3 PDF
3 PDF
3 PDF
Editors
Kathleen Seiders, Boston College
Glenn B. Voss, North Carolina State University
Track Chairs
Jeff Inman, University of Pittsburgh
Cheryl Nakata, University of Illinois at Chicago
K. Sivakumar, Lehigh University
Paul Bloom, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Steve Hoeffler, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Ronald C. Goodstein, Georgetown University
Brian Wansink, University of Illinois
David Henard, North Carolina State University
Mitzi Montoya-Weiss, North Carolina State University
Sandy Jap, Emory University
Rick Andrews, Louisiana State University
Danny Weathers, Louisiana State University
Peter Golder, New York University
Mike Ahearne, University of Connecticut
Eli Jones, University of Houston
Jagdip Singh, Case Western Reserve University
Deepak Sirdeshmukh, North Carolina State University
Linda Ferrell, University of Wyoming
O.C. Ferrell, Colorado State University
Rebecca Slotegraaf, Indiana University
Rosann Spiro, Indiana University
Volume 16
The program reflects the important contributions of the conference reviewers (listed on pp. iv-vii). All
those who submitted papers and special session proposals are to be thanked, as are members of the Academic
Council and AMA journal editors whose leadership in creating the featured Conference Special
Sessions was instrumental.
We are exceedingly grateful to Denise Smart, AMA Academic Council President, for her advice and
support throughout the conference planning process. Also, we acknowledge the significant implementation
efforts of the AMA staff: Nicole Morris, our Program Manager; Charles Chandler; Francesca Van Gorp
Cooley; and Pat Goodrich. Thanks also to Marie Steinhoff for typesetting the proceedings.
With deep appreciation, we thank all contributors for making this a conference that is worthy of our field.
iii
2005 AMA Winter Educators’ Conference List of Reviewers
iv
Sunil Erevelles, University of Xin He, University of Pittsburgh Harold Kassarjian, University of
North Carolina – Charlotte Tim Heath, Miami University California – Los Angeles
Sevgin Eroglu, Georgia State Geraldine R. Henderson, Carol Kaufman-Scarborough,
University University of Texas – Austin Rutgers University
Neil Herndon, University of Patrick Kaufmann, Boston
F Missouri – Columbia
Louise Heslop, Carleton University
University
Erdener Kaynak, Penn State
Lawrence Feick, University of
Janet Hoek, Massey University University
Pittsburgh
Susan Hogan, Emory University Jeremy Kees, University of
Reto Felix, University of
Hartmut Holzmueller, University of Arkansas
Monterrey
Dortmund Stephen Keysuk Kim, Oregon State
Karen Fernandez, University of
Lee Kam Hon, Chinese University University
Auckland
of Hong Kong Adwait Khare, University of
Rosie Ferraro, Duke University
Heather Honea, San Diego State Houston
Linda Ferrell, University of
Mark Houston, University of Jaehwan Kim, University of
Wyoming
Missouri Colorado
Leslie Fine, Ohio State University
Carol Howard, Oklahoma City Noreen Klein, Virginia Tech
Bob Fisher, Western Ontario
University University
Carlos Flavian, Universidad de
Frederick Hoyt, Illinois Wesleyan Thomas Klein, University of
Zaragoza
University Toledo
Thomas Foscht, University of Graz
Yili Huang, University of Illinois – Yu Jun Koernig, University of
Ellen Foxman, Bentley College
Chicago Illinois – Chicago
Dan Freeman, University of
John Hulland, University of Praveen Kopalle, Dartmouth
Delaware
Pittsburgh College
Frank Fu, University of Houston
Mike Hutt, Arizona State Scott Koslow, University of
University Waikato
G Bruce Hutton, University of Robert V. Kozinets, Northwestern
Larry Garber, Appalachian State Denver University
University Michael Hyman, New Mexico Ram Krishnan, California
Nitika Garg, University of State University Polytechnic State University
Mississippi Hyojkin Kwak, Drexel University
Mrinal Ghosh, University of I
Michigan
Subin Im, San Francisco State L
Joan Giese, Washington State
University Dan Ladik, Suffolk University
University
Scott Inks, Ball State University Michel Laroche, Concordia
Mary Gilly, University of
Koert van Ittersum, Georgia University
California – Irvine
Institute of Technology Debra Laverie, Texas Tech
Charlotte Greig, Golden Gate
Vish Iyer, University of Northern University
University
Colorado Ruby Lee, University of Nevada
Andy Grein, City University of
James H. Leigh, Texas A&M
New York
Raj Grewal, Penn State University J University
Tom Leigh, University of Georgia
Stephen J. Grove, Clemson Cheryl Jarvis, Arizona State Katherine Lemon, Boston College
University University Patrick Lentz, University of
Julie Guidry, Texas A&M Rama Jayanti, Cleveland State Dortmund
University University Steven V. LeShay, Wilmington
Devon Johnson, Northeastern College
H University
Chris Joiner, George Mason
Lewis Lim, Indiana University
Charles Lindsey, Indiana
University University
John Hadjimarcou, University of
Marilyn Jones, Bond University Susan Lloyd, American University
Texas – El Paso
Som Hanvanich, Xavier University Terry Loe, Kennesaw State
Angela Hausman, University of K University
Brian Lofman, Ramapo College of
Texas – Pan American Rajiv Kashyap, William Peterson New Jersey
University
v
Ritu Lohtia, Georgia State
University
Venkatapparao Mummalaneni,
Virginia State University
Q
Peggy Sue Loroz, Gonzaga Patrick Murphy, University of William Qualls, University of
University Notre Dame Illinois
Xueming Luo, University of Jim L. Murrow, Drury University
Texas – Arlington R
N Priya Raghubir, University of
M Kent Nakamoto, Virginia Tech California – Berkeley
Doug MacLachlan, University of Om Narasimhan, University of Priyali Rajagopal, Ohio State
Washington Minnesota University
Humaira Mahi, Michigan State Ed Nijssen, University of Nijmegen Deva Rangarajan, Vlerick-Leuven
University Rakesh K. Niraj, University of Gent, Belgium
Alan Malter, University of Arizona South California Peter Rea, Baldwin-Wallace
Elliot Maltz, Willamette University Thomas G. Noordewier, University College
Detelina Marinova, Case Western of Vermont Kristy Reynolds, Louisiana State
Reserve University Patricia Norberg, Quinnipiac University
James Maskulka, Lehigh University Su Bom Rhee, Santa Clara
University University
Greg Rich, Bowling Green State
Charlotte H. Mason, University of
North Carolina
O University
Charla K. Mathwick, Portland State Gillian Oakenfull, Miami Keith Richards, University of
University University Houston
Shashi Matta, University of Matthew P. O’Brien, University of Nora J. Rifon, Michigan State
Southern California Arizona University
Debbie McAlister, Texas State Elie Ofek, Harvard University Ed Rigdon, Georgia State
University – San Marcos Shintaro Okazaki, Universidad University
Michael S. McCarthy, Miami Autónoma de Madrid Aric Rindfleisch, University of
University Ulrich Orth, Oregon State Wisconsin
David Mick, University of Virginia University Deborah E. Rosen, University of
Sam Min, University of South David Ortinau, University of South Rhode Island
Dakota Florida Bill Ross, Penn State University
Vikas Mittal, University of Abhijit Roy, Loyola College
Pittsburgh P Don Roy, Middle Tennessee State
University
Risto Moisio, University of Photis M. Panayides, Cyprus
Nebraska – Lincoln Subroto Roy, University of New
International Institute of Haven
Michael Mokwa, Arizona State Management
University Salvador Ruiz, Universidad de
Veronika Papyrina, University of Murcia
Sangkil Moon, North Carolina Western Ontario
State University Leonard Parsons, Georgia Institute
Bill Moore, University of Utah
David Moore, University of
of Technology S
Vanessa Patrick, University of Joel Saegert, University of Texas
Michigan Southern California
Elizabeth Moore, University of at San Antonio
Joann Peck, University of Jeff Sager, University of North
Notre Dame Wisconsin
Neil Morgan, University of North Texas
Antony Peloso, Arizona State Kare Sandvik, Buskerud University
Carolina University
Rob Morgan, University of Nicola Sauer, University of
Robert Peterson, University of Mannheim
Alabama Texas – Austin
David Mothersbaugh, University of Paul Sauer, Canisius College
Jeffrey Podoshen, Prado Saeed Samiee, University of Tulsa
Alabama Jaideep Prabhu, Imperial College
Susan Mudambi, Temple Sanjit Sengupta, San Francisco
Devashish Pujari, McMaster State University
University University
Paulo H. Muller, University Reshma Shah, Emory University
Ellen Pullins, University of Toledo Tim Silk, University of Florida
Federal do Paraná
vi
Jim Simpson, University of Janet Tinoco, University of Central Rebecca M. Wells, University of
Alabama – Huntsville Florida Dayton
Alina Sorescu, Texas A&M Julie Toner (Schrader), Bellarmine Patricia West, Ohio State
University University University
Jelena Spanjol, Texas A&M Chris White, Michigan State
University
Richard Spreng, Michigan State
U University
Tiffany Barnett White, University
University David Urban, Virginia of Illinois at Urbana
Srinivas Sridharan, University of Commonwealth University Champaign
Western Ontario John Wong, Iowa State University
Raji Srinivasan, University of
Texas – Austin
V Arch Woodside, Boston College
Rajiv Vaidyanathan, University of
Srini Srinivasan, Drexel University
James A. Stephens, Emporia State Minnesota Y
University Raj Venkatesan, University of Attila Yaprak, Wayne State
Rodney L. Stump, Morgan State Connecticut University
University Alladi Venkatesh, University of Jun Ye, Case Western Reserve
Ursula Y. Sullivan, University of California – Irvine University
Illinois Peter Verhoef, Erasmus University Virginia Yonkers, Siena College
Tracy Suter, Oklahoma State Rotterdam Boonghee Yoo, Hofstra University
University Zannie Voss, Duke University Gergana Yordanova, University of
Scott D. Swain, Boston University Pittsburgh
W Cliff Young, University of
Colorado
T Frank Wadsworth, Indiana
University Southeast
Debu Talukdar, University of
Buffalo Kirk Wakefield, Baylor University Z
John F. Tanner, Jr, Baylor Wakiuru Wamwara-Mbugua, Gail Zank, Texas State
University Wright State University University – San Marcos
Kimberly A. Taylor, Florida Florian Wangenheim, University of Allen Zhang, University of Texas –
International University Dortmund San Antonio
Stephen S. Tax, University of Charles Weinberg, University of Zhu Zhen, Babson College
Victoria British Columbia George Zinkhan, University of
Georgia
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF REVIEWERS iv
The Impact of the Type, Frequency, and Quality of Customer Contact on Customer
Satisfaction
Marshall Rice 1
Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Am I What I Consume After All: A Framework for
Ethnicity Based Consumption, a Social Identity Perspective
Tracy R. Harmon 7
viii
Brands in Action: The Role of Brand Placements in Building Consumer-Brand
Identification
Andrew T. Stephen, Leonard V. Coote 28
ix
Perceived Risk and Consumer Innovativeness Hierarchy: An Empirical Study of
Resistance to High Technology Product Adoption
Tanawat Hirunyawipada, Mohammadali Zolfagharian 73
See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil: A Study of Defensive Organizational Behavior
Towards Customer Complaints
Christian Homburg, Andreas Fürst 89
An Examination of IMC at the Tactical Level: Differences Across Time and Product
Type
Stephen J. Grove, Les Carlson, Michael J. Dorsch, Christopher D. Hopkins 98
Assessing the Effects of In-School Point of Purchase and Sampling on the Choice of
a Healthy Food Option
Dafina Rexha, Katherine Mizerski, Richard Mizerski 99
x
Testing Why Adults Purchase Fast Food Cartoon Character Toy Premiums
Claire Lambert, Richard Mizerski 101
Multimarket Contact and the Moderating Role of Dominant Local Players: A Conceptual
Overview
Sweta Chaturvedi Thota 103
GOVERNANCE
It’s All about Learning: What Firms Can Learn from Consumer Pioneers
Yun Ye 118
Will Consumers Prefer Global or Local Brands? The Role of Identity Accessibility in
Consumer Preference for Global Versus Local Brands
Yinlong Zhang, Lawrence Feick, Vikas Mittal 125
xi
ENCOURAGING YOUNG PEOPLE TO BEHAVE BETTER
Beyond Just Being There: An Examination of the Impact of Attitudes, Materialism, and
Self-Esteem on the Quality of Helping Behavior in Youth Volunteers
Elten Briggs, Tim Landry, Charles Wood, Todd Arnold 130
M.E.A.L. Time: How Nutritional Disclosure Affects Gender Evaluations of Fast Food
Menu Items
Kenneth W. Bates, Kyle A. Huggins 134
INNOVATION ADOPTION
Income Elasticity of Household’s Demand for Communication and its Products: Global
Measurement and its Marketing Implications
Min Lu, Yanbin Tu 148
Influences on What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know Regarding
the Persuasive Aspects of Pricing-Related Selling Tactics
Jay P. Carlson, William O. Bearden, David M. Hardesty 157
xii
Where’s the Affect? An Investigation of the Effect of Three Advertising Scales on
Attitude to the Ad
Arjun Chaudhuri 161
CONSUMPTION OF SERVICES
xiii
STRATEGIC ISSUES IN ELECTRONIC MARKETING
xiv
IMPROVING SALESPERSON PERFORMANCE THROUGH NEW SKILLS AND
TECHNOLOGY
Interaction Between the Salesperson and Customer: A Framework for Improving the
Sales Outcome
Elizabeth Hemphill, Chris Dubelaar, Steven Goodman, Gus Geursen 242
Not All Deals Are Created Equal: Two Different Roles of Sales Promotion
Dongwoo Shin, James H. Leigh 256
Predicting Usage Level and Upgrading Behavior of Service Customers: A Model for
Lifetime Value Estimation at Early Relationship Stages
Florian V. Wangenheim 268
The Impact of Perceived Language Status on Product and Service Quality Expectations
Melissa Maier Bishop 270
xv
CREATING SUCCESS WITH SOFT ASSETS
RELATIONSHIP STRUCTURE
xvi
THE IMPACT OF THE TYPE, FREQUENCY, AND QUALITY OF
CUSTOMER CONTACT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Marshall Rice, York University, Toronto
TABLE 1
Classification of Types of Contact
2. Received Information about the company/ 14 contact points: such as reading online reviews
the company Products about products, company Products seeing print ads,
meeting a sales representative, receiving direct mail,
etc.
3. Initiated Contact with the company 13 contact points: such as contacting the company by
telephone, e-mail communication, contacting support,
etc.
7. Planned and Deployed corporate solutions 6 contact points: such as using company products,
upgrading a product/service, etc.
TABLE 2
Categories of Frequency of Contact
TABLE 3
Impact on Satisfaction based on Frequency of Contact
TABLE 4
HSAT and NSAT by Frequency of Contact
X2 shows significant differences between all groups: (X2 = 119.4 p. < .001)
TABLE 5
Change in Overall Satisfaction With the Company By Type of Contact
TABLE 6
Regression Results
tions should consider putting more resources into improv- overall company satisfaction. However, while the number
ing the quality of contact rather than increasing the total of contacts is clearly important more impact is seen by
number of contacts. increasing the quality of each contact.
This framework does not seek to underscore the role Based upon the current research trends in consumer
of consumption in the construction of a socially based acculturation and the lack of fit of acculturation to micro-
ethnic identity, but examines the role of a socially based cultures within a nation, as well as within an ethnic group,
ethnic identity as an antecedent to the act of consumption. a framework is presented that expands the study of con-
Attempts to assimilate the ethnic self into a one-dimen- sumer buyer behavior. This lack of fit leads to an impor-
sional “melting-pot” ideology fail to address the complex- tant question relevant to marketing: Does the degree of
ities of personal and social identities among diverse pop- ethnic identity affect consumption practices? The frame-
ulations. Thus, the primary assumptions are (1) ethnic work suggests consumption practices are moderated by
identity precedes consumer consumption, (2) as the the degree of ethnic identity formation. The framework
strength of ethnic identity changes, so does consumption includes taking into the consideration the core self, iden-
practices, and (3) ethnicity based consumption does not tifying the strength of a consumer’s ethnic identity using
aid in the construction of a socially-based ethnic identity. Phinney’s (1989) key dimensions which are influenced
This research proposes that the strength of ethnic identi- by socialization processes, and determining whether pur-
fication displayed by consumers is the focal construct of chase decisions vary by degree of ethnic identification
interest during the investigation of ethnicity based con- during the consumption process. The proposed frame-
sumption practices. The proposed study will relate the work considers the collective nature of ethnic identifica-
four components of ethnicity (1) ethnic awareness, (2) tion, which considers the elements of the self, motive,
ethnic self-identification, (3) ethnic attitudes, and (4) ethnicity, and factors of socialization. These four compo-
ethnic behaviors (Phinney 1990) to consumption practic- nents capture the core of the individual while accommo-
es. We expect the differences to be moderated by the dating the situational and contextual factors of intersect-
degree of formation of an ethnically based social identity. ing identities. The proposed framework is divided into
two distinct halves, which capture the core ethnic self, and
Social cognition is one of the prevailing perspectives the apparent ethnic self.
in social psychology which provides the theoretical foun-
dations of conventional conceptions of identity. The as- After consideration of the core ethnic self and the
sumptions which underlie social cognitive theories of apparent ethnic self, which is influenced by social interac-
Consumers may engage in word-of-mouth for a num- A survey was conducted on a convenience sample of
ber of intrinsic reasons. Word-of-mouth among consum- 228 total respondents from two universities in Australia.
ers is also affected by other external factors. The influence Each respondent was given a questionnaire comprising a
of culture appears to be the most important external number of items on issues relating to their cultural values
factors, particularly in the context of international market- and word-of-mouth behavior. These items were measured
ing. While there are many studies on the impact of culture on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5
on marketing, very few examined the effect of culture on (strongly agree). The data was subjected to confirmatory
consumers’ word-of-mouth communication. This study factor analysis (CFA) and fitted to a structural equation
attempts to examine whether and how culture can influ- model with AMOS 6.0. The results gave strong support to
ence consumers’ word-of-mouth behavior. In particular, the influence of masculinity and power distance cultural
special attention will be given to distinguish word-of- dimensions on individuals’ word-of-mouth behavior. The
mouth communication with people of strong ties (defined influence of masculinity on out-group word-of-mouth
as in-group) from communication with people of weaker was significant and positive. Individuals high in mascu-
ties (defined as out-group). Consequently, this article linity are expected to be more assertive and aggressive in
provides both theoretical and empirical contribution to the their approach to communication. As such, they are more
word-of-mouth literature. Ultimately, it is the intention of likely to exchange product information with weaker ties
the authors to help companies to identify markets or such as out-groups. The results of this study have sup-
societies that may be more receptive to word-of-mouth ported this hypothesis. In addition, power distance has
marketing. significant positive influence on in-group word-of-mouth
and negative influence on out-group word-of-mouth. In-
The reasons why one engages in word-of-mouth have dividuals with high power distance are more likely to
been extensively researched for about 40 years. Word-of- engage in word-of-mouth within their in-groups than with
mouth activity has been shown to influence a variety of their out-groups. Those with low power distance are more
consumer conditions, from awareness, expectations, per- likely to feel less inhibited and, as such, will more likely
ceptions, attitudes, behavioral intentions to actual behav- engage in out-group word-of-mouth. These phenomena
iors. Past research found that consumers engaged in word- were observed in this current study. However, the study
of-mouth mainly for altruistic, product involvement, and did not find any evidence of influence of individualism on
self-enhancement reasons. The frequency and intensity of either in-group or out-group word-of-mouth. At the same
word-of-mouth may also depend on situations, service time, contrary to expectations, uncertainty avoidance ap-
quality, types of products and markets, social networks, peared to have little impact on both in-group and out-
social class, individual personality, and culture of the group word-of-mouth.
From the findings, the paper puts forward some basic Secondly, based on literature-derived descriptions
normative guidelines and in the process, reveals that and in-depth face-to-face interview, the managerial deci-
services pursue two key positioning aims (profit and sions and activities were operationalized leading to the
market share; profit and status) and two main positioning following normative guidelines.
