Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 73 views

    Nama: Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda NIM: G42171943 Gol: D Tugas 1

    Uploaded by

    Shofi Werdaya
    This document reports the results of a logistic regression analysis with status as the dependent variable and PMT (payment) as the independent variable. The analysis included 19 cases and found that PMT was not a statistically significant predictor of status, though the regression model was able to correctly classify 68.4% of cases. The analysis was conducted by Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda for a class assignment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Nama: Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda NIM: G42171943 Gol: D Tugas 1

    Uploaded by

    Shofi Werdaya
    73 views15 pages
    This document reports the results of a logistic regression analysis with status as the dependent variable and PMT (payment) as the independent variable. The analysis included 19 cases and found that PMT was not a statistically significant predictor of status, though the regression model was able to correctly classify 68.4% of cases. The analysis was conducted by Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda for a class assignment.

    Original Title

    BIOS_SHOFI NUR_G42171943_D.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document reports the results of a logistic regression analysis with status as the dependent variable and PMT (payment) as the independent variable. The analysis included 19 cases and found that PMT was not a statistically significant predictor of status, though the regression model was able to correctly classify 68.4% of cases. The analysis was conducted by Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda for a class assignment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    73 views15 pages

    Nama: Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda NIM: G42171943 Gol: D Tugas 1

    Uploaded by

    Shofi Werdaya
    This document reports the results of a logistic regression analysis with status as the dependent variable and PMT (payment) as the independent variable. The analysis included 19 cases and found that PMT was not a statistically significant predictor of status, though the regression model was able to correctly classify 68.4% of cases. The analysis was conducted by Shofi Nur Werdaya Sahda for a class assignment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 15

    Nama : SHOFI NUR WERDAYA SAHDA

    NIM : G42171943

    Gol :D

    TUGAS 1

    LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES status
      /METHOD=ENTER pmt

      /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

    Logistic Regression

    [DataSet0] 

    Case Processing Summary

    Unweighted Casesa N Percent

    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 19 100.0

    Missing Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    Unselected Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.

    Dependent Variable Encoding

    Original Value Internal Value

    status gizi kurang 0

    status gizi normal 1


    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Tablea,b

    Predicted

    STATUS GIZI

    status gizi status gizi Percentage


    Observed kurang normal Correct

    Step 0 STATUS GIZI status gizi kurang 0 8 .0

    status gizi normal 0 11 100.0

    Overall Percentage 57.9

    a. Constant is included in the model.

    b. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 0 Constant .318 .465 .470 1 .493 1.375

    Variables not in the Equation

    Score df Sig.

    Step 0 Variables PMT 2.170 1 .141

    Overall Statistics 2.170 1 .141

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

    Chi-square df Sig.

    Step 1 Step 2.177 1 .140

    Block 2.177 1 .140

    Model 2.177 1 .140


    Model Summary

    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

    1 23.686a .108 .146

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because


    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

    Classification Tablea

    Predicted

    STATUS GIZI

    status gizi status gizi Percentage


    Observed kurang normal Correct

    Step 1 STATUS GIZI status gizi kurang 4 4 50.0

    status gizi normal 2 9 81.8

    Overall Percentage 68.4

    a. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 1a PMT 1.504 1.054 2.036 1 .154 4.500

    Constant -2.197 1.833 1.436 1 .231 .111

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: PMT.


    LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES status
      /METHOD=ENTER pmt

      /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

    Logistic Regression

    [DataSet0] 

    Case Processing Summary

    Unweighted Casesa N Percent

    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 19 100.0

    Missing Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    Unselected Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.

    Dependent Variable Encoding

    Original Value Internal Value

    status gizi kurang 0

    status gizi normal 1

    Categorical Variables Codings

    Parameter
    coding

    Frequency (1)

    PMT Tidak Pmt 6 1.000

    pmt 13 .000
    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Tablea,b

    Predicted

    STATUS GIZI

    status gizi status gizi Percentage


    Observed kurang normal Correct

    Step 0 STATUS GIZI status gizi kurang 0 8 .0

    status gizi normal 0 11 100.0

    Overall Percentage 57.9

    a. Constant is included in the model.

    b. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 0 Constant .318 .465 .470 1 .493 1.375

    Variables not in the Equation

    Score df Sig.

    Step 0 Variables PMT(1) 2.170 1 .141

    Overall Statistics 2.170 1 .141

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

    Chi-square df Sig.

    Step 1 Step 2.177 1 .140

    Block 2.177 1 .140

    Model 2.177 1 .140


    Model Summary

    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

    1 23.686a .108 .146

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because


    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 1a PMT(1) -1.504 1.054 2.036 1 .154 .222

    Constant .811 .601 1.821 1 .177 2.250

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: PMT.

    LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES status
      /METHOD=ENTER pmt

      /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

    Logistic Regression

    [DataSet0] 

    Case Processing Summary

    Unweighted Casesa N Percent

    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 19 100.0

    Missing Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    Unselected Cases 0 .0

    Total 19 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.
    Dependent Variable Encoding

    Original Value Internal Value

    status gizi kurang 0

    status gizi normal 1

    Categorical Variables Codings

    Parameter
    coding

    Frequency (1)

    PMT Tidak Pmt 6 1.000

    pmt 13 .000

    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Tablea,b,c

    Predicted

    STATUS GIZI

    status gizi status gizi Percentage


    Observed kurang normal Correct

    Step 0 STATUS GIZI status gizi kurang 0 8 .0

    status gizi normal 0 11 100.0

    Overall Percentage 57.9

    a. No terms in the model.

    b. Initial Log-likelihood Function: -2 Log Likelihood = 26.340

    c. The cut value is .500

    Variables not in the Equation

    Score df Sig.

    Step 0 Variables PMT(1) .667 1 .414

    Overall Statistics .667 1 .414


    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

    Chi-square df Sig.

    Step 1 Step .680 1 .410

    Block .680 1 .410

    Model .680 1 .410

    Model Summary

    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

    1 25.660a .035 .047

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because


    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

    Classification Tablea

    Predicted

    STATUS GIZI

    status gizi status gizi Percentage


    Observed kurang normal Correct

    Step 1 STATUS GIZI status gizi kurang 4 4 50.0

    status gizi normal 2 9 81.8

    Overall Percentage 68.4

    a. The cut value is .500


    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 1a PMT(1) -.693 .866 .641 1 .423 .500

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: PMT.

    TUGAS 2

    GET DATA
      /TYPE=XLS
      /FILE='F:\SHOFI NUR\BIOSTATISTIK.xls'
      /SHEET=name 'Sheet1'
      /CELLRANGE=full
      /READNAMES=on
      /ASSUMEDSTRWIDTH=32767.
    DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
    LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES CaParu
      /METHOD=ENTER Perokok Usia Riwayatkeluarga Daerah
      /CONTRAST (Perokok)=Indicator
      /CONTRAST (Riwayatkeluarga)=Indicator
      /CONTRAST (Daerah)=Indicator

      /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

    Logistic Regression

    Case Processing Summary

    Unweighted Casesa N Percent

    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 20 100.0

    Missing Cases 0 .0

    Total 20 100.0

    Unselected Cases 0 .0

    Total 20 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.
    Dependent Variable
    Encoding

    Original
    Value Internal Value

    Ca Paru 0

    Tidak Ca 1

    Categorical Variables Codings

    Parameter
    coding

    Frequency (1)

    Perokok Merokok 9 1.000

    Tidak me 11 .000

    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Tablea,b

    Predicted

    Ca Paru
    Percentage
    Observed Ca Paru Tidak Ca Correct

    Step 0 Ca Paru Ca Paru 0 6 .0

    Tidak Ca 0 14 100.0

    Overall Percentage 70.0

    a. Constant is included in the model.

    b. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 0 Constant .847 .488 3.015 1 .082 2.333


    Variables not in the Equation

    Score df Sig.

    Step 0 Variables Perokok(1) 10.476 1 .001

    Overall Statistics 10.476 1 .001

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

    Chi-square df Sig.

    Step 1 Step 12.977 1 .000

    Block 12.977 1 .000

    Model 12.977 1 .000

    Model Summary

    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

    1 11.457a .477 .677

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because


    maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot
    be found.
    Classification Tablea

    Predicted

    Ca Paru
    Percentage
    Observed Ca Paru Tidak Ca Correct

    Step 1 Ca Paru Ca Paru 6 0 100.0

    Tidak Ca 3 11 78.6

    Overall Percentage 85.0

    a. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 1a Perokok(1) -21.896 1.212E4 .000 1 .999 .000

    Constant 21.203 1.212E4 .000 1 .999 1.615E9

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Perokok.

    LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES CaParu
      /METHOD=ENTER Perokok
      /CONTRAST (Perokok)=Indicator

      /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

    Logistic Regression

    [DataSet1] 
    Case Processing Summary

    Unweighted Casesa N Percent

    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 20 100.0

    Missing Cases 0 .0

    Total 20 100.0

    Unselected Cases 0 .0

    Total 20 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.

    Dependent Variable
    Encoding

    Original
    Value Internal Value

    Ca Paru 0

    Tidak Ca 1

    Categorical Variables Codings

    Parameter
    coding

    Frequency (1)

    Perokok Merokok 9 1.000

    Tidak me 11 .000

    Block 0: Beginning Block
    Classification Tablea,b,c

    Predicted

    Ca Paru
    Percentage
    Observed Ca Paru Tidak Ca Correct

    Step 0 Ca Paru Ca Paru 0 6 .0

    Tidak Ca 0 14 100.0

    Overall Percentage 70.0

    a. No terms in the model.

    b. Initial Log-likelihood Function: -2 Log Likelihood = 27.726

    c. The cut value is .500

    Variables not in the Equation

    Score df Sig.

    Step 0 Variables Perokok(1) 1.000 1 .317

    Overall Statistics 1.000 1 .317

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

    Chi-square df Sig.

    Step 1 Step 1.019 1 .313

    Block 1.019 1 .313

    Model 1.019 1 .313


    Model Summary

    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R


    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square

    1 26.706a .050 .066

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because


    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

    Classification Tablea

    Predicted

    Ca Paru
    Percentage
    Observed Ca Paru Tidak Ca Correct

    Step 1 Ca Paru Ca Paru 6 0 100.0

    Tidak Ca 3 11 78.6

    Overall Percentage 85.0

    a. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    Step 1a Perokok(1) -.693 .707 .961 1 .327 .500

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Perokok.

    You might also like