ML080070492 PDF
ML080070492 PDF
ML080070492 PDF
:irst measurement
neasu reme nt
;tation (Medium)
JIote: Station #3
iot Dictured
une OT IWO -. o)-incn
P-iype HP~e
Ion-implante
o nlci
(0.3pmthic)
The MDA varies with energy because the quantities on which it depends vary with energy. Here we have separated out all the factors
in the MDA that only depend on the detector itself. The gamma rays per decay, the shield and count time affect the MDA, but will do
so in the same way for all detectors.
R(E) is the energy resolution of the detector as a function of energy; B(E) is the background counts per keV (unit energy) as a
function of energy and e(E) is the absolute efficiency of the detector as a function of energy.
This simple formula is highly significant in guiding us towards the right choice of detector, Let us examine it In more detail.
You can see that the MDA is linear in efficiency, but proportional to the square root of the resolution and the background. So you
would expect that the biggest detector will give the best MDA for a low-activity sample. Is it always the case that "Bigger IsBetter"
(Ref. 3)? Yes and nol More efficiency will always improve the detection limit reached ina given count time. However, you should
consider the sample to be counted:
*Does the spectrum have Interferences (multiplets) in which a gamma-ray peak of interest Is*obscured by a peak from another
nuclide? Equation 1lIs correct, but the resolution of a larger detector Istypically worse than the resolution of a smaller detector. This
could mean that a good resolution detector will give better MDAs than a larger efficiency detector.
2
The Best Choice of High Purity
Germanium (HPGe) Detector
*Does background increase as relative efficiency increases?
Certainly, as the efficiency increases, the background Background vs Detector Volume
increases, but data from a large number of all sizes of
-.5 keyV
detectors shows clearly that the background increases less ~ -1O0koVAverege
2500 keV
rapidly than the efficiency. Thus MDA improves on larger S5
ý-50keVVAVe 0
detectors. (Fig. 3)Cosmic background will also increase with
increasing detector size, but will increase no faster than
efficiency and thus MDA will improve. This background Isthe
general background in the detector when no sample activity
is present. As soon as a sample source with non-zero activity
is presented to the detector, this will also add to the general 2-
background in the form of source induced background.
As detectors increase in size (efficiency), the peak-to-
Compton ratio (p/C) increases, (Fig. 4.) which means that the
ratio of source related signal to source induced background 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
in the spectrum will increase, that is improve (Fig. 4). Figure Detector Volume (cc)
5 shows an example of this. Two GMX detectors were used
to count the same sources In the same geometry. The peak Figure 3. Background counts vs. detector volume for a large
areas for "4'Am and `3 Cs are shown. The ratios at the counts number of detectors.
in the spectra are not as large as the stated efficiency ratio
because the stated efficiency is for 1.3 MeV only. The PeakRto-Compton vs Efficiency
source-induced background is higher for the larger detector
(except in the 100 key region), but the ratio of the two 120 --------
backgrounds is never as high as the efficiency ratio for the Source-Induced Background
10- Halves fromhere to here
peaks. We talked earlier about cosmic and other non-source
background. If the Compton background has been produced
inthe spectrum because of a dense sample matrix, a high
p/C detector will not reduce this Compton background. For
example, in plutonium-in-human lung measurements, a high
contributor to Compton background is the natural 40K gamma
rays scattering from the person's bones. This cannot be 40 ~
reduced by the detector. 120
3
Is a More Complex Solution Likely to be a
Better Solution?
Compton Suppression Systems?
The large Compton background seen in Fig. 5 is due to
capturing only part of the original gamma-ray energy. Some
of the remaining or lost energy actually leaves the detector.
It we could capture these lost energy parts, we could reject 8
the part of the gamma-ray energy captured in the HPGe. In
a Compton Suppression System (CSS), (Fig. 6) the HPGe
detector is surrounded by a Nal(TI) annular detector which
detects photons escaping from the HPGe. The signals from
the HPGe and Nal are used in anticoincidence circuitry to
remove the Compton background events from the primary
gamma-ray spectrum. OSS systems are usually tested with
137Cs, and some systems have background improvements of Energy (key) ReAlThW:
1O=68&U~ehw.1in
O10.00
a factor of 5 over the p/C ratio of the detector itself. F gure 5. Comparison of 1'7CsP"Am spectra obtained with 18 and
CSS Advantages: For a given HPGe detector, a CSS will 98% relative efficiency GMVX detectors, showing the effect of
always reduce Compton background. It is also called an. increasing P:C ratio, improving MDA.
.active shield.' It reduces the cosmic background because a
cosmic ray produces events (counts) in both detectors.
CBS Disadvantages: The sample size is usually small
because the sample must be placed inside the Nal annulus.
The system is complex: coincidence electronics require
careful adjustment and maintenance to ensure consistent
performance. CSS efficiency calibration is complex because
some nuclides naturally emit photons in coincidence with
each other and this reduces the full-energy peak areas for
these peaks as well as reducing the background. Most
importantly CSS systems are expensive. It is usually better
to spend your money on a larger HPGe detector, which may
be less expensive, work better, and be simpler than
Compton suppressing a smaller detector. Compton
suppression of large detectors is not as effective (not as
large an improvement) as small detectors because the large
detectors already have a high p/C ratio. High p/C HPGe
detectors have largely replaced CSS.
4
The Best Choice of High Purity
Germanium (HPGe) Detector
Detector Efficiency: e(E)
The detector efficiency in Eq. 1 will potentially have the most effect on MDA.
IQ-,
The IEEE-325 definition of relative efficiency (Ref. 4) at 1.33 MeV, Is not a good 10%RELATIVE EFFICIENCY
indicator of detector sensitivity in most of the sample geometries you want to GAIMA-X DETECTOR
use, It is defined at a single energy and for a point source at 2 cm distance to the
detector endcap; No real samples meet this criteria except a point 'Co source at
25 cm from the endcapi On the other hand, relative efficiency is often a good
place to start as a general indicator of detector performance. The efficiency for
various energies is shown in Figure 7.
In Eq. 1, E(E) is the absolute efficiency at the specified energy. e(E) will depend
on the detector-to-sample geometry, and many other energy dependent factors,
including gamma-ray absorption in matrix and detector dead layers and the 8 =2 KIcm DEEP
intrinsic efficiency of the detector. The IEEE-325 relative efficiency is no longer a THPG. LEPS DETECTOR
suitable indicator.
RELATIVE EFFICIENCY
11%~
Counting Geometry has a Major Effect on Counting Efficiency HPtOeCOAXDETECTORE
Figure B illustrates how~ three detectors can have the same IEEE-325 efficiency, 0'10 1 0'
yet have different efficiencies for your samples and your nuclides. All three Enew~ (keV)
schematically represented detectors have the same IEEE-325 relative efficiency,
but for counting a flat disk-like sample (e.g., filter paper), it is obvious that the Figure 7. Point source efficiency curves for
long and thin detector will have poorer geometrical efficiency than the "shorter planar and coaxial detectors inarbitrary units.
and fatter" detectors. So if your samples are filter papers, disks or other large
area containers, your best selection will be a shorter and fatter detector, such as
the ORTEC PROFILE F series GEM. With the ORTEC PROFILE and PROFILE- *source "A"
FX GEM series, you can specify the crystal dimensions as well as IEEE-325
relative efficiency (Ref. 7).
Dead Layers, Windows and Absorption
Now you need to consider the gamma-ray range of energies to be analyzed. All
materials will absorb gamma rays. The materials between the emitting nuclide'
and the crystal can absorb (or attenuate) the gamma-ray flux. The absorption Source "B"
processes are a function of energy and described by the exponential attenuation
equation below:'
Detector 1
I= loe
-(E) (2)
Where lois the unattenuated gamma-ray flux, I is the flux after passing through
the material and p isthe linear attenuation coefficient of the absorber and x is the
thickness.
