PANTALOONS
PANTALOONS
PANTALOONS
6 trisha dresses
kurtas
kurta sets
trousers
BIBA Akriti
Global desi Trisha
W
Aurelia
till 2800
Rs. to Rs. 4999
till 4999
Rs. To Rs.4999
till rs 3999
till Rs. 1299
Rs. To Rs.3899
Rs.799 to
Rs.300 to Rs.3799
RANK CRITERIA RATING
1 QUALITY 4.5
2 DESIGN 4.4
3 PRICE 4.4
4 VALUE FOR MONEY 4.2
5 REPUTATION & POSITION IN INDUSTRY 4.1
6 EXPERIENCE 3.8
7 DELIVERY 3.8
8 FLEXIBILITY 3.5
9 PERFORMANCE HISTORY 3.5
10 CREDIT 3.4
11 TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES 3.4
12 OPERATING CONTROLS 3.2
13 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 3.2
14 STRONG SERVICE AND CLAER COMMUNICATION 3
15 PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE 2.9
16 MEETING CUSTOMER SPECIFICATION 2.7
17 AMOUNT OF PAST BUSINESS 2.7
18 DESIRE OF BUSINESS 2.5
19 RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPPLIER 2.5
20 RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENTS 2.5
21 INNOVATION 2.3
22 MANAMGEMENT AND ORGANISATION 2.2
23 PACKAGING ABILITY 2
24 TRAINING AIDS 1.7
25 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION 1.7
26 CERTIFICATION 1.6
27 MINIMUM ORDER QUANTITY 1.4
28 REPAIR SERVICE 1.2
29 ATTITUDE 0.7
30 WARRANTIES AND CLAIM POLICIES 0.7
Criteria Vendor1
The evaluation shows that the VENDOR 3 has maximum rating for average and good on the desire
The brand could select the third vendor according to this evaluation.
Vendor 2 is having more legends of 'very good' but the important criteria were average for the seco
like Job work, Cutting, Delivery etc.
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 2
3 2
4 3
4 3
4 2.5
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
3 2
4 3
4 3.33333333333333
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 5
4 5
4 3
3.66666666666667 4.33333333333333
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 4
3 2
4 3
3 5
4 4
3 3
3 4
3.28571428571429 3.57142857142857
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
2 5
3 4
4 3
5 3
4 2
3 5
4 3
2 4
3.375 3.625
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 5
2 4
4 3
2 4
4 5
3 4
3 5
3 4.28571428571429
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 3
3 5
3 3
4 3
3.5 3.5
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
5 4.5
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
3 2
4 3
4 3.33333333333333
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 4
3 4
3 3
3 2
3.25 3.25
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
4 3
5 4
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 5
2 3
3 4
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 3
2 5
3 3
2.66666666666667 3.66666666666667
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 2
4 3
4 3
2 3
3.25 2.75
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
4 3
4 3
5 3
4.6 3.6
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
2 3
1 4
3 3
4 2
3 4
2.6 3.2
Legend Rating
<3.0
3.0 - 3.5
3.6 - 4.49
4.5 and above
Vendor2 Vendor3
r average and good on the desired criteria as comapered to other vendors.
criteria were average for the second vendor whereas good for the third vendor
ED SCORE
ETHNIC HOME BRANDS
Date: Supplier Name:
Facility Name: Supplier Number:
Facility Number Supplier Country
Address: Contact Title:
City and State Fax No.:
Country Auditor Name:
Contact: Auditor Number
Phone: Auditor Office
Email:
RANK EVALUATION CRITERIA AVERAGE RATINGS
1 COMMERCIAL ASPECTS (PRICE) 4.71
2 ONTIME SHIPMENT 4.58
3 TIMELY DELIVERY 4.48
4 QUALITY 4.38
5 INFORMATION OF THE COMAPNY 4.2
6 FABRIC SOURCING EFFICIENCY (QUALITY) 3.8
7 ORDER FULFILLMENT 3.8
8 SAFETY 3.5
9 RISK 3.4
10 ADHERENCE TO PRODUCTION TARGET 3.31
11 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 3.3
12 INOVATION 3.25
13 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING 3.15
14 REQUIRMENT 3.15
15 REPUTATION OF VENDOR 3
16 ORDER FULFILLMENT 3
17 SAMPLE CONVERSION RULE 2.9
18 PLANNED T&A v/s ACTUAL T&A 2.8
19 MATERIAL UTILIZATION 2.57
20 CHANGE-OVER TIME 2.1
21 LOGISTICS 2
22 VENDER DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITY 1.96
23 VENDOR CERTIFICATION 1.6
ERAGE RATINGS
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 4
4 2
2 4
3 4
4 4
3.6 3.6
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 4
3 2
4 5
2 5
5 4
3.69090909090909 3.78181818181818
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 5
4 2
4 5
2 3
3.25 3.75
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 1
3 3
3.60741626794258 3.58588516746411
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 2
4 3
2 4
3.66666666666667 3
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 2
4 3
4 2.5
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4.4 3.6
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
5 4.5
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 5
4 3
4 4
4.33333333333333 4.25
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
3 3
3 3
4 4
5 5
3.75 3.75
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 3
4 2
3 3
4.00555555555556 3.76666666666667
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
1 3
4 2
2 5
2.33333333333333 3.33333333333333
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
3 2
4 3
4 3
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
5 5
5 4
4 3
5 4
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 4
5 5
4 4
4.36363636363636 3.81818181818182
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 4
4 4
5 5
4.33333333333333 4.33333333333333
VENDOR 2 VENDOR 3
4 4
4 4
4 4
Legend Rating
<3.0
3.0 - 3.5
3.6 - 4.49
4.5 and above
TED SCORE
Date: Supplier Name:
Facility Name: Supplier Number:
Facility Number Supplier Country
Address: Contact Title:
City and State Fax No.:
Country Auditor Name:
Contact: Auditor Number
Phone: Auditor Office
Email:
Facility Staffing
Total Facility Personnel:
Number of Production Lines
Supervisors per Production Lines
Operator per production Lines
Operators in the Finishing Lines
NO. Item
1 Sample/pattern room
product history are personneland
maintained are dedicated to specific customer and product types
2 made
Qualityavailable
of samplesto sample staff?
meets/exceeds
3 customers standards.
Pre-Production meetings are conducted with appropriate managers. Meeting minutes
4 are documented and follow-up
construction requirements and activities planned .
5 design details
based upon and evaluated
actual for fit.
delivery dates of
6 fabrics and critical components .
and
Accessories
no. Item
Fabric storage area is clean, well lit and organized. Fabric is correctly stored indoors, on shelving w
1 covering.,
and type of defects, degree of shade variation and are reviewed by supervisors for
2 follow up action.toAppropriate
fabric inspector effectively shrinkage
review tests are performed
3 and grade
records arefabric.
maintained including
4 trims and accessories card
V WET PROCESSING
No. Items
extractors are balanced to prevent
1 process backlogs.
cleaned and rinsed between
2 operations
purchase orders assortments
3 quantities
stored properly to prevent aging
4 and
posteddecomposition before
for each style use.
for operator
5 reference.
controlled and that control devices
6 are monitored
all other andproperties
aesthetic calibrated.and
7 standards are met.of fit is
to ensure integrity
8 maintained . stains or adversely
will not caused
9 affect the recipe.
INSPECTED BY:
(AUDIT IS TO PULL RANDOM 20
PRODUCTS TO CHECK)
Points scoring
Outstanding
Excellent
Satisfactory
Fair
Poor
Percent
Packaging
Quality Control Staff
Warehouse ( Raw material and Finish )
Outside Technical Support
Turnover Rate Absentee Rate
Minor Defect
Column D