Quotient Rings of Polynomial Rings
Quotient Rings of Polynomial Rings
Quotient Rings of Polynomial Rings
In words, this means that a(x) and b(x) are congruent mod p(x) if they differ by a multiple of p(x). In
equation form, this says a(x) − b(x) = k(x) · p(x) for some k(x) ∈ F [x], or a(x) = b(x) + k(x) · p(x) for some
k(x) ∈ F [x].
Lemma. Let R be a commutative ring, and suppose a(x), b(x), p(x) ∈ R[x]. Then a(x) = b(x) (mod p(x))
if and only if a(x) + hp(x)i = b(x) + hp(x)i.
Proof. Suppose a(x) = b(x) (mod p(x)). Then a(x) = b(x) + k(x) · p(x) for some k(x) ∈ R[x]. Hence,
Hence,
a(x) = b(x) + k(x) · p(x) for some k(x) ∈ R[x].
This means that a(x) = b(x) (mod p(x)).
Depending on the situation, I may write a(x) = b(x) (mod p(x)) or a(x) + hp(x)i = b(x) + hp(x)i.
Example. (A quotient ring of the rational polynomial ring) Take p(x) = x − 2 in Q[x]. Then two
polynomials are congruent mod x − 2 if they differ by a multiple of x − 2.
(b) By the Remainder Theorem, when f (x) = x3 − 4x2 + x + 11 is divided by x − 2, the remainder is
f (2) = 23 − 4 · 22 + 2 + 11 = 5.
Thus,
x3 − 4x2 + x + 11 = (x − 2)q(x) + 5
x3 − 4x2 + x + 11 = 5 (mod x − 2)
1
(c) I’ll use the First Isomorphism Theorem. Define φ : Q[x] → Q by
φ (f (x)) = f (2).
That is, φ evaluates a polynomial at x = 2. Note that
φ (f (x) + g(x)) = f (2) + g(2) = φ (f (x)) + φ (g(x)) and φ (f (x)g(x)) = f (2)g(2) = φ (f (x)) φ (g(x)) ,
It follows that φ is a ring map.
I claim that ker φ = hx − 2i. Now f (x) ∈ ker φ if and only if
f (2) = φ (f (x)) = 0.
That is, f (x) ∈ ker φ if and only if 2 is a root of f . By the Root Theorem, this is equivalent to
x − 2 | f (x), which is equivalent to f (x) ∈ hx − 2i.
Next, I’ll show that φ is surjective. Let q ∈ Q. I can think of q as a constant polynomial, and doing so,
φ(q) = q. Therefore, φ is surjective.
Using these results,
Q[x] Q[x]
= ≈ im φ = Q.
hx − 2i ker φ
The first equality follows from the fact that hx − 2i = ker φ. The isomorphism follows from the First
Isomorphism Theorem. The second equality follows from the fact that φ is surjective.
F [x]
In the last example, was a field. The next result says that this is the case exactly when p(x) is
hp(x)i
irreducible.
F [x]
Theorem. is a field if and only if p(x) is irreducible.
hp(x)i
F [x]
Proof. Since F [x] is a commutative ring with identity, so is .
hp(x)i
F [x]
Suppose p(x) is irreducible. I need to show that is a field. I need to show that nonzero elements
hp(x)i
are invertible.
F [x]
Take a nonzero element of — say a(x) + hp(x)i, for a(x) ∈ F [x]. What does it mean for
hp(x)i
a(x) + hp(x)i to be nonzero? It means that a(x) ∈ / hp(x)i, so p(x) 6 | a(x).
Now what is the greatest common divisor of a(x) and p(x)? Well, (a(x), p(x)) | p(x), but p(x) is
irreducible — its only factors are units and unit multiples of p(x).
Suppose (a(x), p(x)) = k · p(x), where k ∈ F and k 6= 0. Then k · p(x) | a(x), i.e. k · p(x)b(x) = a(x) for
some b(x). But then p(x)[k · b(x)] = a(x) shows that p(x) | a(x), contrary to assumption.
The only other possibility is that (a(x), p(x)) = k, where k ∈ F and k 6= 0. So I can find polynomials
m(x), n(x), such that
a(x)m(x) + p(x)n(x) = k.
Then
1 1
a(x) · m(x) + p(x) · n(x) = 1.
k k
Hence,
1 1
a(x) · m(x) + p(x) · n(x) + hp(x)i = 1 + hp(x)i
k k
1
a(x) · m(x) + hp(x)i = 1 + hp(x)i
k
1
(a(x) + hp(x)i) m(x) + hp(x)i = 1 + hp(x)i
k
2
1
This shows that m(x) + hp(x)i is the multiplicative inverse of a(x) + hp(x)i. Therefore, a(x) + hp(x)i
k
F [x]
is invertible, and is a field.
hp(x)i
Going the other way, suppose that p(x) is not irreducible. Then I can find polynomials c(x), d(x) such
that p(x) = c(x)d(x), where c(x) and d(x) both have smaller degree than p(x).
Because c(x) and d(x) have smaller degree than p(x), they’re not divisible by p(x). In particular,
c(x) + hp(x)i =
6 0 and d(x) + hp(x)i =
6 0.
