Lydian
Lydian
Lydian
My photo
View my complete profile
Subscribe
Posts
Comments
Popular Posts
Followers
8/1/05
George Russell's 'Lydian Chromatic Concept'
The other day while playing a jam session I noticed that the guitarist had written
some key centers on top of all the ii-7/ V7 /ones. Meaning that over the D-
7/G7/Cmaj7 he had written C major. Many Jazz improvisation teachers start their
students out thinking this way. The students at least play in the correct key,
right? Ouch! This is a sure fire way to have a major clam festival. There are not
many worse clams than the natural 11 on a dominant or major chord. This is called
an 'avoid' note at Berklee.
The great arranger and NEC professor George Russell teaches what he calls the
'Lydian Chromatic Concept for tonal organization ', or just 'the concept' for
short. His rationale is that a Major 9th chord with a sharp 11 has more a greater
degree of unity a the same chord with a natural 11.
Jason Gross explains the reasoning behind the LCCOTO-"For Russell, the Lydian mode
(with, in the key of C, its tonic F and dominant C) was a more logical candidate to
become the primary scale because it suggests a greater degree of unity between
chords and scales. Russell argues that a major scale, for example C, consists of
two tetrachords that embody two tonalities, not one. But if you adapt the major
scale to Lydian mode (in the key of C that would be a C major scale with F-sharp
instead of F), it removes the duality of conflicting tonics, and more fully
satisfies the tonality of the major chord. With one tonic used for each respective
scale, Russell reasoned that a greater variety of chords could be stacked. This
offered a new path for adventurous musicians: Standard chord progressions need not
dictate the course of an improvisation, as each note is equidistant from a single
tonic center. Notes could flow more freely beyond the strictures of a song's
chords." From:'George Russell Goes for the Modes' by Jason Gross, Village Voice,
June 4 - 10, 2003
Therefore we should use the Lydian scale as our 'base' scale. Lydian is the new
Ionian! For the beginning improviser this is not really such a bad way to think
about things. If you always add a sharp 11 to every major and mixolydian scale you
avoid the 'avoid' note of the natural 11. You can always add a #11 to these chords
without worrying about messing up the harmonic progression. Of course the 'concept'
is much, much more involved than this.
George Russell has had a major impact on the course of Jazz evolution with this
concept.
Miles said that George was,"the m----------- who taught me how to write." Miles'
classic 'Kind of Blue' album was a result of his contact with George Russell.
Dolphy was also influenced by the 'concept', along with many other important
figures in Jazz.
Here is another way to think of key centers (if you must) using this concept over a
ii-7/ V7/ Imaj/ progression.
Over a:
D-7 / G7 /Cmaj7 /
think:
D melodic-/ /Gmaj /
George teaches how to with navigate outside conventional harmony. He talks about
playing 'outward' and inward'. This means moving outside or inside in degrees, not
just in or out.
For example- Over a C major chord, outward bound playing would be to start playing
a C Lydian, then a go to C mixolydian, then C Phrygian, then C diminished, then D
major, then F# Dorian. The general idea is to slowly move to scales that have fewer
and fewer notes in common with the chord you are playing over.
It's all about what George calls 'Tonal Gravity'. Every note or scale has it's own
particular tonal gravity when played over any particular chord. Conventional Jazz
harmony doesn't deal with, say how a G minor pentatonic sounds and where it wants
to go to when played over an Eb sus4 b9 chord. This is unmapped territory as of
yet.
You really can't go wrong with Lydian. George Russell even goes so far as calling
the chromatic scale a 'Lydian Chromatic Scale'. George's book is very difficult to
make sense of. Fuze even told me that the concept is hard to figure out even if you
have George there to explain it to you.
The unified core of ideas at the root of the Concept has the potential to transport
music into a realm of deeper meaning. Opening up to those possibilities requires
patience, concentrated thought, and dedicated study. Therefore it is important to
realize that you cannot assimilate these ideas from too narrow a basis, either
intellectually or emotionally. By making the effort to absorb the terminology and
structure presented here, your musical foundation can be made stronger and the
connections between you and your music more intelligent. Once the unity of the
Concept begins to penetrate your practical understanding, everything in it becomes
useful. It is then that its message challenges you to inquire musically and
psychologically into the things you think and feel. For this reason, it is crucial
to embrace the Concept from an emotionally receptive position of seeking something
genuine for yourself in a world where most music is far removed from innovation and
excellence. To do this requires a willingness to learn that emanates from self-
motivation.
The Concept has a unique way of interpreting and translating the things of great
value that music can tell us--something about the meaning of organization and
gravity. Its purpose is to generate new pathways toward greater freedom in
exercising aesthetic judgment and discernment that invoke a more objective
fulfillment of musical statement. The focus, attention, and consciousness you put
into the study of the Concept will uncover greater meaning and an expansion of your
musical understanding, regardless of the stylistic genre of music to which you
apply it.
Throughout this course of study you will notice that terms like vertical,
horizontal, and the relationship to states of tonal gravity signal an eloquent
departure from the major-minor consonant-dissonant system that is commonly taught
to students. This specific language, when integrated into your thinking, can bring
about personal advancement that will convey insight and innovation to your craft.
The ideas are interrelated for a unity like that of a mandala, rather than the
compartmentalized, noncontiguous elements that form commonly accepted notions of
musical behavior. By its very nature, the Lydian Chromatic Concept will give you a
fresh outlook that can aid in bringing life to your musical understanding. This
requires you to master a sense of independence and self-awareness. Try to
"visualize" the relationships presented in this book by "hearing" its knowledge
with an inner ear that is capable of formulating your own singular musical ideas
through the experience of an internal focus. This focal point can help you decipher
between the superficial, mechanical associations you may be accustomed to making in
your compositions or improvisations and the quality of consciousness that allows
many levels of subtlety to come into play. Simply to imitate what others have
played and composed is not enough. It may be beneficial for you to consider
adopting a reciprocal attitude to digesting the Concept whereby the energy you give
while implementing its ideas will fuel your passage through unexpected doors of
discovery.
Having a specific aim while working with the Concept can he helpful. Whether you
are a composer, instrumentalist, improviser, educator, arranger, or theoretician,
and even if you come to this book from outside the profession of music, finding an
aim as you work will allow you to put this knowledge into action and have it work
for you. Use this book as a map to help you aim for that which extends beyond your
customary approach. This will require you to examine some basic questions about the
meaning behind an organization of musical tones and why you play or write music.
As you absorb this knowledge and become more intimate with its fundamental
principles, such as the actuality of a passive "do" which yields to everything in
scale that is higher that itself (Chapter II), you can begin to unearth a vision of
your innate "response-abilities" within your musical discipline. At its essence,
The Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization creates a self-organized and
infinite range of possibilities for us to master." Andy Wasserman
Here are some answers to some frequently asked questions about the 'concept' from
George Russell's web site.
3. What is the primary difference between the Lydian Chromatic Concept and all
other theories of music?
Unlike any other theory of music, Mr. Russell’s Concept establishes gravity as the
driving force in music. By seeking what music ITSELF is telling us about its own
elemental structure, The Concept supplies the necessary means to conceive that a
gravitation field of tones exists as a self-organized order of unity. The Concept
does not disprove the discoveries and contributions of other musical theories, but
rather explains where their truths rest in the context of tonal gravity.
6. What is the fundamental difference between the Lydian and Major Scale?
As described in the answer to the previous question, the Lydian Scale has one
single tonic, otherwise known as the “DO” of the scale. The Major Scale is known as
a diatonic (meaning: two tonic) scale. Therefore, the essential difference between
these two scales is that the Lydian (a single tonic scale) is in a state of unity
with itself, and the Major Scale, with its two tonics, is in a state of resolving.
8. Are there any historical and acoustical foundations underlying the Concept?
The recently published edition of the Concept goes into great depth and discussion
concerning the historical and acoustical foundations underlying the Concept. These
ideas are critical to understanding the significance of this theory, and are too
involved and elaborate to post on this website. It should be noted that the current
book presents these specific subjects far more extensively than in previous
editions.
10. Does a student of the Concept have to abandon their already existing knowledge
of Western music theory?
Students of this work are able to adapt their own musical perspectives to the ideas
presented by the Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization. For example,
analysis of compositions by J.S. Bach and Maurice Ravel are included in the current
volume to reinforce the all-inclusive nature of tonal gravity.
11. Is the current revised edition dramatically different from the previous
editions?
Yes. Generally speaking, the previous editions of the Lydian Chromatic Concept of
Tonal Organization (dating back to 1953) were focused more on the “how-to” aspect
of improvising. The more robust, comprehensive and detailed current volume adds
never before published depth and dimension through exhaustive examples of analysis,
scales, background information and test examples for the student. Volume Two, the
completion of the entire work, is currently in development.
12. What are the extra-musical considerations of the Lydian Chromatic Concept?
George Russell’s Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization stretches far
beyond the usual parameters of music theory, having deep roots linked to the
science of acoustics, physics, world culture and political history. Its framework
is applicable in almost any stylistic genre of music – both Western and non-Western
– encompassing the European classical tradition as solidly as the lineage of jazz
innovators. On the esoteric side, the “Concept” makes connections with
psychological disciplines and spiritual pathways, nurturing a balance between both
the internal and external extra-musical elements critical to any artistic process.
13. Are there any connections drawn in The Concept between music and psychology?
No art form or theory is complete without some basis in psychology and
spirituality. Artists most often describe the process of creativity in transparent
and intangible terms. Most - if not all - music theoretical systems have chosen to
ignore the inclusion of this key internal element. While Mr. Russell’s system
encourages each student of the “Concept” to explore their own ideas and paths, it
freely discusses many potent ideas underlying some specific psychological
perspectives and ancient wisdom traditions and the relationships between one’s
‘essence’ and ‘personality’. Ancient psychological systems made analogies between
the evolution of a person’s mind and being and metaphorical terms such as scale,
harmony, vertical and horizontal.
14. Has the Lydian Chromatic Concept been taught at any established educational
institutions?
Mr. Russell played a key role in the famous Lenox School of Jazz, and went on to
teach The Concept at the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston for over 30
years. He has given seminars in this work around the world and has personally
guided countless private students. The Lydian Concept is being taught by accredited
teachers at the Universities of Massachusetts and Indiana, the Longy School of
Music, and the Josef Hauer Konservatoriums in Austria. The previously released
versions of the book have been used to teach the LCCOTO at colleges and
universities around the world over the last 40 years. There are currently a small
number of instructors in the United States, Europe and Japan who are formally
certified by George Russell to teach the Concept. To find out more about George
Russell, click on this link to www.georgerussell.com.
I have spent time with his book and have talked to a lot of guys who studied with
him, but never studied with him myself. I welcome any corrections or comments from
anyone who is more familiar with the 'concept' than me. In the TV program that I
produced on guitarist David Fiuczynski, David talks about how the 'Concept' changed
his playing. You can watch some excerpts here.
If you have ever heard George's compositions for his big band you would know that
he is on to something really big........
Russell on eMusic
9 comments:
chicken little said...
If you don't know who George Russell is then you don't know modern jazz. His
concept is found in nearly everything that is considered "modern". Even if cats
don't know they've checked out George they probably have. Thanks for reminding me
how important he and this concept really is.
7:57 PM
Anonymous said...
I took two years of his classes and toured with him.
1. when perfect 5ths are stacked, the #11 occurs before the "Natural 11" ( which he
once called"the most unnatural f%*kin' note in the world!!")
2. Ergo , a C Major 13 ( #11) chord, sits in calm repose , while a C Maj. 13 chord
w/ a natural 11
has an unresolved clash (a minor 9th)
10:59 AM
Anonymous said...
George said," We have only begun to peer up Lydia's dress."
8:11 PM
Hucbald said...
Actually, this is a concept related to the scale generated by the natural harmonic
overtone series, which stacked in thirds creates a dominant seventh with a major
ninth and an augmented eleventh. Since a lot of jazz is blues based, and blues uses
dominant seventh chords for the IV, V, and I, augmented elevenths are naturally the
coin of the relm in that genera. I always start my students out with blues for just
that reason: Theoretically, it is the style most in agreement with the natural
harmonic overtone series.
The so-called Ionian mode, on the other hand, is a scale generated by three major
triads each a fifth apart, as in a IV, I, V relationship. In other words, it's
actually the harmony that generates the scale, and not the scale that generates the
harmony (In both jazz and classical music).
I got hints of this while I was at Berklee, but the lightbulb didn't really appear
above my head until I started studying trad theory for my masters degree. Kick-ass
blog, by the way.
3:01 AM
Anonymous said...
I recently acquired Russell's book! Thanks for being one of the people that helped
turn me on to it!
9:10 PM
Anonymous said...
Just a thought on Rob Scheps coment
1. when perfect 5ths are stacked, the #11 occurs before the "Natural 11" ( which he
once called"the most unnatural f%*kin' note in the world!!")
This is true, but isn't it also true that if you switch it around the tonic is the
perfect fifth of the natural 11th?(did that make sense?)
Also
2. Ergo , a C Major 13 ( #11) chord, sits in calm repose , while a C Maj. 13 chord
w/ a natural 11
has an unresolved clash (a minor 9th)
There is no minor ninth in either of those chords in relation to C being the tonic.
But I assume he means the minor ninth harmony in relation to E (the major 3rd in
the C scale) F being the minor 9th related to E as well as the 11th related to C.
(but think about this E is the major 7th of F) I also beleive that the unresolved
clash that is mentioned is only a "clash" if you hear it that way. I played that
chord (a chord I have never played before) and I although I heard that strange
vibration I thought it sounded, for lack of a better word
nice.
Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm no expert on theroy nor do I mean to insult anyone I
am just experimenting. wouldlike some feed back even if you dont approve of my
comment.
1:01 PM
a said...
Hi there!
Thanks for the intresting blog, on such an intresting subject. Only in the humblest
of moods, and not wishing to say "you are worong" or anything of the sort, I would
like to point out that the term diatonic does not come from the latin root di,
meaning two, but the greek root dia, meaning through (as in diagonal, diapente,
diapason, diatessaron, diaspora, diagram, and countless other words of greek origin
with that prefix).
So dia-tonikos means through distances of a tone (in modern practice, what we now
call tones and half tones).
Changing subject, you might find it intresting looking at Arnold Schoenberg's
theory on the genesis of tonality, where he explains the major scale taking the
same principle of perfect fifths as a starting point.
He points out that C is the fifth of F, the third sound appearing in its natural
harmonic series (And therefore depeds on it for existance). As is G to C. Thus we
have a balanced system where there is a downward force , from C to its subdominant,
F, and an upward force by which it relates to it's dominant, G.
To me it's much like the chinese cosmological vision of man held in position by the
earth and the heavens. Quite perfect, like the principle of "threeness" it
embodies...
Take away the earth and man is left without it's supporting matrix!!! Not such an
unnatural f%*kin' note, that bloody F, perhaps?
Anyway, just another intresting view on the same subject. I find them both, and
others I've encountered along the way most fascinating.
Happy music making!
Greetings from Mexico!
Alex Cortes
8:30 PM
a said...
just an other little note... Russell is most definitely NOT the only one talking
about gravity!!! And also not the only one not propounding "thou shalls" and "thou
shall nots" through his system.
Saludos
9:28 AM
Anonymous said...
I found that the different scales that Russell uses in his theory are all modes of
the melodic and harmonic minor scales, and the diminished and whole-tone scales. He
just makes the tonal center the lydina mode.
11:22 PM
Post a Comment