Understanding The Role of The CSO
Understanding The Role of The CSO
Understanding The Role of The CSO
December 2013
AT A GLANCE
BCG interviewed 48 chief strategy officers (CSOs) of companies from around the
world to address four questions.
Our interviews explored CSO responsibilities, team composition and size, how CSOs The CSO has the
work with other parts of the business, and other key success factors. least-defined role
among C-suite-level
executives.
What Are the Typical CSO Responsibilities?
Our findings revealed that the CSO has the least-defined role among C-suite-level
executives. The role is characterized by a high level of ambiguity, constantly evolv-
ing relationships with key stakeholders, and regular changes to the scope of work.
As one executive we interviewed noted, “The strategy department is in charge of
every new project that falls outside the boxes of the traditional organization.”
Strategic-planning process 82
Strategy Strategic-planning content development 77
development
Long-term trends and outlook 64
Competitive intelligence 64
Cross-business-unit initiatives 68
Innovation including business model innovation and 59
Strategy new-business incubation
execution
Identification of cost improvement opportunities 23
Postmerger integration 20
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of CSO respondents
Source: BCG interviews.
Note: The panel was composed of 48 companies worldwide.
The size of the CSO’s centralized strategy team varies depending primarily on the
size of the company itself, but the centralized team tends to be smaller than strate-
gy teams in the business units. (See Exhibit 2.) Of the CSOs we interviewed, 68 per-
cent reported teams of ten or fewer, with a median size of seven. Responsibilities
drive team size, too. CSOs who are accountable for M&A or innovation tend to have
larger teams than CSOs without those responsibilities.
Strategy function FTEs per 1,000 FTEs Strategy function FTEs per $1 billion in sales
25,000 100,000
10.00 100.00
$5 $50
billion billion
Typical size Typical size Typical size
2–7 FTEs 7–12 FTEs 12–14 FTEs
10.00
R = 0.61
² R² = 0.66
1.00
1.00
TMT
0.10 TMT
0.10 IG, EN
IG CP FI TMT EN
Even though growth and business model innovation are among the top priorities of
the CSOs we spoke with, few CSOs have formal processes for executing on those
priorities. As a result, CSOs often find themselves responding reactively rather than
The CSOs we spoke to all agreed that the first 100 days on the job are critical when
it comes to building relationships and gaining credibility. Said one, “I have seen that
Most CSOs reported the CEO forms his impressions in the first 100 days and rarely changes them later
that, in hindsight, on.” Most reported that, in hindsight, they should have focused their first months
they should have more on building relationships with the business leaders and CEOs.
focused their first
months more on To stay connected to the strategy resources in the business units, CSOs use a range
building relationships. of levers. These include adding nonbureaucratic team members with strong com-
munication skills; developing a community of business unit strategists through reg-
ular meetings, monthly calls, or newsletters; and staying closely involved with daily
performance management at the business unit level.
This seems to be a plausible theory, but does it work in practice? The answer is yes,
mostly, but with a few significant caveats. Our interviews highlighted the important
role that strategy departments play in attracting talented people from outside the
organization. Most of the CSOs we spoke to recruit from a combination of invest-
ment banks, top-tier consultancies, and business schools. In general, this model
works well, providing both a strong strategy team and an effective platform to bring
those people into the organization. Strategy teams tend to have quite high turnover,
but in general this is evidence that the model is working.
Where CSOs report a more mixed experience is in developing and accelerating the
careers of talented managers who are already within the organization. Companies
that do this well are rigorous about selecting managers to “cycle through” the strat-
egy team and then providing targeted training and professional development to the
chosen few. Over time, this creates a track record of accelerating the careers of tal-
ented people—and attracting the next wave of talent into the department. Unfortu-
nately, however, the reverse is also true. Without a clear mandate to bring in the
best people, a structured development program, and a process for cycling them into
line roles, the strategy department can rapidly become a dead end for less-talented
managers. This negative cycle can be hard to break once it sets in.
It is no surprise that CEOs and CSOs alike commonly ask us what CSOs typically
do next. Although only 41 percent of CSOs sit on the executive committee or man-
agement board, they do tend to rise in the executive ranks, with 67 percent either
becoming the head of a business unit or taking on another role on the executive
committee.
D espite being the least-defined C-suite role, and notwithstanding some of the
common frustrations surrounding the corporate-planning process, the over-
whelming majority of CSOs add a great deal of value, usually by focusing on a
small number of critically important functions. From the CEO’s perspective, an
effective CSO provides tremendous leverage and insight. And from the CSO’s
perspective, the role typically provides a solid foundation for an executive-level
line-management position.
Sam Stewart is a partner and managing director in the firm’s Sydney office. You may contact him
by e-mail at stewart.sam@bcg.com.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Anne-Sophie Schissler for her support. They also thank Katherine
Andrews, Gary Callahan, Martha Craumer, Catherine Cuddihee, Kim Friedman, and Sara
Strassenreiter for their writing, editing, and production assistance.