This relationship determines both how deep a detector needs to be to stop the Detector 3
incident gamma rays and the reduction in efficiency due to the window thickness
and crystal dead layer thickness. The exponential function inthe equation means
there is no absolute cutoff length for absorption or stopping power, so that a thin Figure 8. Three different crystal geometries, all
planar detector will have reduced, but not zero efficiency at high energy and a with the same IEEE point source efficiency, but
thick contact coaxial detector will have reduced and not zero efficiency at low very different absolute efficiency for a puck
energy. The optimum choice of detector Is a tradeoff of all measurement sample on endcap.
parameters.
5
Figure 9 compares absolute efficiency of two detectors, one
P-type (GEM) and one N-type (GMX). The crystals are of
Efficiency of GEM and GUX (-55%)
very similar diameter, but the GEM is 14 mm deeper than the E
GMX. As you look at the efficiency above about 150 keV,
there is little difference in efficiency. The efficiency curves are
diverging slightly with increasing energy because the deeper .5
GEM crystal will stop more gamma rays. Below 150 keV, the
GMX has higher efficiency and below 100 key, the difference
increases rapidly as you go down in energy. This is because
the dead layer of the GEM (-600 microns) is much larger
than that of the GMX (-0.3 microns). Any gamma rays
stopped inthe dead layer do not produce an output. At 60 A.
key (2"Amn) the GMX has about 1.7 times the absolute
efficiency of the GEM and a proportionately better detection w
limit for 241Am (Eq. 1). This does not mean the GEM cannot
measure "'Am, it simply means that it is not as good as the Energy (keV)
GMX. The GMX however would cost significantly more, and
for the measurement of higher energy gamma rays, for Figure 9. Comparison of absolute efficiency of an N-type (GMX)
example, 1370s at 661 keV, is no better. Don't forget the GEM and a P-type (GEM). (Point source at 25 cm.)
will have superior resolution and p/C, because it is a P-type
and has bigger dimensions. So the GEM will have better
MDA at the higher energies.
Figure 10 shows absolute efficiency curves for a 70 mm
diameter x 15 mm thick source on endcap for an 85 mm
diameter x 30 mm depth thin window PROFILE X series
GEM-FX8530, compared to a GEM8O 76 mm diameter x 87
mm depth. Note the much higher absolute efficiency of the
FX85 at all energies below 160 keV. At 59 keV, the FX is SIX
times more efficient, and below that the efficiency of the
GEM80 fails off due to the thick (-70 pm) contact. The FX
detector has an ultra thin contact (-10 pm Ge) allowing good
transmission at 22 keV and below.
6
The Best Choice of High Purity
Germanium (HPGe) Detector
Sample Presentation
Samples for gamma-ray spectrometry come Inall shapes, sizes, chemical and physical forms. The activity you need to measure may
be very low in a large sample, or it may be very high in a small sample or anywhere in between. The matrix of the sample may be
dense and have a high atomic number, therefore making accurate measurements difficult due to attenuation of the gamma rays.
You may be able to position the sample relative to the HPGe detector in a way to optimize the spectrum gathered, and therefore the
results. You may have external reasons which define or restrict the choice of how the sample Is presented to the detector. Some
reasons you may see are:
of the
A human being in a bioassay measurement is a fixed-format sample. There Is no opportunity to change the presentation
,subject into another geometry.
*Awide-area, uncollimated sol survey Isa very different counting geometry than a waste drum.
*While a 2 L Marinelli beaker and large detector might be the best choice, you may have already standardized on 1 L beakers, so be
sure any new detector will actually fit Inside your existing Marinelli beakers.
Filter vs. Bottle vs. Marineilli Beaker
Absolute Efficiency vs Energy for Large Samples
Remember the MDA (Eq. 1) depends on the absolute 02.2
efficiency and the absolute efficiency depends on the
geometry of sample and detector. You may select the sample
geometry from several different containers. Lets look at some
different samples counted on a single detector. In Fig. 7, the
filter paper was placed directly on the endcap and the filter
active area diameter is slightly smaller than the diameter of
the detector. Would a smaller diameter detector or a larger
diameter detector be better for this filter paper? The best
detector diameter for a disk source on endcap (that is, in
.close" geometry to the crystal) is about 1.2 times the
diameter of the disk (Refs. 5, 6, and 7). A larger crystal does
not increase the efficiency significantly and a smaller
detector reduces the efficiency. The form of the sample also o 200 400 000 Soo 1000 1200 1400 1000 10ow 2000
has an impact on the efficiency. Three different geometries Energy (kaV)
are shown in Fig. 11 and you can see the filter geometry is,
by far, the best of the three examples. So if you can, you Figure 11. Filter paper, Marinelli beaker and bottle geometries
should make disk samples rather than use the larger sample compared.
containers. The 1 L bottle Isa larger diameter than the filter
paper.
Efficiency for I Liter and 2 Liter Marinelli
The situation changes if you want to determine specific 0.040 -4lý
activity or activity per unit sample, such as pCi/kg. In such
practical cases, you should consider, itit is possible to use
the entire sample in that geometry. If only 1%of the sample ~0.040
could be put on the filter, but 100% of the sample could be
put inthe Marinelli beaker, then using the Marinelli beaker to
count the whole sample would be more efficient over-all in
terms of counts inthe spectrum per unit activity Inthe 0.010
original source.
In Fig. 12, 1 L and 2 L Marinelli beakers are compared on
the same detector. It may seem at first surprising, but the 1 L
beaker has a higher efficiency than the 2 L. The reason Is 0 no0 400 000 SO 1000 1200 1400 1000 1000 2000
back to simple geometry. The 1 L beaker puts a greater Energy ClwV)
proportion of the sample closer to the detector. Thus 1000 Bq
of activity in the 1 L beaker will produce more counts in the Figure 12. Comparison of 1 L and 2 L Marineilli beakers on the
spectrum than 1000 Bq in the 2 L beaker. However, and it is same detector.
important, if there is enough sample to fill the 2 L Marinelli,
then the 2 L beaker will produce lower MDC (minimum
detectable concentration MDA/volume) because of the larger sample.
7
Marineilli Beaker or a Bottle? I Liter and 2 Liter Marinelli with I Liter Battle
Figure 13 shows that a Marinelli beaker has about 3 times
the efficiency of a bottle geometry. The Marinelli beaker
utilizes the sides of the detector thereby gaining efficiency. At
low energies, however the aluminum endcap wall, (replaced
by beryllium or carbon fiber on the face of the GMX
detector), will attenuate the gamma rays, thus reducing the
advantage of the Marinelli.
I0M0
What About "Wrap-Around" Geometries? 0M
Figure 14 shows that a small disk on endcap has a higher
efficiency than a sample wrapped around the curved surface
of the detector. This initially surprising result can be
explained as follows. Imagine a point source placed on the
curved endcap surface. Directly below the source, the 0 200 400 goo a00 IW0 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
germanium is as close to the sample as if it is on the face of Energy (U*V)
the endcap. However, when you consider gamma rays
emitted at an angle, the curved surface puts the sensitive Ge Figure 13. 1 L and 2 L Marinelli Beakers compared to 1 L bottle
further away from the source than it would be on the flat on endcap for a GMX detector.
endcap face. However, as inthe case of the 1 L and 2 L
Marinellis in Fig. 13, ifyou can make the sample as large as Absolute Efficiency vs Eniergy for Disk and Cylinder
the area of curved surface (much larger than the amount on
11
the front flat surface), the curved surface has the highest P c
I*
s ost
erachighcylinder
efficiency in terms of counts Inthe spectrum per unit activity
0.20
of the source. The cylindrical surface area in the detector in
Fig. 11 was 15 times that of the flat disk on the end face of
the crystal, which would more than offset the differences
shown In the curves. S~0.10
"Well" Detectors
The well detector (GWL Series) has been around for some
years. A well detector has the highest geometric efficiency 0M.0
possible, but can only contain small samples and introduces
some other complexities. The geometry is so "close" that
coincident, summing complicates calibration. Software can 0.00
correct for coincident summing (TOC), but you must 0 000 1000 100 200 2M0 200
remember this if you are considering a well detector. Well Figure 14. Disk and "wrap-arou nd' geometries compared.
detectors are for use in cases where the quantity of sample
is very small, e.g., in some forensics applications.
