Admiralty Court has two different tribunals:

1. “Instant Court” of Admiralty Jurisdiction is under US Const. Art. 3, Sec.. 2.

2. “Prize Phase” of Admiralty Jurisdiction is under the WAR POWERS ACT, Art 1, Sec 8,
Clause 11. Law of Prize is a military venue and, when they do a “capture”, it is done under the
WPA, Art. 1, Sec. 8, Clause 11. A “Seizure” under the civilian venue is done under the US
Const., Art. 3, Sec. 2.3.
All is being orchestrated by the Lord High Admiral, the President of the US.
4. All or your judges on the bench today are commissioned vice admirals under the King’s
Bench.
5. The IRS Code 9.17 states “All assets or seizures are done under the Supplementary Rules, A B
C D F G, under the Insurrection and Rebellion Act passed, the first of two Acts was passed
8/6/1861; the second was passed 7/17/1862. See Vol. 12 of the US Statutes-at-Large.
Maritime Law has two distinct forms:
Emergency Bank Act was passed by Roosevelt March 9, 1933, aka War Powers Act, and Section
2 amended the Trading With The Enemy Act, originally passed 10/6/1917 to include domestic
transactions and made citizens of the US Enemies. Section 5b in the original Act excluded
domestic transactions and citizens of the US.

“Constitution of no Authority” by Lysander Schooner. There is an unlimited grant of power.

“A View of the Constitution” by Anthony Stokes
Read the “Protocols of Zion”, 11 and 12, by Victor E. Marsden.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm
You cannot sue anyone under the Common Law in an Admiralty Court.
Title 11, Sec. 109, all citizens of the US are debtors in bankruptcy.
Title 26, Sec. 6305, Upon certification from the Secretary, the Commissioner shall collect the
obligation as though it were a tax. It means they are collecting an insurance premium. Everything
is insurance under contributions. Tribulations are contributions.
Legans sink; flotsam floats.
Olivio v. Belois, case number 3076
Learn how to put a writ together the right way.
Federal Common Law, 31 Lawyer’s edition, Get it and read it. Law, Equity, and the 57 Rules of
Admiralty were merged. Under the Rules of Civil Procedure in 1966.
Erie v. Tompkins decision,
Federal Rule Decisions, vol. 34, p. 325, 150 pages lay out all of the changes of everything they
did in 1966.
Waiver and Consent. Ramsey v. Alegra,1827 Supreme Court decision, this is why, if you do not
go into the court, they arrest you, use coercion to bring you into the court to make you make a
general appearance so they can get Venue, not jurisdiction. Venue is territorial. Your zip code
identifies your military venue under the guise of the IRS. They want you to come into the court
and ID yourself, which gives them venue, then they assess your obligation under the contract so
formed. The presumption is that you are the Debtor.
August 25, 1983, the Federal Register designated all of your military districts by zip code, which
identifies the IRS District, because they do not want you to know that you are in military
districts. Each has a Provost Marshall over each district. Then they put a Provost Marshall
General under the Bureau of War out of Washington, DC over the Provost Marshalls.
A person was held in a state jail without a charge. The Provost Marshall was called and he told
the jail people that if the person was not released, they would be arrested. You have rights and
remedies. They get you to go in and waive your remedy.
Title 46, 781 and 782 – Public Vessels Act
Mathew 24 and 25:
CATRONA 297 Fed.Supp. p. 827, 1924 District Court decision. In admiralty, they fictionalize
the vessel; they make the vessel a juristic person. Public Vessels Act, 1925 – they fictionalized
the vessels. In 1920, they passed the Suits in Admiralty Act, where the US waived judicial and
sovereign immunity and they consented to be sued. In Admiralty, that is where your article 3
court is. That is where your common law is. Under the Admiralty. Every state case should be
moved under Title 28, Sec. 1446 - Move to Federal court as a Federal Question under the
constitution, Art. 3, Sec. 2 gives the District Court original jurisdiction of all Admiralty Maritime
claims. Rule 9(a) says you can do that.
Rule 9(a) – Do your negative averment.
Title 28, Sec. 1333 – Gives the District Court original jurisdiction exclusive of the courts of the
state. These courts do not have jurisdiction under Admiralty. Nature = Admiralty jurisdiction;
Cause = Venue in Maritime Law.