F [x]
This shows that has zero divisors. Therefore, it’s not an integral domain — and since fields are
hp(x)i
integral domains, it can’t be a field, either.
Q[x]
Example. (A quotient ring which is not an integral domain) Prove that is not an integral
hx2 − 1i
domain by exhibiting a pair of zero divisors.
(x − 1)(x + 1) = x2 − 1 = 0 mod x2 − 1 .
Q[x]
Example. (A quotient ring which is a field) (a) Show that is a field.
hx2 + 2x + 2i
Q[x]
(b) Find the inverse of (x3 + 1) + hx2 + 2x + 2i in .
hx2 + 2x + 2i
(a) Since x2 + 2x + 2 = (x + 1)2 + 1 > 0 for all x ∈ Q, it follows that x2 + 2x + 2 has no rational roots.
Hence, it’s irreducible, and the quotient ring is a field.
x2 5x 3
x3 + 1 - − +
2 4 2
x 1
x2 + 2x + 2 x−2 −
2 4
x 1
2x + 5 − 1
2 4
13 8x 20
+ 0
4 13 13
Therefore,
x2
13 5x 3 x 1
= − + (x2 + 2x + 2) − − (x3 + 1).
4 2 4 2 2 4
3
Hence,
x2
4 5x 3 4 x 1
1= − + (x2 + 2x + 2) − − (x3 + 1).
13 2 4 2 13 2 4
Reducing mod x2 + 2x + 2, I get
4 x 1
1 + hx2 + 2x + 2i = − − (x3 + 1) + hx2 + 2x + 2i
13 2 4
4 x 1
1 + hx2 + 2x + 2i = − + hx2 + 2x + 2i (x3 + 1) + hx2 + 2x + 2i
−
13 2 4
4 x 1
Thus, − − + hx2 + 2x + 2i is the inverse of (x3 + 1) + hx2 + 2x + 2i.
13 2 4
Z2 [x]
Example. (A field with 4 elements) (a) Prove that is a field.
hx2 + x + 1i
(b) Find ax + b ∈ Z2 [x] so that
Z2 [x]
(c) Construct addition and multiplication tables for .
hx2 + x + 1i
(a) Let f (x) = x2 + x + 1. Then f (0) = 1 and f (1) = 1. Since f has no roots in Z2 , it’s irreducible. Hence,
Z2 [x]
2
is a field.
hx + x + 1i
(b) By the Division Algorithm,
x4 + x3 + 1 = (x2 + x + 1)(x2 + 1) + x.
This equation says that x4 + x3 + 1 and x differ by a multiple of x2 + x + 1, so they represent the same
coset mod x2 + x + 1.
Therefore,
(x4 + x3 + 1) + hx2 + x + 1i = x + hx2 + x + 1i.
(c) By the Division Algorithm, if f (x) ∈ Z2 [x], then
Z2 [x]
There are two possibilities for a and two for b, a total of 4. It follows that is a field with
hx2 + x + 1i
4 elements. The elements are
Z2 [x]
Here are the addition and multiplication tables for :
hx2 + x + 1i
+ 0 1 x x+1
0 0 1 x x+1
1 1 0 x+1 x
x x x+1 0 1
x+1 x+1 x 1 0
4
· 0 1 x x+1
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 x x+1
x 0 x x+1 1
x+1 0 x+1 1 x
The addition table is fairly easy to understand: For example, x + (x + 1) = 1, because 2x = 0 (mod 2).
For the multiplication table, take x · x as an example. x · x = x2 ; I apply the Division Algorithm to get
x2 = 1 · (x2 + x + 1) + (x + 1).
So x · x = x + 1 mod x2 + x + 1 .
Alternatively, you can use the fact that in the quotient ring x2 + x + 1 = 0 (omitting the coset notation),
2
so x = x + 1 (remember that −1 = 1 in Zs ).
Remark. In the same way, you can construct a field of order pn for any prime n and any n ≥ 1. Just take
Zp [x]
Zp [x] and form the quotient ring , where f (x) is an irreducible polynomial of degree n.
hf (x)i
Z3 [x]
Example. (Computations in a quotient ring) (a) Show that is a field.
hx3 + 2x + 1i
Z3 [x]
(b) How many elements are there in ?
hx3 + 2x + 1i
(c) Compute
(x2 + x + 2) + hx3 + 2x + 1i (2x2 + 1) + hx3 + 2x + 1i .
x 0 1 2
x3 + 2x + 1 (mod 3) 1 1 1
Z3 [x]
Since x3 + 2x + 1 is a cubic, it follows that it’s irreducible. Hence, is a field.
hx3 + 2x + 1i
Z3 [x]
(b) By the Division Algorithm, every element of can be written in the form
hx3 + 2x + 1i
5
Therefore,
(2x4 + 2x3 + 2x2 + x + 2) + hx3 + 2x + 1i = x2 + hx3 + 2x + 1i.
(d) Apply the Extended Euclidean algorithm:
x3 + 2x + 1 - x2 + 2x + 1
x2 + 1 x x+2
x+1 x+2 1
2 2x + 2 0
Hence,
(x2 + 1) + hx3 + 2x + 1i = (2x2 + x + 2) + hx3 + 2x + 1i.
−1
c 2018 by Bruce Ikenaga 6