MPRE Babri

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (i)
INTRODUCTION
As you start to prepare for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (“MPRE”), be aware
that the exam is designed to test your ability to apply a set of detailed legal rules—similar to the legal
rules you have learned in other courses in law school. You cannot pass the exam simply by having good
morals and good manners. You must know the rules, and you must know how to apply them.
The best way to prepare for the exam is to complete all of your course assignments. This will include
reading the outline, watching the lecture, and answering black letter law questions in the BARBRI AMP
software and practice questions in BARBRI’s StudySmart® software and in this book.
Here’s what you’ll find in this book:
Comprehensive Outline of the Law: This outline not only summarizes all the essential law, but it also
contains many examples to illustrate less obvious points.
Conviser Mini Review: This is a condensed version of the comprehensive outline, and you should use it
as a final refresher before you take the exam.
Review Questions: These are short-answer questions that test your basic understanding of the concepts
discussed in the outline. Check your answers against the answers we have provided, referring back to the
pertinent section of the outline if you need more review of a particular topic.
Practice Exams: You should complete the practice questions in the StudySmart® software as assigned
(these questions are also available in this book in Practice Exams 1 - 3). Once you have completed your
MPRE review, you are encouraged to take a practice exam under timed conditions so that you get a feel
for the time pressures you will face on the exam. We suggest using Practice Exam 4 for this purpose,
because these questions were not previously assigned and you’ll be seeing them for the first time.
Lecture Handout: This handout corresponds with your MPRE lecture. The lecturer will review points
of law most likely to be tested and will give you tips on exam-taking technique.
PR-03-INTRODUCTION---P.indd 1 1/7/2016 2:26:48 PM

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRACTICE EXAMS 173.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRACTICE EXAMS
Four full practice exams follow. You have two hours to answer the questions in an exam. An answer
sheet is provided after each set of practice exam questions.
The exams each contain 60 questions, as does the actual MPRE. On the actual exam, 50 questions are
scored and 10 are nonscored “pretest” questions. Because you will not know which are the nonscored
questions, you must answer all questions.
Your score will be based on the number of questions you answer correctly. It is therefore to your advan-
tage to answer as many questions as you can. Use your time effectively. If a question seems too diffi-
cult, go on to the next one. Nevertheless, you should try to answer all questions because wrong answers
are not deducted from the right answers.
As on the actual MPRE, a few questions in each practice exam will measure aspects of the ABA
Code of Judicial Conduct. The remaining questions are designed so that disciplinary questions can be
answered solely under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and questions outside the disci-
plinary context should be answered under the general law governing lawyering, including statutory and
common law.
Each question may include, among others, one of the following key words or phrases:
1. Subject to discipline asks whether the conduct described in the question would subject the lawyer
to discipline under the provisions of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. In the case
of a judge, the test question asks whether the judge would be subject to discipline under the ABA
Model Code of Judicial Conduct.
2. May or proper asks whether the conduct referred to or described in the question is professionally
appropriate in that it: (i) would not subject the lawyer or judge to discipline; (ii) is not inconsistent
with the Preamble, Comments, or text of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct or the
ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct; and (iii) is not inconsistent with generally accepted princi-
ples of the law of lawyering.
3. Subject to litigation sanction asks whether the conduct described in the question would subject
the lawyer or the lawyer’s law firm to sanction by a tribunal, such as punishment for contempt,
fine, fee forfeiture, disqualification, or other sanction.
4. Subject to disqualification asks whether the conduct described in the question would subject the
lawyer or the lawyer’s law firm to disqualification as counsel in a civil or criminal matter.
5. Subject to civil liability asks whether the conduct described in the question would subject the
lawyer or the lawyer’s law firm to civil liability, such as claims arising from malpractice, misrep-
resentation, and breach of fiduciary duty.
6. Subject to criminal liability asks whether the conduct described in the question would subject
the lawyer to criminal liability for participation in or aiding and abetting criminal acts, such as
prosecution for insurance and tax fraud, destruction of evidence, or obstruction of justice.
PR-07-prct-exam-instruct--P.indd 173 1/7/2016 11:30:35 AM

174. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRACTICE EXAMS
7. When a question refers to discipline by the bar, state bar, or appropriate disciplinary authority,
it refers to the agency in the jurisdiction with authority to administer the standards for admission
to practice and for maintenance of professional competence and integrity.
8. Whenever a lawyer is identified as a certified specialist, that lawyer has been so certified by the
appropriate agency in the jurisdiction in which the lawyer practices.
9. The phrases informed consent and consent after consultation have the same meaning.
PR-07-prct-exam-instruct--P.indd 174 1/7/2016 11:30:35 AM

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 1.
I. REGULATION OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION
A. SOURCES OF REGULATION
1. The State
The practice of law, like other professions and businesses, affects the public interest and is,
therefore, subject to regulation by the states in the exercise of their police powers.
a. Courts
Because the practice of law is intimately connected with the administration of justice,
the courts have the inherent power to regulate the legal profession in and out of court.
The ultimate power thus rests with the highest court in the state, not with the state
legislature. The highest court generally promulgates the ethics rules and oversees the
discipline of lawyers.
1) Ethics Rules—The American Bar Association (“ABA”) Model Rules and

Judicial Code
Every state has professional ethics rules that govern the conduct of lawyers, and
nearly every state has adopted some version of the ABA Model Rules of Profes-
sional Conduct. Likewise, most states have adopted some version of the ABA
Model Code of Judicial Conduct.
2) Case Law
Every state has a body of judge-made case law concerning the rights and duties of
lawyers. For example, the case law of a state may limit a lawyer’s ability to enforce
a fee contract after being fired by the client.
3) Rules of Court
State courts typically have rules of court with which lawyers must comply. For
example, a rule of court may govern the lawyer’s obligation to represent an
indigent client at the court’s request.
b. Bar Associations
Each state has an association of lawyers, commonly called the state bar association. A
majority of states have an “integrated” bar system, meaning that every lawyer who is
admitted to practice in the state must be a member of the state bar association. Common
functions of a state bar association are to administer the state’s bar examination, to
provide continuing education programs for practicing lawyers, and to assist the state
courts in regulating and imposing professional discipline on lawyers.
c. Congress and State Legislatures

Congress and the states have enacted statutes that govern some aspects of the practice of
law. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act imposes a mandatory reporting duty when a
securities lawyer becomes aware of credible evidence that a client is materially violating
a federal or state securities law. Also, a state evidence statute may define the scope of
the attorney-client privilege.
2. The Federal System
PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 1 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

2. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
a. Courts
A lawyer who practices in a federal court or agency is also constrained by federal
statutes, federal case law, and the rules of that particular court or agency. Each federal
court has its own bar, and a lawyer cannot practice before a particular court without first
becoming a member of its bar.
b. Government Attorneys
An attorney for the federal government is subject to state laws and rules (as well
as local federal court rules) governing attorneys in each state in which the attorney
engages in her duties. [28 U.S.C. §530B(a)] Note that federal regulations interpret this
statute as pertaining only to rules that prescribe ethical conduct for attorneys and that
would subject an attorney to professional discipline (e.g., it does not apply to state rules
of evidence or procedure, or state substantive law). [28 C.F.R. §§77.2, .3]
3. Regulation by Multiple States

A lawyer is subject to regulation by each state in which the lawyer is admitted to practice,
regardless of where the lawyer actually practices law or where the lawyer’s conduct occurred.
[ABA Model Rule 8.5] If the rules of the states in which the lawyer is admitted are in
conflict, choice of law rules apply (see C.4., infra).
B. ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

In most states, to be admitted to the practice of law, a person must have successfully completed
college and law school, passed a bar examination, and submitted to a bar admission committee
an application for admission, which generally includes proof of good moral character. If the
committee approves the application, the candidate is sworn in to practice before the highest
court of the state. Note that each state has its own “bar” (roster of lawyers who are admitted to
practice), and admission to the bar of one state does not, without more, entitle a person to practice
law in any other state.
1. The Application
An applicant for admission to the bar must respond truthfully and completely to inquiries
made on the application or otherwise by the admissions committee.
a. False Statements
An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar admission
application, must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact. [ABA Model
Rule 8.1(a)]
Example: When A applied for admission to the bar, he was required to fill out
a personal information form that asked whether he had ever been
convicted of a crime, received less than an honorable discharge from
the military service, or been disciplined for dishonesty by any school. A
knowingly failed to reveal that he had been suspended from college for a
semester for cheating on an examination. A’s failure to reveal the suspen-
sion is grounds for denying his bar application. If A’s failure to reveal is
discovered after A is admitted to the bar, A is subject to discipline. [See
Carter v. Charos, 536 A.2d 527 (R.I. 1988)]
b. Failure to Disclose Information

Likewise, an applicant (or a lawyer in connection with an applicant’s application for

admission to the bar) must not: (i) fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misap-
prehension known by the person to have arisen in the matter, or (ii) knowingly fail to
respond to a lawful demand for information from an admissions authority. [ABA Model
Rule 8.1(b)] This rule does not, however, require disclosure of information otherwise
protected by the confidentiality provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct. (See
IV., infra.)
Example: Bar applicant B applied for admission using a forged certificate of
graduation from the State University School of Law. Attorney A knew
about B’s forgery, and she knew that the forgery had not been detected
by the bar admission officials. A must voluntarily tell the bar admission
officials about the forgery.
2. Character and Fitness—“Good Moral Character”

The state has an interest in insuring that lawyers admitted to practice possess high moral
standards and are mentally and emotionally stable.
a. Investigative Procedure
A bar applicant is usually required to fill out a detailed questionnaire and list a number
of references as part of his application. (Some states also require the applicant to submit
fingerprints and photographs.) This information is then checked either by letter or
personal investigation. If there is a question concerning the applicant’s moral fitness, the
applicant may be asked to appear at a hearing before the committee.
1) Burden of Proof and Duties of Applicant

The burden of coming forward and establishing good moral character is on the
applicant. In addition, the applicant owes a duty to cooperate in reasonable inves-
tigations by the state bar and to make disclosures relevant to his fitness to practice
law. [In re Anastaplo, 366 U.S. 82 (1961)]
2) Procedural Rights
A bar applicant has a right to due process in committee proceedings. Thus, he has
the right to know the charges filed against him, to explain away derogatory infor-
mation, and to confront critics. [Willner v. Committee, 373 U.S. 96 (1963)] An
applicant who is denied admission on the basis of bad moral character is entitled to
judicial review, usually by the state’s highest court.
b. Conduct Relevant to Moral Character

All aspects of an applicant’s past conduct that reflect on his honesty and integrity are
relevant to an evaluation of moral character. The committee may consider any conduct
or charges against the applicant—including those charges of which the applicant was
acquitted—and any litigation to which the applicant was a party.
Example: In one case, an applicant was denied admission because of personality
traits that were deemed to make him unfit to practice. It was shown that
the applicant was overly sensitive, rigid, and suspicious; was excessively
self-important; and had a tendency to make false accusations against
others and ascribe evil motives to them. [Application of Ronwin, 555
P.2d 315 (Ariz. 1976)]

1) Criminal Conduct
Mere conviction of any crime is not sufficient to deny the admission of an appli-
cant to practice law. To cause disqualification of an applicant, the crime in question
must involve moral turpitude, such as a crime involving intentional dishonesty for
the purpose of personal gain (e.g., forgery, bribery, theft, perjury, robbery, extor-
tion) or a crime involving violence (e.g., murder, rape, mayhem). The nature of the
offense and the motivation of the violator are also factors in determining whether
moral turpitude exists.
a) “Adolescent Misbehavior” and Civil Disobedience

Examples of criminal behavior that do not rise to the level of moral turpitude
include an applicant’s arrest when he was a youth for a fistfight (adolescent
behavior that does not necessarily bear on the applicant’s current fitness to
practice law) and an applicant’s arrest for nonviolent civil disobedience. [See
Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners, 65 Cal. 2d 447 (1966)]
2) Rehabilitation
An applicant may still gain admission to the legal profession despite past conduct
involving moral turpitude if he can demonstrate sufficient rehabilitation of his
character and a present fitness to practice law. [See, e.g., March v. Committee of
Bar Examiners, 67 Cal. 2d 718 (1967)]
3) Concealment of Past Conduct Constitutes Moral Turpitude

False statements or concealment of facts in response to an inquiry by the admis-
sions committee is itself evidence of sufficient lack of moral character to deny
admission—even if the underlying conduct does not involve moral turpitude. [ABA
Model Rule 8.1; and see Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. and W. William Hodes, The Law
of Lawyering (hereafter “Hazard & Hodes”) §66.04 (4th ed. 2015)]
4) Political Activity
An applicant who refuses to take the oath to uphold the state and federal Constitu-
tions may be denied admission because there is a rational connection between this
requirement and the practice of law. [Law Students Research Council v. Wadmond,
401 U.S. 154 (1971)] However, an applicant’s mere membership in the Communist
Party (when there is no showing that the applicant engaged in or advocated actions
to overthrow the government by force or violence) is not sufficient to show a lack
of moral character and deny the applicant admission to practice law. [Schware v.
Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 (1957)]
3. Citizenship and Residency Are Not Valid Requirements

A state cannot require that a person be a United States citizen to be admitted to the practice
of law; such a requirement violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Consti-
tution. [In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717 (1973)] Similarly, a requirement that a bar applicant be a
resident of the state in which he is seeking admission to practice law violates the Privileges
and Immunities Clause of the Constitution and is, therefore, invalid. [Supreme Court of New
Hampshire v. Piper, 470 U.S. 274 (1985)]

C. REGULATION AFTER ADMISSION

Upon admission to the bar, a person becomes a lawyer and is thus subject to the applicable law
governing such matters as professional discipline, procedure and evidence, civil remedies, and
criminal sanctions.
1. Misconduct
a. Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (i) violate or attempt to violate any of
the Rules of Professional Conduct, (ii) knowingly assist or induce another person to
violate the Rules, or (iii) use the acts of another person to commit a violation. [ABA
Model Rule 8.4(a)]
Example: Attorney A knows that it is a violation of the Rules to approach an
accident victim at the scene of the accident and offer his legal services.
A asks his brother-in-law T, a tow truck driver, to give A’s business cards
to people involved in the accidents that T is called to tow. A is guilty of
professional misconduct for using the acts of another to violate a rule.
b. Certain Criminal Acts

A lawyer is subject to discipline for committing a criminal act that reflects adversely
on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. [ABA Model
Rule 8.4(b)] To constitute professional misconduct, the crime must involve some
characteristic that is relevant to the practice of law. For example, crimes involving
dishonesty, breach of trust, substantial interference with the administration of justice,
and most crimes involving violence reflect on the lawyer’s fitness to practice law. Other
crimes (e.g., solicitation of prostitution, single offense of drunk driving, possession of
a marijuana cigarette), while punishable by law, do not necessarily trigger professional
discipline.
Examples: 1) Attorney A willfully failed to file a personal federal income tax
return, knowing that she owed a substantial amount of tax. Even though
A’s conduct was not connected with her practice of law, A is subject to
discipline.
2) Lawyer L is arrested for soliciting sexual acts from an undercover

police officer whom L believed to be a prostitute. L is not subject to
discipline because his criminal conduct does not show dishonesty,
untrustworthiness, or unfitness to practice law.
c. Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit, or Misrepresentation

Any conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation constitutes profes-
sional misconduct. [ABA Model Rule 8.4(c)] Examples of this type of misconduct,
which need not rise to the level of a crime, include cheating on a bar examination [see
In re Lamb, 49 Cal. 3d 239 (1989)—lawyer who impersonated her husband for exam
was disbarred], plagiarism [see In re Lamberis, 443 N.E.2d 549 (Ill. 1982)—plagiarism
in preparation of LL.M. thesis resulted in discipline], and defrauding one’s own law
firm by misusing expense accounts [see In re Siegel, 627 A.2d 156 (N.J. 1993); and see
Hazard & Hodes, §69.05].

d. Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice

A lawyer is subject to discipline for engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the admin-
istration of justice. [ABA Model Rule 8.4(d)] This rule is rarely invoked because nearly
all of the offenses that would arise under it (e.g., falsifying evidence, improper delaying
tactics, frivolous claims) are dealt with more specifically in the rules relating to litiga-
tion (see VIII., infra).
e. Stating or Implying Ability to Improperly Influence Officials
A lawyer must never state or imply that he has the ability to improperly influence a
government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the law or legal
ethics rules. [ABA Model Rule 8.4(e)]
Example: Lawyer L is a member of a very politically prominent family. Both his
mother and brother are judges, and his father was once governor of the
state. It would be improper for L to mention his prominent relatives in
the course of procuring legal employment, as this implies he has some
sort of improper influence with the courts or the government. If a client
mentions L’s relatives, L is obligated to explain that he has no special
influence to wield on the client’s behalf.
f. Assisting a Judge in Violation of Judicial Code
A lawyer is subject to discipline for knowingly assisting a judge or judicial officer in
conduct that violates the Code of Judicial Conduct or other law. [ABA Model Rule 8.4(f)]
Example: R graduated from law school and became a member of the bar, but
he never practiced law. Instead, he entered politics and was ultimately
elected to a high federal office. When a drug charge was brought against
R’s chief deputy, R met personally with the judge before whom the case
was pending and attempted to convince the judge to dismiss the charge.
[See CJC Rule 2.9—prohibits ex parte communications about a pending
matter] R is subject to discipline.
g. Harassment or Discrimination in Law Practice
A lawyer must not, in conduct related to the practice of law (e.g., representing clients,
interacting with witnesses, operating and managing a law practice), engage in conduct
that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is harassment or discrimination on the
basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation,
gender identity, marital status, or socioeconomic status. Note: A trial judge’s finding
that a lawyer exercised peremptory challenges on a discriminatory basis does not, on its
own, establish a violation of this rule. [RPC 8.4(g)]
1) Permitted Actions
This rule does not limit a lawyer’s ability to:
(i) Accept, decline, or withdraw from a representation in accordance with RPC
1.16 (see II.F., infra), or limit her practice to members of underserved popula-
tions in accordance with the RPC;
(ii) Provide legitimate advice or advocacy that is otherwise consistent with the
RPC; or
(iii) Promote diversity or inclusion (e.g., efforts aimed at recruiting, hiring,
retaining, and advancing diverse employees).

2. Duty to Report Professional Misconduct

The legal profession prides itself on being self-policing. One element of a self-policing
group is that each member of the group must be obligated to report misconduct by the other
members. [See comment 1 to ABA Model Rule 8.3] Therefore, a lawyer who knows that
another lawyer has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct in such a way that it raises
a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer
must report the violation to the appropriate professional authority. [ABA Model Rule 8.3(a)]
Similarly, a lawyer who knows that a judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct in a
way that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office must report the viola-
tion to the appropriate authority. [ABA Model Rule 8.3(b)]
Examples: 1) Attorney A learned that attorney B and accountant T had formed a tax
service partnership in which T would do solely accounting work and B
would do solely legal work. B has thus violated the disciplinary rule against
partnerships with nonlawyers. (See X.E.2., infra.) A may report the viola-
tion, but she will not be subject to discipline if she fails to do so. A may
decline to report B’s violation because it concerns an arcane guild rule and
does not indicate that B is dishonest, untrustworthy, or unfit to practice law.
Other examples of violations that may not raise a substantial question as to a
lawyer’s fitness to practice include some types of improper solicitation and the
improper use of nonlawyer assistants.
2) Lawyer M and lawyer N are good friends and golfing buddies. One day,
they were golfing and mutually complaining about the tax laws; N mentioned
that he does not worry about tax increases because he just underreports his
income when the taxes go up. M must report N to the disciplinary authorities.
Despite the fact that N was discussing his conduct in his personal affairs, it
is illegal conduct involving dishonesty and must be reported. [See Hazard &
Hodes, §68.04]
a. Key Definitions
“Knowledge” means actual knowledge, but it may be inferred from the circumstances.
[ABA Model Rules, Terminology] It has been held to mean more than mere suspi-
cion. Thus, while a lawyer may report suspected misconduct, she must report known
misconduct. “Substantial” means “a material matter of clear and weighty importance.”
[ABA Model Rules, Terminology]
b. Sanctions for Failure to Report Misconduct
A lawyer who fails to report this type of misconduct is herself subject to discipline for
violating the rule requiring disclosure. [ABA Model Rule 8.3]
c. Exception for Confidential Knowledge
This rule does not require disclosure of information protected by the confidentiality
rules. [See ABA Model Rule 1.6] Thus, if a lawyer learns about another lawyer’s
misconduct through a privileged communication with the other lawyer or one of his
clients, the lawyer has no duty to report the misconduct. Indeed, the lawyer would be
subject to discipline for violating the confidentiality rules if he did report it. Moreover,
there is no duty to disclose information gained by a lawyer or judge while serving as a
member of an approved lawyers’ assistance program that helps lawyers and judges with
substance abuse problems. [ABA Model Rule 8.3(c) and comment 5]

Examples: 1) Lawyer L sought legal advice from his mentor, lawyer M, as to what
L should do about offering a certain piece of evidence in court. L made
it plain that he was seeking advice from M in M’s role as a lawyer. L
told M that he knew the evidence was false. M, of course, advised L not
to offer the evidence. A few months later, M learned that L had ignored
his advice and had offered the evidence. Because M’s knowledge of the
matter is protected by the ethical duty of confidentiality, M must not
report L’s disciplinary violation.
2) Attorney X had long been aware that attorney Y, another partner in
his firm, had a very serious drinking problem, but X did not have any
proof that it was affecting Y’s job performance. One day, X ran into Y
as Y was on his way into court. Y was clearly drunk and could barely
follow their conversation. X cautioned Y not to appear before the judge,
but Y responded that he had tried cases when he was in worse shape
than this. X must report Y to the disciplinary authorities. X did not learn
of Y’s substance abuse in the context of an approved lawyers’ assistance
program or an attorney-client relationship.
3. Disciplinary Process
“Professional discipline” means punishment imposed on a lawyer for breaking a rule of
professional ethics.
a. Complaint
Disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer begin when a complaint is made to the state
disciplinary authority (usually the state bar). Complaints are often brought by aggrieved
clients, but may also be brought by anyone with knowledge of the misconduct. Filing a
complaint against a lawyer is considered privileged, and thus cannot be the basis of an
action (e.g., defamation) by the lawyer against the complainant.
b. Screening
If the complaint is without merit, it might be dismissed by the grievance committee
without ever involving the lawyer. If the complaint appears to have merit, the lawyer
will be asked to respond to the charges. After further investigation, the committee
will either dismiss the complaint or schedule a hearing. If the committee dismisses the
complaint, the complainant does not have any right to appeal; the decision is final.
c. Hearing
1) Due Process Required
If there is a hearing on the complaint, the accused lawyer is entitled to procedural
due process, which means that she has the right to counsel, to proper notice, to be
heard and introduce evidence, and to cross-examine adverse witnesses. In addition,
the hearing must be limited to the charges made in the complaint. [In re Ruffalo,
390 U.S. 544 (1968)]
2) Application of Other Rights
The exclusionary rules of criminal law do not apply to disciplinary proceedings.
Thus, evidence obtained through an illegal search, for example, is admissible in
a disciplinary proceeding. A lawyer may, however, invoke his Fifth Amendment

privilege and refuse to answer questions at the hearing, and no disciplinary action
can be taken against the lawyer if it is based solely on the claim of Fifth Amend-
ment privilege. [Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967)]
3) Burden of Proof
The burden of proof is on the party prosecuting the charge, and most states require
proof of the charge beyond a preponderance of the evidence (but less than beyond
a reasonable doubt). Most states also require that only evidence admissible under
the rules of evidence be considered; thus, inadmissible hearsay would be excluded.
4) Decision and Review
After the hearing, the grievance committee will either dismiss the charges or
recommend sanctions. If sanctions are recommended or disciplinary action is
actually taken, the lawyer is entitled to review of the decision by the state’s highest
court. The burden is then on the lawyer to show that the committee’s action or
recommendation is not supported by the record or is otherwise unlawful.
d. Sanctions
The most common sanctions imposed on a lawyer found to have committed professional
misconduct are:
(i) Private or public reprimand or censure, which is an acknowledgment of miscon-
duct that goes on the lawyer’s record with the disciplinary authorities;
(ii) Suspension of the lawyer’s license to practice for a definite period of time, at the
end of which the right to practice is automatically reinstated; and
(iii) Disbarment, which is the permanent revocation of the lawyer’s license to practice.
A disbarred lawyer may, however, apply for readmission upon proof of rehabilitation.
Other sanctions available include probation, restitution, costs of the disciplinary proceed-
ings, and limitations on the lawyer’s practice. [See ABA Model Rule for Lawyer Disci-
plinary Enforcement 10] Which sanction is imposed generally depends on the severity of
the misconduct and the presence or absence of mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
4. Choice of Law in Disciplinary Proceedings
If the conduct in question occurred in connection with a proceeding that is pending before a
tribunal, the ethics rules of the jurisdiction in which the tribunal sits will be applied, unless
the tribunal’s rules provide otherwise. [ABA Model Rule 8.5(b)(1)] For any other conduct, the
rules of the jurisdiction in which the conduct occurred will apply, but if the predominant effect
of the conduct is in some other jurisdiction, that jurisdiction’s rules will apply. [ABA Model
Rule 8.5(b)(2)] A lawyer will not be subject to discipline if her conduct is proper in the juris-
diction in which she reasonably believes the predominant effect of her conduct will occur. [Id.]
Example: The legal ethics rules of East Dakota prohibit a lawyer from paying a “referral
fee” to another lawyer as compensation for the referral of a legal matter. The
legal ethics rules of West Dakota permit such referral fees if they are reason-
able in amount and if the referred client consents. East Dakota lawyer Ed
referred an estate planning client to West Dakota lawyer Wes. The client lives
in West Dakota and most of her property is located there. With the client’s
consent, Wes sent Ed a reasonable referral fee. Wes is not subject to discipline
in either state.