Defense – Privity and Knowledge means that if you commit an overt act that contributes to the
loss, you cannot collect on the claim. The government created the problem by overselling Gold
Contracts. They want everybody to pay for the loss through contributions.
Joint Tort Seizure Act – Every state has passed a Joint Tort Seizure Act. A Tort Seizure is any
person who has committed an injury or a civil wrong. Every time they bring you into court, it is a
Maritime Tort.
Blerk’s Practice. This is what they were using in the colonies when they were suppressing the
colonists. Blerk’s Practice says that a maritime tort is the same thing as assumpsit on contract of
debt. It is a Chose In Action. See Corpus Juris Secundum, Vol. 2, under Admiralty, Section 150
to 166, Court of Common Pleas, Municipal Court, Etc, all came from the old English Admiralty.
What you should be doing is a Letter of Undertaking or Stipulation per Monroe v. Alabama.
A general appearance under Admiralty is when you go in there and recognize the court, which is
a fiction. If you recognize the plaintiff, who is a legal fiction, and you recognize the defendant,
who is a legal fiction. When you give them your name, What is a court? A court is where a
contract is made. Every time you give these people any information. Go read George Mercer.
He wrote the book on Contracts. Also, Tulane Law Review, vol. 55, written by a professor on
contributions and indemnity and it is all Maritime Law. There are four types of indemnity: There
is 1. Express Contract; 2. Implied Contract; 3. Statutorily; and, 4 Indemnity Restitution.
Two types of Contribution: 1. Pro Rata; and, 2. Degree of Fault.
Common Law is your divine law. You have to have a corpus deliciti (body of an offense); there
has to be a victim.
Expatriation under Title 8, Sec. 1481, sub section 6 which says that you have to do a formal
renunciation of the citizenship under the War Powers Act. If you read Title 50, sec. 7c, your sole
remedy is under this section and the Acts passed in pursuance thereof. You have to do it with the
Attorney General because he is the property custodian of Title 50 and the Appendix, Sections 1
through 10. This is where you will find this Trading With The Enemy Act.
Sue the government in the Suits and Admiralty act, and they will run from you. The Truth In
Admiralty Act is in Title 46, section 742, Suits in Admiralty. Title 46, section 781 is the Public
Vessel Act. Title 46, section 740 is The Extension Act. You sue them in Suits in Admiralty.
Isaiah 24:5; This is what Planet X is about. This planet is going out of orbit.
Mathew 25
In Admiralty, you have a remedy to get out of this. When you go into court, you have to make a
special appearance. A guy went into court and said I am here without prejudice, without waiving
any rights, remedies, statutorial or procedural. This comes out of UCC 1-207. If you waive any
rights or defenses, you have made a general appearance. The court has venue and can impose the
liability on you because of the contract that you have. If you recognize the court, the defendant,
or the plaintiff, the court has venue.
Cactus Pipe and Supply Company v. MN MONTMARTRE 756 f. 2d 1103-1113 (1985) by
waiver and consent. See RAMSAY v. ALLEGRE 12 Wheat p. 611 (1827).
Freight, Inc., The creditors rights can be the subject of a complaint in Admiralty.
All Admiralty Cases are in the rem, res (race)
Black’s, 5th Ed., page 713: In Rem – A technical term used to designate proceedings or actions
instituted against the thing, in contradistinction to personal actions, which are said to be in
personam.
An “action in Rem” is a proceeding that takes no cognizance of owner but determines right in
specific property against all of the world, equally binding on everyone. Flesch v. Circle City
Excavating and Rental Corp., 137 Ind.App. 695, 210 N.E.2d 865, 868. It is true that, in a strict
sense, a proceeding in rem is one taken directly against property, and has for its object the
deposition of property, without reference to the title of individual claimants; but, in a larger and
more general sense, the terms are applied to actions between parties, where the direct object is to
reach and dispose of property owned by them, or of some interest therein. Such are cases
commenced by attachment against the property of debtors, or instituted to partition real estate,
foreclose a mortgage, or enforce a lien. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565. In the strict
sense of the term, a proceeding “in rem” is one which is taken directly against property or one
which is brought to enforce a right in the thing itself.
