Chapter 3 - Statutory Analysis
Chapter 3 - Statutory Analysis
Chapter 3 - Statutory Analysis
Is this meeting an open meeting governed by section 56-6-1? The Plain Meaning Rule
application of step 2 reveals an open meeting is required by the statute A canon of construction that provides that if the meaning of a statute is
when the following elements are present: clear on its face, it will be interpreted according to its plain meaning and
1. Two or more board members the other canons of construction will not be applied by the court.
2. meet at other than a chance or social gathering where discussion of
public business is not the central purpose, and A. Legislative History
3. public business is discussed or action may be or is taken. To determine the meaning of a statute, a court may look to the legislative
A narrative summary of the elements and the application of the statute to history of the statute to discover what the legislature intended it to mean.
the facts illustrates step 3: Legislative history is the record of the legislation during the enactment
1. Two or more board members. This element is met. Both Dan and Ida process before it became law. It is composed of committee reports,
are board members. transcripts of hearings, statements of legislators concerning the
2. Meet at other than a chance or social gathering where discussion of legislation, and any other material published for legislative use in regard
public business is not the central purpose. It appears that this element is to the legislation.
not met by the facts. This was a social gathering and also possibly a Legislative history may be of assistance in several ways when interpreting
chance meeting. a statute. The history may identify why an ambiguous term was used and
The gathering was a Christmas party. It does not appear that the what meaning the legislature intended, what the legislature intended the
discussion of public business was the central purpose. If it is discovered statute to accomplish, the general purpose of the legislation, and so on.
that the sole reason they went to the party was to discuss public business,
the exclusion in subsection (b) of the statute probably does not apply and For example: Section A(9) of the Housing Discrimination Act provides
the meeting may be covered by the act. that no person shall deny an individual housing on the basis of gender
preference. The court is called upon to interpret the term person. Does it
3. Public business is discussed or action may be or is taken. This element include corporations and businesses such as partnerships?
is met. Public business was discussed. In the case before the court, a closely held corporation that owned an
After performing step 3, it appears that this was not a public meeting apartment complex refused to rent an apartment to a couple because of the
within the meaning of the act. Although the requirements of the first and gender preference of the corporation employee who managed the
third elements are met (two or more board members met and discussed complex. The corporation argued that a corporation is not a person within
public business), the requirements of the second element are not. the meaning of the statute. Included in the legislative history of the statute
When performing step 3, remember to match the client’s facts with the is a committee report recommending the passage of the legislation. The
required elements of the statute. When this is accomplished, you can report contains the following: “The intent of the legislation is to eliminate
determine how the statute applies. In the example concerning the purchase any and all forms of gender discrimination in housing. The term ‘person’
of goggles and the sale of goods, all the required statutory elements were is intended to include all individuals and business entities, including
met by the facts of the client’s case, and an implied warranty was created. corporations.” The legislative history in this example provides the court
In the public meetings example, the facts did not meet the requirements of guidance in interpreting the statute.
the second element of the statute, and therefore the meeting was not a
public meeting within the meaning of the statute. Note that for federal statutes there is usually a great deal of legislative
D. Summary of the Statutory Analysis Process history.
The three steps presented in this section are a useful approach to statutory This may be reviewed by consulting the congressional record. Legislative
analysis. history for state statutes may be very limited or nonexistent, depending on
These steps may be summarized as follows: the state.
Step 1 Determine whether the statute applies in any way to the legal Consult the appropriate state legislative records or service office for the
problem or issue. availability of legislative history.
Step 2 Carefully read the statute and identify the required elements.
Remember, legislative history is considered only if the plain meaning of a 5. Intended Remedy. Statutes are to be interpreted in a manner that
statute is not clear or sections of a statute are internally inconsistent. If the furthers the intended legislative remedy.
meaning is clear, that meaning will be applied by the court even if the 6. Entire Context. The words, phrases, and subsections of a statute are to
legislative history indicates the legislature intended a different meaning. be interpreted in the context of the entire statute.
7. Constitutionality. Statutes are assumed to be constitutional and should
legislative history be construed in a manner that preserves their constitutionality, if possible.
The record of legislation during the enactment process. It is composed of 8. Criminal Statutes. Criminal statutes are to be narrowly interpreted.
committee reports, transcripts of hearings, statements of legislators It is important to remember that, as with all matters involving case law,
concerning the legislation, and any other material published for legislative when a court interprets a statute, the principle of stare decisis applies. A
use in regard to the legislation. court will follow the interpretation previously adopted unless the previous
interpretation is overruled and a new interpretation is adopted.
B. Canons of Construction
Canons of construction are rules and guidelines the courts use when V. Key Points Checklist: Working with Statutes
interpreting statutes. The Plain Meaning Rule governs when the canons of When reviewing a statute, do not limit your focus to a specific section.
construction apply. If the meaning of the statute is clear on its face, there Remember, a section is one part of an entire act that usually contains
is no room for interpretation and a court will not apply the canons of several statutory sections. Read a section in the context of the entire act.
construction. Be sure you are familiar with all the sections of the act, as there may be
The canons of construction are too numerous to be addressed individually another section, such as a definitions section, that affects the interpretation
in this text, but some of the better-known canons are presented here. of the statute you are reading.
1. Expressio Unius. The entire Latin phrase is expressio unius est exclusio When you find a statute that appears to apply, do not stop your research.
alterius, which translates as “the expression of one excludes all others.” If In many instances, more than one statute or legislative act applies to a
the statute contains a list of what is covered, everything else is excluded. specific question or fact situation. Read statutes carefully and slowly.
Several readings may be necessary. You may have to make a chart or
canons of construction diagram of the various sections and subsections of a statute to gain an
The rules and guidelines courts use when interpreting statutes. understanding of the operation of the statute.
All the words of a statute have meaning. If a word does not seem
For example: If a statute governing artists lists potters, glassblowers, necessary or appears repetitive, you may have misread the statute. Read it
painters, poets, writers, and sculptors but does not list weavers, weavers again. Consult a secondary source that contains a discussion or
are not covered by the statute. Only the occupations listed are covered. All interpretation of the statute.
other occupations are not covered. Do not assume a word means what you think it does. Many statutory
words are terms of art, loaded with meaning. Check the definitions section
Note, however, that statutes are often written to state that a list is not of the statute, case law, or a legal dictionary to ensure you give the correct
exclusive. meaning to a term.
When so written, this canon of construction does not apply, and the statute The plain meaning of a statute governs its statutory interpretation. If the
is not limited to the items listed. meaning is clear, it is not subject to interpretation.
If the statute is unclear or ambiguous, look to other sources for guidance,
For example: “A ‘Building’ as used in this statute means a structure on such as legislative history or applicable canons of constructions. Are there
private or commercial property and includes but is not limited to a court opinions that interpret the statute? Are there secondary sources, such
dwelling, an office of fixed location, ...” as law review articles or encyclopedia sections, that discuss the statute?
2. Ejusdem Generis. This term means of the same genus or class. As a VI. Application
canon of construction, it means that whenever a statute contains a specific The application of the principles of statutory analysis is illustrated in the
list followed by a general term, the general term is interpreted to be following examples.
limited to other things of the same class or kind as those in the list.
A. Chapter Hypothetical
For example: A statute regulating self-propelled vehicles lists “bicycles, In the hypothetical situation presented at the beginning of the chapter,
tricycles, unicycles, and other devices.” “Other devices” is limited to Cecil’s research turns up five sections of the state’s Commercial Code
mean devices of the same class or kind as bicycles, tricycles, and Sales Act that may apply:
unicycles. Motorized vehicles are not “other devices” within the meaning Section 29-2-102 provides that the act applies to the sale of goods only.
of the statute. Services are specifically excluded in the act.
Section 29-2-105 defines goods as “all things which are movable at the
3. Pari Materia. This Latin phrase translates as “on the same subject time of the contract for sale.”
matter.” Section 29-2-313 provides that an express warranty is created by a seller’s
As a canon, it means that statutes dealing with the same subject should be affirmation of fact or promise that relates to the quality of the goods.
interpreted consistently. Section 29-2-314 states that “a warranty that the goods shall be
merchantable is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a
For example: A state’s Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against merchant with respect to goods of that kind.”
an individual on the basis of “gender preference.” The state’s Fair Section 29-2-315 provides, “Where the seller at the time of contracting
Employment has reason to know any particular purpose of which the goods are required
Act also uses the term gender preference. The term should be interpreted and the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill or judgment to select or
consistently in both statutes unless the statutes have definitions sections furnish suitable goods there is a warranty that the goods shall be fit for
that give clearly different meanings. such purpose.”
After conducting research on how to analyze statutory law, Cecil applies
4. Last Antecedent Rule. Qualifying words and phrases apply to the words the steps recommended in this chapter.
or phrase immediately preceding and do not extend to other, more remote Step 1 Determine whether the statute applies. When reviewing the
words or phrases. statutes, Cecil notes that section 29-2-102 provides that the Commercial
Code Sales Act applies only to the sale of goods. If this transaction is not
For example: A DWI statute provides “‘driver’ means every person who a sale of goods, the statute does not apply and the warranty provisions of
drives or is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon a highway the act do not apply.
...” The phrase “upon a highway” modifies the term “motor vehicle.” It Section 29-2-105 defines goods as “all things which are movable ...” This
does not modify the term “drives.” definition is of no help. Is a permanent hair treatment movable within the
meaning of the act? In this case, both goods and services are involved.
The service portion, the beautician applying the permanent, does not The act defines merchant as a person who deals in goods of the kind sold.
appear to be goods within the meaning of the statute but is clearly a If the beauty salon and the beautician routinely sell perm kits, then the
service. The invoice, however, shows that Mrs. Jackson paid twenty seller is a “merchant.”
dollars for a perm kit. The perm kit is clearly goods under the act. The Here, the salon routinely sells perm kits when it charges for them as a part
transaction is a mixed transaction involving both services and goods. of a permanent. Therefore, the seller is a “merchant.”
Cecil’s review of the statute indicates that there is no section that After performing this step, Cecil can reach a conclusion on whether the
addresses mixed transactions. statute applies and whether Mrs. Jackson would have a cause of action for
Since the statute does not give guidance concerning mixed transactions, breach of warranty under section 29-2-314. Assuming that the transaction
Cecil must refer to case law. In the case of Elie v. American Saloon, the is a sale of goods, which is doubtful in light of the conclusion reached
court provides guidance for determining when a mixed transaction is a in step 1, it appears that the statute would apply: there would be a
sale of goods covered by the Commercial Code Sales Act. contract for the sale of goods by a merchant of those goods.
The court adopted what it called the predominant factor test. Under this Under section 29-2-314, the seller warrants that the goods are
test, the nature of the contract will be determined by what predominates. merchantable, which is defined in case law as meaning “fit for the
If the transaction involves primarily a service, it is a service contract and ordinary purposes for which such goods are used.” In Mrs. Jackson’s case,
is not covered by the act. If the transaction involves primarily the sale of the goods obviously were not fit for their ordinary purpose. Her hair
goods, it is a sale of goods and is covered by the act. In its discussion of changed color and broke. If section 29-2-314 applies, Mrs.
the application of the test, the court stated that the bill or receipt should be Jackson clearly has a claim for breach of warranty. Remember, however,
examined. If the largest portion of the bill applies to the cost of the goods the conclusion in step 1 was that section 29-2-314 does not apply because
sold, the transaction is predominately a sale of goods and the act applies. the transaction is probably a sale of a service not goods.
If the majority of the bill applies to the services provided, the transaction B. Will Revocation Statute
is a service transaction, not covered by the act. Section 50-5 of a state statute is the applicable statute in this example. It
Applying this test to Mrs. Jackson’s facts, the bill clearly indicates that the provides as follows:
largest portion of the transaction applied to the service of giving the No will in writing, nor any part thereof, shall be revoked unless, with the
permanent. Twenty dollars was charged for the perm kit (goods) and intent to revoke, the testator:
eighty dollars for giving the permanent (services). Cecil concludes that a. executes a subsequent will or codicil,
under the predominant factor test, the service predominates the b. prepares a writing declaring an intention to revoke the same which is
transaction, and it appears to be a service contract not covered by the act. executed in a manner in which a will is required to be executed, or
After performing step 1, Cecil concludes that there is no warranty relief c. the testator or some person in the testator’s presence and by the
available against Beauty Care beauty salon because the Commercial Code testator’s direction ... cancels, or destroys the same, with the intent to
Sales Act does not apply to the transaction. revoke.
Cecil’s conclusion is based on his interpretation of the law. Since he is The following facts apply in this example. Before Mary Glenn died, she
new at statutory analysis, he knows his analysis could be wrong. To be on directed her brother, Tom Glenn, to cancel her will. Because she was too
the safe side, he continues his analysis in order to provide his supervisory weak to write, she directed her brother to cancel the will by writing across
attorney a complete review of the law. He proceeds to steps 2 and 3. the first page,
Step 2 Analyze the statute. If the act does apply, that is, if it were “I hereby revoke this will. It is my intent that this will be no longer valid.
concluded that the transaction was a sale of goods rather than a service, I direct my brother to do this because I can no longer write.” Tom took the
which of the warranty remedies, if any, would be available to Mrs. will to Mary’s kitchen, a room adjacent to her bedroom, and wrote what
Jackson? Cecil carefully reads the statute and determines that the three Mary had requested on the first page of the will and added, “This was
warranties included in sections 29-2-313, 29-2-314, and 29-2-315 are the done at the request of Mary Glenn by me, Tom Glenn.”
only possible warranties available in the act. Which of these would apply? Was the will validly revoked under the terms of the statute?
Clearly, sections 29-2-313 and 29-2-315 would not apply. Section 29-2- Step 1 Determine whether the statute applies. The statute appears on its
313 requires some affirmation or promise by the seller relating to the face to apply to this fact situation. The statute governs will revocations
quality of the goods. and this is an attempted revocation.
In Mrs. Jackson’s case, there was no statement by the beautician, either Step 2 Analyze the statute. After a careful reading, the statute can be
oral or written, concerning the quality of the permanent. Section 29-2-315 analyzed and the required elements identified. The statute provides three
also would not apply, as Mrs. Jackson did not communicate any particular ways in which a written will can be revoked:
purpose for which the goods were required. Also, there are no facts to 1. by a subsequent will or codicil executed by the testator, with the intent
indicate that she in any way relied on the beautician’s expertise in to revoke
selecting the permanent, although it could be argued that this is implicit in 2. by a writing intended to revoke the will, executed in the same manner
getting a permanent. as a will is required to be executed
To be on the safe side, Cecil reviews the courts’ interpretation of the term 3. by the testator or some person in the testator’s presence and by the
particular purpose. The case law indicates that the term refers to a unique testator’s direction canceling or destroying the will with the intent to
and specific purpose for which the goods are required that is clearly and revoke
specifically communicated by the buyer to the seller. The facts in Mrs.
Jackson’s case show there was no specific communication. Step 3 Apply the statute to the legal problem or issue. When the statute is
Cecil’s last hope is section 29-2-314. He reads the statute and identifies applied to the fact situation, it appears that subsections (a) and (b) clearly
the following as the elements of an implied warranty of merchantability: do not apply. Subsection
1. The transaction must be a contract for the sale of goods. (a) requires a subsequent will or codicil, neither of which is present in
2. The seller must be a merchant of those goods. Mary Glenn’s case. Subsection (b) requires a writing revoking the will,
On the face of it, it appears that this statute would apply. Cecil proceeds to executed in a manner in which a will must be executed. Assume that
step 3. research reveals that the state statutes require a will to be witnessed by
Step 3 Apply the statute to the legal problem or issue. Cecil applies the two witnesses. There were no witnesses in this case. The requirements of
statute to the problem through the use of a chart. this subsection are not met because the writing by Tom was not executed
Statutory Elements in the required manner.
1. Contract for sale of goods If there is a valid revocation under the statute, it can only have occurred
2. Seller is a merchant of those goods under the cancellation provisions of subsection (c). For a revocation to
Facts of Client’s Case occur under subsection (c), the following elements must be met:
Assuming that the predominant factor test did lead to the conclusion that 1. The testator or some person
this transaction is a sale of goods, not services, then this is a sale-of-goods a. in the presence of the testator, and
transaction. b. by the testator’s direction
2. Cancels or destroys the will
3. With the intent to revoke.
In this example, the required elements of the statute will be applied to the These sources should not be used if the meaning of the statute is clear on
facts of the case in a different way than in the previous example. In the its face.
previous example, a chart was used. Here, a narrative summary is used. The ease with which you are able to analyze a statute increases with
1. Testator or some person. The requirements of this element are met. The practice.
testator did not cancel the will but “some person,” her brother, did. The more you read and analyze statutes, the easier it becomes. The
a. In the presence of the testator. It is questionable whether this element is exercises at the end of this chapter may prove helpful in this regard.
met. Does “in the testator’s presence” mean actual physical presence in
the same room? If the person canceling the will is in an adjacent room, is Exercises
that “in the testator’s presence?” If the statute does not define the term Additional assignments are located on the Online Companion and the
presence, case law must be consulted. If the courts have not interpreted Student CD-ROM accompanying the text
the term, the legislative history of the act may shed some light. ASSIGNMENT 1
b. By the direction of the testator. This element is met. Mary Glenn Describe in detail the components of a statute.
directed her brother to revoke the will. ASSIGNMENT 2
2. Cancels or destroys the will. This element appears to be met. The Look up a statute in your state and identify its component parts. You may
language clearly revokes the will and appears on the will itself. The find a statute on the Web through http://www.findlaw.com/ or look one up
statute does not require that the revocation language appear on a specific at a local law or public library (most public libraries have the state
page of the will such as the signature page. Case law should be consulted statutes).
to see whether the courts have established where the revocation language In the following exercises, a statute is presented, followed by questions
must be placed. concerning the statute.
3. With the intent to revoke. This element is met. The intent to revoke is ASSIGNMENT 3
clearly indicated in the language Mary Glenn chose. Statute: Criminal code section 20-4-102, Arson.
The conclusion is that the statute applies and the will has been revoked if A person who knowingly sets fire to, burns, causes to be burned, or by use
the presence requirement is met and if cancellation language is effective of any explosive, damages or destroys, or causes to be damaged or
when placed on the first page of a will. By following the three destroyed, any property of another without his consent commits arson.
recommended steps, subsections (a) and (b) of the statute were eliminated Questions
from consideration, and the subsection that could apply was identified A. What are the required elements of arson?
(subsection (c)). The application analysis helps focus the attention on B. Tom breaks into a neighbor’s barn, sets off twenty sticks of dynamite,
what research is needed to reach a final conclusion. Note that the final and blows up the barn. The barn does not catch fire but it is blown to
conclusion cannot be reached in step 3 until research is conducted to small bits and completely destroyed.
determine what “in the testator’s presence” requires under the statute. Has Tom committed arson? Why?
C. Lois breaks into a house intending to steal cash and jewelry. She lights
Summary a match to locate a safe. She drops the match; it falls in a trashcan and the
An expanding source of law in the United States is the law passed by house catches fire. Has Lois committed arson? Why?
legislative bodies. D. Dai’s Diner is losing money and about to go out of business. Dai and
This body of law, commonly called statutory law, assumes a greater role Steve own the building where the diner is located. One evening Dai sets
because many matters once covered by case law are now addressed by the building on fire in order to collect the insurance on the building. Has
state and federal legislative bodies. As a result of this growth, paralegals Dai committed arson? Why?
are more frequently engaged in analyzing legal problems and issues
governed by statutory law, which means they must have the ability to
conduct statutory analysis.
Statutory analysis is the process of determining whether a statute applies,
how it applies, and the effect of that application. A prerequisite to
analyzing a statute is a familiarity with the parts of a statute. While these
may vary in different jurisdictions, it is helpful to have an understanding
of the basic framework commonly used.
The most efficient way to address a problem involving a statute is to have
an approach to statutory analysis. This chapter presents a three-step
approach.
The first step is the determination of whether the statute governs the
situation in any way. This step involves locating all the possible statutes
that may apply, then deciding which ones apply to the facts raised by the
legal problem. If the problem involves the sale of land, for example,
statutes governing the sale of goods do not apply.
The second step is to read the statute carefully and identify what is
required for the statute to apply. These requirements are usually referred
to as the elements of the statute. A careful analysis may require several
readings of the statute and reference to interpretative sources, such as
court opinions, or secondary sources, such as treatises and law review
articles.
The third step is the application of the elements to the facts of the legal
problem.
This step involves matching the elements of the statute to the facts of the
case and determining how the statute applies.
When engaging in statutory analysis, there are considerations and
guidelines that should be kept in mind. Most of these come into play
when the meaning of a statute is unclear or ambiguous. In addition to
court opinions, which give guidance to the interpretation of a statute,
legislative history and canons of construction may be consulted.
Legislative history is composed of all the legislative material and records
concerning a statute before it became law. Canons of construction are
guidelines developed by courts for use in interpreting ambiguous statutes.