Risk Management
Risk Management
Risk Management
Risk Management
Uncertainty
Where the incidence and likelihood of an event can’t reliably be estimated the situation is said to be
uncertain.
Risk
A risk can be defined as the likelihood of an unfavorable event being occurred. The higher the variations
in the outcomes of a project the riskier the project would be.
Before we move on to discuss risk management strategies we shall look into the following two types of
risks:
This type of risk is faced by organizations that are engaged in foreign trade.
Defined
“The risk that an investor will have to close out a long or short position in a foreign currency at a loss
due to an adverse movement in exchange rates. Also known as “currency risk” or “exchange rate
risk”.
Translation risk
Transaction risk
Economic risk
Translation risk
This is the risk that the organization will make exchange losses when the accounting results of its foreign
branches or subsidiaries are translated into the home currency. Translation losses can result, for example,
from restating the book value of a foreign subsidiary's assets at the exchange rate on the statement of
financial position date.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 1
Financial Management Risk Management
Transaction risk
There are several approaches to explaining the causes of exchange rate fluctuations
By Ejaz Khan|EK 2
Financial Management Risk Management
Exchange rates are determined by supply and demand in the foreign exchange markets. For example, the
value of the British pound against other currencies is determined by supply and demand for the pound.
The demand for pounds comes from buyers of British exports, who are required to pay in pounds.
Pounds are also bought by British exporters who receive payments in foreign currencies and want
to exchange their currency receipts into pounds.
Demand for pounds is also created by flows of investment capital and savings. Foreign investors
wishing to purchase investments in the UK must buy pounds to pay for their investments. UK
investors selling their foreign investments might exchange their sale receipts (in a foreign
currency) into pounds.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 3
Financial Management Risk Management
Four-way equivalence
The four-way equivalence model states that in equilibrium, differences between forward and spot rates,
differences in interest rates, expected differences in inflation rates and expected changes in spot rates are
equal to one another.
(equals)
Difference in interest Fisher effects Expected differences in
rates Expected inflation rates
differences in inflation
rates
(equals)
Interest rate parity (equals)
International (equals)
Fisher Effects purchasing power
By Ejaz Khan|EK 4
Financial Management Risk Management
In the foreign exchange markets, most exchange rates are quoted to four decimal places. It is easy to get
confused about which exchange rate should be applied to a particular transaction.
The basic rule to remember is that the bank will use the rate that is more favourable to itself and less
favourable to the customer.
Example
A UK company needs $20,000 to pay a US supplier. The bank’s current rates for
sterling/US dollar (US$/£1) are 1.8850 – 1.8860. The company needs to buy US dollars in
exchange for British pounds, in order to pay the US supplier. The bank is selling dollars and
receiving British pounds in exchange. It will apply a rate of 1.8850 to the currency
transaction with the company, because 1.8850 will give it more British pounds than the rate
of 1.8855. The cost of buying the dollars is therefore £10,610.08 (= $20,000/1.8850).
Example
The same UK company receives US$25,000 from a customer, and it wants to convert
these dollar receipts into British pounds. The exchange rate is 1.8850 – 1.8860. The bank
will buy dollars and sell the pounds at 1.8860, and so the company will receive £13,255.57 (=
$25,000/1.8860) in exchange for the dollars. Taking this transaction and the previous
example together, the UK company’s cash flows in British pounds from the two transactions
would be as follows:
£
Buy $20,000 at 1.8850: pay (10,610.08)
Sell $25,000 at 1.8860: receive 13,255.57
Net receipts 2,645.49
It would be more sensible for the company to pay $20,000 to the US supplier out of the
$25,000 it receives from its customer. That would leave it needing to sell just US$5,000 at
1.8860. The receipts in British pounds would then be £2,651.11 (= $5,000/1.8860) which is
more than from buying $20,000 and selling $25,000 in separate transactions. The difference
is small, but for a company engaged extensively in foreign trade, the total amounts involved
can become very large over time.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 5
Financial Management Risk Management
By Ejaz Khan|EK 6
Financial Management Risk Management
Foreign currency risk needs to be managed so that the company does not suffer from the adverse
exchange rate movements. The process is known as “hedging”.
One way to avoid transaction risk is to invoice foreign customer in home currency, or to arrange
with the foreign supplier to be invoiced in home currency. In this case the risk is transferred to
customer or supplier.
There is the possible marketing advantage by proposing to invoice in the buyer's own
currency, when there is competition for the sales contract.
The exporter may also be able to offset payments to his own suppliers in a particular
foreign currency against receipts in that currency.
By arranging to sell goods to customers in a foreign currency, a UK exporter might be
able to obtain a loan in that currency at a lower rate of interest than in the UK, and at
the same time obtain cover against exchange risks by arranging to repay the loan out of
the proceeds from the sales in that currency.
Netting and matching can be applied to cash flows in a foreign currency or to assets and liabilities
denominated in a foreign currency.
Netting means offsetting a payment against a receipt to get a net payment or a net receipt.
Netting can reduce a currency exposure to the net amount.
Alternatively netting means offsetting a liability against an asset in the same currency.
Matching is similar, except the receipt and payment are the same amount, or the asset and
liability are for the same amount. Matching reduces an exposure to currency risk to 0.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 7
Financial Management Example
Risk Management
A UK company
When a company expects to expects to receive have future cash receipts in
a foreign currency and future cash payments in the same
US$400,000 in two
currency at about the same time, it can use the receipts
months’ time and to
to make some or all of the payments. To the extent
that future receipts match make payments of future payments, the
foreign exchange risk is $600,000, also in two eliminated. Movements in
the spot exchange rate will months. To hedge its affect the receipts and
payments equally. The loss currency exposures, from the adverse
movement affecting the cash the company can receipts or payments will
be offset by the gain from the match $400,000 of favourable movement
affecting the cash payments or receipts and receipts.
payments, leaving a
3. Matching assets and net exposure of just liabilities
$200,000 in
A company might also try to payments. This net match assets and liabilities in
the same currency, to reduce exposure might be exposures to foreign
exchange risk. hedged with a
forward exchange
For example suppose that a UK contract company plans to make an
investment in a business operation in the USA. The
investment would involve buying non-current assets in US
dollars. The company might finance the project by
obtaining a US dollar loan. The assets of the project and the
financial liabilities would therefore be matched in the
same currency. Cash flows from the project in US dollars
could then be used to pay interest on the loan and repay the
loan principal. The company’s only exposure to foreign
exchange risk would then be the net cash flow surplus from
the project.
A company with a foreign subsidiary might raise debt capital in the currency of the subsidiary, so that
when consolidated accounts are prepared for the group, the assets of the subsidiary will be matched,
at least partially, by the foreign currency borrowings (liabilities). This will reduce exposure to
translation risk, i.e. reduce the reported gains or losses on consolidation.
Leading means making a payment early, before the end of the credit period allowed. Lagging means
making a payment as late as possible, possible by taking longer credit than allowed. Leading or
lagging might be used by a company when it believes that the exchange rate between two currencies
will change significantly up or down during a credit period.
The purpose of leading is to pay early in a currency that is expected to increase in value
against the payer’s own currency during the credit period.
The purpose of lagging is to delay payment as long as possible in a currency that is expected
to fall in value
By Ejaz Khan|EK 8
Financial Management Risk Management
5. Forward contract
A forward contract or simply a forward is a non-standardized contract between two parties to buy
or sell given amount of foreign currency at a specified future time at a price agreed today. This is in
contrast to a spot contract, which is an agreement to buy or sell an asset today. It costs nothing to
enter a forward contract. The party agreeing to buy the underlying currency in the future assumes a
long position, and the party agreeing to sell the currency in the future assumes a short position. The
price agreed upon is called the delivery price.
For example, if an exporter knows that he will receive 83,000 USD in three months time, he can pass
a forward contract with a counterpart who agrees to buy that amount in three months at a given
exchange rate, the forward exchange rate.
Although forward exchange contracts are used extensively by companies to hedge exposures to
currency risks, they have some limitations.
It is not possible to arrange forward exchange contracts for some currencies, because not all
currencies are traded in the forward market. Some currencies that are traded ‘spot’ cannot be
traded forward.
There is a limit to time horizon for forward contracts. For the major currencies, such as the US
dollar, the euro and the British pound, forward contracts with other major currencies can be
arranged with a settlement date of up to one year forward. For other exchange rates, forward
contracts might only be possible with a settlement date of several months. Forward contracts
cannot therefore be used to hedge long-term exposures to currency risk.
6. Futures
A future is a forward contract for the purchase or sale of a standard quantity of an item, for settlement
or delivery at a specified future date. Futures contracts have some special features.
They are traded on an exchange, known as a futures exchange. In contrast, actual forward
contracts are negotiated ‘over-the-counter’. For example, a company wishing to hedge a
currency risk with a forward contract must negotiate a deal directly with a bank. A company
using currency futures must buy or sell futures contracts on a futures exchange that deals in
the relevant type of contract.
Futures are standardized contracts. Every futures contract for the purchase/sale of a
particular item is identical to every other futures contract for the same item, with the only
exception that their settlement dates/delivery dates may differ. For example, a currency future
for Euros against the US dollar is for the purchase/sale of €125,000.
On every futures exchange, there are regular settlement dates for futures contracts. These
are usually in March, June, September and December. A company might therefore buy or sell
March futures for settlement in March, or June futures for settlement in June, and so on.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 9
Financial Management Risk Management
It is not usually possible to arrange a ‘perfect hedge’ for a currency risk exposure with futures
contracts. This is because futures contracts are for a standard amount of a currency, and the
exposure might not be for a convenient multiple of this standard amount.
The current exchange rate for buying or selling currency futures is never the same as the
current spot exchange rate, until the futures contract eventually reaches settlement date. If a
position is closed out before then, the hedge will not be ‘perfect’.
Advantages of futures
Futures are tradable and can be bought and sold on a secondary market so there is pricing
transparency, unlike forward contracts where prices are set by financial institutions
The exact date of receipt or payment of the currency does not have to be known, because the
futures contract does not have to be closed out until the actual cash receipt or payment is
made
Disadvantages of futures
7. Currency Options
Whereas a forward or future contains the contractual obligation to deliver at the agreed time and
forward rate, an option offers a choice. Take the example of a euro-area exporter buying an option to
sell 100,000 USD at an exchange rate (strike price) of 1.35 in three months. If at maturity the spot
exchange rate of the euro is anywhere above the strike price, the exporter will exercise this option and
receive 74,074 EUR. However, if the spot rate has moved to, say, 1.32, he will not exercise the option
but sell his dollars in the spot market where he receives 75,758 EUR.
The option thus protects the exporter against adverse moves in the exchange rate without removing
the opportunity to benefit from favorable movements. Put differently, hedging with an option leads to
an asymmetric risk distribution. The seller of the option, however, faces a loss if the option is
exercised and has no gain if it is not exercised. In order to compensate for this risk, he will demand a
premium (rather like an insurance premium) for writing the option.
The differences between forwards and options can be summarized in three points:
By Ejaz Khan|EK 10
Financial Management Risk Management
Described above is the simplest single option. However, there exist more complex constructions such
as "exotic" options or combinations of several simple options. It is, e.g. possible to reduce the option
premium by combining sell and buy options with different strike prices. Of course, this also implies a
more complex risk structure.
By Ejaz Khan|EK 11
Financial Management Risk Management
A money market hedge is another method of creating a hedge against an exposure to currency risk.
Instead of hedging with a forward exchange contract, a company can create a hedge by borrowing or
lending short-term in the international money markets, to fix an effective exchange rate ‘now’ for a
future currency transaction.
A slightly different arrangement is needed for a money market hedge for an exposure arising from:
Suppose that a UK company is expecting to pay a supplier US$500,000 in six months’ time,
and it wants to fix an effective exchange rate for this transaction with a money market
hedge.
Spot six-month interest rates currently available in the money markets are as
follows:
Deposits Borrowing
US dollar 4.125% 4.250%
British pound 6.500% 6.625%
By Ejaz Khan|EK 12