9
Throughput Limited Counting
Figure 17 shows a representative system throughput curve, Total Throughput Comparison at 2.2 ps
(Ref. 9). The shape is typical of most throughput curves. 50,000
Above the point of maximum throughput, pileup losses
increase and, in terms of time taken to get to a given MDA, 400
counting above the point of maximum throughput actually
increases the counting time. This is because less and less
data is being stored in memory as the input count rate 30,0001
increases. Ifyou can change the input count rate by
changing the counting geometry in some way, then the point 20,000.
of maximum throughput Isthe best place to operate. &Poftile MCA 1
However in some cases, e.g., post accident monitoring, wide 10,000. DPEPu
count rate variations "wide dynamic ranges" need to be ,DruPu
accommodated.,
The combination of the digital or analog shaping time 0 50,000 100,000 150,000
chosen, the system processing dead time per pulse and theII
dead time due to the reset of the preamplifier (if not Figure 17. System throughput curves.
resistive), defines the system maximum throughput.
Misleading claims are sometimes made incommercial literature about maximum achievable throughput of various electronic systems.
However, the throughput limit is determined by the amplifier settings (or digital filter settings). These settings determine the dead time
and resolution. So you select the settings based on the resolution you need, and this determines the throughput you can achieve.
Getting the Best Data Whe'n the System Is Through put-Limrnited
By choosing the correct detector, you can improve the quality of the spectral data. You might think that choosing a small detector
would give superior high count-rate performance. This might be true for certain low-energy applications where very good resolution at
very short shaping times is Important (Ref. 9), but this is not always the case. Recall Fig. 4. In this figure, you see that the large
detector has 'higher peaks and lower valleys." Thus, for throughput-
limited work at intermediate to high energies, a collimated larger(b
detector will produce better quality data than a smaller detector, even
though both may have the same capability interms of throughput to
memory. The larger detector has a higher proportion of photopeak
r10
(good) events inits pulse stream than Compton background (bad)
events incomparison to the smaller detector. - I
Figure 18 shows two spectra superimposed taken with a 120% X
relative efficiency and a 12% relative efficiency P-type (GEM) detector z
(Ref. 8). The 120% GEM was collimated to produce the same over-all 0
count rate as the 12% GEM. Peak net areas from the 120% are
almost 3 times as large as those from the 12% even though both are U EEG W
counting at the same count rate. Thus the 120% would have a
"throughput limited MDA" almost 3 times better than that of the 12%
for the same measurement time. Figure 18. 12% uncollimated and 120% collimated
detectors compared at the same count rate.
10
The Best Choice of High Purity
,Germanium (HPGe) Detector
And Lastly:
Low and Very Low Count Rates. Low Background Detectors.
Reduced and low background detectors are available, constructed with different degrees of low background specification. The
background in the detector comes from natural emitters found in nearly all materials. By carefully selecting the materials used in the
detector, these natural radionuclides can be significantly reduced. No detectors (low or otherwise) have non-mode radionuclides in the
material. The background has both peaks and continuum. Ref. 11 describes the background and how to quantify it.
The Standard Options From ORTEC Are:
LB - Low Background
XLB - Low Background with lead backshleld.
LLB - Low Background with remote preamplifier
PLB - Reduced Background in PopTop
Low background (Ref. 7) options require specially selected materials, and therefore can add considerable cost to the detector. Before
deciding that such a step is necessary, consider the following:
What problem are you trying to solve or mitigate? The basic principle should be removal of INTERFERENCE LINES which degrade
the results. The background continuum is *not usually the problem.
Examples:
In a lung burden system, the major source of background is the 41K Compton background from the subject. Ifuranium is being
measured, then some attention should be paid to removing sources of this line (including Compton-scattered events from the subject)
from the spectrum.
In an In-situ measurement, the source of background is not the detector itself. You should first shield the detector from external
radiation sources such as nearby containers.
Figure 19 shows the background in different detectors. Ifyou
are measuring uranium via the 186 keV line, then the Peak Areas In Background for Different Types
reduced background PopTop or low background option rather * P4IOO0%St
than the standard detector is needed. This is due to uranium 0 P40984A PL
being present in the standard detector aluminum endcap. low00 0 M4645A. LU
The LB and PLB detectors use selected magnesium 1400-
endcaps.
~1200. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
White an LLB configuration may represent the ultimate in low
i000
background, you should discuss the measurement with a
detector expert, who may be able to offer a cost-effective
solution without extreme background reduction measures. In
most cases, your budget is fixed and It is important to spend 400
money where it will give you the best performance
improvements.
Conclusion 2W2
It is hoped that this application note has helped you clarify
some of the issues surrounding the choice of your next
HPGe detector. Clearly, some choices are better than others
when it comes to choosing a detector to measure samples
with particular energy gamma rays, in a specific geometry Figure 19. Low background (LB), reduced background PopTop
and count rate regime. We are ready to discuss your needs (PILB), and standard detector.
at any time. Contact your local sales engineer or email
info@ ortec-online~com.
11
The Best Choice of High Purity
Germanium (HPGe) Detector
References
1. G.Gilmore and J.D. Hemmingway, 'Practical Gamma-Ray Spectrometry," Wiley 1995 ISBN 0 471 95150 1.
2. J.A.Cooper, 'Factors Determining the Ultimate Sensitivity of Ge(Li) Gamma-Ray Spectrometers", NucI Instr and Meth 82 (1970)
273-277.
3. R.Keyser, T.Twomey, and S.Wagner, "Benefits of using Super-Large Germanium Gamma-Ray Detectors for the Quantitative
Determination of Environmental Radionuclides," Radioactivity and Radiochemistry, Vol 1 No 2 , pp 46-56 (Spring 1990).
4. "IEEE Test Procedures for Germanium Detectors for Ionizing Radiation," ANSI/IEEE Standard 325-1986
5. R.M. Keyser, T.R Twomey, P.Sangsingkeow, 'Advances In HPGe Detectors for Real-World Applications," ORTEC 1999.
6. R.M. Keyser, T.R Twomey, and P.Sangslngkeow, "Matching Ge Detector Element Geometry to Sample Size and Shape: one
does not fit aill!," Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Meeting of the ANS, Nov 1998.
7. ORTEC Charged Particle and Photon Detector Catalog CD-ROM available from www.ortec-online.com
8. T.R Twomey, R.M. Keyser, M.L. Simpson, and S.E Wagner, ORTEC, 'High Count Rate Spectroscopy with Ge Detectors:
Quantitative Evaluation of the Performance of High Rate systems," Radioactivity and Radiochemistry, Vol 2 , No 3 (1991).
9. R.D. Bingham, R.M. Keyser, TR. Twomey, 'An Innovative, Portable MCA Based on Digital Signal Processing,' Conference
Proceedings, 23rd ESARDA meeting on Safeguards and Nuclear Materials Management, Brugge, May 2001
10. See, for example: R.Keyser, T.Twomey, S. Haywood, W.E. Parker, T.F Wang, D.Clark, K. Raschke, W.Romine, W.Buckley
and W.Ruhter, "Recent Developments in the MGA++ Codes," ESARDA Conference, Seville, Spain, May 1999.
11. "Test Methods for Spectrum Background Determination in HPGe Spectrometry," IEC 61976-2000.
R
OT C OD__ Home IApplicatiot
The GAMMA-X detector Is a coaxial Germanium (Ge) detector with an ultra-thin entrance win
While most coaxial detectors have entrance windows from 500- to 1000-pm thick, the entrar
window of the GAMMA-X detector is a 0.3-pm-thick, ion-implanted contact. Ion implantation
results in a totally stable contact which will not deteriorate with repeated cycling.
