Draft City Development Plan For Pune City 2041 Vol-2 PDF

REVISED CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PUNE - 2041,
MAHARASHTRA, UNDER JNNURM
1 Kick off meeting for Revising/ Updating City Development Plan of Pune - 2041 ........................... 1
1.1 List of Participants in the Kick off meeting ..................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 List of PMC officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012 ......................... 1
1.1.2 List of PIU officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012 ........................... 1
1.1.3 List of VSPL officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012 ......................... 1
1.2 Presentation to the PMC officials in the Kick Off meeting by VSPL................................................ 2
1.2.1 The presentation made by VSPL ............................................................................................. 2
2 Pune Municipal Corporation Officials Meetings ........................................................................ 27
2.1 First Workshop on 19th May, 2012 ............................................................................................... 27
2.1.1 Agenda .................................................................................................................................. 27
2.1.2 Schedule of the Workshop .................................................................................................... 27
2.2 List of Participants for the first workshop .................................................................................... 27
2.2.1 List of PMC officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012........................... 27
2.2.2 List of PIU officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012............................. 28
2.2.3 List of VSPL officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012 .......................... 28
2.3 Presentation to the PMC officials in the first workshop by VSPL ................................................. 29
2.3.1 The presentation made by VSPL ........................................................................................... 29
2.3.2 Snapshots of Kick-Off workshop ........................................................................................... 41
2.3.3 Participation .......................................................................................................................... 42
2.3.4 The outcome.......................................................................................................................... 42
2.3.5 Problems/ Issues related to environment and infrastructure of the city ............................. 49
2.3.6 Strategies to overcome the Issues related to environment and infrastructure of the city .. 49
2.3.7 Measures for effective public service delivery ..................................................................... 50
2.3.8 Sector Priority ....................................................................................................................... 50
3 Individual Stakeholder Consultations........................................................................................ 52
3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 52
3.2 Stakeholders consulted ................................................................................................................ 52
3.3 Summary of individual Stake holder Consultations...................................................................... 52
4 Focused Group Workshops/ Meetings for Sector Goal, Strategies & Action Plans ...................... 74
4.1 Agenda .......................................................................................................................................... 74
4.2 List of Participants for the workshops/ Meetings ........................................................................ 74
4.2.1 List of PMC officials attended the Workshops/ Meetings .................................................... 74
4.2.2 List of NGOs who attended the Workshops/ Meetings ........................................................ 75
4.2.3 List of Parastatal Agencies who attended the Workshops/ Meetings .................................. 75
4.2.4 List of Elected members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings ..................................... 75
4.2.5 List of Other members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings ....................................... 75
4.2.6 List of VSPL team members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings ................................ 76
i|Page
4.3 The presentation by VSPL ............................................................................................................. 76

4.3.1 SNAPSHOTS OF WORKSHOPS/ MEETINGS .......................................................................... 110
4.3.2 Outcome: Sector wise summary of all discussions ............................................................. 114
4.3.3 The Outcome....................................................................................................................... 126
5 City Wide Consultations through E-mails/ Post ....................................................................... 132
5.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 132
5.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 132
5.1.2 Process ................................................................................................................................ 132
5.1.3 Snapshot of Advertisement in News paper ........................................................................ 132
5.2 Responses by the informed citizens through e-mails and posts ................................................ 133
5.2.1 By E-mails ............................................................................................................................ 133
5.2.2 By Posts ............................................................................................................................... 167
5.3 Outcome of the City Wide Consultations through E-mails/ Post ............................................... 172
5.3.1 The Expectation .................................................................................................................. 172
5.3.2 The outcome ....................................................................................................................... 172
6 Service Performance & Citizen Satisfaction Survey .................................................................. 175
6.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 175
6.2 Citizen's satisfaction survey analysis .......................................................................................... 175
6.3 Summary of Key findings of Citizen Satisfaction Survey............................................................. 191
6.3.1 Citizen Perceptions ............................................................................................................. 191
6.4 Different sectors covered in the survey ..................................................................................... 191
6.4.1 Water Supply....................................................................................................................... 191
6.4.2 Sewerage ............................................................................................................................. 192
6.4.3 Drainage .............................................................................................................................. 193
6.4.4 Solid Waste Management ....................................................................................................... 1
6.4.5 Transport and Traffic ......................................................................................................... 188
6.4.6 City Environment................................................................................................................. 190
7 Outcome of Citizen Satisfaction Survey & 3rd Workshop: Priority sectors ................................. 192
7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 192
7.2 Priority Sectors ........................................................................................................................... 192
7.2.1 Ward level ........................................................................................................................... 192
7.2.2 City Level ............................................................................................................................. 199
Annexure 1: Voyants Performa on 19th May2012 ............................................................................ 200
Annexure 2: CDP survey format English for website ......................................................................... 207
Annexure 3: CDP survey format Marathi for website........................................................................ 212
ii | P a g e
1 Kick off meeting for Revising/ Updating City Development

Plan of Pune - 2041
1.1 List of Participants in the Kick off meeting
1.1.1 List of PMC officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012
List of Pune Municipal Corporation Officials in Second & Third Workshop/ Meetings from 22nd June to 24th
July, 2012
S. No Name Department/Designation
1 Mr Mahesh Pathak Municipal Commissioner
2 Mr. Vivek Kharwadkar Additional City Engineer PMC
3 Mr. Pravin Ashtikar DMC (S)
4 Mr. Anoop Kumar Yadav Add. Commissioner PMC
5 Mr. Dinesh D. Girolla Planning Officer (PMC)
7 Ms. Nalawade Savita Sunil Dy. Account Officer JNNURM
8 Mr. Mangesh Dighe Environment office
1.1.2 List of PIU officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012
List of Project Implementation Unit Officials in First Workshop on 13th April, 2012
1 Mr. Chetan Zaveri Vice President IL&FS
2 Dr. S.B. Katoley Tech Advisor Environment
3 Mr. Ashish Agarwal PIU JNNURM
4 Ms. Sandhya Agarwal PIU JNNURM
5 Ms. Nidhi Chandra PIU JNNURM
1.1.3 List of VSPL officials who attended the Kick off meeting on 13th April, 2012
List of Voyants Solution Pvt. Ltd Officials in First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
1 Ms. Bhavya Kukrety Asst. General Manager
2 Ms. Meenakshi Tyagi Project Coordinator
3 Mr. H. Vaz Socio-economic Expert
1|Page
1.2 Presentation to the PMC officials in the Kick Off meeting by VSPL
1.2.1 The presentation made by VSPL
Revising /updating the City

Development Plan of Pune (2012 -2041)
2|Page
Best Practices 1
The world’s best metropolitan cities had a
strong VISION
3|Page
“I want to deliver those changes that Londoners, and

visitors to the city, tell us they want to see: a cleaner
city with safer streets, better transport, and good
quality affordable housing.”
Mayor of London, Boris Johnson
“When you
have little
money, you
learn to be
creative.”
- Jaime Lerner,
former Mayor
of Curitiba
4|Page
“Managing traffic and

expanding travel choices are
keys to improving and
sustaining Seoul’s economy,
environment, and livability,”
Seoul Mayor Myung Bak Lee
What influences Livability of a city?
Consistency between its infrastructure,

its regulations and its spatial structure
Better accessibility to public transportation and more

frequent and faster services create new demand for
developed settlement nearby…
5|Page
Curitiba
High density High density
“65 km of exclusive busways 340 km of feeder

services
serving more than 1.3 million passengers every
day.”
Reduction of about 27 million auto trips per year

Saving about 27 million liters of fuel annually
Hong Kong
42% of the territory’s households,
43% of the employment population and
75% of the commercial/office areas
are located within a radius of 500 meters

Development Clusters around the Railways Stations
of metro/railway stations.
in Hong Kong
“The public transport systems in Hong Kong carry over 90 percent of the
area’s 11 million daily trips.”
6|Page
"GREEN BELT" ,
"GREENSPACE“, and
"GREENSTRUCTURE"
…are an important aspect of sustainable
development
7|Page
Sao Paulo: Greening water infrastructure
Portland Singapore
Streetscapes Eco-parks
Eco-links
Greening the utility spaces
Curitiba, 52 m²/ person

Bogota, 107 m²/ person
Singapore, 66 m²/ person
Beijing Curitiba
Greening transit 16 parks
corridors 14 forests
1000 green public spaces
8|Page
Integration of busway & commuter rail
The waterways and the low-lying land throughout the city that is prone to
flooding was turned into parks that act as buffers between flood-prone
rivers and the city of Curitiba.
9|Page
Sabarmati riverfront development & heritage walk
Ground realities..
10 | P a g e
“Purchase of Garbage” programme, Curitiba
“The city of Curitiba has the highest percentage of citizens who recycle
in the world.The program is voluntary, but 70% of households take
part.”
Towards environmental management…
Through São Paulo’s “Ecopoint” initiative, the city says it collected 57,400 cubic
metres of waste in the first six months of its implementation, that would
otherwise have been left on the streets.
11 | P a g e

reducing carbon footprint

Slum Networking, Indore
Component Slum networking Conventional city
method (Rs. million) system (Rs. million)
Overall drains 60 200
Sewer mains 100 200
Distribution systems 220 400
Pumping stations Nil 30
Capitalized pumping Nil 20
costs
Total costs 380 850
Before the Slum Networking

Project, the rivers Khan and
Saraswati in Indore, India had
been reduced to open sewers.
The river and its surrounds after

Slum Networking in Indore. New
pedestrian pathways and gardens
make the river bed a major
recreational area.
12 | P a g e
São Paulo is consciously seeking to recycle city areas left by relocated families into such
common spaces as parks, playgrounds, soccer fields and skate parks — ways to help people
socialize and build a sense of citizenship for remaining residents.
13 | P a g e
Tianjin Eco city…
14 | P a g e
Seoul, the world’s fifth biggest metropolis, with a population of over 10 million
people, is using the Internet to give its residents a direct role in the running of
the city.
Published in International Telecommunications Union, May 2010
15 | P a g e
The Pratt Centre for Community Development, Brooklyn NY
Eempowers communities through:
 Community Planning
 Equitable Development Policy and Advocacy
 Sustainability and Environmental Justice :
 Helping Communities Build
16 | P a g e
Pune – A unique city 2
PUNE - PROFILE
Description 2001 2011

Population 7,232,555 9,426,959
Population Growth 30.73% 30.34%
Area (Sq.km) 15,643 15,643
Density 462 603
Proportion to Maharashtra 7.47% 8.39%
Population
Sex Ratio 919 910
Average Literacy Rate 80.45% 87.19%
Source: Census 2011 Male Literacy Rate 88.34% 92.72%
Female Literacy Rate 71.89% 81.13%
17 | P a g e
INVESTMENT REGIONS - MAHARASHTRA
Pune is fast emerging as one of INVESTMENT HUB of Maharashtra
Pune comes under DMIC Project Influence Area
INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER- PUNE REGION
Description 2001
Area 57268
Districts 5 – Pune, Satara, Kolhapur,
Sangli, Solapur
Road NH- 4,9,13 & 204, Mumbai-
Pune Expressway
Rail 10 – Railway Station
Airports 6 Airfields ( 1- International, 1-
Private Airport)
Connectivity Pune – 154 Km
with Mumbai
18 | P a g e
PUNE – ONGOING & UPCOMING PROJECTS

IT/ ITES Parks
Software Technology 635 (108 added)
Parks Registered Units
by 2006-07
IT/ITeS Major Players Cognizant, Convergys,
EXL, KPIT, Msource
Volume of Supply 20 million Sq ft of

Upcoming office space
Roads/ Transportation
Pune Metro phase I to be ready by April 2013
(cost Rs. 12,880cr)
Maharashtra Airport Developing Pune
Development International Airport on
Company (MADC) 24.28 Ha land
BRTS Phase I To be completed by
December 2012
PUNE – ONGOING & UPCOMING PROJECTS

Major Residential Development
Upcoming Residential/ Township
WAKAD
Central Pune Bhosale Nagar, Deccan, Model
Colony, Prabhat Road, Shivaji Nagar
SANGHVI
BALEWADI
North Pune Chinchwad, Akurdi, Pradhikaran,
KHARADI
Talegaon, Chakan, Ravet AOUDH
South Pune Ambegaon, Katraj, Kondhwa, PASHAN KALYANI NAGAR

Parvati, Salisbury Park, Sinhagad
Road, Mohammadwadi, NIBM,
Warje KOREGAON PARK
East Pune Boat Club, Hadapsar, Kalyani Nagar,

Kharadi, Koregaon Park, Wagholi, HADAPSAR
Viman Nagar WAJRE
West Pune Aundh, Balewadi, Baner, Bavdhan,

Hinjewadi, Kothrud, Pashan, WADAGAON
Pimple- Saudagar, Wakad
19 | P a g e
CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP) IS BOTH A PERSPECTIVE AND A
VISION FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A CITY
solutions
What
interventions to
What do we make in order to
need to attain the vision?
address on a
Where do we priority basis?
want to go?
Where are
we now?
CDP IN CONTEXT OF JNNURM

JNNURM INCLUDES 2 SCHEMES FOR THE
METROPOLITAN CITIES
MoUD SUB MISSION FOR URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE
SUB MISSION FOR

MOHUPA
BASIC SERVICES FOR THE URBAN POOR
COVERAGE- 65 CITIES
PUNE WAS COVERED UNDER MISSION CITIES
20 | P a g e
SECTORS COVERED UNDER JNNURM

MISSION CITIES
• Urban renewal
• Urban basic services
Water supply
Sewerage
Solid waste management
Drainage
Slum and poverty
• Traffic and transportation

• Heritage and environment
• Urban governance & reforms, municipal
finances
21 | P a g e
Project Methodology 3
BROAD METHODOLOGY
STRATEGIES
PROJECT FOR
INCEPTION DEVELOPMENT 3
2 OPTIONS City
Development
Plan (Draft
REVIEW OF SITUATION PROJECT
VISION AND Formulation)
CDP 2005-12 ASSESSMENT IDENTIFICATION
STRATEGY
Assessment
Constraints/ Prioritisation CITY 4
criteria & INVESTMENT
Strengths strategies
parameters PLAN &
FINANCIAL
Amendments/
Economic Prioritise ALTERNATIVE
Ratification
sectors/
Physical action areas
REFORM
Environment AGENDA
Urban FINAL CITY

poverty DEVELOPMENT
Workshops PLAN
SWOT
Analysis
1
Submissions
22 | P a g e
DETAILED METHODOLOGY
Preliminary Analysis
1. Location and Linkages Kick off Meeting
INCEPTION STAGE
2. Socio-economic assessment Data Collection
3. City Infrastructure
PHASE I
4. Environment Stakeholder
5. Urban Governance and Finance Profile
Stakeholder Consultation
Kickoff Workshop I
Review of
existing CDP
Detailed Sector Analysis
Demographic & Social Profile
City Economy
SECTOR STUDY & CITY Urban Spatial Management
PROFILE Urban Environment
PHASE II
Urban Poverty Issue/Problems/

Housing and Slums Potential
Institutional Setup and Urban Governance
Municipal Finance
Urban Infrastructure and Services
Heritage and Tourism
DETAILED METHODOLOGY
Bench Mark Study Literature
Development of
Review
city vision and Stakeholder Consultation
PHASE III
sector goals and Stakeholder

Workshop II
strategies Consultation
Prioritization of Issues
Setting of Vision, Goals and Strategies
Development of
PHASE IV
Evaluation of Strategies
strategies and Stakeholder
priority actions Stakeholder Workshop III Consultation
Listing of
Prioritizing Strategies and Actions
Projects
Preparing a City Capital Investment Plan (CIP)

Investment Plan
Preliminary Financial Operating Plan
PHASE V
(CIP), financing
strategy and CDP Stakeholder
Fourth Workshop/Draft CDP
Consultation
FINAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
23 | P a g e
A way for Financing and Implementation
Monetize Land and Facilitate Finance

• Catalyst projects necessary to kick-start change
• Leveraging infrastructure investment to create land resources
Innovative Financing Strategies

1.Tax Increment Financing
2.Sale of Development Rights
3.Advertisement Rights
4.Betterment Levy, Development Cess
5.Levy of Entry charge, Professional Tax
Economic
Develop
Development framework that..
• Diversifies the economic base by identifying key growth

sectors to the base industries of Pune other than IT
industry
• Manage real estate growth

• Focuses on building strong long-term relationship that
spans across the education-research-industry triad
24 | P a g e
Stakeholder’s consultation
and people’s participation
• Plan SHOULD reflect the aspirations of the people,

market and industry
• Leads to implementation FACILITATION
Plan to Engage Stakeholders and build Ownership
• Begin engagement early – listen actively – maintain regular

contact
• Build-in flexibility to respond to changing needs of people and
market
• Ratify strategic decisions with stakeholders
• Encourage private sector implementation
STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
Workshops (4)
City level
Meetings with key stakeholders
Consultations
Consultation combined with data
collection
Group discussion-cluster level

Ward level (comprising of 4-5 wards)
Consultations
Meeting with ward councillors
Household survey – sample based

Household surveys – public (1% of total population)
consultations
Individual consultations
25 | P a g e
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
 Extensive Stakeholder Consultations

 Recognising challenges faced by institutional stakeholders
 Conceptulising a shared vision through consensus building
 Innovative financing strategies for identified infrastructure

projects
 Financing projects identified with cross territorial / multi-
institutional benefits e.g. Transport
 Facilitating multi-institutional partnerships – cross holdings in

infrastructure projects
 Project Specific SPVs
Thank you
26 | P a g e
2 Pune Municipal Corporation Officials Meetings
2.1 First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
2.1.1 Agenda
To familiarize the stakeholders with the purpose, process and expected outcomes of the
‘Revising/ Up-dating CDP for Pune- 2041’, and generate enthusiasm, understanding and
commitment for the same.
Deriving a consensus and agreeing upon a structured programme to take the ‘Revising/ Updating
CDP Pune-2041’ forward.
To share their views regarding the existing situation of various sectors which are to be covered in
the ‘Revising/ Updating CDP Pune-2041’.
2.1.2 Schedule of the Workshop

S.NO Time Schedule Description
1 11:00A.M. -11:10 A.M. Introduction by Dept. Introduction and objective of the
Commissioner workshop to all stakeholders
2 11:10A.M.– 11:45A.M. Presentation by Voyants Need for revised city development plan
Solution Pvt. Ltd. for Pune.
Glimpse of Pune pertaining to its strength
and opportunities.
Identifying the major issues related to
urban development and impact on the
environment..
3 11:45A.M.–12:30P.M. Discussions Key stakeholders views and thoughts of
the city.
4 12:30 P.M.-1:20 P.M. Distribution of Questionnaires were distributed and
questionnaire explained.
Collection of filled questionnaire.
5 1:25 P.M.– 1:30 P.M. Vote of thanks
2.2 List of Participants for the first workshop
2.2.1 List of PMC officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012
List of Pune Municipal Corporation Officials in First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
1 Mr. Mahesh Pathak Commissioner
2 Mr. Naresh Zurmure Additional Commissioner (IFS)
3 Mr. V.G. Kulkarni Supd. Engr. WS Drainage PMC
4 Mr. R.T. Shinde Dy. Comm. Land & Estate
6 Ms.Nalawade Savita Sunil Dy. Account Officer JNNURM
7 Mr. D.P. More DMC (Slum)
8 Mr. D.S. Molak H. MC VCD
9 Mr. Jayant S. Bhosekar AMC Tilak Road
10 Mr. S.T. Pardeshi MOH
27 | P a g e
List of Pune Municipal Corporation Officials in First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
12 Mr. Sandip S. Dhole Asst. Commissioner DP Road
13 Mr. Vijay B. Landge Asst. Commissioner Ghole Road
14 Mr. Madhav Deshpande AMC Bibwewadi
15 Mr. Shankar Chatur A&C Taxes
16 Mr. Garad Madhukant Dy. Comm. Zone 4
17 Mr. N. N. Barapatre Supd. Engineer
18 Ms.Sandhya Gagre AMC Sahakarnagar
19 Mr. Bhange P.L. Dy. Engineer (Hadapsar W.O.)
20 Mr. Anil Karvade CEO Z.P. PUNE (Representative
21 Mr. S.A. Gawade AMC SWM PMC
22 Mr. Vasant Patil AMC Dhanakewadi
23 Mr. Arun Khilari AMC Vishranbagwada
24 Mr. S.S. Patil DP Kothrud
26 Adv Manjusha Idhate Sr. Legal Advisor
27 Mr. Vijay Dahibhate Dy. Commissioner
28 Mr. Mukund Bhosale AMC
29 Mr. M.S. Gaikwad AMC
30 Mr. Umesh Mali AMC
31 Dr. Sucheta Karande Environment Manager Indradhanushya
33 Vilas Kanade Joint Commissioner PMC
34 Ms. Ulka Kalaskar Chief Accountant
2.2.2 List of PIU officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012
List of Project Implementation Unit Officials in First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
1 Mr. Ashish Agarwal PIU JNNURM
2 Ms. Sandhya Agarwal PIU JNNURM
3 Ms. Nidhi Chandra PIU JNNURM
2.2.3 List of VSPL officials who attended the first workshop on 19th May, 2012
List of Voyants Solution Pvt. Ltd Officials in First Workshop on 19th May, 2012
1 Mr. Saumyasib Mukhopadhyay Asst. General Manager
3 Mr. Pranav Praveen Asst. Manager
4 Mr. Vikas Singh Asst. Manager
5 Mr. Kedar Nirgude Housing Planner
6 Mr. Tejaswinee Chetale Envision Consultant
28 | P a g e
2.3 Presentation to the PMC officials in the first workshop by VSPL
2.3.1 The presentation made by VSPL
Revising CDP - Pune
VOYANTS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
1
project water- transportation environment structural power project
development & sanitation division & waste engineering division management
planning division division management division division
19th May, 2012 division partnering vision
Pune
TOI-IMRB Quality of Life Survey
project water- transportation environment structural power project Source : Times of India report , 2011
29 | P a g e
Geographical Location
N DESCRIPTIONS
State Maharashtra
District Pune
Municipal Area 243.84 Sq.Km
Source : PMC, 2012
Pune
PMC Limit
project water- transportation environment structural City Roadspower project
Railway Line
19th May, 2012 division River/ Lakes partnering vision
Strategic Location
Nashik
AHMEDABAD
Distances from major towns and cities
TOWN/ CITIES DISTANCE FROM PUNE (KM)

DELHI
Mumbai 163
Thane
Nashik 202
Ahmadnagar Ahmadnagar 105
Solapur 243
Mumbai
MUMBAI Satara 100
Bangalore 835
Delhi 1417
Source : Google Map , 2010
50 Kms
Satara Solapur
100 Kms CHENNAI
LEGEND BANGALORE
Project City GOA 200 Kms

Key Towns/Cities project water- transportation environment structural power project
NH National Highway planning division division management division division
19th Airway
May, 2012 division partnering vision
Study Area - PMC

ZONE 3
Bhavani Peth
Kasba-Vishram
ZONE 1 Sahakar Nagar
Aundh Tilak Road
Ghole Road ZONE 4
Kothrud Bibwevadi
WarjeKarve Road Dhankawdi
Hadapsar
Kondwa (proposed )
ZONE 2
Dholepatil Road
Nagar road
Sangamwadi
Source : CSP, Jan2012

project water- environment structural power project
transportation
30 | P a g e
What is a CDP?
A City Development Plan (CDP) is both a perspective Existing
and a vision for the future development of a city.
Where do we want to go?
Where are we now?
What do we need to address on a priority basis?
What interventions to make in order to attain the vision?
Urban Basic
Infrastru Services
cture for Poor
Vision
solutions

Focus area for CDP
 Urban Economic Development

 Social Assessment/ Poverty Reduction
 Land Use Planning and Urban Management
 Urban Infrastructure
 Institutional Issues
 Municipal Reforms and Urban Governance
 Financial Management, and

 Environmental Management & adverse social impacts
(loss of habitat & sources of income)

The Process
PHASE I: INCEPTION STAGE PHASE II: SECTOR ASSESSMENT & CITY PROFILE
Preliminary Analysis Stakeholder Consultation Kickoff Workshop - I Sector wise Analysis

PHASE
 Location and Linkages  Primary Stakeholders  What is CDP?  Demographic & Social  Urban Environment
I & II
 Socio-economic assessment  Secondary  Sectors covered Profile  Urban Poverty

 City Infrastructure Stakeholders  Benefits of CDP  City Economy  Housing and Slums
 Environment  CLSG  Urban Spatial Pattern  Institutional Setup and
 Urban Governance and  Brief City profile &  Infrastructure & Services Urban Governance
Finance Initial Findings  Heritage and Tourism  Municipal Finance
INCEPTION REPORT
PHASE III: CITY VISION, SECTOR GOALS AND STRATEGIES PHASE IV: STRATEGIES, PRIORITY PHASE V: FOP & DRAFT CDP
ACTIONS & PROJECTS
Best Practices & Workshop – II FOP Workshop – IV
III, IV & V
CITY PROFILE
PHASE
Benchmark Study Evaluation of Strategies, Workshop – III

REPORT
Priority Actions & CIP

 National/ International  City Profile
DRAFT CDP REPORT
Best Practices  City Vision
 Benchmark @ ULB and  Sector Goals
projection
31 | P a g e
Stakeholder Consultation 4 WORKSHOPS
CITY LEVEL MEETINGS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS

CONSULTATIONS
CONSULTATION COMBINED WITH DATA COLLECTION
GROUP DISCUSSION-CLUSTER LEVEL (comprising of 4-5

prabhags)
PRABHAG LEVEL
CONSULTATIONS
MEETING WITH WARD COUNCILLORS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY – sample based (1% of total

HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS – PUBLIC population)
CONSULTATIONS
project water- environment
INDIVIDUAL
structural power
CONSULTATIONS
project
transportation
Snapshots during Consultation
10

Pune
1st Glimpse
TOI-IMRB Quality of Life Survey

32 | P a g e
Demographic & Socio-Economic Profile of the City

Demographic Profile
Population Growth Literacy Rate
0.6 3500000 94
50.08% 92 91.61
0.5 3000000
90
41.09% 40.56%
0.4 2500000 88 87.19
40.56%
86
0.3 2000000
84 82.91
24.23%
22.73%
0.2 1500000 82 80.73
80
0.1 1000000
78
6E-16 500000 76
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
74
-0.1 0
Urban India Maharashtra Pune District PMC
Population Avg. Annual Growth Rate (%)
Source: Census of India, 2011
Source: Census of India, 2011 Provisional figures
Provisional figures

Socio Economic Profile

Workforce Distribution 2001 Census
SL.No. Occupation Category Population % of total working population
Main Workers 811,291 93.77%
1 Cultivators 4,717 0.58%
2 Agriculture Laborers 5,529 0.68%
3 Household Industry Workers 25,430 3.13%
4 Other 775,615 95.60%
Marginal Workers 53,859 6.23%

1 Cultivators 455 0.84%
4 Other 45,307 84.12%
Total Working Population (Main + Marginal) 865,150 34.08%
Non Workers project water- environment structural

1,673,323
power project
65.92%
transportation
Source: Census of India,
planning division
2001
division management division division
33 | P a g e
Industry
 Recent industrial growth in a radius of 60-65 kms from the main city.
 Pune has emerged as one of the top investment destinations. It is a hub of automotive industry as well as IT industry.
 Various large and small units operating sectors are:

Auto components, Engineering, IT/ITeS, BPO, Pharmaceuticals and Food processing.
 Major Industrial hubs: Hadapsar, Hinjewadi, Chakan, Talegaon. Ranjangoan, Kharadi.
Industrial Area Near Hadpsar project water- transportation environmentArea Near

Industrial structural
Hadpsar power project
development & sanitation & waste engineering division Cyber City
management Maggarpatta
division
Tourism
 Pune has rich heritage and natural landscape with increasing tourism.
 The city’s forts, caves and other adventurous treks around the little mountains and hillocks.
 Few famous tourist spots: Shaniwar Wada, Lal Mahal, Aga Khan Palace, Kelkar Museum, Shinde Chattri, Omkareshwar &
Pataleshwar temples, Osho Ashram, Dagdu Seth Mandir, Parvati , Saras Baug.
Katraj Lake
Shaniwar Wada
Shinde Chattri project water- Aga Khan Palace structural

environment power project
transportation
Urban Growth Management, Housing, Slums & Urban Environment

34 | P a g e
Urban Growth and chronological develop1824-2011
Spatial Growth Pattern Poona 1924

Pune 1821
Kirkee
Poona
Source : CDP, ,2006

Source , land use area in hac ,1821,2001
development & sanitation division & waste engineering division Landusemanagement
Analysis
Housing Scenario
Housing Typology
Wada Chawls
Cooperative
project Housing
water- Societies transportation environment structural Slumspower project
Slums
Slums Details
Total Slums 564
Notified Slums 353
Un-Notified Slums 211
Slums Population 11-12 Lakhs (2001)
PMC, 2012
 Slum population is steadily increasing and is now approximately 40% of the

population.
 Narrow and uneven pattern of lanes and pathways due to haphazard development
pattern.
 Unplanned settlements are spreading on the hillsides and along the water
bodies, threatening the breathing lungs of the city.

35 | P a g e
Urban Environment
City Environment
 125 gardens
 11 natural hills
 Mula & Mutha are the major rivers in the city.
 Urban Forest areas Paevati Panchgaon and Katraj lake ( Area 2603 Ha )
 Forest area on Bhamburda and Vetal tekdi being undertaken with State
Forest Department.
 Biodiversity Park being developed in an area of 218.61 ha.

Source ESR, 2010-11
transportation
- 23 -
PUNE – CARBON FOOTPRINTS
Food
consumption
(1300 T Grains,
Pune City – Ecosystem Daily Flows (Input 600t fruits &
Vegetables,
& Output) Fibre 600t of milk
25t (paper
17t, polemer
Solid Waste
4t, Jute/ 1000t/ day
cotton
3t, Leather 1t)
PUNE Polluter
WATER CITY Water

250 million
650 Million litres [2.5Mt
Litre mixed with
1300t solid
waste as
sewage
Fossil Fuel
Coal 5000t = 10
MU(KWh)
Electricity, Petrol = Air Pollution
120 t (168000
l), Deisel 80t
300t Carbon
(110,000), Kerosen
e 6t, Gas
50t, Biomass 50t
project water- Source: IURMAN

environment - 2005
structural power project
transportation
Physical Infrastructure

36 | P a g e
Water Supply / Overview
Source of water
Water Bodies Rivers Mula, Mutha & Pawana Natural
Dams (Water Supply Khadakwasla, Panset, Natural

source Pune City) Warasgaon & Temghar
Lakes Pashan & Katraj lake Natural
Source : PMC, 2012
Coverage of water supply

Water Number of 48
Coverage Distribution Zones
Coverage of water 94.19%
supply connections
Per capita water 194 LPCD average water supply
supply vary from 138 LPCD to 260 LPCD as
per PMC
Source : PMC, 2012

25
Sewerage and Sanitation / Overview Sewerage / Initial Findings
Total Sewage 744 MLD

1 Collection efficiency
generation
Sewer Network 97.6 percent
Coverage collection efficiency of sewerage network is
Number of sewerage 9 In Nos approximately 73 percent
Waste water disposal treatment plants and
Pumping Station
Collection efficiency 73.35 2 Sewage treatment
of sewerage network
Coverage of toilets 97.36 Percent
Percentage of 7 percent Almost 29 percent of the total sewerage generated
recycle and reuse remains untreated and is disposed of into the Mula-
water Mutha River.
Number of 466
Community toilets
Number of Pay and 770
use toilets
Source : CSP,2012 26
Solid Waste Management

Waste Generation Observations based on Reconnaissance Survey &
Preliminary Analysis
 Ranging from 1,300 to 1,400 MT per day
 400-450 grams per capita per day (based on 2011 census) Door-to-door collection of waste is only 52.7%
Composition
Segregation of waste at source is only 50%
 69 percent of waste is composed domestic waste
Source: PMC
Wrong practice of disposing waste
After Swachta Abhiyaan into storm water drains

37 | P a g e
Drainage
Drainage Channels & Coverage
 23 basins/watersheds.
 234 Nallahs with total length of 262,114 m
 Four rivers flow through the city with a total length of 53.92 km.
 The total length of rain water drain is 20,085 m.
 The total length of road side drains is 150 km.
Observations based on Reconnaissance Survey & Preliminary Analysis
The topography of the city is

supportive to the natural drainage
Low network coverage of storm
water drainage
Choked drains found in few areas e.g.
Junna
project Market, water-
development &
Nag Teri nallah,
sanitation
etc.
transportation environment
& waste
structural
engineering
power
division
project
management
division
Traffic and Transportation Overview
Total road network 1800 Km

Municipal Roads 1750 Km
Other Roads 50 KM
Vehicular growth 10 Percent increase annually
Public transport system PMPML Buses , Auto
No. of Buses 1850 , 1450 PMPML Buses , 350 on rent , other non functional
Number of Bus terminals 7 , 2 Intercity Bus terminals Source : PMC, 2012
Congested Traffic Nodes

Jahangir hospital Chowk,
Rasta Peth,
Junna Bazaar Chowk,
Fatima Nagar,
Swargate Signal,
Mahatma Phule Chowk.
29
- 30 -
Roads & Transportation Sectors
 Inadequate capacity of roads and heterogeneous traffic
Major Congested Roads in Pune  Inadequacy of public transport.
• Laxmi Road,
• J.N.Road,  Increase in personalized vehicles has also been observed.
• Tilak Road,  Haphazard vehicular movement due to poor driving sense of drivers, insufficient parking
• Shivaji Road, facilities and inadequate enforcement has compounded traffic problems.
• Thorle Bajirao Road and Jangli Maharaj
 There is an absence of a safe and comprehensive system of pathways exposing
Fringe areas
• Ambedkar Road and Karve Road pedestrians to risks.
On-Street Parking along Commercial

project Area
water- Traffic Jams Near Dagdu Sethstructural
environment Mandir power Traffic Jams Near Laxmi road Market
project
transportation
19th May, 2012Parking Area division partnering vision
38 | P a g e
- 31 -
Projects undertaken under JnNURM
Sl.No. Projects Undertaken
1 Pilot BRT
2 CYG BRT
3 BRTS Phase I
4 Nagar Rd. Subway
5 Baner Road Subway

BRTS Pilot Project River Improvement
6 Sangamwadi Approach Road
7 New Alandi Road
8 STPs (Sewerage)
9 River Improvement
10 Nallah Improvement
11 SWD Phase-I
development & sanitation & waste engineering division management
BANNER
th
SUBWAY planning division BSUP
division
division
Housing under Construction in Hadapsardivision
management 12 Modern
division Bus Procurement
19 May, 2012 division Source : PMC, PIU Cell
partnering vision
32
Urban Reform

39 | P a g e
ULB Level Mandatory Reform
Sr. ULB Level Mandatory Reform Status

1. E-Governance Setup Successful completion of the reform achieved in 2009-10 for all
the proposed activities under the head
2. Transition to Double Entry Accounting Transition underway and preparation of budget for coming year
System (2012-13) under progress; however substantial degree of progress
made
3. Property Tax coverage of 85% Successful achievement of the milestone made in 2008-09 with
4. Property Tax collection efficiency of 90% 99% coverage and 95% collection efficiency
5. 100% cost recovery of water supply Successful in achieving 100% cost recovery. The ULB has targeted
6. 100% cost recovery of solid waste to achieve milestone equivalent to developed country for UFW
services and NRW to levels of 16% and 23% respectively by 2012
7. Internal earmarking of funds for UP and All the sub tasks under the reform have been achieved in 2007-08
provision of basic services pertaining to earmarking, allocation, provision, defining etc.
Source : PMC, PIU Cell ,2012

34
Sr. ULB Level Optional Reform Status

1. Introduction of property title certification system Successfully achieved in 2007-08
2. Revision of Building Bye laws - streamlining the Approval Process All the sub activities including consultation, identification, notification
and implementation have been achieved in 2006-07
3. Revision of Building Bye laws - Mandatory Rainwater Harvesting in All the activities have been achieved in 2006-07 u/s 37 of the MR&TP
all Buildings Act 1966
4. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for EWS/LIG Necessary provisions have been made in the Development Plans
5. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion of Implementation under progress
agricultural land for non-agricultural purpose
6. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land and Implementation under progress
property
7. Byelaws on Reuse of Recycled Water Provision is made in Development Control Rules. (M 8/28.2-06.12.2007)
so as to make STP construction compulsory for townships. Group of 150
tenements or more it is mandatory.
8. Administrative Reforms All the proposed administrative reforms have been achieved in the
year 2008-09
9. Structural Reforms Reforms under this head including realignment of organizational
structures, structuring internal judicial system etc. completed in 2008-09
10. Encouraging Public Private Partnership PPP initiatives have been taken up in the field of e-tendering, kiosks,
metro rail, mono rail etc. since 2007-08
Other initiatives include creation of revolving fund Currently in progress 35
development & sanitation & waste engineering Source
division : PMCmanagement
PIU Cell, 2012
division
- 40 -
We look forward to improve the CDP to bring CHANGE in the City’s identity
Thank You

40 | P a g e
2.3.2 Snapshots of Kick-Off workshop
Plate 2-1: Workshop chaired by PMC Commissioner Plate 2-2: PMC Additional Commissioner Sh.N.Zurmure
Sh.Mahesh Pathak giving his advice for CDP
Plate 2-3: Dr.Sh.Praveen Ashtekar, PMC Deputy Plate 2-4: Sh.Vivek Kharwarkar PMC City Engineer
municipal commissioner briefed regarding revising giving his views
CDP
Plate 2-5: Presentation made By Consultant Plate 2-6: Active participation of stake holders in CDP
41 | P a g e
Plate 2-7 Participants
Plate 2-8: Participants gave their views through

structured proforma
2.3.3 Participation
To get unbiased views of all the attendants of the first workshop, regarding various infrastructure
facilities present in the city, the consultant facilitated the officials with a structured questionnaire to be
filled during the workshop and was analyzed by the consultant after the workshop. This was important so
as to give all the attendants a fair chance to express their views and perspectives about the CDP. The
outcome of the first workshop analyzed after the meeting is as follows.
2.3.4 The outcome

2.3.4.1 Water Supply
The suggestions given were,
Water should be provided to all people. Water supply system should be designed so as to provide
equitable distribution.
Metering of all water connection should be targeted.
Water losses are heavy. Since water is augmented from dam, leakages should be minimized.
42 | P a g e
Water supply
15%
Equitable water supply
Local financial resources are

20% inadequate
65% Service in urban poor areas

are inadequate
Priorities:
1. Equitable water supply.
2. Service in urban poor area is inadequate.
3. Local financial resources are inadequate.
4. Percentage of non-revenue water is too high.
2.3.4.2 Sewerage and sanitation
The suggestions given are,
The sewage chamber is damaged in several places as a consequence the waste water is
overflowing.
Main trunk line should be maintained properly. Sewerage lines and main trunk line should be
laid in with proper invert levels.
Efficient treatment plant should be installed.
Sewerage and Sanitation
Collection efficiency
29% 20%
Treatment Capacity
Network Coverage
8% Service in urban poor areas are

inadequate
29%
Recycling and reuse of waste water
14%
43 | P a g e
Priorities:
1. Treatment capacity and Recycling & reuse of waste water.
2. Collection efficiency.
3. Network Coverage.
4. Service in urban poor areas is inadequate.
2.3.4.3 Drainage
Adequate budget allocation.

WTP capacity should be improved or new WTP of adequate capacity should be installed.
Trunk drainage line of sufficient diameter should be constructed; existing trunk drainage line
should be maintained.
100% water collection and recharge should be done.
Drainage design should follow the required slope.
Water Logging or Flood
21%
Yes
79% No
Duration of Water logging / Urban flood
Navapol Kopra, Sayhadri park, NIBM-Salunke

4 - 5 days
vihar road, Sinhgard road
Shivajinagar, Yerwada jail, Police lines, Aundh,

2- 3 days
Jagtap chowk, Kasba, Pashan
Kothrud, Karve nagar, Baner 1 day
0 1 2 3 4 5
No of Days Duration
44 | P a g e
Back flow in Drainage lines
25%
Yes
75% No
Locations of Backflow: Khaurewach, Gunjalwadi, Gokhale nagar and Yerwada.

2.3.4.4 Solid Waste Management
Automated waste collection and treatment plants can be installed.

Dumping points should be notified and published for people.
Challenges with costs
25%
Door to door collection and
segregation
Tax collection efficency is less
25%
Less no of vehicles for
25%
transportation
Lack of Public awareness
25%
Requirements for Efficient waste management
20%
40% Treatment plant
Dumping site
Supervision
40%
45 | P a g e
Waste management in Illegal colonies
33%
Collected
67% Not collected
Challenges with collection efficiency

17%
Segregation bins
Equipments
33%
Vehicles
33%
Labors
17%
Challenges with public awareness
14%
14%
Segregation at source
Collection time conflicts
57%
Senior citizens
15%
Payment issues
46 | P a g e
Challenges with E- waste management

13%
37%
Collection points
50% Recycling and Disposal

Cost
2.3.4.5 Traffic and Transportation

Road infrastructure should be provided as per City Mobility Plan.

S.No Question Answer Remark
1 Total number of buses 300 Less compare to BEST
2 Frequency per day 8 times/Bus Sufficient but uncertain
3 Passenger capacity 40 Adequate
4 Intercity Bus trips/ day 1000 Adequate
5 Annual growth of Bus traffic Increasing Adequate
6 IPT (Auto/ Taxi) Increasing Adequate
S.No Issues Location

1 Area with Parking Issues Collector office, PMC, Gaonthan area, M.G. road, Laxmi road.
2 Pedestrian concentrated area Central building premises, railway stations, Shivajinagar,
Swargate, Laxmi road.
3 Traffic congestion area Mandhakka, COEP, RTO, Simla office, Swargate, University Jn,
Hadapsar-Gadi road, Jahangir hospital Jn, Railway station.
4 Accident prone zones Swargate Jn, Sancheti Jn, BRT routes, University Jn.
Major victim of Accidents
33%
Two wheelers
17% Bicycle
Pedestrians
50%
47 | P a g e
2.3.4.6 Environment
Improve public transport such as metro, monorail and buses.

All vehicles should use CNG instead of petrol.
PM10 and PM25 emissions should be reduced drastically.
Strengthen the environment cell.
Environment
9%
Vehicular Growth
15%
23% Public awareness
15% Carbon emissions
Ambient Air , water quality and

20% sources
18% Land pollution and sources
Priorities:
1. Vehicular Growth.
2. Public awareness.
3. Carbon emissions.
4. Ambient air, water quality and sources.
5. Land pollution and sources.
6. Climate change and urban heat island.
2.3.4.7 Heritage
The suggestions given is,
Unnecessary sites should not be declared as heritage site.
Heritage
8%
Maintenance of heritage
8% building
31% Public awareness
11%
Private properties
Lack of zoning regulation for

15% hertage sites
Identification of sites
27%
48 | P a g e
Priorities:
1. Maintenance of heritage building.
2. Public awareness.
3. Private properties.
4. Lack of zoning regulation for heritage sites.
5. Identification of sites.
6. Population growth.
2.3.4.8 Slum
The suggestions given is,
The slum dwellers should properly utilize the rehabilitated areas

No of slums 563
Interventions Wanby Yojana for slum housing, JNNURM - BSUP for infrastructure
Issues Slum dwellers residing in 250 sq.ft G+1 dwelling units denied shifting to rehabilitated site.
2.3.5 Problems/ Issues related to environment and infrastructure of the city

Sector Problems/ Issues
Water supply Available in ample, but not equivalent distribution required.
water losses are high
Drainage Inefficient collection of storm water
Sewerage Proper collection and disposed required
Only 70% coverage
SWM No land filling is done. But alternatives methods and location reqd.
E waste and C&D policies should be prepared and implemented
In efficient collection of waste
Segregation of wet and dry garbage are not practiced
Roads Lack of pedestrian and cycling facilities.
Ring road HCMTR corridor should be given priority
Pot Holes
T&T Proper management and inadequate funding
Traffic problem
Lack of Buses
Environment There should be more garden.
Other issues High density growth and congestion in the city. Heat island effect.
Health Services for Poor
2.3.6 Strategies to overcome the Issues related to environment and infrastructure of the city
Sector Strategies
Traffic and transportation Public transport should be improved to solve traffic problems
Road widening
Land acquisition process should start and finish early
49 | P a g e
Sector Strategies
Creating public awareness
NMT to be given importance.
Multi modal transport to be adopted.
Integration of all form of transport and interchange terminal to be developed
D.P. roads should be developed by PMC.
PPP model road construction can be adopted
Drainage 100 % collection should be done and treated completely
SWM Creating public awareness
Segregation of solid waste should be carried separately
House to house collection of garbage should be privatized.
Water supply Water meter shall be installed
Non revenue water shall be minimized by water audit
Slum The slum dwellers should properly utilize the rehabilitated areas
Environment Defining threshold limit w.r.t. use of natural, human and monetary resources.
Creating public awareness
2.3.7 Measures for effective public service delivery

Municipal finance should be given to deliver the basic services to the public & it should be used
for mandatory duties of PMC.
Parking facilities.
Traffic (heavy) industries.
Bus frequency.
An administrative reforms survey of all offices and employees in necessary. This survey is
beneficial to analyze the potential amongst the workforce. It will also lead to identify to arrange
various types of training.
Current urbanization trends is unsustainable ie growth first and development later, leads to
compromise parameters related to service delivery.
To create and increase infrastructure manpower is the key area. To search the potential of
Manpower survey of all employees is must. It will also help to identify the need of training.
2.3.8 Sector Priority
Sector Priority
Water Supply 3 4 6 3 3 1 1 1 1 6 5 1
Sewerage and Sanitation 1 3 5 3 5 6 2 3 3 3 3 5
Solid waste management 4 2 7 2 2 7 4 4 2 4 2 3
Traffic and transport 5 1 3 6 1 3 6 7 7 1 6 2
Drainage 2 5 4 3 4 5 2 2 4 5 4 8
Environment 6 7 1 1 7 4 6 6 6 2 1 6
Housing 7 6 2 7 6 2 5 5 5 8 7 4
Heritage and conservation 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7
50 | P a g e
The cumulative analysis matrix of all the sectors shows that water supply is the sector that is given the
top priority which is followed by Sewerage and sanitation. Heritage and conservation is the sector that is
kept at the least priority by majority of stake holders who have filled up the questionnaires.
Priority:
1. Water Supply.
2. Sewerage and Sanitation.
3. Solid waste management.
4. Traffic and transport.
5. Drainage.
6. Environment.
7. Housing.
8. Heritage and conservation.
51 | P a g e
3 Individual Stakeholder Consultations
3.1 Introduction
According to the requirements outlined, for the process of preparation of City Development Plan, by
JnNURM various stakeholders have to be consulted at various stages. These stakeholders are important
as they give important suggestions and recommendation regarding the existing situations in the city and
also make the consultant aware of their visions which they perceive for the city. These are very fruitful
consultations as they provide necessary inputs for the preparation of CPD of any city. Hence in this
chapter various issues, strategies and recommendations are enlisted by different stakeholders who are
essential for consolidation of this City Development Plan for Pune - 2041.
3.2 Stakeholders consulted
Pune Municipal Corporation officials

Parastatal Agency officials
NGOs
Elected Members
Slum Dwellers
3.3 Summary of individual Stake holder Consultations
1. Stakeholder 1 (Mr. Shrinivas Bonala (Additional City Eng, Projects & BSUP Housing)
Date: 25th June, 2012
Issues:
• In JNNURM, PPP method is applied which facilitates private builders to use extra FSI for their own
benefit.
• This results in exploitation of land in terms of provision of all infrastructures like water, road,
solid waste management etc.
• SRA schemes lead to financial burden on PMC as they provide 100% of funding to the slum dweller.
Strategies/ Recommendations:
• While planning the CDP, care should be taken to not to overload the provision of infrastructure in
the forthcoming years, given the limitations of resources.
• Slums situated on environmentally sensitive location (hills, along river) should be cleared and
relocated on other barren area.
• In situ rehabilitation – with the help of NGO’s Kachha houses of slum dwellers are reconstructed
into Pucca houses.
• In both cases 10% of project cost should be borne by slum dweller.
Remarks:
• BSUP worked on number of houses for slum dwellers
o Hadapsar- 2408
o Varaje – 1300
o Parvati and yerwada- 4000 houses
52 | P a g e
2. Stakeholder 2 (Ms. Harshida Shinde (Deputy Engineer, DP Cell)

Issues:
• Presently there is no consolidated land use plan for the total PMC area which includes the newly
added 23 villages.
• Re-densification method was preferred over jurisdictional change for accommodating the future
population.
Remarks:
• The developments of self sufficient townships are highly appreciated.
3. Stakeholder 3 (Dr. Jayashree Katare (Deputy Director, SRA)

Issues:
• 43% of the population lives in slums.
Remarks:
• SRA has been involved in providing housing for the slum dwellers and the urban poor under
certain conditionalities following the process of Registration.
4. Stakeholder 4 (Mr. Ganesh Sonune (Project Officer, UNDP), Mr. P. Ashtikar (Deputy Commissioner
Special/OSD (EST JNNURM, Fire Department)
• According to NDMA, 2 % of the total budget should be allocated for fire fighting.
Projects:
• Ward level disaster management plan has been prepared.
Remarks:
• Fire hazards response and mitigation plan
• Rs. 550 crore funds required.
Points Discussed:
• It was discussed that any of the department in the PMC can have a disaster so it is not enough to
set up a disaster cell rather all departments should work toward it.
• Disaster management should be integrated with all the departments and should not just be a
separate entity.
• It is important to outline the hazards in all the departments and then plan for that
• Give disaster management as better term namely; Preparation and Mitigation.
• The need of air ambulance was emphasized where as much as two helicopters were suggested
for PMC to serve during any medical emergency or disaster.
53 | P a g e
5. Stakeholder 5 (Mr. Prashant Waghmare (City Engineer)

Issues:
• Transportation and housing are major issues in Pune city.
• Leak detection plan should be prepared for reducing the water losses
Remarks:
• Coverage of sewerage network is 99 percent
• Work of 3 drainage basin is under-process need to improvement remaining 21 basins
• Projected population of Draft DP is approximately 65 lakh for the year of 2031.
6. Stakeholder 6 (Mr. Promood Nirbhavne (City Engineer Road)

Issues:
• Land acquisition is major issue in road construction
• Public Awareness is important
• Strong enforcement of traffic rules
• Development plan should be strictly implemented
• Rehabilitation process should be transparent and fast
• ‘Road designing guidelines’ are under way and should be implemented for different land uses
(commercial, residential, industrial etc.)
7. Stakeholder 7 (Mr. Suresh Jagtap. (JMC) and supporting staff)

Date: 3rd July, 2012
Issues:
• Is 100% door to door collection possible in a metro city?
• People don’t want to pay tax for SW collection.
• Builders don’t follow the rules and regulations in the longer run regarding vermi compost plant
due to poor monitoring by PMC.
• People don’t take the pain to segregate the waste at their end.
• Rag pickers are less interested in residential waste than commercial waste due to their low
recyclable value.
• Centralized system of SWM is better.
• Slums need a different segregation plan.
• Penalties should be suggested at the policy level for not segregating the waste, littering, waste
disposal at wrong places.
• Community awareness and involvement may be a helpful tool in SWM.
54 | P a g e
Projects:
• 700 Mt Pyro-lysis thermal station to start which will feed 10MW power to the main grid.
8. Stakeholder 8 (Mr. N. Zurmure (Additional Commissioner, PMC), Mr. Mangesh Dighe (Environment
officer, PMC)
Issues:
• Heat island effect has increased due to urbanization and change in living standard.
• Floating business population has increased in few years leading to additional stress on
infrastructure services in the city.
• Lack of monitoring has led to degradation of services in the city.
• Due to saucer shaped geography of Pune a lot of energy is wasted in pumping of water
throughout the city.
• PMRDA is not in existence as yet
• Water metering is required in the city.
• Instead of incentive based green building initiatives the city should move to mandatory green
building rules.
• Initiatives like Solar water heater, Vermi compost, solar lighting necessary to reduce energy load
on the city.
• Monitoring techniques for city management like GIS is very important.
• Pune Metropolitan Region should be kept in mind while planning for PMC.
• PMRDA should be a monitoring and governing body with its own set of regulation mandatory for
the region. Projects like metro rail can be taken care of by the PMRDA.
• Suggested the use of Environmental Performance Index (EPI) to assess the environment scenario
in the city.
• Since Pashan Lake is a declared eco-sensitive zone and is preserved for its bio diversity only
restricted for tourism also no water extraction can take place. This should be maintained.
• Katraj Lake is for tourism.
• DEWATS can be proposed for slums in first phase.
• Enforcement of ECBC code.
• There should be some change in building by laws and development control rules w.r.t. eco-
housing.
• Monitoring should be done on cutting and planting of trees on a regular basis.
• Use of intelligent transport system.
• Capacity building of PMC staff w.r.t. monitoring of building by laws on ground.
• There should be congestion tax.
• Rent-a-cycle system should be introduced.
• Interlinking of all PMC departments.
• Natural lakes are the green lungs of the city and should be conserved.
Remarks:
• ESR 2012-13 will be made available within next few days.
55 | P a g e
• Joint Forest Management has led to pumping of Rs 4 crore from PMC to the forest dept.
• Hanjer is a good technology.
• Pollution standards have changed which reflects increased pollution level in the city.
• City Vision could be “Greener city wid good Mobility”
9. Stakeholder 9 (Mr. V.G Kulkarni (S.E Water Supply and Sewerage Department)
Issues:
• No telescopic tariff for water consumption
• Undulating topography resulting in the problem of low water pressure
• Old water supply distribution network
• Lack of Metered connection
• Condition of all water treatment plants are not good need to replacement
• Collection efficiency of sewerage network is approximately 73 percent which further leads to
polluting the environment due to shortfall in treatment capacity
• Source to treatment plant water flow by gravity
• Uninterrupted power supply (express feeders for all WTPs)
• Water audit at regular interval to control the water losses
• 100 percent recovery of water supply on telescopic tariff basis
• Energy audit at regular intervals
• As per the agreement between PMC and irrigation department. PMC has to recycle 500 MLD of
treated sewage back to irrigation canal for irrigation purposes.
• PMC has made modification in the building control rules and has made it mandatory for housing
societies with 150 or more tenements to construct STP and recycle 100 percent treated for
tertiary purposes.
10. Stakeholder 10 (Mr. Dinesh Girola (Planning officer)

Point of discussion:
• CDP should be prepared under the revised JnNURM guidelines.
• Main focus of previous CDP was
• River Development
• Slum Improvement
• Sustainable transport
• Environment
• CDP should be focused on priority basis, priority should be decided on the basis of stakeholder
consultation & priority of every person is different for example – slum dwellers gave more
preferences to Infrastructure Facilities.
• Khadagwasala is the main source of water and different housing societies presently used
underground water sources.
• Available water sources is not sufficient for future Planning
56 | P a g e
• Probably DP will come within one or two weeks and it’s under approval.
• Projected population of DP 2035 is approximately 65 lakh.
• Pune comes under seismic zones IV.
11. Stakeholder 11 (Mr. ChetanTupey, Chairman City Improvement Committee)

Points of Discussion:
• Community toilets required for physical challenged and handicapped.
• Firefighting laws are not properly followed
• Energy efficiency
• Need to establish the separate planning Division in Municipal Corporation
• All the facilities like social infrastructure and Garden should be design as per Hierarchy and the
preferences of citizen’s e.g.
• Mugal Gardens
• Japanese Garden
• For designing the facilities like Stadium accessibility and distance from the town should be
consider
• Carbon footprint
• Proper Pedestrian Facilities
• While designing the road reserve for utilities should be necessary
• City Mobility Plan Should be Integrated with Development Plan and CDP
• Provision of Farmer Market
• For the Promotion of Tourism advertisement and awareness is Necessary
• Lack of Civic sense
• Education and Awareness is must at Root level and integrated it with education.
12. Stakeholder 12 (Mr. Sunil Gogle Prabhag No. 16 Alandi Road)

• Projects should be executed as per DPRs because most of the projects in Pune are not execute as
per DPRs.
• For the proper implementation there is need to establishment of monitoring committees
• Proper building by-laws required for slum in situ projects
• Provision of govt. rented housing
• Water taxes should be compulsory for slum dweller also
• Recycling and reuse of water should be necessary. Reuse water should be used for gardening and
other secondary purposes
• DEWATS system for sewage treatment should be implemented for slums
• Because of concretization water is not percolate properly so the roads and other facilties should
be design properly so water can percolate properly.
57 | P a g e
13. Stakeholder 13 (Ms. Poonam Mehta (Livelihood Development Expert For BSUP,PIU, Social Dev.
Executive (RAY), Deputy Collector)
Issues:
• Growth of industries, commercial development and MIDC’s expansion can also lead to expansion
of slums within and outside the city limits.
• Absence of a good baseline survey in Pune.
• There might be an ambiguity in the allotment of funds by RAY and BSUP in the future as whether
the funds would be transferred under HUPA or UD ministry, as there might be change in the
channeling of funds.
• Slum growth should be considered while planning.
• Land Tenure Security for the Slum Dwellers has to be kept in mind while CDP.
• Development issues should be handled concerning shelter, livelihood and housing for slum
dwellers.
Projects:
• In Pune, there have been lots of project initiatives in dealing especially with the slum population
under various schemes, such as the SRA, SRS and also initiatives from NGOs such as MASHAL who
has come up with Slum Mapping, and construction of housing is going on, along with provision of
BSUP.
Remarks:
• RAY’s goal of slum free city is in preparatory stage.
• Relocation of slum creates transportation problem.
• Slum major concerns are livelihood issue, street vendors , slum woman empowerment, solid
waste and sewerage management
• The calculation method for growth of slum population is not exclusive and taken from the usual
population growth.
14. Stakeholder 14 (Mr. Relekar (I.T. REG. OFFICER)

Issues:
• So far, E–waste collection & disposal is not considered.
• Accessibility to MIDC area is poor and transport frequency is low.
• Schools for MIDC residents are not nearby.
• MIDC area of Pune should be the nucleus for future growth.
• As MIDC areas are growth centers of city , there should be self content development in its
surrounding areas, for that infrastructure provision to these areas is necessary.
• Future infrastructure demand should be considered while planning for CDP of Pune – 2041.
• Budget allocation is essential.
• PMC should provide alternative transport system for MIDC areas.
58 | P a g e
• Technical training, engineering institutes should be motivated and invited in MIDC.

• E-waste recycling, recycling of water and rain water harvesting should be initiated.
• While planning for city, adjoining areas should be taken into consideration as impact areas.
Projects:
• Hinjewadi – 1992-Rajiv Gandhi IT Park,
o Area – 700 ha.
o Work force – 90000
• Hinjewadi Phase 1, 2, 3 – 120 units , 75 units in operation.
• Hinjewadi phase – III contains 10, 000 flats.
• Hinjewadi Phase IV by 2015.
• Site given for Hinjewadi Phase – IV.
• By 2015, workforce will be 2 lakh.
• This will demand large amount of subordinate activities and facilities.
• Kharadi – 1999 – Knowledge city
• Talawade – 1988
Remarks:
• Land is acquired through LAA- 1894 and MIDC Act 1961.
• Rainwater harvesting systems and STP are functional.
• Internal Infrastructure Provision by MIDC and does not depend on PMC
• PMC provides roads and public transport to the area.
• In future Hinjewadi is going to have it impact on Pune city
• Mixed use developments are most preferred by IT areas.
15. Stakeholder 15 (Mr. K.S. Aakode (Director, TCPD)

Issues:
• Local developers objected the building bye law stating 20% of the houses should be allocated to
EWS groups.
• Transportation is biggest issue- vehicle population is 4 times of people population in city.
• Housing- Govt. housing boards face problem in land acquisition and can't promote affordable
housing (housing board is not fully active), upcoming townships are not solution on this.
• Chakkan and Hingewadi are the future growth centers.
• 10 km radius fringe area is identified for fringe area plan.
• Mixed use development is mostly preferred in Hingewadi and future developments.
• Hilly areas are declared as no development zone.
• The priority sectors from the development point of view are environment, transportation and
solid waste management.
• Proposal for mass transit, ring road, metro rail.
• BRTS network should be wisely planned studying origin and destination survey.
59 | P a g e
• Heavy traffic should have different network.

• There is need of new town authority which will coordinate all city level authorities like PMC,
PCMC, Cantonment board, MIDC etc.
• Environment – no development zones should be marked, riverfront development plan in
proposal stage.
• Prioritization – 1. Environment 2. Transport 3. Solid waste management.
Projects:
• Mass rapid transit system such metro and monorail should be planned.
• Elevated MRTS can be constructed along Mula – Mutha River.
16. Stakeholder 16 (Ms. Nayana Gurav Bondarde (Regional Officer, MTDC)

Issues:
• Tourist spots of Pune lack tourism related infrastructure and are in poor condition: eg. Food
courts near tourist stations, drinking water, public toilets, auto rickshaw stops.
• City transport is not in good condition, Pune Darshan Buses are not up-to the mark.
• Darshan trip of Pune covers 11 religious sites.
• Fort development plan- under this 6 forts (Shivneri,Singhgad, Lohgad, Rajgad, Torana, Rajmachi
will be connected and residential and infrastructure facilities will be provided at the base of fort.
• MTDC –Pune is planning for Pune festival.
• Dntertainment development like Essell-world, Pune Festival.
Projects:
• Signage's along road.
Remarks:
• Janwani is conducting heritage walks.
17. Stakeholder 17 (Mr. K. Venkat Nagareddy (CEO, PCB)

Issues:
• The infrastructure needs attention the top priority being drainage, sewerage and solid waste
management.
Projects:
• Construction of sewerage line
Remarks:
• Have already asked for JNNURM funds for schemes.
18. Stakeholder 18 (Mr. M.B. Sable (Section Engineer, PCB)

60 | P a g e
Issues:
• Few squatter developments along nallas.
19. Stakeholder 19 (Mr. Shirodkar (Deputy Engineer, PCB)

Issues:
• 90% drainage line has problem and has to be repaired.
• Existing water pipelines are damaged needs replacement.
20. Stakeholder 20 (Mr. Arun Godbole – (Deputy Engineer, KCB)

Issues:
• Whole drainage line is old and in poor condition.
• Ambedkar Road has very high traffic volume despite its insufficient width.
• Pollution control board noticed for repairing of whole drainage line as it is old and in poor
condition.
• Road widening at Ambedkar Road is necessary as traffic volume is high on this road.
• Slum rehabilitation – slums in Khadki area should be relocated and rehabilitated.
• Fund mobilization – PMC should bear the project cost for water supply as JNNURM funds are
provided to them.
Existing Slums in Cantonment Area
No. of Year of
Sr.no. Names of Slums Area Category
encroachments establishment
1 Mahadev wadi 0.6 +0.4 acre B-4 162 1980
2 Gen. arun kumar vaidya nagar 0.4 acre B-4 60 1985
3 Rajiv gandhi nagar 2.13 acre C 369 1983
4 Gawali wada vasahat 1.5 acre A-2 344 1980
5 Durga vasahat 2 acre A2 231 1980
21. Stakeholder 21 (Mr. D. A. Pardeshi (Labor & Public Relation Officer)

Issues:
• Infrastructure is poor in PMPML depot.
• Encroachments of street vendors along stops and depots.
• No modal parking at major bus stations.
• Lack of required number of Workshop shades & sections, diesel pumps and modern washing
machines.
• Basic infrastructure is not enough for existing bus capacity.
61 | P a g e
• Due to lack of parking for buses 50% of PMPML buses have to be parked on road at the depots.
• Requirement of 100 buses, 6 acre land for the depot, petrol pump.
• The location of bus depot in the outskirts is most preferred location.
• Infrastructure services in bus stands like public toilets, security systems, food stalls are required.
• There is a lack of parking spaces, intermediate transport.
• As a cost cutting strategy BRT lanes can be proposed in left side.
• Revenue generation by promoting commercial development at bus depots.
• Provision of bus depots at outskirts. This will cover 20 km radius area around depots.
• Concrete flooring for all bus depots.
• Funds requirement for PMPML
o 10 crores – basic investment excluding land cost.
o 5 crores –work
o 3 crores – concreting
o 2 crores - basic infrastructure improvement
Remarks:
• Automobile manufacturers are managing the government.
22. Stakeholder 22 (Mr. K. Sahastrabudhe, RANWA NGO)

Issues:
• Implementation of Biodiversity Act 2002 is not there.
• Implementation of Biodiversity Act 2002 should be there and management committee for this
purpose at ward level and at Corporation level should be formed.
• Need to improve Biodiversity status of all Gardens; steps should be taken for the habitation of
species which are locally found in all Gardens instead of one butterfly garden.
• Specific efforts are required in preserving common house sparrows; this can be done along the rivers.
• Public transport should be strengthened to discourage private transport.
Projects:
• Biodiversity zones in each garden.
• Biodiversity zones along the rivers in the city.
Remarks:
• www.ranwa.org has a lot of data regarding biodiversity and environment.
23. Stakeholder 23 (Mr. Ashok Srinivasa and Mr. Sujit Patvardhan PARISAR NGO AND PRAYAS NGO)
Issues:
• One comprehensive mobility plan is there, then why projects are undertaken as NON-CMP
projects for example: construction of underpass, construction of fly-over over BRT corridor which
is financially and technically non compliant.
• PMPML parking lots have been taken away by PMC.
62 | P a g e
• Existing capacity of governance is very poor.

• JNNURM should monitor how much % of previous CDP projects and recommendations have been
implemented on ground.
• CDP, CMP, and DP should be synchronized.
• Monitoring at project level should be very strong and independent and a third party agency
which may include civil societies of the city.
• SLB should be adopted for transportation.
• PMPML should be provided with service stations and parking lots.
• JNNURM II should not fund another project other than capacity building and improvement of
governance.
Remarks:
• Not interested in CDP and its process since the implementation of previous CDP is not visible.
• Prisar NGO has prepared Street design guidelines.
• Instead of poor development there should be no development.
24. Stakeholder 24 (Prof. Vijay Paranjape, Gomukh Environmental Trust For Sustainability NGO)
Date: 23rd June, 2012
Issues:
• There is gap between what is proposed/ demanded by public and what has given by government.
• Water leakage is more than stated in report. Stated is 25% and actual is approx. 40%.
• Pumped water supply system caused unequal distribution of water. Also water supply budget
exceeds due to pumped water.
• Tender process is harmful as it does not stick to people opinion and not giving what government
has agreed to give. There should be right entry and exist of People participation, tendering
process and Consultation company.
• Governance gap – original proposals drawn by consulting public are however converted into
Concretization.
• System Gap - Integration and co-ordination between departments like water supply, drainage,
sanitation, storm water management etc. is necessary.
• Water supply should take advantage of ground profile and gravity. Water supply should be
according to physical morphological geographical planes.
• Old water supply should be updated according to expansion of city and available water sources in
these areas.
• Pashan Lake and Katraj Lake water can serve separate catchment areas.
Project:
• Identification of water and sewage leakage areas.
• Leak detection Project should be implemented and it should be in logical order.
o Assessment of water – physical assessment of water resource is necessary – how much rain,
how much is dam yield, and how much water is distributed and allocated.
63 | P a g e
o Source assessment – how much water is percolated – captive acquires

• Adding 1 & 2 we get the total source assessment.
Remarks:
• Decentralization of sources and supplies (use of ground water, lakes)
• Bucket study should be done for water supply in slum areas.
25. Stakeholder 25 (Mr. Sharad Mahajan (Executive Director of MASHAL NGO)

Project:
• Discussion on various data collection needs in order to implement various rehabilitation and
slums improvement schemes in a professional and technically sound manner.
• The realm of Land Tenure Security, the various schemes are discussed like:
o SRA – Builder and Market Driven
o BSUP - I, and PMC Land, Centre and State Govts.
o BSUP - II, NGOs involvement
o In Situ rehabilitation.
Remarks:
• Organization has been involved in the betterment of the urban slum dwellers in Pune.
• The background and the genesis of the Slum Mapping taken up by the organization has been
discussed.
• Discussion about the 4 different Acts related to slums improvement and how they have been
implemented and contributed towards the improvement and betterment of the urban slum
dwellers in Pune.
26. Stakeholder 26 (Mr. Neim Keruwala, Mrs. Arundhati Viswasrao, Mr. Harshad JANWANI NGO)
Issues:
• Metro may create disturbances to livelihood of people.
• Public consultation for public transport is not being done.
• No provision for disabled person in public transport.
• Traffic demand management should be worked out before proposing any transport solution.
• Land reservation for bus depots across periphery of Pune is necessary.
• Pune CDP should have multiple visions as Pune city is now a hub for education, IT, automobile
and agro products.
• Assessment of City’s maximum potential for quality of life is necessary after that development
should move to regional approach i.e. other growth nodes should be promoted near city like
Satara, Aurangabad, Nashik etc.
Remarks:
• Janwani deals with the following five sectors namely environment, heritage, Traffic and
Transportation, city structure and governance.
64 | P a g e
• Mahratta chamber of commerce, industry and Agriculture (MCCIA) formed Janwani meaning
‘voice of the people.
• Proposed metro route does not cover fringe areas i.e. Hinjewadi area; which is major traffic
volume area.
27. Stakeholder 27 (Ms. Malati Gadgil (CEO, Swach NGO)

Issues:
• Not enough trucks and containers provided by PMC.
• As compost made by mixed waste, its quality is not good and farmers are not ready to take that
compost, if this compost will be generated by only wet waste, quality will improve and marketing
will be easy.
• Most of the waste segregation is done on the streets.
• 11 transfer stations are not enough in the city.
• 700MT Pyro-lysis technique thermal plant coming up in Ramtekdy industrial estate can cause
pollution.
• Sewage network is not present in slums.
• Hanjer is a failure technology as mixed waste don’t produce good compost
• The sector goal should include “Respect for the People who are providing this service to the
society” till 2041.
• Reducing distance of transfer stations – as the physical distance increases complains increases at
the transfer station.
• Wet waste – goes for composting
• Dry waste – get sorted and sold (recycled)
• Inert waste – leaves the area to land fill sites
• 16 Prabhags have been proposed with Zero waste.
• Plan for city which safeguards the interest of the marginalised people living at the fringe.
• The plan should keep the marginalised population and unorganised sector in mind.
• Unless and until political vested interest is not there, change is not possible.
• Many direct and indirect benefits to waste picker in door to door collection.
• Health initiatives necessary for waste pickers.
• Construction & demolition debris can be reused.
Project:
• Decentralized method for waste management
• Specific space for garbage sorting within the city.
• Katraj is a successful Zero Waste Model
Remarks:
• Total zones – 4
• 1 zone will need 100 sorting spaces
• 1 sorting space of 20’X30’.
• 20000 households are served per sorting space.
65 | P a g e
28. Stakeholder 28 (Ar. Ravi Kadam and Dr. Sandeep)

Issues:
• Public transportation is the key sector that needs to be addressed.
• Land rates are the biggest hindrance for affordable housing.
• Hills should be conserved and preserved.
• Housing supply should be affordable.
• Singapore model of housing can be adopted.
• Vertical growth should be made mandatory to increase open spaces in the city.
• GIS mapping should be done on the city level.
• Incentivization of land pooling should be done.
• Large parcel of land with all amenities should be encouraged.
• Environmental planning laws should be integrated with Developmental control rules.
• Conservation of Core and old Pune should be undertaken.
• Administration should be strong.
29. Stakeholder 29 (Ms. Sanskriti Menon (Programme Director, CEE NGO)

Date: 4th July, 2012
Issues:
• The projects suggested by previous CDP are not yet visible in the city.
• Ward level democracy is not functional; the decisions taken by Prabhag Samities may not be
implemented.
• There are serious issues in governance specially in monitoring.
• The technologies used for data collection are obsolete.
o No flow meter for sewage
o No ground water assessment
o Basic sewage network map is not present
o Map for ground water aquifers not present.
• Non compatible RWH in small and individual plots may prove harmful to buildings.
• There should be correspondence between Development Plan and the City Development Plan.
• Keeping in purview of 74th CAA
o There should be strong monitoring cell– citizen based monitoring system which has tie up
with Area Sabhas.
o Prabhag Level and Area level Service level Benchmarks should be established and
subsequently achieved.
o Proper database at Prabhag level should be maintained.
o Ward infrastructure Index (WII) should be introduced & updated at regular intervals to reflect
the development of the ward.
• Environmental Status Report(ESR) of PMC provided only the data; it should give the comparative
status as well
66 | P a g e
• There should be SLB standardized for environment.

• RWH & Ground Water Recharge should be done at the city level along the transport lines.
30. Stakeholder 30 (Mr. Avinash CEE NGO)

Issues:
• School infrastructure is improper
o 50% toilets are unusable.
o Toilet designs are improper.
o Insufficient number of sanitary inspectors.
o Poor database available.
o Monitoring indicators provided for school student’s health are insufficient and need to be
elaborated.
• There should be GIS mapping of Schools & Health centers under PMC.
• At the policy level no school should be allowed for multiple uses.
• Teacher's potential should be used for improving the education system and city health system.
• Night shelters should be provided for in migrants.
• UID should be considered for PDS.
31. Stakeholder 31 (Mr. Ambrish Galinde, Octroi)

1. Improving present public transport by - Increasing frequency(max. 15mins), locating more bus
stops(should be approached in 5 mins walk)
2. Providing circular transport (100 % subsidized) in 5 km radius of the core area. This will increase
mobility and decrease fuel bill. Auto rickshaws will be automatically be reduced in core area.
3. Use of land as resource, as PMC located on prime location this asset should be utilized.
4. Non- congested area can be provided FSI more than 1, this extra FSI can be charged under paid
FSI- good source for PMC income.
5. Advertisement areas can be relocated as it has good potential of revenue generation
6. Model can be developed where corporate can be part of financial structure, many corporate
companies like Infosys, etc, automobile companies coming to Pune are part of Pune
development, and they should contribute in development fees or fund projects.
32. Stakeholder 32 (Mr. V. Kharawadkar)

Date: May, 2012
1. Land mobilization – working on 900 places listed for amenity purposes.
2. Environment grants
3. FSI is exclusive domain of PMC which should be fully utilized as land premium for income
generation.
67 | P a g e
4. PMC collects 600 cores per year under Land Premium cost which can be extended to 1500 cores.
5. Carbon credit should be attributed to PMC, CNG and other gas agencies are laying pipelines in
city, they are facing land problems and PMC tries to solve those, so they should pay to PMC.
6. Financing of infrastructure and BOT projects.
7. Municipal Assets and Land as a source of financing.
33. Stakeholder 33 (Slums of Parvati Hills, Panmada Jhopadppatti, Dandekar Pool, Janta Vasa, Kamgar
Putla, Lohiya Nagar)
Points of Observation:
• As compared to many other Indian Cities, Pune slums are probably much better off in provision of
the BSUP. To further improve and enhance these services efforts should be made in the CDP to
build in these services in a quantitative and qualitative manner.
• In all the slums there is a fair level of satisfaction regarding the housing and the in situ
rehabilitation schemes provided by the Municipal Corporation.
• In one of the visited slums there is even 24 hours Piped water supply and Electricity.
• While Electricity is metered, water supply is not metered. The ever increasing groundwater
depletion scenario, water meters should be introduced in an effort to initiate checks and
balances in the use of water. Rain water harvesting should be promoted and some incentives
should be given for the same.
• Solid Waste Management needs attention. Efforts in organizing solid waste collection and
disposal should be energized with the help of local NGOs.
• In one of the slums there was a remark that cleanliness of the Community Toilets is not up to the
mark as the ones appointed to clean and maintain the toilets are not regularly doing their duties
and as a result some times when the toilets gets choked, they have to deploy local people.
• Some people also expressed their need for some playgrounds for the children in the
rehabilitation measures
• Other expressed need for small clinics/dispensaries to address the medical needs of the slum
dwellers. We suggest that services from HUPA can be resorted to address this very basic need as
well.
• Some others expressed a need for a Community Hall, where the slum dwellers can meet to
discuss and plan further betterments for their slum communities in a cooperative manner for the
future improvements, not only by the corporation, but also from their own collective efforts as a
community.
• Some others requested some facilities be provided for their children’s education within their
locality to facilitate and enhance their children’s education without having to travel distances.
34. Stakeholder 34 (ITDP)

• CDP should Focus how to make roads people friendly not vehicle friendly
• 37 percent trips in Pune are by walks
68 | P a g e
• Pedestarnization is necessary in old city and it should be connected with parking facilities and
telescopic penalty is charged to parked vehicle in core area
• Most of the footpath in Pune are Non-Standardized its need to be wide
• Pedestrian footpath should be activity friendly and street should be activity oriented
• Core city area / old Pune should be with minimum 4-wheeler. More emphasis should be given on
NMT and pedestrian facilities.
• In old city area, road grid should be of 300-400m and NMT / pedestrian facilities shall be
planned accordingly
• Except the GM road and FC road tree planation is not properly along the footpaths for example
Paud Road, Bani Road.
• In old city streets should be declare as free vehicle zone and proposed for cycling and pedestrian
only
• Cross feeder roads should be Identify for improvement
• Footpath should be designed 3 mtr wide
• Ramp should be given between the properties
• Plantation along the footpath is necessary to control the vehicular entry
• Multi- modal Transport system should be necessary
• River bank or River side area should be proper developed and utilize for pedestrian walks and
Facilities
• Route should be rationalized (ITDP already done the route rationalized study for PMPML).
35. Stakeholder 35 (CES)

• 14-15 percent area proposed under the roads in development plan but roads are not developed
as per the Development Plan. So for the free movement of vehicles and passenger , all DP roads
should be Developed
• As per Development Plan there is a proposal of Internal ring road which neglected and not
developed as per the Development Plan Because its Included the HCMT and rail corridors
• Road network should be developed and planned while planning the any transport system like
BRTS, Tram and other facilities.
• The Average road length of maximum roads in Pune is 24-30 mtrs
• There are easterly westerly and northerly bye pass in Pune city
• There is need of internal and outer by pass in Pune
• NMT facilities should be highlighted in CDP
• HCMT Corridor should be Implemented as per Development Plan
36. Stakeholder 36 (C.V Khand Consultants)

• Land Acquisition (LA) needs to be taken up during DPR of projects and / or at approval stage at
least. Otherwise after sanction, once fund comes, it may not be utilized due lack of proper
69 | P a g e
acquisition.
• Need to pay proper compensation (may be as per market) and LA process should be faster.
• More and more project should be implemented through PPP mode.
• Instead of elevating individual junctions, it will be better to provide elevated corridor.
• Tunnels proposed through hill (3 locations). Details available with PMC.
• There should be inner ring road connectivity for connecting radial roads. Major roads of Pune are
mainly radial type.
• PMPML needs more buses (upto2700 nos), more depots / stands etc. for their smooth and
effective operations.
• Safety awareness program (safety week and safety day) needs to be conducted by PMC (can be
one of our recommendation)
37. Stakeholder 37 (Ms.Laxmi Narayan, Swach NGO)

38. Date: May, 2012
Issues:
• Segregation is being practiced but the ultimate disposal is done with BOT method which is based
on mixed waste which does not let the segregated waste be utilized.
• Non-uniform system in terms of collecting agency that is private or public (PMC) and collection
charges of waste collection is being practiced in the city.
• For some areas waste collection is done by PMC free of cost and in some areas it is done by
private agency with some charges taken from the households and in few areas the cost is borne
by the corporators.
• Improper waste collection sites are provided.
• Segregated waste should be recycled and reused as composting etc.
• Ultimate Disposal system should not encourage mixed waste.
• Encourage local communities, NGOs, common citizens to manage decentralized compost plants
and waste processing.
• Uniformity in waste collection service should be maintained by the PMC that is collection fee
should have a system and also the services should follow a single model.
• Waste should not be left on the collection site/ transfer station for more than 2 days.
• Katraj Model could be followed throughout the city.
Project:
• Decentralized waste processing should be done.
• Provision of whole sale market for scrap should be made by PMC and the shops may be rented or
sold.
• In all the commercial areas space should be reserved for scrap shops.
• Norms and standards and regulations to be incorporated in the development control rules for
scrap shops.
• Provision of Scientifically designed waste collection sites and transfer stations should be made
within 0.5km radius of a residential/ commercial area.
• Protected smaller space available Free of cost at neighbourhood level should be provided for
dumping and sorting of waste/ scrap.
“Waste should be considered as Resource not waste.”
70 | P a g e
39. Stakeholder 38 (Mr.Rajiv kulkarni Principal- in – charge Singhagad College of Architecture)

• Promotion of TOD- transport oriented development as transport is major issue in city.
• PMC should provide separate proposals for existing city and New development and expansion
happening.
• Any project run by PMC should have separately service providing and service monitoring cell
which will enhance quality control of the project.
• Process is bigger than progress
• Auto DCR – electronic approval method is just adding to process, this does not help in fulfilling
DCR rules 100%.
• Government should act as only policing and monitoring body, implementation should hand over
to private firms.
• More systematic changes are required rather than physical development and concretization.
40. Stakeholder 39 (Meeting with Maharashtra Navnirmaan Sena elected members)

Date: 16th August, 2012
Points of discussion:
• Meeting started with explaining the process of CDP and the summary of the till date work being
carried out.
• There was also discussion about the issues and developments in the city and the potentials of the
city were also put forward.
• Then the questionnaires were distribute to the party members so that they can fill in the form
and submit it back to the party office.
• The party members assured that the forms will be duly filled and will be reverted back to the
consultant as soon as possible.
41. Stakeholder 40 (Meeting with Indian National Congress elected members)

• The different problems of the city as well as the respective wards were discussed in the meeting
with the elected members.
• The introduction about the CDP was given to the members explaining them the importance of
CDP in development of the city.
• The members were updated about the current status of work by the consultant.
• The members were then furnished with questionnaire forms so that they can provide the
consultants with their view regarding their respective wards so that these issues and problems
can be translated as projects for their respective wards.
42. Stakeholder 41 (Meeting with Bharatiya Janata Party elected members)

• An introduction was given to the party member explaining the process of CDP and the summary
71 | P a g e
of the overall work to be done in CDP Pune.

• There was discussion about the projects being included in the CDP for the development of the
city.
• Then the questionnaires were distribute to the party members so that they can fill in the form
and submit it back to the party office.
43. Stakeholder 42 (Meeting with Shivasena elected members)

Date: 23rd August, 2012
• Meeting started with explaining the process of CDP and the summary of the till date work being
carried out.
• Then the questionnaires were given to the party head so that he can distribute them among his
party elected members fill in the form and submit it back to the party office.
44. Stakeholder 43 (Meeting with Mr Rahul Jagtap, System Manager (e-Governance))

Date: 3rd September, 2012
• Discussed about integration of all the departments in PMC.
• Presence of e-Tendering discussed.
• Requirement of actual tracking of the ongoing developmental works.
• Need of a common platform for data sharing, data management, data validation and data use.
• Up-gradation of the techniques required.
• Software advancement like use of i-pad applications to track services.
• Extensive use of m-governance and its actual implementation.
• Sms based tracking of attendance and absentees as used by sanitary inspectors in solid waste
management.
• Lack of portal to evaluate the performance of government officials.
• The requirement of skilled IT work force was emphasized.
• The importance of Accounts dept, IT dept and HR dept discussed.
• Importance of SDI and GIS discussed.
45. Stakeholder 44 (Meeting with Dr Santaji Kadam, President General Practitioner's Association)
Date: 5th September, 2012
• There was discussion about the various uses of river for tourism as in cities like London or France.
• Discussion about the river bank cleaning from Khadagwasla to Yerwada bridge Bund Garden
initiative by doctors associations, PMC and NGOs.
• Since the river is passing through the city hence it holds a great importance.
• The effect of river cleaning was that there was no epidemic in Pune this year. There were only
minor cases of Malaria and Dengue.
• Due to river cleaning programmes, Slum dwellers were affected the most as there were very less
cases of malaria in the slums.
72 | P a g e
• For Bio Medical Waste incineration, plants are not structured properly. Even the government is
not putting the point properly which finally leads to non-acceptance of disposal plants by the
local residents and practitioners.
• Government medical facilities are good but due to the mind set of people and their apprehension
towards government's inferior quality, PMC is not able to get the benefits.
• Government should create awareness towards Sexually Transmitted Diseases and should also
create a stress management and counseling cell involving Physiatrists.
• Precautionary measures should be taken against Malaria, Dengue, and Chicken Guinea.
• It should be made necessary that doctor's associations should create awareness programmes.
• Government facilities should be displayed in all hospitals.
• The clinical establishment laws should be amended with proper reforms.
73 | P a g e
4 Focused Group Workshops/ Meetings for Sector Goal,

Strategies & Action Plans
4.1 Agenda
The main agenda of these workshops and meetings were to discuss the vision, goals, strategies and
action plans of different sectors. These workshops/ meetings, consolidate the views of all the
stakeholders' together in order to prepare the CDP Pune-2041. The meetings were helpful in bringing all
the stakeholders on a platform so as to formulate a single, most appropriate vision for each sector that is
covered in the CDP; to bring on ground, each stakeholder's holistic views and perspective about the city
in the future. The views of all the participating stakeholders were necessary in setting up of each sector's
goals and strategies for enhancing the quality of life of the population of Pune. Also by these meeting and
workshops, the consultant kept the stakeholders updated about the ongoing work of the preparation of
CDP Pune-2041.
4.2 List of Participants for the workshops/ Meetings

4.2.1 List of PMC officials attended the Workshops/ Meetings
List of Pune Municipal Corporation Officials the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Mr. Naresh Zurmure Additonal Commissioner (IFS)
2 Mr. V.G. Kulkarni Supd. Engr. WS Drainage PMC
3 Mr. Shrinivas Bonala Additional City Eng, Projects & BSUP Housing
4 Mr. R.T. Shinde Dy. Comm. Land & Estate
6 Dr. Jayashree Katare Deputy Director, SRA
7 Mr. Ganesh Sonune Project Officer, UNDP
8 Mr. Prashant Waghmare City Engineer
9 Mr. Promood Nirbhavne City Engineer Road
10 Mr. Suresh Jagtap JMC
11 Ms. Poonam Mehta Livelihood Development Expert For BSUP,PIU, Social Dev. Executive
(RAY), Deputy Collector
12 Mr. Relekar I.T. REG. OFFICER
13 Mr. Ambrish Galinde Octroi Dept
14 Ms. Harshida Shinde Deputy Engineer, DP Cell
15 Ms. Nalawade Savita Sunil Dy. Account Officer JNNURM
17 Mr. S.A. Gawade AMC SWM PMC
19 Mr. Vijay Dahibhate Dy. Commissioner
20 Dr. Sucheta Karande Environment Manager Indradhanushya
22 Mr. Vilas Kanade Joint Commissioner PMC
23 Ms. Ulka Kalaskar Chief Accountant
74 | P a g e
4.2.2 List of NGOs who attended the Workshops/ Meetings

List of NGOs in the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Mr. K. Sahastrabudhe RANWA NGO
2 Mr. Ashok Srinivasa PARISAR NGO AND PRAYAS NGO
3 Mr. Sujit Patvardhan PARISAR NGO
4 Prof. Vijay Paranjape Gomukh Environmental Trust For Sustainability NGO
5 Mr. Sharad Mahajan Executive Director of MASHAL NGO
6 Mr. Neim Keruwala JANWANI NGO
7 Ms. Arundhati Viswasrao
8 Mr. Harshad
9 Ms.Laxmi Narayan SWACHH NGO
10 Ms. Malati Gadgil CEO, Swach NGO
11 Ms. Sanskriti Menon Programme Director, CEE NGO
12 Mr. Avinash CEE NGO
4.2.3 List of Parastatal Agencies who attended the Workshops/ Meetings

List of Parastatal agencies in the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Mr. Arun Godbole Deputy Engineer, KCB
2 Mr. K.S. Aakode Director, TCPD
3 Ms. Nayana Gurav Bondarde Regional Officer, MTDC
4 Mr. D.A. Pardeshi PMPML
5 Mr. K. Venkat Nagareddy CEO, PCB
6 Mr. M.B. Sable Section Engineer, PCB
7 Mr. Shirodkar Deputy Engineer, PCB
4.2.4 List of Elected members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings

List of Elected Members in the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Mr. ChetanTupey Chairman City Improvement Committee
2 Mr. Sunil Gogle Prabhag No. 16 Alandi Road
4.2.5 List of Other members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings

List of other Members in the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Ar. Ravi Kadam Architect
2 Dr. Sandeep Environment Infrastructure
3 Envision Environmental Consultantancy
4 Consulting Engineering Services
5 Institute for Transportation and Development Policy
6 C.V Khand Consultants
7 Precast India Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
8 Architect, 4th Axis Design Studio
9 The Citiotel, Business Hotel
10 Paanchali Restaurant
11 Rajdhani Restaurant
12 Baal Gandharv Rastaurant
75 | P a g e
List of other Members in the Workshops/ Meetings

13 Akshaya Restaurant
14 Bamboo House Restaurant
15 Vaishaali Rastaurant
16 Visage Clinic
17 Chitranjan Hospital
18 Regent Hotel
4.2.6 List of VSPL team members who attended the Workshops/ Meetings
List of Voyants Solution Pvt. Ltd Team Members in the Workshops/ Meetings
1 Shri. S.P. Gautam Urban Planning Expert
2 Mr. H. Vaz Socio-Economic Expert
3 Mr. Dev Modi Road, Bridges & culvert Expert
4 Mr. Anand Koppu Infrastructure Expert
5 Mr. Kalyan Ghosh Traffic and Transport Expert
6 Mr. Saumyasib Mukhopadhyay Environment & Infrastructure Expert
7 Mr Ajay Sharma Financial and Urban Governance Expert
9 Mr. Vikas Singh Urban Planner
10 Mr. Chandrakanth Urban Planner
11 Mr. Kedar Nirgude Housing Planner
12 Ms. Preeti Bhujbal Urban Planner
13 Mr. Abhishek Gaurav Urban Planner
14 Mr. Tanveer Dhillon Urban Planner
4.3 The presentation by VSPL
Revising CDP - Pune
1
project water- transportati environment structural power project
development & sanitation on division & waste engineering divisio management
planning division management division n division
22th June, 2012 division division partnering vision
76 | P a g e
Presentation Structure
1 Sector Analysis and City Profile
Physical Features of the City
Demographic Profile
Socio-Economic Profile of the Study
Physical planning and Growth Management
Physical Infrastructure
Urban Poor and Slums
Social Infrastructure
Urban Environment
Heritage and Conservation
Institutional Framework and Finance

2
Presentation Structure
2 Second Workshop July 2,2012

Agenda and Proforma
3 Outcome of First Workshop and Consultation

Schedule of Expert’s Visit to Pune
Consultation Structure and Proforma
4 Meeting with City level Policy Committee July 6, 2012
Agenda and Executive Summary for Meeting
5 Revised Activity Schedule
3
Physical Features of the City

77 | P a g e
Historical background
Center of power for the Maratha Queen of Deccan and Monsoon Capital in Educational and Business center
Empire and Peshwa Empire British time
5
Geographical Location
DESCRIPTIONS
State Maharashtra
NH‐4 to Mumbai in the North
District Pune
and Bangalore in the South
Municipal Area 243.84 Sq.Km
NH‐50 to Nasik
Source : PMC, 2012
NH‐9 to Solapur.
Pune City

development & sanitation on division & waste Source : PMCdivisio
engineering management
Linkages and Connectivity
Distances from major towns and cities
SL. TOWN/ CITIES DISTANCE FROM PUNE

NO. (KM)
1 Satara 100
2 Ahmadnagar 105
3 Mumbai 163
4 Nashik 202
5 Solapur 243
6 Bangalore 835
7 Delhi 1417
NH‐4 to Mumbai in the North and Bangalore in the South
NH‐50 to Nasik
NH‐9 to Solapur. Source : PMC

78 | P a g e
Climate
Mean Temperature recorded for Pune Mean Rainfall recorded for Pune
40 38 180
35 37 163
35 155
160
Temperature in Deree Celsius
32 32 31
30 29 30 138
28 27 29
30 30 140 129
29
Precipitation in mm
27
25 26 25 25 25 25 120
22 22
20 20 22 23 22 20 100
22 21
20
15 19 80 68
16
14
10 12 60
11 12 40
5 40 28
0 20 11
0 3 2 4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0
Months Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Maximum Minimum Mean Precipitation
Average temperatures ranging between 20 ° to 30 The city receives an annual rainfall of 722
°C. Source : IMD -Pune
mm (28.4 inches) Source : IMD -Pune

Climate
Over the period of 20 years, there is a fluctuation in temperature In last 20 years, there Is a drastic changes in annual
In last four years, more or less constant temperature. rainfall.
Source : IMD -Pune Recently , there is an improvement in rainfall. Source : IMD -Pune

Study Area – Pune Municipal Corporation Area
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
Aundh Dholepatil Road
Ghole Road Nagar road
Kothrud Sangamwadi
WarjeKarve Road
ZONE 4
ZONE 3
Bibwevadi
Bhavani Peth
Dhankawdi
Kasba-Vishram
Hadapsar
Sahakar Nagar
Kondwa (Proposed)
Tilak Road
Source PMC

79 | P a g e
Demographic & Socio-Economic Profile of the

project
City water- transportati environment structural power project
Demographic Profile
Population Growth Population – Age Group 0-6
Indicators POPULATION (%)
Population Growth Rate
60% 35,00,000 Population Total (Age Group 0-6) 3,24,572 10% of total population
50.08%
50% 30,00,000
41.09%
Male population 171,152 52.73%
40.56%
40% 25,00,000
40.56% Female Population 153,420 47.27%
30% 20,00,000
24.23% Sex Ratio for 0-6 age group 896
20% 15,00,000
22.73%
-
10% 10,00,000 Literacy Rate
0% 5,00,000
Gender Ratio (Total Population)
960 945 94% 91% 92%
926 90%
-10% 0 940 919 921
920 89%
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 900 899 899 85%
Year 900 84% 86% 86%
Population Avg. Annual Growth Rate (%) 873 85%
880
860 79%
80%
Population Density 840 74%
820
DENSITY (PERSONS PER India Maharastra Pune PMC 69%
YEAR AREA (SQ.KM) District India Maharastra Pune District PMC
SQ.KM)
Urban area Urban Area
1951 125.00 3907 2001 2011
2001 Literacy rate 2011 Literacy rate
1961 125.00 4854
1971 138.76 6170
Pune's population has increased by 5 to 6 times in the last fifty years and the increase
1981 146.00 8242
has been very rapid from 1981. Growth rate of population is over 3% per annum on an average
1991 146.00 11585
2001 243.84 10410 Pune city has the highest literacy rate as compared to District, State and National Levels.
2011 project 243.84 water- 12777 environment structural power project Source Census of
transportati
development & sanitation on division & waste engineering divisio management India

Particulars Total Workers Male Workers Female Workers WPR (%)
Urban 2001 2001 2001 2001
India 9,22,78,654 7,61,75,323 1,61,03,331 32.25
Maharashtra 68,84,468 -- -- --
Pune District 14,38,597 11,51,812 2,86,785 34.25
PMC 8,65,150 6,77,814 1,87,336 34.08
Sl.No. Occupation Category Population % of total working population

Main Workers 811,291 93.77%
1 Cultivators 4,717 0.58%
4 Other 775,615 95.60%
Marginal Workers 53,859 6.23%
1 Cultivators 455 0.84%
4 Other 45,307 84.12%
Total Working Population (Main +
865,150 34.08%
Marginal) project water- environment structural power project Source Census of
transportati
Non Workers planning
1,673,323
division
65.92%
management division n division
80 | P a g e

Work participation ( %) Gender -wise Work Participation
38%
8,11,291 62%
32%
18,00,000
16,73,323 16,00,000 16,73,323
66%
53,859
14,00,000 21%
2%
12,00,000
Population ( No's)
79%
M ale
10,00,000
Main worker Marginal worker Non worker
8,00,000 Female
8,11,291
39%
6,00,000 M ain worker
The non workers share is 66% which shows 61%
4,00,000 M arginal worker
high dependency ratio.
2,00,000
Non worker
53,859
0
Main worker Marginal worker Non worker
The proportion of working female is very less.
project water- environment structural power project Source Census of

transportati
Occupational Classification ( %)
Gender - wise Occupational classification
38%
8,20,922 62%
32% 16,73,323
66% 18,00,000
16,73,323
16,00,000
31,290 20%
1% 12,938 14,00,000
80% Primary
1%
Population ( No's)
12,00,000 Secondary
Primary Secondary Tertiary Non workers Tertiary
10,00,000
8,20,922 Non workers
8,00,000 48%
53%
6,00,000 Male
32 % of the total population contribute to 47% 52% Female
4,00,000
tertiary sector (90% of total workers)
2,00,000
12,938 31,290
-
Primary Secondary Tertiary Non workers
Females are mostly engaged in agricultural
and household industries.
transportati
The main drivers of the economy in Pune are:

• Education centre -- The Oxford of East
• Automobile and automobile parts-- The Detroit of India
• Established and huge potential to develop as IT hub of India
• Agro & food processing and bio-technology industries.
Cities Education Center Automobile Industries It Industries Agro & food processing and bio-
technology industries
Number s Ranking Number s Ranking Number s Ranking Number s Ranking
Ahmadabad
Bangalore
Delhi
Mumbai
Pune
Chennai
Gurgaon
81 | P a g e
Industry
Statistical picture of industrial growth in Pune
Year No of Industrial Units Investment (Crore)
1972 1473 129.00
1978 2515 406.84
1985 4529 1592.65
1990 6766 3203.84
 Recent industrial growth in a radius of 60-65 kms from the main city.
 Pune has emerged as one of the top investment destinations. It is a hub of automotive industry as well as IT industry.
 Various large and small units operating sectors are:
Auto components, Engineering, IT/ITeS, BPO, Pharmaceuticals and Food processing.
 Major Industrial hubs: Hadapsar, Hinjewadi, Chakan, Talegaon. Ranjangoan, Kharadi.
Industrial Area Near project water- transportati environment Area Near
Industrial structural power project Source MIDC
development & sanitation & waste engineering divisio Cyber City Maggarpatta
management
Hadpsar on division Hadpsar
18
Commercial Establishment
Employment Number Number of Employees
category Employees %
Shops 11718 28866 12.4%
commercial 22925 193557 83.4%
Hotels 3967 9237 4.0%
Theatres 30 313 0.1%
Total 38640 231973 100.0%
Large proportion of city workers population engaged in Trade

and commerce.
The city serves as regional whole sale market for food grain
 Pune serves as distribution centre for agriculture implements, fertilizers, drugs, cement, petroleum products, forest produce
such as timber and textile products.
project water- environment Area Near
structural power project Source ESR – 2005, PMC
Industrial Area Near transportati Industrial
development & sanitation & waste engineering divisio Cyber City Maggarpatta
management
Hadpsar on division Hadpsar
82 | P a g e
Factors Influencing Population Projection

Population Projection
Factors influencing Pune’s Population Growth
•Pune International Airport (Northeast Pune )
•Delhi - Mumbai Infrastructure Corridor (Northwest Pune)
•Mumbai –Pune Expressway;
•Information Technology (IT) townships of Magarpatta city, Amonora in Hadapsar (West Pune) and Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park in
Hingewadi (East Pune);
•Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS)
•Development of real estate’s township Megapolis and Blue ridge in Hingewadi.

Population Projections
Linear Arithmetic Incremental Geometric

Census Exponential Method Average of D & E
Year Trend Progression Increase Progression
Population ALT- I ALT- II
Method Method Method Method
Decadal Decadal
(A) (B) (C ) (D) (E) (D+E)/2
growth growth
1951 4,88,419
1961 6,06,777 24.23%
1971 8,56,105 41.09%
1981 12,03,363 40.56%
1991 16,91,430 40.56%
2001 25,38,473 50.08%
2011 31,15,431 22.73%
2021 32,97,107 35,53,266 36,44,986 42,53,870 44,87,573 44.04% 43,70,721 40.29%
2031 37,46,384 39,91,102 41,74,542 58,08,316 62,11,404 38.41% 60,09,860 37.50%
2041 41,95,661
project
44,28,937
water-
47,04,097
environment
79,30,788
structural
85,97,417
power
38.41%
project
82,64,102
Source 37.51%
Census of
transportati
Population Projections
1,00,00,000
90,00,000
85,97,417
80,00,000
Population (No's)
70,00,000 82,64,102
62,11,404
60,00,000
60,09,860
50,00,000 44,87,573
40,00,000 43,70,721
3115431
30,00,000 2538473
1691430
20,00,000 1203363
856105
10,00,000 488419 606777
0
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041
Year
Census Population Linear Trend Method Arithmetic Progression Method Incremental Increase Method
Exponential Method Geometric Progression Method Average of D & E Expon. (Census Population)

transportati
83 | P a g e
Urban Growth Management, Housing, Slums & Urban

Environment

22 June, 2012 division division partnering vision
Urban Growth Management
project water- environment structural power project Source CSP -2011, PMC
transportati
Urban Growth Management

Existing Land Use Pattern
25
84 | P a g e
Housing Scenario
Household Size Housing Condition
Dilapidated
2%  2% of the houses are dilapidated most
of them are found in slum area.
Livable
29%
Semi Temporary
Parmanent 2%
Good 10%
69%
Permanent
Source: Census of India, 2001 88%
 HH size of PMC is 4.57 shows the presence of  12% of the houses are not made of
nuclear family. permanent material.
65% of the population below 35 water-
project
development &
years.
sanitation
transportati environment
& waste
structural
engineering
power
divisio
project
management
Source: Census of India, 2001
on division
Urban Environment Baseline
Future Growth Direction
The growth direction of PMC is towards Hingewadi, PCMC and

Hadapsar.
The growth are triggered mainly by IT industry in Hingewadi,

automobile industry in PCMC and BPO, IT and manufacturing industry
in Hadapsar.
The growth corridors mainly pass through North, West and East
direction. Southern side of PMC contains hilly area where growth is
not favorable. Airport location in Northeast made the restriction of
growth due to airport funnel area.
27
Status of Physical Infrastructure

85 | P a g e
Water Supply / Overview

Source Name
Water Bodies Rivers
Dams Khadakwasla, Panset,
Warasgaon & Temghar
Lakes Pashan ( Man Made) Katraj
lake (Natural)
Ground water 399 dug wells & 4820 bore
wells.
Water Sources Dam Storage Capacity TMC
Panshet 10.42
Varasgaon 12.82
Temghar 3.77
Khadakwasla 1.97
TOTAL 28.98
Water Coverage Number of Distribution Zones 48
Coverage of water supply 94.19

connections in percentage
Per capita average water 194 LPCD
supply
Water losses Transmission and distribution 25percent
losses Source : Pune, City sanitation Plan, 2012 29
Water Supply / Service Level Bench Marking
Source : Pune, City sanitation Plan, 2012 30

Water Supply / Existing Situational analysis
Per Capita Water Supply ( Zone Wise) Continuity of Water Supply
Source : Pune, City sanitation Plan, 2012
31
86 | P a g e
Water Supply / Major Issues

1 Equitable Water Supply
The water supply in the core city area is for about 18 to 24 hours a day while
in the peripheral areas especially in north east part of Pune city it is
between 4 and 8 hours and per capita water supply is also vary from 138 to
260 LPCD.
2
System losses and unaccounted for water
It is estimated that transmission and distribution losses account for 25
percent of the total supply due to old and defunct water supply network;
resulting water leakage and reduced the pressure.
3 Coverage of Metered Connection

The coverage of metered connections is only 29 percent. This has an
adverse implication of low revenue collection for the water supply
department.
High number of unmetered water connections has further led to non-
judicious use of water.
32
Review of Previous CDP
Sector/ Component Estimated Approved Balance Additional Remarks Balance

Investment under Project Cost DPRs DPR to be
JNNURM prepared Prepared
Water Supply 488.50 - 488.50 - 488.50
1 Source Devpmt/ Intake 165.50 165.50
augmentation
2 Pipeline - new 46.26 46.26
4 Elevated Service 61.18 61.18
Reservoirs
5 Treatment Facilities 166.56 166.56
6 System Refurbishment/ 49.00 49.00
Replacement
The priority capital investment was proposed for refurbishment and augmentation of the distribution network, source
development, storage capacity and provision of treatment facilities. In previous CDP no project of water supply got sanctioned
under JnNURM 33
Strategies and goals Proposed in previous CDP
Key Issues In previous CDP Goal for Development in previous CDP  Current Status /Issues
 It is estimated that about 30 per cent of water is lost in distribution,  Adequacy, reliability and  Water losses account for 25-30 percent
thus reducing the net per capita supply to 182 LPCD. accessibility to core municipal
 Water supply is not equitable
services for all citizens with PMC
 Equitable distribution is an issue that has to be addressed by distributed
as the prime service provider
refurbishing the old distribution network and covering the newly
 70 percent cost recovery in water supply is
added areas.
Achieved
 While the water supply levels are reasonably good, the system
 Extend of Metering connection is still very
coverage in terms of house service connections is poor at just 21 per
less 29 percent
cent of total property tax assessments. PMC should move towards
providing 100 per cent house service connections and metered
supply to all houses.
34
87 | P a g e
Future Projects and Deman'

On going Water Supply Project Project in Pipe Line
 Equitable water supply scheme for the city.  Construction of 500 mld capacity at parvati water works.
 Laying closed conduit of 2500 mm dia from khadakwasla dam to cantonment  Construction of 250 mld capacity at vadgaon water works.
water works enroute parvati water works to avoid uptake from open canal.
 Implementation of equitable water supply scheme.
 Construction of 200 mld water treatment plant at warje water works.
 Construction of jackwell on th upstream of khadakwasla dam.
 Laying closed conduit of 1600 mm dia from khadakwasla dam to warje water Source: Water Supply and Sewerage Department, 2012
works. water demand has been calculated on the basis of previous CDP 2006 at the
following rates;
Future water Demand and Gap
 Net Domestic Supply at consumer’s end = 140 LPCD
Year Projected Projected Total Water
 Provision for Non-Domestic supply = 30 LPCD
population population Population Requirement
PMC Pune (MLD )  Losses in the system = 55 LPCD
Cantonment  Total gross Supply = 225 LPCD
2011 3,115,431 79,965 3,195,396 719.0
2021 4,487,573 87,962 4,575,535 1029.5  Existing water requirement =719 MLD
2031 6,211,404 95,959 6,307,363 1419.2  Net water supply = 732 MLD, so there is no gap in case of water supply
2041 8,597,417 103,956 8,701,373 1957.8
 Future Requirement for the year of 2041= 1957 MLD
35
SWOT , Analysis and Strategies'
Strengths Weaknesses
 Availability of reliable water sources  Water losses 25-30 percent Strategies for Development
 Good quality of water  Less coverage of metered connection (29 percent)
 Equitable distribution of water supply in all areas.
 Good coverage of Piped water supply  Water supply is not equitable
 Good cost recovery  Ensuring 24X7 pressurized water supply in all areas.
 100 percent coverage of metered connection.

 Opportunities  Threats  Reduction in losses from the distribution network.
 100 percent metering will lead to 100  Undulating topography resulting in the problem
percent collection of water taxes there by of low water pressure  Water conservation awareness program.
increasing the revenue income of  NRW ( Non-Revenue water)
 100 percent Recovery of water supply on fixed tariff
Municipal Corporation.  Lack of awareness regarding water conservation
Basis .
 Improvements to water supply and among the citizens
pressure are required in some areas of  Energy efficiency plan for reducing the electricity
the City, predominately the outer areas, charges.
specially the north eastern areas.
Opportunity to avail funding through the
JnNURM.
 Opportunity of availing 24X7 water
36
supply should be tapped under JnNURMwater-
project environment structural power project
transportati
Water Supply
Warje WTP WADGAON WTP

37
88 | P a g e
Sewerage and Sanitation / Overview
Total Sewage 744 MLD Detail of Sewage Generation

generation
Aspect Quantity (MLD)
Sewer Network 97.6 percent
Total water supply 1,123
Coverage
Losses in water supply + 20 337
Number of sewerage 9 In Nos
Net water supply 786
Waste water disposal treatment plants and
Sewage generation 629
Pumping Station
approximately
Collection efficiency 71 percent
Other sewage generated 115
of sewerage network
Total sewage generation 744
Coverage of toilets 97.36 Percent
Source : CSP,2012
Percentage of 7 percent
recycle and reuse
water
Number of 466
Community toilets
Number of Pay and 770
use toilets
Source : CSP,2012
38

17 Sewerage Districts
Sewage districts and their corresponding

treatment facilities were identified
A total of 17 such Sewage districts have been

identified
Source : Water Supply and Sewerage Department , PMC 2012

39

Sewage Treatment Plant and Method of Treatment Location of Sewage Treatment Plants
SN Name Capacity in Method of Treatment
MLD
1 Bhairoba 130 Activated sludge process
30 MLD (SBR) 18 MLD (EAP)
2 Erandwane 50 Modified activated sludge
process 40 MLD
3 Tanajiwadi 17 Biotech with extended 17 MLD (Bio-Tower (SBR)
& Ext. Aeration) 130 MLD
aeration (ASP)
115 MLD (ASP) 45 MLD
4 Bopadi 18 Extend aeration process 90 MLD (ASP) (SBR)
5 Naidu 90 Activated sludge process
50 MLD (ASP)
6 Mundwa 45 Sequential batch reactor
process
7 Vitthalwadi 32 Activated sludge process
32 MLD (ASP)
8 Naidu 115 Activated sludge process
9 Baner 30 Sequential batch reactor
process
10 Kothurd 50 Activated sludge process
Total 567
Source : Water Supply and Sewerage Department
40 , PMC 2012
89 | P a g e
MUNDHWA STP : 45 mld

PROCESS : Sequential Batch Reactor.
STATUS : Commissioned in March 2009
VITHHALWADI STP : 32 MLD

PROCESS : Extended Aeration
Process.
STATUS : Commissioned in March 2009
41
Service Level Bench Marking
Source : CSP,2012
42
Sewerage / Major Issues
 As per analysis and observations, 97% of the developed area has access to sewerage network however; the collection efficiency of
sewerage network is approximately 73% which further leads to polluting the environment.
 Almost 29% of the total sewage generated is released into the rivers untreated which leads to high levels of water pollution leading to
prevalence of water-borne diseases.
 Currently the percentage of recycled and reused water is only 6 percent
 Revenue collection efficiency of PMC is only 68 percent
 70 percent cost recovery against the standard of 100 percent
43
90 | P a g e

 Key Issues In previous CDP  Goal for Development in previous CDP  Current Status /Issues
 Though the current coverage in terms of road length is  Adequacy, reliability and accessibility to core  Achieved 97 percent coverage of Sewerage
54 per cent, it is observed that 90 per cent of the municipal services for all citizens with PMC as the network having the total network length of
developed area has access to Under Ground covering prime service provider 1260 km ( 70 percent coverage in term of
about 80 per cent of the population. But this gap road length)
needs to be covered as and when development takes
 Achieved 73 percent collection efficiency
place in the added areas.
of sewerage
 Almost one-third of the total sewerage generated
 Achieved approximately 71 percent
remains untreated and is disposed-off into the Mula-
adequacy in sewage treatment remaining 29
Mutha River. Thus the river water gets polluted and
percent untreated sewage still disposed –off
this leads to water-borne diseases.
in to Mula Mutha river
 Though at the current level of water losses, the
 6 percent waste water is only recycled or
shortage in sewerage treatment capacity is only 239
reused
MLD, assuming PMC would be able to minimise losses
at 15 per cent of supply, the gap would be only 143
44
MLD. project water- transportati environment structural power project
Sewerage and Sanitation Previous CDP Review
Sector/ Component Estimated Approved Balance Project Additional DPRs Remarks Balance
Investment under Cost prepared DPR to be
(Crore Rs) JNNURM (Crore Rs) (Crore Rs) Prepared
(Crore Rs) (Crore Rs)
Sewerage & 803.90 86.13 717.77 232.30 485.47
Sanitation
1 Sewer Network 376.28 376.28
2 STP & PS 388.84 86.13 302.71 232.30 Submitted
to JNNURM
3 Public 38.78 38.78
Conveniences
45
Sewerage and Sanitation Sanctioned Project Under JnNURM
Sl. Location Capacity Sanctioned Cost Current Status

(MLD) (Crores Rs)
Sewage Treatment Plants
1. Baner 30 9.84 COMPLETED
2. Mundhwa 45 13.87 COMPLETED
3. Kharadi 40 12.58 COMPLETED
4. Naidu 115 23 COMPLETED
5. Vittalwadi 32 10.67 COMPLETED
Pumping Stations and Rising main
6. Kasba Rising Main (1575 RM) 5.55 COMPLETED
7. Kasba P. Station 112 2.45 COMPLETED
8. Topkhana R. Main (2250 RM) 4.95 COMPLETED
9. Topkhana P. Station 92 3.25 COMPLETED

Sub-Total B 204 16.19 COMPLETED
GRAND TOTAL 86.13

46
91 | P a g e
Projects
On going Water Supply Project Existing STP Proposed STP’s Total
Sewage District Capacity in Process
 Collection system in Balewadi area ( 43Km) Process 2024 Total
MLD
 Trunk mains & Conveyance mains (12Nos, 46.03Km)
 STP’s for 100% treatment of sewage generated by city up to year SD1- Matsy Bij Kendra 00 00 08 08
MBR
2044 SD2- Mundhawa SBR 45 SBR 45 90
 (Financial provision for 2024) – 10 STP’s, 383MLD
 Up-gradation of 2 Intermediate Pumping stations SD3- Bhairoba ASP+Ar. Dig. 130 SBR+Power 70 200
 Capacity Building 90
SD4- Naidu ASP (To be 125 125
SBR+Power
Future Generation 2041, Demand and Gap dismantled)
SD4- Naidu ASP 115 00 00 115
Year Projected Projected Total Water Sewage SD5- Vithalwadi ASP 32 00 00 32
population population Population Requir Generation SD6- Vadgaon 00 00 ASP+Power 20 20
Cantonment ement (MLD) SD7- Warje 00 00 EA 25 25
SD8- Kothrud ASP 50 00 00 50
(MLD)
Bio-
2011 3,115,431 79,965 3,195,396 719.0 575.2 SD9- Tanajiwadi
Tower+EAP
17 EA 19 36
2021 4,487,573 87,962 4,575,535 1029.5 823.6 SD10- Bopodi EAP 18 SBR 21 39
2031 6,211,404 95,959 6,307,363 1419.2 1,135.3 SD11- Baner SBR 30 00 00 30
2041 8,597,417 103,956 8,701,373 1957.8 1,566.2 SD14 – Mental Hospital 00 00 ASP+Power 36 36
SD15- Kharadi SBR 40 SBR 14 54
 Existing Sewage Generation = 575  Gap = 48 MLD
Total 567 383 860
MLD  Future Requirement = 47
 Treatment Capacity= 527project
MLD water-
1566+48MLdtransportati
= 1644 MLD environment structural power project
SWOT , Analysis and Strategies'
Strengths Weaknesses Strategies for Development

 Good coverage of sewerage network  29 percent of sewage remains  Maintain high quality treatment at cost-effective rate
(97 percent) untreated  Increase the collection efficiency of sewerage
 Favorable natural slope  Lack of recycling and reuse of waste  Increase the adequacy of waste water treatment
 quality of sewage treatment 100 water  Increase the capacity of recycling and reuse for industrial cooling ,
percent agricultural activities and other secondary purposes
 99 percent complaint redressal  Maximize wastewater revenue collection

Opportunities Threats  Quick Response to customer complains
 Reuse of treated waste water for  untreated sewage mixed in river Mula
 Improve interdepartmental coordination of transportation & utility
secondary purposes and Mutha which are resulting in
projects (water, wastewater, storm water, gas, electric, telephone,
 Web based Grievance redressal water pollution
roadways, pathways, railroads, etc.).
system.
48

Waste Generation
 Ranging from 1,300 to 1,400 MT per day,

 400-450 grams per capita per day (based on 2011 census)
Source of Generation
SN Source of Generation Quantity (MT) % of total

1 HH/ Domestic 950 69.1
2 Street sweeping & drain cleaning 140 10.2
3 Hotels & Restaurants 150 10.9

Waste Segregation
4 Market/ commercial area 50 3.6  Around 50% of waste is segregated
5 Hospital, Clinics - 0.0 at source varying from 20% to 65%
6 Construction / demolition Waste 75 5.5 among wards.
7 Industrial Waste (non-hazardous) - 0.0  About 42% of the properties
8 Fruit, vegetable, fish, meat market 7.5 0.5 practice segregation.
waste
 Segregation is also practiced at
9 Bio-medical waste 1.8 0.1
community bins and public bins
TOTAL 1,374.3 100.0
development & sanitation on division
Source: CSP,2012
& waste engineering divisio management
92 | P a g e

Waste Collection Transportation of Waste
SN Type of Vehicle Number Age(Yr.) No. of Shifts
 Door-to-door collection
1 BRC 60 6.5 2
 Solid Waste (Collection and Handling) Cooperative 2 Compactor 32 8 1
(SWaCH), a PMC initiative is a registered society of rag 3 Mini Compactor 10 4 1
pickers 4 Dumper Placer 83 9 2
5 Ghanta Truck 90 7.5 1
 1963 members are involved in door-to-door collection
6 Hotel Truck 23 8 2
 Collection of waste is 52.7% Source: CSP,2012
 Private door-to-door collection Processing & Disposal of Waste
 Waste collection system practiced by some societies and
 Scientific Landfill Disposal of inert waste
residential complexes
 M/s Hanjer Biotech constructed scientific landfill - currently
 Waste is segregated either at source or by the locally hired
the plant is working with a full capacity of 1000 TPD
sweepers
 Composting of organic waste
 Finally the segregated waste is collected by Ghanta Trucks
 3 composting plants (2 commissioned, 3rd under progress) -
 Waste collection through Ghanta Trucks & Hotel Trucks
capacity of 100 TPD each
 90 Ghanta Trucks (for door-to-door collection)  Construction of a 700 TPD
 Bio gas plant
 23 Hotel Trucks (for collection of waste from 1349 hotels) capacity waste to energy plant
 12 bio gas plants.
under progress
project water-
 2 Mechanical
environment structural
compost
power
plantsproject
transportati
51
Solid Waste Management / Service Level Bench Marking
52
93 | P a g e
Key Issues In previous CDP Goal for Development in previous CDP Current Status /Issues / Achievements
 Integration of solid waste collection by covering all  Adequacy, reliability and accessibility to core  Door to Door Collection 50 percent only
wards through door-to-door collection municipal services for all citizens with PMC as the
 Collection efficiency 100 percent
 As rag pickers are collecting and segregating waste, it prime service provider
 No open Dumping
will be beneficial if PMC develops the wholesale scrap  Source segregation and door-to-door collection,
market and explores provision for facilities in each effective transportation and environmentally safe  100 percent scientific disposal since 2010
ward for waste segregation. disposal  Nagar Ratna Puraskar under JNNURM
 Promotion of civic education for city sanitation and cleanliness
 Successful pilot project- “Nirmal Katraj,

Dekhne Katraj” (Zero garbage Ward)
 In process of acquiring ISO certificate for

primary and secondary collection
53

Review of Previous CDP Major Issues
Sector/ Component Estimated Approved Balance Balance DPR to
Investment under Project Cost be Prepared
(crores Rs) JNNURM (crores Rs) (crore Rs) Door-to-door collection of waste is only 52.7%
SWM 98.78 - 98.78 98.78
1 Vehicles, Hand Carts, etc. 18.50 Segregation of waste at source is only 50%
2 Disposal Site 17.29
3 Land Fill Infrastructure 56.49
Wrong practice of disposing waste
4 Composting Plant 6.49
into storm water drains
Source: Pune CDP 2006-07 & PMC

Future Generation Demand and Strategies
Year Projected Projected Total Solid waste

Strategies for Development
population population Population Generation
of TPD  100% door to door collection of segregated
Cantonment waste
2011 3115431 79965 3195396 1598  100 % segregation at Source
2021 4487573 87962 4575535 2288  Volume reduction at primary collection site
2031 6211404 95959 6307363 3154
 Develop independent processing facility for
2041 8597417 103956 8701373 4351
e-waste
Pune Solid waste generation is calculated on the basis 500 Gram per capita  Awareness generation for reduction,
per day as per CPHEOO & UDPFI Guidelines. Year-wise generation of recycling and reuse of waste
Municipal Waste is tabulated below.  Provide incentives for recycling.
 Identification and sanctioning of land for
Scientific landfill and garbage processing
to cater to future needs
55
94 | P a g e
SWOT , Analysis
Strengths Weakness
100% collection and processing of Solid Waste Low segregation at source
Automated and closed vehicles for transportation Partial door to door collection
PPP approach in waste collection at source Inadequate Staff.
Scientific disposal of inert waste Attitudinal and habitual practice of littering, dumping of waste on streets,
Strong public grievance redressal system open places, etc
Waste to Energy plant, compost plants and bio gas plants to cater to future Land identification and acquisition for future scientific landfill
needs
ISO certification for zero garbage pilot project
Opportunities Threats
Willingness of CBO’s, NGOs to contribute to the system. Load on the SWM collection system and rise in expenditure
Awareness generation Burden on cleaning of streets
Recycling of waste. Environment and health hazard
Waste to energy options Enormous e-waste anticipated with in next few years.
Capping of Garbage site
Facility for E Waste processing on BOT/ PPP model
Designing legal framework for compulsory segregation at source and disposal
of construction waste
56
Drainage
Drainage Channels & Coverage
 The city of Pune is divided into 23 basins/watersheds. Each basin comprises of network of natural drains discharging storm
water into Mutha and Mula rivers.
 The topography of the city is supportive to the natural drainage system up to the extent that even after the presence of 31
water logging spots the water drains out within 1 or 2 hours.
 There are a total of 234 nallahs with total length of 262,114 m.
 Four rivers flow through the city with a total length of 53.92 km.
 The total length of rain water drain is 20,085 m.
 The total length of road side drains is 150 km.
 As per Service Level Benchmarking, the existing network coverage of storm water drainage is only 55%.

