Application Note

Energy and Chemical

Simulated Distillation Analysis

of Middle Distillates Using the
Accelerated ASTM D2887 Method

Author Abstract
James D. McCurry, Ph.D.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
This Application Note describes the performance of the Agilent 8890 gas
chromatograph when running ASTM D2887B using each of the three capillary
columns specified by the method. Key performance measures were easily met using
each tested configuration.
Introduction A calibration standard containing performance was verified by analyzing
normal hydrocarbons from C5 to C44 was Reference Gas Oil (RGO) Sample 1,
ASTM D2887 is a gas chromatographic prepared by dissolving the Agilent D2887 batch 2 (p/n 5060-9086). Three middle
method used to determine the boiling Calibration Mixture (p/n G3440-85037) distillate samples, representing boiling
point distribution of middle distillates in 15 mL of carbon disulfide. This ranges across the D2887 scope, were
such as kerosene, aviation fuel, diesel, solution was analyzed on each column then analyzed on each column. Both the
and selected light oils1. ASTM developed using the instrument conditions listed RGO sample and three middle distillate
an accelerated version of D2887 in Table 2. After calibration, the system samples were injected neat.
using the same capillary columns as
the original D2887 method. For the Table 1. 8890 configured for ASTM D2887B.
accelerated D2887, analysis times were
Parameter Value
reduced from 30 minutes to nine minutes
using higher column flows and faster Automatic Liquid Sampler Agilent 7650 ALS

oven temperature programming ramps. Syringe Autosampler syringe 5 µL (p/n G4513-80206)

ASTM has designated this method as Inlet Cool-on-column (COC)

D2887B with the operating conditions Detector Flame ionization (FID)
incorporated into the existing D2887
document. Table 2. 8890 Operating conditions for ASTM D2887.

Experimental ALS Column 1 Column 2 Column 3

Sample injection volume 0.1 µL 0.1 µL 0.1 µL

Instrument configuration and Pre-injection solvent washes 5 × 0.25 µL CS2 5 × 0.25 µL CS2 5 × 0.25 µL CS2
operating conditions Pre-injection sample washes none none none
An Agilent 8890 GC was configured Sample pumps 5 5 5
according to the ASTM D2887B Post injection solvent washes 5 × 0.25 µL CS2 5 × 0.25 µL CS2 5 × 0.25 µL CS2
specifications using each of these three
Viscosity delay 2 seconds 2 seconds 2 seconds
columns:
Inlet
• Column 1: Initial temperature 100 °C 100 °C 100 °C
HP-1, 10 m × 0.53 mm id, 0.88 mm
Initial hold time 0.1 minutes 0.1 minutes 0.5 minutes
(p/n 19095Z-021)
Ramp rate 35 °C /min 35 °C /min 35 °C /min
• Column 2: Final temperature 350 °C 350 °C 350 °C
HP-1, 5 m × 0.53 mm id, 2.65 mm
Column
(p/n 19095S-100)
Flow rate 26 mL/min helium 35 mL/min helium 37 mL/min helium
• Column 3:
Initial temperature 60 °C 40 °C 40 °C
DB-1, 7.5 m × 0.53 mm id, 1.5 mm
Initial hold time 0.1 minutes 0.1 minutes 0.5 minutes
(p/n 125-1002)
Ramp rate 35 °C /min 35 °C /min 35 °C /min
Table 1 shows the hardware
Final temperature 360 °C 360 °C 360 °C
configuration for the 8890 GC, and
FID
Table 2 shows the specific operation
Temperature 360 °C 350 °C 350 °C
conditions used for each column.
Hydrogen flow 40 mL/min 40 mL/min 40 mL/min

Air flow 400 mL/min 400 mL/min 400 mL/min

Make-up flow N2 at 15 mL/min N2 at 15 mL/min N2 at 15 mL/min

2
Results and discussion
C6
C5 C7
C12
C8
Column 1: HP-1, 10 m × 0.53 mm id, 0.88 µm
Figure 1 shows the calibration standard C9 C10 C14
C11 C16
runs from all three columns. Each
C15 C17
column showed good separation C18 C20 C24 C28 C32 C36 C40 C44
of the C5 to C8 normal alkanes with
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
average peak skewness of 1.1 for all Time (min)
peaks from C6 to C44. Additionally, the C5
chromatographic resolution for n-C16 and C6
C12
Column 2: HP-1, 5 m × 0.53 mm id, 2.65 µm

n-C18 was greater than 4 on each column. C7

C8 C14
C9 C10 C11 C16
Figure 2 shows a typical boiling point C15 C17
C24
C18 C20 C28 C32 C36 C40 C44
calibration report for column 1 obtained
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
using the Agilent SimDis software. Time (min)
Similar reports were obtained for the C5
calibration data from columns 2 and 3 C12 Column 3: DB-1, 7.5 m × 0.53 mm id, 1.5 µm
(not shown). C6
C7 C10 C C14 C16
C8 C9 11
C15 C17
C18 C20 C24 C28 C32 C36 C40 C44

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (min)

Figure 1. Calibration standards run on each column specified in ASTM D2887B.

Figure 2. SimDis boiling point calibration curve for column 1.

3
Before running samples, the system
performance was verified by analyzing
an RGO sample, and comparing the
experimental cut point temperatures
to the published reference values.
Figure 2 shows an engineering report
containing the boiling point yield curve
and RGO results obtained with column 1.
Table 3 lists the experimental RGO
performance results compared to the
reference values. For each column, the
experimental cut point temperatures fall
well within the ranges allowed by ASTM.

Figure 3. Agilent SimDis Engineering Report showing the boiling point yield curve and results for the RGO
analysis on column 1.

Table 3. RGO Performance results for each D2887B column.

  Ref Allowed Column 1 Column 2 Column 3

% Off Temp °C Diff °C Temp °C Diff °C Temp °C Diff °C Temp °C Diff °C

IBP (0.5) 115 7.6 114 1.0 115 0.0 115 0.0

5 151 3.8 152 1.0 151 0.0 151 0.0

10 176 4.1 178 2.0 175 1.0 177 1.0

15 201 4.5 203 2.0 201 0.0 202 1.0

20 224 4.9 227 3.0 224 0.0 225 1.0

25 243   246 3.0 243 0.0 244 1.0

30 259 4.7 262 3.0 259 0.0 259 0.0

35 275   277 2.0 275 0.0 275 0.0

40 289 4.3 292 3.0 289 0.0 289 0.0

45 302   304 2.0 302 0.0 303 1.0

50 312 4.3 314 2.0 312 0.0 312 0.0

55 321 4.3 323 2.0 321 0.0 321 0.0

60 332 4.3 333 1.0 331 1.0 332 0.0

65 343 4.3 344 1.0 342 1.0 342 1.0

70 354 4.3 355 1.0 353 1.0 353 1.0

75 365 4.3 367 2.0 365 0.0 365 0.0

80 378 4.3 379 1.0 378 0.0 378 0.0

85 391 4.3 392 1.0 391 0.0 391 0.0

90 407 4.3 408 1.0 407 0.0 407 0.0

95 428 5 429 1.0 428 0.0 428 0.0

FBP (99.5) 475 11.8 472 3.0 474 1.0 473 2.0

4
Figures 4, 5, and 6 show the three Column 1: HP-1, 10 m × 0.53 mm id, 0.88 µm

middle distillate samples and RGO

RGO
chromatograms obtained with the three
columns. The sample chromatograms
are remarkably similar, with small
differences in profile and retention times Jet A
due to differences in column dimensions
and operating conditions (see Table 2).
The data from the sample runs were
processed with the SimDis software Diesel
using the calibration runs from each
respective column (Figures 1 and 2).
Table 4 compares the results obtained
for the three middle distillate samples. Waxy distillate

The temperatures obtained at each cut

point were nearly identical on all three 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
columns. Time (min)

Figure 4. RGO and three middle distillate samples run on column 1.

Column 2: HP-1, 5 m × 0.53 mm id, 2.65 µm

RGO

Jet A

Diesel

Waxy distillate

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (min)

Figure 5. RGO and three middle distillate samples run on column 2.

5
 Column 3: DB-1, 7.5 m × 0.53 mm id, 1.5 µm

RGO

Jet A

Diesel

Waxy distillate

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (min)

Figure 6. RGO and three middle distillate samples run on column 3.

Table 4. Comparison of results of three samples run on three D2887B columns.

Jet A Diesel Waxy distillate

% Off Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3

IBP (0.5) 103 104 103 156 152 157 333 336 336

5 145 145 146 230 229 231 363 361 362

10 162 162 163 253 252 254 371 369 370

15 169 169 170 267 266 267 377 375 376

20 175 175 176 274 273 275 382 380 382

25 180 180 181 283 282 283 387 385 387

30 186 186 188 288 288 289 392 390 392

35 193 193 194 295 294 295 396 395 397

40 197 197 198 299 299 300 401 399 401

45 202 202 203 304 303 305 405 404 406

50 209 209 210 307 306 308 409 408 410

55 216 216 217 313 312 314 414 413 415

60 219 219 221 318 317 319 418 417 419

65 227 227 228 321 320 322 423 421 424

70 233 233 235 327 326 328 428 426 428

75 237 237 238 332 331 333 433 431 433

80 246 246 247 337 337 339 438 437 439

85 253 253 254 344 344 345 444 443 445

90 261 260 262 350 350 351 452 451 452

95 271 271 272 358 358 359 465 464 465

FBP (99.5) 292 291 293 379 379 379 503 503 502

6
Conclusions Reference
The 8890 GC was shown to successfully 1. ASTM D2887-16a, Standard
run a simulated distillation analysis Test Method for Boiling Range
according to the accelerated Distribution of Petroleum Fractions
ASTM D2887B method using any by Gas Chromatography, ASTM
one of the three specified capillary International, West Conshohocken,
columns. Performance measures PA, 2016, www.astm.org.
for peak symmetry, resolution, and
RGO verification were easily met for
each configuration. The 8890 GC
system provided consistent cut point
temperatures for three samples
representing boiling ranges across the
ASTM D2887 scope.

7
www.agilent.com/chem

This information is subject to change without notice.

© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2018

Printed in the USA, December 6, 2018
5994-0548EN