Figure 8 compares ORTEC's GAMMA-X and GEM detector elements. The GAMMA-X detector
element depicted is different from that of the GEM detector because the former's starting mE
is n-type germanium.
The GAMMA-X detector is the only Ge spectrometer designed for both gamma- and x-ray
spectroscopy with high precision and efficiency for both. This point can be illustrated by com
the GAMMA-X detector with a LEPS and with an HPGe coaxial detector (Fig. 9). The GAMMA-'
detector offers a combination of the performance of the LEPS at low energies and a coaxial
) detector at high energies.
The low-energy performance of this detector is defined by its resolution at 5.9 keV, its activE
surface area, and the detector window thickness.
The thickness of the entrance contact of the GAMMA-X detector is described by the ratio of tI
are~as of two peaks of a readily available source. The peaks chosen are those of the B8-keV
gamma rays from the 10 9 Cd and of the 22.16-keV Ag K x rays from the same source. The
warranted window attenuation ratio
is 20. Obviously, the ability to see and measure the resolution accurately at 5.9 key speaks
eloquently of the thinness of the entrance window.
Figures 10-12 show a comparison of the low-energy performance of a GEM HPGe coaxial det
(Fig. 10), a 5-cm active area, 10-mm-deep LEPS (Fig. 11), and a GAMMA-X detector (Fig. 1ý
In the GEM coaxial detector the thick ("-700 pm) lithium-diffused ou~ter contact completely a
the Ag K x rays of the ' 0 9 Cd source (Fig. 10). Only the 88-key gamma-ray line is visible. In
GAMMA-X detector, the entrance window of the detector element itself is 0.3 pmn thick. TheA
rays are perfectly visible, with excellent peak-to-valley ratios (Fig. 12). The very low-energy
escape peaks in Fig. 12 are totally missing in Fig. 10. Figure 11 shows the spectrum as obtai
with an HPGe detector expressly designed for work at energies below 100 key: a 5-cm activi
area, 10-mm-deep LEPS. The spectra of Figs. 11 and 12 are quite similar.
Beryllium Window
Detectors supplied with 2-3/4-in.-diam endcaps (10 to -~35%/) are supplied with 2-in.-diamI
windows; those supplied in 3-1/4-in.-diam endcaps (-.30 to 650/) are supplied with 2-1/2-in
diamn Be windows. These windows are 0.020 in. thick and have a transmission coefficient of',
at 5.9 keV. (Low-background carbon fiber windows are optional. See Figure 22 for transmiss
characteristics of the Be and carbon fiber windows.) Detectors in 3-3/4-in.-diam. endcaps(n
100%/) receive 3.3-in.-diam. Be windows which are 0.030, in. thick.
To achieve good energy resolution at 5.9 keV, the technology of this state-of-the-art detecto
must be well understood by the manufacturer. Resolution specifications stated only at 14 or
key can be misleading and may be indicative of having failed to master the technology.
GAMMA-X detectors have high-voltage shutdown and high-rate indicator protection features.
LN2 supply is exhausted and the detector begins to warm while high-voltage bias is applied(
using the Model 659 Bias Supply), the high voltage automatically shuts off, thus protecting t
FET from damage.
This is accomplished with a~temperature sensor (located on the mount behind the detector) I
shuts down the high voltage before the molecular sieve can outgas'and cause a dangerous h
voltage arc. Using the high-leakage current of a warming detector to shut down the high yolu
can result in FET and detector damage.
In the GEM detector, in which the outer contact is positively biased, hole collection dominate
charge collection process; in the GAMMA-X detector, electron collection is the dominant proc
Fast neutrons generate hole-trapping centers; that is, negatively charged defects that trap h
but not electrons.
Therefore, the GAMMA-X detector, in which the hole collection process is of secondary impor
is basically less sensitive to radiation damage than coaxial Ge devices in which the hole colle
process is of primary importance. These theoretical considerations have been experimentally
2
confirmed.
Figure 13, a plot of the 1.33-MeV FWHM resolution as a function of fast neutron fluence for t
GAMMA-X and a GEM detector of the same efficiency, shows that the GAMMA-X detector is ft
more resistant to fast neutron radiation damage. 2 As noted, the detector temperature affect!
radiation damage resistance to fast neutrons.
It should be noted that once severe radiation damage has occurred, the "longest mileac
obtained by avoiding cycling the detector to room temperature. 3 This is true for either p- or;
Ge detectors. However, for slightly damaged GAMMA-X detectors ('-O.1 keV degradation), 4cý
or even leaving the detector warm for an extended period, will have no unfavorable effect.
Options of Interest
Ordering Information
-A For PopTop Capsule with 1.3 mm thick Al Window, add "-A" to the model no. [e.g., GMX90P4
Table 3 for transmission data)
-PLUS Ultra- hig h-cou nt-rate Preamplifier, add "-PLUS" to the model number [e.g., GMX9OP-PLUS fc
or GMX90-PLUS for Non-PopTop]
SMART-i-N SMART-i detector option for negative bias detector. To order, add SMART-i-N as a separate
-PLB Reduced Background PopTop Capsule with Carbon Fiber Endcap, add "-PLB" to the model nui
-PLB GMX9OP4-PLB]
moc
-PLB-BReduced background PopTop capsule with Be Window in Cu Endcap, add "-PLB-B" to the
[e.g., GMX1OP4-PLB-B]
*All GAMMA-X PopTop detector capsules include sealed detector element, preamplifier, high-
voltage filter, and a Be window 0.02 inches thick and with diameter >_that of the detector
element. Useful energy range is 3 key to 10 MeV.
tFWHM = Full Width at Half Maximum; EWi1M = Full Width at One-Tenth Maximum; FW.Q21%
Full Width at One-Fiftieth Maximum; total system resolution for a source at 1000 counts/s
measured in accordance with ANSI/IEEE Std. 325-1996, using ORTEC standard electronics.
NOTE: For those familiar with HPGe detector specifications, you will notice that ORTEC now C
ONLY "first category" detector specifications. Recent process improvements now make this
possible.
2R.H. Pehi, N.W. Madden, J.H. Elliott, T.W. Raudlorf, R.C. Trammell, and L.S. Darken, Jr., "Radiation Damage
Resistance of Reverse Electrode Ge Coaxial Detectors," IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS-26, Ni1, 32 1-23 (1979).
3H.W. Kraner, R.H. Pehi, and E.E. Hailer, "Fast Neutron Radiation Damage of High-Purity Germanium Detector
IEEE Trans. Nuci. Scd. NS-22, Ni1, 149 (1975).
4T.W. Raudorf, R.C. Trammell, and Sanford Wagner, "Performance of Reverse Electrode HPGe Coaxial Detecto
Light Damage by Fast Neutrons," IEEE Trans, Nuci. Scl. NS-31, Ni, 253 (1984).
12/7/2007
http ://www.ortec-online.com/detectors/photonlib 2 _2 .htm
ORTEC Detector Element - GAMMA-X Germanium (HPGe) Coaxial Detectors (in PopT... Page 5 of 5
Alliance Partners I Press Release I Conf. & Meeting Schedule I Careers I Quality Policy I Privacy Statemer
Copyright 9) 2007T Advanced Measurement Technology, Inc.
2 -2 .htm12707 12/7/2007
http ://www.ortec-online.com/detectors/photon/b
ORTEC Detector Element - GAMMA-X Germanium (HPGe) Coaxial Detectors (in PopT... Pagel1 of 3
ORTEC . Search
Home IApplicatioi
Products ISe
Detector Element
10-1
10% RELATIVE EFFICIENCY
GAMMA-X DETECTOR
7
LU
I I
10I 102 103
Energ (key)
Figure 9. Comparison of the Efficiency- Energy Curve of
the LEPS, HPGe Coaxial, and GAMMA-X Detectors.
104
I 101I
I
U
g)1
A Ag K X RAYS -
10?I
10'1
104)
Ag X-RAYS
- 22.16 keV '09Cd SPECTRUM
5 CM' LEPS DETECTOR
Ge ESCAPE 24.96 keV
PEAK~S
88 keV-
E
.A.-
Eneigy tk&VI
10.
