(Jim Surmanek) Introduction To Advertising Media (BookFi) PDF
(Jim Surmanek) Introduction To Advertising Media (BookFi) PDF
(Jim Surmanek) Introduction To Advertising Media (BookFi) PDF
title:
author:
publisher:
isbn10 | asin:
print isbn13:
ebook isbn13:
language:
subject
publication date:
lcc:
ddc:
subject:
Jim Surmanek
CONTENTS
Introduction xi
Part I
Background Ingredients
Chapter 1
The Advertising Process 3
Chapter 2
The Role of Media Planning 8
9
The Role of the Media Planner
Chapter 3
Major Mass Media Types 14
15
Magazines
18
Newspapers
23
Out-of-Home Media
28
Radio
31
Television
Part II
Media Definitions and Dynamics
Chapter 4
Rating 51
51
How Ratings Are Calculated
53
"Average", Rating
53
Commercial Ratings
54
Importance of Ratings
55
Ratings for Unreported Demographics
57
Ratings for Non-Broadcast Media
57
A Rating Point Is a Rating Point
59
Professional Workshop
Chapter 5
Homes Using TV:
60
HUT/PUT/PVT/PUR/Cume
64
Professional Workshop
Chapter 6
Share 65
67
Professional Workshop
Chapter 7
Rating/HUT/Share 68
71
Estimating a Rating
73
Professional Workshop
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
As is usually the case with books like this one, many people directly and indirectly contributed their knowledge, wisdom and
support.
I thank my early teachers at Ogilvy & Mather who taught me about advertising and especially how to be a student of this
profession. I'm indebted to Jack Hill for hiring me and teaching me the fundamentals and intricacies of media research; to Ken
Caffrey, Mike Drexler, and Jules Fine for guiding me through the learning process of media planning; to David Ogilvy for
fostering an atmosphere for learning and for being the superb teacher he is.
I thank the many people who took their personal time to gather some facts and figures and who gave me ideas for what to
include in this book: Ro Campbell, Sue Gomez, Laura Loveday, Paul Silverman and Lisa Strassman.
I thank Michelle de Castro who labored after hours and on weekends to type my manuscript and who never once objected to the
many changes I made as this work unfolded.
I also thank the people who provided me with background material and information about their organizations, and who have
allowed me to write about their companies: Kevin Beaumont (Arbitron), Byron Chandler (TAB), Joan Cheramonte (Simmons),
Julie Ann Cohn (Donnelley), Jack Dempster (ACT Media), Steven Dyer (A. C. Nielsen), Debbie Ewing (A.C. Nielsen), Julie
Goldsmith (Birch/Scarborough), Mark Harris (Gannett), Chuck Levinson (CAB), Bruce MacEvoy (SRI, International), Dan
Mahan (NAB), Julie Muer (TDI), Miriam Murphy (RADAR), Solomon Ortasse (Claritas), Bill Shaeffer (Arbitron), Chetah Shah
(MRI), Carl Spaulding (Mediaplan, Inc.) and Jacqueline Tobak (Monroe Mendelsohn).
INTRODUCTION
PART I
BACKGROUND INGREDIENTS
Chapter 1
The Advertising Process-*
In this chapter we summarize how advertising fits into the
overall marketing effort. We highlight some of the questions
advertisers must face before advertising is created, such as what
is the advertising supposed to accomplish. We also highlight the
various types of advertising companies which create and place
advertising.
You're eight years old and open up a lemonade stand in front of your home. As a youngster with more experience than reflected
by your years, you establish a financial plan to determine your costs, probable revenue, and gross profit. You predict you will
sell 50 drinks each week (all on Saturday, the only day you can devote to this effort). You calculate your expenses for this
anticipated volume:
manufacturing: lemons, sugar, water, ice.
distribution: wood, nails and paint for signage, pitcher, cups.
labor: your anticipated hourly wage times the number of hours.
Your total expenses divided by total anticipated sales equals a cost of 8 cents per drink. You decide to charge customers 10
cents and thereby seek a 2 cent profit (a healthy 20 percent margin).
Alas, you find you are not selling as many drinks as you expected. Your costs exceed your revenue. You are operating at a loss.
What to do?
As advertising is a critical ingredient in the marketing process, so media planning is a critical element in the advertising process.
Whether the advertiser opts for a consultant, boutique, buying service, advertising agency, specialty company, or any
combination of these services, media planning is involved.
Chapter 2
The Role of Media Planning
In this chapter we discuss the role of media planning and,
specifically, the role of the media planner in the advertising process.
We examine various points-of-view about what advertising media
are and what they are supposed to accomplish. We also explain the
thought processes of a media planner in analyzing quantitative and
qualitative information about media.
Some might argue that a powerful creative message, brilliantly executed, can produce consumer awareness and stimulate sales.
A further argument is that the media vehicles carrying that message are of little or no importance, because the advertising itself
is just that good. It can also be safely argued that an ineffective, poorly produced advertising message stands little or no chance
of convincing consumers to buy, regardless of the general effectiveness of the selected media in which the advertising appears.
Because none of these arguments has ever been proven, they are open to question.
One argument, although not necessarily proven, is logical and stands on safe ground: great creative carried by highly effective
media vehicles will probably give a product the best chance of success. The two cannot be separated. You cannot have great
creative that leads to product sales unless consumers are exposed to the advertising by seeing it, hearing it, or both, in the media
they consume. The extent to which the chosen media deliver the same people as those to whom the advertising message is
written is the extent to which the advertising is most effective. Also, advertising
Chapter 3
Major Mass Media Types
This chapter introduces the various major mass media forms, and the sub-
segments of these media, which are used for advertising. We look at the
historical beginnings of each of these media and track theft growth into the
1990s. We discuss the kinds of advertising units the media offer for sale to
advertisers, such as a full-page advertisement in a magazine or a thirty-second
commercial on television.
There is an abundance of media available for advertisingfrom doorknob hangers to commercials on national TV, and everything
in between. In 1990, advertisers spent approximately $130 billion in various media to communicate their advertising message.
Table 3.1 lists the proportions of this expenditure by media type
TABLE 3.1: U.S. Advertising Volume by Media Type
Mass Media Other
Magazines 5% Direct Mail 19%
Newspapers 25 Yellow Pages 7
Outdoor 1 Other 14
Radio 7 Total: 100%
Television 22
Source: McCann-Erickson
This book concentrates on those media that are commonly called mass media. Conceivably a misnomer, the term "mass media"
is nevertheless used because these media characteristically are able
Magazines
In 1741 there were two magazines published in the United States. Andrew Bradford published the first one, American Magazine,
which was on sale three days before Benjamin Franklin's General Magazine. Although neither publication is available today for
In recognition of a more affluent and better educated society, as well as magazine publishers' perception of reader interest in
special interest or lifestyle editorial focuses, publishers have launched an average of 1.3 new magazines every day for the last
several years. Although the majority are short-lived, many continue to be published. Table 3.3 highlights the growth in the
number of magazines and their combined circulation as reported by the Audit Bureau of Circulation for the (currently) 541
magazines that are members of this organization.
TABLE 3.3: Circulation of A.B.C. General & Farm Magazines
# Magazines or Groups Circulation (millions)
1970 302 244
1975 325 251
1980 407 286
1985 477 326
1990 541 363
Source: Magazine Association
Consumer magazines are generally classified according to their primary editorial focusbusiness, entertainment, men, women,
general interest, sports, newsweekly, etc. The classification is merely a convenience when planners are considering the types of
Also notable in this table is the inclusion of Parade and Sunday, both of which are also referred to as Sunday Magazines or
Newspaper Distributed Magazines or Syndicated Supplements or simply Supps. In addition to these two national supps are two
others (as shown in Table 3.5). All four are centrally published, distributed in metropolitan newspapers, and usually appear
within the Sunday edition. Although commonly Considered magazines, supps often fall within the classification of newspapers,
especially those supps that
TABLE 3.5: Newspaper Distributed Magazines
# Newspapers Circulation
Carrying (millions)
Parade 338 35.1
Sunday 29 15.4
USA
Weekend 308 16.4
Vista 20 .9
Newspapers
Advertising in newspapers goes as far back as newspapers themselvesback to the 1600s. The first ads ran free because the
publishers believed they contained information that was a vital part of the news that readers expected from the newspaper. As
the centuries rolled by, publishers started charging advertisers for the space their ads occupied. Sales agents were recruited to
sell advertising space to local advertisers to help defray the cost of publishing and to increase the publishers' profits. These
agents then started selling advertising space to "foreign" advertisers in distant cities. "Agencies" sprang up to represent. national
advertising clients in dealing with local newspaper advertising. With the support from advertising, traveling salesmen put
national brands into stores from coast to coast. Some of this advertising began to move out of print and into radio and eventually
into television. As the media choices proliferated and products obtained national
Newspapers are one of the more geographically flexible media forms. In addition to availabilities in small suburban
communities and colleges, a number of the larger metropolitan dailies also offer zoned editions which cover specific smaller
areas within the metropolitan area.
Free Standing Insert (FSI) A preprinted advertising message which is inserted into, but not bound into,
print media (generally into newspapers).
Many newspapers also carry supplementary material or periodicals, such as Free Standing Inserts (FSIs), Sunday magazines, and
comics. FSIs are preprinted inserts of one or more pages which are mostly 100 percent advertising and/or coupon offers.
In addition to the four syndicated supplements discussed in the previous section on magazines are five of the larger dailies
which publish their own Sunday supp. Although primarily distributed through newspapers, supps (especially national supps) are
commonly considered part of the magazine medium.
Radio
The oldest radio station in the United States broadcast for the first time out of San Jose, back in 1909. In 1921 it was given the
call letters KQW which was changed to KCBS when CBS acquired it in 1949. There are now more than 10,000 radio stations in
the United States. The vast majority accept advertising, as the following figures show:
4,932 commercial AM stations
4,155 commercial FM stations
1,374 non-commercial stations
The standard radio commercials are 30-second and 60-second spots, although shorter and longer commercials can be purchased.
Purchases can be made on radio networks, in individual markets via
Television
Although advertisers spend only 22 cents out of every dollar for advertising on television, the medium is so highly consumed
and "visible" that the average person probably thinks the vast majority of advertising is on TV. For many people it's difficult to
think about advertising without thinking about TV. It's also difficult to think of a time when television was not a
communications medium. It has, nevertheless, been around for a long time. Technically, television was invented in the 1800s in
the form of a perforated rotating disc through which one could scan "moving" pictures. In the early 1900s John Baird developed
the first "television set," and in 1927 Philo Fransworth created color television. A few years later Vladimir Zworykin invented
an electronic television camera pickup tube. The TV set as we know it today was demonstrated at the 1939 World's Fair in New
York.
As an advertising medium, television has grown from the days when it offered a handful of programs, each of which was totally
controlled and sponsored by a sole advertiser. Today it offers many
Network Broadcast
Network A broadcast entity that provides programming and sells commercial time in programs telecast
nationally via affiliated and/or licensed local stationse.g., ABC television network, ESPN cable
network, Mutual radio network.
A network is any group of stations joined to broadcast the same programsusually simultaneously. There are four networks in
operation: ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox. The local TV stations affiliated with these networks contract to air a certain amount of
network programming each week, in return for which they are paid a compensation fee*. Some of these stations (referred to as
O&Os) are Owned and Operated by the networks. Table 3.12 lists the network-owned and -operated stations.
O&O A station Owned and Operated by a broadcast network.
The reason for the compensation is that the network is placing a program (with commercials in it) on a local station, which
therefore preempts the station from airing its own program and selling advertising in that program. This loss of local advertising
revenue is somewhat compensated for by the network fees. This arrangement, however, is symbiotic inasmuch as the local
station does not have to create or produce local programming to air at the time a network program is airing, and there is a belief
that network programs allow the station to attract more viewers than it might with just local programming. This greater
attraction could have a rub-off effect on the local station whereby viewers are retained even when local programs air.
The networks can transmit their programming to local stations via telephone lines or satellite, or by sending a videotape. The
intent is to air a program simultaneously in all markets, with
* Immediately prior to the publishing of this book, compensation agreements between the networks and local stations
were under discussion. These talks could lead to local stations no longer being compensated by the networks for carrying
network programming.
the exception of compensating for time zone differences for the East and West Coast markets, when possible. For example, a
program originating from New York and broadcast at 9:00 p.m. will be seen on local stations as follows:
Time Zone
Eastern 9:00 p.m.
Central 8:00 p.m.
Mountain 7:00 p.m.
Pacific 9:00 p.m.
Live broadcasts, such as a Presidential speech, do not usually have time zone adjustmentsthat is, if the President spoke at 9:00
p.m. New York time it would be seen at 6:00 p.m. on the West Coast.
Delayed Broadcast (DB) The term given to a network TV program that is delayed for airing in a given
market at a different time than the time it airs nationally.
When a network program in a local market airs at a different time or on a different day from the original telecast, it is termed h
delayed broadcast or DB. This is quite common, for example, for Alaska and Hawaii.
Networks can also offer an advertiser "regional" advertising which is accomplished by inserting the advertiser's commercial at
one or another "feed" points. For example a 9:00 p.m. program
Additionally, programs are also classified according to the time of day they air. Exhibit 3.2 displays the standard TV dayparts
according to their average timespan (Eastern Standard Time).
Commercials of varying lengths (e.g., 10, 15, 30, or 60 seconds) can be purchased. All network TV commercials air in-program,
that is, between the absolute beginning and absolute end of the program. For the most part, several commercials from different
advertisers
Exhibit 3.2:
Network Television Dayparts
Pod A grouping of commercials and nonprogram material in which (usually) more than one advertiser's
commercials air. Also referred to as a "commercial interruption" or "commercial break," but airing in-
program.
are grouped into what is called a commercial pod and air sequentially during a period known as the commercial breakof which
there are several during the telecast of the average program.
Two types of commercial purchases can be made, and three methods of buying are available:
Types
ParticipationThis refers to the purchase of one or more commercials in one or more programs.
SponsorshipThis usually requires a majority purchase of the announcements available within a program or a program segment.
Sponsoring advertisers are generally given one or more billboards at the beginning and/or end of the program. Billboards are
generally of short duration (e.g., five seconds). They announce program sponsorship to the audience and afford the advertiser
free advertising.
Billboard In broadcast, free airtime given to an advertiser, usually to one that purchases multiple
commercials within a programi.e., a "sponsor" of the program.
As with network TV, there are various types of purchases and several methods used:
Types
Long-termsimilar to a network TV unfront buy, these kinds of purchases are made for a period generally longer than a calendar
quarter.
Syndication can be considered a hybrid within the broadcast TV spectrum. It has some of the characteristics of network TVfor
instance, it is national in scopeand some of the traits of spot TVspecifically, it can be purchased on a local market basis. An
As noted by the number of subscribers for each of the networks, not every cable system offers every network to its subscribers.
There are a number of reasons why cable operators may not carry all programs:
Capacity. Some cable operators offer more channels to their subscribers than others, depending on the operator's technological
configuration. Table 3.19 displays the percent of total U.S. cable-subscribing households that can view various
Superstations
Superstation An independent TV station whose signal is transmitted throughout the United States via
satellite. Technically refers only to WTBS, but is also used for other stations.
There are four TV stations in the United States commonly referred to as superstations, although technically this distinction
belongs only to WTBS/Atlanta. A superstation transmits its signal locally via normal broadcast and also nationally via satellite,
thus allowing people in distant markets to receive the broadcast via cable TV.
WTBS is the only superstation that sells advertising time either in its local coverage area (Atlanta) or nationally (via cable TV).
The non-Atlanta purchase is the TBS network, as shown in Table 3.17. The other three superstations (WGN/Chicago,
WPIX/New York, WWOR/New York) do not offer a local/national split.
PART II
MEDIA DEFINITIONS AND DYNAMICS
Chapter 4
Rating
In this chapter we define what a rating is and how it is
calculated. We explain why a rating is one of the more
important media terms and how rating information is
perceived by the media planner and by the media
supplier. Finally, we investigate ancillary factors that
might affect the ''quality'' of a rating point.
Rating The percentage of a given population group consuming a medium at a particular moment
Generally used for broadcast media, but can be used for any medium One rating point equals one
percent.
You've heard newscasts or read articles that talked about ratings: The Superbowl got such and such a rating, or a program was
cancelled due to poor ratings, etc. The reference to ratings is apopulation group reference to the quantity of the television
audience that viewed.a program. The precise definition is the percentage of individuals (or homes) exposed to an advertising
medium. In its simplest form, a one rating is equivalent to one percent of a given population group. The definition can apply to
many media forms, but is commonly used for television or radio programs.
The same dynamics apply to calculating a rating for any population basehouseholds, men, women, men 18-34, teens, etc. For
example, let us assume your primary target audience (those to whom you want to direct the advertising) is men 18-49, and you
also want to apply secondary emphasis to men 50+. You'll therefore want to know the ratings of TV programs for each of these
audiences.
Because programs have different appeals to different demographic groups, a program rating for one group could be quite
different from the rating for another group. The demographic ratings for the three TV programs in market X in Table 4.2
TABLE 4.2: Program Ratings in Market X For Different Demographic Groups
Men 18-49 Men 50+
Viewing Audience Rating Viewing Audience Rating
Program A 30 10 40 20
Program B 60 20 60 30
Program C 45 15 20 10
Not Viewing 165 80
Total Population 300 200
"Average" Rating
Not all people view an entire TV program or listen for a long period of time to a particular radio station. There's tune-in and
tune-out during a program as people switch channelswhich has become easier to do with the advent of the remote control
device. When media research suppliers estimate a program rating they calculate the average rating the program produces for its
time duration. A program rating of 20, for example, means that during the average minute of broadcast 20 percent of a
population group was tuned in to that program. Commonly, research suppliers provide Average Quarter Hour ratings, meaning
the average rating that was produced during the average minute of that 15-minute segment.
Commercial Ratings
When we defined rating, we emphasized the words advertising medium to dispel any misconception that a rating applies to
advertising message deliverythat is, commercial exposure. Although there is a movement afoot to obtain ratings for
commercials, they are currently not available. A rating, therefore, is only an indicator of the percentage of a group of individuals
that have the opportunity to be exposed to the advertising. The percentage of people who will actually see or hear the
commercials can vary substantially, ranging from zero (although this is highly improbable) to 100 percent of the
viewing/listening audience. The "commercial rating" that might be obtained is influenced by many factors, including (1) how
many
Importance of Ratings
Rating is the most important broadcast term. Ratings are used extensively by media planners and media buyers to evaluate
alternative programs or combinations of programs that can best achieve the advertising goals. As will be seen in later sections of
this book, ratings form the foundation from which various other measures (reach and frequency, impressions, effective reach,
Wearout, etc.) are calculated to determine media selection and scheduling tactics.
Media suppliers (TV and radio networks, local market TV and radio stations) use rating information to assess a program's or
station's popularity, and, in part, to determine how much it will charge an advertiser to place a commercial within that program
or on that station.
Popularity
The higher a program rating, the more people are watching it. The higher the rating, the greater chance the program will
continue to be on-air; conversely, the lower the rating, the greater the chance the program will be cancelled. But the ratings are
not considered in isolation from other factors, such as the time of day of broadcast. For example, because more people view TV
during 8:00-9:00 p.m. than during 8:00-9:00 a.m., a program has a greater opportunity to generate a high rating at night than in
the morning. The fact that program A in the morning gets a 5 rating and program B in the evening gets a 20 rating does not
necessarily indicate that program A is less popular that program B. In fact, program A might be relatively more popular than
program Bit might garner a greater proportion of the total audience viewing TV at that particular time than program B does in
its time slot. This concept of "relative popularity" is known as share and is discussed later.
As with demographic groups, ratings cannot be averaged across geographic markets. For example, if you are advertising in
market X and market Y and need to determine an average rating for program A in both markets combined, you must add the
number of people viewing program A in market X and market Y and divide the total number of viewers by the combined
population of the two markets. Program A in our example delivers an average 18.5 ratingnot a 17.0 rating as might be
incorrectly calculated by adding the two ratings (14.0 and 20.0) and dividing by 2. (Note: You see a shift in the way a rating is
reported in Table 4.4for example, instead of "14," "14.0." Although either number could be used [inasmuch as they are identical]
it is always best to have consistency of how
TABLE 4.4: Program Ratings by Markets and Groupings
Market X Market Y Total
Population Rating Population Rating Population Rating
Program A 70 14.0 300 20.0 370 18.5
Program B 120 24.0 300 20.0 420 21.0
Program C 65 13.0 300 20.0 365 18.3
Not Viewing 245 600 845
Total 500 1,500 2,000
Chapter 5
Homes Using TV: HUT/PUT/PVT/PUR/Cume
In this chapter we define the term Homes Using
TV and related terms, and explain how they are
calculated. We highlight how this media
phenomenon varies according to the
demographic group, geographic market, or
media form with which you are dealing.
As ratings can vary by demographic segment, so can PUT levels. Additionally, PUT levels do not necessarily reflect HUT
levels. It is therefore important to accurately describe the demographic segment for which you are seeking information or
describing your findings. Tables 5.2 and 5.3 show examples of the PUT and HUT variations that can exist at exactly the same
time of day.
The PUT level for adults 18+ at 8:00-8:30 p.m. is 60 percent, compared to a 45 percent PUT for men 18-49.
Let us assume there are five TV homes, each with four people (one man, one woman, one teenager, one child). Further assume
that not all the household members are viewing, and of those who are viewing, there is no consistency from one home to
another. As shown in Table 5.3, four of the five TV homes have their set turned on80 HUT. Of the five men in this population
base (one per home) only one is viewing (20 PUT). Of the five women in the population, two are viewing (40 PUT). Using the
same math, the PUT for teens is 20; for children, 40; for total people, 30.
Viewing/listening levels vary by time of day, by day of the week, and by month of the year. They also vary from one geographic
area to another. The variations are primarily a function of when people are physically able to consume a medium, and what they
decide to do during these timespans. Let's say you live in Los Angeles and have a nine-to-five office job, and your cousin lives
in New York City and works eight to four. At 8:30 a.m. you are physically able to
Given that people do not usually consume both TV and radio at the same time, coupled with the when and What dynamics
previously reviewed, we find that the usage levels of television and radio tend to complement each other: Radio listening is at its
highest level when TV viewing is at its lowest, and vice-versa, as shown in Exhibit 5.1.
Exhibit 5.1:
Use levels of radio and television. (Percent of women listening
to radio/viewing television)
Source: Nieisen/Arbitron
PROFESSIONAL WORKSHOP
1. Three programs are available for viewing in market X at 8:00-8:30
p.m. and receive adult 18+ ratings of 20, 15, and 10 respectively.
What is the PUT level at this time?
2. For the same configuration listed above, what is the HUT level?
3. There are five radio stations available in market Y, which has
100,000 women age 18 and older. The average station is listened to
by 10,000 of these women from 6:00 to 7:00 a.m. What is the PUR
level at this time?
Chapter 6
Share
In this chapter we define what share is as it relates to media
planning, how it is calculated, and how it is intertwined with HUT.
Share ''Share of audience'' is the percentage of HUT (or PUT, PUR, PVT) tuned to a particular program
or station. "Share of market" is the percentage of total category volume (dollars, units, etc.) accounted
for by a brand. "Share of voice" is the percentage of advertising impressions generated by all brands in
a category accounted for by a particular brand, but often also refers to share of media spending.
Share is the percentage of HUT tuned to a particular program. It can also be the percentage of PUT, PVT, PUR or Cume rating.
It is commonly referred to as share of audience.
The same term is used by marketers when assessing their "share of market"the percentage of total Sales volume of a particular
product category (e.g., instant coffee) accounted for by product X. This percentage is used as a benchmark to express what
portion of total industry sales dollars a company has garnered for itselfwhat its relative position in the marketplace is. Similarly,
in television or radio share is used to indicate the percentage of the total viewing/listening audience a program, or station, has.
Both the marketer and the media supplier strive for dominant shares, for similar reasons. A high or growing share indicates not
only relative strength vis-a-vis competitors, but also consumer acceptance and, to a large degree, business stability.
The mechanics of calculating a program share of audience are shown in Table 6.1. Program A, viewed by two of the five
available TV homes in market X, produces a 40 rating; programs B and C each produce a 20 rating. In total, four of the five
homes are viewing TV, thereby generating an 80 percent HUT. Because share is a percentage of HUT, HUT becomes the base
against which share is calculated. This calculation requires that the program rating be divided by the HUT. Thus, program A's 40
rating divided by an 80 percent HUT gives a 50 percent share of the total viewing audience.
The share of the program broadcast during the daytime might be the same as that of a program at nighttime, but because HUT
levels vary by time of day, the nighttime program will produce a higher rating. (See Table 6.2.) Comparison of program shares,
therefore, should be restricted to programs in the same general time periods. It is appropriate, for example, to compare program
A to program B if they are on the air at the same time; but it is not appropriate, and possibly misleading, to compare them if
they are on the air at distinctly different times. The only valid way to address share of
Chapter 7
Rating/HUT/Share
This chapter shows the inter-relationship of rating, HUT, and
share. We demonstrate how the numbers for each of these
terms are reported by media research suppliers and how a
media planner goes about estimating a rating for a future TV
program.
Clearly, the terms rating, HUT, and share are totally interrelated and are often used in conjunction with each other during the
media selection process. Because of this interrelationship, by having data for any of the two we can calculate the third. The
formulas are these:
Solving for Rating: HUT × Share = Rating
Exhibit 7.1:
Interrelationship of rating/HUT/share.
Exhibit 7.2 gives the reader a sense of how rating, HUT, and share are typically presented in syndicated research sources.
Studying this information will reinforce your understanding of how the three terms interrelate, indicate why each term is
independently important in a media analysis, and demonstrate the complexity of the information with which a media planner or
buyer needs to deal. The following facts, among others, can be gathered from the table:
From January 30 to February 27, KAAA broadcast three different programs on Wednesdays between 9:30 and 10:00 p.m.
Program A received a 14 household rating on February 6 and a 15 the following week.
For its two telecasts, program A averaged a 15 household rating and obtained a 21 share based on the average 73 HUT for the
time period across the four weeks studied.
Programs B and C each aired one week, receiving a 9 and a 23 household rating respectively.
During the four weeks, KAAA averaged a 15 rating with a 21 share.
Estimating a Rating
All ratings information from syndicated research sources is for past performance. Media buyers need to estimate program ratings
for the future. The past might be an indicator of future performance, but does not guarantee it. As shown in Exhibit 7.2, Program
D produced ratings ranging from 14 to 18, for an average rating of 16. The challenge is predicting whether the program will
hold at an average 16 rating in the future, increase, or decrease.
The first step in estimating a rating is to estimate the level of potential viewing audience (PUT) for the time period in question.
History has shown that PUT levels are fairly consistent from one year to the next*that is, if the 9:00-10:00 p.m. time period
produced a 60 PUT during February in market X for the last few years, the probability is it will produce the same level next
February.
The next step is to estimate the share you think this program might receive. This is far more difficult to calculate because the
estimate is based more on opinion than on hard fact, and is complicated by ever-changing competitive programming
environments. Some of the variables that can be considered when estimating a share are these:
History: What is the track record of similar types of programs?
The type of program: Will it be a documentary or a situation comedy? The latter generally gets a higher share.
* There were HUT aberrations at the beginning of the decade. Although inexplicable, this occurrence does not negate the
general reliability of HUT predictions.
Chapter 8
Gross Rating Points
In this chapter we show how ratings are combined to
produce a combined total known as gross rating points
(GRPs), and how GRPs are used by the media planner
to analyze the relationships of alternative media
schedules. We also discuss how GRPs vary by
demographic group, by media type, and by time frame.
Gross Rating Points (GRPs) The sum of all ratings delivered by a given list of media vehicles.
Although synonymous with TRPs, GRPs generally refer to a "household" base. In out-of-home media,
GRPs are synonymous with a Showing.
Gross Rating Points are the sum of all ratings. Like ratings, GRPs are expressed as a percentage and can be used for various
media forms.
If, for example, you plan to purchase two announcements, one in each of two programs, and each program has a 10 rating, you
will be purchasing 20 GRPs (10 × 2). The operative word is gross. GRPs describe the total audience of a media schedule
without regard to duplication of audiences; that is, the number or percent of people who are exposed to more than one media
vehicle. In this example of two 10-rated programs yielding 20 GRPs, there is no consideration for how much of the audience of
the first program, if any, is part of the audience of the second program.
Let's say your media budget allows for the purchase of 6 announcements scattered across three TV programs as shown in Table
8.1. By multiplication (average rating times number of announcements) you determine that this schedule will generate 100
GRPs. The "100" is 100 percent. It does. not necessarily state that 100 percent of the population will watch these shows or be
exposed to your commercials in the shows. The 100 GRPs does indicate, however, that the equivalent of 100 percent of the
population will watch one or more of these programs. Hypothetically, the 100 GRPs could be composed of 100 percent of the
population,
Just as we saw different demographic ratings for the same program in the chapter on ratings, so GRPs/TRPs will encompass
If, for example, all four of the media forms shown in Tables 8.2-8.5 were used in a media plan, the TRP calculations would
have to be made against the same demographic group (the target group of the advertising effort). It would be incongruous to
report that the media effort is composed of a total of 400 TRPs (100 in each of the four media types). If you keep in mind that
TRPs are an expression, in percentage terms, of coverage of specific population groups, this becomes quite clear.
For the same reason that you cannot add together TRPs for different demographic segments, you cannot add TRPs for
combinations of geographic markets. As shown in Table 8.6, for example, scheduling 100, 50 and 25 TRPs respectively in
markets A, B and C yields an average TRP level of 50 for the three markets combinednot 175 TRPs (which is the sum of the
three levels). The 50 TRPs is obtained by multiplying the TRPs in each market by the population base, adding the products, and
dividing by the combined population base. (Note: Remember that TRPs are percentages. For a TRP of 50, multiply by 50
percent or .50, for a TRP of 100, multiply by 100 percent or 1.0.)
Time Frame
The time frame for the accumulation of GRPs/TRPs varies by medium and must therefore be considered when evaluating media
types:
Magazines accumulate theft readership, and therefore their coverage, over t/me, depending on how many different people read
the magazine and when they physically obtain an issue for reading. Thus, coverage over time can vary from a week or two for
some weekly magazines to several months for monthly magazines.
Newspapers, for the most part, are read the day of issuance. TRP accumulation is therefore in a single day.
Outdoor TRPs are a reflection of one day's audience accumulation, although nearly all outdoor purchases are made for a
duration of at least one month.
Sunday newspaper supplements have a longer lifespan than daily newspapers. Their TRPs are accumulated primarily on the day
of issuance, but also in the ensuing days.
Chapter 9
Impressions
In this chapter we show how impressions are calculated based on ratings
or absolute audience measures and demonstrate how impressions are used
to compare alternative media schedules.
Impressions The gross sum of all media exposures (numbers of people or homes) without regard to
duplication.
Impressions are the sum of all advertising exposures. They are identical to GRPs/TRPs, except they are expressed in terms of
numbers of individuals (or homes) rather than as a percentage. It is equally correct to refer to them as gross impressions.
As shown in the following tables, impressions can be calculated in two ways. For demonstration, let us assume we are analyzing
a television schedule geared to reaching adults 18 and older in market X (which has an adult 18+ population of I million). The
same arithmetic applies regardless of the target audience, the market, or the medium being analyzed.
Method # 1 (see Table 9.1): Multiply the audience of each TV program by the number of announcements scheduled in each.
Add the' products of the multiplication.
TABLE 9.1: Calculating Impressions
Program A18+ Viewers # Announcements A18+ Impressions
A 250,000 × 2 = 500,000
B 200,000 × 3 = 600,000
C 150,000 × 4 = 600,000
D 100,000 × 3 = 300,000
Total
2,000,000
Impressions are used for various purposes. The first purpose is for use in sales brochures and the like when advertisers inform
retailers of the breadth and scope of the advertising planned to support a product. The belief is that retailers are accustomed to
seeing delivery figures in gross impressions and are impressed by these statistics: "2,000,000 impressions," for example, sounds
like a lot more that "200 GRPs." The expression "boxcar number'' is often used when referring to impressions because the
magnitude of the numbers is akin to the number of cases of a packaged goods product that can be shipped in a railway boxcar.
The second use for impressions involves media plan comparisons. Because impressions can be calculated for any media form, it
is a convenient way to compare gross audience deliveries of different media vehicles or different media plans. Table 9.3 shows
two media plans at equal dollar budgets. Both deliver 90 million women impressions. If all women are the target, both plans (on
the surface) are equal. If, however, the target is women 18-34, then plan I is superior, because it delivers more of your target
audience. If women 50 and older are the target, plan H has the advantage.
Two additional uses of impressions are for calculating Audience Composition and Cost-per-Thousand, both of which are
discussed in later chapters.
PROFESSIONAL WORKSHOP
1. You intend to purchase 300 TRPs against men in market
X, which has a total population of I million people. Forty
percent of these people are men. How many men
impressions will you generate?
2. You've scheduled five national magazines to receive one
ad each. Each magazine has a women rating of 10. If there
are 90 million women in the United States, how many
impressions will you generate?
3. If the magazines in question 2 skew to women 18-34,
Will you have more or fewer impressions for women 18-
34?
4. Your market X media plan calls for 20 announcements
on each of three radio stations. Each station has an average
1.0 rating for men. You also schedule a newspaper ad in a
metropolitan daily that has a 40 percent coverage of men.
What will the impressions you generate be equivalent to?
Chapter 10
Index
In this chapter we show how to calculate an index. We
demonstrate how an index is used to quickly review numerical
relationships between different numbers or sets of numbers. We
also discuss two specific kinds of index numbersBrand
Development Index and Category Development Indexthat are
commonly used in marketing analyses.
Index A number indicating change in magnitude relative to the magnitude of some other number (the
base) taken as representing 100. A 110 index indicates a 10 percent positive change in magnitude; a 90
index a 10 percent negative change.
You've heard of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It's usually up or down or holding at the same level relative to a base level.
The same concept applies to index when used for media evaluation. An index is a percentage which relates one number to
another number, called the base. An index is used to demonstrate quickly whether a number is average, above average, or below
average. Unlike percent increase or percent decrease, an index includes the base in the reported number.
Calculating an Index
Calculating an index requires simple division. It follows the same arithmetic relationship as percent increase or decrease, but is
accomplished with one less step. To calculate percent increase, for example, you subtract the smaller number from the larger
number and divide the difference by the smaller number. To calculate an index for the same increase, you avoid the subtraction
step and
If the 60 percent/40 percent in the above example is reversed, the same procedure applies to both the percent decrease and an
indexexcept the base is now 60 percent, so you are dividing by the larger number:
Percent Decrease Index
Result: (33%) 67
Conclusion for either: 40 percent is 33 percent less than 60 percent
Because an index compares a number to the base, and the base is always 100 (percent), an index of 100 means something is
average (the same as the base); an index over 100 means it is above average; an index below 100 means it is below average.
The amount by which something is below average is demonstrated by its numerical distance from 100. In the above example,
the 67 index is 33 less than 100. Here are some more examples to help reinforce the above/below average designation:
Index To Read
100 Average
125 25% above average
225 125% above average
75 25% below average
50 50% below average
25 75% below average
Let us assume you are writing a media plan to address adults who went bowling. To determine their age skews you tabulate
Because all the numbers in the table are interrelated, the index can be calculated in either of two ways:
1. Divide the "Percent Across" for the 18-24 age group by the "Percent Across" for the total population (25.5%/15.0% = 170).
The indices in Table 10.3 can be calculated in various ways and still yield the same conclusions. Method 1 is to divide the
percent of total sales accounted for in each market by the percentage of total population in that market:
Method 2 is to divide the share of market in each area by the average U.S. share of market. In the above example, this brand
commands a 22 percent share of market in market Athat is, of all the product category sold in this market, this particular brand
accounts for 22 percent of the total. The average market has a 20 percent share. Therefore, 22 share divided by 20 share equals a
110 index or a 110 BDI.
PROFESSIONAL WORKSHOP
1. Of all the adults 18 years and older living in market X, 20 percent
buy their groceries at the Sigma supermarket chain. Of all the women
18-49 in this market, 30 percent shop at Sigma. Do women 18-49
have a greater or lesser propensity for shopping at Sigma than the
average adult? What is the index? What is the magnitude of that
propensity?
2. Product X is sold in markets A, B, C and D, which respectively
represent 5 percent, 10 percent, 10 percent, and 25 percent of the U.S.
population. Product X's percent of total sales in each market is
(respectively) 30 percent, 10 percent, 20 percent, and 40 percent.
What is the BDI in each market?
3. Television program A had a five-year run, producing an average
household rating each year as follows: 10, 15, 20, 20, 10. What is the
index of performance each year relative to the average year?
4. In market A, product X has a BDI of 90 compared to a CDI of 110.
What does this tell you? If the BDI is 110 and the CDI 90, what does
this tell you?
Chapter 11
Audience Composition
In this chapter we show how audience composition of a medium's
audience is used to analyze alternative media schedules and how the
term is used to describe generally the kind of audiences various media or
media schedules attract.
# #
Viewers Viewers
Adults
18+ 300,000 60% 200,000 40%
Teens 12-
17 100,000 20 200,000 20
Kids 2-11 100,000 20 100,000 20
Total 500,000 100% 500,000 100%
program C skews much more heavily to an adult audiencethat is, a greater percentage of its audience is adults. This skew
suggests that the adult is in control of the TV set and has chosen to view this program. If this indeed is the case, a commercial
placed in this program, which is directed to an adult, might have a better chance of effectively reaching the adult than if placed
in program D.
