All Order-To-Cash Indicators at A Glance
All Order-To-Cash Indicators at A Glance
All Order-To-Cash Indicators at A Glance
Table of contents
Basics .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
What are indicators? ............................................................................................................................................................. 4
How do indicators work? ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
What is the connection between indicators and the internal control system? .................................................. 4
What are the results based on? ......................................................................................................................................... 5
How is the relationship between indicators and processes? ................................................................................... 5
Are indicators synonymous with findings? .................................................................................................................... 5
What are the indicators? ...................................................................................................................................................... 5
p a g e | 2 / 18
Order-to-cash
p a g e | 3 / 18
Order-to-cash
Basics
Examples are:
• Lost discounts
• Possible duplicate payments
• Poorly maintained terms of payment in invoices
• Postings by super users
• Unusual offsetting accounts in accounting documents
p a g e | 4 / 18
Order-to-cash
p a g e | 5 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that non-compliant deliveries to critical customers were
conducted.
Description: Marked document due to a flag in the customer master data related to
biochemical, nuclear, national security or missile technology issues (Fields CCC01,
CCC02, CCC03, CCC04, MILVE in table KNA1).
Risk: There is the risk that outgoing invoices are not being paid because credit limits are
not used.
Description: The document has been marked because it is an outgoing invoice (debit
item with customer reference (BSEG-KOART=D)) and for the customer a) there is no
direct debiting authorization and b) a credit limit has not been defined and c) the
customer has never paid something in the financial year considered or has been dunned
or paid later than the twice the defined payment term.
p a g e | 6 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that customers with frequent address changes are fraudulent or
they are not willing to pay.
Description: The document has been marked because it references a customer where
the address (street is analyzed, Table KNA1) has been changed at least two times
within a period of 180 days and the processing date of the document is within the
change dates of the customer address changes. Changes are only taken into
consideration if the new and old value of the street are different according to the
SOUNDEX algorithm.
Description: The indicator calculates how often a VAT code appears in the postings.
This frequency is calculated per country of the customer and per document type, as well
as the property, whether it is an intercompany customer or not. If the frequency of the
VAT code in a group (customer country + document type + intercompany yes/no) is low
(less than 1% of the cases), the use of this VAT code is considered to be rare and
documents with these rare VAT codes are marked.
Missing customer
Objective: Compliance and correctness
Risk: There is the risk of insufficient traceability of business transactions due to missing
customer master data.
Description: Marked document referencing a customer (Table BSEG, Field KUNNR) that
does not exist in the customer master data (Table KNA1 or KNB1).
p a g e | 7 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that fraudulent incoming payments cannot be allocated.
Description: Marked payment because there are also items posted to a revenue account
in the document.
Risk: There is the risk that duplicate credit notes have been paid or cleared.
Description: Marked document because the document contains a credit note item that
has been paid or cleared and there are other paid or cleared credit note items (with
regards to the same customer) with the same amount which have also been paid or
cleared.
Risk: Customer could have been changed after the invoice had been issued.
Risk: There is the risk that customers pay late, and high receivables lead to a lack of
liquidity or loss of interest.
Description: Marked document because customer paid at least 3 days or more after
term of payment. The indicator only operates if a payment term with more than 0 days
payment period has been defined in the document (Table BSEG, Field ZBD3T>0),
otherwise the document is ignored.
p a g e | 8 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that customers pay late, and high receivables lead to a lack of
liquidity or loss of interest.
Description: Marked document because customer paid later than 1,5 times of average
payment time in days (days between baseline date and clearing of the invoice). The
indicator is only relevant if no useful payment terms have been maintained in the
invoice. Payment terms are not useful if the due date period has been set to 0 days
(Table BSEG, data field ZBD3T, ZBD2T, ZBD1T=0). Intercompany invoices are not taken
into consideration.
Description: Marked sales doc due to changes in payment terms after sales doc.
p a g e | 9 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: Customer gets goods and services although near credit limit.
Description: Marked document due to changes of the credit limit of a customer used in a
sequence.
Risk: If the customer is close to bankruptcy there is a high risk that receivables will not
be paid.
Description: Marked document because the customer had more than one change to the
customer block field within the same day. (Table KNA1 or KNB1 Field SPERR) The
changes occurred the same day of the referencing FI document processing date.
Risk: Standard processes and internal controls were circumvented by directly entering
an FI document without adhering to the sales process.
p a g e | 10 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is a risk that standard sales processes and internal controls were
circumvented.
Description: Marked change document where the sales doc was adjusted/changed after
the referencing financial document was processed (header or position).
Risk: There is the risk that postings are swapped among customers.
p a g e | 11 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that a sales delivery order was subsequently created.
Description: Marked sales delivery because it was created prior to sales order in the
sequence. The date in field VBAK-ERDAT (sales doc) is compared to the date in LIKP-
ERDAT (delivery).
Risk: There is the risk that deliveries were not invoiced, and goods were not paid for.
Description: Marked delivery because a SD sales invoice related to this delivery could
not be found.
Risk: There is the risk that goods are delivered to non-compliant countries.
Description: The delivery document has been marked because the receiving customer is
located in a country having a score less than 35 considering the Corruption Perception
Index. Deliveries in the country of origin of the own company are not analyzed.
Furthermore, the delivered goods need to be hazardous goods. A material is a
hazardous good if the data fields PROFL, DG_PACK_STATUS, STOFF or HAZMAT are
used in the material master data (table MARA).
p a g e | 12 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that for an intra-community supply of goods or for an intra-
community supply of services a VAT-ID has not been used.
Description: The document has been marked because the referenced customer is
corporate (Datafield KNA1-STKZN) and is registered in another third country (Datafield
KNA1-LAND1) or the supplying country and receiving country within the EU is different
(Datafields BSEG-EGLLD and EGBLD) and a VAT-ID could not be found in the
document (Datafield BSEG-STCEG).
Risk: There is the risk that an intra-community supply of goods has not been treated tax
free or for an intra-community supply of services within the EU the reverse charge
approach was not applied.
Description: The document has been marked because the referenced customer is
corporate (Data field KNA1-STKZN) and is registered in another third country (Data
field KNA1-LAND1) or the supplying country and receiving country within the EU is
different (Data fields BSEG-EGLLD and EGBLD) and (manually entered) VAT has been
charged (Data field BSEG-MWSTS).
Description: Marked FI document where the referenced customer is not the same as the
referenced customer in the associated sales doc.
p a g e | 13 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that VAT in an outgoing invoice has been charged although the
transaction was not taxable (VAT group).
Description: Marked document due to charged VAT and the customer belongs to the
corporate group (BSEG-VBUND not empty) and both, the customer and the own
company are in the same EU country or the supplying country and receiving country are
the same (Neglect of VAT group).
Description: The document has been marked because no clearings were posted for a
receivable in respect of this foreign customer in the whole fiscal year, although an open
customer item exists or existed at year end. Intercompany customers are outside of the
scope.
p a g e | 14 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk that accounts receivables are reversed late and potentially posted
again to avoid depreciation.
Description: The document was marked because it contains a debit item related to a
customer (accounts receivables KOART=D) and this document was reversed more than
30 days after its posting date. It is also shown when there were accounts receivables
items of the same customer which were posted within 14 days after the processing
date of the reversal.
Risk: There is the risk that revenue has been posted without an outgoing invoice.
Description: The document has been marked because it posted a revenue (credit item in
P/L) and the account of the revenue has in >90 percent of cases a debit item
(KOART=D) in the document belonging to a customer (e.g. an invoice). In this case, the
debit item of a customer does not exist.
Risk: There is the risk that a SD invoice was created after the delivery.
Description: Marked SD invoice created prior to sales delivery in the sequence. The date
in field VBRK-ERDAT (SD invoice) is compared to the date in LIKP-ERDAT (delivery).
Risk: There is the risk that an order for a DS invoice was created after the delivery.
Description: Marked SD invoice created prior to sales order in the sequence. The date in
field VBRK-ERDAT (SD invoice) is compared to the date in VBAK-ERDAT (sales doc).
p a g e | 15 / 18
Order-to-cash
Description: Marked sales invoice due to lack of payment terms (Table VBRK, Field
ZTERM). Intercompany customers are out of scope.
Risk: There is the risk that the usual sales process has not been used since a sales order
belonging to the sales invoice could not be found.
Risk: There is the risk that not all invoices have been recorded in the accounting.
Description: The SD invoice has been marked because no invoice in the accounting
could be found for it. SD invoices with net value 0 (VBRK-NETWR) and SD invoices not
being in the fiscal year are not analyzed.
Risk: There is a risk of bad quality of master data concerning value added tax (VAT).
This could result in possible errors in tax returns.
Description: The document has been marked because the VAT ID in the document and
the VAT ID in the customer master data do not match. It has been taken into account
that the VAT ID could have been changed in the master data in the past.
p a g e | 16 / 18
Order-to-cash
Risk: There is the risk of a misstatement in the balance sheet if customers are assigned
to wrong reconciliation accounts.
Description: The financial document has been marked, because it is a customer invoice
and the properties of the customer do not fit with the structure of the reconciliation
account. It is assumed that reconciliation accounts (accounts receivables) are structured
according to assigned customers: home country, EU foreign country, non-EU foreign
country, private customer or company, intercompany or non-intercompany.
Reconciliation accounts are subject to investigation if they are only almost
homogeneous (but not totally homogeneous) according to at least one of these
properties. Almost homogeneous means that e.g. 99.6% of customers assigned to the
reconciliation account are home country customers. In that case all the other 0.4% of
non-home country customers (alternative: 0.2% of home country customers) on this
reconciliation account are marked as an exception.
Risk: There is the risk that VAT is declared too late in the VAT sales tax pre-registration.
Description: The outgoing Invoice (SAP SD) was marked because the entry date (table
VBRK, data field ERDAT) is at least 90 days after the entry date of the corresponding
delivery (table LIKP, data field ERDAT) and the invoice contains VAT (table VBRP, data
field MWSBP). This is critical because (at least in Germany) the VAT arises with delivery
and thus possibly was declared too late.
Risk: There is a risk that receivables will be overstated and that the net income for the
year will be overvalued.
Description: Receivables are flagged for which a provision for specific doubtful debts
was expected, but no provision was found. Intercompany receivables are not
p a g e | 17 / 18
Order-to-cash
1. If the indicator does not strike, then the converse conclusion that the company
has done everything right about provision for specific doubtful debts is
inadmissible.
2. If the company does not calculate provisions for specific doubtful debts per
customer separately using the special G/L indicator 'E', the indicator will show hit
in case of doubt.
3. The indicator only pays attention to the existence of provisions for specific
doubtful debts per customer. The amount of a provision for specific doubtful
debts is not valued.
Risk: There is a risk that sales tax will be charged, although this is not necessary.
Description: The outgoing invoice was marked because the (business) customer is
based in a third country (non-EU-member country) and VAT has been invoiced. As a
rule, such services or deliveries are mostly VAT free. But there are exceptions. Check for
such exceptions.
p a g e | 18 / 18