Actions in which the court is required to have control of the thing or object and in which an
adjudication is made as to the object which binds the whole world and not simply the interests of
the parties to the proceeding. Flesch v. Circle City Excavating & Rental Corp., 137 Ind.App.
695, 210 N.E.2d 865.
See also In personam; In rem jurisdiction; Quasi in rem.
Black’s, 5th Ed., page 1172 – 1173: Res – The subject matter of a trust or will. In the civil law, a
thing; an object. As a term of the law, this word has a very wide and extensive signification,
including not only things which are objects of property, but also such as are not capable of
individual ownership. And in old English law it is said to have a general import, comprehending
both corporeal and incorporeal things of whatever kind, nature, or species. By “res,” according to
the modern civilians, is meant everything that may form an object of rights, in opposition to
“persona,” which is regarded as a subject of rights. “Res,” therefore, in its general meaning,
comprises actions of all kinds; while in the restricted sense it comprehends every object of right,
except actions. This has reference to the fundamental division of the institutes, that all law relates
either to persons, to things, or to actions.
Res is everything that may form an object of rights and includes an object, subject-matter or
status. In re Riggle’s Will, 11 A>D.2d 51, 205 N.Y.S.2d 19, 21, 22. The term is particularly
applied to an object, in an action, or as the object against which, directly, proceedings are taken.
Thus, in a prize case, the captured vessel is “the res”; and proceedings of this character are said
to be in rem. (See In Personam; In Rem.) “Res” may also denote the action or proceeding, as
when a cause, which is not between adversary parties, is entitled “In re ______.”
Classification – Things (res) have been variously divided and classified in law, e.g., in the
following ways: (1.) Corporeal and incorporeal things; (2.) movables and immovables; (3.) res
mancipi and res nec mancipi; (4.) things real and things personal; (5.) things in possession and
choses (i.e., things) in action; (6.) fungible things and things not fungible (fungibles vel non
fungibiles); and, (7.) res singulae (i.e., individual objects) and universitates rerum (i.e.,
aggregates of things). Also persons are for some purposes and in certain respects regarded as
things.
UCC 1-201 – Rights are remedies.
Ohio Revised Statutes, 1301.102 – Definitions. Section (ee): Presumption - The tryer of the facts
shall presume the facts are true if facts are not put into the record to show a contrary finding. All
of these courts are courts of Assumpsit. Assumpsit means I agree or I undertook to indemnify the
public and national debt under the Doctrine of Contributions, which is an Admiralty and
Maritime insurance policy, under Delivio v. Beloit 3076, so you are a debtor under contract.
They are working on presumptions. What is the presumption? That you are the debtor. They
want you to come in there and identify yourself and then pay your obligation under the contract
under a Maritime Tort, which is the same thing as a Maritime contract.
HJR 192, (June 5, 1933), The Emergency Banking Act, which was codified into Title 31, section
5118 (2)(d). It is hereby declared to be against public policy for any contract or obligation to
contain a clause which purports to give the obligee the right to demand payment in any kind of
specific coin or currency of the US. In 1977, it was amended to allow gold and silver coins, but
they are still not legal tender. They are still not using money as legal tender. FRN are not money;
they are private bills of credit aka bills of exchange.
Under the UNCOTIL United Nations Commission On Trade and International Law, they
superceded Article 3 of the UCC in December 5, 1988 in New York City. It is no good anymore
under this convention. They have an International UCC and it tells you how to do these bills of
exchange. There are 96 articles in this convention, and it tells you how to do the International
Bill of Exchange.
International Bill of Exchange
Bank checks are International bills of exchange.
The United Nations Treaty is the Supreme Law of the Land, not the Constitution.
72 judges and commissioners, called the National Conference of Commissioners, put the UCC
together in 1940. The did it from the NIL196 Negotiable Instruments Law 196, which comes
from the English Bill of Exchange Act of 1691 and 1692.
You can support Jean Keating's work by going to http://freedom-school.com
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS
SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE
DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL
WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT
MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE LAW HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO
KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN
AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE
CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in 100% Australian Independent Media, Jean Keating, mikiverse, Mikiverse Headline
News, Mikiverse Health, Mikiverse Law, Mikiverse Politics, Mikiverse Science | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment