Tutorial 1
Tutorial 1
Tutorial 1
Mooting is the oral presentation of a legal issue or problem against an opposing counsel and
before a judge. It is perhaps the closest experience that a student can have whilst at
university to appear in court. The argument follows the conventions of argument used in
real court. There are 5 or more participant in a moot which are a judge and 4 mooters in two
teams. The hypothetical case argued in court is referred to as the moot problem which is
devised in order to highlight particular issues of doubt in the law. The issues of doubt may
arise from the case law or statute. They are referred to as ground of appeal. Most moot
problems contain 2 grounds of appeal and each member of each team argues one side of
each ground of appeal.
Once the argument is completed then the moot judge will give a short judgement. Mooting
experience can have a positive impact on your future career. The legal profession is an
increasingly difficult one to enter, and some application forms even demand that a
candidate can provide evidence of their advocacy or mooting experience. Mooting will also
help you to build confidence in public speaking, general research, and presentation skills,
which are useful skills you can transfer to most careers.
Mooting differs as it assumes that the evidence has already been tested and focuses on practising
speech and the ability to argue the question of law, whereas mock trials exist to ‘test the evidence’
and establish the case’s facts before presenting them in a real court of law. Mooting is actually a part
of mock trial.
3.
Memorial cover
Table of contents
Moot Problem
Skeletal argument
Written submission
State the facts of the case which usually done by the lead counsel
State all the grounds of appeal before dealing with each one of them
For the ground of appeal= law, application, and conclusion
Then proceed with closing submission
Index of authorities
bibliography where you list all the cases you cited, the books, the reports, the statutes
you’ve used and any other material that you have used to prepare your memorial.
Bundle of authorities
May it please Your Lordships. I am Yuvanesh Kumar, together with my learned friend
Matthew James Garcia, I appear on behalf of the appellant Mr. P Ramlee. The respondent, Mr. Aliff
Syukri is represented by my learned friends amuthen and Faiz. My Lords, this is the hearing of the
appeal against the decision of Yang Arif Mr. Denning sitting in the court of appeal. The learned judge
held that Mr P. Ramlee had made defamatory statement against aliff Syukri