a. Conflicts of Interest—Choice of Law Agreements Permitted

As stated above, there is a safe harbor for a lawyer whose conduct conforms to the rules
of a jurisdiction in which she “reasonably believes” the predominant effect will occur.
Regarding conflicts of interest only, a lawyer and client may enter into an advance
written agreement specifying the predominant effect jurisdiction, i.e., which jurisdic-
tion’s conflicts rules will apply to the matter. If the agreement is entered into with the
client’s informed consent and the client later tries to disqualify the lawyer from another
matter or files a disciplinary complaint, the agreement may be considered by the court
or disciplinary authority in determining whether the lawyer reasonably believed the
jurisdiction’s rules would apply. [ABA Model Rule 8.5, comment 5]
5. Effect of Sanctions in Other Jurisdictions
A suspension or disbarment in one jurisdiction does not automatically affect a lawyer’s
ability to practice in another jurisdiction.
a. Other States
Professional discipline imposed by one state is not necessarily binding on another. Most
states recognize the determinations of lawyer misconduct by sister states, but they do
not agree on the reasons for recognition. The preferred view is that sister states accept
disciplinary action by one state as conclusive proof of the misconduct, but not of the
sanctions imposed. [See Kentucky Bar Association v. Signer, 558 S.W.2d 582 (Ky.
1977); Florida Bar v. Wilkes, 179 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1965); ABA Model Rule for Lawyer
Disciplinary Enforcement 22E] Under this view, sister states are free to impose their
own sanctions for the misconduct.
b. Federal Courts
Each federal court in which a lawyer is admitted to practice must make an independent
evaluation of the lawyer’s conduct. [Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957)] The
fact that a lawyer has been disciplined by a state, however, is competent evidence in a
federal proceeding and may in itself be sufficient to convince a federal court to impose
a similar sanction. [See In re Rhodes, 370 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1967)]
6. Disability Proceedings
A lawyer who is incapacitated by an impairment such as substance abuse poses a particular
risk of harm to clients, the public, and legal institutions. Most jurisdictions have disability
proceedings, which result in the disabled lawyer’s suspension from practice until she can
show that rehabilitation has occurred. The procedures followed are generally the same as
those of disciplinary proceedings, but provision may be made for psychiatric evaluation and
diversion into a rehabilitation program. [Restatement of the Law (Third) Governing Lawyers
(hereinafter “Restatement”) ch. 1, topic 2, tit. C, introductory note]
D. UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE AND MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE
The rule against unauthorized practice of law has two prongs: (i) a lawyer is subject to discipline for
practicing in a jurisdiction where she is not admitted to practice, and (ii) a lawyer is subject to disci-
pline for assisting a nonlawyer to engage in the unlicensed practice of law. [ABA Model Rule 5.5(a)]
1. Unauthorized Practice by Lawyer
A lawyer who is admitted to practice law in one jurisdiction is not, without more, authorized
to practice in any other jurisdiction. A lawyer is subject to discipline for practicing in a juris-
diction where she is not admitted to practice. [ABA Model Rule 5.5(a)] Except as allowed

by that jurisdiction’s laws or ethics rules, the unadmitted lawyer must not: (i) represent that
she is admitted to practice in that jurisdiction, or (ii) establish an office or other systematic or
continuous presence for the practice of law in that jurisdiction. [ABA Model Rule 5.5(b)]
2. Permissible Types of Temporary Multi-Jurisdictional Practice
The nature of modern law and commerce requires many lawyers to practice across state
lines. ABA Model Rule 5.5(c) recognizes this fact and provides that if a lawyer is admitted
to practice in one state, and is not disbarred or suspended from practice in any state, then she
may provide legal services in a second state on a temporary basis in four situations:
a. Association with Local Lawyer
A lawyer may practice on a temporary basis in a state in which she is not admitted if
she associates a local lawyer who actively participates in the matter. [ABA Model Rule
5.5(c)(1)]
Example: Attorney A is admitted to practice in State One only, and she works for a
law firm that regularly represents a nationwide labor union. The union is
trying to organize workers in State Two, and A is sent there to give legal
advice to the union’s organizers. With the union’s consent, A associates
local labor lawyer L and rents a temporary office near L’s office. L works
actively with A in handling legal problems arising from the union’s
organizing efforts. A’s temporary practice in State Two is proper.
b. Special Permission to Practice in Local Tribunal
An out-of-state lawyer may request special permission from a local court, administra-
tive agency, or other tribunal to handle a matter in that tribunal. [ABA Model Rule
5.5(c)(2)] In a court, such permission is commonly called admission “pro hac vice,”
which means admission for purposes of this matter only. (The rules of many states
require the out-of-state lawyer to associate local counsel as a condition of pro hac vice
admission.) An out-of-state lawyer who reasonably expects to be admitted pro hac
vice may engage in preliminary activities in the state, such as meeting with clients,
reviewing documents, and interviewing witnesses.
Example: Toxic tort lawyer L is admitted to practice in Oklahoma only. He has
been retained by three Oklahoma clients to bring a class action on behalf
of persons injured by a herbicide manufactured by a California defen-
dant. L plans to file the class action in a California state court, and he
reasonably expects to be admitted pro hac vice to handle the case in that
court. It would be proper for L to take a two-week trip to California to
interview other potential class representatives, even though he has not
yet filed the case in California or been admitted pro hac vice.
c. Mediation or Arbitration Arising Out of Practice in Home State
A lawyer may mediate, arbitrate, or engage in another form of alternative dispute
resolution in a state in which she is not admitted to practice if her services arise out of,
or are reasonably related to, her practice in the state in which she is admitted. [ABA
Model Rule 5.5(c)(3)]
Example: Attorney A is admitted to practice in State One only. She represents a
State One client in a contract dispute, and the contract states that all such
disputes will be submitted to arbitration in State Two. It is proper for A
to represent her client in the State Two arbitration, and the same would
be true of a mediation or other form of alternative dispute resolution.

d. Other Temporary Practice Arising Out of Practice in Home State

ABA Model Rule 5.5(c)(4) is a catch-all category that permits a lawyer to temporarily
practice out of state if the lawyer’s out-of-state practice is reasonably related to the
lawyer’s home state practice.
Example: Lawyer L is admitted to practice in State One only. He represents a State
One client that buys up and revitalizes run-down shopping centers. That
client asks L to travel to State Two to negotiate with the owner of a State
Two shopping center, and to draft a purchase agreement that will satisfy
the owner and that will be valid under the law of State Two. It would be
proper for L to render those services in State Two.
e. Temporary Practice by Foreign Lawyers

A lawyer who is licensed and in good standing in a foreign jurisdiction may engage in
temporary practice in the United States under circumstances similar to those described
in a. - d., above. Furthermore, a foreign lawyer may provide legal services temporarily
in the United States if the services are governed primarily by international law or the
law of a foreign jurisdiction. [ABA Model Rule for Temporary Practice by Foreign
Lawyers] Foreign lawyers who seek pro hac vice admission are subjected to greater
scrutiny than United States lawyers. Even if a lawyer is so admitted, the judge has the
discretion to limit the foreign lawyer’s participation in the matter. [ABA Model Rule on
Pro Hac Vice Admission]
3. Permissible Types of Permanent Multi-Jurisdictional Practice
A lawyer who is admitted in one United States or foreign jurisdiction, and who is not disbarred
or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction, may open a law office and establish a systematic
and continuous practice in a different jurisdiction in two narrowly limited situations:
a. Lawyers Employed by Their Only Client
Some lawyers are salaried employees of their only client, e.g., in-house corporate
lawyers and lawyers employed by the government. They may set up a permanent office
to render legal services to their employer in a state in which they are not admitted to
practice, but if they want to litigate a matter in that state, they must seek admission pro
hac vice. [ABA Model Rule 5.5(d)(1)]
Example: Attorney A is admitted to practice in Maryland and Virginia. She is
employed by General Motors (“GM”), which assigns her to be the legal
advisor in the GM office in Idaho. A need not be admitted to practice
in Idaho, but if she wants to represent GM in a suit pending in an Idaho
court, she must seek admission pro hac vice.
1) Foreign Lawyers Advising on United States Law
A foreign lawyer practicing under this rule (e.g., serving as in-house counsel for a
corporation) may not directly advise her client on the law of a United States jurisdic-
tion. Rather, she must consult with a lawyer who is licensed by the relevant jurisdic-
tion and base any advice to her client on advice she obtains from the local lawyer.
b. Legal Services Authorized by Federal or Local Law

In rare instances, federal or local law authorizes a lawyer to practice a restricted branch
of law in a state in which he is not otherwise admitted to practice. [ABA Model Rule
5.5(d)(2)]

Example: Lawyer L is admitted to practice law in New York, and he is admitted

to prosecute patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
which is located in Washington, D.C. When L “retired” and moved to
Florida, he did not become a member of the Florida bar; rather, he set up
a Florida practice that is limited to patent prosecution in the Patent and
Trademark Office. L does not handle other patent matters, such as patent
licensing or patent infringement, and he does not practice any other kind
of law. L’s restricted practice in Florida is proper. [See Sperry v. Florida,
373 U.S. 379 (1963)]
4. Consequences of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice

A lawyer who is admitted to practice in only one jurisdiction but practices in another juris-
diction pursuant to 2. or 3., above, is subject to the disciplinary rules of both jurisdictions.
[ABA Model Rule 8.5(a); comment 19 to ABA Model Rule 5.5] Furthermore, an in-house
or government lawyer who practices under 3.a., above, may be subject to the second jurisdic-
tion’s client security assessments and continuing legal education requirements. [ABA Model
Rule 5.5, comment 17]
5. Unauthorized Practice by Nonlawyers

A person not admitted to practice as a lawyer must not engage in the unauthorized practice of
law, and a lawyer must not assist such a person to do so. [ABA Model Rule 5.5(a); Restate-
ment §4]
a. General Considerations in Defining “Practice of Law”

Important considerations in determining whether the practice of law is involved
include: (i) whether the activity involves legal knowledge and skill beyond that which
the average layperson possesses; (ii) whether the activity constitutes advice or services
concerning binding legal rights or remedies; and (iii) whether the activity is one tradi-
tionally performed by lawyers. [ABA, Annotated Model Rule of Professional Conduct
5.5 (7th ed. 2011)]
1) Activities Constituting Law Practice

Examples of activities that courts have found constitute law practice when done on
behalf of another include: appearing in judicial proceedings; engaging in settle-
ment negotiations; and drafting documents that affect substantial legal rights or
obligations (e.g., contracts, wills, trusts). Preparing an estate plan is generally
considered the province of lawyers, and some courts have also held that nonlawyer
clinics on how to obtain a low-cost divorce constitute unauthorized practice.
2) Activities Not Constituting Law Practice

There are some activities that a nonlawyer may undertake that do not constitute
the practice of law. For example, state and federal agencies often permit nonlaw-
yers, such as accountants, to appear before them representing clients. Also, while
nonlawyers may not draft legal documents, they can act as scriveners, filling in
the blanks on standard forms. Thus, real estate brokers, title insurance compa-
nies, and escrow companies are usually permitted to fill in the blanks on standard
documents related to the sale of real property. Nonlawyers can also publish books
or pamphlets offering general advice, including most do-it-yourself books and kits.

3) Tax Advice
Giving advice on tax law would probably constitute the unauthorized practice
of law, but an accountant or other layperson may prepare tax returns and answer
questions incidental to the preparation of the returns.
b. Consequences of Unauthorized Practice

A nonlawyer who engages in the unauthorized practice of law is subject to several
sanctions, including injunction, contempt, and criminal conviction. [Restatement §4,
comment a] A lawyer who assists in such an endeavor is subject to professional discipline.
c. Delegating Work to Nonlawyer Assistants

The rule stated above does not, of course, prohibit a lawyer from delegating tasks to a
paralegal, law clerk, student intern, or other such person. But the lawyer must supervise
the delegated work carefully and must be ultimately responsible for the results. [ABA
Model Rule 5.5, comment 2]
Example: Paralegal P is working under attorney A’s supervision on a complex real
estate transaction. P may write and sign letters on the law firm letter-
head to make routine requests for information from banks, mortgage
companies, and governmental agencies, provided that P indicates that
she is a paralegal, not a lawyer. But P should not sign letters to clients,
adversaries, opposing counsel, or tribunals; she may draft such letters,
but they should be approved and signed by A. That helps assure that A is
properly supervising P’s work. [New Jersey Op. 611 (1988)]
d. Training Nonlawyers for Law-Related Work

A lawyer may advise and instruct nonlawyers whose employment requires a knowledge
of the law—e.g., claims adjusters, bank trust officers, social workers, accountants, and
government employees. [ABA Model Rule 5.5, comment 3]
e. Helping Persons Appear Pro Se
A lawyer may advise persons who wish to appear on their own behalf in a legal matter. [Id.]
Example: Client C asked attorney A to represent her in a dispute with her landlord
concerning the stopped-up plumbing in her apartment. After hearing
C’s explanation, A advised C that she would be able to handle the matter
herself in small claims court at far less expense. A instructed C on how to
obtain the proper forms for small claims court and gave her general advice
on what facts to gather and how to prove her case. A’s conduct is proper.
f. Assisting a Suspended or Disbarred Lawyer
A lawyer violates ABA Model Rule 5.5(a) if he assists a lawyer whose license has been
suspended or revoked in practicing law. It is proper to hire a suspended or disbarred
lawyer to do work that a layperson is permitted to do, but the suspended or disbarred
lawyer must not be permitted to do any work that constitutes the practice of law.
II. THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP—GENERAL POINTS

A. NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP
The relationship between a lawyer and client is contractual. The terms of that contract are generally

3) Tax Advice
Giving advice on tax law would probably constitute the unauthorized practice
of law, but an accountant or other layperson may prepare tax returns and answer
questions incidental to the preparation of the returns.
b. Consequences of Unauthorized Practice

A nonlawyer who engages in the unauthorized practice of law is subject to several
sanctions, including injunction, contempt, and criminal conviction. [Restatement §4,
comment a] A lawyer who assists in such an endeavor is subject to professional discipline.
c. Delegating Work to Nonlawyer Assistants

The rule stated above does not, of course, prohibit a lawyer from delegating tasks to a
paralegal, law clerk, student intern, or other such person. But the lawyer must supervise
the delegated work carefully and must be ultimately responsible for the results. [ABA
Example: Paralegal P is working under attorney A’s supervision on a complex real
estate transaction. P may write and sign letters on the law firm letter-
head to make routine requests for information from banks, mortgage
companies, and governmental agencies, provided that P indicates that
she is a paralegal, not a lawyer. But P should not sign letters to clients,
adversaries, opposing counsel, or tribunals; she may draft such letters,
but they should be approved and signed by A. That helps assure that A is
properly supervising P’s work. [New Jersey Op. 611 (1988)]
d. Training Nonlawyers for Law-Related Work

A lawyer may advise and instruct nonlawyers whose employment requires a knowledge
of the law—e.g., claims adjusters, bank trust officers, social workers, accountants, and
government employees. [ABA Model Rule 5.5, comment 3]
e. Helping Persons Appear Pro Se
A lawyer may advise persons who wish to appear on their own behalf in a legal matter. [Id.]
Example: Client C asked attorney A to represent her in a dispute with her landlord
concerning the stopped-up plumbing in her apartment. After hearing
C’s explanation, A advised C that she would be able to handle the matter
herself in small claims court at far less expense. A instructed C on how to
obtain the proper forms for small claims court and gave her general advice
on what facts to gather and how to prove her case. A’s conduct is proper.
f. Assisting a Suspended or Disbarred Lawyer
A lawyer violates ABA Model Rule 5.5(a) if he assists a lawyer whose license has been
suspended or revoked in practicing law. It is proper to hire a suspended or disbarred
lawyer to do work that a layperson is permitted to do, but the suspended or disbarred
lawyer must not be permitted to do any work that constitutes the practice of law.
II. THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP—GENERAL POINTS

A. NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP
The relationship between a lawyer and client is contractual. The terms of that contract are generally

implied by custom, but for the most part can be varied by mutual agreement. The lawyer operates
as both the client’s fiduciary and agent, with the duties and limitations of those designations. For
example, because the lawyer is considered a fiduciary, the contract between the lawyer and client
will be construed against the lawyer and closely scrutinized for fairness. Similarly, the lawyer is
subject to the limitations imposed by the laws of agency.
B. CREATING THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP

In lore, although perhaps not in fact, an English barrister has an ethical duty to take any case
offered upon tender of a proper fee. [Wolfram, Modern Legal Ethics §10.2.2 (1986)] In contrast,
lawyers in the United States are generally free to refuse service to any person for any reason. A
lawyer-client relationship arises when:
(i) A person manifests an intent that the lawyer provide legal services and the lawyer agrees;
(ii) A person manifests an intent to have the lawyer represent him, the lawyer fails to make clear
that he does not want to undertake the representation, and the lawyer knows or should know
that the prospective client is reasonably relying on the lawyer to provide the services; or
(iii) A tribunal appoints a lawyer to represent a client.
[Restatement §14]
1. Implied Assent and Reasonable Reliance

The lawyer’s assent is implied when he fails to clearly decline representation and the
prospective client reasonably relies on the representation. The reasonableness of the reliance
is a question of fact.
Examples: 1) Client Carla writes a letter to attorney Aida, asking Aida to represent her
in a personal injury case. Aida never responds to the letter. One year later, the
statute of limitations expires on Carla’s claim, and she sues Aida for malprac-
tice for failing to file the suit. Here, there was no attorney-client relationship.
Although Aida did not expressly decline the representation, it was unreason-
able for Carla to rely on Aida’s representation based on an unanswered letter.
[See Restatement §14, illus. 3]
2) Client Casey calls lawyer Lisa’s office asking that Lisa represent him in a
court proceeding relating to his arrest for driving under the influence (“DUI”).
Lisa is out of the office. Casey tells Lisa’s secretary that he understands that
Lisa handles many DUI cases and hopes that she will take the case even though
the court date is only 10 days away. The secretary tells Casey to send over all
papers relevant to the proceeding. She does not tell him that Lisa will decide
whether to take the case only after reviewing the papers. One day before
Casey’s court date, Lisa phones Casey and declines to represent him. Here,
it would likely be found that an attorney-client relationship existed because
Casey’s reliance was reasonable. Lisa regularly handled DUI cases, her agent
responded to his request for help by asking him to send the papers, and the
imminence of the hearing made it appropriate for Lisa to decline while there
was still time for Casey to get another lawyer. [Restatement §14, illus. 4]

2. Court Appointments
Trial and appellate courts often find it necessary to appoint lawyers to represent indigent
clients and clients with unpopular causes. ABA Model Rule 6.2 provides that a lawyer must
not seek to avoid such an appointment except for good cause. Examples of good cause are
stated below.
a. Violation of Law or Disciplinary Rule

A lawyer must decline a court appointment if to accept it would require the lawyer to
violate a law or disciplinary rule. [ABA Model Rule 6.2(a)]
Example: When attorney A was a deputy public defender, he represented client Q
in an aggravated assault case, and he learned a great deal of confidential
information about Q’s life and criminal background. Later, A entered
private practice, and the local court appointed him to defend D, who was
charged with the attempted murder of Q. The confidential information A
obtained from Q is highly relevant to the defense of D. (See V.C., infra.)
A must therefore decline the appointment to defend D.
b. Unreasonable Financial Burden

A lawyer may seek to be excused from an appointment if to accept it would impose an
unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer. [ABA Model Rule 6.2(b)]
Example: The Supreme Court of West Dakota appointed lawyer L to represent D
in the appeal of D’s conviction and death sentence for three murders.
The trial of D’s case lasted 13 months and resulted in a trial record in
excess of 150,000 pages. To handle the appeal properly, L would be
required to work at least 600 hours. The West Dakota legislature has set
legal fees at a paltry $17 per hour for appellate counsel in death penalty
cases. L is a struggling solo practitioner and will not be able to support
his family if he is required to take that much time away from his regular
clients. L may seek to be excused from the supreme court appointment.
c. Personal Inability to Represent Client Effectively

A lawyer may seek to be excused from a court appointment if the lawyer finds the client
or the cause so repugnant that the lawyer-client relationship would be impaired or the
lawyer could not represent the client effectively. [ABA Model Rule 6.2(c)]
Example: The trial court appointed attorney A to defend accused child molester
M. As a young boy, A himself was molested by a similar person, and
A finds that he cannot even look comfortably at M, much less represent
him zealously. A may seek to be excused from the court appointment.
3. Duty to Reject Certain Cases

A lawyer must refuse employment in the following situations:
a. Client’s Motive Is Harassment

A lawyer is subject to discipline for bringing an action, conducting a defense, asserting
a position, or taking other steps if the client’s motive is to embarrass, delay, or burden
a third person. [ABA Model Rule 4.4(a)] Thus, a lawyer must reject any case where he
believes this is the prospective client’s motive.

b. Unsupportable Factual or Legal Position

A lawyer who is serving as an advocate in a legal proceeding must not take a position
that is either factually or legally frivolous. [ABA Model Rule 3.1] A position is not
frivolous if the lawyer can make a good faith argument that the facts are as claimed or
that the present law should be changed. A position also is not frivolous merely because
the lawyer does not have all the facts at hand at the outset, but expects to develop them
during discovery. Note that in a criminal case, the defense lawyer may defend his client
to the extent allowed by constitutional law even if the defense would otherwise violate
this rule. [ABA Model Rule 3.1, comments 1-3; and see VIII.A.2., infra]
c. Lawyer Not Competent

A lawyer must reject a case if he is too busy or too inexperienced to handle the matter
competently. [ABA Model Rule 1.1]
d. Strong Personal Feelings

If a lawyer’s personal feelings about a case are so strong that they would impair his
ability to effectively represent the client, he must refuse the case. [ABA Model Rules
1.16(a)(1), 1.7(a)(2)]
e. Impaired Mental or Physical Condition

A lawyer must decline a case if his mental or physical condition would materially
impair his ability to represent the client. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(2)]
4. Duties Owed to Prospective Client

When a person consults with a lawyer about the possibility of forming a lawyer-client
relationship, and no such relationship ensues, the lawyer has a duty to: (i) protect the
prospective client’s confidential information, which includes declining to represent other
clients in the same or a related matter if the confidential information would be harmful to the
prospective client; (ii) protect any property the prospective client has given to the lawyer; and
(iii) use reasonable care in giving the person any legal advice, such as whether the claim has
merit, whether conflicts of interest exist, and when the action must be commenced. [Restate-
ment §15]
5. Ethical Obligation to Accept Unpopular Cases

Lawyers have an ethical obligation to help make legal service available to all who need it. A
lawyer can fulfill this obligation by accepting a fair share of unpopular matters or indigent
or unpopular clients. [ABA Model Rule 6.2, comment 1]
C. ATTORNEYS’ FEES
The nature and amount of an attorney’s fee are subjects for contractual agreement between the
attorney and the client (except when the fee is set by statute or court order). In theory, the attorney
and client bargain at arm’s length over the fee, but in practice many clients are inexperienced with
attorneys’ fees. Thus, in fee disputes, courts strain to give the benefit of the doubt to the client.
[See, e.g., Terzis v. Estate of Whalen, 489 A.2d 608 (N.H. 1985); with respect to fee setting in
general, see Restatement §§34 - 43]
1. When to Agree on Fee

