Acyclovir Uv Method
Acyclovir Uv Method
Acyclovir Uv Method
net/publication/256287833
CITATIONS READS
3 1,323
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Fathi Assaleh on 02 June 2014.
ABSTRACT
Analytical method development being a vital part of pre formulation-formulation research and development obviates the need to develop reliable, effective,
eco friendly and cost effective methodologies for routine analysis of active pharmaceutical ingredients. UV spectroscopy is one of the earliest, yet of wide
applications in drug analysis in different stages of formulations and quality control; despite the availabilities of sophisticated chromatographic techniques and
other hyphenated techniques. Current research attempts to develop simple, sensitive, accurate, precise and economical UV spectrophotometric methods for the
routine analysis of acyclovir in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms using two separate alkaline media, 0.1N NaOH (method A) and 0.1N KOH (method B)
and validate them as per ICH guidelines. In both the methods maximum absorbance was observed at 264 nm. Beer’s law was obeyed in the concentration of
2.5-40 µg / mL in method A and 2.5-30 µg / mL in method B with correlation coefficient of 0.999. The % recovery carried out by adding known amount of
standard drug to pre-analyzed tablet solutions was 98.75 ± 0.52 % to 99.78 ± 0.69 % (method A) and 98.55 ± 0.31 % to 99.78 ± 0.22 % (method B). Intra and
interday precision expressed in % RSD were 0.38 ± 0.01 and 0.27 ± 0.02 - 0.44 ± 0.01 respectively and the percent purity was 99.85 ± 0.05 %. The methods
were validated statistically as per ICH guidelines and the results obtained were within the acceptance criteria for the parameters relating to linearity, accuracy,
precision.
Keywords: Acyclovir, dosage forms, UV spectrophotometric, alkaline medium, validation.
NaOH (method A) and 100 mL of 0.1 N KOH (method B) inter day study solutions of same concentration (5 µg / mL)
and further dilutions were made with 0.1 N NaOH and 0.1 N were prepared, analyzed and results presented as % RSD.
KOH in method A and method B respectively. A series of
standard solutions containing 2.5-40 μg / mL of acyclovir Drug Content Estimation in Formulations
were prepared in 0.1 N NaOH and a series of standard ACV content in the marketed formulations was estimated by
solutions containing 2.5-30 μg / mL of acyclovir were this method. Twenty tablets were weighed; the mean weight
prepared in 0.1 N KOH and absorbances were measured at was determined and finely powdered. An accurately weighed
264 nm against reagent blank. Recovery studies were carried tablet powder equivalent to its labeled amount (200, 400 or
out by adding a known quantity of pure drug to the pre- 800 mg) of ACV was transferred into 100 mL volumetric
analyzed formulation and following the same methodology. flask containing either 0.1 N KOH or NaOH and sonicated
Percentage recovery was calculated from the amount of drug for 10 minutes. After achieving complete solubility of the
found. drugs, the volume was made up to the mark using the alkali
solution. The resulting solution was filtered through 0.45 μm
Method Validation membrane filter. From the filtrate, a 5 mL of solution was
Method validation is the process of establishing documented transferred into 10 mL volumetric flask and volume was
evidence to provide a high degree of assurance that a specific made up to mark with alkali solution to obtain the
activity will consistently produce a desired result or product concentration of 25 μg mL-1 ACV which were then subjected
meeting its predetermined specifications and quality to proposed methods and the amount of ACV was determined
characteristics. The analytical method development of ACV using calibration curves using the two developed methods.
in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms was validated in
terms of accuracy, intra and inter day precision, linearity and Recovery Studies
percent recovery13,14. To further validate the accuracy of the method developed,
analytical recovery studies were performed by adding known
Linearity amount of pure drug to pre-analyzed samples of the tablet
Appropriate concentrations of stock solutions were assayed formulations with 2, 10 and 20 µg / mL concentration range.
as per the developed methods. Beer-Lambert’s concentration Percent analytical recovery values were obtained by
ranges were found to be 2.5-40 μg / mL in (method A) and comparison between concentrations obtained from spiked
2.5-30 in (method B). samples against actual added concentrations (2, 10 and 20 µg
/ mL) covering the specified range.
Accuracy
Accuracy was determined by performing recovery studies on RESULTS
marketed formulations (tablets) and for prepared solutions Calculation of percent purity
containing known amount of drug by standard addition A 1 250 50 50
method in which standard drug were added at three different % purity = %1cm
A 100 wt .taken 5 5
concentration levels (80 %, 100 %, 120 %) to pre analyzed
amount present
samples as per ICH guidelines. The recovery studies were % purity = 100
carried out in triplicates at each level. dose of tablet
Precision (intraday and inter day) The percent purity of the drug was found to be 99.85 ± 0.05
Precision was demonstrated by intraday and inter day %. Data for optical characteristics and linearity of ACV are
variation studies. Intraday precision was determined by presented in Table 1 and the calibration curve of ACV for
taking different solutions of same concentration (5 µg / mL) method A and method B in Figure 2. .
and analyzed thrice a day, results indicated by % RSD. In the
Sample No. (%) Conc (µg / mL) Pure drug % Recovery Statistical mean Standard deviation (± SD) % Recovery SD
S1:80 10 6 0.0681 0.0681 1.0 × 10-4 0.15
S2:80 10 6 0.0682
S3:80 10 6 0.0680
S4:100 10 8 0.0821 0.0820 1.5 × 10-4 0.19
S5:100 10 8 0.0822
S6:100 10 8 0.0819
S7:120 10 10 0.0979 0.0977 1.5 × 10-4 0.16
S8:120 10 10 0.0978
S9:120 10 10 0.0976
The values obtained for the determination of acyclovir in cm2 / 0.001 (method A) and 0.01780 μg / cm2 / 0.001 (method
tablet formulations by the proposed method were provided in B) absorbance units showed that the methods was quite
Table 2. To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the sensitive. Method validations followed by statistical analysis
methods known amounts of pure drug was added to were done as per ICH guidelines13,14. The percentage
previously analyzed pharmaceutical preparations and the recovery studies carried out by adding known amount of
mixtures analyzed by proposed method and the percent standard drug to pre-analyzed tablet solutions were 98.75 ±
recoveries are given in Tables 2. Results of validation studies 0.52 % to 99.78 ± 0.69 % (method A) and 98.55 ± 0.31 % to
relating to accuracy, precision (intra- and inter day) are 99.78 ± 0.22 % (method B). Accuracy studies carried out
presented in Tables 3 and 4. For intraday precision studies with different concentrations levels (80, 100 and 120 %)
average of 8 samples were taken with mean value (0.0424 ± showed the percentage recovery SD values of 0.15-0.19 %.
0.02), SD values (1.6 × 10-4) and % RSD (0.38 ± 0.01). The Results of the intra- and interday precision studies expressed
relationship amongst different RSD values i.e. RSD amongst in % RSD were 0.38 ± 0.01 and 0.27 ± 0.02 - 0.44 ± 0.01;
samples and RSD amongst different absorbances are respectively10-14. Thus the developed methods were found
presented in Table 4. sensitive, accurate, precise and reproducible and could be
used for the routine estimations of acyclovir in bulk and
DISCUSSION pharmaceutical formulations. Moreover the methods are very
The purpose of the current research was to develop an simple, use of analytical grade lab reagents makes it more
economical, easy, time saving, reliable UV spectroscopic cost effective, doesn’t require any sample pre treatment or
method for the routine estimation of ACV in bulk and any complicated methods of sample preparation and expected
pharmaceutical formulations. As per the developed methods, to be beneficial in small and large analytical and formulation
Beer’s law was obeyed in the concentration range of 2.5-40 RandDs.
μg / mL in (method A) and 2.5-30.0 μg / mL in (method B)
with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9998 and 0.9996 for ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
methods A and B respectively, indicating a good linearity of The authors are grateful to Torrent Pharmaceutical, Ahmedabad, India for
providing gift samples of acyclovir. The authors are also grateful to Nirmala
the developed methods. Sandell’s sensitivity of 0.01930 μg /
College of Pharmacy, Mangalagiri, Guntur, AP, India for providing electrophoresis with sample stacking. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol
necessary facilities to carry out the research work. Biomed Life Sci 2002; 772(2): 291-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-
0232(02)00116-2
REFERENCES 8. Fernandez M, Sepulveda J, Aranquiz T, Von Plessing C. Technique
1. Roy A, Yohannan D, Lalitha K, Saha RN. Development of rapid UV validation by liquid chromatography for the determination of acyclovir
spectrophotometric methods for estimation of celecoxib and acyclovir in in plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt technol Biomed Life Sci 2003; 791(1-
formulations. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2008; 42(3): 215-21. 2): 357-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00252-6
2. Pant P, Saradhi V, Felice SC, Gurung B, Divya VG, Rao NM. 9. Susantakumar P, Gaur A, Sharma P. Development and validation of LC-
Spectrophotometric determination of acyclovir through oxidative MS/MS method for the estimation of acyclovir in pharmaceutical
coupling of with 2, 2’-Bipyridine by Horsradish peroxidase (HRP). J formulation. Pharmacophore 2011; 2(4): 210-24.
Appl Chem Res 2009; 10: 7-12. 10. Gandhi P, Momin N, Kharade S, Konapure NP, Kuchekar BS.
3. Reddy SA, Chakraborty R, Sen S, Parameshappa B. Spectrophotometric Spectrophotometric estimation of acyclovir in pharmaceutical dosage
determination and validation of Acyclovir. Arch Appl Sci Res 2011; forms. Indian J Pharm Sci 2006; 68(4): 516-17. http://dx.doi.org/
3(1): 328-32. 10.4103/0250-474X.27833
4. Frederick GH. In: Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL (eds.) Goodman and 11. Lakshmi AV. Spectrophotometric method for the estimation of acyclovir
Gilman’s. The Pharmacological basis of Therapeutics, 11thed McGraw in bulk and tablet dosage forms. Int J Biol Pharm Res 2013; 4(1): 23-26.
Hills Medical Publishing Division, New York; 2006. 12. Dongare US, Chemate SZ, Jadhav SA, Pawar VR. Spectrophotometric
5. Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, 6thed, Jaypee determination and validation of acyclovir in tablet dosage form. Int J
Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi; 2008. http://dx. Pharm Tech Res 2012; 4(4): 1840-45.
doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/10282 13. International conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements
6. Caamano MM, Garcia LV, Elorza B, Chantres JR. Improved RPLC for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH Harmonized
determination of acyclovir using hexylamine as silanol masking agent. J Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: text and
Pharm Biomed Anal 1999; 21(3): 619-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 methodology. ICH-Q2(R1)Geneva; 2005.
/S0731-7085(99)00166-1 14. United States Pharmacoepia (USP). 24thed United States
7. Vo HC, Henning PA, Leung DT, Sacks SL. Development and validation Pharmacopoeial Convention Inc., Rockvile, USA; 2000. p. 748a and
of a plasma assay for acyclovir using high performance capillary 2149b.
Website
http://www.jpsionline.com