Key Issues and Challenges For PPP in India
Key Issues and Challenges For PPP in India
Key Issues and Challenges For PPP in India
• Commercial Viability - Projects as water supply and sanitation projects are yet to
demonstrate their commercial viability to the public
• Hidden Debt - from the macro-economic point of view, we can see a substantial
disadvantage in the fact that as a consequence of the long-term character of PPP
projects, the mandatory expenses grow and the hidden debt arises, and this debt will
exist for a lot of years, and thus it can affect negatively the fighting power of the future
governments and burden significantly the future generations.
• Long Gestation Period - generally the preparation of individual PPP Projects may take
up to 23 years (depending on project size and complexity). This long gestation period
along with its attendant uncertainties are a big dampener for private sector enthusiasm;
• Transfer of Risk - from the private sector to the public sector possible a new set of
risks, e.g. possible risk of bankruptcy of the private player;
• Focus on Economic Benefits - PPP Projects tend to focus on the economic aspects of
the project, sometimes to the detriment of social and environmental aspects.
Barriers to PPP
Mr. P. Chidambaram (Finance Minister in 2006), in a major PPP Conference51 listed
four major weaknesses in PPP development in India as.
• Lack of Bankable Projects Finding credible and viably structured projects continues to
be a challenge. There is a lack of shelf of credible, bankable infrastructure projects,
which could be offered for financing to the private sector. Some initiatives have been
taken both at the central as well as the states’ level to develop PPP projects these tend to
be isolated cases and have demonstrated a marked lack of consistency.
• Limited Capacity to Manage PPP in Public Sector There is also lack of capacity in
public institutions and officials to manage the PPP process. Since these projects involve
long term contracts covering the life cycle of the infrastructure asset being created, it is
necessary to manage this process to maximize returns to all the stakeholders.
• Lack of Political Will – PPP contracts are often seen as government ‘selling its jewels’.
This myth is perpetuated partly by the political parties for maintaining vested interests,
and partly by inefficient or corrupt bureaucracy which is sometimes reluctant to part
away with operational control. Paradoxically the honest bureaucrat finds that ‘selling’
the PPP concept is more hard work than the actual implementation and also makes him
/ her vulnerable to charges of corruption and nepotism.
• Public sector capacity to successfully execute PPPs – Perhaps the single biggest
reason for delays and sub optimal framing of PPP projects has been the public sector’s
limited skills set and experience in drafting balanced PPP contracts and concession
agreements.
• Need to Address the Risk and Return Concerns of Foreign Investors. Financing terms
generally mean that PPP’s are more exposed to interest rate volatility— this causes
concern in a period of rising rates and reduced liquidity.
Key Learnings
As per CBI, a few lessons identified for PPP markets around the world are54: 1. Build
on models that other countries have tried and tested : 2. Develop high-quality,
outcomes-focused public procurement managed by skilled professional staff 3.
Understand the needs and capacity of the market 4. Ensure sustainable deal flows
through managed markets to encourage new providers 5. Use innovation as a means of
delivering service improvements and value for money 6. Create governance
arrangements that are fit for purpose 7. Move towards a competitive neutrality model
that establishes a level playing field for all providers
2.1.1. Financial Public authorities holding limited and insufficient budgets need new
resources and approaches for provision of statutory public services. As the society is
generally against further taxes raising and possibilities of credits are limited, the public
sector needs greater efficiency in the use of public resources. For the public sector, PPP
brings:
Lower implementation costs, despite higher cost of capital for the private
entities.
. Non-financial
Transfer of risks (especially economical risk). As a rule, risk is allocated to the partner
that is better prepared to manage it;
2.2. Benefits of PPP for the private sector 2.2.1. Financial Entrepreneurs seek profit
opportunities in cooperation with the public entities under PPP scheme.
The most positive experience is that we have built 100 km of highway in Istria, despite
building roads by a private investor is unpopular. Bina-Istra is perceived in public as a
serious and desirable partner, which is a huge benefit for us.