7.2 Academic Audit

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

7.

2 Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
• Assessment shall be based on conduct and actions taken in relation to Continuous Improvement (10)
Assessment criteria, frequency, conduct mechanism, action plan, implementation and effectiveness

Assessment shall be based on conduct and actions taken in relation to continuous improvement

 Annual Academic Audit is conducted at the end of every academic year.


 Process adopted for successful implementation of planned activities will be monitored by following:
 Departmental Meetings: In these meetings following items will be taken up.

First Departmental Meeting:


 Subject Allocation,
 Sharing CO/PO/PSO attainments to all faculty during previous semester,
 Departmental Committees constitution,
 Planning of co-curricular activities
 Faculty other responsibilities/ Counsellors allocation
Second Meeting to Fourth Meetings:
 Review of Attendance of Students
 Syllabus Coverage
 Assignments Class Tests
 Review of Student activities
 HoD communicates the feedback of students on faculty and will counsel those faculty with less
feedback.

 Review of Syllabus Coverage by HoD for every fortnight and by Principal for every month.
 Review of course-wise implementation of action plan submitted by previous teachers for better
CO/PO/PSO attainments for every semester.
 Inter departmental academic audit will be done by a committee constituted by Principal at the end of
every academic year.
 Stock verification and monitoring the working condition of all equipment in laboratories by a
committee constituted by Principal at the end of every academic year.
 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC):
At the end of the academic year activities organized by each department will be reviewed by IQAC for
further improvement.
 Result Analysis of both semesters
 Review of feedback on guest lectures/ workshops/ seminars/ industrial Visits/ Industrial
Training/ Internships

 Review of quality of projects done by students

 Review of participation of students in Co-curricular/ Extra-curricular activities


a. Paper Presentations
b. Poster Presentations

c. Project display contests

d. NSS Activities

e. NCC Activities

f. Programs on Ethics

g. Programs on preserving environment/ eco-friendly programs


h. Programs on Communication Skills/ Personality Development

i. Programs on Entrepreneurship Development

j. Participation of students in Cultural Activities

k. Participation of students in Sports & Games


 Review of training/ placements activities and quality of placements
 Review activities for Higher Education/ Career Guidance

 Review of Research Publications by Faculty

 Review of FDPs Organized/ Attended by Faculty

Action taken based on the Academic Audit:

Item Reviewed Action taken


Review of Syllabus Coverage in departmental HoD will allocate additional hours to those faculty
meetings who are lagging in completion of the syllabus.

Review of feedback on guest lectures/ workshops/ This item is discussed in Governing Body (GB) &
seminars/ industrial Visits/ Industrial Training/ Academic Council (AC) and suggestions given by
Internships and review of participation of students in Hon’ble members of GB & AC are implemented to
Co-curricular/ Extra-curricular activities, status is enhance both quantity and quality of the events.
provided in
Review of quality o projects done by students Curricular projects done by the students are evaluated
by project evaluation committee and best projects
(usually two) from each department are nominated as
best and second best projects by considering following
parameters.
 Originality of the work
 Use of latest technologies.

 Usefulness to the society

 Cost involved

 Publication of the work


Review of quality of Placements To improve the quality of placements following
parameters are consider to make continuous efforts to
enhance the performance.
 Highest Package
 Number of students who got highest package

 Average package

 Number of students who got more than


average package

 Number of students who got less than average


package

You might also like