When a lawyer has not regularly represented the client, the basis or rate of the fee and the

expenses for which the client will be responsible must be communicated to the client, prefer-
ably in writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation.
[ABA Model Rule 1.5(b)]
Examples: 1) At the close of her first appointment with a new client, attorney A gave the
client a simple written memorandum. The memorandum explained that her
fee would be calculated at $175 per hour, and that the number of hours could
not be predicted with certainty but would probably be about 100. Later, when
the matter proved more difficult than A had anticipated, A gave the client a
supplemental memorandum that doubled the estimated number of hours. A
handled the fee issue properly under the ABA Model Rules.
2) At the end of his third appointment with lawyer L, a new client asked
how L planned to charge him for the work. L responded: “In a matter of this
nature, it’s simply impossible to tell you in advance what the fee will be. But
you have my assurance that it will be a fair fee.” L’s conduct is a disciplinary
violation under ABA Model Rule 1.5(b).
2. Discipline for Unreasonable Fee
A court will not enforce a contract for an unreasonably high attorney’s fee or an unreason-
ably high amount for expenses, and the attorney is subject to discipline for trying to exact
such a fee or expenses. [ABA Model Rule 1.5(a)]
a. Factors
The factors considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee are:
(i) The time and labor required;
(ii) The novelty and difficulty of the questions involved;
(iii) The skill needed to perform the legal services properly;
(iv) The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the work for this client will preclude
the lawyer from doing fee-paying work for others;
(v) The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal work;
(vi) The amount at stake and the results obtained for the client;
(vii) The time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances;
(viii) The nature and length of the relationship between the lawyer and the client;
(ix) The experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer performing the services; and
(x) Whether the fee is fixed or contingent (a contingent fee can be higher because it
requires the lawyer to take a gamble).
[ABA Model Rule 1.5(a)]

b. Items that May and May Not Be Billed

The attorney must disclose the basis on which a client will be charged for legal services
and expenses, and the attorney’s bill should clearly show how the amount due has been
computed. The attorney must not charge the client for ordinary overhead expenses
associated with staffing, equipping, and running the attorney’s office, but the attorney
may charge the client for the actual cost to the attorney of special services such as
photocopying, long distance calls, computer research, special deliveries, secretarial
overtime, and the like. [Restatement §38(3)(a)] Alternatively, the attorney may charge
a reasonable amount to which the client has agreed in advance. [ABA Model Rule
1.5, comment 1] The attorney must not charge the client more than her actual cost for
services provided by third parties, such as court reporters, travel agents, and expert
witnesses. Furthermore, the attorney must not “double bill” her time. [See ABA Formal
Op. 93-379 (1993)]
Example: Attorney spends three hours working on client A’s case while flying on
an airplane to take depositions in client B’s case. Attorney must not bill
B for three hours of travel time if she elects to bill A for three hours
of work time. She may charge either one or the other for the full three
hours, or she may apportion the time between the two clients.
3. Collecting and Financing Attorneys’ Fees
a. Payment in Advance
A lawyer may require her fee to be paid in advance, but she must refund any unearned
part of the advance if she is fired or withdraws. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(d); comment 4
to ABA Model Rule 1.5; and see F.5., infra] Be careful to distinguish a true retainer fee
from a payment of a fee in advance. A true retainer fee is money that is paid solely to
ensure the availability of the lawyer, and the lawyer who is fired or withdraws generally
need not refund the retainer fee.
Examples: 1) XYZ Oil Company pays the A & B environmental defense firm a
monthly retainer fee of $1,000 simply to be available to represent XYZ
in the case of an oil spill. The retainer fee agreement provides that the
$1,000 per month will not be credited against hours spent on XYZ’s
legal work. This is a true retainer fee. If the A & B firm withdraws or is
fired from a particular case, it may keep the retainer payments provided:
(i) the retainer amount was reasonable, and (ii) it has not violated the
retainer agreement.
2) Lawyer L agreed to represent client C in a divorce case for $100 per
hour. L’s written fee contract with C provided that C would pay L a
$2,500 “nonrefundable retainer” and that the retainer would be “credited
against C’s charges.” C fired L after L did $1,000 worth of work on the
case, but L refused to refund any part of the retainer. L must refund
$1,500 to C; the fee contract does not clearly explain the meaning of
“nonrefundable retainer,” and it ought to be construed against L, who
drafted it. [See Jacobson v. Sassower, 66 N.Y.2d 991 (1985)]
b. Property for Services

A lawyer may accept property in return for services (e.g., an ownership interest in
a business), provided that this does not involve a proprietary interest in the cause of

action or subject of litigation contrary to ABA Model Rule 1.8(i) (see V.C.8., infra). Such
an arrangement is also subject to scrutiny as a conflict of interest because it may be a
business transaction between the lawyer and the client. [ABA Model Rule 1.5, comment 4]
c. Cutting Off Services

A lawyer must not make a fee agreement that could curtail services in the middle of the
relationship and thus put the client at a bargaining disadvantage. [ABA Model Rule 1.5,
comment 5]
Example: Attorney A agreed to defend client D in a drug smuggling case. A clause
buried in the middle of A’s wordy fee agreement provides that all work
must be paid for in advance. D paid A $2,000 in advance. In the middle
of preparation for trial, A told D that the original advance was used up
and that if D did not advance more money, the work would stop. A’s
conduct is not proper. [Id.; and see State v. Mayes, 531 P.2d 102 (Kan.
1975)]
d. Credit Arrangements and Security

A lawyer may permit the client to pay a legal fee by credit card [ABA Formal Op.
00-419 (2000)], and a lawyer may participate in a bar association program that enables
clients to finance fees through bank loans. A lawyer may also take an interest-bearing
promissory note from a client to secure the payment of fees. [See Hulland v. State
Bar, 8 Cal. 3d 440 (1972)] When permitted by local law, a lawyer may use a statutory,
common law, or contractual attorney’s lien to secure the payment of a fee. [ABA Model
Rule 1.8(i)(1)]
4. Contingent Fees
Under a contingent fee agreement, the lawyer collects a fee only if the matter is resolved in
the client’s favor. Often, the fee is expressed as a percentage of the client’s eventual recovery
in the case. However, a contingent fee need not be a percentage of the amount recovered;
an otherwise proper contingent fee may still be proper even if there is no res, or pool of
money, from which the fee can be paid. Contingent fees are regarded as unethical in some
common law countries, but they are tolerated in the United States. Critics contend that they
stir up litigation, encourage excessive fees, and give the lawyer an unprofessional stake in the
outcome of the case. Proponents reply that only through a contingent fee arrangement can a
client of modest means afford to litigate a claim. Some states have set statutory limits on the
contingent fee percentages a lawyer can exact in personal injury, medical malpractice, and
similar types of cases.
a. When Contingent Fee Prohibited
1) Criminal Cases
A lawyer is subject to discipline for using a contingent fee arrangement when
defending a person in a criminal case. [ABA Model Rule 1.5(d)(2)]
2) Domestic Relations Cases

A lawyer is also subject to discipline for using a contingent fee in a domestic
relations case when the contingency is based on the securing of a divorce, the
amount of alimony or support, or the amount of a property settlement. [ABA
Model Rule 1.5(d)(1); see also Restatement §35, comment g] However, a lawyer

may use a contingent fee in a suit to recover money that is past due under an
alimony or support decree. [ABA Model Rule 1.5, comment 6]
Example: Lawyer L agreed to represent W in a marital dissolution case in
exchange for 10% of the amount to be received by W as a property
settlement. The arrangement would subject L to discipline.
b. Contingent Fee Must Be Reasonable

A contingent fee must be reasonable in amount; moreover, a lawyer must not use a
contingent fee when the facts of the case make it unreasonable to do so. [Comment 3 to
ABA Model Rule 1.5]
Example: Client C asked lawyer L to represent her as plaintiff in a medical
malpractice case. Liability was clear, the damages were large, and the
defendants were affluent. The case was a clear winner, and L knew that
he could settle it with only a few hours of work. Nonetheless, L signed
C up to a 331/3% contingent fee agreement. After two hours of work, L
arranged a lucrative settlement that C accepted. It was unreasonable for
L to use a contingent fee agreement in the first place, and it would be
unreasonable for L to collect one-third of the settlement proceeds. [See
ABA Model Rule 1.5, comment 3]
c. Writing Requirement for Contingent Fee Agreements

A contingent fee agreement must be in a writing signed by the client, and the writing
must state:
(i) How the fee is to be calculated, including the percentage that the lawyer will get if
the case is settled before trial, won after trial, or won after appeal;
(ii) What litigation and other expenses are to be deducted from the recovery;
(iii) Whether deductions for expenses will be made before or after the contingent fee
is calculated; and
(iv) What expenses the client must pay, whether or not she wins the case.
At the end of a contingent fee case, the lawyer must give the client a written statement
showing the outcome of the case, the remittance to the client, and how the remittance
was calculated. [ABA Model Rule 1.5(c)]
5. Fee Disputes
a. In General
In seeking compensation from a client, a lawyer may not employ collection methods
forbidden by law, improperly use confidential information, or harass a client. [Restate-
ment §41]
b. Remedies
1) Liens
In addition to filing a lawsuit to recover their fees, lawyers have several remedies if
a client refuses to pay all or a portion of a fee. Most states recognize a common law

or statutory charging lien, under which any recovery obtained for the client serves
as security for the lawyer’s fees. Even states that do not recognize a charging lien
usually recognize such a lien if created by the lawyer and client’s express agreement.
[3 A.L.R.2d 148 (1949)] Many states also permit the lawyer to exercise a retaining
lien, under which he can retain documents, funds, and property of the client until his
fee is paid, but there is a strong minority view contra.
2) Retention of Funds in Trust Account
If a lawyer receives funds on behalf of a client from which his fee is to be paid
(e.g., a settlement check), and the client disputes the amount of his fee, the lawyer
must retain the disputed amount in a client trust account (VI.B.2.c., infra) until the
dispute is resolved. [ABA Model Rule 1.15(e)]
3) Arbitration or Mediation
Bar associations in many jurisdictions have established arbitration or mediation
services to help lawyers resolve fee disputes with their clients. Comment 9 to ABA
Model Rule 1.5 urges lawyers to use these services when they are available.
Example: Lawyer L’s standard retainer agreement includes a provision that
requires arbitration of both fee disputes and legal malpractice
claims. The agreement is proper, provided that it is clear and that
L’s clients truly understand its ramifications. [District of Columbia
Bar Op. 190 (1988)]
6. Fee Splitting with Other Lawyers
As a general rule, a lawyer must not split a legal fee with another lawyer. The rule is designed
to prevent lawyers from becoming “client brokers” and to discourage excessive fees. The
general rule is subject to three exceptions.
a. Lawyers Within a Firm
The partners and associates within a law firm may, of course, pool and split legal fees—
that is the essence of practice in a law firm.
b. Separation and Retirement Agreements
A law firm may make payments to a former partner or associate under a separation or
retirement agreement.
Example: The partnership agreement of the P, D & Q law firm provides that when
partner Q retires, the firm will pay her monthly benefits equal to 30% of
Q’s average monthly billings during the year prior to her retirement. The
arrangement is proper.
c. Certain Splits with Lawyers Outside Firm

Sometimes two or more lawyers from different firms work together on a case. ABA
Model Rule 1.5(e) permits them to submit a single bill to the client, and then to split the
fee, if the following conditions are met:
(i) The total fee is reasonable;
(ii) The split is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer, or some
different proportion if each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the matter;
and

(iii) The client agrees to the split in a writing that discloses the share each lawyer
will receive.
Example: In a complex corporate tender offer matter that involves both antitrust
and securities law issues, lawyers from three firms join forces to represent
Grundy, Inc. Lawyers from firm A will do whatever courtroom work
needs to be done. Lawyers from firm B will do the out-of-court work
on the antitrust issues, and lawyers from firm C will do the out-of-court
work on the securities law issues. The three firms do not agree to assume
joint responsibility for the matter, but they agree to send Grundy, Inc. a
single bill and to divide the proceeds in proportion to the work done by
each firm. Grundy, Inc. is advised of the arrangement and consents to it
in writing. Assuming that the total fee is reasonable, the arrangement is
proper.
7. Forwarding or Referral Fees

Referral of cases between lawyers is common, for instance, when the referring lawyer is too
busy to handle a case or does not feel competent to handle a case. ABA Model Rule 7.2(b)
prohibits a lawyer from paying anyone—including another lawyer—for recommending
him or referring a matter to him. Furthermore, ABA Model Rule 1.5(e) does not permit fee
splitting with a referring lawyer who neither assumes responsibility for a matter nor does
work on the matter (see 6.c., above). A lawyer may, however, set up a “reciprocal referral”
arrangement with another lawyer or with a nonlawyer professional in which each person
agrees to refer clients or customers to the other. The arrangement must not be exclusive, and
the lawyer’s client must be informed of the existence and nature of the arrangement. [ABA
Model Rule 7.2(b) and comment 8] These reciprocal referral arrangements are discussed
further in XII.B.3.e., infra.
D. SCOPE OF REPRESENTATION
The scope and objectives of a lawyer’s representation of a client may be defined and limited by
agreement between the lawyer and client. In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a lawyer
should pursue a client’s objectives in all reasonably available legal ways. However, a lawyer must
not advise or assist a client to commit a crime or fraud, but a lawyer may discuss the legal conse-
quences of a proposed course of action with the client. [ABA Model Rule 1.2(d)] Furthermore, a
lawyer may help the client determine the validity, scope, and meaning of a law. [Id.] A lawyer also
may take actions that are impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. [ABA Model Rule
1.2(a)]
1. Decisions to Be Made by Client
When a client brings a legal problem to a lawyer, it is the client who must decide what shall
be the objectives of the lawyer’s work. Thus, it is the client who must make the key decisions
that affect the client’s substantial legal rights. A lawyer must therefore abide by the client’s
decision regarding the following matters:
(i) Whether to accept a settlement offer;
(ii) What plea to enter in a criminal case;
(iii) Whether to waive a jury trial in a criminal case;

(iv) Whether the client will testify in a criminal case; and
(v) Whether to appeal.
[ABA Model Rule 1.2(a); Restatement §22(1)]

Examples: 1) Lawyer L agrees to represent C on a contingent fee basis in C’s suit against
D for slander. L’s fee agreement provides that the suit cannot be settled before
trial without L’s consent. L is subject to discipline. The decision to settle a
suit is made by the client, not the lawyer—even in a contingent fee case. [See
ABA Model Rule 1.2(a)]
2) Attorney A is defending B in a burglary case. A has carefully advised B

about the legal and practical consequences of pleading not guilty, waiving a
jury trial, and testifying on his own behalf. Having done that, A must now
allow B to make the final decision on those three vital issues. [Id.]
2. Limits on Lawyer’s Responsibility and Authority

A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the
circumstances, and if the client gives informed consent. For example, a lawyer might agree
to counsel her client about a dispute with the client’s landlord, but stipulate that if the dispute
has to be arbitrated or litigated, the client will hire another lawyer for that purpose. [ABA
Model Rule 1.2(c) and comment 7]
a. Disagreements Between Lawyer and Client
Lawyers and clients sometimes disagree about the means to be used to reach the client’s
objectives. Clients normally defer to their lawyers about issues of law, tactics, and
strategy. Conversely, lawyers normally defer to their clients about questions of expense
and concern for third persons who might be affected by a legal tactic. A lawyer and
client should try to resolve their disagreements, but if they cannot, the lawyer may
withdraw or the client may fire the lawyer. [See ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(3), (b)(4)]
b. Telling the Client “No”

When a lawyer discovers that her client expects assistance that violates a law or legal
ethics rule, the lawyer must explain why she cannot do what the client expects. If the
client insists on the lawyer’s assistance in violating the law or ethics rule, the lawyer
must withdraw. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(1)]
c. Discovering a Client’s Illegal Conduct
When a lawyer discovers that a client has begun an illegal course of action and the
action is continuing, the lawyer must not assist in the wrongdoing, e.g., by drafting
fraudulent documents or suggesting how the wrongdoing can be concealed. [ABA
Model Rule 1.2(d) and comment 10] In this situation, the lawyer must withdraw.
[ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(1)] Sometimes withdrawal alone is not enough—the lawyer
may have to make a “noisy withdrawal” in which she gives outsiders notice of her
withdrawal and disaffirms any of her prior opinions, documents, affirmations, or
the like that the client is using to carry out the wrongdoing. [ABA Model Rule 1.2,
comment 10] The lawyer’s noisy withdrawal may put the client’s victim on guard, but
that is permissible (and probably praiseworthy). [See also ABA Model Rule 4.1(b) and
comment 3—concerning disclosure of confidential information]

3. Client with Diminished Capacity
a. Lawyer’s Duties
Normally, it is assumed that a client can make decisions about important matters, but
if the client is a minor or has diminished mental capacity, that may not be true. Never-
theless, such a client may be able to make some kinds of decisions that affect her own
well-being. For example, even very young children can have valuable opinions about
who should have custody of them. Similarly, even very old clients can handle routine
financial matters, although they may need legal protection concerning major transac-
tions. The lawyer has a duty, so far as reasonably possible, to maintain a normal lawyer-
client relationship with the client. [ABA Model Rule 1.14(a) and comment 1] The lawyer
must treat the client with attention and respect. Even if the client has a guardian or other
representative, the lawyer should, so far as possible, treat the client as a client, particu-
larly in communicating with the client about significant developments. [Comment 2 to
ABA Model Rule 1.14]
b. Protective Action and Appointment of Guardian

When the client has diminished capacity and faces a risk of substantial physical, finan-
cial, or other harm, the lawyer may take reasonable actions to protect the client. These
actions include consulting with people or entities that can protect the client, and, when
appropriate, seeking the appointment of a guardian or similar surrogate. [ABA Model
Rule 1.14(b)] When taking protective action, the lawyer has implied authority to reveal
the client’s confidential information, but only to the extent necessary to protect the
client. [ABA Model Rule 1.14(c)]
Example: For many years, lawyer L has represented widower W in personal and
business matters. Now W’s physical and mental condition make it unsafe
for him to continue living alone in the old family home, and he has no
close relatives or friends to assist him. L may search out suitable living
quarters for W, where eating facilities and medical help are close at
hand. To the extent possible, L should involve W in making the decision
to move. If L reasonably believes that W needs a conservator, she may
seek to have one appointed; in the appointment process, she may, if
necessary, disclose confidential information about W’s condition. After a
conservator is appointed, L should still treat W as her client, consulting
with him, keeping him advised of developments, and allowing him to
make all decisions of which he is capable.
4. Emergency Legal Assistance to Nonclient with Seriously Diminished Capacity
When a person with seriously diminished capacity faces imminent and irreparable harm
to her health, safety, or financial interest, a lawyer may take legal action on her behalf,
despite her inability to establish a lawyer-client relationship or to make or express considered
judgments about the matter. However, the lawyer cannot act until the person (or someone
acting on her behalf) has consulted the lawyer, and the lawyer should not act unless he
reasonably believes the person has no other representative available. Any action undertaken
should be limited to that which is reasonably necessary to maintain the status quo or other-
wise avoid imminent and irreparable harm. [ABA Model Rule 1.14, comment 9]
a. Lawyer’s Duties
A lawyer who represents a person in such emergency circumstances has the same duties

as he would with respect to a client. [Id.] In an emergency situation, confidences may

be disclosed only to the extent necessary to accomplish the intended protective action.
The lawyer should disclose the nature of his relationship with the person to any tribunal
or counsel involved in the matter. Furthermore, steps should be taken to regularize the
relationship as soon as possible. [ABA Model Rule 1.14, comment 10]
b. No Compensation for Lawyer
Normally, a lawyer would not seek compensation for emergency actions taken on behalf
of a nonclient. [Id.]
E. COMMUNICATING WITH THE CLIENT
1. Matters that Require Informed Consent
The lawyer must promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance that requires
the client’s informed consent. [ABA Model Rule 1.4(a)] “Informed consent” means that the
client agrees to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has sufficiently explained the
material risks and reasonable alternatives. [ABA Model Rule 1.0(e)]
Examples: 1) ABA Model Rule 1.7(b) permits a lawyer, in defined circumstances, to
represent two clients who have a concurrent conflict of interests. One prereq-
uisite is that both clients give informed consent in writing. The lawyer must
sufficiently explain the material risks and reasonably available alternatives to
both clients before they can give valid consent.
2) If an adversary offers to settle a civil case, or offers a plea bargain in a
criminal case, the lawyer must promptly convey the offer to her client unless
the client has previously instructed the lawyer that an offer on those terms is
acceptable or unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or reject
such an offer. [ABA Model Rule 1.4, comment 2]
2. Information About Status of the Matter and Means to Be Used
The lawyer must keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter [ABA
Model Rule 1.4(a)(3)] and about the means by which the lawyer plans to accomplish the
client’s objectives [ABA Model Rule 1.4(a)(2)]. If the lawyer must make an immediate
decision (such as whether to object to a line of questioning during a trial), the lawyer need
not consult with the client before acting. [ABA Model Rule 1.4, comment 3] However, in less
urgent situations, the lawyer should consult with the client before acting.
Example: Client C hired lawyer L to negotiate on C’s behalf in a real estate dispute. C
told L: “You have complete authority—just get the best deal you can.” Despite
the grant of broad authority, L should keep C advised of the progress of the
negotiations. When there is time to do so, L should review the material issues
with C before taking final action.
3. Request for Information
If the lawyer keeps the client properly informed of developments in the matter, the client
will not often need to ask the lawyer for information. When a client does make a reasonable
request for information, the lawyer must respond promptly. [ABA Model Rule 1.4(a)(4)] If
that is impossible, then the lawyer or a member of her staff should acknowledge the client’s
request and tell the client when the information will be available. In particular, the client’s
telephone calls should be promptly returned or acknowledged because few things make
clients more irate than having their telephone calls ignored.

4. Consultation About Illegal or Unethical Conduct

If the client expects the lawyer to do something that is either illegal or unethical, the lawyer
must consult with the client and explain why he cannot do what the client wants. [ABA
Model Rule 1.4(a)(5)]
Example: Attorney A is representing defendant D at a criminal trial. They expected to
use an alibi defense based on the testimony of witness W, but the prosecu-
tion’s case-in-chief proves beyond doubt that W’s proposed testimony would
be perjurious. In a recess before the defense’s case-in-chief, D tells A to call
W according to plan. A must explain to D why he cannot use W’s testimony
and must consult with D about an alternative defense strategy.
5. Special Circumstances
The amount and kind of information and explanations the lawyer should give to the client
depend on the client’s situation. If the client is young or has diminished capacity, the lawyer
may have to do more explaining and assisting than if the client is an ordinary adult. [See
ABA Model Rule 1.14; ABA Model Rule 1.4, comment 6] If the client is an organization or
group, the lawyer should ordinarily communicate with the appropriate officer. [ABA Model
Rule 1.4, comment 6] If the client and the lawyer have a regular, established relationship
concerning many routine matters, the two of them may agree on a convenient arrangement
for only limited or occasional reporting. [Id.]
Example: For many years, attorney A has done the routine collection work for a major
bank. In a normal week, the bank sends A 20 to 30 new collection cases.
Over the years, A and the bank have settled on a standard procedure for
handling these cases. It would be proper for A and the bank to agree that A
must report only major or unusual occurrences.
6. Withholding Information from Client

A lawyer may delay the transmission of information to a client if the client would be likely
to react imprudently to an immediate communication. [ABA Model Rule 1.4, comment 7]
The lawyer must not, however, withhold information to serve the lawyer’s or a third person’s
interest or convenience. [Id.]
Example: Defendants D and E were charged with the felony murder of X, and they were
granted separate trials. In the depths of despondency, D vowed to take his
own life if E was convicted. That same day, E was convicted. D’s lawyer may
withhold that information from D until D is able to react to it more rationally.
a. Court Rule or Order

A court rule or order may forbid a lawyer from sharing certain information with a
client, and the lawyer must comply with such a rule or order. [ABA Model Rule 3.4(c);
ABA Model Rule 1.4, comment 7]
Example: In a patent infringement case, the patentee’s lawyer demanded produc-
tion of all of the defendant’s laboratory operating manuals. The defendant
complied with the demand and gave the patentee’s lawyer the manuals.
Subsequently, however, the defendant convinced the judge that the
manuals contained valuable trade secrets, and the judge therefore issued
a protective order forbidding the patentee’s lawyer from sharing the
information in the manuals with her client. Patentee’s lawyer must either
obey the order or use appropriate legal means to challenge its validity.

F. TERMINATING THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP

Once established, the lawyer-client relationship ordinarily continues until the completion of the
work for which the lawyer was hired. However, the relationship can end prematurely in any of
three ways: (i) the client can fire the lawyer; (ii) in some situations, the lawyer must withdraw;
and (iii) in some situations, the lawyer may withdraw. [See Restatement §32]
1. Client Fires Attorney

The client’s complete trust is an essential part of any attorney-client relationship. The law
thus allows the client to fire the attorney at any time, with or without just cause. [See, e.g.,
Fracasse v. Brent, 6 Cal. 3d 784 (1972)] Even if the client fires the attorney for no good
reason, the client will not be held liable for breach of contract; for policy reasons, courts
construe all attorney employment contracts as being terminable at will by the client. [Id.]
a. Client’s Liability for Fees

When the client fires the attorney, the client is liable to the attorney in quantum meruit
(an equitable action to avoid unjust enrichment) for the reasonable value of the work the
attorney did before being fired. If the contract between the attorney and client provides
for a flat fee or a maximum fee, that constitutes a ceiling on the quantum meruit
recovery. [See Rosenberg v. Levin, 409 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1982)] That is, the attorney
cannot recover more than was provided for by express contract.
b. Contingent Fee Cases

When a client hires a lawyer on a contingent fee basis, and then fires the lawyer before
the case is over, the lawyer is still entitled to quantum meruit recovery for the reason-
able value of the work done before the firing. However, the lawyer’s claim does not arise
until the contingency comes to pass. [Id.]
Example: Lawyer L agreed to represent plaintiff P in a personal injury case.
L agreed to do the work for 40% of P’s recovery, but not more than
$10,000. After L spent hundreds of hours preparing the case for trial,
P fired L for no apparent reason. Then P settled the case for $40,000.
Before the settlement, L had no claim against P because the contingency
had not come to pass. After the settlement, L is entitled to the reasonable
value of his services, but not more than $10,000 (the maximum set in the
contract).
2. Court Permission to Substitute Attorneys
After a lawsuit has been filed, the rules of most courts require the court’s permission for a
substitution of attorneys. When a party wants to fire her attorney, courts almost always grant
the necessary permission, but permission may be denied if a substitution of attorneys would
cause undue delay or disruption. [See, e.g., Ruskin v. Rodgers, 399 N.E.2d 623 (Ill. 1979)—
permission denied when client tried to fire attorney without cause two days before date set
for trial] On the other hand, when an attorney seeks to withdraw from a case, the court may
deny the necessary permission; in that event, the attorney must continue the representation,
even if there is good cause for withdrawal. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(c)]
3. Mandatory Withdrawal
a. Disability
An attorney must withdraw if the attorney’s mental or physical condition materially

impairs the attorney’s ability to continue representing the client. [ABA Model Rule
1.16(a)(2)]
b. Illegality or Ethical Violation

If to continue with the representation will require the attorney to violate a law or a disci-
plinary rule, the attorney must withdraw. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(1)]
Example: Attorney A agreed to represent client C in a slander suit against D. At
the outset, A believed in good faith that C had a sound claim against D.
Discovery later showed not a shred of evidence to support C’s conten-
tions. C finally confessed to A that she was maintaining the suit simply
to harass and injure D. A must withdraw because to continue would
require him to violate the disciplinary rule against frivolous litigation.
[ABA Model Rule 3.1]
4. Permissive Withdrawal
An attorney may withdraw from representing a client for any reason if it can be done
without material adverse effect on the client’s interests or if the client consents. [ABA Model
Rule 1.16(b)(1)] In addition, the attorney may withdraw despite an adverse impact on the
client’s interests in the situations listed below, provided the circumstances are severe enough
to justify harming the client’s interests. [See Restatement §32]
a. Client Persists in Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct

A lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if the client persists in a course of
action that involves the lawyer’s services and that the lawyer reasonably believes is
criminal or fraudulent. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(b)(2)] Note that if the client’s criminal
or fraudulent conduct involves some assistance by the lawyer, then the lawyer must
withdraw. [ABA Model Rules 1.16(a)(1), 1.2(d)]
b. Client Has Used Attorney’s Services to Commit Past Crime or Fraud

An attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client has used the attor-
ney’s services to commit a past crime or fraud. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(b)(3)]
c. Client’s Objective Is Repugnant or Against Lawyer’s Beliefs

An attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client insists on taking
action that the attorney considers to be repugnant or with which the lawyer has a funda-
mental disagreement. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(b)(4)]
d. Client Breaks Promise to Attorney

An attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client substantially fails to
fulfill an obligation to the attorney and has been warned that the attorney will withdraw
unless it is fulfilled (for instance, client refuses to pay attorney’s fee, or refuses to appear
for scheduled hearings despite promises to attorney). [ABA Model Rule 1.16(b)(5)]
e. Financial Hardship for Attorney

An attorney may withdraw from representing a client if to continue the representation will
impose an unreasonable financial burden on the attorney. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(b)(6)]
f. Client Will Not Cooperate
An attorney may withdraw from representing a client if the client has made the attorney’s

work unreasonably difficult (e.g., where the client refuses to cooperate with the attorney
in discovery proceedings). [Id.]
g. Other Good Cause
An attorney may withdraw if there is other good cause for withdrawal. [ABA Model
Rule 1.16(b)(7)]
5. Attorney’s Duties Upon Termination of Representation
An attorney who withdraws from a matter must comply with local laws that require notice
to or permission of the tribunal before withdrawal. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(c)] Moreover,
upon termination of the representation, the attorney must take reasonable steps to protect the
client’s interests, including:
(i) Providing the client with reasonable notice of the withdrawal;
(ii) Providing the client with time to obtain another attorney;
(iii) Refunding attorneys’ fees paid in advance and not yet earned and expense advances
not yet spent; and
(iv) Returning all papers and property to which the client is entitled.
[ABA Model Rule 1.16(d)]
Examples: 1) Lawyer L decided to withdraw from representing client C in a workers’
compensation case because C repeatedly failed to comply with the adver-
sary’s legitimate discovery requests, repeatedly failed to show up to have his
deposition taken, and deliberately refused to make the monthly fee payments
that he had promised to L. C asked L to turn the case files over to C’s new
lawyer, but L refused to do so until his past due fees had been paid. The law
of L’s state (following the better view) does not allow a lawyer to hold case
files hostage to compel payment of legal fees. [See Academy of California
Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. App. 3d 999 (1975)] L is subject
to discipline.
2) Attorney A was retained to represent client C in a divorce case. With C’s
consent, C’s parents paid A $1,000 as an advance on attorneys’ fees not yet
earned. The parents understood that they could not attempt to influence A’s
judgment about how to handle C’s case. (See V.D.1., infra.) C then departed
for parts unknown, making it impossible for A to pursue the divorce case.
The parents would now like to have their $1,000 back, and A would like
to withdraw from the matter. In these circumstances, it is proper for A to
withdraw and to refund the fee advance to C’s parents. [New York City Bar
Op. 83-62 (1983)]
III. LAWYER’S DUTIES OF COMPETENCE AND DILIGENCE
A. COMPETENCE
When representing a client, a lawyer must act competently, i.e., with the legal knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. [ABA Model Rule 1.1]

work unreasonably difficult (e.g., where the client refuses to cooperate with the attorney
in discovery proceedings). [Id.]
g. Other Good Cause
An attorney may withdraw if there is other good cause for withdrawal. [ABA Model
Rule 1.16(b)(7)]
5. Attorney’s Duties Upon Termination of Representation
An attorney who withdraws from a matter must comply with local laws that require notice
to or permission of the tribunal before withdrawal. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(c)] Moreover,
upon termination of the representation, the attorney must take reasonable steps to protect the
client’s interests, including:
(i) Providing the client with reasonable notice of the withdrawal;
(ii) Providing the client with time to obtain another attorney;
(iii) Refunding attorneys’ fees paid in advance and not yet earned and expense advances
not yet spent; and
(iv) Returning all papers and property to which the client is entitled.
[ABA Model Rule 1.16(d)]
Examples: 1) Lawyer L decided to withdraw from representing client C in a workers’
compensation case because C repeatedly failed to comply with the adver-
sary’s legitimate discovery requests, repeatedly failed to show up to have his
deposition taken, and deliberately refused to make the monthly fee payments
that he had promised to L. C asked L to turn the case files over to C’s new
lawyer, but L refused to do so until his past due fees had been paid. The law
of L’s state (following the better view) does not allow a lawyer to hold case
files hostage to compel payment of legal fees. [See Academy of California
Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. App. 3d 999 (1975)] L is subject
to discipline.
2) Attorney A was retained to represent client C in a divorce case. With C’s
consent, C’s parents paid A $1,000 as an advance on attorneys’ fees not yet
earned. The parents understood that they could not attempt to influence A’s
judgment about how to handle C’s case. (See V.D.1., infra.) C then departed
for parts unknown, making it impossible for A to pursue the divorce case.
The parents would now like to have their $1,000 back, and A would like
to withdraw from the matter. In these circumstances, it is proper for A to
withdraw and to refund the fee advance to C’s parents. [New York City Bar
Op. 83-62 (1983)]
III. LAWYER’S DUTIES OF COMPETENCE AND DILIGENCE
A. COMPETENCE
When representing a client, a lawyer must act competently, i.e., with the legal knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. [ABA Model Rule 1.1]

1. Legal Knowledge and Skill
a. Factors in Determining Requisite Skill

In deciding whether a lawyer has the knowledge and skill required to handle a partic-
ular matter, the following factors should be considered:
(i) The complexity and specialized nature of the matter;
(ii) The lawyer’s general experience;
(iii) The lawyer’s training and experience in the field in question;
(iv) The preparation and study the lawyer is able to give the matter; and
(v) Whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of
established competence in the field.
[ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 1] Note that most matters do not require specialized
skill and that every lawyer is capable of competence either through necessary study or
association of another lawyer. Thus, a lack of legal knowledge or skill really means a
failure to seek it. [Hazard & Hodes, §4.02]
b. Becoming Competent Through Preparation

It follows from the above that a lawyer may accept representation despite lacking
competence in the field involved if the requisite competence can be achieved by reason-
able preparation. This often comes into play when a lawyer is appointed as counsel for
an unrepresented person. [ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 4]
c. Emergency Situations
In an emergency, a lawyer may assist a client, even if the lawyer does not have the skill
ordinarily required in the field in question, if referral to or consultation with another
lawyer would be impractical. However, the assistance should not exceed what is reason-
ably necessary to meet the emergency. [ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 3]
Example: In the middle of the night, attorney A’s neighbor calls him and asks what
to do about her estranged husband who is drunkenly trying to get into
her house, in violation of a court order. The neighbor’s regular lawyer
is unavailable, and A knows little or nothing about family law. In this
emergency situation, A may advise the neighbor, but his advice should
be limited to the emergency at hand.
2. Thoroughness and Preparation
To handle a matter competently, a lawyer must inquire into and analyze the facts and legal
elements of the problem, applying the methods and procedures used by competent practitioners.
Competence, of course, requires adequate preparation. [ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 5]
3. Retaining Other Lawyers to Assist in the Matter
Sometimes a lawyer may gain competence in a matter by consulting with other lawyers.
Before a lawyer retains or contracts with lawyers outside her firm to assist in the provision
of legal services to the client, the lawyer: (i) must reasonably believe that the services of the

outside lawyers will contribute to the competent and ethical representation of the client, and
(ii) “should ordinarily” obtain the client’s informed consent. [ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment
6] The reasonableness of the lawyer’s decision to retain lawyers outside her firm will depend
on factors such as the background of the nonfirm lawyers, the nature of the services assigned
to the nonfirm lawyers, and the professional conduct rules in the jurisdictions in which the
services will be performed. [Id.]
4. Maintaining Competence—Technology and Continuing Legal Education

Lawyers should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice. As such, a lawyer
should take steps to understand the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.
The lawyer also should engage in continuing legal education programs sponsored by the
organized bar and must comply with all applicable continuing legal education requirements.
[ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 8]
B. DILIGENCE
A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. [ABA
Model Rule 1.3]
1. Diligence Defined
A lawyer should pursue a matter on the client’s behalf despite opposition, obstacles, and
personal inconvenience, and may take whatever lawful and ethical measures are required
to vindicate the client’s cause. The lawyer should act with dedication and commitment to
the client’s interests and with zeal in advocacy on the client’s behalf. [ABA Model Rule 1.3,
comment 1]
a. Diligence Does Not Require Incivility

A lawyer should use good judgment in determining the means by which a matter is
pursued, and the lawyer is not bound by Rule 1.3 to press every conceivable advantage.
Moreover, the duty of diligence does not require the lawyer to be offensive or uncivil
toward the adversary or other persons. [Id.]
b. Workload
A lawyer must control his workload so that each matter can be adequately handled.
[ABA Model Rule 1.3, comment 2]
2. Promptness
Procrastination is perhaps the professional shortcoming most widely resented. [ABA Model
Rule 1.3, comment 3] Procrastination often has severe or devastating consequences to the
client’s interests, as when a court-ordered deadline is missed or the statute of limitations is
permitted to run. Even when procrastination does not harm the client’s substantive inter-
ests, it can cause the client needless anxiety and can undermine confidence in the lawyer’s
trustworthiness. A lawyer may, of course, agree to a reasonable postponement if it will not
prejudice her client. [Id.]
3. Completion of the Matter

Once a lawyer agrees to handle a matter for a client, the lawyer must see the matter through
to completion (unless, of course, the lawyer is fired or is required or permitted to withdraw).
If there is doubt about whether the lawyer-client relationship has come to an end, the lawyer
should clarify it, preferably in writing. [ABA Model Rule 1.3, comment 4]

Examples: 1) Over the past 15 years, attorney A has served as trademark counsel for
Webb Corp., but in recent months the relationship has become somewhat
strained. A is uncertain whether Webb Corp. wishes to continue to use her
services. Today A read in a trademark newsletter that one of Webb’s competi-
tors is attempting to register a trademark that will seriously interfere with
Webb’s business. A should promptly call the matter to Webb’s attention and
ask Webb whether it wishes her to act on its behalf in this matter.
2) Client C hired lawyer L to defend her in a drunk driving case. At trial, C

was convicted, and her driver’s license was suspended. L is uncertain whether
C expects him to do anything about an appeal. L must consult with C about
the possibility of an appeal before relinquishing responsibility for the matter.
4. Existence of Lawyer-Client Relationship

A lawyer’s obligation under the duties stated above, as with most of the lawyer’s ethical
duties, depends on whether there is a lawyer-client relationship. If there is any doubt,
however, as to whether the lawyer-client relationship was either formed or terminated,
the lawyer must either take affirmative steps to terminate the relationship or act with the
required diligence. [Hazard & Hodes, §2.05]
5. Solo Practitioner’s Duty to Plan for Death or Disability

The untimely death or disability of a solo practitioner can create havoc for her clients. To
prevent that, every solo practitioner should designate another competent lawyer who, upon
the death or disability of the solo practitioner, would review the clients’ files, notify the
clients of the circumstances, and determine whether protective action is needed. [ABA
C. SINGLE VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO IMPOSE DISCIPLINE

Neither Rule 1.1 (competence) nor Rule 1.3 (diligence) requires a pattern of misconduct; a single
incident is sufficient to impose professional discipline. Special circumstances should be considered
when imposing the sanction, but not when determining whether there has been a violation. Even
when the lawyer is in the midst of a personal crisis, he must take reasonable steps to put his cases on
temporary hold, until he can give them his full attention. [Hazard & Hodes, §7.06, illus. 7.10]
Example: Client Cathy came to lawyer Larry with a medical malpractice claim, the statute
of limitations on which was due to run out within the week. Larry agreed to take
the case and began drafting the complaint. Two days later, Larry’s son was hit by
a car. For several days, during which time the doctors performed several surgeries,
they did not know whether the child would live or die. Larry did not leave his son’s
side during this critical time, and thus did not file Cathy’s case within the statutory
period. Cathy filed both a malpractice case and a disciplinary complaint against
Larry. Larry is subject to discipline for lack of diligence in handling Cathy’s case.
The disciplinary authority will likely consider the circumstances in assessing a
sanction, but they are irrelevant to the question of whether Larry breached his duty
to Cathy. [See Hazard & Hodes, §7.06, illus. 7.10]
D. MALPRACTICE LIABILITY
1. Relationship Between Disciplinary Matters and Malpractice Actions
Professional discipline is only one of the possible consequences of incompetent or neglected

legal work. Another possible consequence is civil liability for legal malpractice. A malprac-
tice action differs from a disciplinary matter in three ways: (i) in a malpractice action, the
forum is a civil court, not a disciplinary tribunal; (ii) in a malpractice action, the attorney’s
adversary is an injured plaintiff, not the state bar; and (iii) the purpose of a malpractice
action is to compensate the injured plaintiff, not to punish the attorney, and not to protect the
public from future wrongs.
2. Ethics Violation as Evidence of Legal Malpractice

If a lawyer violates a legal ethics rule, does that automatically mean that she has also
committed legal malpractice? If not, does it create a presumption that she has committed
malpractice? The “Scope” section of the ABA Model Rules answers “no” to both questions:
the legal ethics rules are for disciplinary purposes. They are not designed to be a basis for
civil liability, and a lawyer’s breach of an ethics rule does not automatically or presumptively
mean that the lawyer has committed malpractice. Courts do, however, regard an ethics viola-
tion as relevant evidence that the lawyer’s conduct was below the appropriate standard of
care. [See Fishman v. Brooks, 487 N.E.2d 1377 (Mass. 1986); and see generally Hazard &
Hodes, §5.01]
3. Theories of Malpractice Liability

The plaintiff in a legal malpractice case can invoke a variety of legal theories. The choice of
theories can be important because of differences in the statutes of limitation and measures of
damages.
a. Intentional Tort
One theory is intentional tort. An attorney is liable (just as any nonprofessional would
be) for fraud, misrepresentation, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, or misuse of
funds.
b. Breach of Fiduciary Duties

A second theory is breach of fiduciary duties. An attorney acting as a fiduciary for the
client owes the client all of the customary duties of a fiduciary, including loyalty, confi-
dentiality, and honest dealing.
c. Breach of Contract
A third theory is breach of contract. For instance, an attorney may have breached a term
of an express oral agreement with the client. If there is no express contract, a court may
be willing to find an implied promise by the attorney to use ordinary skill and care to
protect the client’s interests.
d. Negligence
A fourth theory, by far the most common, is unintentional tort—i.e., simple negligence.
[See generally Restatement §§48 - 54] Using this theory, the plaintiff must establish the
routine elements of any negligence case: a duty of due care, a breach of that duty, legal
causation, and damages. These elements are discussed separately in the paragraphs that
follow.
1) Duty of Due Care

a) To Clients
An attorney owes a duty of due care to a client, but it is not always clear when
a person becomes a client. [Id. §50] Courts are quick to find that an attorney-
client relationship has been established if the attorney’s neglect has misled the
alleged client. [See Restatement §14]
Example: C asked attorney A to represent him as plaintiff in a products
liability case. A said she would have to check with her partners
to make sure the case posed no conflict of interest, and A said
that she would “get back to C one way or the other.” A never
checked with her partners, and she totally forgot C’s case.
The statute of limitations ran. A court could conclude that an
attorney-client relationship had been established between A
and C.
b) To Third Parties
An attorney also owes a duty of due care to any third party who was intended
to benefit by the attorney’s rendition of legal services and to other nonclients
in certain circumstances. [See Restatement §51]
Examples: 1) C hired attorney A to draft a trust agreement naming B as
beneficiary. A drafted the trust agreement negligently, making
it subject to an unnecessary tax; the tax reduced the amount
that B could receive from the trust. Because B was intended to
benefit from A’s services, and because the potential for harm
to B should have been obvious, B has a good malpractice
claim against A.
2) M hired lawyer L to bring a civil suit against D. As it turned

out, M’s claim against D had no sound factual basis, and L
would have recognized that from the outset had L not been
negligent. D incurred trouble and expense in defending the
suit. D has no negligence claim against L because D was not
intended to benefit from L’s services and D was not any other
type of protected nonclient.
c) Standard of Care
The standard of care for an attorney is the competence and diligence
normally exercised by attorneys in similar circumstances. [Id. §52] If an
attorney represents to a client that he has greater competence (e.g., is a
specialist) or will exercise greater diligence than that normally demonstrated
by attorneys undertaking similar matters, he is held to that higher standard.
[Id. §52, comment d]
2) Breach of Duty of Due Care
a) Errors of Judgment
An attorney is liable for negligence, but not everything that causes harm
is negligence. An attorney is not liable for “mere errors in judgment” if the
judgment was well-informed and reasonably made.

Examples: 1) Attorney A decided not to take the pretrial deposition of

witness X. A’s motive was to save litigation expenses for
her client; further, it appeared that X’s testimony would be
peripheral and unimportant. At trial, X turned out to be a
critical witness for the adversary. Even if A’s failure to take
X’s deposition caused A’s client to lose the case, A has not
committed malpractice if her judgment was well-informed and
reasonably exercised.
2) In a surgical malpractice case, lawyer L failed to interview
the operating room nurse, an obvious witness who might
have knowledge of key facts. L’s client lost the case because
of the failure to prove a fact that the nurse’s testimony could
have supplied. When the client sued L for legal malpractice, L
responded that he had made a “tactical judgment” not to inter-
view the nurse. Holding L liable, the court noted that “there is
nothing tactical about ignorance.”
b) Knowledge of Law
An attorney is expected to know the ordinary, settled rules of law known to
practitioners of ordinary competence and diligence. Furthermore, an attorney
has a duty to go to the library to look up rules of law that he does not know.
If the answer is there to be found through standard research techniques and
sources, and if the attorney does not find it, he has breached the duty of due
care. [See, e.g., Aloy v. Mash, 38 Cal. 3d 413 (1985)] Obviously, some issues
of law are unsettled and debatable; if the attorney has done reasonable legal
research, then he has fulfilled the duty of due care—even if he makes the
wrong guess about how an unsettled issue will ultimately be resolved by the
courts.
c) Calling in a Specialist
Some legal problems are uniquely within the competence of a legal specialist.
It is a breach of the duty of due care for a general practitioner to attempt to
handle such a problem if a reasonably prudent lawyer would have sent the
client to a specialist.
Example: Client C asked attorney A to help him obtain legal protec-
tion for a new manufacturing process that C had invented. A
realized that he was totally ignorant about the law of patents
and trade secrets, but he nevertheless tried to advise C. As
a result, C lost his opportunity to apply for a United States
patent on his invention. A breached the duty of due care by
failing to send C to a patent attorney.
3) Legal Causation
As in any tort case, the plaintiff in a professional negligence case must prove that
the defendant’s conduct was the legal cause of the plaintiff’s injury. That is, the
injury would not have happened but for the defendant’s negligence, and further-
more, that it is fair to hold the defendant liable for unexpected injuries or for
expected injuries that happen in unexpected ways. [See Restatement §53]

Examples: 1) P hired lawyer L to represent her in a suit against the federal

government. L neglected P’s case, and the statute of limitations ran.
P then sued L for legal malpractice. In the malpractice case, P must
prove that she had a good claim against the federal government. If
P did not have a good claim in the first place, then L’s negligence
was not the legal cause of injury to P.
2) History professor H hired attorney A to defend her in a plagiarism

case. H lost the case because of A’s failure to prepare adequately.
The loss broke H’s mind and spirit; she became a hopeless alcoholic
and was fired from her university position. If H files a legal
malpractice suit against A, a court would probably conclude that
H’s loss of earning power was not legally caused by A’s negligence.
4) Damages
The plaintiff in a professional negligence case must prove damages—e.g., the
money paid out to discharge an adverse judgment, or the value of a lost cause
of action. The plaintiff can recover for direct losses and also for losses that are
indirect but foreseeable. [Id. §53]
Example: Attorney A did the legal work for the acquiring corporation in
a large merger transaction. A bungled the merger agreement; in
consequence, the merger fell through, and A’s client suffered large
legal expenses in defending against suits brought by aggrieved
shareholders. In a malpractice action, A’s client can recover both
the legal expenses and the profits lost due to the aborted merger,
provided that it can prove its losses with reasonable certainty.
4. Liability for Negligence of Others

The ordinary principles of respondeat superior apply in suits for professional negligence.
Thus, an attorney can be held liable for injuries caused by a negligent legal secretary,
law clerk, paralegal, or employee associate when acting within the scope of employment.
Furthermore, under general principles of partnership law, each partner in a law firm is liable
for the negligence of another partner committed in the ordinary course of the partnership
business. The law varies widely from state to state concerning vicarious liability among
shareholders in an incorporated law firm.
5. Malpractice Insurance
Because legal malpractice actions have become commonplace, prudent lawyers carry ample
malpractice insurance. Only one state, Oregon, requires lawyers to have malpractice insur-
ance, but a growing number of states require lawyers to disclose their insured or uninsured
status to the state bar, or, in a few states, directly to potential clients. [See ABA Journal 63
(May 2006)]
6. Contracting with Client to Limit Malpractice Liability

A lawyer must not make an agreement prospectively limiting the lawyer’s liability to a client
for malpractice unless the client is independently represented in making the agreement.
[ABA Model Rule 1.8(h)]
Example: Lawyer L requires his clients to sign a standard, preprinted retainer agree-
ment that provides, in part, that the client cannot sue L for malpractice. L’s

clients are not independently represented in signing his retainer agreement. L

is subject to discipline.
7. Settling Malpractice Claims

A lawyer must not settle a pending or potential malpractice claim with an unrepresented
client or former client without first advising that person, in writing, to seek advice from an
independent lawyer about the settlement and giving that person time to seek that advice. [Id.]
Example: Defendant D hired attorney A to defend him in a criminal case, and D gave A
$5,000 as an advance against attorneys’ fees yet to be earned. Shortly before
trial, D became dissatisfied with A’s work, fired her, and threatened to sue her
for malpractice. A returned the unearned portion of the fee advance to D by
a check that had an endorsement on the back purporting to release A from all
liability for malpractice. A did not advise D to seek advice from an indepen-
dent lawyer. A is subject to discipline. [See, e.g., New York State Bar Op. 591
(1988)]
8. Reimbursement of Client
A lawyer who has breached a duty to his client with monetary effect cannot escape discipline
by reimbursing the client for any loss. Thus, even if the lawyer pays the client back for any
damage he caused, he is still subject to discipline.
IV. DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
A. GENERAL RULE
As a general rule, a lawyer must not reveal any information relating to the representation of the
client. [ABA Model Rule 1.6] A lawyer may, however, reveal such information if the client gives
informed consent, or if the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation.
[Id.] The ethical duty is subject to some additional exceptions, discussed in D., infra. The rationale
of the ethical duty is that it encourages candor between the lawyer and the client, encourages the
client to seek early legal advice, and helps the lawyer discover all of the information relevant to
the client’s legal problem. [See ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment 2; with respect to the ethical duty
of confidentiality, see generally Restatement §§59 - 67]
B. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ETHICAL DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
The ethical duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, but the two
doctrines differ in three important ways.
1. Compulsion vs. Gossip

The attorney-client privilege is an exclusionary rule of evidence law. It prevents a court,
or other governmental tribunal, from using the twin powers of subpoena and contempt to
compel the revelation of confidential communications between an attorney and a client. In
contrast, the ethical duty of confidentiality prohibits an attorney from voluntarily revealing
information relating to the representation of a client—it applies in every context where the
attorney-client privilege does not apply. [See ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment 3]
Examples: 1) During the course of a civil trial, lawyer L’s adversary called her to the
witness stand and posed questions about her confidential communications with

her client. In this context, the rights and duties of L and her client are governed
by the attorney-client privilege, not by the ethical duty of confidentiality.
2) When lawyer L was chatting with a friend at a cocktail party, the friend
asked L for some information that L had gained in the course of representing
one of her clients. In this context, the attorney-client privilege is irrelevant—
the privilege does not apply at cocktail parties. Here, L is governed by the
ethical duty of confidentiality.
2. Kinds of Information Covered

The ethical duty of confidentiality covers more kinds of information than the attorney-client
privilege. The attorney-client privilege protects only confidential communications between
the attorney and client (or the agents of either of them). The ethical duty, in contrast, covers
not only confidential communications, but also any other information that the attorney
obtains relating to the representation of the client, no matter what the source of that infor-
mation. The ethical duty thus applies to all information that relates to the representation of
the client, regardless of whether it is privileged, whether the client asked for it to be kept in
confidence, and whether revealing it might harm or embarrass the client. For purposes of this
outline, the term “confidential information” means all information protected by the duty of
confidentiality expressed in ABA Model Rule 1.6.
Example: Attorney A is representing client C in proceedings to challenge the will left
by C’s mother. While conducting her own investigation of the facts of the
case, A learns from a third party that C is the illegitimate son of an itinerant
book salesman. This information is not protected by the attorney-client privi-
lege because A did not gain it through a confidential communication with C.
Nevertheless, under ABA Model Rule 1.6, the information is covered by the
ethical duty of confidentiality.
3. Disclosure vs. Use

The attorney-client privilege concerns only the disclosure of information. In contrast, the
ethical duty of confidentiality concerns both the disclosure and use of information. An
attorney can be disciplined for disclosing a client’s confidential information without the
client’s informed consent (unless one of the exceptions to the ethical duty is applicable)
[ABA Model Rule 1.6(a)], or for using confidential information to the disadvantage of a
client, former client, or prospective client, without the affected client’s informed consent.
[ABA Model Rules 1.8(b), 1.9(c), 1.18(b)]
C. SUMMARY OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Because the ethical duty of confidentiality is so closely related to the attorney-client privilege, the
following is a brief summary of the main features of the privilege. [See Restatement §§68 - 86—
restates the law of attorney-client privilege]
1. Basic Rule
The attorney-client privilege prohibits a court or other governmental tribunal from compel-
ling the revelation of confidential communications between an attorney (or an attorney’s
agent) and a client (or a client’s agent) if the subject of the communication concerns the
professional relationship between the attorney and the client.