TABLE 11.2: Skew
Program C Program D
# Viewers % Total # Viewers % Total
Adults 18+ 40,000 80% 40,000 40%
Teens 12-17 5,000 10 30,000 30
Kids 2-11 5,000 10 30,000 30
Total 50,000 100% 100,000 100%
An audience composition analysis of a medium (or a media category, etc.) is a handy device for describing generally the kind of
audiences the medium attracts. When the analysis also includes an audience composition index for each demographic cell, you
could ''write a story" about the people who consume the medium. For example, Table 11.3 shows such an analysis. The story
you could write might read: The people who consume medium A tend to be middle-aged and older, with a household income
skewing to the relatively higher level. More often than not they live in a household with two people, which, combined with their
age and income level, indicates they fit within the category that is termed "empty
nesters," where the kids are grown and have left the household. Because it is usual for the higher income people to have attained
a higher education level, it is not surprising to see that these people are more educated than the average adult. For the most part,
these adults are concentrated in the northeastern and western regions of the United States, although half of all these adults can
still be found throughout the remainder of the United States.
Despite its usefulness, audience composition cannot stand on its own as the primary reason for selecting a medium or media
category, for two reasons. First, other media dynamics, such as reach and frequency, should be part of the selection analysis.
Second, the base numbers used in the composition might be very small and therefore not indicative of the main thrust of the
medium. This is especially true if you simply review the indices without considering the base numbers. For example, a medium
might have
Chapter 12
Cost-Per-Thousand (CPM)
In this chapter we introduce a mathematical function known as
CPM which addresses the advertising cost of media relative to
the audiences delivered by these media. We demonstrate how
CPM analyses are used by the media planner to decide which
media schedule is more cost-efficient.
Cost-per-Thousand (CPM) The cost per 1,000 people (or homes) delivered by a medium or media
schedule.
CPM is an abbreviation of cost-per-thousand, with the "thousand" from the Latin mile. It is the cost per one thousand
individuals (or homes) delivered by a medium or media schedule. Calculating CPM requires simple division and multiplication:
Divide the cost by the delivery and multiply the quotient by 1,000.
A shorter method is to eliminate three zeros from the delivery and perform the same division:
The reason CPM is used instead of cost-per-audience-member is convenience in reciting the data. It's easier to say a media
vehicle has a CPM of $5.43 than to say it has a cost-per-audience-member of .00543 or 5.43 thousandths of a dollar.
Although you can use different cost structures across different media forms (such as a page black/white and a: 30) to determine
relative CPMs, you should be careful not to assume that the creative units are necessarily equal to each other. Much research
Chapter 13
Cost- Per- Rating-Point (CPP)
In this chapter we define another term based on the relationship of a
medium's advertising cost and its audience delivery. We show how cost-
per-point (CPP) varies from one specific media vehicle to another and
how it varies by demographic group. We demonstrate how CPP is used
by the media planner to project the total advertising cost of a specific
media schedule and how it can be Used to determine how much media
delivery is affordable within a defined media budget.
Cost-per-Rating-Point (CPP) The cost of an advertising unit (e.g., a 30-second commercial) divided by
the average rating of a specific demographic group (e.g., women 18-49).
Cost-per-rating-point is the cost of purchasing one rating point. It is commonly referred to as CPP (cost-per-point). As we will
see, it relates to cost-per-thousand, but is used for entirely different reasons. CPP is most often used for broadcast media.
The calculation for CPP is the same as for CPM, but the components are different. To get a CPP, divide the cost of a unit of
advertising (e.g., a 30-second TV commercial) by the program rating. As shown, the CPP for the TV :30 is $50; for the Radio
:60, $20:
Because the term is cost-per-rating-point you need to define which rating you want before calculating CPPs or before using
CPP data to devise a media plan. In the above TV example, if the 20
first calculate the average CPP for the combination of TV entities. The average CPP for the 50 percent/50 percent combination
is $17.50 ($10 plus $25 divided by 2). Next, divide the total available budget by the average CPP to determine total TRPs.
Allocate the total TRPs to each TV entity according to the desired ratio. Multiplying the TRPs by TV entity times the respective
CPP will yield the budget for each entity. By comparing the two tables (Dollar Allocation and TRP Allocation) you'll note
striking differences in the amount of dollars and number of TRPs that each system yields. Neither system is necessarily the
better. It all depends on what you're trying to accomplish with the media, which is a rather involved subject and requires a
complete understanding of the many dynamics discussed in other sections of the book.
This mathematical principle also applies when calculating the CPP for a group of markets. For example, let us assume you
intend to purchase radio in three markets within a $2,000 budget and want to estimate the average TRPs you can buy in the
three markets combined. You have estimated the CPP for each of the three markets, as shown in Table 13.4. It would be
erroneous to add the three and determine the CPP to be $13, as it would be erroneous to add the three and divide by three to
strike a $4.33 average. The correct math requires you to include the size of each market rela-
tive to the otherremembering that CPP is cost-per-rating-point and that one rating point produces different audience amounts in
different population-size markets. As the table indicates, the average CPP for the three markets combined is $5.00 (obtained by
multiplying the CPP in each market by the percent of population it represents of your total three-market universe, and adding the
products).
If you have an estimated CPP (for a program, a station, a market, etc.) and want to determine the CPM without regard to how
many TRPs you might include in your media plan, you can use the
Conversely, if you have a CPM and wish to estimate the CPP, the following formula can be used:
*Shown in thousands.
The usefulness of converting CPP to CPM is to provide additional information for the media evaluation process. For example, if
you need to choose between two media entities (two markets, two programs, two media vehicles, etc.) you would be hard-
pressed to select one on the basis of CPP. As shown in Table 13.5, a $10,000 budget could afford 800 TRPs in market A and
775 in market B, based on their respective CPPs of $12.50 and $12.90. Which choice is more efficientwhich will deliver the
greatest audience per dollar invested? By calculating CPM we determine that B is more efficient.
TABLE 13.5: CPP & CPM Comparlsons
$10.000 Budget
Market A Market B
CPP $ 12.50 $12.90
Affordable TRPs 800 775
Population (= 100 TRPs) 275,000 325,000
Cost/100 TRPs $1,250 $1,290
CPM $4.55 $3.97
Chapter 14
Reach
In this chapter we build on what we learned about ratings and an
advertising medium's capability to deliver audiences by introducing
the concept of reach. We explain how different media vehicles
attract different groups of people and how, by combining these
media vehicles in a media plan, you can increase the number of
people who will be exposed to your advertising message. We
examine how reach accumulates by medium, with successive uses of
a medium, and by combining media forms.
Reach The number or percentage of a population group exposed to a media schedule within a given
period of time.
At this point you should have a good grasp of what a rating point is and how it leads to GRPs/TRPs and eventually to
impressions. You've noted that GRPs and impressions are indicators of gross delivery, without regard for duplication. Neither
indicates how many different people will be exposed to a medium; reach does. Reach is the number of different individuals (or
homes) exposed to a media schedule within a given period of time. Reach is generally expressed as a percentage. It applies to all
media forms.
When media suppliers ''send out" their medium every person has the opportunity to receive that medium. For example, when a
TV program is broadcast, everyone (with a TV set) has the opportunity to tune their set to the channel on which the program is
broadcast; when a newspaper distributes copies of its daily edition, everyone has the opportunity to buy a copy. Obviously, not
Duplication The number or percentage of a medium's audience, or of those reached with a media
schedule, who are exposed to more than one media vehicle or to more than one advertising message.
Exhibit 14.2 displays the percentage of women who will be reached with an advertising schedule encompassing three magazines.
Again, the dynamics of reach are the same as in television but are displayed differently in this exhibit for greater clarification.
Magazine A is read by 20 percent of all women. Some of these women also read magazine B or magazine C, and some read both
B and C. The 20 percent that read magazine A is the gross audience of magazine A. Those that read only magazine A are its
exclusive audience, and those that read A and another magazine are part of a duplicated audience.
14%read only A (exclusive audience)
2% read A and B
2% read A and C
2% read A, B and C
20%read A
Exhibit 14.2:
Calculating magazine reach.
Reach Accumulation
As additional media are added to a media schedule, reach generally increasesunduplicated audiences are accumulating, which is
why
It should be clear that within a media form, reach does not generally accumulate along a straight line. As a second vehicle is
added to a first, some of the audience is duplicated and therefore counted only once in the reach equation. As more and more
vehicles are added, the relative amount of duplication usually increases. This can be seen in Table 14.2: 4,000 readers read both
magazines A and C, resulting in a 10 percent duplication (4,000 divided by the combined gross audience of 40,000), and 10,000
readers read all three magazines, resulting in a 17 percent duplication (10,000 divided by the combined gross audience of
60,000). In fact, Exhibit 14.3 demonstrates that it would take 24 different
Exhibit 14.3:
Reach Accumulation
The percentage of duplication between media vehicles has an inverse relationship with reach accumulation: the lower the
duplication, the higher the reach, and vice-versa. As shown in Table 14.3, media vehicles A and B have a combined duplication
rate of 16.7 percent (100,000 people are exposed to both vehicles, which represents 16.7 percent of the gross combined audience
of 600,000 people). The combination of vehicles A and C has a duplication of
8.3 percent. Because A and C have a lower duplication rate than A and B, the total reach of the A/C pair is greater than that of
the A/B pair. Also displayed in this table is the duplication rate represented by each vehicle. As shown, the 100,000 people
exposed to both A and B represent 25 percent of vehicle A's audience and 50 percent of vehicle B's. Vehicle B, therefore, is
adding 100,000 exclusive readers to vehicle A, representing 50 percent of its total audience. This compares to vehicle C, which
adds 150,000 exclusive readers, or 75 percent of its total audience. The higher the ratio of exclusive (non-duplicated) audience to
a medium's total audience, the greater the reach accumulation.
Generally speaking, and with all other variables held constant, reach accumulates fastest when media are scheduled sequentially
from the largest to the smallest vehicle. Shown in Table 14.4 are two listings of the same magazineson the left in rank-order
from largest to smallest; on the right in the opposite order. By scheduling the four largest magazines you can obtain a 36 reach,
compared to having to purchase nine magazines if you start at the bottom and work up toward the largest.
programs are viewed or listened to at the time they are broadcast. With the exception of VCR recording for later viewing (which
accounts for a small amount of total viewing) media consumption happens at the time of broadcast because the broadcast
intrudes on the consumer with the offer of "watch this now or don't watch it." Print media are different. Direct mail, magazines,
newspapers, and out-of-home media have permanency. They invite the consumer to "look at this when you decide to." Because
of this inherent permanency and sustained offer, print media accumulate their total audiences over time, not instantly.
Issue Life The length of time it takes a magazine to be read by the maximum measurable audience.
There are several dynamics that affect how fast print media might accumulate their total audience reach, and how long a specific
media vehicle might exist in the consumers' eyes. With magazines, for example, this existence is known as issue life. Here are
some of the dynamics:
The more material contained in a direct mail piece, and/or the more complicated the offer, and/or the more recipient
involvement needed to consume the message, the longer the life of the piece.
The shorter the time for a consumer to respond to a direct mail offer, the shorter the life.
The shorter the publication interval, the faster the accumulation. For example, daily newspapers accumulate their
audiences faster than weekly magazines; weeklies faster than monthlies. Table 14.5 shows the pattern of audience accumulation
for two weeklies and two monthlies, all of which have approximately the same total audience level. By the fifth week the
weeklies have accumulated their total readership, whereas the monthlies take about ten weeks.
Readers-per-Copy (RPC) The number of individuals who read a given copy of a publication.
The higher the number of different people who read a given copy of a publication (known as readers-per-copy, or RPC), the
slower the accumulationalthough this can vary substantially according to the editorial focus of the magazine and the amount of
time it takes the average reader to read an entire issue. A magazine that continues to be passed along to more and more people
accumulates more and more readers per copy, but the passing-along process obviously takes time.
The greater the proportion of newsstand sales versus subscriptions, the slower the audience accumulation (but this is a broad
generality with many exceptions).
Timely or news-oriented publications are generally consumed faster and therefore accumulate reach faster.
The greater the need for reference by the consumer, (e.g., a special issue or supplement on first aid care or places to vacation)
the longer the issue life of a magazine or newspaper
Roadblock
Roadblock A scheduling device used with broadcast media to increase reach at a given point in time
(e.g., scheduling a commercial on all local market stations at 9:00 p.m.).
In the first example of how reach works we assumed a schedule of four TV programs, each airing at a different time in the
week. In this situation, a given viewer has the opportunity to see all four programs. If the programs aired simultaneously, for
example, all on Monday from 8:00-8:30 p.m., the average viewer could view only one of the programs at any specific moment.
Therefore, if each of the four programs has a 20 rating, then each is attracting different viewers. If there is no duplication of
audience between the four programs, then the ratings for each are additive, which results in an 80 reach. This tactic of
scheduling advertising at precisely the same time of day is known as a roadblocka device that intercepts as many viewers as
possible in order to maximize reach at a specific time. If commercials are scheduled on all TV programs (or radio stations)
broadcast at a given time, then reach is equivalent to the PUT (People Using TV) level at that time. Keep in mind, however, that
this scheduling tactic is not necessarily as cost efficient as scheduling programs at different times. Two of the disadvantages
follow:
Audience Turnover The average ratio of cumulative audience listening/viewing to the average audience
listening/viewing.
Precise timingReach will equal the sum of individual ratings only if the advertising message airs at precisely the same time on
all programs. Because there is audience turnover during a typical TV (or radio) programsome program viewers tune out during
the program and new viewers tune inthere can be audience duplication among viewers who might have seen your commercial on
Program A (at 8:10 p.m.) and on Program B (at 8:20 p.m.).
Cost efficiencyDuring any specific time of day, competing TV (or radio) programs have different commercial cost structures.
Some programs command a higher commercial cost than others, resulting in different CPMs by program. Buying
Media Mix
Media Mix The use of two or more media forms, e.g., TV and magazines or radio, outdoor, and
newspapers.
When two or more different media forms are used in a media plan, it is referred to as a media mixmixing media such as TV and
magazines, or TV, radio and magazines, etc., as opposed to simply using more than one vehicle within a medium (such as two
or more magazines).
When you add a second media form, you generally accelerate reach accumulation beyond what could be obtained by using more
of the same media form. For example, if you first buy a 20-rated TV program (and therefore reach 20 percent of your target
audience), you can usually generate more additional reach if you add a 20-rated magazine than if you add another 20-rated TV
program. Accelerating reach is but one reason to mix media. Here are some more:
To reach people who do not consume your first medium, or are only lightly exposed to the first medium.
To provide additional repeat exposure of your advertising in what might be a less expensive secondary medium after you've
attained optimum reach in the first medium.
When combining two or more media forms, you must establish reach for each medium on the same population base. For
example, you cannot combine the reach of women in one medium with the reach of homes in another. Nor can you combine the
homes reached with cable TV (which is not in every home with a TV set) with the homes reached with broadcast TV (which
assumes a
To physically appreciate how the random combination technique works, you might try this demonstration. Mark 20 ping pong
balls, 10 with the word "TV" and 10 with the word "magazines." Gather 20 people in a room. Randomly toss out the 10 TV
balls and ask that no one catch more than one ball. Then toss out the 10 magazine balls, requesting that no one catch more than
one of these balls, whether or not they already caught a TV ball. Count the number of people who caught a TV ball (it has to be
10). These 10 represent a 50 reach (10/20 = 50%). Repeat the process for magazines. This will also equal a 50 reach. Then count
the number of people who have either a TV ball or a magazine ball or both. It will probably come out to be about 15
peoplerepresenting a 75 reach of the group of 20 people.
Only-Only-Both
It is often mistakenly assumed that when two media forms are combined, all people reached will be exposed to your advertising
in both media. Because the usual effect of adding a second medium is to extend reach to those not exposed to the first medium,
not all people will be exposed to both media forms. The only way all people reached can be exposed to both media is when each
medium produces 100 percent reach of the target, or when media delivery is tightly controlled, such as sending a direct mail
piece to every person who receives a subscription-only magazine.
Whenever a media mix reach is calculated you should also indicate the "only-only-both" componentsthat is, the reach of those
who will be exposed only to the first medium, the reach
While you still have those 20 people in a room counting ping pong balls, you might want to physically examine the only-only-
both concept. If you obtained a 50 reach of each medium (TV and magazines) you should have the following array:
# People with Ping Pong
Balls Reach
TV only 5 25
Magazines only 5 25
Both TV & 5 25
Magazines
Total 15 75
Not reached 5 25
The random combination technique should not be used for calculating reach within a media form, primarily because the rates of
duplication between two media vehicles within the same media category are generally higher than between two different media
forms. As previously shown in Table 14.4, the combination of magazines A, B, C, and D produced a 36 reach based on actual
A 19 19 19
B 13 27 30
C 12 32 38
D 11 36 45
Two questions remain: At what point should you stop accumulating reach in one medium and start adding a second medium?
How do you evaluate reach for those people who are exposed to your advertising more than once?
There are no rules for determining how much reach is enough. Answering this question is the same as trying to answer "How
high is up?" We might answer: as high as it needs to be. We have seen that as more and more vehicles are added to a schedule,
reach accumulates, but the accumulation produces diminishing returns with each successive addition. You could graph the reach
accumulation obtainable within a specific media form, such as that displayed in Exhibit 14.3, and visually pick that point at
which you believe the reach curve is "flattening," that is, the point beyond which additional reach is adding proportionately very
little to a schedule. Using the same graph you can select what you believe to be a "threshold'' level of activitya point below
which you perceive the advertising delivery will not produce a desired consumer response. Using either the flattening or
threshold barometer you can determine how much money that level of activity will cost, subtract this cost from your total
budget, and use the remaining monies for a second medium.
You could also do a cost analysis to determine the cost per additional reach point to give quantitative substance to your decision.
Shown in Table 14.8 is a hypothetical approach to this type of analysis. We see that magazine B adds 8 reach points to magazine
A at a cost of $5,000 per reach point, magazine C adds 5 reach points at a cost of $6,000 per reach point, etc. All in all,
however, the media planner's judgment must come into play in deciding "how high is up?"
Exposure A person's physical contact (visual and/or audio) with an advertising medium or message.
The second question is related to the first. As reach accumulates there are diminishing returns for reach, but not for the total
exposure of your advertising message(s). Total exposure is a combination of reach and frequency. The latter is discussed in the
next section.
PROFESSIONAL WORKSHOP
1. You purchase two magazines, each with a 10 rating for men. What is the
minimum and maximum reach you might obtain?
2. You schedule ten TV programs, each with a 5.0 rating, and five
magzines, each with a 10.0 rating. How much reach will you generate?
3. You're considering the purchase of radio stations A and B. Station A has
20,000 listeners and station B has 10,000. The two combined have a 20
percent duplication rate. What is the combined reach of the stations?
4. Using the same example as in question 3, what percent of station A's
audience is duplicated with B? What percent of station B's audience is
duplicated with A?
5. Your TV schedule has a 50 reach of adults, and your outdoor plan yields
a 30 reach. Using the random technique, what is your combined reach?
6. Using the example in question 5, what is the reach of people who will be
exposed to only TV, only outdoor, and both media?
Chapter 15
Frequency
In this chapter we investigate frequency, a media dynamic that is used hand-in-glove
with the previously discussed dynamic of reach. We also discuss the differences
between the terms mean, median, and modeall of which refer to the overall term of
average.
Frequency The number of times people (or homes) are exposed to an advertising message, an
advertising campaign, or to a specific media vehicle. Also, the period of issuance of a publication, e.g.,
daily or monthly.
We've seen that a media vehicle produces an audience that can be described in total numbers and as a rating. We've also seen
that when different vehicles are used in combination, audience delivery increasesboth in gross terms (gross rating points and
impressions), and in net terms (reach). We know that all of the people reached will be exposed to at least one advertising
message, and some to more than one. Up to this point we have not accounted for those who will receive more than one
advertising message. This is where the term frequency comes into play. Frequency is the average number of tunes individuals
(or homes) are exposed to the advertising messages delivered in a media schedule.
A simple example of frequency: if 10 people took one business trip per year, and 10 others took two trips, you can conclude that
the average number of trips this group of 20 took was 1.5 (10 × 1 + 10 × 2 = 30/20 = 1.5).
Let's reprise the schedule originally presented in the previous chaptershown as Exhibit 15.1, and displayed in an alternate format
in Table 15.1. We have a total of 40 people who we estimate will view one or more of the four TV programs: 17 people will
view only one program (A or B or C or D); 11 people, two programs; 7 people, three programs; and 5 people, four programs. If
we add all of this together then the 40 people will view the equivalent of 80
programs and will therefore be exposed to the equivalent of 80 commercials. By division, we can establish that the average
person will be exposed to an average of two commercials.
The concept of frequency, like reach, is identical in all media forms. Exhibit 15.2 and Table 15.2 show, for example, how
frequency computations are made for a combination of magazines. Here again we see three magazines, each read by 20 percent
of the population. In the last chapter we calculated a net audience of 50 (that is, a 50 reach) who read one or more of these
magazines. It's obvious that there is duplication of readership between the magazines, with some people reading two of the three
magazines and some reading all three. If there was no duplication, the three magazines combined would yield a 60 reach, with
each person having an average exposure (average frequency) of one (1.0). But because of duplication, the actual reach is less
and the average frequency is, therefore, more than 1.0. This duplication results in
Exhibit 15.2:
Calculating magazine reach.
TABLE 15.2: Calculating Average Frequency
Magazine 1 Time 2 Times 3 Times Total
A 14%× 1
B 14%× 1
C 14%× 1
A+B 2%×2
A+C 2%×2
B+C 2%×2
A+B+C ' 2%×3
Gross Sum (TRPs) 42 12 6 60
Net Sum (Reach) 50
Average Frequency 1.2
Equivalent # Programs/Insertions
Schedule 1 Reach Frequency
Medium
80 40 2.0
TV
60 50 1.2
Magazines
140 70 2.0
Combined
Equivalent # Programs/Insertions
Schedule 2 Reach Frequency
Medium
60 40 1.5
TV
80 50 1.6
Magazines
140 70 2.0
Combined
Frequency in Only-Only-Both
Frequency for Only-Only-Both cannot be tabulated unless you have precise media consumption data for each person you are
reaching with your media schedule. Without this precision, you cannot know the average frequency within any of these three
groupings. Using schedule 1 in Table 15.3, for example, we can conclude that 20 percent of people will be exposed only to TV,
30 percent only to magazines, and 20 percent to both TV and magazines. We know that the average person reached via TV
(either only TV or with TV and magazines) is exposed to an average of 2.0 advertising messages. What we do not know is the
frequency composition of the 40 percent of people who are exposed to TV either in the ''only" TV segment or in the "both" TV
and magazines segment. Hypothetically, of the 40 percent of people exposed to TV, the half exposed only to TV could have a
frequency lower or higher than the average 2.0. It can be assumed that the group exposed only to TV would have a higher
frequency than the group exposed to both media, based on the belief that those who are viewing proportionately more TV than
average have a lesser opportunity to be exposed to magazines. But this is only assumption and could lead to misinformation.
(See Table 15.4.)
Mean (100/5) = 20
Chapter 16
Reach/Frequency/GRPs
This chapter examines the interrelationship and
interdependence of reach, frequency and gross rating points.
We demonstrate how these three media dynamics are used to
analyze the audience delivery productivity of various media
schedules with specific focus on how each media form, each
sub segment of these forms, or each combination of the media
forms produces markedly different audience delivery patterns.
We discuss how a media planner can exercise control over how
much reach or frequency can be generated within a given
number of GRPs. Lastly, we caution about possibly misusing
the number of announcements or advertisements in a media
schedule to determine the audience' reach of that schedule by
demonstrating the non relationship between announcements and
reach.
Reach 50 100,000
× Frequency 4.0 4
= GRPs 200
= Impressions
R/F 50/4.0 400,000
* Population base = 200,000
R/F can be estimated for all major media forms, with the basic formula being the same for all forms. We'll first use TV
examples to demonstrate R/F dynamics, then show the application in other media.
Exhibit 16.1:
Estimating a Reach Curve
Exhibit 16.2:
Frequency Is A Straight Line
Because frequency remains a straight line, you can graph the line based on two different GRP levels and use the line to estimate
reach and frequency for any level of GRPs. For example, if you estimated R/F for the levels of 100 and 500 GRPs, and plotted
the frequency line on a graph, you would effect what is shown in Exhibit 16.2. If you then wanted to estimate the reach for 300
GRPs, you would read up from the 300-GRP point until it intersects the frequency line (at 5.0), and then divide 300 GRPs by a
5.0 frequency to yield a 60 reach.
The reach curve and frequency line are affected by these truths:
The more duplication of audience between media vehicles, the lower the rate of reach accumulation; conversely, the less the
duplication, the greater the rate.
The lower the rate of reach accumulation, the faster the rate of frequency accumulation; conversely, the greater the rate of reach,
the slower the frequency accumulation.
An additional dynamic at play in a reach curve is the point at which reachfor all intents and purposesceases to accumulate.
Obviously, reach cannot exceed 100 percent of a population group. In fact, based on typical media consumption patterns, reach
might be substantially less than 100 percent. For example, if your media plan schedules only daytime television, the probability
is that your reach will never exceed 60 percent of adult women because, on average, 40 percent of women typically do not view
daytime TV.
The graphs shown in Exhibit 16.3 demonstrate reach and frequency accumulation for six different television time periods
You'll also note in Table 16.1 that if you multiply reach by frequency for the people demographic, your product will always be
less than 200you will produce fewer than 200 GRPs against women 18 and older or men 18 and older if you schedule 200 GRPs
against households. The reason for this ties back to viewing patterns and the different rates of media consumption by different
demographic groups. Table 16.2 on page 140 shows the average number of GRPs that are produced among women 18 and older
and men 18 and older by 100 household GRPs scheduled in each of six
Exhibit 16.3:
Reach Curves / Frequency Lines by Daypart Households
Exhibit 16.3
Continued
Using GRP conversion factors which might be available to you, you can set out to calculate R/F. This calculation can be done
from reach curves designed for that population segment, or by using various formulas which are generally computerized, or by
using published tables. Computer models and published tables are generally available from syndicated media research
companies, media suppliers, or a company's proprietary systems. The larger advertising agencies, for example, generally
develop their own proprietary R/F models.
As shown in Table 16.3, the same level of GRPs scheduled against different demographic groups produces different R/F levels.
For example, 200 women 18+ GRPs in early morning will generate a 26/7.8, compared to 200 men 18+ GRPs in the same
daypart yielding a 21/9.6. You'll note the substantial differences between this R/F pattern and the one in Table 16.1, where R/F
among these groups was a result of scheduling household rating points. Whenever you schedule people GRPs, you will produce
more reach and/or frequency against these people than if you schedule the same amount of household GRPs. This happens
because household GRPs are people-indiscriminate. For example, two TV programs, each with a 10 rating, could produce
widely varying ratings for women, men, etc.
In our examples so far, we have been discussing R/F patterns with all GRPs scheduled in only one TV daypart. When a
combination of dayparts is used in a media schedule, different patterns emerge. Generally, as additional dayparts are added to a
media schedule, reach accumulates faster than might ordinarily be achieved by concentrating activity within one daypart. This
phenomenon is akin to our earlier discussion on media mix in Chapter 14, "Reach." The scheduling of additional dayparts
affords the opportunity to reach people who are ordinarily not viewing the first daypart.
Shown in Table 16.4 is the R/F of various combinations of two daypartssuch as a schedule composed of 100 women 18+ GRPs
in daytime and another 100 in primetime. If you compare the R/F results shown in this table to the results shown in Table 16.3,
you'll
TABLE 16.4: Reach/Frequency for Daypart Combinations
W18 + GRPs
1 2 3 4 5
Day 100
Early Fringe/News 100 100
Prime Access 100
Prime 100 100 100 100
Late Fringe/News 100 100
Total TRPS 67/3.0 62/3.2 72/2.8 52/3.9 67/3.0
R/F
Reworking our hypothetical schedules from Table 16.5, we might find that schedule 5 is superior because it allows the purchase
of more GRPs and produces a slightly higher reach and frequency. Table 16.6 demonstrates this possibility. Keep in mind,
however, that the one percentage point difference in reach between these
Reach/Frequency in Radio
The same general dynamics hold true for radio as for TV. In fact, both of these electronic media forms are planned on the basis
of GRPs (as opposed to, say, magazines). The only difference between radio and TV media planning is that radio usually also
refers to the number of announcements that are placed on each station because the activity by station has a direct effect on
reach/frequency accumulation, as do these additional factors:
1. The GRP level
2. The number of stations purchased
3. The average rating of the purchased stations
4. The dispersion of announcements across different times of the day on each station
Assume you intend to purchase 100 GRPs targeted to adults 18 and older. You've decided to analyze three alternative schedules,
as shown in Table 16.7. If you place a schedule on five average stations in market X, you'll purchase 111 announcements to
generate 100 GRPs and will produce a reach/frequency of 28/3.6. If you place a
If duplication rates were reported for all TV and radio programs, the same kind of formulas could be developed to calculate
broadcast reach and frequency. The media planner would not have to rely on the generalities of GRPs and general audience
accumulation data. However, because of the dynamic and ever-changing program environment in broadcast media, such
duplication information would be relatively unreliable for predicting future media consumption patterns.
Exhibit 16.4:
Controlling Reach/Frequency within 93.5 GRPs
The real application of this R/F control requires that you have some understanding of the duplication rates between media
vehicles within a media form, and between different combinations of media forms. It is logical to assume, for example, that
programs within a given TV time period probably have more duplication than programs in different time periods. Also,
magazines within an editorial category (such as women's magazines) will have more duplication than magazines in divergent
categories. But even with this understanding, you should test your notions by conducting a reach/frequency analysis of
alternative combinations.
Number of Spots
It has become common to refer to the number of commercial announcements in television or radio as the number of spots.
Although grammatically questionable, referring to commercial announcements as "spots" is semantically propereveryone knows
Exhibit 16.5:
Non-Relationship of # Spots and Reach
Chapter 17
Frequency Distribution
In this chapter we extend our understanding of frequency by discussing
frequency distribution. We demonstrate how different media audience
members receive different levels of advertising exposure and how, by
combining these levels, we arrive at average frequency. We also examine
how different components of a media form produce varying frequency
patterns.
In all our examples on reach and frequency we demonstrated average frequency among those people reached with a media
schedule. As you digested those tables and charts you noted that some people received more than average frequency, and some
less than average. For example, when we spoke of magazine reach and frequency we saw that some people read only one
magazine, some read two, and some read all three. Each of these groups of people (each of these reach segments) received
different rates of exposure, that is, different levels of frequency.
Frequency Distribution The array of reach according to the level of frequency delivered to each group.
Let's use the combination of three magazines that was originally displayed in Exhibit 15.2. We saw that 42 percent of people
read only one of the three magazines, six percent read any two, and two percent read all three. If you array this reach and
exposure level (as shown in Table 17.1), you will have calculated a frequency distribution. The usual way of showing this
distribution is displayed in the lower part of the table.
You'll also note that the three magazines produced a total of 60 GRPs. With a combined 50 reach, the average frequency is
therefore 1.2even though none of these people is exposed to the medium exactly 1.2 times. A frequency distribution overrides
the necessity
of displaying the average frequency because it addresses the amount of reach obtained at each level of frequency. Semantically,
it would be better to call a frequency distribution "a distribution of reach by each level of frequency," but media shorthand
prevails.
The frequency distribution of ten 20-rated announcements scheduled in ten primetime TV programs is displayed in Table 17.2.
The 200 women 18+ GRPs generated by this schedule produce a reach of 64.9 and an average frequency of 3.1. Some of the
women reached will view only one program, some more than oneup to the possible total of all ten programs. The specific
distribution for this schedule indicates that 20.6 percent will view only one program, a different group of women representing
13.9 percent of the population will view only two programs, etc. Because there is no duplication between these only groups, the
reach against each frequency level can be added together to get total reach. Going back to our previous discussion on mean
average, you'll see that the average frequency is 3.1. The median average frequency is 4.0, but median averages are not used in
frequency distributions.
Exhibit 17.1 displays the frequency distribution in Table 17.2 graphically. Typical frequency distributions follow this same
patternless and less reach as the level of frequency increases. The reasons for this pattern are twofold:
1. Some people view only a little bit of TV and therefore will automatically not have the opportunity to be exposed to many
commercials. Some people view a lot of TV and will therefore receive proportionately higher levels of advertising exposure.
2. The chances of hitting everyone with the same level of frequency diminish as more and more TV programs are added to a
media schedule, because different programs attract different people. In our schedule of ten primetime programs, for example, it's
unreasonable to believe that most of the people reached will be part of the viewing audience of most of the programs.
Although the general pattern of a frequency distribution is as shown, specific patterns vary according to the rates of duplication
Exhibit 17.1:
Frequency Distribution Pattern Schedule:
200 W18+ GRPs In Primetime
between media forms and between vehicles within a form. If you schedule one announcement in each of two TV programs that
have no duplication (no one views both programs), your average frequency will be one. If these two programs have total
duplication (everyone reached views both programs), your average frequency will be two. Because of varying duplication rates
between vehicles, coupled with the available audience size at any given time (HUT levels), frequency distributions vary by
television daypart. Those dayparts, such as daytime, that have proportionately more duplication between programs tend to have
proportionately more reach at the higher frequency levels; those with proportionately less duplication (e.g., primetime) tend to
have proportionately less reach at the higher frequency levels.
Shown in Table 17.3 are frequency distributions for a schedule of 200 women 18+ GRPs in each of five TV dayparts. Total R/F
varies between dayparts (for reasons explained in the previous section), as does the amount of reach at each frequency level
between and within dayparts. For ease in reviewing these data, arithmetic
Another way to evaluate a frequency distribution is to calculate the gross delivery at each frequency level to determine how
much relative pressure (or weight) is directed to each frequency group. Using the information from Table 17.3 for 200 W18+
GRPs in primetime, for example, we can calculate how many GRPs are generated by each frequency level. As shown in Table
17.4, the 20.6 reach at one frequency level equals 21 GRPs; the 13.9 reach at the two-level equals 28 GRPs, and so forth.
Adding GRPs for each frequency level produces the total GRPs of 200. Of the total
If you tie this GRP information into cost considerations, you can determine the relative investment you are making for the
schedule you are analyzing. In the above primetime frequency distribution, for example, you can correctly state that 10.5 percent
of the media budget you want to expend in primetime for 200 GRPs is accounted for by women who will be exposed to only
one commercial announcement.
By displaying the GRPs generated at each frequency level for different media schedules, such as for 200 women 18+ GRPs in
daytime versus primetime, you can both evaluate the concentration of GRP "weight" and make some judgments on whether or
not your media budget is providing the kinds of frequency concentrations you are seeking. Exhibit 17.2 demonstrates the vast
differences between daytime and primetime. The 200 GRPs in daytime show a definite skew to the higher frequency levels,
whereas primetime exhibits a generally fiat concentration pattern.
Exhibit 17.2:
Concentration of GRP, by Frequency Level-Schedule: 200 W18+ GRPs in Each Daypart
Reach: 20 10 8 75
You can't access the PC to rerun the data because there's a power
outage. You're not having a good day, but you still must know the
R/F. Can you figure it out?
2. The multimedia schedule you are running produces an 80/4.0
against men 18-34. How many of these men will be exposed to
one or more commercial messages?
3. You decided to run in two magazines, each of which reaches 20
percent of women in an average issue. If there is no duplication of
audience between these magazines, what will your frequency
distribution look like? If there's 50 percent duplication, what will it
look like?
Chapter 18
Quintile Distribution
In this chapter we focus on quintile distributions. We show how these
distributions are related to the previously discussed frequency
distributions, and how quintiles are calculated. We demonstrate how
different uses of media, or different combinations of media, produce
different quintile patterns. We also show how media research suppliers'
definitions of quintiles are not necessarily in concert with how media
planners use quintile analyses to assess media schedules.
Quintile Distribution A display of frequency (or related data) among audiences grouped into equal
fifths of reach.
Different people consume different media with varying intensity. This consumption pattern is generally fairly habitual. Although
consumption patterns may change as a person changes (for instance, as they get older, or become more educated, or attain a
different income level), at any given point in time a person tends to fall within a defined level of media exposure. Some people,
for example, spend a great deal of time reading magazines. Others spend less. Some view a great deal of TV. Some watch very
little. If you were to randomly select any five people and query them on how much TV they view in an average day, we would
find five different levels of viewingfrom the light viewer who might view only an hour or less each day, to the heavy viewer
who might view five hours or more per day. By arraying these people into five different groups (each containing one person),
we have effected a quintile distribution. A quintile distribution is like a frequency distribution, but rather than displaying reach
at each frequency level, it groups the audience reached into five equal parts and averages the frequency for each group.
Although quintiles (fifths) will be discussed
Total viewing hours in the market are seven million (7 hours × 1 million households). The light viewing quintile accounts for
200,000 hours (1 hour × 200,000). The lightest viewing quintile, therefore, accounts for three percent of all viewing hours
(200,000/7,000,000). Conversely, the heaviest viewing quintile accounts for 43 percent of total market viewing hours. In nearly
all quintile distributions, you will find that the heaviest group always accounts for significantly more consumption than the
lightest group.
7. Continue the same procedures as above to account for all reach at all frequency levels.
8. Check your findings by first adding the GRPs at each quintile level. This should equal the total GRPs of the schedule.
Exhibit 18.1:
Television quintile analysis
Table 18.3 displays the real-world situation. It shows that heavy radio listeners are almost equally distributed among each of the
TV quintiles. To read the chart: 20 percent of adults are considered heavy radio listeners. Of this 20 percent, 19 percent are
heavy viewers of primetime TV, and 23 percent are light viewers. The same holds true for light radio listeners; that is, 21
percent of all listeners are heavy TV viewers, and 20 percent are light TV viewers.
Because of what happens in the real world, the frequency distribution tends to flatten whenever a second medium is added to
the first. Adding magazines to a base of television, for example, delivers equal frequency to each TV quintile but
disproportionately more frequency to the lighter viewing quintiles than to the heavier viewing quintiles. As shown in Exhibit
18.2, the addition of magazines increases frequency among the lightest viewing fifth by 200
Exhibit 18.2
Quintile distribution adding a second medium.
Predefined Quintiles
All of the quintile distributions displayed so far have been based on specific media schedules in each of the various media
forms. All have also been devised using the frequency distribution of those schedules. Many syndicated media research
companies report media audiences by quintile (or equivalent), but these designations do not necessarily jibe with the quintile
distribution that will be obtained for a specific media schedule. Syndicated research companies classify audiences into one or
another quintile based on their findings of media consumption intensitieseither by arraying segments, each of which
encompasses 20 percent of the population base, and determining their overall level of media consumption, or by defining an
array of media intensity and determining the portion of the population within that array. Shown in Table 18.5 is an example of
two major syndicated research reports listing their definitions of each quintile for magazine readership along with the
corresponding percent of total U.S. population within each segment. If you use this information in planning a media schedule,
you need to understand that different sources reveal different information, and that overall general information may or may not
indicate the quintile distribution of a specific media schedule.
TABLE 18.5: Quintile Definitions Used by Syndicated
ResearchersWomen 18 and Older
Number of Issues In a Month
I (Heavy) II III IV V(Light)
MRI 18+ 11-17 7-10 3-6 2 or less
Simmons 10+ 6-9 4-5 2-3 1 or less
Percent of Total Reading Audience
I (Heavy) II III IV V (Light)
MRI 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Simmons 20.4 23.8 18.6 19.8 17.5
Chapter 19
Effective Reach
In this chapter we go beyond the basic concepts of reach and frequency by
combining these separate terms into one media dynamic known as effective
reach. We show how effective reach is calculated by using a frequency
distribution. We examine the various patterns of effective reach which
emerge through the use of alternative media schedules. We discuss possible
answers to a question that has plagued advertisers: How much frequency is
enough? We conclude with a discussion on advertising wearout by
reviewing pertinent research conducted on the issue and by demonstrating
some techniques for deciding the proper level of effective reach.
Effective Reach The number or percentage of a population group reached by a media schedule at a
given level of frequency.
Effective Frequency The level of exposure frequency at which reach is deemed "effectively" delivered.
See Effective Reach.
We have spoken of total reach, average frequency, frequency distribution, and quintile distribution. All of these are obviously
interrelated and basically address the same thing: the quantity and intensity of potential advertising exposures. From a numerical
standpoint the aim of the media planner is to maximize this total exposureto provide the most delivery per dollar invested.
Maximization of exposure opportunities goes beyond delivering reach and frequency. It involves reaching people with
frequency. Enter the media dynamic known as effective reachoften also called effective frequency. It is the percent (or number)
of people reached by a media schedule at a frequency level deemed effective.
This effective frequency level is not the overall average frequency nor the average frequency within any quintile. It is the
frequency level that you have defined as being the right level to get
8+ 3.6 8+ 3.6
Total 64.9
Average
frequency 3.1
Hypothetically, if you decided that a 6.0 frequency is the effective level you need to seek, you would choose 200 GRPs in
daytime, early fringe, or late fringe, each of which delivers the highest level of 6+ reach12.
We've noted, however, that you should not compare equal GRPs from one media schedule to another inasmuch as the costs
might
Bear in mind that the effective reach concept applies to all media. Just as all media can be analyzed on the basis of total reach/
frequency, they can be analyzed on effective reach levels. Also keep in mind that when combining media, some people who are
exposed at the 1.0 level for medium A and the 1.0 level for medium B move into the 2.0 level for a combination of both media
(i.e., receive two exposures from either medium A or B or both). Table 19.4 shows frequency distributions for two schedulesone
encompassing 200 GRPs in TV and the other one a schedule for one insertion in each of seven women's magazines. You'll note
that in the combination the percent reached at the 1.0 level is less than the reach obtained by either medium alone.
Exhibit 19.1:
Effective Frequency Range
is quantifying the frequency level at each of the critical satiation points. We also need to understand that the corollary to
remembering is forgetting.
Ebbinghaus found that after one week, 75 percent of "learned" information was forgotten; after four weeks 95 percent was not
remembered. Hubert Zielske4 also investigated learning and forgetting (in 1959 for print media and, joined by Walter Henry,
again in 1980 for television advertising). A summary of the 1980 findings appears in Exhibit 19.2. The graph shows the unaided
recall level obtained by various scheduling patterns, each totalling 1,300 GRPs. The first schedule, for example, allocated 100
GRPs per week for 13 consecutive weeks. This schedule achieved the highest recall score, but was followed by a rapid decay
rate which ended in week 52 with the lowest recall of any of the studied
Exhibit 19.2:
Summary of Five 1,300 Rating-Point Schedules
respondents in their serf-administered questionnaire. For example, of all the adults 18 and older who claim to be part of the
early morning TV audience, 9 percent say they are generally out of the room during the telecasts, 54 percent claim to pay some
attention, and only 37 percent claim to pay full attention.
If you are running an average (though effective) commercial, in an average schedule in TV across many dayparts, in an average
competitive marketplace, you might conclude that only 62 percent of the people watching the TV programs in which you have
placed your commercial might pay full attention. Conceivably, the percentage paying full attention to your commercial could be
more or less than 62 percent, but let's stick with this ratio for the purpose of demonstration. Applying this 62 percent to a desired
3+ frequency level would lead you to need a 5+ media exposure frequency:
5
frequency(Media audience OTS)
× 62% (Possible "full attention" exposure to
your commercial)
3 (Effective frequency level)
frequency
A decision to choose a particular effective frequency level is not easy to make. It is, nevertheless, important to make a choice.
To not decide on a level is to decide that it does not matterand evidence Suggests it very much matters. Regardless of the level
that is chosen, it appears that you would be better off to be roughly right than exactly wrongbetter to go for something in the
range of a 2+ or 3+ or 4+ level than to just settle for a 1+ level. But even after you make this decision, you need to concern
yourself with the
Wearout
Wearout A level of frequency, or a point in time, when an advertising message loses its ability to
effectively communicate.
There are many definitions for wearout, and all address the same phenomenon. For example, wearout can be seen as:
Where decay sets in. Referring back to our learning-satiation-decay curve, there probably is a point at which the consumer has
absorbed as much as he or she needs to (or wants to). Any additional exposure beyond this point is wasteful and possibly
harmful to the advertised product.
Communication inability. There is a level at which a commercial is felt to lose its ability to communicate, persuade, or create
positive attitudes. Further exposure beyond this point can be considered to have either a negative or, at best, a neutral effect.
Non-achievement of goals. "A commercial wears out when it fails to achieve the campaign goal as it has before."8
Whether you use one of the definitions above or one of your own, the logical fact remains that there is most probably a
maximum frequency level within the effective reach concept. Effective reach may start (for example) at the 3.0 frequency level,
but it certainly ends somewhere before infinity.
Specifying this finite maximum is impossible. A host of variables, many of which are also important in defining the minimum
level, come into play when thinking about the maximum. We can speculate, with some confidence in our judgment, that
wearout occurs for different individuals at different points in time (in the frequency continuum) depending on their
demographics and lifestyle characteristics, the creative execution, their propensity to be within the product's consumption group,
the number of competitive product advertisements to which they are exposed, etc. Nevertheless, there are some indications of
what this maximum level might be.
Marplan 15
Research
Communications 13-14
Research
Tele Research 15-20
Market 20-25
Evaluation
Study
Benton & 20
Bowles
TVC 12
It is not an uncommon practice to use information like the above, tied to a quintile distribution, to decide the point of wearout
for a given advertising campaign. Table 19.7, for example, shows a television schedule that produces a 25.0 frequency among
the heaviest-viewing 20 percent of the total reach. If a 25 frequency is considered the maximum level of effective
communication that is, a 26 frequency is the point where decay startsthen the commercial(s) being used in this campaign have
worn out, suggesting that a new commercial, or pool of commercials (or a print ad, etc.) should be produced. There are several
factors to consider, however, in making this decision:
TABLE 19.7: Wearout Based on Quintile
Distribution
Quintile Reach Frequency
Heaviest 19 25.0
Next 19 12.1
Next 19 7.2
Next 19 4.2
Lightest 19 1.9
Total/Average 95 10.1
1. All the research conducted on the subject of wearout was for specific commercial executions under specific conditions and
may or may not apply to your product in your media choice and given your chosen schedule.
2.Assign a value to each frequency level (or range of frequency), using the value as a multiplier against reach to produce what
Jules Fine9 terms Real Effective Reach. As shown in Table 19.9, lower frequency levels receive lower values than those in the
3-10 range; frequency levels above 8.0 are given a zero
References
1. Greyser, Stephen A., "Irritation in Advertising," Journal of Advertising Research, April, 1980.
2.Jackobovits, Leon, "Semantic Satiation and Cognitive Dynamics," American Psychological Association meeting paper,
September, 1966.
3.Achenbaum, Alvin, "Effective Exposure: A New Way of Evaluating Media," Association of National Advertisers Workshop,
February, 1977.
4.Zielske, Hubert A., and Walter, A. Henry, "Remembering and Forgetting Television Ads," Journal of Advertising Research,
April, 1980.
5. Krugman, Herbert, "Why Three Exposures May Be Enough," Journal of Advertising Research, April, 1980.
6.Naples, Michael, Effective Frequency: The Relationship Between Frequency and Advertising Effectiveness, Association of
National Advertisers, 1978.
7.Ostrow, Joseph, Advertising Research Foundation Workshop, 1982.
8.Priemer, A. B., "You Can Measure Wearout; However...," Association of National Advertisers Workshop, February, 1981.
9.Fine, Jules, "Using Media Effectively," Marketing Communications, January/February, 1978.
Chapter 20
Media Audience Definitions
Most of our previous discussion has centered on media audiences: how
different media vehicles produce different audience numbers (or percentages),
how audience accumulates over time or with repeated use of a medium, how
reach and frequency are affected by different combinations of media, and so
forth. We have referred to readers or viewers or listeners within a given
demographic groupwomen or men of a certain age, total people, etc. Although
we have spoken of the rating for program A or the readers of magazine B, we
did not discuss how that rating or number of readers came to be, nor did we
speak of the computation mechanics that led to the audience count with which
we Were dealing. This chapter will first concentrate on the definitions of what
an audience is in terms of demographics, product usage habits, and
psychographics. We will discuss two popular research studies that are used to
describe consumers. We will also introduce an increasingly popular analytical
device known as geodemography. In the latter part of the chapter we will
investigate how the major mass media report their audiences to demonstrate the
kinds of information with which a media planner deals in analyzing media
alternatives.
Product Users
Although demographic studies are important in your planning process, they are usually considered of secondary importance to
studies that define product users, or users of products within a given category. An assessment of product users is a more
effective method of analysis because media selection is predicated on the ability to reach very specific groups of people who are
most apt to purchase a particular product or service.
A product user study can give you a more precise definition of each medium's ability to reach these users. If you are advertising
tennis shoes, for example, you certainly would want to reach men and women 18-34 years old, as this demographic group has
an above-average propensity to buy tennis shoes. The inference is that if you advertise to this group you have a better than
average chance of talking to people who are likely to buy your tennis shoes. With a product user study showing how many
people within the audience of each medium actually buy tennis shoes, however, you have an even better chance of finding the
specific people you want to reach.
Although user profiles are more useful, and directionally more precise, than demographic profiles, they are not always reported
by syndicated research sources, nor are they necessarily available for all media. You might find that tennis shoe buyers are
reported for a long list of magazines, but not for network TV or radio; you might find they are reported for broad television
dayparts, but not for specific programs. To the extent you can find user information, you should use it. But you certainly should
not select one medium versus another simply because this kind of information is available for one medium but not another.
ActualizersSuccessful, sophisticated, active, take-charge people with high self-esteem. They are among the established and
emerging leaders in business and government. Their self-image focuses on personal growth and they seek to develop, explore,
and express themselves in a variety of ways, enjoying challenges in all areas of their lives. They have a wide range of interests,
are concerned with social issues, are open to change, and have a global perspective. Image is importantnot as evidence of status
or power, but as an expression of taste, independence, and character. Their lives are characterized by richness and diversity.
They show a cultivated taste for the "finer things in life." As innovators, they like to try new products and services. Their
widespread interests are evidenced by the variety of magazines they read. They are light TV viewers who favor informational
and public affairs programs.
FulfilledsMature, satisfied, comfortable people who value order, knowledge, and responsibility. They are well-informed about
world and national events and are alert to opportunities to broaden their knowledge. They have a moderate respect for the status
quo, institutions of authority, and social decorum, but are open-minded about new ideas and social change. They tend to rely on
strongly held principles in their choices and decisions, and many present an appearance of calm self-assurance. Content with
their careers, families, and station in life, their leisure activities tend to center around their homes. They are conservative and
practical consumers. Prestige and image are less important than functionality, value, and
Geodemographic Areas
Based on the concept that people tend to live near others who share similar demographic and lifestyle characteristics ("birds of a
feather flock together"), geodemography focuses on the statistical similarities of people in neighborhoods. Although all
individuals are different, members of a small neighborhood unit often share
The above four audience measurement designationsAQH, AA, Cume, and Viewers per 1,000 Householdsare in common use.
They are, however, by no means the only designations available in syndicated media research reports. Therefore, whenever you
seek audience data for a specific designation, you should also review the entire research report to discover what other kinds of
measurements are available.
Print Media Audiences
The concepts of rating, average audience, and total audience also apply to magazines and newspapers, although the ingredients
that drive these audience measurements are quite different from those used for broadcast media. The primary distinction
between print and broadcast media is how their physical form dictates how they are consumed: broadcast media are consumed
simultaneously by more than one person, while print media are nearly always consumed by one individual at a time.
Three major factors are used to determine the size of print media audiences:
Circulation In print media, the number of copies sold or distributed by a publication.
Circulation This is the number of copies of a magazine or newspaper issue in distribution and available for purchase and
reading. If, for example, a publisher prints and distributes one million copies of a magazine, only one million people have the
opportunity to purchase that magazine. But, because of the physical nature of the magazine, each of these one million copies
stays in existence for an extended period of time. The amount of time
Regardless of the number of readers per copy a publication generates, the accumulation nevertheless takes time for the first
reader to read it, pass it to the second reader, and so forth. For newspapers, this amount of time is generally briefoften the same
day. Magazines are another story. For the most part, magazines take much longer to accumulate their total number of readers per
copy and therefore their total audience. Table 20.6 displays a typical accumulation profile for weekly and monthly magazines.
Although there are some differences by magazine within each category of issuance, the general patterns are similar. The pattern
for any particular publication is a result of what that publication is and how readers consume it. For example:
The shorter the publication interval, the faster the accumulation.
The higher the readers-per-copy, the slower the accumulation.
Timely or news-oriented publications are consumed faster and therefore accumulate faster.
The higher the percentage of newsstand circulation, the more rapidly the primary audience is accumulated.
The larger the percentage of in-home audience a publication has, the faster its audience accumulation.
The pattern of audience accumulation also varies by type of reader. People who purchase the magazine and read it at home have
the first opportunity to read the issue. This category of reader therefore accumulates early, before the type who pick up the
magazine and read it someplace else. Table 20.7 shows the variation in type of audience accumulation for a typical weekly
magazine.
TABLE 20.7: Variation in Audience Accumulation by Type of
ReaderMagazine A
Total In-Home Out-of-Home
Audience Audience Audience
Week
1 65% 75 40%
2 85 95 70
3 95 100 85
4 99 95
5 100 100
Primary/Passalong/In-Home/Out-of-Home As we have noted, readers are categorized according to whether they read the
publication in theft home or elsewhere, and whether they purchase the magazine or not. These different types of readers are
depicted in Exhibit 20.1 and are defined below:
Primary Readers Readers who purchase a magazine or who are members of a household where the
publication is purchased.
Primary ReadersThe readers in the household in which the magazine is purchased. This includes the specific purchaser and
anyone else living in that household who also reads the magazine.
Exhibit 20.1:
Magazine audiences
Passalong Readers Readers of a publication who are not primary readers. Also called Secondary
Readers.
Passalong ReadersAny readers who are not primary readers.
In-Home ReadersAnyone (primary or passalong) who reads the magazine in their own home.
In-Home Readers People who read a magazine or newspaper in their own home.
Out-of-Home ReadersAnyone who reads the magazine outside their own home, such as at work, on an airplane, in a doctor's
office, etc.
Out-of-Home Readers People who read a magazine someplace other than in their own home.
There are some research studies that indicate a greater ''value'' for the primary versus the passalong reader, and for the in-home
versus out-of-home reader, in terms of the opportunity for a reader to be exposed to an advertisement. Clearly, not all readers
read every page of a magazine. Even those that read the vast majority of a publication do not necessarily see a particular
advertisement. The more time people spend reading a publication, however, the more likely they are to go through it page by
pagethus the greater the opportunity for them to see a particular advertisement. Table 20.8 demonstrates this reading time
dynamic for four different magazines. You'll note that regardless of the magazine, primary readers spend more time reading than
passalong readers; in-home readers spend more time than out-of-home readers.
You should not, however, jump to the conclusion that only primary readers should be analyzed, or only in-home readers.
Passalong and out-of-home readers also have an opportunity to see your advertisement and should therefore be counted as part
of the medium's audience. It is your call whether or not you "value" these passalong and out-of-home audiences to the same
degree as primary and in-home readers. No research exists that can direct you to give full value to all types of readers, or
diminished value to some types.
You should also keep in mind that not all magazines fall within the generalizations shown above. For example, in-flight
publications are usually read on an airplane. These are neither purchased by a reader nor generally read in one's home, but this
alone should not suggest to the media planner that the audiences should be devalued. Similarly, business magazines and
newspapers have a proportionately higher percent of readers who read at their place of work, but this does not mean readers will
spend less tune reading or read less thoroughly.
Out-of-Home Media Audiences
Daily Effective Circulation The gross number of people (without regard to duplication) exposed to an
out-of-home advertising display in one day.
There are two audience measurements commonly used for out-of-home mediaspecifically for outdoor (poster panels, etc.) and
transit media (bus ads, etc.):
Daily Effective Circulation (DEC) is the number of people exposed to an advertising display in one day. The length of exposure
(the day) can vary from 12 to 24 hours depending on the
Chapter 21
Media Audience Research
In this chapter we will discuss how several media research suppliers
collect media audience data for the major mass media by using
various interviewing or questionnaire techniques as well as through
the use of electronic devices. We precede that discussion with one on
sampling error, in which we describe how all media audience
information is based on a sampling of the population, and why media
audience data should be viewed more as an indication of possibility
rather than an absolute.
With rare exception, you will have to rely on audience research data to compare one medium to another and to create an overall
media plan. It is incumbent on you to understand what kind of data are available so you can seek out the information you need.
It is also important that you understand the genesis of the reported information so you can appreciate that the audience data are
merely estimates based on a sampling of the population.
There is a growing trend to go beyond simple demographic descriptors (such as age and income) in analyzing and selecting
media. Increasingly, media vehicles are being chosen based on the lifestyle characteristics of the audience who consume the
media vehicle, or on the product/service usage patterns of these audiences. Notwithstanding this trend, the majority of media
audience data available to the media planner are based on demographics. Further,
Sampling Error
Sampling Error The possible deviation in the reported finding of media audience research based on a
sample from what might be the actual finding had a complete census been done. Usually reported as
"±" the reported number.
With the possible exception of information provided by the Audit Bureau of Circulation (which is discussed later) all audience
data are estimatesprojections based on a sampling of the total population. Inherent in using a sample rather than the entire
population is sampling error, the possible deviation for the reported finding from what might be the actual finding had the entire
population been studied. It is important for you to fully appreciate what sampling error is and why you should keep it in mind
whenever comparing one media vehicle to another or one media form to another.
If you took a cup of water from a salt lake and weighed the salt in the water, you could with great accuracy determine the total
volume of salt in the entire lake by multiplying your finding by the total amount of water in the lake. There would be little or no
question that the sample cup was representative of the whole. On the other hand, if you measured the depth of the lake at any
given point, you could not accurately determine the average depth of
Exhibit 21.1:
Hypothetical Standard Deviations for a 10-Rated Program
Shown in Table 21.1 is the ± error for each of a series of household rating estimates for a specific media research report. A
program estimated to have a 10 rating has 2-sigma tolerance of ± 1.6 error, meaning the actual (real) rating could be as low as
8.4 or as high as 11.6. A ± 1.6 error for a 10-rated program is equivalent to a 16 percent swing up or downi.e., 16 percent
relative error (1.6 divided by 10 = 16 percent). You'll note that the higher the
reported rating, the lower the relative error. But even at the high level (40 rating) you are still dealing with ± 7 percent errorthe
actual rating could be 2.6 rating points less or more.
The next example demonstrates the possible decisions that might be made to purchase time on radio station A or B. On the
surface, station B appears to be superior with a higher rating and the same cost as A. However, when the sampling error is
applied we find that actual ratings (and therefore actual number of listeners) could be more or less than reported. Station A,
therefore, could have a larger audience than station B. (See Table 21.2.)
TABLE 21.2: Application of Sampling Error in Purchase
Decisions
Station A Station B
Average Rating 3.0 4.0
Cost $ 100 $ 100
Sampling ± Error* 1.1 1.2
Possible Rating
low 1.9 2.8
high 4.1 5.2
Possible New Listeners**
low 1,900 2,800
high 4,100 5,200
* At 95% confidence level
** Market population = 100,000 men
3.
4. Square root of .3721 × 2 = 1.2 (rounded)
5. ±error on this 4 rating = 1.2
6. At the 95 percent confidence level, a 4.1 rating can range from (4.1 - 1.2) = 2.8 to (4.1 + 1.2) = 5.2
Although you don't need to calculate standard errors each time media forms are evaluated, it is nevertheless beneficial to read
the technical appendixes of the various media research reports used in the evaluation process to better understand how data are
collected, and to serve as a reminder that all audience data are no more than estimates.
Audience estimates are shown for each televised program for which a minimum number of the sample respondents report
viewing for each half hour, as well as for broad TV dayparts. The
Chapter 22
Geographic Areas
In this chapter we will concentrate on describing the various geographic units
used by a media planner for analyzing media audience and product/service
usage information.
Most source material showing product sales or media delivery presents information on some territorial basis that allows you to
make evaluations based on geographical units rather than relying only on national data. This type of investigation leads to more
precise media plansplans that target not only demographic groups, but demographic groups within specific cities, states, etc.
Here are the more common geographic units.
Exhibit 22.1
Broadcast Coverage Area
Television Market
TV Market An unduplicated television area to which a U.S. county is assigned based on the highest
share of viewing to originating TV stations.
A TV market is an unduplicated geographic area to which a county is assigned on the basis of the highest share of viewing of
originating stations.
Both the A.C. Nielsen and Arbitron companies survey viewing habits in every county in the United States. These data report
how much the people in each county view each TV station. With these data, they are able to determine which stations are
viewed most and then assign the county to one market or another.
The homes in Yates County view more hours of programs originating from Syracuse than they do programs coming from
Rochester stations. Yates County, therefore, is assigned to the Syracuse television market.
It is necessary to place a county in only one TV market to avoid an overlap of information. If a county were assigned to more
than one television market, it would make geographic analyses of media delivery impossible.
Designated Market Area (DMA) A.C. Nielsen's definition of a TV market.
There are just over 200 TV markets in the United States, encompassing over 3,000 counties. Arbitron's term for a TV market is
Area of Dominant Influence (ADI); Nielsen's term is Designated Market Area (DMA). Although the terms differ, and to some
extent so do the research techniques establishing viewing habits,
Exhibit 22.2
Television Market
ADI and DMA are quite similar, and both are synonymous with the term TV Market.
Various data are often tabulated according to these designations, such as the demographic characteristics of the population (age,
sex, income, etc.), purchasing patterns (food expenditures, gasoline consumption, etc.). Media consumption is also tabulated for
the same geographic areas (television viewing, radio listening, magazine and newspaper circulation, etc.). Having all these data
enables us to conveniently assess how to spend advertising budgets in each medium on a geographic basis.
Cable TV Market
About six out of ten homes in the United States have cable TV through which they receive all television programs. These
programs consist of broadcast transmissions that can ordinarily be received over the air (via a TV antenna), cable-originated
programs (both nationally telecast shows, like MTV, and locally originated and telecast shows), distant broadcast stations (which
beam their signal up to a satellite where it is then bounced down to other markets), and subscriber-paid non-commercialized
programming (such as HBO). Although there is an abundance of programs
Geodemographic Areas
Geodemographic areas are quite different from the other types of geographic areas we've discussed. The others are defined on
the basis of "who can physically receive a broadcast signal" (TSA), or "what the social and socioeconomic relationship is of
people who live in and around a central city" (MSA), etc. Geodemography is based on much smaller geographic entities than
any of the other definitionsusing Census Block Groups, for example, of which there are over 250,000 in the United States, with
the average Group containing approximately 350 households.
A mention of geodemographic areas is appropriate here because these areas are, indeed, defined pieces of geography for which
media consumption patterns can be obtainedwhich could therefore lead to recommendations for selecting media types or media
vehicles. The primary placement of our discussion on geodemographic areas remains, nevertheless, in Chapter 20, "Media
Audience Definitions," inasmuch as the thrust of the definition is primarily on the "demography" portion of the word.
A Note of Caution
Although you can obtain a lot of information for most of the geographic areas we have discussed, not all information is
available for all areas. Further, the various types of geographic areas may
PART III
HOW TO CONSTRUCT A MEDIA PLAN
Chapter 23
Marketing Input
In this chapter we discuss the need for the media planner to fully
understand the marketing plan before writing a media plan, and to take
from that marketing plan specific direction or information in the areas
of:
Achievement Goals
Consumer Definitions
Sales Data
Competitive Activity
Promotion Strategy
Creative Strategy
Considerable study and knowledge are needed before you set out to write a media plan for a product or service. You need to dig
deep and immerse yourself in the marketing plan, playing the role of both the marketer (the advertiser) and the consumer. You
need to be proactive in defining the marketing goals you want to achieve, and reactive in terms of predicting how the consumer
will be exposed to the advertising (and all related communication elements) as well as attempting to predict what the consumer
stimulus (the advertising message) will eliciti.e., what action the consumer might take as a result of being exposed to the
advertising.
Whether or not a marketing plan, in the classic sense, exists, you must nevertheless hammer out all important ingredients of the
plan so all efforts are appreciated, and responded to, by all concerned parties and disciplines: not only advertising, but
manufacturing, distribution, sales, public relations, trade relations, promotion, etc. All disciplines must be dancing to the same
tune: all communication
Achievement Goals
Regardless of the product or service to be marketed, there is always some kind of goal to be achieved. If there is no goal, there is
no need to advertise. Goals may be defined in terms of sales dollars at wholesale or retail, product unit or case volume, share-of-
market, advertising awareness and usage levels, or any number of other designations. Having identified these goals, you're in a
far better position for getting a handle on what you need to accomplish with the use of media. For example, if you are
introducing a new product is a highly Competitive arena, you probably will need to have high levels of media delivery to
quickly capture consumers' attention. Conversely, a sustained level of advertising support, at somewhat lower levels of
advertising intensity, might be more appropriate for an established product with relatively little competition. A goal of sustaining
advertising awareness would point you in a different direction than a goal of increasing awareness. Building share-of-market
suggests a different media plan than one that requires maintaining an existing share.
Consumer Definitions
In addition to the quantitative information that is available from a wide variety of syndicated market and media research sources,
there is often proprietary information known by the advertiser. This could come from the advertiser's own research, or could be
based simply on intuition and belief. This kind of information usually transcends what you can find in research books, and often
segments consumers in terms other than those found in standard research. Having as complete a dossier on the consumer as
possible will prove to be extraordinarily advantageous in designing the best media plan. It will also reinforce the fact that not all
consumers
Sales Data
For most products and services, sales data are a must. It is the rare brand that has a fiat sales picture in all of the United States.
There are always areas of high and low development where local factors or competitive forces play on the vitality of a brand.
Knowing these pockets of strength or weakness will prove invaluable in guiding your media investments. Likewise, knowing
seasonal sales patterns, by market, will also prove very worthwhile.
Competitive Activity
It is also the rare brand that has no competition. A brand might have the lion's share of a category, but there are always other
competitive animals hovering to gain a share or increase their share. Knowing the competition, and knowing what they are doing
in advertising, is a must. You need to analyze competitive activity to see which media competitors are using, how much they
use, in which markets and to what level they are advertising, etc. Such knowledge could reveal opportunities for dominating
media not used by the competition, or could suggest increased spending in media used extensively by competition.
Promotion Strategy
You need to be aware of any promotional efforts planned for the product or service, whether or not these are media driven, in
order to coordinate media activity appropriately. For example, if a cents-off coupon is to be distributed via direct mail or a flee-
standing insert, you might want to ensure that consumer advertising is scheduled to heighten awareness of the product at the
time the consumer receives the coupon. Certainly, if the cents-off coupon is
Creative Strategy
Not to minimize the importance of all the other marketing ingredients discussed above, but the creative strategy is one of the
more important elements guiding the media plan. Media are the conduit for delivering the creative message. If the media you
select and the manner in which you use them do not reflect the creative thrust or specific creative executions, your media plan is
dead wrong. If the marketing plan does not contain a creative strategy (or creative positioning statements), it should be
contained in your "media objectives."
Chapter 24
How Much to Spend on Advertising
One of the most difficult decisions an advertiser
has to make is how much to spend on
advertising. The major problem is that no one
knows the optimal amount to spend. Everybody
believes there is a threshold of spending below
which advertising has little or no effect on
consumers. Many also believe that there is a
maximum amount, beyond which additional
advertising again has little or no additional
effect. But no one knows precisely what the
threshold or maximum is. In this chapter we will
lay out the thought process you should go
through in trying to decide how much to spend
on advertising. The process requires you address
key issues, such as understanding what the role
of advertising is for your brand or service. We
will also examine five methods for deciding a
media budget with specific discussion on the
strengths and weaknesses of each of these
methods.
Quite often advertisers rely on historical information to decide future advertising expenditure levels. Also common is the use of
some ingrained formula based primarily on establishing a ratio of advertising spending to predicted sales volumecommonly
known as an advertising/sales ratio. Although these mathematical devices can help you decide how much to spend, neither is
necessarily foolproof or exact. There are innumerable outside factors that
You may choose to adjust the A/S ratio geographically. You may opt, for example, to spend at a higher A/S ratio in certain
markets that appear to you as having greater opportunity for sales growth, or at a lower A/S ratio in mature markets where you
are already the brand leader with little or no competitive threat.
While the appropriation for advertising is part of the marketing budget, it is nevertheless the most vulnerable cost element.
Manufacturing and distribution costs, as well as profit margins, are usually fixed. The only flexible marketing cost is the amount
of money to be spent in advertising. Therefore, while budgets could be derived using the advertising/sales ratio method, they are
quite often subject to revision.
There are strengths and weaknesses in the A/S approach.
This entire phenomenon is exacerbated with new products. With no specific history, the question of how much to spend on
advertising comes down to a guessing game: What is the optimal A/S ratio? Which task should be accomplished at what cost? If
expenditures are too low to achieve the unknown threshold, the product is doomed to failure. If expenditures are too high,
profitability suffers.
A dollar spent in advertising is a dollar that cannot be invested elsewhere. Advertising must compete with other income-
producing alternativesstocks, bonds, real estate, etc. The level of the advertising budget needs to be viewed as an investment,
with the marketer seeking a proper return on that investment.
Chapter 25
Media Objectives
Media objectives define the goals you want to
achieve through the use of advertising media.
These goals must be explicitly stated so you
have a clear and precise idea of exactly what
you expect to achieve. The goals cannot be
wishy-washy. They must guide you in a
specific direction and be action-oriented. You
won't know how to get someplace if you don't
know where you are going.
In this chapter we discuss a discipline for
writing media objectivesone which requires
answering various questions. We examine the
virtues of advertising in geographic markets
where a brand has a strong franchise versus a
relatively weak franchise. We also discuss
how the need for consumer coupons, or the
desire for in-market media testing, can affect
the writing of media objectives.
Media objectives must position the media plan relative to the market and to the marketing plan. An objective that states:
"Introduce product X in order to achieve high levels of awareness"
does not provide direction. It merely says: Advertise. To guide you in assessing alternatives, you need a more realistic and
actionable objective such as:
"Reach at least 80 percent of the potential market within the first month of advertising, ensuring that the average
consumer will be exposed to a minimum of four advertising messages."
Who?
Whom does the brand want to reach?
What is the relative importance of each group?
A thorough objective recognizes the importance, or lack of importance, of each demographic cell. You should analyze audiences
on the basis of age, sex, income, education, race, employment status, family size, marital status, possessions, lifestyle
characteristics, and any other traits for which data are available.
Quite often you'll discover that there are one or two key target audiences which appear to account for most of the sales of a
product, or most of the opportunity for sales growth. The temptation is to home in on these groups in all media analysis and
consideration, completely disregarding all other groups. By limiting analysis in this manner, you've made the conscious decision
that all other groups have zero valuethat the media reaching these non-defined groups are providing unwanted or wasted
delivery.
No matter what the product or service, you will generally find that nearly all groups, regardless of their demographic
description, consume a product to one degree or another. A group is keyof primary importanceto the extent that it accounts for a
disproportionately greater level of consumption than average. But other groups, with disproportionately lower levels of
consumption, must be viewed as having secondary or tertiary importance, not complete unimportance.
It behooves you to place a "value" on all consumer groups. The value should be expressed as a quantitative "weight"such as a
percentage of the whole, or a ratio to the average. For example, you
Women 35-49 20
Women 50+ 10
Men 18-34 20
Men 35-49 15
Men 50+ 5
Total 100%
Had you written an objective that cited only women 18-34 (because they account for the majority of consumption), you would
have dismissed people who account for the remaining 70 percent of consumption.
Where?
Where should the brand concentrate its advertising efforts?
Are there markets that have minimal sales? How should these markets be valued?
Are brand sales changing disproportionately in any market?
Are there markets with a disproportionately high BDI?
Are there markets with a low BDI and a high CDI that should receive special recognition?
Is national advertising mandatory?
How?
What are the basic requirements for color, audio, visual?
How does the complexity of the message affect copy length? What is the brand's creative experience?
How many different creative executions will be employed?
Are there different creative executions for different target audiences?
Do some creative executions require more advertising. pressure than others?
Copy is obviously of extreme importance to any viable advertising effort. Regardless of the impact of the media plan, if it does
not properly reflect the copy strategy, the entire campaign suffers. The media planner should not, however, play second fiddle to
the copywriter. It is important for both to work together to create the best copy in the best medium, and this should happen in
the early stages of planning. The copywriter should be made aware of the media ramifications of certain decisionsjust as the
media planner should have a complete understanding of the copy needs.
Priorities
In some cases, not all objectives can be realistically met. For example, there may be an objective to reach at least 80 percent of a
target group, and a second objective which requires advertising continuously throughout the sales season. Media availability and
cost could prohibit you from accomplishing both of these objectives. It is therefore wise to give priorities to the objectives in
order to have a clear direction in the decision-making process. If reach is given a greater priority than continuity of advertising,
you can then elect to provide the needed levels of reach for as long a period as is affordable without necessarily advertising
throughout the sales season.
Chapter 26
Preconceived Notions about Media Types
In this chapter we suggest that media planners have preconceived notions
about how various media perform their task of delivering audiences and,
therefore, whether a medium should be used to accomplish a specific media
objective. These preconceived notions are usually based on the media planner's
individual experience of having Used (purchased) the medium, but can also be
based on the simple understanding of what a particular medium can or cannot
offer. We examine some of the more popularly believed notions and display
them, by medium, as either positive or negative attributes.
A popularly held scientific belief is that the left hemisphere of a person's brain primarily handles verbal and mathematical tasks,
and the right hemisphere primarily handles spacial and musical skills. Left brain, right brain; science and art. The seasoned
media planner approaches the creation of a media plan using both hemispheres. The left brain deals with all the numbers at hand
by manipulating data found in current media research reports, determining audience delivery, calculating cost efficiency, etc.
The fight brain functions at the same time by accessing the accumulated knowledge of media dynamicsbased on past
involvement with the media, interpretations of ancillary research, personal consumption of the media, thoughts and opinions of
fellow workers, etc. Consciously or unconsciously, the planner deals with all this input not only during the planning process, but
even before putting pen to paper.
Informercial (Infomercial) A long-form broadcast commercial which provides much more information
than can be supplied in a typical, say, 30- or 60-second commercial. Also called Advertorial.