TABLE 1
Summary of Application of the Comprehensive Strategic Positioning Model
Charge Card: Profit and Status Symbolic Membership Top of the Range
Amex and The Brand Name
Store Card: Profit and Status Functional Fortification Service, Value for Money,
M&S and The Brand Name
Debit Card: Profit and Market Functional Fortification The Brand Name
Switch Share
FIGURE 1
The Research Framework with Hypothesized Relationships and Structural Model Coefficients
Feedback
H1 (0.414*)
Autonomy
H2
H7 (0.12*) Organizational
Commitment
Participation H3 (0.19*)
Role
Role Service
clarity
Clarity H9 (0.226*) Quality
H4 H8 (0.652*)
Supervisory
H4
Consideration H6 (0.295*)
Job H11
Satisfaction
H5 (0.12*)
Team
Support
Several researchers have examined the need for cross- In the spring of 2004, a “Status of Cross-Functional
functional integration in the business school curriculum Business Education in the United States” survey was sent
(e.g., Alden et al. 1991; DeMoranville, Aurand, and to marketing department chairs at colleges and universi-
Gordon 2000; Schelfhaudt and Crittenden 2005). Based ties across the United States. The purpose of the survey
on these research findings, there are two major reasons for was to benchmark the state of cross-functional under-
integration within the business school program: graduate marketing education by addressing the three
major research questions identified above. The survey
1. Cross-functional integration is the norm in business, resulted in a 15 percent response rate, slightly below the
resulting in increased interdepartmental communica- 18 to 57 percent response rates found in previous studies
TABLE 1
Factorial Analysis of Variance Significance Levels
Criterion
a
Arc sine transformed
b
Fisher’s r to z transformed
TABLE 2
Mean Criterion Values
H1 and H2 were supported, H3 was not supported. H4 and H5 were not supported, H6 was supported.
John R. Dickinson
Odette School of Business
University of Windsor
Windsor, Ontario
Canada N9B 3P4
Phone: 519.243.4232, Ext. 3104
E-Mail: bjd@uwindsor.ca
In this study we build a system dynamics model in the The model is run under a symmetric setting where all
context of horizontal learning alliances (Figure 1). The parameters are set the same for the two firms and an
dyadic model captures the two partner firms’ learning, asymmetric setting where some parameters are set differ-
increase in competitive advantage, dependence and will- ent for the two firms. The simulation results confirm that
ingness to continue the partnership, with “willingness to when the force of competition overweighs the force of
continue the partnership” directly related to the stability of cooperation, the propensity of instability is increased.
an alliance. The model is symmetric between firm A and Further, when two firms are perfectly symmetric in learn-
B. For both firms, private learning increases individual ing capability, partner knowledge and intent of appropria-
firm’s competitive advantage, while collective learning tion, the partnership is highly stable, while asymmetry in
increases the joint competitive advantage, which is shared these characteristics increases the propensity of instabil-
by the two firms; dependence increases with investment in ity.
the partnership and unavailability of alternative partners;
The goal of this research is to propose and test a scale Customer delight can be defined as “an emotion,
that is suitable to measure the dimensions that compose characterized by high levels of joy and surprise, felt by a
the customer delight construct, as well as its behavioral customer towards a company or its offering (product/
consequences. Aiming that, three studies were used to service)” (Kumar 1996, p. 9). Thus, customer delight is
prove the existence of content and construct validity for defined as a rather positive emotional state towards the
the proposed dimensions. purchase/consumption experience, generally derived from
the surprisingly positive disconfirmation level of per-
INTRODUCTION ceived performance (Oliver et al. 1997; Rust and Oliver
2000). Delight would be characterized as an emotion
Regardless of the great number of academic re- made up of cognitive and affective aspects, including here
searches giving prominence to customer satisfaction, the surprise (Kumar 1996). In this sense, Izard (1997) clari-
understanding of what happens to the customer when he/ fies that even the cognitive concepts inherent in satisfac-
she experiences something beyond satisfaction during the tion and, consequently, in customer delight – such as need
post-consumption experience is still incipient. Going be- and desire –, and its comparative standards are considered
yond satisfaction engenders a deeply positive emotional affective by nature or, at least, as having an affective
state regarding the experience of buying or consuming, component.
which is known as customer delight. Considering this
scenario, this paper attempts to contribute to the Con- Notwithstanding the fact that a delighted customer
sumer Behavior literature by proposing a scale that is an should be at first satisfied, delight cannot be mistaken for
attempt to comprehend and measure the dimensions that mere satisfaction. The differentiation basically occurs at
compose the customer delight construct, as well as its an arousal level of the positive emotional response: at a
behavioral consequences, and which is also suited to low level there lies satisfaction; at a high level, delight
evaluate different cases of buying or consuming experi- (Oliver and Westbrook 1993). In this sense, previous
ences. studies also determined that pleasure and arousal are part
of intrinsic characteristics of either the goods or the
With this in mind an exploratory/qualitative research services experiences. Therefore, both dimensions are
was carried out, trying to understand the construct and viewed as complementary in the delight formation, con-
generate items for the construction of a measurement sidering that pleasure by itself is regarded as a positive
scale. Subsequently, a quantitative/descriptive research affect of moderate arousal (Mano and Oliver 1993).
was conducted through three studies: the first two aimed
at the fine-tuning of the measures by successively apply- Other evidence on the differentiation between satis-
ing the scale to distinctive samples; the third also aimed at faction and delight can be found in the studies of Oliver
the validation of the scale through the criteria of model and Westbrook (1993). These studies showed that cus-
adjustment, unidimensionality, reliability, convergent, and tomers who experience high levels of joy and surprise
discriminant validity properly attributed to the instru- presented greater indexes of repurchase intention and a
ment. The content validity was a permanent concern high degree of expectations disconfirmation. Therefore,
during the study. the authors empirically confirmed the existence of a
delight state separated from satisfaction. Kumar (1996)
Furthermore, this study consists of a theoretical re- also attributed discriminant validity to the constructs and
view of the aspects that involve customer delight and the concluded that the effects of delight on the repurchase
description of the methodological procedures used in intentions of individuals are higher and go beyond those
field research. The explanation regarding the analyses of satisfaction. In this sense, it can be observed that the
performed and results found has the purpose of describing differentiation between satisfaction and delight is not
the research findings as a whole, giving a basis for the present just at the level of surprisingly positive
discussion that encloses the study. disconfirmation experienced, but also at the level of the
THE DELIGHT SCALE DEVELOPMENT Thus, the scale observed in Table 2 is the one pre-
PROCESS – THIRD STUDY sented for validation, being composed of 23 items, di-
vided into five factors. The dimensions that compose
The third sampling pointed to a factorial structure customer delight and its behavioral consequences are
composed of six dimensions, responsible for a total vari- described below, along with their respective Cronbach’s
ance explained of 64.52 percent and a KMO measure Alpha values: Factor1 – Affective Aspects Dimension
value of 0.874. For the results analysis, the EFA was (0.9179); Factor 2 – Cognitive Aspects Dimension
initially conducted and its results were compared to those (0.8497); Factor 3 – Post-consumption Evaluation Di-
from the internal consistency and item-item/item-total mension (0.7735); Factor 4 – Positive Surprise Dimen-
correlation analysis, running all the procedures again each sion (0.7725) and Factor 5 – Personalization Dimension
time a variable was removed. Thus, at the end of all (0.7830). As a result, the validation process of the pro-
analyses employed, the rejection of the following items posed scale is demonstrated below.
was performed: V40, V35, V17, V34, V13, and V16.
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis with VARIMAX Rotation Source: Data Collection
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure (KMO): 0.862 Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity 1911.087 – sig. = 0.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis with VARIMAX Rotation Source: Data Collection
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure (KMO): 0.887 Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity: 3105.668 – sig.= 0.000
Note: Although the load of V28 is rather low, it was decided that this variable should be maintained, since otherwise
we would have a factor with only two variables, which is not recommended in the validation process. Furthermore,
this three-item factor had already been proposed and validated by Izard (1977), as well as used in many studies before
this one, proving its reliability.
RESULTS OF THE DELIGHT SCALE 1991; Garver and Mentzer 1999; Jöreskog and Sörbom
VALIDITION PROCESS 1982; Steenkamp and Trijp 1991). In these circumstances,
these authors recommend the necessary procedures to
Since the content validity was already achieved achieve construct validity as unidimensionality, reliabil-
through the methodological accuracy employed in the ity, convergent and discriminant validity, besides the
development phases and in the scale fine-tuning, clearly measurement models adjustment criterion. Table 3 shows
specified in the study method, with the aim of verifying the CFA results for the five-scale dimensions.
the construct validity, the five-scale dimensions were
submitted as five different measurement models to the Analyzing the fit-indexes, one can detect that most of
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). This method is widely the measures are satisfactory. The χ2/df for the personal-
applied in marketing studies, as well as correlated fields, ization dimension is higher than expected, but the prob-
in the search for the construct validity (Bagozzi et al. ability of the qui-square being influenced by the sample
χ2)
Chi-square (χ 59.145 8.534 4.745 6.285 6.980
Degrees of freedom (GL) 33 4 1 2 1
χ2/GL)
Chi-square/degrees of freedom (χ 1.792 2.134 4.745 3.124 6.980
Goodness-of-fit Index (GFI) 0.952 0.985 0.986 0.983 0.971
Adjusted Goodness-of-fit Index (AGFI) 0.919 0.944 0.917 0.950 0.913
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 0.976 0.975 0.964 0.976 0.945
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 0.983 0.990 0.988 0.984 0.945
Root Mean Square Error of
Approximation (RMSEA) 0.059 0.070 0.127 0.096 0.161
size is well known and discussed in the literature (Hair an average variance extracted (AVE) over 0.5. By analyz-
et al. 1998; Kline 1998). Therefore, Raykov and ing the reliability of the five dimensions, we could affirm
Marcoulides (2000) recommend that other fit-indexes that all the measurement models are reliable. Thus, the
should be analyzed, so that a real idea on the model affective dimension presented CR = 0.9749 and AVE =
adjustment can be reached. 0.6880, the cognitive dimension presented CR = 0.9609
and AVE = 0.6296, the post-consumption evaluation
When analyzing the measures of the indexes GFI, dimension presented CR = 0.9672 and AVE = 0.6887, the
AGFI, TLI, and CFI, it can be noted that their values were positive surprise dimension presented CR = 0.9695 and
always higher than 0.90, which is in agreement with the AVE = 0.7121, and the personalization dimension pre-
recommendations of Hair et al. (1998) and Kline (1998). sented CR = 0.9648 and AVE = 0.6406.
The adjustment measure RSMEA possesses acceptable
values ranging between 0.05 and 0.08 (Hair et al. 1998). For Garver and Mentzer (1999) and Bagozzi et al.
Analyzing the data mentioned in Table 3, one can observe (1991), the convergent validity of a scale is given by the
that the dimensions of post-purchase evaluation, positive quality of its fit-indexes. Besides all the scale dimensions
surprise and personalization presented values that ex- having been validated through the examination of their
ceeded the acceptability for the referred index. According fit-indexes, the factor regression coefficients were also
to Raykov and Marcoudiles (2000), this index shares the verified to certify the convergent validity. All the factor
same theoretical nature of the CFI. Thus, due to the high regression coefficients were statistically significant, which,
values of the CFI obtained in the analysed dimensions, according to Bagozzi et al. (1991), means that t-values are
these measures were considered validated as well. higher than |2,00| for p < 0.05 (7.86 was the lowest t-value
found in the study). As a strong condition for convergent
After presenting the criteria that led to the conclusion validity, Steenkamp and Trijp (1991) suggest that all the
that all the dimensions of the proposed scale are fit and factor regression coefficients should exceed 0.5. This
validated, unidimensionality was pursued and achieved condition was also achieved, since 0.591 was the lowest
through the examination of standardized residues pro- value found.
posed by Garver and Mentzer (1999), Jöreskog and Sörbom
(1988), and Steenkamp and Trijp (1991). According to the As a final procedure, so as to infer construct validity,
authors, in order to present unidimensionality, a dimen- the discriminant validity was verified through the method
sion should have all its standardized residuals lower than proposed by Fornell and Larcker (1981). This method
2.58. The highest standardized residual score found in the proposes that the average variance extracted for each
study was 2.049 in the personalization dimension, there- dimension should be higher than the squared correlation
fore, all dimensions may be considered unidimensional. between this dimension and any other dimension, which
characterizes the shared variance. For the studied con-
According to Garver and Mentzer (1999) a reliable struct – customer delight and its behavioral consequences –
measurement model – in this case a reliable dimension – discriminant validity was detected among the dimensions.
should present a composite reliability (CR) over 0.7 and This can be observed by the values of the average variance
FIGURE 1
Buyer-Seller Mismatches
Seller Exchange
Paradigm
Transactional
TABLE 1
The Concept of Mismatches in Relationship Literature
1. Mismatch of Exchange Orientation – Seller’s Exchange Orientation vs. Buyer's Exchange Orientation – Gronoos 1997; Pels, Coviello, and Brodie 2000
– Seller’s Offer and Buyer's Need
2. Mismatch of Desire for Relationship – Seller’s Motivation for Relationship vs. Buyer's Motivation for Relationship – Barnes 1997; Day 1994;Garbarino and Johnson 1999;
Sollner 1999
3. Mismatch of Relationship Values – Seller’s Values vs. Buyer’s Values – Gassenheimer, Houston, and DAvis 1998
4. Behavioral or Social Mismatch – Seller’s Relationship Investment vs. Buyer’s Relationship Investment – Krapfel, Salmond, and Spekman 1991
Leading to Relationship Failure – Seller’s Time Orientation vs. Buyer's Time Orientation – Garbarino and Johnson 1999
– Seller’s Collaborative Orientation vs. Buyer’s Collaborative Orientation – Garbarino and Johnson 1999
– Seller’s Level of Dependence vs. Buyer’s Level of Dependence – Gundlach and Cadotte 1994; Keep, Hollander, and
Dickinson 1998; Kumar, Scheer, and Steenkamp 1995
– Seller’s Level of Trust vs. Buyer’s Level of Trust – Kumar, Scheer, and Steenkamp 1996; Sirdeshmulch,
Sinah, and Sabol 2002
– Seller’s Levelof Information Sharing vs. Buyer’s Level of Information Sharing – Keep, Hollander, and Dickinson 1998
5. Mismatch of Marketing Tools – Seller’s Marketing Tools vs. Buyer’s Exchange Orientation – Jackson 1985
6. Unexpected Costs Leading to – Seller’s Expectations vs. Relationships Ability to Meet Financial Goals – Cannon and Homburg 2001; Cannon and Narayandas
Relationship Failure 2000; Dwyer, Schurr, and Oh 1987; Gummeon 1997;
Jackson 1985
7. Relationship Disfunctions – Buyer Seller Expectations vs. Inherent Drawbacks of relationships – Wilkinson and Young 1998; Hakansson and
Senhota 1995; Colgate and Danaher 2000; Walter,
Ritter, and Gurmenden 2001
8. Prerequisites for Relational Strategy – Seller Expectations vs. Actual Readiness for Relationship Strategy – Berry 1995; Bitner 1995; Colgate and Danaher 2000;
Gordon McKeage, and Fox 1998; Gronroos 1995;
Payne and Ballantyne 1991; Pine, Peppers, and
Rogers 1995; Sheth and Parvatiyar 1995
50
to mismatches (Table 1). As such, the following serves as (Sheth and Parvatiyar 2000). These goals play an active
an initial definition for buyer-seller mismatches: role in shaping relationship needs. When buyers and
sellers have incompatible relationship goals, they result in
Buyer-Seller mismatches are composed of active or mismatches.
latent differences in parties’ perceived needs and wants
from a business relationship, as shaped by situational Reflected in Incompatible Interfirm Relations
factors and dissimilar goals, that are ultimately reflected
in incompatible interfirm relations. Borrowing from the Nordic school of relationship
theory, mismatches are reflected in ongoing interaction
Variety of Mismatches: Inherent in this conceptual- between buyers and sellers (Gronroos 1997). Mismatches
ization is the idea that a variety of mismatches can occur become manifest in actions that buyers and sellers take or
in relationships. Business relationships can be complex fail to take towards each other, resulting in an unsatisfied
because a range of exchanges may take place. This com- need or want across a particular relationship dimension.
plexity allows for multiple layers of interaction across These differences can be assessed at a high level (like in
product/service exchanges, partnership investments (Rok- previous research) as one firm’s general desire for rela-
kan, Heide, and Wathne 2003), information exchange tional dealings versus the other party’s general desire for
(Anderson and Weitz 1992), social norms (Cannon, Ach- transactional dealings (see Figure 1). It is suggested here,
rol, and Gundlach 2000), operational linkages, and many however, that desired needs and wants from the relation-
others. So, while an overall mismatch of transactional ship drive the exchange orientation. Thus, mismatched
versus relational exchange orientations might exist, a exchange orientations serve as a proxy for a variety of
variety of mismatches can occur that may or may not underlying mismatched needs and wants. Ultimately,
significantly impact the relationship as a whole. This mismatches become salient, take shape, and result in
represents a departure from previous notions of a solitary incompatible dealings.
overarching match or mismatch.
To illustrate, buyers can be confronted with a seller
Perceived Needs and Wants who constantly attempts to raise the bar on the commit-
ment of the relationship, when in fact, the buyer senses no
Consistent with theory applied to relationships (e.g. return on this investment. While this seller might see
resource dependence, TCA, social exchange), parties potential growth in getting “deeper” into the customer
enter relationships with the expectation that doing so will relationship, they are met with buyer apathy. Alterna-
be rewarding (Berry and Parasuraman 1991). Buyers and tively, buyers can be frustrated in relationships where they
sellers pursue a range of needs and wants from the other continually vie for attention from a seller who is “busy
party. Within the context of mismatches, buyers and with other opportunities.” These differences in perceived
sellers can strive for needs that the other party is ultimately needs and wants are played out and result in mismatches.
unable or unwilling to provide. Mismatched needs can To further explore the connection between mismatched
occur across (1) homogenous relationship dimensions needs and wants within exchange orientations, the follow-
(i.e., common to both parties) or (2) heterogeneous rela- ing discusses buyer-seller tradeoffs associated with trans-
tionship dimensions, such as supplier dependability in actional and relational dealings.
exchange for an exclusive relationship. Finally, research
suggests that desired needs and wants can be latent or BUYER-SELLER EXCHANGE TRADEOFFS
active as the situations change (Gronroos 1997).
Organizations, for the most part, make intentional
Shaped by Situations and Goals decisions to establish relationships and have particular
goals in mind (Oliver 1990). Furthermore, they do so in
Several authors acknowledge that relationship theory ways that maximize rewards from these relationships
has been generally insensitive to situational factors that (Frazier 1983). Many have explored various goals and
shape relationships (Coviello et al. 2002). Mismatches tradeoffs for suppliers and customers arising from a
provide a framework for including them. For example, a transactional or relational exchange. For example, many
multitude of situational conditions in the macro and task posit that relationship strategies can lead to competitive
environment and firm characteristics can shape buyer- advantage (Day 2000), yet others suggest maintaining
seller mismatches such as: environmental factors (Keep, close relationships can also prove very costly (Sharma
Hollander, and Dickinson 1998), product-market charac- and Tzokas 1999). An integrated review of these benefits
teristics (Crosby and Evans 1990), firm strategy (Wilson and sacrifices as they map to both a transactional and
2000), and risk orientation. Relationship goals also shape relational orientation is presented in Table 2. It is sug-
buyer-seller needs and wants. Firms enter relationships gested that understanding these factors presents insight
for the purpose of fulfilling strategic goals like entering into why buyers and sellers might pursue incompatible
new markets and serving customer needs to name a few needs and wants from relationships.
TABLE 2
Buyer-Seller Exchange Tradeoffs
* Avoidance of High Service Costs, Investments, Adaptation n,o,t,v,aa,ac Cost Reduction through Synergies p,r,u,ac,ag
Avoidance of Overdependence, Relationship Burdens p,r,ae Customer Learning p,ag
Greater Ability to Focus on Acquiring New Customers j,i * Customer Retention, Satisfaction, Loyalty c,k,n,x,y,ac,ah
Less Hassle / Low Commitment j,o,aa Optimized Focus of Resources, Retention j,i.ag
Leads to Economies of Scale s
* Leads to Opportunities for Competitive Advantage j,u,ad,ai
Greater Price Stability p,ac
Risk Reduction / Higher Leverage with Buyers ae
Sales / Profitability Outcomes j,ac,af
a amihud 1976 k Garbarino and Johnson 1999 u Krapfel, Salmond, and Spekman 1991 ne Sollner 1999
b Anderson 1995 l Gasseheimer, Houston, and Davis 1998 v LaBahn and Krapfel 2000 af Spekman 1988
c Berry and Parasuraman 1991 m Billiland and BEllo 2002 w Lambert, Emmelhainz, and Gardner 2000 ag Sriram, Krapfel, and Spekman 1992
d Bitner, Gwinner, and Gremler 1998 n Golicic, Foggin, and Mentzner 2003 x Leuthesser and Kohli 1995 ah Webster 1992
e Brennan and Turnbull 1999 o Gronroos 1997 y Morgan and Hunt 1994 ai Weitz and Jap 2000
f Burnham, Frels, and Mahajan 2003 p Han and Wilson 1993 z Noordeweier, John, and Nevin 1990 aj Williamson 1985
g Cannon and Homburg 2001 q Helper and Levine 1992 aa Pels, Coviello, and Brodie 2000
h Cannon and Narayandas 2000 r Kalwani and Narayandas 1995 ab Sharma and Grewal 1995
i Child and Dennis 1995 s Keep, Hollander, Dickinson 1998 ac Sharma and Tzokas 1999
j Day 2000 t Krapfel 1991 ad Sheth and Sharma 1997
52
A MODEL OF BUYER-SELLER MISMATCHES An economic mismatch could include conflict over
preferred discounts or length of contract. A social
Given the newness of the concepts presented in this mismatch might arise from asymmetrical levels of
paper, the model (Figure 2) is a framework to guide theory trust. Form also explains whether the mismatch oc-
development and testing of buyer-seller mismatches. curs across a homogenous relationship dimension
(e.g., frequency of interaction) or a heterogeneous
Situational Conditions one (e.g., buyer’s need for reliability vs. seller’s push
for exclusivity).
The model assumes a context shaped by situational
conditions that emanate from the macro and task environ- 2. Salience: This refers to whether the mismatch is
ment, as well as both party’s characteristics. This eleva- latent or active for either party.
tion of situational conditions lends greater understanding
to the types of relationships that can feasibly form in a 3. Priority: Mismatches relative to goals, needs, and
given context. Conditions act to motivate, as well con- wants can be assigned a certain priority, which could
strain relationship development due to incentives and be perceived differently by the parties. A high prior-
deterrents arising from the context. In the model, situa- ity mismatch could be a shift in strategic direction that
tions shape buyer-seller goals, needs and wants from significantly alters the relationship structure. A low
relationships; mismatches that take place; comparison priority mismatch might be a personality conflict
level of alternatives; and resulting outcomes. between two boundary personnel.
Buyer and Seller Relationship Goals, Needs, and Wants 4. Extensiveness: The extensiveness of a mismatch
describes the degree to which incompatibilities exist
These components shape what is sought in a relation- at an individual level or organization. A seller may
ship and are where mismatches of needs and wants occur. determine that a blocked need for closer interaction
A disproportionate focus in the literature has discussed within a customer’s firm is localized around a par-
buyer needs and wants from a relationship, however, it is ticular gatekeeper. Buyers might see the overall seller’s
asserted that inclusion of seller’s needs and wants pro- offer (organization) falling short of its needs.
vides a more holistic picture.
5. Magnitude: Mismatches take on relative magnitudes
Buyer and Seller Exchange Orientations based on the perceived gap size.
The assumption here is that exchange orientations 6. Temporal Nature: Parties to a relationship may learn
arise out of need structures (Pels, Coviello, and Brodie to cope with certain mismatches over a long period of
2000). Changes in need structure might drive changes in time, while others require immediate action.
exchange orientation. If a seller sees a need to retain a
customer whose past interaction has remained arm’s length, Perceived Mismatches and Comparison Level of Al-
that seller might begin utilizing relationship tactics, thus ternatives (CL alt)
altering the exchange orientation. A buyer who desires
“less hassle” in a relationship might enact a transactional The model proposes two basic outcomes of mis-
orientation to ward off unnecessary use of time. Thus, it is matches. First, it suggests that, parties perceive mis-
suggested firms do not adopt some degree of transactional matches relative to their situation, goals, needs, and wants.
or relational orientation for its own sake. Rather, orienta- Second, they judge these mismatches against a compari-
tions arise as a perceived means for achieving desired son level of alternatives, hereafter CL alt (Thibaut and
needs and wants from the relationship. Kelly 1959). A significant stream of research has used the
concept of CL alt to study relationships (Wilson 2000),
Buyer-Seller Mismatches i.e., parties continually evaluate outcomes against desired
needs and wants. CL alt is the lowest level of outcomes
When considering the host of mismatches that can that a party will accept in light of other available alterna-
occur within a relationship, understanding their traits adds tives. This standard serves as the deciding factor for
insight towards classification of the phenomenon. The whether the party will cope with the outcomes or seek
following traits within the model are considered an initial alternatives (Thibaut and Kelley 1959).
set of aspects to define a mismatch. It is not assumed that
this list is exhaustive, as further inquiry will likely refine CONCLUSIONS
and/or add to this set.
Given the instability of many relationships, research
1. Form: Mismatches can take different forms. A simple recommends buyers and sellers move toward plural ap-
typology might include economic and social needs. proaches that blend relational and transactional strategies.
FIGURE 2
Buyer-Seller Mismatch and Mismatch Outcomes
Set of Buyer-Seller
Mismatches
Form
Salience
Buyer Seller
Priority
Goals, Needs, and Wants Goals, Needs, and Wants
Extensiveness
from Relationship Magnitude from Relationship
Temporal Nature
No No
Coping/Maintain Coping/Maintain
In a recent study, Balabanis and Diamantopoulos In general, it seems that preference rankings can be
(2004) identify a number of weaknesses of prior research better explained by the combination of demographic
linking CE to DCB. First, earlier research had typically variables and CE for Germany than for Britain. The
been restricted to one product category, thereby not allow- highest R 2 -value in the study by Balabanis and
ing researchers to investigate potential variation of DCB Diamantopoulos (2004) is .14 (Cars/Britain), while the
across product categories. Second, previous studies had highest explained variation in the present study is .18
focused on a very limited number of countries of origin (Shoes/Germany). Taken together, the fact that the high-
(COO) of the researched product categories, which in turn est R2-value in both studies is obtained for the home
prevented findings regarding varying degrees of DCB for country suggests that CE is better suited for explaining
different COOs included in the study. Since there are domestic rather than foreign-country bias. Still, the level
some indications that the effect of CE on DCB depends on of explained variance is far from satisfactory. Since the
the specific configuration of COO and product category, CC construct has not yielded satisfactory results, one
it is important to consider both aspects jointly. In sum, implication from this study is that further research is
there are reasons to believe that the effect of consumer needed to understand more clearly how preference judg-
ethnocentrism on domestic country bias is likely to differ ments for domestic versus foreign products are formed.
both across countries and product categories, but prior
research has not been designed to test this assumption. The effect of CE on domestic product preference is a
consistent finding in both Balabanis and Diamantopoulos
Based on those weaknesses, Balabanis and (2004) and the present study. Domestic firms in Germany
Diamantopoulos (2004) investigate the effect of CE on can well rely on a “safeguarding” effect when marketing
DCB for one domestic (Britain) and five foreign countries their products to consumers high in CE. At the same time,
of origin in eight product categories, and find initial managers from foreign countries cannot rely on CE as a
support for the assumption that this effect varies across reliable indicator of the inclination of consumers to down-
product categories and COOs. grade their products.
Replicating and extending Balabanis and Diamanto- The findings of the study confirm that CE effects are
poulos (2004), we contribute to the literature by (1) product- and country-specific, which confirms Balabanis
conducting a similar study using a larger sample of Ger- and Diamantopoulos’ (2004) findings. However, the re-
man consumers, (2) investigating a total number of 14 sults of the study contradict Balabanis and Diamantopoulos
product categories (including the eight categories re- (2004) somewhat, in that at least economic competitive-
searched by Balabanis and Diamantopoulos 2004) and (3) ness of the country-of-origin plays a role in determining
testing whether the addition of an alternative construct, respondents’ judgments. One explanation for this finding
Consumer
Characteristics
• Domain expertise
• System expertise
• Demographic
characteristics
• Attitude towards web
• Brand preference
• Price & non-sensory
attributes
Direct
Purchase
visit
Search/
Deliberation
visit
Product &
Situational Factors
• Nature of the product Web-design features
• Shopping strategy • Amount of information Hedonic- Knowledge-
Browsing visit Building visit
• Navigational tools’
decision aids
Brand site
Yes Yes
Directed Brand price Specific site
Purchase visit decision address known?
No No Shop bots
Search engine- Search engine-
keyword search keyword search
Experience/
Prior Search Shop bots
Sufficient No Low
knowledge about Involvement of
product category? Consumer
Visit e-
Yes stores
High
Product &
Company/ Reviews/ Product Siturational Factors
Shop bots Consumer reports
Brand site sites
ers. Consumers start their search with the “ultimate, all Search Index = Alternative transitions – Attribute transitions
singing, all dancing version of the product rather than with Alternative transitions + Attribute transitions
a straightforward replacement” (Smith 2000). In other
words consumers search for a product which scores high where alternative (attribute) transitions represent the num-
on all their important evaluative criteria (attributes). This ber of instances in which the ith +1 piece of information
gives them an opportunity to know what is available in the accessed was of the same alternative (attribute) as the ith.
market and at what price. But very often this ideal product This will give an indication whether it is an alternative-
will be a high priced premium product and not what the based search or attribute-based search depending on
consumer wants. Consumers then “trade down” (Smith whether search index is positive or negative. This index
2000) to evaluate more realistic brands for the purpose of captures the consumers’ search pattern in cases where the
forming a consideration set. Since information search is information accessed can be segregated as attribute based
associated with search cost in terms of time (and cognitive or alternative based.
effort), customers attempt to arrive at the consideration set
with minimum number of searches. They select criteria However, in most searches, a combination of at-
which, according to them, will reduce the number of tributes and attribute values are used as search criteria and
searches required for the formation of consideration set. this makes it difficult to use this index. The general search
In order to achieve this goal, consumers may engage in pattern indicates that instead of accessing information
attribute (alternative) based search. Some of the earlier about an attribute, consumers use attribute-values as search
studies have focused on developing a search index, which criteria to arrive at a set of alternatives. This brings up the
reflects this kind of search pattern in a web based decision- need for a new search index, which captures the search
making environment. Payne (1976) proposed Search In- pattern described above.
dex as:
3. Total number of attributes, NA 3. When the price range is larger and the number of
attributes more, it is under calibration.
4. The attribute value: in most cases, the price range, in
the first search, R1 4. When the price range is smaller and the number of
attributes less, it is considered over calibration.
5. Price range in the last search, RL
In (3) and (4) it is assumed that when the price range
6. Maximum price range, RMAX. is smaller, the selection criteria becomes stricter even
though the number of attributes is less and is treated as
In addition to the above variables, we need to mea- transition to over calibration. Similarly, larger price range
sure the transitions- under calibration transitions, NU, and indicates less strict selection criteria and the transition is
over calibration transitions, NO. In two consecutive treated as under calibration transition.
searches, if the search criteria are more stringent in the
second search than in the first, it is a case of transition to Using the above parameters, an index of search
over calibration and NO is taken as 1. Similarly in the pattern can be expressed as:
second search, if the search criteria are less stringent
compared to the first, it is considered as transition to under SPI = 100 {(A1 – AL)/2NA + (RL – R1)/2RMAX} NU/NT
calibration and NU is taken as 1.
where A1 = number of attributes in the first search
Identifying Over/Under Calibration Transitions AL = number of attributes in the last search
NA = total number of attributes in the search
In consecutive searches, the following scenarios are R1 = price range in the first search
probable: (a) the attribute value changes, while number of RL = price range in the last search
The term, {(A1 – AL)/2NA + (RL – R1) / 2RMAX} is a The index, we proposed allows for range specifica-
measure of over all under/over calibration. Theoretically, tion only in price. However, in reality, the websites allow
the most extreme values for this term are -1 and +1. Here, for range specification in more number of attributes. In
we are interested in the sign of the expression. The order to capture the search patterns in such cases, one can
following scenarios are possible with respect to the sign of modify SPI by adding terms, similar to (A1 – AL)/2NA,
SPI. representing the over/under calibration with respect to the
range specification of different attributes. However, by
Positive Sign: This can happen in the following doing so the interpretation of SPI becomes more complex.
conditions. Since we thought price is a surrogate measure in many
cases for product features and performance, only price
• Customer specifies relatively stringent criteria on the range is included in our search pattern index.
attributes as well as the price range (i.e both (A1– AL)
and (RL – R1) are positive) in the initial search. This is AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE INDEX
a simple case of over calibration. The customer
searches for the ideal or dream product in the first The Search Pattern Index is tested using data from an
search itself. experiment involving apartment search in a web-based
environment. A total of 19 attributes (NA = 19) of the
• Other conditions, in which SPI is positive, are not so apartment like location of the apartment, availability of
straightforward. Customer may over calibrate in one heat/hot water, facilities such as swimming pool, fitness
criterion but under calibrate in the other. In this case, room in the complex are used as search criteria. Along
SPI will be positive only when the under calibration with these attributes, participants specified maximum and
in attributes/price range is canceled out by the over minimum monthly rent for the apartment as other search
calibration in price range/attributes. For example, if criteria. The maximum monthly rent that can be entered
a customer specified 4 attributes initially and 8 at- for search was $1300 and minimum was $400. Hence the
tributes in the final search, and if NA=10, then under maximum price range, Rmax is 900 (i.e., 1300 – 400).
calibration by the customer in attributes is -0.2 (i.e., Participants used a combination of these search criteria in
(A1 – AL)/2NA). However, if the same customer had a number of searches to arrive at a list of apartments,
specified a price range of 100 initially, 700 in the last which they consider for renting. The participants’ choice
search, and if RMAX is 1000, then the over calibration of attributes and the price range specified in each of the
in price range, (RL – R1) / 2RMAX) is 0.3. Hence, the searches was captured in log files. The experiment was
overall over calibration in this case is 0.1. conducted in severe to slight pressure and few alternatives
vs. many alternatives (2 x 2 experiments).
SPI will be negative in the following conditions:
The search histories of eight participants who display
• Customer specifies relatively less stringent criteria different search patterns are studied. The search param-
on the attributes as well as the price range (i.e both eters A1, AL, R1, RL, NO, and NU, are calculated from the log
(A1 – AL) and (RL – R1) are negative) in the initial files and used to arrive at the Search Pattern Index. The
search. This is a simple case of under calibration. The SPI, calculated for different combination of search pa-
customer searches for what is available in the market rameters are given in Table 1.
and then goes toward the product which best suits his/
her needs. Another explanation may be that a cus- The search histories selected show great amount of
tomer who under calibrates may not have sufficient variability. The number of attributes used in the first
knowledge about the product. search varies from 13 to 4 and that in the last search ranges
from 1 to 8. Similarly the price range selected varies from
• Other necessary condition for a negative sign for SPI 200 to 900. In all these cases, the Search Pattern Index
is the overall under calibration by the customer, (SPI) captures the underlying aspect of search pattern.
similar to the second condition explained in the case The sign of SPI indicates whether it is overall over/under
of positive sign. Here, for SPI to be negative, the over calibration and magnitude represents the extent of over/
calibration in attributes/price range has to be can- under calibration. The index is positive with higher mag-
celled out by under calibration in price range/at- nitudes when stricter criteria (over calibration) are used in
tributes.
Search
Pattern
Sl. No Search Parameters Index
A1 AL R1 RL NU NT
the first search compared to the last search, in terms of more efficiently. One way of customization, which many
both the number of attributes and price range (cases 1, 2, companies do, is to make the search more interactive and
and 8 in Table 1). When less stringent criteria are used in prompt customers to visit more appropriate sites. This is
the first search, in terms of both the number of attributes done by tracking the sites and pages visited by the con-
and price range, the index is always negative (case 3). sumers in their search. Identification of search pattern and
However in cases where participants used more attributes more importantly making inferences about the consumers
but wider price range, the sign and magnitude of the index from the search pattern will help to customize the search
depends on the extent of overall over/under calibration for individual consumer. In this paper we identified cer-
specified by both price range and number of attributes tain factors that influence search patterns. These factors
used in the search. In cases 4, 5, and 6, the under calibra- have varying influence on consumers’ search activity at
tion in terms of price range was large enough in order to different stages of their search. Also, in order to reflect the
nullify the over calibration specified in terms of A1 and AL individual search pattern, especially in the search for
and therefore the overall index is negative. But in case 7, formation of consideration set, a Search Pattern Index is
the over calibration specified in terms of A1 and AL is developed. This can be used as a dependent measure in
sufficient to nullify the under calibration expressed in future researches to understand and predict consumers’
terms of price range and hence the search index is positive. search pattern in a web-based environment. The index can
This illustrates the SPI’s ability to capture the search be easily modified to suit websites of different e-stores
pattern in terms of overall over/under calibration in differ- because the basic nature of search remains the same- i.e.,
ent searches. searching for alternatives using attributes and attribute
values as criteria.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
We developed a uni-dimensional index to represent
Emergence of web as an important source of informa- search pattern, which is a multi-dimensional activity.
tion has necessitated the identification of search patterns. Future research can focus on developing a multi-dimen-
More and more e-businesses are trying to customize their sional index without sacrificing the ease of interpretabil-
web sites to help the consumers search for information ity.
Method and Analysis The findings of this study also demonstrate the influ-
ence of environmental conditions on resource conversion.
We tested the hypotheses using data collected in the The results indicate that competitive intensity does not
retail industry. Trained market researchers were then sent diminish the conversion of knowledge resources into the
into the field to conduct 320 pre-arranged in-office inter- capability of ability to meet customer needs. In fact, the
views with retailers systematically selected from a direc- conversion of knowledge resources had a positive influ-
tory. A total of 293 usable responses were received, ence on the ability to meet customer needs even in highly
yielding a 60 percent response rate (when taking the competitive markets. These finding are encouraging as
replacement sample into account). Retail sectors in the they indicate that even in markets stronger in competitive
sample consisted of airlines, major household appliance, intensity, synergistically combining knowledge resources
automobile dealers, banks, beauty salons and services, can result in the development of the capability of ability to
clothing retail, computer dealers, convenience stores, meet customer needs.
copy and duplication service, cosmetics retail, depart-
ment stores, electronic appliances, florists retail, furniture Further, the results pertaining to the influence of
retail, gift shops, golf, grocer, hotels, insurance, jewelers, market dynamism on resource conversion indicated that
pet shops, pharmacies, photo finishing, pizza, real estate market dynamism did in fact influence a firm’s knowl-
agent, restaurants, sporting goods, toys, and travel agen- edge resource conversion. Specifically, the results indi-
cies. cated that firms who were able to synergistically combine
knowledge resources operating in highly dynamic mar-
The fit of the measurement model was assessed by kets were less effective at developing the capability of
examining factor loadings from latent variables to indica- ability to meet customer needs when compared to firms
tor variables, the chi-squared test, and fit indices. All operating in less dynamic markets. As theorized, dynamic
factor loadings were significant at the p < .001 level and markets are characterized by ever changing consumer
Market Attractiveness
(a) Competitive Intensity Order-of-Brand Entry
(b) Market Turbulence
(c) Market Growth Potential
the attractiveness of that market (Glazer 1991). A turbu- entrants with a “head start,” because they increase the
lent, dynamic market requires a firm to be responsive and lead-time between early-movers and late-movers.
adapt to changes in its environment (Rajagopalan and
Spreitzer 1996). A number of factors influence the attrac- Barney (1991) argues that early entrants can develop
tiveness of the market, including customer turbulence, an advantage over late entrants, because they have the
competitive intensity, technological intensity, buyer power, opportunity to develop solid relationships with suppliers,
and supplier power (Doyle 2000; Jaworski and Kohli establish strong brand awareness, and obtain a large share
1993; Miller 1987; Porter 1980). This study will focus on of the market. Consequently, they are able to lock in
three key factors; competitive intensity, market turbu- suppliers and customers and create barriers to entry, thus
lence, and market growth potential (Doyle 2001). We now making entry more difficult for subsequent entrants. If
turn to a brief discussion of each of these factors. firms know that their industry will be characterised by
intense competition, they have an incentive to make a pre-
Competitive Intensity emptive move by entering earlier and erecting barriers to
entry, rather than entering later and facing barriers to
Competitive intensity refers to the extent to which the entry. On this basis, we put forth the following hypothesis:
composition of the market and competitive actions change
over time (Gatignon and Xuereb 1997; Kohli and Jaworski Hypothesis 1: The greater the competitive intensity in
1990; Slater and Narver 1994). According to Fuentelsaz, a market, the earlier the brand entry.
Gomez, and Polo (2002, p. 250), “competition stems from
firms interacting and striving in the same environments Market Turbulence
and for the same resources.” Competitive intensity ad-
dresses the breadth and aggressiveness of a competitor’s Market turbulence is defined as the extent to which
actions (Slater and Narver 1994). Day (1994) asserts that the composition of customers and their preferences change
the intensity of competition within a market determines over time (Han, Kim, and Srivastava 1998; Kohli and
the profit potential of that market. Jaworski 1990). Market turbulence is similar to “environ-
mental heterogeneity,” which refers to “the change in
According to Porter (1980, p. 17), competitive inten- diversity of production methods and marketing tactics
sity in a market occurs “because one or more competitors required to cater to customers’ needs” (Miller 1987,
either feels the pressure or sees the opportunity to improve p. 62).
position.” Rivalry can take the form of price competition,
aggressive advertising and marketing tactics, product Customers are an important component of an indus-
introductions, and increased levels of customer service or try. They can influence the nature of competition within
warranties. an industry (and hence industry profitability) by forcing
prices down, demanding higher quality or more services,
A firm achieves superior performance by choosing to and playing competitors against each other (Porter 1980).
enter an attractive market, where it can defend its position
against competitors. An increased level of competitive A market that is characterised by high levels of
intensity decreases the attractiveness of the market, in that turbulence implies that a firm must constantly modify its
it can result in the erection of barriers to entry such as portfolio of brands or develop new brands in order to
economies of scale and strong brand name recognition continuously meet customers’ changing preferences or
(Urban and Hauser 1993). Entry barriers provide early latent needs (Jaworski and Kohli 1993). This makes a
TABLE 1
Pearson Correlations and Descriptive Statistics
Mean S.D 1 2 3 4
TABLE 2
Regression Analysis: Standardized Regression Coefficients
Dependent Variable
Independent Variables Order of Brand Entry
ß t
Control Variables
Brand development time -.421 -2.338**
Quality of brand -.435 -2.711**
Degree of similarity of brand .196 1.290
Business unit size -.170 -.845
Direct Effects
Competitive Intensity .715 4.195*
Market Turbulence -.206 -1.570***
Market Growth Potential .691 3.950*
R2 .922
Adjusted R2 .832
F 10.188
Danielle A. Chmielewski
Department of Management (Marketing Program)
Alan Gilbert Building
The University of Melbourne
Parkville Vic 3010
Australia
Phone: +61.3.8344.1886
FAX: + 61.3.9348.1921
E-Mail: dchmi@unimelb.edu.au
Our research also provides guidance for managers on Second, managers may also work on the antecedents
how to improve a firm’s complaint management. More of the prevalence of DOB. In this context, the customer
specifically, the findings of our study suggest that manag- orientation of a firm’s HRM is particularly important.
ers should strive to reduce the prevalence of DOB in their
company. This can be done in two ways:
Although this scenario may be pushing the limits, it Observational set and perceived similarity are the
exemplifies a boundary condition where the concepts of two most relevant antecedents in the service recovery
justice, equity, fairness, disconfirmation, and attribution context. Observational set is the focal of one’s attention
are not adequate to explain all consumer behaviors. The and it can be instructed or cued. When people focus on the
traditional view downplayed consumers’ ability to self- needy other’s emotional state or perspective, they are
restore satisfaction, ignored consumers’ consideration for more likely to feel empathetic towards those who are in
other’s welfare, and overlooked the effect of positive need than when people focus on the facts (Eisenberg and
emotions on post-recovery evaluation. Miller 1987). Perceived similarity concerns one’s percep-
tion of the resemblance between oneself and a comparison
Prosocial Behavior and Forgiveness object. In their meta-analysis of sixteen studies, Miller
et al. (2001) concluded that perceived similarity with
Prosocial behavior research in psychology suggests another was associated with or led to feelings of empathy
consumers may look beyond their own well being (Batson or sympathy.
et al. 1995). Prosocial behavior is broadly defined as
“social behaviors oriented to benefit another, regardless Forgiveness as Consumer Behavior
of potential outcomes for oneself” (Miller, Kozu, and
Davis 2001). Such behavior includes but not limited to What marketers are doing during service recovery
donating, forgiving, helping, sharing and volunteering. are essentially wooing for consumer forgiveness with
Philosophers, such as Hume (1949), considered prosocial compensation and apology, asking consumer to replace
behavior as moral actions of human instinct. Of the resentment (e.g., dissatisfaction) with beneficence (e.g.,
various prosocial behaviors, forgiveness is one of the satisfaction). The two consequents of forgiveness, lower
most relevant concepts in the service marketing context. avoidance and lower revenge, are also strikingly similar to
Modern philosophers, such as North (1987), agreed that the marketing consequents of successful service recovery
the central theme in forgiveness involves replacing re- (e.g., increase repatronage and lower negative word-of-
sentment with beneficence. Using McCullough, Parga- mouth activity). Thus, forgiveness is a valid, alternative
ment, and Thoresen’s (2000) definition, forgiveness is an perspective of service recovery.
intraindividual and prosocial change toward a perceived
transgressor. Hypotheses
Satisfaction
Observational
Set + +
Empathy
+ Forgiveness + Repatronage
Perceived Intention
Similarity + Negative WOM
Intention
self-explanatory (the positive and negative signs indicate our ability to explaining consumer behavior; (3) postulate
the predicted directions of relationship) and the logics a new perspective by seeing service recovery efforts as
flow from the discussion above. attempts to seek consumers forgiveness.
Results Discussion
Our analysis revealed substantial and statistically Our study results demonstrate that examining con-
significant differences across the three market milieus at sumer-firm relationships in situ is a promising approach
the macro level. We found that the U.S. insurance market for better understanding exchange relationships, particu-
milieu is more relationship based, the German insurance larly when considering markets in different countries.
market is rule based, and the milieu of the Dutch insurance This extends contemporary understanding of the exchange
market is located between the two extreme positions. dynamics and thus provides both theoretical and manage-
Although additional differences were found in the micro rial relevance. The results clearly reveal that an isolated
model relationships between countries, the more interest- investigation of micro mechanisms is inappropriate, espe-
ing result is related to the influence of market milieus. cially in cross-cultural settings. We believe that our work
First, the macro level variables add significantly to model enhances the knowledge of macro effects on micro mecha-
fit. Second, regarding direct effects of market milieus on nisms by conceptualizing and empirically demonstrating
exchange-specific constructs, we find full support for H3 the different effects. References available upon request.
Strategy researchers and industrial economists have The framework and propositions in this paper have
examined whether firms that engage in multimarket com- several research implications for managers and research-
petition would compete aggressively against each other or ers. The impact of the several moderating variables on the
observe mutual forbearance (i.e., tacitly collude). Mutual level mutual forbearance and, consequently, on the level
forbearance is a form of tacit collusion in which firms of competition between firms that operate in multimarkets
avoid competitive attacks against the rivals they meet in has been examined in this paper. The reduced levels of
multiple markets (Jayachandran, Gimeno, and Vardarajan mutual forbearance and the increased intensity of compe-
1999). Interestingly, past research has argued both for and tition may have serious implications on the success of
against whether mutual forbearance is a deterministic multimarket firms and on the level of competition that
outcome of multimarket contact. multimarket firms may face from a single-market firm or
a dominant local player operating in that market. This
It is stressed here that although the relationship be- study will help shed light on how managers of multimarket
tween multimarket contact and mutual forbearance has firms should mentally map their market and determine
been examined in prior research, the factors that moderate their rivals.
SUMMARY works (cf., Bradach and Eccles 1989; Heide 1994, 2003).
Plural governance is intended to afford firms in networks
The governance of interfirm relationships in market- with greater flexibility to adapt to changing conditions in
ing channels is complex. Much extant literature has con- their environments or channels. This notion is applied to
sidered relationship governance from the perspective of more general considerations of how uncertainty can be
discrete, isolated dyadic relationships (e.g., a single buyer dealt with in relationship networks through governance
and a single supplier). In reality, relationships in market- mechanisms. The discussion then turns to introducing the
ing channels, supply chains, and distribution networks notion of governance system compatibility; that is, opti-
combine to form relationship networks that are inherently mal configurations or combinations of governance modes
complex and can have high levels of uncertainty. The under plural governance must be compatible across levels
governance of relationships in these networks is likely to or branches of relationship networks. The most efficient
vary significantly from the governance of the single governance systems or plural forms of governance are
dyadic relationships that have been the focus of many those that provide sufficient flexibility and greater cer-
previous studies. An emerging stream of literature consid- tainty, and that are compatible across levels. The concep-
ers the governance of multiple, linked relationships in tual framework builds on these foundations and advances
network-type structures (e.g., Heide 2003; Mishra, Heide, propositions that predict (1) how downstream channel
and Cort 1998; Wathne and Heide 2004). While it is conditions can influence upstream channel governance
understood that complex systems of interfirm relation- choices, and (2) when plural governance is required based
ships exist and are relatively commonplace in practice on prevailing conditions elsewhere in a network.
(cf., Anderson et al. 1994), research into the governance
of these networks of relationships is needed. The concepts and propositions discussed in this paper
have a number of implications for theory and practice.
Continuing in the tradition of this emerging stream of Studying relationship networks and how they might be
literature, and seeking to extend previous, more descrip- efficiently governed in order to increase flexibility and
tive conceptualizations of relationship networks in mar- certainty for firms in these networks is of importance to
keting, this paper advances a more general conceptualiza- academic and practitioner audiences. At a theoretical
tion of governance in relationship networks. The paper level, the framework proposed in this paper is novel in the
focuses specifically on how governance system choices sense that it considers contingent effects across levels of
are made and what factors influence these decisions, and networks (e.g., upstream vs. downstream) in determining
the performance-related outcomes of systems of gover- the most appropriate systems of governance that are
nance. An important element of the conceptual discussion compatible with each other. This builds on recent work by
in this paper is the notion that governance choices for one Mishra et al. (1998) and Wathne and Heide (2004).
level in a network are strongly influenced by a firm’s Including plural governance in these conceptualizations
assessments and evaluations of conditions of uncertainty adds to the depth and richness of the framework. For
and relationship characteristics at other levels in the same practitioners, this paper offers suggestions for how to
network. The authors present an extended conceptual make optimal and efficient governance system choices
discussion and formal propositions in an attempt to ad- under conditions of uncertainty and complexity in a
vance thought towards a more general framework of relationship network context. The conceptualizations pro-
network governance. vide guidelines for what practitioners should consider and
evaluate as part of the process of designing the most
A central issue considered in the conceptual frame- appropriate governance systems for their needs. Refer-
work relates to the use of plural forms, or plural gover- ences available upon request.
nance, in managing multiple, linked relationships in net-
SUMMARY merce, and Dell driving the standard for modular com-
puter manufacturing processes (Kumar, Scheer, and Kotler
Firms that launch radical product and process inno- 2000).
vations are market driving: creating, shaping, and accel-
erating markets for their radical innovations and redefin- The market driving entrepreneur typically creates
ing customer expectations, value propositions, and busi- and enters new markets through alliances and similar
ness processes. Successful market driving is dependent on cooperative strategies rather than competitive positioning
developing, growing, and strategically leveraging net- (Sarasvathy 2001). Success is dependent on leveraging
works of alliances and key customers, and relationship and building upon who they know: industry contacts,
marketing plays a critical role in fostering collaboration. funding sources, supporters, suppliers, and customers
This suggests a fundamental shift in marketing focus from (Sarasvathy 2001). This emphasis on alliances and col-
targeting and communicating with prospective customers laboration is the most significant influence on the selec-
towards the cultivation, management, and leveraging of tion of relationship marketing objectives and strategies.
multiple collaborative relationship ties. Thus initial rela- Alliances facilitate widespread industry adoption and
tionship marketing efforts should be concentrated on provide access to markets and customers that otherwise
establishing strong alliance network ties and conducting may not be available to the entrepreneurial firm. Initial
frequent and intensive mutual learning-oriented commu- customers provide feedback and the input that drives
nications with initial customers. successive product iterations and service enhancements
(Gatignon and Xuereb 1997; Hill 1997).
Contrasting Being Market Driven with Market Driv-
ing Market driving firms both drive the formation of
expectations and use an iterative approach to refining new
Market Driven Firms Are Responsive: Market driven products and services to meet customer and alliance
relationship marketing strategies emphasize responsive- partner expectations that evolve through successive inter-
ness to both channel member and existing customer needs. action with their networks. Due to limited resources
When a firm is market driven its primary objectives are to entrepreneurs must achieve this incremental learning within
gain full channel member support of a product launch and a relatively short timeframe. Interaction with the firm’s
to leverage existing customers in adopting an incremental networks must also reinforce strategically important rela-
innovation, often through the use of product/service mi- tionships.
gration strategies. The result of a successful market driven
strategy should be expanded market share or share of Market Driving Creates an Innovation Network
wallet/budget, reinforced brand loyalty, and enhanced
existing customer satisfaction. While firms can maintain A collaboration-oriented relationship marketing strat-
competitive advantage by being market driven in existing egy should result in lower product launch costs, reduced
markets, they become vulnerable to firms pursuing a time for market acceptance, and reduced market uncer-
market driving strategy. tainty. Embedded relationships provide an additional bar-
rier against competitive threats and help reduce overall
Market Driving Firms Are Opportunistic and Col- marketing costs. The strategic leveraging of these rela-
laborative: Market driving firms are generally new en- tionships leads to ongoing product, service, and market
trants who revolutionize an industry by delivering a opportunities as the network expands and becomes in-
substantial leap in customer value through either a break- creasingly interconnected to other alliance and customer
through technology or marketing system made possible networks. The desired end state is status as an industry
by a unique business process (Kumar, Scheer, and Kotler standard and possession of a highly embedded network of
2000). The most successful radical innovations produce relationships contributing to future innovations based on
what Arthur (1990) refers to as a market in lock-out, joint value creation. This is a natural evolution for the
where a technology or technology-based business process initial customer relationships in which the seeds of col-
becomes an industry standard that is extremely difficult to laboration were planted. This environment of shared risk
dislodge. Examples include Amazon.com and EBay be- and reward fosters greater learning between the firm and
ing perceived as the standards for conducting e-com- the customer, which in turn can lead to improved efficien-
TABLE 1
Market Driving Versus Market Driven Relationship Marketing
Type of Innovation Radical product and/or process innovation Incremental product / service
innovation
Firm Situation Typically entrepreneurial; new product to new markets New product/service to existing
markets
Basic strategic Strategy evolves from an iterative process, testing as Select an optimal strategy among
approach many alternatives as possible by leveraging alternatives based upon expected
♦ Firm technical, functional, market expertise returns, using
♦ Emerging networks of prospective customers/alliances ♦ Pre-specified criteria
♦ Collaboration ♦ Pre-determined goals
♦ Research and projections
♦ Knowledge of existing channels
and customers
Involvement of Initial target customer input is integral to the iterative Possible contact via context of NPD
target customer process of product/service and segment refinement; research
in the innovation Dialog is continuous, and network of potential Leverage existing relationships for
process customer/collaborators continually expands potential migration
Key Relationship Identifying, recruiting and forming networks of Customer adoption/migration to new
Mktg Strategies alliances and customers product
Building commitment to the technology as a standard Full channel cooperation
Customer as input to future product
ideas
Joint value creation via embedded network relationships Customer as referral source
Key Relationship (1) Well defined market (1) Expand market share
Mktg Goals (2) Standards as an effective barrier to entry (2) Expand share of wallet/budget
(3) Access to additional markets and opportunities (3) Reinforce brand loyalty
Key Mktg-Based (1) Industry standard technology or process (1) Expanded cash flow from
Assets from (2) Embedded product innovation network incremental sales
RM Activities acceptance time (2) Enhanced cash flow from
reduced market
The respondents for the study were composed partly Our findings are important for marketers who have
of senior and graduate students at a major university in a historically sought to lump consumers into innovative
suburban campus and partly of non-students contacted categories with the assumption that these would hold
personally through student interviewers from two market across products. Furthermore, consumers seem to differ in
research classes. The scale items for measuring the five the way they perceive the two types of innovative prod-
perceptual factors were adapted from existing studies. ucts along perceptual dimensions such as complexity,
The same scale items were repeated in two separate financial risk, and performance assurance dimensions but
sections of the survey – one for Incrementally New do not differ (in our sample) across product types in their
Products (INPs) and another for Radical New Products perceptions of perceived knowledge or perceived comfort
(RNPs) in the context of consumer electronics. A total of with the purchase process. These findings are also impor-
609 surveys were first analyzed for reliability and validity tant to marketers as they seek to design marketing plans to
(convergent and discriminant) using Cronbach’s Alpha address consumer’s perceptions.
FIGURE 1
Conceptual Framework of Relationship Among Consumer Pioneers, Higher-Level
Organizational Learning, and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Product
Environ- Innovative
mental Level
Uncertainty
Higher-Level
Organizational
Learning
Consumer Sustained
Pioneers Competitive
Advantage
The present study attempts to bridge this gap by Questionnaires were administered by mail to a na-
examining the determinants of helping behavior in a tional sample of youth who had received marketing mate-
sample of youth volunteers involved in a task requiring rials asking them to participate in a fundraising effort for
significant self sacrifice. We hypothesize that attitudes an international relief organization that involved fasting –
toward this task will mediate the effect of other individual i.e., not eating solid food for 30 hours. The respondents’
variables on the quality of the helping behavior received attitudes towards the organization and towards the
by the NPO. Based on the conceptualization of helping fundraising task were measured by instructing the respon-
behavior forwarded by Bendapudi, Singh, and Bendapudi dent to “Please mark an “X” on the space that best
(1996), we consider two distinct dimensions of helping describes your honest attitudes or feelings about each of
behavior – help vs. no help and token help vs. serious help. the following.” The fasting task and the name of the
The first of these dimensions is captured by the variable organization were each followed by a five-point scale
participation, which indicates whether or not the respon- anchored by “negative” and “positive.” Materialism
dent chose to take part in the fast; and the second of these (MAT) and Self-Esteem (SES) were both measured using
dimensions is captured by the variable goal-setting, which established scales. In order to test our hypotheses we
indicates whether or not the individual set a fundraising followed the procedure outlined by Barron and Kenney
goal. We examine three primary independent variables of (1986) for testing mediation. This test entails three steps:
interest that have been theorized to play key roles in (1) regress the independent variable on the mediator, (2)
determining volunteer behavior and that should be espe- regress the independent variable on the dependent vari-
cially relevant for better understanding teens’ charitable able, and (3) regress both the independent and mediator on
participation: (1) their attitudes towards the organization, the dependent variable. Four of the six anticipated rela-
(2) their level of self-esteem, and (3) their level of mate- tionships were supported: H1a, H1b, H2a, and H3b. A
rialism. Our hypotheses are as follows: task was consistently a significant predictor of both help-
ing behavior dependent variables.
H1a: The relationship between attitude towards the or-
ganization and the decision to volunteer is medi- Our findings indicate that for NPOs marketing to
ated by attitude towards the task. youth for involvement in volunteer projects, even if teens
think highly of an organization, the choice of the task is
H1b: The relationship between attitude towards the or- crucial to their participation and their commitment to
ganization and goal setting is the mediated by fundraising. For NPOs recruiting teens that are likely to be
attitude towards the task. higher in materialism, the nature of the task or activity
The sample for the study consisted of university The path coefficients for the structural model were
students from Canada, Germany and the U.S. There were consistent with the hypotheses established. The coeffi-
168, 139, and 97 respondents respectively from the three cient from self-transcendence to materialism was -0.21
countries. Canadian students completed and returned the (p < 0.01) indicating the negative relationship hypothe-
questionnaire in class, and U.S. and German students sized. The result was consistent across the three countries.
completed the questionnaire outside of class and returned The coefficient from self-enhancement to materialism
it the next week. All participation was voluntary and no was 0.70 (p < 0.01) demonstrating the positive relation-
ship hypothesized. This result also held across the three
samples.
