Turnover Intention Among Italian Nurses: The Moderating Roles of Supervisor Support and Organizational Support
Turnover Intention Among Italian Nurses: The Moderating Roles of Supervisor Support and Organizational Support
Turnover Intention Among Italian Nurses: The Moderating Roles of Supervisor Support and Organizational Support
Research Article
Maura Galletta, msc, phd,1 Igor Portoghese, msc, phd,1 Maria Pietronilla Penna, msc,1
Adalgisa Battistelli, msc, phd3 and Luisa Saiani, rn, bnsc, mnsc2
1
Department of Psychology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, 2Department of Public Health and Community Medicine,
University of Verona, Verona, Italy and 3Laboratory Epsylon – Dynamics of Human Abilities and Health Behaviors,
University of Paul Valéry Montpellier, Montpellier, France
Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the variables that are related to person–environment fit in Italian
nurses, highlighting the role of supervisor support and organizational support in the relationship between
nurses’ perceptions of care adequacy, job satisfaction, and turnover intention. Therefore, 1240 nurses from
three hospitals completed a self-administered questionnaire. The results showed that supervisor support and
organizational support act differently as moderators of the care adequacy–job satisfaction–turnover intention
relationship. Finally, job satisfaction was a mediating variable between care adequacy and turnover intention.
These findings have important implications for hospitals because they help to promote effective work envi-
ronments and to reduce turnover intention.
Key words care adequacy, Italy, job satisfaction, nurses’ turnover intention, organizational support, retention of nurses,
supervisor support.
outcomes. Schneider et al. (2000) proposed a person-based employed, mediated through job satisfaction. Nurses who
framework to explain the process by which individuals are perceived their managers as supportive (e.g. recognition,
attracted to, selected by, and either leave or remain in orga- encouragement, flexible work schedules, and positive feed-
nizations. The main characteristic of the P–E Fit Theory is its back) reported greater scores in both job satisfaction and the
focus on the interaction between employees and their job or intention to remain employed (Sourdif, 2004). Moreover, per-
organization, rather than on the individual effects of personal ceptions of supervisory support were related to perceptions
or organizational characteristics, to explain the employees’ of the quality of care in the unit (Raikkonen et al., 2007).
work behavior. According to Schneider (1983: 35), “people Based on these considerations, PSS is likely to act specifically
are attracted to organizations because of organizational on the relationship between care adequacy and job satisfac-
goals, organizations select people who appear to be able to tion, which in turn is related to turnover intention. Perceived
help the organization achieve its goals, and people who organizational support is activated by a social exchange
achieve their own goals there will tend to remain in the process and through a norm of reciprocity, which can produce
organization.” However, a misfit can motivate workers to try a sense of employee obligation to aid the organization. This
to change the organizational characteristics to meet their might generate attitudinal and behavioral outcomes that
job needs, adjust themselves to the organization, or quit reciprocate favors, which lead to lower turnover (Tekleab
the organization to search for another compatible organiza- et al., 2005). As job satisfaction is a relevant antecedent of
tion (Takase et al., 2005). Therefore, a misfit between the job turnover intention (Lambert et al., 2001), POS is likely to act
and environmental supplies can lead to employees’ turnover specifically on the relationship between job satisfaction and
intention (Takase et al., 2008). For example, a misfit can occur turnover intention. Thus, supervisory and organizational
when nurses perceive that, in their unit, the main (profes- support can act as facilitators in the process of “matching” the
sional and organizational) mission to offer adequate care to employee with the work environment. Even though the lit-
patients is not ensured. In fact, studies on staff nurses in erature has shown the importance of PSS and POS in the
magnet hospitals identified the perceived care adequacy as relationship between job satisfaction, quality of care, and
one of the principal elements of a healthy, satisfying, and turnover intention, how PSS and POS can act differently as
productive work environment, which increased nurses’ reten- moderating variables in the care adequacy–job satisfaction–
tion (Kramer & Schmalenberg, 2002). Furthermore, in defin- turnover intention relationship has not been analyzed.
ing the quality of the relationship between the individual and
the organization, a growing body of work recognizes the AIM AND HYPOTHESES
important role of support from both a supervisor and the
The aim of the study was to examine the relationship
organization in decisions to stay (Maertz et al., 2007).
between the principal variables that are related to turnover
intention. Specifically, the moderating role of PSS on the
Perceived supervisor and organizational support relationship between care adequacy and job satisfaction and
the moderating role of POS on the relationship between job
An important factor in defining the essence of social
satisfaction and turnover intention were examined. Based on
exchange in employment relationships is supervisory and
the literature, the following hypotheses were tested:
management support. In fact, employees develop general
• Hypothesis 1a: care adequacy shows a positive relation-
views regarding the degree to which supervisors and the
ship with job satisfaction
organization value their contributions and care about their
• Hypothesis 1b: PSS shows a positive relationship with
well-being (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Kottke & Sharafinski,
job satisfaction
1988; Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002), which are called “per-
• Hypothesis 2: PSS moderates the positive relationship
ceived supervisor support” (PSS) and “perceived organiza-
between care adequacy and job satisfaction, such that the
tional support” (POS), respectively. As supervisors act on
relationship is stronger when PSS is higher
behalf of the organization because they evaluate the employ-
• Hypothesis 3a: Job satisfaction shows a negative rela-
ees’ contribution and manage the reward systems, the treat-
tionship with turnover intention
ment that employees receive from their supervisor can
• Hypothesis 3b: POS shows a negative relationship with
impact on their turnover intention (Eisenberger et al., 1986;
turnover intention
Tekleab et al., 2005). In the healthcare context, a nursing
• Hypothesis 4: POS moderates the negative relationship
supervisor is the person who directly works with the nursing
between job satisfaction and turnover intention, such that the
staff in the unit and therefore has an impact on both the
relationship is weaker when POS is lower
staff’s working life and quality of care (Failla & Stichler,
• Hypothesis 5: Job satisfaction mediates the relationship
2008). They play a key role in coping daily with major
between care adequacy and turnover intention
challenges, as well as in demanding efficiency (Abdelrazek
Figure 1 represents the hypothesized relationships.
et al., 2010), and they can affect the quality in different ways,
including the effect that they have on job satisfaction or staff
METHOD
well-being (Hannan et al., 2001). In fact, a lack of support
from the direct supervisor could prompt nurses’ dissatis-
Design, participants, and data collection
faction and burnout. According to Tourangeau and Cranley
(2006), supervisor support is an important organizational A cross-sectional survey was conducted. A convenience
factor that indirectly affects the intention to remain sample of registered nurses was recruited for this study. For
Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and correlations among the study variables (n = 1240)
**P < 0.01. The Cronbach’s alpha values are shown in italics. CareAd, care adequacy; JobSat, job satisfaction; POS, perceived organizational
support; PSS, perceived supervisor support; TurInt, turnover intention.
Table 2. Hierarchical regression results for the moderating effect of perceived supervisor support (PSS) on the relationship between care
adequacy and job satisfaction
95% CI
Regression step b SE t-value Lower limit Upper limit
Step 1
Education 0.01 0.018 0.41 -0.03 0.040
Tenure -0.08** 0.003 -2.87 -0.01 -0.003
R2 = 0.004*
Step 2
Care adequacy 0.22*** 0.026 8.55 0.17 0.270
PSS 0.40*** 0.026 15.37 0.35 0.450
DR2 = 0.27***
Step 3
Care adequacy ¥ PSS 0.09*** 0.023 3.69 0.04 0.130
DR2 = 0.008***
F = 13.64
Total R2(adj) = 0.29
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Standardized b-values from the final step of the regression analysis are presented. CI, confidence interval.
was 36.95 years (SD = 7.91) and the average age of the men Hierarchical regression analyses
was 37.31 years (SD = 8.19) (range: 21–60 years). The mean
experience levels were 14.16 years (SD = 8.88) in the profes- In order to test the interaction effects, two different regres-
sion (range: 1–38 years) and 7.84 years (SD = 6.92) in the unit sion models were carried out. Multiplicative terms for the
(range: 1–38 years). Table 1 shows that the Italian nurses per- standardized independent variables were created, as sug-
ceived moderate levels of care adequacy, job satisfaction, gested by Cohen and Cohen (1983). Then, the standardized
POS, and PSS and had low scores of turnover intention, on independent variables were introduced into the equation in
average (mean = 1.83, SD = 1.22). three steps. Regression equations were computed by entering
two control variables (education and tenure) in the first step
of each regression analysis. Next, the independent variable
(job satisfaction or care adequacy) and the moderator (PSS
Exploratory factor analysis
or POS) were introduced in step 2. The interaction term was
The discriminant validity of the constructs was tested introduced in step 3 (see Tables 2 and 3 for the results).
via an EFA with the maximum likelihood extraction Lastly, the significant interaction effects were represented
method. The results showed five factors with Eigenvalues by figures. Independent lines of regression were generated
> 1, explaining ~ 58% of the variance of the indicators. from the regression equation to represent the relation-
The Keiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was ship between the independent variable and the dependent
0.92 and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant variable, defining the high values and the low values of the
(c2 [d.f. = 210] = 13,597.35, P < 0.001), indicating adequate moderator variable at relatively one SD above and below
intercorrelations among the items in the questionnaire and the mean. A JST was carried out to test the mediation effect.
the suitability of the factor analysis (Hair et al., 2006). The To assess the significance, three steps were carried out by
reliability coefficients of the measures were good (0.82–0.92), calculating: (i) the a path (care adequacy on job satisfaction);
revealing a strong internal consistency. (ii) the b path (job satisfaction on turnover intention),
Table 3. Hierarchical regression results for the moderating effect of perceived organizational support (POS) on the relationship between job
satisfaction and turnover intention
95% CI
Regression step b SE t-value Lower limit Upper limit
Step 1
Education 0.10*** 0.020 3.50 0.03 0.110
Tenure -0.26*** 0.003 -9.06 -0.04 -0.020
R2 = 0.09***
Step 2
Job satisfaction -0.19*** 0.032 -5.89 -0.26 -0.130
POS -0.01 0.033 -0.30 -0.07 0.050
DR2 = 0.04***
Step 3
Job satisfaction ¥ POS -0.05† 0.023 -1.93 -0.09 0.001
DR2 = 0.003†
F = 3.73
Total R2(adj) = 0.13
***P < 0.001. †P < 0.10. Standardized b-values from the final step of the regression analysis are presented. CI, confidence interval.
Table 4. Mediation effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between care adequacy and turnover intention: results for the joint significance
effect
95% CI
Care adequacy effect Mediator effect on Lower limit of Upper limit of the
Mediator on the mediator (a) turnover intention (b) Indirect effect (ab) the mediated effect mediated effect
Job satisfaction 0.36* (0.03) -0.23* (0.03) -0.08* (0.01) -0.11 -0.06
Model summary
F R2(adj) P-value
43.58 0.07 < 0.001
Second, for this study, a sample of nurses from the north of Gagné and Deci (2005) stated that the extent to which orga-
Italy was used. Therefore, it is impossible to compare the nizations support their employees by satisfying their psycho-
measures of this study with data from other regions of Italy, logical needs could influence the employees’ behavior. They
which reduces the external validity of the research. In order documented that the need for job autonomy is associated
to obtain greater support for the model, it might be necessary with high motivational autonomy as it assigns responsibility
to replicate the study with nurses from different geographic and stimulates personal growth and it can determine higher
areas of Italy (e.g. nurses in central and southern areas). job satisfaction and commitment to the unit and lower turn-
Another limitation is that a longitudinal design was not used. over. In conclusion, the results of this study add new knowl-
As this research was cross-sectional in nature, one should be edge on more effective strategies to improve nurses’ quality
aware that it is not possible to explain the causal influence of work life and to reduce the likelihood of dysfunctional
(Mathieu & Taylor, 2006). Turnover is a result of dynamic turnover by creating work environments that support nursing
processes that need longitudinal-type studies to investigate practice and the actual demands of nurses.
its evolution across time. Future studies should consider such
methods and test the long-term effects of perceived support, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
care adequacy, and job satisfaction over outcomes such as
actual turnover and absenteeism. The authors thank all the nurses who participated in this
research.
Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived Raikkonen O, Perala ML, Kahanpaa A. Staffing adequacy, supervi-
organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 1986; 71: 500–507. sory support and quality of care in long-term care settings: staff
Failla KR, Stichler JF. Manager and staff perceptions of the manag- perceptions. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007; 60: 615–626.
er’s leadership style. J. Nurs. Adm. 2008; 38: 480–487. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support:
Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. a review of the literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002; 87: 698–714.
J. Organ. Behav. 2005; 26: 331–362. Ribelin PJ. Retention reflects leadership style. Nurs. Manage. 2003;
Goffin RD, Gellatly IR. A multi-rater assessment of organizational 34: 18–20.
commitment: are self-report measures biased? J. Organ. Behav. Schmalenberg C, Kramer M. Perception of adequacy of staffing. Crit.
2001; 22: 437–451. Care Nurse 2009; 29: 1–9.
Hair JJF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Schneider B. An interactionist perspective on organizational effec-
Multivariate Data Analysis (6th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: tiveness. In: Cameron KS, Whetten DA (eds). Organizational
Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2006. Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. Orlando, FL:
Hannan S, Norman IJ, Redfern SJ. Care work and quality of care Academic Press, 1983; 27–54.
for older people: a review of the research literature. Rev. Clin. Schneider B, Smith DB, Goldstein HW. Attraction–selection–
Gerontol. 2001; 11: 189–203. attrition: toward a person–environment psychology of orga-
Hom PW, Griffeth RW, Sellaro CL. The validity of Mobley’s (1977) nizations. In: Walsh BW, Craik KH, Price RH (eds).
model of employee turnover. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1984; Person–Environment Psychology: New Directions and Perspectives
34: 141–174. (2nd edn). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000; 61–86.
Kottke JL, Sharafinski CE. Measuring perceived supervisory and Sourdif J. Predictors of nurses’ intent to stay at work in a university
organizational support. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1988; 48: 1075–1079. health center. Nurs. Health Sci. 2004; 6: 59–68.
Kramer M, Schmalenberg CE. Magnet hospital staff nurses describe Stone PW, Larson EL, Mooney-Kane C, Smolowitz J, Lin SX, Dick
clinical autonomy. Nurs. Outlook 2002; 51: 13–19. AW. Organizational climate and intensive care unit nurses’ inten-
Lambert EG, Hogan NL, Barton SM. The impact of job satisfaction tion to leave. Crit. Care Med. 2006; 34: 1907–1912.
on turnover intent: a test of a structural measurement model using Takase M, Maude P, Manias E. Nurses’ job dissatisfaction and turn-
a national sample of workers. Soc. Sci. J. 2001; 38: 233–250. over intention: methodological myths and an alternative approach.
McGilton KS, Hall LM, Wodchis WP, Petroz U. Supervisory support, Nurs. Health Sci. 2005; 7: 209–217.
job stress, and job satisfaction among long-term care nursing staff. Takase M, Yamashita N, Oba K. Nurses’ leaving intentions: anteced-
J. Nurs. Adm. 2007; 37: 366–372. ents and mediating factors. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008; 62: 295–306.
MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Hoffman J, West S, Sheets V. A Tekleab AG, Takeuchi R, Taylor MS. Extending the chain of rela-
comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening tionships among organizational justice, social exchange, and
variable effects. Psychol. Methods 2002; 7: 83–104. employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Acad. Manage.
Maertz CP, Griffeth RW, Campbell NS, Allen DG. The effects of J. 2005; 48: 146–157.
perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support Tourangeau AE, Cranley LA. Nursing intention to remain
on employee turnover. J. Organ. Behav. 2007; 28: 1059–1075. employed: understanding and strengthening determinants. J. Adv.
Mathieu JE, Taylor SR. Clarifying conditions and decision points for Nurs. 2006; 55: 497–509.
mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Wagner CM. Predicting nursing turnover with catastrophe theory.
Behav. 2006; 27: 1031–1056. J. Adv. Nurs. 2010; 66: 2071–2084.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based Practice in Waters LK, Roach D. Job satisfaction, behavioral intention, and
Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (2nd edn). New absenteeism as predictors of turnover. Pers. Psychol. 2006; 32:
York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010. 393–397.