Report of Regular Inquiry Against Musheer Ahmed, (Late) Naib Nazir, Tehsil Sadiq Abad, District, Rahim Yar Khan
Report of Regular Inquiry Against Musheer Ahmed, (Late) Naib Nazir, Tehsil Sadiq Abad, District, Rahim Yar Khan
Report of Regular Inquiry Against Musheer Ahmed, (Late) Naib Nazir, Tehsil Sadiq Abad, District, Rahim Yar Khan
The instant regular inquiry against Musheer Ahmed (late) the then
Naib Nazir Civil Courts Sadiqabad was entrusted to the undersigned by the
Senior Civil Judge,(Admin) Rahim Yar Khan vide his orders dated
16.05.2018.
The facts of the complaint in brief were that in suit titled “Abdul
Sadiqabad reported that the amount was not mentioned in R.D register. The
amount Rs.20,000/- received by the Bailif, Malik Saifur Rehman at that time
serving at Sadiqabad and according to his version the same was handed over
to Malik Musheer Ahmed Ex-Niab Nazir (Since died). The above mentioned
After first regular inquiry the then learned Senior Civil Judge
Mr.Muhammad Asif Rana made liable the accused official Musheer Ahmed
(Late) Naib Nazir but as the said accused official was died in a road accident
so, it was held that the claim of the complainant, alongwith 11 other
complainants shall be satisfied from the estate/service dues of said late accused
official.
2
Rahim Yar Khan, vide his orders dated 02.02.2015 remanded the matter for re-
consideration and decision in accordance with law and rules after hearing the
competent authority had also directed to get registered a criminal case against
the said accused/official. After a thorough preliminary inquiry into the matter
the inquiry officer Mr. Muhammad Shafique, learned Civil Judge 1 st Class,
namely Muhammad Ameen bailiff, Hazoor Bukhsh, Abdul Rasheed Wains and
Abdul Rasheed Bhatti Naib Nazir were also responsible as there was
accused/official Malik Musheer Ahmed the then Naib Nazir, Sadiqabad, who
was overall Incharge of the Nazarat Branch of the said Sub-division. It was
further opined that the terms and conditions of the service may abate upon the
orders of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Rahim Yar Khan vide orders dated
Ahmed (Late) the then Naib Nazir, Civil Courts, Sadiqabad, District Rahim
Yar Khan. So, I restrained myself, while inquiring the instant matter, to inquire
S.Yaseem Vs. Pakistan Railways Etc.” that any employee who stood
proceedings the proceedings will abate with the said happening. It was further
held that with the death of the accused official disciplinary proceedings
initiated against him shall stand abated and the respondent department shall be
who is alive and in service of department. As far as the complaints against the
as well as the other Honourable High Courts have held in plenty of cases that
Reliance has been placed upon Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab and
others,(2010 SCMR 1554), Roshan Dani and 11 others Vs. WAPDA through
and 4 others,{2005 PLC(CS) 538}, Syed Abdus Salam Kazmi Vs. Managing
deceased officials, the following case laws supports the version that the
proceedings against the deceased official may be abated, depending upon the
terms of the service 2013 SCMR 392 and 2006 SCMR 1287; in the same way
in Indian Jurisdiction case titled “Devi Jahanti Vs. State of Behar and others
{2001 (49) BLJR 2179} and Hira Bai Desh Mukh and others Vs. state of
the major penalty against the said official provided under the rules was
dismissal from service but after the death of the accused/official when the
charge against him and hearing was impossible; neither any penalty as
provided in the rules nor which was opined by the previous learned inquiry
concerned, the learned inquiry officer as per directions moved for lodging the
FIR whereupon the DPO, Rahim Yar Khan opined that the said matter was
concerned corner for action against the delinquent. It is worth mentioning here
that the record is silent about any criminal proceedings if taken so far i.e by
the relevant law. Be that as it may, I am of the view that the petitioner may
said deceased accused official may be abated, however, the petitioners have
matter should have been reported for inquiry [vide high court rules and orders,
Vol-IV, CH.1, part-B(5)]. In the same way, Civil Nazir was also responsible for
the management of accounts at outlying Tehsils [vide high court rules and orders,
the other officials took temporary charge and then permanent Naib Nazir was
deputed. As per preliminary inquiry report the relevant record was found
tampered. Verily, the liability could not be attached solely to the deceased
accused official.
Ameen bailiff, Hazoor Bukhsh, Abdul Rasheed Wains, Abdul Rasheed Bhatti
Naib Nazir and the then Civil Nazir being Incharge of nazarat branch of
respectfully placed before the learned Senior Civil Judge,(Admin) Rahim Yar
Announced:
04.06.2018. FAHAD-UR-REHMAN,
Inquiry officer/Magistrate Section 30,
Rahim Yar Khan.
6
04.06.2018.
O R D E R:
Vide my separate detailed order of even date in English version,
instant regular inquiry has been decided. The file of this regular inquiry and
report is hereby sent to the learned senior civil Judge(Admin), Rahim Yar
Announced
04.06.2018. FAHAD-UR-REHMAN,
Inquiry officer/Magistrate Section 30,
Rahimyarkhan.