The document discusses a case regarding whether the Philippine government can deny vessel registry to corporations with alien stockholders. It summarizes the relevant facts, law, and ruling. Specifically:
1) Smith, Bell & Co. is a Philippine corporation with majority British stockholders seeking registry of its vessel Bato for domestic trade. However, registry was denied under a new law restricting registry to corporations without alien stockholders.
2) Smith, Bell & Co. argued this violated the equal protection clause. However, the court upheld the law as a valid exercise of police power, finding the government can regulate common carriers in public waters.
3) The court ruled that reasonable classifications in legislation are allowed to further public welfare
The document discusses a case regarding whether the Philippine government can deny vessel registry to corporations with alien stockholders. It summarizes the relevant facts, law, and ruling. Specifically:
1) Smith, Bell & Co. is a Philippine corporation with majority British stockholders seeking registry of its vessel Bato for domestic trade. However, registry was denied under a new law restricting registry to corporations without alien stockholders.
2) Smith, Bell & Co. argued this violated the equal protection clause. However, the court upheld the law as a valid exercise of police power, finding the government can regulate common carriers in public waters.
3) The court ruled that reasonable classifications in legislation are allowed to further public welfare
The document discusses a case regarding whether the Philippine government can deny vessel registry to corporations with alien stockholders. It summarizes the relevant facts, law, and ruling. Specifically:
1) Smith, Bell & Co. is a Philippine corporation with majority British stockholders seeking registry of its vessel Bato for domestic trade. However, registry was denied under a new law restricting registry to corporations without alien stockholders.
2) Smith, Bell & Co. argued this violated the equal protection clause. However, the court upheld the law as a valid exercise of police power, finding the government can regulate common carriers in public waters.
3) The court ruled that reasonable classifications in legislation are allowed to further public welfare
The document discusses a case regarding whether the Philippine government can deny vessel registry to corporations with alien stockholders. It summarizes the relevant facts, law, and ruling. Specifically:
1) Smith, Bell & Co. is a Philippine corporation with majority British stockholders seeking registry of its vessel Bato for domestic trade. However, registry was denied under a new law restricting registry to corporations without alien stockholders.
2) Smith, Bell & Co. argued this violated the equal protection clause. However, the court upheld the law as a valid exercise of police power, finding the government can regulate common carriers in public waters.
3) The court ruled that reasonable classifications in legislation are allowed to further public welfare
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Application was made at Cebu, Citizens or native inhabitants of liberty, or property without due
G.R. No. 15574
the home port of the vessel, to the Philippine Islands; (b) citizens process of law, or deny to any September 17, 1919 the Collector of Customs for a of the United States residing in person therein the equal SMITH, BELL & COMPANY certificate of Philippine registry. the Philippine Islands; (c) any protection of the laws." (LTD.), corporation or company vs. The Collector refused to issue composed wholly of citizens of Counsel says that Act No. 2761 JOAQUIN NATIVIDAD the certificate, giving as his the Philippine Islands or of the denies to Smith, Bell & Co., reason that all the stockholders United States or of both, Ltd., the equal protection of the of Smith, Bell & Co., Ltd., were created under the laws of the laws because it, in effect, DOCTRINE: Equal Protection not citizens either of the United prohibits the corporation from United States, or of any State States or of the Philippine thereof, or of thereof, or the owning vessels, and because Islands. managing agent or master of the classification of corporations The first paragraph of the Philippine Bill of Rights of the Philippine Bill, vessel resides in the Philippine based on the citizenship of one The instant action(A writ or more of their stockholders is repeated again in the first of mandamus) is the result. Islands paragraph of the Philippine Bill of capricious, and that Act No. Rights as set forth in the Jones Law, On February 23, 1918, the 2761 deprives the corporation provides "That no law shall be Philippine Legislature enacted of its properly without due enacted in said Islands which shall Any vessel of more than fifteen process of law because by the Act No. 2761. The first section gross tons which on February 8, deprive any person of life, liberty, or passage of the law company property without due process of law, of this law amended section 1918, had a certificate of 1172 of the Administrative was automatically deprived of or deny to any person therein the Philippine register under existing equal protection of the laws." Code to read as follows: every beneficial attribute of law, shall likewise be deemed a ownership in the Bato and left vessel of domestic ownership so with the naked title to a boat it long as there shall not be any could not use . FACTS: SEC. 1172. Certificate of change in the ownership thereof Smith, Bell & Co., (Ltd.), is a Philippine register. — Upon nor any transfer of stock of the corporation organized and registration of a vessel of companies or corporations existing under the laws of the domestic ownership, and of more owning such vessel to person not ISSUE: Philippine Islands. than fifteen tons gross, a included under the last preceding certificate of Philippine register paragraph. A majority of its shall be issued for it. If the vessel Whether or not the Government of stockholders are British is of domestic ownership and of the Philippine Islands, through its subjects. fifteen tons gross or less, the The first paragraph of the Legislature, can deny the registry It is the owner of a motor taking of the certificate of Philippine Bill of Rights of the of vessel in its coastwise trade to vessel known as the Bato built Philippine register shall be Philippine Bill, repeated again corporations having alien for it in the Philippine Islands of optional with the owner. in the first paragraph of the stockholders. more than 15 tons gross The Philippine Bill of Rights as set Bato was brought to Cebu in forth in the Jones Law, the present year for the "Domestic ownership," as used in provides "That no law shall be RULING: purpose of transporting this section, means ownership enacted in said Islands which plaintiff's merchandise between vested in some one or more of the shall deprive any person of life, ports in the Islands. following classes of persons: (a) The petition for a writ territorial jurisdiction, without good order of the people, and of mandamus is denied, with costs regard to any differences of race, legislate so as to increase the against the petitioner. So ordered. color, or nationality. The word industries of the State, develop its "person" includes aliens. Private resources and add to its wealth corporations, likewise, are and prosperity. From the very "persons" within the scope of necessities of society, legislation YES, this is a valid exercise of the guaranties in so far as their of a special character, having police power. Common carriers property is concerned. these objects in view, must often which in the Philippines as in be had in certain districts." his is the United States and other the same police power which the countries are, as Lord Hale said, Classification with the end in view United States Supreme Court say "affected with a public of providing diversity of treatment "extends to so dealing with the interest," can only be permitted may be made among conditions which exist in the state to use these public waters as a corporations, but must be based as to bring out of them the privilege and under such upon some reasonable ground greatest welfare in of its people." conditions as to the and not be a mere arbitrary For quite similar reasons, none of representatives of the people selection. Examples of laws held the provision of the Philippine may seem wise. Act No. 2761 of unconstitutional because of Organic Law could could have the Philippine Legislature, in unlawful discrimination against had the effect of denying to the denying to corporations such as aliens could be cited. Generally, Government of the Philippine Smith, Bell &. Co. Ltd., the right to these decisions relate to statutes Islands, acting through its register vessels in the Philippines which had attempted arbitrarily to Legislature, the right to exercise coastwise trade, does not belong forbid aliens to engage in ordinary that most essential, insistent, and to that vicious species of class kinds of business to earn their illimitable of powers, the legislation which must always be living. sovereign police power, in the condemned, but does fall within promotion of the general welfare authorized exceptions, notably, and the public interest. within the purview of the police power, and so does not offend One of the exceptions to the against the constitutional general rule, most persistent and provision. far reaching in influence is, that Another notable exception neither the Fourteenth permits of the regulation or Amendment to the United States distribution of the public domain Constitution, broad and or the common property or RATIONALE: comprehensive as it is, nor any resources of the people of the other amendment, "was designed State, so that use may be limited to interfere with the power of the to its citizens. Even as to The guaranties of the Fourteenth classification, it is admitted that a State, sometimes termed its Amendment and so of the first State may classify with reference `police power,' to prescribe paragraph of the Philippine Bill of to the evil to be prevented; the regulations to promote the health, Rights, are universal in their question is a practical one, peace, morals, education, and application to all person within the dependent upon experience.