Foreign Exchange Risk Management PDF
Foreign Exchange Risk Management PDF
Foreign Exchange Risk Management PDF
Management
Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk is commonly defined as “the possibility of loss or profit resulted from
unexpected exchange rate changes”
Under floating exchange rate system, the value of currency changes with the market forces
which in turn change the values of assets and liabilities and cash flows – both present and
future.
All currencies can experience periods of high volatility which can adversely effect the profit
margins if suitable strategies are not in place to protect the cash flow from sudden currency
fluctuations
Types of Foreign
Exchange Exposure
11-3
Types of Foreign Exchange Exposure
• Foreign exchange exposure is a measure of the potential change for a
firm’s profitability, net cash flow, and market value because of a
change in exchange rates
• An important task for the financial manager is to measure foreign
exchange exposure and to manage it so as to maximize or stabilize the
profitability, net cash flow, and market value of the firm
• The impact on a firm when foreign exchange rates change can be
classified into three kinds of exposure: transaction, operating, and
translation exposure
11-5
Types of Foreign Exchange Exposure
Transaction exposure
Impact of settling existing obligations, which entered into before changes
in exchange rates but to be settled after changes in exchange rates
11-9
Time
Types of Foreign Exchange Exposure
• Transaction exposure vs. Operating exposure
• Both transaction exposure and operating exposure exist because of
unexpected changes in future cash flows
• The difference between them:
• Transaction exposure is concerned with the uncertainty of future
cash flows which are already contracted
• Operating exposure focuses on expected future cash flows (not
yet contracted) that might change because a change in exchange
11-10
rates could altered international competitiveness
Types of Foreign Exchange Exposure
• Tax consequence of foreign exchange exposures
• As a general rule, only realized foreign exchange losses are deductible for calculating
income taxes; Similarly, only realized foreign exchange gains create taxable income
• Losses from transaction exposure usually reduce taxable income in that year, but losses
from operating exposure may maintain for several years and thus reduce taxable income
over a series of future years
• Note that translation exposure could affect the parent company’s net worth or net income,
but it will not generate cash losses in practice, i.e., both the parent company and
subsidiaries will not lose any money physically during the translation of financial
statements
• Since losses from translation exposure are only “paper” losses, involving no cash flows,
they are not deductible from pretax income
11-11
Sources of Transaction
Exposure
11-12
Sources of Transaction
Exposure
• Transaction exposure measures gains or losses that arise from
the settlement of existing financial obligations whose terms
are stated in a foreign currency
• The sources of transaction exposure include
• Purchasing or selling goods and services in foreign currencies
through credit accounts (to form the A/P or A/R on the balance
sheet)
• Borrowing or lending funds in foreign currencies
• Entering into foreign exchange or foreign currency derivative
contracts
11-13
Purchasing or Selling through Credit
Account
The most common example of transaction exposure arises
when a firm has a receivable or payable denominated in
foreign currencies
For each trade of goods and services, the total transaction
exposure consists of quotation, backlog, and billing
exposures (see Exhibit 11.3)
Suppose that a U.S. firm sells merchandise on credit account
to a Belgian buyer for €1,000,000 to be made in 60 days.
