The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (July 2017) Vol.

68 (3), Page 1436-1441

Causes and Management of Wound Infection

Ahmad Mohammad Kashha1, Ayat Hassan Zailai2, Waad Suliman Alsaadi3, Rahaf Yaseen
Almutawa3, Moath Hassan Albarakati3, Amir Hamoud Almhmadi3, Wafa Saleh Alkhuzaie4,
Abdullah Hussain alZahrani5, Shahad Khalid Ali balbaid1
Battarjee Medical College1, Cairo University2, Umm Alqura University3,
Ibn Sina National College4, King Abdulaziz University5
Corresponding author: Ahmad Mohammad Kashha , email: A-1k1@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT
Aim of the work: the care of patients with a wound infection may seem conflicting, various diverse
antibiotic preparations may be utilized after some time with an end goal to control the causative organism
and a kwide range of treatment procedures might be utilized by various healthcare experts. With the
approach of Independent (Supplementary) Nurse Prescribing Courses and the future potential for medical
caretakers with reasonable capabilities to recommend antibiotics for patients with wound infections, there is
a requirement for attendants and different specialists to review and update their insight into this vital subject.
Keywords: Wound Infection, Treatment, Antibiotic, Antiseptics.

INTRODUCTION All surgical wounds are infected by microbes,

The advancement of a wound infection relies nonetheless in most cases; infection does not
upon the intricate interaction of many components. improve as innate host defenses are quite efficient
In the event that the honesty and defensive in the removal of contaminants.
capacity of the skin is broken, expansive amounts A complex interplay between host, microbial and
of various cell sorts will enter the injury and start a surgical features eventually determines the
fiery reaction. This might be described by the avoidance or creation of a wound infection. The
exemplary indications of redness, torment, postponement in recuperation and ensuing
swelling, raised temperature and fever. This expanded length of doctor's facility stay
procedure eventually plans to reestablish additionally has financial outcomes. It has been
homeostasis [1]. The potential for infection relies assessed that every patient with a surgical site
upon various patient factors, for example, the infection will require an extra 6.5 days in the
condition of hydration, diet and existing medical hospital, which brings about the multiplying of
conditions and in addition extraneous variables, healing center expenses related with that patient
[4]
for instance identified with pre-operative, intra- . Surgical site infections are allied not only with
operative and post-operative care if the patient has increased morbidity, but also with substantial
experienced surgery. This frequently makes it hard mortality. In a study, 77% of the deaths of surgical
to foresee which wounds will become infected. patients were related to surgical wound infection
[5]
Subsequently the avoidance of wound infection . Kirkland et al. [6] calculated a relative risk of
ought to be an essential administration objective death of 2.2 attributable to surgical site infections,
for all medicinal services specialists [2]. The 2002 in comparison with matched surgical patients
overview report by the Nosocomial Infection without infection.
National Surveillance Service (NINSS), which The study was approved by the Ethics Board of
covers the period between October 1997 and Umm Alqura University.
September 2001, showed that the frequency of
hospital acquired infection identified with surgical Symptoms of Wound infection
injuries was as high as 10%. These infections The clinical presentation of wound infection
muddle ailment, cause tension, increment tolerant contains fever, induration, erythema, edema, pain
distress and can prompt passing. The cost to the and a change in drainage to an infected nature. On
NHS is nearly £1 billion pounds for every annum the other hand, symptoms of infection in chronic
[3]
. Gathered data on the frequency of wound wounds or drained patients might be more difficult
infections possibly underestimate the true to extricate. In these cases, diagnosis might
incidence as most wound infections arise when the depend on non-specific symptoms, for example,
patient is discharged and these infections can be anxiety, disorder, or decrease in glycemic control
treated in the community without hospital notice. in the diabetics. Most wound infections are caused
Infections of the surgical wound are a standout by bacterial colonization, initiating either from the
amongst the most widely recognized HAIs and normal flora on the skin, or bacteria from other
are a vital reason for horribleness and mortality. parts of the body or the outside environment. The
1436
Received: 17 /4 /2017 DOI: 10.12816/0039686
Accepted: 25 / 4 /2017
 Causes and Management of Wound Infection

