Improving The Electro-Catalytic Activity and Durability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-# Cathode by Surface Modification
Improving The Electro-Catalytic Activity and Durability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-# Cathode by Surface Modification
Improving The Electro-Catalytic Activity and Durability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-# Cathode by Surface Modification
Just Accepted
“Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted
online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical
Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination
of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in
full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully
peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the
Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore,
the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After
a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web
site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes
to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and
ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or
consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
1
2
Improving the Electro-catalytic Activity and
3
4
5
6
Durability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ Cathode by
7
8
9
10
Surface Modification
11
12
13
14 Huijun Chen,1 Zheng Guo,2 Lei A Zhang,3 Yifeng Li,4 Fei Li,1 Yapeng Zhang,1 Yu Chen,3 Xinwei Wang,2
15
16 Bo Yu,4 Jian-min Shi,5 Jiang Liu,1 Chenghao Yang, 1 Shuang Cheng, 1 Yan Chen 1 ,6 *and Meilin Liu 3*
17
18
19 1
20 Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Surface Chemistry of Energy Materials, New Energy Institute, School
21
22 of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou510006, China
23
24
25 2 School of Advanced Materials, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055,
26
27
28
China
29
30
3 Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245, USA
31
32
33
34 4 Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
35
36
37 5 Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang
38
39
40 621000, China
41
42
43 6 Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center for Surface Chemistry of Energy Materials,
44
45 School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, PR
46
47
48 China
49
50
51 KEYWORDS: surface engineering, oxygen reduction reaction, oxygen defects, electrodes, oxide
52
53 hetero-structures
54
55
56
57
58 1
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 2 of 28
ABSTRACT: Electrode materials with high activity and good stability are essential for
1
2
3 commercialization of energy conversion systems such as solid oxide fuel cells or electrolysis cells at the
4
5 intermediate temperature. Modifying existing perovskite-based electrodes surface to form a hetero-
6
7 structure has been widely applied for rational design of novel electrodes with high performance. Despite
8
9
10
many successful developments in enhancing electrode performance by surface modification, some
11
12 controversial results are also reported in the literature and the mechanisms are still not well understood.
13
14 In this work, the mechanism of how surface modification impacts the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR)
15
16
activity and stability of perovskite-based oxides were investigated. We took La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3
17
18
19 (LSCF) as the thin-film model systems and modified its surface with additive PrxCe1-xO2 layers of
20
21 different thicknesses. We found a strong correlation between surface oxygen defects and the ORR
22
23 activity of hetero-structure. Inducing higher oxygen vacancy concentration compared to bare LSCF,
24
25
26 PrO2 coating is proved to greatly facilitate the rate of oxygen dissociation, thus significantly enhancing
27
28 ORR activity. Due to low oxygen vacancy density introduced by Pr0.2Ce0.8O2 and CeO2 coating, on the
29
30 one hand, it does not boost the rate of ORR, but successfully suppresses surface Sr segregation, leading
31
32
33
to an enhanced durability. Our findings demonstrate the vital role of surface oxygen defects and provide
34
35 with important insights for rational design of high-performance electrode materials through surface
36
37 defect engineering.
38
39
40
41 1.INTRODUCTION
42
43 Due to the high efficiency for chemical-to-electrical energy conversion, excellent fuel flexibility,
44
45
and the capability to produce fuels from electricity or solar energy, high-temperature electrochemical
46
47
48 systems have attracted great attentions, including solid oxide fuel cells, solid oxide electrolysis cells,
49
50 oxygen separation membrane, and solar-thermal H2O/CO2 splitting systems.1, 2 However, broader
51
52 commercialization of these systems is hindered by the lack of electrode materials with high performance
53
54
55 and long lifespan.3 Modifying existing perovskite based electrode surface with a secondary phase to
56
57 form a hetero-structure has been widely used to improve the electrodes activity and stability.4, 5-6 Such
58 2
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
secondary phases include perovskite-based oxides,7-11 alkaline earth metal oxides,12 transition metal
1
2
3 oxides,13-17-18 lanthanides oxides19 and their composites phases.20 Despite many successful developments
4
5 in enhancing electrode performance by surface modification, some controversial results are also
6
7 reported in the literature. For instance, the decoration of CoOx was reported to improve the ORR activity
8
9
10
of (La,Sr)CoO3 (LSC)14 and La0.8Sr0.2FeO3 electrode,15 but show little impact on that of LSCF16 and
11
12 (La,Sr)MnO3 (LSM)/ yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrode.17 Mutoro et al.12 showed that the
13
14 decoration of SrOx nano-particles on LSC surface greatly enhanced the oxygen surface exchange
15
16
kinetics, while Rupp et al.14 reported a severe deactivation effect of sub-monolayer of SrOx on the LSC.
17
18
19 The proposed mechanisms for enhancement in catalytic activity arisen from surface modification are
20
21 still controversial. 21-24
22
23
24 It is well known that oxygen defects play an essential role in determining the activity and stability
25
26
27 of oxide electrodes.13, 25-30 For many perovskite with high electronic and ionic conductivity such as LSC,
28
29 LSCF, and BSCF, more oxygen vacancies on the surface are reported to lead to higher surface oxygen
30
31 exchange coefficient. 31, 32 Consistently, perovskite oxides with a higher O 2p band center energy level,
32
33
34
which are associated with lower oxygen vacancy formation energy, are reported to have better ORR
35
36 activity.27 On the other hand, high concentration of oxygen vacancies on the surface is claimed to
37
38 destabilize perovskite oxide surface,13, 29 attributed to the electrostatic interaction between positively
39
40
charged oxygen vacancies on the surface and negatively charged cation dopant such as Sr, Ca, and Ba.29
41
42
43 Such interaction can lead to cation segregation and separation on the surfaces, which is one major cause
44
45 for the degradation of perovskite oxide materials.4 For oxide hetero-structure electrodes, the oxygen
46
47 vacancies in the surface coating layer are found to influence the activity and stability of electrodes.13, 20,
48
49 33
50 The mechanism for such influence, however, is still unclear.
51
52
53 In this work, praseodymium doped ceria (PrxCe1−xO2) modified La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 (LSCF) thin
54
55 films synthesized by Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) were used as the model hetero-structure electrodes.
56
57
58 3
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 4 of 28
The controversial reports about the impact of surface modification in literature, as mentioned above, in
1
2
3 many cases originated from the inability to control the coating's thickness, microstructure, density,
4
5 composition and uniformity. The use of PLD technique in this study ensures that the surface coating has
6
7 a well-defined thickness, composition, and morphology, enabling a systematic investigation into the
8
9
10
impact of surface modification. PrxCe1−xO2−δ was chosen as the modification layer due to its tunable
11
12 oxygen defect chemistry.34-37 The objective is to provide critical insight into the mechanism of how
13
14 surface modification impacts the ORR activity and stability of perovskite-based oxides. Particularly, we
15
16
focus on understanding the impact of oxygen defect in the modification layer on the overall ORR
17
18
19 performance. We found that PrO2 modified LSCF showed much higher ORR activity compared with
20
21 bare LSCF, which were attributed to the high oxygen vacancy concentration in the top layer that
22
23 facilitated the oxygen dissociation process. In contrast, Pr0.2Ce0.8O2 (PCO) and CeO2 modified LSCF
24
25
26 only showed moderate enhancement in ORR activity, but presented much better long-term stability. We
27
28 believe this can be related to the high oxygen formation energy and low Sr solubility in the top layer,
29
30 which suppress Sr segregation to LSCF surface during high temperature operation. Our results provide a
31
32
33
guide line for the rational design of oxide hetero-structure through surface oxygen defects engineering.
34
35
36 2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
37
38
39 Highly textured LSCF (001) films with ~25 nm thickness were prepared by PLD on YSZ (001)
40
41
single crystals substrates (CTMwafer, China) with GDC as a buffer layer. A surface modification layer
42
43
44 of PrO2, Pr0.2Ce0.8O2 (PCO) and CeO2 with two different thicknesses (~2nm and ~6 nm) was deposited
45
46 subsequently on top of LSCF/GDC/YSZ(001) thin film hetero-structure. The PLD growth was carried
47
48 out at 600 °C under oxygen pressure of 10 mTorr. A KrF excimer laser with wavelength of 248 nm,
49
50
51 energy of 300 mJ per pulse and a pulse frequency of 10 Hz were used for the deposition. The target
52
53 substrate distance was set to be 10 cm. The films were cooled down to room temperature in 2 torr
54
55 oxygen pressure with a cooling rate of 5 oC/min. PrO2 , PCO and CeO2 reference samples were
56
57
58 4
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
deposited on to YSZ substrate with GDC buffer layer using the same PLD condition for comparison.
1
2
3 The procedure to make PLD target can be found in Supporting Information Section 1.
4
5
6 X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8 Advance, Germany) was used to confirm that all the powders and
7
8 targets are the right phase. HRXRD 2θ−ω scans were performed to determine the orientation and the
9
10
11
crystallinity of the thin films synthesized by PLD. The HRXRD measurements employed a high-
12
13 resolution four-circle diffractometer with a two-bounce Ge(022) channel-cut monochromator and a
14
15 scintillation counter, using Cu Kα1 radiation(Rigaku SmartLab, Japan). XPS measurement was
16
17
performed for surface chemistry analysis, using Thermo Scientificinstrument (ESCALAB 250Xi) with
18
19
20 monochromated Al Kα (15kV) X-ray radiation equipped with charge neutralization. The C 1s peak at
21
22 284.6 eV was used as the internal reference peak for calibrating binding energies. The local cation
23
24 composition on the surface was quantified by AES (PHI-700 , ULVAC-PHI) with energy resolution of
25
26
27 1‰. Surface morphologies were investigated using a SEM (ZEISS SUPPRA 55VP, German) with ET
28
29 secondary electron detector, and AFM using Asylum Research instrument (MFP-3D-S). High resolution
30
31 transmission electron microscope(HRTEM) , high angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-
32
33
34
STEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elements linear scanning was performed by a JEOL
35
36 JEM -3200FS machine to determine the interface structure. Focus ion Beam (FIB, FEI, Scios) milling
37
38 technique was used for HRTEM sample preparation.
39
40
41
The ORR activity and stability of modified LSCF and reference samples were evaluated by EIS
42
43
44 using Zahner Im6 System. The EIS test was carried in frequency from 10 kHz to 5 mHz with an
45
46 excitation voltage of 10 mV.
47
48
49 First-principles calculations were carried out in Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) 38.
50
51
52 Generalized gradient approximation parameterized by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerholf 39 with spin-
53
54 polarization was adopted to describe the unpaired f electrons in Pr and Ce ions. Plane-wave basis set
55
56 with energy cutoff 400 eV and a 4 × 4 × 4 and 2 × 2 × 2 Monkhorst-Pack 40 k-points were used for
57
58 5
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 6 of 28
the fluorite conventional unit cell and the 40-atom supercell. To overcome the delocalization tendency
1
2
3 of DFT method in describing small polarons, local lattice distortions surrounding them were created by
4
5 using Ce_3 and Pr_3 pseudo-potentials prior of spin-polarized calculations.
6
7
8 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
9
10
11
12
Using PLD, bare LSCF thin films and LSCF with a ~2nm (thin) and ~6nm (thick) coherent coating
13
14 of PrO2, Pr0.2Ce0.8O2−δ (PCO) and CeO2 were grown on Yttrium stabilized Zirconia (YSZ) (001) single
15
16 crystal substrates to serve as model systems. A Gd-doped CeO2 (GDC) layer buffer layer was grown
17
18
between LSCF and YSZ substrate to avoid undesired reaction between electrode and electrolyte. High
19
20
21 resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD) results showed that the LSCF, the PrxCe1−xO2−δ coating, and the
22
23 GDC buffer layers were all highly textured in (001) orientation. Representative HRXRD results for the
24
25 LSCF, the thick CeO2 (~6nm) modified LSCF are shown in Figure 1a. More detailed HRXRD results
26
27
28 are shown in Figure S2. All the as prepared samples presented very smooth surface with roughness of
29
30 less than 1 nm (Figure 1b, Figure S4).
31
32
33
34 LSCF (b)
YSZ (002)
36
37
LSCF (001)
GDC (002)
38
LSCF (002)
GDC (004)
39
40
41
42
Intensity (a.u.)
LSCF as-prep.
43
44
CeO2(004) GDC (004)
CeO2 (002)GDC (002)
YSZ (002)
YSZ (004)
45 CeO2 thick
(c) RMS 0.45nm
46
47
LSCF (001)
48
LSCF (002)
49
50
51
52
53 CeO 2 thick as-prep.
54
55 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
56 2 (degree)
57
58 6
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Figure 1.(a) HRXRD pattern of as prepared LSCF, thick CeO2 (~6 nm)/LSCF (CeO2 thick). The peaks
1
2
3 of top CeO2 layer overlap with the GDC buffer layer . All the layers are highly textured in (001)
4
5 orientation. AFM images of (b)as prepared LSCF, (c) thick CeO2/LSCF. The surface roughness of
6
7 LSCF and thick CeO2/LSCF were 0.21 nm and 0.45 nm, respectively.
8
9
10
11
The ORR activity of the LSCF and the modified LSCF electrodes at different temperatures and
12
13 oxygen partial pressures were evaluated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) performed
14
15 on model cells with the thin-film electrode as the working electrode, YSZ substrate as the electrolyte,
16
17
and porous Ag-YSZ as the counter electrode (Figure 2a). Representative EIS spectra are shown in
18
19
20 Figure 2b for the bare LSCF and the LSCF with a thick modification layer (~6 nm) tested at 600 oC in
21
22 air. Since the contribution of the counter electrode (porous Ag-YSZ) to the total impedance of the cell is
23
24 much smaller than that of the dense thin-film working electrode (Figure S3), the Nyquist plots are
25
26
27 dominated by a semicircle attributed to the surface oxygen exchange process of the thin-film electrode.
28
29 Using the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 2b, the ORR area specific resistance (ASR) of the LSCF
30
31 and the modified LSCF at different temperatures in air are obtained (Figure 2c-d). Oxygen exchange
32
33
34
coeffient kq can be calculated from the ORR ASR using equations (1-2).
35
36
37 kq=kBT/4e2ASR co (1)
38
39
40 co =(3-δ)/Vm (2)
41
42
43
where kB is Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, e is the electron charge. The lattice
44
45
46 oxygen concentration co is calculated based the bulk molar volume Vm and oxide ion vacancy content δ
47
48 of LSCF at 873K reported by Niwa et al41.
49
50
51 Among the samples tested, PrO2/LSCF shows the most pronounced enhancement in ORR kinetics.
52
53
54 The ORR kinetic of the thick PrO2/LSCF is nearly 6 times faster than that of the bare LSCF at 600 °C in
55
56 air. The CeO2/LSCF samples showed only a slight enhancement in oxygen reduction kinetics. The
57
58 7
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 8 of 28
performance of the PCO/LSCF was between that of the PrO2/LSCF and that of the CeO2/LSCF
1
2
3 electrode. The effect of the modification layer thickness was also studied. For both PrO2 and PCO
4
5 modification, the ORR kinetics increased with the thickness of the modification layer, leading to higher
6
7 kq value for a thicker layer (Figure 2 c and d). In contrast, for the CeO2 modification, the performance
8
9
10
became worse with the increasing thickness of the top CeO2 layer.The dependence of kq on oxygen
11
12 partial pressure of the modified LSCF and corresponding single phase were fitted using the following
13
14 equation
15
16
17
kq ∝ p𝑂𝑚
2 (3)
18
19
20
21 where pO2 is the oxygen partial pressure. The exponent m can provide information about the
22
23 species involved in the rate limiting step (RLS) of the ORR.
24
25
26
27
Considering a simple mode for the ORR, the reaction steps and the corresponding exponent m are
28
29 as follows: 42-45
30
31
32 O2,gas ⇔ O2,ads; m=1 (4)
33
34
35
O2,ads ⇔ 2Oads; m=0.5 (5)
36
37
38
39 O2, ads 4e - 2 V'O' 2 OOx ; m=0.25 (6)
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58 8
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 Figure 2. (a) Schematics of the EIS measurement setup. (b) Nyquist plot for the bare LSCF and the
32
33
34
thick (~6nm) PrO2, PCO and CeO2 modified LSCF measured in air at 600 °C. The inset figure shows
35
36 the equivalent circuit for the fitting of EIS data. (c-d) Temperature dependence of oxygen surface
37
38 exchange coefficient, kq for the bare LSCF and the LSCF coated with a thin (c) and a thick (d)
39
40
modification layer
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58 9
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 10 of 28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 Figure 3. The oxygen partial pressure dependence of the kq for (a) PrO2/LSCF, (b) PCO/LSCF, (c)
18
19 CeO2/LSCF and corresponding reference samples at 600 oC. The test pressure ranges from 1 bar to 10-3
20
21
22 bar. (a) PrO2/LSCF, (b) PCO/LSCF (c) CeO2/LSCF. Thin and thick are referred to the thickness of the
23
24 decoration layer, which are 2 nm and 6 nm, respectively. Pure is referred to bare PrxCe1−xO2−δ films
25
26 deposited on YSZ with GDC as the buffer layer.
27
28
29
30
After surface modification, the dependence of kq on oxygen pressure showed noticeable changes.
31
32 For bare LSCF, m was close to 0.5 (Figure 3), indicating that the dissociation of molecular oxygen to
33
34 atomic oxygen is likely to be RLS (O2,ads ⇔ 2Oads).42-45 This result is consistent with previous report for
35
36
mixed ionic and electronic conductors (MIEC) such as LSCF and LSC, which have sufficiently high
37
38
39 electronic and ion conductivity.31, 32 The m value for the PrO2 modified LSCF was between 0.5 and 0.25,
40
41 implying that the rate of ORR may be limited by both oxygen dissociation and charge transfer process.
42
43 The m value for the PCO and the CeO2 modified LSCF electrode were close to 0.25, indicating that the
44
45
46 charge transfer process ( O2, ads 4e - 2 V'O' 2 OOx ) may be the rate-limiting step of ORR. It needs to
47
48 note that the ORR reaction steps proposed above may contain several elemental steps. Determining the
49
50
51 exact elemental step as the RLS is beyond the scope of this work. Our EIS results, however, provided
52
53 evidence that surface modifications critically influence the mechanism and kinetics of ORR, due to the
54
55 different oxygen defects chemistry of the top layer, as to be discussed in a later section.
56
57
58 10
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Besides the initial ORR activity, long-term stability of bare LSCF and modified LSCF were also
1
2
3 compared. The kq of all samples at 600 oC in air as a function of operation time are shown in Figure 4.
4
5 The kq of the bare LSCF reduced continuously with operation time, becoming more than 6 times lower
6
7 than the initial value after 60 hours operation. In contrast, all surface modified electrodes showed
8
9
10
enhanced stability. In particular, the LSCF electrode coated with a 6 nm thick CeO2 layer showed much
11
12 higher kq after long time operation, although the initial kq was slightly lower than that of the bare LSCF.
13
14
15
16
17 PrO2 thin PrO2 thick
18
19 PCO thin PCO thick
20 CeO2 thin CeO2 thick
-7
21 10
k (cms )
LSCF
-1
22
23
24
q
25
26
27 -8
28 10
29
30
31
32
33 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
34 Time (h)
35
36
37
38
39 Figure 4. The kq of bare LSCF and modified LSCF at 600 oC in air for about 60 hours. The thin and
40
41
42 thick are referred modification layer with the thickness of ~2nm and ~6nm.
43
44
45 To understand the mechanism for the enhancement in stability of the surface modified LSCF, we
46
47 have characterized the detailed surface morphology and composition of the bare LSCF and the surface
48
49
50
modified LSCF electrodes before and after annealing at 600 oC in air. As shown in Figure 1b and
51
52 Figure 5a, as prepared LSCF films presented very smooth surface. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)
53
54 results from different locations of the as-prepared LSCF surface did not show any noticeable difference
55
56
(Figure 5b), indicating a chemically homogeneous surface. After annealing in air at 600 oC for 3 hours,
57
58 11
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 12 of 28
the LSCF surface became very rough, with particles presented on the surface (Figure 5c). HRXRD
1
2
3 results showed no secondary phase form in bulk (Figure S6). As shown in AES element mapping of Sr
4
5 on annealed LSCF, the particles that form on surface were Sr enriched phases with low concentration of
6
7 Fe and Co. (Figure 5d, Figure S7) Further increasing the annealing temperature to 750 oC resulted in
8
9
10
even larger Sr-enriched particles on the LSCF surface (Figure S8). Such preferential segregation of Sr
11
12 to the surface after high temperature annealing have been widely observed in perovskite-based
13
14 materials,4 such as (La,Sr)MnO3, 29, 46-48 Sr(Ti,Fe)O3,49 (Ba,Sr)(Co,Fe)O350 and (La,Sr)2CoO4.51 Due to
15
16
the insulating nature of the Sr enriched particles, they physically block the active sites for oxygen
17
18
19 reduction reaction and impede the paths for ionic and electronic transport. Therefore, we believed the
20
21 segregation and separation of Sr cation on the surface is the reason for the degradation of LSCF at 600
22
23 oC (Figure 4).
24
25
26 0302.8.map: Company Name
27 2017 Mar 2 10.0 kV 0 nA FRR 10.92 min
28 (a) Sr1
(b) RSF
29 2
Intensity
70.3
30 1
31 Sr1
32
33
La Fe Co Sr
34 LSCF as prep. 500 nm C O
35 200 400 600 800 1600 1800
36 Kinetic Ener gy (eV)
37
38 (c) (d)
39
40
1
41
42 2
43 500 nm
LSCF 600 oC Sr mapping
0.200 ?m
44
45
46
50000 X 10.0 keV 0.5 µm
47
3/2/2017
48 0.200 ?m
3 Figure 5. (a) SEM image of as prepared LSCF (b) Representative AES spectra from different location,
49
50 0.0
51
52 as marked in (a), on as prepared LSCF surface (c) SEM image of LSCF after annealing at 600oC in air,
53
54 (d) AES mapping of Sr for annealed LSCF from the same location as for (c)). The brightness in (d)
55
56
57
represents the intensity of Sr concentration.
58 12
59
X 60
10.0 keV 2.0 µm
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
The PrxCe1-xO2 modified LSCF films presented very smooth surface in their as prepared states
1
2
3 (Figure 1 and Figure S4). After annealing at 600oC, although there were still particles showed up on
4
5 the surface of PrO2/LSCF and PCO/LSCF surface (Figure 6 c-f), the coverage of these particles were
6
7 much less than that on bare LSCF. For annealed CeO2/LSCF, only a few scattered particles were
8
9
10
observed on the surface (Figure 6 g-h). These results indicate that the modification layer on top of
11
12 LSCF can suppress Sr segregation and phase separation on the LSCF surface, which explains the
13
14 enhanced stability of modified LSCF.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53 Figure 6. SEM images of the bare LSCF (a-b) and the LSCF modified by (c) thin PrO2, (d) thick PrO2,
54
55 (e) thin PCO (f) thick PCO, (g) thin CeO2, and (h) thick CeO2 after annealing at 600°C in air for 3 hours;
56
57
58 13
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 14 of 28
(i) Comparison of the Sr 3d XPS spectra for the bare LSCF and the modified LSCF in their as prepared
1
2
3 state (left) and after annealing (right). The yellow and purple doublets are attributed to bulk coordinated
4
5 Sr in LSCF lattice (Srlattice) and surface Sr species (Srnon-lattic). (j) Comparison of Srnon-lattic/Srlattice ratio for
6
7 bare LSCF and modified LSCF.
8
9
10
11
To further understand the influence of surface modification on the Sr segregation behavior in LSCF,
12
13 we compared the chemical environment of Sr in the near surface for bare LSCF and modified LSCF. Sr
14
15 3d spectra of the bare LSCF and the LSCF with a thin surface modification layer in their as prepared
16
17
state and after 600 oC annealing are presented in Figure 6i. The Sr 3d spectra were deconvoluted with
18
19
20 two sets of spin–orbit split doublets. The doublets located at lower binding energy (Srlattice) are attributed
21
22 to Sr within LSCF lattice, while the ones located at higher binding energy are attributed to Sr-OH, Sr-
23
24 CO3 and under coordinated Sr (Srnon-lattice).4, 49, 51-54 The Srnon-lattice / Sr lattice ratio reflects the extent of Sr
25
26
27 segregation and separation in bare LSCF and modified LSCF. The Sr non-lattice/Sr lattice ratio of bare LSCF
28
29 showed large increase after annealing (Figure 6i-j), indicating a strong Sr segregation towards the
30
31 surface. This is consistent with the AES results for bare LSCF as shown in Figure 5. After covering
32
33
34
LSCF with a thin modification layer, we can see non-lattice Sr becomes much less pronounced both for
35
36 as prepared and annealed samples.
37
38
39 The Srnon-lattice/Srlattice ratios are in the order of LSCF> PrO2/LSCF> PCO/LSCF> CeO2/LSCF
40
41
(Figure 6j), suggesting that CeO2 modification is most effective for suppressing Sr segregation in LSCF
42
43
44 (Figure 6j), which is consistent with SEM results (Figure 6g-h). As shown in Figure 6 c-f, the particle
45
46 density on PCO/LSCF surface is larger than that on PrO2/LSCF, but the particles size is considerably
47
48 smaller. Although SEM is a powerful tool to reveal surface morphology of thin films, it cannot provide
49
50
51 a quantitative comparison of the coverage of these surface particles among different samples. The XPS
52
53 results provide direct evidence that the PCO can more successfully suppress Sr segregation than PrO2,
54
55 which is consistent with the better stability of PCO/LSCF than PrO2/LSCF shown in Figure 4. For the
56
57
58 14
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
LSCF with a thick modification layer (~6nm), due to the detection depth limit of XPS, we were not able
1
2
3 to probe the Sr environment. Therefore, instead of XPS measurement, we did High Resolution
4
5 Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)
6
7 characterization for the annealed thick CeO2/LSCF film. As shown in Figure 7, there was no clear Sr
8
9
10
segregation and secondary phase formation near the interface of CeO2 and LSCF. Due to the surface
11
12 damage introduced by FIB milling during sample preparation, we were not able to obtain the local
13
14 structure information of Sr segregation on the top surface of bare LSCF with TEM measurement. Using
15
16
Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (TOF-SIMS, Figure S10), the presence of Sr
17
18
19 segregation on LSCF surface and the suppression effect of PCO coating were observed and were
20
21 consistent with our XPS and SEM results.
22
23
24
25 Substr ate
26 (a) 0
27
(b) Fe Co Sr La Ce
28 YSZ 0.5 mm
LSCF
GDC
29
30
CeO 2 20
31
32
2 nm
Distance (nm)
33 GDC
34
35 37.8 nm 40
36
LSCF
37
38
39 60
40
41
LSCF
25.0 nm
CeO 2
42
43
CeO 2
(e)
44 5.6 nm 80
45
46 Intensity (a.u.) Sur face
47
48
49
Figure 7. (a) HRTEM images of thick (~6 nm )CeO2/LSCF thin film after annealing at 600 oC for 3
50
51
52 hours in air; (b) EDS analysis from the substrate to the surface.
53
54
55 Considering the essential role of oxygen vacancy for ORR activity and stability for LSCF, we
56
57
58 15
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 16 of 28
hypothesize that the mechanism for the different improvement of ORR performance for PrO2, PCO and
1
2
3 CeO2 modified LSCF are related to their very different oxygen defect chemistry. To provide more
4
5 insight into the underlying mechanism, we did theoretical computation of the oxygen vacancy formation
6
7 energy 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑐 for PrO2, PCO and CeO2. The calculation details can be found in the Supporting
8
9
10 Information Section 2. As shown in Figure 8a, we found that 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑐 decreased with the increase of Pr
11
12 dopant concentration in the CeO2 host materials, which are consistent with previous experiment and
13
14
theoretical work.20, 34, 35
15
16
17
18 The reason for the different improvement in ORR activity for PrO2, PCO and CeO2 modified LSCF
19
20 can be related their different oxygen defect concentration (Figure 8b). The oxygen vacancy formation
21
22 energy (Evac) in PrO2 (0.91eV) is found to be much lower than that in LSCF (1.3-2.4 eV).20, 55
23
24
25 Depositing a PrO2 layer onto LSCF can lead to higher concentration of oxygen vacancies on surface
26
27 compared with the bare LSCF, which strongly facilitate the dissociation and incorporation of oxygen
28
29 molecular oxygen, leading to a significant enhancement of ORR activity for PrO2 coated LSCF.32, 56, 57
30
31
32
This interpretation is consistent with our previous near ambient XPS results. 20CeO2, on the other hand,
33
34 shows very high oxygen vacancy formation energy (3.7eV) (Figure 8 a). As a result, CeO2 single phase
35
36 exhibited very low kq, which was also independent of oxygen partial pressure (Figure 3c). Covering
37
38
LSCF with a CeO2 lead to a blocking effect for the absorption of oxygen gas molecular and charge
39
40
41 transfer process. Therefore, CeO2 modification showed the smallest improvement in ORR activity.