Ag K X Rays
'"'Cd SPECTRUM
-j 10.5
22.16 keV GAMMA-X DETECTOR
Ge ESCAPE 24.96
-PEAKS 88 keV
'.10. COAEMIALDef(Cyos I- IO
-j 103
10
a
101
. J()
Encogy IkeV)
a- CONVENTIONAL Go
30 - COAXIAL DETECTOR
N - - GAMMA-X DETECTOR
z
10 7:
I
E
1
107
3 ~
1w*
1w'
S 0 0 c00o
1010
0 OQ0o 0
8218
o
Neutlrons/cml
Figure 13. Effect of Neutron Fluence on the energy resolution
(FWHIM) of the 1332-key 6 Co Line for. both conventional and
reverse-electrode config uration Ge coaxial detectors.
(Electronic noise has not been subtracted.)
Alliance Partners I Press Release I Conf, & Meeting Schedule I Careers I Quality Policy I Privacy Statemer
Copyright @ 2007 Advanced Measurement Technology, Inc.
DSPEC-j r-2.O-NEGGE
ORTEC (9
DSPEC ir 2.0
.. from ORTEC
'Patent Pending
'Patent No. 6,327,549
'Ron Jenkins, R.W. Gould, end Dale Gedcke, Quantitative X-Ray Spectrometry (New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.), 1981, pp 266-267.
2
DSPEC ir 2EDO
Low Frequency Rejector...
LFR Results Are In!
New Digital Filter Improves Resolution for Mechanically-Cooled Systems!
The LFR is designed to remove microphonic noise from the output signal of high purity germanium detectors. What kind
of results can you expect? If you have mechanically-cooled systems with degraded resolution, the LFR can improve your
resolution significantly. Here are some examples.
Test Case 1: X-COOLER Test Case 2: Stirling Cooler Test Case 3: X-COOLER
Laboratory Based Resolution Portable "Detective" Resolution Laboratory Based Resolution
System (FWHM, keV) Type System (FWHM, keV) System (FWHM, key)
Detector Energy (key) LFR ON LFR OFF Detector Energy (keV) LFR ON LFR OFF Detector Energy (key) LFR ON LFR OFF
GEM65 59.5 0.75 0.85 GEM15 59.5 1.2 1.6 GMX15 59.5 0,75 0.76
662 1.30 1.34 662 1.5 2.0 662 1.28 1.25
1173 1.65 1.73 1173 1.9 2.3 1173 1.59 1.63
1332 1.74 1.79 1332 1.8 2.3 1332 1.69 1.74
Improved Resolution Improved Resolution No Microphonic Noise
MN M
What Does the LFR Do?
The LFR is a new digital filter that can improve the resolution
of your system. The innovative design was developed NNN
specifically to remove periodic low frequency electronic noise
from the output of high purity germanium detectors. Sources of Figure 1.
electronic noise that cause spectral degradation Include
mechanical coolers, ground loops, and other environmental
sources. A, M
'D.L. Upp, RM. Keyser, T.R. Twomey, ORTEC, 'New Cooling Methods for
HPGe Detectors and Associated Electronics," Presented at MARC VI Figure 2.
Conference, April 2003
3
FAST Communications with USB 2.0
Universal Serial Bus, or USB, is a computer standard designed to eliminate the guess work in connecting peripherals to
your PC. With the DSPEC Jr 2.0, ORTEC keeps your laboratory current with the fastest and easiest way to manage data
transfer in the industry. With the introduction of USB 2.0, the standard boasts a 40 fold improvement in data transfer rate!
Don't waste a microsecond'
5ap~echage
ASC
SimpleASCtopl SetShpignarmeer
adjustmnctsimowerg
wdecthr
IDSPEC Jr 2.0 helpudsyou mitain coneftro of ytsopulrdigitalesystem. ThErise tie andrfatntopr
you to "fine tune" spectrometer performance to the application. Optimizing your resolution and throughput has never
been easier!
In DSPEC Jr 2.0 there are 112 rise times (from 0.8 to 23 ps in 0.2 increments) and 22 flat top widths (from 0.3 to 2.4 lps
in 0.1 increments), in addition to tilt parameters, giving you well over 2,000 combinations of parameters.
4
_____ _____ ____ DSPEC fr 2.0
Don't worry ...we still include the automated "Optimize" feature in the control panel to allow you to choose the best fit!
This means that improvements for the resolution capability of your detector and better throughput are just a click of a
mouse button away.
SMA T-1TM Support for Quality Data - all the time, every time
ORTEC's unique SMART-i detectors are indeed smart. They monitor and store the detector state-of-health (detector
temperature, preamp power, bias overrange, bias on/off state). A single check by the DSPEC jr 2.0 will verify the
detector is ready and remains ready to perform acquisition. During acquisition, the
SMART-i detector continually monitors the state-of-health (SOH) to ensure the
integrity of the acquired data. At the end of acquisition a quick check of the SOH
flag in the SMART-i detector shows if any parameters deviated from specification
during the measurement. This is vitally important for environmental samples that
must be counted for long periods of time and regul atory-d riven samples where
data integrity is important.
Another big advantage is the SMART-i detectors have the recommended bias
value preset at the factory. You no longer have to look through paperwork or for
tags on the detector to find the right bias setting. Simply turn on the DSPEC Jr 2.0 SAT1Dtco ihDtco nefc
and the SMART-i detector automatically senses the detector temperature, Module (DIM).
determines the right high voltage bias, and turns it on.
With a footprint the size of a desk diary, DSPEC jr 2.0 can sit right on the desktop. Lightweight and rugged, multiple
DSPEC jr 2.0 can be stacked on top of one another, their cases interlocked, without fear of sliding or tipping.
5
Ballistic Deficit Correction
No need to worry about ballistic deficit with the patented digital
signal processing of the DSPEC product line from ORTEC. In
larger HPGe detectors, a characteristic known as ballistic deficit
is sometimes exhibited. This typically results in poor resolution
especially for high energy peaks. In analog systems, the ballistic
deficit is corrected with either a gated integrator amplifier or
through a resolution enhancer module. In digital systems,
however, a simple adjustment to the flat top width of the digital
filter is all that is necessary.
Using the InSight mode in the DSPEC Jr 2.0 allows the operator
to make adjustments to the flat top width (and tilt) and
immediately see the effects of the signal processing. In most
cases with extremely large detectors (such as the 207% efficient
one used in this example!), a flat top setting of 0.8 ps is more
Insight Oscilloscope Mode.
than sufficient to recover excellent resolution.
F 'I .~p
.ta
Z.l
St774
:U.S. Patent No. 5,872,363
'U.S. Patent No. 5,912,825
'U.S. Patent No; 5,821,533
6
DSPEC ir 2EMO
Specifications
Display: 240 x 160 pixel backlit LCD provides status Pulse Pile-Up Rejector: Automatically set threshold.
information, instrument ID, bias information, live and real time. Pulse-Pair Resolution: Typically <500 ns.
Concurrent Connections: Limited by the computer and Automatic Digital Pole-Zero Adjustment: Computer
supportingUSB3 hubs. ORTEC CONNECTIONS-32 software controlled. Can be set automatically or manually. Remote
supports up to 127 USB-connected devices per computer. diagnostics via InSight Oscilloscope mode. (Patented.)
System.Gain Settings: Digital Gated Baseline Restorer: Computer controlled
Coarse Gain: 1, 2, 4, B. 16, or 32. adjustment of the restorer rate (High, Low, and Auto).
Fine Gain: 0.45 to 1. (Patented.)
The available range of gain settings supports all types of HPGe LLD: Digital lower level discriminator set In channels. Hard
detectors. Specifically the following maximum energy values are -cutoff of data in channels below the LLD setting.
achievable using the standard ORTEC preamplifier (max gain to
min gain): ULD:_ Digital upper level discriminator set in channels. Hard
COAX 187 keV to12 MeV cutoff of data in channels above the ULD setting.