most common infection-causing bacteria are organized separately; however cocci and bacilli
Staphylococcus aureus and other types of can likewise be found in sets, chains and
staphylococci. Complications of wound infection unpredictable groups. They can be imagined
may change in extend from nearby to foundational utilizing a bacteriological recoloring process
[7]
. The most extreme nearby difficulty of a called Gram recoloring; after Gram recoloring,
contaminated injury is slowed down injury Gram-positive microscopic organisms are purple
recuperating, bringing about a non-mending and Gram-negative microorganisms are red.
wound. This frequently brings about huge torment, Species that neglect to recolor with the Gram
uneasiness and mental disservice for the patient. response, for example, Clostridia, require specific
Foundational entanglements can incorporate stains. The development and survival of all
cellulitis (bacterial disease of the dermal or microorganisms are needy upon natural
subcutaneous layers of skin), osteomyelitis components, for instance strict aerobes require
(bacterial contamination of the bone or bone oxygen, while anaerobes are quickly executed by
marrow) or septicemia (bacterial nearness in the oxygen. It is imperative to note, notwithstanding,
blood that can prompt an entire body incendiary that the two aerobes and anaerobes can make due
state). in closeness to each other and that some can get by
Table1. Diagnostic studies and risk factors of in the two conditions by developing vigorously
surgical wound infection and afterward changing to anaerobic digestion
Diagnostic Studies Risk Factors without oxygen; these are known as facultative
Blood culture Diabetes anaerobes [10].
Antimicrobial Malnutrition Viruses
susceptibility These are made out of genetic material (nucleic
Bacterial culture Poor hygiene corrosive) encased inside a protein coat or a
Gram stain Compromised membranous envelope. In spite of the fact that
or suppressed infections don't for the most part cause wound
immune system contaminations, microscopic organisms can taint
Fungal culture Decreased skin injuries framed throughout certain viral
mobility or ailments. It is critical to recollect that distinctive
immobility micro-organisms can exist in polymicrobial groups
Obesity and this is regularly the case inside the edges of a
Poor circulation wound [11].
Possible wound infection pathogens Table2. Models of possible wound infection
The majority of micro-organisms is under than pathogens
0.1mm in distance across and can accordingly just Beta Haemolytic Streptococci
be seen under a microscope. They can be arranged (Streptococcus pyogenes)*
into various groups, such as bacteria, fungi, Gram- Enterococci (Enterococcus
protozoa and viruses, depending on their structure positive cocci faecalis)
and metabolic capabilities [8]. Staphylococci (Staphylococcus
Protozoa aureus/MRSA)*
These are single celled organisms inside a Fungi Aspergillus Yeasts (Candida)
fragile membrane and without a cell wall. They Gram- Enterobacter species
are most essentially connected with infected skin negative Escherichia coli
ulcers. facultative Klebsiella species
Fungi rods Proteus species
These are made out of bigger more intricate Bacteroides
cells than bacteria. They are either single-celled Anaerobes
Clostridium
yeasts or multi- cellular organisms with a cores Gram-
contained inside a cell tissue. Fungi can be in negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa*
charge of shallow infections of the skin, nails and aerobic rods
hair [9]. * Most common causative organisms
Bacteria associated with wound infections
These are generally basic cells that can be
additionally sorted by contrasts in their shape and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
cell wall. Cocci (round formed cells), bacilli Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was
(poles) and sprirochaetes (spirals) can be first announced in the UK in the 1980s and

1437
 Ahmad Kashha at el.
remains a reason for worry for all human services (Table 3) and obtrusiveness of the significant
professionals. There are presently a wide range of small scale creature. Various particular
strains of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus components have likewise been distinguished in
aureus influencing an expansive number of people connection to disease rates in surgical injuries [14].
in a wide range of medicinal services settings. These include:
How much individuals are influenced runs in  Presence of an existing chronic infection
seriousness from basic injury colonization, which  Time interval between skin preparation and
should not be dealt with forcefully, to foundational surgery
disease, for example, bronchopneumonia, which  Nature of the invasive procedure - especially if
may turn out to be lethal. Narrative confirmation involving the bowel
recommends that methicillin-resistant  Extent of tissue loss and/or trauma to tissues
Staphylococcus aureus is not any more pathogenic during surgery
in an injury than the non-safe variant;  Adequacy of wound drainage
notwithstanding, it is acknowledged that if an  Appropriate use of wound management materials.
injury is tainted with methicillin-resistant Specific wound-related factors that may predispose to
Staphylococcus aureus it is hard to make do with the development of an infection include:
antibiotics. When in doubt, professionals ought to  Poor application of the principles of asepsis at the
take after the neighborhood convention for the time of wound dressing changes
administration of a wound colonized with  Presence of devitalised tissue within the wound
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, with margin - necrotic tissue or slough, particularly if
continuous treatment in view of clinical signs. over 50%
 Nature and prolonged presence of exudate not
Wound infection and improvement of
managed by a closed wound drainage system.
infection
There are a number of ways in which micro-
Table3. Pathogenic effects of virulent micro-
organisms can gain access to a wound:
organisms
 Direct contact: transfer from equipment or the
hands of carers Toxin production Vigorous stimulation of
 Airborne dispersal: micro-organisms immune cells
deposited from the surrounding air Superantigen Some species of micro-
 Self-contamination: physical migration from
production organisms such as the
the patient's skin or gastrointestinal tract exotoxins of Staphylococcus
and Streptococcus produce
While there is no complete proof to recognize superantigens
the most well-known course of section for a Presence of biofilms A microbial colony enclosed
miniaturized scale creature into an injury, in an adhesive polysaccharide
coordinate contact and poor hand-washing systems matrix that is usually attached
of social insurance experts amid pre-and operative to a wound surface [8].
periods of patient care are thought to be Biofilms present in the form of
noteworthy components. The nearness of a a transparent sticky film
miniaturized scale living being inside the edges of covering the wound surface.
an injury does not show that injury contamination Cells in biofilms exhibit a
is inescapable [12]. Defensive colonization may decreased sensitivity to host
have an influence whereby a few microorganisms immunological defence
create very particular proteins that murder or mechanisms, decreased
repress other, normally firmly related, bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial
species or where certain microbes deliver an agents and increased virulence.
assortment of metabolites and finished results that They have also been
restrain the increase of other small scale life forms implicated in persistent
[13]
. At last, improvement of a contamination will infections [15]
be affected to a great extent by the harmfulness of Superantigen release Stimulation of T (thymus
the life form and immunological status of the within the blood maturing) cell subsets allowing
patient; for instance, patients considered most in stream that initiates the release of cytokines that
danger are those being treated with long haul an uncontrolled initiate cell and tissue damage
steroids and those getting chemotherapy. proliferation of T
Harmfulness portrays both the pathogenicity cells

1438
 Causes and Management of Wound Infection

On the off chance that, after cautious generic groups of wound administration items that
appraisal, it is obvious that the injury is tainted, it can possibly decrease the bacterial weight in the
is vital to affirm this and distinguish the causative injury; these are compounds containing silver or
organism(s) and conceivable sensitivities to anti- iodine [21].
microbials. Wound swabbing is the most widely
recognized testing technique utilized all through Antibiotic treatment
the UK in spite of the fact that its clinical esteem Antibiotics are chemical substances created by
has been addressed by various creators [16]. It has a micro-organism that have the volume, in weaken
been recommended that normal swabbing, for arrangements, to specifically hinder the
example, at week by week interims or at the development of or to execute other micro-
season of incessant dressing changes, is neither organisms [8]. While it is presently, for the most
useful nor savvy [17]. In simply money related part, acknowledged that foundational antibiotics
terms, a negative injury swab costs from £15 to are essential for the management of clinically
£25 per swab - subordinate upon the wellbeing infected wounds, the choice of antibiotic to be
setting in which it has been gotten - and each used is not always apparent. Only after a
asked for anti-infection affectability will cost an comprehensive assessment process including
extra £5 per set per life form. Promote consideration of patient characteristics, the results
examinations include: of microbiological investigations and the
identification of both the nature and location of the
Serum examinations, these include little wound, can the most proper antibiotic be
measures of blood being gotten from the patient to distinguished. The standard utilization of topical
recognize lifted white cell tallies and raised levels antibiotics is not advocated for colonized or
of serum C-receptive protein (CRP), a protein infected wounds. What's more, a current
ordinarily not found in the serum, but rather methodical survey of antimicrobial operators has
display in numerous intense fiery conditions with presumed that foundational or topical
corruption. In any case, it ought to be recollected antimicrobials are not by and large showed for the
that the last is not analytic of a constant injury administration of chronic wound infections [22]. In
contamination [18]. Quantitative investigation any case, there might be some incentives in the
(through injury biopsies), this can help with the prophylactic utilization of topical antimicrobials
acknowledgment of an expanded bacterial weight; for the underlying administration of intense
in any case, this is not frequently embraced in the cellulitus, while anticipating elucidation of anti-
UK and past investigations have demonstrated that infection affectability and the foundation of a
injuries can mend regardless of high bacterial helpful regimen. Resistance to antibiotics has
numbers [19]. turned into a difficult issue as of late especially
Treatment with the ascent of pandemic strains of methicillin-
Once a conclusion of wound infection has resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The overuse of
been affirmed and anti-infection sensitivities broad-spectrum antibiotics will only serve to
recognized, proper administration regimens ought exacerbate the situation. It could accordingly be
to be considered, with a high need given to contended that all antibiotic utilize ought to be
reducing the danger of cross infection. It is critical founded on known sensitivities.
to regard the patient all in all and not the
contamination alone, so administration procedures Qualities of prophylactic antibiotics contain
must be founded on information got from an all- effectiveness against anticipated bacterial
encompassing evaluation of the necessities of the microorganisms most likely to cause infection
individual [20]. The principle treatment target will (Table 4), good tissue penetration to reach wound
be to decrease instead of kill the bacterial weight involved, cost efficiency, and insignificant
inside the injury edges. Notwithstanding anti- disturbance to intrinsic body flora (e.g. gut) [23].
microbial treatment, there are two fundamental

1439
 Ahmad Kashha at el.

Table4. References for Prophylactic Antibiotics as Specified by Probable Infective Microorganism

Involved [24, 25].
Operation Expected Pathogens Recommended Antibiotic
Head and neck surgery S aureus, streptococci, anaerobes Cefazolin 1-2 g
and streptococci present in an
oropharyngeal approach
Appendectomy, biliary procedures Gram-negative bacilli and Cefazolin 1-2 g
anaerobes
Obstetric and gynecological Gram-negative bacilli, Cefazolin 1-2 g
procedures enterococci, anaerobes, group B
streptococci
Gastroduodenal surgery Gram-negative bacilli and Cefazolin 1-2 g
streptococci
Urology procedures Gram-negative bacilli Cefazolin 1-2 g
Colorectal surgery Gram-negative bacilli and Cefotetan 1-2 g or cefoxitin 1-2
anaerobes g plus oral neomycin 1 g and oral
erythromycin 1 g (start 19 h
preoperatively for 3 doses)
Orthopedic surgery (including S aureus, coagulase-negative Cefazolin 1-2 g
prosthesis insertion), cardiac surgery, staphylococci
neurosurgery, breast surgery,
noncardiac thoracic procedures
Vascular surgery S aureus, Cefazolin 1-2 g
Staphylococcusepidermidis, gram-
negative bacilli

Surgical treatment is regularly connected with backslide of disease

In spite of the fact that the objective of each and wound dehiscence.
specialist is to avert wound diseases, they will Recommendation for the avoidance of
emerge. Treatment is individualized to the patient, Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
the injury, and the idea of the contamination. The
working specialist ought to be made mindful of the • Accomplish intraoperative skin arrangement
likelihood of contamination in the injury and with a liquor based disinfectant specialist aside
decide the treatment for the injury. In a perfect from this is contraindicated (solid proposal; great
world, surgical care should begin with fastidious proof).
detail to systems that keep the advancement of
surgical site infections in any case. Preoperatively, • The utilization of plastic cement wraps with or
consideration ought to be paid to factors like without antimicrobial properties is redundant for
enhancement of patient status, appropriate asepsis, the counteractive action of SSI. (frail proposal;
and surgical site planning. Intraoperatively, high-to direct quality proof).
adherence to great essential surgical standards of
negligible and fine tissue dismemberment, • Implement perioperative glycemic control, and
legitimate determination of suture materials, and utilize blood glucose target levels lower than 200
appropriate injury conclusion is imperative. On mg/dL in patients with and without diabetes (solid
the off chance that a surgical site infection sets in, proposal; high-to direct quality proof).
the treatment frequently includes opening the
injury, clearing discharge, and purging the injury. • Application of a microbial sealant instantly
The more profound tissues are reviewed for after intraoperative skin planning is a bit much for
trustworthiness and for a profound space disease the counteractive action of SSI (powerless
or source. Dressing changes enable the tissues to suggestion; low-quality proof).
pulverize, and the injury mends by auxiliary
expectation more than half a month. • In perfect or clean-contaminted prosthetic joint
Early/deferred conclusion of contaminated injuries arthroplasties, don't direct extra antimicrobial

1440
 Causes and Management of Wound Infection

prophylaxis measurements after the surgical entry 9. English MP, Smith RJ and Harman RR(1971):
point is shut in the OR, even within the sight of a The fungal flora of ulcerated legs. Br. J.
drain (solid proposal; great proof). Dermatol., 84(6): 567-81.
10. Hsiao CH, Chuang CC, Tan HY et al. (2012):
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ocular
CONCLUSION
infection: a 10-year hospital-based
study. Ophthalmology, 119(3):522-527.
Wound Infections are mutual and costly 11. Bowler P, Duerden B and Armstrong D(2001):
complications that increase morbidity and Wound microbiology and associated approaches to
mortality in hospitalized patients, while not all wound management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 14(2):
surgical site infections may be avoided, 244-269.
investigation has established that a significant 12. Bowler P(1998): The anaerobic and aerobic
portion may be avoided by subsequent evidence- microbiology of wounds: a review. Wounds, 10(6):
based infection control principles, for instance, 170-178.
tight glucose control in diabetic patients, timely 13. Kingsley A (2001): Proactive approach to wound
infection. Nurse Stand, 15(30): 50- 58.
prophylactic antibiotic administration,
14. Flanagan M(1997): Wound Management: ACE
appropriate hair removal, and aseptic skin and Series. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.London.
surgical site preparation. Nonetheless, in order 15. Costerton JW, Stewart PS and Greenberg EP
for avoidance strategies to be successful, a team (1999 ):Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of
approach within each facility is necessary to persistent infections. Science, 284: 1318-1322.
ensure that best practices are applied dependably. 16. Cooper R and Lawrence JC(1996): The isolation
and identification of bacteria from wounds. J. Wound
REFERENCES Care, 5(7): 335-340.
17. Gilchrist B (2000): Taking a wound swab. Nurse
1. Calvin M(1998): Cutaneous wound repair. Wounds, Times, 96(4): 2-13.
10(1): 12-32. 18. Krasner D (1990): Chronic wound care.In: A
2. Heinzelmann M, Scott M and Lam T(2002): Clinical Source Book for Professionals.
Factors predisposing to bacterial invasion and Pennsylvania: Health Management Publications.
infection. Am. J. Surg., 183(2): 179-190. 19. : Steer JA, Papini RP, Wilson AP, McGrouther
3. NINSS(Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection in DA and Parkhouse N(1996): Quantitative
English Hospitals(2002): A national surveillance microbiology in the management of burn
and quality improvement programme. Public Health patients. Burns , 22(3): 177-181.
Laboratory Service, 20. Collier M(2001):A ten-point assessment plan for
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15866006 wound management. J. Comm. Nurs., 16(6): 22-26.
4. Plowman R(2000) :The socioeconomic burden of 21. Collier M(2003): MIMS for Nurses Pocket Guide:
hospital acquired infection. Euro. Surveil., 5(4): 49- Medical Imprint ,London.
50. 22. O'Meara SM, Cullum NA, Majid M and Sheldon
5. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al. TA(2001): Systematic review of antimicrobial agents
(1999) :Guideline for prevention of surgical site used for chronic wounds. Br. J. Surg., 88(1): 4-21.
infection. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.,
20(4):250-278. 23. 23-Woodfield JC, Beshay N and van Rij AM
6. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL et al. (1999): (2009): meta-analysis of randomized, controlled
The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: trials assessing the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone. A
attributable mortality, excess length of study of wound, chest, and urinary infections. World
hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect. Control Hosp. J. Surg., 33(12):2538-2550.
Epidemiol., 20(11):725-730. 24. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance
7. McCulloch, JM and Kloth LC (2010): Wound (NNIS) System(1996):NNIS report, Data summary
Healing: Evidence-based Management. 4th ed., Davis from October 1986-April 1996. A report from the
Company, Philadelphia .Pp:5&109. NNIS System.
8. Cooper R, Kingsley A and White R(2003): Wound https://scholar.google.com.eg/scholar?q=24.%09Nati
infection and microbiology .In: Medical onal+Nosocomial+Infections+Surveillance+(NNIS)+
Communications . Ltd for Johnson & Johnson System&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa
Medical. UK. 25-Woods RK, Dellinger EP(1998):Current guidelines
for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds. Am.
Fam. Physician., 57(11):2731-2740.

1441