Drainage
Review of Previous CDP
Sector/ Component Estimated Investment Approved under Balance Project Cost Additional DPRs Remarks Balance DPR to be
(crores Rs) JNNURM (crores Rs) prepared Prepared
(crores Rs) (crores Rs) (crores Rs)
SWM 715.14 399.67 315.47 495.00 DPR submitted to -
MMRDA
1 De-silting & Strengthening of Primary Drains 2.50
2 Upgradation (from pucca open to pucca closed drain) 66.82
3 New pucca open drains 132.54
4 New pucca closed drains 513.28
Source: Pune CDP 2006-07 & PMC
Major Issues On Going Projects
 Present drainage system cannot sustain the Under JNNURM funding, out of 23 basins, 4 basins
changing monsoon pattern i.e. heavy rains in works are under progress. The major works done
short period. include:
 Nallah channelization
 Low network coverage (55%) of storm water
drainage.  Construction of compound wall with fencing
along nallah bank
 There is a wrong practice of disposal of waste by
citizens into drains leading to choking of some of  The above mentioned project covers works on
the drains. about 16km nallah length on 6 major nallahs in
project water- the city
transportati environment structural power project
95 | P a g e
Drainage Service Level Bench Marking / SWOT
SN Performance Expected Status (%) Current Status Strategies for Development

Indicator (%)
1 Coverage 100 55  Basin development for all 23 drainage
2 Incidence of 0 52 basins
water logging
 Construction , Remodeling and
Source: CSP,2012
rehabilitation of storm water drains and
Strength Weakness
 The topography of the city is  The coverage of network is very road side drains
supportive to the natural flow of less being only 55%  De-Silting
rain water  The present system cannot sustain
 100 percent coverage of drainage system
heavy rains in short period.
Opportunity Threat
 Promoting rain water harvesting  Flooding and Water logging
 Developing 23 basins for effective
SWD
59
Total road network 1,922 Km (Road Department, 2012)

Municipal Roads 1872 Km
Other Roads 50 KM
Vehicular growth 10 Percent increase annually
Public transport PMPML Buses , Auto
system
No. of Buses 1418+327 Hired (PMPML , 2012)
Type and Length of Road
SN Type of Road Length of road (km) Percentage (%)
A. Municipal Roads
1. Concrete 57 3
2. Tar roads 1,330 71
3. W.B.M 295 16
4. Gravel and earthen 190 10
Total Length of Road 1,872
B. Other Roads (National Highway, State 50
60
Highway, P.W.D roads)
Total development & sanitation 1,922 & waste engineering divisio management
on division
Type of Roads
(Source: Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Pune City)
61
96 | P a g e
Major Traffic congestions are observed in areas of

Jahangir hospital Chowk,
Rasta Peth,
Junna Bazaar Chowk,
Fatima Nagar,
Swargate Signal,
Mahatma Chowk.
High concentration of commercial and other

activities the most congested roads in the core
city are
Source: Regional Transport Office Pune, 2012 • Laxmi Road,
• J.N.Road,
The total number of vehicles on Pune roads has increased with
• Tilak Road,
almost 10% annual growth
• Shivaji Road,
• Thorle Bajirao Road and Jangli Maharaj
Two-wheelers are the major mode of transport in the city
Fringe areas
constituting more than 70% of the motorized vehicles
• Ambedkar Road and Karve Road 62
63
Public Transport Public Transport Characteristics

S. Year Fleet Buses on No.of Total Average Avg. age of fleet
Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. (PMPML) is the service
N Size road Routes Route Daily
provider of the public transport system of Pune.
o PMPML + length Passengers
. Hire
Sl. Type of Buses / Vehicle Number of Vehicle 1 2007-08 631.14 768+165 283 18.4 807511 6
N 2 2008-09 631.14 817+258 304 17.5 971250 6
1 Leyland 727 ( Including 10 Volvo Buses) 3 2009-10 631.14 949+333 323 17.6 1172424 5
2 Tata 691 ( Including 10 Star Buses) 4 2010-11 631.14 916+308 334 17.9 1236176 7
Total 1418 Source: PMPML Pune, 2012
Euro Norms
1 Euro 1 Diesel 201 Bus Terminals in Pune City
2 Euro 2 Diesel 352 • Swargate (Inter City )
3 Euro 3 Diesel 495
• N.T Wadi (shiva ji Nagar) Depot
4 Euro 3 CNG 85
• Kothurd Depot
5 Euro 4 CNG 285
• Katraj Depot
Total 1418
Hire Buses
• Hadapasar Depot
1 LeyLand 114 • M. Yard Depot
2 Tata 213 • Pune Station Bus Terminal (Intercity)
Source: PMPML Pune, 2012
Total 327 • Mahatma Gandhi Bus Terminal
64
97 | P a g e
Traffic and Transportation / Major Issues
 Inadequate capacity of roads and heterogeneous traffic has increased congestion leading to low operating speeds, delays and
environmental pollution.
 Inadequacy of public transport for over a decade has led to emergence of auto‐rickshaws as a public transport mode. Increase
in personalized vehicles has also been observed.
 Haphazard vehicular movement due to poor driving sense of drivers, insufficient parking facilities and inadequate
enforcement has compounded traffic problems.
 The margins of major roads and the footpaths are encroached upon in several sections for a variety of purposes including
informal activities.
 There is an absence of a safe and comprehensive system of pathways exposing pedestrians to risks. It also creates
pedestrian-vehicular conflict zones in almost all stretches of arterial and sub-arterial roads.
65
- 66 -
On-Street Parking along Commercial Area Traffic Jams Near Dagdu Seth Mandir Traffic Jams Near Laxmi road Markey

22th June, 2012Parking Area
division division partnering vision
Key Issues In previous CDP Goal for Development in previous CDP Current Status /Issues / Achievements
• Absence of functional hierarchy of road network results in • Road widening, dedicated bus lanes, cycle tracks and • In old areas and the villages with in the Municipal
inter-mixing of local and regional traffic. improvement of the public transport system in the short run;
exploring the possibility of BRTS and MRTS in the long run boundary the roads are narrow and due to non-
• Narrow roads in the central and core areas of the city with cooperation from the residence road widening is
restricted capacity add to congestion problems.
not possible
• Inadequate grade separation leads to travel delays and
threatens road safety. • High Vehicular Growth
• Poor road surface quality and absence of appropriate safety • From the previous CDP potential projects Like
and visibility enhancement parameters like signage, Improvement in road and transportation has come
markings, channel islands, street name boards and other
street furniture constitute an important problem. up but due to lack of feeder transportation in the
inner areas optimum utilization of these services
• Only 40% of the roads have footpaths and most of the
existing ones are encroached upon by informal activities and have not taken place
street hawkers.
• People’s preference is own Vehicles specially two
• There is an absence of access control measures and other wheeler
such traffic management measures on the arterial roads.
• Lack of pedestrian Facilities
• The public transport system is inadequate.
• The problem of lack of civic sense towards traffic and poor

travel behavior is compounded by the lack of coordination
among agencies involved in planning and providing for
traffic and transportation.
67
98 | P a g e
Traffic and Transportation / Review of Previous CDP
Sector/ Component Estimated Approved under Balance Project Additional DPRs Remarks Balance DPR
Investment JNNURM Cost prepared to be
(crores Rs) (crores Rs) (crores Rs) (crores Rs) Prepared
(crores Rs)
Transportation & Traffic Mgmt 2,248.34 1,072.70 1,175.64 122.00 1,053.64
1 Roads Upgrdation 195.48 1,058.83 526.31

2 Roads New Formation 327.78
3 Roads Widening & 315.00
Strengthening
4 Utility Corridors & Shifting 646.88
for Major Roads
5 Public Transport/ 100.00 42.00 ITS DPR to be submitted
Improvements/ BRTS to JNNURM
6 HCMTR/ IRDP 243.92 243.92
7 ROB/Flyover/Bridges 179.28 13.87 165.41 80.00 Parnakuti & Juna Bazar
FOs submitted to
MMRDA
8 Land Acquisition for Road 200.00 200.00
Improvements
9 Traffic Management / 40.00 40.00 68
Junction Improvement project water- transportati environment structural power project
- 69 -
Sl.No. Projects Undertaken
1 Pilot BRT
2 CYG BRT
3 BRTS Phase I
4 Nagar Rd. Subway
5 Baner Road Subway

BRTS Pilot Project River Improvement
6 Sangamwadi Approach Road
7 New Alandi Road
8 Modern Bus Procurement

BANNER
th
SUBWAY planning BSUP Housing under Construction
division in Hadapsardivision
management n division
Traffic and Transportation / Review of Previous CDP
Sl. Project Revised Tender Awarded Amount Utilized % of expenditure

Sanctioned Amount till now incurred against
Cost (crores Rs) (crores Rs) tendered Amount
(crores Rs)
1 Pilot BRT 103.14 135.03 132.42 Completed
2 CYG BRT 434.22 436.73 360.54 82.55
3 BRTS Phase I 476.62 489.05 467.04 95.50
4 Nagar Rd. Subway 6.61 8.83 7.81 88.45
5 Baner Road Subway 7.26 7.9 7.76 Completed
6 Sangamwadi Approach 7.82 9.51 8.26 Completed
Road
7 New Alandi Road 37.03 37.36 24.26 64.93
Grand Total 1072.7 1124.41 1008.09 89.65
70
99 | P a g e
Recommendations of Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Pune
• CMP seeks to Move People, Not Vehicles Parking Management

• Sixty percent of total Investment is for public /mass
transport system • Strategic Parking Plazas are required
• In the First phase , focus should be on traffic Management • Parking plaza must discourage commercial /use
• Augmenting BRT, Public transport must in First Phase • It should facilitate public transport/NMT
• Parking Plaza Should be improve traffic
Circulation
Road Safety • Consider Implementing Congestion Charges
Non Motorized Transport
• Make all traffic sign retro-reflective
• Traffic Marking on all roads • Footpath to promote walking for Short Trip
• Ensure Adequate Street lighting in roads • Footpath Should be at 1.5 M wide
• Design must discourage two-wheeler from using
• Implement traffic management measures near
them
railway station and the Swargate area • Pedestrian zebra-crossing must be clearly marked
• Carry out Junction improvements for road near traffic signals
safety • Footpaths at busy intersection should71
have hand
project
development &
water-
sanitation
transportati environment
& waste
rail power
structural
engineering divisio
project
management
on division
Traffic and Transportation

Public Transport Non-Motorized transport and pedestrian facilities

 Development of efficient public transport system  Safety concern of cyclist and pedestrian has to be addressed by encouraging the
 Public transport should serve the needs of urban poor’s construction of segregated right of way for bicycle and pedestrian.
 Increase the public transport modes coverage and quality including the  Restoration of footpath
expansion and improvement of bus system  Barricading of footpath –foot path opening only the strategic location to regulate
Increasing the Fleet capacity the pedestrian movement, to improve traffic safety and pedestrian safety also .
Establishment of newer and higher quality bus system to cater the need  Pedestrian walkover –to be provided at high pedestrian link and Zones
of all sections  Provision of zebra –crossing pedestrian signal at various strategic locations
Implementing higher quality bus system specially in outer corridors
Traffic Management
Strengthening the passenger information system
 Establishment of central area review and improvement system
 Introduction of new Modes of public transport such as Metro-rail , LRTS
and Monorail System  Preparation of local area traffic management plans
 Discouraging private modes through higher cost: Initial operations and  Education campaign to educate the passenger to encourage the use of public
parking ,congestion pricing, lower right of way transport and road safety measure
 Capacity building program for traffic police
72
Traffic and Transportation

Road Network
 Junction improvements
 Pavement Marking and Signage to be installed at appropriate locations
 Priority to given signage near schools
 Retro-reflective signage
 Identification and improvement of accident prone areas
 Adequate street lighting
73
100 | P a g e
Fire Fighting and Street Lights
Fire Fighting Street Lights
SN Descriptions Quantity/detail Total number of street lights 121,992

Number of poles 115,000
1 No. of Fire Tenders 16 Types of lights Quantity Percentage
2 Capacity of Fire Tenders 4,500 Liters. used
3 Coverage of Fire Services 243.84 Sq. km. 70 W HPSV 10,500 8.61
150 W HPSV 14,926 12.24
4 No. of Fire Incidents reported in 2,055 250 W HPSV 23,673 19.41
the city 400W HPSV 400 0.33
5 No. of Fire Incidents attended 2,055 76 W T5 Fitting 7,000 5.74
96 W T5 Fitting 6,000 4.92
by Fire Department 56 W T5 Fitting 27,800 22.79
6 Fire Prone Areas All Slum Areas in PMC 48 W T5 Fitting 22,000 18.03
7 Availability of source of Water 1 lac Liter. Water Tank is available at 9 25 W LED Fitting 260 0.21
45 W LED Fitting 4,381 3.59
Supply for Fire Tenders Fire Stations & at all Water Works of 60 W LED Fitting 253 0.21
PMC 86W LED Fitting 899 0.74
8 Total Staff in Fire Department 459 150 W LED Metal 1,500 1.23
Halide
Source: Fire Department PMC, 2012
70 W Metal Halide 400 0.33
250 W Metal Halide 2,000 1.64 74
Source: Electricity Department, PMC,2012
project water- environment Total
structural 121,992
power 100
project
transportati
Fire Fighting and Street Lights
Strategies for Development Street lighting and Fire Fighting

 Replacing high pressure sodium sources with LED technologies.
 Establishment and Management of Street lighting control system
 Establishment of solar street lighting in various public places
 Space required for firefighting equipment’s (tanker, fire hydrant space) is to be given in road widening project.
 Fire hydrants with 24 X 7 water supplies should be installed at the end of every street.
 The firefighting team with adequate staffs (like fireman) needs to strengthen.
 Firefighting infrastructure such as tanker, sand buckets, staffs are to be upgraded (with technical consideration) to meet the present and future
requirement.
75
Urban Environment Baseline

Existing City Environment Environment Map –Pune City
Geomorphological setting of the city shows a backdrop of

hills on the south and south western sides
Pune is situated on the banks of the two rivers, Mula & Mutha
City Environment Exiting Nos. Land utilization

Gardens 115 Distribution
Theme Gardens 8
Hills 11
21.26 lakh
Trees
trees
Tree Species 380
Projects under Joint 1826 Ha of
Forest Management 11 forest
(Source: ESR, 2011)
76
101 | P a g e
Urban Environment Quality – Key Challenges

Air Quality Water Quality
RSPM exceeded the permissible limit of 60 µg/m3 71% of the total generated sewerage in the city is treated.
The remaining 29% is released into the river untreated and
Prime source of RSPM is the increasing numbers of vehicles in leads to high levels of both BOD and COD
the city (600-800 vehicles registered per day)
PMC carries out periodic monitoring for water quality of
180
rivers, lakes, nallahs and wells in the city.
160
140
Stream of river Mula-Mutha falls under Class A- IV, water
Air Quality - µg/m 3
120
100 PERMISSIBLE LIMIT
quality is fit for agriculture, industrial cooling and process
80 water. But not fit for drinking purposes. (Source: CSP -2012)
60 60 µg/m 3 – RSPM 8
50 µg/m 3 – SOx 7
40
6 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Level
DO (Mg/ Lt)
40 µg/m 3 – NOx
20 5
4
0 3
Sox Nox RSPM Sox Nox RSPM Sox Nox RSPM
2
2008 2009 2010 1
Navi Peth 16.89 51.26 147.83 29.94 46.17 149.12 29.05 42.69 137.87 0
Oasis, NDA road 21.26 51.35 132.78 19.42 36.68 139.2 29.63 52.55 150.43
Mandai 17.21 68.23 122.83 17.79 37.48 148.2 37.15 66.56 153.23
(Source: City Sanitation Report – Pune, 2012)
project water- environment structural power (Source: City Sanitation Report – Pune, 2012)
project
transportati

Noise Quality
80
Noise Level at Residential Zone
70
Vehicular movement on the road owing to traffic jams, honking
Noise Level dB(A)
60
55dB – Residential Zone
are the main causes of noise pollution in the city today. 50
40
30
20
Noise levels at Commercial Zone, residential Zone & Sensitive 10
0
Zone are all above the permissible limits.
82
Noise Level at Commercial Zone
80
78
76
74
Noise Level dB(A)
72 90 Noise Level at Sensitive Zone

70 80
68
Noise Level dB(A)
70
66
65 dB – Commercial Zone 60
64
62 50 50dB – Sensitive Zone
40
30
20
10
0
(Source: City Sanitation Report – Pune, 2012)


Encroachment – 3 Types of Encroachment in Pune City
Religious Encroachment
603 contentious • 12 in category A i.e. their status has been regularized.

places of worship • 25 in category B i.e. willing to shift to another location.
are in Pune City • 566 to be removed. Work started on 106 of these.
Commercial Encroachment
• Hawkers/ tapirs (temporary or permanent) sprung up all over the city.

• Some hawkers were regularized in 1989 and granted licenses which have to be
renewed every year by the Encroachment Dept. of the PMC.
Residential Encroachment
• These include extensions of verandahs, gardens or parking lots into footpaths or

public spaces, and use of basements sanctioned for parking for other purposes.
(Source: Deccan Gymkhana Parisar Samiti (DGPS) 79

102 | P a g e
Carbon Footprint of Pune City

Carbon Emission Pune City – Ecosystem Daily
Food
Flows (Input & Output) consumption
Per capita CO2e emission in Pune is 1.31 tons which in comparison is (1300 T Grains,
below the National average of 1.75 tons 600t fruits &
Vegetables,
Fibre 600t of milk
Pune city’s total carbon emission as 6,007,753 tons of CO2e 25t (paper
Solid Waste
17t, polemer
4t, Jute/ 1000t/ day
Highest emissions from electricity consumption, followed by consumption cotton 3t,
Pune City Carbon Emissions Leather 1t)
of petroleum products and waste treatment (Source: TERI study)
Pune City Carbon Emission

PUNE Polluter
7%
5% 1%
WATER CITY Water
250 million litres
Residential
36% 650 Million [2.5Mt mixed
Commercial Litre with 1300t solid
waste as
Industrial sewage
Transportation Fossil Fuel

28% Waste Coal 5000t = 10
MU(KWh)
Others Electricity, Petrol = Air Pollution
120 t (168000 l),
23% Deisel 80t
300t Carbon
(Source: ICLEI ) (110,000),
Kerosene 6t, Gas
project water- environment structural power 50t, Biomass 50t
project
transportati
Eco-Housing Concept of Pune City

Eco Housing
PMC give Star Ratings to the upcoming constructions under the eco-
housing projects
ECO-HOUSING
Eco-housing programme was implemented in the city in partnership with CONCEPT
stakeholders, including the urban local body; leading developers,
architects, housing finance institutions, and technology providers
Until year 2011, around 10.22 Lakh Sq.m. built-up area has got eco-
housing certification in Pune.
PMC initiative on Eco-Housing/ Strategy
Rainwater Harvesting Solar Energy Recycling of treated water Green Architecture Ecofriendly building material
 Implemented RWH  Compulsory to all high rise  Considered for centrally air  Fringe villages PMC -15% of  Promote such aspect
 Developed new rules of buildings and star hotels conditioned buildings additional amenity space for conducting seminars and
RWH in development  Encourage the use of solar  Waste Water Recycling Plant layouts above 1 acre. exhibitions
control regulation systems for heating purposes compulsory for townships &  Adopt climate responsive  Mandatory use of 25%
on the wider scale building (tenements >150) design practices to achieve pozzolana material Blended
thermal comfort (NBC) Portland Cement81(BPC)
Efforts/ Projects Undertaken on Environment by Local Body

Environment al Status Report (ESR) Environment al Status Report (ESR)
• Pune’s annual ESR was produced in response to a Sector/ Component Estimated Approved under Balance Project
provision of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Investment JNNURM Cost
and Municipal Councils (Amendment) Act of 1994. (Rs. Crore) (Rs. Crore) (Rs. Crore)
• It has been credited with reaffirming the need for an Environment 237.50 - 185.24
environmental assessment tool to help the municipality 1 River Conservation/
125.00 197.74 72.74
define its planning priorities. Protection
2 Parks and Play Grounds 112.50 112.50
Energy Conservation
Source: Pune Municipal Corporation & CDP Pune 2006-07
Promoting use of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) – 57% of
the city's rickshaws running on environment-friendly fuel
PMC encouraged use of Renewable Energy by giving
exemption in 5% property tax for Housing Societies that run
any one of the projects below and 10% tax exemption for
those who implement any two of the projects below
• Vermicomposting Unit
• Use of Solar Energy
• Rain Water Harvesting
103 | P a g e
Issues
Issues
29% of untreated sewerage is disposed into the Rivers Mula-Mutha, which are highly polluted
In recent years the climate has considerably changed due to exponential rise in the number of concrete
structures and the loss of green cover on the hills
Congestion in the core area resulted in limited scope of land reservation
Air Environment: Alarming levels of RPM and SPM - exceeding the permissible levels
Green House Gases: Pune is releasing around 6,007,753 tons of CO2 emissions, mainly contributed by
vehicles, power and residential sectors. This quantity if unabated could be a major threat to stabilizing
Climate Change.
Environmental Health: High occurrence of respiratory infections, heart problems, sickness from water and
vector-borne diseases and other diseases because of exposure to ambient and indoor pollutants and
inappropriate disposal practices of municipal solid waste have become the way of life in the city.
(http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-21/pune/31082464_1_open-spaces-air-pollution-river)
83
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITY THREAT
 Green space in Pune covers  Increasing slum population on  Potential for development of  High level of air pollution
hillocks (950 hectares), forest the hillsides and along water more parks & green open leading to high occurrence of
area (2380 hectares) and 115 bodies spaces health problem among the city
gardens.  Increasing number of registered  Urban Forestry and Plantation population
 According to Ministry of vehicles (600-700) per day Schemes for the city  Lack of sufficient sewage
Environment and Forest (MoEF)  Poor traffic management  Green Corridor Development treatment plants leading to 29%
guidelines, a city should have  Increasing number of illegal of sewerage left untreated
33% green cover of its total hawkers causing environmental pollution
area. Total area of Pune city is  Highly congested areas
243.94 sq.km. out of which 85 vulnerable to disasters like fire
sq. km i.e 35% is under green
cover which is more than the
given guidelines.
 Conservation of rivers, water
bodies and natural environment
of the city are on the priority list
of PMC. 84
Potential & Strategy for Environmental Management

ASPECTS STRATEGIES AND POTENTIALS PROJECTS
Green Cover & Open  Demarcation and Protection of existing Hills/ Forest & Recreational areas
Spaces  Urban Forestry and Plantation Schemes for the city to increase green cover within the city
 Plantation in dividers to curb dust, pollution and to restore aesthetic looks.
 Good potential for development of more parks & green open spaces
 Development of urban green corridors to enhance the local climate
 Linking of Green corridors and urban green areas
Rivers/ Water Bodies  Good potential for water recharge
 Developed Master plan for Rainwater Harvesting Plan
 Potential for eco-tourism
 Developed as a recreational activities to attract the local tourist
 Developing Green buffer/ corridor
Air Quality  Regular vehicular checks to keep air pollution levels within prescribed levels
 Increase the use of alternate fuels like CNG
 Continuous monitoring at various locations within the city at regular intervals.
 Planned Plantation in the city areas, choice of air pollution resistant tree species in order to minimize ambient air pollution.
 Road network must be improved for reducing vehicular emissions
Greenhouse Gas  To reduce GHG emissions at the city level include technology improvements, which includes:
Mitigation (GHG) • public transportation systems and solar streetlights; 85
•project
policies, such water-
as the implementation of buildingenvironment
transportati codes and recycling requirements;
structural and
power project
•planning
Other voluntary actions, including
division awareness campaigns
management and recognition
division programs.
n division
104 | P a g e
Heritage & Tourism

Heritage & Tourism – Pune City 4 2

1
Heritage of the city is comprised of dense city core 1 Historical/ Cultural
Institutional buildings, colonial bungalows and Nature/ Wildlife

2
palaces constitute the urban heritage of the city.
Aga Khan Palace 3 Religious
The illustrious past of the city has given St. Mary’s Church Parvati Hill Temples
the region a unique identity.
1
2
3 1
3
2 1
5
3
Vishrambaug Wada Pashan Lake 1 4
Saniwar Wada
University Building
4
3 5
3 2
1
Osho Ashram project water- transportati environment structural power

Shinde Chhatri project
Raja Dinkar
planning Bund Garden Pataleswar Cave &
Saras division
Baug Katraj Snake Park
22th June, 2012 Kelkar Museum
division division partnering vision Temple
Tourist In-Flow
District Wise Domestic Visitor Arrival in Maharashtra (July District Wise Foreign Tourist Visitor Arrival in Maharashtra
2009 - June 2010) (July 2009 - June 2010)
Yavatmal 1,501,786
Yavatmal 20
Washim 157,543
Washim 22
Wardha 184,853
Wardha 579
Thane 1,600,831
Thane 8,549
Solapur 4,113,127
Solapur 70
Sindhudurg 916,866
Sindhudurg 1,064
Satara 1,550,983
Satara 4,777
Sangli 535,299
Sangli 72
Ratnagiri 789,130
Raighad 1,749,562 3rd Highest domestic Ratnagiri
Raighad
279
3,611
2nd Highest foreign
Pune
Parbhani 820,297
8,779,119 (8%)
tourist arrival in Pune 287,553 (14%) tourist arrival in
Parbhani 5
Osmanabad 4,133,014 the State Osmanabad 179 the State
Nanded 2,269,845 Nanded 1,653
Nasik 3,366,045 Nasik 5,063
Nandurbar 2,360,564 Nandurbar 18
Nagpur 4,013,137 Nagpur 9,754
Mumbai 28,691,854 (25%) Mumbai 1,672,446 (79%)
Latur 109,563 Latur -
Kolhapur 5,640,753 Kolhapur 1,537
Jalna 1,316,034 Jalna -
Jalgaon 3,041,302 Jalgaon 117
Hingoli 3,121,731 Hingoli -
Gondia 1,294,158 Gondia 27
Gadchiroli 37,677 Gadchiroli 11
Dhule 76,233 Dhule 9
Chandrapur 2,170,626 Chandrapur 2,020
Buldhana 1,823,565 Buldhana 1,688
Bhandara 383,478 Bhandara 21
Beed 4,344,708 Beed 154
Aurangabad 7,604,421 Source: Tourism Survey for State of Maharashtra Aurangabad 117,712 (6%) Source: Tourism Survey for State of Maharashtra
Amravati 1,124,884 under Ministry of Tourism, GoI by AC Nielsen ORG-
MARG
Amravati
Akola
32
7 MARG
88
under Ministry of Tourism, GoI by AC Nielsen ORG-
Akola 105,282
Ahmednagar project12,921,487 (11%) water- transportati environment
Ahmednagar structural
7,884 power project
- 5,000,000
development
10,000,000
&
15,000,000
sanitation
20,000,000 25,000,000 on division
30,000,000 35,000,000
& waste - engineering
200,000 400,000 divisio
600,000 800,000 management
1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000
105 | P a g e
Monthly Tourist In-Flow Tourist Accommodation in Pune City
Monthly Tourist In-Flow Occupancy Rate and Average Room Rate of Hotels – Pune City
The monthly tourist in-flow of Pune District shows that the maximum tourist
arrival is in the month of May with 902,066 and the minimum is in the month 6000 90.00%
of July with 441,951 tourist arrival. 80.00%
5000
1,000,000 70.00%
4927
900,000
Average Room Rate (Rs)

800,000 4000 60.00%
4951
Occupancy Rate (%)

700,000 50.00%
600,000 3000 3232 3921 40.00%
500,000 3140
2621
400,000 2000 30.00%
300,000
200,000 20.00%
1000
100,000 10.00%
-
July August September October November December January February March April May June 0 0.00%
Domestic 440,089 543,606 582,084 837,911 598,318 724,748 836,132 852,745 834,520 810,851 859,006 859,110 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Foreign 1,862 2,964 8,594 15,856 14,319 20,053 39,238 35,668 34,914 33,470 43,060 37,555 Average Room Rate (Rs) Occupancy Rate
Total 441,951 546,570 590,678 853,767 612,637 744,801 875,370 888,413 869,434 844,321 902,066 896,665
(Source: the HVS Trends and Opportunities Report 2011)
Source: Tourism Survey for State of Maharashtra under Ministry of Tourism, GoI by AC Nielsen ORG-
MARG

Junnar Malshej Ghat (124km)

Caves & Trekking Hill Stations, Trekking,
Regional Tourism Potential - Pune

Falls, Rivers, Dam
Bhimshankar
Trekking, Wildlife, Narayangaon (76km)
Panvel (116km)
Religious, Temples Forts & Wine Festival
Forts & Temples
Pune has a potential for regional tourism
promotion. Matheran (136Km) Rajmachi
Forest, Lakes, temples & Forts Trekking,
Forts, Wildlife,
Theme based tourism- circuit can be plan Lakes, Dams,
for enhancing the regional tourism Karjat (104Km) Temples
Trekking, Rafting, Caves,
Rivers, Health Resort
Pune city can act as the center for theme
based tourist destination zone
Lonavala (64Km) Alandi (24 Km)
Trekking, Rafting, Caves, Pilgrim
Rivers, Health Resort
Khandala (68Km) Mulshi Dam & Lakes

Hill station & Hiking Nature
Raigad (102Km) Panchet Water Park

Hill Stations, Rock Climbing, Fun & Entertainment
Forts, Palaces, Lakes
Nanded Waghala
Gurudwara
1 Religious Kolad (122Km)
Rafting, Lakes, Rivers, Dams,
Baramati (98 Km)
Nature/ Wildlife Falls, Forts, Caves
2 Temples
3 Fun & Entertainment Pune City

development & sanitation on division Mahabaleshwar
& waste (113Km) engineering divisio management
Panchgani (95Km)
planning division Hill Stations, Lakes, Falls, Forts
22th June, 2012 Hill Stations, caves, templespartnering vision
division division
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITY THREAT
 Pune has immense tourism potentials  Poor accessibility to many  Tourism potential  Aggressive marketing and
with its rich cultural, heritage and tourist destinations due to unexploited promotion by competing
natural environs basic Infrastructure  Development of good destinations in
 Vibrant landscape, lifestyles and bottlenecks transport connectivity neighbouring cities
cuisines  Lack of tourist infrastructure  Eco-tourism development  Environmental
 Rich fair and festivals & basic amenities at many degradation of the natural
 As per HVS report, Pune city hotels tourist destinations precinct
(base demand) has seen a significant  Lack of information about
growth (35%) and trends indicate this to tourist destinations
get even stronger as the city moves from  Unfavorable brand image as a
being a largely commercial driven tourist friendly destination.
market to also developing as a Meeting  Auto Rickshaws are only
and Conference destination in West mode of public transport.
India. Poor public transport facility
 Areas such as Hinjewadi, Pimpri on routes to tourist
Chinchwad, Talegaon and Chakan, destinations in city
Ranjangaon are the main demand
generators for the city hotels
106 | P a g e
Slums
Slums Population
Slums Details
Total Slums 564
Area under Slums 525 Hectare (5.25 sq.km)
Slums Population 11-12 Lakhs (2001)

BPL Population 9441 (1.02% of total population)
Source: Pune, City Sanitation Plan ,2012 and Slum Atlas (2009) by MASHAL
Source: Pune, City Sanitation Plan ,2012
• Slum population is steadily increasing and is now

approximately 40% of the population.
• Unplanned settlements are spreading on the hillsides and
along the water bodies, threatening the breathing lungs of
the city.
development & sanitation Source: Pune, engineering
& waste City Sanitationdivisio
Plan management
on division
planning division ,2012
Slums
93
project water- transportati environment
Source: Pune, Citystructural power
Sanitation Plan ,2012 project
Slums
Major Issues
Slums Redevelopment Programme under JnNURM
 211 slums are undeclared or not notified, in which approximately 27
percent of the total slum population resides. Government Redevelopment Scheme: This scheme is being implemented in about 78
 Data base related to access to basic facilities by the slum dwellers slums
is not yet available.
 Density in slums is 2399 persons per hectare which is excessively Valmiki-Ambekar Awas Yojna: Under this scheme, PMC has already built (or is in
high. the process of building) 800 houses in different slums. About 1200 houses are
 Number of slums are located on environmentally sensitive areas and being constructed near Hadapsar.
disaster prone areas.
 Average Tenement Density 290 per Ha.
 Slum dwellers do not have tenure security.
Strategies
 A comprehensive GIS based survey indicating the most deprived slum, with respect
to the parameters of location, density, access to basic infrastructure facilities should
be prepared with the, on which the minimum levels of access to basic
infrastructure should be provided in each slum. To develop housing stock and improve the infrastructure at a faster pace, GoM
 On the basis of community/ people’s preferences the schemes for up gradation of has created the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) has begun work on preparing
slum like in-situ; resettlement etc. should be taken up. A consensus should be built a blueprint for making Pune city free of slums which is sanctioned under the
among the slum dwellers regarding resettlement areas. Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY).
 Slums located in most environmentally sensitive and disaster prone areas should be
given priority in the provision of housing.
 Upcoming Housing schemes should have mandatory provision for the housing of the
low income groups of that may be kept as public property and rented out to the
population which do not have the purchase power for housing, or may be in the 94
form of provision of servant occupancy
project attached towater-
higher income group housings. environment structural power project
transportati
107 | P a g e
Institutional Framework & Municipal Finance

Institutional Frame work
List of services
General Administration Public Works- Roads
Street Lighting Security
Public Health Transport Department/Workshop
Accounts and Audit Water Supply & Sewerage
Municipal Secretary Development Planning and Building Permission
Education Law Department
Solid Waste Management Fire Department
Slum Clearance/Improvement Urban Community Development
Tax Assessment and Collection Public Relation Officer
City Development Primary Health Land and Estate
Octroi
96
Role and Responsibilities
Sector Planning & Design Implementation O&M

Land use plan and implementation PMC, TCPD PMC, TCPD -
Water Supply PMC PMC PMC
Sewerage PMC PMC PMC
Roads, Bridges, Flyovers/ RoB /Multilevel PWD, MSRDC, NHAI, PMC PWD, MSRDC, NHAI, PWD, MSRDC, NHAI,
Parking PMC PMC
Traffic Control & Management System Police Dept (Traffic) Police Dept (Traffic) Police Dept (Traffic)
Public Transport System PMPML PMPML, RTO PMPML, PMC
Street Lighting PMC PMC PMC
Storm Water Drainage PMC PMC PMC
Solid Waste Management PMC PMC PMC
Parks/ Playgrounds PMC PMC PMC
Slum Development SRA, PMC SRA, PMC SRA, PMC
Housing MAHDA, PMC MAHDA, PMC MAHDA
Air, water & noise pollution Control PMC, MPCB PMC PMC
River Protection PMC, MPCB PMC PMC
Tourism MTDC MTDC MTDC
Public Health PMC PMC PMC
97
Education MSBSHES, PMC, DEO MSBSHSE, PMC, DEO MSBSHSE, PMC, DEO
108 | P a g e
ULB Level Mandatory Reform
Sr. ULB Level Mandatory Reform Status

1. E-Governance Setup Successful completion of the reform achieved in 2009-10 for all
the proposed activities under the head
2. Transition to Double Entry Accounting Transition underway and preparation of budget for coming year
System (2012-13) under progress; however substantial degree of progress
made
3. Property Tax coverage of 85% Successful achievement of the milestone made in 2008-09 with
4. Property Tax collection efficiency of 90% 99% coverage and 95% collection efficiency
5. 100% cost recovery of water supply Successful in achieving 100% cost recovery. The ULB has targeted
6. 100% cost recovery of solid waste to achieve milestone equivalent to developed country for UFW
services and NRW to levels of 16% and 23% respectively by 2012
7. Internal earmarking of funds for UP and All the sub tasks under the reform have been achieved in 2007-08
provision of basic services pertaining to earmarking, allocation, provision, defining etc.
98
ULB Level Optional Reform

Sr. ULB Level Optional Reform Status
1. Introduction of property title certification system Successfully achieved in 2007-08
2. Revision of Building Bye laws - streamlining the Approval Process All the sub activities including consultation, identification, notification and
implementation have been achieved in 2006-07
3. Revision of Building Bye laws - Mandatory Rainwater Harvesting All the activities have been achieved in 2006-07 u/s 37 of the MR&TP Act
in all Buildings 1966
4. Earmarking 25% developed land in all housing projects for Necessary provisions have been made in the Development Plans
EWS/LIG
5. Simplification of Legal and Procedural framework for conversion Implementation under progress
of agricultural land for non-agricultural purpose
6. Introduction of computerized process of Registration of land Implementation under progress
and property
7. Byelaws on Reuse of Recycled Water Provision is made in Development Control Rules. (M 8/28.2-06.12.2007) so
as to make STP construction compulsory for townships. Group of 150
tenements or more it is mandatory.
8. Administrative Reforms All the proposed administrative reforms have been achieved in the year
2008-09
9. Structural Reforms Reforms under this head including realignment of organizational structures,
structuring internal judicial system etc. completed in 2008-09
10. Encouraging Public Private Partnership PPP initiatives have been taken up in the field of e-tendering, 99kiosks, metro
project water- transportati rail, mono rail
environment etc. since 2007-08
development & sanitation & waste engineering divisio management
th
Other initiatives include revolving fundon division
creation of division
planning Currently in progress
Proforma for Second Workshop
106
22June, 2012 division division partnering vision
109 | P a g e
Proforma for Second Workshop
107
- 113 -
“We look forward to prepare the CDP for 2041 for providing better quality of life for
population at large”
Thank You

4.3.1 SNAPSHOTS OF WORKSHOPS/ MEETINGS
Plate 4-1: Mr. V.G Kulkarni (S.E Water Supply and Plate 4-2: Mr. Ganesh Sonune (Project Officer, UNDP)
Sewerage Department) giving inputs on CDP - Pune giving his advice for CDP
110 | P a g e
Plate 4-3: Ms. Harshida Shinde (Deputy Engineer, DP Plate 4-4: Meeting with Swach NGO's CEO Ms. Malati
Cell) giving view on CDP- Pune Gadgil on Solid Waste Issues in the city
Plate 4-5: Discussion with CEE NGO's Ms. Sanskriti Plate 4-6: Meeting with Mr Mangesh Dighe over
Menon and Mr. Avinash environmental issues
Plate 4-7: Review meeting with Additional Municipal Plate 4-8: Discussion with staff members of Singhad
Commissioner Dr. A. Yadav (Spl) Architecture college.
111 | P a g e
Plate 4-9: Interaction with residents of Panmada Plate 4-10: Interaction with residents at the contraction
Jhopadpatti site of new flats of Lohiyanagar
Plate 4-11: Interaction with elected members of Plate 4-12: Interaction with elected members of Indian
Maharashtra Navnirmaan Sena National Congress
Plate 4-13: Interaction with elected members of Plate 4-14: Interaction with elected members of
Bhartiya Janata Party Shivasena
112 | P a g e
Plate 4-15: Interaction with Dr Santaji Kadam, Plate 4-16: Interaction with Mr. Hemant Nikam
President general practitioners association
Plate 4-17: Meeting with Hon'ble Addl. Municipal Plate 4-18: Interaction with Hon'ble Deputy Comm.
Comm (Spl) and other senior officers of PMC (SWM) PMC along with other staff members
Plate 4-19: Meeting Ms. Ulka Kalaskar Plate 4-20: Interaction with ITDP official
113 | P a g e
Plate 4-21: Meeting with all HODs of concerned Plate 4-22: Meeting with all HODs of concerned
departments departments
Plate 4-23: Meeting with all HODs of concerned Plate 4-22: Meeting with all HODs of concerned
departments departments
4.3.2 Outcome: Sector wise summary of all discussions

The outcomes of various consultations in water supply sector are:
• Leak detection plan should be prepared for reducing the water losses.
• Due to saucer shaped geography of Pune a lot of energy is wasted in pumping of water
throughout the city.
• Water metering is required in the city.
• No telescopic tariff for water consumption
• Undulating topography resulting in the problem of low water pressure
• Old water supply distribution network
• Lack of Metered connection
• Condition of all water treatment plants are not good need to replacement
• Source to treatment plant water flow by gravity
• Uninterrupted power supply (express feeders for all WTPs)
114 | P a g e
• Water audit at regular interval to control the water losses

• 100 percent recovery of water supply on telescopic tariff basis
• Energy audit at regular intervals
• Available water sources is not sufficient for future Planning
• Water taxes should be compulsory for slum dweller also
• Recycling and reuse of water should be necessary. Reuse water should be used for gardening and
other secondary purposes
• Because of concretization water is not percolate properly so the roads and other facilities should
be design properly so water can percolate properly.
• Water leakage is more than stated in report. Stated is 25% and actual is approx. 40%.
• Pumped water supply system caused unequal distribution of water. Also water supply budget
exceeds due to pumped water.
• Water supply should take advantage of ground profile and gravity. Water supply should be
according to physical morphological geographical planes.
• Old water supply should be updated according to expansion of city and available water sources in
these areas.
• Khadagwasala is the main source of water and different housing societies presently used
underground water sources.
• Pashan Lake and Katraj Lake water can serve separate catchment areas.
• Identification of water and sewage leakage areas.
• Leak detection Project should be implemented and it should be in logical order.
o Assessment of water – physical assessment of water resource is necessary – how much
rain, how much is dam yield, and how much water is distributed and allocated.
o Source assessment – how much water is percolated – captive acquires
• Decentralization of sources and supplies (use of ground water, lakes)
• Bucket study should be done for water supply in slum areas.
o No ground water assessment
o Map for ground water aquifers not present.
• Water supply is not metered. The ever increasing groundwater depletion scenario, water meters
should be introduced in an effort to initiate checks and balances in the use of water.
4.3.2.2 Sewerage
The outcomes of various consultations in sewerage and sanitation department are:
• Coverage of sewerage network is 99 percent
115 | P a g e
• Work of 3 drainage basin is under-process need to improvement remaining 21 basins

• DEWATS can be proposed for slums in first phase.
• Collection efficiency of sewerage network is approximately 73 percent which further leads to
polluting the environment due to shortfall in treatment capacity
• As per the agreement between PMC and irrigation department. PMC has to recycle 500 MLD of
treated sewage back to irrigation canal for irrigation purposes.
• PMC has made modification in the building control rules and has made it mandatory for housing
societies with 150 or more tenements to construct STP and recycle 100 percent treated for
tertiary purposes.
• Community toilets required for physical challenged and handicapped.
• DEWATS system for sewage treatment should be implemented for slums.
• Rainwater harvesting systems and STP are functional.
• The infrastructure needs attention the top priority being sewerage.
• Construction of sewerage line
• Already PCB has asked for JNNURM funds for schemes.
• Identification of sewage leakage areas.
o No flow meter for sewage
o Basic sewage network map is not present
• School infrastructure is improper
o 50% toilets are unusable.
o Toilet designs are improper.
o Insufficient number of sanitary inspectors.
o Poor database available.
• Monitoring indicators provided for school student’s health are insufficient and need to be
elaborated.
• Sewage network is not present in slums.
4.3.2.3 Drainage
The outcomes of various consultations in Drainage are:
• The drainage infrastructure needs attention on a top priority basis.

• 90% drainage line has problem and has to be repaired.
• Whole drainage line is old and in poor condition.
• Pollution control board has been noticed for repairing of whole drainage line as it is old and in
poor condition.
• RWH & Ground Water Recharge should be done at the city level along the transport lines.
116 | P a g e
• Rain water harvesting should be promoted and some incentives should be given for the same.
• Non compatible RWH in small and individual plots may prove harmful to buildings.
The outcomes of various consultations in Solid Waste Management department are:
• People don’t want to pay tax for SW collection.

• Builders don’t follow the rules and regulations in the longer run regarding vermi-compost plant
due to poor monitoring by PMC.
• People don’t take the pain to segregate the waste at their end.
• Rag pickers are less interested in residential waste than commercial waste due to their low
recyclable value.
• Centralized system of SWM is better.
• Slums need a different segregation plan.
• Penalties should be suggested at the policy level for not segregating the waste, littering, waste
disposal at wrong places.
• Community awareness and involvement may be a helpful tool in SWM.
• According to PMC Hanjer is a good technology.
• So far, E–waste collection & disposal is not considered.
• E-waste recycling, recycling of water and rain water harvesting should be initiated.
• Not enough trucks and containers provided by PMC.
• As compost made by mixed waste, its quality is not good and farmers are not ready to take that
compost, if this compost will be generated by only wet waste, quality will improve and marketing
will be easy.
• Most of the waste segregation is done on the streets.
• 11 transfer stations are not enough in the city.
• 700MT Pyro-lysis technique thermal plant coming up in Ramtekdy industrial estate can cause
pollution.
• According to Swach NGO; Hanjer is a failure technology as mixed waste don’t produce good
compost
• The sector goal should include “Respect for the People who are providing this service to the
society” till 2041.
• Reducing distance of transfer stations – as the physical distance increases complains increases at
the transfer station.
• Wet waste – goes for composting
• Dry waste – get sorted and sold (recycled)
• Inert waste – leaves the area to land fill sites
• 16 Prabhags have been proposed with Zero waste.
• Plan for city which safeguards the interest of the marginalised people living at the fringe.
• The plan should keep the marginalised population and unorganised sector in mind.
117 | P a g e
• Unless and until political vested interest is not there, change is not possible.
• Many direct and indirect benefits to waste picker in door to door collection.
• Health initiatives necessary for waste pickers.
• Construction & demolition debris can be reused.
• Solid Waste Management needs attention. Efforts in organizing solid waste collection and
disposal should be energized with the help of local NGOs.
• In one of the slums there was a remark that cleanliness of the Community Toilets is not up to the
mark as the ones appointed to clean and maintain the toilets are not regularly doing their duties
and as a result some times when the toilets gets choked, they have to deploy local people.
• Segregation is being practiced but the ultimate disposal is done with BOT method which is based
on mixed waste which does not let the segregated waste be utilized.
• Non-uniform system in terms of collecting agency that is private or public (PMC) and collection
charges of waste collection is being practiced in the city.
• For some areas waste collection is done by PMC free of cost and in some areas it is done by
private agency with some charges taken from the households and in few areas the cost is borne
by the corporators.
• Improper waste collection sites are provided.
• Segregated waste should be recycled and reused as composting etc.
• Ultimate Disposal system should not encourage mixed waste.
• Encourage local communities, NGOs, common people to manage decentralized compost plants
and waste processing.
• Uniformity in waste collection service should be maintained by the PMC that is collection fee
should have a system and also the services should follow a single model.
• Waste should not be left on the collection site/ transfer station for more than 2 days.
• Katraj Model could be followed throughout the city.
• Decentralized waste processing should be done.
• Provision of whole sale market for scrap should be made by PMC and the shops may be rented or
sold.
• In all the commercial areas space should be reserved for scrap shops.
• Norms and standards and regulations to be incorporated in the development control rules for
scrap shops.
• Provision of Scientifically designed waste collection sites and transfer stations should be made
within 0.5km radius of a residential/ commercial area.
• Protected smaller space available Free of cost at neighbourhood level should be provided for
dumping and sorting of waste/ scrap.
The outcomes of various consultations in Transport department are:
• Land acquisition is major issue in road construction.
118 | P a g e
• Public Awareness is important

• Strong enforcement of traffic rules
• Development plan should be strictly implemented
• ‘Road designing guidelines’ are under way and should be implemented for different land uses
(commercial, residential, industrial etc.)
• Projects like metro rail can be taken care of by the PMRDA.
• Use of intelligent transport system.
• There should be congestion tax.
• Rent-a-cycle system should be introduced.
• Accessibility to MIDC area is poor and transport frequency is low.
• PMC should provide alternative transport system for MIDC areas.
• Transportation is biggest issue- vehicle population is 4 times of people population in city.
• Proposal for mass transit, ring road, metro rail.
• BRTS network should be wisely planned studying origin and destination survey.
• Heavy traffic should have different network.
• Mass rapid transit system such metro and monorail should be planned.
• Elevated MRTS can be constructed along Mula – Mutha River.
• Signage's along road need to be improved.
• Road widening at Ambedkar Road is necessary as traffic volume is high on this road.
• Infrastructure is poor in PMPML depot.
• Encroachments of street vendors along stops and depots.
• No modal parking at major bus stations.
• Lack of required number of Workshop shades & sections, diesel pumps and modern washing
machines.
• Basic infrastructure is not enough for existing bus capacity.
• Due to lack of parking for buses 50% of PMPML buses have to be parked on road at the depots.
• The location of bus depot in the outskirts is most preferred location as this will cover 20 km
radius area around depots.
• Infrastructure services in bus stands like public toilets, security systems, food stalls are required.
• There is a lack of parking spaces, intermediate transport.
• As a cost cutting strategy BRT lanes can be proposed in left side.
• Revenue generation by promoting commercial development at bus depots.
• SLB should be adopted for transportation.
• PMPML should be provided with service stations and parking lots.
• Provision for disabled person in public transport should be implemented.
• Traffic demand management should be worked out before proposing any transport solution.
• Land reservation for bus depots across periphery of Pune is necessary.
119 | P a g e
• Proposed metro route does not cover fringe areas i.e. Hinjewadi area; which is major traffic
volume area.
• Improving present public transport by - Increasing frequency(max. 15mins), locating more bus
stops(should be approached in 5 mins walk)
• Providing circular transport (100 % subsidized) in 5 km radius of the core area. This will increase
mobility and decrease fuel bill. Auto rickshaws will be automatically be reduced in core area.
• Pedestrianization is necessary in old city and it should be connected with parking facilities and
telescopic penalty is charged to parked vehicle in core area
• Most of the footpath in Pune are Non-Standardized its need to be wide
• Pedestrian footpath should be activity friendly and street should be activity oriented
• Core city area / old Pune should be with minimum 4-wheeler. More emphasis should be given on
NMT and pedestrian facilities.
• In old city area, road grid should be of 300-400m and NMT / pedestrian facilities shall be
planned accordingly
• Except the GM road and FC road tree plantation is not properly along the footpaths for example
Paud Road, Bani Road.
• In old city streets should be declare as free vehicle zone and proposed for cycling and pedestrian only
• Cross feeder roads should be Identify for improvement.
• Footpath should be designed to be 3 m wide.
• Ramp should be given between the properties
• Plantation along the footpath is necessary to control the vehicular entry
• Multi- modal Transport system should be necessary
• River bank or River side area should be proper developed and utilize for pedestrian walks and
Facilities
• Route should be rationalized (ITDP already done the route rationalized study for PMPML).
• 14-15 percent area proposed under the roads in development plan but roads are not developed
as per the Development Plan. So for the free movement of vehicles and passenger , all DP roads
should be Developed
• As per Development Plan there is a proposal of Internal ring road which neglected and not
developed as per the Development Plan Because its Included the HCMT and rail corridors
• Road network should be developed and planned while planning the any transport system like
BRTS, Tram and other facilities.
• High Capacity Motorized Transport Corridor should be Implemented as per Development Plan.
• There is need of internal and outer by pass in Pune
• NMT facilities should be highlighted in CDP.
4.3.2.6 Environment
The outcomes of various consultations in Environment Sector are:
• Instead of incentive based green building initiatives the city should move to mandatory green
120 | P a g e
building rules.
• Initiatives like Solar water heater, Vermi compost, solar lighting necessary to reduce energy load
on the city.
• Monitoring techniques for city management like GIS is very important.
• Suggested the use of Environmental Performance Index (EPI) to assess the environment scenario
in the city.
• Since Pashan Lake is a declared eco-sensitive zone and is preserved for its bio diversity only
restricted for tourism also no water extraction can take place. This should be maintained.
• Katraj Lake is for tourism.
• Enforcement of ECBC code.
• There should be some change in building by laws and development control rules w.r.t. eco-
housing.
• Monitoring should be done on cutting and planting of trees on a regular basis.
• Joint Forest Management has led to pumping of Rs 4 crore from PMC to the forest dept.
• Pollution standards have changed which reflects increased pollution level in the city.
• Natural lakes are the green lungs of the city and should be conserved.
• No development zones should be marked, riverfront development plan in proposal stage.
• Implementation of Biodiversity Act 2002 is not there.
• Implementation of Biodiversity Act 2002 should be there and management committee for this
purpose at ward level and at Corporation level should be formed.
• Need to improve Biodiversity status of all Gardens; steps should be taken for the habitation of
species which are locally found in all Gardens instead of one butterfly garden.
• Specific efforts are required in preserving common house sparrows; this can be done along the
rivers.
• Biodiversity zones in each garden and along the rivers in the city should be proposed.
• Hills should be conserved and preserved.
• Environmental planning laws should be integrated with Developmental control rules.
• Environmental Status Report(ESR) of PMC provided only the data; it should give the comparative
status as well
• There should be SLB standardized for environment.
4.3.2.7 Heritage and tourism
The outcomes of various consultations in Heritage and tourism sector are:
• Tourist spots of Pune lack tourism related infrastructure and are in poor condition: eg. Food
courts near tourist stations, drinking water, public toilets, auto rickshaw stops.
• City transport is not in good condition, Pune Darshan Buses are not up-to the mark.
• Darshan trip of Pune covers 11 religious sites.
• Fort development plan- under this 6 forts (Shivneri,Singhgad, Lohgad, Rajgad, Torana, Rajmachi
will be connected and residential and infrastructure facilities will be provided at the base of fort.
121 | P a g e
• MTDC –Pune is planning for Pune festival.

• Entertainment development like Essell-world, Pune Festival.
• Janwani is conducting heritage walks.
• Conservation of Core and old Pune should be undertaken.
4.3.2.8 Slum
The outcomes of various consultations in Housing and Slum sector are:
• SRA schemes led to financial burden on PMC as they provide 100% of funding to the slum
dweller.
• Slums situated on environmentally sensitive location (hills, along river) should be cleared and
relocated on other barren area.
• In situ rehabilitation – with the help of NGO’s Kachha houses of slum dwellers are reconstructed
into Pucca houses.
• In both cases 10% of project cost should be borne by slum dweller.
• 43% of the population lives in slums; this poses the biggest problem in the city.
• SRA has been involved in providing housing for the slum dwellers and the urban poor under
certain conditionality following the process of Registration.
• Rehabilitation process should be transparent and fast
• CDP should be focused on priority basis, priority should be decided on the basis of stakeholder
consultation & priority of every person is different for example – slum dwellers gave more
preferences to Infrastructure Facilities.
• Proper building by-laws required for slum in situ projects
• Growth of industries, commercial development and MIDC’s expansion can also lead to expansion
of slums within and outside the city limits.
• Absence of a good baseline survey in Pune.
• There might be an ambiguity in the allotment of funds by RAY and BSUP in the future as whether
the funds would be transferred under HUPA or UD ministry, since there might be change in the
channeling of funds.
• Slum growth should be considered while planning.
• Land Tenure Security for the Slum Dwellers has to be kept in mind while CDP.
• Development issues should be handled concerning shelter, livelihood and housing for slum
dwellers.
• In Pune, there have been lots of project initiatives in dealing especially with the slum population
under various schemes, such as the SRA, SRS and also initiatives from NGOs such as MASHAL who
has come up with Slum Mapping, and construction of housing is going on, along with provision of
BSUP.
• RAY’s goal of slum free city is in preparatory stage.
• Relocation of slum creates transportation problem.
• Slum major concerns are livelihood issue, street vendors , slum woman empowerment, solid
122 | P a g e
waste and sewerage management.

• Local developers objected the building bye law stating 20% of the houses should be allocated to
EWS groups.
• Housing- Govt. housing boards face problem in land acquisition and can't promote affordable
housing (housing board is not fully active), upcoming townships are not solution on this.
• Presence of few squatter developments along nallas should be looked into.
• Slum rehabilitation – slums in Khadki area should be relocated and rehabilitated.
• Night shelters should be provided for in migrants.
• UID should be considered for PDS.
• As compared to many other Indian Cities, Pune slums are probably much better off in provision of
the BSUP. To further improve and enhance these services efforts should be made in the CDP to
build in these services in a quantitative and qualitative manner.
• In all the slums there is a fair level of satisfaction regarding the housing and the in situ
rehabilitation schemes provided by the Municipal Corporation
• Some people also expressed their need for some playgrounds for the children in the
rehabilitation measures
• Other expressed need for small clinics/dispensaries to address the medical needs of the slum
dwellers. We suggest that services from HUPA can be resorted to address this very basic need as
well.
• Some others expressed a need for a Community Hall, where the slum dwellers can meet to
discuss and plan further betterments for their slum communities in a cooperative manner for the
future improvements, not only by the corporation, but also from their own collective efforts as a
community.
• Some others requested some facilities be provided for their children’s education within their
locality to facilitate and enhance their children’s education without having to travel
distances.
4.3.2.9 Urban Growth and Land use
The outcomes of various consultations in Urban Growth and land use sector are:
• Presently there is no consolidated land use plan for the total PMC area which includes the newly
added 23 villages.
• Re-densification method was preferred over jurisdictional change for accommodating the future
population.
• The developments of self sufficient townships are highly appreciated.
• Heat island effect has increased due to urbanization and change in living standard.
• Floating business population has increased in few years leading to additional stress on
infrastructure services in the city.
• Lack of monitoring has led to degradation of services in the city.
• PMRDA is not in existence as yet
• Pune Metropolitan Region should be kept in mind while planning for PMC.
123 | P a g e
• PMRDA should be a monitoring and governing body with its own set of regulation mandatory for
the region.
• MIDC area of Pune should be the nucleus for future growth.
• As MIDC areas are growth centers of city, there should be self content development in its
surrounding areas, for that infrastructure provision to these areas is necessary.
• Future infrastructure demand should be considered while planning for CDP of Pune – 2041.
• While planning for city, adjoining areas should be taken into consideration as impact areas.
• In future Hinjewadi is going to have it impact on Pune city
• Mixed use developments are most preferred by IT areas.
• Chakkan and Hinjewadi are the future growth centers.
• 10 km radius fringe area is identified for fringe area plan.
• Mixed use development is mostly preferred in Hinjewadi and future developments.
• Hilly areas are declared as no development zone.
• Assessment of City’s maximum potential for quality of life is necessary after that development
should move to regional approach i.e. other growth nodes should be promoted near city like
Satara, Aurangabad, Nashik etc.
• Land rates are the biggest hindrance for affordable housing.
• Housing supply should be affordable.
• Singapore model of housing can be adopted.
• Vertical growth should be made mandatory to increase open spaces in the city.
• GIS mapping should be done on the city level.
• Incentivization of land pooling should be done.
• Large parcel of land with all amenities should be encouraged.
• Use of land as resource, as PMC located on prime location this asset should be utilized.
• Non- congested area can be provided FSI more than 1, this extra FSI can be charged under paid
FSI- good source for PMC income.
4.3.2.10 Institutional Framework, Municipal Finance and Urban Governance
The outcomes of various consultations in this sector are:
• In JNNURM, PPP method is applied which facilitates private builders to use extra FSI for their own
benefit.
• This results in exploitation of land in terms of provision of all infrastructures like water, road,
solid waste management etc.
• Capacity building of PMC staff with respect to monitoring of building by laws on ground.
• Interlinking of all PMC departments.
• Projects should be executed as per DPRs because most of the projects in Pune are not execute as
per DPRs.
• For the proper implementation of policies there is need of establishment of monitoring
committees
124 | P a g e
• Provision of govt. rented housing should be done at the policy level.