The current exchange rate is $1.12/€, so the seller expects to
receive $1,120,000
For the exchange rate to become $1.08/€ ($1.15/€), the seller
will receive $1,080,000 ($1,150,000)
Thus exposure (or risk) means not only the probability of some
losses but also the probability of some gains
11-14
Exhibit 11.3 The Life Span of the Transaction Exposure for Trades
of Goods and Services
t1 t2 t3 t4
Seller quotes a price Buyer places Seller ships Buyer settles A/R
in foreign currency to firm order with products and with cash in
buyer (in verbal or seller at price bills buyer foreign currency
written form) offered at time t1 (becomes A/R) quoted at time t1
11-15
Quotation Backlog Billing
Exposure Exposure Exposure
Time Span of Transaction Exposure
• ※After the price is quoted at t1, if the exchange rate changes
against the seller at t2, the seller may earn less or even suffer
losses. So the transaction exposure starts from t 1
• ※At t3, the seller books foreign-currency-denominated receivables
at the exchange rate of that time point, but changes in exchange
rate between t3 and t4 will affect the received cash flow in domestic
dollars at t4, that is the billing exposure
• ※The transaction exposure on credit account is actually the billing
exposure
Borrowing or Lending Foreign
Currencies
• A true case for the transaction exposure over foreign debt is about the
Grupo Embotellador de Mexico (Gemex)
• Gemex, the largest bottler of PepsiCo outside the U.S., had U.S. dollar debt
of $264 million in 1994
• The Mexico’s new peso was pegged at Ps3.45/$ since Jan. 1, 1993, but the
peso was forced to float in Dec. 1994 because of economic and political
events and the exchange rate stabilized near Ps5.5/$
• So, the debt in pesos is from Ps910 million to Ps1452 million, which
increases by 59%
11-17
Entering into Foreign Exchange or Foreign
Currency Derivative Contracts
Distributions: dividends translated @ the rate on Distributions: dividends translated @ the rate on
date of payment. date of payment.
Equity Items: Common stock & Paid-in capital Equity Items: Common stock & Paid-in capital
translated @ historical rates. Retained earnings +/- translated @ historical rates. Retained earnings +/-
income/loss for the year. income/loss +/- imbalance from translation.
Translation Adjustments: not included into Translation Adjustments: unrealized forex gains/
21
consolidated income but in equity reserve account. losses included in primary earnings.
US Translation Procedures
Purpose: Need to translate foreign subs statement into US$
Is local currency
functional currency?
No Yes
Is US$
Use current rate method
functional currency?
11-27
Management of Transaction
Exposure
A financial hedge refers to either an off-setting debt obligation (such as
a loan) or some type of financial derivative such as an interest rate swap
To eliminate the transaction exposure, firms can borrow foreign currencies
today to prepare for the settlement of A/Rs in foreign currencies in the future
Due to the borrowing activities, this kind of hedge is classified as financial
hedge
Contractual hedges employ the forward, futures, and options contracts
to hedge transaction exposures
The Trident case as follows illustrates how contractual and financial
hedging techniques may be used to protect against transaction exposure
11-28
Hedging – Meaning
11-31
Why Hedge
• PPP theory does not always work ( Since PPP theory proposes that change
in purchasing power changes price and thus wipes out loss or gain on the
exchange volatility)
• To maintain cash flows both present and future
※ Hedging will not increase the expected value for a cash flow. Actually, if taking the
hedging cost into account, hedge transactions will decrease the expected cash flow
※ Hedging reduces the variability of future cash flows about the expected value of the
distribution. This reduction of distribution variance is a reduction of risk 11-36
Hedging is not always
good.
However, is a reduction in the variability of future cash flows to
be a sufficient reason for currency risk management? Opponents
of currency hedging commonly make the following arguments
Shareholders are much more capable of diversifying currency risk
according to their individual preferences and risk tolerance than the
management of the firm
Although currency risk management can reduce the variance, it
reduces the expected cash flow due to hedging costs.
So, the net benefit of hedge depends on the trade-off between these two effects
Hedging activities are sometimes conducted to benefit the
management at the expense of the shareholders
For instance, the true goal of hedging the variance of the company’s income is
to ensure the bonus of the management 11-37
Why should a firm not Hedge?
• Management may overuse the expensive hedge
• Management may believe that it will be criticized more severely for incurring
foreign exchange losses than for incurring similar or even higher hedge costs in
avoiding the foreign exchange loss
• Possibly due to the accounting rules: because the foreign exchange losses appear in
the income statements as a highly visible item or as a footnote, but the hedging costs
are buried in operating or interest expenses
• Efficient market theorists believe that investors can see through the
“accounting veil” and therefore have already factored the foreign exchange
effect into a firm’s market valuation
• Although the translation exposure are only “paper” losses, there are still some firms
to hedge this risk
• However, the above argument implies that it is not necessary to hedge the
translation (accounting) exposure
11-38
Techniques of Hedging ( Ref Ch 10 IFM
by Sharan)
• Contractual Hedges • Natural Hedges
* Forward market hedges * Leads & Lags
* Hedging through Currency Futures and * Risk Sharing
Options
* Pricing of Transactions
* Money Market Hedge
* Matching cash flows
* Parallel Loans
* Currency Swaps
* Currency Diversification
* Cross Hedging
Forward Contracts
• These are foreign exchange contracts offered by market maker banks.
• They will sell foreign currency forward, and
• They will buy foreign currency forward
• Market maker banks will quote exchange rates today at which they will carry out
these forward agreements.
• These forward contracts allow the global firm to lock in a home currency
equivalent of some “fixed” contractual foreign currency cash flow.
• These contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange exposure resulting from an
initial commercial or financial transaction.
Example # 1: The Need to
Hedge
• U.S. firm has sold a manufactured product to a German company.
– And as a result of this sale, the U.S. firm agrees to accept payment of €100,000 in 30
days.
– What type of exposure does the U.S. firm have?
• Answer: Transaction exposure; an agreement to receive a fixed amount of foreign currency
in the future.
– What is the potential problem for the U.S. firm if it decides not hedge (i.e., not to
cover)?
• Problem for the U.S. firm is in assuming the risk that the euro might weaken over this
period, and in 30 days it will be worth less (in terms of U.S. dollars) than it is now.
• This would result in a foreign exchange loss for the firm.
Hedging Example #1 with a Forward
• So the U.S. firm decides it wants to hedge (cover) this foreign exchange
transaction exposure.
– It goes to a market maker bank and requests a 30 day forward quote on the euro.
– The market marker bank quotes the U.S. firm a bid and ask price for 30 day euros, as
follows:
– EUR/USD 1.2300/1.2400.
– What do these quotes mean:
• Market maker will buy euros in 30 days for $1.2300
• Market maker will sell euros in 30 days for $1.2400
Example #2: The Need to Hedge
• U.S. firm has purchased a product from a British company.
• And as a result of this purchase, the U.S. firm agrees to pay the U.K. company
£100,000 in 30 days.
• What type of exposure is this for the U.S. firm?
• Answer: Transaction exposure; an agreement to pay a fixed amount of foreign currency in the
future.
• So the U.S. firm decides it wants to hedge (cover) this foreign exchange
transaction exposure.
– It goes to a market maker bank and requests a 30 day forward quote on pounds.
– The market maker quotes the U.S. firm a bid and ask price for 30 day pounds as follows:
– GBP/USD 1.7500/1.7600.
– What do these quotes mean:
• Market maker will buy pounds in 30 days for $1.7500
• Market maker will sell pounds in 30 days for $1.7600
So What will the Firm Accomplished
with the Forward Contract?
• Example #1: The firm with the long position in euros:
• Can lock in the U.S. dollar equivalent of the sale to the German company.
• It knows it can receive $123,000
• At the forward bid: $1.2300/$1.2400
• Example #2: The firm with the short position in pounds:
• Can lock in the U.S. dollar equivalent of its liability to the British firm:
• It knows it will cost $176,000
• At the forward ask price: $1.7500/$1.7600
Advantages and Disadvantages of the
Forward Contract
• Contracts written by market maker banks to the “specifications” of the global
firm.
• For some exact amount of a foreign currency.
• For some specific date in the future.
• No upfront fees or commissions.
• Bid and Ask spreads produce round transaction profits.
• Global firm knows exactly what the home currency equivalent of a fixed amount
of foreign currency will be in the future.