42
43 Furthermore, due to the different oxygen vacancy concentration in the top layer, the ORR activity got
44
45 improve when PrO2 thickness increased, but decreased with CeO2 top layer thickness. The oxygen
46
47
48 formation energy of PCO was between PrO2 and CeO2, leading to less improvement in ORR activity
49
50 compared with PrO2/LSCF but better performance than CeO2/LSCF.
51
52
53 Oxygen defect concentration on the top layer of modified LSCF can also impact the Sr segregation
54
55
56
behavior of LSCF. This is why kq of the modified LSCF does not completely follow the order of oxygen
57
58 16
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
vacancy formation energy of the modification layer after long time operation (Figure 4).Our recent
1
2
3 results showed that the oxygen defect chemistry of perovskite oxides were strongly impacted by the
4
5 presence of hetero-interfaces.58 A less reducible CeO2 on top of LSCF leads to a decrease in oxygen
6
7 vacancies on the LSCF surface. As a results, the electrostatic attraction between the positively charged
8
9
10
oxygen vacancy and negatively charge Sr dopant decreased, resulting in a decrease in the driving force
11
12 for Sr to segregate to the surface.29 Therefore, CeO2/LSCF presents much less Srnon-lattice than the bare
13
14 LSCF does. This effect is similar to the enhanced stability of LSC by surface modification of less
15
16
reducible oxides reported by Tsvetkov et al.13 By doping Pr into CeO2, the oxygen formation energy
17
18
19 decreases and surface oxygen concentration increases. As a result, PrO2 and PCO showed less apparent
20
21 effect in suppressing Sr segregation. The reason why a more reducible PrO2 on top of LSCF can still
22
23 improve the stability of LSCF is that the PrO2 layer physically blocks the direct contact of the LSCF
24
25
26 with CO2 and H2O. As is well known, direct exposure of LSCF to CO2 and H2O in the air may facilitate
27
28 the formation of insulating phases such as Sr(OH)2 and SrCO34, 49, 51 It needs to note that, besides
29
30 oxygen vacancy formation energy, the different substitution energy of Sr in PrO2, PCO and CeO2
31
32
33
(Figure 8) can also contribute to the variation of Sr segregation in LSCF. CeO2 with highest Sr
34
35 substitution energy can better suppress Sr segregated from the bulk of LSCF to the interface and surface
36
37 of hetero-structure. To compensate the charge difference, substituting Pr or Ce with Sr is normally
38
39
accompanied with the formation of oxygen vacancies. Therefore, the large Sr substitution energy in
40
41
42 CeO2 is correlated with its high oxygen vacancy formation energy.
43
44
45 Our results demonstrate that surface oxygen vacancies have critical impact on the ORR kinetics and
46
47 stability of perovskite electrodes. While high oxygen vacancies promote the ORR reaction, it may
48
49
50 destabilize the surface by introducing more surface dopant segregation. Therefore, an ideal material
51
52 design can be the use of composite coating which can both block the Sr segregation and provide oxygen
53
54 defects on the surface to facilitate the reaction, as demonstrated in some of recent works.20, 33 It is also
55
56
57
worth to emphasis that besides materials characteristics, the microstructure of the top layer also strongly
58 17
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 18 of 28
impact on the ORR activity of the hetero-structure. For instance, we found the ORR activity of
1
2
3 PrO2/LSCF and PCO/LSCF increased with the thickness of top layer. In contrast, a thicker the top CeO2
4
5 lead to a worse ORR activity. Therefore, one reason for the large variation in performance of surface
6
7 modified electrode in literature can be the different microstructure such as thickness and density of the
8
9
10
surface coating. Techniques such as atomic layer deposition 59 that can realize surface modification with
11
12 well controlled thickness and composition are believed to be powerful tools for the synthesis of high
13
14 performance electrode material.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36 Figure 8. (a) Vacancy formation energy (Black square) and Sr substitution energy (Blue sphere) in
37
38
CeO2, PCO (Pr0.25Ce0.75O2) and PrO2. PCO have two scenarios in Sr substituting Pr and Ce site. Dashed
39
40
41 line is for the guiding of eyes. The inset figure shows the spin charge density of PCO with an oxygen
42
43 vacancy in the cell. (b) Illustration shows the critical impact of oxygen vacancies in the modification
44
45 layer on the performance of hetero-structure electrodes. High densities of oxygen vacancy in the top
46
47
48 layer can facilitate oxygen dissociation and incorporation on the surface, leading to high ORR activity,
49
50 as for the case of PrO2/LSCF. Low concentration oxygen in the top layer can help suppress Sr
51
52 segregation to the surface, leading to better stability, as exampled by CeO2/LSCF.
53
54
55
56
4. Conclusion
57
58 18
59
60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
of oxygen vacancy formation energy and Sr substitution energy; Summary of fitting parameters for Sr
1
2
3 3d peak (Table S1).
4
5
6 AUTHOR INFORMATION
7
8
9
Corresponding Author
10
11
12
*(Y. C.)E-mail address: escheny@scut.edu.cn.
13
14
15 *(M. L.)E-mail address: meilin.liu@mse.gatech.edu.
16
17
ORCID
18
19
20 *Yan Chen : 0000-0001-6193-7508
21
22
23 *Meilin Liu: 0000-0002-6188-2372
24
25
26 Notes
27
28 The authors declare no competing financial interest
29
30
31 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
32
33
34 This work was supported by Guangzhou Science and Technology Program General Projects (No.
35
36 201707010146), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018MS40), Guangdong
37
38
39
Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (No. 2014ZT05N200), the National Natural
40
41 Science Foundation of China (11605063, 91745203), the Science and Technology Planning Project of
42
43 Guangdong Province, China (No. 2017B090916002), the Recruitment Program of Global Youth Experts
44
45
of China. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a
46
47
48 DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of
49
50 Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59 20 Environment
60 ACS Paragon Plus
Page 21 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
REFERENCES
1
2
3 1. Zheng, Y.; Wang, J. C.; Yu, B.; Zhang, W. Q.; Chen, J.; Qiao, J. L.; Zhang, J. J., A Review of High
4
5 Temperature Co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2 to Produce Sustainable Fuels Using Solid Oxide
6
7
8
Electrolysis Cells (SOECs): Advanced Materials and Technology. Chemical Society Reviews 2017, 46,
9
10 1427-1463.
