8

Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids

for Training in Earth Observation
Dana Petcu1, Daniela Zaharie1, Marian Neagul1, Silviu Panica1,
Marc Frincu1, Dorian Gorgan2, Teodor Stefanut2 and Victor Bacu2
1West University of Timisoara
2Technical University of Cluj Napoca
Romania

1. Introduction
Remote sensing involves techniques that use sensors to detect and record signals emanating
from target of interest not in direct contact with the sensors. Remote sensing systems
integrate cameras, scanners, radiometers, radar and other devices, and deal with the
collection, processing, and distribution of large amounts of data. They often require massive
computing resources to generate the data of interest for their users.
Nowadays, remote sensing is mainly applied to satellite imagery. Satellites have proven in
the last two decades their powerful capabilities to allow the Earth observation on a global
scale. This observation is currently used in strategic planning and management of natural
resources. The applications based on satellite data are often encountered in at least six
disciplines: (1) agriculture, forestry and range resources in vegetation type, vigor and stress,
biomass, soil conditions, or forest fire detection; (2) land use and mapping for classification,
cartographic mapping, urban areas, or transportation networks; (3) geology for rock types,
delineation, landforms, or regional structures detection; (4) water resources for water
boundaries, surface, depth, volume, floods, snow areal, sediments, or irrigated fields
detection; (5) oceanography and marine resources for marine organisms, turbidity patterns,
or shoreline changes detection; (6) environment for surface mining, water pollution, air
pollution, natural disasters, or defoliation detection.
Current applications involving satellite data needs huge computational power and storage
capacities. Grid computing technologies that have evolved in the last decade promise to
make feasible the creation of an environment, for these kinds of applications, which can to
handle hundreds of distributed databases, heterogeneous computing resources, and
simultaneous users. Grid-based experimental platforms were developed already at this
century’s beginning with a strong support from NASA and ESA.
In this context, the chapter presents for the beginners an overview of the technological
challenges and user requirements in remote sensed image processing, as well as the
solutions provided by the Grid-based platforms built in the last decade. Section 2 starts with
a short description of the basic principles of the satellite imagery, the technical problems and
state of the art in solving them. It points also the fact that the training activities in Earth
observation are not following the intensity of the research activities and there is a clear gap
between the request for specialists and the labor market offer.
Source: Image Processing, Book edited by: Yung-Sheng Chen,
ISBN 978-953-307-026-1, pp. 572, December 2009, INTECH, Croatia, downloaded from SCIYO.COM

www.intechopen.com
116 Image Processing

For initiated readers, Section 3 of this chapter presents a complex case study: the solutions
provided by the recent developed platform, namely GiSHEO, in what concerns the image
processing services, workflow-based service composition, and user interaction combined
with e-learning facilities.
For experts, Section 4 presents the results obtained by applying the services offered by the
GiSHEO platform in order to assist archaeologists in identifying marks corresponding to
buried archaeological remains.

2. Problems in satellite imagery and current solutions

The following section shortly presents the basic principles in satellite imagery and the
existing solutions for fast response to its high request for resources of various kinds:
computational, storage, or human.

2.1 Remote sensed image processing – basic principles

Remote sensing data measures reflected or emitted radiation from surfaces in different parts
of the electromagnetic spectrum like visible, ultraviolet, reflected infrared, thermal infrared,
microwave and so on.
Multiband or multispectral data consist of sets of radiation data that individually cover
intervals of continuous wavelengths within some finite parts of the electromagnetic
spectrum. Each interval makes up a band or channel. The data are used to produce images
of Earth's surface and atmosphere or to serve as inputs to complex analysis programs.
An image is produced by radiation from ground areas that are samples for a larger region.
The radiation varies depending on the reflectance, absorption or emittance properties of the
various ground objects. The sampling area varies from a square meter to a squared
kilometer depending on the sensor position and accuracy. Each radiation measure is
associated with a gray level tone when is displayed on a computer output device. Usually a
sampled area corresponds to a pixel on a display.
The multiband data collected by one sensor have differences from one band to another. The
constant band to band response for a given feature or class of materials is interpreted as its
spectral signature (a plot of wavelengths versus an intensity function like reflectance). If
three bands are each assigned to one of the primary colors, blue, green, and red, a color
composite is obtained.
Nowadays, hyperspectral sensors are making accurate and precise measurements of
individual materials using spectrometers operating from space. The resulting data set
produces a detailed spectral signature.
The most simple image processing operations that are performed on satellite data, named
transforms in (Mather, 2004), are those allowing the generation of a new image from two or
more bands of a multispectral or multi-temporal image. It is expected that the final image
has properties that make it more suited to a particular purpose than the original one or ones.
For example, the numerical difference between two images collected by the same sensor on
different days may provide information about changes that have occurred between the two
dates, while the ratio of the near-infrared and red bands of a single-date image set is widely
used as a vegetation index that correlates with the difficulty to measure variables such as
vegetation vigor, biomass, and leaf area index (see details in (Mather, 2004)). We should
note that change detection is the most common used for satellite imagery, being important,
for example, in meteorological studies and disaster management.

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 117

The more complex image processing concepts and methods involved in satellite imagery are
dealing with spectral transforms, including various vegetation indices, principal
components and contrast enhancement, independent component analysis, vertex
component analysis, convolution and Fourier filtering, multiresolution image pyramids and
scale-space techniques such as wavelets, image spatial decomposition, image radiometric
and geometric calibration, spatial decomposition, thematic classification using traditional
statistical approaches, neural networks, or fuzzy classification methods, image modeling,
two-dimensional time series modeling, image fusion for better classification or
segmentation, or multi-image fusion.
Several recent books are aiming to present in details the digital image processing procedures
and methodologies commonly used in remote sensing. Books like (Jong & Meer, 2005;
Schowengerd, 2007; Chen, 2007; Chen, 2008) are covering most of the above described
topics. Other books provide an introduction view to a level meaningful to the non-specialist
digital image analyst, as (Richards & Jia, 2006) does, or to the level of graduate students in
the physical or engineering sciences taking a first course in remote sensing, as (Schott, 2007).
The book (Borengasser et al, 2008) describes case studies for the use of hyperspectral remote
sensing in agriculture, forestry, environmental monitoring, and geology. Topics for
agriculture, forestry, and environmental monitoring applications include detecting crop
disease, analysing crop growth analysis, classifying water quality, mapping submerged
aquatic vegetation, and estimating hardwood chlorophyll content. For geology applications,
topics include detecting hydrocarbons and identifying and mapping hydrothermal
alteration.

2.2 Grid computing for remote sensed image processing

Remote sensing is a major technological and scientific tool for monitoring planetary surfaces
and atmospheres. Practical applications focusing on environmental and natural resource
management need large input data sets and fast response.
To address the computational requirements introduced by time-critical applications, the
research efforts have been directed towards the incorporation of high-performance
computing (HPC) models in remote sensing missions. Satellite image geo-rectification and
classification are the first candidates for parallel processing. The book (Plaza & Chang, 2008)
serves as one of the first available references specifically focused on describing recent
advances in the field of HPC applied to remote sensing problems.
Satellite image processing is not only computational-intensive, but also storage-intensive;
therefore special technologies are required for both data storage and data processing.
Hundreds of gigabytes of raw sensor data are generated per day and these data must be fast
processed to produce the data required by the final users. Moreover, satellite image
processing also involves different types of image processing techniques and algorithms. For
each type of image processing an analysis is needed in order to point out several
requirements as determining a suitable processing type, data movement issues and
workflow management. Furthermore, satellite image processing applications require not
only the processing of large volumes of data, but also various types of resources, and it is
not reasonable to assume the availability of all resources on a single system. In this context,
the Grid based technologies promised to make feasible the creation of a computational
environment handling not only heterogeneous computing resources, but also hundreds of
distributed databases, and simultaneous users.

www.intechopen.com
118 Image Processing

There are at least three reasons for using Grid computing for satellite image processing: (a)
the required computing performance is not available locally, the solution being the remote
computing; (b) the required computing performance is not available in one location, the
solution being cooperative computing; (c) the required computing services are only
available in specialized centres, the solution being application specific computing.
An early paper (Lee et al., 1996) describes a metacomputing application that integrates
specialized resources, high-speed networks, parallel computers, and virtual reality display
technology to process satellite imagery; the inputs of the near-real-time cloud detection code
are two-dimensional infrared and visible light images from satellite sensors.
Later on, realizing the potential of the Grid computing for the satellite imagery, several
projects were launched at the beginning of this century to make the Grid usage idea a
reality. Within the European DataGrid project an experiment aiming to demonstrate the use
of Grid technology for remote sensing applications has been carried out; the results can be
found for example in the paper (Nico et al., 2003). In the same period, (Aloisio & Cafaro,
2003) presented an overview of SARA Digital Puglia, a remote sensing environment that
shows how Grid technologies and HPC can be efficiently used to build dynamic Earth
observation systems for the management of space mission data and for their on-demand
processing and delivering to final users.
Since 2005, the GEOGrid project (Sekiguchi et al., 2008) is primarily aiming at providing an
e-Science infrastructure for worldwide Earth sciences community; it is designed to integrate
the wide varieties of existing data sets including satellite imagery, geological data, and
ground sensed data, virtually, again enabled by Grid technology, and is accessible as a set of
services. Later on, D4Science (Tsangaris et al., 2009) studied the data management of
satellite images on Grid infrastructures.
The testing phase has finished with the study delivered by the European DEGREE project
(DEGREE consortium, 2008) about the challenges that the Earth Sciences are imposing on
Grid infrastructure, as well as several case studies in which Grid are useful.
The second stage is the one of the production environments. (Cafaro et al, 2008) describes
the standard design of a current Grid computing production environment devoted to
remote sensing. For example, a special service was developed in the frame of the European
BEinGRID project (Portela et al., 2008) to process data gathered from satellite sensors and to
generate an multi-year global aerosol information; through the use of Grid technologies the
service generates data in near real time. The platform called Grid Processing On Demand,
shortly G-POD (Fusco et al., 2008), aims to offer a Grid-based platform for remote
processing of the satellite images provided by European Space Agency (ESA) and it offers
several satellite image processing services for environmental management. G-POD has
proved its usefulness of the concept for real applications like flood area detection. The
platform for satellite imagery search and retrieval, called Ground European Network for
Earth Science Interoperations - Digital Repositories, shortly GENESI-DR (GENESI-DR
consortium, 2008), offers to an end-user an interface for digital data discovery and retrieval;
raw data are processed using G-POD facilities. The Landsat Grid Prototype LGP is using
Grid computing to generate single, cloud and shadow scenes from the composite of multiple
input scenes, the data for which may be physically distributed; the system ingests multiple
satellite scenes, calibrates the intensities, applies cloud and shadow masks, calculates
surface reflectance, registers the images with respect to their geographic location, and forms
a single composite scene (Gasster et al., 2008). Ongoing EGEE-3 and SEE-Grid-SCI European

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 119

Grid-based e-infrastructures projects are currently building environmental applications

based on satellite data including also some of the ones provided by GENESI-DR.
The Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), an international coordinating body
for spaceborne missions for the study of the Earth, maintains a working group on
information systems and services with the responsibility to promote the development of
interoperable systems for the management of Earth observation data internationally. The
WGISS Grid Task team is coordinating efforts of ESA, NOAA and NASA projects.
A new trend is to make use of service-oriented architectures. A Service Grid reflects the
recent evolution towards a Grid system architecture based on Web services concepts and
technologies. The Service Grids’ potential for remote sensing has already been pointed out
at the beginning of this evolution, for example in (Fox et al., 2005). Wrappers are used to
encapsulate proprietary image processing tools as services and furthermore allowing their
usage in more complex applications. This is the road taken in the last years also by small
scale research platforms like MedioGrid (Petcu et al, 2008) or Grid-HIS (Carvajal-Jimenez et
al, 2004) trying to support national requests for remote sensing applications.

2.3 Training in Earth Observation

The rapid evolution of the remote sensing technologies is not followed at the same
developing rate by the training and high education in this field. Currently there is only a
few number of resources involved in educational activities in Earth Observation. One of the
most complex is EduSpace (ESA, 2007).
Recognizing the gap between research or production activities and the training or education
ones, a partnership strategy for Earth Observation Education and Training was established
in 1999 for an effective coordination and partnership mechanism among CEOS agencies and
institutions offering education and training around the world. The key objective is to
facilitate activities that substantially enhance international education and training in Earth
observation techniques, data analysis, interpretation, use and application. In this context, the
CEOS Working Group of Education, Training and Capacity Building is collecting an index
of free Earth observation educational materials (CEOS, 2009).

3. Grid-based platform for remote sensed image processing – GisHEO

We have developed recently a platform, namely GiSHEO (On Demand Grid Services for
Training and High Education in Earth Observation (GiSHEO Consortium, 2008)) addressing
the issue of specialized services for training in Earth observation. Special solutions were
proposed for data management, image processing service deployment, workflow-based
service composition, and user interaction. A particular attention is given to the basic services
for image processing that are reusing free image processing tools, like GDAL or GIMP.
Our aim is to set up and develop a reliable resource for knowledge dissemination, high
education and training in Earth observation. In order to answer to the on-demand high
computing and high throughput requirements we are using the latest Grid technologies. A
special features of the platform is the connection with the GENESI-DR catalog mentioned in
the previous section.
Contrary to the existing platforms providing tutorials and training materials, GiSHEO
intends to be a living platform where experimentation and extensibility are the key words.
The platform design concepts were shortly presented in (Panica et al., 2009) and the details
about the e-learning component can be found in (Gorgan et al., 2009). In this section we

www.intechopen.com
120 Image Processing

shortly present the architecture and technologies that are used and then we are going in
details related to the basic image processing services and interfaces.

3.1 Platform architecture

While the Grid is usually employed to respond to the researcher requirements to consume
resources for computational-intensive or data-intensive tasks, we aim to use it for near-real
time applications for short-time data-intensive tasks. The data sets that are used for each
application are rather big (at least of several tens of GBs), and the tasks are specific for image
processing (most of them very simple). In this particular case a scheme of instantiating a
service where the data are located is required in order to obtain a response in near-real time.
Grid services are a quite convenient solution in this case: a fabric service is available at the
server of the platform that serves the user interface and this service instantiates the
processing service where the pointed data reside.
Figure 1 presents the conceptual view of the implemented architecture.

Fig. 1. GiSHEO architecture

The WMS is the standard Web Mapping Service ensuring the access to the distributed
database and supporting WMS/TMS & VML. WAS is the acronym for Web Application
Service that is invocated by user interface at run-time and allows workflows description.
GDIS is a data index service – more precisely a Web service providing information about the
available data to its clients. It intermediates access to data repositories, stores the processing
results, ensures role based access control to the data, retrieves data from various information
sources, queries external data sources and has a simple interface that is usable by various
data consumers. The platform has distributed data repositories. It uses PostGIS for storing

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 121

raster extent information and in some cases vector data. Moreover the data search is based
on PostGIS spatial operators.
The physical platform is based on four clusters that are geographically distributed at four
academic institutions. Due to the low security restriction between the four institutions, data
distribution between the clusters is done using Apache Hadoop Distributed File System.
The data transfer from and to external databases is done using GridFTP – this is for example
the case of the connection with GENESI-DR database.
The Workflow Service Composition and Workflow Manager are the engines behind WAS
and are connected with the tasks manager. Each basic image processing operation is viewed
as a task. Several tasks can be linked together to form a workflow in an order that is decided
at client side (either the teacher, or the student interface). The workflow engine is based on
an ECA (Event-Condition-Action) approach since it offers much more dynamism and
adaptability to changes in workflow tasks and resource-states than other classic workflow
engines. In order to respond to the special requirements of the platform a rule-based
language has been developed.
The GTD-WS (Grid Task Dispatcher Web Service) is a service-enabled interface for easy
interoperability with the Grid environment. EUGridPMA signed certificate are required to
access the full facilities of the platform.
A particular component of WAS is eGLE, the eLearning environment. It uses templates to
allow teachers specialized in Earth observation to develop new lessons that uses Earth
observation data.

3.2 Basic services for image processing

We divide remote sensing processing operations into two types: basic and complex. Basic
operations represent basic image processing algorithms that can be applied on a satellite
image (histogram equalization, thresholding etc.). Complex operations are represented by
the complex image processing algorithms (i.e. topographic effect regression) or by a
composition of two or more basic operations. In Grid terms this operations must be exposed
using some Grid-related technologies in order to interact with other grid components. Two
related technologies can be used here: Grid services and Web services.
Web services (WS) are Internet application programming interfaces that can be accessed
remotely (over a network) and executed on a remote system that hosts the requested
services. Grid services can be seen as an extended version of Web services.
In our platform the Web services serve as an interface for the processing algorithms. This
interfaces can be accessed remotely (normally using an user interface like a Web portal) and
allowing the execution on a computational Grid of different types of processing techniques
(distributed or parallel) depending on each algorithm in part.
In the framework of GiSHEO project we have developed a number of basic services that are
useful in Earth observation e-learning process. In the following, some of them are presented
together with visual examples.
The service for grayscale conversion (Figure 2) receives as input a coloured satellite image in
any desired format (TIFF, PNG, BMP etc.) and transforms the triplets of values
corresponding to each pixel in a value in the range 0-255. The service for histogram
equalization (Figure 3) is used to increase the global contrast of an image; the histogram of
the resulting image will be flat (pixels with the same value will not be separated into new
values, however, so the histogram may not be perfectly flat). The service for quantization

www.intechopen.com
122 Image Processing

(Figure 4) is used for reducing the number of colours used in a image; our implementation
uses a multilevel quantization.

Fig. 2. Grayscale conversion: input parameter – an image file; output - the converted
grayscale image file

Fig. 3. Histogram equalization: input parameter – an image file; output – the transformed
image

Fig. 4. Quantization: input parameters – image and number of gray levels; output – image
The service for thresholding (Figure 5) refers to a processing technique for image
segmentation; in our implementation the user must chose a threshold (T) and this is used to
compute the entire image. The service for blending images (Figure 6) is used for blending

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 123

two images; different types of blending are supported. The service for image embossing
(Figure 7) implements an algorithm for embossing an image.

