This case planning chart summarizes the legal claim, facts, evidence, and defenses in the case of State v Monty Khanna. The legal claim is for acquittal under sections 354 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code relating to outraging a woman's modesty. The facts alleged include Monty Khanna trying to hold Kashish's hand in a lift, but she did not report it for 10 days and attended another party with him after the incident. The evidence includes witness testimony and depositions from Monty Khanna and Kashish. The defense argues there is no eyewitness, only circumstantial evidence, inconsistencies in depositions, and that Kashish was ambitious and trying to take advantage of Monty Kh
This case planning chart summarizes the legal claim, facts, evidence, and defenses in the case of State v Monty Khanna. The legal claim is for acquittal under sections 354 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code relating to outraging a woman's modesty. The facts alleged include Monty Khanna trying to hold Kashish's hand in a lift, but she did not report it for 10 days and attended another party with him after the incident. The evidence includes witness testimony and depositions from Monty Khanna and Kashish. The defense argues there is no eyewitness, only circumstantial evidence, inconsistencies in depositions, and that Kashish was ambitious and trying to take advantage of Monty Kh
This case planning chart summarizes the legal claim, facts, evidence, and defenses in the case of State v Monty Khanna. The legal claim is for acquittal under sections 354 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code relating to outraging a woman's modesty. The facts alleged include Monty Khanna trying to hold Kashish's hand in a lift, but she did not report it for 10 days and attended another party with him after the incident. The evidence includes witness testimony and depositions from Monty Khanna and Kashish. The defense argues there is no eyewitness, only circumstantial evidence, inconsistencies in depositions, and that Kashish was ambitious and trying to take advantage of Monty Kh
This case planning chart summarizes the legal claim, facts, evidence, and defenses in the case of State v Monty Khanna. The legal claim is for acquittal under sections 354 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code relating to outraging a woman's modesty. The facts alleged include Monty Khanna trying to hold Kashish's hand in a lift, but she did not report it for 10 days and attended another party with him after the incident. The evidence includes witness testimony and depositions from Monty Khanna and Kashish. The defense argues there is no eyewitness, only circumstantial evidence, inconsistencies in depositions, and that Kashish was ambitious and trying to take advantage of Monty Kh
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
CASE PLANNING CHART
Case title: STATE V MONTY KHANNA
Client Goals/Objectives Elements of Facts to support Source of Informal Formal Opponent’s Legal claim claim claim proof discovery discovery defences Acquittal under Section 354: Mens The party was Chief of sanjay Monty khanna had In the cross Delay in fir section 354 rea required is organized in the easy fatherly feelings examination wat was Chief of and 509 of the intention to outrage life restaurant. As soon towards Ms Kashish. culled out is that defence Indian Penal or knowledge to as they got into the lift Cross examination When on the day of there is no eye witnesses. Code outrage the modesty Mr. Monty Khanna of poornima Christmas she told witness the case Cross of a woman tried to hold the hand mmonty khanna rests solely upon examination of Actus reus: Assault or of Ms. Kashish is about her intimate circumstantial prosecution criminal force alleged as an omnibus Deposition of the feelings and her being evidence. There is no witness Sec 509: mens rea allegation without any accused depressed by not complete chain. No intention to outrage proof or evidence. Ms having a man she was evidence is the modesty of a kashish joins the party retorted to by monty produced. The woman and after the alleged khanna as he was depositions have whatever he is doing incident and left with married and told her material or saying that should the person who she that. She took inconsistencies and be heard or seen by alleged to have umbrage at this and contradictions. such women . all of commited the incident. threatened him of the which are missing She reported about the consequences he crime after 10 days. All would face in the these facts and the future. On the new forgoing circumstances year eve party it was ensued from them she who who came conspicuously show into the arms of that she was monty khanna and concocting the story to tried to kiss him. her advantage as she is Being unsuccessful in ambitious and wants to that she she again take advantage of extended threats someone. Submitted by: Name: Meghan LL.B., V Sem., Sec. E Class Roll No. 173562 Exam. Roll No. 170370 Campus Law Centre, DU