Government Policies and Reforms (Financial, Industrial, Corporate) - Asia & Asian Tigers
Government Policies and Reforms (Financial, Industrial, Corporate) - Asia & Asian Tigers
Government Policies and Reforms (Financial, Industrial, Corporate) - Asia & Asian Tigers
The four Asian Tigers, also known as the Four Dragons – Hong Kong, Singapore, South
Korea and Taiwan have developed spectacularly from 1960s towards present times. The four
have been described as “Asia’s poster child” due to the accelerated growth in finance,
innovation and technology. Studies point out that knowledge and innovation together with
regional integration trough trade and policy coherence are the major drivers of Asia’s
economic expansion. The four Asian tiger economies share similar characteristics such as
outward orientation, high human capital, evolving institutions and most importantly, flexible
policies.
However, the nature of regional networking for each of the four economies was different.
South Korea was developed in terms of industrialization and had already independent brands
and large companies, known as chaebols, while the other Asian Tigers – Singapore, Hong
Kong and Taiwan were focused mainly on subcontracting and international procurement for
foreign transnational companies (Arora and Ratnasiri, 2015). Furthermore, especially for the
case of Taiwan and Singapore, financial and investment policies played an important part in
their economic development. When it comes to the national strategy for economic growth, the
government played an important role in guiding the scientific and technological progress. For
instance, according to Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2013) the Singaporean government implemented
various innovation financing policies in order to encourage investments towards the
development of innovative capabilities. In this sense, the Economic Development Board is the
governmental agency responsible for attracting foreign investments to Singapore and for
positioning Singapore as a global business center. Consequently, Taiwanese government also
focused on upgrading technology in the country and managed to implement successfully
extensive financing programs. The Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan has established
numerous research institutes, programs and venture funds in order to provide equity and to
stimulate the competitiveness of SMEs, thus managing to support industrial innovation
(Wonglimpiyarat, 2013).
On the other hand, in South Korea chaebol has been the known form of business
conglomerate and due to its unique corporate governance it has created a great extent of
controversy. Its structure is based on centralized ownership, which enabled companies to
adopt efficient decisions when faced with economic hardship. Despite its good functioning,
the Korean chaebol lacks external monitoring and raises issues regarding its corporate
governance and the allocation of resources in terms of production (Park and Yuhn, 2012). In
addition, in order to address several issues, especially those related with unemployment and
disadvantaged individuals, the South Korean government introduced considerable policies
(the most known one being the Social Enterprise Promotion Act), thus managing to create a
“more formalized civic society” (Bertotti et al, 2014).
According to studies, the four Asian economies have faced serious challenged during the
global financial crisis in 2007. In this sense, the intervention of Asian governments was
prompt and helped to lead to a revival of Asian economies. In Hong Kong, for instance, free
trade agreements and tax breaks were used in order to increase banks profitability, thus
transforming Hong Kong into a regional financial center. In South Korea, several reforms
have been initiated by the government in order to address issues such as corporate governance
and labor market among others. In addition, the Monetary Stabilization Bond was a unique
policy tool created by the South Korean government to “control excess liquidity and manage
export driven economic growth” (Cherng et al, 2013).
Industrial development together with technology dissemination have gained momentum due
to the inflow of foreign direct investment, thus making Southeast Asian economies attain
great success in terms of industrialization growth. Among the four Asian Dragons, South
Korea stands out because of the government’s involvement in creating programs that “provide
databases and services”. Important policies that refer to trade, industry, energy and other
resources are under the control of Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy (MOCIE).
Also, the Industrial Information Network (IIN) has managed to become an influential
organization and with the help of government funds has succeeded in increasing industrial
productivity and competitiveness of companies (Choi, 2007).