Pragmatics Speech Acts Theory
Pragmatics Speech Acts Theory
Pragmatics Speech Acts Theory
• Speech acts theory: it is a theory which analyses what we do with words, not only the
content but also the effect of what we say.
All sentences are speech acts, whatever we say and whatever we write.
• Perlocutionary level (effect): pragmatic effect, the intended effect to be produced by the
utterance on the receiver.
Examples
- Can you please be quiet fo a second?
Locutionary level: asking for your opinion about a specific possibility / condition.
Illocutionary level: implying that that possibility / condition is better than yours.
Perlocutionary level: I expect you to agree with me that you should change.
Illocutionary level: you don’t / didn’t know something; expressing regret: implying that you would have behaved differently or implying that
there was a different way / solution.
Perlocutionary level: eliciting compassion / sympathy, because: you are sorry or it’s too late.
Observation about
perlocution
Locutionary level: information about age. Question about the credibility of that condition.
Illocutionary level: something keeps repeating too often. You losing your temper.
Perlocutionary level: produce / transmit surprise, shock, astonishment. Produce / transmit a sense of danger /
threat.
Speech acts functions
Each sentence can be associate to a specific act according to his function:
• Representative acts (+/- constative): expressing what the speaker believes to be true (when you
say or imply verbs like describe, claim, predict, think).
• Commissive acts: expressing intentions of performing an action in the future (when you say or
imply verbs like promise, offer, threat, refuse, volunteer).
• Directive acts: making the hearer do something (when you say or imply verbs like command,
order, request, invite, forbid, suggest); generally they are imperatives.
• Expressive acts: manifesting psychological states in relation to social circumstances (when you
say or imply verbs like apologise, congratulate, deploring, be sorry, regret).
• Declarative acts: changing the state of things (when you say or imply verbs like declare, resign,
pronounce, baptise).
The utterances often have more than one of these macro-functions (overlap).
Direct vs Indirect Speech
Acts
Each speech act can be more direct or indirect.
The same speech act can have a function if it is expressed directly, and
another function if it expressed indirectly.
• Direct speech acts: when the form and the function coincide. You use a
declarative, expressive, etc. exploiting its function as a declaration,
expressive, etc.
• Indirect speech acts: when the form and the function so not coincide.
You use a declarative, expressive, with a different function.
Examples
- It’s cold in here.
- You passed your exam? … I knew you would, you are the best!!
• In direct speech acts, where the form and the function of an utterance coincide,
illocution is close to the locutionary level.
- Shut up!