Tax 2 Syllabus 2019 PDF
Tax 2 Syllabus 2019 PDF
Tax 2 Syllabus 2019 PDF
School of Law
Taxation 2
nd
2 Semester, AY 2018-2019
Prof. R. R. Dujunco
Grades:
Recitation/Attendance 40%
Midterms 30%
Finals 30%
Provisions cited below pertain to the 1997 NIRC, as amended, unless otherwise stated.
A. Transfer Taxes
Page 1 of 10
f) Classification of donor
g) Determination of gross gift
h) Composition of gross gift
i) Valuation of gifts made in property
j) Tax credit for donor’s taxes paid to a foreign country
k) Exemption of gifts from donor’s tax
l) Persons liable
m) Tax basis
Page 2 of 10
• Fort Bonifacio Development Corp v. CIR, G.R. No. 173425, 2013
a) Definition
b) Sources of input tax
(1) Purchase or importation of goods
(2) Purchase of real properties for which VAT has actually been paid
(3) Purchase of services for which VAT has actually been paid
(4) Transactions deemed sale
(5) Presumptive input
(6) Transitional input
c) Persons who can avail of input tax credits
d) Determination of output/input tax; VAT payable; excess input tax credits
(1) Determination of output tax
(2) Determination of creditable input tax
(3) Allocation of input tax on mixed transactions
(4) Determination of the output tax and VAT payable and computation of VAT
payable or excess tax credits
e) Substantiation of input tax credits
12. Refund or tax credit of excess input tax
a) Who may claim for refund/apply for issuance of tax credit certificates
b) Period to file claim/apply for the issuances of tax credit certificates
c) Manner of giving refunds
d) Destination principle/Cross-border doctrine
• Philex Mining Corp v. CIR, G.R. No. 125704, 1998
• Atlas Consolidated Mining v. CIR, 524 SCRA 73 (2007)
• CIR v. Mirant Pagbilao, G.R. No. 172129, September 12, 2008
• CIR v. Aichi Forging Company, G.R. No. 184823, October 6, 2010
• CIR v. San Roque Power Corporation, G.R. Nos. 187485, 196113, and
197156, February 12, 2013
• KEPCO Philippines v. CIR, G.R. No. 181858, November 24, 2010.
13. Invoicing Requirements
a) In general
b) In “deemed sale” transactions
c) Consequences of issuing erroneous VAT invoice or VAT official receipt
14.Filing of returns and payment
15.Withholding of final VAT on sales to government
Page 3 of 10
11. Percentage tax on IPOs – Sec. 127
12. Payment of Percentage Taxes – Sec. 128
Revenue Regulations No. 6-2001, July 31, 2001
Revenue Regulations No. 10-2004.
• Republic of the Philippines v. Sunlife Assurance Company of Canada, G.R. No.
158085, October 14, 2005
• CIR v. Lhuiller, G.R. No. 150947, July 15, 2003
• First Planters Pawnshop v. CIR, G.R. No. 174134, July 30, 2008
4. Collection
a) Requisites
b) Prescriptive periods; suspension of running of statute of limitations
G. Taxpayer’s remedies
Page 4 of 10
1. Protesting an assessment – Revenue Regulations No. 12-99
a) Protested assessment
b) Period to file protest
c) Form, content, and validity of protest
d) Submission of supporting documents
e) Effect of failure to file protest
f) Decision of the Commissioner on the protest filed
(1) Period to act upon or decide on protest filed
(2) Remedies of the taxpayer in case the Commissioner denies the protest or
fails to act on the protest
(3) Effect of failure to appeal
• RCBC v. CIR, G.R. No. 168498, 2007
• Evangelista v. Collector, 1957
• Ungab v. Cusi, 97 SCRA 887
• CIR v. Kudos Metal Corporation, G.R. No. 178087, 2010
• Republic v. Kerr & Co., 25 SCRA 208
• BPI v. CIR, G.R. No. 139736, 2006
• Republic v. Salud, G.R. No. 130430, 1999
• Fishwealth Canning Corp v. CIR, G.R. No. 179343, 2010
H. Government remedies
• CIR v. Suyoc Consolidated Mining, 104 Phil. 819
• Republic v. Patanao, G.R. No. L-22356, 1967, L14142, 1961
• Republic v. Acebedo, 22 SCRA 135
• CIR v. Philippine Global Communications, G.R. No. 167146, 2006
1. Administrative remedies
a) Tax lien
b) Distraint and levy
c) Forfeiture of real property
Page 5 of 10
• City of San Pablo v. Reyes, 305 SCRA 353, 1999
• Pepsi-Cola Bottling v. City, 24 SCRA 789
• Matalin Coconut v. Municipal Council, 143 SCRA 404
• Phil Match Co. Ltd v. City of Cebu, 81 SCRA 99, January 18, 1999
• PLDT v. City of Davao, G.R. No. 143867, August 22, 2001
• Meralco v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 353
• Figuerres v. CA, G.R. No. 119172, March 25, 1999
• Coca-Cola v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 156252, June 27, 2000
• Yamane v. BA Lepanto Condominium Corporation 474 SCRA 258
• Lopez v. City of Manila, 303 SCRA 448
• Iloilo Bottlers v. Iloilo City, G.R. No. 52019, 1988
• Arabay v. CFI, 66 SCRA 617, 1975
• Allied Thread v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 40296, 1984
• Mobil Philippines v. City Treasurer of Makati, G.R. No. 154092, 2005
• Hagonoy Market Vendor Association v. Municipality of Hagonoy Bulacan, G.R. No.
