More power for the federal government benefits policymaking politically, economically, and socially according to the document. Politically, a strong federal government prevents detrimental actions by states and ensures compromise. Economically, federal legislation and stimulus packages can boost the national economy. Socially, federal powers allow for policies that benefit many Americans regardless of background, such as the Affordable Care Act. However, some argue that excessive federal power can lead to unnecessary wars driven by greed rather than security needs.
More power for the federal government benefits policymaking politically, economically, and socially according to the document. Politically, a strong federal government prevents detrimental actions by states and ensures compromise. Economically, federal legislation and stimulus packages can boost the national economy. Socially, federal powers allow for policies that benefit many Americans regardless of background, such as the Affordable Care Act. However, some argue that excessive federal power can lead to unnecessary wars driven by greed rather than security needs.
More power for the federal government benefits policymaking politically, economically, and socially according to the document. Politically, a strong federal government prevents detrimental actions by states and ensures compromise. Economically, federal legislation and stimulus packages can boost the national economy. Socially, federal powers allow for policies that benefit many Americans regardless of background, such as the Affordable Care Act. However, some argue that excessive federal power can lead to unnecessary wars driven by greed rather than security needs.
More power for the federal government benefits policymaking politically, economically, and socially according to the document. Politically, a strong federal government prevents detrimental actions by states and ensures compromise. Economically, federal legislation and stimulus packages can boost the national economy. Socially, federal powers allow for policies that benefit many Americans regardless of background, such as the Affordable Care Act. However, some argue that excessive federal power can lead to unnecessary wars driven by greed rather than security needs.
Quarantine | DBQ Monday, June 1st, 2020 Does more Federal Power benefit or hurt Policymaking
The United States of America started the government with the Articles of Confederation. This proved to be too weak and led to minimal progress. The Founding Fathers then made the Constitution. Afterward, the bill of rights was added. These documents lead to improvements in the government and how it is run. Some of the people in favor of the Constitution were called the Federalists. They favored a strong centralized government. More power for the Federal government benefits policy making based on political, economic, and social issues. To begin, expanding powers of the Federal Government benefits policymaking politically because there is an equal order reigning over all the states, and it doesn’t allow for the states to take detrimental actions over a local feud. In Document 4, Bill Frenzel said that "‘Gridlock is a natural gift the framers of our Constitution gave us so that the country would not be subjected to policy swings resulting from the whimsy of the public.’" This quote shows that more Federal Government powers benefit policy making politically because gridlock is essential to the country, so that there is compromise within the government aside from what the public may think. There needs to be a common agreement from both sides so that the general public can see unity among the Federal Government. Looking at Document 5, the National Government has the power to declare war while the states do not. The State Government does however, maintain state militia. Then both Federal and State Governments can make and enforce laws according to the Venn Diagram. This shows that politically, more powers in the National Government benefit policymaking, because extreme measures and actions will be filtered out in the Federal Government, which needs votes on before anything happens. To further elaborate on this statement, more power for the Federal Government benefits policy making economically, because dealing with the nation’s income involves a central power that can provide equal access nationwide. Document 6 states that the Obama administration “passed a massive stimulus package in February 2009 to jumpstart the economy- and it was successful… GDP growth was higher from 2009-2012 in part due to the legislation. Trump has benefited from Obama's economic stewardship”. This evidence proves the claim that more federal power benefits policy making economically because the legislation, one of the government branches, helped for there to be an economic increase nationally, starting from one presidential term to the next. In Document 1, James Madison writes, “those who are without property, have ever formed distinct interests in society. Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, . . . grow up of necessity in civilized nations, and divide them into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern Legislation”. This quote shows that economically speaking, more federal power benefits policy making, because in a divided country by social and economic classes, interests, viewpoints and more, there needs to be more power for the Federal Government to control it all. Lastly, the Federal Government receiving more power benefits policy making socially, because it can sway social media platforms and impact people of all no matter their social backgrounds. Document 7 states, “Trump signed an executive order that aims to curtail legal protections that shield…online companies from liability for content posted by their users. Twitter labeled two of Trump's tweets about mail-in ballots, saying they contain "potentially misleading information about voting processes.’" This shows that socially, more power to the Federal Government benefits policy making, because the current U.S. President was highly offended and upset about Twitter’s actions towards his posts, and he can then sign an executive order with his power. Document 10 is a bar graph that shows those receiving and not receiving tax credit benefited more from the affordable health care act, as well as independents, low and high deductible plans and total marketplace enrollees. This shows that more power to the Federal Government benefits policy making socially, because most people of different social classes benefited more from the ACA rather than being negatively affected. Because of the Federal Government and its powers, more people were able to get healthcare because it was affordable. Some may say that the Federal Government having more power actually negatively affects policy making, because there have been unnecessary wars of greed. An example of this can be seen through the war in Iraq. Document 8 states, “Before the 2003 invasion, Iraq's domestic oil industry was fully nationalized and closed to Western oil companies. A decade of war later, it is largely privatized and utterly dominated by foreign firms”. This drastic change shows that more power to the Federal Government harms policy making because the U.S. decided to go to war in Iraq to steal their oil to benefit oil companies elsewhere, in this case, the United States businesses and companies. However, it is better for the Federal Government to declare war on another country rather than the State Government. This is said because if there is less power in the Federal Government, then there will be more power in the State Government as the United States is ruled under federalism.
Unit II Congressional District Questions Q1: How Does The Constitution Limit Government Power To Protect Individual Rights While Promoting The Common Good?