11
12 2. Wachsman, E. D.; Marlowe, C. A.; Lee, K. T., Role of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in a Balanced Energy
13
14
Strategy. Energy & Environmental Science 2012, 5, 5498-5509.
15
16
17 3. Zhang, Y.; Knibbe, R.; Sunarso, J.; Zhong, Y. J.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. P.; Zhu, Z. H., Recent
18
19 Progress on Advanced Materials for Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells Operating Below 500 Degrees C. Adv.
20
21 Mater. 2017, 29, 1700132-1700165.
22
23
24 4. Li, Y. F.; Zhang, W. Q.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.; Liu, M. L., Controlling Cation
25
26 Segregation in Perovskite-based Electrodes for High Electro-catalytic Activity and Durability. Chemical
27
28 Society Reviews 2017, 46, 6345-6378.
29
30
31
5. Ding, D.; Li, X. X.; Lai, S. Y.; Gerdes, K.; Liu, M. L., Enhancing SOFC Cathode Performance by
32
33 Surface Modification through Infiltration. Energy & Environmental Science 2014, 7, 552-575.
34
35 6. Zhu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Ran, R.; Chen, Y.; Shao, Z.; Liu, M., Promotion of Oxygen Reduction by
36
37
Exsolved Silver Nanoparticles on a Perovskite Scaffold for Low-temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells.
38
39
40 Nano letters 2015, 16, 512-518.
41
42 7. Ding, D.; Liu, M. F.; Liu, Z. B.; Li, X. X.; Blinn, K.; Zhu, X. B.; Liu, M. L., Efficient Electro-
43
44 Catalysts for Enhancing Surface Activity and Stability of SOFC Cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3,
45
46
47 1149-1154.
48
49 8. Crumlin, E. J.; Mutoro, E.; Ahn, S. J.; la O, G. J.; Leonard, D. N.; Borisevich, A.; Biegalski, M. D.;
50
51 Christen, H. M.; Shao-Horn, Y., Oxygen Reduction Kinetics Enhancement on a Heterostructured Oxide
52
53
54
Surface for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 3149-3155.
55
56 9. Sase, M.; Yashiro, K.; Sato, K.; Mizusaki, J.; Kawada, T.; Sakai, N.; Yamaji, K.; Horita, T.;
57
58 Yokokawa, H., Enhancement of Oxygen Exchange at the Hetero Interface of (La,Sr)CoO3/(La,Sr)
59 21 Environment
60 ACS Paragon Plus
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 22 of 28
5675-5680.
1
2
3 19. Saher, S.; Naqash, S.; Boukamp, B. A.; Hu, B. B.; Xia, C. R.; Bouwmeester, H. J. M., Influence of
4
5 Ionic Conductivity of the Nano-particulate Coating Phase on Oxygen Surface Exchange of
6
7 La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ .Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2017, 5, 4991-4999.
8
9
10
20. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ding, D.; Ding, Y.; Choi, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yoo, S.; Chen, D.; deGlee, B.; Xu, H.;
11
12 Lu, Q.; Zhao, B.; Vardar, G.; Wang, J.; Bluhm, H.; Crumlin, E. J.; Yang, C.; Liu, J.; Yildiz, B.; Liu, M.,
13
14 A Robust and Active Hybrid Catalyst for Facile Oxygen Reduction in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Energy
15
16
Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 964-971.
17
18
19 21. Chen, Y.; Cai, Z. H.; Kuru, Y.; Ma, W.; Tuller, H. L.; Yildiz, B., Electronic Activation of Cathode
20
21 Superlattices at Elevated Temperatures - Source of Markedly Accelerated Oxygen Reduction Kinetics.
22
23 Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 1221-1229.
24
25
26 22. Feng, Z. X.; Yacoby, Y.; Gadre, M. J.; Lee, Y. L.; Hong, W. T.; Zhou, H.; Biegalski, M. D.;
27
28 Christen, H. M.; Adler, S. B.; Morgan, D.; Shao-Horn, Y., Anomalous Interface and Surface Strontium
29
30 Segregation in (La1-ySry)2CoO4 ±δ/La1-xSrxCoO3-δ Heterostructured Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
31
32
33
2014, 5, 1027-1034.
34
35 23. Han, J. W.; Yildiz, B., Mechanism for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Kinetics at the (La,Sr)CoO3-δ
36
37 /(La,Sr)2CoO4±δ Hetero-interface. Energy & Environmental Science 2012, 5, 8598-8607.
38
39
24. Gadre, M. J.; Lee, Y. L.; Morgan, D., Cation Interdiffusion Model for Enhanced Oxygen Kinetics at
40
41
42 Oxide Heterostructure Interfaces. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2012, 14, 2606-2616.
43
44 25. Feng, Z. L. A.; El Gabaly, F.; Ye, X. F.; Shen, Z. X.; Chueh, W. C., Fast Vacancy-mediated Oxygen
45
46 Ion Incorporation across the Ceria-gas Electrochemical Interface. Nature Communications 2014,
47
48
49 5,4374-4384.
50
51 26. Grimaud, A.; Hong, W. T.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Tarascon, J. M., Anionic Redox Processes for
52
53 Electrochemical Devices. Nature Materials 2016, 15, 121-126.
54
55
56
27. Lee, Y. L.; Kleis, J.; Rossmeisl, J.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Morgan, D., Prediction of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
57
58 Cathode Activity with First-principles Descriptors. Energy & Environmental Science 2011, 4, 3966-
59 23 Environment
60 ACS Paragon Plus
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Page 24 of 28
3970.