Organizations should endeavor to increase the com- From a conceptual standpoint, our research suggests
petence of customers that is needed by the customer to that customer education can be a catalyst for increasing
stimulate full use of a product during consumption. We customer loyalty. Through the acquisition of skills, we
suggest a joint value creation framework should serve as expect customers to use products more intensely, which
the theoretical basis for the customer education concept leads to greater product performance and increased prod-
since it demonstrates how customer value is created. uct satisfaction. Additionally, we believe customer edu-
cation also influences the customer’s satisfaction and trust
The framework is founded on two basic axioms. with the company. The combination of customer satisfac-
First, it is presumed that the generation of customer value tion, company satisfaction, and company trust is what
represents a multi-stage process, which starts with the ultimately leads to customer loyalty. Future research
generation of the product idea, continues with the devel- should examine the link between customer education and
opment and production of the product, and finalizes with customer loyalty.
Perceived usefulness
H1 Manager’s attitude
of RFID
toward adopting RFID H4
Perceived ease of use Behavioral intention
H2 Manager’s subjective
and implementation H5 about adopting
of RFID norms toward adopting RFID
RFID
H6
Normative beliefs and H3
motivation to comply Manager’s perceived
with referent behavioral control on
adopting RFID H7a,b,c
Moderators
♦ Manager’s experience
♦ Firm size
the costs and benefits of bar coding. If the gap between Managers’ normative beliefs and motivation to com-
these is significantly large (i.e., RFID is more effective ply with referents are stipulated to influence subjective
than bar coding), then the manager can justifiably seek norms and subsequently behavior intention (Ajzen and
RFID implementation. Whether a firm adopts RFID tech- Fishbein 1980; Davis et al. 1989). Referents expected to
nology or not is likely to be influenced by the manager’s exert influence on managers adopting RFID include sup-
cognitive evaluation of the gains from the implementa- ply chain partners, senior managers, consultants, etc. For
tion. Thus, it is hypothesize that: instance, recommendations by highly reputed consultants
as well as advice by experienced executives held in high
H1: Perceived usefulness has a direct and positive effect esteem by a manager may motivate the manager to under-
on the manager’s attitude toward RFID adoption. take a specific business function, in this case, deploying
RFID technology. Furthermore, if supply chain partners
Perceived ease of use is conceptualized in terms of and competitors are deploying RFID, then managers will
extent of difficulty, time, and learning costs associated most likely follow suit. Thus, it is hypothesized that:
with changing from the current system to RFID technol-
ogy. If RFID deployment is perceived to be cumbersome H3: Manager’s normative beliefs and motivation to com-
and difficult, or inconveniencing to supply chain partners, ply with a referent have direct effects on his/her
then it is expected that managers might be hesitant to subjective norms toward RFID adoption.
implement it. However, if the deployment is perceived to
be less involving, then managers might be inclined to The manager’s attitude toward implementation of
readily implement it. Moreover, the cost of training em- RFID is posited to be a major determinant of whether or
ployees on how to use RFID can be high and time not he/she executes RFID deployment. Attitudes develop
consuming. Learning costs can also include the negative from beliefs that people hold about the object of the
performance implications of technology changeover and attitude (Doll and Ajzen 1992). It is expected that if
potential losses in the process of replacing the current managers strongly believe that implementing RFID in
system with RFID. These costs could influence manag- their organization will culminate in improved process
ers’ attitude toward RFID adoption. Thus, it is hypothe- performance and better coordination with supply chain
sized that: partners, they are likely to develop favorable attitudes
toward RFID. However, if their RFID evaluation is neg-
H2: Perceived ease of use has a direct and positive effect ative, then we expect that their attitude toward RFID
on the manager’s attitude toward adopting RFID. implementation will be negative. This is expected to
Secondly, the study reinforces the role of normative The issues raised in this study have important impli-
beliefs in technology adoption. RFID deployment has cations for academics and researchers. For academicians,
strategic and operational implications on firm’s partners the study raises important questions about the mediating
in the supply chain. Furthermore, being a recent develop- role of manager’s attitude in technology adoption. Indeed,
ment in supply chain collaboration and management, the study’s focus on technology adoption from the point
Income # of
Country Elasticity t-Value p-Value Observation R-Square
TABLE 2
Regression Results for IT Products
Income # of
Country Elasticity t-Value p-Value Observation R-Square
FIGURE 1
Households With Access to a Home Computer in 2000
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
Denmark
Switzerland
Sweden
Korea
United
Canada
Australia
Germany
Finland (1)
Japan
United
Belgium (3)
Portugal
Austria
Ireland
Turkey (4)
Mexico
France
Spain
Italy
Notes: Beginning of 2002; 2March 2001–April 2002 (financial year) instead of 2001; 31999 instead of 2000;
1
4
Households in urban areas only; 5For 1999, households in urban areas with more than 15,000 inhabitants
only.
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0.0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
the life cycle of communication and IT products become some marketing recommendation of using price discrim-
shorter and shorter, this recommendation is significant to ination to households and switching their market target to
the communication and IT industry. households as their products evolve to the growth stage of
product life cycle.
CONCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND
FUTURE RESEARCH The work presented here is not without limitations.
We use aggregate data in our analytical framework. The
This paper investigates the income elasticity of house- conclusions reached in this paper may not be valid across
hold’s demand for communication and IT products in 23 all types of communication and IT products. Some parts
OECD countries during 1989 to 2001. We find that of communication and IT products, taken cell phone as an
communication and IT products are luxury goods to example, might be necessary goods to the households in
households in these countries, which suggests that such some countries. Therefore, using micro-data to investi-
products are luxury goods to the households globally. We gate these types of nuances is a worthwhile area for future
also discuss the marketing implications of our findings research.
and provide communication and IT products vendors with
ABSTRACT ad. For instance, Chaudhuri and Buck (1995a; see also
Chaudhuri 2004) showed that reptilian affects are not
A natural viewing situation is used to examine the related to liking for the ad while prosocial affects are
efficacies of three scales that purport to account for positively, strongly and significantly related. Burke and
emotional and rational responses to advertising. With Edell (1989) showed that upbeat, warm and negative
attitude to the ad as the dependent variable, the three scales feelings differ in their effects as well.
are tested using a large number of subjects, a random and
large number of ads and a sufficiently large number of One problem with the operationalization of this last
independent observations (each subject was exposed to a approach has been that researchers who use the Edell and
single ad only). The results indicate differences in the Burke (1987) feelings scale tend to shorten the scale (53
prediction of attitude to the ad among the three scales. items) and adapt it to their purposes (as an example, see
Surprisingly, the most parsimonious of the three scales MacInnis, Rao, and Weiss 2002). In general though,
achieves the greatest predictive ability. measurement scales are developed with the understand-
ing that they should be used in their entirety and not
INTRODUCTION abridged according to the purposes of a particular piece of
research. Thus, there would seem to be a need for a shorter
The purpose of this study is straightforward. Can a scale which still captures all the multidimensional aspects
short scale for assessing the emotional and rational reac- of qualitatively different affects. The CASC scale offers
tions to advertisements predict the attitude to these ads as such an alternative with only 16 items which purport to
well or better than two scales that are well known but are measure four different affective and cognitive dimen-
considerably longer in length? If so, the implications of sions. One of the goals of this study was to test if the CASC
the study for practical purposes of data collection are also scale had the same predictive power of the feelings and
obvious. Respondent fatigue will be lowered and better judgment scales. If so, then it presents a viable and
quality of responses may be expected with a substantially perhaps more practical alternative to the other two scales.
smaller scale that also addresses the multidimensional
properties of responses to advertising. Although there has been considerable work, as cited
above (see also Batra and Ray 1986; Holbrook and West-
Accordingly, this study compared the “feelings” scale wood 1989 and others), that suggests that a range of
(53 items) developed by Edell and Burke (1987) and the emotional effects are evoked by advertising, no single
“judgments” scale [25 items taken from the Reaction accepted theoretical paradigm has emerged that guides
Profile for TV commercials (Wells, Leavitt, and McCon- research in this area. Individual studies have used a variety
ville 1971)] also used by these authors (Burke and Edell of theoretical frameworks, such as Plutchik’s (1980)
1989; Edell and Burke 1987; Burke and Edell 1986) with typological approach (Holbrook and Westwood 1989)
the relatively short (16 items) CASC (Communication and Mehrabian and Russell’s (1974) dimensional ap-
Analytic and Syncretic Cognition) scale developed by proach (Olney, Holbrook, and Batra 1991). None of these
Chaudhuri and Buck (1995a, 1995b, 1998). The three approaches, however, are clearly anchored in the struc-
scales were examined in terms of their ability to predict ture of the brain. The theory of the “triune brain,” as
attitude to the ad. adapted in the CASC scale, described below, bases itself
on knowledge of the human brain.
Affect has been operationalized in different ways in
consumer research and advertising studies. One way has THE CASC SCALE
been to view affect as an overall, global reaction such as
“liking” for an ad (Haley and Baldinger 1991; Herr and This scale was developed in the area of communica-
Page 2004; Mitchell and Olson 1981). Another way has tion sciences (Chaudhuri and Buck 1995a) and subse-
been to assess affect as an amalgam of a set of qualitatively quently refined and published in the social psychology
different types of affects that may be evoked by an ad. This and consumer research literature (Chaudhuri and Buck
has been prompted by evidence (Chaudhuri and Buck 1995b, 1998). It claims, on the basis of confirmatory
1995a; Edell and Burke 1987) that different dimensions of factor analysis and repeated testing, to measure both
affect can have strikingly different effects on liking for the emotional and rational (syncretic and analytic cognitions)
The “judgments” scale was used by Burke and Edell STUDY GOALS
(1986) as an adjective based attitude to the ad scale in
order to capture ad reactions over time in a naturally The following research goals formed the motivation
occurring situation. These authors used the scale to test for the study. Attitude to the ad was chosen as the depen-
television commercial wearout – i.e., to see if subjects’ dent variable on which to test the predictive ability of the
evaluation of ads declined as levels of exposure increased. three scales since these scales all purport to measure
They used thirty of the items from the Reaction Profile for responses to advertising and not necessarily to brands or
TV commercials developed by Wells, Leavitt, and McCo- companies. Further, attitude to the ad has been found to be
nville (1971) and four additional items from other re- an important concept in determining the persuasiveness of
search on attitude to the ad in order to compile the scale. advertising messages (MacKenzie and Lutz 1989; Mue-
The scale was found to be reliable (internal consistency) hling and McCann 1993).
and to have a stable three factor structure consisting of the
34 items. Notably, it was found in this study that ratings 1. Which scale is better overall at predicting attitude to
for the scale did not change over time while the ratings of the ad?
an overall attitude to the ad scale did. Thus, this scale is
different from an overall attitude to the ad scale. 2. Which dimensions of the three scales predict attitude
to the ad?
In a later study, Edell and Burke (1987) reported
reducing the scale to 25 items based on the redundancy 3. Are the dimensions of these scales stable under the
among some of the items. These authors referred to the following conditions?
three factors of the scale as the “judgments” scale and they
found that this scale was qualitatively different from the • When there is a natural viewing situation. While
feelings scales also used in their study. These authors also the feelings and judgments scales were devel-
emphasized that the scale measures judgments about the oped in a naturally occurring setting, the CASC
characteristics of an ad such as Humorous, Informative, scale was not.
Gentle, Valuable, etc. while the feelings scale measures
responses that are properties of the individual (happy, sad, • With a random sample of ads. None of the scales
etc.) and not a characteristic of the ad itself. This view may were developed under this condition.
be contested since the judgments scale also measures
As a result of asking one subject to react to one ad The feelings scale, which was expected to comprise
only, a data set of 448 independent observations was of three factors, resulted in eleven factors for the 53 items
obtained for the measures discussed next. used in this study and explained 64.8 percent of the
variance in the items. Moreover, the varimax rotated
Measures factor solution failed to converge. Examination of the
initial factor matrix showed that only the first three factors
The questionnaire contained items from all the three had loadings greater than .50 and, accordingly, only these
scales and also on an attitude to the ad scale. The CASC three factors were used in further analysis. Burke and
scale had 16 items all of which were taken from Chaudhuri Edell (1989) also state that these items should result in
and Buck (1998). The feelings scale consisted of the 53 three factors. Thus, only these 39 items were used in
items described by Burke and Edell (1989) which loaded further analysis and they were summed according to the
greater than .5 on a factor in that study. The judgments factors they loaded on. Thirty one of the items loaded
scale had the 25 items refined and used by Burke and Edell greater than .5 on the first factor; 6 items on the second
(1989) and Edell and Burke (1987). The instructions to the factor and 2 items on the third factor.
subjects reproduced the instructions provided by Chaudhu-
ri and Buck (1998) and Edell and Burke (1987) for the The 25 items in the judgements scale loaded on five
three scales.1 factors which together explained 60.8 percent of the
variance in the items. Burke and Edell (1989) reported that
The attitude to the ad scale was measured as the sum these 25 items loaded on only three factors in their study
of the responses to a seven point semantic differential but this was not the case with regard to the data in the
scale with the following five items: pleasant/unpleasant, present study. However, the original formulation of this
unfavorable/favorable, unlikeable/likeable, good/bad, and scale (Wells, Leavitt, and McConville 1977; Wells 1964)
negative/positive. These items have been widely used to reported six dimensions and, thus, the five factors were
measure attitude to the ad in previous research (Muehling accepted as valid dimensions to investigate further. Ac-
and McCann 1993). cordingly, the items which loaded greater than .5 on each
The three scales were next analyzed with regard to Of the three scales in the analysis described above,
their effects on attitude to the ad. Multiple regression was the CASC scale emerges as the most successful in predict-
used for this analysis. First, the feelings scale was used to ing consumer attitudes to advertising. First, it is the only
predict attitude to the ad. All three dimensions of the scale in which all the dimensions made unique and signif-
feelings scale together accounted for 36.8 percent of the icant contributions to attitude to the ad. In fact, the
variance in attitude to the ad and only two of the three individualistic dimension of the CASC scale made the
factors were significantly (p. < .05) related to attitude to highest contribution of all the dimensions in the three
the ad. Second, the judgments scale was used to predict scales. The prosocial dimension made the third highest
attitude to the ad. The five dimensions of the scale ac- contribution and the analytic dimension made a smaller
counted for 45 percent of the variance in attitude to the ad but unique and significant contribution. Second, even
and only four of the five factors in the scale were signif- with only 16 items it accounted for more of the variance
icantly (p. < .05) related to the dependent variable. Last, (44.2%) in attitude to the ad than the 39 items used from
the CASC scale was used to predict attitude to the ad. The the feelings scale (36.8%)and almost as much of the
three dimensions of the CASC scale accounted for 44.2 variance (45%) as the 25 items in the judgments scale.
percent of the variance in attitude to the ad and all three Last, it accounted for 9.4 percent incremental explanation
dimensions were significantly related. of variance in attitude to the ad over and above the
contributions of the other two scales. Moreover, its factor
structure seems to be fairly stable, in spite of the fact that
To test the incremental variance in attitude to the ad, the fourth dimension of the scale narrowly missed the
if any, accounted for by the CASC scale over and above arbitrarily set eigenvalue cutoff point of one. Three of the
the variance accounted for by the feelings and judgments four dimensions had eigenvalues higher than one and
scales, a two step procedure was used. In the first step, all these explained more than half of the variance in the 16
the eight dimensions of the feelings and judgments scales items.
were used as independent variables with attitude to the ad
as the dependent variable. This resulted in an R square of The feelings scale was the least successful of the three
.484. Next, the three dimensions of the CASC scale were scales with only one factor making a unique and signifi-
also introduced into the equation. This resulted in an R cant contribution to attitude to the ad over and above the
square of .578. Thus, the increase in R square, or the unique contributions of the CASC and judgments scales.
additional variance explained in attitude to the ad by the Further, at least in this study, the factor structure of the
CASC scale was .094 or 9.4 percent. In this final step, only scale was not as expected. Instead of the three factors
one of the three dimensions in the feelings scale and two which were expected, eleven factors with an eigenvalue
of the dimensions in the judgments scale were significant greater than one emerged. The judgments scale fared
(p. < .05) predictors of attitude to the ad. However, all the better with all 25 items loading on five factors, more or
three dimensions of the CASC scale were significantly less according to the specifications of the original formu-
(p. < .05) related to attitude to the ad. Thus, all the lation of the reaction profile for television commercials
dimensions of the CASC scale uniquely contributed to the (Wells, Leavitt, and McConville 1971). The judgments
prediction of attitude to the ad and the scale as a whole also scale also made a sizeable contribution to the explanation
uniquely and substantially contributed to the explanation of variance in attitude to the ad and two of the dimensions
of variance in attitude to the ad over and above the of the scale made unique and significant contributions.
variance accounted for by the feelings and judgments
scale. Overall, it would seem from this study that the 16
items of the CASC scale deserve the attention of those
The significant (p. < .05) standardized coefficients attempting to test the effectiveness of television commer-
(beta) in the last step were .209 (prosocial), .097 (analytic) cials in terms of consumer attitudes. The CASC scale
and -.332 (individualistic) for the three factors in the offers the ability to measure both emotional and rational
CASC scale. The only dimension of the feelings scale responses to advertising in a practical and fairly stable
which was significant (p. < .05) had a beta of -.122. The format. Moreover, it appears to contain unique elements
only two significant dimensions of the judgments scale that are not in the other two scales. Further, even with a
had beta weights of .242 and -.164. Thus, only six of the shorter number of items, it predicts attitude to the ad as
eleven independent variables in the equation made unique well if not better than the other two scales. The CASC
and significant (p. < .05) contributions to the prediction of scale does not claim to measure the entire range of human
The expectation is that for strong reputation firms, national advertising expenditure information on over
volume will matter more than valence; for weaker firms, 100,000 different brands. Monthly data were aggregated
valence should be more important than volume. In keep- into quarters over the time period of investigation for each
ing with research showing information effects dependent of the companies included in the study.
on stakeholder perceptions (Wartick 1992; Ahluwalia,
Burnkrant, and Unnava 2000), the analysis accounts for Company Brand Attitude Data
stronger and weaker prior company brand attitudes.
Techtel Corporation provided the company brand
DATA AND DATA ANALYSIS attitude data, which was collected via quarterly surveys of
the personal computing and network computing markets.
This study utilizes data on publicity, advertising, and Their panel surveyed approximately 1500 people influen-
company brand attitude for each of 18 firms, requiring tial in purchasing computer software and hardware (esti-
three separate sources. All data cover the period Janu- mated 50% response rate). The Techtel measure of com-
ary 1, 2000 to July 1, 2003 encompassing 42 months or 14 pany brand attitude asked respondents whether they have
quarters. positive, negative, or no opinion of a company. Like
Aaker and Jacobson (2001), we made use of this informa-
Publicity Data tion to develop a company brand attitude measure defined
as Net Positive Opinion (NPO = percent of respondents
CARMA International provided the publicity data, with positive opinion about the firm –percent of respon-
which are based on a Media Analysis Rating System first dents with a negative opinion about the company). A
developed in 1991. The system rates each article in the simple 3 point scale (positive (1)/neutral (0)/negative (-1)
context in which it appears. Using a pre-determined set of has been used in political science (Robinson, Shaver, and
seven criteria, each article is coded and receives a score Wrightsman 1999) and has been shown (e.g., Haley and
between zero (the least favorable) to 100 (the most favor- Case 1979) to provide information similar to measures
able). All codings begin at 50 (the neutral point), with a with more scale points. For this study we focus on Tech-
possible 50 points added or subtracted from this value. tel’s Enterprise Panel consisting of firms also studied by
CARMA conducts daily tracking of the volume of posi- CARMA, including: AT&T, Cisco, Compaq, Computer
tive and negative press coverage as well as the valence Associates, Dell, EMC, Gateway, Hewlett Packard, IBM,
rating for each article appearing in eighteen major maga- Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Peoplesoft, SAP, Siebel, Sun,
zines and newspapers in the U.S. For this study daily data Sybase, Unisys.
were compiled into quarterly periods to match the compa-
ny brand attitude data. Analysis of Data
TABLE 1
Descriptive Statistics of Variables Used in the Analysis for Overall Sample of Firms, and
Stronger and Weaker Net Positive Opinion Groups of Firms (per quarter)
of favorable publicity was the only significant influence where opinions are unformed or neutral. Such a result was
on Net Positive Opinion (see Table 3A). This model not found; no positive advertising effects were detected
accounts for over 50 percent of the variance in the depen- here. This may support MacInnis et al. (2002) who con-
dent variable. tend that for mature brands, it is the type of message and
not the volume of ad spending that matters.
Results for the Weaker opinion companies were
markedly different (see Table 3B). The overall regression A second notable result was that publicity did matter,
model accounted for only 22 percent of the variance in Net with the influence of valence and volume nuanced. In the
Positive Opinion. An examination of the individual coef- overall model the volume of positive publicity accounted
ficients revealed Publicity Valence as the only factor for the variation in company brand attitude. We can see,
having significant influence on Net Positive Opinion. It however, that this effect obscures a significant difference
appears that Volume of publicity and advertising spend- in how publicity works. Wartick (1992) found that com-
ing had no significant influence on company brand atti- panies with stronger versus weaker reputations are differ-
tude for those with Weaker reputations. entially affected by the volume and valence of publicity.
In his analysis as in ours, volume of positive publicity
DISCUSSION correlated with higher ratings for firms with better repu-
tations. These firms were not influenced by publicity
The task of this research was to examine marketing valence per se. In the context of the social cognition
communications related antecedents of company brand research discussed earlier, it is possible that companies
attitude, namely the volume and valence of publicity and with prior positive reputations are reinforced by more
the volume of advertising on a set of firms in the technol- exposure, a mere exposure effect. Perhaps these stronger
ogy industry. In several articles noted earlier, Aaker and perceptions are related to the stronger commitment found
Jacobson argued that company brand attitude is a compo- to insulate audiences from negative information (Ahlu-
nent of brand equity. These attitudes are related to stock walia et al. 2000).
returns and provided information beyond normal ac-
counting measures. Our current research adds to insights Firms with weaker prior attitudes are affected by the
about company brand attitude by examining the role valence of publicity in the media, but not the volume of
advertising and publicity play in the support or weakening positive or negative articles. Again this result is consistent
of brand equity. with both Wartick’s and Ahluwalia’s findings that com-
panies with weaker reputations are affected more by
First, the volume of advertising is not related to brand unfavorable information than the amount of information.
attitude for the full sample of 18 firms; nor for the separate It appears that that firms with stronger prior reputations
examination of firms with stronger or weaker net positive are given a limited shield of protection not afforded to
opinion. This result is consistent with conclusions by firms with weaker reputations.
Lodish et al. (1995) that advertising weight is not suffi-
cient to explain sales effects. In particular they suggested Third, firms with stronger and weaker reputations do
that newer and smaller brands gain the most from adver- have some important differences in publicity coverage.
tising. Though our study did not examine newer or smaller As the descriptive statistics reveal, firms with stronger
brands, firms with weaker company brand attitudes may brand attitudes have far fewer negative stories and a more
be expected to gain from advertising like a newer brand positive publicity rating on average. The levels of positive
TABLE 3B
Regression of Ad Spending, Volume of Publicity, and Valence on Company Brand Attitudes
for Firms with Weaker Prior Company Brand Attitudes
publicity and advertising between stronger and weaker Finally, the results give credence to the belief that
firms are not different. The important result is that the public relations activity is gaining ascendance relative to
individual regression models run on the firms with stron- advertising in corporate branding. Here we see the unique
ger and weaker brand attitudes still finds a volume effect role of volume and valence of publicity shaping stake-
for the stronger firms and a valence effect for the weaker holder opinions. It supports the view that the media may
firms. Even though firms with stronger company attitudes play a pivotal role in the branding process. Though
have about the same number of positive articles as do beyond the scope of the current research, prior research
firms with weaker company attitudes, the volume of suggests that this media influence effect is magnified
positive publicity continues to perpetuate the strong rep- under conditions of audience uncertainty where informa-
utation. Firms with stronger prior reputations should tion may reduce riskiness perceptions.
strive to enhance the volume of positive publicity they
receive.. No study is without limitations. The effects observed
in this investigation are clearly related to a small set of
At the same time, firms with weaker reputations have firms within the technology industry for a set period of
an average publicity rating lower than the stronger firms; time. An examination of a larger set of firms across a
however, they scored right at the CARMA neutral public- variety of industries may reveal different relationships.
ity rating of 50. It appears that the variation in valence is However, the results reported here are consistent with
influencing firm reputation. This implies that firms with those of other studies focused on different industries and
weaker reputations are not impacted by more articles, using different measures of company brand attitude, pro-
rather it is the ratings or valence of the articles that is most viding a level of convergent validity. The strong effects of
closely related to the level of company brand attitude. publicity found in this study should not be used to elimi-
Fluctuations in the rating valence of stories about these nate advertising. All that is clear from this study is that the
firms is closely related to brand attitudes for these weaker amount of advertising is not related to company brand
reputation firms. attitudes. As MacInnis and her colleagues suggested, it
Task
Performance
Interactional
Justice
Person-Focused
Interpersonal
Citizenship
Behavior
Multi-Foci
Commitment
Task-Focused
Interpersonal
Citizenship Behavior
foci commitments towards the team and the on-going contributes to the better understanding of the role of
project. It is further demonstrated that multi-foci commit- interactional justice perception in enhancing interfunc-
ment serves as the partial mediator between the perceived tional communication and cooperation in the new product
interactional justice and both team members’ task perfor- development process.
mance and interpersonal citizenship behavior. The paper
SUMMARY pleski et al. 1993; O’Neal and LaFief 1992). Thus, accep-
tance of marketing’s key role in establishing product
Many firms have instituted quality programs in an quality implies a contingency view of product quality
effort to upgrade and continually improve the quality of (Varadarajan and Jayachandran 1999). However, there
their products for the ultimate purpose of creating com- has been little, if any, research on if and how environmen-
petitive advantage (Clark and Fujimoto 1991; Menon tal factors moderate the relationship between product
et al. 1997). This emphasis on product quality is well- quality and performance.
deserved as there is strong evidence that product quality
is an important determinant of firm performance (Buzzell Since product quality is a deliberate firm strategy to
2004; Hildebrandt and Buzzell 1991; Jacobson and Aaker differentiate one’s offerings from its competitors’ (Jacob-
1987; Phillips, Chang, and Buzzell 1983; Sethi 2000). son and Aaker 1987; Phillips, Chang, and Buzzell 1983;
The positive impact of product quality on performance Porter 1980; Varadarajan and Jayachandran 1999), we
(Buzzell 2004; Hackman and Wageman 1995; Hilde- propose that the effectiveness of such a strategy will be
brandt and Buzzell 1991; Jacobson and Aaker 1987; influenced by the nature and dynamics of its environment
Phillips, Chang, and Buzzell 1983; Sethi 2000) is of (internal and external). This proposition resonates with
particular interest because it suggests a direct effect rela- Varadarajan and Jayachandran’s (1999) argument that
tionship. Research has investigated the direct effect of the “market performance outcome of a business’s deci-
product quality on various performance dimensions such sion to offer products of a high quality is contingent on . . .
as market share and profitability (Buzzell 2004; Hilde- consumers’ characteristics and competitors’ reactions”
brandt and Buzzell 1991; Phillips, Chang, and Buzzell (p. 130).
1983), price (Jacobson and Aaker 1987; Phillips, Chang,
and Buzzell 1983) and costs (Jacobson and Aaker 1987; We define product quality from a customer, rather
Phillips, Chang, and Buzzell 1983). Though the evidence than a supplier, perspective (Bounds et al. 1994; Kordu-
is substantial, uncritical acceptance of this result suggests pleski et al. 1993; Morgan and Piercy 1998). A customer-
that product quality defies the logic of contingency theo- focused approach views quality as the customer’s percep-
ry. Such a view is subject to theoretical skepticism given tion of how well a given product meets their needs and
that a variety of marketing strategies (e.g., market orien- expectations (Kordupleski et al. 1993; Morgan and Piercy
tation, innovation, strategic alliances) have been found to 1998; Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry 1985). Put an-
follow contingency theory. other way, quality is “simply conformance to [the] re-
quirements” (O’Neal and LaFief 1992) of the customer.
Practically, uncritical acceptance of the direct effect Although product quality may influence new product
of quality on performance down plays the role of market- performance directly, it is possible that external market
ing in ensuring market performance. The importance of factors may help or harm that relationship (Varadarajan
the marketing function in building product quality is well- and Jayachandran 1999). Our theoretical arguments sug-
established (Cravens et al. 1988; Kordupleski et al. 1993; gest that when technological uncertainty is high, firms
O’Neal and LaFief 1992). In fact, it has been argued that may need to commit to certain aspects of the technology
marketing, as the most customer-focused function (Kor- before they know and understand the ramifications of
dupleski et al. 1993), should play the lead role in establish- their actions. The level of quality based on those actions
ing product quality (Kordupleski et al. 1993; O’Neal and is likely to be rendered inferior by new technological
LaFief 1992) as its job is to understand customer needs developments which may have a negative effect on prod-
and translate those needs into products with high custom- uct quality. Similarly, in situations of high market uncer-
er value (Cravens et al. 1988; Kordupleski et al. 1993; tainty, project teams need to monitor market shifts and
O’Neal and LaFief 1992). Creation of value through high adjust product specifications accordingly (Menon et al.
product quality depends on marketing skills in analyzing 1997). Since it takes time for firms to adjust the level of
and determining customer needs, competitor analysis, quality to meet both rapidly changing customer needs and
identifying appropriate target segments, product position- competitive actions, the positive effect of product quality
ing, communication, pricing, distribution, and speedy on new product performance is likely to diminish. Greater
implementation of launch (Cravens et al. 1988; Kordu- customer demandingness may indicate that customers are
Powerful Powerless
N = 60 N = 78
Antecedents
Experiential Consequences
Cognition (% frequencies)
χ2 = 21.49 (p < 0.05)
Action oriented 0.43 0.15
Provider oriented 0.49 0.55
Rumination 0.06 0.16
Avoidance 0.02 0.14
Expectations (% frequencies)
χ2 = 9.07 (p < 0.05)
Core service related 0.46 0.25
Interpersonal service related 0.36 0.59
No expectations 0.18 0.16
Emotions (mean values)
Anger
t = -8.11 (p < 0.05) 1.97 3.55
Happiness
t = 8.44 (p < 0.05) 2.30 1.48
Worry
t = -5.42 (p < 0.05) 1.78 2.69
Shame
t = -3.21 (p < 0.05) 1.30 1.69
Emotion expression (mean values)
t = 1.65 (p < 0.10) 4.33 3.90
Service quality perceptions (mean values)
t = 8.47 (p < 0.05) 3.69 2.15
Consumer satisfaction (mean values)
t = 9.11 (p < 0.05) 4.87 2.49
having already paid for this expensive chalet,” or focus- action-oriented thoughts. These results reflect past re-
sing on how the provider was delivering the service. search indicating the “other-focus” of powerless consum-
Powerless consumers tended to have provider-oriented ers while powerful consumers focus on how they can
thoughts (55%) and reported a very low frequency of any accentuate and protect their powerful position in the
A performance orientation for consumers focuses on Seventy percent of the stories reflected situations
four key constructs: vision, access, incentive, and exper- where consumer performance was enabled, while 30
tise. We define vision in terms of two key components, the percent of the stories reflected situations where consumer
consumer’s awareness of key performance goals or out- performance was restrained. In terms of the consumer
comes, and the feedback the consumer receives related to performance model, a vast majority of the stories (72%)
the achievement of the goals or outcomes. Access defines described situations where access had the strongest influ-
This is done by estimating the “best” (in an OLS- In an experiment seventy-nine business students at
sense) scale factor, by which to multiply the utilities for master level were asked to express on a scale from 0 to 10
the bridging attributes in the second design to match the their willingness to by 2 x 27 different cars, each described
utilities in the first. The hope being that the coefficients of in an 18-attribute profile. A week later they were asked to
all factors in the second equation should also be made evaluate five car profiles (with all 18 attributes). This
comparable with those of the first equation by multiplica- second round was a holdout round, i.e., the data from this
tion with the same constant. Only rarely will the “regulat- round was not used to calculate the preference functions.
ed” utilities of the bridging attributes from the second Rather they were used to evaluate the functions by com-
design be the same as those estimated from the first paring the results of the holdout round with predictions
design, and consequently we end up with two estimates of based on the preference functions calculated on data from
the utilities of the bridging attributes, as well as two the first round. The main results were as follows:
estimates of the constant. This problem is solved by
averaging these utilities. 1. Compared to traditional bridging SUR reduced the
MAD (Mean Absolute Deviation) by about 30 per-
Although bridging has been used in several conjoint cent and the correlation between actual and predicted
studies as an intuitively reasonable – although somewhat preferences was increased by no less than about 70
rough – method for solving the problem of respondent percent. These figures are averages taken over the
overload, the method is not quite satisfactory, as it is best five holdout profiles.
described as a sequence of ad hoc’eries. Consequently the
statistical (distributional) properties of the model are 2. The variation of MAD and correlations across the five
rather obscure, making traditional testing meaningless – profiles was considerable smaller for SUR than for
or at least complicated. traditional bridging – i.e., SUR is more stable.
In order to overcome the weaknesses of traditional 3. Traditional bridging results in larger uncertainty on
bridging, I would suggest Zellner’s seemingly unrelated parameters estimated in the second evaluation as
regression model (SUR). In its basic form, the model is: compared to the first.
Σi α X + ε
y1 = α0 + i i 1
To sum up: The advantages of SUR as compared to
traditional bridging are:
y =β + Σ βZ +ε
2 0 j j 2 1. Estimation and “bridging” is done in one go instead
j of in tandem.
where (possibly) cov(ε1, ε2) =/ 0
3. The uncertainty is more evenly divided among the 5. Unlike bridging, SUR is a formal model with well-
parameters in the model, whereas traditional bridg- known statistical properties; which means that statis-
ing favours the first conjoint evaluation. tical evaluation and testing etc. can be performed on
the total model, and not only on the separate (un-
4. The possible correlation of the error terms – caused bridged) models. References available upon request.
by the fact that the two parts of the model are based
With the emergence of computer-mediated commu- In this paper, the main focus is on the relationships
nication (CMC), online stores are experimenting with between online store attributes and customer satisfaction.
attributes that are unique to the new media. There is a While Baker (1986) and Bitner (1992) proposed catego-
choice of many attributes (such as search engine, ordering ries of attributes that impact consumer responses to retail-
system, order status tracking, customer survey, personal- er cues, Eroglu, Machleit, and Davis (2003) argue that
ization, and virtual reality display, etc.), each performing these typologies do not easily translate into the online
a specific function and distinct from other attributes world. Existing empirical research is limited.
within the website. In addition to deciding which at-
tributes to include and how to specifically operationalize We report on an empirical study designed to test
the selected attributes, online store managers are also whether retail store attributes affect users’ satisfaction
concerned about the impact of an attribute or a set of with and loyalty to the website. Secondary data, collected
attributes on customer satisfaction and loyalty. at the online store level, were compiled directly from
www.bizrate.com in August 2003. Customer ratings on
While there is an established body of literature and 1079 individual online stores were collected.
decades of experience regarding the design of physical
stores, the new world of online stores and website at- First, factor analysis of 12 attributes (excluding “over-
tributes are now beginning to receive attention. In addi- all look and design of site”) was performed and the results
tion to describing multiple attributes, several authors have indicate that the time at which the measures are taken
attempted to categorize them into “must have” and “should contribute to the factor loadings; hence the two factors are
have” attributes (e.g., Burke 2002). Given the large num- labeled “at check out” and “after delivery.” The two
ber of possible attributes as well as the changing nature of factors explain 68 percent of the variance. Second, several
technology that makes new attributes increasingly possi- multiple regression analyses are performed to examine
ble, it is not surprising that there is a lack of consensus the relationship between the attributes and the attributes
regarding “must have” and “optional” attributes. and customer satisfaction and loyalty (intention to revis-
it).
Website Attributes
From the analysis of the customer ratings, we draw
Using Ghose and Dou’s (1998) classification of web- some conclusions regarding the influence of online store
site attributes, we first attempt to identify potential at- attributes on site design, satisfaction and repeat purchase
tributes across four different types of websites – commu- intentions. First of all, “ease of finding what you are
nication, entertainment, information, and transaction (on- looking for” and “clarity of product information” are the
line store). With so many website attributes to choose two most important attributes for generating positive
from, our analysis suggests that transaction (or online ratings of overall look and design of the site. The analysis
store) sites are more likely to include certain types of also suggests how specific attributes are operationalized
attributes. It also suggests that online stores are “attribute are as important as whether or not a specific attribute is
rich” – potentially containing the maximum number (16) included.
of the 25 specific attributes. It is also very likely that online
stores will differ not only on the number of specific We also find that the time gap between interacting
attributes incorporated within specific websites, but also with a site and evaluating the experience or indicating
how a specific attribute such as “customer support” is revisit intentions affects the impact of attributes; some
operationalized. These variations create important chal- attributes persist in their impact. Others appear to lose
lenges for research on the effects of individual attributes some of their impact.
on customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Sense of Place: Sense of place is the meaning at- Consumer behavior researchers have examined the
tached to a spatial setting by a person or group. Further, person-product bonding relationships by focusing on
In addition, measurement has complicated the study The paper reports results from a survey of recently
of defection drivers in two ways. First, researchers often defected consumers on a variety of services using the five
have relied on measures of customer satisfaction to iden- elements of the Servqual scale, price, and the physical
tify problem areas in service delivery that might influence product as defection driver categories. The study shows
future defection. Satisfaction has been found to have a that a vast majority of defection decisions are multi-
significant impact on repurchase intentions, but that im- dimensional. Less than 10 percent of the respondents have
pact is typically small (Bolton 1998), and it has been a uni-dimensional defection weight profile in which one
shown that in some cases as much as 65 percent to 85 reason dominates, i.e., represents 75 percent or more of
percent of defected customers report being “satisfied” or the decision to defect. This finding supports Keaveney’s
“highly satisfied” (Reichheld 1996). Even dissatisfaction (1995) qualitative findings of the complexity of the defec-
is not necessarily a predictor of defection (Hennig-Thurau tion decision.
and Klee 1997). For a loyal customer, it may take repeated
incidences of dissatisfaction with various elements of a The paper also compares the relative influence of the
product purchase or service encounter before the custom- tested defection drivers using the DWM technique to the
er chooses to switch. Or, it may require that a customer relative influence of the same drivers as reported by
reach a threshold level of dissatisfaction on a particular traditional customer satisfaction measures using regres-
factor or combination of factors to choose to leave. Even sion analysis. Significant differences in the relative weights
if a customer is not particularly loyal, defection may not of the tested factors are demonstrated between the two
occur despite unsatisfactory experiences, because of con- methods, supporting past evidence that traditional mea-
venience or competitive issues. sures of satisfaction are not valid proxies for drivers of
defection.
SUMMARY and that the ability of both cognition and affect to predict
customer satisfaction should increases.
Previous research has recognized that both cognition
and affect significantly predict satisfaction judgments. The results of an experimental study based on a real
However, only a few studies have investigated cognitive consumption experience indicate that the impact of cog-
and affective antecedents of customer satisfaction simul- nition on the satisfaction evaluation increases over time
taneously. Moreover, these studies have been static (i.e., and that the influence of affect decreases. Moreover, these
cross-sectional) in nature. This represents a significant effects are more pronounced in the case of consistent
shortcoming since it is well established that customer performance experiences. Finally, the study shows that
satisfaction is a dynamic phenomenon. Despite the strong the variance in customer satisfaction jointly explained by
recognition that customer satisfaction should be viewed cognition and affect increases as experience accumulates.
from a dynamic perspective, the role of cognitive and The findings have several important implications for
affective influences has not been systematically studied in marketing managers. For example, the study helps man-
this manner. The few studies which have investigated the agers to understand customer satisfaction in a more thor-
antecedents of customers satisfaction from a dynamic ough way. It sheds light on the formation process of
perspective have focused on the cognitive component of customer satisfaction and shows that customers satisfac-
customer satisfaction. tion has a more stochastic character in early stages. Thus,
it is more easily for managers to influence the satisfaction
Against this background, this study provides a dy- judgment in the early stages where the satisfaction evalu-
namic analysis of the simultaneous influence of cognition ation has not yet been crystallized. Further, it is common
and affect in the satisfaction formation process. The in practice for managers to think of customer satisfaction
fundamental proposition is that the role of cognition and in a logical, rational manner (i.e., if the product or service
affect may change over time. We argue that affect plays its performs well, satisfaction will be higher). The results of
strongest role at the early stages of satisfaction develop- this study point out that affect can play a critical role as
ment, whereas the impact of cognition should increase well, particularly in the early stages of the satisfaction
over time. In addition, we build a case that this phenom- formation process. Thus, for new relationships or new
enon also depends on the level of consistency of the products and services managers must pay close attention
consumption experience (i.e., is it consistently positive or to affective aspects and be careful to manage them effec-
consistently negative). Furthermore, we argue that satis- tively.
faction judgments should become more stable over time
ABSTRACT were the two factors integration of the external factor and
service quality variation. It was assumed that, as a result
The Six Sigma methodology, traditionally referring of cultural value differences between the service provider
to defect reduction and quality improvement in manufac- and the customer, the integration of the external factor
turing, can also be applied successfully to marketing. could be defective. This might be based on the perception
Some service quality defects are related to intercultural of the customer, who measures the service’s quality
differences, especially when taking the direct integration according to his/her own specific cultural values while the
of external factors – international customers – into ac- service provider might base the service on another culture
count. In a study involving German, Spanish, and Swed- value. Thus, the integration of external factor – the inter-
ish customers, the authors found that people from cultures national customer – is defective. Since the perceived
with a high degree of uncertainty avoidance were less service quality varies based on cultural value differences
satisfied when their service expectations were not met. and there is a dependency between service quality and the
This suggests that Six Sigma can reduce service quality integration of the external factor (Hutchens 1989; Stamatis
defects related to intercultural differences if preceded by 1996), another assumption was that if the integration of
sound intercultural operative planning and training of the external factor was defective, the level of perceived
service personnel. service quality would be low.