Direct Mail
Positive Attributes
Allows extraordinary creative flexibility limited only by postal regulations for size and content (note: if delivered by other
methods, there are conceivably no limitations).
Offers unlimited geographic targeting (from total national to one individual person) not available in any other media form.
Delivers precise demographic and psychographic groups, with an absolute minimum of waste to non-targeted consumers, via
innumerable database and list sources.
Provides an automatic lead source for people who have responded to the advertiser, which can be productively used for future
direct mailings.
Allows relatively precise timing of delivery of the advertising message, not dependent on normal media consumption habits or
mass media delivery timing.
Magazines
Positive Attributes
Offer a wide array of editorial formats and different editorial focuses to reach readers while they have a specific state of mind,
which can complement a specific advertising message.
Have high-fidelity color produced on quality paper, allowing for effective product presentation.
Are capable of reaching specific demographic groups with relatively minimal waste to groups outside the target audience.
Offer the opportunity for long copy exposition via full-page or multiple-page ads.
Can bind-in preprinted material supplied by the advertiser.
Newspapers
Positive Attributes
Immediately deliver their reading audience, generally 100 percent within one day.
Offer wide array of editorial environments (depending on scope of an individual publication) via different sections
(international, national, or local news; food; entertainment; etc.) which can complement a specific advertising message.
Offer the opportunity for long copy exposition via full-page or multiple-page ads.
Can accommodate preprinted material supplied by the advertiser (e.g., Freestanding Insert).
Allow distribution of reader-response materials: coupons, sweepstakes/contest entry forms, surveys, etc.
Offer permanence of the advertising messagefor repeat exposure during a second reading of the newspaper, for
clipping/saving/reference, and for exposure to others who might read the same copy.
Outdoor
Positive Attributes
Provides for 24-hour exposure of the advertising message.
Offers creative flexibility for size, shape, coloration, and three-dimensional display.
Is the second most geographically selective medium (behind direct mail).
Offers the opportunity for advertising exposure at or near the point of product purchase.
Is considered the most cost-efficient of all major media forms.
Has unlimited reach potential.
Allows delivery to multiple household members simultaneously (e.g., while members are in a car).
Radio
Positive Attributes
Offers a wide array of formats (program types) to reach listeners during a specific state of mind, which can complement a
specific advertising message.
Allows delivery to multiple household members simultaneously.
Provides for relatively immediate delivery.
Is advertiser driven and does not require the listener to seek the advertisingthat is, it is intrusive.
Can be purchased nationally, regionally, or locally.
Is capable of producing one of the highest levels of reach of most generalized consumer segments (e.g., teens, men, women,
adults 18-34, etc.).
Can produce high frequency levels.
Can deliver advertising messages at any time during any 24-hour period.
Television
Positive' Attributes
Provides full-color advertising.
Delivers advertising that can simultaneously be seen and heard and, inherently, allows movement to be displayed: sight, sound
and motion.
Allows delivery to multiple household members simultaneously.
Provides for relatively immediate delivery.
Is advertiser driven and does not require the viewer to seek the advertisingthat is, it is intrusive.
Can be purchased nationally, regionally, or locally.
Can be purchased in fairly concentrated pieces of geography via individualized cable offerings.
Chapter 27
Media Strategies
In this chapter we discuss the final analytical stage of how to construct a
media plan. We demonstrate the kinds of analyses which can be conducted
and the thought processes you should undertake in deciding which media
vehicle or combinations of media are best suited to achieve the media
objectives. We focus on six specific strategic areas: target audience,
geography, scheduling, reach/frequency, couponing, and testing. Within these
strategic areas we delve into methodologies and systems used to decide how
to allocate advertising dollars or impressions to each geographic area, and
how to execute an in-market test utilizing advertising media.
Media strategies are the solutions to the media objectives. Strategy statements reflect the specific course of action to be taken
with media:
Which media will be used
How often each will be used
How much of each medium will be used
During which periods of the year each medium will be used
Devising media strategy requires you have an in-depth knowledge of media characteristicshow they work, how they are
consumed, how they can be used to generate a desired effect. You must also have an understanding of the media
marketplacewhat the availability and cost structure of each medium is at a given point
Target Audience
Let us assume you have established an objective for a $1 million media plan that recognizes the relative importance of men and
women in purchasing decisions for Product X:
Select media on the basis of a 40 percent/60 percent weighting for men and women respectively.
For ease of illustration, let us assume you have only one choice of a creative unit for each of the media formsonly 30-second
spots for TV, only pages for magazines, etc. Additionally, let us also assume you have determined which of the media vehicles
within each media type will be in the considered set, and that you have averaged the cost per advertising unit and the average
audience delivery for each of these types, so that you can look at figures for the overall medium, as shown in Table 27.1.
The first step you might take is to analyze audience composition to determine how these media skew to men and women. Table
27.2
The second step might be to calculate total impression delivery within the $1 million budget. This can be done in several ways:
Determine the number of units affordable and multiply by the audience delivery per unit; or
Divide the budget by the respective CPMs; or
Obtain adult impressions in either of the above two fashions, and allocate the total to men and women based on audience
composition.
Table 27.3 indicates that medium A produces the most impressions and C the least.
Following an impression analysis, the logical next step might be to calculate cost-per-thousand. Table 27.4 shows that medium
A has the lowest CPM and C the highest, which jibes with the previous impression analysis. As is always the case, the more
impressions per dollar, the lower the CPM.
TABLE 27.4: Cost-per-Thousand
Medium Men Women Adults
A $ 8.00 $ 2.67 $ 2.00
B 12.50 8.33 5.00
C 20.00 20.00 10.00
D 13.33 20.00 8.00
E 6.67 20.00 5.00
At this point it makes sense to specifically address the media objective of weighting men 40 percent and women 60 percent.
Table 27.5 performs this calculation: men impressions times 40 percent plus women impressions times 60 percent equals adult
"weighted" impressions. Media A still comes up the winner; C is still the lowest producer. If you stopped your analysis at this
point, you would give preferential consideration to medium A, followed by B, E, D and C in that order. This means you would
analyze many alternative plans, each of which would include a proportionately higher amount of medium A.
You might opt, however, to continue the basic analysis by also considering media values. These values can be based on
anything
you wish and are generally based on qualitative factors (which may or may not be backed by quantitative information), your
judgment, or tangential quantitative information at your disposal. For example, you may elect to favor a medium that has these
attributes (and thereby disfavor those that do not):
A programming/editorial environment which is perceived to be compatible with the basic elements of the creative execution
with which you are dealing;
Ability to deliver sight, sound and motion;
Ability to deliver high fidelity color;
Ability to be seen/heard by the sales force during their workday;
A track record of proven performance (relative to product X);
Timing flexibility to buy late or cancel at the last minute;
Ability to reach both men and women at the same time.
Suppose, therefore, that you made these judgment calls for each of the media types, giving those that met most or all of your
evaluation criteria a value of 100 percent, those that met only a few criteria a value of 25 percent, and those in the middle,
values of 50 percent or 75 percent. You could then apply these values to the weighted impressions generated by each media form
to yield a "weighted/valued" impression delivery, against which you could calculate a CPM. This math is shown in Table 27.6.
Here we see that medium B is top ranked.
Different analyses can yield different answers and thereby steer you in different directions. For example, shown in Table 27.7
are the priority choices you could have made for each of the previous analytical ingredients.
TABLE 27.7: Ranking of Media
Rank
Analysis Ingredient 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
Audience Composition B C A D E
Adult Impressions A B E D C
Adult CPM A E B D C
Weighted Impressions A B E D C
Weight/Valued Impressions B A D C E
Clearly, an impression and CPM analysis is not the be-all-and-end-all. It is only one evaluation tool for helping you decide
which media (or medium) could be in the considered set.
Geographic Objective
There are usually pronounced differences in a brand's sales, competitive pressures, category development, distribution patterns,
and a host of other marketing variables from market to market. If it is assumed that advertising affects sales, the more
advertising pressure in a market the greater the opportunity to build sales.
You might, however, decide to establish local market goals based on additional ingredients, such as category development (CDI)
or judgment. Table 27.9 demonstrates the kind of analysis you might undertake. Here we see that market A accounts for 10
percent of the U.S. population and has a BDI of 110 and a CDI of 90. Your brand is therefore performing above average, and
better than the category at large. Market E, however, is performing below average,
If the goal is to align spending with established targets, you need to reduce the level of spending in national media and reinvest
the difference into local media. Determining the proper balance between national and local can be done by a simple
mathematical procedure:
Procedure Results
1. Find the market with the greatest relative over- Market B125
expenditure: spending index
2. Determine the maximum budget for this. $120,000
marketi.e., the spending goal;
With a total budget of $1 million and a national budget of $800,000, you now have $200,000 to invest (market by market) via
local media. Table 27.12 demonstrates the procedures for establishing how much should be spent in local media in each market.
For example, with a budget goal of $80,000 in market A and a prorated national budget of $72,000, you need to spend $8,000
locally so the total national plus local spending equals the goal. You'll note that market B, which was overspent when the entire
budget was invested in national media, is allocated no money for use via local media.
TABLE 27.12: Media Dollar AllocationNational and Local Media
Dollars
Target National Local Total
Market % (000) (000) (000) (000) Index
A 8 80 $ 72 $8 $ 80 100
B 12 120 120 120 100
C 20 200 168 32 200 100
D 25 250 200 50 250 100
E 35 350 240 110 350 100
Total 100% $1,000 $800 $200 $1,000 100
Once you've defined local media budgets you can proceed with determining which media will be used and how much of each
can be used within the budget. For example, if you are using spot TV, all you need is the anticipated CPP (cost-per-point) for
each local market to calculate total affordable GRPs. Let us assume that the
Table 27.13 compares the two plans we have discussed: Plan I, using all national media, and Plan II, using a combination of
national and local media. Also shown is the spending target percentage by market. You'll see substantial differences between the
plans from one market to another. Plan II, which incorporates ''controllable'' local media, allows you to produce more GRPs in
the relatively important E market, albeit at the reduction of GRPs in other markets. Plan I produces GRPs by market relative to
local viewing levels, not relative to the target percentage. You will also note that Plan II produces slightly more GRPs
overall202 versus 200. This is only a function of the local media chosen, which happen to have an average CPM slightly less
than national media in this example. You will find in your actual real-world analyses that total national average GRPs (or
impressions) will be less or more or the same for local media compared to national media based on which local or national
media you choose.
TABLE 27.13: Comparison of PlansLocal GRPs
Plan I Plan II
Spending All National National Local Total
Target % Media GRPs GRPs GRPs GRPs
Market
A 8% 180 144 12 156
B 12 200 160 160
C 30 210 168 25 193
D 25 200 160 33 193
E 35 200 160 92 252
Total/Average 100% 200 160 42 202
Budget (000) $1,000 $800 $200 $1,000
Table 27.15 demonstrates the difference between the two allocation systems using the same national/local media Plan II
discussed above. You'll see some notable differences:
Market E is allocated fewer GRPs in the impression allocation systembecause of the need to purchase GRPs in other, higher
CPM markets.
National average GRPs are less for the impression allocation system than the dollar system.
Either of these allocation systems can be manually calculated, but they are obviously easier to effect using a computer. When
these systems were first devised by the author and labeled NASTEA (Network And Spot TV Equalizing Allocator), all
calculations were done on a desk calculator. Today, the same kind of system can be accessed from on-line media information
suppliers.
Scheduling Objective
Every media plan should have a scheduling objective to guide the planner in allocating media across the year, even, conceivably,
by day of the week and time of day. When advertising is delivered is often a critical issue. Advertising for suntan lotion should
obviously be concentrated in those months when people need suntan lotion. Advertising for a product consumed to varying
degrees throughout the year, however, presents a less obvious scheduling requirement. As stated earlier, you must conduct a
complete investigation of the brand's needs vis-a-vis its competitive position and historical sales trends, and consider other
important marketing input as well, so you can translate these considerations into actionable media objectives that will address
the requirement for timing.
There are very few products or services that have a fiat seasonal sales patternthat is, where there is no discernible difference in
Pulsing A flighting technique that calls for either a continuous base of support augmented by
intermittent bursts of heavy pressure, or an on-again-off-again pattern (e.g., one week on, one week
off).
Beyond the general tuning consideration, you also need to think about the pattern of weekly audience delivery. You may have
an objective, for example, that requires you to advertise at least to some extent during each calendar quarter. Thus you must
decide whether to schedule continuous advertising covering every week, or, alternatively, to schedule bursts of advertising for
selected weeks, each burst followed by a hiatus. This pattern is known as flighting. You might decide that some combination of
continuous and flighting be effected via a pattern known as pulsing. Exhibit 27.1 illustrates these three techniques using a
hypothetical schedule
Exhibit 27.1:
Scheduling techniques
Over the long run, audience accumulation of flighted and continuous schedules at equal rating levels is identical. All three
schedules will accumulate the same number of GRPs; all three will reach the same number of people with equivalent average
frequency; all three will distribute impressions among the different audience segments in about the same manner.
Exhibit 27.2:
Flighting patterns
Reach/Frequency Objective
Assume an objective has been established to maximize reach of women with a minimum of four advertising exposures per
month (once per week). For demonstration ease, let us assume that network television has been chosen as the only medium to be
used. You are now faced with deciding between network TV dayparts, and if a combination of dayparts is to be used, what
proportion of each should be used.
You could start the analysis by devising as many alternative schedules as are affordable within the given budget. Shown in
Table 27.18 are six alternatives (though numerous alternatives are possible). The six plans are different in many ways, as the
comparison in Table 27.19 shows. They produce different numbers of announcements, different women GRP levels, different
cost efficiencies, and different total women reach and average frequency. The only thing in common among the plans is that
they are all
None of the above information, however, is useful in making a decision if the objective is effective reach (maximize reach of
women with a minimum of four advertising exposures per month). The number of announcements is a function of the budget
and the cost per commercial unitit does not reveal anything about reach. Total women GRPs is informational and offers an
indication of the gross delivery, but does not reveal facts about reach. Cost-per-thousand is useful for assessing the efficiency of
one alternative versus another, but again, provides no information about reach. Total women reach/frequency, at first blush,
might be used as the criterion for selecting one plan over another, but average frequency does
TABLE 27.19: Media plan comparison
Number of:30 Total Women Total Women
Plan Announcements GRPs CPM Reach/Frequency
A 8 90 $9.41 60/1.5
B 50 250 3.42 55/4.6
C 38 114 7.52 30/3.8
D 15 121 7.05 51/2.4
E 28 170 5.02 59/2.9
F 23 102 8.36 53/1.9
Based on the above, you would opt for plan B, composed of all daytime TV. This plan reaches more women who will be
exposed to at least four advertising messages. If you had not done a frequency distribution you might choose plan A because it
generates more total reach than the other plans.
Although this analysis seems very straightforward, you will seldom have the flexibility to select media vehicles on the basis of
just one objective. In addition, all analyses are complicated by a number of other factors which have an effect on how the
planner addresses each medium at any given time.
Costs, for example, fluctuate among network TV dayparts throughout the year based on supply and demand. For example,
primetime network might be less cost efficient than late night network in one calendar quarter, and more cost efficient in
another. The lower the cost-per-thousand, the more GRPs can be purchased within a set budget. The more GRPs that can be
purchased, generally the higher the reach and/or frequency that can be produced.
Let us take the above exercise one step further and assume that ''communication values'' are part of the media analysis. If we
assume, for example, that daytime's communication value is 75
If you calculate a frequency distribution based on the above weighted GRPs, the reach of women at the 4 + frequency level is
11. This is the same effective reach as generated by Plan F (50 percent prime and 50 percent late evening). If an evaluation of
effective reach does not reveal major differences among plan alternatives, or if other objectives bear importantly on media
usage, then you must use other criteria to decide which media are most appropriate for accomplishing the objectives of the plan.
Coupon Objective
If you have defined an objective to distribute a coupon via media, you will need to analyze alternatives in a somewhat different
fashion than we previously discussed. Reach and frequency, for example, are not necessarily important; primary audience data
become much more important than total audience.
There are different kinds of coupons (cents-off, free trial offer, premium offer, sweepstakes entry, etc.) which can be configured
in different ways (on-page, tip-in, FSI). The type of coupon generally
A tip-in coupon does not present this mutilation problem unless the entire advertisement is directing the reader to tear out the
tip-in. If this is the case, then the backup ad is virtually useless without the tip-in card. The nature of the advertising message
will help you decide if the ad lives for the coupon, or if it can remain an effective advertising communication after the coupon is
removed.
The specific ingredients you choose for your print media analysis of a coupon effort are very much a result of your overall
objectives, pertinent data at hand, and your judgment. If, for example, you need to cover a relatively small area, you will have to
rely more on circulation data for magazines than on readership datainasmuch as readership data within small geographic areas
are generally not available for most magazines. If you have useful and pertinent datasuch as Coupon response rates for past
effortsthis certainly should be part of your equation. You should also exercise judgment in deciding which kinds of information
you will use and how you might value (or weight) each piece of information.
Table 27.23 demonstrates one possible analysis you might undertake.
Let us assume you can afford to purchase only two of three magazines within your considered set. Your selection will vary
depending on the evaluation criteria you use. The following lists the kinds of choices you might make:
ChoiceExplanation/Rationale for Choice
A + B You're concerned mostly with absolute
distribution of coupons. These two
magazines have the highest circulation.
Testing Objective
If you have read all preceding pages in this book you will have concluded not only that there is a great deal of information to
help guide you in the media planning process, but also that there are very few, if any, definitive answers on which media are
best for advertising your product, how much reach/frequency is optimal, how much should be spent on advertising, and so forth.
With a relative paucity of the kind of information needed to make critical media decisions, you would be wise to incorporate
some form of media testing into every media plan you create. Media/marketing tests should be conducted to gain knowledge so
better decisions can be made in the future. All tests have two things in common:
They help minimize the risk of incorrectly spending media funds.
They are learning experiences from which we can extrapolate results for future use.
Among the more common types of tests are those for a new product prior to its national launch. Many advertisers hedge their
bet before they embark on a broadscale national introduction of a new product or new version of an old product. A great deal of
money is needed to properly launch a new product nationallymoney for manufacturing, distribution, and advertising. To spend
these funds without knowing the consumer reaction to the producthow much of it they will buyis at best a financially unwise
decision.
Additionally, there are a number of other tests that can be conducted, all of which can provide useful information. For example,
you can test:
Spending levels. Increasing or decreasing ad spending relative to the current level.
awareness levels have climbed, etc. To judge these differences you need to define point A and establish it as your base
measurement. For example, if you currently have a 10 percent share of market, point A is a ten share. At the conclusion of the
test period you will read your share of market and compare it to the base. If you are defining point A in terms of the current or
historical situation in the
The Little America method is most commonly used for testing new products where there is no established history for
performance, either nationally or in any particular market. It is also used for "soft" measurements which do not encompass
absolute sales data, such as measuring recall of varying creative executions.