137621, 2002
2. Nature and source of taxing power – 1987 Const., Article X, Secs 5 and 6
a) Grant of local taxing power under the LGC
b) Authority to prescribe penalties for tax violations
c) Authority to grant local tax exemptions – Sec. 192, LGC
d) Withdrawal of exemptions
e) Authority to adjust local tax rates – Sec. 191, LGC
f) Residual taxing power of local governments – Sec. 186, LGC
g) Authority to issue local tax ordinances – Secs. 187 to 189, LGC
Page 6 of 10
9. Taxing powers of barangays (Exclude: Rates) – Sec. 152, LGC
14.Taxpayer’s remedies
a) Periods of assessment and collection of local taxes, fees or charges – Sec. 194, LGC
b) Protest of assessment – Sec. 187, LGC
c) Claim for refund of tax credit for erroneously or illegally collected tax, fee or charge
Page 7 of 10
d) Preparation of schedules of fair market values
(1) Authority of assessor to take evidence
(2) Amendment of schedule of fair market values
e) Classes of real property
f) Actual use of property as basis of assessment – Sec. 218, LGC
g) Assessment of property
(1) General revisions of assessments and property classifications – Sec. 219
(2) Date of effectivity of assessment or reassessment
h) Assessment of property subject to back taxes – Sec. 222, LGC
i) Notification of new or revised assessments
E. Taxpayer’s remedies
1. Contesting an assessment of value of real property
a) Appeal to the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA)
b) Appeal to the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA)
c) Effect of payment of tax
IV. TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES (P.D. No. 1464), as amended by the
CUSTOMS MODERNIZATION AND TARIFF ACT (Republic Act No. 10863, which took effect on June 16,
2016)
• Nestle Philippines v. CA, G.R. No. 134114, 2001
• Commissioner of Customs v. Milwaukee Industrial Corporation, G.R. No. 135253,
2004
• Auyong Hian v. CTA, 59 SCRA 110, 1974
• Llamado v. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 28809, 1983
• Transglobe International v. CA, G.R. No. 126634, 1999
• SBMA v. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 160270, 2010
Page 8 of 10
• Philippines Phosphate v. Commissioner, G.R. No. 141973, 2005
• RV Marzan Freight v. CA, G.R. No. 128064, 2004
D. Remedies
1. Government
a) Administrative/extrajudicial
(1) Search, seizure, forfeiture, arrest
(2) Authority of the Commissioner to make compromise
b) Judicial
(1) Rules on appeal including jurisdiction
2. Taxpayer
a) Protest
b) Abandonment
c) Abatement and refund
Page 9 of 10
V. JUDICIAL REMEDIES [R.A. No. 1125, as amended, and the Revised Rules of the Court of Tax
Appeals (CTA)]
• Blaquera v. Rodriguez, 103 Phil. 267, 1958
• Raymundo v. de Joya, 101 SCRA 495, 1980
• CIR v. CA and Atlas Consolidated, 271 SCRA 605, 1997
B. Judicial procedures
1. Judicial action for collection of taxes
a) Internal revenue taxes
b) Local taxes
(1) Prescriptive period
2. Civil cases
a) Who may appeal, mode of appeal, effect of appeal
(1) Suspension of collection of tax
(2) Injunction not available to restrain collection
(3) Taking of evidence
(4) Motion for reconsideration or new trial
b) Appeal to the CTA, en banc
c) Petition for review on certiorari to the SC
3. Criminal cases
a) Institution and prosecution of criminal actions
(1) Institution of civil action in criminal action
b) Appeal and period to appeal
(1) Solicitor General as counsel for the people and government officials sued in
their official capacity
c) Petition for review on certiorari to the SC
Page 10 of 10