• the degree of power distance (indicating the extent to In his research, Hofstede (1980, 2001) compares low
which a society accepts the fact that power in institu- and high uncertainty avoidance in societies and uses the
tions and organizations is distributed unequally); degree of uncertainty avoidance to distinguish between
societal norms. With regard to peoples’ beliefs, attitudes,
• the degree of uncertainty avoidance (indicating the and behaviors, low uncertainty avoidance refers to: low
extent to which a society tries to avoid uncertain levels of stress and anxiety; weaker superegos and less
situations by, for example, establishing more formal showing of emotions; aggressive behavior is frowned
rules and believing in, and/or striving for expertise); upon; greater tolerance and acceptance of diversity and
uncertain situations; strong belief in general approaches
• the degree of individualism (indicating the extent to and common sense to problem solving, where people
which relationships are based on loose social frame- should be rewarded for innovative approaches; commit-
works rather than on collectivism, where people are ments are less binding and relationships are built quickly
tightly integrated in primary groups, such as families but can also be dissolved as quickly; focus on short-term
and organizations); planning (up to five years); rules and laws should be
adaptive and changed if they don’t work; more acceptance
• the degree of masculinity (indicating the extent to of dissent; and willingness to take unknown risk.
which dominant values or roles in society are viewed
“masculine,” for example achievement, assertive- On the other hand, high uncertainty avoidance refers
ness and performance, when measured against its to: higher stress levels and an inner urge to be busy; robust
opposite pole, femininity, defined as quality of life, superegos and more showing of emotions; aggressive
caring for other people as well as social and gender behavior of self and others is accepted; less tolerance and
equality (Hofstede 1980, 1997, 2001). acceptance of unclear situations; less acceptance of dis-
sent and strong need for consensus, clarity and structure;
Based on their research in Asia, Hofstede and Bond strong belief in expertise and knowledge for problem
(1988) found a new dimension, which was later added to solving, where accuracy should be rewarded; commit-
Hofstede’s (1997, 2001) research as a fifth dimension and ments are long-lasting and relationships, which are built
labeled: slowly, are expected to last for a long time; focus on long-
FIGURE 1
Country UAI*
Greece 112 Colombia 80 Norway 50
Portugal 104 Brazil 76 New Zealand 49
Guatemala 101 Venezuela 76 South Africa 49
Uruguay 100 Italy 75 Canada 48
Belgium 94 Czech Republic 74 Indonesia 48
El Salvador 94 Austria 70 United States 46
Poland 93 Pakistan 70 Philippines 44
Japan 92 Taiwan 69 China 40
Peru 87 Arab World 68 India 40
Argentia 86 Ecuador 67 Malaysia 36
Chile 86 Germany 65 Ireland 35
Costa Rica 86 Thailand 64 United Kindom 35
France 86 Finland 59 Hong Kong 29
Panama 86 Iran 59 Sweden 29
Spain 86 Switzerland 58 Denmark 23
South Korea 85 West Africa 54 Jamaica 13
Turkey 85 Netherlands 53 Singapore 8
Hungary 82 East Africa 52
Mexico 82 Australia 51
Israel 81
* UAI = Uncertainty Avoidance Index
225
term planning (up to 20 years); strong need and adherence process variables, which will then be measured, ana-
to rules and regulations to make behavior predictable; lyzed, improved, and controlled. The Measurement
concern with security in life; and knowing about risks phase comprises the setup of a capable measurement
(Adler 1997, p. 53; Hofstede 2001, p. 161). Based on these system to measure the dependent variables: in this
general comparisons, service providers can and should case customer satisfaction with regard to a specific
use Hofstede’s (1980, 2001) uncertainty avoidance index service. In the Analysis phase, the independent vari-
to integrate the external service factor in their operations ables are assessed, which was the service variable
by defining service quality for international customers in “delivery time” in this study. Then, in the Improve-
terms of cultural awareness and intercultural prepared- ment phase, the value of the independent variables
ness of service employees in addition to their obvious will be increased. Finally, the Control phase is neces-
business and organizational skills. A specially tailored sary to review the measurement system and the cor-
intercultural training – including service factors such as rectness of its outputs (Pande, Neuman, and Ca-
reliability, responsiveness, competence, courtesy, credi- vanagh 2000, p. 39).
bility, security, access, communication, and understand-
ing the customer – can provide appropriate and useful • Customer Satisfaction Measurement: Six Sigma aims
approaches for adaptation to international customers’ at the achievement of fullest customer satisfaction by
different value systems and behaviors. This is especially providing a defect-free process or service. As already
true when the training focuses on the aforementioned mentioned above, customer satisfaction can be se-
uncertainty avoidance differences as the result of different lected as dependent target variable, which is influ-
cultural backgrounds. Therefore, to achieve a high level enced by one or more process drivers. Its measure-
of external factor integration, service providers should ment should be done before as well as after the
strive continuously to improve the level of customer process improvement to compare and view progress.
satisfaction, which should include intercultural under-
standing and display of correct and appropriate behavior • Cultural Awareness and Preparation Training: Six
towards international customers. Based on the cultural Sigma also integrates change management. Improv-
differences in Hofstede’s uncertainty avoidance dimen- ing a process also means changing human behavior in
sion, it can be hypothesized: H1: Customers from cultures organizations to minimize defects. In international
with a high degree of uncertainty avoidance will be less service marketing, operational planning for special
satisfied when their service expectations are not met. cultural awareness as well as preparation training on
Consequently, in order to achieve customer satisfaction intercultural differences is necessary and especially
with people from high uncertainty avoidance cultures, the essential for the integration of the external factor
service provider needs to meet all relevant service expec- when service providers and customers have different
tations. cultural backgrounds and opposing views on how to
deal with uncertainty avoidance. As explained be-
QUALITY VARIATION AND SIX SIGMA fore, the differences between low and high degrees of
uncertainty avoidance can be so severe between
Quality variation characterizes service as well. The people from diverse cultural backgrounds that under-
central source of quality variation is the defective integra- standing their behavior and being aware of their
tion of the external factor (Hutchens 1989; Stamatis different perceptions are very important to prevent
1996). Among the reasons for defective customer integra- irreparable service defects. Therefore, proactive in-
tion are some of the following service personnel short- tercultural communication training programs based
comings: lack of responsiveness and timeliness, missing on Hofstede’s (1980, 2001) uncertainty avoidance
competence and courtesy, miscommunication and faulty dimension have to emerge as critical events in the
understanding of the customer (Heineke and Davis 1994). development of the international service provider’s
Kotler (2003) identifies three actions to overcome quality management strategies to improve service quality.
variation: process improvement, customer satisfaction Such training can effectively enhance future service
measurement, and service personnel training. All three quality both for service providers and customers in
actions can be achieved with the Six Sigma methodology: overseas assignments, as well as in multicultural and
ethnically diverse domestic settings. The information
• Process Improvement: Six Sigma not only implies gained and behavioral skills learned will not only
statistics; it also uses managerial tools for process help to prevent service defects, but also enable the
improvement. A Six Sigma project usually follows service provider to perform on a much higher quality
the so called D-M-A-I-C approach (Define-Measure- level. Thus, customers will experience the service
Analyze-Improve-Control). In the Definition phase, function on a much higher satisfaction level.
customer requirements are surveyed, potential sav-
ings are evaluated and the process is mapped. The There are basically two ways to achieve a Six Sigma
customer requirements directly lead to the relevant level. One way is through reduction of scattering, the
FIGURE 3
1 2 3 4 5
very satisfied not satisfied TOTAL
Ulrich F. Luenemann
Department of Communication Studies
California State University, Sacramento
6000 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95819
Phone: 916.278.6688
FAX: 916.929.1638
E-Mail: calulli@saclink.csus.edu
SUMMARY the alpha type occurs within a fixed and stable system and
can be accurately measured with reliable dimensions.
More than ten years ago, Achrol’s (1991) work on the Beta change also involves periphery change within a fixed
evolution of the marketing organization envisaged the system, but is complicated by the fact that the dimensions
dynamic environment in which marketers exist today. He of measurement or calibration have changed as well. Beta
portends, “The future will be characterized most notably change may be likened to changes occurring in a stable
by unprecedented levels of diversity, knowledge rich- system, however fluctuating “rubber yardsticks” provide
ness, and turbulence” (Achrol 1991, p. 77). Our discipline unreliable measurement. We extend the discussion of this
has witnessed Achrol’s prophecies come to fruition, as the type of change by proposing two distinct forms of beta
marketing environment is characterized by unprecedent- change. The typology has relevant application to a broad
ed dynamism and turbulence. Broad social and cultural spectrum of change affecting marketing strategy, and we
change in the form of technological intensity, globaliza- highlight some examples for illustration.
tion and global outsourcing, and regulatory and political
unrest is illustrative of our marketing landscape. There- In response to the unique impact of change, a few key
fore, to extend the predictions of Achrol into the present, organizational phenomena will combine to determine
and in the spirit of “understanding diverse and emerging marketing’s ability to overcome change. Three relevant
markets, technologies, and strategies,” our aim is to ad- factors instrumental to the marketing function’s change
vance appreciation of change and its role in the marketing response include opacity, asperity, and intricacy. Re-
organization. search has demonstrated these variables’ impact on an
organization’s ability to manage and ultimately survive
Little is known about the effects of broad social, significant change (Hannan, Pólos, and Carroll 2003).
cultural, and strategic change on the marketing organiza- Opacity describes phenomena at the individual level,
tion in particular. Further, no commonly accepted frame- specifically concerning marketing managers’ perceptions,
work exists by which to categorize and thus better under- actions, or possible oversights. In particular, we consider
stand specific types of change in marketing. As a founda- opacity as marketing mangers’ inability to foresee, effec-
tion, we draw from existing literature in organizational tively comprehend, and thus plan accordingly in the face
theory on change. Most organizational theorists agree that of change. Asperity describes normative, cultural phe-
change may occur either incrementally and peripherally nomena affecting large groups or subgroups within the
which causes a small scale impact, or radically by altering organization. Within marketing, interrelatedness between
the core functioning of the organization. Because this normative structures and organizational culture makes the
first-order or periphery change is the most predominant marketing function more or less susceptible to failure in
type of change to be experienced by organizations (Fox- light of change. Finally intricacy describes the overall
Wolfgramm, Boal, and Hunt 1998), it is surprising that organizational design, specifically the degree of intercon-
contemporary research has made little attempt to refine nectedness between relevant organizational units. Al-
this conceptualization further. One important exception is though highly interconnected organizations may promote
the typology introduced by Golembiewski, Billingsley, positive communication structures and decentralized de-
and Yeager (1976), which delineates three distinct cate- cision making for example, organizations that are too
gories of change. This typology is considered a relevant highly interconnected may lose flexibility. Achrol (1991)
lens through which to view marketing specific change, emphasizes that the impact of change will be intensified in
and has been usefully employed in other marketing re- densely interconnected and interdependent settings. We
search (e.g., Cooper 2000). apply these organizational phenomena to the marketing
discipline with specific descriptions and examples of each
Similar to the radical change classifications of core opacity, asperity, and intricacy.
and second-order change, the typology considers gamma
change. The authors define gamma change as a “quantum Our research marries these marketing organizational
shift in ways of conceptualizing salient dimensions of phenomena to the various conceptualizations of change.
reality,” (Golembiewski et al. 1976, p. 138). Alpha change Just as alpha, beta, and gamma changes are defined so
involves smaller scale change such as that described by differently, it follows that their impact on opacity, asper-
the terms periphery, non-core, or first-order. Change of ity, and intricacy will fluctuate and vary. In worst-case
Mona Srivastava
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843
Phone: 979.845.4525
FAX: 979.862.2811
E-Mail: msrivastava@cgsb.tamu.edu
FIGURE 1
Conceptual Model
Social
Disclosure
P2, P5
People
Skills Negotiation Relationship
P1, P3 P6 Establishment
Exchange
Disclosure
P4
Empirical examination of the propositions presented in Table 1 tests this graphical model.
Propos-
Research Propositions Instrument Item Construct tions
Norms are used to provide a context for Information the agent acquired Social P2
messages (Weitz and Jap 1995) included which other agents Disclosure
were being considered
Communication increases over time spent The agent got to know the People P3
on the relationship (Weitz and Jap 1995) principal Skill
Salespersons must be skilled active listeners The agent got to know the People
that have the ability to communicate (Weitz principal Skill
and Jap 1995)
Exchange specific self-disclosure influences The agent got the principal to Exchange P4
the outcome of a sales attempt (Jacobs et al. share good things about the Disclosure
2000) property
Social self-disclosure influences the The agent got the principal to Social P5
outcome of a sales attempt(Jacobs et al. share why they were selling and Disclosure
2000) if they had already purchased
Negotiation of terms leads to a sale (Weitz The amount of changes to the Negotiation P6
and Jap 1995) agent’s proposed service
offering (sales commission, list
and reserve price, advertise-
ments)
and aim to determine which agent characteristics influ- cipal relationship is established (a sale of agent services
ence whether an agent-principal relationship was formed occurs). If unsuccessful, no legally binding agreement is
between agent and principal. established between that agent and that principal (no sale
occurs). Whether an agency agreement is established with
In this paper real estate agents, or realtors, are used as another agent, or does nothing at all is not measured.
sellers to examine agent-principal relationship establish-
ment because they engage in commonly occurring agency Construct Operationalisation
experiences with property sales (and purchases) that re-
quire establishment of an agent-principal relationship for Based on Churchill’s (1979) paradigm, discussions
technical or economic reasons. They operate in agent- provided a breadth and depth of qualitative data required
principal relationships in which people generally have for empirical instrument development to test Figure 1.
multi-agent experiences as they sell houses and property
at different points in their lives. In general, people who For this research we define negotiation as: the bar-
have engaged in such agent-principal relationships as gaining, trading-off, “haggling,” that results in change to
either agent and/or as principal (property vendors that the terms of the agent-principal agreement. This excludes
wish to sell their properties with the assistance of an agent) the design, plan, and assembling of the agent proposal,
readily share information about their experience. The anything prior to the completion of initial principal eval-
dependent variable for this research is a relationship uation of the agent proposal, anything prior to both parties
establishment attempt. This can be either successful or establishing their goals, measurement of the principal’s
unsuccessful. If successful, a legally binding agent-prin- previous experiences, and anything to do directly with
FIGURE 2
Structural Model Estimates
1 1 1 1
q 14 a q 14 d q 11 e q 11 k
1.23 1.15 1.00 .73
eppl 1.03 1.00 e exch
1 1
People .68 Exchange
Skills Disclosure
.33 -.05
6.16
.63
eneg
esoc 1
1 Social .02
Negotiation
Disclosure
2.14 1.59 1.00 1.00 .90 1.03
q 11 d q 11 b q 11 a q 13 a q 13 b q 13 c
1 1 1 1 1 1
1.08 4.60 4.08 3.58 3.38
1.85
eq 11 d eq 13 a eq 13 b eq 13 c
eq 11 b eq 11 a
Boot Bollen
Incre- Strap &
RMSEA Normed Relative Mental Comparative Mean SE of Stine
Chi-Sq Df P max Fit Fit Fit Fit Disc MEAN P-value
M’ment 18.97 29 .922 .02 .95 .92 1.03 1.00 38.38 .30 .97
Model
Structural 40.26 31 .123 .06 .94 .92 .99 .99 38.53 .26 .40
Model
Sale 21.20 31 .906 .03 .94 .91 1.03 1.00 41.47 .32 .96
No sale 47.72 31 .028 .10 .87 .81 .95 .95 36.78 .26 .16
TABLE 3
Differences Between a Sale and No-Sale (SEM Results)
People Skills to
Exchange Disclosure 0.63 0.16 3.98 *** 0.68 0.25 2.73 0.01 No
People Skills to
Social Disclosure 0.32 0.10 3.19 0.00 0.38 0.15 2.53 0.01 No
Social Disclosure to
Negotiation 0.40 0.28 1.43 0.15 -0.47 0.36 -1.28 0.20 Yes
Exchange Disclosure to
Negotiation -0.19 0.25 -0.75 0.46 0.16 0.31 0.53 0.60 No
sion results in the table below show significant relation- On a theoretical level, negotiation should depend on
ships between modelled constructs and the outcome of an information disclosure for setting up terms of a business
agent-principal relationship establishment attempt when relationship. Personal relationships set up the clients’
Sig. < 0.05. satisfaction prior to any sharing of information that may
lead to commencement of negotiations, or eventuate in a
These results show that getting to know the customer sale. We propose therefore that this can be viewed as two
(sig. = .009 in Table 4) is the best way to (a) achieve social distinct phases of the sales process. The people skills
disclosure and (b) establish the relationship that deter- construct can be viewed as what is commonly discussed in
mines the likelihood that a marketing exchange will industry sales literature and training courses as “rapport
occur; Knowing the competition is important aspect for a building,” or “empathy selling” (Golis 1991). These re-
sale (sig. = .037 in Table 4); That negotiation and ex- sults give empirical support to the notion that the selling
change specific disclosure will not assist in establishing a process can be observed as a “phase transition” where
sales exchange without the support of the people skills people skills (the ability to build rapport) are most impor-
component. tant and come first. Without establishing rapport, and
TABLE 4
Logistic Regressions Results
Construct Measured
Instrument Item Wald Sig. by Instrument Item
TABLE 5
Purchaser Pilot Study Results
FIGURE 3
Revised Model
Social
Disclosure
P2, P5
People Relationship
Negotiation Establishment
Skills
P6
P1, P3
Exchange
Disclosure
P4
The important practical implication from our re- Negotiation emerges as a demand side benefit (post
search is in the area of sales training known currently to be relationship establishment, post-“sale”) for pursuit of a
a process of (i) developing a taxonomy of behaviors (ii) final transaction and is not needed for relationship estab-
practicing skills and (iii) providing support and reinforce- lishment. Currently, agent-principal relationships (sales)
ment (Shaw 1981). This research takes the first step in begin in the case of real estate by presenting a proposed
defining a taxonomy of behavior that leads to sales rela- marketing campaign to a client in the context of selective
tionship establishment. successes and failures that is often tweaked and altered.
Our research demonstrates that negotiation is not even
By modeling and empirically testing behavior that desirable when tendering a relationship proposal to a
influences the likelihood that a sale is made, the outcome potential client. As a result agency owners should hire
of a sales attempt is found not to be determined, as agents that have excellent people skills and can get along
described by Bergen et al. (1992), by processes that follow with a potential client because of the importance of these
initial contact between an agent and a principal in which to a relationship establishment attempt outcome directly;
terms of an agency agreement are negotiated. It is instead have adequate processes in place so that agents are not put
determined at the point at which an initial context, or in the position of having to negotiate terms of an agent-
reference point, is established. This point is translated by principal relationship because this will not assist in rela-
the principal into their measure, or perception, of equity tionship establishment; and ensure adequate training pro-
and fairness that actually determines the outcome of the cesses are available for personal skill acquisition, prac-
agent-principal relationship establishment attempt rather tice, and support.
than any negotiation.