As It Falls A method for simulating a national test media plan in test markets.
As It Falls. In the As It Falls method, the test market receives the advertising pressure it normally would receive under the
national test plan. As such, test market goals are unique for each market.
The first step in this translation method is to determine the local market delivery of all national media. A schedule of 100
network
Chapter 28
Media Flow Chart
In this chapter we provide several examples
of how media activity is shown within a
media plan.
When all calculations, evaluations, analyses, considerations, and judgments are completedwhen you come to the point of having
selected specific media and having defined how much of each you want to use and when you want to use them, you can produce
the fruits of your labor on one piece of paper: the media flow chart.
Flow chart A summary of recommended media showing their usage throughout an advertising period;
e.g., an annual flow chart.
This piece of paper is appropriately named because it illustrates the flow of how you intend to schedule the chosen media. The
following pages (Exhibits 28.1, 28.2, and 28.3) show some examples of what flow charts can look like. They can be exceedingly
brief and highlight only the most important information (as in an "executive summary"), or they can contain lots of pertinent
data. Their creation and look are totally a function of what you need to display. The idea in creating a flow chart is to show
information clearly so any reader can quickly and correctly understand which media are going to be used, how they might be
used, and when they are being used.
Exhibit 28.1:
Product X Magazine Activity
Exhibit 28.2:
Product X Television Activity
Exhibit 28.3:
Product X Market A
Chapter 29
Principles of Media Management
In this chapter we punctuate that media
planning requires much more than
manipulating numbers. We also set forth 10
principles of media management.
It should be apparent that media planning requires much more than simple decisions to select one or another medium. A
complete understanding of how media deliver their audiences and thorough analyses of media selection alternatives, combined
with a sprinkling of intelligence, logic, judgment, and creativity, are mandatory before astute media decisions can be made.
Although much of this "input" is based on numbers, you should always be mindful that numbers don't think . . . you do.
Too often numbers are used as a crutchas the primary rationale for selecting one medium over another or one television spot
rather than another. Be wary of myopic reliance on numbers. Know all that goes into generating the numbers, all the varying
research techniques used, and all the pitfalls and dangers surrounding the numbers. Know this and you will appreciate why
numbers are no more than a guidenot the rolein the decision-making process.
By all means use computer technology to help you deal with the storehouse of marketing and media information, and to help
you analyze multiple alternatives across multiple evaluation criteria. But don't get trapped into thinking that what the computer
spits out is gospel. Don't run your fingers down the columns of data on a printout and shout "Eureka!" Realize the computer is
no more than a sophisticated calculator. Had you indeed used a simple calculator
GLOSSARY
A.A.A.A. American Association of Advertising Agencies, commonly called the ''4-A's.''
Ad/edit ratio The ratio of advertising to editorial pages in a print medium. E.g., 60/40 indicates 60 percent of all pages are
advertising.
ADI (Area of Dominant Influence) Arbitron Company's definition of a TV market.
Adjacency A commercial time period that is scheduled immediately preceding or following a scheduled program on the same
station in which a spot TV commercial can be placed. Opposite of an in-program placement. Also called a break position.
Advertorial A print advertisement which is styled to resemble the editorial format and type face of the publication in which it
runs. Most publishers require advertorials to be labeled "advertisement" at the top. Also refers to Infomercial.
Affidavit A notarized statement from a broadcast station that confirms the commercial actually ran at the time shown on the
station's invoice.
Affiliate A broadcast station bound to a contractual relationship with one or more networks to carry network-originated
programs and commercial announcements. See also O & O.
Afternoon Drive A radio daypartusually 3:00-7:00 p.m.
Agate Line A newspaper space measurement that is one column wide by 1/14 inch high (14 agate lines to the inch). Replaced as
an advertising measurement tool by S.A.U.
Agency-of-record (AOR) An advertising agency or independent media buying company that purchases media on behalf of
another agency or group of agencies serving the same advertiser. Sometimes also refers to a full-service advertising agency that
performs all the services for a particular advertiser.
Allotments The number of outdoor panels in a showing; varies by market.
AM (Amplitude Modulation) The transmission of sound in radio broadcasting in which the amplitude (power) of a transmitting
wave is modulated (changed) to simulate the original sound.
ANA Association of National Advertisers.
Announcement An advertising message in broadcast media, commonly 10, 15, 30, or 60 seconds in length. Synonymous with
"commercial" and usually referred to as a "spot."
AQH The average quarter-hour rating for broadcast programs as reported by several media research suppliers (e.g., A.C.
Nielsen).
Arbitron Company A media research supplier.
Area of Dominant Influence See ADI.
FORMULAS
Audience Composition (Pg. 91) Example
INDEX
A
AADT. See Average annual daily traffic
AA rating. See Average audience rating
ABC. See Audit Bureau of Circulations
ABC Audit Report, 222-223
ABC network, 32
Accumulated reach, 110
Accumulation profiles, 206-207
Achenbaum, Alvin, 175-176, 187
Achievement goals, in media planning, 246
Achievers, 194
ACORN, 196
ActMedia, Inc., 24
Actualizers, 193
ADI. See Area of Dominant Influence
Adjacencies, 38
Advertiser-produced magazines, 273, 274
Advertising agencies, 7
origins, 18-19
Advertising consultants, 6
Advertising effectiveness, 12-13
Advertising goals, 9
and ratings, 54
and spending, 246, 250-251
Advertising plans, 5-6
Advertising salespeople
origin, 18
and CPP information, 100
Advertising/sales ratio, 249, 250, 253-255, 291-292
Advertising spending, 5, 9, 249-259
and ratings, 55, 58
estimating with CPP, 101-103
Advertising strategy, 5-6, 250-251
Advertising units, in newspapers, 18
Advertising volume, 14
Adweek's Marketer's Guide to Media, 100
Affiliate stations, 37
Aided recognition technique, 229
AisleVision, 24
American Association of Advertising Agencies, 231
American Magazine, 15
Arbitron Company, 60, 196, 234
Radio Market Reports, 218-219
Television Market Reports, 219-221
Area of Dominant Influence (ADD, 219, 234-235, 241
As it falls method, 318-319
Attentiveness, 54, 182, 229
and high ratings, 58
and frequency, 175, 180
and radio, 281
Audience analysis, 261-262
Audience composition, 83, 91-94
Audience delivery, 9, 11
guarantees by TV networks, 36
and advertising spending, 255
Audience receptivity, 12
and program environment, 57
Audio systems, 23
Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC), 16, 212, 221-223, 239
Available funds method, 257
Average annual daily traffic (AADT), 231
Average audience (AA) rating, 201
Average-issue audience, 223
Average quarter hour ratings, 53, 201
B
Backlit, 24
Baird, John, 31
Bases, for indexes, 84
C
Cable-originated programming, 42, 235
Cable TV, 41-47
audience measurement, 229
circulation, 42
markets, 235-236
networks, 43
CACI, 196
Capacity of cable TV, 44-45
Car cards, 27
Case histories, 12
Category development index (CDI), 88-89
CATV. See Community Antenna Television
CBS network, 32
CDI. See Category development index
Census Block Groups, 197, 199, 240
Channel One, 27
Checkout Coupon system, 24
Chicago Tribune Magazine, 21
Christian Science Monitor, 19
Cinema advertising, 27
Circulation
of broadcast media, 204
of magazines, 17
of national cable networks, 42
of outdoor advertising, 57, 230-231
of print media, 203-204
City zones, 239
Claritas, 196, 199
Clearances
radio, 29
syndicated TV, 40
Clocks, in transit advertising, 26
ClusterPLUS, 196, 197-198
Clutter, 259, 284
CMSA. See Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area
Coaxial cable, 41
College bulletin boards, 27
College newspapers, 19
Color advertisements, 21
availability, 21
Column, 21
Commercial breaks, 35
Commercial pods, 35
Commercial purchases
methods, 36
types, 35
Communication values, 306-307
Community Antenna Television (CATV), 41
Compatibility of advertising and editorial/program environment, 58
Competitive environment, 185, 247, 251
Computer models, use in calculating R/F, 140
Computers in media planning, 325-326
Confidence level, 214
Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA), 238
Consultants, 6
Consumer and farm publications, 16
Consumer price index (CPI), 84
Consumer reactions to advertising, 10
awareness, 4
receptivity, 12
D
Daily effective circulation (DEC), 201-210, 231
Daypart packages, 39
Dayparts
network TV, 35
radio, 31
spot TV, 38
DB. See Delayed broadcast
DEC. See Daily effective circulation
Declie distribution, 161
Delayed broadcast (DB), 33
Demographic cells, 92-93, 189-190, 261
Demographic editions, 18
Demographic groups, 5-6
and VALS 2 segments, 192
Demographic ratings, 52-53, 225
and TRPs, 75-76
Demography, 189-190
Designated Market Area (DMA), 234-235, 241
Diaries
radio listening, 218-219
TV viewing, 220, 225, 228
VCR viewing, 221
Diorareas, 26
Directional boards, 281
Direct mail, 15, 23, 272-273
and issue rife, 113
positive and negative attributes, 274-275
Direct response advertising, 15, 250
Distant broadcast stations, 235
Distant signals, 4, 235
Distribution patterns, 205
DMA. See Designated Market Area
Dollar allocation/impression allocation, 297-298
Dollar allocation system, 294-297
Dollars versus impressions, 298-299
Donnelley Marketing Information Systems, 196-197
Doublebase report (MRI), 225
Duplication of audience, 74, 108, 110
and estimating reach, 134, 136
relationship with reach, 112
and roadblocks, 115
E
Ebbinghaus, Herman, 174-175, 176, 185
Editorial environment, 10, 277, 289
F
Facing, 232
FAS-FAX (ABC), 222
FD. See Full depth
Feed points, 33-34
Fiber optics, 45
Financial plan, 3
Fine, Jules, 186, 187
Flighting, 300, 303
Formulae, use in calculating R/F, 140
Four-week flights, 39
Fox network, 32
Franklin, Benjamin, 15
Fransworth, Philo, 31
Free standing insert (FSI), 20, 274, 277, 308
Frequency, 125-131
relationship with reach and GRPs, 132-151
Frequency distribution, 152-157, 307
Frequency lines, and reach curves, 133-143
FSI. See Free standing insert
Fulfilleds, 193
Full depth (FD), 21
G
General Magazine, 15
Geodemographic areas, 195-200, 236, 240
Geographic areas, 6, 233-241, 252-253
and market analysis, 262-265
Geographic editions, 18
Geographic objectives, 290-292
Greyser, Stephen, 175, 187
Gross rating points (GRPs), 74, 125, 305
calculating, 75
household versus people, 140
by media type, 76-78
for outdoor media, 210
reason for use, 79
relationship with reach and frequency, 132-151
time frames for, 78-79
GRPs. See Gross rating points
H
HBO, 42, 235
Headlight displays, 26
Health club TV/radio, 27
Health Monitor Center, 24
Heavy listeners/viewers, 160, 165
Henry, Walter, 176-177
Hiatuses, 300
Historical information, and advertising spending, 249, 255
Homes using TV (HUT), 60, 220
interrelationship with ratings and share, 68-72
variations, 62-63, 66-67
Hot-air balloons, 27
Human memory dynamics, 174-177
HUT. See Homes using TV
I
Illuminated posters, 25
Imagery transfer, 281
Impressions, 81-83
and frequency, 125
Independent stations, 37
J
Jacobovits, Leon, 175, 187
Junior panels, 25
Junk mail, 275
K
Katz Radio Group, 31
King displays, 26
Krugman, Herbert, 178-179, 187
L
Lead-in, 72
Learning-satiation-decay sequence, 175-179, 183
and time between exposures, 185
Least squares regression analysis, 134-135
LED. See Lighted electronic display
Length of commercials, 54
Length of copy, 269
Lifestyles, 191-195
Light listeners/viewers, 160, 165
Lighted electronic display (LED), 24
Little America method, 317-320
Local market media delivery, 292-293
Local Market Scanamerica, 220
Local market targets, 291-292
Local placement of TV commercials, 38, 45
Long-term spot TV purchases, 38
Look Ups, 24
Los Angeles Times Magazine, 21
M
Machine traffic count for outdoor, 231
Magazines, 15-18, 273
accumulation of audience, 78, 113
calculating reach, 108-109
growth in number, 16
and issue life, 113-114
positive and negative attributes, 275-277
reader categories, 207-209
readership measurement, 224-229
TRPs, 76
Makers, 195
Marketing/advertising process, 4
Marketing consultants, 6
Marketing plans, 245
Market position, in media planning, 252
Mass media, 14-47
positive and negative attributes of forms, 272-274
McLuhan, Marshall, 23
Mean average, 130-131, 153
Media buyers, 7
and CPP information, 100
and rating/HUT/share, 69
use of ratings by, 54
Media components, 6
Media consultants, 6
Media consumption intensities, 168
Media delivery, 5
Media flow chart, 321-324
Media goals, 10, 260-270
N
Naples, Michael, 178, 187
NASTEA. See Network and spot TV equalizing allocator
National daily newspapers, 19
National Decision Systems, 196
NBC network, 32
Network and spot TV equalizing allocator (NASTEA), 299
Network broadcast TV, 32-36
Network radio, 29
Network TV program formats, 34
Newspaper Designated Market, 222
Newspaper-distributed magazines, 17-18, 20-21
accumulation of audience, 78
audience measurement, 224
positive and negative attributes, 281-283
Newspapers, 18-21, 273
accumulation of audience, 78, 113
and geographic areas, 239
and issue life, 113-114
measurement of readership, 224, 228
numbers and circulation, 19
positive and negative attributes, 277-279
sections, 20
TRPs, 77
New York Times Magazine, 21
NFO, 196
A.C. Nielsen Company, 225, 226, 234, 239
Nielsen county size groups, 239-240
Nielsen Media Research, 60, 196
Nielsen People Meter (NPM), 226
Nielsen Station Index (NSI), 225-226
Nielsen Television Index (NTI), 226-227
Non-qualifying panels, 232
NPM. See Nielsen People Meter
NSI. See Nielsen Station Index
NTI. See Nielsen Television Index
Number of spots, 149-151
P
Package registration, 117
Painted bulletins, 25-26, 273
Panels, 232
Parade magazine, 21, 39
Participation purchases, 35
Passalong readers, 208, 209, 279, 308
Pay cable, 42
Pay-per-view programs, 42
Penetration
of cable TV, 46-47
of newspapers, 57
Pennysaver newspapers, 273
People using radio (PUR), 60-62
Permanent displays, 26
Persons using TV (PUT), 60-62, 225
estimating levels of, 71
and roadblocks, 115
Persons viewing TV (PVT), 60-62
PMSA. See Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area
Pocketpiece (NTI), 227
P.O.P. Radio, 23
Positioning
of advertisements, 10
of commercials, 54
Poster panels, 25, 273
Potential Rating Index of ZIP Markets (PRIZM), 196, 199-200
Preprints, 18, 20, 276
Priemer, A. B, 187
Primary market areas, 239, 241
Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA), 238
Primary readers, 207, 208, 308
Primary target audiences, 52
and media mix, 117
Primetime Video, 28
Principles of media planning, 326-327
Print media
audiences, 203-209
P/F, 144-145
translation tactics, 320
See also Direct mail, Magazines, Newspapers
Priorities, 270
PRIZM. See Potential Rating Index of ZIP Markets
Product positioning, 5
Product user studies, 190
Promotion strategies, 247-24
Proprietary information, 217, 246
Psychographics, 191-195
Published tables, use in calculating R/F, 140
Publisher's Statements (ABC), 221-222
Pulsing, 300
PUR. See People using radio
Q
Qualitative information, 10, 174, 289
Quantitative information, 9, 11, 174, 289
Quarterly cancellation rights, 36
Questionnaires, 223, 228, 230
Queue advertising, 28
Quintile distribution, 160
adding a second medium, 166
calculating, 162-164
flattening phenomenon, 167
of a media mix, 164-168
reason for use, 169
of TV viewing, 161, 163
and wearout, 184
R
RADAR See Radio's All Dimension Audience Research
Radio, 28-31, 273
accumulation of audience, 79, 112
audience measurement, 224, 229
commercials, 28-29
dayparts, 31
formats, 30, 31
markets, 237
positive and negative attributes, 280-281
R/F, 143-144
stations, 28
criteria to be reported by Arbitron, 219
translation tactics, 320
TRPs, 76
Radio's All Dimension Audience Research (RADAR), 227
Rail/subway posters, 27
Random combination method, 117-120, 129
Ratings, 51-64
calculating, 51-53
estimating, 71-72
interrelationship with HUT and share, 68-72
for non-broadcast media, 57
for unreported demographics, 55-57
Reach, 106
accumulation, 109-112
over time, 112-115
calculating for magazines, 108-109
calculating for TV, 107-108
and frequency, 125
and media mix, 117
non-relationship with number of spots, 150-151
relationship with duplication, 112
relationship with frequency and GRPs, 132 -151
Reach curves, 111
flattening of, 123-137
and frequency lines, 133-143
threshold level of, 123
use in calculating R/F, 140
Reach estimates. See Cumulative audience
Reach/frequency (R/F), 133-149
controlling, 147-149
goals, 267
for a media mix, 146-147
objectives, 304-307
for out-of-home media, 146
for print media, 144-145
for radio, 143-144
Readership dynamics, 206
Readers-per-copy (RPC), 114, 204-206
Real effective reach, 186-187
Recent-reading technique, 224
Reference use of print media, 276, 278, 282
and issue life, 114-115, 205
Regional cable TV networks, 44
Regional TV advertising, 33-34
Relative error, 215-216
Relevance of commercial message, 54
Repeat readership, 282
Reproduction quality in print media, 10
Response cards, 15
Restroom displays, 28
Retail trading zones, 239
R/F. See Reach/frequency
Roadblocks, 115
ROP. See Run-of-paper
ROS. See Run-of-station
U
UHF. See Ultra High Frequency TV channels
Ultra High Frequency (UHF) TV channels, 37
Unaided recall, 176
Unduplicated estimates. See Cumulative audience
Unwired networks, 29, 30-31
Upfront buys, 36, 46
USA Today, 19
USA Weekend, 21
User studies, 190
V
VALS 2, 192-195
Variations in viewing/listening levels, 62-64
VCR recording, 112-113, 221, 225, 284
Very High Frequency TV channels, 37
VHF. See Very High Frequency TV channels
VideoCart, 24
Video compression, 45
Video walls, 28
Viewers per 1,000 households, 202-203
Viewers per set, 202
Vista, 21
W
The Wall Street Journal, 19
The Washington Post Magazine, 21
Wearout, 179, 183-185
based on quintile distribution, 184
Weighted/valued impression delivery, 289, 290