From Esemplasticism: The Truth Is A Compromise (Exhibition Catalogue), TAG/Club Transmediale, Berlin, 2010
From Esemplasticism: The Truth Is A Compromise (Exhibition Catalogue), TAG/Club Transmediale, Berlin, 2010
From Esemplasticism: The Truth Is A Compromise (Exhibition Catalogue), TAG/Club Transmediale, Berlin, 2010
I’m interested to take seriously the challenging and enriching verve of sonic materiality
and the diverse experiences of auditory phenomena. To do so, I hope to follow sound as it
comes to impart meaningful exchanges against the singular body, and further, how it
locates such a body within a greater social weave. From my perspective, sound operates
as an emergent community, stitching together bodies that do not necessarily search for
each other, and forcing them into proximity. Such movements in turn come to build out a
spatiality that is both coherent and divergent – acoustic spatiality is a lesson in
negotiation, for it splits apart while also mending; it disrupts the lines between an inside
and outside, pulling into its thrust the private and the public to ultimately remake notions
of difference and commonality. All these sonic movements and behaviours must be taken
as indicating a particular and unique paradigmatic structure: sound is thus an epistemic
matrix generating specific spatial coordinates, social mixes, and bodily perceptions.
Following the details of this paradigmatic structure, what kind of language might
begin to surface, as means to describe or to think through where we are in the throes of
sonic events?
Sound may be appreciated to act as a hinge, bringing into contact particular
contradictory forces or conditions. The operations of the voice may begin to highlight this
unique ontology of sound, for the voice both gives presence to an individual body,
figuring as an identifiable sound of personhood, while at the very same instant, it leaves
the body behind, separating from its origin to ultimately circulate outside the self. The
voice, as a special kind of sound, embodies the contradictory and dramatic force of sound
to compose forms of tension: the voice hinges together self and surrounding in a seeming
paradox – I am myself at the moment my voice travels beyond me. Sound in general can
be heard to function similarly, creating a space that is both here and there, concrete and
ephemeral; it delivers the world in all its materiality while already disappearing into the
ether. Sound brings into conversation the unnameable with the nameable, the
representational with the non-represented. In this way, I take sound as the very means by
which we come to negotiate the challenges of presence and absence, of the real and the
virtual, as they interweave into an unsteady flow of information, sensuality, energy.
The hinge of sound may come to teach us how to be present within the surges of
the temporal, to locate ourselves in relation to all that disappears, or threatens to
overwhelm. It could be understood as a particular form of politics, giving entry to the
excluded, the repressed, the silenced through an ever-present flow of challenging noise.
To expose further this paradigmatic structure of sonic materiality, I’d like to
further map out, in the form of a glossary, a set of themes or sonic figures. These may
function as points of departure for travelling further into sound’s particular discourse. It is
my feeling that these sonic figures function as micro-epistemologies, each giving way to
specific perspectives onto the world, whether in the differentiating break of the echo or
the challenges found at the heart of silence. To write about sound, to house it within
words, is to welcome hearing into language, as a force that brings rupture and order
together, to dissolve the strict duality of rationality in favor of the work of the
imagination – that, as Arjun Appadurai suggests, may act as a form of new labor by
which the intensities of contemporary culture are managed.
Echo – multiplication and repetition of a given sound; it breaks the temporal vector of
sound, folding back on itself to appear as if from an unseen source: who’s there? the echo
speaks, giving shape to an unseen, acousmatic body. The echo brings forward a
disorienting multiplication, shattering the clear arc of sound to give us the experience of
difference: the echo, as an acousmatic body, a voice coming back from over there, from
out of the dark, haunts the listener; it returns our own voice as if from another’s,
performing as an alter-ego, a shape-shifting sonority that replaces the single sound with a
differentiating repetition.
Silence and Noise – the imaginary edges to auditory experience; they provide physical as
well as phantasmic points against which sounds are measured, fantasized, conveyed; they
gather the intensities of auditory experience, locating sound upon a philosophical and
ethical scale, making volume a community issue and audition a political process. Silence
and noise are an oppositional antagonism, with noise rending the system open and silence
allowing all things to find their place.
Rhythm – the making of a particular order; it rivets together time and space according to
certain energy expenditures, defining a relation amongst bodies and things; it is a field
(the percussive) in which different orders meet, regimenting bodies while also affording
acts of modulation and breakage (to dance the night away…); the beat is a territorial
dispute, an argument; it is a violence bringing pain and pleasure together, teaching us
how to find place and also how to redefine, reorganize or disrupt existing patterns.