Agents need to be most concerned about gaining
For the literature, this paper contributes the finding acceptance by a client at the initial point of contact so that
that information disclosure is seen as an influence of the the client will disclose sufficient information to the agent
likelihood that a sale will result, rather than negotiation so that the agent can consolidate the initial relationship
although social information is seen as an influence on into a sales transaction. As a result, the client is less likely
negotiation. Quigg and Wisner’s (1998) work needs to be to experience cognitive dissonance that will result in an
reworked to reflect the contributions of Levitt’s (1986) unsuccessful relationship establishment attempt.
consumer reference point thereby acknowledging attitu-
dinal psychology; Braun’s (1999) work needs to be mod- CONCLUSION
ified to reflect the substantial benefit to agent-principal
relationship establishment from identification of Kahne- A fresh view of the selling process as one of phase
man, Knetsch, and Thaler’s (1986) framing effects (iden- transitions offers great potential. At a practitioner level,
tification of the competition); and Jacoby, Chestnut, and the notion of “rapport” reaching as a prerequisite for a
Fisher (1978) and Marsh and Zumpano’s (1998) work phase transition to negotiation and then onto a sale offers
needs to be modified because these authors incorrectly empirical evidence not provided in this way before whilst
detail the role of information in agent-principal relation- not being a startling new insight for the sales profession.
ship establishment. Thus this research provides new support for existing
training methods. Gathering further data from the client
Although we do not specifically focus on communi- side of the agency transaction and replication in other
cation, interpersonal communication between agent and industries offers much scope for developing the model
client (in generally getting along and getting to know each into accountable marketing knowledge. The scope also
other) is shown to be paramount to a sale. Bagozzi (2000) exists for work across cultures and geographic locations
clearly acknowledges the role of emotions in consumer to even further refine and confirm the model. Interesting
purchase decisions and the level of rationality behind insights may result from the application of the model in a
agents’ efforts to avert cognitive dissonance on the part of cross-cultural setting. Importantly, this research is held
the purchaser (Bagozzi and Dholakia 1999; Bagozzi, out for comment, and contribution to the divide between
According to Thaler (1985) mental accounting theo- To many participants of LPs, the program rewards are
ry, consumers evaluate the acquisition utility of transac- uncertain and delayed because they are contingent to a
tions, combining what is obtained relative to its price and series of subsequent purchases. In response to uncertainty
valuating the utility, in accordance to Kahneman and and delay outcomes, people discount their values and
Tversky (1979) prospect theory. Prospect theory holds impacts on present decisions (Frederick, Loewenstein,
that utilities are evaluated as gains and losses relative to and O’Donoghue 2003; Rachlin, Raineri, and Cross 1991).
some reference point, and while both gain and loss func- One could thus predict that the effect of reward prospect
tions are concave (i.e., displaying diminishing sensitivi- on acquisition utility can be very limited especially at the
ty), loss function is steeper (i.e., loss aversion). Based on early stage of program completion. A transparent medium
these features of value function, Thaler (1985) formulated system may counter the effects by making the prospect of
principles of hedonic framing, which specifies the way of reward definite at the time of transactions. We define the
evaluating joint outcomes to maximize resulting utility. transparency of a medium system as the extent to which
the monetary value of each unit of medium is made
When a consumer joins an LP, he/she has an expec- explicit to the consumers. A transparent medium system
tation of a future reward. Subsequently, every time the will make the reward prospect more definite in values,
consumer makes a purchase after he/she joined the LP, he/ thus enhance its effect on evaluation of acquisition utility.
she is approaching the program reward. We termed this
partial realization of reward rospect of reward Although Segregating the Prospect of Reward
the program reward is not obtained in a single transaction,
the prospect of the reward does carry utility that, as a part Because the gain function is concave, segregating the
of what is obtained in the transaction, represents a gain in prospect of reward from other components in utility
acquisition utility in every transaction with the LP-offer- evaluation enhances resulted acquisition utility. Offering
ing company, but a loss in every transaction with a non- incommensurate reward will prevent consumers from
LP-offering company. integrating the reward prospect with product value and
Despite this, potential customers did so far not have H6a: The lower the age of the consumer, the more
many opportunities to signal their likes and dislikes with positive consumers’ attitude toward m-advertis-
marketing activities via mobile devices. This puts market- ing.
ers at a high risk (Robins 2003). If marketers want to use
the communication channels that mobile media provide in H6b: The lower the age of the consumer, the higher the
an efficient way, they need to understand how mobile perceived value of m-advertising.
consumers perceive and evaluate mobile devices as a
source of advertising. A major issue in advertising re- H7a: Perceived value of m-advertising differs between
search is measurement of the effects of advertising on the men and women.
recipient. This paper aims to contribute to this objective
and presents results of a survey on consumer attitudes H7b: Attitude toward m-advertising differs between men
toward advertising via mobile devices (m-advertising). and women.
The objective of this study was to examine the relation-
ships between attitude toward m-advertising and key H8a: The lower the education of the consumer, the more
influence factors. positive consumers’ attitude toward m-advertis-
ing.
The following hypotheses were examined:
H8b: The lower the education of the consumer, the
H1: The higher the perceived value of m-advertising, higher the perceived value of m-advertising.
the more positive consumers’ attitude toward m-
advertising. The study was conducted over a six week period in
autumn 2003 during which 815 mobile phone owners
H2a: The higher the entertainment factor of the mobile were interviewed on their attitude toward m-advertising.
advertising message, the more positive consum- The interviewed persons have been selected on the basis
ers’ attitude toward m-advertising. of a quota sample that is representative for the Austrian
population. The Austrian market shows the highest pen-
H2b: The higher the entertainment factor of the mobile etration of mobile phone users in Europe and is therefore
advertising message, the higher the perceived val- very suitable for investigation on mobile marketing and
ue of m-advertising. advertising. All measures were assessed via a 5-point-
Likert-type scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to
H3a: The higher the informativeness of the mobile ad- “strongly agree.”
vertising message, the more positive consumers’
attitude toward m-advertising.
The central tenet of our paper is that regulatory focus As suggested by Grönroos (1997), the relational
impacts relationship marketing success on several levels. mode can be seen as a continuum ranging from passive to
First, regulatory focus enhances the effectiveness of rela- active. Consumers in an active mode seek contact, where-
P1 P6 Commitment
Regulatory Focus Relational Mode
- Affective, Normative,
Passive-Active
Calculative
P3 P2 P5 P4
Need for Connection/ Regulatory Focus
Belongingness (Temporally Induced)
Relationship
Tactics
as those in a passive mode rely on the existence of the We propose a consumer’s regulatory focus to be
relationship, considering it as a kind of safety net. More linked to his/her relational mode. More specifically, as
active consumers are often desirable from a marketing promotion-oriented consumers are consciously aspiring
point of view: the more active the customer’s role in towards goals, they believe in a relationship with a com-
service production is, the better the outcome. This is pany as it might enable goal achievement. They are thus
especially the case when the service requires customer likely to be more active than other consumers in the
participation or customer self-service reduces costs to a relationships they have as to ensure a successful outcome.
considerable extent. In contrast, prevention-oriented consumers are more re-
ceptive to establish relationships with firms to the extent
The relation between relational mode and regulatory they believe it helps them avoid losses or fulfill a duty or
focus is closely related to goal independence (Tjosvold obligation. This inclination, however, is likely to be
1993), which states that customer willingness to bond passive in nature, as it is based on vigilance and only doing
may depend on the extent to which customers believe they what is necessary (Shah and Higgins 1997). For example,
need the firm’s support to achieve important, personal a prevention-oriented consumer could be willing to be
goals. Regulatory focus is suggested to facilitate goal linked to a firm as a result of potential cost savings (avoid
pursuit (Shah, Higgins, and Friedman 1998) and is thus losing money) or out of a sense of duty (e.g., as a sense of
likely to relate to the effectiveness of a firm’s marketing reciprocity upon receiving excellent service), but is not
strategies. likely to actively contribute to relationship maintenance.
In essence, we propose promotion-orientation is likely to
Regulatory Focus contribute to an active willingness to engage in a relation-
ship, whereas prevention-orientation is likely to lead to a
Regulatory focus theory (Higgins 1987) brings for- passive one.
ward the idea that consumers not only care about what
goals they reach, but also how they reach them. It proposes P1a: Promotion-orientation has a positive impact on
consumers to utilize two different self-regulation strate- relational mode.
gies in goal striving: promotion or prevention orientation.
The promotion orientation emphasizes the pursuit of P1b: Prevention-orientation has a negative impact on
gains (or the avoidance of nongains) and aspirations relational mode.
toward ideals (Higgins 2000). It is related to eagerness;
consumers engage in tasks since they are motivated by Need for Connection
achievement and aspiration (Crowe and Higgins 1997).
The prevention orientation, on the other hand, emphasiz- Not all consumers, however, are interested in having
es the avoidance of losses (or the pursuit of nonlosses) and relationships with companies. Need for connection (Ander-
the fulfillment of obligations. It is related to vigilance sen and Chen 2002) or belongingness (Baumeister and
(Crowe and Higgins 1997). Consumers perform tasks as Leary 1995) describes “the need of people to form and
a sense of duty. They feel it is their responsibility, what maintain strong interpersonal relationships” and is mani-
they ought to do, but do not feel passionate about tasks the fested in “frequent, nonaversive interactions with an on-
same way as promotion-oriented consumers do. going relational bond” (Baumeister and Leary 1995).
P2: Need for connection has a positive effect on rela- Relationship tactics are likely to encourage custom-
tional mode. ers to become relationally involved and committed. For
example, warm and personal service, or participation in
We also expect a significant interaction effect to special events can show consumers the advantages of
occur between regulatory focus and need for connection. being actively involved with a company. Furthermore,
Although promotion-orientation is linked to eagerness customers may want to reciprocate and become more
and a more active relational mode, a consumer low in need active in the relationship if they perceive the relationship
for connection might not simply find relationships impor- tactics to offer value beyond the exchange. Companies
tant. As one of the main benefits of relationships to that use relationship tactics and thereby communicate a
customers is the perceived social bond the interaction long-term orientation are believed to restrain from oppor-
creates (Gwinner, Gremler, and Bitner 1997), those lack- tunistic behavior (Ganesan 1994) and are therefore likely
ing the need for such connections might not pursue them to be preferred by relation-oriented customers.
as means of achieving goals. For example, a promotion-
oriented consumer might purchase most items from a P4: Relationship tactics have a positive influence on
particular retailer, but might feel no need to belong or relational mode.
identify him/herself with it. In this case, the consumer is
more passive in the relationship. In contrast, need for The Perceived Fit Between Relationship Tactics and
connection might serve to make a prevention-oriented Regulatory Focus
consumer more active in the relationship. For example, a
consumer not wanting to avoid missing out on great Relationship tactics as other persuasive messages
promotions might be in active contact with the company usually involve some goal to be attained (e.g., an increase
if she/he feels a need to belong to their network of in the number of loyal customers). When firms employ
customers and interact with them on a frequent basis. In them, they present arguments in support of the advocated
this case, the need for connection heightens the consum- position, which can be framed as in terms of either gains
er’s activity level in the relationship while helping him/ or losses (Cesario, Grant, and Higgins 2004). For exam-
her achieve the same goal, thus contributing to a more ple, when trying to recruit customers for a loyalty pro-
active relational mode. gram, a firm could frame the arguments in terms of eagerly
ensuring gains (e.g., join our loyalty program – you will
P3a: For consumers high in need for connection, pre- receive special promotions) or in terms of losses (if you do
vention-orientation has a positive impact on rela- not join our loyalty program you’ll miss our special
tional mode. offers). Thus, the firm can temporally induce a regulatory
focus as means of influencing their customers.
P3b: For consumers low in need for connection, promo-
tion-orientation has a negative impact on relational If these arguments presented match the regulatory
mode. orientation of the customer, s/he should experience regu-
latory fit and feel right, which heightens his/her perceived
Relationship Tactics evaluation of an event and the value derived from it
(Higgins et al. 2003). Thus, we propose that if the relation-
Relationship tactics are means firms employ to in- ship tactics employed by a firm evoking a particular
crease customer retention. They can be viewed as a regulatory focus matches that of the customer they will be
continuum ranging from direct mail, tangible rewards, perceived as being more persuasive, enhancing consumer
and preferential treatment to interpersonal communica- willingness to engage in a relationship with a firm. Since
tion (Berry 1995). The lowest (i.e., least intimate) levels regulatory fit also enhances motivational strength (Spie-
of relationship tactics are represented by direct mail (the gel, Grant-Pillow, and Higgins 2004), we also propose
perceived degree of contact that companies have with consumers to take a more active role in the relationship if
their customer via direct mail) and tangible rewards (the there is a fit between the consumer’s and the firm’s
specific benefits e.g., savings in price that customer per- regulatory focus.
SUMMARY where
The concept of customer lifetime value (CLV) is CLV, = Lifetime value of customer I.
receiving increased attention in the current literature on
customer equity (CE) and on linking marketing to finan- TNT, = Total number of transactions made by
cial performance. Previous CLV research (e.g., Rust, customer I in period t.
Lemon, and Zeithaml 2004) has investigated predictabil-
ity of CLV and its drivers mainly in established customer CMNRT = Average contribution margin of base
relationships. The objective of the present paper is to transaction.
investigate how future customer transaction behavior and
lifetime value can be forecasted particularly at an early PUPit = Proportion of “upgrade” transactions
stage of the customer relationship. By differentiating by customer I in period t.
between frequency of customer transactions and upgrad-
ed transactions, not only CLV, but also the relevant CLV ∆CMUp = Additional contribution margin for high
drivers can be determined. In addition, for a subsample of value transactions.
customers, the paper links the derived CLV prediction
error to survey data, thereby determining whether predic- d = Discount rate.
tion inaccuracies can be partially explained by customer
attitudes that reflect the firms’ failure to retain a potential- t = 1. . .T = Number of time periods considered.
ly high-value customer.
CLV Driver Prediction
The key focus of the paper is relationship depth
(while relationship length is inherently considered due to As CLV predictors, customer channel usage, enable-
the longitudinal study design). In accordance with Bolton, ment of direct communication, competitiveness of choice,
Lemon, and Verhoef (2004), relationship depth is defined past behavior, and demographics are used. Channel choice
as the intensity or usage level of services over time, and refers to the differentiation between direct and indirect
specifically includes upgrading behavior (i.e., purchasing channel usage. Direct communication enablement is re-
of higher value or margin products instead of low cost lated to the decision whether to allow the firm to get into
“basic” alternatives). Consequently, in the present study direct contact with the customer. Competitiveness of choice
which focuses on the airline industry, relationship depth refers to the variety of providers from which customers
is conceptualized as two-dimensional: Usage level per choose. Past behavior is given by exhibited flying behav-
period is reflected by the number of flights per period. ior at the time the prediction is made.
Upgrading refers to the proportion of upgrades, i.e.,
flights in a “higher” booking class (where the baseline Model, Estimation, and Results
level is economy class) in the same period. Focusing on
those two drivers of the relationship depth dimension Data on the above described dependent and indepen-
rather than directly modeling the monetary transaction dent variables are taken from the frequent filer customer
value per period offers additional insights for firms and base of a large European airline. Two samples, one
academics, as it allows to differentiate between, e.g., consisting of 2,900 customers acquired in the first quarter
high-value customers whose value mainly derives from a of 1999, and one consisting of 3,200 customers acquired
large number of transactions, and another, potentially in the first quarter of 2000, the latter serving as hold-out
equally valuable group, which is valuable not because of sample, are analyzed. The predictive power of the inde-
a large number of transactions, but because it has a strong pendent variables on number of transactions and propor-
disposition to use high-value services (i.e., business class). tion of upgraded transactions is tested using a nested tobit
In general, the CLV of a customer in this context is given model. The model results yield strong support for an effect
by of all predictors on number of transactions, and also
T
TNTit [ CM NRT + (PUPit . ∆CM)] support for the effect of past upgrading behavior and
CLVi = Σ
t=1 (1 + d)t
(1) direct communication enablement on future upgrading
TABLE 1
Summary of Experimental Conditions
American American Local: American landmark (The Golden Gate) picture on the packaging
Sample Belgian Custom foreign (seemingly local): American landmark (The Golden Gate)
Belgian Foreign “as is”: Belgian landmark (The Grand Canal in Bruges)
TABLE 2
Means for the Dependent Variables by Country and Brand Positioning
FIGURE 1
Brand Attitude Index Means by Brand Positioning and by Country
5.8
5.6 Romania
5.4
5.2 USA
5.0
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
Local Custom Foreign “Foreign as is”
(seemingly local)
Sample size 39 36 39 30 37 33
Customizing effort/
domestic appeal 8(24%)* 13(34%) 16(44%) 12(37%) – –
PK: Sales/Customer
attraction inferences 1(3%) 1(3%) 9(25%) 2(6%) 5(17%) 5(15%)
PK: Manipulation/
deception inferences – – – 6(19%) – –
ing markets are less likely to be suspicious of a foreign of college students, from only two universities, one in a
marketer’s persuasion attempts and more likely to appre- developed and one in a transitioning country. Further,
ciate the marketer’s effort to appeal to the domestic only one product, chocolate, was used. Future research
consumer. It seems that these consumers are likely to be should use multiple products from different product cat-
more suspicious of marketing actions undertaken by do- egories and more representative samples in order to draw
mestic producers than the actions undertaken by foreign more definite conclusions. Future research should test
producers. Evidently, this situation holds if the country- whether the effect is moderated by product category. In
of-origin effect is favorable to the foreign producer. In particular, it is plausible that effects for the “good” prod-
contrast, an international company attempting to enter a ucts, such as chocolate, might differ from the effects for
developed market with a strategy of positioning the for- the “stigmatized” products, such as cigarettes. The current
eign brand as seemingly domestic will encounter consum- study opens a program of research that intends to replicate
ers’ suspicions and lack of acceptance. In this case, the and extend reported findings. The study needs to be
company may benefit from explicitly communicating the replicated with various brand and packaging stimuli.
foreign origin of the brand as a signal for product quality. Further exploration is also needed to understand the
mechanism that brings about the effects of custom posi-
Evidently, the results of this exploratory study should tioning a foreign brand as domestic.
be interpreted with caution. The study used small samples
The current study tries to fill the gap by doing the “The typical Sharon is . . . that girl, she had this tiny
following: (1) Advance the notion of consumers’ preju- little dress on and she was absolutely hammered
dice against brands, and address its important role in (English slang for drunk ) with her mate and she was
This paper adopts a capabilities view and introduces The study involved three main phases. First, in-depth
a conceptual model consisting of three types of market interviews were conducted with senior marketing execu-
driven intangibles, namely, outside-in capability, inside- tives in 24 organizations. Thereafter, a questionnaire was
out capability, and spanning capability grounded on the developed and piloted. Finally, a representative-mailed
theoretical foundation supplied by Day (1994), and ar- survey was undertaken. Our survey was carried out in
gues that these firm intangibles contribute differently to 2001–2002 (coordinated by Aston Business School, U.K.).
sustainable competitive edge and superior performance Following the SIC (Dun and Bradstreet), our sample
advantages. Our argument, thus, follows the path depen- covered small (20–99 employees), medium (100–499
dence assumptions of the RBT traced back to the work of employees), and large (500 or more employees) firms
Penrose (1959). Market driven intangibles can be defined representing business products, consumer products, busi-
as any attribute, intellectual or relational, that can be ness services, and consumer services. The sampling frame
deployed advantageously in the marketplace. Following was supplied by national research institutes in both coun-
this conceptualization, we distinguish between two key tries involved. In total, 799 usable responses were re-
marketing intangibles: market orientation with a market ceived: 472 in New Zealand and 327 in Finland, and a
driven emphasis (Jaworski et al. 2000) and market driven response rate over 20 percent. No significant differences
capabilities (Day 1994). It has been argued, that as part of in means were found between early and late respondents
enhancing our understanding of market driven intangi- on the scales studied (t-tests at .05 level), indicating that
bles and performance, the relationship among innovative- non-response bias is unlikely to be a problem. Similar
ness, market orientation, and marketing capabilities should studies are underway in other countries (e.g. the U.K.,
R2 = 0.73
Relationship
Value
0.77 -0.17
Relationship Relationship
Benefits Costs
(N.B.: All parameter estimates are significant at the 5 percent level. The variance explained by each formative value
dimension is obtained by multiplying the path coefficient of the second-order dimension with the coefficient of the
respective first-order dimension. Example: variance explained by sourcing benefits = 0.77 x 0.68 = 0.52).