Fig. 5. Thresholding algorithm with T=125 (input parameters - image and threshold T; the
image can be TIFF, PNG, BMP etc; output - image)

Fig. 6. Image blend: input parameters - layer|image1|image2|blend type (numerical value);

output - blended image
The service for image transformation using a binary decision tree (Figure 8) is used for a
quick image transformation using a binary decision tree to detect areas with water, clouds,
forest, non-forest and scrub. The service for layers overlay is used for overlaying different
layers; it has several images at inputs and produces one image. The service for vegetation

www.intechopen.com
124 Image Processing

Fig. 7. Emboss service: input parameters – image|emboss level|grey level; output - image

Fig. 8. Image transform: inputs - red-band image|infrared-band image|w|c|nf|f|s, where

w-water value, c-clouds value, nf-nonforest value, f-forest value, s-scrub value; output – 5-
color image resulted after applying a binary decision tree algorithm

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 125

index computation is used for computing the normalized difference vegetation index
(NDVI) that shows whether an area contains a live green vegetation or not; it also supports
the calculation of enhanced vegetation index (EVI); the input parameters are the red-band
image and near infrared-band image (default MODIS-EVI values are used L=1, C1 = 6, C2 =
7.5, and G as gain factor = 2.5).
Basic services presented above can be used as single services or composed ones (see more
about Web service composition in the next subsection). Figure 9 gives an example of a
resulted image in a composed execution. The input image is a standard aerial image. The
applied services are the following ones: gray-scale conversion, histogram equalization,
quantization and thresholding.

Fig. 9. Shape detection using a composition of several services (grayscale conversion,

histogram equalization, quantization and thresholding)

3.3 Workflows and user interfaces

Processing large satellite data requires both a computational and storage effort. Usually
operations on them are done in order to gain some insight on features which are not visible
in the original image such as features visible at different bandwidths, changes over various
time periods in ground features (floods, fires, deforestation, desertification, ice coverage),
artificial or natural ground formations which are not easily distinguishable (ancient roads,
fortifications, impact craters). These operations usually require two major steps before
obtaining the final image(s). The first stage implies extracting relevant information from the
satellite images such as geo-coding information, layers or bands. This information can be
later used in the resulting image on the surface of the planet and in the actual processing
step. This subsection will deal mostly with the latter step and with relevant examples.
Processing images in order to obtain relevant information usually requires several steps
each of them consisting of a simple operation such as: obtaining the negative, gray level
conversion, histogram equalization, quantization, thresholding, band extraction, embossing,
equalization, layers subtraction etc. As it will be detailed later in this section, choosing the
operations and their order depends on the desired result. This selection and ordering can be
made either by the user or can be automatically generated starting from the desired output
and following the chain of image combinations which lead to it. In this latter case it is up to
the user to chose the solution which best fits its initial image characteristics (image type,
codification, stored information). To support the user actions, we have developed a
workflow language (Frincu et al, 2009) together with a set of tools for users not familiar with

www.intechopen.com
126 Image Processing

programming which can be used both for visually creating a workflow (Figure 10) and for
automatically generate a solution given a user defined goal. The application is then
responsible for converting the visual workflow into a specific language developed by us
which can then be executed. After defining the workflow the user can then select a region
containing one or more images on which the workflow is to be applied. The communication
is asynchronously and the user can directly observe how each of the images is gradually
converted by the workflow.

Fig. 10. Visually designing a GiSHEO workflow

In the frame of the GiSHEO project we are mostly interested in applying image
transformations for historical and geographical use (see the case study from the next
section). In this direction we have identified several workflows made up of basic image
operations which allow the users to better observe features relevant for the two previously
mentioned fields. For example in history and in particular in archaeology there is a constant
need for identifying ancient sites of human settlements, fortresses or roads. Different flows
of image transformations (e.g. gray level conversion, histogram equalization, quantization
and thresholding) could enhance the image in order to make the marks induced by
archaeological remains easier to be identified by visual inspection.
Identifying the required operations is followed by actually designing the workflow which
usually implies binding them together in a certain order. Designing the workflow can be
achieved in two ways either by using a visual tool such as the one presented in Figure 10,
showing how a sequence of operations can be created, or by directly using the workflow
language developed especially for this task which will be briefly presented in the following
paragraph.

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 127

As previously mentioned visually designing the workflow is only the first step as it needs to
be transformed into a language understood by the workflow engine (named in GisHEO
OSyRIS – Orchestration System using a Rule based Inference Solution). The workflow
language named SILK (SImple Language for worKflows) is rule based and can also be used
directly by users preferring to define workflows without using the visual designer. A
sequence of basic image processing operations can be defined using SILK as follows:
# Initial activation task
A0:=[o1:output=”imageId”, ”instances”=”1”];
# The following tasks belong to the processing workflow
A:=[i1:input, o1:output, ”processing”=”image grayscale(image)”, ”isFirst”=”true”];
B:=[i1:input, o1:output, ”processing”=”image equalize-histogram(image)”];
C:=[i1:input, o1:output, ”processing”=”image quantization(image)”];
D:=[i1:input, o1:output, ”processing”=”image threshold(image)”, ”isLast”=”true”];
# Compute grayscale from the initial image
A0[a=o1] -> A[i1=a];
# Apply histogramequalization to the grayscale image
A[a=o1] -> B[i1=a];
# Apply quantization to the equalized image
B[a=o1] -> C[i1=a];
# Apply thresholding to the quantized image
C[a=o1] -> D[i1=a];
After transforming the visual workflow in the SILK language the workflow is executed
using a workflow engine and the result is sent back to the user which is able to view it
inside its web portal. In Figure 11 it can be seen how a selection of four images from a
geoencoded map is displayed after being processed. The sequence of operations
corresponds to the sequence previously described and exemplified in Figure 10.

Fig. 11. Processed selection of four images inside the GiSHEO web interface
After obtaining the result users can than either choose another image selection or change the
workflow.
As it can be noticed from the previous paragraph the user interaction module is composed
of several parts including the visual workflow designer which can be used independently
for creating the workflows and the web portal which allows users to select a previously
defined workflows, to choose a region comprised of several images and to apply the

www.intechopen.com
128 Image Processing

workflow on them. The users could still use and navigate the map in search for other
potential targeted images while the processing is still running. The visual designer and the
engine API together with the automatic workflow generator are available on demand from
the project repository.
The recent developed gProcess Platform (Radu et al, 2007), incorporated in GiSHEO
platform, provides a flexible diagrammatical description solution for image processing
workflows in the Earth Observation field. Abstract workflows (or Process Description
Graphs (PDG)) and instantiated workflows (or Instantiated Process Description Graphs
(IPDG)) are the workflows that can be defined using the gProcess Platform. Both workflows
representation is based on DAGs. The PDG is a pattern definition of the workflow because it
contains only the conceptual description of the workflows. On the other hand, the IPDG
representation is linked to specific input data or resources. Based on this only the IPDGs can
be executed in the Grid infrastructure. For describing workflows, we are using different
types of nodes. The input data or data resources are used to specify satellite images or data
values (int, float, string data types). The data resources are inputs for operators, sub-graphs
and services. Operators are algorithms implemented to run over the Grid. The difference
between operators and services is related to the way in which these nodes are executed in
the Grid environment. Sub-graphs are used to integrate graphs that may have been
developed by others and they can be used to define a hierarchical representation of the
algorithm. We adopted an XML based representation as a persistent storage solution for the
processing graphs. For every graph node, we defined an XML tag and a series of attributes
that defines the nodes.
As a future development of the gProcess Platform, we intend to add the possibility to define
in workflows some control structures like for or if statements. This will involve the ability of
creating more complex image processing algorithm for execution over the Grid.
The gProcess architecture (Figure 12) is based on the client-server model. The server side
enables the access to the Grid infrastructure using a set of services (EditorWS, ManagerWS,
ExecutorWS and ViewerWS). The User Oriented Application Level and Application Level
are encapsulated in the client side. The Client Java API accomplishes the access to the server
side; this layer creates a transparent invocation level to the server side services. User
Oriented Application Level exposes a set of user interaction components (EditorIC,
ManagerIC, ViewerIC). The complex functionality is developed by using the Application
Level, which combines the editor, manager and viewer functionality.
Each of the Web services exposed by the gProcess Platform is managing different
functionality. The EditorWS provides information that is used to describe workflows, like
the list of operators, the available sub-graphs or services, what satellite images can be used,
etc. The EditorIC component that supports the user’s editing operations for the workflow
development uses this Web service. The interactive workflow design, the visualization of
the workflow at different levels (by expanding or contracting sub-graphs), or user editing
tools are developed using this interaction component.
Different information related to the existing workflows (PDGs or IPDGs) are exposed by the
ManagerWS. Another functionality of this Web service is related to the interaction with the
gProcess repository to integrate new operators, services, sub-graphs, to include new
workflows or to access already designed workflows. The ManagerIC component can be
used to instantiate workflows to different data resources (satellite images), to manage the
model resources (operators, services, sub-graphs). The operator integration and monitoring
user interface are implemented in Flex.

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 129

Fig. 12. gProcess platform based architecture

The instantiated workflows (IPDGs) can be executed over the Grid by using the
ExecutorWS. Another important functionality of this Web service is the monitoring support
for the executing workflows. An internal data structure that maps the workflow definition is
created, and it is used to submit the operators to execution.
GProcess Operators Integration. The atomic component that implements a specific
functionality is integrated in the gProcess platform like an operator. Currently a basic set of
image processing operators are included in the gProcess operator’s repository. The gProcess
Platform supports the integration of user-developed operators. The operators must be
written in Java and they have to extend a base class. The workflow description (the IPDG
file) contains only the id from the repository. At execution time, the data from the database
is retrieved and used to submit the operator to execution. An operator can have multiple
input data resources. In the database, we store an invocation pattern that is used at the
execution time. For example for the add operator, the pattern can be the following:
OperationExec [Add-?,?,?]. The OperationExec represents the class that is executed. The Add
represents the operator name. The last “?” specify the output and the other “?” characters
are specifying the inputs. At execution time, this pattern is replaced with the execution
command, for example: OperationExec [Add-omania_b2.tif,romania_b3.tif, add_result.tif].
In the graphical user interface (Figure 13), in order to integrate a new operator to the
repository, the user must complete the following steps. The general information section
must be completed with the operator name and also with a short description of the operator.
In the input section, the user can select the input type for each data resource that is needed
by that operator. In the same manner in the output section, the user can select the output
type. In the upload tab, the user must select the executable class for the operator and also the
dependencies that are required at execution time. After completing these steps, the user can
define workflows by using the newly added operators.
Workflow example – EVI algorithm. The Enhanced Vegetation Index is used to enhance the
vegetation signal by reducing the atmosphere influences. The input data for the algorithm
are satellite images. Based on a set of processing steps the algorithm highlights the
vegetation areas. The input resources are the NIR, Red and Blue spectral bands. The basic
formula is:

www.intechopen.com
130 Image Processing

Fig. 13. gProcess interface for integration of new operators

In order to design the workflow for this algorithm we have to identify the atomic
components, and to rewrite the formula using the available operators. Since we have only
binary operators for addition, subtraction, etc. the new formula is the following:

In Figure 14 we exemplify the EVI graphical representation of the workflow.

A sample from the XML definition of the workflow is the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Workflow>
<Nodes>
<Resource id="1" name="B4" description="NIR spectral band">
<LocalResource path="romania_B4.tif" />
<PostConditions>
<Output idTypeDB="3" />
</PostConditions>
</Resource>
…

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 131

Fig. 14. EVI workflow

<Operator id="3" name="Sub" description="" idDB="2">
<Preconditions>
<Input id="1"/>
<Input id="2"/>
</Preconditions>
</Operator>
…
<Operator id="15" name="Div" description="" idDB="4">
<Preconditions>
<Input id="3"/>
<Input id="14"/>
</Preconditions>
</Operator>
</Nodes>
<Groups>
</Groups>
</Workflow>
The processing result is presented in Figure 15 for a particular example.
Monitoring interface. The ExecutorWS is the component that, based on a user selected
IPDG, submits the jobs to execution. The monitoring component from this Web service
updates the database with the current execution status for each node from the workflow
description. The monitoring interface (Figure 16) displays this monitoring information, node
name, start time, end time, execution status (waiting, submitted, running or completed). If
the job is completed then the result can be visualized (if the result is an image), or it can be
downloaded.

3.4 E-learning components

The aim of the eGLE application is to provide the non-technical specialists in Earth
observation with an environment that will allow them to search and retrieve information

www.intechopen.com
132 Image Processing

Fig. 15. EVI example: the satellite pseudo-colored spectral bands, and the pseudo-colored
image result

Fig. 16. Monitoring graphical user interface

from distributed sources, launch large scale computations on massive data over Grid
networks and create lessons based on these pieces of information in a transparent manner.
The interface of the eGLE Environment is focused on simplicity in order to be easy to use by

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 133

average computer users, but the functionalities implemented must allow the launching of
complex Grid operations with minimum restrictions.
There are three main steps that a teacher must complete in order to create a Grid based
lesson and they are described in what follows.
Step 1. Acquire the information needed for the lesson. In a transparent manner, without
having any knowledge over the location of the data or the protocol needed to access it
(HTTP, FTP, GFTP etc.), the teacher is able to browse and search for information based on
keywords, time intervals or latitude-longitude defined areas. This modality of information
search and retrieval will be available at first only for public, non-secured repositories, as the
secured access problem is a more complex issue that requires some specific user knowledge
and actions. Another type of information that the teacher can include into the lesson are the
results of his own computations executed over the Grid. Through the platform visual tools
included in the eGLE interface, the teacher can describe his own PDGs, create iPDGs, and
launch them in execution, monitor the execution progress and access the results without
possessing any technical information related to Grid.
Step 2. Organize and display the lesson content. Once the information needed for the
lesson is acquired, the teacher should be able to setup the lesson structure, to organize
logically the information and to define the desired display settings (e.g. text size and color).
As the amount of data included into the lesson can be very large (satellite images, videos,
files with measured values etc.) or may be accessible only at runtime (the custom
computations launched by students) the offline lesson development using dedicated
desktop applications is not an option. The eGLE Platform provides the teacher with all the
functionalities needed to create the visual appearance of the lesson through the usage of
visual containers like tools, patterns and templates.
Tools are visual and functional elements specialized on a certain content type (image, video,
text, graph etc.) and represent the atomic parts (smallest division) of the lesson. They are
developed by the programmers and integrated into the eGLE platform in order to be used
by teachers through the environment interface. The tools are concerned with data retrieval
and display mechanisms and provide only an API that can be used to customize their
settings (specify the data to be accessed and displayed – image, video etc., modify their
visual appearance – width, height, text color, text size etc) according with the content they
are specialized on.
Patterns represent visual containers and logical information organizers. They can be created
directly by the teachers at authoring time (Fig. 17, Select Pattern) through a wizard like
interface that will allow them to customize their visual appearance (ex. number of columns).
On each column of a pattern can be integrated a different tool that will be chosen on the
second step of the wizard (Fig. 17, Select Tools). Once a pattern is created, it can be reused
by the teacher (or by other teachers) with the same visual settings but with different tools
included.
Templates are visual containers and patterns collections that define the general layout and
settings at lesson global level. The visual attributes defined at template level will provide
unitary visual formatting throughout the entire lesson, and can be overridden at pattern or
tool level if necessary.
Step 3. Data binding and user interaction description. After creating a pattern and
selecting the desired tools to be integrated into the lesson, the teacher has the opportunity to
specify the instantiated data that will be displayed in each tool by moving to the step 3 of
the wizard (Fig. 17, Edit content). At this point each tool will display visual user interface

www.intechopen.com
134 Image Processing

Fig. 17. Wizard steps that helps the teacher to define patterns and instantiate tools
components that are specific to the tools data type (text area for text tools, PDG/iPDG
information for graph displaying tools etc.). For example the PDG component will connect
to the server and retrieve a list of available PDGs in the idea that the user could use a
previously defined workflow. In the same manner, the iPDG specialized tool will provide
the user with necessary user interface components that will allow him to search and retrieve
the information necessary to execute the iPDG over the Grid.
For some of the tools, at this point the teacher will have the ability to specify a certain
student interaction level. For example, the student could receive the right to launch Grid
computations on certain data sets. From this point of view, the eGLE platform aims to
implement three different lesson scenarios:
- Static lessons: the student cannot modify the displayed information. Nevertheless, he
may be granted the ability to control slideshows, videos or multimedia content.
- Dynamic data lessons: the students can launch specific Grid computations (described
through a non-modifiable PDG) with input data sets that are predefined by the teacher
at authoring time. All the available options will be displayed using a list component
while the processing result will be automatically included into the lesson in a specific
area chosen by the teacher.
- Dynamic workflow lessons: the students are granted the ability to modify a predefined
PDG. For security reasons, the elements that can be added to the graph will be chosen at
authoring time by the teacher, but the student will have the ability to describe any
processing graph using the provided components. After finishing the workflow
description the user could be allowed to launch the computation over the Grid on a
specific data set or on several data sets, also predefined by the teacher.
When all the required settings are completed, the user may advance to the step four of the
wizard which provides a preview of the content chosen.

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 135

4. Case study: remote sensing processing services for research in

archaeology provided by GiSHEO
Remote sensing techniques proved to be useful in non-intrusive investigation of
archaeological sites by providing information on buried archaeological remains (Gallo et al.,
2009; Lasaponara & Masini, 2007). The presence of different remains in the ground can
generate different marks identifiable in high resolution panchromatic and/or multispectral
images: crop marks, soil marks, shadow marks and damp marks (Gallo et al, 2009). The crop
marks are determined by the particularities of vegetation above different kind of remains.
The crop above wall foundations is negatively influenced because of lack of water in soil
while the crop above buried pits or ditches is positively influenced because of soil nutrients.
The soil marks consist of changes of the soil colour or texture. Both crop and soil marks can
be identified from panchromatic images and different spectral bands (for instance crop
marks are easier to be identified by using red and near infrared bands). The main steps in
extracting marks related to archaeological remains are described in the following.
Step 1. Data preparation. This step can consist in rectifying the distortions in the image
and/or in fusing data corresponding to panchromatic of different spectral bands
(Lasaponara & Masini, 2007). Particularly useful in identifying crop marks are the
vegetation indices and other thermal parameters which can be computed from different
spectral bands (e.g. red and near infra red bands).
Step 2. Applying image enhancement techniques. In order to emphasize the marks of
buried remains, the images are processed by applying basic techniques. Since a good
contrast is very important in making different marks easily to identify by the human eye,
the contrast enhancing techniques (contrast stretching or histogram equalization) are
frequently used in processing archaeological images (Aqdus et al., 2008). Other techniques
frequently used to detect crop and soil marks is edge detection, edge thresholding and edge
thinning (Lasaponara & Masini, 2007). In the case of multispectral images an important
processing step is that of computing the principal components which help in identifying
changes in surface variability.
Step 3. Extracting knowledge from processed images. Automatic identification of
archaeological sites from digital images is a difficult task, since the small anomalies induced
by the buried remains are usually hidden by stronger marks corresponding to the structures
currently existing on the ground (roads, constructions, trees, rocks etc). Therefore the final
identification and interpretation of the marks should be made by the expert by visually
inspecting the enhanced image and by corroborating his observations with additional
information (e.g. historical maps, current roads network etc).
The case study we conducted aimed in experimenting with different workflows of
enhancement operations applied to high-resolution panchromatic images. The images
correspond to several sites in Timis county, Romania where on ground research proved the
existence of different remains, e.g. clusters of pits, tombs, roman fortifications etc. Different
sequences of operations have been applied on a set of images selected by an archaeologist
who also interpreted and validated the results.
The results obtained for three images are presented in Figs. 18, 19 and 20, respectively. In all
cases we were looking for soil marks. The results in Fig. 18 were obtained by first converting
the initial image in gray scale and then applying contrast stretching (Fig. 18a) or histogram
equalization (Fig. 18b). For the image presented in Fig. 19a besides the contrast enhancing

www.intechopen.com
136 Image Processing

Fig. 18. Soil marks enhancement (pits cluster and ancient square delimitation) (a) Original
image with position of pits marked by arrows (b) Gray level image (c) Gray level image
enhanced by contrast stretching (c) Gray level image enhanced by histogram equalization.
operations (Figs. 19b and 19c) a sequence of several operations has been also applied (Fig
19d). The workflow used in this case consisted in a sequence of six operations: gray scale
conversion, histogram equalization, edge detection (Sobel filter), thresholding, inversion
and erosion.
In the case of the image presented in Fig. 20a besides contrast enhancement by histogram
equalization (Fig. 20b) we also applied an emboss filter to the gray scale image (Fig. 15c)
followed by histogram equalization (Fig. 20d).
These examples just illustrate the possibility of enhancing panchromatic images by applying
flows of basic image processing operations. Thus tools allowing the construction of
workflows of simple operations or just the selection of predefined workflows could be
useful in training of students in landscape archaeology. Further work will address to
construct the support for extracting archaeological marks from multispectral images.

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 137

Fig. 19. Soil marks enhancement (burial mounds) (a) Original image with positions of burial
mounds marked by arrows; (b) Gray scale image enhanced by contrast stretching; (c) Gray
scale image enhanced by histogram equalization; (d) Result of a sequence of operations on
the gray scale image: histogram equalization, edge detection, thresholding, inversion,
erosion.

7. Conclusion
In order to respond to the need of training and high education platforms for Earth
Observation, a Grid-based platform for satellite imagery has been recently developed and its
services are exposed in this paper. The development is far from being complete. Complex
services are envisioned to be constructed in the near future and intensive tests and
comparisons with other approaches are planned to be performed in the next year.

8. References
Agdus, S.,A.; Drummond, J. & Hanson, W.S. (2008). Discovering archaeological crop marks:
a hyperspectral approach. The Intern. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
&Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII (B5), Beijing(2008), pp. 361-366,ISSN1682-1750
Aloisio, G. & Cafaro, M. (2003). A dynamic Earth observation system. Parallel Computing 29-
10, pp. 1357–1362, ISSN 0167-8191
Borengasser, M.; Hungate, W.S. & Watkins R. (2008). Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Principles
and Applications, CRC Press Taylor & Francis, ISBN 978-1-56670-654-4, Boca Raton

www.intechopen.com
138 Image Processing

Fig. 20. Soil marks enhancement (roman fortifications) (a) Original image with linear
fortification marked by arrows; (b) Gray scale image enhanced by histogram equalization;
(c) Embossed gray scale image; (d) Embossed gray scale image enhanced by histogram
equalization.
Cafaro, M.; Epicoco, I.; Quarta, G.; Fiore, S. & Aloisio, G. (2008). Design and implementation
of a Grid computing environment for remote sensing. In: High Performance
Computing in Remote Sensing, 281–305, Chapman&Hall/CRC, ISBN 978-1-58488-
662-4
Carvajal-Jimenez, C.L.; Lugo-Beauchamp, W. & Rivera, W. (2004). Grid-HSI: using Grid
computing to enable hyper-spectral imaging analysis. In: Procs.3rd Intern. Conf.
Communications, Internet&Information Technology, Hamza. M.H. (Ed.), pp. 583-588,
ISBN 0-88986-445-4, St. Thomas, USA, Nov. 2004, IASTED/ACTA Press, Calgary
CEOS (2009). Working group on education, training and capacity building – WGEdu
Overview. Available at http://oislab.eumetsat.org/CEOS/webapps/

www.intechopen.com
Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation 139

Chen C.H. (Ed.) (2007). Signal and Image Processing for Remote Sensing. CRC Press, Taylor &
Francis Group, ISBN 978-0-8493-5091-7, Boca Raton
Chen C.H. (Ed.) (2008). Image Processing for Remote Sensing. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis
Group, ISBN 978-1-4200-6664-7, Boca Raton
DEGREE consortium (2008). Earth Science White Paper on Grids. Available at http://
www.eu-degree.eu/DEGREE/internal-section/wp6/DEGREE-D6.1.2_v2.8.pdf
ESA (2007). EDuspace The European Earth observation Web site for secondary schools..
Learning with Earth Observation. Europe from Space. Disaster Monitoring. Global
Chage. Available at http://www.eduspace.esa.int/
Frincu, M.E.; Panica, S.; Neagul, M. & Petcu, D. (2009). Gisheo: On demand Grid service
based platform for EO data processing, Procs.HiperGrid’09, ISSN: 2066-4451,
Romania, May 2009, Volume 2, pp. 415–422. Politehnica Press, Bucharest.
Fox, G.; Pallickara, S.; Aydin G. & Pierce M. (2005). Messaging in Web service Grid with
applications to geographical information systems. In: Grid Computing: A New
Frontier of High Performance Computing. Grandinetti L. (Ed.), pp. 305–331, ISBN 978-
0-444-51999-3, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Fusco, L.; Cossu, R. & Retscher, C. (2008). Open Grid services for Envisat and Earth
observation applications. In: High Performance Computing in Remote Sensing, Plaza A.
&Chang C.(Eds.),237–280,Chapman&Hall/CRC,ISBN978-1-58488-662-4,Boca Raton
Gallo, D.; Ciminale, M.; Becker H. & Masini N. (2009). Remote sensing techniques for
reconstructing a vast Neolithic settlement in Southern Italy. Journal of Archaeological
Science 36, Issue 1 (January 2009), pp. 43-50, ISSN 0305-4403
Gasster, S.D.; Lee, C. A. & Palko, J.W. (2008). Remote sensing Grids: Architecture and
implementation. In: High Performance Computing in Remote Sensing, Plaza A. &
&Chang C.(Eds.),203–236,Chapman&Hall/CRC,ISBN978-1-58488-662-4,Boca Raton
GENESI-DR Consortium (2008). Ground European network for Earth Science
interoperations – Digital repositories. Available at http://genesi-dr.eu
GiSHEO Consortium (2009). On-demand Grid services for high education and training in
Earth observation. Available at http://gisheo.info.uvt.ro.
Gorgan D.; Stefanut T. & Bacu V. (2009). Grid based training environment for Earth
observation. In: Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing, LNCS 5529,
Abdennadher, N. & Petcu, D. (Eds.), pp. 98-109, ISBN 978-3-642-01670-7, Springer,
Berlin.
Jong, Steven M. de; Meer, Freek D. van der (Eds.) (2005). Remote sensing image analysis::
including the spatial domain. Series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing,
Vol. 5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-2559-9, Dordrecht
Lasaponara, R. & Masini, N. (2007). Detection of archaeological crop marks by using satellite
Quickbird multispectral imagery. Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 34, Issue 2
(February 2007), pp. 214-221, ISSN 0305-4403
Lee, C.A.; Kesselman, C. & Schwab, S. (1996). Near-realtime satellite image processing:
metacomputing in CC++. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, Vol. 16, Issue 4
(July 1996), pp. 79–84, ISSN 0272-1716
Mather, P. M. (2004). Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: an Introduction. John
Wiley & Sons Ltd, ISBN 978-0470849194, Chichester, UK
Masini, N.; Rizzo, E.; Lasaponara, R. & Orefici, G. (2008). Integrated remote sensing
techniques for the detection of buried archaeological adobe structures: preliminary

www.intechopen.com
140 Image Processing

results in Cahuachi (Peru). Advances in Geoscience, 19 (2008), pp. 75-82, ISSN 1680-
7340
Nico, G.; Fusco, L. & Linford, J. (2003). Grid technology for the storage and processing of
remote sensing data: description of an application. Procs. SPIE: Fuhisada H. et al.
(Eds.) vol. 4881, no. 677 (April 2003), pp. 677–685, Agi Pelagia, Greece, Sept. 2002.
Panica, S.; Neagul, M,; Petcu, D.; Stefanut, T. & Gorgan, D. (2009). Desiging a Grid-based
training platform for Earth observation. In: Procs. SYNASC 08, pp. 394-397, ISBN:
978-0-7695-3523-4, Timisoara, Sept. 2008, IEEE Computer Press, Los Alamitos
Petcu, D.; Gorgan, D.; Pop, F.; Tudor, D. & Zaharie, D. (2008). Satellite image processing on a
Grid-based platform. International Scientific Journal of Computing, vol. 7, issue 2
(August 2008), pp. 51-58, ISSN 1727-6209
Plaza A. & Chang C. (Eds.) (2008). High Performance Computing in Remote Sensing. Chapman
& Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-58488-662-4, Boca Raton
Portela, O.; Tabasco, A.; Brito, F. & Goncalves, P. (2008). A Grid enabled infrastructure for
Earth observation. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 10 (2008), ISSN 1607-7962
Radu, A., Bacu, V. and Gorgan, D.: Diagrammatic description of satellite image processing
workflow. Proc. SYNASC07. pp. 341-348, ISBN 0-7695-3078-8, Timisoara, Sept. 2007,
IEEE Computer Press, Los Alomitos
Richards, J. A. & Jia, X. (2006). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction.
Springer-Verlag, ISBN: 978-354064-860-4, New York.
Schott J. R. (2007). Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach. 2nd edition, Oxford University
Press, ISBN 978-019517-817-3,, Oxford, USA
Schowengerdt R.A. (2007). Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing, 3rd
Edition, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc., ISBN 978-0-12-369407-2, Burligton, USA
Sekiguchi, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Kojima, I.; Yamamoto, N.; Yokoyama, S.; Tanimura, Y.;.
Nakamura, R.; Iwao, K. & Tsuchida, S. (2008). Design principles and IT overviews
of the GEOGrid. IEEE Systems Journal, Vol.2, No.3 (Sept.2008), 374-389, ISSN 1932-
8184
Tsangaris, M.; Kakaletris, G.; Kllapi, H.; Papanikos, G.; Pentaris, F.; Polydoras, P.; Sitaridi,
E.; Stoumpos, V. & Ioannidis, Y. (2009). Dataflow processing and optimization on
Grid and cloud infrastructures, Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data
Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1 (March 2009), pp. 67-74, IEEE Computer Society

www.intechopen.com
 Image Processing
Edited by Yung-Sheng Chen

ISBN 978-953-307-026-1
Hard cover, 516 pages
Publisher InTech
Published online 01, December, 2009
Published in print edition December, 2009

There are six sections in this book. The first section presents basic image processing techniques, such as
image acquisition, storage, retrieval, transformation, filtering, and parallel computing. Then, some applications,
such as road sign recognition, air quality monitoring, remote sensed image analysis, and diagnosis of industrial
parts are considered. Subsequently, the application of image processing for the special eye examination and a
newly three-dimensional digital camera are introduced. On the other hand, the section of medical imaging will
show the applications of nuclear imaging, ultrasound imaging, and biology. The section of neural fuzzy
presents the topics of image recognition, self-learning, image restoration, as well as evolutionary. The final
section will show how to implement the hardware design based on the SoC or FPGA to accelerate image
processing.

How to reference
In order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:

Dana Petcu, Daniela Zaharie, Marian Neagul, Silviu Panica, Marc Frincu, Dorian Gorgan, Teodor Stefanut and
Victor Bacu (2009). Remote Sensed Image Processing on Grids for Training in Earth Observation, Image
Processing, Yung-Sheng Chen (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-026-1, InTech, Available from:
http://www.intechopen.com/books/image-processing/remote-sensed-image-processing-on-grids-for-training-in-
earth-observation

InTech Europe InTech China

University Campus STeP Ri Unit 405, Office Block, Hotel Equatorial Shanghai
Slavka Krautzeka 83/A No.65, Yan An Road (West), Shanghai, 200040, China
51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Phone: +385 (51) 770 447 Phone: +86-21-62489820
Fax: +385 (51) 686 166 Fax: +86-21-62489821
www.intechopen.com