2. Client
A “client” means a person or entity that seeks legal services from an attorney. The privilege
covers preliminary communications leading up to an attorney-client relationship, even if no
such relationship develops. [See also ABA Model Rule 1.18—duty of confidentiality to a
prospective client]
Example: H wants to hire a lawyer to obtain a dissolution of his marriage. After
speaking in confidence with lawyer L about his marital problems, H decides
not to hire L as his lawyer. Even though no attorney-client relationship
ultimately develops between H and L, the attorney-client privilege protects
what H told L in confidence.
a. Corporate Clients
When the client is a corporation, the privilege covers communications between the
lawyer and a high-ranking corporate official. It also covers communications between
the lawyer and another corporate employee if the following conditions are met:
(i) The employee communicates with the lawyer at the direction of the employee’s
superior;
(ii) The employee knows that the purpose of the communication is to obtain legal
advice for the corporation; and
(iii) The communication concerns a subject within the scope of the employee’s duties
to act for the corporation.
[See Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981)]
3. Attorney
An “attorney” means a person who is authorized (or whom the client reasonably believes to
be authorized) to practice law in any state or nation. However, for the privilege to apply, the
attorney must be acting as an attorney—not in some other capacity, such as a friend, business
advisor, or member of the family.
4. Communication
The term “communication” covers information passed from the client to the attorney and
from the attorney to the client. It also covers information passed to or from the agents of
either the attorney or the client.
Example: Whitney Corp. hires attorney A to represent it in a dispute over the construc-
tion of a nuclear power plant. A hires structural engineer E to assist her on
the technical aspects of the case. At A’s direction, E talks with F, the chief
engineer of Whitney Corp., to find out certain facts about the case. E’s discus-
sion with F is covered by the attorney-client privilege.
a. Mechanical Details of Relationship
Usually the attorney-client privilege does not cover the mechanical details of the
attorney-client relationship, such as the identity of the client, the fee arrangement
between the attorney and client, and the bare fact that the attorney is acting for the
client. But these mechanical details can be protected by the privilege if revealing them
is tantamount to revealing a privileged communication. [See Christopher Mueller &
Laird Kirkpatrick, Evidence §5.19 (3d ed. 2003)]

Example: X came to lawyer L’s office and asked to employ L in a confidential

matter. X then said that he was the hit and run driver in the car wreck
reported on the front page of today’s newspaper. X asked L to negotiate
with the authorities for him, but not to reveal his identity without first
getting X’s specific permission. Later, the parents of the victim in the hit
and run brought a wrongful death action against a John Doe defendant.
They subpoenaed L and asked her to reveal the identity of the person
who had consulted her about the hit and run. A court cannot compel L to
disclose X’s identity; the attorney-client privilege protects it because to
reveal it would be tantamount to revealing X’s statement that he was the
hit and run driver. [See Baltes v. Doe I, 4 ABA/BNA Lawyer’s Manual
on Professional Conduct 356]
b. Preexisting Documents and Things

The attorney-client privilege covers both oral and written communications. However,
the client cannot protect a preexisting document or thing from discovery simply by
turning it over to the attorney. If the document or thing would be discoverable in the
client’s hands, it is equally discoverable in the attorney’s hands.
Examples: 1) Client C hires attorney A to defend her in a breach of contract case.
C turns over to A her entire file of records relating to the contract. If
the records would be discoverable when in the possession of C, they are
equally discoverable when in the possession of A.
2) D tells his lawyer, L: “I just shot X, and I threw the revolver in the
trashcan behind my apartment.” The revolver itself is not privileged, but
D’s communication with L about the revolver is privileged. [California
v. Meredith, 29 Cal. 3d 682 (1981)] L’s knowledge of the whereabouts of
the revolver is privileged. If L simply looks in the trashcan to confirm
D’s story, D can invoke the privilege and prevent L from testifying about
what he saw. [Id.] L has no legal or ethical duty to retrieve the revolver
from the trashcan. Furthermore, absent D’s informed consent, L must not
tell anyone where the revolver is. [ABA Model Rule 1.6] If L retrieves
the revolver from the trashcan, he may keep it long enough to obtain
from it any information that may be useful in D’s defense. Then L must
turn it over to the proper authorities. [California v. Meredith, supra;
State v. Olwell, 394 P.2d 681 (Wash. 1964)] By removing the revolver
from the trashcan, L has destroyed a valuable piece of evidence—the
incriminating location of the revolver. L’s action requires a compromise
between the need to protect privileged communications and the need for
relevant evidence. The compromise reached in Meredith and Olwell is as
follows: The trier of fact will be told where the revolver was found, but
the trier of fact will not be told that L was the source of that information.
For example, L and the prosecutor can simply stipulate that the jury at
D’s trial will be informed of the location of the revolver, without telling
them the source of that information. However, if L retrieves the revolver
from the trashcan and hides or destroys it, L may face criminal liability
for tampering with evidence, and L is also subject to professional disci-
pline. [In re Ryder, 263 F. Supp. 360 (E.D. Va. 1967)]

5. “Confidential” Defined
To be covered by the attorney-client privilege, a communication must be “confidential”; it
must have been made by a means not intended to disclose the communicated information to
outsiders, and the communicating person must reasonably believe that no outsider will hear
the contents of the statement.
a. Presence of Third Party

The presence of a third party will not destroy the confidentiality if the third party was
present to help further the attorney-client relationship. However, the third party need
not play a direct role in the communication and may be present because of the client’s
psychological needs (e.g., a family member accompanying the client). [Restatement §70,
comment f]
Example: Five persons were present during an office conference between Client
and Attorney. In addition to Client and Attorney, the persons present
were Client’s accountant (who was there to help explain Client’s books
of account), Attorney’s law clerk (who was there to assist Attorney in
drafting some interrogatory answers), and Attorney’s legal secretary
(who was there to take dictation). The presence of the accountant, the
law clerk, and the secretary does not destroy the confidentiality.
Compare: During a recess in trial, Attorney and Client discussed Client’s intended
testimony in a crowded courthouse corridor where bystanders could
obviously overhear. This conversation is not confidential for purposes of
the attorney-client privilege. Thus, the privilege does not bar examina-
tion of either Client or Attorney regarding the conversation.
b. Eavesdroppers
In days gone by, the presence of an unsuspected eavesdropper was sometimes held to
destroy the confidentiality of a communication. Under modern evidence law, that is
no longer true; an eavesdropper can be prohibited from testifying about a confidential
communication.
6. Client Is Holder of Privilege

The attorney-client privilege exists for the benefit of the client, not for the benefit of the
attorney. Therefore, the client is the “holder” of the privilege—i.e., the client is the one who
can claim or waive the privilege.
a. Waiver of Privilege
A waiver consists of a failure to claim the privilege when there is an opportunity to do
so, or the intentional revelation of a significant portion of the privileged communication.
Example: Client C shows his next-door neighbor the first two pages of a three-page
privileged letter. In a later civil case, C’s adversary can compel produc-
tion of the entire letter. C has waived the privilege.
b. Lawyer’s Duty to Invoke Privilege

If the client has not waived the privilege, and if someone tries to obtain privileged infor-
mation when the client is not present, the lawyer must claim the privilege on the client’s
behalf.
Example: Lawyer L represents client C in a civil case. On a day when C is not

present in court, C’s adversary calls L to the witness stand and poses
questions about confidential communications between C and L. L must
claim the privilege on C’s behalf.
7. Duration of Privilege
The attorney-client privilege continues indefinitely. Termination of the relationship, even for
cause, does not terminate the privilege. The privilege even survives the death of the client.
[Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998)] Thus, a lawyer has a continuing
obligation to assert the privilege on behalf of a client who has died, subject to exceptions
relating to the deceased’s disposition of property. [Restatement §77, comment c]
8. Exceptions to Privilege
Modern evidence law provides several exceptions to the attorney-client privilege.
a. The privilege does not apply if the client seeks the attorney’s services to engage in or
assist a future crime or fraud. [See Restatement §82]
b. The privilege does not apply to a communication that is relevant to an issue of breach
(by either the attorney or the client) of the duties arising out of the attorney-client
relationship. [Id. §83]
c. The privilege does not apply in civil litigation between two persons who were formerly
the joint clients of the attorney. [Id. §75(2)]
d. The privilege does not apply in a variety of situations in which the attorney can furnish
evidence about the competency or intention of a client who has attempted to dispose
of property by will or inter vivos transfer.
9. Related Doctrine of Work Product Immunity

Generally, material prepared by a lawyer for litigation or in anticipation of litigation is
immune from discovery or other compelled disclosure unless the opposition shows a substan-
tial need for the material and an inability to gather the material without undue hardship. A
lawyer’s mental impressions or opinions are immune from discovery or compelled disclosure
regardless of the opposition’s need unless the immunity has been waived. [See Restatement
§§87 - 93]
D. ETHICAL DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND ITS EXCEPTIONS

As explained previously (see B.1., supra), the ethical duty of confidentiality applies in every
context in which the attorney-client privilege does not apply. The ethical duty also covers a
broader range of information than the privilege. Finally, the ethical duty concerns not only
the disclosure of information, but also the use of information to the disadvantage of a client, a
prospective client, or a former client.
1. Duty Not Destroyed by Presence of Third Party

Unlike the attorney-client privilege, the presence of a nonprivileged third person does not
necessarily destroy an attorney’s duty of confidentiality. Confidential information remains
confidential even if it is known to others, unless the information becomes generally known.
Whether information is generally known depends on all the surrounding circumstances,

but information is not generally known when it can be obtained only by means of special
knowledge or substantial difficulty or expense.
2. Exceptions to the Duty of Confidentiality

The exceptions to the ethical duty are discussed separately in the following paragraphs.
a. Client’s Informed Consent

An attorney may reveal or use confidential information if the client gives informed
consent. [ABA Model Rule 1.6(a)] Remember that “informed consent” means that the
client agrees to a proposed course of action after the lawyer has adequately explained
the risks and reasonable alternatives. [ABA Model Rule 1.0(e)]
Example: Attorney A is representing defendant D in an armed robbery case. D
reluctantly tells A that at the time of the alleged robbery, D was 10 miles
away visiting a house of prostitution, and that at least five witnesses
can vouch for his presence there. A may disclose and use this embar-
rassing information in the defense of the armed robbery case if D gives
informed consent.
b. Implied Authority
An attorney has implied authority from the client to use or disclose confidential infor-
mation when appropriate to carry out the representation—unless, of course, the client
gives specific instructions to the contrary. [ABA Model Rule 1.6(a)]
Examples: 1) Lawyer L represents client A in negotiating a construction contract.
Unless A instructs L to the contrary, L has implied authority to disclose
confidential information about A’s business if that will serve A’s interests
in the negotiation. [ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment 5]
2) Lawyer M represents client B in litigation. Unless B instructs M to the

contrary, M has implied authority to disclose confidential information in
a fact stipulation if that will serve B’s interests in the litigation. [Id.]
3) Lawyer N is drawing up a will and a trust agreement for client C.

Unless C instructs N to the contrary, N has implied authority to discuss
C’s confidential information with other lawyers in N’s firm if that will
serve C’s interests. [Id.]
4) Lawyer O is representing client D in a bankruptcy case. Unless

D instructs O to the contrary, O has implied authority to allow her
paralegal, her law clerk, her legal secretary, and the law firm’s copy-
machine operator to have access to D’s confidential business papers.
However, O must take reasonable steps to assure that those employees
preserve the confidentiality of the information. [ABA Model Rule 5.3;
ABA Formal Op. 95-398 (1995)]
5) Lawyer Q is representing X Corp. in secret merger negotiations with

Y Corp. Secrecy is vital because if word leaks out, the stock prices of
the two companies will move apart, making the merger impossible. On
one knotty issue, Q seeks the informal, uncompensated advice of his
friend, lawyer R, a merger expert in a different law firm. Q poses the

issue to R in the form of a hypothetical that does not identify either X

Corp. or Y Corp. by name. Unfortunately, Q is careless in posing the
hypothetical, which allows R to deduce the identities of X Corp. and Y
Corp. Q is subject to discipline for breaching the duty of confidentiality.
A lawyer may use a hypothetical to obtain advice from a fellow lawyer
for the benefit of the client, but the hypothetical must be discreet enough
to preclude any reasonable chance that the fellow lawyer will be able to
deduce the identity of the client or the situation at hand. [ABA Model
Rule 1.6, comment 4; ABA Formal Op. 98-411]
c. Dispute Concerning Attorney’s Conduct

An attorney may reveal a client’s confidential information to the extent necessary to
protect the attorney’s interests in a dispute that involves the conduct of the attorney.
[ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(5)] In using this exception, the attorney should: (i) reveal only
what is necessary, (ii) attempt to limit the disclosure to those who need to know it, and
(iii) obtain protective orders or take other steps to minimize the risk of unnecessary
harm to the client. [ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment 14]
Examples: 1) Attorney A represented client C in a child custody case. C told A in
confidence about C’s emotional difficulties, alcoholism, and inability to
hold steady employment. These confidential disclosures made the task
of representing C vastly more difficult and time-consuming than A had
originally anticipated. C ultimately lost the child custody case. C then
refused to pay A’s legal fee, claiming that it was unreasonably high. If A
is unable to settle the fee dispute amicably and has to sue C to collect the
fee, A may reveal C’s confidential disclosures to the extent necessary to
prove why A’s fee is reasonable under the circumstances. [ABA Model
Rule 1.6(b)(5)]
2) Lawyer L defended client D in an arson case. D told L in confi-

dence that he did burn the building, hoping to collect the fire insurance.
After careful consideration, D followed L’s advice and did not testify
on his own behalf at the trial. Furthermore, L refused to call two alibi
witnesses whose testimony L knew would be false. D was convicted. D
then sued L for legal malpractice. In defending against D’s malpractice
claim, L may reveal as much of D’s confidential disclosures as is neces-
sary to prove why L did not present the testimony of D and the two alibi
witnesses. [Id.]
3) In the arson example described above, instead of suing L for malprac-

tice, D filed a complaint with the state bar, accusing L of incompetence
in the conduct of the trial. At the disciplinary hearing, L may reveal as
much of D’s confidential disclosures as is necessary to prove why L did
not present the testimony of D and the two alibi witnesses. [Id.]
4) Client T hired attorney Y to help him form a limited partner-

ship venture for real estate investments. T furnished Y with confi-
dential data for Y to use in preparing financial statements and other
documents needed in connection with the sale of the partnership shares.

Unbeknownst to Y, some of the confidential data was fraudulent, and

T’s partners lost their investments as a consequence. Two of the partners
confronted Y and accused him of being knowingly involved in the fraud.
Y may reveal enough of T’s confidential information to convince the
partners that Y did not know that the data was fraudulent, even though
Y has not yet been formally charged with a criminal or civil wrong or a
disciplinary violation. [See comment 10 to ABA Model Rule 1.6] This
illustrates the doctrine called “preemptive self-defense.” [See Hazard &
Hodes, §10.37]
d. Disclosure to Obtain Legal Ethics Advice
A lawyer may disclose enough of the client’s confidential information as is necessary to
obtain legal ethics advice for the lawyer. [ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(4)]
Example: Client C came to attorney A’s office carrying a mysterious package about
the size of a shoebox. C explained that federal narcotics agents were
looking for C in connection with the illegal importation of a significant
quantity of uncut heroin; C told A that he had no connection with any
heroin or any other drug trade. A agreed to represent C, and he asked C
for a $5,000 advance on attorneys’ fees. C replied that he had no ready
cash, but that he would entrust A with the mysterious package, assuring
A that its contents were worth much more than $5,000. A was uncertain
about his ethical obligations in this situation so he excused himself, went
to another room, and telephoned T, his old legal ethics professor. After
disclosing enough facts to give T the essence of the problem—but not
enough to disclose C’s identity or the precise circumstances—A asked T
for legal ethics advice. A’s disclosure was proper. [Id.]
e. Disclosure Required by Law or Court Order
ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(6) permits a lawyer to reveal her client’s confidential informa-
tion to the extent that she is required to do so by law or court order.
Examples: 1) Suppose that a federal anti-terrorism statute arguably requires lawyer
L to reveal the whereabouts of client C, who is suspected of illegal entry
into the United States. If L knows of C’s whereabouts only because of a
confidential communication from C, the information is protected by both
the attorney-client privilege and the ethical duty of confidentiality. L
must first determine whether the anti-terrorism statute purports to super-
sede the privilege and ethical duty. [See ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment
12] If L concludes that it does, she must next disclose the situation to C
because this is the kind of vital information that a lawyer must commu-
nicate to a client. [See ABA Model Rule 1.4(a)(3)] If L cannot find a
nonfrivolous ground for challenging the validity or applicability of the
statute, ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(6) permits her to reveal the information
about C’s whereabouts. [See ABA Model Rule 1.6, comments 12 and 13]
2) In the situation described in 1), above, suppose that a federal district
judge is considering whether to order L to disclose C’s whereabouts.
Absent C’s informed consent to the disclosure, L should assert all
nonfrivolous grounds for not disclosing the information. If the court
orders disclosure, L should consult with C about an appeal. If no appeal

is taken, or if the order is upheld on appeal, then ABA Model Rule

1.6(b)(6) permits L to reveal the information about C’s whereabouts.
[Id.]
f. Disclosure to Prevent Death or Substantial Bodily Harm

ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(1) permits a lawyer to reveal the client’s confidential informa-
tion to the extent that the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent reasonably
certain death or substantial bodily harm. [Accord Restatement §66] Note that the
exception applies to death or bodily harm whatever the cause; it need not be caused by
the client, and the cause need not be a criminal act. Notice also that the death or bodily
harm need not be imminent—it need only be reasonably certain. Finally, notice that the
exception gives the lawyer discretion to disclose the confidential information; it does
not require disclosure. Some states, however, do require disclosure.
Examples: 1) Kidnapper K is in custody pending trial, and he hires attorney A to
defend him against a charge that he kidnapped and murdered victim V.
K tells A in confidence where he buried V’s body. This is a completed
crime—disclosure of K’s secret could not prevent death or substantial
bodily harm to anyone. If A reveals K’s secret, A will be subject to disci-
pline.
2) Kidnapper J telephones attorney B and asks for B’s legal advice. J

tells B in confidence that he has kidnapped victim U, that he has her
bound and gagged in the back of his van, and that he is on the road to
Lonesome Pine, where he plans to hold U for ransom. The legal advice
J seeks from B is whether the penalty for murder is more serious than
the penalty for kidnapping for ransom. B promises to call J back in a few
minutes. B then telephones the police, tells them the situation, and tells
them that J is on the road to Lonesome Pine. B’s conduct is proper in
light of the reasonably certain risk of death or substantial bodily injury
to U.
g. Disclosure to Prevent or Mitigate Substantial Financial Harm

The Restatement, about 90% of the states, and now the ABA Model Rules permit a
lawyer to reveal the client’s confidential information to the extent necessary to prevent
the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in
substantial financial harm to someone, if the client is using or has used the lawyer’s
services in the matter. The same is true if the client has already acted, and the lawyer’s
disclosure can prevent or mitigate the consequent financial harm. [See Restatement §67;
ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(2), (3)]
h. Disclosure to Detect and Resolve Conflicts of Interest

When a lawyer changes firms, when two firms merge, or when a law practice is being
purchased, lawyers may disclose limited client information (e.g., client names and a
brief summary of the general issues involved) in order to detect and resolve conflicts of
interest, subject to four conditions: (i) the disclosure may be made only after substantive
discussions regarding the new relationship have occurred; (ii) the disclosure must be
limited to the minimum necessary to detect any conflicts of interest; (iii) the disclosed
information must not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice

the clients; and (iv) the disclosed information may be used only to the extent neces-
sary to detect and resolve any conflicts of interest. [ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(7) and
comments 13 and 14]
3. Protecting Confidential Information

A lawyer must make reasonable efforts to protect a client’s confidential information from
inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure by the lawyer and those under the lawyer’s supervi-
sion, and from unauthorized access by third parties. [ABA Model Rule 1.6(c)] The reason-
ableness of the lawyer’s efforts is determined by considering such factors as the sensitivity of
the client’s information, the cost of additional safeguards, and the difficulty of implementing
the safeguards. [ABA Model Rule 1.6, comment 18]
V. DUTY TO EXERCISE INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT
A. THE GENERAL RULES CONCERNING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Loyalty is an essential element in the relationship between a lawyer and client. The lawyer’s
professional judgment must be exercised solely for the benefit of the client, free of compromising
influences and loyalties. [See Restatement §§121 - 135—restates the law of conflicts of interest;
and see comment 1 to ABA Model Rule 1.7] Thus, absent the necessary informed consent (see
B.2., infra), a lawyer must not represent a client if a conflict of interest exists. A conflict of interest
arises when there is a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client will be materi-
ally and adversely affected by the lawyer’s own interests or the lawyer’s duties to another current
client, a former client, or a third person. [Restatement §121; ABA Model Rule 1.7(a)]
1. Consequences of a Conflict of Interest

If a conflict of interest is apparent before a lawyer takes on a client’s matter, then the lawyer
must not take it on. [ABA Model Rule 1.7(a)] If a conflict becomes apparent only after the
lawyer has taken on the client’s matter, and if informed consent of the affected client(s) will
not solve the problem, then the lawyer must withdraw. [ABA Model Rule 1.16(a)(1); ABA
Model Rule 1.7, comment 4] A lawyer’s failure to handle a conflict properly can have three
unpleasant consequences: (i) disqualification as counsel in a litigated matter, (ii) professional
discipline, and (iii) civil liability for legal malpractice.
2. Imputed Conflicts of Interest

Generally, lawyers who practice together in a “firm” are treated as a single unit for conflict
of interest purposes. That is, when one of the lawyers cannot take on a matter because of a
conflict of interest, the other lawyers in the “firm” are also barred from taking on that matter.
[ABA Model Rule 1.10(a)] The conflict is said to be “imputed” from the first lawyer to the
other lawyers.
a. Meaning of “Firm”
The term “firm” includes not only an ordinary private law firm, but also other groups of
lawyers who practice closely together, such as lawyers in a corporate law department,
legal aid office, or prosecutors’ or public defenders’ office. [See ABA Model Rule 1.0(c)
and comments 2 - 4] Whether a group of lawyers should be regarded as a “firm” for
conflict of interest purposes depends on many factors, including: (i) do the lawyers have
a formal agreement among themselves, (ii) do they hold themselves out in a way that

e. When Appropriate Response Not Taken

If the securities lawyer believes that the CLO did not achieve an appropriate response
from the client, the securities lawyer must report the evidence to one of the following:
(i) the client’s whole board of directors, (ii) the audit committee of the board, or (iii) a
committee made up of outside directors (directors who are not beholden to the client).
Notice that the Sarbanes-Oxley reporting rule is mandatory, unlike ABA Model Rule
1.13(b), which gives the lawyer some discretion about how to proceed (see 3., supra).
f. Revealing Confidential Information

The securities lawyer may reveal to the SEC, without the client’s consent, any confi-
dential information that is reasonably necessary to: (i) stop the client from committing
a violation that will cause substantial financial injury to the client or its investors; (ii)
rectify such a financial injury if the lawyer’s services were used to further the violation;
or (iii) prevent the client from committing or suborning perjury in an SEC matter or
lying in any matter within the jurisdiction of any branch of the federal government.
g. Compliance with Rules

A securities lawyer who violates the Sarbanes-Oxley rules can be disciplined by the SEC,
but a securities lawyer who complies with the Sarbanes-Oxley rules cannot be held civilly
liable for doing so and cannot be disciplined under any inconsistent state rule.
h. Action When Securities Lawyer Is Fired

If a securities lawyer is fired for complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley rules, she may
report the firing to the client’s board of directors (thus setting up the client for an expen-
sive wrongful termination suit).
VI. SAFEGUARDING THE CLIENT’S MONEY AND PROPERTY
A. GENERAL DUTY
When money or property belonging to a client comes into the lawyer’s hands, the lawyer must not
steal it, borrow it, or put it to the lawyer’s own use. Furthermore, the lawyer must keep it separated
from the lawyer’s own money and property. A lawyer is subject to discipline for commingling the
client’s money or property with the lawyer’s own personal or business funds or property. [ABA
Model Rule 1.15; and see Restatement §44—lawyer safeguarding client’s property acts as a
fiduciary and is subject to civil liability for failure to safeguard such property]
B. CLIENT TRUST FUND ACCOUNT

All money that a lawyer receives in connection with a representation (whether from the client or
a third party) must promptly be placed in a client trust fund account, separate from the lawyer’s
own personal and business accounts. [Id.]
1. Type of Account
The client trust fund account must be located in the state where the lawyer practices.
[ABA Model Rule 1.15(a)—however, the account may be elsewhere if the client consents]
Ordinarily, a lawyer must never put her own money or her firm’s money into the client trust
account, but she may put some of her own money into that account for the sole purpose of
paying bank service charges. [ABA Model Rule 1.15(b)]

a. Large Sum Held for Long Period

If a lawyer is entrusted with a large sum to hold for a long period, the lawyer should put
it into a separate, interest-bearing account, and the interest it earns will belong to the
client. [See Restatement §44, comment d] A separate account is recommended when the
lawyer is administering estate funds or the like. [ABA Model Rule 1.15, comment 1]
b. Small Sums
Usually, lawyers are entrusted with only relatively small sums to hold for relatively short
periods of time. The lawyer should put these sums into a pooled client trust account; the
account is pooled in the sense that it holds funds entrusted to the lawyer by a variety
of different clients. The pooled client trust account is typically a checking account that
earns interest. If each client’s small sum were put in an individual account, the amount
of interest it could earn would be less than the bank’s service charge for maintaining the
individual account. The 50 states devised Interest On Lawyer Trust Account (“IOLTA”)
programs. If a client entrusts a lawyer with a sum that is too small to earn any net
interest, the lawyer must put it into a pooled checking account that earns interest. After
the bank deducts its service charges from the interest, the bank sends the remaining
interest to the state bar or to a legal foundation, which uses the interest to fund chari-
table legal programs. In short, an IOLTA program creates an asset that would otherwise
not exist, and it then puts that asset to a public use. In Brown v. Legal Foundation of
Washington, 538 U.S. 216 (2003), a sharply divided Supreme Court upheld the consti-
tutionality of IOLTA programs, holding that the individual clients whose interest was
“taken” for “public use” were not entitled to “just compensation” because they did not
lose anything they would otherwise have had.
2. Funds that Must Be Placed in Account
a. Money Advanced by Client to Cover Costs and Expenses

When the client entrusts the lawyer with money to pay costs and expenses not yet
incurred, the advance must be put into the lawyer’s client trust fund account. [ABA
Model Rule 1.15] The lawyer can then pay the expenses with checks drawn on the
account.
b. Legal Fees Advanced by Client

Sometimes a client entrusts the lawyer with an advance against legal fees that the
lawyer has not yet earned. Such an advance must be put into the client trust account.
That is because a lawyer must refund to the client any unearned, prepaid legal fees
at the close of the representation, and an irresponsible lawyer could harm a client by
frittering away a fee advance. When a lawyer holds a fee advance in her client trust
account, she may make withdrawals as fees are earned if there is no existing dispute
about the lawyer’s right to do so. [See Restatement §44, comment f] To make sure there
is no dispute, cautious lawyers send the client an itemized bill before withdrawing legal
fees from the trust account. [See Restatement §44, comment f]
c. Funds in Which Both Client and Lawyer Have an Interest

A lawyer sometimes receives funds from a third party that are to be used, in part, to pay
the lawyer’s fee. The lawyer must place such funds in a client trust account until there
is an accounting and severance of the respective interests of the client and the lawyer.
[ABA Model Rule 1.15(e)] If the client disputes the amount that is due to the lawyer,

then the disputed portion must be kept in the client trust account until the dispute is
resolved. [Id.]
Example: Attorney A agreed to represent P as plaintiff in a products liability case.
P agreed to pay A $75 per hour for her work, and P agreed that the fee
could be deducted from the proceeds of the suit before remittance to
P. After expending 100 hours on the case, A arranged a settlement of
$50,000, and the defendant sent A a check in that amount. A depos-
ited the check in her client trust fund account and notified P that it had
arrived. The same day, A sent P a statement for services showing 100
hours of work and a total fee of $7,500. P protested the fee, saying that
she would pay $5,000, but not a cent more. Furthermore, P demanded
immediate payment of the entire $50,000. A then sent P $42,500, trans-
ferred $5,000 to her personal bank account, and kept the remaining
$2,500 in her client trust fund account. P and A ultimately submitted
their fee dispute to arbitration; when the arbitrator ruled in A’s favor,
she transferred the $2,500 to her personal bank account. A handled the
matter properly. [See Restatement §44, comment f]
d. Funds in Which a Third Party Has an Interest
Sometimes a third party has an interest in funds that come into the lawyer’s posses-
sion on behalf of a client. [ABA Model Rule 1.15, comment 4] Statute, common law,
or contract may require the lawyer to protect the third party’s interest against interfer-
ence by the client; accordingly, when the third party’s claim is not frivolous, the lawyer
must refuse to surrender the funds to the client until the third party has been paid. [Id.]
However, a lawyer should not unilaterally presume to arbitrate a dispute between the
client and the third party. [Id.] If there are substantial grounds for the dispute, the lawyer
may file an interpleader action to have a court resolve the dispute. [Id.] The lawyer must
promptly distribute any sums that are not in dispute. [ABA Model Rule 1.15(e)]
Example: When attorney A agreed to represent client C in a personal injury case,
A and C made a three-way agreement with C’s physician that A would
pay C’s medical bills out of the proceeds of C’s suit. When C won a
$10,000 judgment, he demanded that the entire sum be immediately
paid over to him because of a dispute between C and the physician over
the medical bills. A’s legal and ethical obligation is to hold the amount
of money necessary to pay C’s medical bills until the dispute between C
and the physician is resolved.
C. SAFEGUARDING PROPERTY
When the lawyer comes into possession of property (other than money) to be held on a client’s
behalf, the lawyer must identify it as belonging to the client and must put it in a safe place. [ABA
Model Rule 1.15(a)] For small items, most lawyers use a bank safe deposit box. Lawyers are
required to hold the property of others with the care required of a professional fiduciary. [ABA
Model Rule 1.15, comment 1] Accordingly, a lawyer cannot use the client’s property for her own
purposes, and must promptly take steps necessary to safeguard the client’s property as are appro-
priate to the circumstances.
Example: Lawyer L represented horse breeder B in negotiating a contract whereby B
exchanged two valuable horses for a lakeside cottage. While the transfer was
pending, B turned the two horses over to L for safekeeping. L arranged for them to
be boarded at a certified and bonded stable. L’s conduct was proper.

D. DUTY TO NOTIFY, KEEP RECORDS, RENDER ACCOUNTINGS, AND PAY OVER

PROMPTLY
A lawyer has the following additional duties respecting a client’s money or property:
(i) The lawyer must notify the client promptly when a third party turns over money or property
to the lawyer to hold on the client’s behalf;
(ii) The lawyer must keep complete, accurate, and up-to-date records of all money and
property held on behalf of the client. These records must be kept in accordance with gener-
ally accepted accounting practice, and they must be preserved for five years after the termi-
nation of the representation;
(iii) The lawyer must render appropriate accountings of all money and property held on behalf
of the client; and
(iv) When the time comes to pay over money or deliver property to which the client or a third
party is entitled, the lawyer must do so promptly.
[ABA Model Rule 1.15(a), (d)]
VII. THE LAWYER AS COUNSELOR
A. LAWYER AS ADVISOR TO THE CLIENT
1. Duty to Render Candid Advice

When acting as advisor to a client, a lawyer must exercise independent judgment and render
candid advice. [ABA Model Rule 2.1] Candid advice is sometimes hard to take—the facts
may be harsh and the choices unattractive. The lawyer should attempt to keep the client’s
morale up but should neither sugarcoat the advice nor delude the client. [See ABA Model
Rule 2.1, comment 1]
2. Giving Advice Beyond the Law

A lawyer may give a client not only legal advice, but also moral, economic, social, or polit-
ical advice when relevant to the client’s situation. [ABA Model Rule 2.1] When appropriate, a
lawyer may also urge a client to seek advice from persons in related professions—e.g., advice
from an accountant, psychiatrist, physician, or family counselor. [See ABA Model Rule 2.1,
comment 4]
3. Volunteering Advice
A lawyer ordinarily has no duty to give advice until asked. However, if the lawyer knows that
the client is planning a course of action that will have substantial adverse legal consequences
for the client, the lawyer may volunteer advice without being asked. [See ABA Model Rule
2.1, comment 5]
Example: Client C hired lawyer L to do some tax work. In the course of that work, L
learned that C was regularly putting large amounts of money into a trust estab-
lished for her grandchildren. If L reasonably believes that C is endangering

LECTURE HANDOUT
Copyright © 2018 by BARBRI, Inc.

LECTURE HANDOUT 1.
MULTISTATE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXAMINATION
I. Introduction; Test Overview
Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (“MPRE”)
Based on “the law governing the conduct and discipline of lawyers and judges.”
Format of exam: 60 multiple choice questions with four possible answers per question.
Students are not penalized for a wrong answer; therefore, you should guess if don’t know the
answer.
Two hours for exam; two minutes per question.
II. Regulation of the Legal Profession
A. Sources of Regulation and Admission to Practice Law
1. ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC)
The ABA has no disciplinary authority and membership is voluntary, but states
base their Rules of Professional Conduct on the Model Rules, and the Model
Rules control on the MPRE.
a. “Must” rules: mandatory (violating lawyer is subject to discipline; e.g.,

private or public reprimand, suspension, disbarment)
b. “Should” rules: advisory (no punishment for violation)
c. Comments: explain the Model Rules
2. Courts
States’ highest courts have inherent power to regulate lawyers and adopt ethical
rules for lawyers.
3. Bar admission and disciplinary matters

2. LECTURE HANDOUT
a. U.S. Supreme Court: Requirements for admission must be rationally

related to the practice of law.
1) What IS a rational requirement?
a) ___________________________________________________
b) ___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
c) Good moral character (see b., below): applicant fills out a

questionnaire and admissions committee investigates
applicant’s past conduct; conduct involving “moral turpitude”
may jeopardize admission
2) What IS NOT rational?
a) ________________________________________________
b) ________________________________________________
c) ________________________________________________
________________________________________________
b. Regarding character investigations, an applicant _____________________

_______________________________ must not:
1) Make a false statement of material fact;
2) Fail to respond to a lawful demand for information (duty to

cooperate); or
3) Fail to disclose any fact necessary to correct a misapprehension.
However, this does not require a lawyer to disclose information otherwise

protected by her duty of confidentiality (i.e., information relating to
representing a client in a matter).
PROBLEM NO. 1
Applicant is applying for admission to the State A Bar. When Applicant was in
high school, he and his parents lived in State B, next door to Attorney. Attorney is
admitted to practice in State B, but not in State A. Applicant seemed to be a
promising lad, and Attorney was disappointed to learn that Applicant, during his
senior year in high school, was convicted of burglarizing a liquor store. After
serving his sentence, Applicant went to college and later to law school. Attorney
LECTURE HANDOUT 3.
has had no contact with Applicant since Applicant’s high school years, but so far
as Attorney knows, Applicant has not done anything since high school that would
reflect poorly on his character. The Bar of State A sent Attorney a routine
questionnaire, asking a series of questions about Applicant’s character. Attorney
does not know whether Applicant disclosed the burglary conviction on his bar
application, and she does not know where to contact him to find out.
How must Attorney respond to the questionnaire?
(A) Not respond at all, because she has no relevant information to provide.
(B) Not respond at all, because as a State B lawyer she is not obligated to
provide information to the Bar of State A.
(C) Not mention Applicant’s burglary conviction in her response unless she
first contacts him and obtains his permission to do so.
(D) State what she knows about Applicant, including mention of his burglary
conviction.
B. Regulation After Admission
1. Duty of lawyer to report professional misconduct
a. A lawyer who KNOWS that another lawyer has committed a violation that
raises a substantial question as to the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or
ability to practice MUST report the violation, unless _________________
__________________ (lawyer learned of the violation while representing
the violating lawyer) or the lawyer learned of the violation while
participating in an _____________________________________.
b. Lawyers have the same duty to report judges who violate the Code of
Judicial Conduct.
2. A lawyer is subject to discipline for committing a crime if the crime is relevant to

some aspect of practicing law (most crimes involving dishonesty and serious
violence qualify, but solicitation of prostitution or a single DUI probably would
not).
3. Any _____, __________, ________________, or _____ is grounds for discipline.

Thus, a lawyer who commits fraud in the conduct of a business is subject to
discipline, even if the lawyer is not active in the practice of law.
4. In conduct ________________________, lawyers must not harass or discriminate

on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, age, sexual
orientation, gender identity, marital status, or socioeconomic status.
4. LECTURE HANDOUT
a. This rule does not affect a lawyer’s ability to accept or decline a case (e.g.,
limiting one’s practice to underserved populations), and does not preclude
“legitimate advice or advocacy” otherwise consistent with the RPC.
b. Although the rule prohibits employment discrimination by lawyers, a

lawyer does not violate the rule by engaging in conduct intended to
promote diversity.
PROBLEM NO. 2
During the trial of a case by Attorney Dorothy, Attorney Blanche took shelter in a
tavern from an unexpected rainstorm. While in the tavern, Attorney Blanche saw
Attorney Dorothy having a drink with a juror on the case Attorney Dorothy was
trying.
What is required conduct for Attorney Blanche?
(A) Keep this knowledge confidential.
(B) Identify herself to Dorothy and reprimand Dorothy for drinking in a public
place with a juror.
(C) Inform the judge trying the case of this incident.
(D) Caution Dorothy and the juror not to talk further with each other.
5. Jurisdiction to discipline a lawyer
a. Any state in which the lawyer is admitted to practice has power to

discipline the lawyer, _________________________________________.
b. A lawyer not admitted in the state is also subject to the jurisdiction of the
state if the lawyer renders or offers to render any legal services in the
state.
6. Choice of law in disciplinary matters
a. For conduct in connection with litigation pending before a court, the rules
of the jurisdiction in which the court sits govern the lawyer’s conduct.
b. For any other conduct, the rules of the jurisdiction in which the lawyer’s
conduct occurred (or where the predominant effect of the conduct
occurred) apply.
LECTURE HANDOUT 5.
C. Unauthorized Practice of Law
1. The following activities require a license (and constitute the “practice of law”):
a. ____________________________________________________________
b. ____________________________________________________________
c. ____________________________________________________________
2. The following activities do not require a license (these do NOT constitute the
“practice of law”):
a. _________________________
b. _________________________
c. _________________________
PROBLEM NO. 3
Attorneys Hamilton and Burr hire Angelica, a third-year student at a local law
school, to assist them as their clerk. Angelica is not licensed under any state law
or court rule that allows third-year law students to engage in practice under the
supervision of a licensed attorney. For which of the following tasks are Hamilton
and Burr subject to discipline?
(A) Filling in a release form for personal injury plaintiffs to sign after their cases
have been settled. (Hamilton himself has the plaintiffs sign the forms.)
(B) Interviewing witnesses to accidents, and having them sign Angelica’s written
version of the interview.
(C) Reaching settlement agreements with insurance company representatives

before suit has been filed.
(D) Conducting legal research on a question of law involved in the case.
D. Practicing Across Jurisdictional Boundaries
1. Unauthorized practice: can’t do it where not admitted
2. Permissible temporary multijurisdictional practice:
a. Associate with an active local lawyer;

6. LECTURE HANDOUT
b. Special permission called pro hac vice;
c. Mediation or arbitration out of home-state practice; and
d. Anything reasonably related to lawyer’s home-state practice.
3. Permissible permanent multijurisdictional practice: lawyer employed by her only

client (usually in-house counsel)
III. The Client-Lawyer Relationship
A. Creation of Relationship
1. Consensual relationship; lawyers generally have no duty to accept clients.
2. Other than by express intent of the parties, a relationship may be formed if:
a. Client manifests intention that lawyer represent him;
b. Lawyer fails to clearly decline; AND
c. Lawyer knows that client is reasonably relying on her to provide the

services.
3. Appointments
A lawyer must not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person

except for good cause, such as ______________________________ or personal
inability to represent client effectively
B. Scope of Representation
1. A lawyer may reasonably limit the scope of the representation if the client gives
informed consent.
2. Client’s decisions vs. lawyer’s decisions
a. In a civil case, a lawyer must abide by a client’s decision whether to

__________.
b. In a criminal case, the lawyer must abide by the client’s decision, after
consultation with the lawyer, as to:
1) _________________________
LECTURE HANDOUT 7.
2) _________________________
3) _________________________
c. In a civil or criminal case, the lawyer must abide by the client’s decision
regarding ___________________________.
d. The lawyer may make strategic decisions, such as which court to file in or
which discovery methods to employ.
3. A lawyer must not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the
lawyer knows is ______________________ (but may discuss legal consequences
of any proposed course of conduct).
4. If client has diminished capacity (very young, disabled, etc.), try to maintain a
normal relationship. Decisions do not shift to lawyer; if necessary, lawyer should
_________________________________________________.
C. Lawyer’s Duty of Communication
A lawyer must:
1. Reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s
objectives are to be accomplished;
2. Keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;
3. Promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and
4. Explain matters to the client to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the
client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
D. Fees
1. The fee arrangement (scope of representation, basis or rate of fee, and expenses
for which client will be responsible) must be communicated to client before or
within a reasonable time after representation starts. As a general rule, a
WRITTEN fee agreement is _____________________. (But see section on
contingent fees.)
Exception: The fee arrangement need not be expressly communicated when a

lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate in
subsequent matters.
2. Minimum fees prohibited

8. LECTURE HANDOUT
3. All fees must be ____________. Factors in determining reasonableness of fees

include:
a. Time and labor required (must not double bill for the same period of
time);
b. Novelty and difficulty of questions involved;
c. Whether lawyer must turn away other cases, if the client is aware of this;
d. What other attorneys in the community charge for similar work;
e. The amount at stake and the results obtained for the client;
f. Time limitations imposed by the client;
g. The nature and length of the relationship between the lawyer and client;
h. The experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer; and
i. Whether the fee is fixed or contingent; a contingent fee may be higher

(e.g., $3,000 per hour is unreasonable, but the lawyer may earn an
equivalent amount in a contingency fee matter).
4. Contingent fees are generally permissible, but the agreement must be __________
_______________ and signed by the client. The agreement must clearly notify the
client of any expenses for which the client will be liable, whether or not the client
is the prevailing party.
a. Contingent fees are prohibited:
1) When ____________________________________________
2) In ______________________________, if payment or amount is

contingent upon the securing of a divorce or upon the amount of
alimony, support, or settlement
a) “Past due” support payments are debt and therefore okay
b. Required disclosures to client (in the written agreement)
1) How the fee is to be calculated, including the percentages that will

accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial, or appeal
2) What expenses are to be deducted from the recovery

LECTURE HANDOUT 9.
3) Whether deductions for expenses will be made before or after the

contingent fee is calculated
At the conclusion of a contingent fee matter, the lawyer must provide the
client with a written statement outlining how the fee was determined.
c. When lawyer is terminated before contingent fee is awarded
1) Without cause: _________________________________________

______________________________________________________
2) With cause: lawyer not entitled to payment
5. Fee splitting with other lawyers
a. Lawyers in the same firm may split in any manner; they may also split
fees pursuant to separation or retirement agreements with lawyers who
have left the firm.
b. Lawyers in different firms may split fees from a matter only if:
1) The division is in proportion to the services performed by each

lawyer (or some different proportion IF each lawyer assumes
_________________________ for the representation);
2) The client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each

lawyer will receive, and the agreement is confirmed in writing; and
3) The total fee for all lawyers is reasonable.
PROBLEM NO. 4
Two years ago, Weaver obtained a divorce from her husband Hubbard in State A.
The court awarded Weaver custody of the three children and ordered Hubbard to
pay Weaver $3,000 per month in child support and alimony payments. The lawyer
who represented Weaver in the divorce proceedings died. Hubbard failed to make
the $3,000 payments for seventeen months in a row. Weaver ran out of money
and in desperation hired attorney Avilla to represent her in a proceeding to collect
the past-due payments from Hubbard. State A has no law or court rule that
requires the loser to pay the winner’s attorneys’ fees in domestic relations matters.
Because Weaver had no money to pay Avilla a regular fee, Avilla agreed to do the
work on a contingent fee basis for 10% of whatever amount Weaver was
ultimately able to recover. Avilla won an award for Weaver of the entire amount
due ($51,000), and by tracking down and attaching Hubbard’s secret bank
10. LECTURE HANDOUT
account, he got the full amount paid to Weaver. He then sent Weaver a bill for his
share, $5,100.
Is Avilla subject to discipline?
(A) No, unless $5,100 is an unreasonable high fee for the work Avilla did.
(B) No, because Weaver had no money to pay a regular fee.
(C) Yes, because Avilla used a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter.
(D) Yes, because Avilla took a portion of the money that was intended for
support of Weaver and the children.
E. Termination of Client-Lawyer Relationship
1. Three ways:
a. Client fires lawyer (client always has power to terminate attorney-client

relationship for any reason)
b. Mandatory withdrawal (lawyer must withdraw)
1) Lawyer’s physical or mental disability ______________________

_____________________________________________________
2) If the representation will result in a violation of the RPC or other

law
(In addition, a lawyer must consult with the client about any
relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the lawyer knows
that the client expects assistance not permitted by the RPC or other
law.)
3) Discharge by the client, for any reason or no reason
c. Permissive withdrawal (lawyer may withdraw)
1) Withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect

on the client;
2) Client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services

that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent;
3) Client has used the lawyer’s services to commit past crime or

fraud;
LECTURE HANDOUT 11.
4) Client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers

repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental
disagreement;
5) Client breaks promise to the lawyer, and has been given reasonable
warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the promise is
fulfilled (usually, this involves the client’s failure to pay his legal
fees)
6) Unreasonable financial hardship for attorney;
7) Representation has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the

client; OR
8) Other good cause exists.
2. Need court’s permission if withdrawing from a matter that is in litigation
3. Upon withdrawal, a lawyer must take steps to protect a client’s interests, such as
giving reasonable notice to the client and allowing time for employment of other
counsel.
4. Upon withdrawal, a lawyer must surrender papers and property to which the client
is entitled and ______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
IV. Protecting Client Interests
A. Competence
A lawyer must provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation

requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary
for the representation.
Three ways to avoid an incompetence problem (take ALE):
1. A ___________________________________________________
2. L ___________________________________________________
3. E ___________________________________________________
12. LECTURE HANDOUT
B. Diligence
1. A lawyer must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a

client. As part of this duty, the lawyer must control his workload.
2. The lawyer’s duty to act with reasonable diligence does NOT require incivility or
the use of offensive tactics. The lawyer also may agree to an opposing party’s
reasonable request for extensions of time, etc., as long as it does not prejudice the
client.
C. Malpractice Liability
1. Violation of a Rule of Professional Conduct does NOT necessarily mean there is

legal malpractice, and vice versa.
2. However, violation of a model rule is ___________________________________

_________________________________________________________________.
3. Unlike disciplinary violations, malpractice requires __________ and __________

_________________________________________________________________.
4. Theories of malpractice liability
a. Intentional tort
b. Breach of fiduciary duties
c. Breach of contract
d. Negligence (to clients, prospective clients, and third parties who are
intended to benefit from legal services)
1) Standard of care
a) General practitioner: regular “competent representation”

standard
b) Specialists: higher standard; the standard of other

specialists in the matter
5. Settlement of existing malpractice claim
A lawyer must not settle a claim or potential claim for legal malpractice with an
unrepresented client or former client unless she advises the client in writing to
_______________________________________________, and gives the client a
reasonable opportunity to do so.
LECTURE HANDOUT 13.
6. Prospective limitation of malpractice liability
A lawyer must not make an agreement prospectively limiting the lawyer’s

liability to a client for malpractice _________________________________
_____________________________________ (stricter standard than above).
D. Duty of Confidentiality
A lawyer must not reveal information relating to the representation of the client.
1. Compared with attorney-client privilege
a. Attorney-client privilege:
1) Only covers __________________________________________

between a lawyer and client made for the purpose of legal advice
(e.g., a lawyer’s conversation with a nonclient witness is not
privileged, but is protected under the duty of confidentiality)
2) Protects a court or tribunal from compelling the revelation of these

communications (it does not apply outside a court proceeding)
3) Is held by the client, not the attorney
4) Exceptions to privilege
a) Client seeks attorney’s services to engage in crime/fraud
b) Communication is relevant to a breach of attorney-client

relationship
c) Civil litigation between former joint clients of the attorney
d) Certain cases involving competency or intention of a

testator
b. In contrast, the duty of confidentiality:
1) Protects _______________________________________________
2) Applies to any type of disclosure by the lawyer (not just within a

courtroom)
3) Is held by the lawyer
4) See exceptions below

14. LECTURE HANDOUT
2. Exceptions to duty of confidentiality
A lawyer may reveal information protected by the duty of confidentiality in the

following situations:
a. The client gives informed consent, OR the disclosure is impliedly

authorized in order to carry out the representation
b. To the extent necessary to defend self from civil, criminal, or disciplinary

claim (e.g., _________________________________________)
c. To comply with other law or a court order
d. To prevent ________________________ death or substantial bodily harm
Examples:
1) A lawyer may reveal a client’s intention to commit suicide (even if

suicide is not a crime).
2) If a client tells the lawyer that he just stabbed his wife and left her
bleeding and unconscious in their home, the lawyer may alert the
police. Even though there is no specific exception for past crimes,
the lawyer may reveal information to prevent the wife’s reasonably
certain death or substantial injury. (However, if the client instead
tells the lawyer that he killed his wife and buried her body, the
lawyer would not be able to alert the police because the wife is
already dead.)
e. To secure legal advice about the lawyer’s compliance with the RPC (e.g.,
lawyer seeks ethics advice from ethics professor regarding a potential
conflict of interest, and is careful not to reveal client’s identity)
f. To prevent ______ from committing a ______________ that is reasonably

certain to result in substantial injury to the ________________________
of another, and in furtherance of which the client ___________________
__________________. The exception also applies if the client has already
acted and disclosure can prevent, mitigate, or rectify the injury.
g. To detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising out of a merger between

firms, a sale of a law practice, or a lawyer’s change in employment (but
disclosure must not compromise the attorney-client privilege or prejudice
the client).
LECTURE HANDOUT 15.
3. Duty of confidentiality continues after the representation ends, and also applies to
information learned during discussions with a prospective client, even if no
relationship is ultimately formed.
E. Safeguarding Funds and Other Property
1. Trust accounts
A lawyer must keep all clients’ money in a separate trust account and MUST
NOT mix (“commingle”) client funds with lawyer funds, except the lawyer may
deposit his own funds in a trust account for the SOLE purpose of _____________
_____________. Nor may the lawyer remove any funds from the trust account for
any use other than the client’s case.
a. For small sums to be held for a short period of time, a lawyer may use a
_____________________ (called IOLTA account in most states), and any
remaining interest goes to the state bar or a legal foundation.
2. Retainer: two types
a. __________________: belongs to client (goes into trust account) and is

transferred to lawyer’s account as it is earned, and any unearned portion
must be returned if lawyer is fired or withdraws.
b. __________________: belongs to attorney (goes into lawyer’s account)
3. A lawyer must safeguard other types of property and keep it separate from
lawyer’s own property (e.g., securities and valuable jewelry usually should be
kept in a safe deposit box).
4. A lawyer must promptly notify client of receipt of property and money (e.g., “I
received the settlement check”), and promptly forward any money or property to
which the client is entitled.
5. Disputed claims
a. Lawyer v. Client:
The lawyer must hold __________________________ in the trust account

until the dispute is resolved.
b. Third Party v. Client:
If third party has a lien on funds held by lawyer, lawyer must hold the
disputed portion in the trust account until the dispute is resolved (if there
is no lien, lawyer must give funds to the client if requested).
16. LECTURE HANDOUT
PROBLEM NO. 5
Attorney, who represented Plaintiff, received a check from Defendant payable to

Attorney’s order in the sum of $10,000 in settlement of Plaintiff’s claim against
Defendant.
Which of the following is a proper course of action for Attorney to take?
(A) Endorse the check and deposit it in Attorney’s account.
(B) Deposit the check in Attorney’s personal bank account and send his
(Attorney’s) personal check for $10,000 to Plaintiff.
(C) Deposit the check in a client trust account, advise Plaintiff, and forward a
check drawn on that account to Plaintiff.
(D) Call the client and see if Client will re-negotiate to give Attorney more
fees.
V. Conflicts of Interest
A. Rule of Imputed Disqualification
Generally, if one lawyer in a firm has a conflict, it is imputed to all other lawyers at the
firm.
Exception: The conflict is based on a _________________ of the disqualified lawyer and

does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client by
the remaining lawyers in the firm.
1. “Firm” includes groups of lawyers who practice law closely together (e.g., legal
aid group, corporate law department, public defenders’ office)
B. Conflicts Among Current Clients (Concurrent Conflicts)
1. Direct adversity
In general, a lawyer may not represent Client 1 if Client 1’s interests are directly
adverse to Client 2, even if the lawyer represents Client 2 in completely unrelated
matters.
2. Lawyer’s personal interests and duties to others
A lawyer must not represent a client if there is a ____________________ that the

representation of that client will be ________________________ by the lawyer’s
LECTURE HANDOUT 17.
responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or the lawyer’s

own personal interests.
a. Multiple representation
A lawyer may represent multiple clients in the same matter in certain

circumstances (generally civil cases only). However, if the clients may
potentially become adverse or have different interests, the lawyer must
obtain the clients’ informed consent at the outset. If the potential conflict
ripens into an actual conflict, the lawyer may need to withdraw if the
conflict cannot be effectively waived.
b. Personal interests
Example: A lawyer may not refer clients to an enterprise in which the

lawyer has an undisclosed financial interest.
3. Waiver of conflict
All the conflicts above can be cured if:
a. Lawyer ____________________ that he can represent the affected client

competently and diligently despite the conflict, AND
b. Lawyer fully explains risks and alternatives (_________________) and

client’s consent is “confirmed in writing” (can be electronic, and a
confirmatory memo from the lawyer following the client’s oral waiver will
suffice).
But note: A conflict if unconsentable if the representation involves asserting a

claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same
litigation (i.e., lawyer _______________________________________).
C. Former Client Conflicts
A lawyer may not represent a client with adverse interests to a former client in ________
__________________________ without the former client’s consent.
1. Matters may be considered substantially related if they involve the same

transaction, or if confidential information learned in the former representation
would materially advance the new client’s position in the current matter.
Example: A lawyer who has represented a businessperson and learned extensive

private financial information about that person may not subsequently represent
that person’s spouse in seeking a divorce.
18. LECTURE HANDOUT
D. Prospective Client Conflicts
1. A prospective client is a person who ________ with a lawyer about the possibility
of forming a client-lawyer relationship with respect to a matter.
2. A lawyer who has obtained information from a prospective client must not
represent a client adverse to the prospective client if the lawyer received
information from the prospective client that could be significantly harmful to the
prospective client in the matter. This conflict can be waived with the informed
consent of the client and prospective client.
Example: A husband consults with a lawyer about representing him in his

divorce, and tells the lawyer during the consultation that he has been secretly
stashing money in an offshore account. Even if the lawyer ultimately declines to
represent the husband, he may not subsequently represent the husband’s wife in
the divorce.
E. Former Government Employee in Private Practice
A lawyer who previously worked for the government must not later represent a client in
connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated ________________________
as a public officer or employee, unless the government agency consents.
1. However, the conflict is NOT imputed to other attorneys at the disqualified

lawyer’s firm if the disqualified lawyer is ________________________, does not
share in fees from the matter, and the government is notified in writing.
2. For purposes of this rule, a “matter” is ____________________________.
a. ________________________________ and ________________ are NOT

matters, so there is no conflict.
b. _____________________________________________ DOES constitute

a matter.
F. Using Client’s Confidential Information
A lawyer must not use information relating to the representation of a client __________
___________________________ without informed consent.
G. Acquiring an Interest in Litigation
A lawyer may not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or the subject
matter of litigation that the lawyer is conducting for a client, except:
LECTURE HANDOUT 19.
1. A lawyer may acquire ________________________ to secure the lawyer’s fee or

expenses.
2. A lawyer may contract with a client for a reasonable contingent fee in a civil case.
H. Business Transactions with a Client
A lawyer must not enter into a business transaction with a client or knowingly acquire an
ownership, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client unless:
1. The transaction is _______________________________;
2. Terms are fully disclosed to client in writing that client can reasonably
understand;
3. Client is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking and is given a reasonable

opportunity to seek the advice of independent legal counsel on the transaction;
and
4. Client consents ______________________________ to the essential terms of the

transaction and the lawyer’s role in the transaction. (Although most waivers need
only be “confirmed in writing,” here the client’s signature is required; also see
aggregate settlement agreements below.)
Examples: A loan or sales transaction, or a lawyer investment on behalf of a client.
I. Aggregate Settlement Agreements
When settling on behalf of multiple clients for a lump sum, the lawyer must:
1. Assure that all clients agree as to how the sum will be shared;
2. Make extensive disclosures to the clients regarding the terms of the agreement;
and
3. Get each client’s informed consent _________________________________.
Note: Aggregate settlements and business transactions (above) are the two areas where
the conflict waiver must be signed by the client!
J. Financial Assistance
A lawyer must not provide financial assistance to a client _________________________

________________________, except:
20. LECTURE HANDOUT
1. A lawyer may _______________________________________, the repayment of

which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter
2. A lawyer representing __________________ may pay court costs and expenses of

litigation outright
Example: A lawyer representing a client in litigation may NOT make a loan to the client
for living expenses or medical treatment.
K. Gifts from Clients
1. A lawyer must not _______________________________________, including a

testamentary gift.
2. A lawyer must not ________________________ on the client’s behalf giving the

lawyer or a person related to the lawyer any substantial gift _________________
_________________________________.
L. Literary or Media Rights
While representing a client, a lawyer must not make or negotiate an agreement giving the
lawyer literary or media rights to a portrayal or account based in substantial part on
information relating to the representation. However, the lawyer may do so ____________
______________________________.
M. Third Party Paying Lawyer’s Fee
A lawyer must not accept compensation for representing a client from someone other
than the client unless all of the following conditions are met:
1. ______________________________________________________,
2. ______________________________________________________, and
3. _______________________________________________________.
N. Organization as Client
1. A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents ________________,

NOT ___________________________ (but dual representation may be permitted
subject to conflicts of interest rules).
2. If organization’s lawyer learns that an act has been or is about to be committed in

a way that violates a duty to the organization, or violates a law in a way that might
be imputed to the organization, AND if the violation is likely to cause substantial
LECTURE HANDOUT 21.
injury to the organization, the lawyer must proceed as is reasonably necessary to

protect the interests of the organization.
a. A lawyer ordinarily MUST report violation to some higher authority (e.g,

president) within the organization.
b. If higher authority fails to act, the lawyer MAY report relevant

information to appropriate persons outside the organization only if, and to
the extent that, the lawyer reasonably believes such reporting is ________
_____________________________________________.
O. Attorneys Who Are Related
Lawyers related to each other as _________, _________, __________, or _________

ordinarily may not represent adverse parties unless each client gives informed consent.
This type of conflict is personal and therefore __________________.
P. Sexual Relations with Clients
A lawyer must not have sexual relations with a client _____________________________

_____________________________. Again, this type of conflict is personal and therefore
not imputed.
VI. Different Roles of the Lawyer
A. Lawyer as Advisor
In rendering advice, a lawyer may refer not only to law but to other considerations such
as moral, economic, social, and political factors that may be relevant to the client’s
situation.
B. Lawyer as Evaluator
At the client’s request, a lawyer may provide an evaluation of a matter affecting a client
for use by a third party (e.g., lawyer for borrower provides summary of client’s financial
information to a prospective lender).
1. If the evaluation is likely to have a material and negative effect on the client’s
interests, the lawyer must get informed consent from the client _______________
__________________.
C. Lawyer as Negotiator
A lawyer must not make a false statement of material fact when dealing with others on a
client’s behalf, but generally has no affirmative duty to ______________________.
22. LECTURE HANDOUT
Under generally accepted conventions in negotiation, a lawyer may exaggerate the

following because they are not considered statements of material fact:
1. _______________________________
2. _______________________________
D. Lawyer Serving as Third-Party Neutral
1. A lawyer serving as a third-party neutral (arbitrator, mediator, etc.) must inform

unrepresented parties that ____________________________.
2. If litigation arises, the lawyer must not represent any of the parties ___________
______________________________________.
E. Lawyer as Advocate
1. No frivolous claims (every claim, defense, or issue must have a good faith
argument)
a. A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding may defend the

proceeding so as to require that every element of the case be established.
Therefore, even if the lawyer knows the client is guilty of the criminal
charge, the lawyer may plead the defendant “not guilty.”
2. Duty of candor to the tribunal
a. False statements
A lawyer must not knowingly ____________________ of law or fact to a

tribunal, or ___________________________________ of material fact or
law.
b. Legal authority
A lawyer must reveal an adverse decision or statute of _______________

_________________ (may distinguish it away).
c. False evidence
1) A lawyer MUST NOT offer evidence (testimony or other

evidence) that the lawyer ____________ to be false.
If a lawyer knows that her criminal defendant client plans to

commit perjury or has already done so, the lawyer must:
LECTURE HANDOUT 23.
a) Attempt to persuade the client to testify truthfully (or to

rectify false testimony already given)
b) If client persists, consider withdrawal if that will remedy

the situation (usually it will not)
c) If all else fails, reveal the situation to the judge
Note: The duty to rectify false testimony lasts until ____________

_____________________________.
2) A lawyer MAY refuse to offer evidence that she ______________

_____________________, except for the testimony of a defendant
client in a criminal matter.
3) If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer

has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its
falsity, the lawyer must take reasonable remedial measures,
including, if necessary, _____________________.
PROBLEM NO. 6
Attorney Ralph Kramden is moving for a summary judgment in a case where the
law of Franklin is controlling. He discovers a recent Franklin Supreme Court
decision, Norton v. Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler, with language directly
opposed to his client’s position on a critical point of law. That case in turn leads
to two Olympia decisions that are directly opposed to his client’s position. His
adversary has not cited any of the three cases, and the judge appears to be
unaware of them.
Kramden must, or be subject to discipline:
(A) Argue the motion without disclosing any of the three cases.
(B) Disclose all three cases to the judge without explaining why they are
harmful to the client’s position.
(C) Disclose the Franklin case to the judge without explaining why it is
harmful to his client’s position.
(D) Disclose all three cases to the judge and explain briefly why they are
harmful to his client’s position.
3. Fairness to opposing party and counsel

24. LECTURE HANDOUT
a. Must not obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter,

destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential
evidentiary value.
b. Must not make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make a reasonably

diligent effort to comply with opposing party’s proper requests.
c. At trial, a lawyer must not:
1) Allude to any matter that is ____________________________

______________________________;
2) ___________________________ of facts in issue, except when

testifying as a witness;
3) State a _______________________ as to the justness of a cause,

the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant, or the
guilt or innocence of an accused; or
4) Request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily

giving relevant information to another party UNLESS the person is
_____________________________________ and refraining from
giving such information would not adversely affect the person’s
interests.
4. Impartiality and decorum of the tribunal
a. Must not seek to influence court officials or jurors in a manner prohibited

by law.
b. Must not engage in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal.
c. No ex parte communication with a court official about the merits of the

case unless the lawyer gives adequate notice to the other side.
d. Communications with jurors and prospective jurors during trial
1) If lawyer is connected to the case, she must not speak with the juror
________________________.
2) If lawyer is NOT connected to the case, she must not speak with the
juror ________________________.
e. Communicating with a juror or prospective juror after discharge of the

jury is prohibited if:
LECTURE HANDOUT 25.
1) _________________________________________________
2) _________________________________________________
3) _________________________________________________
5. Must not make false statements (or statements made with reckless disregard as to
truth or falsity) about the integrity or qualifications of a judicial officer or
candidate.
F. Lawyer as Prosecutor
1. Must not prosecute without _________________________.
2. Must assure the accused is advised of his right to counsel, knows how to get
counsel, and is given a chance to get counsel.
3. Must make timely disclosure to the defense of all known evidence or information
that _____________________________________.
4. Must seek to remedy the conviction of a defendant in his jurisdiction if he knows

of clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is innocent.
G. Lawyer as Witness
A lawyer must not act as an advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a
necessary witness. This prohibition cannot be waived by the client.
Exceptions:
1. Testimony relates to ____________________________________
2. Where testimony pertains to ______________________________
3. Lawyer’s withdrawal would cause substantial hardship to client
H. Lawyer in Nonadjudicative Proceeding
A lawyer representing a client before a legislative body or administrative agency in a

nonadjudicative proceeding must disclose that she is appearing in a representative
capacity (and not on her own behalf).
26. LECTURE HANDOUT
VII. Transactions with Third Persons
A. Truthfulness in Statements to Third Persons
In the course of representing a client a lawyer must not knowingly:
1. Make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or
2. Fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to

avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client (and if disclosure is
prohibited by the lawyer’s duty of confidentiality, the lawyer must withdraw).
B. Communications with Represented Persons
1. General Rule
No direct communication with a person who is represented by a lawyer in

connection with a matter, unless it meets one of the following requirements:
a. The communication is authorized by law;
b. ________________________________; OR
c. ______________________________________.
Note: The parties to the lawsuit may communicate directly with each other and a
lawyer does not violate the above rule by informing the client of that fact.
2. Organizations
If the adverse party is an organization (e.g., corporation), the lawyer must obtain
permission from the organization’s counsel to communicate with the following
employees/other constituents:
a. Person who has authority to obligate the organization;
b. Person whose conduct can be imputed to organization; or
c. Person who supervises, directs, or regularly consults with the

organization’s lawyer on the matter.
Note: Consent is generally NOT required to speak with a former employee of the
organization.
LECTURE HANDOUT 27.
C. Communication with Unrepresented Persons
1. May negotiate a transaction or settle a client’s dispute with an unrepresented

person
2. Must not _________________________ when that is not the case
3. Must not give legal advice other than advising the person to obtain counsel
D. Respect for Rights of Third Persons
1. In representing a client, a lawyer must not use means that have no substantial
purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods
of obtaining evidence that violate a person’s legal rights.
2. A lawyer who receives documents or electronic information sent by mistake must

__________________________________.
VIII. Law Firms and Associations
A. Responsibilities of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers
1. Partners and managing lawyers must reasonably ensure that a firm has measures
in place so that lawyers will follow the RPC.
2. Supervising lawyers must make reasonable efforts to ensure that subordinate

lawyers conform to the RPC.
3. Vicarious responsibility
A lawyer is responsible for another lawyer’s violation of the RPC if:
a. The lawyer ________ or _________ the conduct involved; or
b. The lawyer has authority over the violating lawyer and knows of the
conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but
____________________________________.
4. Lawyers have similar responsibilities for conduct by __________ (both inside and
outside the firm; e.g., paralegals and outside document management companies).
B. Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer
1. Generally, a lawyer is bound by the RPC even though he acted at the direction of
another lawyer.
28. LECTURE HANDOUT
2. However, a subordinate lawyer is NOT subject to discipline if:
a. His supervising lawyer told him to do it; and
b. It was a _______________ resolution of an _______________ question of

professional duty.
C. Professional Independence of a Lawyer
1. A lawyer must not form a partnership with a nonlawyer (e.g., an accountant or

broker) if ANY of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.
2. Fee splitting with nonlawyers is prohibited.
Exceptions:
a. Firm may pay death benefits to a lawyer’s estate or to specified persons.
b. If purchasing the law practice of a deceased or disabled lawyer, a lawyer

may make payment to the deceased/disabled lawyer’s representative.
c. Compensation and retirement plans for nonlawyer employees are allowed

even if based on a profit-sharing arrangement.
d. A lawyer may share court-awarded legal fees with a nonprofit

organization that employed, retained, or recommended employment of the
lawyer in the matter.
D. Restrictions on Right to Practice
1. Employment and partnership agreements that restrict a lawyer’s right to practice

after termination are prohibited, except ________________________________.
2. A lawyer may not offer or make an agreement in which a restriction on the

lawyer’s right to practice is part of the ____________________________.
Example: In connection with settling a claim on behalf of a client, a lawyer may

not agree to refrain from representing other persons in similar matters.
IX. Public Service
A. Voluntary Pro Bono Service
The ABA recommends 50 hours of pro bono work per year, but a lawyer who fails to
meet this aspirational goal is NOT subject to discipline.
LECTURE HANDOUT 29.
B. Serving in Legal Services Organizations
1. A lawyer is permitted to serve as a director, officer, or member of a legal services

organization (apart from her regular employment), but must not knowingly
participate in decisions or actions of the organization that would cause a conflict
with one of her clients.
C. Law Reform Activities
1. A lawyer may serve as a director, officer, or member of an organization involved

in reform of the law or its administration, even if the reform may affect the
interests of a client of the lawyer.
2. When the lawyer knows that the interests of a client may be materially benefited
by a decision in which the lawyer participates, the lawyer __________________
_________________________________________________________.
D. Political Contributions to Obtain Government Employment
“Pay to play” contributions by a lawyer or law firm are prohibited (i.e., where a lawyer
would not have made the contribution “but for” the desire for the employment or
appointment).
X. Promoting Legal Services
A. Attorney Advertising
Attorneys have a First Amendment right to advertise, but states may impose restrictions
(subject to intermediate scrutiny).
Examples: Yellow page ads, office signs, business cards, announcements, letterhead,
brochures, letters sent by mail, recorded phone messages, Internet websites.
1. Identification of Advertiser
Any communication concerning a lawyer’s services must include the name and
office address of at least one lawyer or law firm responsible for its content.
2. Attorney advertisements must not include:
a. False or misleading statements
b. Statements that create unjustified expectations

30. LECTURE HANDOUT
c. Unsubstantiated comparisons
Note: Including a disclaimer may solve the problem.
3. Subjects that are specifically permitted in advertisements:
a. _______________________;
b. Educational background;
c. Pricing and fee information;
d. Memberships in bar associations; and
e. Names of regular clients, provided they give consent.
B. Solicitation
1. A solicitation is a ______________________________________ for the purpose

of obtaining legal employment.
2. General ban on personal contacts
A lawyer must not solicit professional employment from a prospective client by

_______, ____________ or ________________ contact when a significant
motive for the lawyer’s doing so is the lawyer’s pecuniary gain (money).
Examples: Knocking on doors, calling on the telephone, sending instant messages

on the Internet.
a. Exceptions
1) Offering free legal services
2) Close friends and relatives
3) Present or former clients
4) Other lawyers
5) Participating in group and prepaid legal services plans that use

personal contacts (as long as the persons are not known to need
legal services in a particular matter)
3. Targeted direct mail (e.g., letters, e-mails)

LECTURE HANDOUT 31.
a. Generally permitted if truthful
b. Must be labeled with the words ____________________ (unless sent to a

family member, close friend, another lawyer, or a current or former client)
c. Jurisdiction may restrict (e.g., federal law prohibits solicitation within 45

days of a plane crash)
4. When all types of solicitation are prohibited
Regardless of who the targeted person is, a lawyer must not solicit by any method
if:
a. The person has made known to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited by
the lawyer; or
b. The communication involves __________, __________, ____________.
C. Communication of Fields of Practice
1. A lawyer may state that she does (or does not) practice in particular fields of law.
2. A lawyer must not state or imply that she is ______________ in a particular field
of law, unless she is certified by an organization approved by the state or ABA
and identifies that organization in the communication.
D. Firm Names and Letterheads
1. May include names of current, retired, and deceased partners
a. But must not use name of partner who is __________________________

and who will not be practicing with firm for a substantial period
2. Trade names are permitted if not misleading (must not imply connection with
government agency or charity).
3. Multistate law firms: if lawyers in an office are identified on a letterhead or other

communication, it must also include any jurisdictional limitations on their ability
to practice.
E. Referral Arrangements
A lawyer may enter into a reciprocal referral agreement with another lawyer or a
nonlawyer professional, subject to the following restrictions:
32. LECTURE HANDOUT
1. Must not be _________________
2. Each referred client must be told of the arrangement (and if there is a conflict of
interest, it must be properly addressed)
3. Arrangement must not interfere with lawyer’s professional judgment
4. Must not be of _________________________; should be reviewed periodically
PROBLEM NO. 7
Attorney placed an advertisement in City Newspaper, the city in which Attorney

practiced. The ad contained Attorney’s name, office address, telephone number, and
the following additional information: (i) “Attorney is a graduate of State University
Law School”; (ii) “Attorney has an MBA from City Graduate School of Business”;
and (iii) “Attorney is the only lawyer in town who speaks Spanish fluently.”
Is Attorney’s advertisement proper?
(A) Yes, if all statements contained therein are true and verifiable.
(B) Yes, provided City Newspaper’s distribution area is limited to City.
(C) No, because the ad is self-laudatory.
(D) No, because an MBA is not law-related.
XI. Judicial Ethics
A. ABA Code of Judicial Conduct
Governs judges, magistrates and referees.
B. General Obligations
1. Judges are judges 24 hours a day; must avoid impropriety and _______________
__________________________ (remember that lawyers have no “appearance of
impropriety” prohibition under the current ABA Rules, but judges do!).
a. Appearance of impropriety exists where judge’s conduct creates a

_______________________ that the judge has violated the CJC or
otherwise reflects adversely on the judge’s honesty, impartiality,
temperament or fitness for the job.
2. Must not abuse judicial prestige

LECTURE HANDOUT 33.
a. Must not use judicial letterhead for personal business
b. MAY write a ______________________ based on personal knowledge on

official letterhead if:
1) Judge indicates the reference is personal
2) There is no likelihood that the letter could reasonably be perceived

as an attempt to use judicial office to exert pressure
C. Impartiality, Competent, and Diligent Performance
1. Competence and diligence
a. Maintain knowledge,
b. Promptly dispose of court business and be punctual in attending court, and
c. Devote adequate time to duties.
2. Ex parte communications
Must not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications (i.e., from one side
only where no representative from the opposing side is present). If a judge
inadvertently receives a substantive ex parte communication, she must notify the
absent party and give opportunity to respond.
Three exceptions to prohibition:
a. Where expressly authorized by law (e.g., temporary restraining order)
b. Mediation or settlement ___________________________
c. Emergencies
3. Must avoid bias, prejudice and harassment (and make sure subordinates do the
same).
This includes that which is based on race, sex, gender, religion, national origin,
disability, age, socioeconomic status, ____________, ________________, and
_______________________.
4. Must be fair and impartial, and follow the law.
a. No external influences
34. LECTURE HANDOUT
1) Cannot independently investigate the facts of a case.
2) Consulting with other judges or court personnel is permitted, but

the judge must avoid receiving factual information and must
ultimately decide the matter independently.
3) If consulting with a disinterested expert, the parties must receive

(a) advance notice of the expert’s identity; (b) notice of advice to
be solicited from the expert; and (c) reasonable opportunity to
object and respond to the advice.
5. Must require decorum in court.
D. Disqualification
A judge ________________________ in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality

might reasonably (and objectively; not based on party’s whim) be questioned.
The judge should also disclose on the record any information the parties or their lawyers
might consider relevant as to disqualification, even if the judge does not believe there is a
reasonable basis to disqualify.
Grounds for disqualification:
1. Bias or personal knowledge concerning a party, a party’s lawyer, or relevant facts
2. Prior involvement, where the judge:
a. Served as a material witness in the matter
b. Served as a lawyer or public official in the matter, or as a judge in the

matter in another court
c. Was associated in law practice with a lawyer who was substantially

involved in the matter when they practiced together
3. When a former partner or close relative (within 3rd degree of relationship/closer

than a cousin) is a party, an attorney, or a witness in the proceeding
4. Economic interest
A judge must disqualify herself if she knows she has an economic interest
(personally or as a fiduciary) in the matter or in one of the parties before her,
except ________________________________.
LECTURE HANDOUT 35.
a. This includes interests held by the judge’s (1) spouse; (2) domestic
partner; (3) child (wherever the child resides); or (4) any other family
member who lives in the judge’s household.
b. Exceptions (these are not considered an economic interest): securities

held by an organization of which the judge is a member; mutual funds,
bank deposits, or mutual insurance policies (unless the proceedings could
affect value)
5. When a judge knows a party (or party’s lawyer or firm) has contributed more than
the jurisdiction’s specified amount to the judge’s election campaign committee
within a designated number of years prior to the judge’s election
6. When a judge or a candidate for judge makes a public statement (other than in a
court proceeding/opinion) that commits or appears to commit the judge ________
______________________________
Parties and lawyers can waive all grounds for disqualification, EXCEPT: _____________
___________________________________________.
PROBLEM NO. 8
Judge R is a member of the Board of Visitors of Santa Maria Orphans’ Home.

The Home owns more than 50,000 shares of stock in Union Oil Company of
Olympia. Judge R’s wife owns only three shares of stock in Franklin Refining &
Supply, Inc. Union Oil sues Franklin Refining for breach of an oil transfer
agreement. The case is assigned to Judge R. Judge R’s wife’s uncle represents
Union Oil in the suit. Aside from the foregoing, there is no reasonable ground to
doubt Judge R’s impartiality.
Which of the following is consistent with the Code of Judicial Conduct?
(A) Judge R may hear the case; he need not disqualify himself.
(B) Judge R must offer to disqualify himself because his wife’s uncle
represents Union Oil.
(C) Judge R must offer to disqualify himself because of his wife’s ownership
of the Franklin Refining stock.
(D) Judge R must offer to disqualify himself because of the Orphans’ Home’s
ownership of the Union Oil stock.
36. LECTURE HANDOUT
E. Extrajudicial Activities
1. Judges are encouraged to participate in personal and extrajudicial activities, but

must not participate in activities that will ______________________________,
interfere with the judge’s official duties, or otherwise appear to undermine the
judge’s integrity or impartiality.
2. Law-related organization
A judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a

government agency or private organization devoted to the improvement of the
law.
3. Educational, charitable, religious, or civil activities
a. A judge may assist in planning for fundraising, but must not __________
________________________, except from family members or from other
judges over whom the judge has no supervisory power.
b. A judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee, etc., unless the

organization is likely to be involved in proceedings in front of the judge or
will frequently be involved in adversarial proceedings in the court in
which the judge sits or one under its appellate jurisdiction.
4. Fiduciary activities
A judge is generally prohibited from serving as an executor, administrator,

trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary.
Exception: A judge may serve in such a capacity for a member of the judge’s
family, unless:
a. It interferes with the judge’s official duties;
b. It involves the judge in proceedings that would ordinarily come before

him; or
c. It involves the judge in adversarial proceedings in the court on which the

judge sits or under its appellate jurisdiction.
5. Participation in business
a. Generally prohibited; a judge must not be a business’s officer, director,

partner, manager, advisor, etc.
LECTURE HANDOUT 37.
b. Exception: A judge may hold and manage her own or her family
members’ investments and may participate in a personal or family
business, unless it:
1) Interferes with the judge’s duties;
2) Leads to frequent disqualification; or
3) Involves the judge in transactions or relationships with persons

likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
6. Teaching and writing articles is permitted.
7. A judge must not testify as a character witness except ___________________.
8. Membership in discriminatory organization
A judge must not belong to an organization that practices “invidious

discrimination” on one of these grounds: race, sex, gender, religion, national
origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.
a. Even if not a member, a judge must not use the benefits or facilities of the
organization (but may attend if it is an isolated event that cannot be
perceived as an endorsement of the organization’s practices).
b. Exception: A judge is allowed to be a member of a __________________

or certain organizations that are dedicated to preserving the ethnic or
cultural identities of its members.
9. Gifts
Judges must not accept gifts, loans, bequests or other things of value where
prohibited by law or where acceptance may appear to undermine impartiality.
Permitted gifts are subject to reporting requirements.
a. Duty to report
Gifts incident to a public testimonial; invitations to attend events without

charge, if the same invitations are offered to nonjudges; gifts, loans, or
anything of value from a person whose interests have come before the
judge or are likely to do so.
b. No duty to report
De minimis gifts (plaques, certificates); ordinary social hospitality;

scholarships, discounts, or prizes available to anyone; gifts from people
38. LECTURE HANDOUT
whose appearance or interest in a case would cause the judge to be

disqualified anyway (e.g., family and close friends).
10. Practice of law
A full-time judge must not practice law, except:
a. Pro se
b. Legal advice and drafting documents for family (but may not act in a
forum)
11. Reporting misconduct
a. If a judge personally KNOWS of substantial misconduct by another judge

or a lawyer, the judge must _______________________.
b. If the judge receives information indicating there is a “substantial

likelihood” of misconduct by another judge or a lawyer, the judge must
_____________________________________________.
F. Judges and Politics
If a judge is running for office, the judge/candidate must comply with the following
requirements.
1. May speak on behalf of his own candidacy, but must not make speeches on behalf
of a political organization or hold office in a political organization.
2. Must not, with respect to cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come
before the court, make _______________________________ that are inconsistent
with impartial performance of duties.
3. Must not publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office.
4. Must take reasonable steps to ensure others (including family members) do not do
what the judge/candidate may not do.
5. May respond to false or misleading statements issued by an opponent or the

media with a factually accurate response (this may be done personally, but
preferably through someone else).
6. Candidates _________________________________ campaign contributions, but

may raise funds through a campaign committee for a specified period before and a
specified number of days after the election. Candidates must meet all reporting
requirements.
LECTURE HANDOUT 39.
FINAL REMINDERS
The exam concerns the ABA Model Rules, not state rules or logic.
You are a lawyer with professional obligations, 24/7, worldwide.
GOOD LUCK!
MPRE MAXIMIZER
Now that you’ve completed

your MPRE review,
it’s time to maximize!
Use this quick-study tool to:
• Review the quickest rules and exceptions so

you don’t miss any softball questions
• Take a bird’s-eye view of broad topic areas to

confirm your understanding
• Increase your confidence on exam day

You have no duty to volunteer facts In ex parte proceedings, you must inform the court
that might help the other side. of all material facts that will enable it to make an
informed decision.
You must not charge a contingent fee

You can in a domestic relations case if collecting a
(1) when representing a defendant in a
post-judgment balance due under an existing order
criminal case or (2) in a domestic for child support, alimony, etc.
relations case.
You may pay the reasonable fees of an Such fees much never be contingent on the content
of the testimony or the outcome of the case.
expert witness.
You generally must not have sexual You can if a consensual sexual relationship already
relations with a client. existed when the representation started (but still
check for a “material limitation” conflict).
If you withdraw or are fired, you must You generally don’t need to refund a “true retainer”
refund all unearned fees and expenses fee (money that was paid by the client solely to
that were paid by the client in advance. ensure your availability).
You generally must not limit your You can if the client is independently represented in
malpractice liability in advance. making the agreement.
You must communicate the basis or You don’t need to repeat yourself if you have
rate of the fee to the client before or regularly represented the client in the same type of
matter and will be charging the client on the same
within a reasonable time after the basis or rate.
representation begins.
A judge generally must not testify as a The judge can do so if duly summoned to testify (e.g.,
character witness. by subpoena).
You may refer a client to a lawyer or a The reciprocal referral agreement must not be
nonlawyer professional pursuant to a exclusive, and the referred client must be informed of
the existence and nature of the agreement.
reciprocal referral agreement.
You must not bring/defend a frivolous When representing a criminal defendant (or any
proceeding or take a frivolous position. client who may be incarcerated), you can require that
the prosecutor prove every element.

INFORMED INFORMED INFORMED
CONSENT CONSENT/AGREEMENT CONSENT/AGREEMENT
CONFIRMED IN IN WRITING
WRITING SIGNED BY CLIENT
• Limiting the scope • Most waivable • Business transaction

of the conflicts of interest* with/pecuniary
representation • Direct interest adverse to
adversity/material client
• Third person paying limitation
client’s legal fees • Former clients & • Aggregate
employment settlement between
• Providing a • Prospective clients clients
materially harmful • Government work
evaluation of • Prior involvement • Contingent fee
client’s affairs for in matter as judge, agreement
use by a third arbitrator, etc.
person
* But certain imputed
• Revealing client’s conflicts can be cured
confidential with just
information or using screening/written
notice
it to their
disadvantage (unless
exception applies or • Client’s agreement
otherwise permitted to fee-splitting
by RPC) arrangement with
attorney at different
firm

A lawyer wants to share a legal fee with an attorney at a different law firm. Although
lawyers may refer clients to each other, keep in mind that true referral fees (in which one
of the lawyers is not involved with or responsible for the case) are not allowed. Make
sure that the split is proportional to the work done by each lawyer, OR each lawyer
assumes joint responsibility for the representation. Additionally, the total fee must be
reasonable and the client must consent to the arrangement and its terms.
A client asks a lawyer to testify on the client’s behalf or otherwise act as the client’s
advocate at a legislative or administrative proceeding. This is allowed, but the lawyer
must disclose that they are acting in a representative capacity. The lawyer does NOT
need to identify the client.
A client, lawyer, and/or some third party are in dispute over funds held by the lawyer.
The lawyer must keep the disputed portion separate in the client trust account until the
dispute is resolved. The other side of this rule is that the lawyer must promptly distribute
the undisputed portion.
Multiple clients ask a lawyer to represent them in the same civil matter. If the clients’
interests are already antagonistic, the lawyer should decline. If their interests are
harmonious but potentially adverse, the lawyer must address the “significant risk of
material limitation” conflict (must reasonably believe that competent and diligent
representation is possible and must obtain the clients’ informed consent, confirmed in
writing). If during the course of the matter the clients’ interests actually become adverse,
the lawyer must re-address the conflict and may be forced to withdraw.
A subordinate lawyer violates a disciplinary rule. Is a partner in the firm responsible? For
purposes of civil liability (if the client is injured), each partner is liable for the firm’s
obligations. But the partner will only be subject to discipline if the firm did not have
adequate training or supervision measures in place for its members, or if the partner
ordered, ratified, or knew about and failed to mitigate the particular misconduct. A
partner has the same responsibility with respect to a nonlawyer’s actions.
A client wants to compensate a lawyer with nonmonetary property or by giving the

lawyer an interest in a business. Although generally permitted, such arrangements are
subject to the rule governing business transactions with clients (must be fair to the
client, etc.). Also, make sure that the arrangement does not involve a prohibited
proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject of litigation.
A lawyer representing a client adverse to an organization wants to interview an

employee of the organization. The rule that prohibits a lawyer from communicating with
a represented person without their counsel’s consent also limits communications with
constituents of represented organizations. However, the lawyer is only prohibited from
communicating with certain categories of constituents. If the employee is not high-
ranking, does not regularly consult with the organization’s counsel about the case, and
did not commit the conduct at issue, they are likely fair game for an interview.

You dropped the Was it permissible
ball & disclosed because the
CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT gave
INFORMATION! informed consent
Implied or it was impliedly
Now what?
Yes Authority
authorized?
Informed
Consent
Does an No
EXCEPTION
apply?
• Candor to the
Is tribunal
confidentiality • Outside reporting
SUPERSEDED of corporate
No by a different violations
Yes ethics rule
(rare)?
• Prevent reasonably certain death or substantial Yes

bodily harm
• Prevent, mitigate, or rectify substantial financial
injury to another based on the client’s future or
No
past crime/fraud IF the client is using or has used
the lawyer’s services in furtherance of the act
• Establish claim or defense on the lawyer’s behalf
in a dispute between the lawyer and client (e.g.,
malpractice or fee dispute) or in a proceeding
concerning the representation
• Obtain legal ethics advice
• Comply with court order or other law
• Detect or resolve conflicts of interest arising out
of merger, sale, or change of employment
SUBJECT TO
DISCIPLINE
You must not You can’t make a
commingle your false statement of
own funds with You generally can’t
material fact to a
client funds or any knowingly disobey a
other funds held in third person in
court rule or order.
connection with a connection with a
representation. representation.
You can put your You can “puff” on

own funds into a issues like estimates You can openly
client trust account of price or value, or refuse to obey for
for the sole purpose a party’s intentions the purpose of
of paying bank as to settlement. making a good
service charges on These aren’t faith challenge to
that account. considered material its validity.
facts.
STOP AND GO
You are generally
You can participate
permitted to report
in a group or
another lawyer’s
prepaid legal
You are generally misconduct, and
services plan that
free to reject any may be required to
uses personal
case. do so if it raises a
contacts to enroll
“substantial
members or sell
question” about the
subscriptions.
lawyer.
You can’t In a civil case, you

participate in a plan shouldn’t threaten
You can’t seek to disciplinary charges
that uses personal
avoid a court
contacts if you own for the purpose of
appointment except
or direct the obtaining an
for good cause.
organization that advantage for your
operates the plan. client.

Opposing Client of Lawyer Private Work Using
Who Left Firm Confidential Government
Information Against a Person
SAME or
SUBSTANTIALLY ACTUALLY
RELATED matter & RECEIVED
Representing Current Client At least one LAWYER “CONFIDENTIAL
(General Rule) REMAINING IN THE GOVERNMENT
FIRM HAS MATERIAL INFORMATION”
DIRECTLY ADVERSE CONFIDENTIAL about a person while in
to another current client INFORMATION about government service
OR it
Opposing Prospective Client
&
SIGNIFICANT RISK OF The information could
MATERIAL SAME or MATERIALLY
LIMITATION based on SUBSTANTIALLY DISADVANTAGE the
own interests or duties person
RELATED matter
&
to another
Government Work Following
Gained
Private Work
Opposing Former Client information
during the SAME matter
SAME or consultation that could
SIGNIFICANTLY HARM
&
SUBSTANTIALLY WAS PERSONALLY
the prospective client
RELATED matter AND SUBSTANTIALLY
Private Work Following INVOLVED
Opposing Former Firm’s Government Work
Client Prior Involvement in Matter
SAME “MATTER” as Judge, Judicial Officer, Law
SAME or SUBSTANTIALLY (specific facts and Clerk, or Third-Party Neutral
RELATED matter parties)
&
SAME matter
ACQUIRED &
MATERIAL WAS PERSONALLY WAS PERSONALLY
CONFIDENTIAL AND AND SUBSTANTIALLY
INFORMATION INVOLVED
SUBSTANTIALLY
while at former firm
INVOLVED
• You can advance a client’s court costs • You must not provide any other
and expenses (and can agree to financial assistance to a client in
forgive repayment if the client loses). connection with pending or
contemplated litigation.
• If a client is indigent, you can pay
their court costs and expenses
outright.
• You can talk with an unrepresented • You must not state or imply that
person about your client’s matter. you are disinterested.
• If the unrepresented person’s

interests conflict with your client’s
interests, you must not give them
any legal advice (other than to
obtain counsel).
• You can advertise that you do or do • You must not state or imply that
not practice in particular areas of you are certified as a specialist in a
law, or that you “concentrate” in or particular area of law, unless you
“specialize” in that area as long as are in fact certified as a specialist by
such communications are not false an approved organization that is
or misleading. clearly identified in the
communication.
• You may refuse to offer evidence • You must not refuse to offer the
that you reasonably believe (but testimony of a criminal defendant
do not know) is false. in this situation.
• A full-time judge may: • A full-time judge must not

• Act pro se. otherwise practice law. This
• Provide legal advice to, and includes acting as a family member’s
draft and review documents lawyer in any forum.
for, a member of her family
without compensation.

If you speak to a represented person about You may be subject to discipline for engaging in
your client’s matter without knowledge that dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation
they have counsel, the rule for communicating even if such conduct was unrelated to your law
with unrepresented persons applies—you must practice.
not appear to be disinterested, etc.
A conflict based on a lawyer’s personal interest
If your client has diminished capacity, you still (e.g., family relationship) is not imputed to
owe them a duty of confidentiality. However, other lawyers in the firm—unless there is a
you are “impliedly authorized” under the duty significant risk it would materially limit their
of confidentiality to reveal information to the representation of the client.
extent necessary to protect the client from
substantial harm.
The duty of candor to the tribunal (correcting
Avoiding “impropriety” or the appearance of false statements; remedying false evidence)
impropriety is a standard for judges, not expires at the end of the proceeding—when a
lawyers. final judgment has been affirmed on appeal or
the time for appeal has expired. If after this
Imputed conflicts based on the disqualified point you find out that a witness lied, you are
lawyer’s prior dealings (representations, generally under no obligation to disclose it.
consultations, employment, involvement in
matter) are often curable by screening the If you can’t disclose the extent of a conflict to a
lawyer, making sure the lawyer does not share client because of your duty of confidentiality to
in the fees, and notifying the affected parties. someone else, the conflict is not waivable
because you are unable to meet the “informed
It’s fine for represented opposing parties to talk consent” requirement.
directly to each other, and you can advise your
client regarding such communications. Discipline and civil liability are separate. In a
malpractice case, your ethics violation is
When it looks like there is a conflict based on relevant evidence that your conduct was below
your prior government work on the same the standard of care, but it does not create a
matter, make sure that the “matter” involved presumption of malpractice. On the other side
specific facts and parties. For example, the of the coin, if you breached a duty to the client,
drafting of regulations that do not involve you cannot escape discipline by reimbursing
specific facts or parties is generally not a the client for their loss.
“matter” for purposes of this rule.
You are not assisting in the unauthorized
You cannot escape discipline by violating the practice of law if you advise a person on how to
rules through the acts of another person. This appear pro se.
usually comes up when you send a nonlawyer
agent to contact someone who you’re not You can’t be on opposite sides of the same
allowed to contact yourself. litigation.

MPRE Babri

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MPRE Babri

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MPRE Babri

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main components of the MPRE study materials?

What are the main components of the MPRE study materials?

What should you do when taking a practice exam?

What should you do when taking a practice exam?

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (i)

Here’s what you’ll ﬁnd in this book:

PR-03-INTRODUCTION---P.indd 1 1/7/2016 2:26:48 PM

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRACTICE EXAMS

PR-07-prct-exam-instruct--P.indd 173 1/7/2016 11:30:35 AM

PR-07-prct-exam-instruct--P.indd 174 1/7/2016 11:30:35 AM

I. REGULATION OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION

1) Ethics Rules—The American Bar Association (“ABA”) Model Rules and

c. Congress and State Legislatures

2. The Federal System

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 1 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

3. Regulation by Multiple States

B. ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

b. Failure to Disclose Information

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 2 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

2. Character and Fitness—“Good Moral Character”

1) Burden of Proof and Duties of Applicant

b. Conduct Relevant to Moral Character

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 3 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

a) “Adolescent Misbehavior” and Civil Disobedience

3) Concealment of Past Conduct Constitutes Moral Turpitude

3. Citizenship and Residency Are Not Valid Requirements

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 4 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

C. REGULATION AFTER ADMISSION

a. Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct

b. Certain Criminal Acts

2) Lawyer L is arrested for soliciting sexual acts from an undercover

c. Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit, or Misrepresentation

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 5 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

d. Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 6 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

2. Duty to Report Professional Misconduct

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 7 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 8 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 9 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

a. Conﬂicts of Interest—Choice of Law Agreements Permitted

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 10 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 11 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

d. Other Temporary Practice Arising Out of Practice in Home State

e. Temporary Practice by Foreign Lawyers

b. Legal Services Authorized by Federal or Local Law

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 12 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

Example: Lawyer L is admitted to practice law in New York, and he is admitted

4. Consequences of Multi-Jurisdictional Practice

5. Unauthorized Practice by Nonlawyers

a. General Considerations in Deﬁning “Practice of Law”

1) Activities Constituting Law Practice

2) Activities Not Constituting Law Practice

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 13 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

b. Consequences of Unauthorized Practice

c. Delegating Work to Nonlawyer Assistants

d. Training Nonlawyers for Law-Related Work

II. THE LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP—GENERAL POINTS

PR-05-outline & DIVIDER-R.indd 14 12/14/2017 12:29:25 PM

b. Consequences of Unauthorized Practice

c. Delegating Work to Nonlawyer Assistants