Succession Under Indian Succession Act, 1925 in Respect of Christians
Succession Under Indian Succession Act, 1925 in Respect of Christians
Succession Under Indian Succession Act, 1925 in Respect of Christians
Prepared by
Sri S. VASU DEV,
Junior Civil Judge,
Yemmiganur.
INTRODUCTION:
Lineal Descendants:
The phrase “Lineal Descendant” means, “a Descendant
born out of a lawful marriage”. Thus a daughter’s illegitimate son
or a son’s illegitimate daughter or other illegitimate issue cannot
be said to be a “Lineal Descendant”. An illegitimate child is not a
child within the meaning of the act. Therefore, such a child has
no share in the property of the parents. But in Jane Anthony Vs.
Siyath 2008 (4) KLT 1002 recognized the right of illegitimate
child under Indian Succession Act.
Kindred or Consanguinity:
The term “Kindred” means, relations by blood through a
lawful marriage. Therefore, relations by illegitimate birth are not
recognized as Kindred under the Act. Kindred does not include
relation by affinity such as mother-in-law or step mother or step
father. Thus, a step father or a step mother has no legal right of
Succession to the property of his or her step children. The
position is the same in the case of a father-in-law as well.
S. 24 of the Act makes an initial reference to the concept of
kindred and consanguinity, defining it as “the connection or
relation of persons descended from the same stock or common
ancestor.” S. 25 qualifies ‘lineal consanguinity' with regard to
descent in a direct line. Under this head fall those relations who
are descendants from one another or both from the same
common ancestor. Now, succession can be either ‘per capita'
(one share to each heir, when they are all of the same degree of
relationship) or ‘per stirpes' (division according to branches when
degrees of relationship are discrete). For Christians, if one were
to claim through a relative who was of the same degree as the
3
Rules of Distribution:
The Succession Act contemplates only those relations that
arise from a lawful marriage. Where an intestate has left a widow
and if he has left lineal descendants, i.e., Children and Children’s
Children, 1/3rd of his property shall belong to the widow, and the
remaining two third shall go to the lineal descendants. If the
intestate has no lineal descendants, but has left persons who are
of kindred to him, half of his property shall belong to the widow
and the other half shall go to those who are of kindred to him.
11. Where the intestate has left a widow, and there are no lineal
descendants, the widow’s share is one half of the estate of the
intestate, as is provided under Section 33 (b).
16. As per Section 48, when the intestate has left neither lineal
descendant, nor parent, nor sibling, his property shall be divided
equally among those of his relatives who are in the nearest degree
of kin to him. If there are no heirs, whatsoever to the estate, the
Doctrine of Escheat can be invoked by the Government, where
upon the estate of the deceased will revert to State.
* * *