Rules For Significant Figures
Rules For Significant Figures
To determine the number of significant figures in a number use the following 3 rules:
1. Non-zero digits are always significant
2. Any zeros between two significant digits are significant
3. A final zero or trailing zeros in the decimal portion ONLY are significant
Example: .500 or .632000 the zeros are significant
.006 or .000968 the zeros are NOT significant
For addition and subtraction use the following rules:
1. Count the number of significant figures in the decimal portion ONLY of each number in the problem
2. Add or subtract in the normal fashion
3. Your final answer may have no more significant figures to the right of the decimal than the LEAST
number of significant figures in any number in the problem.
For multiplication and division use the following rule:
1. The LEAST number of significant figures in any number of the problem determines the number of
significant figures in the answer. (You are now looking at the entire number, not just the decimal
portion)
*This means you have to be able to recognize significant figures in order to use this rule*
Example: 5.26 has 3 significant figures
6.1 has 2 significant figures
there are three rules on determining how many significant figures are in a number:
Focus on these rules and learn them well. They will be used extensively throughout the remainder
of this course. You would be well advised to do as many problems as needed to nail the concept of
significant figures down tight and then do some more, just to be sure.
Please remember that, in science, all numbers are based upon measurements (except for a very few
that are defined). Since all measurements are uncertain, we must only use those numbers that are
meaningful. A common ruler cannot measure something to be 22.4072643 cm long. Not all of the
digits have meaning (significance) and, therefore, should not be written down. In science, only the
numbers that have significance (derived from measurement) are written.
Hopefully, this rule seems rather obvious. If you measure something and the device you use (ruler,
thermometer, triple-beam balance, etc.) returns a number to you, then you have made a
measurement decision and that ACT of measuring gives significance to that particular numeral (or
digit) in the overall value you obtain.
Hence a number like 26.38 would have four significant figures and 7.94 would have three. The
problem comes with numbers like 0.00980 or 28.09.
Suppose you had a number like 406. By the first rule, the 4 and the 6 are significant. However, to
make a measurement decision on the 4 (in the hundred's place) and the 6 (in the unit's place), you
HAD to have made a decision on the ten's place. The measurement scale for this number would
have hundreds and tens marked with an estimation made in the unit's place. Like this:
This rule causes the most difficulty with students. Here are two examples of this rule with the zeros
this rule affects in boldface:
0.00500
0.03040
Here are two more examples where the significant zeros are in boldface:
2.30 x 10�5
4.500 x 1012
Zero Type #1: Space holding zeros on numbers less than one.
Here are the first two numbers from just above with the digits that are NOT significant in boldface:
0.00500
0.03040
These zeros serve only as space holders. They are there to put the decimal point in its correct
location. They DO NOT involve measurement decisions. Upon writing the numbers in scientific
notation (5.00 x 10�3 and 3.040 x 10�2), the non-significant zeros disappear.
Zero Type #2: the zero to the left of the decimal point on numbers less than one.
When a number like 0.00500 is written, the very first zero (to the left of the decimal point) is put
there by convention. Its sole function is to communicate unambiguously that the decimal point is a
deciaml point. If the number were written like this, .00500, there is a possibility that the decimal
point might be mistaken for a period. Many students omit that zero. They should not.
200 is considered to have only ONE significant figure while 25,000 has two.
This is based on the way each number is written. When whole number are written as above, the
zeros, BY DEFINITION, did not require a measurement decision, thus they are not significant.
However, it is entirely possible that 200 really does have two or three significnt figures. If it does, it
will be written in a different manner than 200.
Typically, scientific notation is used for this purpose. If 200 has two significant figures, then 2.0 x
102 is used. If it has three, then 2.00 x 102 is used. If it had four, then 200.0 is sufficient. See rule #2
above.
How will you know how many significant figures are in a number like 200? In a problem like
below, divorced of all scientific context, you will be told. If you were doing an experiment, the
context of the experiment and its measuring devices would tell you how many significant figures to
report to people who read the report of your work.
Exact Numbers
Exact numbers, such as the number of people in a room, have an infinite number of significant
figures. Exact numbers are counting up how many of something are present, they are not
measurements made with instruments. Another example of this are defined numbers, such as 1 foot
= 12 inches. There are exactly 12 inches in one foot. Therefore, if a number is exact, it DOES NOT
affect the accuracy of a calculation nor the precision of the expression. Some more examples:
Interestingly, the speed of light is now a defined quantity. By definition, the value is 299,792,458
meters per second.
In mathematical operations involving significant figures, the answer is reported in such a way that
it reflects the reliability of the least precise operation. Let's state that another way: a chain is no
stronger than its weakest link. An answer is no more precise that the least precise number used to
get the answer. Let's do it one more time: imagine a team race where you and your team must finish
together. Who dictates the speed of the team? Of course, the slowest member of the team. Your
answer cannot be MORE precise than the least precise measurement.
For addition and subtraction, look at the places to the decimal point. Add or subtract in the normal
fashion, then round the answer to the LEAST number of places to the decimal point of any number
in the problem.
In mathematical operations involving significant figures, the answer is reported in such a way that
it reflects the reliability of the least precise operation. Let's state that another way: a chain is no
stronger than its weakest link. An answer is no more precise that the least precise number used to
get the answer. Let's do it one more time: imagine a team race where you and your team must finish
together. Who dictates the speed of the team? Of course, the slowest member of the team. Your
answer cannot be MORE precise than the least precise measurement.
The LEAST number of significant figures in any number of the problem determines the number of
significant figures in the answer.
This means you MUST know how to recognize significant figures in order to use this rule.
The answer to this problem would be 8.6 (which was rounded from the calculator reading of 8.55).
Why?
2.5 has two significant figures while 3.42 has three. Two significant figures is less precise than
three, so the answer has two significant figures.
Example #2: How many significant figures will the answer to 3.10 x 4.520 have?
You may have said two. This is too few. A common error is for the student to look at a number like
3.10 and think it has two significant figures. The zero in the hundedth's place is not recognized as
significant when, in fact, it is. 3.10 has three significant figures.
Three is the correct answer. 14.0 has three significant figures. Note that the zero in the tenth's place
is considered significant. All trailing zeros in the decimal portion are considered significant.
Another common error is for the student to think that 14 and 14.0 are the same thing. THEY ARE
NOT. 14.0 is ten times more precise than 14. The two numbers have the same value, but they
convey different meanings about how trustworthy they are.
Four is also an incorrect answer given by some ChemTeam students. It is too many significant
figures. One possible reason for this answer lies in the number 4.520. This number has four
significant figures while 3.10 has three. Somehow, the student (YOU!) maybe got the idea that it is
the GREATEST number of significant figures in the problem that dictates the answer. It is the
LEAST.
Sometimes student will answer this with five. Most likely you responded with this answer because
it says 14.012 on your calculator. This answer would have been correct in your math class because
mathematics does not have the significant figure concept.
Example #3: 2.33 x 6.085 x 2.1. How many significant figures in the answer?
Answer - two.
Why?
It has the least number of significant figures in the problem. It is, therefore, the least precise
measurement.
Answer - three.
Why?
It has the least number of significant figures in the problem. It is, therefore, the least precise
measurement. Notice it is the 4.52 portion that plays the role of determining significant figures; the
exponential portion plays no role.
WARNING: the rules for add/subtract are different from multiply/divide. A very common student
error is to swap the two sets of rules. Another common error is to use just one rule for both types of
operations.