Chapter17 (Variable & Absorption Costing)
Chapter17 (Variable & Absorption Costing)
Chapter17 (Variable & Absorption Costing)
4. All of the following costs are inventoried under absorption costing except:
A. direct materials.
B. direct labor.
C. variable manufacturing overhead.
D. fixed manufacturing overhead.
E. fixed administrative salaries.
8. Lone Star has computed the following unit costs for the year just ended:
Under variable costing, each unit of the company's inventory would be carried at:
A. $35.
B. $55.
C. $65.
D. $84.
E. some other amount.
Chapter 17 529
9. Prescott Corporation has computed the following unit costs for the year just ended:
Under absorption costing, each unit of the company's inventory would be carried at:
A. $75.
B. $107.
C. $116.
D. $133.
E. some other amount.
10. Santa Fe Corporation has computed the following unit costs for the year just ended:
Which of the following choices correctly depicts the per-unit cost of inventory under variable
costing and absorption costing?
A. Variable, $85; absorption, $105.
B. Variable, $85; absorption, $116.
C. Variable, $103; absorption, $105.
D. Variable, $103; absorption, $116.
E. Some other combination of figures not listed above.
Indiana Company incurred the following costs during the past year when planned production and
actual production each totaled 20,000 units:
12. If Indiana uses variable costing, the total inventoriable costs for the year would be:
A. $400,000.
B. $460,000.
C. $560,000.
D. $620,000.
E. $660,000.
Chapter 17 531
14. Consider the following comments about absorption- and variable-costing income statements:
15. Roberts, which began business at the start of the current year, had the following data:
The gross margin that the company would disclose on an absorption-costing income statement
is:
A. $97,500.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
The contribution margin that the company would disclose on an absorption-costing income
statement is:
A. $0.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
17. Chicago began business at the start of the current year. The company planned to produce
25,000 units, and actual production conformed to expectations. Sales totaled 22,000 units at
$30 each. Costs incurred were:
If there were no variances, the company's absorption-costing net income would be:
A. $190,000.
B. $202,000.
C. $208,000.
D. $220,000.
E. some other amount.
Chapter 17 533
18. Norton, which began business at the start of the current year, had the following data:
The contribution margin that the company would disclose on a variable-costing income
statement is:
A. $97,500.
B. $147,000.
C. $166,500.
D. $370,000.
E. some other amount.
19. Madison began business at the start of the current year. The company planned to produce
30,000 units, and actual production conformed to expectations. Sales totaled 28,000 units at
$32 each. Costs incurred were:
If there were no variances, the company's variable-costing net income would be:
A. $270,000.
B. $292,000.
C. $308,000.
D. $532,000.
E. some other amount.
Franz began business at the start of this year and had the following costs: variable manufacturing cost
per unit, $9; fixed manufacturing costs, $60,000; variable selling and administrative costs per unit, $2;
and fixed selling and administrative costs, $220,000. The company sells its units for $45 each.
Additional data follow.
Chapter 17 535
23. Income reported under absorption costing and variable costing is:
A. always the same.
B. typically different.
C. always higher under absorption costing.
D. always higher under variable costing.
E. always the same or higher under absorption costing.
24. Gomez's inventory increased during the year. On the basis of this information, income
reported under absorption costing:
A. will be the same as that reported under variable costing.
B. will be higher than that reported under variable costing.
C. will be lower than that reported under variable costing.
D. will differ from that reported under variable costing, the direction of which cannot be
determined from the information given.
E. will be less than that reported in the previous period.
25. Which of the following conditions would cause absorption-costing net income to be lower
than variable-costing net income?
A. Units sold exceeded units produced.
B. Units sold equaled units produced.
C. Units sold were less than units produced.
D. Sales prices decreased.
E. Selling expenses increased.
26. Which of the following situations would cause variable-costing net income to be lower than
absorption-costing net income?
A. Units sold equaled 39,000 and units produced equaled 42,000.
B. Units sold and units produced were both 42,000.
C. Units sold equaled 55,000 and units produced equaled 49,000.
D. Sales prices decreased by $7 per unit during the accounting period.
E. Selling expenses increased by 10% during the accounting period.
I.Yearly income reported under absorption costing will differ from income reported under
variable costing if production and sales volumes differ.
II.Long-run, total income reported under absorption costing will often be close to that reported
under variable costing.
III.Differences in income under absorption and variable costing can often be reconciled by
multiplying the change in inventory (in units) by the variable manufacturing overhead
cost per unit.
28. Which of the following formulas can often reconcile the difference between absorption- and
variable-costing net income?
