Qualitative Structural Analysis of Beams and Frames
Qualitative Structural Analysis of Beams and Frames
Frames
Qualitative structural analysis might not be familiar to structural engineers. The
usual way of analysis of structures is numerical (quantitative) method in which
the structural designers should determine values for dimensions and loads and
compute bending moments and reactions.
Naturally, the detailed numerical analysis is to check values that have been
employed in the preliminary analysis. Therefore, unless the structural elements
sized correctly, the analysis has to be repeated many times regardless of using
computer or hand calculation. This could be time consuming and costly and the
designer should try to avoid this situation.
By and large, it is considered that required knowledge and skills to carry out
suitable and correct preliminary analysis comes from researching and studying
techniques of numerical analysis, but this might not be the case.
For example, in simple elements the basic skills are to recognize the relationships
between loads, deflected shape and resulting reactions.
Qualitative structural analysis is substantially different from quantitative
method. Not only it does not have a specific solution procedure but also it
depends on a number of diagrams.
Qualitative structural analysis method takes time and requires a lot of practices
to utilize correctly and avoiding confusion.
1. Types of support and their restraints: the fully fixed support provide two
reactions and one moment, pinned support has two reactions and roller support
provide one reaction that is vertical as shown in Table 1:
Table 1 Types of supports and their reactions
2. Moment at the hinge is equal to zero.
4. Draw bending moment diagram on the tension side of the beam to keep
consistent answers.
5. For all loading cases, the structure remains in the elastic ranges of material
behavior. Stress is proportional to strain and deflections are directly proportional
to loads (first assumption of elastic analysis of structures).
For example: Two span beams ABC is shown Figure 2 with deflected shape,
reactions and bending moment diagram. Using principle of superposition, the
indeterminate beam can be solved easily.
Firstly, remove support C that lead to simply support and cantilever beam then
draw the bending moment diagram as shown in left side of Figure 3 .Secondly,
apply force Vc at C and draw BMD as shown in right side of Figure 3.
These two diagrams provide the solution of the original two span beams.
Similarly, deflections could be treated in the same manner.
Figure 2 Beam ABC with deflected shape, reactions, and bending moment
diagram
Figure 3: Remove reaction at C (left side), remove W and recall reaction C right
side, and solve both to get the original solution
9. There is no bending moment in the part of the structure that remains straight
after loading, however it could move.
10. Bending moment diagrams will be straight lines if applied loads were point
loads.
11. Bending moment diagrams will be curved if applied loads were distributed
loads.
12. At simply supports, bending moment is equal to zero.
14. Unbraced frames will not sway if it is symmetrical and symmetrically loaded.
15. Qualitative analysis is carried out for visible loads, therefore self weight is
neglected.
16. Apart from at hinges, shapes of deflected elements are extremely smooth.
17. In frames, angles of rigid joints should maintain the original angles after
loadings as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Angle of rigid joint frame keep the same angle after loading
18. In frames, rigid joints might close or open only as shown in .
Figure 5: Open and close rigid joints after loading with bending moment
diagrams
19. There is only one moment value in the rigid joints that connects two elements.
20. Shear forces become axial force and axial force become shear force in the
alternate members at the right angle rigid join. sum(fx) = 0 , sum(fy) = 0 can be
employed to check this statement. See Figure 6
Figure 6: Right angle rigid join in which shear force become axial and axial force
become shear force in the alternate member.
However, this is not the case in the oblique angle join as shown in Figure 7
Figure 7: Oblique angle joint
21. In rigid joints in which there are more than two members, the joint must be in
equilibrium. As shown in Figure 8, in the following joint MA = MB+MC
Deflected shape
Reactions