Materi Hari 2 Davy Sukamta PDF

2/18/2020
ASCE 7-16 cl.12.10 / SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.10
NICK ALEXANDER & DAVY SUKAMTA
WORKSHOP PUSKIM SEMARANG 2020
 TRANSFER FORCES IN DIAPHRAM

 INTERACTION BETWEEN DIFFERENT LATERAL SYSTEMS
 BACKSTAY EFFECT
 GUIDANCE IN EVALUATING TRANSFER FORCE IN DIAPHRAGM
 RECOMMENDED STIFFNESS PROPERTIES
 BUILDING ANALYSIS & DIAPHRAGM FORCES
 DIAPHRAGM ANALYSIS & COMPONENT INTERNAL FORCES
 OVERVIEW OF SOME CASE STUDIES
PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

TRANSFER FORCES IN DIAPHRAGM WORKSHOP PUSKIM SEMARANG 2020 2
1
2/18/2020
Jenis gaya yang harus diatasi diafragma: Why two sets?

 Gaya Inersia  RESPONS MAKSIMUM PADA SETIAP
 Gaya Transfer LANTAI TERJADI PADA WAKTU YG
GAYA INERSIA
BERBEDA & TIDAK BERSAMAAN
 ELEMEN VERTIKAL TIDAK PERLU

DIDESAIN MENGATASI
PENJUMLAHAN SELURUH RESPONS
MAKSIMUM PADA SETIAP LANTAI
(TERLALU KONSERVATIF)

SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.8.3
ASCE 7-16 cl.12.10.1.1

SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.10.1.1

2
2/18/2020
INTERACTION BETWEEN DIFFERENT

LATERAL SYSTEMS
GAYA TRANSFER:
 Internal forces due to
displacement compatibility
 Large force transfer due to
vertical discontinuity (BACKSTAY)

Backstay Effect
GAYA TRANSFER:
 Internal forces due to displacement
compatibility
 Large force transfer due to vertical
discontinuity (BACKSTAY)

3
2/18/2020
 FRAME BEHAVIOUR DOMINATED BY SHEAR MODE
 WALL BEHAVIOR DOMINATED BY FLEXURAL MODE

Source: Taranath
 CONNECTED BY FLOOR DIAPHRAGM
 LARGE TRANSFER FORCE OCCURS DUE TO INTERACTION BETWEEN THE TWO MODES OF BEHAVIOR
 THESE TRANSFER FORCE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY TO FACILITATE DISTRIBUTION OF

FORCES BETWEEN LATERAL SYSTEM USED IN THE ANALYSIS

Flexural Mode
Vs
Shear Mode
Source: Moehle

4
2/18/2020
 VERTICAL DISCONTINUITY WILL ALSO RESULT IN LARGE FORCE TRANSFER WITHIN THE DIAPHRAGM
 MAIN BACKSTAY EFFECT OCCUR AT GRADE LEVEL WHERE ABRUPT STIFFNESS CHANGE OCCURS DUE
TO HUGE LATERAL STIFFNESS PROVIDED BY THE BASEMENT STRUCTURE
 THE FORCE DUE TO BACKSTAY EFFECT CAN BE VERY LARGE AND NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED
ACCORDINGLY

 EVALUATION OF BACKSTAY EFFECTS MUST CONSIDER TWO APPLICABLE LOAD PATHS:

 LOAD PATH A: OVERTURNING RESISTANCE OF THE FOUNDATION SYSTEM DIRECTLY BENEATH THE TOWER
SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM
 LOAD PATH B: BACKSTAY RESISTANCE OF THE FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS AND THE PODIUM/BASEMENT PERIMETER
WALLS

5
2/18/2020

WALLS
OVERTURNING RESISTANCE
BACKSTAY RESISTANCE

 ANALYSIS & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSFER FORCE IN DIAPHRAGMS

MUST CONSIDER ALL FACTORS THAT CAN AFFECT DISTRIBUTION OF FORCE
WITHIN AVAILABLE LOAD PATH:
 STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS (MUST BE MODELLED AS SEMIRIGID)

 EFFECT OF DISCONTINUITY (E.G. ELEVATION CHANGE IN SLAB) TO STIFFNESS
 EFFECT OF DISCONTINUITY (E.G. OPENINGS) TO LOAD PATH
 FOR BUILDINGS WHERE HIGHER MODES CONTRIBUTE TO SEISMIC RESPONSE,
DYNAMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN LATERAL SYSTEMS (E.G. FRAME AND WALL),
BETWEEN TOWERS, AND BETWEEN TOWER – PODIUM, MUST BE CAPTURED
ACCORDINGLY (REFER TO SHORTCOURSE HAKI 2016: DIAPHRAGM DESIGN)