A. Change in inventory units x predetermined variable-overhead rate per unit.
B. Change in inventory units ÷ predetermined variable-overhead rate per unit.
C. Change in inventory units x predetermined fixed-overhead rate per unit.
D. Change in inventory units ÷ predetermined fixed-overhead rate per unit.
E. (Absorption-costing net income - variable-costing net income) x fixed-overhead rate per
unit.
29. Monex reported $65,000 of net income for the year by using absorption costing. The
company had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 20,000 units, and sales
of 18,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $20 per unit, and total budgeted
fixed manufacturing overhead was $100,000. If there were no variances, net income under
variable costing would be:
A. $15,000.
B. $55,000.
C. $65,000.
D. $75,000.
E. $115,000.
Chapter 17 537
30. Canyon reported $106,000 of net income for the year by using variable costing. The company
had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 50,000 units, and sales of
47,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $15 per unit, and total budgeted
fixed manufacturing overhead was $150,000. If there were no variances, net income under
absorption costing would be:
A. $52,000.
B. $97,000.
C. $106,000.
D. $115,000.
E. $160,000.
31. Consider the following statements about absorption costing and variable costing:
32. Consider the following statements about absorption costing and variable costing:
35. Which of the following methods defines product cost as the unit-level cost incurred each time
a unit is manufactured?
A. Throughput costing.
B. Indirect costing.
C. Process costing.
D. Absorption costing.
E. Back-flush costing.
36. Orion's management recently committed to incurring direct labor and all manufacturing
overhead charges regardless of the number of units produced. Under throughput costing, the
company's cost of goods sold would include charges for:
A. selling and administrative costs.
B. direct materials.
C. direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
D. direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead.
E. direct materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead, and selling and administrative
costs.
Chapter 17 539
37. Highline Company reported the following costs for the year just ended:
If Highline uses throughput costing and had sales revenues for the period
of $950,000, which of the following choices correctly depicts the
company's cost of goods sold and net income?
Cost of Net
Goods Sold Income
A. $180,000 $45,000
B. $180,000 $645,000
C. $305,000 $45,000
D. $305,000 $645,000
E. Some other combination of figures not listed above.
39. Which of the following differs between absorption costing and variable costing?
A. The number of units produced.
B. The fixed-overhead volume variance.
C. Sales revenues.
D. The treatment of variable manufacturing overhead.
E. Income tax rates.
Required:
Determine which of the nine statements:
A. Relate only to absorption costing.
B. Relate only to variable costing.
C. Relate to both absorption costing and variable costing.
D. Relate to neither absorption costing nor variable costing.
Answer:
A. 3, 6, 8, 9
B. 2, 7
C. 1, 4
D. 5
Chapter 17 541
Miscellaneous Calculations: Variable and Absorption Costing
41. Information taken from Grille Corporation's May accounting records follows.
Required:
A. Assuming the use of variable costing, compute the inventoriable costs for the month.
B. Compute the month's inventoriable costs by using absorption costing.
C. Assume that anticipated and actual production totaled 20,000 units, and that 18,000 units
were sold during May. Determine the amount of fixed manufacturing overhead and fixed
selling and administrative costs that would be expensed for the month under (1) variable
costing and (2) absorption costing.
D. Assume the same data as in requirement "C." Compute the contribution margin that
would be reported on a variable-costing income statement.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A
Answer:
A. Direct materials used $150,000
Direct labor 80,000
Variable manufacturing overhead 30,000
Total $260,000
42. Sosa, Inc., began operations at the start of the current year, having a production target of
60,000 units. Actual production totaled 60,000 units, and the company sold 90% of its
manufacturing output at $55 per unit. The following costs were incurred:
Manufacturing:
Direct materials used $300,000
Direct labor 420,000
Variable manufacturing overhead 360,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead 600,000
Selling and administrative:
Variable 120,000
Fixed 630,000
Required:
A. Assuming the use of variable costing, compute the cost of Sosa's ending finished-goods
inventory.
B. Compute the company's contribution margin. Would Sosa disclose the contribution
margin on a variable-costing income statement or an absorption-costing income
statement?
C. Assuming the use of absorption costing, how much fixed selling and administrative cost
would Sosa include in the ending finished-goods inventory?
D. Compute the company's gross margin.
Answer:
A. Variable production costs total $1,080,000 ($300,000 + $420,000 + $360,000), or $18
per unit ($1,080,000 ÷ 60,000 units). Since 6,000 units remain in inventory [0 + 60,000
- (60,000 x 90%)], the ending finished goods totals $108,000 (6,000 x $18).
C. None. All fixed selling and administrative cost is treated as a period cost and expensed
against revenue.
