Building Base Image

Base Image
One of the primary steps around planning involves selecting the appropriate starting operating system image to
use for installation. Enterprise customers have a variety of options to choose from for their starting OS image.
This section will outline the top 3 mechanisms that are available and the pros and cons for each approach. This
section assumes that most of these administrators are supporting a variety of hardware in their network.
Reusing Existing Images
Large enterprises often have older captured images that are used to deploy Operating systems on their existing
hardware pool. The image build process steps used for existing image creation can create challenges especially
when the image is being used for deployment on newer hardware systems. The ability of the Image to work on
newer hardware is also determined by the drivers that are included natively within the OS Image. As newer
hardware devices and thereby hardware systems emerge, the drivers may not be included natively often times
requiring manipulation of the image to make it functional.
For e.g. an XP image captured on a D630 system configured in AHCI Mode will not work with on an IRRT mode
controller setup on E-Series systems. An attempt to deploy an image will result in 0x07B BSOD message.
Other factors that can contribute to a non-functional images are hot fixes commonly known as QFEs (Quick Fix
Engineering) Released from Microsoft and/or Dell. Existing images do require a periodic refresh to be able to
support newer generations of hardware. In general the more compact the imaging process, the more likeliness
that it will require retrofitting.
Drivers packaged with the existing images can also sometime cause unexpected behavior when newer devices
are detected.
Using Retail OS Media
Retail OS media refers to the original Microsoft Installation media provided with each system by the
manufacturer or available from Microsoft. This refers to the original Microsoft RTM Disc as opposed to the
media provided by Dell labeled as ‘Reinstallation media’. Re-install media is customized snapshot of the
hardware system that was purchased and is much tailored to the configuration ordered. Microsoft media on the
other is the as-shipped media when the operating system or a corresponding integrated service pack was
launched. Depending on the timing it may or may not contain the latest hot fixes of Microsoft QFEs that have
been released since the particular OS was RTM ’ed (Release to Manufacturing). Thus the deployment process in
this case needs to layer in the QFE post OS installation to bring the OS up to the latest specification as defined
by Microsoft.
Factory Shipped Image
Dell systems ship out with Factory Installed images sometimes referred to as ‘on-the-box’ image which are
highly customized to the hardware at the time the system was shipped. The image can be reused as-is if the
target hardware was an exact match for the initial hardware deployment when the system is purchased. Some
other considerations with using the as-is factory image is the partition layout,
additional software dependencies, etc., that are ordered with the box and may have potential conflict when
deploying on other systems. Customers choosing to use the factory install image option should try and match
the hardware as closely as possible given the optimal operational efficiency that each image is customized to. A
point to also consider is these images are node-locked at the BIOS level to the motherboards. So deploying an
image from a machine to another machine without any kinds of sysprep generalize may cause un-foreseen
issues.
Hardware Selection for Building Images

Once the choice of the base image to use for deployment has been made, the next step involves selecting the
test hardware to deploy the image and capture an image on. Deployment system used for the image capture
process can occasionally introduce variations. For e.g. once the system image has been deployed, using the
syprep process without the proper switches specified can cause all unused drivers to get removed for image
optimization. While this approach is beneficial to optimizing the size of the captured image, it causes the image
to be locked down to a particular hardware configuration.
Installing on Mule Hardware

This process is commonly used when the actual hardware on which the image will eventually be deployed is
unavailable on the build site for testing or is located at remote locations. An example would be a where a
system or exact configuration match is unavailable. In this case, the drivers and/or applications are often staged
based on the knowledge of the target system.
Installing on a VM
Virtual machines offer the most cost-effective way of building hardware image without relying on the physical
configuration of the box. While this absolves of any issues during the build can capture process, this doesn’t
necessarily mirror the building of the image on an actual piece of hardware. Images built in a Virtual machine
environment typically end up encompassing a larger driver set during the capture process. This implies the
images may be less than optimal but is highly portable.
Removing Build Machine Hardware specific dependencies

After you are done with building the image, you should remove the machine specific information/content like
Event Logs, Unique SID’s and other unique information. You can do this by running the command “Sysprep
/oobe /generalize”. Please see the reference section for more information on Sysprep tool.
Build Images
When building an image, there are various schools of thoughts on how the Master Image should be built
varying from the larger “One size fits all” image to the smaller “Stripped down” images. Also, we would be
making an effort to understand the OS specific nuances, integrating QFE’s and OS Service packs, integrating
hardware specific drives into the image build process, considerations for the image capturing process.
You can find a comparison between the Larger Image and the Smaller Images approach.
Larger Images Smaller Images
(+) Less Setup
(+) Easy to design

(-) Difficult to maintain in the long run
(-) Difficult to troubleshoot

(-) Consumes more Network Bandwidth during OS Deployment.
Install QFEs from Microsoft and Dell

(-) More setup
(-) Difficult to design

(+) Easy to maintain in the long run
(+) Easy to troubleshoot
(+) Consumes less Network Bandwidth during OS Deployment.
(-) All software’s are installed on all machines, (+) Software can be installed based on various inputs, and
hence high licensing cost. hence lower licensing cost.
A QFE is a software package that is used to address a problem in a Software Product. Microsoft and Dell Inc.,
regularly release these QFE to address various problems. Also to install an older OS on a newer hardware, we
need to install some software components like UMDF and KMDF which are released later, so that device
installation happens without any issues during OS Deployment.
Installing Universal or Common applications

Every company has a set of Applications that it installs on every client like Antivirus Software, Email Client,
Productivity Software’s like Microsoft Office, etc. These applications can be pre-installed when we are building
the image, or can be installed separately as part of OS Deployment. The advantage of putting it in the image
itself is that, you don’t have to maintain complex OS Deployment scripts. The downfall of having the software
pre-installed on the image is that, every time there is a newer version of the software, the image has to be
updated.
Laying down Drivers in Traditional way

In the traditional way of installing drivers, all the drivers for the systems to be supported are copied into the
master image for unattended installation.
Single Image that supports multiple systems. Bulky image, consumes more network bandwidth during
deployment, takes more time to deploy.
Advantages Disadvantages
Unsupported/Incompatible Drivers may be picked up the OS, than what was recommended, yielding a poor
experience.
Laying down drivers using new approach and tools.

In the new approach, we segregate drivers for different platforms into separate packages and conditionally
consume these packages at runtime as part of a Deployment Task Sequence Item using WMI query.
Advantages Disadvantages
Compact image that supports multiple systems..

Consumes less network bandwidth and takes less time to deploy.
Easier to maintain and update the image in the long run.
Difficult to design.
Only Supported/Compatible drivers are installed, hence giving the best experience.
Below is a snapshot depicting the use of WMI queries to install Drivers Packages for different systems.
Install Hardware independent software

Hardware independent software’s are those, which don’t require a particular Hardware component for them to
function. Examples include Microsoft Office, Adobe Reader, etc. These software’s can be installed into the
image, or they can be deployed during OSD separately.
Install Hardware dependent software

Hardware dependent software’s are software’s which are dependent on a particular hardware component to be
present. Examples are DVD Burning Software, which is useful only if there is DVD R/W Drive, Bluetooth Stack for
Bluetooth device. Installation of such software required prior knowledge of existence of such devices on the
target system. Hardware dependent software’s can be easily installed on the target machine by using
conditional Deployment Task Sequence steps and WMI Queries.

Building Base Image

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Building Base Image

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Building Base Image

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Base Image

Reusing Existing Images

Using Retail OS Media

Factory Shipped Image

Hardware Selection for Building Images

Installing on Mule Hardware

Removing Build Machine Hardware specific dependencies

Larger Images Smaller Images

(+) Less Setup

(+) Easy to design

(-) Difficult to troubleshoot

Install QFEs from Microsoft and Dell

(-) Difficult to design

(+) Easy to troubleshoot

(+) Consumes less Network Bandwidth during OS Deployment.

Installing Universal or Common applications

Laying down Drivers in Traditional way

Laying down drivers using new approach and tools.

Compact image that supports multiple systems..

Install Hardware independent software

Install Hardware dependent software

You might also like