6
2/18/2020
 STEPS IN DETERMINING DIAPHRAGM ANALYSIS:
 DEFINE CLEAR LOAD PATH FOR SEISMIC FORCE TRANSFER WITHIN THE
DIAPHRAGM
 IDENTIFY COLLECTORS, CHORDS, AND DIAPHRAGM SLAB COMPONENTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREDEFINED LOAD PATH
 USE DIAPHRAGM ANALYSIS RESULTS (I.E. SLAB ELEMENT STRESS CONTOUR AND
FRAME ELEMENT AXIAL FORCE DIAGRAM) TO VERIFY THE INITIAL LOAD PATH
ASSUMPTION
 USE STRUT AND TIE ANALOGY AS REFERENCE IN VERIFYING LOAD PATH AND
FORCE TRANSFER MECHANISM WITHIN THE DIAPHRAGM
 ADJUST LOAD PATH AND DIAPHRAGM COMPONENTS ASSIGNMENT AS
NECESSARY BASED ON ASSESMENT OF DIAPHRAGM ANALYSIS RESULTS
 DESIGN THE DIAPHRAGM (REFER TO SHORTCOURSE HAKI 2016: DIAPHRAGM
DESIGN)

SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.3.1:
ASCE 7-10 clause 12.3.1.2 Diaphragms of concrete slabs or concrete filled

metal deck with span-to-depth ratios of 3 or less in structures that have no
horizontal irregularities are permitted to be idealized as rigid
7
2/18/2020
Y
X

 ILUSTRASI PENGARUH STIFFNESS DIAFRAGMA

TERHADAP DISTRIBUSI GAYA PADA DIAFRAGMA
DAN ELEMEN VERTIKAL
 NEHRP RECOMMENDS RANGE OF STIFFNESS
ASSUMPTIONS BETWEEN 0.15 TO 0.5 FOR
DIAPHRAGM STIFFNESS (NAKAKI 2000)
 WHERE ANALYSIS RESULTS ARE SENSITIVE TO
DIAPHRAGM STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS, IT IS
RECOMMENDED TO “BOUND” THE SOLUTION USING
UPPER AND LOWER-BOUND STIFFNESS
ASSUMPTIONS FOR DESIGN PURPOSES

8
2/18/2020

WALLS
OVERTURNING RESISTANCE
BACKSTAY RESISTANCE

 STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS USED IN MODELLING WILL AFFECT DISTRIBUTION OF

SEISMIC FORCE BETWEEN THE TWO LOAD PATHS
 DUE TO UNCERTAINTY IN ACTUAL COMPONENT STIFFNESS AND ACTUAL
DISTRIBUTION OF SEISMIC FORCE, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO BRACKET THE ANALYSIS
RESULT USING UPPER-BOUND AND LOWER-BOUND STIFFNESS PROPERTIES
 ATC 72-1 RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:

 CASE 1: UPPER BOUND BACKSTAY EFFECT
 UPPER-BOUND ESTIMATE OF FORCES IN THE BACKSTAY LOAD PATH
 LOWER-BOUND ESTIMATE OF FORCES IN THE FOUNDATION BELOW THE TOWER
WILL GOVERN THE DESIGN OF THE PODIUM/BASEMENT FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS
AND PERIMETER WALLS, AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTIONS
 CASE 2: LOWER BOUND BACKSTAY EFFECT
 LOWER-BOUND ESTIMATE OF FORCES IN THE BACKSTAY LOAD PATH
 UPPER-BOUND ESTIMATE OF FORCES IN THE FOUNDATION BELOW THE TOWER
 WILL GOVERN THE DESIGN OF THE TOWER FOUNDATION SYSTEM
9
2/18/2020
 RECOMMENDED STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE BASEMENT/PODIUM AND FOUNDATION (ATC 72-1)

 RECOMMENDED STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE TOWER AND FOUNDATION (ATC 72-1)

10
2/18/2020
Two Towers on Common Podium
F11
DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS

Structural Engineers
F22
F12
DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS

Structural Engineers
11
2/18/2020
EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

 (a) Distribusi gaya ELF, Fx  (a) Distribusi gaya per mode, Fx
 (b) Gaya diafragma, Fpx  (b) Gaya diafragma, Fpx
 (c), (d), (e), (f) Kombinasi gaya ELF
dan gaya diafragma

GAYA KOLEKTOR & SAMBUNGANNYA (SNI 1726: 2019 bagian 7.10.2)

TERBESAR DARI:
• W o Fx (transfer forces automatically included)
• W o (Fpx + transfer forces)
• r (Fp.min + transfer forces)

12
2/18/2020
KOMBINASI PEMBEBANAN (SNI 1726: REDUNDANSI untuk gaya diafragma?

2019 bagian 7.4.2.3):
 Gaya inersia: r = 1.0
 (1.2 + 0.2 SDS)D + rQE + L
 Gaya transfer: r = r gedung
 (0.9 – 0.2 SDS)D + rQE + 1.6H
KOMBINASI PEMBEBANAN KOLEKTOR DAN SAMBUNGANNYA(SNI 1726: 2019 bagian 7.4.3.2):

 (1.2 + 0.2 SDS)D + W 0QE + L
 (0.9 – 0.2 SDS)D + W 0QE + 1.6H
Strut and tie model:

 Assist in reinforcement layout

13
2/18/2020
Large openings:
 Analogous to beam with opening
 Additional reinforcements for load path

Reentrant corners:
 Tension reinforcement to transfer shear
 Chord reinforcement at reduced depth

14
2/18/2020
Note:
 Deformation incompatibility Slabs and depressions:
 Lap reinforcements
 Eccentric moment to be considered
 IRREGULARLY-SHAPED DIAPHRAGM
 DEFINE LOAD PATH AND IDENTIFY DIAPHRAGM
COMPONENTS

15
2/18/2020
Y
X

In-Plane Stresses in Slab Y

X
F11
CASE: (DYNX+0.3DYNY)

DIAPHRAGM
16
2/18/2020
Y
Axial Stresses in Beams
X
MAXIMUM BEAM AXIAL FORCE

DIAPHRAGM
Y
Axial Stresses in Beams X
MINIMUM BEAM AXIAL FORCE

DIAPHRAGM SHORT-COURSE
WORKSHOP PUSKIM 2020
PUSKIM SEMARANG 2019
17
2/18/2020
Y
X
F22

DIAPHRAGM
Y
X
MAXIMUM BEAM AXIAL FORCE
CASE: (0.3DYNX+DYNY)

DIAPHRAGM
18
2/18/2020
Y
X
F12

DIAPHRAGM
Y
X
F11
CASE: (0.3DYNX+DYNY)

DIAPHRAGM
19
2/18/2020
 ACI 318-11 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary
 ASCE 7-16: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
 ATC-72-1: Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall
Buildings
 NEHRP SEISMIC DESIGN TECHNICAL BRIEF NO. 3: Seismic Design of Cast-in-Place
Concrete Diaphragms, Chords, and Collectors
 NEHRP SEISMIC DESIGN TECHNICAL BRIEF NO. 5: Seismic Design of Composite Steel
Deck and Concrete-Filled Diaphragms
 SNI 1726:2019: Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan
Gedung dan Non Gedung

20

Materi Hari 2 Davy Sukamta PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Materi Hari 2 Davy Sukamta PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Materi Hari 2 Davy Sukamta PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2/18/2020

ASCE 7-16 cl.12.10 / SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.10

NICK ALEXANDER & DAVY SUKAMTA

WORKSHOP PUSKIM SEMARANG 2020

 TRANSFER FORCES IN DIAPHRAM

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

Jenis gaya yang harus diatasi diafragma: Why two sets?

 ELEMEN VERTIKAL TIDAK PERLU

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.8.3

ASCE 7-16 cl.12.10.1.1

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

INTERACTION BETWEEN DIFFERENT

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 FRAME BEHAVIOUR DOMINATED BY SHEAR MODE

 WALL BEHAVIOR DOMINATED BY FLEXURAL MODE

 THESE TRANSFER FORCE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY TO FACILITATE DISTRIBUTION OF

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 EVALUATION OF BACKSTAY EFFECTS MUST CONSIDER TWO APPLICABLE LOAD PATHS:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 EVALUATION OF BACKSTAY EFFECTS MUST CONSIDER TWO APPLICABLE LOAD PATHS:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 ANALYSIS & DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSFER FORCE IN DIAPHRAGMS

 STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS (MUST BE MODELLED AS SEMIRIGID)

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 STEPS IN DETERMINING DIAPHRAGM ANALYSIS:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

SNI 1726:2019 ps.7.3.1:

ASCE 7-10 clause 12.3.1.2 Diaphragms of concrete slabs or concrete filled

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 ILUSTRASI PENGARUH STIFFNESS DIAFRAGMA

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 EVALUATION OF BACKSTAY EFFECTS MUST CONSIDER TWO APPLICABLE LOAD PATHS:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

 STIFFNESS ASSUMPTIONS USED IN MODELLING WILL AFFECT DISTRIBUTION OF

 ATC 72-1 RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

Two Towers on Common Podium

DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS

DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS

EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

GAYA KOLEKTOR & SAMBUNGANNYA (SNI 1726: 2019 bagian 7.10.2)

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

KOMBINASI PEMBEBANAN (SNI 1726: REDUNDANSI untuk gaya diafragma?

KOMBINASI PEMBEBANAN KOLEKTOR DAN SAMBUNGANNYA(SNI 1726: 2019 bagian 7.4.3.2):

Strut and tie model:

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

In-Plane Stresses in Slab Y

PERANCANGAN GEDUNG BERTINGKAT TAHAN GEMPA SESUAI SNI 1726:2019

MAXIMUM BEAM AXIAL FORCE