Some New Fixed Point Theorems On S Metric Spaces
Some New Fixed Point Theorems On S Metric Spaces
Some New Fixed Point Theorems On S Metric Spaces
1,2Sakthi College off Arts and Science for Women, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu,
adu, India
Copyright © 2020
20 by author(s) and
International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an Open Access article
distributed under
un
the terms of the
Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/4.0)
1. INTRODUCTION
Metric spaces are very important in various area of mathematics such as analysis, topology, applied mathematics etc. so
various generalized of metric spaces have been studied and several fixed point results were obtained.
Definition: 1.1
Let X be a nonempty set and S: X3→ [0, ∞) be a function satisfying the following conditions for all x, y, z, a∈ X:
A. s (x, y, z) ≥ 0
B. s (x, y, z) = 0 If and only if x=y=z
C. s (x, y, z) ≤ s (x, x, a) + s (y, y, a) + s (z, z, a)
We define,
S(Tx, Tx, Ty) < max { s(x, x, y), s(Tx, Tx, x) s(Ty, Ty, y), s(Ty, Ty, x) s(Tx, Tx, y)} s(25)
Lemma: 2.2
Let (x,s) be an s-metric space then s (x,x,y) = s (y,y,x) for all x,y єX (2.1)
Lemma: 2.3
Let (x, s) be an s-metric spaces if {xn} and {yn} are sequence in X such that xn→x. yn→y. Then s (xn, xn, yn) → s (x, x, y).
Remark:
Every s-metric space is topologically equivalent to a B-metric space.
Definition: 2.4
Let (x, s) be an metric space and T be a mapping of x, we define
S(Tx, Tx, Ty) < max { s (x, x, y), s (Tx, Tx. x), s(Ty, Ty, y), s(Ty,Ty,x) +s(Tx,Tx,y) } V(25)
2
for any x ,y єX , x≠y.
Definition: 2.5
Let (x, s) be an s-metric space T be a mapping from x into x. T is called a cv- mapping on x if for any xєX and any positive
integer n≥2 satisfying
We have,
"#$ % ,$ % , &
S (Tnx, Tnx, Tix)< {( !, !, !), } (2.3)
'
Theorem: 2.6
Let (x, s) be an S-metric space and T be a mapping from X into X. If T satisfies the condition (V25). Then T is a CV-mapping.
Proof:
Let x∈X and the condition (V25) be satisfied by T.By using mathematical induction (2.2) This condition is true. In fact for
n=2 by (V25)
we have,
s (T2x, T2x,Tx) <max {s(Tx, Tx,x), s(T2x, T2x,Tx) s(Tx, Tx,x), s (Tx, Tx, Tx)+s(T2x, T2x, x)}
2
And so, s(T2x, T2x,Tx) <max { s(Tx,Tx,x),s(T2x,T2x,x)}
2
Hence that the condition (2.3) is proved.
we find,
s(Tkx, Tkx, Tk-1x) < max { s(Tk-1x, Tk-1x, Tk-2x) , s(Tk-1x, Tk-1x, Tk-2x), s(Tk-1x, Tk-1x, Tk-1x)+ s(Tkx, Tkx, Tk-2x) }
2
< max {),s(Tkx, Tkx, Tk-2x) }
2
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30311 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 183
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
s(Tkx, Tkx, Tx) < max { s(Tk-1x,Tk-1x, x), s(Tkx, Tkx, x) }
2
And hence,
"#$ % ,$ % , &
s(Tkx, Tkx, Tix) < * {( !, !, !), }
'
Hence the condition (2.3) is satisfied. The proof is completed. The converse part of theorem is not true for always. Now we
see in the following example.
Examples: 2.7
Let R be the real line. Let us consider the usual s-metric on R is defined in
s (x, y, z)= |x-z| + |y-z| for all x, y, z∈R
Let,
Tx= { x if x∈[0,1]
x-2 if x=4
1 if x=2
Then T is a self mapping on the s-metric space [0,1]U{2,4}.
Solution:
For x=1/3, y=1/4 ∈[0,1] we have,
s (Tx, Tx, Ty)= s(1/3, 1/3, ¼)= 1/6, s (x, x, y) = s(1/3, 1/3, ¼)= 1/6
s (Tx, Tx, x) = s(1/3, 1/3, 1/3)=0, s (Ty, Ty, y) = s(1/4, 1/4, ¼)=0
s (Ty, Ty, x) = s(1/4, 1/4,1/3)=1/6, s (Tx, Tx, y) = s(1/3, 1/3,1/4)= 1/6
And so,
s(Tx, Tx, Ty) = 1/6 < max { 1/6, 0,0,1/6}=1/6 Therefore T does not satisfy the condition (2.2) now we show that T is a CV-
mapping we have the following case for x∈{2,4}.
Case: 1
For x=2, n=2
s (T2, T2 ,T2) < max { s(T2, T2, 2), s(T22 , T2,2) }
2
s(1,1,1) < max { s(1,1,2), s(1,1,2) }
2
0 < max {2, 1} =2
For n>2 using similar arquments we have to see that condition (lemma 2.1.2) holds.
Case: 2
For x=4 and n∈{2,3}
s (T24 , T24,T4) < max s(T4, T4, 4), s(T24 , T24,4) }
2
s (1,1,2) < max { s(2,2,4) , s(1,1,4) }
2
2 < max {4, 3}=4
Theorem: 2.8
Let T be a CV-mapping from on S-metric space (x,s) into itself. Then T has a fixed point in X if and only if there exist
integers l and m, l>m≥0 and x∈X satisfying ,
Tix=Tmx (2.4)
Proof:
Necessary condition; Let x∈X be a fixed point of T.
that is, Tx1=x1
Then (2.4) is true with l=1, m=0
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30311 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 184
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Sufficient condition: suppose there exists a point x∈X and an integers l and m, l>m≥0 such that ,
Tix=Tmx
Now, we show that y is fixed point of T. Suppose not, that is y is not a fixed point of T. Then n≥2, and
Tiy≠Tiy for 0≤i<j≤n-1
Then we obtain,
Max s(Tiy,Tiy, y) < max {s(Tiy, Tiy, y), s(Tjy, Tjy, y) }
1 ≤ i < j ≤n-1 1 ≤ i < j ≤n-1 2
That is a contradiction.
Consequently Tm x = y is a fixed point of T.
3. Some Fixed point theorems on s-metric spaces And m is the minimal integer satisfying Tmy = y, m≥1 Now,
In this section, we present some fixed point theorems we show that y is fixed point of T. Suppose not, that is y is
using the notions of a CS-mapping and LS-mapping not fixed point of T. Then m≥2 and Tiy ≠ Tjy, o≤i<j≤m-1
compactness and diameter on S-metric space.
Since T is a CV-mapping we have,
Theorem: 3.1 d (y,Tiy) = d (Tmy, Tiy)
Let T be a CS-mapping on X. Then T has a fixed point in X if <max{ d(Tiy,y) , d(Tjy,y) }
and only if there exists integers p and q. p>q≥ 0 and a 1 ≤ i < j ≤m 2
point x∈X such that
<max { d(Tiy,y), d(Tjy,y) }
Tpx = Tqx (3.1) 1 ≤ i < j ≤m-1 2
If the condition (3.1) is satisfied, then Tqx is a fixed point of Then we obtain,
T. Max d(y,Tiy) <max { d(Tiy,y) , d(Tjy,y) }
1 ≤ i ≤m-1 i < j ≤m-1 2
Proof:
Let ∈X be a fixed point of T. Which is contradiction.
Therefore y = Tqx is a fixed point of T.
ie. =-. For P=1, q=0 the condition (3.1) is satisfied.
Corollary: 3.1
Conversely, suppose there exists a point x∈X and two Let (x,d) be an s-metric space and T be a self mapping of X
integers p,q, p>q≥0 such that, Tpx = Tqx satisfying the condition (2.2). Then T has a fixed point in X
if and only if there exist integers p and q, p>q ≥0 and x∈X
Without loss of generality, we assume that P is the Satisfying (3.1) If the condition (3.1) is satisfied . Then Tqx
minimal such integer satisfying Tkx = Tqx, k>q. Putting y = is a fixed point of T.
Tqx and m= p-q,
Theorem: 3.2
We have, Let T be an LS-mapping from an s-metric space (x,s) into
Tmy = Tm.Tqx itself then T has a fixed point in X if and only if there exists
= Tp-q+qx integers p and q.
= Tpx
= Tqx = y p>q ≥0 and x∈X satisfying (3.1) the condition (3.1) is
satisfied. Then Tqx is a fixed point of T.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30311 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 185
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Proof: [3] Bailey, D. F. Some theorems on contractive mapping
It is obvious from theorem (2.8) and theorem (3.1). J. London Math. SOC 41,101-106 (1996)
[4] S. sedghi and N. V. Dung fixed point theorems on s-
Reference:
metric spaces Mat. Veshik 66 (1) (2014)113-124.
[1] s. s chang size on Rhoades open questions and some
fixed point theorems for a class of mappings proc. [5] J. Harjani. B. Lopez K. sandarngani a fixed point
Amer. Math. SOC (97) (2) (1986) 343-346 theorem for mapping satisfying a contractive
condition on a metric space Abst. Appl. Anal (2010).
[2] M. Edelstien on fixed and contractive mappings J.
Lond Math. Soc 37 (1962) 74-79
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30311 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 3 | March-April 2020 Page 186