• Budget allocation for MIDC is essential.
• Technical training, engineering institutes should be motivated and invited in MIDC.
• There is need of new town authority which will coordinate all city level authorities like PMC,
PCMC, Cantonment board, MIDC etc.
• JNNURM should monitor how much % of previous CDP projects and recommendations have been
implemented on ground.
• CDP, CMP, and DP should be synchronized.
• Monitoring at project level should be very strong and independent and a third party agency
which may include civil societies of the city.
• JNNURM II should not fund another project other than capacity building and improvement of
governance.
• Tender process is harmful as it does not stick to people's opinion and not giving what government
has agreed to give. There should be right entry and exist of People participation, tendering
process and Consultation company.
• Governance gap – original proposals drawn by consulting public are however converted into
Concretization.
• Ward level democracy is not functional; the decisions taken by Prabhag Samities may not be
implemented.
• There are serious issues in governance specially in monitoring.
• There should be correspondence between Development Plan and the City Development Plan.
• Keeping in purview of 74th CAA
o There should be strong monitoring cell– citizen based monitoring system which has tie up
with Area Sabhas.
o Prabhag Level and Area level Service level Benchmarks should be established and
subsequently achieved.
o Proper database at Prabhag level should be maintained.
o Ward infrastructure Index (WII) should be introduced & updated at regular intervals to
reflect the development of the ward.
• Advertisement areas can be relocated as it has good potential of revenue generation
• Model can be developed where corporate can be part of financial structure, many corporate
companies like Infosys, etc, automobile companies coming to Pune are part of Pune
development, and they should contribute in development fees or fund projects.
• FSI is exclusive domain of PMC which should be fully utilized as land premium for income
generation.
• Carbon credit should be attributed to PMC, CNG and other gas agencies are laying pipelines in
city, they are facing land problems and PMC tries to solve those, so they should pay to PMC.
125 | P a g e
4.3.3 The Outcome

4.3.3.1 Water Supply - Vision statement, Goals, Strategies
Sectoral
Vision
Sector Goals Strategies and action Plan
To ensure • Equitable distribution of water • Identification and assessment of water resources to

safe, supply in all areas. fulfill the future requirement
reliable, • Ensuring 24X7 pressurized water • analysis of present water supply system
equitable, supply in all areas. • Decentralization of water supply system
affordable • To increase the level of ground • Reframing of suitable water supply zones
water for water.
all with • Improvement of storage capacity
• Strengthening of storm water • Improvement of storm water drainage system to
sustainabl
system for drinking purposes. utilize storm water
e water
sources. • Minimizing the transmission and • Provision of city wide rainwater harvesting system
distribution losses. and ground water recharging system
• 100 percent coverage of • Water audit study
metered connection.
• Achieving the Benchmarks and Performance
• 100 percent cost recovery of indicators through Water audit, Energy audit &
water supply on fixed tariff Basis Financial reforms.
• Introduction of telescopic tariff
• Introduction of PPP in water supply
4.3.3.2 Sewerage- Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

Sectoral Vision Sector Goals Strategies and action Plan
To provide Achieve 100% collection efficiency To connect all the households to sewerage
universal of sewerage system
access to Maintain high quality treatment at Provision of DEWATS in all slums till the
affordable
cost-effective rate implementation of RAY and BSUP projects.
sanitation
and ensure Achieve adequacy of waste water Provision of city wide sewerage network system
ecologically treatment up to service level Improvement of conveyance system to increase
sound benchmark the adequacy
management Achieve 100% capacity of recycling Increase the treatment capacity of existing
of waste and reuse for agricultural activities treatment plants to achieve the adequacy in
water and other secondary purposes treatment
providing Achieve 100% waste water revenue Introduction of sewerage charges
public health collection
protection. Capacity building of PMC staff.
Response to customer complains Encourage pay and use category of public
within 24 hours. convenience with community involvement in the
maintenance of the same
126 | P a g e
4.3.3.3 Drainage - Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

To develop and Maintain To protect and enhance the Protection and preservation of
comprehensive water functions of natural drainage natural drainage basin
shed and Storm water features Beautification of natural
infrastructure system to Prevention of soil erosion along the drains
protect health and safety, natural drains Provision of penalty for
to enhance the quality of
To make city free of water logging encroachment and dumping
life to preserve and
areas of waste in drains at
improve the environment.
100 percent coverage of drainage community and individual level
network
Storm water to be treated and
reused
4.3.3.4 Solid Waste Management -Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

To provide most Waste Design use “less packing”
cost effective Minimization Use packing that can be recycled
and efficient 100 percent Introduce “bring your own bag day” to encourage shoppers
solid waste door to door to bring their own bags and reduce excessive use of plastic
collection and Segregation of bags
disposal service waste at source introduce private sector and NGOs participation in waste
while providing Recycle and management to make the door to door collection more
maximum reuse of waste efficient
practical
Respect for the provide community recycle bins
protection to
People who are vermi-compost should be mandatory for housing societies
environment
providing this and townships
with Zero waste
service to the development of community composting system where
city.
society” organic waste is deposited and composting activities can be
Recycle and undertaken
reuse of waste engage waste dealer for regular collection of waste material
Respect for the C&D waste use for roads and building material
People who are introduction of garbage bag charges
providing this
introduction of waste recycling awareness training
service to the
society” Improvement in waste transportation facilities
Health initiatives necessary for waste pickers.
Awareness program
127 | P a g e
4.3.3.5 Traffic & Transport- Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

To provide a safe, Equitable allocation of DP roads should 100 percent implemented
efficient and cost roads space with people Increasing carrying capacity through widening
effective To ensure the and improve riding quality through
multimodal transportation facilities strengthening of existing roads
transportation and services are available New missing links developed as per
system that is to adequately serve development plan
accessible to all existing and proposed To make the existing and future transportation
residents and population densities, corridors free from encroachment.
visitors, protects housing and employment Increase the public transport modes coverage
environment, pattern. and quality including the expansion and
promotes economic All transport corridors to improvement of bus system
development and is be in coherence with the
compatible with Increasing the Fleet capacity
national transport policy ,
and supportive of Establishment of newer and higher quality bus
CMP so as to maintain safe
the city’s future system to cater the need of all sections.
and efficient traffic flow
land use plan. Establishment of central area review and
and convenient transit
service with define road improvement system
way capacity Preparation of local area traffic management
To achieve the city plans
transport 100 percent eco- Education campaign to educate the passenger
efficient. to encourage the use of public transport and
Efficient traffic road safety measure
management Capacity building program for traffic police
To achieve 100 percent Safety concern of cyclist and pedestrian has to
city wide pedestrian be addressed by encouraging the construction
facilities. of segregated right of way for bicycle and
To make core city area pedestrian.
free from motorized Restoration of footpath
vehicles Barricading of footpath –foot path opening
only the strategic location to regulate the
pedestrian movement, to improve traffic
safety and pedestrian safety also.
Pedestrian walkover –to be provided at high
pedestrian link and Zones
Provision of zebra –crossing pedestrian signal
at various strategic locations
128 | P a g e
4.3.3.6 Urban Growth and Land Use- Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

To achieve • 100 percent implementation of • Declare core area as special planning area
compatible land Development Plan • No permission for land use change, increase
uses with • Protect and enhance the fabric in F.S.I/FAR to be given inside the core city
harmonious and character of the old /core area.
urban form city area. • No parking to be allowed inside the core city
having adequate • To ensure that services and on the main roads.
open and green facilities are provided up to the • Implementation of Development plan
spaces, high service level bench marks • Integration of land use planning with CMP,
standards of • Implementation of Land use SWD plan and other development proposals.
infrastructure provisions and DC rules to • Strict enforcement of development control
and effective promote diverse economic rules.
land activities so as to create self- • Town planning schemes should be
management. sufficient suburbs that are well undertaken to ensure planned development.
linked with the other parts of the
city.
4.3.3.7 Housing and Slums - Vision statement, Goals, Strategies
Sectoral Sector Goals Strategies and action Plan

Vision
Slum • To provide 100% affordable • Implementation of RAY Project
free city housing for all with • A comprehensive GIS based survey indicating the most
and integrated service provision, deprived slum, with respect to the parameters of
Housing • Provision of Tenure security location, population density, tenement density,
for all to all slum dwellers. housing condition, access to basic infrastructure
• access to basic facilities should be prepared on the basis of which the
infrastructure needs and minimum levels of access to basic infrastructure should
social amenities for all be provided in each slum.
• To provide 100% affordable • To stop the growth of existing slums in-terms of area
housing for all with and number of tenements
integrated service provision, • Provision of low cost rental housing
• Provision of Tenure security • Rehabilitation of existing slum dweller
to all slum dweller, • Zoning reservation for EWS and LIG Housing
• access to basic • Shelter for poor in-migrants and house less population
infrastructure needs and • Strengthening of livelihood of urban poor by
social amenities for all finalization and implementation of vendor policy
• Community participation in O&M of basic services
129 | P a g e
4.3.3.8 City Environment -Vision statement, Goals, Strategies
Sectoral Vision Sector Goals Strategies

Green, safe Maximizing long term protection to Development of urban green corridors
Sustainable biodiversity while giving aesthetic values to enhance the local climate
and livable city to the protected habitat Linking of Green corridors and urban
for present and To achieve through a developed plan green areas
future public access to all existing and planned Regular vehicular checks to keep air
generations. recreation areas specially water fronts pollution levels within prescribed
and gardens through NMT and levels
pedestrian access facilities Increase the use of alternate fuels like
To retain , preserve , restore and CNG
develop city’s natural resources such as Continuous monitoring at various
rivers , hills , vegetation air and water locations within the city at regular
quality intervals.
To Develop open spaces and green Planned Plantation in the city areas,
areas to provide a variety of quality choice of air pollution resistant tree
leisure opportunities to residents and species in order to minimize ambient
visitor air pollution.
Resource conservation—maximizing Road network must be improved for
efficiency of water and energy resources reducing vehicular emissions
4.3.3.9 Heritage & Tourism- Vision statement, Goals, Strategies

Conservation of To protect and conserve Capacity Building & Provision of Technical Support
heritage and core area for Conservation & Heritage Management
cultural Conserve the social Heritage Resource Information Management
properties, fabric and cultural System for integration of heritage concerns within
traditional arts values of the city the development plans –, Zonal, Sub- Zonal, Area
and crafts and Restore the tangible and Level.
natural resources. intangible heritage Area Level Conservation, revitalization
Restore the tangible and Heritage sensitive infrastructure up-gradation,
intangible heritage provision of essential community facilities,
commercial areas, guidelines for new
development in historic areas, strengthening of
linkages with surrounding contemporary
Development Strategies for heritage tourism,
enhanced visitor experience and revenue
Generation, and awareness generation.
130 | P a g e
4.3.3.10 Institutional framework, Municipal Finances and Urban Governance - Vision

statement, Goals, Strategies

To promote a city To achieve interdepartmental Formation of an regulatory department
managed by pro- coordination and cooperation with in PMC to collect correlate and
active institutions Strong community instruct / finalize the data , functions and
and capable staff participation to governess time line of different departments of PMC.
with increase To achieve 100 percent Strong community participation to
accountability , performance oriented PMC governess high revenue collection
overall efficiency Machinery Interlinking and sharing of information
and required Improved PMC delivery of among different zones and PMC head
transparency basic services. office
Training and capacity building of PMC staff
Regular monitoring and review of the
level of services provided by PMC
To achieve a city To increase revenue generation.

that is a model for
To implement expenditure reduction
urban finance
measures.
management.
Energy efficiency.
Fuel consumption and other item where
reduction is possible after conducting
proper cost audit of all major items of
expenditure.
Controlling the growth of expenditure.
Leveraging available surpluses / own
resources.
131 | P a g e
5 City Wide Consultations through E-mails/ Post
5.1 Methodology
5.1.1 Introduction
In order to have a comprehensive development plan it is necessary to have as much consultation as
possible for which the consultant requested the PMC to uplink a performa on its website so that this can
be used to collect the views and perceptions of the people throughout the city. This gives the people of
the city a unique opportunity to get involved in the preparation process the CDP of Pune and gives them
a platform to express their concerns about their own city. This is considered as a very upfront initiation
and one of the first of its kind in the country to involve the citizens of a city in the decision making
process and in the preparation of City Development Plan.
5.1.2 Process
For collection of city wide consultation PMC uploaded a performa on its website for a fortnight so that
people can download it and give their views. The citizens were given the choice to fill the performa and
send them back either by email or by post to the PMC.
In order to intimate the citizens about this facility on PMC website, it published advertisements in two
leading news paper of the city in both English and in local language i.e. Marathi viz. Times of India (Page
16 on 5th July, 2012) and Shakal Times (Page 09 on 5th July, 2012). An advertisement was given in Indian
Express on 5th July, 2012, page 21 in which Dr. P. Ashtiker, Deputy Municipal Commissioner and Special
officer on JnNURM appealed from the citizens to take part in the CDP preparing process.
5.1.3 Snapshot of Advertisement in News paper
Plate 5-1: Advertisement in Times of India on 5th July, Plate 5-2: Adevtisement in Shakaal Timeson 5th July,
2012 on page 16 2012 on page 09
132 | P a g e
Plate 5-3: Advertisement in Indian Express on 5th July, 2012 on page 21
5.2 Responses by the informed citizens through e-mails and posts
In total 6 responses were received through e-mail and 3 by post which are given below.
5.2.1 By E-mails
1. Respondent 1: 9th July, 2012
From: Sudhir Jatar <scnjat@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:36 PM
Subject: Revision/Updating CDP-2041 Pune City JNNURM
To: PMC CDP JNNURM <piu.jnnurmpune@gmail.com>
Dear Sir or Madam,

Kindly receive enclosed documents as below with reference to your advertisements in Sakal and ToI
dated 5 July 2012:
1. CDP Revision Form;
2. Annexure 1: Water Artificial Shortage;
3. Annexure 2: Mishandling Garbage Management;
4. Annexure 3: Public Transport System; and
5. Polyfest report on Sampada manure as part of Annexure 3.
Please acknowledge
Yours sincerely,
Maj. Gen. S. C. N. Jatar, Retd
Nagrik Chetna Manch
A 102 Neel Sadan, 1426 Sadashiv Peth, Pune 411030
Telephone: +912024475366
133 | P a g e
Visit us at <http://www.nagrikchetna.com>
Please:
· Forward emails by putting the names of recipients under “Bcc” (Blind carbon copy) not in "To" or "Cc."
· Clean the emails you are forwarding by deleting past recipients
· Or copy & paste the Text & Graphics to a new email.
5 attachments — Download all attachments
CDP Revision JNNURM.pdf
123K View Download
CDP - 1-Water Artificial Shortage 260612-Annx 1.pdf
65K View Download
CDP - 2-Mishandling Garbage Mgmnt-Annx 2.pdf

84K View Download
CDP - 3-Public Transport System-Annx 3.pdf
220K View Download
Polyfest report Sampada Manure 270412.pdf
36K View Download
134 | P a g e
(i) Attachment 1:
135 | P a g e
136 | P a g e
137 | P a g e
138 | P a g e
139 | P a g e
(ii) Attachment 2:
140 | P a g e
(iii) Attachment 3:
141 | P a g e
142 | P a g e
143 | P a g e
(iv) Attachment 4:
144 | P a g e
145 | P a g e
146 | P a g e
147 | P a g e
148 | P a g e
149 | P a g e
150 | P a g e
151 | P a g e
152 | P a g e
153 | P a g e
154 | P a g e
(v) Attachment 5:
155 | P a g e

From: Ashok Kumar Misra <ashokmisrasy@yahoo.co.in>
Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Subject: Revising/Updating City Development Plan-2041, Pune city
To: piu.jnnurmpune@gmail.com
Dear Sir,
Sub: ‘Revising/Updating City Development Plan-2041, Pune city
Attached herwith our suggestions for Pune City Development Plan-2041.

Please give us an appointment to discuss in detail.
Kindly acknowledge recipt of the enclosed document.
Best Regards,
Ashok Kumar Misra, BE, DBM, DIP(IMPEX),

36 Yrs @ Hindustan Motors (WB), Bharat Forge, Mather & Platt,
Premier Automobiles, JCB Manufacturing, Pune.
Corporate Trainer, Mentor BYST, Member; Project Guide-IEI (India)
Mobile: 9881401144
NB: Contact for FREE program on Stress Management & Total Personality Development
jnnurm.docx
24K View Download
156 | P a g e
(i) Attachment 1:
157 | P a g e
158 | P a g e
159 | P a g e
160 | P a g e
161 | P a g e
162 | P a g e

From: Nidhi Chandra <nidhi.chandra86@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Regarding complain & suggestions for Revised City Development Plan of Pune City.
Dear Sir,
This mail is in regard to the complain & suggestions for Revised City Development Plan of Pune City. Being
a common citizen my complain is regarding the local transport system is city. same are attached.
Thanks,
Nidhi
Sugeestions from Nidhi.doc
25K View Download
(i) Attachment 1:
Pune City Devlopment Plan
Complains:
I am very thankful to the concern department for deciding to enforce the rule for keeping seats
reserved for women in public transport buses in the City. But the situation on the ground is
altogether different. Every day I used to travel by bus from PMC Depot to Vishrantwadi, some
prescribed seats reserved for ladies are occupied by men. The male passenger doesn’t bother to
vacant the seat even after requesting so many times and even conductor doesn’t ask male
passengers to give seat to ladies. And also express inability saying they wouldn’t listen to him.
Neither the conductor nor the drivers use to help, nor those sitting on the seats reserved for us.
Not only this senior citizen is also suffering, I have always seen that ladies or gents seating on seat
reserved for Sr. citizen never gave there seats to sr. citizens.
Secondly there is no queue system to go inside the bus, the bus used to be two times more
crowded, being ladies passenger it is quite difficult to travel in such situation.
Thirdly there is lack of information system about the bus route system. No board is displayed on
bus. Always I used to ask that where this bus is going.
Suggestions:
Strict action should take against the male passengers seating on ladies seat. And also seat
reserved for senior citizen.
Frequency of buses should be more so that crowd can decrease.
The display system in bus should be strong and informative, so that passenger need not to ask
anyone reagarding bus route.
Bus should be maintenend properly. Some buses are so old and are polluting.
More emphasis should be given on CNG Buses.
Thanks
163 | P a g e

From: piu jnnurmpune <piu.jnnurmpune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issue with government service (Reg. clearing title for property)
To: Divyesh Khambhatwala <divyeshvk@gmail.com>
We acknowledge your mail. Thanks for your response and valuable suggestions
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Divyesh Khambhatwala <divyeshvk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am having issue with the government service for clearing title for property.
I have purchased one flat in Sep-2010 with address Survey no. 55/4/4, Flat#18, Pratham residency
apt., Opp. Mother Teresa school, Wadgaonsheri, Pune - 411014, Maharashtra and at the time of
purchase builder has not told me that the purchased flat is not sanctioned by government and at the time
of loan procedure I came to know that this flat is not approved by government and flat is not available on
blue print, but builder told me that the procedure with government is in process and will get sanctioned
letter with updated blue print soon, so we have not make agreement.
Previously I was thinking that builder is cheating me but after few follow up with builder I got the
information about PMC land department, so I personally visited PMC office in Shivajinagar and got to
know that builder is saying right that we are in process of getting flat sanctioned. I personally visited
PMC, Shivajinagar many times and due to less follow by builder the process was getting delayed and also
PMC land department person was telling me until and unless it will get follow up by builder or any person
the file will not process further.
So, I have personally did follow for at least two months and got file process from PMC with title clear. But
now today (dated 16-Jul-2012) I got to know that PMC will forward that file to Talati office, gram-
panchayat of Wadgaonsheri. Now I am visiting talati office and talati office member is saying that the file
will take 45 days to come in talati office, Wadgaonsheri, Pune from PMC, Shivajinagar, Pune, so again I
am just waiting for talati members to process file and waiting builder to get everything clear, so that I can
get the flat on my name and do the agreement.
Now almost 1 year 11 months got completed but I yet not got flat on my name and possession which is
due to less follow from builder, very slow process of government.
I want flat and possession now because my mother and father are shifted with me and even after
purchasing flat we are staying in rented flat. I have discussed the same issue with many people and
everyone saying like forget the flat and take the token amount back and purchase flat at other place, but
due to current market rates I am not able to purchase 2 BHK flat. Now, I am completely blank on this and
just waiting for my flat to get approve and agreement from builder and my home.
I have only receipt of token amount against the flat and that I can reproduce at anytime.
Please suggest me how should I process further to get the flat on my name, you can contact me at below
details,
Name: Divyesh Khambhatwala
Contact: 09689915660
Email: divyeshvk@gmail.com
164 | P a g e
--
Best Regards,
Divyesh V. Khambhatwala
Cell: 096899 15660
Yahoo/ Gmail/ Skype: divyeshvk
http://divyeshvk.blogspot.com
5. Respondent 5: 16th July, 2012 (By post and e-mail)

From: Ankit Kishore (MAG-NE) <Ankit.Kishore@vodafone.com>
Subject: Feedback for PCMC
To: "piu.jnnurmpune@gmail.com" <piu.jnnurmpune@gmail.com>
Hi All,
Please find my feedback regarding PCMC :
1) As of today the buses running in PCMC for some routes have very less frequency. People have to
wait for hours to reach their destinations
2) The PMT buses are really in a bad state which results in breakdown of buses often and due to this
the scheduled travel gets cancelled and at the end the people have to suffer.
3) Water supplies in areas like kondhwa, hadapsar are bad.
4) The auto rickshaw fares have reached the sky. As there is are government prepaid services
present in the city the drivers take the fares according to their wish.
5) The EPF online does not get updated regularly.
Regards,
Ankit
02030451578

From: Bhanuvarma Nair <bbnair62@rediffmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:19 AM
Subject: Reg. suggestion for JNNURM, ref Indian express Advt. Pune new line
Ref: Your advertisement reg JNNURM, Phase II in Indian Express Pune news line.
Sir
Regarding Transport PMPML: I am submitting the following suggestion

It is often seen that while traveling many male passengers occupy the seats reserved for female
passenger. Most of the conductors maintain muteness and remain silent due to which the female
passengers are forced to stand inside the bus while traveling. Therefore, it is requested that a special
165 | P a g e
squad may be established comprising of females who will conduct surprise checks in the buses and the
guilty conductor and the male passengers may be suitably prosecuted punished and proper fine may
please be levied from them.
During my visit to many other states I observed that male passengers never encroach on the seat
reserved for female passenger and also the conductor never permit or allow any male passenger to sit on
the seats reserved for female passenger.
In view of the above the administrative authorities of Pune Municipal Corporation are requested to
introduce suitable legislation accordingly and implement the same at the earliest thus not allowing the
male passenger to occupy the reserved seats for female passenger.
It is also suggested that similarly a new separate law should also introduced for reserving seats inside the
bus exclusively for male passenger and female passenger should not be allowed to occupy the seats
reserved for male passenger inside the bus. This is extremely necessary to avoid discrimination based on
gender in official and social approach. In case if any female passenger is encroaching on the seats reserved
for male seat suitable fine may be recovered in cash from female passenger and the conductor for
maintenance of negligence towards duty while in service and an valid govt receipt may also be issued for
the fine received in cash. Even it is suggested that in the bus stop a two separate arrangements for female
and male may be made available and the female passenger may be permitted to enter the bus first.
Point No. 2 : Regarding unemployment and housing

I read in news paper that due to shortage of land many investments are going outside maharashtra due
to which unemployment in maharashtra is gradually increasing. In addition many citizens purchase
independent plot and construct independent bunglows which is one of the major reason for shortage of
land in Maharashtra. In order to overcome this type of crucial problem and as a remedial and
precautionary measure the PMC is requested to confiscate the land from the owner by paying him
appropriate cost of the land based on market value.
It is to be realized that in an building many families can be accommodated where as in an bungalow only
one or two families can be accommodated therefore it is proposed and suggested that tax assessment for
families residing in bunglow may be different and also it may be brought under separate Maharashtra
special category Tax act for which a new legislation is required to be introduced /created and passed by
the PMC authorities/govt. of Maharashtra and the same may be implemented.
The various taxes like Property tax, water bill, Electricity bill, service tax and luxury tax for residents
residing in bunglow may be increased i.e (two times more than that of the flat owner). Because instead of
an bungalow if an building is constructed in the same land many families can be accommodated where as
in an bungalow only one or two families can be accommodated therefore it is felt that occupying the land
by constructing an bungalow is an encroachment on the right of the common man based on housing
problem who can afford & capable only to purchase a flat.
(B.B.Nair)
Type III/22 IMD Colony, Pashan
Mobile: 9975386159
166 | P a g e
5.2.2 By Posts
167 | P a g e
168 | P a g e
169 | P a g e
170 | P a g e
2. Respondent 2: 21st July (By post and email)

From: Ashok Sreenivas <ashok@parisar.org>
Date: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Inputs regarding CDP 2012
To: Meenakshi Tyagi <tyagi.mee@gmail.com>, kedar nirgude <nirgudekedar@gmail.com>
Cc: Sujit Patwardhan <sujit@parisar.org>, Ranjit Gadgil <ranjit@parisar.org>
Dear Ms Tyagi,
Thanks for meeting with us on 20th June in the context of your ongoing stakeholder consultations for a
CDP for Pune. As discussed in the meeting, we have serious concerns about the process and need for
creating a CDP now as detailed below. We will also share these concerns with the concerned authorities.
1. The objectives of creating the CDP are not very clear and it would be good if you shared a copy of
the full TOR with all stakeholders. For example, it is strange that the city yet again wants to
develop a vision when one was developed just five or six years ago. Therefore, prima facie, it
appears that its primary purpose of creating this CDP is to fulfill the requirements of NIJNNURM
(or JNNURM II). In other words, it appears to be more about procuring funds and less about the
city's development. Given the extremely weak monitoring and verification mechanisms built into
JNNURM, we believe such a CDP will only result in funds flowing into the city and getting spent in
ways that do not achieve the objectives of sustainable development (as shown by the experience
from the current phase of JNNURM).
2. It seems completely unrealistic to define a city's development plan for 30 years in just three
months, if the plan is to have any real value. If cities across the country are adopting such an
approach, it indicates another fundamental problem in the JNNURM approach.
3. The CDP creation process appears to be completely independent of and parallel to the ongoing
creation of the Development Plan (DP) for Pune as mandated by the MRTP Act.
4. There is no clarity on what happened to the previous CDP - how much of it was implemented,
reasons why something could not be implemented, plans for completing the same etc. For
example, though considerable funds were procured for BRT (in both Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad)
from JNNURM, both cities have only built large road infrastructure using the funds without
moving towards a good, functional BRT.
5. From a transport perspective, Pune already has a Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) which has
been approved by the city's General Body. Hence, the need for a CDP seems redundant when
there is already a comprehensive plan in place defining transport targets and broad solutions up
to 2030.
In short, we believe there are many reports and plans already in place, and the need is not for more plans
but for a proper administrative system and mechanism to implement those plans with proper oversight
to ensure that they achieve their objectives. In particular, for transport, we believe what is required is
good project design and management to implement the proposals in the CMP accompanied by suitable
oversight to ensure that the city progress towards achieving the goals of the CMP. However, if Pune does
go ahead and prepare a CDP to fulfill the requirements for NIJNNURM funding, then it must ensure a
transparent process for finalizing the CDP. To do this, it must put up the draft CDP on its website and
invite comments from all citizens (though newspaper advertisements etc.) for a reasonable period of
171 | P a g e
time, and finalize the CDP based on these comments.

As regards NIJNNURM, we believe that it must have the following components without which it will be as
much of a failure as JNNURM I:
1. The budget and means for independent, transparent and continuous oversight of the projects to
ensure that they achieve their service delivery goals (and not just expenditure targets) must be
integrated within the project proposal and funds disbursal mechanism of NIJNNURM. In case of
transport, it must ensure that the CMP and all projects seeking funding must be compliant in
letter and spirit to the National Urban Transport Policy.
2. Institutional and individual capacity in India's Urban Local Bodies is a matter of serious concern,
and hence there are doubts about effective management and administration of funds even for
well-defined projects. Therefore, it would be good if NIJNNURM focuses on building institutional
capacity, systems and processes in Indian cities more than funding physical infrastructure, as the
latter will most likely be useless without the former.
Thank you.
Warm regards
Ashok
--
Ashok Sreenivas
Parisar
5.3 Outcome of the City Wide Consultations through E-mails/ Post
5.3.1 The Expectation

The process of city wide consultation was sought after to seek the views of the population of Pune city to
prepare a comprehensive city development plan with as much as possible consultation. It was expected
that a large number of people will take part in the process and will give their valuable suggestions and
views for the preparation of the new City Development plan for Pune-2041, but on the contrary the team
received only 6 e-mails and 3 responses through post.
5.3.2 The outcome

The consultation was intended to be a source to provide the views of the people for the CDP preparation
process for which a structured Performa was also provided. But few of the responses were just the
grievances of the people rather than their views regarding their daily problems. According to the received
consultations the major problem lied in the transportation system of the city. There was a grave concern
regarding the transport facilities present in the city. The concerns of the respondents have been
cumulated sector wise and are given as follows:

The received mails suggested the lack of water sources and their reliability. There is also mention of the
artificial scarcity created by the PMC as alleged by the concerned citizen. The problem of water supply in
the city is mainly due to the faulty design and bad monitoring of the water supply department. Also the
172 | P a g e
mails reveal that almost 30 percent of water is wasted due to leakages and water theft. So there was a
concern for the loss of water leading to increase of non revenue water in the city. They also suggested
the provision of water metering for the whole city. The problem of water pressure was also among the
important concerns in the citizen of the city.
5.3.2.2 Sewerage
In the sewerage sector the citizen are concerned about the proper collection of sewerage in the city and
their treatment facilities. According to the Performa received the PMC is unable to treat all the sewage
generated in the city. It has taken PMC 15 years to partly fulfil the condition of treating the sewage but
PMC has not simultaneously planned the project for pumping the recycled or treated sewage in the canal.
This has led to the system gap in the sewage treatment in the city. The concern of the citizens finally
leads to the pollution problem of the water bodies present in the city due to the disposal of untreated
sewerage into them.
5.3.2.3 Drainage
The drainage sector when discussed by the citizens revealed that the core area of the Pune city is not
totally covered by the storm water drainage system. Thus this leads to the occasional water logging
problem in the city. Thus whenever there is rain in the city, it is marked with frequent water logged
patches in the core area. It is found out that even in the newer areas which are added in the recent years
into the PMC do not have the complete coverage by the storm water drains in their respective areas.
There is also mention of Rain water harvesting system provision in the city and the citizens want RWH to
be an important feature added to the Building Approval norms.
The letters reveal the bad situation of solid waste management in the city. Inspite PMC is capable of
disposal of all the solid waste generated in the city but there is blatant violation of all state and central
government directives and Supreme Court directions resulting in further health hazard. The biogas plants
are polluting, the segregation plant has basic defects in siting and producing organic manure, dumping
site is still not capped and water in nearby villages is polluted with stink all-round. There are no
arrangements to monitor air and water quality around these plants.
There is issue regarding the present Hanjer Plant which is able to treat the mixed solid waste in to
manure. As Hanjer is capable of processing mixed garbage, PMC has neither any compulsion nor incentive
to ensure segregation at source, which is mandatory as per current rules and regulations. The capacity of
Hanjer plant would go up by about 25 to 35 % if it gets only wet segregated garbage. While PMC insists
that garbage is being segregated, it has failed to provide Nagrik Chetna Manch with a list of organisations
engaged in doorstep collection of MSW, which strengthens our impression that PMC is not adhering to
the applicable regulations regarding segregation of garbage at source. PMC does not have a record of the
quantity of garbage used for generating gas and garbage collected from restaurants, hotels etc. PMC is
even now not covering all such units due to “shortage of vehicles.” Importantly, PMC has not supported
SWACH to undertake 100% doorstep collection work throughout PMC limits although it is the largest
organisation and the only Government approved NGO in the field.
173 | P a g e

Transportation sector has met with the largest number of concerns according to most of the Performa
received. According to the citizens there is adequate road infrastructure in Pune city, especially because
the funds allotted by JNNURM for BRTS have been largely used for improving the road infrastructure in
the City. However, roads are badly maintained and the funds are not utilised properly. A ring road and a
high capacity mass transit route (HCMTR) are a necessity. Both these projects are languishing for lack of
political will and administrative support. The main reason for the lag in constructing HCMTR is that it is
meant only for public transport, which does not interest the authorities. The citizens will not be surprised
if HCMTR is now included in both CDP and DP with a provision that personalised transport will be allowed
on it. This will be a disaster on the lines of all other PMC, GoM and GoI projects under JNNURM. There is
huge dissatisfaction among the people regarding public transportation system and the road
infrastructure in the city.
The people also mentioned about the not compliance of rules in the buses where there is non availability
of seating facilities to the senior citizens and the women despite earmarking of seats as the male
passengers unethically grab those seats and do not let go of it even on prolonged requests.
5.3.2.6 Environment
The Environmental sector shows a lot of concern as the people feels that the scenario in the city has
further detoriated in the city. There is continuous increase in the air and noise pollution in the city
because of the increased vehicle population and from their harmful fumes. Thus there is more concern
over introduction of CNG buses in the city and even in the private means of transport in the city. The
people want to reduce the use of private vehicles and emphasize on the use of mass transit system.
5.3.2.7 Heritage and tourism
The sector of Heritage has a brief reference about the congestion of the core area in the city and the
inability of the PMC to conserve the core area in the city which is an important heritage.
5.3.2.8 Slum
In this sector according to the received Performa the concern of the populations is only to the level of
making the city slum free and no such deep thought has been put into the problem of slums in Pune.
5.3.2.9 Institutional Framework, Municipal Finance and Urban Governance
One of the major concerns of the citizens of Pune is the Governance of the city. They are having less faith
in the way in which the current government and authorities are functioning. The main reason behind this
is the total absence of project management skills. This is obvious from the shoddy manner of executing of
various projects. It's hard to find any project that has been implemented within the allotted funds and
time frame and specified quality. Transparency is also a major concern among people.
174 | P a g e
6 Service Performance & Citizen Satisfaction Survey
6.1 Methodology
In order to understand the citizen's satisfaction level regarding the service performance provided by PMC
and their perception regarding the improvement in these services, a survey at the household level was
conducted which was primarily of qualitative nature. For this survey, structured questionnaire technique
with random sampling was used. The survey samples were taken from all segments of society.
6.2 Citizen's satisfaction survey analysis
Revising CDP - Pune
1
19th July, 2012 division division partnering vision
Data analysis as per ward wise Survey
Water supply hours / day

25
20
20
Number of Hours
15
10
8
16 7 7
6
5 5 5
5 4 4 4 4 4
9 9 8
6 2 7
5
3 3 3 3 3
2 2
0
By Primary Survey, 2012 By CSP of Pune, 2012
5
In B S Dhole Patil road there is a large discrepancy in the actual supply hours and the PMC data. Rests of
the wards are almost near the registered data.
175 | P a g e
Quantity of potable water supplied

100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
6%
17% 11% 14%
90%
Percentage population Response
34% 30%
80% 42% 42%
70% 56%
60%
50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
94%
83% 74% 86%
40%
66% 70%
30% 58% 59%
20% 44%
10%
0%
Sufficient Not Sufficient
6
Aundh reflects the maximum insufficiency of water in the ward along with Hdapsar, Yerwada, Bibvewadi
and Sangamwadi ward.
7
The overall quality of water in city is good. Only in Bhawanipeth ward 18% people are not satisfied woth
quality of water.
176 | P a g e
8
22% of Bibvewadi and 17% of Ghole Road ward residents are not satisfied with the quality of water
supply network. Rest the overall quality of water supply network is satisfactory.
10
Hadapsar, Yerwada, Shahkarnagar, Aundh, Bhawanipeth, Karve road ward residents have complaints
about the water pressure in the city.
177 | P a g e
11
According to the analysis almost half of the city's population takes steps to conserve water which is a
satisfactory result.
12
97% of Ghole road residents are not willing to pay for better quality water supply along with
Shahkarnagar and almost half of Bhawani peth ward and Kasba Vishrambag ward. All the wards on the
outskirt of PMC are more willing to pay which is around 15-20% increase in water charges.
178 | P a g e
13
The whole city is covered with Municipal sewerage network.
Distance of community toilets from residences

100%
8%
percentage population response
18% 13% 17% 12%

90% 25% 25% 28%
80% 42% 44% 44% 38% 41%
70%
60% 77%
50%
87% 93% 88%
40% 82% 83%
75% 58% 72%
30% 58% 56% 56% 62% 59%
20%
10% 24%
0%
Nearby Far away

14
Hadapsar, Aundh, Bibvewadi, Bhawani peth, Tilak road ward residents are not satisfied with the distance
of the community toilets from their respective homes.
179 | P a g e
15
Almost 60% the city thinks that the fee for community toilet is on the higher side hence should be
reduced.
16
Hadapsar, Aundh, Yerwada, Sangamwadi ward residents are not satisfied by the cleanliness of the
community toilets in their area.
180 | P a g e
17
Almost all the wards are sufficiently connected by either PCC road or tar road. 4 out of 14 ward have a
very low percentage of poorly paved roads.
18
There are street light throughout the city but only half the city population is satisfied regarding its
sufficiency in their respective localities.
181 | P a g e
19
Bibvewadi, Dhankewadi, Hadapsar, Warje- Karve road ward residents are not satisfied with the
pedestrian facilities in their locality.
20
Almost the whole city is not satisfied with the existing road infrastructure present in their wards.
182 | P a g e
21
Almost 65-70% population of the city would prefer to travel by public transport in the city.
22
All the ward residents feel that there is congestion problem in their ward.
183 | P a g e
23
The whole city residents are affected by the water logging problem.
24
Approx 70% of the city population thinks that their ward si not covered by underground storm water
drainage network.
184 | P a g e
25
Approx 50% of the city is covered by Door to door collection along with approx 85% community bins.
26
The whole city is satisfied with the frequency of door to door collection frequency.
185 | P a g e
27
Almost all the wards are swept on a daily basis in the city.
28
Apart from 35% of Sangamwadi ward the whole city is satisfied with the SWM services.
186 | P a g e
29
42% of residents of Sangamwadi ward are not satisfied by the solid waste cleanliness in the city.
30
Almost the whole city feels that the condition of air pollution has worsened in the recent time.
187 | P a g e
31
Almost the whole city feels that noise pollution has increased in the recently.
Condition of Playgrounds
100% 5% 0% 0%
5% 0% 0% 0% 3%
8% 7% 11% 7%
0% 4% 8% 8%
16% 11% 2%
90% 24% 0%
10% 17%
80% 39% 0% 13%
16% 34% 48% 0% 27%
5% 45%
70% 50% 0%
60% 0% 62%
50% 11%
2%
50% 0%
0% 59% 90%
40% 42% 82%
71% 76%
30% 66% 61%
0% 5% 66% 54%
52%
20% 45%
0% 0%
22% 27%
10% 19% 17%
0%
Poor 1 Average 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 5

32
188 | P a g e
33
34
35
189 | P a g e
36
37
38
190 | P a g e
39
6.3 Summary of Key findings of Citizen Satisfaction Survey
6.3.1 Citizen Perceptions

The 'service performance satisfaction and qualitative' survey which was conducted in Pune city mainly
focused on the entire infrastructure services provided by Pune Municipal Corporation to the city
Population. The sectors which were included in the survey were water supply, sewerage, drainage, solid
waste management, road infrastructure, transportation, city environment and heritage of the city. Within
each sector different aspects are covered which relate to the overall satisfaction level of all the people of
Pune. Among the various priority survey health facilities and education facilities were also included. The
demand survey also revealed the satisfaction level of people regarding the social infrastructures already
existing in the city like playgrounds, parks, neighborhood gardens, civic centers, community halls, sports
complexes, public health centers, emergency response centers and fire services.
6.4 Different sectors covered in the survey
6.4.1 Water Supply

The survey focused on various aspects in water supply sector viz. number of water supply hours, the
quality of water supply network, source of drinking water supply, sufficiency of water supplied, quantity
Data analysis as per ward wise Survey of water supply,
Water supply hours / day quality of water
25
20
supply, pressure of
20
water supplied,
Number of Hours
15 steps taken by the

10
people to save
8
5 5
7 16 7
5
6 water and
5 4 4 4 4 4
6 2
9
willingness
5
of 9 8
7
3 3 3 3 3
2 2
0 people to pay more
By Primary Survey, 2012 By CSP of Pune, 2012
5
191 | P a g e
for enhanced water supply.
According to the survey in B.S. Dhole Patil road there is a large discrepancy in the actual supply hours and
the PMC data. Even in Aundh, Bhawani Peth ward the registered data is higher than the supply hours
revealed by the primary survey. Rests of the wards are almost near the registered data. In few of the
wards like Ghole Road, Kasba Vishrambag and Shahkar Nagar the supply hours have been indicated more
than that of the registered data by Pune Municipal Corporation as indicated in the City Sanitation plan
2012.
Regarding the quantity of portable water supply the wards on an average have a satisfactory reaction;
nevertheless Aundh reflects the maximum insufficiency of water in the ward along with Hadapsar,
Yerwada, Bibvewadi and Sangamwadi ward with the percentage of population ranging from 20 percent to
56 percent dissatisfied regarding this aspect. If talked about Quality of water supplied in the city, it is
good. Only in Bhawanipeth ward 18 percent and in Karve Road 14 percent people are not satisfied with
quality of water. Rest of the city is rather quite content with the quality.
22 percent of residents of Bibvewadi and 17 percent of Ghole Road ward residents are not satisfied with
the quality of water supply network. Rest the overall quality of water supply network is satisfactory.
Hadapsar, Yerwada,
Shahkarnagar,
Aundh,
Bhawanipeth, Karve
road ward residents
have complaints
about the water
pressure in the city.
Still around 65-70
percent of
12
population of the project
development &
water-
sanitation
transportati
on division
environment
& waste
structural
engineering
power
divisio
project
management
th July, 2012
city is satisfied with19the pressure component of the water supply sector.
division divisionpartnering vision
According to the analysis almost 50 percent of the city's population takes steps to conserve water which
is a satisfactory result. This shows that there is awareness among the citizens of the Pune city regarding
conservation of water.
Also the willingness of the people to pay more money for better water supply is satisfactory. But in case
of Ghole road ward around 97 percent of residents are not willing to pay for better quality water supply
along with Shahkarnagar and almost half of Bhawani peth ward and Kasba Vishrambag ward. But all the
wards on the outskirt of PMC are more willing to pay which is around 15-20% increase in water charges.
Hence in future even if the rates of water supply are revised within the given bracket then the city would
welcome the change and would anticipate a good quality of service deliverance.
6.4.2 Sewerage
The aspects considered for this sector was the coverage percentage of municipal sewerage network in
the city, distance of community toilets from the houses of the people, cleanliness of the community
192 | P a g e
toilets and the fee which was collected from the people for the usage of the community toilets. The Pune
municipal Corporation has been successful in covering the whole of the city under the sewerage network.
Almost 98 percent of the city is under municipal connection. Only around 2 percent of the population is
covered by septic tank. Regarding the coverage the people are very satisfied with the facilities provided
by the Pune Municipal Corporation.
Hadapsar,
Distance of community toilets from residences
Aundh,
100%
8% Bibvewadi, Bhawani
18% 13% 17% 12%

25% 90%
25% 28%
42% 80% 38% 41%
44% 44%
70%
77%
peth, Tilak road ward
60%
75%
50%
82%
40% 87% 93%
83% 88% residents are not
58% 72%
30% 62% 59%
58% 56% 56%
20% satisfied with the
10% 24%
0% distance of the
community toilets from
their respective homes.
Almost 65 percent of
Nearby Far away
14 the population of the
city is satisfied with the proximity of the community toilets from their
development &
planning
sanitation
division
on division respective homes. The situation is
& waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
19th July, 2012 division partnering vision
division
in a way grave in Hadapsar ward where 77 percent people find the toilets far from their homes.
Almost 60% the
city purviews
that the fee for
community
toilet is on the
higher side
hence should be
reduced. In
Bhawani Peth,
Ghole road, project water-
15
environment structural power project
transportati
karve road, Kasba Vishranbag
19th July, 2012 Sahkarnagar, Yerwada, Sangamwadi, Warje- Karwenagarpartnering
planning
division
and vision
Tilak road
division
on division
management
division
division n division
where the population percentage ranges from 60 percent to 100 percent; the fee is in the affordable
limits according to the people. In B S Dhole Patil Road 37 percent and in Dhanakwadi 38 percent of the
population stated that the fee are on the lower side.
There is major issue regarding the cleanliness of the community toilets in the city. Hadapsar, Aundh,
Yerwada, Sangamwadi ward residents are not satisfied by the cleanliness of the community toilets in
their area. It can be inferred that the wards on the out-skirt of Pune are receiving a inferior level of
services that the core city. In Hadapsar ward and Sangamwadi ward almost 96 percent and 91 percent
people respectively are not satisfied with the cleanliness of the toilets.
6.4.3 Drainage
The drainage section of the citizen perception survey included the aspects like the occurrence of water
logging in the city and the coverage of storm water drain network in the city. If these two aspects are
properly functioning in the city then it can be assumed that the drainage network of the city is efficient
enough to keep the city water logging free and the instantaneous draining of the storm water into the
193 | P a g e

network lines to the larger water bodies after the rain.
According to the
survey around 70
percentage of the
city residents
responded that
their ward is not
covered by under-
ground storm
water drainage
network. The 24
major problem of storm water network lies in wards like
development &
planning
Aundh, Bhawanipeth,
sanitation
division
Bibevewadi, Ghole
on division road,
& waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
19th July, 2012 division partnering vision division
Dhanakwadi, Hadapsar, and Warje-Karvenagar where the responding population within the range of 50
percent to 91 percent is not satisfied with the coverage of storm water network.
According to the
enquiry about the
situation of water
logging from the
people of their
respective wards,
the whole city is
affected by the
problem. The
23
problem of water
logging is worse in the wards of Kasba Vishrambag and Shahakarnagar as almost all the respondents
development &
planning
sanitation
division
transportati
on division & waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
division
stated it as a major problem. Even wards like Aundh, B S Dhole Patil road, Bhawanipeth, Bibwewadi,
Karve road, Hadapsar, Sangamwadi and Tilak road are suffering as more than 70 percent of the
population is suffering from water logging problem.
6.4.4 Solid Waste Management

Solid waste management is the sector where Pune city has accomplished a lot during its course. Right
from door to door
collection to
collection through
community bins to
street sweeping, a
lot has been
already done in
the city. Several
non government
organizations
along with the Corporation have been working hard to make the city a better place
25 to live in. Several best
1|Page
practices have been taken up by the PMC and the citizens for a clean city to live in.
Due to the excellent Data efforts byperNGO
analysis as Swach
ward wise along with the initiatives of PMC, the city has been able to
Survey
introduce almost
50 percent door
to door collection
in the city. In this
criterion Swach is
able to collect
almost all the
solid waste from
their covered
areas with an
excellent frequency i.e. almost 100 percent on a daily basis. Along with door to door collection,29 85
percent of the 19 city population
th July, 2012
is covered by community bins. Few wards like Bibevewadi,
planning
division
division
on division
management Kasba
partnering vision
division
division n division
DataVishrambag, Bhawanipeth
analysis as per ward wise Survey are almost totally covered with community bins.
The practice of
street sweeping is
carried out with
diligently in the
city with nearly all
the area being
covered
thoroughly. Only
few peripheral
wards are
28
experiencing a lower level of service deliverance where almost 40 -42 percent of population is not been
project
development &
water-
sanitation
transportati
on division
environment
& waste
structural
engineering
power
divisio
project
management
19th July, 2012 partnering vision
able to get benefits of this service on a whole. Regarding the consistency
division division
of services in the sector of solid
waste management, apart from 35 percent of population from Sangamwadi, the whole of the city is
satisfied with the provided services. The overall cleanliness of the solid waste services in the city is
satisfactory only 42 percent residents of Sangamwadi ward are not satisfied by the solid waste cleanliness
in the city. It is also majorly notices that the wards on the fringes of the city remain unclean according to
their 20-25 percent residents.
6.4.5 Transport and Traffic
The transport sector in
Pune city is one of the most
problematic sectors among
all. The aspects covered in
the satisfaction survey
included both the coverage
of roads, types of roads,
road infrastructure
17
188 | P a g e
including street lights, their sufficiency, congestion in the wards, and preference of public transport. Due
to the uncontrolled growth of number of vehicles; both two and four wheeler in the Pune city, today
transport sector needs lot of changes and augmentation in itself.
The aspect covered in this section is the type of access road present in the wards. According to the survey
almost all the wards are sufficiently connected by either PCC road or tar road. The percentage of
population serviced by tar road ranges from 43 percent to 82 percent throughout different wards in the
city. The survey also revealed about the presence of PCC roads ranging from 19 percent to 82 percent
Datapopulation
analysis as per access.
ward wise 4 out of 14 wards have a very low percentage of poorly paved roads.
Survey
Regarding the
presence of street
infrastructure like
street lightings and
the presence of
pedestrian facilities
were also the
important part of
survey. According
to the survey
18
almost all wards are facilitated with street lights but regarding the sufficiency of street lights have a
project
development &
water-
sanitation
transportati
on division
environment
& waste
structural
engineering
power
divisio
project
management
19th July, 2012 partnering vision
different impact on the survey as only half the city population is satisfied
division division
regarding its sufficiency in their
respective localities. Bibvewadi, Dhankewadi, Hadapsar, Warje- Karve road ward residents are not
satisfied with the pedestrian facilities in their locality.
Almost whole city
is dissatisfied with
the existing road
infrastructure
present in their
wards. On a
contrary in Aundh
Ward around 80
percent of people
are very content with the road infrastructure present in their ward. Even in Yerwada and Warje
Data analysis as per ward wise Survey 20
Karvenagar ward around 30 - 40 percent people are satisfied with the road infrastructure
development &
planning
sanitation
division
on division in their
& waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
division
respected wards.
Almost 65-70%
population of the city
would prefer to travel
by public transport in
the city. Surprisingly
100 percent people of
21
19th July, 2012

development &
planning
sanitation
division
on division & waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
partnering vision
189 | P a g e
division division
Ghole road and Karve road ward have inclination towards Public transport. Even in Yerwada 98 percent of
the population want to use public transport in their day to day life provided it's safe and cost effective.
Almost all the

ward residents feel
that there is
congestion
problem in their
ward because of
various reasons
like encroachment,
illegal parking,
hawking etc. around 60-75 percent population responded that they have experienced
project water- environment
22 congestion in their
transportati
respective wards.
19th July, 2012
planning
division
division
on division
management division
partnering vision
division
n division
6.4.6 City Environment

Through the satisfaction survey,
Data analysis as peritward
haswise
been
Surveyattempted to assess the city environment by focusing on
aspects like noise

pollution and air
pollution, as a
common citizen
can only share his
experience about
environment very
qualitatively. There
has been very
degrading effect on
the environment as almost the whole city feels that there has been constant degradation in 30the
transportati
Data analysis as per ward wise Survey development & sanitation on division & waste engineering divisio management
19th July, 2012

planning
division
division
environment
management
in the
partnering vision
division
division n division
recent years.
In case of air
pollution almost
the whole city feels
that the condition
of air pollution has
worsened in the
recent times. In
wards like
31 Shahakar nagar,
Hadapsar, Aundh, Yerwada, Karve Road approx 90-92 percent people have stated that the condition of air
development &
planning
sanitation
division
on division & waste
management
engineering
division
divisio
n
management
division
division
pollution is dwindling at a very fast and increasing rate.
The situation of noise pollution has also registered a worsening trend over the years according to almost
190 | P a g e
all the residents of the city. Only around half the people in wards like Danakwadi, Kasba Vishrambag or
Bhawanipeth stated that the noise pollution has reduced over the year but rest of the city has either
assessed it as a worsening trend or as a stagnant case.
191 | P a g e
7 Outcome of Citizen Satisfaction Survey & 3rd Workshop:

Priority sectors
7.1 Introduction
In the household survey, individual consultations and focused group discussion for prioritizing the
provision of services, the citizens were asked to rank the sectors according to their priority of
improvement. In this section they were asked to rank the various infrastructure services according to
their priority giving the most urgently required service as first rank and the least prioritized sector as the
last rank. This was carried out in all the fourteen wards of the city where the people chose the service
which they wanted to be improved with utmost urgency. The citizens were asked to rank between eight
different infrastructure services which included both physical and social infrastructure service. The
different type of services were Water Supply, Sewerage/ Sanitation, Solid Waste Management, Storm
water drainage, Road infrastructure, Public transport system, Health facilities and Education facilities.
This priority ranking was carried out in all the fourteen wards in the city and later it was combined
together in view of the whole of the city to find the most prior infrastructure services perceived by the
citizens of the Pune city. This ranking is to be perceived as only in terms of citizen's current and most
urgent requirement in the city.
7.2 Priority Sectors
According to the citizen satisfaction survey different wards have come up with various ranking associated
to each infrastructure service. Hence different wards will suggest a different ranking which later
combines together to reveal the priority of the whole city.
7.2.1 Ward level

7.2.1.1 Aundh Ward
Priority ranking of Aundh ward

7.0
8th
Priority ranking(1 to 8) for various
6.0 7th
6th
5.0
infrastructures
4.0 5th
4th
3.0
3rd
1st 2nd
2.0
1.0
0.0
Aundh ward
Public transport system Water Supply Road infrastructure Solid Waste Management
Storm water drainage Health facilities Sewerage/ Sanitation Education facilities
192 | P a g e
According to the priority ranking revealed by the citizen survey done in Aundh ward in Pune city, the
most utmost need of the people residing there is Public Transport System. Thus the residents of Aundh
ward want the transport facilities in their area to get revamped up with on a priority basis. On the priority
list water supply is a close second as they face issues with water supply in their area. Road infrastructure,
Solid waste management and storm water drainage are close on priority list hence shows that these
three services require almost equal attention and hence to be rectified on a priority basis after transport
and water supply. The last three sectors on the priority list are Health, Sewerage/Sanitation and
Education facilities present in the ward. The graph reveals that they are in a better condition in the ward
and hence their up gradation can be done at the regular level after the previous important sectors.
7.2.1.2 Bhawani peth Ward
Priority ranking of Bhawani peth ward

8.0
8th
6th 7th
6.0
Priority ranking(1 to 8) for
variousinfrastructures
5th
4.0 3rd 4th
2nd
1st
2.0
0.0
Bhawani peth ward
Water Supply Public transport system Sewerage/ Sanitation Road infrastructure
Solid Waste Management Storm water drainage Health facilities Education facilities
In Bhawani peth ward the citizens are more concerned towards the water supply system and after that
on second ranking transport system comes. The Sewerage/Sanitation, road infrastructure and solid waste
management are close on their priority list after the first two sectors. Similarly storm water drainage,
health facilities and education facilities are again last three on the citizen's priority list. Hence in Bhawani
peth ward foremost care should be taken in revitalizing the water supply and public transport system.
7.2.1.3 Bibvewadi Ward
Priority ranking of Bibvewadi ward

8.0
7th 8th
6.0 6th
infrastructures
4th 5th
4.0 3rd
2nd
1st
2.0
0.0
Bibvewadi ward
Public transport system Water Supply Road infrastructure Sewerage/ Sanitation
193 | P a g e
In case of Bibvewadi ward, the people are more pro about the development of public transport system at
the first place. Subsequently water supply, road infrastructure along with Sewerage and solid waste
management are a matter of concern to the resident of the people in Bibvewadi. Again the last three
sectors which are Storm water drainage, health facilities and Education facilities are well to do in this
ward as it can be interpreted from the graph and hence these three sectors do not require urgent
development work.
7.2.1.4 B.S. DholePatil Road Ward
Priority ranking of B S Dhole patil road ward

7.0
8th
6.0
7th
5.0
6th
4.0 4th 5th
3rd
2nd
3.0
1st
2.0
1.0
0.0
B S Dhole patil road ward
Water Supply Public transport system Education facilities Road infrastructure
Sewerage/ Sanitation Health facilities Solid Waste Management Storm water drainage
B S DholePpatil road is one of the core areas of the Pune city. Even in this area in-spite a very good water
supply network and supply hours, the residents are mostly concerned about the water supply followed by
the public transport system. In this ward the people have given education sector more priority than the
other wards but still road infrastructure, sewerage/sanitation follow it close by. There is a steep
difference between the health sector, solid waste management and storm water drainage at the last
three ranks.
7.2.1.5 Dhankawadi
Priority ranking of Dankawadi ward

8.0 8th
7th
6.0
6th
5th
4.0
4th
3rd
1st 2nd
2.0
0.0
Dankawadi ward
Health facilities Solid Waste Management Storm water drainage Education facilities
194 | P a g e
In Dhankawadi the residents chose public transport as the most priority sector which should be improved
at the earliest. Water supply network is a close second here in Dhankawadi. There is some discontent
regarding the road infrastructure in this ward followed by sewerage and sanitation. Health facilities in this
ward is give a relatively priority than the other wards. Since the situation of solid waste management,
storm water drainage and education are better so they have been laid off on a latter priority in the survey
which means they can be improved in due course of time.
7.2.1.6 Ghole Road Ward
Priority ranking of Ghole road ward

8.0 8th
6.0
7th
6th
infrastructures
3rd 4th 5th

4.0
2nd
1st
2.0
0.0
Ghole road ward
The water supply sector in Ghole road is considered to be the most prior sector by the residents
according to the citizen satisfaction survey. It is closely followed by public transport at the second most
urgently required sector. Sewerage/ Sanitation, road infrastructure, solid waste management and storm
water drainage are very close on the priority list preceded by health facilities and education facilities who
are the last two sectors on the priority sector by the people living in Ghole road ward.
7.2.1.7 Hadapsar Ward
Priority ranking of Hadapsar ward

7.0
8th
6.0 7th
6th
5.0
infrastructures
5th
4.0 4th
2nd 3rd
3.0
1st
2.0
1.0
0.0
Hadapsar ward
Sewerage/ Sanitation Health facilities Storm water drainage Education facilities
195 | P a g e
Hadapsar ward residents have ranked public transport on a top priority basis as they are located on the
out skirts of the city.
7.2.1.8 Karve Road Ward
Priority ranking of Karve road ward

8.0 8th
7th
6.0
6th
5th
4.0 3rd 4th
2nd
1st
2.0
0.0
Karve road ward
Water Supply Public transport system Road infrastructure Sewerage/ Sanitation
In Karve road water supply has come up to be the most important sector according to the priority
ranking. It is then followed by public transport system which precedes road infrastructure facilities in the
ward. Sewerage/ Sanitation, solid waste management and health facilities take down the next three
places on the priority list which is followed by health and education facilities at the last in the priority
ranking list.
7.2.1.9 Kasba Vishrambag Ward
Priority ranking of Kasba Vishrambag ward

7.0 7th 8th
6th
6.0
5th
5.0 4th
4.0
3rd
3.0 2nd
1st
2.0
1.0
0.0
Kasba Vishrambag ward
Kasba Vishrambag residents chose water supply as the priority sector for their ward for which immediate
action should be taken. Public transport and Sewerage/ Sanitation are followed by water supply. Here in
this ward also hea;th and education are the last two sectors in the ranking as on a whole it is understood
that these two sectors are already worked upon in the city.
196 | P a g e
7.2.1.10 Shahakarnagar Ward
Priority ranking of Shahakarnagar ward

8.0 8th
6.0 5th 6th 7th

4th
4.0 3rd
1st 2nd
2.0
0.0
Shahakarnagar ward
Health facilities Storm water drainage Solid Waste Management Education facilities
Public transport system in Shahakarnagar tops the priority service list keeping water supply a close
second. The residents of Shahakarnagar Ward gave next priority to road infrastructure and after that
Sewerage/ Snitation, health facilities, storm water drainage and solid waste management were a close to
each other in the ranking.
7.2.1.11 Sangamwadi Ward
Priority ranking of Sangamwadi ward

8.0 8th
7th
6th
6.0 5th
4th
4.0 3th
2nd
2.0 1st
0.0
Sangamwadi ward
Storm water drainage Health facilities Sewerage/ Sanitation Education facilities
The residents of Sangamwadi ward pointed out public transport as the sector which required most urgent
upgrade in their area. The next attention was required for water supply and subsequently road
infrastructure, solid waste management, storm water drainage, health facilities, sewerage and sanitation
and finally education facilities at the last of the priority ranking. In Sangamwadi the graph shows that
there is a gradual need of up-gradation of all the services present in the area, to start with public
transport system.
197 | P a g e
7.2.1.12 Tilak Road ward
Priority ranking of Tilak road ward

7.0 7th 8th
6th
6.0
5th
5.0
4th
4.0 3rd
2nd
3.0
1st
2.0
1.0
0.0
Tilak road ward
Solid Waste Management Education facilities Storm water drainage Health facilities
Same as above wards in Tilak road ward also public transport system is top of the priority list for its
residents. It is then succeeded by water supply. One anomaly seen here form the other wards is that
education facilities is higher up in the ranking which makes it an important sector to be taken care off in
the project priority.
7.2.1.13 Warje-Karvenagar Ward
Priority ranking of Warje-Karvenagar ward

8.0 8th
7th
6.0 6th
4th 5th
infrastructures
4.0
2nd 3rd
2.0 1st
0.0
Warje-karvenagar ward
Storm water drainage Sewerage/ Sanitation Health facilities Education facilities
The residents of Warje-Karvenagar chose public transport system as their top priority infrastructure
service which should be looked into for its development. Water supply and road infrastructure followed it
where they were placed close to one another. After them solid waste management, storm water
drainage and sewerage/ sanitation were ranked on the priority list with less difference between them.
The last two ranks were given to health and education facilities by the residents of the ward.
198 | P a g e
7.2.1.14 Yerwada Ward
Priority ranking of Yerwada ward

8.0 8th
7th
6th
6.0 5th
4th
infrastructures
4.0
2nd 3rd
1st
2.0
0.0
Yerwada ward
Public transport system Water Supply Sewerage/ Sanitation Storm water drainage
Solid Waste Management Road infrastructure Health facilities Education facilities
Yerwada residents gave importance to public transport system, water supply and sewerage/ sanitation
for the first three ranks but were places close to each other. These sectors were succeeded by storm
water drainage, solid waste management, road infrastructure and heath facilities. Education facilities
were given the last choice in the citizen satisfaction survey of this ward.
7.2.2 City Level

Priority ranking of different services

8.00 8th
infrastructures
6th 7th
6.00
4th 5th
4.00
3rd
1st 2nd
2.00
0.00
city level average

This graph depicts the priority ranking of the city as a whole when ranking from all the wards were
recombined together. According to this graph the population of the city at large has the opinion that the
public transport system and the water supply system should be re-structured and re-developed so that
the provision of these services are improved particularly in number of hours of water supply, quantily of
water supply, quality of public transport. Road infrastructure should also be improved greatly in the city
along with the sewerage and sanitation. The solid waste management sector got the next rank as this is
one of the sectors which have all ready been worked upon the city. This is the same case with storm
water drainage which is followed by health and education facilities. This shows that Pune has already
been an aware city regarding health and education from yester years.
199 | P a g e
Annexure 1: Voyants Performa on 19th May2012
200 | P a g e
201 | P a g e
202 | P a g e
203 | P a g e
204 | P a g e
205 | P a g e
206 | P a g e
Annexure 2: CDP survey format English for website
207 | P a g e
208 | P a g e
209 | P a g e
210 | P a g e
211 | P a g e
Annexure 3: CDP survey format Marathi for website
212 | P a g e
213 | P a g e
214 | P a g e
215 | P a g e

Draft City Development Plan For Pune City 2041 Vol-2 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft City Development Plan For Pune City 2041 Vol-2 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft City Development Plan For Pune City 2041 Vol-2 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REVISED CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PUNE - 2041,

MAHARASHTRA, UNDER JNNURM

4.3 The presentation by VSPL ............................................................................................................. 76

1 Kick off meeting for Revising/ Updating City Development

1.1 List of Participants in the Kick off meeting

1.2.1 The presentation made by VSPL

Revising /updating the City

The world’s best metropolitan cities had a

“I want to deliver those changes that Londoners, and

“Managing traffic and

What influences Livability of a city?

Consistency between its infrastructure,

Better accessibility to public transportation and more

High density High density

“65 km of exclusive busways 340 km of feeder

Reduction of about 27 million auto trips per year

are located within a radius of 500 meters

Sao Paulo: Greening water infrastructure

Curitiba, 52 m²/ person

Integration of busway & commuter rail

Sabarmati riverfront development & heritage walk

“Purchase of Garbage” programme, Curitiba

Towards environmental management…

Towards environmental management…

Towards environmental management…

Before the Slum Networking

The river and its surrounds after

Tianjin Eco city…

The Pratt Centre for Community Development, Brooklyn NY

Eempowers communities through:

Pune – A unique city 2

Description 2001 2011

INVESTMENT REGIONS - MAHARASHTRA

Pune is fast emerging as one of INVESTMENT HUB of Maharashtra

Pune comes under DMIC Project Influence Area

INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER- PUNE REGION

PUNE – ONGOING & UPCOMING PROJECTS

Volume of Supply 20 million Sq ft of

PUNE – ONGOING & UPCOMING PROJECTS

South Pune Ambegaon, Katraj, Kondhwa, PASHAN KALYANI NAGAR

East Pune Boat Club, Hadapsar, Kalyani Nagar,

West Pune Aundh, Balewadi, Baner, Bavdhan,

CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

CDP IN CONTEXT OF JNNURM

MoUD SUB MISSION FOR URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE

SUB MISSION FOR

PUNE WAS COVERED UNDER MISSION CITIES

SECTORS COVERED UNDER JNNURM

• Traffic and transportation

Urban FINAL CITY

Urban Poverty Issue/Problems/

sector goals and Stakeholder

Setting of Vision, Goals and Strategies

Preparing a City Capital Investment Plan (CIP)

FINAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

A way for Financing and Implementation

Monetize Land and Facilitate Finance

Innovative Financing Strategies

Development framework that..