D. The cost of a unit would increase by $10 ($600,000 ÷ 60,000 units) because of the
addition of fixed manufacturing overhead. Thus:
Chapter 17 543
Absorption- and Variable-Costing Income Calculations
43. The following data relate to Venture Company, a new corporation, during a period when the
firm produced and sold 100,000 units and 90,000 units, respectively:
The company met its original planned production target of 100,000 units. There were no
variances during the period, and the firm's selling price is $15 per unit.
Required:
A. What is the cost of Venture's end-of-period finished-goods inventory under the variable-
costing method?
B. Calculate the company's variable-costing net income.
C. Calculate the company's absorption-costing net income.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A
Answer:
A. Ending finished-goods inventory (units): 0 + 100,000 - 90,000 = 10,000
Inventoriable costs under variable costing:
Variable cost per unit produced: $720,000 ÷ 100,000 units = $7.20 per unit
Ending inventory: 10,000 units x $7.20 = $72,000
Chapter 17 545
Absorption- and Variable-Costing Inventory/Income Calculations
Required:
A. Determine the number of units in the ending finished-goods inventory.
B. Calculate the cost of the ending finished-goods inventory under (1) variable costing and
(2) absorption costing.
C. Determine the company's variable-costing net income.
D. Determine the company's absorption-costing net income.
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A
Answer:
A. Ending finished-goods inventory: 0 + 200,000 - 170,000 = 30,000 units
45. Kim, Inc., began business at the start of the current year and maintains its accounting records
on an absorption-cost basis. The following selected information appeared on the company's
income statement and end-of-year balance sheet:
Income-statement data:
Sales revenues (35,000 units x $22) $770,000
Gross margin 210,000
Total sales and administrative expenses 160,000
Balance-sheet data:
Ending finished-goods inventory (12,000 units) 192,000
Kim achieved its planned production level for the year. The company's fixed manufacturing
overhead totaled $141,000, and the firm paid a 10% commission based on gross sales dollars
to its sales force.
Required:
A. How many units did Kim plan to produce during the year.
B. How much fixed manufacturing overhead did the company apply to each unit produced?
C. Compute Kim's cost of goods sold.
D. How much variable cost did the company attach to each unit manufactured?
LO: 1, 2, 3 Type: A, N
Chapter 17 547
Answer:
A. Sales (35,000 units) + ending finished-goods inventory (12,000 units) = production
(47,000 units). Note: There is no beginning finished-goods inventory.
B. Since planned and actual production figures are the same, Kim applied $3 to each unit
($141,000 ÷ 47,000 units).
D. Kim attached $13 to each unit. This figure can be derived by analyzing cost of goods
sold:
The same $13 figure can be obtained by studying the ending finished-good inventory:
46. Houston Company has per-unit fixed and variable manufacturing costs of $40 and $15,
respectively. Variable selling and administrative costs are $9 per unit. Consider the two cases
that follow for the firm.
Case A: Variable-costing net income, $110,000; sales, 6,000 units; production, 6,000
units
Case B: Variable-costing net income, $178,000; sales, 7,500 units; production, 7,100
units
Required:
A. From a product-costing perspective, what is the basic difference between absorption
costing and variable costing?
B. Compute Houston's absorption-costing net income in Case A.
C. Compute Houston's absorption-costing net income in Case B.
Answer:
A. The difference between absorption costing and variable costing lies in the treatment of
fixed manufacturing overhead. Under absorption costing, fixed manufacturing overhead
is a product cost and attached to each unit produced. In contrast, under variable costing, it
is written off (expensed) as a period cost.
B. Since the number of units sold equals the number of units produced, variable- and
absorption-income figures are the same: $110,000.
C. With sales of 7,500 units and production of 7,100 units, income computed under
absorption costing includes $16,000 (400 units x $40) of prior-period fixed manufacturing
overhead. Absorption income is therefore $162,000 ($178,000 - $16,000).
Chapter 17 549
Reconciliation of Absorption- and Variable-Costing Income
47. Beachcraft Corporation has fixed manufacturing cost of $12 per unit. Consider the three
independent cases that follow.
Case A: Absorption- and variable costing net income each totaled $240,000 in a period
when the firm produced 18,000 units.
Required:
A. In Case A, how many units were sold during the period?
B. In Case B, how much income would Beachcraft report under variable costing?
C. In Case C, how many units were in the ending finished-goods inventory?
LO: 4 Type: A
Answer:
A. Absorption- and variable costing income will be the same amount when inventory levels
are unchanged. Thus, sales totaled 18,000 units.
48. Coastal Corporation, which uses throughput costing, began operations at the start of the
current year. Planned and actual production equaled 20,000 units, and sales totaled 17,500
units at $95 per unit. Cost data for the year were as follows:
Required:
A. Compute the company's total cost for the year.
B. How much of this cost would be held in year-end inventory under (1) absorption costing,
(2) variable costing, and (3) throughput costing?
C. How much of the company's total cost for the year would appear on the period's income
statement under (1) absorption costing, (2) variable costing, and (3) throughput costing?
D. Compute the year's throughput-costing net income.
LO: 1, 2, 3, 7 Type: A, N
Answer:
A. Direct materials (20,000 units x $18) $ 360,000
Direct labor 160,000
Variable manufacturing overhead 280,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead 340,000
Selling and administrative costs 430,000
Total $1,570,000
Chapter 17 551
C. The total costs would be allocated between the current period's income statement and
the year-end inventory on the balance sheet. Thus:
Throughput Costing
49. Krell Corporation, which uses throughput costing, began operations at the start of the current
year (20x1). Planned and actual production equaled 40,000 units, and sales totaled 35,000
units at $80 per unit. Cost data for 20x1 were as follows:
Required:
A. What is meant by the term "throughput costing"?
B. Compute the cost of the company's year-end inventory.
C. Prepare Krell's income statement for the year.
B. Ending inventory: 0 + 40,000 units - 35,000 units = 5,000 units; 5,000 units x $20 =
$100,000
C. Krell Corporation
Throughput-Costing Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 20x1
Chapter 17 553
Variable- and Absorption-Costing Income Statements, Volume Variance
50. Outdoors Company manufactures sleeping bags that sell for $30 each. The variable standard
costs of production are $19.50. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is $100,000, and
budgeted production is 10,000 sleeping bags. The company actually manufactured 12,500
bags, of which 11,000 were sold. There were no variances during the year except for the
fixed-overhead volume variance. Variable selling and administrative costs are $0.50 per
sleeping bag sold; fixed selling and administrative costs are $5,000.
Required:
A. Calculate the standard product cost per sleeping bag under absorption costing and variable
costing.
B. Compute the fixed-overhead volume variance.
C. Prepare income statements for the year by using absorption costing and variable costing.
LO: 2, 3, 9 Type: A
Answer:
A. The absorption cost is $29.50 [$19.50 + ($100,000 10,000 units)], and the variable cost is
$19.50.
C. Outdoors Company
Absorption-Costing Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 20xx
Outdoors Company
Variable-Costing Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 20xx
51. Absorption and variable costing are two different methods of measuring income and costing
inventory.
Required:
A. Product costs are defined as costs associated with the manufacturing process. How does
the operational definition of product cost differ between absorption costing and variable
costing?
B. An absorption-costing income statement will report gross profit or gross margin whereas a
variable-costing income statement will report contribution margin. What is the difference
between these terms?
C. BoSan, Inc., has greatly modified its manufacturing process to reduce non-value-added
activities and has also adopted the just-in-time philosophy. As a result, the average
finished-goods inventory has dropped from six weeks' supply to eight business days'
supply. In view of these changes, will the difference in operating income between
variable costing and absorption costing be greater or less than in the past? Explain.
Answer:
A. The sole difference between the two methods is that fixed manufacturing overhead costs
are defined as a product cost under absorption costing and as a period cost under variable
costing.
B. Gross profit (gross margin) is the difference between sales and cost of goods sold. Cost of
goods sold includes variable and fixed manufacturing costs. Contribution margin, on the
other hand, is the difference between sales and variable expenses, namely, variable cost of
goods sold and variable operating expenses. Fixed costs are ignored when calculating the
contribution margin.
C. These changes should reduce the differences in operating income between absorption
costing and variable costing. Inventories of work-in-process and finished goods are much
smaller than previously; thus, changes in inventories will be much less significant, which
reduces differences in income.
Chapter 17 555
Reconciliation of Absorption- and Variable-Costing Income
52. The difference in net income between absorption and variable costing can be explained by the
change in finished-goods inventory (in units) multiplied by the standard fixed manufacturing
overhead rate.
Required:
Explain why this calculation accounts for the difference noted.
LO: 4 Type: RC
Answer:
The only difference between the two methods is the treatment of fixed manufacturing
overhead. Such amounts are expensed under variable costing whereas with absorption
costing, a predetermined amount is attached to each unit manufactured. This applied overhead
moves back and forth between the balance sheet and the income statement depending on what
happens to inventory during the period (i.e., increase or decrease). Because of this situation,
the change in inventory multiplied by the fixed manufacturing overhead per unit corresponds
with the difference in reported income between absorption costing and variable costing.