0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views4 pages

Best Path Final Essay

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

My preferred “Path” choice for my MGB program and

reasons for my preference, i.e. the Canada, Taiwan,


Austria path or the Canada, France, Korea path or the
Canada, the Netherlands, Peru path. (In this essay, you
may also indicate if you would be equally happy with
either path.)
With the MGB program taking place in countries throughout
the world, the Canada, Netherlands and Peru path is most
interesting to me. This is despite the attractive qualities of
the other paths, such as Taiwan's strong relations and
history of mutual cooperation with my home country of
Ecuador; Korea’s dynamic economy; and Ecuador’s recent
free trade agreement established with France.
The third path of Canada, the Netherlands and Peru is my
preferred path because these nations' economies are closely
integrated with one another and with those of other
countries. Logistically, the Netherlands is a key partner in
positioning Canadian goods throughout Europe and Peru is
Canada’s second-largest bilateral trading partner in South
and Central America and the third-largest destination for
Canadian direct investment in South and Central America.
The extensive international trade cooperation and free trade
agreements Canada, the Netherlands, and Peru have in
place with each other particularly stands out to me. These
partnerships will be interesting to consider in greater depth
during the MGB program and will hopefully teach me lessons
and allow me to develop ideas of how Ecuador can become
more integrated in the global economy.
NAFTA is the most well-known and impactful free trade
agreement that comes to mind with respect to Canada.
NAFTA eliminated trade barriers between the United States,
Canada, and Mexico. Over the last 23 years of the
agreement, Canada has experienced a sizable increase in
trade with these countries of 63.5% at an adjusted inflation
rate. The most notable benefit that Canada has earned is its
boost in foreign direct investment, which increased 243%
between 1993 and 2013.
Ecuador could emulate two major aspects of NAFTA. First, a
greater openness to foreign direct investment would help the
country to expand and innovate through technological
advancement. Second, Ecuador could focus on exporting
the goods that its neighboring countries and other trade
partners lack. While Canada is the United States' largest
supplier of energy, Ecuador could similarly learn to intensely
export the goods and services that other countries do not
possess such as bananas and crustaceans rather than
processed goods.
With regards to the Netherlands, the country is the sixth-
largest economy in the European Union, an industrialized
nation, and a major exporter of agricultural products. It is
also considered a transportation hub of Europe and its main
industries center on food processing and mechanized
agriculture. Furthermore, a strong bilateral relationship exists
between the Netherlands and Canada. The Dutch account
for the second largest source of foreign direct investment in
Canada, which totals approximately $56.3 billion. Also, in
2012 the merchandise trade between them was valued at
$8.1 billion.
Ecuador, with its agriculture-based economy, should seek to
hasten industrialization in the same sectors developed in the
Netherlands. This will allow for greater quantities of
Ecuadorian goods to be sold to foreign partners. To go along
with this, the processing of foods and vegetables considered
to be exotic by other countries should be part of Ecuador's
development moving forward.
In the case of Peru, its economy reflects its varied
topography: an arid lowland coastal region, the central high
sierra of the Andes, and the dense forest of the Amazon.
This environment, where it is possible to find varied weather
and lands, is atractive to investors. Furthermore, economic,
political, and trade relations between Peru and Canada have
grown considerably in recent years. Both nations are part of
the Organizations of American States, the Pacific Alliance,
and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. According to data
following the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement of 2015,
Canadian merchandise exports to Peru soon reached
$858.3 million and Canadian merchandise imports from Peru
reached $3.3 billion. Canadian foreign direct investment in
Peru totalled $9.9 billion in 2015.
Ecuador should seek to implement free trade agreements in
the same way that Peru has, which will strengthen its
economy. Taking part in more agreements like the Pacific
Alliance would eliminate tariffs previously in place between
member countries and would help to promote greater
regional integration. Other key steps to take within these
agreements would be to facilitate travel between countries
through a common passport and to develop a common stock
exchange. To go along with this, Ecuador, in the same way
that Peru did, should seek to cultivate a safe domestic
environment that generates consumer and investor
confidence at home and abroad.
As mentioned in my other essay, it is ultimately my goal to
take the lessons learned from the MGB program and apply
them to the case of Ecuador. Through the Canada,
Netherlands and Peru path I will be able to get the most out
of the program by learning the successes of global business
in each country and benefiting from experiences outside of
the classroom.

You might also like