Financial Accounting Management Accounting
Financial Accounting Management Accounting
Financial Accounting Management Accounting
BUSINESS PROCESS
collection of related, structured activities or tasks that produce a specific service or
product
THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS
the key to success is the effective management of the constraint of the company
management approach that emphasizes the importance of managing constraints
CONSTRAINT (BOTTLENECK)
anything that limits or prevents an organization from achieving higher performance
relative to its goal
PROCESS REENGINEERING
approach to improvement that involves analysis and redesign of workflows within and
between enterprises in order to eliminate unnecessary steps, automate non-value-
added tasks, reduce errors and reduce costs
elimination of inefficient business processes
FLOWCHART
a capital investment is approved only if there is budget and it meets a minimum rate
of return
(6) Motivating and Measuring Management
done through performance evaluation on various segments, entity or division of the
company
related net income and investment costs like inventory and fixed assets are
CHAPTER 2: COST TERMINOLOGY AND CONCEPTS produced directly or indirectly by a cost system
COST ANALYSIS
understanding the cost behavior under varying conditions (2) LEAST SQUARES METHOD
key in effectively predicting future costs and essential in planning and controlling a Simple Regression Analysis
firm’s activity determines the fixed and variable components by solving 2 simultaneous linear
equations which are based on the condition that the sum of the deviations above
PLANNING the regression line equals the sum of deviations below the regression line
management make decisions partly based on expectations as to the future Point of Line: Y = a + bX == TC = FC + VCU(x)
CONTROLLING EQ 1. ∑ Y =Na+ b ∑ X
process of using feedback information for comparison with expectations and
implementing any necessary corrective actions EQ 2. ∑ XY =∑ Xa+ b ∑ X 2
COST FUNCTION
mathematical expression of how cost changes with activity level EQ 3. EQ 1 – EQ 2
activity levels explains the total costs and that the relationship is linear within the
relevant range ALTERNATIVE:
Point of Line: Y = a + bX
b=n ¿ ¿
COMPARISON OF COSTING METHODS
INPUT ACTUAL NORMAL STANDARD
actual
actual
a=( ∑ Y ) −(b)¿ ¿
Direct Materials (AQ x std. input per unit output WHERE:
(AQ x AC)
AC) Y = TOTAL COST
actual a = FIXED COST
actual
Direct Labor (AH x std. input per unit output b = VARIABLE COST PER UNIT
(AH x AR)
AR) x = ACTIVITY LEVEL
Factory actual input @ budgeted std. input @ budgeted n = # of sample
actual
Overhead rate rate
(3) MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS
METHODS OF COST SEGREGATION used when the dependent variable costs is caused by more than one independent
(1) HIGH – LOW POINT METHOD variable (activity measure)
simple and widely used method which considers the highest and lowest activity
levels of the relevant range (4) VISUAL FIT METHOD
NOT ACCURATE and is considered INFERIOR to other statistical techniques SCATTERGRAPH Method
derives fixed and variable elements of a mixed cost thru visual inspection Standard error of the estimate
graph that plots all activity level and costs, and separates the fixed and variable measures the accuracy of predictions (forecast) using the regression line
components thru the “line of regression” estimate of the discrepancy that may happen between the actual and projected costs to
the line of conditional expected values and where the sum of distance be incurred
(deviations) above and below it are approximately the same serves as a confidence interval or acceptable range of tolerance, for use in exercising
control over the costs
(5) INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING (WORK MEASUREMENT) METHOD the lesser the standard error of estimate, the greater the degree of confidence
analyzes the relationship between inputs and outputs in physical form
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
CORRELATION
measures the co-variation between dependent (y) and independent (x) variables
RANGE OF CORRELATION
1)No Correlation (r = 0)
no line can be drawn to show the relationship of y and x
2)Perfect Correlation (r =±1)
a)Positive (Direct) Relationship (r = +1)
value of dependent variable (y) increases as the value of independent
variable (x) increases
regression of line slopes upward to the right
b)Negative (Inverse / Indirect Relationship (r = -1)
value of y decreases as the value of x increases
regression of line slopes downward to the the right
RULE OF THUMB:
r > 0.5 = high correlation
r < 0.5 = low correlation
Low correlation means the data at hand shows no direct correlation between the cost
(y) and cost driver (x), therefore, data cannot be used as a basis for projecting future
costs
STANDARD DEVIATION
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN
Marginal Income / Marginal Profit
amount available to recover fixed costs and then provide profits
CM > FC = PROFIT; CM < FC = LOSS
for managerial purposes only
Sales xx ALTERNATIVE 2.
Sales Ratio MOS (Q/S) MOSR A B C TOTAL
(Budgeted)
SPU P 120.00 P 200.00 P 90.00
BEP (xx x CMU / (VCU) (80.00) (150.00) (45.00)
(BEP Ratio) x CMR
) CMR CMU P 40.00 P 50.00 P 45.00
MOS xx MOS Ratio Desired Profit Profit Ratio x SM UNITS x 4 x 3 x 3
x Budgeted Sales COMPOSITE CMU P 160.00 P 150.00 P 135.00 P 445.00
Desired Profit
BEP for MULTIPLE PRODUCTS Total FC P 1,157,000.00
Sales Mix – relative proportion in which the company’s product are sold ÷ COMPOSITE CMU 445
Sales Mix Ratio – sales units of individual product / total sales units of all products COMPOSITE BEP (units) 2,600
Quality Costs
Cost of Conformance to Quality Standard – incurred to keep defective products
from falling into the hands of the customers
(1) Prevention Cost – any activity that reduces the number of defects in goods and
services; incurred to avoid defects, which are units that do not meet the
specification (ex. Preventive maintenance, Quality engineering)
(2) Appraisal Cost – activities related to inspection to make sure that the goods and
services meet quality standards; to incurred to monitor and find defective units
before they leave the plant (ex. Inspection costs for materials, Product quality
standards, inspection/testing of incoming materials)
Cost of Non-conformance to Quality Standard – incurred because defects are
produced despite efforts to prevent it
(3) Internal Failure Cost – identification or discovery of defects during the appraisal
or inspection process; incurred when a unit is found to be defective before it leaves
CHAPTER 6. GROSS PROFIT VARIANCE ANALYSIS
6-way Analysis
Change in Sales is due to:
Quantity Factor
∆ in Quantity Sold x Selling Price Last xx
Year
Price Factor ∆ in Price x Sales Volume Last Year xx
Quantity – Price Factor ∆ in Sales Volume x ∆ in Selling Price xx
Net Increase in Sales xx
Change in COS is due to:
Quantity Factor ∆ in Quantity Sold x Unit Cost Last Year xx x Gross Profit Rate LY x %
Cost Factor ∆ in Unit Cost x Sales Volume Last Year xx xx
Quantity – Cost Factor ∆ in Sales Volume x ∆ in Unit Cost xx Price Factor – F (UF) Sales TY xx
Less: Sales TY @ LY SP (xx)
Net Increase in COS (xx)
xx
Net Increase in Gross
xx Cost Factor – F (UF) COS TY xx
Profit
Less: COS TY @ LY Unit Cost (xx)
(xx)
Net Increase in Gross
xx
Profit
4-way Analysis
Change in Sales is due to:
Quantity Factor – F (UF) Sales TY @ LY SP xx MULTIPLE PRODUCTS: 4-way Analysis
(xx
Less: Sales LY xx EXAMPLE:
)
Gross Profit Variance for Multiple Products
Price Factor – F (UF) Sales TY xx
(xx
Less: Sales TY @ LY SP xx PRODUCTS UNITS SPU
CP
GPU SALES COS GP
) U
Net Increase in Sales xx A 400 90 60 30 P 36,000 P 24,000 P 12,000
Change in COS is due to: B 700 40 30 10 28,000 21,000 7,000
201
Quantity Factor – F (UF) COS TY @ LY Unit Cost xx C 600 70 35 35 42,000 21,000 21,000
3
(xx TOTAL 1,700
P
P 66,000 P 40,000
Less: COS LY xx 106,000
)
Cost Factor – F (UF) COS TY xx
(xx A 500 80 50 30 P 40,000 P 25,000 P 15,000
Less: COS TY @ LY Unit Cost xx B 1,000 50 25 25 50,000 25,000 25,000
) 201
C 800 60 40 20 48,000 32,000 16,000
Net Increase in COS (xx) 4
P
Net Increase in Gross TOTAL 2,300 P82,000 P56,000
xx 138,000
Profit ( P16,000
CHANGE (600) (P32,000) (P16,000)
)
SOLUTION:
SINGLE PRODUCT: 3-way Analysis GP 40,000
used as an alternative solution to the 4-way Analysis 2013 Average GP per unit= = =P 23.53
units 1,700
GP 56 , 000
201 4 Average GP per unit= = =P 24.35
3-way Analysis units 2,3 00
Quantity Factor Sales TY @ LY SP xx
Less: Sales LY (xx) Price Factor Sales TY P138,000
Increase in Sales xx F (UF) Less: Sales TY @ LY SP
A (500 units x P 90) P
45,000
B (1,000 units x P 40) 40,000
C (800 units x P 70) (P
56,000 (141,000)
3,000)
COS TY P 82,000
Less: COS TY @ LY CPU
Less: Cost Factor A (500 units x P 60) P
F (UF) 30,000
B (1,000 units x P 30) 30,000
C (800 units x P 35) 28,000 (88,000) 6,000
Units Sold TY 2,300
Quantity Factor Less: Units Sold LY (1,700)
F (UF) Increase in Quantity Sold 600
x Ave. GP per unit LY x P23.53 14,117
Ave. GP/unit TY @ LY
P 23.04
GPU
Sales Mix Factor
Less: Ave. GP/unit LY (23.53)
F (UF)
Difference (0.48)
x Units Sold TY x 2,300 (1,117)
Net Increase in
P 16,000
GP
BUDGETARY CONTROL
use of budget to control a firm’s activities
PLANNING PROCESS
brings together ideas, forecasts, resource availability and financial realities to create a
course of action to achieve in the firm’s goals and objectives
GOAL CONGRUENCE
a firm’s striving to achieve a common set of objectives
BUDGET SYSTEM
serves as a fiscal disciplinarian and helps ensure that managers understand their
authority, responsibility and limitations
PURPOSE OF BUDGET
1. Formalize the planning process
2. Create a Plan of Action
3. Coordinate and integrate management’s efforts
4. Aid in resource allocation
5. Motivate managers
6. Create a Basis for Performance Evaluation
7. Promote continuous improvement
8. Create an aura of control
CENTRALIZATION
process where the concentration of decision making is in one or on a few hands
all the important decisions and actions at the lower level are subject to the
approval of the president or the top management
CHAPTER 10. QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES