Disclaimer PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

DISCLAIMER: SUBJECT TO 19. North Negros v.

Hidalgo; Case about easements


and excavations
LABITAG FEELS OF TWEAKING,
20. Ongsiako v. Ongsiako; Case about natural
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK BES - drainage of waters
jison, selin
21. An easement of Right of way was established for
1. A, Geographical Indication of Origin the community; North Negros Case, easement
established for whom?
2. A* Defendant denied existence of Co-ownership
22. All of the Above; Amor v. Florentino Case, what
3. Calicdan v. Cendana - Donation made by one who happened?
does not own it, extraordinary acquisitive prescrip
23. Floro v. Llenado; Case involving requisites of
4. C or D, Debatable right of way

5. D, Possession with a title that proceeds from true 24. Maybe All of the Above, Maybe not; Depends on
owner* the facts. (Kasilag v. Roque involves two contracts,
one mortgage one verbal agreeement. Held: the
6. Articles of Incorporation/By-laws
contract was a contract of sale of the land between
7. Redemption agreed upon between the USU and them, null and void for violating homestead act;)
the NO, C
25. Pamplona v. Moreto; Partition by Estoppel Case
8. Apply/Acquire water rights
26. Halili v. CA; Case involving legal redemption
9. Actus, right to use carriage outside of co-ownership

10. 10 meters 27. Dizon v. CA; Case wherein plaintiff failed to


prove identity of the land
11. Easement of Light and View and Altius Non
Tolendi 28. Tuason v. Tuason; Case wherein Co-owners
agree to partition the land into smaller lots and sell,
12. 1 for Rural (86 score ng nagsabi neto), 1 for not violative of prohibition;
Urban
29. Action to Quiet Title; A cultivator-possessor
13. Simple Onerous Solemn Contract since the Japanese Occupation after WWII may file
what;
14. Within 5 years from death of donor (Based on
page 142 of Labitag Notes/Reviewer) 30. Imprescriptible; Possessor may file this action?
(Anong action to pero sige)
15. BPS in Good Faith; Tolerated BPS Question
31. Rumarate v. CA; Similar case with the one
16. If specified na may fruits na napala, expenses
situated above
reimbursable. If not, taxes automatic answer (Art.
507) 32. Action to recover owner ownership is
reinvindicatoria; Which is incorrect;
17. Moralidad v. CA Case; Usufruct was conditioned
on the peaceful and harmonious relationship 33. All of the above; Question regarding description
of right of retention
18. Ramirez v. Ramirez; Case about 6 co-owners
and 2 buildings 34. Titong v. CA; Action to quiet title cannot be used
to resolve boundary disputes;
35. Director of Lands v. CA; Question on exception
to adverse possession/Question of whether or not
constructive possession is not applicable if land is in
adverse possession of another;

36. Olviga and Pingol Case; Actions filed in lower


court, Action for Reconveyance and Specific
Performance respectively

37. Republic v. CA; Case involving requisites for


accession

38. Coleongco v. Regalado; Case wherein Rules on


BPS do not apply if owner is the BPS

39. All of the Above; Facts of the Case of Ortiz v.


Kayanan (Study facts of Ortiz Case)

40. No definite question for labugal case, either facts


or issues involved (Study Labugal)

41. All of the Above; Issues of Salas v. Jarencio


Case (Public v Private prop, Legis have power to
grant land to actual occs, Law grant LTA power to
distribute prop;)

42. . Felices v. Iriola; Case which determined time


when BPS becomes bad faith possessor (If Ortiz
case is present, also a possible answer)

43. San Miguel v. Fernandez; Case wherein issue is


classification of property of public dominion and
property of private property

44. Caltex Case; If decided under NCC, property is


classified as movable

45. Lopez v. Orosa; Case wherein building as an


immovable was raised as an issue;

You might also like