People v. Castiller
People v. Castiller
People v. Castiller
FACTS:
Adelina Castiller was charged of violation of section 4, Article II of the Dangerous Drugs Act
for sale of illegal drugs. Acting on an information that marijuana was being sold by an old woman -
later identified as Adelina - in a small store in Taguig, police officers organized a buy-bust operation.
Pat. Mendibel acted as the poseur-buyer.
During the operation, Pat. Mendibel went to the store of Adelina and said to her, “La, paiksor
ng dalawang foil”. She handed two foils of marijuana which she gave to Pat. Mendibel. Taking the
marijuana foils, Pat. Mendibel introduced himself as a police officer. Adelina, upon learning that her
"customer" was a police, scampered into the back of her store and locked herself inside even before
Pat. Mendibel could hand over the twenty-peso bill in payment of the foils of marijuana. Pat. Mendibel
gave the pre-arranged signal to get the team’s assistance in arresting Adelina. The police officers
knocked at the door, but appellant refused to open the door. Later, however, she voluntarily
opened the door when the police officers, still knocking, asked permission to be allowed
inside her store.
Once inside, she pointed to a large gray container placed beside some cases of softdrink. They
found a hole at the bottom of the large gray plastic container and stored inside were a plastic
"Ajinomoto" bag containing substances. The police officers seized her things for evidence.
The Regional Trial Court convicted Adelina and found that she was caught in flagrante delicto
delivering marijuana.
ISSUE:
Whether or not it was lawful for the police officers to break into Adelina’s store upon her
arrest
RULING:
Yes. Where the person to be arrested attempts to evade the same, the Rules on Criminal
Procedure allow a peace officer, in order to make a lawful warrantless arrest, to "... break into
any building or enclosure in which the person to be arrested is or is reasonably believed to
be, if he is refused admittance thereto, after he has announced his authority and purpose"
[Section 11, Rule 113, 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure]. In the case at bar, the police officers did
not have to break into the premises since appellant voluntarily allowed the law officer inside the
store. Therefore, the entry by the law enforcers into the store in order to effect appellant's arrest was
perfectly lawful.