Design of Columns Subject To Axial Load and Bending
Design of Columns Subject To Axial Load and Bending
Design of Columns Subject To Axial Load and Bending
Introduction
All columns are subjected to some bending as well as axial forces and they need to be
proportioned to resist both. The so-called “axial load” formulas presented in the previous
discussions takes into account some moments as they include the effect of small
eccentricities with the 0.80 and 0.85 factors. These values are approximately equivalent
to the assumption of actual eccentricities of 0.10h for tied columns and 0.05h for spiral
columns.
Columns will bend under the action of moments and those moments will tend to
produce compression on one side of the columns and tension on the other. Depending
on the relative magnitudes of the moments and axial loads there are several ways in
which the sections might fail. Figure 9.1 shows six possible cases or effects of a column
supporting a load Pn and these are briefly discussed in the paragraphs to follow.
(a) Large axial load with negligible moment. For this situation, failure will occur by
the crushing of the concrete with all reinforcing bars in the column having
reached their yield stress in compression.
(b) Large axial load and small moment such that the entire cross section is in
compression. When a column is subject to a small bending moment (that is,
when the eccentricity is small), the entire column will be in compression but
the compression will be higher on one side than the other. The maximum
'
compressive stress in the column will be 0.85fc and failure will occur by the
crushing of the concrete with all the bars in compression.
(c) Eccentricity larger than in case (b) such that tension begins to develop on
one side of the column. If the eccentricity is increased somewhat from the
preceding case, tension will begin to develop on one side of the column and
the steel on that side will be in tension but less than the yield stress. On the
far side the steel will be in compression. Failure will occur by crushing of the
concrete on the compressive side.
(d) A balanced loading condition. As we continue to increase the eccentricity, a
condition will be reached at which the reinforcing bars on the tension side will
reach their yield stress at the same time that the concrete on the opposite
'
side reaches its maximum compression 0.85fc . This situation is called the
balanced loading condition.
(e) Large moment with small axial load. If the eccentricity is further increased,
failure will be initiated by the yielding of the bars on the tension side of the
column.
(f) Large moment with no appreciable axial load. For this condition, failure will
occur as it does in a beam.
95
Pn
Pn
e
Pn
e
Pn
e
Pn
e
Mn
Figure 9.1 Column subject to load with larger and larger eccentricities.
96
The Plastic Centroid
The eccentricity of a column load is the distance from the load to the plastic centroid of
the column. The plastic centroid represents the location of the resultant force produced
by the steel and the concrete. It is the point in the column cross section through which
the resultant column load must pass to produce uniform strain at failure.
For locating the plastic centroid, all concrete is assumed to be stressed in
compression to 0.85fc and all steel to fy in compression. For symmetrical sections the
'
plastic centroid coincides with the centroid of the column cross section, while for
nonsymmetrical sections it can be located by taking moments.
2. Calculate Cs,
Note: In computing Cs, the concrete where the bars are located is
subtracted; that is,
A st 4 25 1963.5 mm2
2
4
C s 1963.5 414 0.85 27.6 10 3 766.8 kN
3. Calculate the total compression Pn,
97
Pn 1407.6 938.4 766.8 3112.8 kN
3112.8 x 1407.6 75 938.4 250 766.8 175
x 152.39 mm
This section shows how statics equations may be used to determine the ultimate load
Pn at which any given short column will fail for a particular eccentricity. Statics equations
are applied to three different columns in this section to determine P n values.
Example.
'
Determine the value of P n for the column shown in Figure 9.3, with fc 20.7 and
fy 414 MPa. Assume e = 450 mm.
Location of Pn Pn
e = 450 mm 3 – 25mm a
Cc = 0.85fc’ab
3 – 25mm T=Asfy
62.5mm
350mm
Column Section Stress Diagram
Solution:
98
1. Calculate steel areas,
A s A 's 3 252 1472.62 mm2
4
2. Calculate the forces assuming all bars have yielded,
Note:
Cc = the compression in the concrete
Cs’ = the force in the compression bars
T = the force in the tension bars
Pn C's C c T 0
Pn 609.67 6.15825a 609.67 0
Pn 6.15825a
4. Calculate a,
a 191.4
c 225.18 mm
0.85 0.85
600 d c 600 537.5 225.18
fs 832.2 MPa > fy 414 MPa Ok!
c 225.18
600 c d ' 600 225.18 62.5
fs' 433.47 MPa > fy 414 MPa Ok!
c 225.18
99
Pn 6.15825 191.4 1178.69 kN Ans.
Example.
'
Determine the value of P n for the column shown in Figure 9.4, with fc 20.7 and
fy 414 MPa. Assume e = 200 mm.
3 – 25mm T=Asfs
62.5mm
350mm
Column Section Stress Diagram
Solution:
100
Pn C's C c T 0
600 537.5 c
Pn 609.67 5.2345c 1.4726 0
c
600 537.5 c
Pn 609.67 5.2345c 1.4726
c
4. Calculate Pn in terms of c by taking moments about the centroid of tensile
steel, (see Figure 9.4)
a
Pn 437.5 C c 537.5 C 's 537.5 62.5 0
2
0.85c
Pn 437.5 5.2345c 537.5 609.67 475 0
2
Pn 661.927 6.431c 0.005085c 2
101
600 d c 600 537.5 403.6
fs 199.06 MPa < fy 414 MPa Ok!
c 403.6
600 c d ' 600 403.6 62.5
fs' 507.09 MPa > fy 414 MPa Ok!
c 403.6
Pn 2429.17 kN Ans.
Example.
Determine the value of the balanced load P bn for the column shown in Figure 9.5,
with fc 20.7 and fy 414 MPa. Also compute the eccentricity at balanced
'
condition.
0.003
3 – 25mm d’ =62.5mm Cs’ = As’fs’ ’s = 0.00448
a Cc = 0.85fc’ab
c = 318.05 mm
Location of Pbn Pbn
eb d = 537.5 mm
475mm
Plastic Centroid 600mm
d-c = 219.45 mm
237.5 mm
3 – 25mm T=Asfy
62.5mm y = fy/Es = 0.00207
350mm
Column Section Stress Diagram Strain Diagram
Figure 9.5 Example of Balanced Condition
102
Solution:
0.003 fy / E s 0.003
c d
0.003d 0.003 537.5
c 318.05 mm
fy / E s 0.003 414 / 200000 0.003
Pbn C's C c T 0
Pbn 609.67 1664.84 609.67 0
Pbn 1664.84 kN Ans.
103
If the value of Pn is greater than Pbn (that is, if e < eb), the ultimate capacity of the
column will be controlled by compression; if less than P bn (or e > eb), the ultimate
capacity will be controlled by tension.
It will be noted that the same theory could be used for round columns, but the
mathematics would be somewhat complicated because of the circular layout of the bars,
and the calculations of distances would be rather tedious. An approximate method was
developed by Whitney to greatly simplify the mathematics. In this method an equivalent
rectangular columns are used to replace the circular ones. The results of this method
correspond quite closely with test results. This method is illustrated in Figure 9.6.
Ds (2/3)Ds
0.8h
h Ag / 0.8h
Many columns are subjected to biaxial bending, that is, bending about both axes.
Corner columns in buildings where beams and girders frame into the columns from
both directions are the most common cases, but there are others, such as where
columns are cast monolithically as part of frames in both directions or where
columns are supporting heavy spandrel beams.
ex
Pu
ey
104