LO-AX 94 keV to 6 May Ratemeter: Count-rate display on MCA and/or PC screen.
GLP/SLP 16.5 keV to 1 MeV Battery: Internal battery-backed up memory to maintain
IGLET-X 8 keV to 500 key settings in the event of a power interruption.
Preamplifilers: Computer selectable as either resistive or TRIP Inputs and Outputs
preamplifier.
Detector: Multipin connector (13W3) with the following:
System Conversion Gain: The system conversion gain is Preamp Power: 1 W maximum (+12 V, -12 V, +24 V, -24 V,
software controlled from 512 to 16k channels. 2 GND).
Digital Filter Shaping-Time Constants: Amp In: Normal amplifier input.
Rise Times: 0.8 ps to 23 ps in steps of 0.2 ps. TRIP Inhibit.
Flat Tops: 0.3 to 2.4 in steps of 0.1 ps. Power for SMART-i or DIM.
Control of HV and SMART-i Detector (2 wires).
Dead-Time Correction: Extended live-time correction
according to Gedcke-Hale method. USB: Universal serial bus for PC communications.
Accuracy: Area of reference peak changes <±3% from 0 to Power: Connection to supply power from a wall mounted dc
50,000 counts per second. supply. (+12 V dc <1.25 A).
Low-Frequency Rejector: When set to ON, removes low- Electrical and Mechanical
frequency (<3 kHz) input noise from spectrum. Change Sample Out: Rear panel BNC connector, TTL
Linearity compatible.
Integral Nonlinearity: <±0.025% over top 99.5% of spectrum, Sample Ready In: Rear-panel BNC connector, accepts TTL
5
measured with a mixed source (" Fe @ 5.9 keV to 11Y @ level signal from Sample Changer. Software selectable polarity.
1836 key). Dimensions:
Differential Nonlinearity: <±1% (measured with a BNC pulser OSPEC jr 2.0: 8.1 H x 20.3 W x 24.9 D cm
and ramp generator) over top 99% of range. (3.2 H x8W x9.8 D in.)
DIM: 11.2 x3.13 x6.5 Wcm
Digital Spectrum Stabilizer: Controlled via computer, stabilizes
(4.4 x 1.25 x 2.6 W in.)
gain and zero errors.
Weight:
System Temperature Coefficient OSPEC Jr 2.0: 1.0 kg (2.2 lb)
0
Gain: <50 ppm/OC. [Typically <30 ppm/ C.]
DIM: <240 g(0.5 lb)
Offset: <3 ppm/*C of full scale, with Rise and Fall times of Operating Temperature Range: 0 to 500C, including LCD
12 ps. and Flat Top of 1 ps. (Similar to analog 6 p~s shaping.) display.
Overload Recovery: At maximum gain, recovers to within 2% U.S. Patents No.s: 5,872,363, 5,912,825, 5,821,533.
of rated output from X1000 overload in 2.5 non-overloaded
pulse widths. (Measured using the InSight Oscilloscope.) Operating Systems: Windows" 2000/XP.
Maximum System Throughput: >1 00,000 cps with LFR off.
>34,000 cps with LFR on. Depends on shaping parameters.
7
DSPEC fr 2.0
Detector High Voltage Supplies Ordering Information
Detector Interface Module (DIM): DSPEC jr 2.0 offers Model Description
high voltage supply flexibility in the form of a DSPEC Jr 2.0 DSPEC Jr 2.0 with MAESTRO-32
microprocessor controlled module, which connects the Software, No DIM, for use with
specific detector to the MCA. On a SMART-i1 HPGe SMART-i equipped detector.
detector, the HV module is integral with the detector itself. DSPEC Jr 2.0-POSGE DSPEC Jr 2.0 with MAESTRO-32
For "legacy' or "non-SMART-i'" detectors, the HV supply Software and DIM-POSGE for
is in the form of a Detector Interface Module or "DIM" with use with Non-SMART-i1 detector.
2 m cables. The DIM has a mating connector for the
traditional detector cable set: 9-pin D preamp power DSPEC jr 2.0-NEGGE DSPEC Jr 2.0 with MAESTRO-32
cable, Analog In, Shutdown In, Bias Out, and Inhibit In. Software and DIM-NEGGE for
use with Non-SMART-i1 detector.
DSPEC Jr 2.0-POSNA DSPEC Jr 2.0 with MAESTRO-32
DIMS for non-SMART-i1 detectors are available with the Software and DIM-POSNAI for
following high voltage options: use with Nal detector.
DIM-POSGE: Detector Interface Module for ANY Non- DSPEC jr 2.0-296 DSPEC Jr 2.0 with MAESTRO-32
SMART-i1 positive bias HPGe detector.
Software and DIM-296 for use
DIM-NEGGE: Detector Interface Module for ANY Non- with Nal detector.
SMART-i1 negative bias HPGe detector.
Additional DIMS
DIM-POSNAI: Detector Interface Module for ANY positive
DiM-POSGE Detector Interface Module for ANY Non-
bias Nal detector. SMART positive bias HPGe detector
DIM-296: Detector Interface Module with Model 296
DIM-NEGGE Detector Interface Module for ANY Non-
Scinti Pack tube base/preamplifier/bias
supply for Nal detectors with 14-pin, 10 SMART negative bias HPGe detector
stage photomultiplier tubes. DIM-POSNAI Detector Interface Module for ANY
positive bias Nal detector
DIM-296 Detector Interface Module with Model 296
Front Panel Display: In all cases, Bias Voltage Setting
ScintiPack tube base/preamplifier/bias
and Shutdown polarity are set from the computer. The supply for Nal detectors with 14-pin, 10
DSPEC Jr 2.0 can monitor the output voltage and stage photomultiplier tubes.
shutdown state; Detector high voltage value (read only);
and Detector high voltage state (on/off) (read/write) which Example System Order:
are displayed on the front panel LCD. In addition, the DSPEC jr 2.0
SMART-i1 detector provides additional state-of-health GEM8OP4
information by monitoring the following functions: Detector SMART-i -P
element temperature (read only); Detector overload state; CFG-X-COOL-ll-i 15
Detector authentication code (read/write); and Detector Specifies a DSPEC Jr 2.0; 80% GEM PopTop, detector
,serial number (read only). with SMART-i technology; and an X-COOLER 11.
SpecificationsSsubjeCt to Change
071107
ORTEC Q
www.artec-online.corn
Tel. (865) 482-4411 * Fox (865) 483-0396 - ortec.lnfo@ametek.com
AMETEKC
ADVANCED MEASUREMENT
801 South Illinois Ave., Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0895 U.S.A.
For International Office Locations, Visit Our Website TECHNOLOGY
Attachment D
SHIELDED CAVITY DIMENSIONS 28-cm i~d. X 40-cm high (11-in. i~d. X 16-in, high).
SHIELDING TYPE Solid-cast virgin lead with steel casing and graded-Z liner.
SHIELDING SPECIFICATIONS
9.5 mm (3/8 in.) low-carbon steel casing
101 mm (4 in.) certified Doe Run, lead
0.5 mm (0.02 in.) tin sheet liner
1.6 mm (0.064 in.) soft-copper sheet liner
WEIGHT Total Assembled 1,134 kg (2,500 Ib). Shipping 1,270 kg (2,800 Ib).
EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS
Shield 51-cm diameter X 63-cm high (20-in. diam X 24-5/8-in, high).
Stand 61-cm square X 77-cm high (minimum) (24-in, square X 30-1/8-in, high (minimum)]
Assembled Height 139 cm (minimum) to 154 cm (maximum) [54-3/4 in. (minimum) to 6C
in. (maximum)].
HPLBS2F
The HPLB52F Shield is similar to the HPLBS1F7, in that it combines front loading with the spli.
shield. It differs, however, in that it is designed for use with an ORTEC "J"Type cryostat Moc
CFG-SJ or. CFG-PJ. A compact design results in the need for only 2-ft X 4-ft floor space [61-c
117-cm], plus clearance for opening of lids and the front door.
SHIELDED CAVITY DIMENSIONS 28-cm i.d..X 40-cm high (11-in. i~d. X 16-in, high).
SHIELDING TYPE Solid-cast virgin lead with steel casing and graded-Z liner.
SHIELDING SPECIFICATIONS
9.5 mm (3/8 in.) low-carbon steel casing
101 mm (4 in.) certified Doe Run lead
0.5 mm (0.02 in.) tin sheet liner
1.6 mm (0.064 in.) soft-copper sheet liner
WEIGHT Total Assembled 1,134 kg (2,500 Ib). Shipping Weight 1,270 kg (2,800 Ib).
EXTERNAL. DIMENSIONS
Shield 51-cm diam X 63-cm high.(20-in. diameter X 24-5/8-in, high),
Stand 61 cm X 117 cm X 77-cm high (minimum) [24 in. X 46 in. X 12-in, high (minimum)].
Assembled Height 94 cm (minimum) to 109 cm (maximum) [37 in. (minimum) to 43 in.
(maximum)].
Ordering Information
Model Description
HPLBS1 Lead Shield for CFG-PV-1, CFG-PV4 or CFG-SV Cryostat
H-PL5S1F Lead Shield for CFG-PV-1, CFG-PV4 or CFG-SV Cryostat, Front Loading
HPLBS2 Lead Shield for CFG-SJ or CFG-HJ Cryostat
HPLBS2F Lead Shield for CFG-SJ or CFG-HJ Cryostat, Front Loading
DS30 Dewar Leveling Stand
Alliance Partners IPress Release IConf, & Mpeeling Schedule I Careers I Qiwlity Po'Icv Privacvy S~atemrno
Copyright !,*,j2007 Advanced 'leasL:ren-enit Technology, ~c
AMUI
ORTEC
Home I Applicatior
Search
.Products ISe
12/7/2007
http://www.ortec-online. com/detectors/photonlb7_1_hplbsl1.htm
ORTEC High-Performance, Low Background Shields and Accessories for Germnanium (H... Page 2 of 3
LevelvingFoot~
(Y' (7.6cmn) Sq., 4-Pics.)_________
Door Swingjs
Approx. 1800
020.00" AD
analysis on user marked ROls and a modified WAN32 analysis (no peak
stripping or directed fit) on the unmarked regions. ROls can be marked on a live ClewROT
or retrieved spectrum and the marker settings saved, then the Analyze/Entire Info
Peak
Results are quickly evaluated and then using some of the functions described
below, the necessary changes made and the data re-analyzed.
and a dialogue box appears. You can browse .UFO files, select alsplay Arvilysis
Re%&t... Avrw~eg SelecPBC...
a name for your PBC file, and save the file, all in an instant. jAcieEcw)n
2
GammaVisiono-32MV606
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
7 SaSaw6 P6
054
Sal
S flIrfDIaIysIABC
iiin
Kg
Da461Tm
Datm TeN*SIFT
rSairgiliialDate I T v w [
Tbw. F77-7
:
(I
3
Precise Spectral Reports in GammaVision-32 and Winpiots
MM:-S
1.5611592.54 F91501.85. VW(155)M2.177
C,-S *11111,21;5279.105eq U5SwyCa,-SOa01132.50:5291318aSq
Learning the simple controls of one transfers L183881
5.0.8]
4
GammaVisione-32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
Conversion
When you need to analyze spectra from various data formats, Ex se Dla;;
lPýg~r~:Plogamics\aan
you need to do so quickly and easily - with as few steps as
possible. An option is available for GammaVision-32 that Lrs~~ PudcsyhIF~~i i. 61]
includes a fully-embedded application which makes reading and
writing in numerous spectral formats a snap! Run 0puoms-
DataMaster is a powerful spectrum conversion utility that is NO P
supported as an add-in for GammaVision-32. This program
allows superior flexibility in converting between a wide variety of -'HotM _ _ __ _ _ _
5
Proven, Patented - Time-Tested and True... GammaVision-32
Analysis and Reporting Software for Ge Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy
spectroscopy. __________________________
6
GammaVision. -32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
WAN32 The original GammaVision-32 engine using library- SampleIysytem IDeey I Reporn /sis CorrectionslIsotopesl
directed peak search for general purpose and research-type AnalysisMAW ......... AditionalError
7
This means that isotopes with coincidence sum peaks such as Co-60, Eu-154, and Cs-i 34 can now be
accurately determined through the use of a simple calibration process and a comprehensive coincidence
library applied to every spectral analysis. Simply check the "TOC" box in the analysis settings and
GammaVision-32's algorithms will apply the correction factors to the results.
Sampie
lype..
aeak Search
ROIRepolt.. &tterwaton Coefficients AtnainWorkshee[:F
geometry Correction Fief Rlate: 750
Entire spectrum ti memory..
create PBC..
Spectrum on Disk. Seect PBC. Cur Raite&600
Qisplay AnalysisResuits...
Equivaiere
JOCkIe
Edtmtc. 6y: 2.702
IDn~s kn
DAC(MP'C)
calculte
ý29: Energies':ý-
.~~l~
n.. ..
...
Zeebrb~-~~ -Current
:C:WUsei\Derno3.Ufo
...
...
8
GammaVision -32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
ORTEC
GammaVision 06 8015S Illinois4ye
03k. Ridge.TNl37830
Anallsl ORTFC .11 2441 ; 1'M
Sample
SampleName.GamnmSarnple Spectrumn
t1 'nalysisg1
SampleType:
Sample SampleVolume Yi00L
Colleteion
Samtple 316:21PM
Date:8113120015 1.3bPrepaialion.&I132001 to11iPIAl
Customer tnfo
DemoDescription
Description: ClientName.DemoCompany
AcquiiiSon,
.1~~.
IDECNTI F IE D P EA K Calibration
Name:Demo 5 10,1,3a
1**OO*O* S U4M MA RY .....
Nuclid e Peak CentroDid Backgrounld Net Area Inltensity Uncert Vt1 24OI
channel Energy Counts counts Dale:ailIJ200t
Ca~li~allon 2:3 56PIA
cts/Sec 1 sigma % key
C5-137 44.23 36.26 29517. 0. 0.000 0.00 .057
cd-109 148.96 88.03 396840. 0. 0.000 0.00 1. 084D
Co-5'7 217.78
CD- 57 24 6.84 S U M MARY 0OF LI BR A RY P rA K USA G E
sn-113 48B7.91 -NUClide - Average Peak--------------- --------
Hg-203 536.48 Name code Activity Energy Activity code MDA value
Sn-113 763. 98 BecquereiS key Becquerels Becqluerels commnents
Y-88 1004.62
Cs -137 1309.81 cd-109 0.0000E:+00 88.03 0. 0005-I
1594. 00 22.16 0.000EA OF N UCL I DES IN SAMPLE .....
cs-137 SU MM
Time
A RY
of count Time corrected uncertainty 1 si Wa
Y-88 17837.85 24. 94 0.00DEý
NLUClide Activity Activity counti ng
co-60 2344.32 co-57 0.OOOOE+DD 122.07 0.ODOMi eq eqt
CO-60 2666.44 135.43 0.0005-4
Y_88 368 5.10 14.42. 0.DooP.,Cd-109 < 2.8954E+02 2.2387r+02
co-57 < 8.0451E+00 1.0690E+01-
C60 3.5645E+03 1173.24 3. 355Eý CO-60 3.5645E+03 3.7100E+03 1.94326-01%
1332.50D 3. 574Eq. CS-137 3.06305+03 3.0845E+03 2,6807E-01%
llg-203 5.40615+02 2.8202E+03 5.5184E-01%
cs-137 3.0630E+03 661.66 3. 063 Ei Y-88 3:5672E+03 7 3466E 03 3.0B08E-O1%
32.19 0. 000Eq Sn-123 1.7925E+03 3.49972*+03 3.1633E-01%,
31.82 0. 00054 < mDA value printed.
36.40 0.OOOEI A -Activity printed, but activity < MIDA.
802.00 0.000EI 8 Activity< MDA and failed tent.
C -Area < critical level.
F -Fail ed fraction or key line tent.
H -Haiflife limit exceeded
Reports made your way... ---- ---- ---- ---
-----
----
Total Activity (
S U M4 M A R Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
34.2 to 1966.9 key) I.2527937E+04 eq
Total Decayed Activity C 34.2 to 1966.9 key) 2.0461029E+04 eq
with GammaVision-32
9
Seamless Compatibility
ALL ORTEC "multichannel buffer" hardware (all 26 types from circa 1983 on) is supported. This means
compatibility with the DSPec line of products (DSPec, DSPec Plus, DSPec jr, DSPec Jr 2.0, and DSPec Pro),
as well as the rugged and portable digiDART. In addition, GammaVision-32 supports the LANL M3CA,
Rossendorf MiniMGA-166 and the ORTEC TRUMP-PCI interface card and DPM-USB converter.
F5_erYý,'._
Safe and Secure... Settings..
dDOIPIU:UeVLrrPUWi ...
Recafl.
Menu Passwords'..
LockjUnlock.Dettctor.. Export...
Edit Detector List-'., Import.Paswrd
iJ~ Print.
Compare...
Print Interactive Graph
_:jCr~t52U
ZA4 i.petectbri About GamrraVision..
Acquire
Stest~start-clear Acquisition Settings...-
Start
:~Start/Save/Report
VeriicatiorV el
ISeeýetector
FRI Disptay' Select
ISe-berect'Of 30
SetDetectorll Az
10
GammaVisiono-32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy- Software
r1 tlho
iptoooloct cobtwn
l
dpoo topý..fon
Ca~beotmof Kee;
Ef56-o.,Y
The GammaVision
Calibration Wizard
makes it easy!
11
Analysis Library Manager
With GammaVision-32, managing libraries is a snap! Not ~ ~ . 5Cbt ~63Z
only is there a full-featured nuclear data library editor -Nucide Flagr. r .
1.137 Edt Cu-57...
included with the software, but you may also
Peak;lg. ..
choose the optional Nuclide Navigator Ill. Associated NuclieFk .7 KiI~K 8..wg,.6***~. I
The GammaVision-32 library- editor allows Epi [Ck.-- nrciv
E~ns er
I1.0610E..
you to cut and paste nuclides and peaks Gaimmwper 100 is8iraeqet l"9.5400E-00 2 136.43
12
GammaVision -32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
Specif ications
General
GammaVision-32 Integrates acquisition control, "Smart' MCA and quantitative analysis functions for use in
conjunction with PC-based gamma spectroscopy workstations. On-line help and Operator Menu password
protection are included.
Operating Systems
Windows 2000/XP network capabilities; support for preemptive multitasking; and ORTEC CONNECTIONS-32
compliant.
Spectroscopy Hardware Support
All ORTEC MCBs (past and present) and all other devices supported by ORTEC CONNECTIONS-32 (see
CONNECTIONS-32 literature). Built-in support for advanced operations (where supported in hardware):
amplifier gain/shaping control, Auto-PZ, DSPec "optimize" and InSight TM mode, DART field mode, SMART-i
detector, graphical setting of MOB spectrum stabilizer and statistical uncertainty peaks. Detector Locking
password protection is supported.
ISlab~ierl Abojt
AC Preuet MPAPr~t
-~iI
Sample ree N c ~.± ...
...
---- ---- pg*~ tloj_1
j12i303Thw!7y:, Ap7,20
Real.Tirne.- L"Jeime:
.Fiai2 ... j21a0 C2 Rate .
Close
13
File Formats Supported
qeneali Erpcrl ImpwtI Duectolies
ORTEC .SPC and .CHN are
supported as standard in file save,
SON" Progranu
Expqrt Fes\DtaM ser\Datoa~ateiFl axe
-JCAPiograrrr
recall, and compare functions. Most Recall,'..;
Arguments:
2r,:'1[ýPtl T
non-ORTEC file formats are Save,
supported by loadable modules, in
a "set and forget" fashion for save .7Rwr0plrurn
and recall. Check for availability of
specific modules.
Optional DataMaster spectrum file Comnpare.
import/export software can be
added for easily converting and - ASCI dlt'
14
GammaVision -32 v6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
Deconvolution Method
Both peak finder AND library are used to direct the deconvolution process. Automatic recalibration of
Energy/Channel based on identified peaks where possible.
Background Methods
Wide range of background methods: automatic, multi-point, parabolic, directed fit, and stepped. Selection by
user or automatically applied to improve analysis results.
Decay Corrections
- Decay correct to any date/time, either back or forward
e Decay corrections for losses during acquisition'
*Decay during sample collection
15
Spectral Corrections
*Peaked Background Correction
eGeometry Correction
*Absorption Correction ANSI N42.14 and ASTM E181-82 compliant from materials database,
and/or from physical standards
*Random Summing (high-rate counting losses)
*True Coincidence Summing Correction
*Library-Based Peak Interference Correction
Reporting
Choose any ORTEC standard report option:
" Unknown peaks
" Library peak list by energy
*Library peak matrix by isotope
*Activity summary
Uncertainty reporting options:
* Percent or activity
* Counting or total
* 1, 2,or 3sigma
* Propagation of additional systematic or random uncertainties
Derived quantity Isotope reporting:
" Average Energy (EBar), to TOD 14844
" Iodine Equivalence, to TID 14844
" DAC (maximum permissible concentration)
Totally custom reporting:
- From Access-compatible results database, and/or via optional A44-B32 Report Writer.
Calibration
Energy Calibration:
" Multi-point, quadratic for energy and FWHM
" Automatic Energy Calibration (U.S. Patent No. 6,006,162)
Efficiency Calibration fit options:
" Single Function Polynomial
" Interpolative
" Quadratic above or below user-set "knee"
" Linear above or below user-set "knee"
" TCC polynomial
16
GammaVision®-32 V6.06
Gamma- Ray Spectroscopy Software
Quality Assurance
Complies with the demands of ANSI N1 3.30 and for each detector allows tracking of:
* Total detector background
- Total (decay corrected) activity for all calibration nuclides
* Average FWHM ratio (spectrum to calibration standard)
*Average FW1/1OM ratio (spectrum to calibration standard)
*Average peak shift from library values
*Actual peak centroid energies
Automation Features
* Multiple detector Start/Stop/Clear functions for up to 8 detectors
" Extensive built-in Job Streaming (Macro language), allowing "one-click" analysis from a user-built icon.
" MultiTasker-32 (option A45-1332 V2).
17
Developer's Support - "Step In" and "Step Out" With Your Own
Programs. Use GammaVision-32'and Your Own Custom Programs
with ORTEC MVCBs.
.18
GammaVision®-32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
19
GammaVision® -32 V6.06
Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Software
DC:539124.5
1) Cs-1 34 (T,/2 = 2.06a)
Ey /keV n/% kk.xn
Kx
kx n = 6.5269
33.4 mRem
2) Ta-182 (T 1 /2 = 115d)
Ey IkeV n% kkxn
59 23 0.38 0.0874
67.5 49 0.38 0.1862
100.1 11.9 0 .5 0.0595
222 8 1.05 0.084
1121 37 6.3 2.516
1189 17.1 6.7 1.1457
1221 28.9 7.1 2.0519
-x knxn
x = 6.1313
21 mRem
3) Sc-46 (TI/2 = 83.8d)
Ey / keV n% kkxn
Kx nx= 11.0
k,
27.5 mRem
4) Mn-54 (T,12 = 312.5d)
Ey /keV n/% kk.xn
107 mRem
5) Na-22 (T,,2 = 2.601 a)
Ey /keV n% k kxn
-4 kx x n~ = 10.46
At = AO x e(0 9 /12
Resulting first year partial body dose is smaller than 117 mRem