paheabuddhai ca sarvajiiah pt inant e naira samsayah , ,
Or he should contemplate his own mttdrd belonging to the

three-syllable vajrins of meditation. The omniscient
Buddhas will be pleased; there is no doubt of it.
The Ptadipoddyotarm comments : / svamudram ityadina
jfianamudraya sahacaryani darsayati / svamudram ludaya-

sthain vajradhatvisvarim tryak*aravajrinam vairocanadiyogi-
nam bahyangananiiapeksiuain dadyat / “By the words *his
own rrudrd and so on, (the verse) shows the praxis together
with the Jfianamudr.t. He should give (in marriage) his
own mudrd , the Queen ol the Diamond Realm* dwelling in
the heart, belonging to tin- 'three-syllable vajrins’, i.e. the
yogins of \ airocuua and so on, who have no eve to external
APPENDIX lit
359
women." Earlier in his commentary on Chapter XII, 76,

("Documents”), Gandrakirti explained the terms ‘Buddha’,
‘\ ajradharma , and ‘\ ajrasattva* as respectively the yogin of
Yairnraun, \ oiîn of Amitahha, and yogin of Aksobhya.
Regarding those iemales or mitdtti -s of the verse cited by

Ar\ adrva, namely, the goddess, naga lady, and so on, Mchm
hi’t't'L p. 118-2, mentions that she is the respective goddess of
the ihice families, thus Locana for Yairocana’s yogin; Pandara
for Amitahha’s yogin; and Mainaki foi Aksobhya's yogin.
‘Knowledge of the three diamonds’ means knowledge of the
diamond of Body, of Speech, and of Mind. But then, why
are live iemales mentioned in the verse ? The Pradipoddyotana
does not help here. Possibly they stand for the muctrd- s of five
did'ereut ages, usually 16-ycared; that is, I presume that they
are pseudonyms of the five, the 'butcher maiden’ etc., listed
under Xidana verse (JK (no. 35).
What is meant bv his going beyond ? The Pradxpoddyolana

inainisc tipi explains: atikramed ity adina caryaphalam aha /
trivajratma yogi alikramet manusyabhavam abhibhavati /
nasyati / uasam prakrtani sarlram tatparavrttya vajravad
abhedvam aksaram avin.f varain bhavet “By the words
‘Should he go bevond’ the verse states the fruit of the praxis.
Should the 'triple-diamond' yogin go beyond, he would over¬
power the human condition. The vulgar burly with 'loss’
is lost. By its transmutation, the ‘syllable’ inseparable like a
‘diamond* would not be susceptible *>1 destruction. ’ The
going l>evorul of the 'tuple-diamond vogin’ contrasts with the
going beyond of the 'deluded self, which is the topic of the last
verse in Chapter XU and with Chapter XV, verse 22 (see
Appendix II .
Regaiding the lidytktafu. left in the original Sanskrit above

as well as previously in my citation of verses from Chapter XVI
in the opening material f<»r the set of niddna vc.ses on Kayavak-
citta Body, Speech, and Mind . the term is well explained
by Buddhaguhya in his Dhyanottara-patala-fikd (PTT, \ ol.
78. p. 80-4.5 and p. 81-1 . 'I'xoydirata' (rite ol the vtdyd)
means dtiatd-yoga (union with divinity), especially at the
samdhis. Therefore, the Pradipoddyotana comments (Mchart
hgrel, p. 147-4) : vidvavrati tabliih sard ham guhvaptijam
samapattiin caiuhsamdhyani kuryat ("The vidydiratin should
360
YOGA OF THE Gl'HYASAMAJATAXTRA
engage in the secret-offering kin<i oi equipoise together with

those [goddesses] at the four junctures.”) These are of course
the morning, noon, sunset, and midnight observances.*
It is well to point out one feature ol Arvadeva’s account

that was not brought forward in our previous discussions of
the Guhyasamaja yoga. He says, "In that way, again and
again he enters the tnie limit ( bhutakofi ); and having emerged
again and again he experiences the five ‘strands of desire’ as
the five Tathagata forms, so the (sublime) mind does not fade.”
&akyamitra says (Narthang ed., f. 345b-7) : ‘ The true limit
is the Clear Light” (yah dag pa hi mthah ni hod gsal ba ste . This
shows that the ultimate fruit promised tor this yoga is not
achieved simply by doing it once; but rather by repetition of
entering into the yoga state of artificial dreamless sleep with
revelation of the Clear Light, until the "diamond body” or
purified “illusory body” achieves the independence to wander
“from Buddha field to Buddha field.” Then, as Mkhas *rub
rje's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras suggests, the yogin is
the Bodhisattva of the Tenth Stage, in the retinue of the Sam-
bhoga-kaya. Still, perhaps the most significant finding of this
appendix is the clear indication from Aryadeva’s account that
it is in the yoga artificial dreamless sleep that occurs the reinteg¬
ration ot male and female energies frequenilv referred to as
yjganaddha . Hence, this is the intimation of what has been
earlier referred to in this work as the Dharmakaya union with
the goddess along with the Clear Light (of deathV This
su f>8 csts * as "'ell, that in this theory the ordinary state of dream¬
less sleep (occurring every night or in each period of normal
sleep) is such a reunion of male and female—mysticallv, death—
from which comes the new life, the birth, i.e. the reawakening
(see Table III, The Clear Lights). The vogin, bv artificially
evoking this state, seeks to capture, strengthen, and restore
the androgyne.
*Ratnjkaraijnli't Pititfikita-'ddk&pAyikti-ntti-Tatnjiali (PIT, \ ol. i>2,

p. 68-5) mentions three kinds of ivata, (1) t'ajratrala , namely of the diamond,
the “mind of enlightenment"; (2) ranairata, namely of three kinds of engage¬
ment; and (3) i-idydnaia.
APPENDIX IV
GR ADING OK 11 IK 1 OLR-STAGE YOGA
Previously (p. 163) it was noted from the Snags rim that for
accomplishing the four steps of yoga there is a lesser, a middling
and a great. Let us therclore, without introducing new material
attempt a grading by way of this suggestion.
A. The lesser four steps
The lesser would certainly lx* the four-stage yoga pointed

out by Ratnakarasanti (see Appendix I) to be shared between
the iMiskiiiatarasutra and the Guh)asamdja!anlra. He referred
to a verse of Guhyasanuija, chap. XV, and I found it to be con¬
sistent with one way of understanding the stages of Guhyasamaja ,
Chap. VI. In this interpretation, the four-stage yoga is equiva¬
lent to the four ninedhabhagiyas that lead to the First Bodhisattva
Stage.
B. The middling four steps
The middling would be the four stages that go with the Stage
of Generation. These steps are clearly stated in Guhyasamdja,
C-hap. XII, and are well explained in Candrakirti’s commentary
(see ‘Documents*). The steps of Guhyasamaja , Chap. VI,
can be understood this way: and the four steps, considered as
subjective yoga can be correlated with steps of external ritual,
as was shown. Besides, the explanation of the four steps with
the terminology of three samddhis is used to correlate the class
of Yoga Tantra with the Stage of Generation of the Anuttara-
yogatantra.
C. The great four steps
The great would be the interpretation of four stages as equi¬

valent to the }adahgayoga cl the Stage of Completion, also ex¬
pressible in terms of five stages (Nagarjuna's Paheakrama).
This is also one way of understanding the stages of Guhyasanuija y
Chap. VI in association with the Explanatory Tantra \ ajramdtd.
362
YOGA OF THE GITIYASAMAJATANTRA
The basic Tantra itself showed the higher interpretation of the

four stages by identifying them, in chap. XV, with the four
goddesses, Locana, etc., who confer enlightenment. On the
terminological level, one may further interpret the four steps
of yoga of Guhyasamaja, chap. XII, as applicable to the Stage of
Completion.
Using Candrakirti’s classifying terminology, the lesser is

shared with non-tantrie Buddhism, the middling is shared by
the Anuttarayogatantra with the three lower Tantras. and the
great is unshared.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Abbreviations,
ed.—-edited
G.O.S.—Gackwad’s Oriental Series, Oriental Institute,

Baroda.
PIT—Peking Tibetan Tripitaka. This is The Tibetan
7 1 ipi taka ; Peking Edition. Reprinted under the
Supervision of the Otani University, Kvoto.
■■ *
Tibetan Tripitaka Research Institute, Tokyo-

Kyoto, 1956.
Toll. No.—.1 Complete Catalogue of the Tibetan Buddhist
Canons , ed. by Hakuju Ui, ct al, Tohoku Imperial
University, Sendai, Japan, 1934, for numbers
1 -4569. A Catalogue of the Tohoku University
Collection of Tibetan Works on Buddhism , ed. by
Yenslio Kanakura, ct al, Tohoku University,
Sendai, 1953, for nmnlx'rs 5001-7083.
tr.—translated
B. Bibliography.
Abhayakaragupta (pada). Amndva-manjari t commentary on the
Sri-Sampufa-tantra, PTT, Vol. 55.

,, .Y/\ pannayogdialt, ed. by B. Bhatta-
charyya, G.O.S. CIX, 1949.
,, Upadda-mahjari , PIT, Vol. 87.
„ Tajidrali-ndina-rnainlalasddhana, Toh.
No. 3140.
Advayasamatdi'ijaya, PTT, Vol. 3 (the last work).
Alanikakalasa. Sri- 1 'a jramala-mahayogatantra-tika-gambh irartha-
dipikd-nama, PTT, Vol. 61.
Amnaya-mahjtni. See Abhayakaragupta.
Anandagarbha. Sri-Guhyasamdja-mahatantiardja-fikd, (PTT,
Vol. 84.)
,, Sri-Paramadya-fikd , ( PTT, Vol. 73.)
Ananguvajrn. Prajhopayaviniicayasiddhi , ed. by B. Bhatta-
charyya in Two Vajraydna Works, G.O.S.

XUV, 1929.
364
YOGA OF THE GU1IVASAMAJATANTRA

Aryadeva. Corydme/a pa /. a*prod ipa , I* I T, Yol. 61.
,, Cittaviiuddhiptokaram, Sanskrit and libetan
texts, oil. I»y Prabhrbhai B. Patel, Yisva-

bharati, 1949.
Arya * nanda-garbkdiakranti-ninitio . Ratn.ikuia collection, I oh.
No. 57.
Jdtokatnola . ed. b\ Hendrik Kern, Harvard

Oriental Series, Yol. One, 1943.
Mahauuui-SutraUunkdravttti, ed. by Svlvain
Levi. Paris, I‘'07.
Srdvakabhumi. See Way man, Alex,

tr. by S. Radhakrislman. New York, 1948.
Paheoktomo-fikd marjimdld-nania (attributed to
Nagabodhi . PTT, Yol. 62.
Pradipoddyotatidbhiiamdhi-ttrakdSika-ndnia-iya-
khyii-tikd the 'Prak dli kb' .PIT, Yols. 90-61.
Blur Annals, The. See Roerich, George N.
Bthadaranyaka Vpanifad , in S. Radhakrishnan, The Principal
Upaniyads , New York, 1953.
Buddhaghosa- Vituddhimagga, Harvard Oriental Scries
edition.
Buddhaguhya. Dhydnoftara-patala-likb , PIT, Yol. 78.
Buddhasrijfiana. Mukhdgama , Toll. No. 1853.
,, Muktitilaka , Toh. No. 1859.
,, Samantabhadra-nbma-sadhana, Toh. No. 1855.
Bu-ston. Bind sbyar , collected works, Ta; Sata-Pitaka Series,
New Delhi, 1967.
Candraguhyalilcka-ndrna-mahbtantrarbja, Toh. No. 477.
Candrakirti (non-tantric). Ptasannapadd niima mbdhyamikavrtti

cd. by Louis de La Yallec Poussin.
Candrakirti (tantric). (luhyasambjbbhisamayblamkara-vrtti , PTI',
Vol. 62.
*, Pradipnddyotana , in Derge Tanjur, ligtud
hgrcl , Ha; in PTT, Yol. 158 (with Melton

hgreL see Tsoh-kha-pa).
Caryameldpaka ( -prod ipa) and tikd. See Aryadeva and Sakvamitra
Caturdei iporiprcchd Caturdevatbpariprcchb , P IT, Yol. 3. See
Smrtijnanakirti and Tsoh-kha-pa.
Celu-pa (Ccluka). Rotnairkfa-ndnia-rahotya-sambja-irtti, P IT,
Yol. 63.
Aryasura.
Asanga.
yy
Bhagavadgitd ,
Bhavvakirti.
>>
BIBLIOGRAPHY
365
Chakravarti, Chintaharan. Tanlra; Studies on their Religion and
Literature, Calcutta, 1963.
Chandogya L r pan if ad, in S. Radhakrishnan, The Principal Upan if ads.
Candra, Lokcsh. See \’ira, Raghu.
Chang, Chen chi. Teachings of Tibetan Toga, Xcw York, 1963.

Chou Yi-liang. “Tantrism in China,” Harvard Journal of
Asian Studies , 1944-45.
Dafabhumika-sutra, cd. hy Dr. J. Rahder, Paris. 1926; Daiabhu-
miivaro noma Mahayanas utra, ed. by Ryukd

Kondo, Tokyo, 1936.
Dasgupta, Shashibhusan. An Introduction to Tantric Buddhism,
Calcutta, 1950.
, y Obscure Religious Cults, 2nd edition, Calcutta,
1962.
Dasgupta, Surendranath. A History of Indian Philosophy,
Cambridge, 1932, Vol. I.
Devendrapariprccha-tantra. As quoted in CandrSklrx.VsPradipoddyotana.
Dharmakirti (tantric). Hevajra-pahjikd called Spyan hbyed, Toh.
No. 1191.
Dharma-samuccaya , Chaps. YI-XII, ed. and tr. by Lin Li-
kouang (revised by A. Barcau, J.VV de-

Jong, and P. Demieville), Paris, 1969.
Dimock, Edward C. “Doctrine and Practice Among the
Yaisnavas of Bengal,” History of Religions,

3:1, Summer 1963.
,, The Place of the Hidden Moon, Chicago, 1966.
Ekadasasvara. Mahdvajradharapathakramopadesamrtaguhya. Tob
1823.
Eliadc, Mircea. Toga :Immortality andFreedom,Xew York, 1958.
Falk, Maryla. Xarna-Rupa and Dharma-Rupa, Calcutta, 1943.
Geiger, Mrs. M. and Prof. W. “Pali Dhamma, vornehmlich

in der kanonischen literatur,” Abh. dc
Bayer, Ak. d. Wiss., Philos.-philol. u. hist.
Kl., XXXI, 1, Munich, 1921.
Guhyasamaja-tantra, cd. by Benoytosh Bhattacharyva,G.O.S. LIII,
1931; reprint, 1967; also cd. by S. Bagchi,

Darbhanga, 1965;* also ed. by Matsunaga,
^ Journal of hoy as an University, Xo. 10, 1975.
•References to Bhaitacharyya’s edition arc shown by page numbers,
and to Bagchi’s edition by verse numbers in a given chapter.
366
YOOA OF THE GUHN'ASAMAJATANTRA
Hadano, Hakuyu. “Human Existence in Tantric Buddhism,”
Tohoku Daigaku Bungaku-bu A enkyu-nempo.

No. 9, 1958^
Hevojra-tantra, cd. and tr. by D.L. Snellgrove, London, 1959,
two vols.
Indrabhuti (or Indrabodhi). Jhanasiddhi , ed. by B. Bhatta-
charvya in Two Yajraydna Works, G.O.S.

XL1V, 1929.
„ Sri-samputa-tilaka . . . tikd-smrtisamdarSandloka
PTT, Voi. 55.
Jagannatham, Y. Divine Lore and Amorous Sentiment , publ. by
author, Eluru, 1956.
Jalandharipada. Herajrasadhanasya-tippanisuddhi-iajrapradipa , P FT
Voi. 56.
Jinadatta. Sri-Guhyasamaja-tantra-panjika-nama, PTT. Voi. 63.

JiUbuxoajrasamuccaya. See £ri- 1 ajrajhanasamuccaya.
Kilaeakra-tantra , Toh. Nos. 361-365; also its exegesis, the l ima la-
prabhd y Toh. 845, is tantamount to ‘revealed

scripture’.
Kamalasila. (First) Bhavanakrama, in G. Tucci’s Minor Buddhist
Texts , II (Rome, 1958).
Kdma-sdtra of Vatsyayana, with the commentary Jayamangala
of Yashodhara. Ed. by Sri Gosvami Damodar

Shastri, Benares City, 1929.
Kloh-rdol bla-ma. Collected Works, Voi. I, Section Ma, cd.
by Ven. Dalama, Mussoori, 1963.
Kffnayam&ri-tantra. Probably the Sarvatathdgatakdyavakcitta~kr$na-
yamdri-nama-tantra , Toh. No. 467.
Kumara. Pradipadipa-fippanihrdayadarSa (commentary on Pradi-
poddyotana ), PTT, Voi. 60.
Kun-dgah-don-grub. Man ring rim giiis gter mdzod. Indian
reprint.
Lakfmiipkara. Peadipoddyotana-vifamapadapanjikd-nama , Toh.
No. 1792.
Lalitavistara, cd. by S. Lcfmann, Halle, 1902; also cd. by P.L.
Vaidya, Darbhanga, 1958.
Utik&vat&ra-sQtra. Ed. by B. Nanjio, Kyoto, 1956; tr. by D.T.
Suzuki, London, 1932.
Lessing, Ferdinand D, See Mkhas-grub-rje.
IlinLIOGRAPflY
367
Lllavajra. Guhyasamdja-tantra-niddna-gurfipaaeSa-bhdsya, PTT
Yol.66
,, Sri-guhyagarbha-mahdtantrardja -/ ikd-nama , PTT.
\’ol. 82.
Madhydntavibhdga, and Madhyantavibhdga-bhaiya, ed. by Gadjin
M. Nagao, Tokyo, 1964.
Iahdmahdydnarat na rajasutia . As quoted in Candrakirti’s Pradi .

poddyotana.
Mahamudrdtilaka-tanlra, Toll. No. 420.
Mahdvairocana-s utra or Vairocandbhisambodhi, Toll. No. 494.
Mahdvyutpatti , ed. by R. Sakaki.

lahaydna-Sutralamkdra . See Asanga.
Maitri Lpaniâd, in S. Kadhakrishnan, The Principal Cpanifads.
Manimala. Sec Bhavvakirti.
Matsuuaga, Yukci. “A Doubt to Authority of the Guhya-
samaja-Akhvana-tantra,'’ Journal of Indian

and Jluddhist Studies, XII :2, March, 1964.
,, "On the Saptalank.u a,’’ Journal of Indian and
Buddhist Studies , XI :2, March, 1963.

see Guhyasamdja-tantra.
Mkhas-grub-rjc, Mkhas grub rje's Fundamentals of the Buddhist
Tantras , tr. by Ferdinand D. Lessing and

Alex Way man, Indo-Iranian Monographs , Vol.
Nil I, The Hague, 1968.
Mulasutra (as quoted in Aryadeva’s Carydmcldpaka ). Stands
lor Guhyasamdja-tantra. (as quoted in

Pradipoddyotana) . Stands for Tattcasamgraha.
Nagabodhi. Sri-Guhyasamdja-mandolopdyikd-vimlati-vidhi-ndma ,
PTT, Vol. 62.
Nagabuddhi. haimdnta-vibhahga-ndma, PTF, \ ol. 62.
,, Samdja-sddhana-iyaiasthdli, PTT, N'ol. 62.
Nagarjuna (tantric). Affddafa-patala-vistara-iydkhyd, FIT , Vol. 60.
„ Pahcakrama, ed. by Louis dc La Vallcc
Poussin, (iaud, 1896.
„ Pin jikrta - fddhana ( = Pindikrama-sddhana ), PTT,
\ ol. 61, and Sanskrit ed. by Poussin in

preceding (Gand, 1896).
,, Sajahgayoga-ndma , PIT, N’ol. 83.
„ Seka-catuh-prakarana , PTF, Vol. 61.
„ Sri-Guhyasamdja-mahdyogatantrotpattikrama
368
YOGA OF THE Gl’IIYASAMAJ AT ANTRA
sddhana-s utrameldpaka-ndma (the ‘ Sutramela-

pmka ”), PTT, Vol. 6!.
Nagarjuna (tantric). Sri-Guhyasamdjatantrasya tantratikd-ndma ,
PTT, Vol. 59.
Naropa. SekoddeSatika,e d. by Mario E. CarelIi,G.O.S. XC, 1941.

Nyaya Manjari. Tr. by J. A. Bhattacharyya, The Calcutta
Review, Oct. 1955.
Obermillcr, E. “The Doctrine of Prajna-paraniita. ..”
Acta Orientafia , 1932.

Padmavajra. Sakalatanttasamhhavasancodani-sriguhyasiddhi-ndma
(the 4 Guhyasiddhi ’), Toll. 2217.
,, S>i-Pdkdrnaianwhdyoginitantrardjavdhikatikd-
ndma, Poll. Ill9.
Pandit Smrti. Sec Srnrtijnanaklrti.
Poussin, L. de La Vallec. See Vasubandlm. See Nagarjuna
(tantric).
,, Vijhapiimdtratdsiddhi . La Siddhi de Hiuan-Tsang,
two vols., Paris, 1928-1929; Index, Paris, 1948.

,, (with Cordier, P.), “Los soixante-quinze ct
les cent dharmas,” in Le Mu saw, Xouvellc

Serie, Vol. VI, Louvain, 1905.
Pradipoddyotana. Sec Candraklrti.
Prakdiika. See Bhavyakini.
Prasantajnana. Upade$a-niScaya-ndma-it iguhyasamdja-rrtti , PTT
Vol. 63.
Radhakrishnan, S. The Dhammapada , London, 1950.
„ ,, The Principal Upanifads , New York, 1953.
Ratnakarasanti (also called Santi-pa). Kusumdnjali-guhya -
samaja-nibandha-mnna, PTT, Vol. 64.
»> Pind'tkrta-sddhanopd vikd-vrtti - ra tndiva li, PTT,
Vol. 62.
>, Prajiidpdramitopaete.fa , PTT, Vol. I 14.
»> $ri-Guhyasamdja-marjdal<U’idhi-(ikd, PIT, Vol.
65.
Ray, Kamala. ‘The Ten Incarnations of Visnu in Bengal.”
Indian Historical Quarterly , Vol. XV', 1941.

Rgyal-tshab-rjc. Dpyid thig z i„ f, r is, in Lhasa collected works,
Vol. Ka.
Roerich, George X. The Blue Annals, Part One, Calcutta,
1949; Part Two, Calcutta, 1953.
nini.iocRApiiY 369
Sadhana-nuilfi, cd. by 1J. Bhattacharyya, two vols., O.O.S.
XXVI and XU, 1925-8.
Saddharniapun<tarika-xntra, cd. by K. Kern and Hunyu Nanjio,

Bibliotheca Buddhica No. 10, St.-Pet., 1900-12.
Sakyamitra. Caryiimrldpakapradipa-fikd , FIT. Vol. 62, and
Narthang edition.
»» h'osaldlamkdra (commentary on the Yoga-
tantra Tatliasams>raha ), Toll. No. 2503.

Samdhinimacana-siitra , tr. into French with Tibetan text cd. by
Etienne Lamottc, Louvain, 1935.

Samdhivydkarana-udma-tantra (an Explanatory Tantra of the
Guhyasamdja), PTr, Vol. 3.
Sam/>ufa (- tilaka ) ( Samputa-ndma-mahd tantra) , Toh. No. 381.
Samara-tantra (*= TantrardjaSrifaghusambara-ndma),Toh. No. 368.

Satnrarodaya-fantra (— Sri-.\fahdsambarodaya-tan(rardja-ndma),To\\.
No. 373.
Saiiki tyayana, Rahula. “Rechcrchcs Bouddhiqucs” Journal
Asiatique , Oct.-Dec., 1934.
Saraha. Dnhd-kofa. See Shahidullah, M.

Sariarahasya-ndma-tanttardja , FIT, Vol. 5.
Satapathabrahmana , tr. by J. Eggrling, Sacred Books of the East,
Vol. 12.
Shahidullah, M. Iss chants mystiques de h'dnhn et de Saraha
Paris. 1928.
Smrtijnanaklrti. Caturdevata-vydkhydna-upadeSa-pausfika , PTT,
Vol. 66.
Sii-Guhyasamdja-tantrardja-vrtti, PTT, Vol. 66.
I ajrai iddrana-ndma-dhdrani-vrtti , Toh. 2684.

Sraddhakaravarman. Vajrajhdnasamuccaya-tantrodbhava-saptdlatp -
kdra<imocana, PIT', Vol. 60.

Sri-Ahhayakaraguptapada. See Abhayakaragupta.
Sricak rasamvara ( = Samvara-tantra ).
Sri I.aksmi. Paiicakrama~ tikd-kramdrtha-prakdlika, PTT, \ ol. 63.

&ri-.\ldydjala-tantia. As quoted in Candrakirti’s Pradipoddyotana.
Sri-Paramddya-tantta . PIT, \’ol. 5.
Sri Rahuguptapada. Prakdfa-ndma-trihaajrasddhana, PT1,\ ol. 56.

SrGl’ajrahrdaydlamkdia-tantra, P Tl, \ ol. 3.
SriA’ajrajndnasamuccaya, an Explanatory Tantra of the Guhya -

samdja, FIT, Vol.3.
370
S*bk&fita-samgraha, ed. by Cecil Bcndall, in Ac Xfttsfon, Nouvelle
S£ric, Vol. 4-5, 1903-04.
TantrafikA. See Nagarjuna (tantric).
Tdttoasamgraha («=* Sarvatath<igatatattvasamgraha-nama-mahdy5na-,
sutra), Toh. No. 479.
Thakur, Saraswati Goswami, tr., Shri Brahma-Samhita, with
commentary by Shri Shri la Jeeva Goswami

Madras, 1958.
Thomas, Edward J. The Life of Buddha, as Legend and History ,
New York, 1952.
Tsoh-kha-pa. (A) on the Guhyasamujatantra :
„ Don gsal ba { — Dpal gsah ba hdus pahi gnad
kyi (ion gsal ba), Toh. No. 5290; PTT, Vol.

160.
„ Mchan hgrel or Mchan bu (=» Sgron ma gsal
bar byed pa), (ippani on the Pradipoddyotana ,

Toh. No. 5282; P TT, Vol. 158.
„ Atthah gcod (— Rin po ehehi myu gu), Toh.
No. 5284; PTT, Vol. 156.
„ Dbaft gi don gyi de hid rab lu gsal ba, PTT,
Vol. 160.
i, Rnal hbyor dag pahi rim pa, Toh. No. 5303;
PTT, Vol. 160.
(B) on Explanatory Tantras of the Guhya -

samdjatantra:
m Biis ius (— Srog rtsol gyi de kho na hid gsal ba),
commentary on CaturdevipariprcchA, Toh.

No. 5285; PTT, Vol. 159.
>> Rgyud bSad thabs kyi man hag gsal bar bstan pa,
commentary on Vajrajhdnasamuccaya, Toh.

No. 5286; PTT, Vol. 160.
(C) on the Pahcakrama of the Guhyasamdja cycle:
»» Riai pa lha rab tu gsal bahi sgron me (frequently
referred to in the present work as ‘comm,

on Pahcakrama ’), Toh. No. 5302; PTT,
Vols. 158-159.
•» Rim lha gdan rdgogs kyi dmar khrid, ITT,
Vol. 159.
Rdo rje bzlas pahi rim pa gin bris, Toh. No.

5292 (A).
>9
ntm.IOGRAPHY
371
(D) on other tantric matters:
Tsoh-kha-pa. Dnos grub kyi sne ma, exposition of Vajrayana
morality, PTT, Vol. 160.
,, 7 id ches gsum Idan , commentary on Ni~rohi
chos drug, Toh. No. 5317; PTT, Vol. 161.
>* Snags rtm then mo, on stages of the tantric
path, Toh. No. 5281; folio references to the

Peking blockprint.
(E) non-tantric:
>i I.am rim chen mo, on stages of the path to
enlightenment, Tashilunpo blockprint edition.
Tucci, Giuseppe, Sec Kamalasila.
,, Indo-Tibetica, 4 volumes, Rome, 1932*41.
,, “Some Glosses upon the Guhyasamaja,”
.1 Manges thinois et bouddhiques, III, 1934-5.
,, The Theory and Practice of the Mandate, London,
1961.
,, Tibetan Painted Scrolls, Rome, 1949; two
vols. and portfolio of plates.
UdayanavatsaTajapoiiprcchn-nama-pariiarta, Dcrge Kanjur, Dkon
brtsegs, Ca, Toh. No. 73.
Vairocanahhisambodhi. See Alahavairocana-sutra.
Vajragarbha. Hevajratantra commentary called Pin(tartha-tikd,
I'oh. No. 1180.
Vajrahasa. 7 antiardja-Sriguhyasamaia-fikd, PTT, Vol. 66.
Yajramdld, an Explanatory Tantra of the Guhyasamdja, PTT, Vol.3.
Tajrafekhara-mahdguhiayogatantra, Toh. No. 480.
Vajraiidarand-nama-dharam, Toh. No. 750.
I ’a jrofnitatantra . As quoted in the Pradipoddyotana.
I arahopaniiad. in 1 oga [ panifads, I he, q.v.
Yasubandhu. Abhidharmakoia, with auto-commentary, tr. under
(itle, Abhidharmakoia de Yasubandhu, by

Louis de La Vallcc Poussin, Paris, 1923-1931.
Vimalaprabhd, PIT, Vol. 46, Sec Kalacakra-tantra.
Yira, Ragtiu, and Chandra, Lokesh. A .Yew Tibeto-Mongol
Pantheon, Part 12, New Delhi, 1967.
Vitapada. Mukhagama-rrtti, PTT, Vol. 65.
„ Muktitilaka-ndma-rydkhydna, PTI', Vol. 65.
,, Yogasapta-ndma-caturabhiêkaprakarana Toh. No.
1875.
372 YOGA OF THE GfllYASAMAJATANTRA

Wayman, Alex. Analysis of the Sriivakabhumi Manuscript ,
Barkclcy, Calif., 1961.
tt “Analysis of the Tantrie Section of the
Kanjur Correlated to Tanjur Fxegesis,”

Indo-Asian Studies , Part 1, New Delhi, 1962.
„ “Buddhist Genesis and the Tantrie Tradi¬
tion,” Or tens Extrernus 9:1, Feb. 1962.
}) “Female Knergv and Symbolism in the
Buddhist Tantras,” History of Religions 2:1,

Summer 1962.
„ “The Five-fold Ritual Symbolism of Passion,”
Studies of Esoteric Buddhism and Tantiinn ,

Koyasan, Japan, 1965.
„ “Notes on the* Sanskrit Term Juana,"
Journal of the American Oriental Society 75:4,

1955.
,, “Contributions regarding the thirty-two
characteristics of the Great Person,” I.ieben-

thal Festschrift, Visvabharati, 1957.
„ “The rules oi debate according to Asahga,”
Journal of the American Oriental Society , 78:1,
1958.
“Concerning satndha-bhasa ' samdhi—bhasa ’

samdhya bhasa,” Melanges d' indianisme a
la mtnudre du Ix>uis Re non, Paris, 19f>8.
“Totemic Beliefs in the Buddhist Tantras,”
History of Religions 1:1, 1961.
The Buddhist Tantras; Tight on Indo-1 ibctan

Esotericism, New York, 1973.
See Mkhas-grub-rje.
Whitney, William Dwight. Sanskrit Grammar , Cambridge , *
Mass., 1941.
Woodrofic, John. Introduction to Tantra Shastra , Madras, 1952.
Yoga Upanifads , The , tr. by T.R. Srinivasa Avyangar and cd.
by G. Srinivasa Muni, Adyar, 1952.

Guhyasamajatantra-Ocr PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guhyasamajatantra-Ocr PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guhyasamajatantra-Ocr PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Full text of "82422626 Wayman Alex Tr Yoga

Of The Guhyasamajatantra OCR"

lm UM.iM lO«U Of HlMh *UtVI3

THE GUH Y AS AM A J AT ANTRA

The Arcane Lore of Forty Verses

] Jrllii :: Varanasi :: Patna

AW Offict : BVNOALOW ROAD, JAWAHAR NACAR, DELHI-7

2. ABHOR RAJPATH, PATNA-4 (BIHAR)

First Edition : Delhi, 1977

RY IBAKTUJU. JAIN AT OtRI JAIHENDRA PRES*, A-45, PHASE- |, INDUSTRIAL

Professor Murray B. Emencau,

The work here presented i<> the public is an organization of

The set of forty verses was memorized for centuries by follo¬

Having long ago become aware of the hazards of speculating

.Since most of the material in this book has not hitherto

I have omitted the Tibetan for Tson-kha-pa’s Mchan fjtgrel on

personal message of a guru, for it is always to explain, not to

The concluded research is the outcome of a long-time aspi¬

Upon returning to my position of those days in Madison,

forty verses in Sanskrit, which along with the. Tibetan and

Ail important observation of comparing the basic text of

of data that is not at all apparent in the basic 1 antra. Ibis

It is a pleasure to reeall the* helpful conversations with

An explanation is due the readers who e*xpe*e ted this work

New York City .

PART ONE : DOCUMENTS 1

I. The Guhyasamaja-nidana-karika (Sanskrit-

II. Chapters VI and XII of the Guhyasamaja-

tantra, translated into English 23

III. Edited Pradlpoddyotana commentary on

PART TWO : INTRODUCTIONS 51

I. Introduction to Buddhist Tantrism 51

B. Definitions and varieties of Tantras 58

C. Some fundamentals of the Tantras 62

D. Winds and mantras 69

E. The world of light 77

II. Introduction to the Guhvasamajatantra 84

A. Texts, commentators, and history 84

B. Title of the work and nidana 105

C. Seven ornaments and subdivisions 113

D. Importance of the forty verses 119

E. The mandala of the Guhyasamaja 122

III. Introduction to the Yoga of the Guhyasamaja

A. The chapters of the Guhyasamaja-

tantra and yoga 137

B. The two stages, initiations, and the

Clear Light 142

G. The four steps of yoga and three

samadhis in the Stage of Generation 156

1). The six members of yoga and five

kramas in the Stage of Completion 163

E. Grouping the Nidana Karikas 173

PART THREE : COMMENTARY ON THE NIDANA

Evam maya srutam ‘Thus by me it was

Ekasmin samaye ‘Upon an occasion’

Bhagavan sarva ‘The Lord—All’

Tathagata ‘Who has come the same way’

Kayavakcitta ‘Body, Speech, and Mind’

Hrdaya-vajrayosid ‘Diamond Ladies

An explanation is due the readers who expee ted this work

STffrnfa Hr^ldkil^d: || [5]

&«T: JTfTrRT: TU II [7]

lfcsTW HWtTT fntR # ^SWHq II [9]

-q^-ys’^ aj 3| ^rr] • qx, • q |

<TmT^«W TOrf sftiJRW M [21]