1
2
3 28. Lee, Y. L.; Lee, D.; Wang, X. R.; Lee, H. N.; Morgan, D.; Shao-Horn, Y., Kinetics of Oxygen
4
5 Surface Exchange on Epitaxial Ruddlesden-Popper Phases and Correlations to First-Principles
6
7 Descriptors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 244-249.
8
9
10
29. Lee, W.; Han, J. W.; Chen, Y.; Cai, Z.; Yildiz, B., Cation Size Mismatch and Charge Interactions
11
12 Drive Dopant Segregation at the Surfaces of Manganite Perovskites. Journal of the American Chemical
13
14 Society 2013, 135, 7909-7925.
15
16
30. Li, F.; Li, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, C.; Chen,
17
18
19 Y.; Liu, M., Impact of Strain-Induced Changes in Defect Chemistry on Catalytic Activity of Nd2NiO4 +δ
20
21 Electrodes. ACS applied materials & interfaces 2018, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11877.
22
23 31. Merkle, R.; Maier, J.; Bouwmeester, H. J. M., A Linear Free Energy Relationship for Gas-solid
24
25
26 Interactions: Correlation between Surface Rate Constant and Diffusion Coefficient of Oxygen Tracer
27
28 Exchange for Electron-rich Perovskites. Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit. 2004, 43, 5069-5073.
29
30 32. Kuklja, M. M.; Kotomin, E. A.; Merkle, R.; Mastrikov, Y. A.; Maier, J., Combined Theoretical and
31
32
33
Experimental Analysis of Processes Determining Cathode Performance in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells.
34
35 Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2013, 15, 5443-5471.
36
37 33. Chen, Y.; Yoo, S.; Pei, K.; Chen, D.; Zhang, L.; deGlee, B.; Murphy, R.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, Y.;
38
39
Chen, Y.; Liu, M., An In Situ Formed, Dual-Phase Cathode with a Highly Active Catalyst Coating for
40
41
42 Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cells. Advanced Functional Materials 2017, 1704907-1704914.
43
44 34. Ahn, K.; Yoo, D. S.; Prasad, D. H.; Lee, H.-W.; Chung, Y.-C.; Lee, J.-H., Role of Multivalent Pr in
45
46 the Formation and Migration of Oxygen Vacancy in Pr-Doped Ceria: Experimental and First-Principles
47
48
49 Investigations. Chemistry of Materials 2012, 24, 4261-4267.
50
51 35. Bishop, S. R.; Stefanik, T. S.; Tuller, H. L., Defects and Transport in PrxCe1−xO2−δ: Composition
52
53 trends. Journal of Materials Research 2012, 27, 2009-2016.
54
55
56
36. Chen, D.; Bishop, S. R.; Tuller, H. L., Nonstoichiometry in Oxide Thin Films Operating under
57
58 Anodic Conditions: A Chemical Capacitance Study of the Praseodymium-Cerium Oxide System.
59 24 Environment
60 ACS Paragon Plus
Page 25 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Solid State Ionics 2006, 177, 1361-1369.
1
2
3 48. Hu, B.; Mahapatra, M. K.; Singh, P., Performance Regeneration in Lanthanum Strontium Manganite
4
5 Cathode during Exposure to H2O and CO2 Containing Ambient Air Atmospheres. Journal of the
6
7 Ceramic Society of Japan 2015, 123, 199-204.
8
9
10
49. Chen, Y.; Jung, W.; Cai, Z.; Kim, J. J.; Tuller, H. L.; Yildiz, B., Impact of Sr Segregation on the
11
12 Electronic Structure and Oxygen Reduction Activity of SrTi1−xFexO3 Surfaces. Energy & Environmental
13
14 Science 2012, 5, 7979.
15
16
50. Kim, Y.-M.; Chen, X.; Jiang, S. P.; Bae, J., Effect of Strontium Content on Chromium Deposition
17
18
19 and Poisoning in Ba1− xSrxCo0. 8Fe0. 2O3− δ (0.3≤ x≤ 0.7) Cathodes of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal
20
21 of The Electrochemical Society 2011, 159, B185-B194.
22
23
24 51. Chen, Y.; Téllez, H.; Burriel, M.; Yang, F.; Tsvetkov, N.; Cai, Z.; McComb, D. W.; Kilner, J. A.;
25
26 Yildiz, B., Segregated Chemistry and Structure on (001) and (100) Surfaces of (La1–xSrx)2CoO4
27
28 Override the Crystal Anisotropy in Oxygen Exchange Kinetics. Chemistry of Materials 2015, 27, 5436-
29
30
31
5450.
32
33 52. Van Der Heide, P., Systematic x‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Study of La1− xSrx‐based
34
35
36
Perovskite‐type Oxides. Surface and interface analysis 2002, 33, 414-425.
37
38 53. Jiang, S. P.; Zhang, S.; Zhen, Y., Deposition of Cr species at (La, Sr)(Co, Fe) O3 Cathodes of Solid
39
40 Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2006, 153, A127-A134.
41
42
43 54. Dupin, J.-C.; Gonbeau, D.; Vinatier, P.; Levasseur, A., Systematic XPS Studies of Metal Oxides,
44
45 Hydroxides and Peroxides. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2000, 2, 1319-1324.
46
47 55. Jun, A.; Yoo, S.; Gwon, O. H.; Shin, J.; Kim, G., Thermodynamic and Electrical Properties of
48
49
50
Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ for Intermediate-temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells.
51
52 Electrochim. Acta 2013, 89, 372-376.
53
54 56. Gupta, A.; Waghmare, U. V.; Hegde, M. S., Correlation of Oxygen Storage Capacity and Structural
55
56
Distortion in Transition-Metal-, Noble-Metal-, and Rare-Earth-Ion-Substituted CeO2 from First
57
58
59 26 Environment
60 ACS Paragon Plus
Page 27 of 28 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces