FFIEC CAT May 2017 All Documents Combined

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
Overview for Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors

In light of the increasing volume and sophistication of cyber threats, the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council 1 (FFIEC) developed the Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
(Assessment), on behalf of its members, to help institutions identify their risks and determine
their cybersecurity preparedness. The Assessment provides a repeatable and measurable process
for institutions to measure their cybersecurity preparedness over time. The Assessment
incorporates cybersecurity-related principles from the FFIEC Information Technology (IT)
Examination Handbook and regulatory guidance, and concepts from other industry standards,
including the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework. 2
Benefits to the Institution
For institutions using the Assessment, management will be able to enhance their oversight and
management of the institution’s cybersecurity by doing the following:
• Identifying factors contributing to and determining the institution’s overall cyber risk.
• Assessing the institution’s cybersecurity preparedness.
• Evaluating whether the institution’s cybersecurity preparedness is aligned with its risks.
• Determining risk management practices and controls that are needed or need enhancement
and actions to be taken to achieve the desired state.
• Informing risk management strategies.
CEO and Board of Directors
The role of the chief executive officer (CEO), with management’s support, may include the
responsibility to do the following:
• Develop a plan to conduct the Assessment.
• Lead employee efforts during the Assessment to facilitate timely responses from across the
institution.
• Set the target state of cybersecurity preparedness that best aligns to the board of directors’
(board) stated (or approved) risk appetite.
• Review, approve, and support plans to address risk management and control weaknesses.
• Analyze and present results for executive oversight, including key stakeholders and the
board, or an appropriate board committee.
1
The FFIEC comprises the principals of the following: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and State Liaison Committee.
2
A mapping is available in Appendix B: Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to the NIST Cybersecurity
Framework. NIST reviewed and provided input on the mapping to ensure consistency with Framework principles
and to highlight the complementary nature of the two resources.
June 2015 1
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Overview for CEOs and Boards of Directors
• Oversee the performance of ongoing monitoring to remain nimble and agile in addressing
evolving areas of cybersecurity risk.
• Oversee changes to maintain or increase the desired cybersecurity preparedness.
The role of the board, or an appropriate board committee, may include the responsibility to do
the following:
• Engage management in establishing the institution’s vision, risk appetite, and overall
strategic direction.
• Approve plans to use the Assessment.
• Review management’s analysis of the Assessment results, inclusive of any reviews or
opinions on the results issued by independent risk management or internal audit functions
regarding those results.
• Review management’s determination of whether the institution’s cybersecurity preparedness
is aligned with its risks.
• Review and approve plans to address any risk management or control weaknesses.
• Review the results of management’s ongoing monitoring of the institution’s exposure to and
preparedness for cyber threats.
Assessment’s Parts and Process
The Assessment consists of two parts: Inherent Risk Profile and Cybersecurity Maturity. Upon
completion of both parts, management can evaluate whether the institution’s inherent risk and
preparedness are aligned.
Inherent Risk Profile
Cybersecurity inherent risk is the level of risk posed to the institution by the following:
• Technologies and Connection Types
• Delivery Channels
• Online/Mobile Products and Technology Services
• Organizational Characteristics
• External Threats
Inherent risk incorporates the type, volume, and complexity of the institution’s operations and
threats directed at the institution. Inherent risk does not include mitigating controls. The Inherent
Risk Profile includes descriptions of activities across risk categories with definitions for the least
to most levels of inherent risk. The profile helps management determine exposure to risk that the
institution’s activities, services, and products individually and collectively pose to the institution.
Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most Inherent

Inherent Risk Inherent Risk Inherent Risk Inherent Risk Risk
When each of the activities, services, and products are assessed, management can review the
results and determine the institution’s overall inherent risk profile.
June 2015 2
Cybersecurity Maturity
The Assessment’s second part is Cybersecurity Maturity, designed to help management measure
the institution’s level of risk and corresponding controls. The levels range from baseline to
innovative. Cybersecurity Maturity includes
statements to determine whether an institution’s Innovative
behaviors, practices, and processes can support
cybersecurity preparedness within the following Advanced
five domains:
• Cyber Risk Management and Oversight Intermediate
• Threat Intelligence and Collaboration
• Cybersecurity Controls Evolving
• External Dependency Management
• Cyber Incident Management and Resilience
The domains include assessment factors and Baseline
contributing components. Within each
component, declarative statements describe
activities supporting the assessment factor at each
maturity level. Management determines which declarative statements best fit the current
practices of the institution. All declarative statements in each maturity level, and previous
levels, must be attained and sustained to achieve that domain’s maturity level. While
management can determine the institution’s maturity level in each domain, the Assessment is not
designed to identify an overall cybersecurity maturity level. The figure below provides the five
domains and assessment factors.
Domain 4:
Domain 1: Cyber Domain 2: Threat Domain 3: Domain 5: Cyber
External
Risk Management Intelligence & Cybersecurity Incident Management
Dependency
& Oversight Collaboration Controls and Resilience
Management
Incident
Threat Preventative Resilience
Governance Connections
Intelligence Controls Planning and
Strategy
Detection,
Risk Monitoring and Detective Relationship
Response, and
Management Analyzing Controls Management
Mitigation
Information Corrective Escalation and

Resources
Sharing Controls Reporting
Training and
Culture
June 2015 3
Management can review the institution’s Inherent Risk Profile in relation to its Cybersecurity
Maturity results for each domain to understand whether they are aligned. The following table
depicts the relationship between an institution’s Inherent Risk Profile and its domain Maturity
Levels, as there is no single expected level for an institution. In general, as inherent risk rises, an
institution’s maturity levels should increase. An institution’s inherent risk profile and maturity
levels will change over time as threats, vulnerabilities, and operational environments change.
Thus, management should consider reevaluating the institution’s inherent risk profile and
cybersecurity maturity periodically and when planned changes can affect its inherent risk profile
(e.g., launching new products or services, new connections).
Risk/Maturity Inherent Risk Levels
Relationship
Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Innovative
Maturity Level for
Cybersecurity
Each Domain
Advanced
Intermediate
Evolving
Baseline
Management can then decide what actions are needed either to affect the inherent risk profile or
to achieve a desired state of maturity. On an ongoing basis, management may use the
Assessment to identify changes to the institution’s inherent risk profile when new threats arise or
when considering changes to the business strategy, such as expanding operations, offering new
products and services, or entering into new third-party relationships that support critical
activities. Consequently, management can determine whether additional risk management
practices or controls are needed to maintain or augment the institution’s cybersecurity maturity.
Supporting Implementation
An essential part of implementing the Assess
Assessment is to validate the institution’s maturity and
inherent risk
process and findings and the effectiveness and
sufficiency of the plans to address any
identified weaknesses. The next section Identify gaps
Reevaluate
provides some questions to assist management in alignment
and the board when using the Assessment.

Cybersecurity Management &
Oversight
•
Implement
What are the potential cyber threats to the plans to
Determine
desired
attain and
institution? sustain
state of
maturity
• Is the institution a direct target of attacks? maturity
• Is the institution’s cybersecurity

preparedness receiving the appropriate level of time and attention from management and the
board or an appropriate board committee?
June 2015 4
• Do the institution’s policies and procedures demonstrate management’s commitment to

sustaining appropriate cybersecurity maturity levels?
• What is the ongoing process for gathering, monitoring, analyzing, and reporting risks?
• Who is accountable for assessing and managing the risks posed by changes to the business
strategy or technology?
• Are the accountable individuals empowered with the authority to carry out these
responsibilities?
• Do the inherent risk profile and cybersecurity maturity levels meet management’s business
and risk management expectations? If there is misalignment, what are the proposed plans to
bring them into alignment?
• How can management and the board, or an appropriate board committee, make this process
part of the institution’s enterprise-wide governance framework?
• What is the process for gathering and validating the information for the inherent risk profile
and cybersecurity maturity?
• How can management and the board, or an appropriate board committee, support
improvements to the institution’s process for conducting the Assessment?
• What do the results of the Assessment mean to the institution as it looks at its overall risk
profile?
• What are the institution’s areas of highest inherent risk?
• Is management updating the institution’s inherent risk profile to reflect changes in activities,
services, and products?
• How effective are the institution’s risk management activities and controls identified in the
Assessment?
• Are there more efficient or effective means for attaining or improving the institution’s risk
management and controls?
• What third parties does the institution rely on to support critical activities?
• What is the process to oversee third parties and understand their inherent risks and
cybersecurity maturity?
• How does management validate the type and volume of attacks?
• Is the institution sharing threat information with peers, law enforcement, and critical third
parties through information-sharing procedures?
Summary
FFIEC has developed the Assessment to assist management and the board, or an appropriate
board committee, in assessing their institution’s cybersecurity preparedness and risk. For more
information and additional questions to consider, refer to the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment
General Observations on the FFIEC’s Web site.
June 2015 5
FFIEC
Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
May 2017
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) – OMB Control No. 1557-0328; Expiration date: August 31, 2019
The above OMB Control Number and expiration date pertain to a requirement of the Paperwork Reduction
Act and its implementing regulation that a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person (or
organization) is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number and, if appropriate, an expiration date. See 44 USC 3506(c)(1)(B) and 5 CFR
1320.5(b)(2)(i), 1320.8(b)(1).
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Contents
Contents
Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i
User’s Guide ................................................................................................................................... 1
Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ................................................................................................................................. 2
Completing the Assessment ........................................................................................................ 2
Part One: Inherent Risk Profile ............................................................................................... 3
Part Two: Cybersecurity Maturity .......................................................................................... 5
Interpreting and Analyzing Assessment Results..................................................................... 8
Resources .................................................................................................................................. 10
Inherent Risk Profile ..................................................................................................................... 11
Cybersecurity Maturity ................................................................................................................. 19
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight ................................................................. 19
Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration .................................................................... 30
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls ........................................................................................... 34
Domain 4: External Dependency Management ........................................................................ 47
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience .......................................................... 51
Additional Resources
Overview for Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors
Appendix A: Mapping Baseline Statements to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Appendix B: Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to NIST Cybersecurity Framework
Appendix C: Glossary
May 2017 i
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool User’s Guide
User’s Guide
Overview
In light of the increasing volume and sophistication of cyber threats, the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council 1 (FFIEC) developed the Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
(Assessment), on behalf of its members, to help institutions identify their risks and determine
their cybersecurity maturity.
The content of the Assessment is consistent with the principles of the FFIEC Information
Technology Examination Handbook (IT Handbook) and the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, 2 as well as industry accepted cybersecurity
practices. The Assessment provides institutions with a repeatable and measureable process to
inform management of their institution’s risks and cybersecurity preparedness.
The Assessment consists of two parts: Inherent Risk Profile and Cybersecurity Maturity. The
Inherent Risk Profile identifies the institution’s inherent risk before implementing controls. The
Cybersecurity Maturity includes domains, assessment factors, components, and individual
declarative statements across five maturity levels to identify specific controls and practices that
are in place. While management can determine the institution’s maturity level in each domain,
the Assessment is not designed to identify an overall cybersecurity maturity level.
To complete the Assessment, management first assesses the institution’s inherent risk profile
based on five categories:
• Technologies and Connection Types
• Delivery Channels
• Online/Mobile Products and Technology Services
• Organizational Characteristics
• External Threats
Management then evaluates the institution’s Cybersecurity Maturity level for each of five
domains:
• Cyber Risk Management and Oversight
• Threat Intelligence and Collaboration
• Cybersecurity Controls
• External Dependency Management
• Cyber Incident Management and Resilience
1
The FFIEC comprises the principals of the following: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and State Liaison Committee.
2
A mapping is available in Appendix B: Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to the NIST Cybersecurity
Framework. NIST reviewed and provided input on the mapping to ensure consistency with Framework principles
and to highlight the complementary nature of the two resources.
May 2017 1
By reviewing both the institution’s inherent risk profile and maturity levels across the domains,
management can determine whether its maturity levels are appropriate in relation to its risk. If
not, the institution may take action either to reduce the level of risk or to increase the levels of
maturity. This process is intended to complement, not replace, an institution’s risk management
process and cybersecurity program.
Background
The Assessment is based on the cybersecurity assessment that the FFIEC members piloted in
2014, which was designed to evaluate community institutions’ preparedness to mitigate cyber
risks. NIST defines cybersecurity as “the process of protecting information by preventing,
detecting, and responding to attacks.” As part of cybersecurity, institutions should consider
managing internal and external threats and vulnerabilities to protect infrastructure and
information assets. The definition builds on information security as defined in FFIEC guidance.
Cyber incidents can have financial, operational, legal, and reputational impact. Recent high-
profile cyber attacks demonstrate that cyber incidents can significantly affect capital and
earnings. Costs may include forensic investigations, public relations campaigns, legal fees,
consumer credit monitoring, and technology changes. As such, cybersecurity needs to be
integrated throughout an institution as part of enterprise-wide governance processes, information
security, business continuity, and third-party risk management. For example, an institution’s
cybersecurity policies may be incorporated within the information security program. In addition,
cybersecurity roles and processes referred to in the Assessment may be separate roles within the
security group (or outsourced) or may be part of broader roles across the institution.
Completing the Assessment

The Assessment is designed to provide a measurable and repeatable process to assess an
institution’s level of cybersecurity risk and preparedness. Part one of this Assessment is the
Inherent Risk Profile, which identifies an institution’s inherent risk relevant to cyber risks. Part
two is the Cybersecurity Maturity, which determines an institution’s current state of
cybersecurity preparedness represented by maturity levels across five domains. For this
Assessment to be an effective risk management tool, an institution may want to complete it
periodically and as significant operational and technological changes occur.
Cyber risk programs build upon and align existing information security, business continuity, and
disaster recovery programs. The Assessment is intended to be used primarily on an enterprise-
wide basis and when introducing new products and services as follows:
• Enterprise-wide. Management may review the Inherent Risk Profile and the declarative
statements to understand which policies, procedures, processes, and controls are in place
enterprise-wide and where gaps may exist. Following this review, management can
determine appropriate maturity levels for the institution in each domain or the target state for
Cybersecurity Maturity. Management can then develop action plans for achieving the target
state.
• New products, services, or initiatives. Using the Assessment before launching a new
product, service, or initiative can help management understand how these might affect the
institution’s inherent risk profile and resulting desired maturity levels.
May 2017 2
Part One: Inherent Risk Profile

Part one of the Assessment identifies the institution’s inherent risk. The Inherent Risk Profile
identifies activities, services, and products organized in the following categories:
• Technologies and Connection Types. Certain types of connections and technologies may
pose a higher inherent risk depending on the complexity and maturity, connections, and
nature of the specific technology products or services. This category includes the number of
Internet service provider (ISP) and third-party connections, whether systems are hosted
internally or outsourced, the number of unsecured connections, the use of wireless access,
volume of network devices, end-of-life systems, extent of cloud services, and use of personal
devices.
• Delivery Channels. Various delivery channels for products and services may pose a higher
inherent risk depending on the nature of the specific product or service offered. Inherent risk
increases as the variety and number of delivery channels increases. This category addresses
whether products and services are available through online and mobile delivery channels and
the extent of automated teller machine (ATM) operations.
• Online/Mobile Products and Technology Services. Different products and technology
services offered by institutions may pose a higher inherent risk depending on the nature of
the specific product or service offered. This category includes various payment services, such
as debit and credit cards, person-to-person payments, originating automated clearing house
(ACH), retail wire transfers, wholesale payments, merchant remote deposit capture, treasury
services and clients and trust services, global remittances, correspondent banking, and
merchant acquiring activities. This category also includes consideration of whether the
institution provides technology services to other organizations.
• Organizational Characteristics. This category considers organizational characteristics, such
as mergers and acquisitions, number of direct employees and cybersecurity contractors,
changes in security staffing, the number of users with privileged access, changes in
information technology (IT) environment, locations of business presence, and locations of
operations and data centers.
• External Threats. The volume and type of attacks (attempted or successful) affect an
institution’s inherent risk exposure. This category considers the volume and sophistication of
the attacks targeting the institution.
Risk Levels
Risk Levels incorporate the type, volume, and complexity of the institution’s operations and
threats directed at the institution. Inherent risk does not include mitigating controls.
May 2017 3
Select the most appropriate inherent risk level for each activity, service, or product within each
category. The levels range from Least Inherent Risk to Most Inherent Risk (Figure 1) and
incorporate a wide range of descriptions. The risk levels provide parameters for determining the
inherent risk for each category. These parameters are not intended to be rigid but rather
instructive to assist with assessing a risk level within each activity, service, or product. For
situations where the risk level falls between two levels, management should select the higher risk
level.
Figure 1: Inherent Risk Profile Layout Risk Levels
Risk Levels
Category: Technologies and
Connection Types Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Total number of Internet service provider No connections Minimal complexity (1– Moderate complexity Significant complexity Substantial complexity
(ISP) connections (including branch 20 connections) (21–100 connections) (101–200 connections) (>200 connections)
connections)
Unsecured external connections, number None Few instances of Several instances of Significant instances of Substantial instances of
Activity, of connections not users (e.g., file transfer
protocol (FTP), Telnet, rlogin)
unsecured
connections (1–5)
unsecured connections
(6–10)
(11–25)
(>25)
Service, or
Product Wireless network access No wireless access Separate access
points for guest
Guest and corporate
wireless network access
Wireless corporate
network access;
Wireless corporate
network access; all
wireless and corporate are logically separated; significant number of employees have
wireless limited number of users users and access points access; substantial
and access points (1– (251–1,000 users; 26– number of access
250 users; 1–25 access 100 access points) points (>1,000 users;
points) >100 access points)
Determine Inherent Risk Profile

Management can determine the institution’s overall Inherent Risk Profile based on the number of
applicable statements in each risk level for all activities (Figure 2). For example, when a majority
of activities, products, or services fall within the Moderate Risk Level, management may
determine that the institution has a Moderate Inherent Risk Profile. Each category may, however,
pose a different level of inherent risk. Therefore, in addition to evaluating the number of
instances that an institution selects for a specific risk level, management may also consider
evaluating whether the specific category poses additional risk.
Figure 2: Inherent Risk Summary
Risk Levels
Number of Statements Selected in Each

Risk Level
Based on Individual Risk Levels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Selected, Assign an Inherent Risk Profile
The following includes definitions of risk levels.

• Least Inherent Risk. An institution with a Least Inherent Risk Profile generally has very
limited use of technology. It has few computers, applications, systems, and no connections.
The variety of products and services are limited. The institution has a small geographic
footprint and few employees.
• Minimal Inherent Risk. An institution with a Minimal Inherent Risk Profile generally has
limited complexity in terms of the technology it uses. It offers a limited variety of less risky
products and services. The institution’s mission-critical systems are outsourced. The
institution primarily uses established technologies. It maintains a few types of connections to
customers and third parties with limited complexity.
• Moderate Inherent Risk. An institution with a Moderate Inherent Risk Profile generally
uses technology that may be somewhat complex in terms of volume and sophistication. The
May 2017 4
institution may outsource mission-critical systems and applications and may support
elements internally. There is a greater variety of products and services offered through
diverse channels.
• Significant Inherent Risk. An institution with a Significant Inherent Risk Profile generally
uses complex technology in terms of scope and sophistication. The institution offers high-
risk products and services that may include emerging technologies. The institution may host
a significant number of applications internally. The institution allows either a large number
of personal devices or a large variety of device types. The institution maintains a substantial
number of connections to customers and third parties. A variety of payment services are
offered directly rather than through a third party and may reflect a significant level of
transaction volume.
• Most Inherent Risk. An institution with a Most Inherent Risk Profile uses extremely
complex technologies to deliver myriad products and services. Many of the products and
services are at the highest level of risk, including those offered to other organizations. New
and emerging technologies are utilized across multiple delivery channels. The institution may
outsource some mission-critical systems or applications, but many are hosted internally. The
institution maintains a large number of connection types to transfer data with customers and
third parties.
Part Two: Cybersecurity Maturity

After determining the Inherent Risk Profile, the institution transitions to the Cybersecurity
Maturity part of the Assessment to determine the institution’s maturity level within each of the
following five domains:
• Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight
• Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration
• Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls
• Domain 4: External Dependency Management
• Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience
Domains, Assessment Factors, Components, and Declarative Statements
Within each domain are assessment factors and contributing components. Under each
component, there are declarative statements describing an activity that supports the assessment
factor at that level of maturity. Table 1 provides definitions for each domain and the underlying
assessment factors.
May 2017 5
Table 1: Domains and Assessment Factors Defined
Domains and Assessment Factors Defined

Domain 1
Cyber Risk Management and Oversight
Cyber risk management and oversight addresses the board of directors’ (board’s) oversight and management’s
development and implementation of an effective enterprise-wide cybersecurity program with comprehensive policies
and procedures for establishing appropriate accountability and oversight.
Assessment Governance includes oversight, strategies, policies, and IT asset management to implement an
Factors effective governance of the cybersecurity program.
Risk Management includes a risk management program, risk assessment process, and audit
function to effectively manage risk and assess the effectiveness of key controls.
Resources include staffing, tools, and budgeting processes to ensure the institution’s staff or
external resources have knowledge and experience commensurate with the institution’s risk profile.
Training and Culture includes the employee training and customer awareness programs
contributing to an organizational culture that emphasizes the mitigation of cybersecurity threats.
Domain 2
Threat Intelligence and Collaboration
Threat intelligence and collaboration includes processes to effectively discover, analyze, and understand cyber
threats, with the capability to share information internally and with appropriate third parties.
Assessment Threat Intelligence refers to the acquisition and analysis of information to identify, track, and
Factors predict cyber capabilities, intentions, and activities that offer courses of action to enhance decision
making.
Monitoring and Analyzing refers to how an institution monitors threat sources and what analysis
may be performed to identify threats that are specific to the institution or to resolve conflicts in the
different threat intelligence streams.
Information Sharing encompasses establishing relationships with peers and information-sharing
forums and how threat information is communicated to those groups as well as internal
stakeholders.
Domain 3
Cybersecurity Controls
Cybersecurity controls are the practices and processes used to protect assets, infrastructure, and information by
strengthening the institution’s defensive posture through continuous, automated protection and monitoring.
Assessment Preventative Controls deter and prevent cyber attacks and include infrastructure management,
Factors access management, device and end-point security, and secure coding.
Detective Controls include threat and vulnerability detection, anomalous activity detection, and
event detection, may alert the institution to network and system irregularities that indicate an
incident has or may occur.
Corrective Controls are utilized to resolve system and software vulnerabilities through patch
management and remediation of issues identified during vulnerability scans and penetration testing.
Domain 4
External Dependency Management
External dependency management involves establishing and maintaining a comprehensive program to oversee and
manage external connections and third-party relationships with access to the institution’s technology assets and
information.
Assessment Connections incorporate the identification, monitoring, and management of external connections
Factors and data flows to third parties.
Relationship Management includes due diligence, contracts, and ongoing monitoring to help
ensure controls complement the institution’s cybersecurity program.
May 2017 6
Domain 5
Cyber Incident Management and Resilience
Cyber incident management includes establishing, identifying, and analyzing cyber events; prioritizing the
institution’s containment or mitigation; and escalating information to appropriate stakeholders. Cyber resilience
encompasses both planning and testing to maintain and recover ongoing operations during and following a cyber
incident.
Assessment Incident Resilience Planning & Strategy incorporates resilience planning and testing into existing
Factors business continuity and disaster recovery plans to minimize service disruptions and the destruction
or corruption of data.
Detection, Response, & Mitigation refers to the steps management takes to identify, prioritize,
respond to, and mitigate the effects of internal and external threats and vulnerabilities.
Escalation & Reporting ensures key stakeholders are informed about the impact of cyber
incidents, and regulators, law enforcement, and customers are notified as required.
Figure 3: Cybersecurity Maturity Levels

Each maturity level includes a set of declarative
Innovative
statements that describe how the behaviors,
practices, and processes of an institution can Advanced
consistently produce the desired outcomes.
Intermediate
The Assessment starts at the Baseline maturity
level and progresses to the highest maturity, the Evolving
Innovative level (Figure 3). Table 2 provides
definitions for each of the maturity levels, which
Baseline
are cumulative.
Table 2: Maturity Levels Defined
Maturity Levels Defined

Baseline Baseline maturity is characterized by minimum expectations required by law and regulations or
recommended in supervisory guidance. This level includes compliance-driven objectives.
Management has reviewed and evaluated guidance.
Evolving Evolving maturity is characterized by additional formality of documented procedures and policies
that are not already required. Risk-driven objectives are in place. Accountability for cybersecurity is
formally assigned and broadened beyond protection of customer information to incorporate
information assets and systems.
Intermediate Intermediate maturity is characterized by detailed, formal processes. Controls are validated and
consistent. Risk-management practices and analysis are integrated into business strategies.
Advanced Advanced maturity is characterized by cybersecurity practices and analytics that are integrated
across lines of business. Majority of risk-management processes are automated and include
continuous process improvement. Accountability for risk decisions by frontline businesses is
formally assigned.
Innovative Innovative maturity is characterized by driving innovation in people, processes, and technology for
the institution and the industry to manage cyber risks. This may entail developing new controls, new
tools, or creating new information-sharing groups. Real-time, predictive analytics are tied to
automated responses.
May 2017 7
Completing the Cybersecurity Maturity

Each domain and maturity level has a set of declarative statements organized by assessment
factor. To assist the institution’s ability to follow common themes across maturity levels,
statements are categorized by components. The components are groups of similar declarative
statements to make the Assessment easier to use (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Cybersecurity Maturity
Domain
Maturity Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight
Level Assessment Factor: Governance
Assessment
Y, Y(C), N
Factor
Baseline Designated members of management are held accountable by the board or an appropriate board committee for implementing
OVERSIGHT
and managing the information security and business continuity programs. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 3)
Information security risks are discussed in management meetings when prompted by highly visible cyber events or regulatory
alerts. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 6)
Management provides a written report on the overall status of the information security and business continuity programs to the
board or an appropriate board committee at least annually. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 5)
The budgeting process includes information security related expenses and tools. (FFIEC E-Banking Booklet, page 20)
Management considers the risks posed by other critical infrastructures (e.g., telecommunications, energy) to the institution.
(FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet, page J-12)
Declarative
Evolving At least annually, the board or an appropriate board committee reviews and approves the institution’s cybersecurity program.
Statement
Management is responsible for ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity tools and staff are requested through the budget process.
Component
There is a process to formally discuss and estimate potential expenses associated with cybersecurity incidents as part of the
budgeting process.
Management determines which declarative statements best fit the current practices of the
institution. All declarative statements in each maturity level, and previous levels, must be
attained and sustained to achieve that domain’s maturity level. Attained and sustained requires
affirmative answers to either “Yes” or “Yes with Compensating Controls” 3 for each of the
declarative questions within a maturity level. While management can determine the institution’s
maturity level in each domain, the Assessment is not designed to identify an overall
cybersecurity maturity level.
Management may determine that a declarative statement has been sufficiently sustained based on
proven results. Certain declarative statements may not apply to all institutions if the product,
service, or technology is not offered or used. Declarative statements that may not be applicable
to all institutions are clearly designated and would not affect the determination of the specific
maturity level.
Interpreting and Analyzing Assessment Results

Management can review the institution’s Inherent Risk Profile in relation to its Cybersecurity
Maturity results for each domain to understand whether they are aligned.
Table 3 depicts the relationship between an institution’s Inherent Risk Profile and its domain
Maturity Levels, as there is no single expected level for an institution. In general, as inherent risk
3
Compensating control - A management, operational, and/or technical control (e.g., safeguard or countermeasure)
employed by an organization in lieu of a recommended security control in the low, moderate, or high baselines
that provides equivalent or comparable protection for an information system.
May 2017 8
rises, an institution’s maturity levels should increase. An institution’s inherent risk profile and
maturity levels will change over time as threats, vulnerabilities, and operational environments
change. Thus, management should consider reevaluating its inherent risk profile and
cybersecurity maturity periodically and when planned changes can affect its inherent risk profile
(e.g., launching new products or services, new connections).
Table 3: Risk/Maturity Relationship
Inherent Risk Levels
Innovative
Cybersecurity Maturity Level for Each
Advanced
Domain
Intermediate
Evolving
Baseline
If management determines that the institution’s maturity levels are not appropriate in relation to
the inherent risk profile, management should consider reducing inherent risk or developing a
strategy to improve the maturity levels. This process includes
• determining target maturity levels.
• conducting a gap analysis.
• prioritizing and planning actions.
• implementing changes.
• reevaluating over time.
• communicating the results.
Management can set target maturity levels for each domain or across domains based on the
institution’s business objectives and risk appetite. Management can conduct a gap analysis
between the current and target maturity levels and initiate improvements based on the gaps. Each
declarative statement can represent a range of strategies and processes that have enterprise-wide
impact. For example, declarative statements not yet attained provide insights for policies,
processes, procedures, and controls that may improve risk management in relation to a specific
risk or the institution’s overall cybersecurity preparedness.
Using the maturity levels in each domain, management can identify potential actions that would
increase the institution’s overall cybersecurity preparedness. Management can review declarative
statements at maturity levels beyond what the institution has achieved to determine the actions
needed to reach the next level and implement changes to address gaps. Management’s periodic
May 2017 9
reevaluations of the inherent risk profile and maturity levels may further assist the institution in
maintaining an appropriate level of cybersecurity preparedness. In addition, management may
also seek an independent validation, such as by the internal audit function, of the institution’s
Assessment process and findings.
The Assessment results should be communicated to the chief executive officer (CEO) and board.
More information and questions to consider are contained in the “Overview for Chief Executive
Officers and Boards of Directors.”
Resources
In addition to the “Overview for Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors,” the FFIEC
has released the following documents to assist institutions with the Cybersecurity Assessment
Tool.
• Appendix A: Mapping Baseline Statements to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
• Appendix B: Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to NIST Cybersecurity Framework
• Appendix C: Glossary
May 2017 10
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Inherent Risk Profile
Risk Levels
Total number of Internet service No connections Minimal complexity Moderate complexity Significant Substantial complexity
provider (ISP) connections (including (1–20 connections) (21–100 connections) complexity (101–200 (>200 connections)
branch connections) connections)
Unsecured external connections, None Few instances of Several instances of Significant instances Substantial instances of
number of connections not users unsecured unsecured of unsecured unsecured connections
(e.g., file transfer protocol (FTP), connections (1–5) connections (6–10) connections (11–25) (>25)
Telnet, rlogin)
Wireless network access No wireless access Separate access Guest and corporate Wireless corporate Wireless corporate
points for guest wireless network network access; network access; all
wireless and access are logically significant number of employees have access;
corporate wireless separated; limited users and access substantial number of
number of users and points (251–1,000 access points (>1,000
access points (1–250 users; 26–100 users; >100 access
users; 1–25 access access points) points)
points)
Personal devices allowed to connect None Only one device type Multiple device types Multiple device types Any device type used;
to the corporate network available; available used; available to used; available to available to >25% of
to <5% of employees <10% of employees <25% of authorized employees (staff,
(staff, executives, (staff, executives, employees (staff, executives, managers)
managers); e-mail managers) and executives, and board; all
access only board; e-mail access managers) and applications accessed
only board; e-mail and
some applications
accessed
Third parties, including number of No third parties and Limited number of Moderate number of Significant number of Substantial number of
organizations and number of no individuals from third parties (1–5) third parties (6–10) third parties (11–25) third parties (>25) and
individuals from vendors and third parties with and limited number and moderate and significant substantial number of
subcontractors, with access to access to systems of individuals from number of individuals number of individuals individuals from third
internal systems (e.g., virtual private third parties (<50) from third parties from third parties parties (>1,500) with
network, modem, intranet, direct with access; low (50–500) with (501–1,500) with access; high complexity
connection) complexity in how access; some access; high level of in how they access
they access systems complexity in how complexity in terms systems
they access systems of how they access
systems
May 2017 11
Risk Levels
Wholesale customers with dedicated None Few dedicated Several dedicated Significant number of Substantial number of
connections connections connections dedicated dedicated connections
(between 1–5) (between 6–10) connections (>25)
(between 11–25)
Internally hosted and developed or No applications Few applications Several applications Significant number of Substantial number of
modified vendor applications (between 1–5) (between 6–10) applications applications and
supporting critical activities (between 11–25) complexity (>25)
Internally hosted, vendor-developed Limited applications Few applications (6– Several applications Significant number of Substantial number of
applications supporting critical (0–5) 30) (31–75) applications (76–200) applications and
activities complexity (>200)
User-developed technologies and No user-developed 1–100 technologies 101–500 501–2,500 >2,500 technologies
user computing that support critical technologies technologies technologies
activities (includes Microsoft Excel
spreadsheets and Access databases
or other user-developed tools)
End-of-life (EOL) systems No systems Few systems that are Several systems that A large number of Majority of critical
(hardware or at risk of EOL and will reach EOL within systems that support operations dependent
software) that are none that support 2 years and some critical operations at on systems that have
past EOL or at risk of critical operations that support critical EOL or are at risk of reached EOL or will
nearing EOL within 2 operations reaching EOL in 2 reach EOL within the
years years next 2 years or an
unknown number of
systems that have
reached EOL
Open Source Software (OSS) No OSS Limited OSS and Several OSS that Large number of Majority of operations
none that support support critical OSS that support dependent on OSS
critical operations operations critical operations
Network devices (e.g., servers, Limited or no network Few devices (250– Several devices Significant number of Substantial number of
routers, and firewalls; include devices (<250) 1,500) (1,501–25,000) devices (25,001– devices (>50,000)
physical and virtual) 50,000)
Third-party service providers storing No third parties that 1–25 third parties 26–100 third parties 101–200 third parties >200 third parties that
and/or processing information that support critical that support critical that support critical that support critical support critical activities;
support critical activities (Do not have activities activities activities activities; 1 or more 1 or more are foreign-
access to internal systems, but the are foreign-based based
institution relies on their services)
May 2017 12
Risk Levels
Cloud computing services hosted No cloud providers Few cloud providers; Several cloud Significant number of Substantial number of
externally to support critical activities private cloud only (1– providers (4–7) cloud providers (8– cloud providers (>10);
3) 10); cloud-provider cloud-provider locations
locations used used include
include international; international; use of
use of public cloud public cloud
Risk Levels
Category: Delivery Channels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Online presence (customer) No Web-facing Serves as an Serves as a delivery Serves as a delivery Internet applications
applications or social informational Web channel for retail channel for serve as a channel to
media presence site or social media online banking; may wholesale wholesale customers to
page (e.g., provides communicate to customers; may manage large value
branch and ATM customers through include retail account assets
locations and social media origination
marketing materials)
Mobile presence None SMS text alerts or Mobile banking Mobile banking Full functionality,
notices only; application for retail application includes including originating new
browser-based customers (e.g., bill external transfers transactions (e.g., ACH,
access payment, mobile (e.g., for corporate wire)
check capture, clients, recurring
internal transfers external transactions)
only)
Automated Teller Machines (ATM) No ATM services ATM services offered ATM services ATM services ATM services managed
(Operation) but no owned managed by a third managed internally; internally; ATM services
machines party; ATMs at local ATMs at U.S. provided to other
and regional branches and retail financial institutions;
branches; cash locations; cash ATMs at domestic and
reload services reload services international branches
outsourced outsourced and retail locations;
cash reload services
managed internally
May 2017 13
Risk Levels
Category: Online/Mobile Products
and Technology Services Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Issue debit or credit cards Do not issue debit or Issue debit and/or Issue debit or credit Issue debit or credit Issue debit or credit
credit cards credit cards through cards through a third cards directly; cards directly; >100,000
a third party; <10,000 party; between between 50,000– cards outstanding; issue
cards outstanding 10,000–50,000 cards 100,000 cards cards on behalf of other
outstanding outstanding financial institutions
Prepaid cards Do not issue prepaid Issue prepaid cards Issue prepaid cards Issue prepaid cards Issue prepaid cards
cards through a third party; through a third party; through a third party; internally, through a
<5,000 cards 5,000–10,000 cards 10,001–20,000 cards third party, or on behalf
outstanding outstanding outstanding of other financial
institutions; >20,000
cards outstanding
Emerging payments technologies Do not accept or use Indirect acceptance Direct acceptance or Direct acceptance or Direct acceptance of
(e.g., digital wallets, mobile wallets) emerging payments or use of emerging use of emerging use of emerging emerging payments
technologies payments payments payments technologies; moderate
technologies technologies; partner technologies; small transaction volume
(customer use may or co-brand with non- transaction volume; and/or foreign payments
affect deposit or bank providers; no foreign payments
credit account) limited transaction
volume
Person-to-person payments (P2P) Not offered Customers allowed Customers allowed to Customers allowed Customers allowed to
to originate originate payments; to originate request payment or to
payments; used by used by 1,000–5,000 payments; used by originate payment; used
<1,000 customers or customers or monthly 5,001–10,000 by >10,000 customers
monthly transaction transaction volume is customers or monthly or monthly transaction
volume is <50,000 between 50,000– transaction volume is volume >1 million
100,000 between 100,001–
1 million
Originating ACH payments No ACH origination Originate ACH Originate ACH debits Sponsor third-party Sponsor nested third-
credits; daily volume and credits; daily payment processor; party payment
<3% of total assets volume is 3%–5% of originate ACH debits processors; originate
total assets and credits with daily debits and credits with
volume 6%–25% of daily volume that is
total assets >25% of total assets
Originating wholesale payments (e.g., Do not originate Daily originated Daily originated Daily originated Daily originated
CHIPS) wholesale payments wholesale payment wholesale payment wholesale payment wholesale payment
volume <3% of total volume 3%–5% of volume 6%–25% of volume >25% of total
assets total assets total assets assets
May 2017 14
Risk Levels
Wire transfers Not offered In person wire In person, phone, Multiple request Multiple request
requests only; and fax wire channels (e.g., channels (e.g., online,
domestic wires only; requests; domestic online, text, e-mail, text, e-mail, fax, and
daily wire volume daily wire volume fax, and phone); daily phone); daily domestic
<3% of total assets 3%–5% of total domestic wire wire volume >25% of
assets; international volume 6%–25% of total assets; daily
daily wire volume total assets; daily international wire
<3% of total assets international wire volume >10% of total
volume 3%–10% of assets
total assets
Merchant remote deposit capture Do not offer Merchant <100 merchant 100–500 merchant 501–1,000 merchant >1,000 merchant clients;
(RDC) RDC clients; daily volume clients; daily volume clients; daily volume daily volume of
of transactions is of transactions is of transactions is transactions is >25% of
<3% of total assets 3%–5% of total 6%–25% of total total assets
assets assets
Global remittances Do not offer global Gross daily Gross daily Gross daily Gross daily transaction
remittances transaction volume is transaction volume is transaction volume is volume is >25% of total
<3% of total assets 3%–5% of total 6%–25% of total assets
assets assets
Treasury services and clients No treasury Limited services Services offered Services offered Multiple services offered
management offered; number of include lockbox, ACH include accounts including currency
services are offered clients is <1,000 origination, and receivable solutions services, online
remote deposit and liquidity investing, and
capture; number of management; investment sweep
clients is between number of clients is accounts; number of
1,000–10,000 between 10,001– clients is >20,000
20,000
Trust services Trust services are not Trust services are Trust services Trust services Trust services provided
offered offered through a provided directly; provided directly; directly; assets under
third-party provider; portfolio of assets assets under management total
assets under under management management total >$10 billion
management total total $500 million– $1 billion–$10 billion
<$500 million $999 million
Act as a correspondent bank Do not act as a Act as a Act as a Act as a Act as a correspondent
(Interbank transfers) correspondent bank correspondent bank correspondent bank correspondent bank bank for >500
for <100 institutions for 100–250 for 251–500 institutions
institutions institutions
May 2017 15
Risk Levels
Merchant acquirer (sponsor Do not act as a Act as a merchant Act as a merchant Act as a merchant Act as a merchant
merchants or card processor activity merchant acquirer acquirer; <1,000 acquirer; outsource acquirer and card acquirer and card
into the payment system) merchants card payment payment processor; payment processor;
processing; 1,000– 10,001–100,000 >100,000 merchants
10,000 merchants merchants
Host IT services for other Do not provide IT Host or provide IT Host or provide IT Host or provide IT Host or provide IT
organizations (either through joint services for other services for affiliated services for up to 25 services for 26–50 services for >50
systems or administrative support) organizations organizations unaffiliated unaffiliated unaffiliated
organizations organizations organizations
Risk Levels
Category: Organizational
Characteristics Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Mergers and acquisitions (including None planned Open to initiating In discussions with A sale or acquisition Multiple ongoing
divestitures and joint ventures) discussions or at least 1 party has been publicly integrations of
actively seeking a announced within the acquisitions are in
merger or acquisition past year, in process
negotiations with 1 or
more parties
Direct employees (including Number of Number of Number of Number of employees Number of employees is
information technology and employees totals <50 employees totals 50– employees totals totals 10,001–50,000 >50,000
cybersecurity contractors) 2,000 2,001–10,000
Changes in IT and information Key positions filled; Staff vacancies exist Some turnover in Frequent turnover in Vacancies in senior or
security staffing low or no turnover of for non-critical roles key or senior key staff or senior key positions for long
personnel positions positions periods; high level of
employee turnover in IT
or information security
Privileged access (Administrators– Limited number of Level of turnover in Level of turnover in High reliance on High employee turnover
network, database, applications, administrators; administrators does administrators external in network
systems, etc.) limited or no external not affect operations affects operations; administrators; administrators; many or
administrators or activities; may number of number of most administrators are
utilize some external administrators for administrators is not external (contractors or
administrators individual systems or sufficient to support vendors); experience in
applications exceeds level or pace of network administration
what is necessary change is limited
May 2017 16
Risk Levels
Category: Organizational
Characteristics Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Changes in IT environment (e.g., Stable IT Infrequent or minimal Frequent adoption of Volume of significant Substantial change in
network, infrastructure, critical environment changes in the IT new technologies changes is high outsourced provider(s)
applications, technologies supporting environment of critical IT services;
new products or services) large and complex
changes to the
environment occur
frequently
Locations of branches/business 1 state 1 region 1 country 1–20 countries >20 countries

presence
Locations of operations/data centers 1 state 1 region 1 country 1–10 countries >10 countries
Risk Levels
Category: External Threats Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Attempted cyber attacks No attempted attacks Few attempts Several attempts Significant number of Substantial number of
or reconnaissance monthly (<100); may monthly (100– 500); attempts monthly attempts monthly
have had generic phishing campaigns (501–100,000); spear (>100,000); persistent
phishing campaigns targeting employees phishing campaigns attempts to attack senior
received by or customers at the targeting high net management and/or
employees and institution or third worth customers and network administrators;
customers parties supporting employees at the frequently targeted for
critical activities; may institution or third DDoS attacks
have experienced an parties supporting
attempted Distributed critical activities;
Denial of Service Institution specifically
(DDoS) attack within is named in threat
the last year reports; may have
experienced multiple
attempted DDoS
attacks within the last
year
May 2017 17
Risk Levels
Total Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most
Number of Statements Selected in

Each Risk Level
Based on Individual Risk Levels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Selected, Assign an Inherent Risk
Profile
May 2017 18
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Cybersecurity Maturity: Domain 1
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight

Assessment Factor: Governance
Y, Y(C), N
OVERSIGHT
Baseline Designated members of management are held accountable by the board or

an appropriate board committee for implementing and managing the
information security and business continuity programs. (FFIEC Information
Security Booklet, page 3)
Information security risks are discussed in management meetings when

prompted by highly visible cyber events or regulatory alerts. (FFIEC
Information Security Booklet, page 6)
Management provides a written report on the overall status of the

information security and business continuity programs to the board or an
appropriate board committee at least annually. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 5)
The budgeting process includes information security related expenses and

tools. (FFIEC E-Banking Booklet, page 20)
Management considers the risks posed by other critical infrastructures

(e.g., telecommunications, energy) to the institution. (FFIEC Business
Continuity Planning Booklet, page J-12)
Evolving At least annually, the board or an appropriate board committee reviews and
approves the institution’s cybersecurity program.
Management is responsible for ensuring compliance with legal and

regulatory requirements related to cybersecurity.
Cybersecurity tools and staff are requested through the budget process.
There is a process to formally discuss and estimate potential expenses

associated with cybersecurity incidents as part of the budgeting process.
Intermediate The board or an appropriate board committee has cybersecurity expertise

or engages experts to assist with oversight responsibilities.
The standard board meeting package includes reports and metrics that go
beyond events and incidents to address threat intelligence trends and the
institution’s security posture.
The institution has a cyber risk appetite statement approved by the board or
an appropriate board committee.
Cyber risks that exceed the risk appetite are escalated to management.
The board or an appropriate board committee ensures management’s
May 2017 19
annual cybersecurity self-assessment evaluates the institution’s ability to

meet its cyber risk management standards.
The board or an appropriate board committee reviews and approves

management’s prioritization and resource allocation decisions based on the
results of the cyber assessments.
The board or an appropriate board committee ensures management takes

appropriate actions to address changing cyber risks or significant
cybersecurity issues.
The budget process for requesting additional cybersecurity staff and tools is
integrated into business units’ budget processes.
Advanced The board or board committee approved cyber risk appetite statement is
part of the enterprise-wide risk appetite statement.
Management has a formal process to continuously improve cybersecurity

oversight.
The budget process for requesting additional cybersecurity staff and tools
maps current resources and tools to the cybersecurity strategy.
Management and the board or an appropriate board committee hold

business units accountable for effectively managing all cyber risks
associated with their activities.
Management identifies root cause(s) when cyber attacks result in material

loss.
The board or an appropriate board committee ensures that management’s

actions consider the cyber risks that the institution poses to the financial
sector.
Innovative The board or an appropriate board committee discusses ways for

management to develop cybersecurity improvements that may be adopted
sector-wide.
The board or an appropriate board committee verifies that management’s

actions consider the cyber risks that the institution poses to other critical
infrastructures (e.g., telecommunications, energy).
May 2017 20
STRATEGY/ POLICIES FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Cybersecurity Maturity: Domain 1
Baseline The institution has an information security strategy that integrates

technology, policies, procedures, and training to mitigate risk. (FFIEC
The institution has policies commensurate with its risk and complexity that
address the concepts of information technology risk management. (FFIEC
Information Security Booklet, page, 16)
address the concepts of threat information sharing. (FFIEC E-Banking
Booklet, page 28)
The institution has board-approved policies commensurate with its risk and
complexity that address information security. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 16)
address the concepts of external dependency or third-party management.
(FFIEC Outsourcing Booklet, page 2)
address the concepts of incident response and resilience. (FFIEC
All elements of the information security program are coordinated enterprise-

wide. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 7)
Evolving The institution augmented its information security strategy to incorporate

cybersecurity and resilience.
The institution has a formal cybersecurity program that is based on

technology and security industry standards or benchmarks.
A formal process is in place to update policies as the institution’s inherent

risk profile changes.
Intermediate The institution has a comprehensive set of policies commensurate with its
risk and complexity that address the concepts of threat intelligence.
Management periodically reviews the cybersecurity strategy to address

evolving cyber threats and changes to the institution’s inherent risk profile.
The cybersecurity strategy is incorporated into, or conceptually fits within,

the institution’s enterprise-wide risk management strategy.
Management links strategic cybersecurity objectives to tactical goals.
A formal process is in place to cross-reference and simultaneously update

all policies related to cyber risks across business lines.
May 2017 21
Advanced The cybersecurity strategy outlines the institution’s future state of

cybersecurity with short-term and long-term perspectives.
Industry-recognized cybersecurity standards are used as sources during

the analysis of cybersecurity program gaps.
The cybersecurity strategy identifies and communicates the institution’s role

as a component of critical infrastructure in the financial services industry.
The risk appetite is informed by the institution’s role in critical infrastructure.
Management is continuously improving the existing cybersecurity program

to adapt as the desired cybersecurity target state changes.
Innovative The cybersecurity strategy identifies and communicates the institution’s role
as it relates to other critical infrastructures.
IT ASSET MANAGEMENT
Baseline An inventory of organizational assets (e.g., hardware, software, data, and

systems hosted externally) is maintained. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 9)
Organizational assets (e.g., hardware, systems, data, and applications) are

prioritized for protection based on the data classification and business
value. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 12)
Management assigns accountability for maintaining an inventory of

organizational assets. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 9)
A change management process is in place to request and approve changes

to systems configurations, hardware, software, applications, and security
tools. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 56)
Evolving The asset inventory, including identification of critical assets, is updated at

least annually to address new, relocated, re-purposed, and sunset assets.
The institution has a documented asset life-cycle process that considers

whether assets to be acquired have appropriate security safeguards.
The institution proactively manages system EOL (e.g., replacement) to limit

security risks.
Changes are formally approved by an individual or committee with

appropriate authority and with separation of duties.
Intermediate Baseline configurations cannot be altered without a formal change request,

documented approval, and an assessment of security implications.
A formal IT change management process requires cybersecurity risk to be

evaluated during the analysis, approval, testing, and reporting of changes.
May 2017 22
Advanced Supply chain risk is reviewed before the acquisition of mission-critical

information systems including system components.
Automated tools enable tracking, updating, asset prioritizing, and custom

reporting of the asset inventory.
Automated processes are in place to detect and block unauthorized

changes to software and hardware.
The change management system uses thresholds to determine when a risk

assessment of the impact of the change is required.
Innovative A formal change management function governs decentralized or highly

distributed change requests and identifies and measures security risks that
may cause increased exposure to cyber attack.
Comprehensive automated enterprise tools are implemented to detect and

block unauthorized changes to software and hardware.
Assessment Factor: Risk Management

RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Baseline An information security and business continuity risk management

function(s) exists within the institution. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 68)
Evolving The risk management program incorporates cyber risk identification,
measurement, mitigation, monitoring, and reporting.
Management reviews and uses the results of audits to improve existing
cybersecurity policies, procedures, and controls.
Management monitors moderate and high residual risk issues from the
cybersecurity risk assessment until items are addressed.
Intermediate The cybersecurity function has a clear reporting line that does not present a
conflict of interest.
The risk management program specifically addresses cyber risks beyond

the boundaries of the technological impacts (e.g., financial, strategic,
regulatory, compliance).
Benchmarks or target performance metrics have been established for

showing improvements or regressions of the security posture over time.
Management uses the results of independent audits and reviews to improve

cybersecurity.
There is a process to analyze and assign potential losses and related

expenses, by cost center, associated with cybersecurity incidents.
May 2017 23
Advanced Cybersecurity metrics are used to facilitate strategic decision-making and

funding in areas of need.
Independent risk management sets and monitors cyber-related risk limits

for business units.
Independent risk management staff escalates to management and the

board or an appropriate board committee significant discrepancies from
business unit’s assessments of cyber-related risk.
A process is in place to analyze the financial impact cyber incidents have

on the institution’s capital.
The cyber risk data aggregation and real-time reporting capabilities support
the institution’s ongoing reporting needs, particularly during cyber incidents.
Innovative The risk management function identifies and analyzes commonalities in

cyber events that occur both at the institution and across other sectors to
enable more predictive risk management.
A process is in place to analyze the financial impact that a cyber incident at

the institution may have across the financial sector.
RISK ASSESSMENT
Baseline A risk assessment focused on safeguarding customer information

identifies reasonable and foreseeable internal and external threats, the
likelihood and potential damage of threats, and the sufficiency of policies,
procedures, and customer information systems. (FFIEC Information
The risk assessment identifies internet-based systems and high-risk

transactions that warrant additional authentication controls. (FFIEC
The risk assessment is updated to address new technologies, products,

services, and connections before deployment. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 13)
Evolving Risk assessments are used to identify the cybersecurity risks stemming
from new products, services, or relationships.
The focus of the risk assessment has expanded beyond customer

information to address all information assets.
The risk assessment considers the risk of using EOL software and
hardware components.
Intermediate The risk assessment is adjusted to consider widely known risks or risk
management practices.
May 2017 24
Advanced An enterprise-wide risk management function incorporates cyber threat

analysis and specific risk exposure as part of the enterprise risk
assessment.
Innovative The risk assessment is updated in real time as changes to the risk profile
occur, new applicable standards are released or updated, and new
exposures are anticipated.
The institution uses information from risk assessments to predict threats

and drive real-time responses.
Advanced or automated analytics offer predictive information and real-time

risk metrics.
AUDIT
Baseline Independent audit or review evaluates policies, procedures, and controls

across the institution for significant risks and control issues associated with
the institution's operations, including risks in new products, emerging
technologies, and information systems. (FFIEC Audit Booklet, page 4)
The independent audit function validates controls related to the storage or

transmission of confidential data. (FFIEC Audit Booklet, page 1)
Logging practices are independently reviewed periodically to ensure

appropriate log management (e.g., access controls, retention, and
maintenance). (FFIEC Operations Booklet, page 29)
Issues and corrective actions from internal audits and independent

testing/assessments are formally tracked to ensure procedures and control
lapses are resolved in a timely manner. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 6)
Evolving The independent audit function validates that the risk management
function is commensurate with the institution’s risk and complexity.
The independent audit function validates that the institution’s threat

information sharing is commensurate with the institution’s risk and
complexity.
The independent audit function validates that the institution’s cybersecurity

controls function is commensurate with the institution’s risk and
complexity.
The independent audit function validates that the institution’s third-party

relationship management is commensurate with the institution’s risk and
complexity.
The independent audit function validates that the institution’s incident

response program and resilience are commensurate with the institution’s
risk and complexity.
May 2017 25
Intermediate A formal process is in place for the independent audit function to update its
procedures based on changes to the institution’s inherent risk profile.
The independent audit function validates that the institution’s threat

intelligence and collaboration are commensurate with the institution’s risk
and complexity.
The independent audit function regularly reviews management’s cyber risk

appetite statement.
Independent audits or reviews are used to identify gaps in existing security

capabilities and expertise.
Advanced A formal process is in place for the independent audit function to update its
procedures based on changes to the evolving threat landscape across the
sector.
The independent audit function regularly reviews the institution’s cyber risk
appetite statement in comparison to assessment results and incorporates
gaps into the audit strategy.
Independent audits or reviews are used to identify cybersecurity

weaknesses, root causes, and the potential impact to business units.
Innovative A formal process is in place for the independent audit function to update its
procedures based on changes to the evolving threat landscape across
other sectors the institution depends upon.
The independent audit function uses sophisticated data mining tools to

perform continuous monitoring of cybersecurity processes or controls.
Assessment Factor: Resources

STAFFING
Baseline Information security roles and responsibilities have been identified. (FFIEC
Processes are in place to identify additional expertise needed to improve

information security defenses. (FFIEC Information Security Work Program,
Objective I: 2-8)
May 2017 26
Evolving A formal process is used to identify cybersecurity tools and expertise that
may be needed.
Management with appropriate knowledge and experience leads the

institution's cybersecurity efforts.
Staff with cybersecurity responsibilities have the requisite qualifications to

perform the necessary tasks of the position.
Employment candidates, contractors, and third parties are subject to

background verification proportional to the confidentiality of the data
accessed, business requirements, and acceptable risk.
Intermediate The institution has a program for talent recruitment, retention, and
succession planning for the cybersecurity and resilience staffs.
Advanced The institution benchmarks its cybersecurity staffing against peers to

identify whether its recruitment, retention, and succession planning are
commensurate.
Dedicated cybersecurity staff develops, or contributes to developing,

integrated enterprise-level security and cyber defense strategies.
Innovative The institution actively partners with industry associations and academia to
inform curricula based on future cybersecurity staffing needs of the
industry.
Assessment Factor: Training and Culture

TRAINING
Baseline Annual information security training is provided. (FFIEC Information

Annual information security training includes incident response, current

cyber threats (e.g., phishing, spear phishing, social engineering, and
mobile security), and emerging issues. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 66)
Situational awareness materials are made available to employees when

prompted by highly visible cyber events or by regulatory alerts. (FFIEC
Customer awareness materials are readily available (e.g., DHS’

Cybersecurity Awareness Month materials). (FFIEC E-Banking Work
Program, Objective 6-3)
May 2017 27
Evolving The institution has a program for continuing cybersecurity training and skill
development for cybersecurity staff.
Management is provided cybersecurity training relevant to their job

responsibilities.
Employees with privileged account permissions receive additional

cybersecurity training commensurate with their levels of responsibility.
Business units are provided cybersecurity training relevant to their

particular business risks.
The institution validates the effectiveness of training (e.g., social

engineering or phishing tests).
Intermediate Management incorporates lessons learned from social engineering and

phishing exercises to improve the employee awareness programs.
Cybersecurity awareness information is provided to retail customers and

commercial clients at least annually.
Business units are provided cybersecurity training relevant to their

particular business risks, over and above what is required of the institution
as a whole.
The institution routinely updates its training to security staff to adapt to new
threats.
Advanced Independent directors are provided with cybersecurity training that

addresses how complex products, services, and lines of business affect
the institution's cyber risk.
Innovative Key performance indicators are used to determine whether training and
awareness programs positively influence behavior.
CULTURE
Baseline Management holds employees accountable for complying with the

information security program. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page
7)
Evolving The institution has formal standards of conduct that hold all employees
accountable for complying with cybersecurity policies and procedures.
Cyber risks are actively discussed at business unit meetings.
Employees have a clear understanding of how to identify and escalate

potential cybersecurity issues.
May 2017 28
Intermediate Management ensures performance plans are tied to compliance with

cybersecurity policies and standards in order to hold employees
accountable.
The risk culture requires formal consideration of cyber risks in all business
decisions.
Cyber risk reporting is presented and discussed at the independent risk

management meetings.
Advanced Management ensures continuous improvement of cyber risk cultural

awareness.
Innovative The institution leads efforts to promote cybersecurity culture across the
sector and to other sectors that they depend upon.
May 2017 29
Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration

Assessment Factor: Threat Intelligence
Y, Y(C), N
THREAT INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION
Baseline The institution belongs or subscribes to a threat and vulnerability information

sharing source(s) that provides information on threats (e.g., Financial
Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center [FS-ISAC], U.S. Computer
Emergency Readiness Team [US-CERT]). (FFIEC E-Banking Work Program,
page 28)
Threat information is used to monitor threats and vulnerabilities. (FFIEC

Threat information is used to enhance internal risk management and controls.

(FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 4)
Evolving Threat information received by the institution includes analysis of tactics,

patterns, and risk mitigation recommendations.
Intermediate A formal threat intelligence program is implemented and includes

subscription to threat feeds from external providers and internal sources.
Protocols are implemented for collecting information from industry peers and
government.
A read-only, central repository of cyber threat intelligence is maintained.
Advanced A cyber intelligence model is used for gathering threat information.
Threat intelligence is automatically received from multiple sources in real

time.
The institution’s threat intelligence includes information related to geopolitical

events that could increase cybersecurity threat levels.
Innovative A threat analysis system automatically correlates threat data to specific risks
and then takes risk-based automated actions while alerting management.
The institution is investing in the development of new threat intelligence and

collaboration mechanisms (e.g., technologies, business processes) that will
transform how information is gathered and shared.
May 2017 30
MONITORING AND ANALYZING Assessment Factor: Monitoring and Analyzing

Baseline Audit log records and other security event logs are reviewed and retained in
a secure manner. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 79)
Computer event logs are used for investigations once an event has
occurred. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 83)
Evolving A process is implemented to monitor threat information to discover

emerging threats.
The threat information and analysis process is assigned to a specific group

or individual.
Security processes and technology are centralized and coordinated in a

Security Operations Center (SOC) or equivalent.
Monitoring systems operate continuously with adequate support for efficient

incident handling.
Intermediate A threat intelligence team is in place that evaluates threat intelligence from
multiple sources for credibility, relevance, and exposure.
A profile is created for each threat that identifies the likely intent, capability,
and target of the threat.
Threat information sources that address all components of the threat profile
are prioritized and monitored.
Threat intelligence is analyzed to develop cyber threat summaries including

risks to the institution and specific actions for the institution to consider.
Advanced A dedicated cyber threat identification and analysis committee or team

exists to centralize and coordinate initiatives and communications.
Formal processes have been defined to resolve potential conflicts in
information received from sharing and analysis centers or other sources.
Emerging internal and external threat intelligence and correlated log

analysis are used to predict future attacks.
Threat intelligence is viewed within the context of the institution's risk profile
and risk appetite to prioritize mitigating actions in anticipation of threats.
Threat intelligence is used to update architecture and configuration

standards.
May 2017 31
Innovative The institution uses multiple sources of intelligence, correlated log analysis,
alerts, internal traffic flows, and geopolitical events to predict potential future
attacks and attack trends.
Highest risk scenarios are used to predict threats against specific business
targets.
IT systems automatically detect configuration weaknesses based on threat

intelligence and alert management so actions can be prioritized.
Assessment Factor: Information Sharing

INFORMATION SHARING
Baseline Information security threats are gathered and shared with applicable internal
employees. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 83)
Contact information for law enforcement and the regulator(s) is maintained

and updated regularly. (FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Work Program,
Objective I: 5-1)
Information about threats is shared with law enforcement and regulators

when required or prompted. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 84)
Evolving A formal and secure process is in place to share threat and vulnerability
information with other entities.
A representative from the institution participates in law enforcement or

information-sharing organization meetings.
Intermediate A formal protocol is in place for sharing threat, vulnerability, and incident
information to employees based on their specific job function.
Information-sharing agreements are used as needed or required to facilitate

sharing threat information with other financial sector organizations or third
parties.
Information is shared proactively with the industry, law enforcement,

regulators, and information-sharing forums.
A process is in place to communicate and collaborate with the public sector

regarding cyber threats.
Advanced Management communicates threat intelligence with business risk context

and specific risk management recommendations to the business units.
Relationships exist with employees of peer institutions for sharing cyber

threat intelligence.
A network of trust relationships (formal and/or informal) has been

established to evaluate information about cyber threats.
May 2017 32
Innovative A mechanism is in place for sharing cyber threat intelligence with business
units in real time including the potential financial and operational impact of
inaction.
A system automatically informs management of the level of business risk

specific to the institution and the progress of recommended steps taken to
mitigate the risks.
The institution is leading efforts to create new sector-wide information-

sharing channels to address gaps in external-facing information-sharing
mechanisms.
May 2017 33
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls

Assessment Factor: Preventative Controls
Y, Y(C), N
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
Baseline Network perimeter defense tools (e.g., border router and firewall) are
used. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 33)
Systems that are accessed from the Internet or by external parties are
protected by firewalls or other similar devices. (FFIEC Information
All ports are monitored. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 50)
Up to date antivirus and anti-malware tools are used. (FFIEC Information

Systems configurations (for servers, desktops, routers, etc.) follow

industry standards and are enforced. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 56)
Ports, functions, protocols and services are prohibited if no longer needed

for business purposes. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 50)
Access to make changes to systems configurations (including virtual

machines and hypervisors) is controlled and monitored. (FFIEC
Programs that can override system, object, network, virtual machine, and
application controls are restricted. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 41)
System sessions are locked after a pre-defined period of inactivity and

are terminated after pre-defined conditions are met. (FFIEC Information
Wireless network environments require security settings with strong

encryption for authentication and transmission. (*N/A if there are no
wireless networks.) (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 40)
Evolving There is a firewall at each Internet connection and between any

Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and internal network(s).
Antivirus and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) detect and

block actual and attempted attacks or intrusions.
Technical controls prevent unauthorized devices, including rogue wireless

access devices and removable media, from connecting to the internal
network(s).
A risk-based solution is in place at the institution or Internet hosting
May 2017 34
provider to mitigate disruptive cyber attacks (e.g., DDoS attacks).
Guest wireless networks are fully segregated from the internal network(s).
(*N/A if there are no wireless networks.)
Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) is deployed

across the enterprise.
Critical systems supported by legacy technologies are regularly reviewed

to identify for potential vulnerabilities, upgrade opportunities, or new
defense layers.
Controls for unsupported systems are implemented and tested.
Intermediate The enterprise network is segmented in multiple, separate trust/security

zones with defense-in-depth strategies (e.g., logical network
segmentation, hard backups, air-gapping) to mitigate attacks.
Security controls are used for remote access to all administrative

consoles, including restricted virtual systems.
Wireless network environments have perimeter firewalls that are

implemented and configured to restrict unauthorized traffic. (*N/A if there
are no wireless networks.)
Wireless networks use strong encryption with encryption keys that are
changed frequently. (*N/A if there are no wireless networks.)
The broadcast range of the wireless network(s) is confined to institution-

controlled boundaries. (*N/A if there are no wireless networks.)
Technical measures are in place to prevent the execution of unauthorized

code on institution owned or managed devices, network infrastructure,
and systems components.
Advanced Network environments and virtual instances are designed and configured
to restrict and monitor traffic between trusted and untrusted zones.
Only one primary function is permitted per server to prevent functions that
require different security levels from co-existing on the same server.
Anti-spoofing measures are in place to detect and block forged source IP

addresses from entering the network.
Innovative The institution risk scores all of its infrastructure assets and updates in
real time based on threats, vulnerabilities, or operational changes.
Automated controls are put in place based on risk scores to infrastructure

assets, including automatically disconnecting affected assets.
The institution proactively seeks to identify control gaps that may be used
as part of a zero-day attack.
May 2017 35
Public-facing servers are routinely rotated and restored to a known clean

ACCESS AND DATA MANAGEMENT state to limit the window of time a system is exposed to potential threats.
Baseline Employee access is granted to systems and confidential data based on

job responsibilities and the principles of least privilege. (FFIEC
Employee access to systems and confidential data provides for

separation of duties. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 19)
Elevated privileges (e.g., administrator privileges) are limited and tightly

controlled (e.g., assigned to individuals, not shared, and require stronger
password controls). (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 19)
User access reviews are performed periodically for all systems and
applications based on the risk to the application or system. (FFIEC
Changes to physical and logical user access, including those that result
from voluntary and involuntary terminations, are submitted to and
approved by appropriate personnel. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 18)
Identification and authentication are required and managed for access to

systems, applications, and hardware. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 21)
Access controls include password complexity and limits to password

attempts and reuse. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 66)
All default passwords and unnecessary default accounts are changed

before system implementation. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 61)
Customer access to Internet-based products or services requires

authentication controls (e.g., layered controls, multifactor) that are
commensurate with the risk. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page
21)
Production and non-production environments are segregated to prevent

unauthorized access or changes to information assets. (*N/A if no
production environment exists at the institution or the institution’s third
party.) (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 64)
Physical security controls are used to prevent unauthorized access to

information systems and telecommunication systems. (FFIEC Information
All passwords are encrypted in storage and in transit. (FFIEC Information

May 2017 36
Confidential data are encrypted when transmitted across public or

untrusted networks (e.g., Internet). (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 51)
Mobile devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, and removable media) are

encrypted if used to store confidential data. (*N/A if mobile devices are
not used.) (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 51)
Remote access to critical systems by employees, contractors, and third

parties uses encrypted connections and multifactor authentication.
Administrative, physical, or technical controls are in place to prevent

users without administrative responsibilities from installing unauthorized
software. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 25)
Customer service (e.g., the call center) utilizes formal procedures to

authenticate customers commensurate with the risk of the transaction or
request. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 19)
Data is disposed of or destroyed according to documented requirements

and within expected time frames. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 66)
Evolving Changes to user access permissions trigger automated notices to

appropriate personnel.
Administrators have two accounts: one for administrative use and one for
general purpose, non-administrative tasks.
Use of customer data in non-production environments complies with

legal, regulatory, and internal policy requirements for concealing or
removing of sensitive data elements.
Physical access to high-risk or confidential systems is restricted, logged,

and unauthorized access is blocked.
Controls are in place to prevent unauthorized access to cryptographic

keys.
May 2017 37
Intermediate The institution has implemented tools to prevent unauthorized access to

or exfiltration of confidential data.
Controls are in place to prevent unauthorized escalation of user

privileges.
Access controls are in place for database administrators to prevent

unauthorized downloading or transmission of confidential data.
All physical and logical access is removed immediately upon notification

of involuntary termination and within 24 hours of an employee’s voluntary
departure.
Multifactor authentication and/or layered controls have been implemented

to secure all third-party access to the institution's network and/or systems
and applications.
Multifactor authentication (e.g., tokens, digital certificates) techniques are

used for employee access to high-risk systems as identified in the risk
assessment(s). (*N/A if no high risk systems.)
Confidential data are encrypted in transit across private connections (e.g.,

frame relay and T1) and within the institution’s trusted zones.
Controls are in place to prevent unauthorized access to collaborative

computing devices and applications (e.g., networked white boards,
cameras, microphones, online applications such as instant messaging
and document sharing). (* N/A if collaborative computing devices are not
used.)
Advanced Encryption of select data at rest is determined by the institution’s data

classification and risk assessment.
Customer authentication for high-risk transactions includes methods to

prevent malware and man-in-the-middle attacks (e.g., using visual
transaction signing).
May 2017 38
Innovative Adaptive access controls de-provision or isolate an employee, third-party,

or customer credentials to minimize potential damage if malicious
behavior is suspected.
Unstructured confidential data are tracked and secured through an

identity-aware, cross-platform storage system that protects against
internal threats, monitors user access, and tracks changes.
Tokenization is used to substitute unique values for confidential

information (e.g., virtual credit card).
The institution is leading efforts to create new technologies and

processes for managing customer, employee, and third-party
authentication and access.
Real-time risk mitigation is taken based on automated risk scoring of user

credentials.
DEVICE/END-POINT SECURITY
Baseline Controls are in place to restrict the use of removable media to authorized
personnel. (FFIEC Information Security Work Program, Objective I: 4-1)
Evolving Tools automatically block attempted access from unpatched employee

and third-party devices.
Tools automatically block attempted access by unregistered devices to

internal networks.
The institution has controls to prevent the unauthorized addition of new

connections.
Controls are in place to prevent unauthorized individuals from copying

confidential data to removable media.
Antivirus and anti-malware tools are deployed on end-point devices (e.g.,

workstations, laptops, and mobile devices).
Mobile devices with access to the institution’s data are centrally managed
for antivirus and patch deployment. (*N/A if mobile devices are not used.)
The institution wipes data remotely on mobile devices when a device is

missing or stolen. (*N/A if mobile devices are not used.)
Intermediate Data loss prevention controls or devices are implemented for inbound
and outbound communications (e.g., e-mail, FTP, Telnet, prevention of
large file transfers).
Mobile device management includes integrity scanning (e.g.,

jailbreak/rooted detection). (*N/A if mobile devices are not used.)
Mobile devices connecting to the corporate network for storing and

accessing company information allow for remote software version/patch
validation. (*N/A if mobile devices are not used.)
May 2017 39
Advanced Employees’ and third parties’ devices (including mobile) without the latest
security patches are quarantined and patched before the device is
granted access to the network.
Confidential data and applications on mobile devices are only accessible

via a secure, isolated sandbox or a secure container.
Innovative A centralized end-point management tool provides fully integrated patch,

configuration, and vulnerability management, while also being able to
detect malware upon arrival to prevent an exploit.
SECURE CODING
Baseline Developers working for the institution follow secure program coding
practices, as part of a system development life cycle (SDLC), that meet
industry standards. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 56)
The security controls of internally developed software are periodically

reviewed and tested. (*N/A if there is no software development.) (FFIEC
The security controls in internally developed software code are

independently reviewed before migrating the code to production. (*N/A if
there is no software development.) (FFIEC Development and Acquisition
Booklet, page 2)
Intellectual property and production code are held in escrow. (*N/A if

there is no production code to hold in escrow.) (FFIEC Development and
Acquisition Booklet, page 39)
Evolving Security testing occurs at all post-design phases of the SDLC for all
applications, including mobile applications. (*N/A if there is no software
development.)
Intermediate Processes are in place to mitigate vulnerabilities identified as part of the

secure development of systems and applications.
The security of applications, including Web-based applications connected

to the Internet, is tested against known types of cyber attacks (e.g., SQL
injection, cross-site scripting, buffer overflow) before implementation or
following significant changes.
Software code executables and scripts are digitally signed to confirm the
software author and guarantee that the code has not been altered or
corrupted.
A risk-based, independent information assurance function evaluates the

security of internal applications.
Advanced Vulnerabilities identified through a static code analysis are remediated

before implementing newly developed or changed applications into
production.
All interdependencies between applications and services have been
May 2017 40
identified.
Independent code reviews are completed on internally developed or

vendor-provided custom applications to ensure there are no security
gaps.
Innovative Software code is actively scanned by automated tools in the development

environment so that security weaknesses can be resolved immediately
during the design phase.
Assessment Factor: Detective Controls

THREAT AND VULNERABILITY DETECTION
Baseline Independent testing (including penetration testing and vulnerability

scanning) is conducted according to the risk assessment for external-
facing systems and the internal network. (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 61)
Antivirus and anti-malware tools are used to detect attacks. (FFIEC

Firewall rules are audited or verified at least quarterly. (FFIEC Information

E-mail protection mechanisms are used to filter for common cyber threats
(e.g., attached malware or malicious links). (FFIEC Information Security
Booklet, page 39)
Evolving Independent penetration testing of network boundary and critical Web-

facing applications is performed routinely to identify security control gaps.
Independent penetration testing is performed on Internet-facing

applications or systems before they are launched or undergo significant
change.
Antivirus and anti-malware tools are updated automatically.
Firewall rules are updated routinely.
Vulnerability scanning is conducted and analyzed before

deployment/redeployment of new/existing devices.
Processes are in place to monitor potential insider activity that could lead
to data theft or destruction.
Intermediate Audit or risk management resources review the penetration testing scope
and results to help determine the need for rotating companies based on
the quality of the work.
E-mails and attachments are automatically scanned to detect malware

and are blocked when malware is present.
May 2017 41
Advanced Weekly vulnerability scanning is rotated among environments to scan all

environments throughout the year.
Penetration tests include cyber attack simulations and/or real-world

tactics and techniques such as red team testing to detect control gaps in
employee behavior, security defenses, policies, and resources.
Automated tool(s) proactively identifies high-risk behavior signaling an

employee who may pose an insider threat.
Innovative User tasks and content (e.g., opening an e-mail attachment) are
automatically isolated in a secure container or virtual environment so that
malware can be analyzed but cannot access vital data, end-point
operating systems, or applications on the institution’s network.
Vulnerability scanning is performed on a weekly basis across all

environments.
ANOMALOUS ACTIVITY DETECTION
Baseline The institution is able to detect anomalous activities through monitoring

across the environment. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 32)
Customer transactions generating anomalous activity alerts are

monitored and reviewed. (FFIEC Wholesale Payments Booklet, page 12)
Logs of physical and/or logical access are reviewed following events.

Access to critical systems by third parties is monitored for unauthorized or

unusual activity. (FFIEC Outsourcing Booklet, page 26)
Elevated privileges are monitored. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,

page 19)
Evolving Systems are in place to detect anomalous behavior automatically during

customer, employee, and third-party authentication.
Security logs are reviewed regularly.
Logs provide traceability for all system access by individual users.
Thresholds have been established to determine activity within logs that

would warrant management response.
May 2017 42
Intermediate Online customer transactions are actively monitored for anomalous

behavior.
Tools to detect unauthorized data mining are used.
Tools actively monitor security logs for anomalous behavior and alert
within established parameters.
Audit logs are backed up to a centralized log server or media that is

difficult to alter.
Thresholds for security logging are evaluated periodically.
Anomalous activity and other network and system alerts are correlated
across business units to detect and prevent multifaceted attacks (e.g.,
simultaneous account takeover and DDoS attack).
Advanced An automated tool triggers system and/or fraud alerts when customer
logins occur within a short period of time but from physically distant IP
locations.
External transfers from customer accounts generate alerts and require

review and authorization if anomalous behavior is detected.
A system is in place to monitor and analyze employee behavior (network

use patterns, work hours, and known devices) to alert on anomalous
activities.
An automated tool(s) is in place to detect and prevent data mining by

insider threats.
Tags on fictitious confidential data or files are used to provide advanced

alerts of potential malicious activity when the data is accessed.
Innovative The institution has a mechanism for real-time automated risk scoring of
threats.
The institution is developing new technologies that will detect potential

insider threats and block activity in real time.
May 2017 43
EVENT DETECTION Baseline A normal network activity baseline is established. (FFIEC Information
Mechanisms (e.g., antivirus alerts, log event alerts) are in place to alert
management to potential attacks. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 78)
Processes are in place to monitor for the presence of unauthorized users,

devices, connections, and software. (FFIEC Information Security Work
Program, Objective II: M-9)
Responsibilities for monitoring and reporting suspicious systems activity

have been assigned. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 83)
The physical environment is monitored to detect potential unauthorized

access. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 47)
Evolving A process is in place to correlate event information from multiple sources

(e.g., network, application, or firewall).
Intermediate Controls or tools (e.g., data loss prevention) are in place to detect
potential unauthorized or unintentional transmissions of confidential data.
Event detection processes are proven reliable.
Specialized security monitoring is used for critical assets throughout the

infrastructure.
Advanced Automated tools detect unauthorized changes to critical system files,

firewalls, IPS, IDS, or other security devices.
Real-time network monitoring and detection is implemented and

incorporates sector-wide event information.
Real-time alerts are automatically sent when unauthorized software,

hardware, or changes occur.
Tools are in place to actively correlate event information from multiple

sources and send alerts based on established parameters.
Innovative The institution is leading efforts to develop event detection systems that
will correlate in real time when events are about to occur.
The institution is leading the development effort to design new

technologies that will detect potential insider threats and block activity in
real time.
May 2017 44
PATCH MANAGEMENT Assessment Factor: Corrective Controls

Baseline A patch management program is implemented and ensures that software
and firmware patches are applied in a timely manner. (FFIEC Information
Patches are tested before being applied to systems and/or software.

(FFIEC Operations Booklet, page 22)
Patch management reports are reviewed and reflect missing security

patches. (FFIEC Development and Acquisition Booklet, page 50)
Evolving A formal process is in place to acquire, test, and deploy software patches
based on criticality.
Systems are configured to retrieve patches automatically.
Operational impact is evaluated before deploying security patches.
An automated tool(s) is used to identify missing security patches as well

as the number of days since each patch became available.
Missing patches across all environments are prioritized and tracked.
Intermediate Patches for high-risk vulnerabilities are tested and applied when released
or the risk is accepted and accountability assigned.
Advanced Patch monitoring software is installed on all servers to identify any

missing patches for the operating system software, middleware,
database, and other key software.
The institution monitors patch management reports to ensure security

patches are tested and implemented within aggressive time frames (e.g.,
0-30 days).
Innovative The institution develops security patches or bug fixes or contributes to

open source code development for systems it uses.
Segregated or separate systems are in place that mirror production

systems allowing for rapid testing and implementation of patches and
provide for rapid fallback when needed.
May 2017 45
REMEDIATION Baseline Issues identified in assessments are prioritized and resolved based on
criticality and within the time frames established in the response to the
assessment report. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 87)
Evolving Data is destroyed or wiped on hardware and portable/mobile media when

a device is missing, stolen, or no longer needed.
Formal processes are in place to resolve weaknesses identified during

penetration testing.
Intermediate Remediation efforts are confirmed by conducting a follow-up vulnerability

scan.
Penetration testing is repeated to confirm that medium- and high-risk,

exploitable vulnerabilities have been resolved.
Security investigations, forensic analysis, and remediation are performed

by qualified staff or third parties.
Generally accepted and appropriate forensic procedures, including chain

of custody, are used to gather and present evidence to support potential
legal action.
The maintenance and repair of organizational assets are performed by

authorized individuals with approved and controlled tools.
The maintenance and repair of organizational assets are logged in a

timely manner.
Advanced All medium and high risk issues identified in penetration testing,
vulnerability scanning, and other independent testing are escalated to the
board or an appropriate board committee for risk acceptance if not
resolved in a timely manner.
Innovative The institution is developing technologies that will remediate systems

damaged by zero-day attacks to maintain current recovery time
objectives.
May 2017 46
Domain 4: External Dependency Management

Assessment Factor: Connections
Y, Y(C), N
CONNECTIONS
Baseline The critical business processes that are dependent on external

connectivity have been identified. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 9)
The institution ensures that third-party connections are authorized.

A network diagram is in place and identifies all external connections.

Data flow diagrams are in place and document information flow to

external parties. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 10)
Evolving Critical business processes have been mapped to the supporting external
connections.
The network diagram is updated when connections with third parties

change or at least annually.
Network and systems diagrams are stored in a secure manner with

proper restrictions on access.
Controls for primary and backup third-party connections are monitored

and tested on a regular basis.
Intermediate A validated asset inventory is used to create comprehensive diagrams

depicting data repositories, data flow, infrastructure, and connectivity.
Security controls are designed and verified to detect and prevent

intrusions from third-party connections.
Monitoring controls cover all external connections (e.g., third-party

service providers, business partners, customers).
Monitoring controls cover all internal network-to-network connections.
Advanced The security architecture is validated and documented before network

connection infrastructure changes.
The institution works closely with third-party service providers to maintain

and improve the security of external connections.
May 2017 47
Innovative Diagram(s) of external connections is interactive, shows real-time

changes to the network connection infrastructure, new connections,
and volume fluctuations, and alerts when risks arise.
The institution's connections can be segmented or severed

instantaneously to prevent contagion from cyber attacks.
Assessment Factor: Relationship Management

DUE DILIGENCE
Baseline Risk-based due diligence is performed on prospective third parties

before contracts are signed, including reviews of their background,
reputation, financial condition, stability, and security controls. (FFIEC
A list of third-party service providers is maintained. (FFIEC Outsourcing

Booklet, page 19)
A risk assessment is conducted to identify criticality of service

providers. (FFIEC Outsourcing Booklet, page 6)
Evolving A formal process exists to analyze assessments of third-party

cybersecurity controls.
The board or an appropriate board committee reviews a summary of

due diligence results including management’s recommendations to use
third parties that will affect the institution’s inherent risk profile.
Intermediate A process is in place to confirm that the institution’s third-party service

providers conduct due diligence of their third parties (e.g.,
subcontractors).
Pre-contract, physical site visits of high-risk vendors are conducted by

the institution or by a qualified third party.
Advanced A continuous process improvement program is in place for third-party

due diligence activity.
Audits of high-risk vendors are conducted on an annual basis.
Innovative The institution promotes sector-wide efforts to build due diligence

mechanisms that lead to in-depth and efficient security and resilience
reviews.
The institution is leading efforts to develop new auditable processes

and for conducting due diligence and ongoing monitoring of
cybersecurity risks posed by third parties.
May 2017 48
CONTRACTS Baseline Formal contracts that address relevant security and privacy
requirements are in place for all third parties that process, store, or
transmit confidential data or provide critical services. (FFIEC
Contracts acknowledge that the third party is responsible for the

security of the institution’s confidential data that it possesses, stores,
processes, or transmits. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 12)
Contracts stipulate that the third-party security controls are regularly

reviewed and validated by an independent party. (FFIEC Information
Contracts identify the recourse available to the institution should the

third party fail to meet defined security requirements. (FFIEC
Outsourcing Booklet, page 12)
Contracts establish responsibilities for responding to security incidents.

(FFIEC E-Banking Booklet, page 22)
Contracts specify the security requirements for the return or destruction

of data upon contract termination. (FFIEC Outsourcing Booklet,
page 15)
Evolving Responsibilities for managing devices (e.g., firewalls, routers) that

secure connections with third parties are formally documented in the
contract.
Responsibility for notification of direct and indirect security incidents
and vulnerabilities is documented in contracts or service-level
agreements (SLAs).
Contracts stipulate geographic limits on where data can be stored or

transmitted.
Intermediate Third-party SLAs or similar means are in place that require timely
notification of security events.
Advanced Contracts require third-party service provider’s security policies meet or

exceed those of the institution.
A third-party termination/exit strategy has been established and

validated with management.
Innovative The institution promotes a sector-wide effort to influence contractual

requirements for critical third parties to the industry.
May 2017 49
ONGOING MONITORING Baseline The third-party risk assessment is updated regularly. (FFIEC
Outsourcing Booklet, page 3)
Audits, assessments, and operational performance reports are

obtained and reviewed regularly validating security controls for critical
third parties. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 86)
Ongoing monitoring practices include reviewing critical third-parties’

resilience plans. (FFIEC Outsourcing Booklet, page 19)
Evolving A process to identify new third-party relationships is in place, including

identifying new relationships that were established without formal
approval.
A formal program assigns responsibility for ongoing oversight of third-

party access.
Monitoring of third parties is scaled, in terms of depth and frequency,

according to the risk of the third parties.
Automated reminders or ticklers are in place to identify when required

third-party information needs to be obtained or analyzed.
Intermediate Third-party employee access to the institution's confidential data are

tracked actively based on the principles of least privilege.
Periodic on-site assessments of high-risk vendors are conducted to

ensure appropriate security controls are in place.
Advanced Third-party employee access to confidential data on third-party hosted

systems is tracked actively via automated reports and alerts.
Innovative The institution is leading efforts to develop new auditable processes for
ongoing monitoring of cybersecurity risks posed by third parties.
May 2017 50
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience

Assessment Factor: Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy
Y, Y(C), N
PLANNING
Baseline The institution has documented how it will react and respond to cyber
incidents. (FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet, page 4)
Communication channels exist to provide employees a means for

reporting information security events in a timely manner. (FFIEC
Roles and responsibilities for incident response team members are

defined. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 84)
The response team includes individuals with a wide range of backgrounds

and expertise, from many different areas within the institution (e.g.,
management, legal, public relations, as well as information technology).
A formal backup and recovery plan exists for all critical business lines.
(FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet, page 4)
The institution plans to use business continuity, disaster recovery, and

data backup programs to recover operations following an incident. (FFIEC
Evolving The remediation plan and process outlines the mitigating actions,
resources, and time parameters.
The corporate disaster recovery, business continuity, and crisis

management plans have integrated consideration of cyber incidents.
Alternative processes have been established to continue critical activity

within a reasonable time period.
Business impact analyses have been updated to include cybersecurity.
Due diligence has been performed on technical sources, consultants, or

forensic service firms that could be called to assist the institution during or
following an incident.
May 2017 51
Intermediate A strategy is in place to coordinate and communicate with internal and

external stakeholders during or following a cyber attack.
Plans are in place to re-route or substitute critical functions and/or

services that may be affected by a successful attack on Internet-facing
systems.
A direct cooperative or contractual agreement(s) is in place with an

incident response organization(s) or provider(s) to assist rapidly with
mitigation efforts.
Lessons learned from real-life cyber incidents and attacks on the

institution and other organizations are used to improve the institution’s
risk mitigation capabilities and response plan.
Advanced Methods for responding to and recovering from cyber incidents are
tightly woven throughout the business units’ disaster recovery,
business continuity, and crisis management plans.
Multiple systems, programs, or processes are implemented into a

comprehensive cyber resilience program to sustain, minimize, and
recover operations from an array of potentially disruptive and
destructive cyber incidents.
A process is in place to continuously improve the resilience plan.
Innovative The incident response plan is designed to ensure recovery from

disruption of services, assurance of data integrity, and recovery of lost
or corrupted data following a cybersecurity incident.
The incident response process includes detailed actions and rule-

based triggers for automated response.
TESTING
Baseline Scenarios are used to improve incident detection and response.

Business continuity testing involves collaboration with critical third

parties. (FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet, page J-6)
Systems, applications, and data recovery is tested at least annually.

(FFIEC Business Continuity Planning Booklet, page J-7)
Evolving Recovery scenarios include plans to recover from data destruction

and impacts to data integrity, data loss, and system and data
availability.
Widely reported events are used to evaluate and improve the

institution's response.
Information backups are tested periodically to verify they are

accessible and readable.
May 2017 52
Intermediate Cyber-attack scenarios are analyzed to determine potential impact to

critical business processes.
The institution participates in sector-specific cyber exercises or

scenarios (e.g., FS-ISAC Cyber Attack (against) Payment Processors
(CAPP)).
Resilience testing is based on analysis and identification of realistic

and highly likely threats as well as new and emerging threats facing
the institution.
The critical online systems and processes are tested to withstand

stresses for extended periods (e.g., DDoS).
The results of cyber event exercises are used to improve the incident
response plan and automated triggers.
Advanced Resilience testing is comprehensive and coordinated across all critical

business functions.
The institution validates that it is able to recover from cyber events

similar to by known sophisticated attacks at other organizations.
Incident response testing evaluates the institution from an attacker's

perspective to determine how the institution or its assets at critical
third parties may be targeted.
The institution corrects root causes for problems discovered during

cybersecurity resilience testing.
Cybersecurity incident scenarios involving significant financial loss are

used to stress test the institution's risk management.
Innovative The institution tests the ability to shift business processes or functions
between different processing centers or technology systems for cyber
incidents without interruption to business or loss of productivity or
data.
The institution has validated that it is able to remediate systems

damaged by zero-day attacks to maintain current recovery time
objectives.
The institution is leading the development of more realistic test

environments.
Cyber incident scenarios are used to stress test potential financial

losses across the sector.
May 2017 53
DETECTION Assessment Factor: Detection, Response, and Mitigation

Baseline Alert parameters are set for detecting information security incidents that
prompt mitigating actions. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 43)
System performance reports contain information that can be used as a

risk indicator to detect information security incidents. (FFIEC Information
Tools and processes are in place to detect, alert, and trigger the incident
response program. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 84)
Evolving The institution has processes to detect and alert the incident response
team when potential insider activity manifests that could lead to data theft
or destruction.
Intermediate The incident response program is triggered when anomalous behaviors

and attack patterns or signatures are detected.
The institution has the ability to discover infiltration, before the attacker
traverses across systems, establishes a foothold, steals information, or
causes damage to data and systems.
Incidents are detected in real time through automated processes that

include instant alerts to appropriate personnel who can respond.
Network and system alerts are correlated across business units to better
detect and prevent multifaceted attacks (e.g., simultaneous DDoS attack
and account takeover).
Incident detection processes are capable of correlating events across the

enterprise.
Advanced Sophisticated and adaptive technologies are deployed that can detect and
alert the incident response team of specific tasks when threat indicators
across the enterprise indicate potential external and internal threats.
Automated tools are implemented to provide specialized security

monitoring based on the risk of the assets to detect and alert incident
response teams in real time.
Innovative The institution is able to detect and block zero-day attempts and inform
management and the incident response team in real time.
May 2017 54
RESPONSE AND MITIGATION Baseline Appropriate steps are taken to contain and control an incident to prevent
further unauthorized access to or use of customer information. (FFIEC
Evolving The incident response plan is designed to prioritize incidents, enabling a

rapid response for significant cybersecurity incidents or vulnerabilities.
A process is in place to help contain incidents and restore operations with

minimal service disruption.
Containment and mitigation strategies are developed for multiple incident

types (e.g., DDoS, malware).
Procedures include containment strategies and notifying potentially

impacted third parties.
Processes are in place to trigger the incident response program when an

incident occurs at a third party.
Records are generated to support incident investigation and mitigation.
The institution calls upon third parties, as needed, to provide mitigation

services.
Analysis of events is used to improve the institution's security measures

and policies.
Intermediate Analysis of security incidents is performed in the early stages of an

intrusion to minimize the impact of the incident.
Any changes to systems/applications or to access entitlements necessary

for incident management are reviewed by management for formal
approval before implementation.
Processes are in place to ensure assets affected by a security incident

that cannot be returned to operational status are quarantined, removed,
disposed of, and/or replaced.
Processes are in place to ensure that restored assets are appropriately

reconfigured and thoroughly tested before being placed back into
operation.
Advanced The incident management function collaborates effectively with the cyber
threat intelligence function during an incident.
Links between threat intelligence, network operations, and incident

response allow for proactive response to potential incidents.
Technical measures apply defense-in-depth techniques such as deep-

packet inspection and black holing for detection and timely response to
network-based attacks associated with anomalous ingress or egress
traffic patterns and/or DDoS attacks.
May 2017 55
Innovative The institution’s risk management of significant cyber incidents results in

limited to no disruptions to critical services.
The technology infrastructure has been engineered to limit the effects of a

cyber attack on the production environment from migrating to the backup
environment (e.g., air-gapped environment and processes).
Assessment Factor: Escalation and Reporting

ESCALATION AND REPORTING
Baseline A process exists to contact personnel who are responsible for analyzing
and responding to an incident. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet,
page 83)
Procedures exist to notify customers, regulators, and law enforcement as

required or necessary when the institution becomes aware of an incident
involving the unauthorized access to or use of sensitive customer
information. (FFIEC Information Security Booklet, page 84)
The institution prepares an annual report of security incidents or violations

for the board or an appropriate board committee. (FFIEC Information
Incidents are classified, logged, and tracked. (FFIEC Operations Booklet,

page 28)
Evolving Criteria have been established for escalating cyber incidents or

vulnerabilities to the board and senior management based on the
potential impact and criticality of the risk.
Regulators, law enforcement, and service providers, as appropriate, are

notified when the institution is aware of any unauthorized access to
systems or a cyber incident occurs that could result in degradation of
services.
Tracked cyber incidents are correlated for trend analysis and reporting.
Intermediate Employees that are essential to mitigate the risk (e.g., fraud, business
resilience) know their role in incident escalation.
A communication plan is used to notify other organizations, including third

parties, of incidents that may affect them or their customers.
An external communication plan is used for notifying media regarding

incidents when applicable.
Advanced The institution has established quantitative and qualitative metrics for the
cybersecurity incident response process.
Detailed metrics, dashboards, and/or scorecards outlining cyber incidents

and events are provided to management and are part of the board
meeting package.
May 2017 56
Innovative A mechanism is in place to provide instantaneous notification of incidents

to management and essential employees through multiple communication
channels with tracking and verification of receipt.
May 2017 57
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool ver.1.1 Mapping Baseline Statements
to FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Appendix A: Mapping Baseline Statements to FFIEC IT

Examination Handbook
The purpose of this appendix is to demonstrate how the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
declarative statements at the baseline maturity level correspond with the risk management and
control expectations outlined in the FFIEC Information Technology (IT) Examination Handbook.
The FFIEC will update this appendix to align with new or updated FFIEC IT Examination
Handbook booklets following their release.
The mapping is by Domain, then by Assessment Factor and Category. Each statement is then
sourced to its origin in an applicable FFIEC IT Examination Handbook. Refer to the last page of
this appendix for the Source reference key.
Yes/No FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
Domain 1 – Cyber Risk Management and Oversight

Governance/Oversight: Designated members of management are held accountable by the board or
an appropriate board committee for implementing and managing the information security and business
continuity programs.
Source: IS.I:pg3 The board, or designated board committee, should be responsible for overseeing
tThe development, implementation, and maintenance of the institution’s information security program
and holding senior management accountable for its actions.
IS.I:pg4: The board should provide management with its expectations and requirements and hold
management accountable for central oversight and coordination, assignment of responsibility, and
effectiveness of the information security program.
IS.WP.2.3: Determine whether the board holds management accountable for the following: Central
oversight and coordination, Assignment of responsibility, Support of the information security
program, and Effectiveness of the information security program.
MGT.III.C.3:pg28: The board of directors is responsible for overseeing the development,

implementation, management, and maintenance of the institution’s information security program.
This oversight includes assigning specific responsibility and accountability for the program’s
implementation and reviewing reports from management.
MGT.WP.2: Determine whether the board of directors oversees and senior management
appropriately establishes an effective governance structure that includes oversight of IT activities.
MGT.WP.2.2.g: Review whether the board or a committee of the board appropriately holds
management accountable for the identification, measurement, and mitigation of IT risks.
Governance/Oversight: Information security risks are discussed in management meetings when

prompted by highly visible cyber events or regulatory alerts.
Source: IS.I.B:pg4: Management also should do the following: Participate in assessing the effect of
security threats or incidents on the institution and its lines of business and processes.
IS.III.A:pg47: Management should develop procedures for obtaining, monitoring, assessing, and
responding to evolving threat and vulnerability information.
May 2017 Page 1


Governance/Oversight: Management provides a written report on the overall status of the information
security and business continuity programs to the board or an appropriate board committee at least
annually.
Source: IS.I.B:pg4: The board, or designated board committee, should approve the
institution’s written information security program; affirm responsibilities for the development,
implementation, and maintenance of the program; and review a report on the overall status of
the program at least annually. Management should provide a report to the board at least
annually that describes the overall status of the program and material matters related to the
program, including the following …
IS.WP.2.4: Determine whether the board approves a written information security program and
receives a report on the effectiveness of the information security program at least annually.
MGT.III.C.3(a):pg30: The board should also annually review a written report, prepared by
management, regarding the financial institution’s actions toward GLBA compliance.
MGT.III.C.4:pg30: Management should also provide to the board on an annual basis a written report
on the overall status of the business continuity program and the results of testing of the plan and
backup systems.
MGT.WP.12.7.f: Verify that the board is responsible for annually reviewing management's report on
the status of the bank's actions to achieve or maintain compliance with the Information Security
Standard.
MGT.WP.12.9.a & c: Determine whether the board of directors approved policies and management
established and implemented policies, procedures, and responsibilities for an enterprise-wide
business continuity program, including the following: Annual review and approval of the business
continuity program by the board of directors and annual reports by management of the results of the
business continuity and disaster recovery tests to the board of directors.
Governance/Oversight: The budgeting process includes information security related expenses and
tools.
Source: IS.I.C:pg5: Funding, along with technical and managerial talent, also contributes to the
effectiveness of the information security program. Management should provide, and the board
should oversee, adequate funding to develop, implement, and maintain a successful information
security program.
IS.WP.2.9: Determine whether the board provides adequate funding to develop and implement a
successful information security function.
MGT.I.B.6:pg14: Management should strive to achieve a planning process that constantly adjusts
for new risks or opportunities and maximizes IT’s value.
MGT.I.B.6(c):pg17 When considering new IT projects, management should look at the entry costs
of the technology and the post-implementation support costs.
MGT.I.B.6(c):pg17: Some institutions budget IT as a separate department. A financial analysis of
an IT department should include a comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the in-house operation
versus contracting with a third-party provider. The analysis may also include a peer group
comparison of operating costs and ratios.
MGT.WP.4: Determine the adequacy of the institution's IT operations planning and investment.
Assess the adequacy of the risk assessment and the overall alignment with the institution's
business strategy, including planning for IT resources and budgeting.
May 2017 Page 2


Governance/Oversight: Management considers the risks posed by other critical infrastructures (e.g.,
telecommunications, energy) to the institution.
Source: BCP.B.J-12: Cyber attacks may also be executed in conjunction with disruptive physical
events and may affect multiple critical infrastructure sectors (e.g., the telecommunications and
energy sectors). Financial institutions and TSPs should consider their susceptibility to simultaneous
attacks in their business resilience planning, recovery, and testing strategies.
BCP.WP.10: Determine whether the financial institution's and TSP's risk management strategies
are designed to achieve resilience, such as the ability to effectively respond to wide-scale
disruptions, including cyber attacks and attacks on multiple critical infrastructure sectors.
Governance/Strategy-Policies: The institution has an information security strategy that integrates

technology, policies, procedures, and training to mitigate risk.
Source: IS.Introduction:pg2: Information security is far more effective when management does the
following: Integrates processes, people, and technology to maintain a risk profile that is in
accordance with the board’s risk appetite. Aligns the information security program with the
enterprise risk management program and identifies, measures, mitigates, and monitors risk.
IS.WP.6.3: Determine whether the institution continually assesses the capability of technology
needed to sustain an appropriate level of information security based on the size, complexity,
and risk appetite of the institution.
MGT.III.C.1:pg27: Senior management should ensure that policies, standards, and procedures
are current, well documented, and integrated with the institution’s information security strategy.
MGT.WP.4.3: Determine whether the institution has adequate tactical and operational IT plans to
support the larger IT strategic plans.
Governance/Strategy-Policies: The institution has policies commensurate with its risk and complexity
that address the concepts of information technology risk management.
Source: IS.II:pg6: Management should develop and implement an information security

program that does the following: Supports the institution’s IT risk management (ITRM) process
by identifying threats, measuring risk, defining information security requirements, and
implementing controls.
IS.WP.3.1: Determine whether the institution has an effective information security program that
supports the ITRM process.
MGT.III.C.1:pg27: Institution management should create, document, maintain, and adhere to
policies, standards, and procedures to manage and control the institution’s IT risk. The level of detail
depends on the complexity of the IT environment but should enable management to monitor the
identified risk posture.
MGT.WP.12.4: Determine whether IT management has developed adequate policies, standards,
and procedures to manage the risk from technology and that they are current, documented, and
appropriately communicated.
May 2017 Page 3


that address the concepts of threat information sharing.
Source: IS.III.C:pg50: The sharing of attack data through organizations, such as FS-ISAC, also
has the potential to benefit the industry at large by enabling other institutions to better assess
and respond to current attacks. Management should consider whether to include such
information sharing as a part of its strategy to protect the institution.
MGT.III.A:pg22: Participation in an information-sharing forum, such as FS–ISAC, should be a
component of the risk identification process because sharing information may help the institution
identify and evaluate relevant cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
MGT.WP.10.1.b: Determine whether management participates in an information sharing forum
(such as FS-ISAC).
Governance/Strategy-Policies: The institution has board-approved policies commensurate with its

risk and complexity that address information security.
Source: IS.I:pg4: Management also should do the following: Implement the board-approved
information security program. Establish appropriate policies, standards, and procedures to support
the information security program.
IS.Wp.6.2: Determine whether the information security policy is annually reviewed and
approved by the board.
that address the concepts of external dependency or third-party management.
Source: OT.B.2: Financial institutions should have a comprehensive outsourcing risk management
process to govern their TSP relationships.
that address the concepts of incident response and resilience.
Source: IS.II.C.21:pg43: Management should do the following: … Establish and maintain policies
that address the concepts of information security incident response and resilience, and test
information security incident scenarios.
IS.Wp.6.34.c: Determine whether management effectively manages the following information
security considerations related to business continuity planning. Review management’s ability
to do the following: Develop policies that address the concepts of information security incident
response and resilience and test information security incident scenarios.
May 2017 Page 4


Governance/Strategy-Policies: All elements of the information security program are coordinated
enterprise-wide.
Source IS.Introduction:pg2: Information security programs should have strong board and senior
management support, promote integration of security activities and controls throughout the
institution’s business processes, and establish clear accountability for carrying out security
responsibilities.
IS.WP.3.2: Determine whether management appropriately integrates the information security
program across the institution’s lines of business and support functions. Review whether
management has the following: Security policies, standards, and procedures that are designed to
support and to align with the policies in the lines of business. Incident response programs that
include all affected lines of business and support units. Common awareness and enforcement
mechanisms between lines of business and information security. Visibility to assess the likelihood
of threats and potential damage to the institution. The ability to identify and implement controls
over the root causes of an incident.
MGT.I.B.2:pg10: The institution should have a comprehensive information security program that
addresses all technology and information assets and that complies with the Information Security
Standards. The information security program should include appropriate administrative, technical,
and physical safeguards based on the inherent risk profile and the individual activities, products,
and services of the institution.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: The information security program should be coordinated across the institution.
MGT.WP.8.2: Determine whether the institution's management of operational risk incorporates an
enterprise-wide view of IT and business processes that are supported by technology.
Governance/IT Asset Management: An inventory of organizational assets (e.g., hardware, software,

data, and systems hosted externally) is maintained.
Source: IS.II.C.5:pg14: Management should inventory and classify assets, including hardware,
software, information, and connections. Management should maintain and keep updated an
inventory of technology assets that classifies the sensitivity and criticality of those assets,
including hardware, software, information, and connections.
IS.WP.6.6: Determine whether management effectively maintains an inventory(ies) of
hardware, software, information, and connections. Review whether management does the
following: Identifies assets that require protection, such as those that store, transmit, or process
sensitive customer information, or trade secrets. Classifies assets appropriately. Uses the
classification to determine the sensitivity and criticality of assets. Uses the classification to
implement controls required to safeguard the institution’s assets. Updates the inventory(ies)
appropriately.
MGT.III.A:pg22: Management should maintain inventories of assets (e.g., hardware, software, and
information), event classes (e.g., natural disaster, cyber, and insider abuse or compromise), threats
(e.g., theft, malware, and social engineering), and existing controls as an important part of effective
risk identification.
May 2017 Page 5


Governance/IT Asset Management: Organizational assets (e.g., hardware, systems, data, and
applications) are prioritized for protection based on the data classification and business value.
Source: IS.II.C.5:pg14: Management should maintain and keep updated an inventory of

technology assets that classifies the sensitivity and criticality of those assets, including
hardware, software, information, and connections. Management should have policies to govern
the inventory and classification of assets both at inception and throughout their life cycle, and
wherever the assets are stored, transmitted, or processed. Inventories enable management
and staff to identify assets and their functions. Classification enables the institution to
determine the sensitivity and criticality of assets. Management should use this classification to
implement controls required to safeguard the institution’s physical and information assets.
IS.WP.6.6: Determine whether management effectively maintains an inventory(ies) of
hardware, software, information, and connections. Review whether management does the
following: Identifies assets that require protection, such as those that store, transmit, or process
sensitive customer information, or trade secrets. Classifies assets appropriately. Uses the
classification to determine the sensitivity and criticality of assets. Uses the classification to
implement controls required to safeguard the institution’s assets. Updates the inventory(ies)
appropriately.
Governance/IT Asset Management: Management assigns accountability for maintaining an inventory

of organizational assets.
Source: IS.II.C.5:pg14: Management should maintain and keep updated an inventory of
technology assets that classifies the sensitivity and criticality of those assets, including hardware,
software, information, and connections. Management should have policies to govern the
inventory and classification of assets both at inception and throughout their life cycle, and
wherever the assets are stored, transmitted, or processed. Inventories enable management and
staff to identify assets and their functions. Classification enables the institution to determine the
sensitivity and criticality of assets. Management should use this classification to implement
controls required to safeguard the institution’s physical and information assets.
IS.WP.6.6: Determine whether management effectively maintains an inventory(ies) of hardware,
software, information, and connections.
MGT.III.A:pg22: Management should maintain inventories of assets (e.g., hardware, software,
and information), event classes (e.g., natural disaster, cyber, and insider abuse or
compromise), threats (e.g., theft, malware, and social engineering), and existing controls as an
important part of effective risk identification. Inventories should include systems and information
hosted or maintained externally.
Governance/IT Asset Management: A change management process is in place to request and

approve changes to systems configurations, hardware, software, applications, and security tools.
Source: IS.II.C.10:pg21: Management should have a process to introduce changes to the
environment in a controlled manner. Changes to the IT environment include the following:
Configuration management of IT systems and applications. Hardening of systems and
applications. Use of standard builds. Patch management. The IT environment consists of
operating systems, middleware, applications, file systems, and communications protocols. The
institution should have an effective process to introduce application and system changes,
including hardware, software, and network devices, into the IT environment.
IS.WP.6.11: Determine whether management has a process to introduce changes to the
environment (e.g., configuration management of IT systems and applications, hardening of systems
and applications, use of standard builds, and patch management) in a controlled manner.
May 2017 Page 6


Risk Management/Risk Management Program: An information security and business continuity risk
management function(s) exists within the institution.
Source: IS.II.C.21:pg43: Management should do the following: Identify personnel who will have
critical information security roles during a disaster, and train personnel in those roles. Define
information security needs for backup sites and alternate communication networks. Establish and
maintain policies that address the concepts of information security incident response and
resilience, and test information security incident scenarios.
IS.WP.6.34: Determine whether management effectively manages the following information
security considerations related to business continuity planning.
MGT.I.B.4:pg12: The business continuity function often resides in the risk management
organizational structure. A specific member of management should be assigned responsibility for
the oversight of the business continuity function, and both business and technology departments
should assign personnel to develop and maintain the individual business unit plans.
MGT.WP.3.: As part of the ITRM structure, determine whether financial institution management
has defined IT responsibilities and functions. Verify the existence of well-defined responsibilities
and expectations between risk management and IT functional areas, such as information security,
project management, business continuity, and information systems reporting.
Risk Management/Risk Assessment: A risk assessment focused on safeguarding customer

information identifies reasonable and foreseeable internal and external threats, the likelihood and
potential damage of threats and the sufficiency of policies, procedures, and customer information
systems.
Source: IS.I.B:pg4: Management should provide a report to the board at least annually that
describes the overall status of the program and material matters related to the program, including
the following: Risk assessment process, including threat identification and assessment.
IS.WP.2.4: Determine whether the board approves a written information security program and
receives a report on the effectiveness of the information security program at least annually.
Determine whether the report to the board describes the overall status of the information security
program and discusses material matters related to the program such as the following:
a. Risk assessment process, including threat identification and assessment.
MGT.III.A:pg22: Comprehensive IT risk identification should include identification of cybersecurity
risks as well as details gathered during information security risk assessments required under
guidelines implementing the GLBA.
MGT.WP.7.4: Determine whether the institution maintains a risk assessment process to perform the
following:
a. Identify risks and threats from both internal and external sources.
b. Develop or update policies within the risk management function to guide risk measurement
activities.
c. Ensure the existence of a process to promote sound understanding and analysis of threats,
events, assets, and controls.
d. Maintain processes within the risk management function to help make risk mitigation decisions.
e. Determine the entities that should have involvement in that decision-making process.
f. Ensure that the board and management understand the risk categories.
May 2017 Page 7


Risk Management/Risk Assessment: The risk assessment identifies internet-based systems and
high-risk transactions that warrant additional authentication controls.
describes the overall status of the program and material matters related to the program, including the
following: Risk assessment process, including threat identification and assessment.
IS.II.C.17:pg38-39: Applications should provide the ability for management to do the following:
…Protect web or Internet-facing applications through additional controls, including web
application firewalls, regular scanning for new or recurring vulnerabilities, mitigation or
remediation of common security weaknesses, and network segregation to limit inappropriate
access or connections to the application or other areas of the network.
IS.WP.6.27.g: Review whether applications in use provide the following capabilities: Protect web or
Internet-facing applications through additional controls, including web application firewalls, regular
scanning for new or recurring vulnerabilities, mitigation or remediation of common security
weaknesses, and network segregation.
Risk Management/Risk Assessment: The risk assessment is updated to address new technologies,
products, services, and connections before deployment.
Source: IS.II.A:pg7: External events affecting IT and the institution’s ability to meet its operating
objectives include natural disasters, cyber attacks, changes in market conditions, new
competitors, new technologies, litigation, and new laws or regulations. These events pose risks
and opportunities, and the institution should factor them into the risk identification process.
IS.II.C:pg11: Additionally, management should develop, maintain, and update a repository of
cybersecurity threat and vulnerability information that may be used in conducting risk assessments
and provide updates to senior management and the board on cyber risk trends.
IS.WP.8.3.d: Determine whether management has effective threat identification and assessment
processes, including the following: Using threat knowledge to drive risk assessment and response.
May 2017 Page 8


Risk Management/Audit: Independent audit or review evaluates policies, procedures, and controls
across the institution for significant risks and control issues associated with the institution's operations,
including risks in new products, emerging technologies, and information systems.
Source: AUD.B.4: The internal audit manager should be responsible for internal control risk
assessments, audit plans, audit programs, and audit reports associated with IT.
IS.IV.A.2(d):pg56: Independent internal departments or third parties typically perform
audits. Audits should review every aspect of the information security program, the
environment in which the program runs, and outputs of the program. Audits should assess
the reasonableness and appropriateness of, and compliance with, policies, standards, and
procedures; report on information security activity and control deficiencies to decision
makers; identify root causes and recommendations to address deficiencies; and test the
effectiveness of controls within the program.
MGT.I.B.7(b)pg19: IT auditors should validate that IT controls are designed appropriately to
mitigate risk and are operating as management intended. IT audit should be completely
independent, should have no role in designing or implementing controls, and should not
have primary responsibility for enforcing policy.
MGT.WP.6.3: Determine whether the board, or its committee, has appropriate oversight of audit
through the following:
a. Audit risk assessment and audit plan.
b. Audit review activities.
c. Audit reports with identified weaknesses.
d. Management’s responses and corrective actions to audit issues.
e. Updates on any audit concerns and the status of issues.
Risk Management/Audit: The independent audit function validates controls related to the storage or
transmission of confidential data.
Source: AUD.B.1: An effective IT audit program should… promote the confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of information systems.
Risk Management/Audit: Logging practices are independently reviewed periodically to ensure

appropriate log management (e.g., access controls, retention, and maintenance).
Source: OPS.B.29: Operations management should periodically review all logs for
completeness and ensure they have not been deleted, modified, overwritten, or
compromised.
IS.II.C.22:pg43: Logging practices should be reviewed periodically by an independent party
to ensure appropriate log management.
IS.WP.6.35(c): Review whether management has the following: Independent review of logging
practices.
May 2017 Page 9


Risk Management/Audit: Issues and corrective actions from internal audits and independent
testing/assessments are formally tracked to ensure procedures and control lapses are resolved in a
timely manner.
Source: IS.IV.A.2(d):pg56: Internal audit should track the results and the remediation of control
deficiencies reported in audits and additional technical reviews, such as penetration tests and
vulnerability assessments.
IS.WP.2.8: Determine the adequacy of audit coverage and reporting of the information
security program by reviewing appropriate audit reports and board or audit committee
minutes.
AUD.B.8: A risk assessment process to describe and analyze the risks inherent in a given line of
business.
AUD.WP.I.7.1: Determine the adequacy of the overall audit plan in providing appropriate
coverage of IT risks.
MGT.I.B.7(b):pg19: Management should also ensure timely and accurate response to
audit concerns and exceptions and ensure appropriate and timely corrective action.
MGT.WP.1.2: Review management's response to issues raised during, or since, the last
examination. Consider the following: a. Adequacy and timing of corrective action. b.
Resolution of root causes rather than just specific issues. c. Existence of any outstanding
issues. d. Whether management has taken positive action toward correcting exceptions
reported in audit and examining reports. e. Independent review of resolution and
reporting of resolution to the audit committee.
MGT.WP.6.1: Consult with the examiner reviewing audit or IT audit to determine the adequacy of
IT audit coverage and management’s responsiveness to identified weaknesses.
Resources/Staffing: Information security roles and responsibilities have been identified.

Source: IS.II.C.1:pg11: Policies, standards, and procedures guide decisions and activities
of users, developers, administrators, and managers and inform those individuals of their
information security responsibilities. Policies, standards, and procedures should also
specify the mechanisms through which responsibilities can be met. … Policies,
standards, and procedures that address the information security program should describe
the roles of the information security department, lines of business, and IT organization in
administering the information security program.
MGT.I:pg4: The governance structure specifies the responsibilities for the board of
directors, managers, auditors, and other stakeholders and specifies the level of authority
and accountability for decision making.
MGT.WP.2.11: Review the institution’s structure to determine whether the board established the
following:
a. The organizational structure provides for effective IT support throughout the institution, from IT
management up through senior management and the board.
b. Defined roles and responsibilities for key IT positions, including executive management (CEO
and COO, and often CIO or CTO), and CISO.
e. A CISO or information security officer position responsible for the management and mitigation
of information security risks.
May 2017 Page 10


Resources/Staffing: Processes are in place to identify additional expertise needed to improve
information security defenses.
Source: IS.I.C:pg5: Funding, along with technical and managerial talent, also contributes
to the effectiveness of the information security program. Management should provide,
and the board should oversee, adequate funding to develop, implement, and maintain a
successful information security program. The program should be staffed by sufficient
personnel who have skills that are aligned with the institution’s technical and managerial
needs and commensurate with its size, complexity, and risk profile. Knowledge of
technology standards, practices, and risk methodologies is particularly important to the
success of the information security program.
MGT.I.B.7(a):pg18: An institution should have programs in place to ensure that staff
members have the expertise necessary to perform their jobs and achieve company goals
and objectives. The institution may need to look externally to find necessary expertise for
specialized areas.
MGT.WP.5.2.b: Employees have appropriate qualifications.
MGT.WP.5.5: Determine whether the financial institution has a process to ensure that staff has the
requisite expertise to fulfill its roles. Review the adequacy of the process.
Training and Culture/Training: Annual information security training is provided.

Source: IS.B:pgs4-5: Management also should do the following: … Provide
information security and awareness training and ongoing security-related
communications to employees, and ensure employees complete such training
annually.
IS.WP.2.5.l: Determine whether management responsibilities are appropriate
and include the following: Facilitation of annual information security and
awareness training and ongoing security-related communications to employees.
MGT.III.C.2:pg28: The institution should use job descriptions, employment agreements
(usually for higher-level or higher-sensitivity positions), training, and awareness programs
to promote understanding and increase individual accountability.
MGT.WP.12.5.f: Determine whether management has effective hiring and training practices
that provide information security awareness and training programs.
Training and Culture/Training: Annual information security training includes incident response,
current cyber threats (e.g., phishing, spear phishing, social engineering, and mobile security), and
emerging issues.
Source: IS.II.C.7(e):pg17: Training materials for most users focus on issues such as end-point
security, log-in requirements, and password administration guidelines. Training programs should
include scenarios capturing areas of significant and growing concern, such as phishing and social
engineering attempts, loss of data through e-mail or removable media, or unintentional posting of
confidential or proprietary information on social media.
IS.WP.6.8.f: Determine whether management effectively mitigates risks posed by users. Review
whether management does the following: Provides training to support awareness and policy
compliance.
May 2017 Page 11


Training and Culture/Training: Situational awareness materials are made available to employees
when prompted by highly visible cyber events or by regulatory alerts.
Source: IS.II.C.7(e):pg17:: Training materials for most users focus on issues such as
end-point security, log-in requirements, and password administration guidelines.
Training programs should include scenarios capturing areas of significant and growing
concern, such as phishing and social engineering attempts, loss of data through e-mail
or removable media, or unintentional posting of confidential or proprietary information
on social media. As the risk environment changes, so should the training.
IS.WP.6.8.f: Determine whether management effectively mitigates risks posed by users.
Review whether management does the following: Provides training to support awareness
and policy compliance.
Training and Culture/Training: Customer awareness materials are readily available (e.g., DHS’
Cybersecurity Awareness Month materials).
Source: IS.II.C.16:pg36: Beyond authentication, remote access controls should
include additional layered security controls and may include some combination of the
following: Customer education to increase awareness of the fraud risk and effective
techniques customers can use to mitigate the risk.
IS.II.C.16(a): pg37: The institution’s customer awareness and education efforts should
consider both retail and commercial account holders.
IS.WP.6.26: Determine whether management develops customer awareness and education
efforts that address both retail (consumer) and commercial account holders.
Training and Culture/Culture: Management holds employees accountable for complying with the
information security program.
Source: IS.II.C.7(e):pg17: Management should hold all employees, officers, and contractors
accountable for complying with security and acceptable use policies and should ensure that the
institution’s information and other assets are protected.
MGT.III.C.2:pg28: Management should require periodic acknowledgement of acceptable use
policies for the network, software applications, Internet, e-mail, confidential data, and social
media. Information security awareness and training programs help support information security
and other management policies.
MGT.WP.12.5: Determine whether management has effective hiring and training practices that
include the following:
d. Requiring periodic acknowledgement of acceptable use policies.
e. Obtaining signed confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements.
f. Providing information security awareness and training programs.
May 2017 Page 12

Domain 2 – Threat Intelligence and Collaboration
Threat Intelligence/Threat Intelligence and Information: The institution belongs or subscribes to a

threat and vulnerability information-sharing source(s) that provides information on threats (e.g., FS-
ISAC, US-CERT).
Source: IS.II.C:pg11: Management should also obtain, analyze, and respond to information from
various sources (e.g., Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center [FS-ISAC]) on
cyber threats and vulnerabilities that may affect the institution.
IS.WP.8.3.f: Determine whether management has effective threat identification and assessment
processes, including the following: Developing appropriate processes to evaluate and respond
to vulnerability information from external groups or individuals.
MGT.III.A:pg22: Participation in an information-sharing forum, such as FS–ISAC, should be a
component of the risk identification process because sharing information may help the institution
identify and evaluate relevant cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
MGT.WP.10.1.b: Determine whether management participates in an information sharing forum (such

as FS-ISAC).
Threat Intelligence/Threat Intelligence and Information: Threat information is used to monitor

threats and vulnerabilities.
Source: IS.III.A:pg47: Management should develop procedures for obtaining, monitoring,
assessing, and responding to evolving threat and vulnerability information. The identification of
threats involves the sources of threats, their capabilities, and their objectives. Information about
threats generally comes from government (e.g., US-CERT), information-sharing organizations (e.g.,
FS-ISAC), industry sources, the institution, and third parties.
IS.WP.8.3.f: Determine whether management has effective threat identification and assessment
processes, including the following: Developing appropriate processes to evaluate and respond to
vulnerability information from external groups or individuals.
MGT.I.A.2:pg6: Establish a formal process to obtain, analyze, and respond to information on
threats and vulnerabilities by developing a repeatable threat intelligence and collaboration program.
MGT.WP.2.8.f: Establishes a formal process to obtain, analyze, and respond to information on
threats and vulnerabilities by developing a repeatable threat intelligence and collaboration program.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: Institution management should: Develop and implement a threat intelligence and
collaboration process to identify and respond to information on threats and vulnerabilities.
MGT.WP.12.8.c: Determine whether the control structure includes: Using a threat intelligence
and collaboration process to identify and respond to information on threats and vulnerabilities.
May 2017 Page 13


Threat Intelligence/Threat Intelligence and Information: Threat information is used to enhance
internal risk management and controls.
Source: IS.III.A:pg48: Once a threat is identified and potential vulnerabilities are assessed, the
significance of the threat should trigger a response. The response should be commensurate with the
risk posed by the threat and should include remediation options. Management should design policies
to allow for immediate and consequential threats to be dealt with expeditiously, while less significant
threats are addressed as part of a broader risk management process. When management receives
vulnerability information from external individuals or groups, management should have appropriate
processes and procedures to evaluate the credibility of the information to appropriately address it.
IS.WP.8.3.a.d: Determine whether management has effective threat identification and
assessment processes, including the following: Maintaining procedures for obtaining,
monitoring, assessing, and responding to evolving threat and vulnerability information….Using
threat knowledge to drive risk assessment and response.
Monitoring and Analyzing/Monitoring and Analyzing: Audit log records and other security event
logs are reviewed and retained in a secure manner.
Source: IS.II.C.22:pg44: Management should have effective log retention policies that address
the significance of maintaining logs for incident response and analysis needs. …Additionally,
logging practices should be reviewed periodically by an independent party to ensure appropriate
log management. … Regardless of the method of log management, management should
develop processes to collect, aggregate, analyze, and correlate security information.
IS.WP.6.35: Determine whether management has an effective log management process that
involves a central logging repository, timely transmission of log files, and effective log analysis.
Monitoring and Analyzing/Monitoring and Analyzing: Computer event logs are used for
investigations once an event has occurred.
Source: IS.II.C.22:pg44: Log files are critical to the successful investigation and prosecution of
security incidents and can potentially contain sensitive information… Security information and
event management (SIEM) systems can provide a method for management to collect,
aggregate, analyze, and correlate information from discrete systems and applications.
Management can use SIEM systems to discern trends and identify potential information security
incidents.
IS.WP.6.35: Determine whether management has an effective log management process that
involves a central logging repository, timely transmission of log files, and effective log analysis.
Review whether management has the following: (d) Processes to effectively collect, aggregate,
analyze, and correlate security event information from discrete systems and applications.
May 2017 Page 14


Information Sharing/Information Sharing: Information security threats are gathered and shared with
applicable internal employees.
Source: IS.II.D:pg45: Risk reporting is a process that produces information systems reports that
address threats, capabilities, vulnerabilities, and inherent risk changes. Risk reporting should
describe any information security events that the institution faces and the effectiveness of
management’s response and resilience to those events. The reporting process should provide a
method of disseminating those reports to appropriate members of management. The contents of the
reports should prompt action, if necessary, in a timely manner to maintain appropriate levels of risk.
IS.WP.7.1: Determine whether the institution has risk monitoring and reporting processes
that address changing threat conditions in both the institution and the greater financial
industry. Determine whether these processes address information security events faced by
the institution, the effectiveness of management’s response, and the institution’s resilience
to those events. Review whether the reporting process includes a method of disseminating
those reports to appropriate members of management.
Information Sharing/Information Sharing: Contact information for law enforcement and the
regulator(s) is maintained and updated regularly.
Source: BCP.WP.I.5.1: Include(s) emergency preparedness and crisis management plans
that…Include an accurate contact tree, as well as primary and emergency contact information, for
communicating with employees, service providers, vendors, regulators, municipal authorities, and
emergency response personnel.
IS.III.D:pg.51: Primary considerations for incident response include the following: Protocols to define
when and under what circumstances to notify and involve regulators, customers, and law
enforcement, including names and contact information for each group.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: Develop a policy for escalating and reporting security incidents to the board,
government agencies, law enforcement, and the institution’s primary federal and state regulator
based on thresholds defined by the financial institution and applicable legal requirements. Relevant
thresholds could include significant financial impact, significant operational downtime, operational or
system breach, or loss of critical infrastructure.
MGT.WP.12.8.i: Developing a policy for escalating and reporting security incidents to the board,
government agencies, law enforcement, and the institution’s primary federal and state regulators
based on thresholds defined by the financial institution.
Information Sharing/Information Sharing: Information about threats is shared with law enforcement
and regulators when required or prompted.
Source: IS.III.D:pg.51: Primary considerations for incident response include the following: How,
when, and what to communicate outside of the institution, whether to law enforcement, regulatory
agencies, information-sharing organizations, customers, third-party service providers, potential
victims, or others.
based on thresholds defined by the financial institution and applicable legal requirements. Relevant
thresholds could include significant financial impact, significant operational downtime, operational or
system breach, or loss of critical infrastructure.
MGT.WP.12.8.i: Developing a policy for escalating and reporting security incidents to the
board, government agencies, law enforcement, and the institution’s primary federal and
state regulators based on thresholds defined by the financial institution.
May 2017 Page 15

Domain 3 – Cybersecurity Controls
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Network perimeter defense tools (e.g., border

router and firewall) are used.
Source: IS.II.C.9:pg19: Tools used to enforce and detect perimeter protection include routers,
firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS) and intrusion prevention systems, proxies, gateways,
jump boxes, demilitarized zones, virtual private networks (VPN), virtual LANs (VLAN), log
monitoring and network traffic inspecting systems, data loss prevention (DLP) systems, and
access control lists.
IS.WP.8.1.a: Determine whether the institution’s security operations activities include the following:
Security software and device management (e.g., maintaining the signatures on signature-based
devices and firewall rules).
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Systems that are accessed from the Internet or by
external parties are protected by firewalls or other similar devices.
Source: IS.II.C.17:pg39: Protect web or Internet-facing applications through additional controls,
including web application firewalls, regular scanning for new or recurring vulnerabilities, mitigation
or remediation of common security weaknesses, and network segregation to limit inappropriate
access or connections to the application or other areas of the network.
IS.WP.6.27(g): Review whether applications in use provide the following capabilities: Protect web
or Internet-facing applications through additional controls, including web application firewalls,
regular scanning for new or recurring vulnerabilities, mitigation or remediation of common security
weaknesses, and network segregation.
OPS.B.23: Transmission controls should address both physical and logical risks. In large, complex
institutions, management should consider segregating wide area networks (WAN) and local area
networks (LAN) segments with firewalls that restrict access as well as the content of inbound and
outbound traffic.
OPS.WP.8.1: Determine whether management has implemented appropriate daily operational
controls and processes including… alignment of telecommunication architecture and process with
the strategic plan.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: Conduct initial due diligence and ongoing monitoring to fully understand the types
of connections and mitigating controls in place between the financial institution and its third- party
providers.
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: All ports are monitored.

Source IS.II.C.12:pg26: Port monitoring to identify unauthorized network connections.
IS.II.C.16:pg37: To prevent or minimize exposure to these incidents, management should do
the following: .Limit traffic (e.g., allow valid traffic and block known bad traffic by port or IP
address).
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Up-to-date anti-virus and anti-malware tools are

used.
Source: IS.II.C.12:pg26: Management should implement defense-in-depth to protect, detect,
and respond to malware. The institution can use many tools to block malware before it enters
the environment and to detect it and respond if it is not blocked.
IS.WP.6.17: Determine whether management has implemented defense-in-depth to protect, detect,
and respond to malware.
May 2017 Page 16


Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Systems configurations (for servers, desktops,
routers, etc.) follow industry standards and are enforced.
Source: IS.II.C.10(c):pg23: The institution should use standard builds, which allow one
documented configuration to be applied to multiple computers in a controlled manner.
IS.WP.6.14: Determine whether management uses standard builds, allowing one documented
configuration to be applied to multiple computers in a controlled manner, to create hardware and
software inventories, update or patch systems, restore systems, investigate anomalies, and audit
configurations.
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Ports, functions, protocols and services are

prohibited if no longer needed for business purposes.
Source: IS.II.C.10(b):pg23: Hardening can include the following actions: …Determining the
purpose of the applications and systems and documenting minimum software and hardware
requirements and services to be included. Installing the minimum hardware, software, and
services necessary to meet the requirements using a documented installation procedure.
IS.B.6.13: Determine whether management has processes to harden applications and systems
(e.g., installing minimum services, installing necessary patches, configuring appropriate security
settings, enforcing principle of least privilege, changing default passwords, and enabling logging}.
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Access to make changes to systems

configurations, (including virtual machines and hypervisors) is controlled and monitored.
Source: IS.II.C.10:pg21: The institution should have an effective process to introduce application
and system changes, including hardware, software, and network devices, into the IT
environment…Application and system control considerations for introducing changes to the IT
environment before implementation should include the following…Restricting changes to
authorized users.
environment (e.g., configuration management of IT systems and applications, hardening of systems
and applications, use of standard builds, and patch management) in a controlled manner.
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Programs that can override system, object,

network, virtual machine, and application controls are restricted.
Source: IS.II.C.15(a):pg32: System and security administrators should restrict and monitor
privileged access to operating systems and system utilities.
IS.WP.6.21: As part of management’s process to secure the operating system and all system
components, determine whether management does the following: Limits the number of employees
with access to operating system and system utilities and grants only the minimum level of access
required to perform job responsibilities.
Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: System sessions are locked after a pre-defined

period of inactivity and are terminated after pre-defined conditions are met.
Source: IS.II.C.16:pg36: Beyond authentication, remote access controls should include additional
layered security controls and may include some combination of the following: Application time-outs
with mandatory re-authentication.
May 2017 Page 17


Preventive Controls/Infrastructure Management: Wireless network environments require security
settings with strong encryption for authentication and transmission. (*N/A if there are no wireless
networks.)
Source: IS.II.C.9(a):pg20: Management should use an industry-accepted level of encryption with
strength commensurate with the institution’s risk profile on the institution’s wireless networks.
IS.II.C.9(a):pg21: Institutions often provide remote network connectivity for employees or
third-party service providers who are not located within or around the institution’s facilities.
This connectivity presents operational advantages, but steps should be taken to ensure that
the connection is encrypted and secured. VPN connections should be used for both
broadband networks and wireless air card connections to isolate and encrypt remote traffic
to institution networks.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Employee access is granted to systems and
confidential data based on job responsibilities and the principles of least privilege.
Source: IS.II.C.7:pg15: Users should be granted access to systems, applications, and databases
based on their job responsibilities.
IS.II.C.10(b):pg23: Hardening can include the following actions: … Configuring privilege and
access controls by first denying all, then granting back the minimum necessary to each user (i.e.,
enforcing the principle of least privilege).
IS.WP.6.13: Determine whether management has processes to harden applications and systems
(e.g., installing minimum services, installing necessary patches, configuring appropriate security
settings, enforcing principle of least privilege, changing default passwords, and enabling logging).
MGT.III.C.2:pg28: Management should document and confirm access privileges for each staff
member based on his or her job description.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Employee access to systems and confidential
data provides for separation of duties.
Source: IS.II.C.7:pg15: Management should mitigate the risks posed by users by doing the
following: Employing segregation of duties.
IS.WP.2.5.g: Determine whether management responsibilities are appropriate and include the
following: …Establishment of appropriate segregation of duties.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Elevated privileges (e.g., administrator

privileges) are limited and tightly controlled (e.g., assigned to individuals, not shared, and require
stronger password controls).
Source: IS.II.C.15:pg31: Authorization for privileged access should be tightly controlled.
IS.WP.6.20: Determine whether management has an effective process to administer logical
security access rights for the network, operating systems, applications, databases, and network
devices. Review whether management has the following: A process to control privileged access.
May 2017 Page 18


Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: User access reviews are performed
periodically for all systems and applications based on the risk to the application or system.
Source: IS.II.C.15:pg31: As part of the user access rights monitoring process, management
should perform regular reviews to validate user access. Reviews should test whether access
rights continue to be appropriate or whether they should be modified or deleted. Management
should review access rights on a schedule commensurate with risk.
IS.Wp.6.8.c: Determine whether management effectively mitigates risks posed by users. Review
whether management does the following:…Establishes and appropriately administers a user
access program for physical and logical access.
MGT.III.C.2:pg28: Management should establish a timely process to review, update, and remove
access privileges associated with any party when appropriate. The lack of such a process may
result in unauthorized or inappropriate activity. Failure to remove access privileges when
appropriate, particularly for those individuals with high levels of privilege, represents significant
i k
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Changes to physical and logical user access,
including those that result from voluntary and involuntary terminations, are submitted to and approved
by appropriate personnel.
Source: IS.II.C.7(b):pg16: Management should develop a user access program to implement and
administer physical and logical access controls to safeguard the institution’s information assets
and technology. This program should include the following elements:…Ongoing reviews by
business line and application owners to verify appropriate access based on job roles with
changes reported on a timely basis to security administration personnel. Timely notification from
human resources to security administrators to adjust user access based on job changes,
including terminations.
IS.WP.6.8: Determine whether management effectively mitigates risks posed by users. Review
whether management does the following:…Develops and maintains a culture that fosters
responsible and controlled access for users. Establishes and appropriately administers a user
access program for physical and logical access.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Identification and authentication are required
and managed for access to systems, applications, and hardware.
Source: ISIS.II.C.15(b):pg33: Management should implement effective application access
controls by doing the following: Implementing a robust authentication method consistent with the
criticality and sensitivity of the application.
IS.WP.6.22: Determine whether management controls access to applications. Review whether
management does the following: Implements a robust authentication method consistent with the
criticality and sensitivity of the application
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Access controls include password complexity
and limits to password attempts and reuse.
Source: IS.II.C.7:pg15: Access rights should be granted in accordance with the
institution’s physical and logical access control policies.
IS.WP.8.1.k: Determine whether the institution’s security operations activities include the following:
Enforcement of access controls and logical access control policies.
May 2017 Page 19


Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: All default passwords and unnecessary default
accounts are changed before system implementation.
Source: IS.II.C.15:pg31: Access rights to new software and hardware present a different problem.
Typically, hardware and software are shipped with default users and at least one default user has
privileged access. Lists of default accounts and passwords are readily available and can enable
anyone with access to the system to obtain privileged access. These passwords should be
changed, and the accounts should be disabled.
IS.WP.6.20: Determine whether management has an effective process to administer logical security
access rights for the network, operating systems, applications, databases, and network devices.
Review whether management has the following: A process to change or disable default user
accounts and passwords.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Customer access to Internet-based products or

services requires authentication controls (e.g., layered controls, multifactor) that are commensurate with
the risk.
Source: IS.II.C.16:pg36: Institutions increasingly offer services to customers through remotely
accessible technology, such as the Internet and mobile financial services. If the institution offers
such services, management should implement appropriate authentication techniques
commensurate with the risk from remote banking activities.
IS.WP.6.22: Determine whether management controls access to applications. Review whether
management does the following: Implements a robust authentication method consistent with the
criticality and sensitivity of the application.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Production and non-production environments

are segregated to prevent unauthorized access or changes to information assets. (*N/A if no production
environment exists at the institution or the institution’s third party.)
Source: IS.II.C.9:pg19: Management should secure access to computer networks through
multiple layers of access controls by doing the following: Establishing zones (e.g., trusted and
untrusted) according to the risk profile and criticality of assets contained within the zones and
appropriate access requirements within and between each security zone.
IS.WP.6.10.a: Determine whether management secures access to its computer networks through
multiple layers of access controls. Review whether management does the following: Establishes
zones (e.g., trusted and untrusted) according to risk with appropriate access requirements within and
between each zone.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Physical security controls are used to prevent
unauthorized access to information systems and telecommunication systems.
Source: IS.II.C.8:pg18: Management should implement appropriate preventive, detective, and
corrective controls for physical security. Physical access and damage or destruction to physical
components can impair the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information. Management
should implement appropriate preventive, detective, and corrective controls for mitigating the risks
inherent to those physical security zones.
IS.WP.6.9: Determine whether management applies appropriate physical security controls to
protect its premises and more sensitive areas, such as its data center(s).
May 2017 Page 20


Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: All passwords are encrypted in storage and in
transit.
Source: IS.II.C.19:pg41: Encryption is used to secure communications and data storage,
particularly authentication credentials and the transmission of sensitive information….Passwords
should be hashed or encrypted in storage.
IS.WP.6.30: Determine how and where management uses encryption and if the type and strength
are sufficient to protect information appropriately.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Confidential data are encrypted when
transmitted across public or untrusted networks (e.g., Internet).
Source: IS.II.C.13(b):pg28: When transmitting sensitive information over a public network,
information should be encrypted to protect it from interception or eavesdropping.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Mobile devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, and
removable media) are encrypted if used to store confidential data. (*N/A if mobile devices are not
used).
Source: IS.II.C.13(a):pg27: Data storage in portable devices, such as laptops, smart phones, and
tablets, poses unique problems….Risk mitigation typically involves data encryption.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Remote access to critical systems by

employees, contractors, and third parties uses encrypted connections and multifactor authentication.
Source: IS.II.C.15(c):pg33: Management should develop policies to ensure that remote

access by employees, whether using institution or personally owned devices, is provided in
a safe and sound manner… Management should employ the following measures: Use
robust authentication methods for access and encryption to secure communications.
IS.WP.6.23: Review whether management does the following: Provides remote access in a safe
and sound manner. Implements the controls necessary to offer remote access securely (e.g.,
disables unnecessary remote access, obtains approvals for and performs audits of remote access,
maintains robust configurations, enables logging and monitoring, secures devices, restricts remote
access during specific times, controls applications, enables strong authentication, and uses
encryption).
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Administrative, physical, or technical controls

are in place to prevent users without administrative responsibilities from installing unauthorized
software.
Source: IS.II.C.12:pg26: Methods or systems that management should consider include the
following:...Monitoring for unauthorized software and disallowing the ability to install
unauthorized software.
environment (e.g., configuration management of IT systems and applications, hardening of
systems and applications, use of standard builds, and patch management) in a controlled manner.
May 2017 Page 21


Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Customer service (e.g., the call center) utilizes
formal procedures to authenticate customers commensurate with the risk of the transaction or request.
Source: IS.II.C.16:pg36: Beyond authentication, remote access controls should include additional
layered security controls and may include some combination of the following: Controls over changes
to account maintenance activities (e.g., address or password changes) performed by customers
either online or through customer service channels.
IS.WP.6.22.a: Determine whether management controls access to applications. Review
whether management does the following: Implements a robust authentication method
consistent with the criticality and sensitivity of the application.
Preventive Controls/Access and Data Management: Data are disposed of or destroyed according to
documented requirements and within expected time frames.
Source: IS.II.C.13(c):pg28: The institution should base its disposal policies on the sensitivity of
the information. Policies, procedures, and training should inform employees about what
actions should be taken to securely dispose of computer-based media and protect the data
from the risks of reconstruction.
IS.WP.6.18.e: Determine whether management maintains policies and effectively controls and
protects access to and transmission of information to avoid loss or damage. Review whether
management does the following:…Has appropriate disposal procedures for both paper-based and
electronic information.
Preventive Controls/Device-End Point Security: Controls are in place to restrict the use of
removable media to authorized personnel.
Source: IS.II.C.13(a):pg27: Management should implement appropriate controls (such as the
use of a DLP program) over portable devices and the sensitive information contained on them.
IS.II.C.13(d):pg29: Management should implement policies for maintaining the security of
physical media (including backup tapes) containing sensitive information while in transit,
including to off-site storage, or when shared with third parties…. Use of adequate encryption of
sensitive information recorded on media that is being physically transported.
IS.WP.6.18: Determine whether management maintains policies and effectively controls
and protects access to and transmission of information to avoid loss or damage. Review
whether management does the following: Requires secure storage of all types of sensitive
information, whether on computer systems, portable devices, physical media, or hard-copy
documents.
May 2017 Page 22


Preventive Controls/Secure Coding: Developers working for the institution follow secure program
coding practices, as part of a system development life cycle (SDLC), that meet industry standards.
Source: IS.II.C.17:pg38: A secure software development life cycle ensures that Internet- and
client-facing applications have the necessary security controls. The institution should ensure
that all applications are securely developed…. At institutions that employ third parties to develop
applications, management should ensure that the third parties meet the same controls.
IS.WP.6.27: Determine whether management uses applications that were developed by
following secure development practices and that meet a prudent level of security.
MGT.III.C.5:pg31: Management should guide the development or acquisition of software by
using a system development life cycle (SDLC) or similar methodology appropriate for the
specific IT environment. The extent or use of the SDLC depends on the size and complexity of
the institution and the type of development activities performed. If the institution primarily
acquires software, management should verify the effective use of an SDLC by the third-party
provider.
MGT.WP.12.10. Determine whether management assesses and mitigates the operational risks
associated with the development or acquisition of software. Appropriate management of the
risks should include the following:
a. Policies documenting risk management controls for the development and acquisition of
systems.
b. System development life cycle or similar methodology based on the complexity and type of
development performed.
Preventive Controls/Secure Coding: The security controls of internally developed software are
periodically reviewed and tested. (*N/A if there is no software development.).
Source: IS.II.C.10:pg21: The process for introducing software should encompass securely
developing, implementing, and testing changes to both internally developed and acquired
software.
IS.WP.6.15: Determine whether management has a process to update and patch operating
systems, network devices, and software applications, including internally developed software
provided to customers, for newly discovered vulnerabilities.
MGT.III.C.5:pg31: Testing, which should include tests of security, validates that equipment and
systems function properly and produce the desired results. As part of the testing process,
management should verify whether new technology systems operate effectively with other
technology components, including vendor-supplied technology. Management should conduct
retesting periodically to help manage risk exposure on an ongoing basis.
MGT.WP.12.10. Determine whether management assesses and mitigates the operational risks
associated with the development or acquisition of software. Appropriate management of the risks
should include the following:
a. Policies documenting risk management controls for the development and acquisition of
systems.
b. System development life cycle or similar methodology based on the complexity and type of
development performed.
c. Tests of new technology, systems, and products before deployment to validate functionality,
controls, and interoperability.
May 2017 Page 23


Preventive Controls/Secure Coding: The security controls in internally developed software code are
independently reviewed before migrating the code to production. (*N/A if there is no software
development.)
Source: D&A.B.2: Financial institutions should consider information security requirements and
incorporate automated controls into internally developed programs, or ensure the controls are
incorporated into acquired software, before the software is implemented.
D&A.B.9: Independence – Audit and quality assurance personnel should be independent of the
project they are reviewing.
D&A.WP.13.1: Evaluate the security and integrity of system and application software by
reviewing: the adequacy of quality assurance and testing programs: the adequacy of security
and internal- control design standards; the adequacy of involvement by audit and security
personnel in software development and acquisition projects; and the adequacy of internal and
external security and control audits.
MGT.III.C.5:pg31: Audit should review the SDLC to ensure that appropriate controls are
incorporated during development. Management should test new technology, systems, and
products thoroughly before deployment.
MGT.WP.12.10.c: Appropriate management of the risks should include tests of new technology,
systems, and products before deployment to validate functionality, controls, and interoperability.
Preventive Controls/Secure Coding: Intellectual property and production code are held in escrow.
(*N/A if there is no production code to hold in escrow.)
Source: D&A.B.39: In addition to ensuring access to current documentation, organizations should
consider protecting their escrow rights by contractually requiring software vendors to inform the
organization if the software vendor pledges the software as loan collateral.
D&A.WP.6.1: Assess the adequacy of acquisition activities by evaluating… The adequacy of
contract and licensing provisions that address… Source-code accessibility/escrow assertions.
Detective Controls/Threat and Vulnerability Detection: Independent testing (including penetration

testing and vulnerability scanning) is conducted according to the risk assessment for external-facing
systems and the internal network.
Source: ISIS.II.C.17:pg38: To verify the controls have been developed and implemented
appropriately, management should perform appropriate tests (e.g., penetration tests, vulnerability
assessments, and application security tests) before launching or making significant changes to
external-facing applications.
IS.WP.4.2.d: Review whether management has the following: A validation of the risk identification
process through audits, self-assessments, penetration tests, and vulnerability assessments.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: Perform penetration tests before launching or making significant changes to
critical systems, including Internet- and client-facing applications. Management should review all
findings and develop processes to ensure the timely remediation of issues identified by the tests.
MGT.WP.12.8.f: Determine whether, as part of the institution’s information security program, the
board of directors oversees and management establishes a control structure that is intended to
specifically address cybersecurity risks and includes the following: Performing penetration tests
before launching new or making significant changes to existing Internet- and client-facing
applications and remediating findings from the tests.
May 2017 Page 24


Detective Controls/Threat and Vulnerability Detection: Anti-virus and anti-malware tools are used
to detect attacks.
Source: IS.II.C.12:pg26: Management should implement defense-in-depth to protect, detect, and
respond to malware. The institution can use many tools to block malware before it enters the
environment and to detect it and respond if it is not blocked.
IS.WP.6.17: Determine whether management has implemented defense-in-depth to protect,
detect, and respond to malware.
Detective Controls/Threat and Vulnerability Detection: Firewall rules are audited or verified at least
quarterly.
Source: IS.III:pg46: Security operations activities can include the following: Security software and
device management (e.g., maintaining the signatures on signature-based devices and firewall
rules).
IS.WP.8.1.a: Determine whether the institution’s security operations activities include the following:
Security software and device management (e.g., maintaining the signatures on signature-based
devices and firewall rules).
Detective Controls/Threat and Vulnerability Detection: E-mail protection mechanisms are used to
filter for common cyber threats (e.g., attached malware or malicious links).
environment and to detect it and respond if it is not blocked.
Detective Controls/Anomalous Activity Detection: The institution is able to detect anomalous

activities through monitoring across the environment.
environment and to detect it and respond if it is not blocked. Methods or systems that management
should consider include the following: …Monitoring for anomalous activity for malware and
polymorphic code.
Detective Controls/Anomalous Activity Detection: Customer transactions generating anomalous

activity alerts are monitored and reviewed.
Source: WPS.B.12: Monitor and log access to funds transfer systems, maintaining an audit trail of
all sequential transactions.
WPS.WP.II.1.3: Requires its senior management receive and review activity and quality control
reports which disclose unusual or unauthorized activities and access attempts.
May 2017 Page 25


Detective Controls/Anomalous Activity Detection: Logs of physical and/or logical access are
reviewed following events.
Source: ISIII.C.22:pg44: Institutions maintain event logs to understand an incident or cyber event
after it occurs. Monitoring event logs for anomalies and relating that information with other
sources of information broadens the institution’s ability to understand trends, react to threats, and
improve reports to management and the board.
IS.WP.6.21(f): As part of management’s process to secure the operating system and all system
components, determine whether management does the following: Filters and reviews logs for
potential security events and provides adequate reports and alerts.
Detective Controls/Anomalous Activity Detection: Access to critical systems by third parties is

monitored for unauthorized or unusual activity.
Source: OT.B.26: Appropriate access controls and monitoring should be in place between service
provider's systems and the institution.
Detective Controls/Anomalous Activity Detection: Elevated privileges are monitored.

Source: IS.II.C.15:pg31: Authorization for privileged access should be tightly controlled.
IS.WP.8.4.f: Determine whether management has effective threat monitoring processes, including
the following: Establishing and documenting a process to independently monitor administrators
and other users with higher privileges.
Detective Controls/Event Detection: A normal network activity baseline is established.

Source: IS.III.C:pg49: Incident identification involves indicators and analysis. …Examples of
technology-based intrusion identification systems and tools include the following:…Network
behavior analysis systems.
IS.WP.8.4.e: Determine whether management has effective threat monitoring processes, including
the following: Monitoring both incoming and outgoing network traffic to identify malicious activity
and data exfiltration.
Detective Controls/Event Detection: Mechanisms (e.g., anti-virus alerts, log event alerts) are in
place to alert management to potential attacks.
Source: IS.III.B:pg48: Threat monitoring policies should provide for continual and ad hoc monitoring
of threat intelligence communications and systems, effective incident detection and response, and
the use of monitoring reports in subsequent legal procedures…. Threat monitoring should address
indicators of vulnerabilities, attacks, compromised systems, and suspicious users, such as those
who do not comply with or seek to evade security policies.
IS.WP.8.5: Determine whether management has effective incident identification and assessment
processes to do the following:
e. Escalate the event consistent with the classification.
f. Report internally and externally as appropriate.
Detective Controls/Event Detection: Processes are in place to monitor for the presence of
unauthorized users, devices, connections, and software.
Source: IS.Introduction:pg2: Aligns the information security program with the enterprise risk
management program and identifies, measures, mitigates, and monitors risk….Management
should be able to identify and characterize the threats, assess the risks, make decisions regarding
the implementation of appropriate controls, and provide appropriate monitoring and reporting.
May 2017 Page 26


Detective Controls/Event Detection: Responsibilities for monitoring and reporting suspicious systems
activity have been assigned.
Source: IS.III.B:pg48: Management should establish the responsibility and authority of security
personnel and system administrators for monitoring. Threat monitoring should address indicators
of vulnerabilities, attacks, compromised systems, and suspicious users, such as those who do
not comply with or seek to evade security policies.
IS.WP.8.4.b: Determine whether management has effective threat monitoring processes,
including the following: Establishing responsibility and accountability for security personnel
and system administrators for monitoring.
Detective Controls/Event Detection: The physical environment is monitored to detect potential

unauthorized access.
Source: IS.II.C.8:pg18: Management should implement appropriate preventive, detective, and
corrective controls for physical security.
IS.WP.6.9: Determine whether management applies appropriate physical security controls to
protect its premises and more sensitive areas, such as its data center(s).
Corrective Controls/Patch Management: A patch management program is implemented and ensures

that software and firmware patches are applied in a timely manner.
Source: IS.II.C.10(d):pg24: Management should implement automated patch management
systems and software to ensure all network components (virtual machines, routers, switches,
mobile devices, firewalls, etc.) are appropriately updated.
IS.WP.6.15: Determine whether management has a process to update and patch operating
systems, network devices, and software applications, including internally developed software
provided to customers, for newly discovered vulnerabilities.
OPS.B.22: Management should establish procedures to stay abreast of patches, to test them in a
segregated environment, and to install them when appropriate.
OPS.WP.5.1: Determine whether management has implemented and effectively utilizes
operational control programs, processes, and tools such as… Project, change, and patch
management.
Corrective Controls/Patch Management: Patches are tested before being applied to systems and/or
software.
Source: OPS.B.22: Management should establish procedures to stay abreast of patches, to test
them in a segregated environment, and to install them when appropriate.
OPS.WP.5.1: Determine whether management has implemented and effectively utilizes
operational control programs, processes, and tools such as… Project, change, and patch
management.
Corrective Controls/Patch Management: Patch management reports are reviewed and reflect
missing security patches.
Source: D&A.B.50: Patch management standards should include procedures for identifying,
evaluating, approving, testing, installing, and documenting patches…Organizations should have
procedures in place to identify available patches and to acquire them from trusted sources.
May 2017 Page 27


Corrective Controls/Remediation: Issues identified in assessments are prioritized and resolved
based on criticality and within the time frames established in the response to the assessment report.
Source: IS.IV.A.4:pg56: The reports should prioritize risk and findings in the order of importance,
suggest options for remediation, and highlight repeat issues. Additionally, reports should
address root causes. … Reporting should trigger appropriate, timely, and reliable escalation and
response procedures.
IS.WP.1.2.a: Review management’s response to issues raised at, or since, the last
examination. Consider the following: Adequacy and timing of corrective action.
Domain 4 – External Dependency Management
Connections/Connections: The critical business processes that are dependent on external

connectivity have been identified.
Source: IS.II.C.6:pg14-15: To mitigate interconnectivity risk, management should do the
following: Identify connections with third parties, including other financial institutions, financial
institution.
IS.WP.6.7: Determine whether management comprehensively and effectively identifies, measures,
mitigates, monitors, and reports interconnectivity risk.
Connections/Connections: The institution ensures that third-party connections are authorized.

Source: IS.II.C.6:pg14-15: To mitigate interconnectivity risk, management should do the following:
Identify connections with third parties, including other financial institutions, financial institution
intermediaries, and third-party service providers….Assess all connections with third parties that
provide remote access capability or control over internal systems.
IS.WP.6.7: Determine whether management comprehensively and effectively identifies,
measures, mitigates, monitors, and reports interconnectivity risk. Review whether
management does the following: Identifies connections with third parties. …Measures the
risk associated with connections with third parties with remote access. Implements and
assesses the adequacy of appropriate controls to ensure the security of connections.
Connections/Connections: A network diagram is in place and identifies all external connections.

Source: IS.II.C.9:pg20: To ensure appropriate network security, management should maintain
accurate network and data flow diagrams, and store them securely, providing access only to
essential personnel. These diagrams should identify hardware, software, and network
components, internal and external connections, and types of information passed between
systems to facilitate the development of a defense-in-depth security architecture.
IS.WP.6.10.b: Determine whether management secures access to its computer networks
through multiple layers of access controls. Review whether management does the following:
Maintains accurate network diagrams and data flow charts.
May 2017 Page 28


Connections/Connections: Data flow diagrams are in place and document information flow to
external parties.
Source: IS.II.C.9:pg20: To ensure appropriate network security, management should maintain
accurate network and data flow diagrams, and store them securely, providing access only to
essential personnel. These diagrams should identify hardware, software, and network components,
internal and external connections, and types of information passed between systems to facilitate the
development of a defense-in-depth security architecture.
IS.WP.6.10.b: Determine whether management secures access to its computer networks through
multiple layers of access controls. Review whether management does the following: Maintains
accurate network diagrams and data flow charts.
Relationship Management/Due Diligence: Risk-based due diligence is performed on prospective

third parties before contracts are signed, including reviews of their background, reputation, financial
condition, stability, and security controls.
Source: IS.II.C.20:pg42: Management should oversee outsourced operations through the
following: Appropriate due diligence in third-party research, selection, and relationship
management.
IS.WP.6.31: Determine whether management appropriately oversees the effectiveness of
information security controls over outsourced operations and is accountable for the mitigation of
risks involved with the use of third-party service providers. Review the due diligence involved,
security controls to mitigate risk, and monitoring capabilities over the institution’s third parties.
MGT.III.C.8:pg34: An effective third-party management program should provide the framework
for management to identify, measure, mitigate, monitor, and report risks associated with the use
of third-party providers. Management should develop and implement enterprise-wide policies
and procedures to govern the third-party management program, including establishing
objectives and strategies, selecting a provider, negotiating the contract, and monitoring the
outsourced relationship.
MGT.WP.12.14.d: An effective third-party management program should incorporate: Evaluation of
prospective third-party providers based on the scope and criticality of services provided.
Relationship Management/Due Diligence: A list of third-party service providers is maintained.

Source: OT.B.19: To increase monitoring effectiveness, management should periodically rank
service provider relationships according to risk to determine which service providers require closer
monitoring.
OT.WP.I.1.3: Interview management and review institution information to identify…current
outsourcing relationships, including cloud computing relationships, and changes to those
relationships since the last examination. Identify any material service provider subcontractors;
affiliated service providers; foreign-based third-party providers; current transaction volume in each
function outsourced; any material problems experienced with the service provided; and service
providers with significant financial- or control-related weaknesses.
May 2017 Page 29


Relationship Management/Due Diligence: A risk assessment is conducted to identify criticality of
service providers.
Source: OT.B.6: Management should consider the following factors in evaluating the quantity of
risk at the inception of an outsourcing decision, [including]…Risks pertaining to the function
outsourced include… [and] Risks pertaining to the technology used.
OT.B.23: Financial institutions must also consider which of their critical financial services rely on
TSP services, including key telecommunication and network service providers.
MGT.III.C.8:pg34: Management should evaluate the quality of service, control environment, and
financial condition of the third parties providing the institution with critical IT services.
MGT.III.C.8:pg35: Some factors that management should consider or address regarding an
effective third-party management program include the following: Tailoring the institution’s third-
party management program based on an initial and ongoing risk assessment of the institution’s
third parties and the services they provide.
MGT.WP.12.14: An effective third-party management program should incorporate the following:

d. Evaluation of prospective third-party providers based on the scope and criticality of services
provided.
e. Tailoring of the monitoring program based on the initial and ongoing risk assessment of the third
party and the services provided..
Relationship Management/Contracts: Formal contracts that address relevant security and privacy
requirements are in place for all third parties that process, store, or transmit confidential data or provide
critical services.
Source: IS.II.C.20:pg42: If the third-party service provider stores, transmits, processes, or
disposes of customer information, management should require third- party service providers by
contract to implement appropriate measures designed to meet the Information Security
Standards.
IS.WP.6.31(c): Determine whether management appropriately oversees the effectiveness of
risks involved with the use of third-party service providers. Review the due diligence involved,
security controls to mitigate risk, and monitoring capabilities over the institution’s third parties.
Review the institution’s policies, standards, and procedures related to the use of the following:
…Contractual assurances from third-party service providers for security responsibilities, controls,
and reporting.
MGT.III.C.8:pg35: Third parties should support the responsibilities of their financial institution
clients to adhere to all applicable laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance .
MGT.III.C.8:pg35: When financial institution management contracts with third-party providers for
some or all IT services, it should ensure that controls over outsourced activities provide the
institution with the same level of assurance as controls over those activities performed in-house.
Relationship Management/Contracts: Contracts acknowledge that the third party is responsible for the
security of the institution’s confidential data that it possesses, stores, processes, or transmits.
following: Contractual assurances for security responsibilities, controls, and reporting.
IS.WP.6.31(c): Determine whether management appropriately oversees the effectiveness of

risks involved with the use of third-party service providers. … Review the institution’s policies,
standards, and procedures related to the use of the following: Contractual assurances from third-
party service providers for security responsibilities, controls, and reporting.
May 2017 Page 30


Relationship Management/Contracts: Contracts stipulate that the third-party security controls are
regularly reviewed and validated by an independent party.
Source: IS.II.C.20:pg42: Management should verify that third-party service providers implement
and maintain controls sufficient to appropriately mitigate risks. The institution’s contracts should
do the following: …Specify that the institution or an independent auditor has access to the service
provider to perform evaluations of the service provider’s performance against the Information
Security Standards.
IS.WP.6.31.e: Determine whether management appropriately oversees the effectiveness of
risks involved with the use of third-party service providers. …Review the institution’s policies,
standards, and procedures related to the use of the following: Independent review of the third-
party service provider’s security through appropriate reports from audits and tests.
Relationship Management/Contracts: Contracts identify the recourse available to the institution

should the third party fail to meet defined security requirements.
Source: OT.B.12: Institutions should include performance standards that define minimum service
level requirements and remedies for failure to meet standards in the contract.
OT.WP.I.3.4: Evaluate the process for entering into a contract with a service provider. Consider
whether the contract contains adequate and measurable service level agreements.
Relationship Management/Contracts: Contracts establish responsibilities for responding to security

incidents.
Source: IS.II.C.20:pg42: Management should oversee outsourced operations through the following:
• Contractual assurances for security responsibilities, controls, and reporting.
• Coordination of incident response policies and contractual notification requirements.
• Verification that information and cybersecurity risks are appropriately identified, measured,
mitigated, monitored, and reported.
IS.WP.6.31(f) & (g): Review the institution’s policies, standards, and procedures related to the
use of the following:
f. Coordination of incident response policies and contractual notification requirements.
g. Verification that information and cybersecurity risks are appropriately identified, measured,
mitigated, monitored, and reported.
Relationship Management/Contracts: Contracts specify the security requirements for the return or
destruction of data upon contract termination.
Source: OT.B.15: The contract should establish notification and time frame requirements and
provide for the timely return of the institution's data and resources in a machine-readable format
upon termination. Any costs associated with conversion assistance should also be clearly stated.
Relationship Management/Ongoing Monitoring: The third-party risk assessment is updated

regularly.
Source: OT.B.3: Factors institutions should consider include…tailoring the enterprise-wide,
service provider monitoring program based on initial and ongoing risk assessments of
outsourced services.
May 2017 Page 31


Relationship Management/Ongoing Monitoring: Audits, assessments, and operational performance
reports are obtained and reviewed regularly validating security controls for critical third parties.
following: …Independent review of the third party’s security through appropriate reports from
audits and tests.
IS.WP.6.31.e: Determine whether management appropriately oversees the effectiveness of
risks involved with the use of third-party service providers…. Review the institution’s policies,
standards, and procedures related to the use of the following:…Independent review of the third-
party service provider’s security through appropriate reports from audits and tests.
MGT.III.C.8:pg34 As part of a financial institution’s third-party management program,
management should ensure that third-party providers effectively provide support by doing the
following: Reviewing results of independent audits of IT controls at third-party providers.
MGT.WP.12.18: When reviewing information provided by the institution's third party providers,
determine the quality of management's follow-up and resolution of customer concerns and
problems with its third-party providers.
Relationship Management/Ongoing Monitoring: Ongoing monitoring practices include reviewing

critical third-parties’ resilience plans.
Source: OT.B.19: The program should monitor the service provider environment including its
security controls, financial strength, and the impact of any external events.
OT.WP.I.3.6: Evaluate the institution's process for monitoring the risk presented by the
service provider relationship. Ascertain that monitoring addresses general control
environment of the service provider through the receipt and review of appropriate audit and
regulatory reports; service provider's disaster recovery program and testing; information
security.
MGT.WP.4.7.c: Determine whether management has an effective ongoing monitoring process of
its third-party providers.
Domain 5 – Cyber Incident Management and Resilience

Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: The institution has documented how it will
react and respond to cyber incidents.
Source: BCP.B.4: Business continuity planning involves the development of an enterprise-wide
business continuity plan (BCP) and the prioritization of business objectives and critical operations
that are essential for recovery…focused on the impact of various threats that could potentially
disrupt operations rather than on specific events.
BCP.WP.7.5: Determine the existence of an appropriate enterprise-wide BCP.
BCP.WP.10: Determine whether the financial institution's and TSP's risk management strategies are
designed to achieve resilience, such as the ability to effectively respond to wide-scale disruptions,
including cyber attacks and attacks on multiple critical infrastructure sectors.
MGT.III.C.3:pg29: Institution management should develop, implement, and periodically test incident
response procedures, which should address escalation, remediation, and reporting of events and
incidents.
MGT.III.C.3(b):pg30: To address cybersecurity risk, the information security program should
consider the following: Cyber incident management and resilience.
MGT.WP.12.8.a: Determine whether a control structure includes: Developing and implementing
processes to identify, protect against, detect, respond to, and recover from security events and
incidents.
May 2017 Page 32


Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: Communication channels exist to provide
employees a means for reporting information security events in a timely manner.
Source: IS.III:pg46: Management should establish defined processes and appropriate
governance to facilitate the performance of security operations. Policies should address the
timing and extent of the security operations activities, reporting, escalation triggers, and
response actions.
IS.WP.2.7: Determine whether security officers and employees know, understand, and are
accountable for fulfilling their security responsibilities.
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: Roles and responsibilities for incident
response team members are defined.
Source: IS.III.D:pg51: Preparation determines the success of any intrusion response. Such
preparation involves defining the policies and procedures that guide the response; assigning
responsibilities to individuals….
IS.WP.8.6.e: Determine whether management has effective incident response processes,
including the following:…Policies and procedures to guide the response, assigning
responsibilities to individuals;…
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: The response team includes individuals with a
wide range of backgrounds and expertise, from many different areas within the institution. (e.g.,
management, legal, public relations, as well as information technology).
Source: IS.III.D:pg52: Because of the wide range of technical and nontechnical issues posed by an
intrusion, typical SIRT membership includes individuals with a wide range of backgrounds and
expertise from different areas within the institution. Those areas include management, legal, and
public relations, as well as IT staff.
IS.WP.8.6.c: Determine whether management has effective incident response processes, including
the following:…Appropriate balance of adequate people and technologies in the response.
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: A formal backup and recovery plan exists for
all critical business lines.
Source: BCP.B.4: The business continuity planning process should include the recovery,
resumption, and maintenance of all aspects of the business, not just recovery of the technology
components.
BCP.WP.3.1: Determine whether the work flow analysis was performed to ensure that all
departments and business processes are covered.
May 2017 Page 33


Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Planning: The institution plans to use business
continuity, disaster recovery, and data back-up programs to recover operations following an incident.
Source: IS.II.C.21:pg43: Business continuity plans should be reviewed as an integral part of the
security process. Strategies should consider the different risk environments and the degree of risk
mitigation necessary to protect the institution if continuity plans must be implemented.
Management should train personnel regarding their security roles during a disaster. Additionally,
management should update technologies and plans for backup sites and communications
networks. These security considerations should be integrated with the testing of the business
continuity plan.
IS.WP.6.34: Determine whether management effectively manages the following information
security considerations related to business continuity planning.
BCP.B.8: The risk assessment is the second step in the business continuity planning process. It
should include: evaluating the business impact analysis (BIA) assumptions using various threat
scenarios.
BCP.WP.I.4: Determine whether appropriate risk management over the business continuity process
is in place and if the financial institution's and TSP's risk management strategies consider wide-scale
recovery scenarios designed to achieve industry-wide resilience.
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Testing: Scenarios are used to improve incident
detection and response.
Source: IS.II.C.21:pg43: Management should do the following:… Establish and maintain
policies that address the concepts of information security incident response and resilience, and
test information security incident scenarios.
BCP.B.J-13: Cyber threats will continue to challenge business continuity preparedness. Financial
institutions should remain aware of emerging cyber threats and scenarios and consider their
potential impact to operational resilience.
BCP.WP.II.1.1: Determine whether the testing strategy addresses various event scenarios,
including potential issues encountered during a wide-scale disruption.
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Testing: Business continuity testing involves

collaboration with critical third parties.
Source: BCP.B.J-6: Testing with third parties should disclose the adequacy of both organizations'
ability to recover, restore, resume, and maintain operations after disruptions, consistent with
business and contractual requirements.
BCP.WP.I.9.3: Assess whether the third-party TSP's contract provides for the following elements
to ensure business resiliency…Testing requirements with the TSP.
Incident Resilience Planning and Strategy/Testing: Systems, applications, and data recovery is
tested at least annually.
Source: BCP.B.J-7: For critical services, annual or more frequent tests of the contingency plan are
required. As with all BCP testing, the frequency should be driven by the financial institution's risk
assessment, risk rating, and any significant changes to the operating environment.
BCP.WP.I.11.4: Determine whether the testing strategy includes guidelines for the frequency of
testing that are consistent with the criticality of business functions, recovery time objectives
(RTOs), recovery point objectives (RPOs), and recovery of the critical path, as defined in the
business impact analysis (BIA) and risk assessment, corporate policy, and regulatory guidelines.
May 2017 Page 34


Detection, Response & Mitigation/Detection: Alert parameters are set for detecting information
security incidents that prompt mitigating actions.
Source: IS.II.C.15(a):pg32: To prevent unauthorized access to or inappropriate activity on the
operating system and system utilities, management should do the following:…Filter and review
logs for potential security events and provide adequate reports and alerts.
IS.II.C.15(b):pg33: Management should implement effective application access controls by doing
the following:…Logging access and events, defining alerts for significant events, and developing
processes to monitor and respond to anomalies and alerts. IS.WP.6.21.f: As part of
management’s process to secure the operating system and all system components, determine
whether management does the following:…Filters and reviews logs for potential security events
and provides adequate reports and alerts.
IS.WP.6.22.f: Determine whether management controls access to applications. Review whether
management does the following:…Logs access and events, defines alerts for significant events,
and develops processes to monitor and respond to anomalies and alerts.
Detection, Response & Mitigation/Detection: System performance reports contain information that
can be used as a risk indicator to detect information security incidents.
IS.II.D:pg45: Risk reporting is a process that produces information systems reports that address
threats, capabilities, vulnerabilities, and inherent risk changes. Risk reporting should describe
any information security events that the institution faces and the effectiveness of management’s
response and resilience to those events.
IS.WP.7.1: Determine whether the institution has risk monitoring and reporting processes that
address changing threat conditions in both the institution and the greater financial industry.
Determine whether these processes address information security events faced by the institution,
the effectiveness of management’s response, and the institution’s resilience to those events.
Detection, Response & Mitigation/Detection: Tools and processes are in place to detect, alert, and
trigger the incident response program.
Source: IS.III.D:pg50: The institution’s program should have defined protocols to declare and
respond to an identified incident.
IS.WP.8.6.a: Determine whether management has effective incident response processes,
including the following: Protocols defined in the incident response policy to declare and respond
to an incident once identified.
Detection, Response & Mitigation/Response and Mitigation: Appropriate steps are taken to contain
and control an incident to prevent further unauthorized access to or use of customer information.
Source: IS.III.D:pg52: While containment strategies between institutions can vary, they typically
include the following broad elements: Isolation of compromised systems or enhanced monitoring
of intruder activities. Search for additional compromised systems. Collection and preservation of
evidence. Communication with affected parties and often the primary regulator, information-
sharing organizations (e.g., FS-ISAC), or law enforcement.
IS.WP.8.6.b: Determine whether management has effective incident response processes,
including the following: Procedures to minimize damage through the containment of the incident,
restoration of systems, preservation of data and evidence, and notification, as appropriate, to
customers and others as needed.
May 2017 Page 35


Escalation and Reporting/Escalation and Reporting: A process exists to contact personnel who are
responsible for analyzing and responding to an incident.
Source: IS.III.C:pg50: Escalation policies should address when different personnel within the
organization will be contacted and the responsibility those personnel have in incident analysis
and response.
IS.WP.8.5.h: Determine whether management has effective incident identification and
assessment processes to do the following: Develop procedures to test the incident escalation,
response, and reporting processes.
MGT.WP.2.8.f: Determine whether management establishes a formal process to obtain, analyze,
and respond to information on threats and vulnerabilities by developing a repeatable threat
intelligence and collaboration program.
Escalation and Reporting/Escalation and Reporting: Procedures exist to notify customers,

regulators, and law enforcement as required or necessary when the institution becomes aware of an
incident involving the unauthorized access to or use of sensitive customer information.
Source: IS.III.D:pg51: Additionally, management should define thresholds for reporting
significant security incidents, and consider developing processes for when the institution should
notify its regulators of incidents that may affect the institution’s operations, reputation, or
sensitive customer information.
IS.III.D:pg51: Protocols to define when and under what circumstances to notify and involve
regulators, customers, and law enforcement, including names and contact information for each
group.
IS.WP.8.6.f: Determine whether management has effective incident response processes,
including the following: Thresholds for reporting significant security incidents and processes to
notify, as appropriate, the institution’s regulators of those incidents that may affect the institution
or the financial system.
based on thresholds defined by the financial institution and applicable legal requirements.
Relevant thresholds could include significant financial impact, significant operational downtime,
operational or system breach, or loss of critical infrastructure.
MGT.WP.2.2.f: Review whether the board approves a policy to escalate and report significant
security incidents to the board, steering committee, government agencies, and law enforcement,
as appropriate.
Escalation and Reporting/Escalation and Reporting: The institution prepares an annual report of
security incidents or violations for the board or an appropriate board committee.
describes the overall status of the program and material matters related to the program,
including the following:…Security breaches or violations of law or regulation and management’s
responses to such incidents.
IS.WP.2.4.e:...Determine whether the report to the board describes the overall status of the
information security program and discusses material matters related to the program such as the
following:… Security breaches or violations and management’s responses.
May 2017 Page 36


Escalation and Reporting/Escalation and Reporting: Incidents are classified, logged, and tracked.
Source: OPS.B.28: Event/problem management plans should cover hardware, operating
systems, applications, and security devices and should address at a minimum: event/problem
identification and rating of severity based on risk; event/problem impact and root cause analysis;
documentation and tracking of the status of identified problems; the process for escalation;
event/problem resolution; management reporting.
OPS.WP.10.1: Describe and assess the event/problem management program’s ability to
identify, analyze, and resolve issues and events.
May 2017 Page 37

Explanation of FFIEC IT Examination Handbook References

Each statement from the FFIEC IT Examination Handbook has a unique identifier that begins with
the document, followed by the section.
Below is a list of the unique identifiers used to reference the all the documents and the sections in
the older references.
Document Section
Audit (AUD) Work Program (WP)
Business Continuity Planning (BCP) or
Development and Acquisition (D&A) Booklet (B) for older
references
Information Security (IS)
or
Management (MGT) Chapter.section.sub-
Operations (OPS) section for Information
Security and
Outsourcing Technology Services Management Booklets
Retail Payment Systems (RPS)
Wholesale Payment Systems (WPS)
Older references:
If it is a booklet, then the page number is listed. If it is from a work program, the tier, objective
reference, and statement number is listed. Each portion of the unique identifier is separated by a
period.
Therefore, if the reference is from the Audit Booklet page 15, it is referenced as
“AUD.B.15.”
If the reference is from the Business Continuity Planning Work Program Tier I, Objective 4,
statement 10, it is referenced as “BCP.WP.I.4.10.”
Newer references (Information Security and Management Booklets):

If it is from a booklet, then the booklet Chapter, Section and Sub-Section are list, followed by the
page number. Chapter, Section and Sub-Section are separated by a period, Page number is
separated by colons.
Therefore, if the reference is from the Information Security Booklet, Chapter I. Governance
of the Information Security Program, Section B. Responsibility and Accountability, page 4. It is
referenced as “IS.I.B:pg4:”
If the reference is from the Management Work Program, Objective 4,
Statement 3, it is referenced as “MGT.WP.4.3:”
May 2017 Page 38

Appendix B: Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool to NIST
Cybersecurity Framework
In 2014, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released a Cybersecurity
Framework for all sectors. The following provides a mapping of the FFIEC Cybersecurity
Assessment Tool (Assessment) to the statements included in the NIST Cybersecurity
Framework. NIST reviewed and provided input on the mapping to ensure consistency with
Framework principles and to highlight the complementary nature of the two resources. As the
Assessment is based on a number of declarative statements that address similar concepts across
maturity levels, the mapping references the first time the concept arises beginning with the
lowest maturity level. As such, statements at higher levels of maturity may also map to the NIST
Cybersecurity Framework.
References for the NIST Cybersecurity Framework are provided by page number and, if
applicable, by the reference code given to the statement by NIST. The Assessment declarative
statements are referenced by location in the tool. Following the mapping is the guide to the
development of the reference codes for the Assessment Tool.
The mapping is in the order of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
NIST Cybersecurity Framework FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
A clear understanding of the organization’s business Accomplished by completing the Inherent Risk Profile
drivers and security considerations specific to use of part of the Assessment.
informational technology and industrial control systems.
(p. 4)
Describe current cybersecurity posture (p. 4) Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
part of the Assessment.
Describe target state for cybersecurity (p. 4) Accomplished if an institution implements the
Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
Identify and prioritize opportunities for improvement with Accomplished if an institution implements the
the context of a continuous and repeatable process (p. Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
4)
Assess progress toward the target state (p. 4) Accomplished if an institution implements the
Communicate among internal and external stakeholders D1.TC.Tr.B.3: Situational awareness materials are
about cybersecurity risk (p. 4) made available to employees when prompted by highly
visible cyber events or by regulatory alerts.
D1.TC.Tr.B.4: Customer awareness materials are
readily available (e.g., DHS’ Cybersecurity Awareness
Month materials).
June 2015 1
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Mapping Cybersecurity Assessment Tool
to NIST Cybersecurity Framework
Risk-based approach to managing cybersecurity risk (p. D1.RM.RA.B.1: A risk assessment focused on
4) safeguarding customer information identifies reasonable
and foreseeable internal and external threats, the
likelihood and potential damage of threats and the
sufficiency of policies, procedures and customer
information systems.
D1.RM.RA.B.2: The risk assessment identifies Internet-
based systems and high-risk transactions that warrant
additional authentication controls.
D1.RM.RA.B.3: The risk assessment is updated to
address new technologies, products, services, and
connections before deployment.
Express a risk tolerance (p. 5) D1.G.Ov.Int.1: The institution has a cyber risk appetite
statement approved by the board or an appropriate
board committee.
Determine how to handle risk (mitigate, transfer, avoid, Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
accept) (p. 5) part of the Assessment Tool.
Develop the organizational understanding to manage Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
cybersecurity risk to systems, assets, data and Domain 1, Assessment Factor Governance.
capabilities (p. 8)
Develop and implement the appropriate safeguards to Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
ensure delivery of critical infrastructure services (p. 8) Domain 3, Assessment Factor Preventative Controls.
Develop and implement the appropriate activities to Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event. (p. 8) Domain 3, Assessment Factor Detective Controls, and
Domain 5, Assessment Factor Detection, Response and
Mitigation.
Develop and implement the appropriate activities to take Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
action regarding a detected cybersecurity event. (p. 8) Domain 5, Assessment Factor Detection, Response and
Mitigation and Assessment Factor Escalation and
Reporting.
Develop and implement the appropriate activities to Accomplished by completing the Cybersecurity Maturity
maintain plans for resilience and to restore capabilities Domain 5, Assessment Factor Incident Resilience
or services that were impaired due to a cybersecurity Planning and Strategy.
event. (p. 9)
Tier 1: Partial
Cybersecurity risk management is not formalized and This falls below Baseline.
risks are managed in an ad hoc and sometimes reactive
manner. (p. 10)
Prioritization of cybersecurity activities may not be This falls below Baseline.

directly informed by organizational risk objectives, the
threat environment or business/mission requirements.
(p. 10)
June 2015 2
Limited awareness of cybersecurity risk at the This falls below Baseline.

organizational level. (p. 10)
Organization-wide approach to managing cybersecurity This falls below Baseline.

risk has not been established. (p. 10)
Organization implements cybersecurity risk This falls below Baseline.

management on an irregular, case-by-case basis due to
varied experience or information gained from outside
sources. (p. 10)
Organization may not have processes that enable This falls below Baseline.
cybersecurity information to be shared within the
organization. (p. 10)
Organization may not have the processes in place to This falls below Baseline
participate in coordination or collaboration with other
entities. (p. 10)
Tier 2: Risk Informed

Risk management practices are approved by D1.RM.RMP.B.1: An information security and business
management but may not be established as continuity risk management function(s) exists within the
organizational-wide policy. (p. 10) institution.
Prioritization of cybersecurity activities is directly D2.TI.Th.B.3: Threat information is used to enhance

informed by organizational risk objectives, the threat internal risk management and controls.
environment, or business/mission requirements. (p. 10)
D1.G.Ov.Int.5: The board or an appropriate board
committee ensures management’s annual cybersecurity
self-assessment evaluates the institution’s ability to
meet its cyber risk management standards.
D1.G.SP.Int.2: Management periodically reviews the
cybersecurity strategy to address evolving cyber threats
and changes to the institution’s inherent risk profile.
There is an awareness of cybersecurity risk at the D1.G.Ov.B.2: Information security risks are discussed in
organizational level but an organization-wide approach management meetings when prompted by highly visible
to managing cybersecurity risk has not been cyber events or regulatory alerts.
established. (p. 10)
D1.TC.Tr.B.1: Annual information security training is
provided.
D1.TC.Tr.E.2: Management is provided cybersecurity
training relevant to their job responsibilities.
Risk-informed, management-approved processes and D1.RM.RMP.E.1: The risk management program

procedures are defined and implemented, and staff has incorporates cyber risk identification, measurement,
adequate resources to perform their cybersecurity mitigation, monitoring and reporting.
duties. (p. 10)
D1.R.St.E.3: Staff with cybersecurity responsibilities
have the requisite qualifications to perform the
necessary tasks of the position.
June 2015 3
Cybersecurity information is shared within the D1.TC.Tr.B.3: Situational awareness materials are
organization on an informal basis. (p. 10) made available to employees when prompted by highly
visible cyber events or regulatory alerts.
The organization knows its role in the larger ecosystem, D1.G.SP.A.3: The cybersecurity strategy identifies and
but has not formalized its capabilities to interact and communicates the institution’s role as a component of
share information externally. (p. 10) critical infrastructure in the financial services industry.
D1.G.SP.Inn.1: The cybersecurity strategy identifies and
communicates the institution’s role as it relates to other
critical infrastructures.
D2.TI.Th.B.1: The institution belongs or subscribes to a
threat and vulnerability information-sharing source(s)
that provides information on threats (e.g., FS-ISAC, US-
CERT).
Tier 3: Repeatable
The organization’s risk management practices are D1.G.SP.B.2: The institution has policies commensurate
formally approved and expressed as policy. (p. 10) with its risk and complexity that address the concepts of
information technology risk management.
Organizational cybersecurity practices are regularly D1.G.SP.E.3: A formal process is in place to update
updated based on the application of risk management policies as the institution’s inherent risk profile changes.
processes to changes in business/mission requirements
and a changing threat and technology landscape. (p. 10)
There is an organization-wide approach to manage D1.G.SP.Int.4: Management links strategic

cybersecurity risk. Risk-informed policies, processes, cybersecurity objectives to tactical goals.
and procedures are defined, implemented as intended,
D1.G.RM.Au.B.1: Independent audit or review
and reviewed. (p. 10)
evaluates policies, procedures, and controls across the
institution for significant risks and control issues
associated with the institution's operations, including
risks in new products, emerging technologies, and
Consistent methods are in place to respond effectively D1.G.SP.E.3: A formal process is in place to update
to changes in risk. (p. 10) policies as the institution’s inherent risk profile changes.
Personnel possess the knowledge and skills to perform D1.R.St.E.2: Management with appropriate knowledge
their appointed roles and responsibilities. (p. 10) and experience leads the institution’s cybersecurity
efforts.
D1.R.St.E.3: Staff with cybersecurity responsibilities has
the requisite qualifications to perform the necessary
tasks of the position.
June 2015 4
The organization understands its dependencies and D4.C.Co.B.1: The critical business processes that are
partners and receives information from these partners dependent on external connectivity have been identified.
that enables collaboration and risk-based management
D2.TI.Th.B.1: The institution belongs or subscribes to a
decisions within the organization in response to events.
threat and vulnerability information-sharing source(s)
(p. 10)
that provides information on threats (e.g., FS-ISAC, US-
CERT).
D2.TI.Th.Int.1: A formal threat intelligence program is
implemented and includes subscription to threat feeds
from external providers and internal sources.
D4.RM.Co.E.2: Responsibility for notification of direct
and indirect security incidents and vulnerabilities is
documented in contracts or SLAs.
Tier 4: Adaptive
Adapt cybersecurity practices based on lessons learned D5.DR.Re.E.8: Analysis of events is used to improve the
and predictive indicators derived from previous and institution's security measures and policies.
current cybersecurity activities. (p. 11)
D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
incidents and attacks on the institution and other
organizations are used to improve the institution’s risk
mitigation capabilities and response plan.
D1.TC.Tr.Int.1: Management incorporates lessons
learned from social engineering and phishing exercises
to improve the employee awareness programs.
Continually incorporates advanced technologies and D1.G.SP.A.5: Management is continuously improving

practices, adapting to a changing cybersecurity the existing cybersecurity program to adapt as the
landscape. (p. 11) desired cybersecurity target state changes.
Responds to evolving and sophisticated threats in a D5.IR.Pl.B.1: The institution has documented how it will
timely manner. (p. 11) react and respond to cyber incidents.
D5.IR.Pl.A.2: Multiple systems, programs, or processes
are implemented into a comprehensive cyber resilience
program to sustain, minimize and recover operations
from an array of potentially disruptive and destructive
cyber incidents.
June 2015 5
Manages cybersecurity risk through an organization- D5.IR.Pl.B.1: The institution has documented how it will
wide approach using risk-informed policies, processes, react and respond to cyber incidents
and procedures to address potential cybersecurity
D1.TC.Cu.E.1: The institution has formal standards of
events. (p. 11)
conduct that hold all employees accountable for
complying with all cybersecurity policies and
procedures.
D1.RM.RMP.Int.2: The risk management program
specifically addresses cyber risks beyond the
boundaries of the technological impacts (e.g., financial,
strategic, regulatory, compliance).
D1.G.Ov.A.5: Management and the board or an
appropriate board committee hold business units
accountable for effectively managing all cyber risks
associated with their activities.
Encourage cybersecurity risk management as part of D1.TC.Cu.Int.2: The risk culture requires formal
culture. (p. 11) consideration of cyber risks in all business decisions.
D1.TC.Cu.A.1: Management ensures continuous
improvement of cyber risk cultural awareness.
Evolve process from an awareness of previous D1.G.Ov.A.2: Management has a formal process to
activities, information shared by other sources, and continuously improve cybersecurity oversight.
continuous awareness of activities on systems and
networks. (p. 11)
Actively share information with partners to ensure that D2.IS.Is.Int.3: Information is shared proactively with the
accurate, current information is being distributed and industry, law enforcement, regulators, and information-
consumed to improve cybersecurity before a sharing forums.
cybersecurity event occurs. (p. 11)
Framework Profile
Establish a roadmap for reducing cybersecurity risk. (p. Accomplished if an institution implements the
11) Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
Develop a current profile. (p. 11) Accomplished if an institution implements the

Develop a target profile. (p. 11) Accomplished if an institution implements the

Identify and remediate gaps in current and target Accomplished if an institution implements the
profiles. (p. 11) Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
Develop a risk-management approach to achieve Discussed in the User’s Guide.

cybersecurity goals in a cost-effective, prioritized
manner (p. 11)
Executive leadership communicates the mission Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
priorities, available resources, and overall risk tolerance Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
to the business/process level. (p. 12)
June 2015 6
Business/Process managers collaborate with the Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
implementation/operations level to communicate Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
business needs and create a risk profile using the input
from the executive leadership. (p. 12)
Business/process managers perform an impact Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
assessment from the implementation progress provided Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
by the implementation/operations group. (p. 12)
Business/process managers perform an impact Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
assessment from the implementation progress provided Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
by the implementation/operations group. (p. 12)
Business/process managers report the outcomes of that Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
impact assessment to the executive level to inform the Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
organization’s overall risk management process. (p. 12)
Business/process managers notify the Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
implementation/operations level to raise awareness of Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
business impact. (p. 12)
Operations group communicates the risk Profile Discussed in the User’s Guide and the Overview for
implementation progress to the business/process level. Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors.
(p. 12)
Create or improve a cybersecurity program. (p. 13) Discussed in the User’s guide.
Organization identifies its business/mission objectives Discussed in the User’s guide.

and high-level organizational priorities. (p. 14)
Organization identifies related systems and assets, Accomplished by completing the Inherent Risk Profile
regulatory requirements, and overall risk approach. (p. part of the Tool.
14)
Organization identifies threats to, and vulnerabilities of, Accomplished if an institution completes the Inherent
identified systems and assets (p. 14) Risk Profile part of the Assessment.
Develop a current profile. (p. 14) Accomplished if an institution implements the

Conduct a risk assessment. (p. 14) Accomplished if an institution completes the Inherent
Risk Profile part of the Assessment.
Create a target profile. (p. 14) Accomplished if an institution implements the

Compare the current and target profile to determine Accomplished if an institution implements the
gaps. (p. 14) Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
Create a prioritized action plan to address gaps. (p. 14) Accomplished if an institution implements the
Implement action plan. (p. 14) Accomplished if an institution implements the

June 2015 7
Repeat as needed to continuously assess and improve Accomplished if an institution implements the
cybersecurity. (p. 14) Assessment as described in the User’s Guide.
Communicate cybersecurity requirements with D4.RM.Co.B.1: Formal contracts that address relevant
interdependent stakeholders responsible for the delivery security and privacy requirements are in place for all
of essential critical infrastructure services. (p. 15) third parties that process, store, or transmit confidential
data or provide critical services.
D4.RM.Co.E.2: Responsibility for notification of direct
and indirect security incidents and vulnerabilities is
documented in contracts or SLAs.
Identify and address individual privacy and civil liberties D4.RM.Co.B.1: Formal contracts that address relevant
implications that may result from cybersecurity security and privacy requirements are in place for all
operations (p. 15) third parties that process, store, or transmit confidential
data or provide critical services.
Governance of cybersecurity risk.
D1.G.Ov.E.2: Management is responsible for ensuring
Identifying and authorizing access. compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
Awareness and training measures. related to cybersecurity.
Anomalous activity detection reviewed for privacy D2.IS.Int.2: Information-sharing agreements are used
concerns. as needed or required to facilitate sharing threat
information with other financial sector institutions or third
Review of the sharing of personal information within and parties.
outside of the organization.
June 2015 8
Appendix A: Framework Core

ID.AM-1: Physical devices and systems within the D1.G.IT.B.1: An inventory of organizational assets (e.g.,
organization are inventoried. (p. 20) hardware, software, data, and systems hosted externally)
is maintained.
ID.AM-2: Software platforms and applications within the D1.G.IT.B.1: An inventory of organizational assets (e.g.,
organization are inventoried. (p. 20) hardware, software, data, and systems hosted externally)
is maintained.
ID.AM-3: The organizational communication and data D4.C.Co.B.4: Data flow diagrams are in place and
flow is mapped. (p. 20) document information flow to external parties.
D4.C.Co.Int.1: A validated asset inventory is used to
create comprehensive diagrams depicting data
repositories, data flow, infrastructure, and connectivity.
ID.AM-4: External information systems are mapped and D4.RM.Dd.B.2: A list of third-party service providers is
catalogued. (p. 20) maintained.
D4.C.Co.B.3: A network diagram is in place and identifies
all external connections.
ID.AM-5: Resources are prioritized based on the D1.G.IT.B.2: Institution assets (e.g., hardware, systems,
classification / criticality / business value of hardware, data, and applications) are prioritized for protection based
devices, data, and software. (p. 20) on the data classification and business value.
ID.AM-6: Workforce roles and responsibilities for D1.R.St.B.1: Information security roles and
business functions, including cybersecurity, are responsibilities have been identified.
established. (p. 20)
D1.TC.Cu.B.1: Management holds employees
accountable for complying with the information security
program.
ID.BE-1: The organization’s role in the supply chain is D1.G.SP.A.3: The cybersecurity strategy identifies and
identified and communicated. (p. 21) communicates the institution’s role as a component of
critical infrastructure in the financial services industry.
ID.BE-2: The organization’s place in critical infrastructure D1.G.SP.Inn.1: The cybersecurity strategy identifies and
and their industry ecosystem is identified and communicates its role as it relates to other critical
communicated. (p. 21) infrastructures.
ID.BE-3: Priorities for organizational mission, objectives, D1.G.SP.E.2: The institution has a formal cybersecurity
and activities are established. (p. 21) program that is based on technology and security industry
standards or benchmarks.
D1.G.Ov.Int.5: The board or an appropriate board
committee ensures management’s annual cybersecurity
self-assessment evaluates the institution’s ability to meet
its cyber risk management standards.
D1.G.SP.Int.3: The cybersecurity strategy is incorporated
into, or conceptually fits within, the institution’s enterprise-
wide risk management strategy.
June 2015 9
ID.BE-4: Dependencies and critical functions for delivery D4.C.Co.B.1: The critical business processes that are
of critical services are established. (p. 21) dependent on external connectivity have been identified.
D1.G.IT.B.2: Organizational assets (e.g., hardware,
systems, data, and applications) are prioritized for
protection based on the data classification and business
value.
ID.BE-5: Resilience requirements to support delivery of D5.IR.Pl.B.5: A formal backup and recovery plan exists
critical services are established. (p. 21) for all critical business lines.
D5.IR.Pl.E.3: Alternative processes have been
established to continue critical activity within a reasonable
time period.
ID.GV-1: Organizational information security policy is D1.G.SP.B.4: The institution has board-approved
established. (p. 21) policies commensurate with its risk and complexity that
address information security.
ID.GV-2: Information security roles & responsibility are D1.G.SP.B.7: All elements of the information security
coordinated and aligned with internal roles and external program are coordinated enterprise-wide.
partners. (p. 21)
D4.RM.Co.B.2: Contracts acknowledge that the third
party is responsible for the security of the institution’s
confidential data that it possesses, stores, processes, or
transmits.
D4.RM.Co.B.5: Contracts establish responsibilities for
responding to security incidents.
ID.GV-3: Legal and regulatory requirements regarding D1.G.Ov.E.2: Management is responsible for ensuring
cybersecurity, including privacy and civil liberties compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related
obligations, are understood and managed. (p. 21) to cybersecurity.
ID.GV-4: Governance and risk management processes D1.G.Ov.B.1: Designated members of management are
address cybersecurity risks. (p. 22) held accountable by the board or an appropriate board
committee for implementing and managing the information
security and business continuity programs.
D1.G.Ov.B.3: Management provides a written report on
the overall status of the information security and business
continuity programs to the board or an appropriate
committee of the board at least annually.
D1.G.Ov.E.1: At least annually, the board or an
appropriate board committee reviews and approves the
institution’s cybersecurity program.
D1.G.SP.E.1: The institution augmented its information
security strategy to incorporate cybersecurity and
resilience.
D1.G.Ov.Int.1: The institution has a cyber risk appetite
statement approved by the board or an appropriate board
committee.
June 2015 10
ID.RA-1: Asset vulnerabilities are identified and D2.TI.Ti.B.2: Threat information is used to monitor threats
documented. (p. 22) and vulnerabilities.
D3.DC.Th.B.1: Independent testing (including penetration
testing and vulnerability scanning) is conducted according
to the risk assessment for the external-facing systems and
the internal network.
D1.RM.RA.E.2: The focus of the risk assessment has
expanded beyond customer information to address all
information assets.
D3.DC.Th.E.5: Vulnerability scanning is conducted and
analyzed before deployment/redeployment of new/existing
devices.
D3.DC.Th.A.1: Weekly vulnerability scanning is rotated
amongst environments to scan all environments
throughout the year.
ID.RA-2: Threat and vulnerability information is received D2.TI.Ti.B.1: The institution belongs or subscribes to a
from information-sharing forums and sources. (p. 22) threat and vulnerability information-sharing source(s) that
provides information on threats (e.g., FS-ISAC, US-
CERT).
ID.RA-3: Threats to organizational assets are identified D3.DC.An.B.1: The institution is able to detect anomalous
and documented. (p. 22) activities through monitoring across the environment.
D2.MA.Ma.E.1: A process is implemented to monitor
threat information to discover emerging threats.
D2.MA.Ma.E.4: Monitoring systems operate continuously
with adequate support for efficient incident handling.
D2.MA.Ma.Int.2: A profile is created for each threat that
identifies the likely intent, capability, and target of the
threat.
ID.RA-4: Potential impacts are analyzed. (p. 22) D5.RE.Re.B.1: Appropriate steps are taken to contain and
control an incident to prevent further unauthorized access
to or use of customer information.
D5.ER.Er.Ev.1: Criteria have been established for
escalating cyber incidents or vulnerabilities to the board
and senior management based on the potential impact
and criticality of the risk.
ID.RA-5: Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and D1.RM.RA.B.1: A risk assessment focused on

impacts are used to determine risk. (p. 22) safeguarding customer information identifies reasonable
and foreseeable internal and external threats, the
likelihood and potential damage of threats, and the
sufficiency of policies, procedures and customer
D1.RM.RA.E.2: The focus of the risk assessment has
expanded beyond customer information to address all
information assets.
D1.RM.RA.E.1: Risk assessments are used to identify the
cybersecurity risks stemming from new products, services,
or relationships.
June 2015 11
ID.RA-6: Risk responses are identified and prioritized. D5.IR.Pl.B.1: The institution has documented how it will
(p. 22) react and respond to cyber incidents.
D5.DR.Re.E.1: The incident response plan is designed to
prioritize incidents, enabling a rapid response for
significant cybersecurity incidents or vulnerabilities.
D5.IR.Pl.E.1: The remediation plan and process outlines
the mitigating actions, resources, and time parameters.
ID.RM-1: Risk management processes are managed D1.G.Ov.B.1: Designated members of management are
and agreed to by organizational stakeholders. (p. 23) held accountable by the board or an appropriate board
committee for implementing and managing the information
security and business continuity programs.
ID.RM-2: Organizational risk tolerance is determined and D1.G.Ov.Int.3: The institution has a cyber risk appetite
clearly expressed. (p. 23) statement approved by the board or an appropriate board
committee.
ID.RM-3: The organization’s determination of risk D1.G.SP.A.4: The risk appetite is informed by the
tolerance is informed by their role in critical infrastructure institution’s role in critical infrastructure.
and sector specific risk analysis. (p. 23)
PR.AC-1: Identities and credentials are managed for D3.PC.Im.B.7: Access to make changes to systems
authorized devices and users. (p. 23) configurations (including virtual machines and
hypervisors) is controlled and monitored.
D3.PC.Am.B.6: Identification and authentication are
required and managed for access to systems,
applications, and hardware.
PR.AC-2: Physical access to assets is managed and D3.PC.Am.B.11: Physical security controls are used to
protected. (p. 23) prevent unauthorized access to information systems and
telecommunication systems.
D3.PC.Am.B.17: Administrative, physical, or technical
controls are in place to prevent users without
administrative responsibilities from installing unauthorized
software.
PR.AC-3: Remote access is managed. (p. 23) D3.PC.Am.B.15: Remote access to critical systems by
employees, contractors, and third parties uses encrypted
connections and multifactor authentication.
D3.PC.De.E.7: The institution wipes data remotely on
mobile devices when a device is missing or stolen. (*N/A if
mobile devices are not used.)
D3.PC.Im.Int.2: Security controls are used for remote
access to all administrative consoles, including restricted
virtual systems.
June 2015 12
PR.AC-4: Access permissions are managed, D3.PC.Am.B.1: Employee access is granted to systems
incorporating the principles of least privilege and and confidential data based on job responsibilities and the
separation of duties. (p. 24) principles of least privilege.
D3.PC.Am.B.2: Employee access to systems and
confidential data provides for separation of duties.
D3.PC.Am.B.5: Changes to physical and logical user
access, including those that result from voluntary and
involuntary terminations, are submitted to and approved
by appropriate personnel.
PR.AC-5: Network integrity is protected, incorporating D3.DC.Im.B.1: Network perimeter defense tools (e.g.,
network segregation where appropriate. (p. 24) border router and firewall) are used.
D3.DC.Im.Int.1: The enterprise network is segmented in
multiple, separate trust/security zones with defense-in-
depth strategies (e.g., logical network segmentation, hard
backups, air-gapping) to mitigate attacks.
PR.AT-1: All users are informed and trained. (p. 24) D1.TC.Tr.B.2: Annual information security training
includes incident response, current cyber threats (e.g.,
phishing, spear phishing, social engineering, and mobile
security), and emerging issues.
PR.AT-2: Privileged users understand roles & D1.TC.Tr.E.3: Employees with privileged account
responsibilities. (p. 24) permissions receive additional cybersecurity training
commensurate with their levels of responsibility.
PR.AT-3: Third-party stakeholders (suppliers, D1.TC.Tr.B.4: Customer awareness materials are readily
customers, partners) understand roles & responsibilities. available (e.g., DHS’ Cybersecurity Awareness Month
(p. 24) materials).
D1.TC.Tr.Int.2: Cybersecurity awareness information is
provided to retail customers and commercial clients at
least annually.
PR.AT-4: Senior executives understand roles and D1.TC.Tr.E.2: Management is provided cybersecurity
responsibilities. (p. 24) training relevant to their job responsibilities.
PR.AT-5: Physical and information security personnel D1.TC.Tr.E.3: Employees with privileged account
understand roles & responsibilities. (p. 25) permissions receive additional cybersecurity training
commensurate with their levels of responsibility.
D1.R.St.E.3: Staff with cybersecurity responsibilities has
the requisite qualifications to perform the necessary tasks
of the position.
June 2015 13
PR.DS-1: Data-at-rest is protected. (p. 25) D1.G.IT.B.13: Confidential data is identified on the
institution's network.
D3.PC.Am.B.14: Mobile devices (e.g., laptops, tablets,
and removable media) are encrypted if used to store
confidential data. (*N/A if mobile devices are not used).
D4.RM.Co.B.1: Formal contracts that address relevant
security and privacy requirements are in place for all third
parties that process, store, or transmit confidential data or
provide critical services.
D3.PC.Am.A.1: Encryption of select data at rest is
determined by the institution’s data classification and risk
assessment.
PR.DS-2: Data-in-transit is protected. (p. 25) D3.PC.Am.B.13: Confidential data is encrypted when
transmitted across public or untrusted networks (e.g.,
Internet).
D3.PC.Am.E.5: Controls are in place to prevent
unauthorized access to cryptographic keys.
D3.PC.Am.Int.7: Confidential data is encrypted in transit
across private connections (e.g., frame relay and T1) and
within the institution’s trusted zones.
PR.DS-3: Assets are formally managed throughout D1.G.IT.E.3: The institution proactively manages system
removal, transfers, and disposition. (p. 25) end-of-life (e.g., replacement) to limit security risks.
D1.G.IT.E.2: The institution has a documented asset life-
cycle process that considers whether assets to be
acquired have appropriate security safeguards.
PR.DS-4: Adequate capacity to ensure availability is D5.IR.Pl.B.5: A formal backup and recovery plan exists
maintained. (p. 25) for all critical business lines.
D5.IR.Pl.B.6: The institution plans to use business
continuity, disaster recovery, and data backup programs
to recover operations following an incident.
D5.IR.Pl.E.3: Alternative processes have been
established to continue critical activity within a reasonable
time period.
D3.PC.Im.E.4: A risk-based solution is in place at the
institution or Internet-hosting provider to mitigate
disruptive cyber attacks (e.g., DDoS attacks).
June 2015 14
PR.DS-5: Protections against data leaks are D3.PC.Am.B.15: Remote access to critical systems by
implemented. (p. 26) employees, contractors, and third parties uses encrypted
connections and multifactor authentication.
D3.PC.Am.Int.1: The institution has implemented tools to
prevent unauthorized access to or exfiltration of
confidential data.
D3.PC.De.Int.1: Data loss prevention controls or devices
are implemented for inbound and outbound
communications (e.g., e-mail, FTP, Telnet, prevention of
large file transfers).
D3.DC.Ev.Int.1: Controls or tools (e.g., data loss
prevention) are in place to detect potential unauthorized or
unintentional transmissions of confidential data.
PR.DS-6: Integrity checking mechanisms are used to D3.PC.Se.Int.3: Software code executables and scripts
verify software, firmware, and information integrity. (p. are digitally signed to confirm the software author and
26) guarantee that the code has not been altered or
corrupted.
D3.PC.De.Int.2: Mobile device management includes
integrity scanning (e.g., jailbreak/rooted detection). (*N/A if
mobile devices are not used.)
PR.DS-7: The development and testing environment(s) D3.PC.Am.B.10: Production and non-production
are separate from the production environment. (p. 26) environments are segregated to prevent unauthorized
access or changes to information assets. (*N/A if no
production environment exists at the institution or the
institution’s third party.)
PR.IP-1: A baseline configuration of information D3.PC.Im.B.5: Systems configurations (for servers,

technology/industrial control systems is created and desktops, routers, etc.) follow industry standards and are
maintained. (p. 26) enforced.
PR.IP-2: A System Development Life Cycle to manage D3.PC.Se.B.1: Developers working for the institution
systems is implemented. (p. 26) follow secure program coding practices, as part of a
system development life cycle (SDLC), that meet industry
standards.
D3.PC.Se.E.1: Security testing occurs at all post-design
phases of the SDLC for all applications, including mobile
applications. (*N/A if there is no software development.)
PR.IP-3: Configuration change control processes are in D1.G.IT.B.4: A change management process is in place
place. (p. 27) to request and approve changes to systems
configurations, hardware, software, applications, and
security tools.
PR.IP-4: Backups of information are conducted, D5.IR.Pl.B.5: A formal backup and recovery plan exists
maintained, and tested periodically. (p. 27) for all critical business lines.
D5.IR.Te.E.3: Information backups are tested periodically
to verify they are accessible and readable.
PR.IP-5: Policy and regulations regarding the physical D3.PC.Am.B.11: Physical security controls are used to
operating environment for organizational assets are met. prevent unauthorized access to information systems and
(p. 27) telecommunication systems.
June 2015 15
PR.IP-6: Data is destroyed according to policy. (p. 27) D1.G.IT.B.19: Data is disposed of or destroyed according
to documented requirements and within expected time
frames.
PR.IP-7: Protection processes are continuously D1.RM.RMP.E.2: Management reviews and uses the
improved. (p. 27) results of audits to improve existing policies, procedures,
and controls.
D1.G.Ov.A.2: Management has a formal process to
continuously improve cybersecurity oversight.
PR.IP-8: Effectiveness of protection technologies is D2.IS.Is.B.1: Information security threats are gathered
shared with appropriate parties. (p. 28) and shared with applicable internal employees.
D2.IS.Is.E.2: A representative from the institution
participates in law enforcement or information-sharing
organization meetings.
PR.IP-9: Response plans (Incident Response and D5.IR.Pl.B.1: The institution has documented how it will
Business Continuity) and recovery plans (Incident react and respond to cyber incidents.
Recovery and Disaster Recovery) are in place and
managed. (p. 28)
PR.IP-10: Response and recovery plans are tested. (p. D5.IR.Te.B.1: Scenarios are used to improve incident
28) detection and response.
D5.IR.Te.B.3: Systems, applications, and data recovery is
tested at least annually.
PR.IP-11: Cybersecurity is included in human resources D1.R.St.E.4: Employment candidates, contractors, and
practices (e.g., deprovisioning, personnel screening). (p. third parties are subject to background verification
28) proportional to the confidentiality of the data accessed,
business requirements, and acceptable risk.
PR.IP-12: A vulnerability management plan is developed D3.CC.Re.Ev.2: Formal processes are in place to resolve
and implemented. (p. 28) weaknesses identified during penetration testing.
PR.MA-1: Maintenance and repair of organizational D3.CC.Re.Int.5: The maintenance and repair of
assets is performed and logged in a timely manner, with organizational assets are performed by authorized
approved and controlled tools (p. 28) individuals with approved and controlled tools.
D3.CC.Re.Int.6: The maintenance and repair of
organizational assets are logged in a timely manner.
PR.MA-2: Remote maintenance of organizational assets D3.PC.Im.B.7: Access to make changes to systems
is approved, logged, and performed in a manner that configurations (including virtual machines and
prevents unauthorized access (p. 28) hypervisors) is controlled and monitored.
PR.PT-1: Audit/log records are determined, documented, D1.G.SP.B.3: The institution has policies commensurate
implemented, and reviewed in accordance with policy. (p. with its risk and complexity that address the concepts of
29) threat information sharing.
D2.MA.Ma.B.1: Audit log records and other security event
logs are reviewed and retained in a secure manner.
D2.MA.Ma.B.2: Computer event logs are used for
investigations once an event has occurred.
June 2015 16
PR.PT-2: Removable media is protected and its use D1.G.SP.B.4: The institution has board-approved policies
restricted according to a specified policy. (p. 29) commensurate with its risk and complexity that address
information security.
D3.PC.De.B.1: Controls are in place to restrict the use of
removable media to authorized personnel.
D3.PC.Im.E.3: Technical controls prevent unauthorized
devices, including rogue wireless access devices and
removable media from connecting to the internal
network(s).
PR.PT-3: Access to systems and assets is controlled, D3.PC.Am.B.7: Access controls include password
incorporating the principle of least functionality. (p. 29) complexity and limits to password attempts and reuse.
D3.PC.Am.B.4: User access reviews are performed
periodically for all systems and applications based on the
risk to the application or system.
D3.PC.Am.B.3: Elevated privileges (e.g., administrator
privileges) are limited and tightly controlled (e.g., assigned
to individuals, not shared, and require stronger password
controls).
D4.RM.Om.Int.1: Third-party employee access to the
institution's confidential data is tracked actively based on
the principles of least privilege.
PR.PT-4: Communications networks are secured. (p. 29) D3.PC.Im.B.1: Network perimeter defense tools (e.g.,
border router and firewall) are used.
D3.PC.Am.B.11: Physical security controls are used to
prevent unauthorized access to information systems, and
telecommunication systems.
D3.PC.Im.Int.1: The enterprise network is segmented in
multiple, separate trust/security zones with defense-in-
depth strategies (e.g., logical network segmentation, hard
backups, air-gapping) to mitigate attacks.
DE.AE-1: A baseline of network operations and expected D3.DC.Ev.B.1: A normal network activity baseline is
data flows for users and systems is established and established.
managed. (p. 30)
D4.C.Co.B.4: Data flow diagrams are in place and
document information flow to external parties.
DE.AE-2: Detected events are analyzed to understand D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber risk
attack targets and methods. (p. 30) incidents and attacks on the institution and other
DE.AE-3: Event data are aggregated and correlated D3.DC.Ev.E.1: A process is in place to correlate event
from multiple sources and sensors. (p. 30) information from multiple sources (e.g., network,
application, or firewall).
June 2015 17
DE.AE-4: Impact of event is determined. (p. 30) D5.IR.Te.E.1: Recovery scenarios include plans to
recover from data destruction, and impacts to data
integrity, data loss, and system and data availability.
D5.ER.Es.E.1: Criteria have been established for
D1.RM.RMP.A.4: A process is in place to analyze the
financial impact cyber incidents have on the institution’s
capital.
DE.AE-5: Incident alert thresholds are established. (p. D5.DR.De.B.1: Alert parameters are set for detecting
30) information security incidents that prompt mitigating
actions.
D3.DC.An.E.4: Thresholds have been established to
determine activity within logs that would warrant
management response.
D3.DC.An.Int.3: Tools actively monitor security logs for
anomalous behavior and alert within established
parameters.
DE.CM-1: The network is monitored to detect potential D3.DC.An.B.2: Customer transactions generating
cybersecurity events. (p. 30) anomalous activity alerts are monitored and reviewed.
D3.DC.An.B.3: Logs of physical and/or logical access are
reviewed following events.
DE.CM-2: The physical environment is monitored to D3.PC.Am.E.4: Physical access to high-risk or

detect potential cybersecurity events. (p. 30) confidential systems is restricted, logged, and
unauthorized access is blocked.
D3.Dc.Ev.B.5: The physical environment is monitored to
detect potential unauthorized access.
DE.CM-3: Personnel activity is monitored to detect D3.DC.An.A.3: A system is in place to monitor and
potential cybersecurity events. (p. 31) analyze employee behavior (network use patterns, work
hours, and known devices) to alert on anomalous
activities.
DE.CM-4: Malicious code is detected. (p. 31) D3.DC.Th.B.2: Antivirus and anti-malware tools are used
to detect attacks.
DE.CM-5: Unauthorized mobile code is detected. (p. 31) D3.PC.De.E.5: Antivirus and anti-malware tools are
deployed on end-point devices (e.g., workstations,
laptops, and mobile devices).
DE.CM-6: External service provider activity is monitored D4.RM.Om.Int.1: Third-party employee access to the
to detect potential cybersecurity events. (p. 31) institution's confidential data is tracked actively based on
the principles of least privilege.
DE.CM-7: Monitoring for unauthorized personnel, D3.DC.Ev.B.3: Processes are in place to monitor for the
connections, devices and software is performed. (p. 31) presence of unauthorized users, devices, connections,
and software.
June 2015 18
DE.CM-8: Vulnerability scans are performed. (p. 31) D3.DC.Th.E.5: Vulnerability scanning is conducted and
analyzed before deployment/redeployment of new/existing
devices.
DE.DP-1: Roles and responsibilities for detection are D3.DC.Ev.B.4: Responsibilities for monitoring and
well defined to ensure accountability. (p. 31) reporting suspicious systems activity have been assigned.
DE.DP-2: Detection activities comply with all applicable D1.G.Ov.E.2: Management is responsible for ensuring
requirements. (p. 32) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related
to cybersecurity.
DE.DP-3: Detection processes are tested. (p. 32) D3.DC.Ev.Int.2: Event detection processes are proven
reliable.
DE.DP-4: Event detection information is communicated D3.DC.Ev.B.2: Mechanisms (e.g., antivirus alerts, log
to appropriate parties. (p. 32) event alerts) are in place to alert management to potential
attacks.
D5.ER.Is.B.1: A process exists to contact personnel who
are responsible for analyzing and responding to an
incident.
D5.ER.Is.E.1: Criteria have been established for
DE.DP-5: Detection processes are continuously D5.IR.Pl.Int.3: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
improved. (p. 32) incidents and attacks on the institution and other
RS.PL-1: Response plan is executed during or after an D5.IR.Pl.B.1: The institution has documented how it will
event. (p. 33) react and respond to cyber incidents.
RS.CO-1: Personnel know their roles and order of D5.IR.Pl.B.3: Roles and responsibilities for incident
operations when a response is needed. (p. 33) response team members are defined.
RS.CO-2: Events are reported consistent with D5.IR.Pl.B.2: Communication channels exist to provide
established criteria. (p. 33) employees a means for reporting information security
events in a timely manner.
D5.DR.Re.B.4: Incidents are classified, logged and
tracked.
D5.DR.Re.E.6: Records are generated to support incident
investigation and mitigation.
D5.ER.Es.B.4: Incidents are detected in real time through
automated processes that include instant alerts to
appropriate personnel who can respond.
RS.CO-3: Information is shared consistent with D5.ER.Es.B.2: Procedures exist to notify customers,
established criteria. (p. 33) regulators, and law enforcement as required or necessary
when the institution becomes aware of an incident
involving the unauthorized access to or use of sensitive
customer information.
June 2015 19
RS.CO-4: Coordination with stakeholders occurs D5.ER.Is.B.1: A process exists to contact personnel who
consistent with response plans. (p. 33) are responsible for analyzing and responding to an
incident.
D5.IR.Pl.Int.1: A strategy is in place to coordinate and
communicate with internal and external stakeholders
during or following a cyber attack.
RS.CO-5: Voluntary information sharing occurs with D2.IS.Is.B.3: Information about threats is shared with law
external stakeholders to achieve broader cybersecurity enforcement and regulators when required or prompted.
situational awareness. (p. 33)
D2.IS.Is.E.2: A representative from the institution
participates in law enforcement or information-sharing
organization meetings.
RS.AN-1: Notifications from the detection system are D5.DR.De.B.3: Tools and processes are in place to
investigated. (p. 33) detect, alert, and trigger the incident response program.
D5.DR.De.Int.3: Incidents are detected in real time
through automated processes that include instant alerts to
appropriate personnel who can respond.
RS.AN-2: The impact of the incident is understood. (p. D1.RM.RMP.A.4: A process is in place to analyze the
34) financial impact cyber incidents have on the institution’s
capital.
D5.IR.Te.E.1: Recovery scenarios include plans to
recover from data destruction, impacts to data integrity,
data loss, and system and data availability.
D5.ER.Es.E.1: Criteria have been established for
RS.AN-3: Forensics are performed. (p. 34) D3.CC.Re.Int.3: Security investigations, forensic analysis,
and remediation are performed by qualified staff or third
parties.
D3.CC.Re.Int.4: Generally accepted and appropriate
forensic procedures, including chain of custody, are used
to gather and present evidence to support potential legal
action.
RS.AN-4: Incidents are categorized consistent with D5.ER.Es.B.4: Incidents are classified, logged and
response plans. (p. 34) tracked.
D5.DR.Re.E.1: The incident response plan is designed to
prioritize incidents, enabling a rapid response for
significant cybersecurity incidents or vulnerabilities.
June 2015 20
RS.MI-1: Incidents are contained. (p. 34) D5.DR.Re.B.1: Appropriate steps are taken to contain
and control an incident to prevent further unauthorized
access to or use of customer information.
D5.DR.Re.E.4: Procedures include containment strategies
and notifying potentially impacted third parties.
D5.DR.Re.E.2: A process is in place to help contain
incidents and restore operations with minimal service
disruption.
D5.DR.Re.E.3: Containment and mitigation strategies are
developed for multiple incident types (e.g., DDoS,
malware).
RS.MI-2: Incidents are mitigated. (p. 34) D5.DR.De.B.1: Alert parameters are set for detecting
information security incidents that prompt mitigating
actions.
D5.DR.Re.E.3: Containment and mitigation strategies are
developed for multiple incident types (e.g., DDoS,
malware).
D3.PC.Im.E.4: A risk-based solution is in place at the
institution or Internet-hosting provider to mitigate
disruptive cyber attacks (e.g., DDoS attacks).
RS.MI-3: Newly identified vulnerabilities are documented D1.RM.RA.E.1: Risk assessments are used to identify the
as accepted risks. (p. 34) cybersecurity risks stemming from new products, services,
or relationships.
RS.IM-1: Response plans incorporate lessons learned. D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
(p. 34) incidents and attacks on the institution and other
RS.IM-2: Response strategies are updated. (p. 34) D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
D5.IR.Te.Int.5: The results of cyber event exercises are
used to improve the incident response plan and
automated triggers.
RC.RP-1: Recovery plan is executed during or after an D5.IR.Pl.B.6: The institution plans to use business
event. (p. 34) continuity, disaster recovery, and data backup programs
to recover operations following an incident.
RC.IM-1: Recovery plans incorporate lessons learned. D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
(p. 35) incidents and attacks on the institution and other
June 2015 21
RC.IM-2: Recovery strategies are updated. (p. 35) D5.IR.Pl.Int.4: Lessons learned from real-life cyber
D5.IR.Te.Int.5: The results of cyber event exercises are
used to improve the incident response plan and
automated triggers.
RC.CO-1: Public Relations are managed. (p. 35) D5.ER.Es.Int.3: An external communication plan is used
for notifying media regarding incidents when applicable.
RC.CO-2: Reputation after an event is repaired. (p. 35) D5.IR.Pl.Int.1: A strategy is in place to coordinate and
RC.CO-3: Recovery activities are communicated to D5.ER.Is.B.1: A process exists to contact personnel who
internal stakeholders and executive and management are responsible for analyzing and responding to an
teams. (p. 35) incident.
D5.IR.Pl.Int.1: A strategy is in place to coordinate and
June 2015 22
Explanation of Cybersecurity Assessment Tool References

To reference the Cybersecurity Assessment Tool declarative statements, each has a unique
identifier that comprises the Domain, Assessment Factor, Component, Maturity Level, and
statement number. Each portion is separated by a period.
The following table provides the codes used in the above references for the Cybersecurity
Assessment Tool. For example, “D1.G.Ov.B.1” refers to Domain: 1, Assessment Factor:
Governance, Component: Oversight, Maturity Level: Baseline, and statement 1.
Domain Assessment Factor Component Maturity Level
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Governance (G) Oversight (Ov) Baseline (B)

Management and
Oversight (D1) Evolving (E)
Strategy/Policies (SP)
Intermediate (Int)
IT Asset Management (IT) Advanced (A)
Risk Management (RM) Risk Management Program (RMP) Innovative (Inn)
Risk Assessment (RA)
Audit (Au)
Resources (R) Staffing (St)
Training and Culture (TC) Training (Tr)
Culture (Cu)
Domain 2: Threat Threat Intelligence (TI) Threat Intelligence and Information

Intelligence and (Ti)
Collaboration (D2)
Monitoring and Analyzing Monitoring and Analyzing (Ma)
(MA)
Information Sharing (IS) Informational Sharing (Is)
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Preventative Controls (PC) Infrastructure Management (Im)

Controls (D3)
Access and Data Management
(Am)
Device/End-Point Security (De)
Secure Coding (Se)
Detective Controls (DC) Threat and Vulnerability Detection

(Th)
Anomalous Activity (An)
Event Detection (Ev)
Corrective Controls (CC) Patch Management (Pa)
June 2015 23
Domain Assessment Factor Component Maturity Level
Remediation (Re)
Domain 4: External Connections (C) Connections (Co)

Dependency
Management (D4) Relationship Management Due Diligence (Dd)
(RM)
Contracts (Co)
Ongoing Monitoring (Om)
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Incident Resilience Planning Planning (Pl)

Management and and Strategy (IR)
Resilience (D5) Testing (Te)
Detection, Response and Detection (De)

Mitigation (DR)
Response and Mitigation (Re)
Escalation and Reporting Escalation and Reporting (Es)

(ER)
June 2015 24
Appendix C: Glossary
Administrator privileges: Allow computer system-access to resources that are unavailable to

most users. Administrator privileges permit execution of actions that would otherwise be
restricted. Source: NSA/CSS Confidence in Cyber Space
Air-gapped environment: Security measure that isolates a secure network from unsecure
networks physically, electrically, and electromagnetically. Source: FFIEC Joint Statement -
Destructive Malware
Anomalous activity: The process of comparing definitions of what activity is considered normal
against observed events to identify significant deviations. Source: NIST: SP 800-94
Antivirus/Anti-malware software: A program that monitors a computer or network to identify

all types of malware and prevent or contain malware incidents. Source: NIST Guide to
Malware Incident Prevention and Handling for Desktops and Laptops
Asset: In computer security, a major application, general-support system, high-impact program,

physical plant, mission-critical system, personnel, equipment, or a logically related group of
systems. Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Attack signature: A specific sequence of events indicative of an unauthorized access attempt.

Source: NIST: SP 800-12
Authentication: The process of verifying the identity of an individual user, machine, software
component, or any other entity. Source: FFIEC Information Security Booklet
Baseline configuration: A set of specifications for a system, or configuration item (CI) within a
system, that has been formally reviewed and agreed on at a given point in time, and that can
be changed only through change-control procedures. The baseline configuration is used as a
basis for future builds, releases, or changes. Source: NIST: SP 800-128
Black holing: A method typically used by ISPs to stop a DDoS attack on one of its customers.
This approach to block DDoS attacks makes the site in question completely inaccessible to
all traffic, both malicious attack traffic and legitimate user traffic. Source: NCCIC/US-CERT
DDoS Quick Guide
Border router: A device located at the organization’s boundary to an external network. Source:
NIST: SP 800-41
Buffer overflow: A condition at an interface under which more input can be placed into a buffer
or data-holding area than the capacity allocated, overwriting other information. Attackers
exploit such a condition to crash a system or to insert specially crafted code that allows them
to gain control of a system. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision 2
Business continuity: The ability to maintain operations and services—both technology and
business—in the event of a disruption to normal operations and services. Ensures that any
impact or disruption of services is within a documented and acceptable recovery time period
and that system or operations are resumed at a documented and acceptable point in the
processing cycle. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
June 2015 1
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool Appendix C: Glossary
Change management: The broad processes for managing organizational change. Change
management encompasses planning, oversight or governance, project management, testing,
and implementation. Source: FFIEC Operations Booklet
CHIPS: A private-sector U.S.-dollar funds-transfer system, clearing and settling cross-border

and domestic payments. Source: CHIPS
Cloud computing: Generally a migration from owned resources to shared resources in which
client users receive information technology services on demand from third-party service
providers via the Internet “cloud.” In cloud environments, a client or customer relocates its
resources—such as data, applications, and services—to computing facilities outside the
corporate firewall, which the end user then accesses via the Internet. Source: FFIEC
Statement on Outsourced Cloud Computing
Crisis management: The process of managing an institution’s operations in response to an

emergency or event that threatens business continuity. An institution’s ability to
communicate with employees, customers, and the media, using various communications
devices and methods, is a key component of crisis management. Source: FFIEC Business
Continuity Planning Booklet
Critical system [infrastructure]: The systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, that are
so vital that the incapacity or destruction of such may have a debilitating impact. Source:
NICCS Glossary
Cyber attack: Attempts to damage, disrupt, or gain unauthorized access to a computer,

computer system, or electronic communications network. An attack, via cyberspace,
targeting an enterprise’s use of cyberspace for the purpose of disrupting, disabling,
destroying, or maliciously controlling a computing environment or infrastructure; or
destroying the integrity of the data or stealing controlled information. Source: FFIEC IT
Examination Handbook Glossary
Cyber event: A cybersecurity change or occurrence that may have an impact on organizational
operations (including mission, capabilities, or reputation). Source: NIST Cybersecurity
Framework
Cyber incident: Actions taken through the use of computer networks that result in an actual or
potentially adverse effect on an information system or the information residing therein.
Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Cyber threat: An internal or external circumstance, event, action, occurrence, or person with the
potential to exploit technology-based vulnerabilities and to adversely impact (create adverse
consequences for) organizational operations, organizational assets (including information and
information systems), individuals, other organizations, or society. Source: NICCS Glossary
Cybersecurity: The process of protecting consumer and bank information by preventing,

detecting, and responding to attacks. Source: Derived from NIST Cybersecurity Framework
June 2015 2
Data classification program: A program that categorizes data to convey required safeguards for
information confidentiality, integrity, and availability; establishes controls required based on
value and level of sensitivity. Source: Derived from SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room
Database: A collection of data that is stored on any type of computer storage medium and may
be used for more than one purpose. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Data loss prevention (DLP): A comprehensive approach (covering people, processes, and
systems) of implementing policies and controls designed specifically to discover, monitor,
and protect confidential data wherever it is stored, used, or in transit over the network and at
the perimeter. Source: NSA/CSS Securing Data and Handling Spillage Events
Data mining: The process or techniques used to analyze large sets of existing information to
discover previously unrevealed patterns or correlations. Source: NICCS Glossary
Deep packet inspection: The capability to analyze network traffic to compare vendor-developed
profiles of benign protocol activity against observed events to identify deviations. Source:
NIST Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems
Defense-in-depth: Information security strategy integrating people, technology, and operations

capabilities to establish variable barriers across multiple layers and dimensions of the
organization. Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Digital certificate: The electronic equivalent of an ID card that authenticates the originator of a
digital signature. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Disaster recovery plan: A plan that describes the process to recover from major processing
interruptions. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Distributed denial of service (DDoS): A type of attack that makes a computer resource or
resources unavailable to its intended users. Although the means to carry out, motives for, and
targets of a DDoS attack may vary, it generally consists of the concerted efforts of a group
that intends to affect an institution’s reputation by preventing an Internet site, service, or
application from functioning efficiently. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC): A technology that was developed to,
among other things, protect against such attacks by digitally ‘signing’ data so you can be
assured it is valid. Source: ICANN
Encryption: A data security technique used to protect information from unauthorized inspection
or alteration. Information is encoded so that data appear as meaningless strings of letters and
symbols during delivery or transmission. Upon receipt, the information is decoded using an
encryption key. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
End-of-life: All software products have life cycles. End-of-life refers to the date when a
software development company no longer provides automatic fixes, updates, or online
technical assistance for the product. Source: US-CERT alert TA-14-310A
June 2015 3
End-point security: Security controls that validate the security compliance of the client system
that is attempting to use the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) virtual private networks (VPN).
Endpoint security controls also include security protection mechanisms, such as Web
browser cache cleaners, that remove sensitive information from client systems. Source:
NIST: SP 800-113
Enterprise network: The configuration of computer systems within an organization. Includes

local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), bridges, and applications. Source:
FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Enterprise-wide: An entire organization, rather than a single line of business or function.

Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Exploit: A technique or code that uses a vulnerability to provide system access to the attacker.
An exploit is an intentional attack to impact an operating system or application program.
External connections: An information system or component of an information system that is

outside of the authorization boundary established by the organization and for which the
organization typically has no direct control over the application of required security controls
or the assessment of security control effectiveness. Source: NIST: SP 800-53
FTP (file transfer protocol): A standard high-level protocol for transferring files from one
computer to another, usually implemented as an application level program. Source: National
Telecommunications and Information Administration
Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC): A nonprofit,

information-sharing forum established by financial services industry participants to facilitate
the public and private sectors’ sharing of physical and cybersecurity threat and vulnerability
information. Source: Derived from FS-ISAC
Firewall: Hardware or software link in a network that relays only data packets clearly intended
and authorized to reach the other side. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Frame relay: A high-performance WAN protocol that operates at the physical and data link
layers of the open systems interconnect (OSI) reference model. Frame relay is an example of
a packet-switched technology. Packet-switched networks enable end stations to dynamically
share the network medium and the available bandwidth. Frame relay uses existing T1 and T3
lines and provides connection speeds from 56 Kbps to T1. Source: FFIEC IT Examination
Handbook Glossary
Gap analysis: A comparison that identifies the difference between actual and desired outcomes.
Governance: In computer security, the setting of clear expectations for the conduct (behaviors
and actions) of the entity being governed and directing, controlling, and strongly influencing
the entity to achieve these expectations. Governance includes specifying a framework for
June 2015 4
decision-making, with assigned decision rights and accountability, intended to consistently

produce desired behaviors and actions. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Hypervisor: A piece of software that provides abstraction of all physical resources (such as
central processing units, memory, network, and storage) and thus enables multiple computing
stacks (consisting of an operating system, middleware and application programs) called
virtual machines to be run on a single physical host. Source: NIST SP 800-125a Draft
Incident response plan: A plan that defines the action steps, involved resources, and
communication strategy upon identifying a threat or potential threat event, such as a breach
in security protocol, power or telecommunications outage, severe weather, or workplace
violence. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Information security: The result of any system of policies or procedures for identifying,
controlling, and protecting information from unauthorized disclosure. Also, the processes by
which an organization protects and secures its systems, media, and facilities that process and
maintain information vital to its operations. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Glossary
Information systems: Electronic and paper-based systems. Electronic systems and physical
components used to access, store, transmit, protect, and eventually dispose of information.
Information systems can include networks (computer systems, connections to business
partners and the Internet, and the interconnections between internal and external systems).
Other examples are backup tapes, portable computers, personal digital assistants, media such
as compact disks, micro drives, and diskettes, and media used in software development and
testing. Source: FFIEC Information Security Booklet
Infrastructure: Systems technologies, including operations such as central computer

processing, distributed processing, end-user computing, local area networking, and
telecommunications. Includes the transmission media (e.g., voice, data, and video), routers,
aggregators, repeaters, and other devices that control transmission paths; also includes the
software used to send, receive, and manage transmitted signals. These operations often
represent critical services to financial institutions and their customers. Source: Based on
Internet service provider (ISP): A company that provides its customers with access to the
Internet (e.g., AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink). Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Glossary
Intrusion detection system (IDS): Software and hardware that detect and log inappropriate,
incorrect, or anomalous activity. IDS are typically characterized based on the source of the
data they monitor: host or network. A host-based IDS uses system log files and other
electronic audit data to identify suspicious activity. A network-based IDS uses sensors to
monitor packets on the network to which it is attached. Source: FFIEC IT Examination
Handbook Glossary
June 2015 5
Intrusion prevention systems (IPS): A system that can detect an intrusive activity and can also
attempt to stop the activity, ideally before it reaches its target. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision
2
Life-cycle process: The multistep process that starts with the initiation, analysis, design, and
implementation, and continues through the maintenance and disposal of the system. Source:
NIST System Development Life Cycle
Malware: Designed to secretly access a computer system without the owner’s informed consent.
The expression is a general term (short for malicious software) used to mean a variety of
forms of hostile, intrusive, or annoying software or program code. Malware includes
computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, spyware, dishonest adware, ransomware,
crimeware, most rootkits, and other malicious and unwanted software or programs. Source:
Man-in-the-middle attack (MITM): Places the attacker’s computer in the communication line
between the server and the client. The attacker’s machine can monitor and change
communications. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Metrics: A quantitative measurement. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Mobile device: A portable computing and communications device with information-storage

capability. Examples include notebook and laptop computers, cellular telephones and smart
phones, tablets, digital cameras, and audio recording devices. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision
2
Multifactor authentication: The process of using two or more factors to achieve authentication.
Factors include something you know (e.g., password or personal identification number);
something you have (e.g., cryptographic identification device or token); and something you
are (e.g., biometric). Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision 2
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): An agency of the U.S. Department
of Commerce that works to develop and apply technology, measurements, and standards;
developed a voluntary cybersecurity framework based on existing standards, guidelines, and
practices for reducing cyber risks to critical infrastructures. Source: NIST
Network: Two or more computer systems grouped together to share information, software, and
hardware. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Network activity baseline: A base for determining typical utilization patterns so that significant
deviations can be detected. Source: NIST: SP 800-61
Network administrator: An individual responsible for the installation, management, and

control of a network. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Network diagram: A description of any kind of locality in terms of its physical layout. In the
context of communication networks, a topology describes pictorially the configuration or
June 2015 6
arrangement of a network, including its nodes and connecting communication lines. Source:
Operating system: A system that supports and manages software applications. Operating
systems allocate system resources, provide access and security controls, maintain file
systems, and manage communications between end users and hardware devices. Source:
Outsourcing: The practice of contracting with another entity to perform services that might
otherwise be conducted in-house. Contracted relationship with a third party to provide
services, systems, or support. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Patch: Software code that replaces or updates other code frequently to correct security flaws.
Penetration test: The process of using approved, qualified personnel to conduct real-world
attacks against a system to identify and correct security weaknesses before they are
discovered and exploited by others. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Person-to-Person payments: Online payments using electronic messaging invoke a transfer of

value between the parties over existing proprietary networks as “on-us” transactions. Source:
Phishing: A digital form of social engineering that uses authentic-looking—but bogus—e-mail

to request information from users or direct them to fake Web sites that request information.
Source: NIST: SP 800-83
Principles of least privilege: The security objective of granting users only the access needed to
perform official duties. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision 2
Privileged access: Individuals with the ability to override system or application controls.
Source: FFIEC Information Security Booklet
Real-time network monitoring: Immediate response to a penetration attempt that is detected

and diagnosed in time to prevent access. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision 2
Red team: A group of people authorized and organized to emulate a potential adversary’s attack
or exploitation capabilities against an enterprise’s security posture. The red team’s objective
is to improve enterprise information assurance by demonstrating the impacts of successful
attacks and by demonstrating what works for the defenders in an operational environment.
Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Remote access: The ability to obtain access to a computer or network from a remote location.
Remote deposit captures (RDC): A service that enables users at remote locations to scan digital
images of checks and transmit the captured data to a financial institution or a merchant that is
a customer of a financial institution. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
June 2015 7
Removable media: Portable electronic storage media, such as magnetic, optical, and solid-state
devices, which can be inserted into and removed from a computing device and which is used
to store text, video, audio, and image information. Such devices have no independent
processing capabilities. Examples include hard disks, floppy disks, zip drives, compact disks
(CD), thumb drives, pen drives, and similar storage devices. Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Resilience: The ability of an organization to recover from a significant disruption and resume
critical operations. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Resilience testing: Testing of an institution’s business continuity and disaster recovery

resumption plans. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Risk assessment: A prioritization of potential business disruptions based on severity and

likelihood of occurrence. The risk assessment includes an analysis of threats based on the
impact to the institution, its customers, and financial markets, rather than the nature of the
threat. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Risk management: The total process required to identify, control, and minimize the impact of
uncertain events. The objective of a risk management program is to reduce risk and obtain
and maintain appropriate management approval. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Glossary
Rlogin: Remote login. A UNIX utility that allows a user to login to a remote host on a network,
as if it were directly connected, and make use of various services. Remote login is an
information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be
reliably protected end-to-end by a single organization’s security controls. Source: NIST
Electronic Authentication Guidance
Rogue wireless access: An unauthorized wireless node on a network. Source: NISTIR 7298
Revision 2
Router: A hardware device that connects two or more networks and routes incoming data
packets to the appropriate network. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Sandbox: A restricted, controlled execution environment that prevents potentially malicious

software, such as mobile code, from accessing any system resources except those for which
the software is authorized. Source: NIST: CNSSI-4009
Security log: A record that contains login and logout activity and other security-related events
and that is used to track security-related information on a computer system. Source: NIST:
SP 800-92
Security posture: The security status of an enterprise’s networks, information, and systems
based on information assurance resources (e.g., people, hardware, software, and policies) and
capabilities in place to manage the defense of the enterprise and to react as the situation
changes. Source: NISTIR 7298 Revision 2
June 2015 8
Sensitive customer information: A customer’s name, address, or telephone number, in

conjunction with the customer’s social security number, driver’s license number, account
number, credit or debit card number, or a personal identification number or password that
would permit access to the customer’s account. Sensitive customer information also includes
any combination of components of customer information that would allow someone to log
onto or access the customer’s account, such as user name and password or password and
account number. Source: Interagency Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized
Access to Customer Information and Customer Notice
Server: A computer or other device that manages a network service. An example is a print
server, which is a device that manages network printing. Source: FFIEC IT Examination
Handbook Glossary
Service-level agreement (SLA): An agreement that details the responsibilities of an IT service

provider, the rights of the service provider’s customers, and the penalties assessed when the
service provider violates any element of the SLA. SLAs also identify and define the service,
plus the supported products, evaluation criteria, and quality of service customers should
expect. SLAs are typically measured in terms of metrics. Examples include processing
completion times and systems availability times. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook
Glossary
Social engineering: A general term for trying to trick people into revealing confidential
information or performing certain actions. Source: NIST SP 800-114
Spear phishing: An attack targeting a specific user or group of users, and attempts to deceive
the user into performing an action that launches an attack, such as opening a document or
clicking a link. Spear phishers rely on knowing some personal piece of information about
their target, such as an event, interest, travel plans, or current issues. Sometimes this
information is gathered by hacking into the targeted network. Source: Guidelines for Secure
Use of Social Media by Federal Departments and Agencies
SQL injection attack: An exploit of target software that constructs structure query language
(SQL) statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target
software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs
actions other than those the application intended. SQL injection enables an attacker to talk
directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can
cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. Source:
MITRE Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
System development lifecycle process: The scope of activities associated with a system,
encompassing the system’s initiation, development and acquisition, implementation,
operation and maintenance, and ultimately its disposal that instigates another system
initiation. Source: NIST System Development Life Cycle
T1: A special type of telephone line for digital communication and transmission. T1 lines
provide for digital transmission with signaling speed of 1.544 Mbps (1,544,000 bits per
June 2015 9
second). This is the standard for digital transmissions in North America. Usually delivered on
fiber optic lines. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Telnet: An interactive, text-based communications session between a client and a host. It is used
mainly for remote login and simple control services to systems with limited resources or to
systems with limited needs for security. Source: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
Security
Third-party relationship: Any business arrangement between a financial institution and another
entity, by contract or otherwise. Source: OCC Bulletin 2013-29
Third-party service provider: Any type of company, including affiliated entities, non-affiliated
entities, and alliances of companies providing products and services to the financial
institution. Other terms used to describe service providers include vendors, subcontractors,
external service providers, application service providers, and outsourcers. Source: FFIEC IT
Examination Handbook Glossary
Threat intelligence: The acquisition and analysis of information to identify, track, and predict
cyber capabilities, intentions, and activities that offer courses of action to enhance decision-
making. Source: SEI Emerging Technology Center: Cyber Intelligence Tradecraft Project
Token: A small device with an embedded computer chip that can be used to store and transmit
electronic information. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Trusted zone: A channel in which the end points are known and data integrity is protected in
transit. Depending on the communications protocol used, data privacy may be protected in
transit. Examples include secure socket layer, internet protocol security and a secure physical
connection. Source: CNSSI Glossary
US-CERT: The U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, part of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security’s National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center. US-
CERT is a partnership between the Department of Homeland Security and the public and
private sectors, established to protect the nation’s Internet infrastructure. US-CERT
coordinates defense against and responses to cyber attacks across the nation. Source: US-
CERT
Virtual machine: A software emulation of a physical computing environment. Source:

Webster’s Dictionary
VPN (virtual private network): A computer network that uses public telecommunication
infrastructure, such as the Internet, to provide remote offices or individual users with secure
access to their organization’s network. Source: FFIEC IT Examination Handbook Glossary
Vulnerability: A hardware, firmware, or software flaw that leaves an information system open
to potential exploitation; a weakness in automated system security procedures, administrative
controls, physical layout, internal controls, etc., that could be exploited to gain unauthorized
access to information or to disrupt critical processing. Source: FFIEC IT Examination
Handbook Glossary
June 2015 10
Zero-day attack: An attack on a piece of software that has a vulnerability for which there is no
known patch. Source: DHS Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation
June 2015 11

FFIEC CAT May 2017 All Documents Combined

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FFIEC CAT May 2017 All Documents Combined

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FFIEC CAT May 2017 All Documents Combined

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool?

What is the purpose of the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool?

What are the two parts of the Cybersecurity Assessment Tool and what do they assess?

What are the two parts of the Cybersecurity Assessment Tool and what do they assess?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool

Overview for Chief Executive Officers and Boards of Directors

Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most Inherent

Information Corrective Escalation and

Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

and the board when using the Assessment.

• Is the institution’s cybersecurity

• Do the institution’s policies and procedures demonstrate management’s commitment to

Completing the Assessment

Part One: Inherent Risk Profile

Determine Inherent Risk Profile

Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Number of Statements Selected in Each

Based on Individual Risk Levels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

The following includes definitions of risk levels.

Part Two: Cybersecurity Maturity

Table 1: Domains and Assessment Factors Defined

Domains and Assessment Factors Defined

Figure 3: Cybersecurity Maturity Levels

Maturity Levels Defined

Completing the Cybersecurity Maturity

Interpreting and Analyzing Assessment Results

Inherent Risk Levels

Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Inherent Risk Profile

Category: Delivery Channels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Locations of branches/business 1 state 1 region 1 country 1–20 countries >20 countries

Category: External Threats Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Total Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Number of Statements Selected in

Based on Individual Risk Levels Least Minimal Moderate Significant Most

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight

Baseline Designated members of management are held accountable by the board or

Information security risks are discussed in management meetings when

Management provides a written report on the overall status of the

The budgeting process includes information security related expenses and

Management considers the risks posed by other critical infrastructures

Management is responsible for ensuring compliance with legal and

There is a process to formally discuss and estimate potential expenses

Intermediate The board or an appropriate board committee has cybersecurity expertise

The board or an appropriate board committee ensures management’s

annual cybersecurity self-assessment evaluates the institution’s ability to

The board or an appropriate board committee reviews and approves

The board or an appropriate board committee ensures management takes

Management has a formal process to continuously improve cybersecurity

Management and the board or an appropriate board committee hold

Management identifies root cause(s) when cyber attacks result in material

The board or an appropriate board committee ensures that management’s

Innovative The board or an appropriate board committee discusses ways for

The board or an appropriate board committee verifies that management’s

Baseline The institution has an information security strategy that integrates

All elements of the information security program are coordinated enterprise-

Evolving The institution augmented its information security strategy to incorporate

The institution has a formal cybersecurity program that is based on

A formal process is in place to update policies as the institution’s inherent