• However, global firm cannot take advantage of a favorable change in the foreign
exchange spot rate.
Hedging- External/ Contractual
options
Adjusting fund flows
altering either the amounts or the currencies of the planned cash flows of the
parent or its subsidiaries to reduce the firm’s local currency accounting exposure
MANAGING TRANSACTION EXPOSURE
11-55
Risk Management in Practice
• The following paragraphs summarized the results of many surveys of
corporate risk management practices in recent years
1. Treasury function:
• The treasury function of most private firms, which is the group typically
responsible for transaction exposure management, is usually considered a
cost center
• It is not suited to treat the treasury as a profit center. Since assets with higher
risk will provide higher expected returns, if the treasury operates as a profit
center, it might tolerate more risks that should be hedged
11-56
Risk Management in Practice
2. Currency risk managers are expected to err on the conservative side when managing
the firm’s money
Although transaction exposures exist before they are actually booked as foreign-currency-
denominated receivables or payables, many firms do not allow the hedging of quotation
exposure or backlog exposure as a matter of policy
Many firms feel that until the transaction exists on the accounting books of the firm, the probability of the
exposure actually occurring is considered to be less than 100%
These conservative policies dictate that contractual or financial hedges should be placed only
on existing exposures
An increasing number of firms, however, are actively hedging not only backlog exposures,
but also selectively hedging quotation and anticipated exposures
Anticipated exposures are transactions for which there are–at present–no contracts or agreements between
parties, but that are anticipated on the basis of historical trends and continuing business relationships
11-57
Risk Management in Practice
3. Which contracts are used for hedge?
• In practice, transaction exposure management programs are generally divided along an
“option-line”; those that use options and those that do not
• Those firms that do use currency options are generally more aggressive in their tolerance of
currency risk
• Firms that do not use currency options rely almost exclusively on forward contracts and
money market hedge
• For extremely conservative and risk-intolerant firms, they hedge all existing exposures with
forwards and hedge a variety of backlog and anticipated exposures with options
11-58
Risk Management in Practice
4. Proportional hedges
• Many MNEs have established rather rigid transaction exposure risk management
policies that mandate proportional hedging
• These policies generally require the use of forward contract hedges on a percentage
(e.g., 50%, 60%, or 70%) of existing transaction exposures
• The remaining portion of the exposure is then selectively hedged on the basis of the
firm’s risk tolerance, the view of exchange rate movements, and the confidence level
about the view
11-59
Risk Management in Practice
5. Full hedge only at favorable forward exchange rates
Many firms require that when there is a favorable forward exchange rate, full forward-
cover is put in place; Otherwise, they may adopt the proportional hedges
More specifically, for the account receivables (payables) of Trident case, the full
forward-cover strategy is adopted when the forward exchange rate is at premium
(discount), i.e., the forward exchange rate is higher (lower) than the spot exchange rate,
$1.7640/£
The reason is that if firms use forward contracts to hedge when the forward rate is
unfavorable, a certain foreign exchange loss will be shown in the income statement
For the management, it is difficult to explain why there is still a foreign exchange loss after
conducting a hedging transaction
11-60
Risk Management in Practice
6. Other derivatives
• Recently, many other complex options are employed to hedge the
exchange rate risk, like range forwards, participating forwards,
average rate options, etc.
11-61
Internal hedging (natural hedging)
• Netting is probably one of the most used methods.
63
Situation after netting
64
• Two types of netting exist: bilateral and multilateral netting.
65
Matching
• Matching is similar in concept to netting.
A company tries to match its currency inflows by amount and
timing with its expected inflows.
There are some limits set by governments, which restrict the use
of this method. 67
Leading and lagging
(lagging).
Long term structural changes
The firm can act on four parameters: change the sales, change
the foreign suppliers, change the foreign production factories or
change the foreign debt. The idea is to change the relationship
between cash inflows and outflows.
69
Price adjustments
• Price adjustments can be made in different manners.